Loading...
5A - Recommendation to the City Council concerning the 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING July 16, 2009 5:00 p.m. BOULDER CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION July 28, 2009 6:00 p.m. 1777 Broadway Municipal Building Council Chambers Submit Written Comments to City Council ATTN: ALISA LEWIS, 1777 BROADWAY, SECOND FLOOR, OR P.O. BOX 791, Boulder, CO 80306 FAX 303-441-4478 OR E-MAIL COUNCIL@BOULDERCOLORADO.GOV Agenda Item 5A Page 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board FROM: David Driskell , Executive Director of Community Planning Ruth McHeyser, Deputy Director of Community Planning Susan Richstone, Long Range Division Manager Chris Meschuk, Planning Department, presenter Alice Guthrie, Parks & Recreation Annie Noble, Public Works / Utilities & Tributary Greenways Joe Castro, Facilities and Fleet Management Bob Harberg, Public Works / Utilities Delani Wheeler, Open Space and Mountain Parks Molly Winter, DUHMD Stephany Westhusin, Public Works / Transportation Tim Head, Public Works / Airport DATE: July 9, 2009 SUBJECT: Planning Board Hearing on the Recommended 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to present the recommended 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program pursuant to the City Council to Charter Section 78 and provide an opportunity for the Planning Board to make a recommendation to City Council on the recommended capital projects in the 2010-2015 CIP. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Board adopt the following Motion: The Planning Board recommend approval of the 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program, the list of CIP projects to undergo a Community and Environmental Assessment Process as presented in Attachment F, and the design review processes recommended by staff in Attachment G, as recommended by the staff memorandum dated July 10, 2008. 1. BACKGROUND ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM The City of Boulder's 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a six-year plan for public physical improvements. The CIP provides a forecast of funds available for capital projects and identifies all planned capital improvement projects and their estimated costs over the six-year period. The first year's program in the CIP is adopted by the City Council as the Capital Budget, as a counterpart to the annual Operating Budget. Even though fiscal resources are appropriated only in the first year of the CIP, the succeeding five years of the CIP are important in providing a longer-term plan for setting spending priorities, scheduling projects in a logical sequence, and coordinating and targeting capital improvement projects for all city departments. Capital improvement projects are generally defined as any major project of $50,000 or more requiring the expenditure of public funds (over and above operating expenditures) for the purchase, construction, or replacement of the physical assets of the community. This broad Agenda Item 5A Page 1 definition includes those projects that are bondable and includes new or expanded physical facilities as well as the land acquisition and site improvements necessary for a project. The CIP is an essential implementation tool for carrying out the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan's policies of orderly and efficient provision of urban facilities and services. The Comprehensive Plan provides for the phased growth of the city with annexation to occur only when the full range of urban services is available. The Capital Improvements Program schedules projects that correct current facility deficiencies to meet or enhance these levels of service standards through facility expansions and maintenance. Each year the CIP is updated by adding a new sixth year of capital improvement projects. Adjustments are made to costs and revenues forecasted the previous year. Changes may also be made to the year(s) in which a project is scheduled, reflecting changes in fiscal conditions and changes in overall funding priorities. New capital projects may be added or deleted based on new facility needs identified in updated or new city master plans, area plans, or studies. As stipulated by the City Charter Section 78, the city Planning Department coordinates the process for preparing the annual CIP with other city departments. The Planning Board evaluates and makes recommendations to the City Manager and City Council on the proposed CIP as part of the annual budget process. Planning Board's role: 1) evaluate CIP projects in the context of the long-term, "big picture" policies of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP); 2) make recommendations on the scope, priorities, and scheduling of CIP projects; 3) make recommendations on resolving policy issues raised by the proposed location and design of CIP projects; 4) make a determination of which CIP projects will be required to undergo a Community and Environmental Assessment Process (LEAP) review and list of projects for design review. The Planning Board's review of the t Sust na C the BVCP, but also looks IP includes the policies an t and plans of 0 et jey o h y~ sub ommun ty plans, area plans and e Aj\ departmental master plans. As defined in the Comprehensive Plan, subcommunity plans and area plans v provide more detailed planning for Business Plan Department Subcommunity land use, urban design, neighborhood °°^s' C strategic/ and Action' revitalization, and public facility • 1510° Master Plans Area Plans needs. Most departments now have functional master plans for the Development Operating Capital Improvement Standards provision of services and facilities. Budget Program and Zoning Master plans are developed to be consistent with the policies and the growth projections in the Comprehensive Plan. They typically include level of service standards needed to meet BVCP goals and policies, more specific policies, and system-wide priorities for scheduling and targeting capital improvements. Agenda Item 5A Pne 2 The priorities are classified into three investment strategies, fiscally constrained, action plan, and vision plan. The master plan is then used by each department in its decision making and prioritization as part of the annual budgeting process, using the business plan framework. For the 2010 budget process, the city is continuing to use the Business Plan to help make decisions about funding priorities primarily for the operating budget. The Business Plan is a decision-making tool which assists the organization in making strategic citywide recommendations regarding revenue and expense priorities for current and future funding. It serves as a link between the comprehensive plan, master plans and the recommended budget. Departments are asked to identify three levels of funding or funding plans: fiscally constrained, action and vision plans, similar to how it is done at the master plan level. To create these funding plans, staff prioritizes programs and services into categories defined in a city-wide set of guiding principles. Staff identifies the levels of service currently provided in each functional area and whether it meets, exceeds or is below service standards and then prioritizes programs and services. This prioritization helps identify where growth or greater expenditure should occur as well as identify where cuts should occur, as is anticipated for the 2010 budget. Consistent with the business plan, each proposed project is categorized as "essential", "desirable" or "discretionary". These are shown on the project summary sheets for each project and were used by all the departments to sort and organize departmental capital priorities as well as program priorities. In general, capital projects are prioritized to first address essential services. For new projects, the city also attempts to be opportunistic whenever possible by partnering with outside funding sources and addressing many goals at the same time (multi-faceted projects that have components with many city departments). • Essential services include programs, services or facilities essential to ensuring health and safety or that are legally mandated; on-going operation and maintenance of existing facilities or infrastructure; and investments contributing the most to achieving the core mission of the city or insuring the integrity of the most fundamental responsibilities of government. CIP examples include Broadway concrete reconstruction, pedestrian facilities repair and replacement, and most all of the water and wastewater utility funds projects. $21.7 million, or 66% of the 2010-2015 CIP is for essential services. • Desirable services include those that enhance programs or facilities in ways that advance desired community values, or enhance essential services or quality of life improvements. Also included would be funding for replacement of an existing facility and/or infrastructure; services valued by the community and created by the legislative action of the city of Boulder City Council or to meet Council's budget policies; programs maintained as "seed corn" to provide a base for restoration in an economic recovery and essential programs that have been reduced, maintaining the elements of a program necessary in order to make future restoration possible. CIP examples include most of the 28th Street Improvements, bikeway and pedestrian facility enhancements, park development, stormwater and flood enhancements and tributary greenways projects. $10.5 million, or 32% of the 2010-2015 CIP is for desirable services. • Discretionary services include those that serve limited purposes or specialized interests, are Agenda Item 5A Page 3 desired by the community but not required to provide or enhance an essential service or that people could obtain through other means, private or other governmental and non-profit agencies. CIP examples include things like noise walls and building new aesthetic treatments. This area of the budget does not expand the systems or preserve the quality or integrity of the infrastructure and/or systems. Until the economy recovers, we will have few of this type of project. For the 2010-2015, $522,500, or 2% of the CIP is for discretionary projects. These are for Valmont City Park (phase 1) and 25% of the Flatirons Golf Course Improvements. II. THE RECOMMENDED 2010 CAPITAL BUDGET The 2010 Capital Improvements Program includes proposed funding of $32.6 million for 68 projects in 14 funds. The entire six-year CIP includes proposed funding of $146.8 million for 110 projects in 15 funds. The chart below generally describes the recommended capital funding by department for 2010. This varies year to year depending on the type and cost of projects recommended for funding in that year and the amount of external funding received. Attachment B contains highlights of the recommended capital improvements program by fund as well as a detailed breakout of recommended funding in each fund. 2010 Recommended CIP Transportation / Airport, 20% Wastewater, 29% Downtown Commercial Dist., 4% FAM, 4% Parks & Recreation , 8% Water, 15% Tributary Greenways, 1 % OSMP, 14% Stormwater & Flood, 5% III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR 2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Agenda Item 5A Page 4 The following questions provide more information than what is provided in the fund summaries or project descriptions. This analysis is intended to provide a city-wide overview of these issues affecting the capital budgeting process. Answers to the following questions are listed below: 1. How does the recommended capital budget address social, environmental and economic sustainability goals? 2. Are there capital needs not shown in the CIP? 3. How much of the CIP is from outside or leveraged funding sources? 4. What CIP projects are funded with growth-related development excise tax revenue? 5. How are operating or maintenance costs for new capital projects being covered? 6. What energy efficiency upgrades are part of Facility and Asset Management projects? 7. What projects are receiving or identified as potential American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Stimulus) funding? 8. What is in the CIP related to the flood studies in progress? What will be the next steps? 9. How are projects requiring a Community Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) determined, does this process address urban design issues such as where raised on the 30th Street underpass project? 10. How are we proposing to address the financing of infrastructure in Area II neighborhoods to address public health and environmental issues of properties on well and septic (e.g. Crestview East and Gapter Road)? 11. What issues were raised by the advisory boards reviewing departmental CIPs? Section IV, beginning on page 12 discusses capital improvements related to the implementation of Subcommunity and Area plans. 1. How does the recommended capital budget address the city's adopted social, environmental and economic sustainability goals? The Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan's policies on community sustainability provide a unifying goal to maintain and enhance the livability, health and vitality of the Boulder Valley and the natural systems of which it is a part, now and in the long-term future. (See BVCP policies: 1.01 Community Sustainability and 1.07 Leadership in Sustainability) The purpose of capital improvements planning is to ensure that the city can provide basic services now and into the future. Most capital projects contribute to improved social conditions throughout the city and help ensure that the basic health and safety needs of all residents are met. There are a few exceptions where projects may benefit specific areas of the city or certain neighborhoods, like pocket parks and multi-use paths, but even these raise the quality of life for the entire community. Many projects will also make areas of the city safer: stormwater and flood improvements will reduce street flooding and potential damage to property; bike and pedestrian improvements make it safer and easier for people to get from one place to another and also to use alternative modes of transportation. It is important for the city to plan capacity and system improvements over the long term to be able to anticipate capital costs and potential rate increases over time, thereby mitigating sudden economic impacts. This is done primarily in the master planning process, where the future needs are planned, but also service delivery systems are evaluated for how they meet sustainability goals. Agenda Item 5A Page 5 Many of the transportation and trail projects will result in increased mobility which also further environmental goals by potentially reducing auto use and pollution, but also provide safer and access to nearby trails, paths, parks. The ability for people to walk or bike to work, school or shopping increases their transportation options but it also is related to improved physical and mental health. This also applies to proposed new trails and visitor infrastructure in Open Space and Mountain Parks. Many of these projects include an environmental benefit like habitat protection or weed control. Other projects invest in entire systems: raw and treated water system improvements will help ensure continued delivery of safe drinking water to the entire community; wastewater treatment improvements will improve the quality of the water discharged into Boulder Creek. Improvements to our public buildings and facilities will ensure their continued viability into the future. Many projects will have a Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) which will identify impacts and benefits, recommend mitigation and incorporate public outreach and input. These are listed in Attachment F. For these and other projects, staff will use the sustainability tools to help identify benefits and impacts and an appropriate public engagement process. For more information on the CEAP process, see page 18. 2. Are there capital needs not shown in the CIP? The capital improvements program is presented primarily as a fiscally-constrained capital budget. Included in Attachment C is a list of identified projects currently without funding. The unfunded list is provided to the City Council and Planning Board as part of the annual CIP in an effort to integrate the city's business plan and provide a more comprehensive understanding of departmental needs that are currently not funded. The unfunded list assists in the prioritization recommended for the CIP, and to allow the board and council to see projects not given funding priority in the CIP based on existing funding levels. The unfunded list is not a complete or comprehensive list of all identified needs, but attempts to focus on those that lack an adequate funding source, but have been identified in a departmental Master Plan. Many of these items are associated with departments that are funded from the general fund and have no other funding source than the general fund. Capital improvements are not typically funded from the general fund. General fund department projects are funded from the capital development fund if growth related (generated from development excise tax revenues). Restricted fund capital improvements are typically funded within the fund itself (e.g., Transportation Fund, Open Space Fund) based on available funds, bonding or leveraged funds from external sources. 3. How much of the CIP is from external or leveraged funding sources? Projects recommended for approval in 2010 include just over $9.8 Million in external funding. Various city departments receive external funds, typically state or federal, that require an application or selection process to identify specific projects for use of these funds. While many of these projects may be considered desireable or discretionary according to the business plan, the use of leveraged funds to complete these types of projects is extremely effective. Transportation projects typically receive the majority of external funding through the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Agenda Item 5A Page 6 The program distributes federal Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) funding for transportation projects. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) also awards funding for specific projects through a selection process. Council approves applications prior to submittal. Applications are submitted to DRCOG approximately 4-5 years prior to project implementation. External funding influences the timing of projects in the CIP because there is usually a requirement for matching funds and timing of construction. Each year the capital budgets are revised to provide local match funding where necessary and take advantage of as much external funding opportunities as possible. The table below describes external funding anticipated for projects proposed in 2010. Total City External Sources Funding Funding Funding Valmont City $3,085,000 $2,760,000 $325,000 GOCO Grant, BMA Park Phase 1 Donations Broadway - $7,400,000 $920,000 $6,480,000 FWHA, CDOT, CU, Euclid Boulder County, RTD Multimodal Improvements Wildland Fire $3,500,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 ARRA - Not approved, Station & anticipated grant Apparatus application. Storage TOTALS $13,985,000 $4,180,000 $9,805,000 Funding of $500,000 per year from the UDFCD is anticipated for the 2010-2015 CIP. 4. What CIP projects are funded with growth-related development excise tax revenue? The Development Excise Tax (DET) is intended to serve the following purposes: (a) to provide that new capital improvement needs are met as non-residential and residential development occurs; (b) to fund the cost of transportation projects needed due to growth; (c) to fund the acquisition and development of new neighborhood and community park land and recreation centers and the development of existing parks and recreation centers to serve the needs of city residents. Growth related excise taxes provide capital funding for the transportation development fund, a portion of the permanent parks and recreation fund, and the capital development fund (municipal services, including Police, Fire, Library, Human Services, and general municipal purposes). They include: • Funding for transportation improvements coordinated with new private development. • Some funding from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund for improvements at Valmont City Park, East Boulder Community Park, and Foothills Community Park. • Funding reserved for public plaza improvements and facility improvements. • Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements • General Storage Facility • Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage (Grant cash match) Agenda Item 5A Page 7 (see project summary sheets in Attachment D for specific project descriptions) On June 2, 2009 City Council provided the following direction on the new Development Excise Tax and Development Impact Fee Studies prepared by the firm of TischlerBise: move forward to implement impact fees and to allocate excise tax capacity to transportation and park land, reduce the Education Excise Tax to zero, and bring back options for a potential Housing Excise Tax ballot issue this fall. On July 7, City Council requested that first reading Housing Excise Tax ballot language be scheduled for the July 21 City Council meeting. 5. How are operating or maintenance costs for new capital projects being covered? New projects or enhancements to existing infrastructure often result in new or increased maintenance needs. Projects classified as existing facility maintenance/rehab or ongoing projects typically do not result in additional operating costs, and can result in a reduction of maintenance costs. If, however, the new or increased maintenance costs are substantial, then these costs are called out as part of the operating budget requests, and dependent on approval. Each fund has an identified source of operations and maintenance funding. Many restricted funds (e.g. Transportation, Open Space, .25 Cent Sales Tax) can allocate funds for capital projects, as well as their operations and maintenance. Some restricted funds (e.g. Transportation Excise Tax Fund, Capital Development Fund, Permanent Parks and Recreation) must be used strictly for capital projects. For projects associated with these funds, operations and maintenance funding relies on other funding sources, including the Transportation Fund and the General Fund. 6. What energy efficiency upgrades are part of Facility and Asset Management projects? Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) projects related to maintenance and updating of existing facilities emphasize energy efficiency and use of renewable materials and sustainable design, such as energy efficient lighting and mechanical systems and computerized controls. Projects include an emphasis on sustainable design practices, reuse and recycling of materials, and energy efficient design applications. New construction is built to the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Silver standard. The city was recently awarded an energy performance contract through the Governor's Energy Office program, which will identify and quantify more substantial capital investments that can be funded through energy savings in the majority of city facilities, allowing for more strategic and effective investments. Our current funding levels have limited us to energy efficiency upgrades with less than a 3-year simple payback. This new approach will allow us to proceed with energy upgrades with as high as a 15-year payback to include renewables and building automation, along with those traditional upgrades with HVAC and lighting systems. 7. What capital projects are receiving or identified as potential American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding? Several capital projects have already been approved for ARRA funding, and several projects have been identified as candidates for applications. The Transportation Department has already been Agenda Item 5A Page 8 granted federal funding for ADA Access Improvements of $505,000 and Folsom & Spruce Intersection Improvements for $320,000. The Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage project has been identified as a project for funding through a recently announced Assistance to Firefighters grant. The city match of the grant has been included in the CIP to allocate funds for the project if the grant application is approved. In addition, the city will receive or anticipates receiving funding from several sources that will assist in capital improvements to numerous privately owned or non-profit housing properties, including Mapleton Mobile home park, Golden West Manor, Thistle Housing, Hayden Place (Boulder Housing Partners); analysis and upgrades to energy efficiencies in city facilities; and residential and commercial green retrofit programs. The police department will receive funding to upgrade radios, signal radars, WI-Fi equipment, and shotguns. Additional funding for non-capital programs and investments are also anticipated, and a continuously updated list is posted on the city's website. 8. What is in the CIP related to the flood studies in progress? What will be the next steps? The following flood studies in progress included in the CIP are: A. Fourmile Canyon and Wonderland Creek Flood Mitigation Planning The Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek Major Drainageway Planning - Phase A Report - Alternatives Analysis was developed by Love & Associates, dated June 2007. The Phase A Report focuses on the development, evaluation, and recommendations of flood mitigation alternatives along both creeks. City staff has coordinated this flood mitigation planning effort with the objectives of the city's Greenways Program. A public process that included two open houses and several public hearings with the Water Resources Advisory Board (WRAB) and Planning Board was conducted. Based on the feedback received during this process, several flood mitigation alternatives were evaluated and refined. A City Council public hearing on the flood mitigation plan for Fourmile Canyon and Wonderland creeks was held on November 10, 2008. At that public hearing, city council raised several concerns. A City Council study session was held on April 28, 2009 to discuss the issues. For most areas, there was concurrence regarding the flood mitigation approach. However, there are several areas where more information and discussion is needed. Staff plans to assemble information that will allow a more detailed comparison of two flood mitigation approaches in these areas. It is anticipated that prior to scheduling the issue again with Council, staff will hold a public meeting and solicit recommendations from WRAB and Planning Board. Money has been budgeted in the CIP for flood mitigation improvements along Fourmile Canyon and Wonderland Creek. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. Projects that provide multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new culvert and Agenda Item 5A Page 9 pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad and Boulder White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. The city applied for TIP funding for this project and although the project did not make the first funding cut it is still possible the city will receive matching funds. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. B. South Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study On March 25, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) informed the city that it has completed its review of the mapping study and intends to officially adopt the study. The process of adopting the mapping study will coincide with the adoption of the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs) for Boulder County. (The new maps will be issued in a digital or electronic format so that they can be accessed over the Internet.) The adoption process includes the following steps: • July 2009 - FEMA will issue revised preliminary DFIRMs for Boulder County, beginning a 30-day community comment period. • October 2009 - Notice of intent to adopt the revised flood maps will be published in local newspapers and in the Federal Register, beginning a 90-day appeal period. • January 2010 - End of 90-day appeal period and official adoption of new flood maps is anticipated. As a result of the study and new mapping, approximately 240 additional structures (with approximately 700 total dwelling units) will be added to the 100 year floodplain. The vast majority of these structures are located within existing developed areas of the city within the West Valley area of the SBC floodplain. A risk assessment report was completed in June 2009 in order to support subsequent flood mitigation planning. The purpose of the risk assessment is to identify and quantify life safety, property damage and environmental risks associated with SBC flooding. To assess the risk to life safety, important information includes inundation mapping and basin response time. Property damage assessments involve depth of flooding and the corresponding value of associated losses. Environmental risks consider erosion and sediment transport, the loss of vegetation and changes in the creek path. Funding has been included in the city's CIP in 2009-2011 to complete the flood mitigation planning effort. Also, $4.25 million has been included in the city's 2012 budget to help fund the construction of flood mitigation improvements. An agreement with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District has been secured and provides a total of $100,000 of supplemental funding for flood mitigation planning. C. Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study Staff has initiated an update to the Boulder Creek flood mapping. Review of the underlying hydrology has been completed and peer reviewed. Preliminary results of the hydraulic modeling Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 10 and associated flood mapping should be available in late 2009. The study will recognize recent work completed by the city including the reconstruction of the Broadway Bridge, the 29th St development as well as the acquisition and removal of several properties along Boulder Creek as part of the city's pre-flood property acquisition program. The study will be based on recent aerial mapping and topography that is vastly superior to base mapping used in previous flood studies. Money has been budgeted in the CIP in 2010 to complete the flood mapping study and submittal to FEMA. D. Gregory Canyon Creek Flood Mapping Study The city of Boulder has developed a floodplain model for Gregory Canyon Creek (GCC) that will potentially update and replace both the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and the city of Boulder floodplain map. This new model will simplify the floodplain management of GCC by providing one regulatory floodplain map for both the city and federal governments. The proposed mapping revision also incorporates more accurate topographic information and improvements along GCC that have occurred since the effective floodplain map was approved by FEMA in 1987. A public meeting is scheduled for July 8 and the issue will be reviewed by the WRAB at their July 20 meeting. Money has been budgeted in the CIP in 2010-2011 to fund flood mitigation improvements along Gregory Canyon Creek. A recent analysis indicates that several structures could be removed from the high hazard zone based on drainageway and culvert improvements near Pennsylvania Ave. 9. How are projects requiring a Community Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) determined, does this process address urban design issues such as where raised on the 30th Street underpass project? A Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) is a conceptual design alternatives impact analysis process. Capital Projects are reviewed annually by the CEAP review group, an interdepartmental staff team who also reviews all CEAP documents. This group has also recently begun discussions regarding those projects that do not require any type of discretionary review process and may not rise to the level of a CEAP in that there are not alternatives at the conceptual design stage, but may have urban design alternatives during the final design stages. The CEAP process as currently structured would not work in such a scenario, but staff agreed that in certain high-visibility projects some type of design review process may be appropriate to the project. Several of these types of projects are included in the 2010-2015 CIP, including the Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Improvements (including the road and bridge over Goose Creek), and the Broadway - Euclid multi-modal enhancements. Staff is continuing to work on what such a process exactly entails, recognizing the desire to not add additional time or complexity to projects, as many already span several years and many levels of local, county, state and federal reviews. The two Transportation projects mentioned above will be used as test cases for prototypes of a design review model. Ideas include utilization of existing staff teams or individual staff expertise in varying ways, including project team assignments, internal staff design review meetings, and possible information items or referrals to advisory boards or City Council. Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 11 For more information on the CEAP process, see section VI on page 18. 10. How are we proposing to address the financing of infrastructure in Area II neighborhoods to address public health and environmental issues of properties on well and septic (e.g. Crestview East and Gapter Road)? $1.2 million dollars was allocated in 2006 for the installation of utility infrastructure in Area II neighborhoods pursuing annexation. That money has been carried-over since that time, and there are now two neighborhoods - Crestview East and Gapter Road that are negotiating annexation agreements with the city. The city does not have enough money allocated to immediately construct the utility infrastructure for both neighborhoods if annexed. The proposal is for city financing of Crestview East first (2009) and Gapter Road neighborhood second (in 2011). This would include water connections and sewer line installation for Crestview East in Upland and Violet. The neighborhood has also requested the construction of a new street (Vine Street) and installation of water and sewer for the lots fronting on this new street with a payment structure through a local improvement district. However, the city does not have enough money for this portion unless the Gapter Road annexation does not go forward and would still require additional financing (e.g.: bank loan or fund reserves), as the total cost of improvements for Crestview East including the Vine Street improvements is $1.9 million. 11. What concerns or issues were raised by the advisory boards reviewing departmental CH's? Questions and concerns raised by the boards are summarized below. Excerpts from the summary minutes regarding the CIP are included in the fund overviews under Advisory Board Action in the beginning of each section of Attachment D. Transportation The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed recommended approval of the 2010-2015 Transportation Capital Improvements Program as submitted on June 8, 2009. Utilities The preliminary CIP was discussed at the Water Resource Advisory Board (WRAB) on May 18, 2009, during which the WRAB requested that an additional revenue option be explored by City staff. At the June 15 meeting, WRAB members voted on the staff recommendations concerning the 2010-2015 Utilities Division CIP as follows: 3-0 in favor of the proposed Water Utility CIP including a 3 percent rate increase 2-1 in favor of the proposed Wastewater Utility CIP including a 2 percent rate increase (the dissenting vote was lodged based on support for a 1 percent rate increase only) 3-0 in favor of the proposed Stormwater and Flood Management Utility CIP including a 1 percent rate increase Parks and Recreation The PRAB reviewed and recommended approval of the 2010 expenditures from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund (Fund 230) as presented at its April 27, 2009 business meeting. PRAB also made a motion to support the staff recommendation for the planned CIP projects for Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 12 2010 through 2015 in all funds. Due to the economic uncertainty, staff recommended deferring the development of Mesa Memorial pocket park and eliminating project monies until funding sources are stabilized. PRAB's motion included a recommendation to re-establish funding for construction of Mesa Memorial pocket park when adequate funding becomes available. Tributary Greenways The Greenways Advisory Committee reviewed the Greenways 2010-2015 CIP on May 20, 2009 and recommended approval (5-0), and included a motion to consider funding the Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage project. Open Space and Mountain Parks The Open Space Board of Trustees will review the recommended Open Space CIP in the summer of 2009. IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF SUBCOAIMUNITY AND AREA PLANS The following questions provide an overview of capital projects related to adopted subcommunity and area plans as well as information regarding capital projects in specific geographic areas of focus throughout the city. 1. How is the implementation of the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP) being addressed in the CIP? 2. How is the implementation of the North Boulder Subcommunity Plan (NBSP) being addressed in the CIP? 3. What future capital projects will be proposed associated with the Gunbarrel Community Center Plan? 1. How is the implementation of the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP) being addressed in the CIP? Implementation of the Transit Village Area Plan is just beginning, and decisions on financing implementation strategies are currently being discussed. However, one significant project is within the 2010-2015 CIP: Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements provides the city's share of funding for transportation facilities in the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP). The city's share of these improvements pays for improvements with community wide benefits or enhancements beyond those required of development. These improvements will be phased with the redevelopment of the area over many years. The city's share of funding will contribute to construction of Junction Place as a new collector, the bridge of Goose Creek for Junction Place, bike lanes and pedestrian amenities on Junction Place, multimodal paths, underpasses and connections, pedestrian connections, pedestrian lighting, public art and traffic signals. The Transportation Fund is proposed to pay $100,000 in 2010 and 2011, and $200,000 in 2012-2014. Any upfront funding would be paid back through development and construction fees and taxes collected in the area. 2. How is the implementation of the North Boulder Subcommunity Plan (NBSP) being addressed in the CIP? Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 13 The development of the Foothills Community Park, and Elks neighborhood park, and Fourmile Creek Improvements are included in the 2010-2015 CIP (see description by department below). Additionally, bicycle and pedestrian connections typically occur in north Boulder annually, but are not specifically called out in the CIP, as they are done opportunistically, or as part of a larger program (e.g., greenways, bikeway, or sidewalk improvement programs). Parks and Recreation Department: The Foothills Community Park in north Boulder is proposed for continued funding for phase three construction (2014/2015). The Elks neighborhood park is proposed for funding to begin in 2011 with construction in 2013-2015. Stormwater and Flood Management Utility: Funding for flood mitigation projects for Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are proposed for funding from 2010-2015. Greenways projects are coordinated with these efforts. Tributary Greenways: Improvements to Fourmile Creek including environmental restoration and an off-street trail connecting 26a' to 28th Streets are proposed, as well as improvements to Wonderland Creek from Foothills to the Diagonal. 3. What future capital projects will be proposed associated with the Gunbarrel Community Center Plan? Future capital improvements associated with the Gunbarrel Community Center Plan will include street and sidewalk improvements and bicycle and trail connections. Improvements in the long- term could also include potential library and park facilities if appropriate locations and new sources of funding are identified. V. IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLANS 1. Which Master Plans are currently being updated or are scheduled for update in the near future? Updates in Progress ■ Fire Master Plan, last update in 1996, anticipated completion in 2009 ■ Wastewater Utility Master Plan, begun in 2007, anticipated completion in 2009 ■ Municipal Courts Master Plan, last update in 1999, anticipated completion in 2010 ■ Downtown/University Hill Management Division & Parking Services Master Plan, anticipated completion in 2010 ■ Greenways Master Plan Update, anticipated completion in 2010 ■ Boulder Reservoir Master Plan, anticipated completion in 2010 Plans/Updates to begin in 2009/2010 ■ Yards Master Plan Update ■ Fleet Services Strategic Plan ■ Energy Strategic Plan ■ Youth Master Plan ■ Treated Water Master Plan Update Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 14 Recently Completed Plans/Updates ■ Source Water 2009 ■ Transportation Update 2008 ■ Library 2007 ■ Wastewater Treatment Plant 2007 ■ Stormwater 2007 ■ Airport Master Plan 2007 2. Is the provision of capital facilities keeping pace with demand or service standards at the level specified in departmental master plans? The extent to which capital facilities are meeting adopted standards varies by department as outlined below. Transportation The 2003 Transportation Master Plan's (TMP) first priority is maintenance of the existing transportation system. The spending for system maintenance and purchasing capacity was reduced over several years due to budget cuts and material cost increases in items such as fuel, asphalt, and concrete. An additional increase in the operating budget was implemented in 2008 and has been requested in 2009 which, if approved, will continue to bring the city closer to service standards but will not completely cover prior budget reductions and material cost increases. In addition, the TMP contains a set of multi modal transportation investments that were intended to accomplish the plan's objectives. These objectives are: • Continued progress toward no growth in long-term vehicle traffic; • Reduction in single-occupant-vehicle travel to 25 percent of all trips; • Continued reduction in mobile source emissions of air pollutants; and, • No more than 20 percent of roadways congested (at Level of Service (LOS) F); • Expand fiscally viable transportation alternatives for all Boulder residents and employees, including the elderly and those with disabilities; and • Increase transportation alternatives commensurate with the rate of employee growth. Achieving these objectives depends on making investments to provide transportation options for the population and employment expected in the future. Currently the plan is only approximately sixty percent funded. Consequently we are currently unable to support the full investment program in the plan. In the absence of additional funding or other mitigation strategy the city will be unable to maintain progress toward established plan objectives. Utilities The recently updated treated water, wastewater collection and wastewater treatment master plans as well as the raw water master plan provide direction for capital needs to meet the adopted service standards. For the Stormwater and Flood Management Utility, staff has reviewed this question as part of the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Utility Master Plan and Stormwater Master Plan that was completed this year. These needs have been programmed in the CIP. Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 15 Funding for the Utilities Division capital improvement program is derived primarily from monthly utility fees but also include Plant Investment Fees (PIFs), hydroelectric sales to Xcel Energy and some external funding. If these funds are insufficient, projects will be funded by issuing revenue bonds with the debt service financed by general utility charges. The rates are evaluated based on proposed capital needs in conjunction with the development of the operating budget. Construction cost inflation has a dramatic affect on the cost of future project work and has been accounted for in the cost of future projects under the assumption of a future 3 percent yearly construction cost inflation rate. Construction cost inflation is tracked using the Engineering News Record (ENR) Cost Index for Denver and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Colorado Construction Cost Index. The ENR index is a composite index based on costs for: 1) local portland cement, 2) local 2x4 lumber, 3) national structural steel, and 4) local union wages plus fringes for carpenters, bricklayers and iron workers. The CDOT index is a composite index based on costs for 1) unclassified excavation, 2) hot bituminous pavement 3) concrete pavement, 4) structural steel and 5) reinforcing steel. The ENR index indicates construction costs have increased 21 percent during the past five years; the CDOT index indicates an increase of over 80 percent during the same period of time. These cost increases are significantly greater than the 25 year average 3 percent construction cost inflation rate based on the ENR index (comparable data for the CDOT index is not available) and have had a dramatic affect on the ability of the city to accomplish needed project work. The ENR index is more reflective of equipment and building construction such as at the treatment plants. The Colorado cost index is more reflective of heavy civil construction such as roadway and major drainageway work. Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) The capital plan is not keeping pace with the standards put forth in the Facilities & Asset Management (FAM) Master Plan. The FAM Master Plan specifies that 1% of the current replacement value (CRV) of facilities will be used for renovation and replacement of General Fund facilities. FAM's operational budgets for routine and major maintenance have been significantly reduced which may impact renovation and replacement schedules for non-essential facilities in the future. The FAM Master Plan Update addresses this issue and recommends an Action Plan to restore funding to provide industry standard service levels for all General Fund facilities by 2014. Library The provision and upkeep of capital facilities for the library has not kept pace with service standards, as outlined in the 2007 Library Master Plan. The library's most recent facility addition at the George Reynolds Branch in South Boulder was completed in 1994. The last addition to the Main library is over fifteen years old. The library's facilities are no longer adequate to address either the rapidly changing world of libraries or the specific needs of Boulder's evolving population and service expectations. The master plan outlines needed improvements in children's and teen spaces, in meeting, reading and study spaces, as well as in areas originally designed to house the physical collection and information technology of the early 1990s. Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 16 Parks & Recreation The master plan was approved in December 2006 and includes park service area guidelines and criteria for prioritizing park development. The capital budget reflects the goals and priorities identified in the master plan and are aligned with the master plan recommendations. The department has prioritized capital projects based on the master plan goals of 1) maintaining and protecting our parks and recreation facilities and programs and 2) becoming economically sustainable. New park development projects are prioritized based on several factors, including meeting service area standards, community needs, and compliance with the 1995 ballot initiative. Staff has begun quantifying the deferred maintenance and renovation and refurbishment needs of the parks and recreation system. At this point, most deferred maintenance and renovation and refurbishment needs have been identified, but not all have been quantified. Projects will be prioritized and included in future CIP budgets or on the unfunded project list. The department is currently developing a Recreation Program and Facilities Plan, which will include recommendations for facility improvements, enhancements and/or additions. Facility needs will be identified and included in future CIP budgets. A long range concern is that the .25 Cent Sales Tax sunsets in 2015 and yet the funds are used for on-going park and facility maintenance. With or without revenue declines, absent a new source of funds after 2015 to replace the .25 Cent Sales Tax, the department's ability to adequately manage its assets will become constrained. Open Space and Mountain Parks The Acquisitions and Management Plan was updated and extended through 2011 in November 2005. The Visitor Master Plan (VMP) adopted in April 2005 includes a system-wide trails assessment and standards for particular services. Areas of priority include: sustainability of the existing trails system, management of undesignated trails, critical connections and unsafe road crossings. The plan helps to prioritize these identified needs and proposes implementation options at three levels: Current Funding, Action Plan Funding and Identified Needs or Vision Plan Funding. Sources of supplemental funds include increases in tax revenues, access to Lottery and GOCO funds, grants and donations. Volunteer participation is a component of many projects. Increasing visitation continues to impact the Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) system and a year long visitation study from June 2004 through June 2005 provides updated information on numbers, densities, times and types of use, and destinations and origins of visits. Additional funds totaling $250,000 per year were requested for a total of $450,000 annually, to help implement the plan at the Identified Needs funding level starting in 2005. VI. REVIEW AND COMMENTS FROM BOULDER COUNTY LAND USE DEPARTMENT Review of the proposed 2010-2015 CIP by county land use staff will be done in July. Any recommendations will be forwarded to both Planning Board and Council. VII. SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 17 ASSESSMENT PROCESS (LEAP REVIEW) The projects that are proposed to be evaluated under Community and Environmental Assessment Process (LEAP) review are listed in Attachment F. The purpose of a CEAP is defined to "assess potential impacts of conceptual project alternatives in order to inform the selection and refinement of a preferred alternative." The CEAP process is referenced in the Council Procedure, the Appendix to Title 2 of the Boulder Revised Code. Section IX. Procedure in Handling Major Capital Improvement Projects, states that projects should be handled in accordance with the City Plans and Projects Handbook, dated November 2007. The Handbook states the following guidelines for selecting projects that should be evaluated through a CEAP: 1. A project or a potential alternative could have a significant impact on an environmental, social, or cultural resource and the project would benefit from a CEAP. 2. The project is anticipated to generate enough neighborhood or community input to require a public hearing or board review. 3. There is more than one possible conceptual alternative that will require staff or community input in the selection. 4. The project requires alternatives analysis as part of internal or external permitting and review processes at the local, county (1041), state, or federal level (NEPA). (An internal city CEAP should be performed prior to submitting for a local permit or to the external agency.) *Note: Projects that require Concept and Site Plan Review do notgo through the CEAP and are not reviewed by the CEAP Review Group. CEAP reviews are prepared when projects are in the site location and facility design phase. The primary purpose of the CEAP is to encourage the consideration of potential social and environmental impacts in planning and decision making and, ultimately, to arrive at actions that achieve the objectives of the project with the fewest impacts. The intent of the CEAP is to make project planning more efficient in considering issues in advance of implementation. All CEAPs include an analysis of the project and alternatives, including how the project will further implement the BVCP, master plan goals, or subcommunity or area plans. The alternatives are then analyzed through a checklist of impacts to Natural Areas or Features, Riparian Area s/Floo dplains, Wetlands, Geology & Soils, Water Quality, Air Quality, Resource Conservation, Cultural/Historic Resources, Visual Quality, Safety, Physiological Well-being, Urban Services, Special Populations, and the Economy. CEAP findings are submitted by departments to their respective advisory board for review as part of CIP project approval. Council has the opportunity to call up projects for their review and approval. (For those departments that do not have an advisory board, Planning Board is responsible for reviewing CEAP findings as part of project approval.) Annually, the list of Capital Projects is reviewed by the internal city CEAP review group, and the group discusses projects that may need a CEAP. Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 18 Approved By: David Driskell Executive Director of Community Planning ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A contains the action minutes of the Planning Board's recommendations to Council for the 2009-2014 CIP. Attachment B summarizes the highlights of the 2010-2015 CIP by fund. Attachment C includes a table showing Unfunded Capital Needs Attachment D provides the CIP submissions by Department, including each fund / department overview and project status reports. Attachment E provides spreadsheets for the 2010-2015 CIP by fund. Attachment F is a list of projects recommended for a CEAP. Attachment G is a list of projects suggested for design review and a list of projects with exterior changes. Attachment H is spreadsheets of projects by Subcommunity. Agenda Item 5A Pa2e 19 Capital Improvement Projects 2010 through 2015 Creek - Spurgeon ese air No 7 5Q T' ti~ ,t d ice" l 6? r oir20 tvtigeral Rd 1.7-~ f3nuld~rr ~ I1J • fti ; g , kesarvorr Lookout- Rd 1 ff .~-92 ~ .ciJJflrliJ@ ~ -T 'ervoir e~ - o,Clc P`Hill i I Dr Tw r_ i..s r c I rw; « 21, 22, 23, 24, 1 J, o~tst`'~e Yarmouth 25,26,27,28, 53 r= 31,321,-34 ncJer - 8 m _ Jay Rd auld~ Cree " v'don rZr -Evje-- 6 ERP--U.. rUcrti.l'F7nds 2 Andrus _ I _ Sawl JJ pnFl$~~~ - T! lcr>~ Saw IdsAv 5 ~Q 133 p~ ~ti InH .on 13 6;~'~ . ' 61 a / Up~(€: 'rrnE - many r P Jr1C1 91 valmont Go 1.. °am Av ke Reserio,r f t 'L I o e Creek , ©r' Oka 7 - ;c^~- 94,95,101 `rtJ 4 17 1 ,iruCrES. - - .42 ` 109, 1$- S Canyon By f Lake Ara ahoe Av 1 ` Itsi~ s Er c O Marsh Uni fsixy Av L.', 106 C001 49 Olorad v QF u•, V I a ~r r- 69 v 4~ 60/ I r o Baseline Rd 97; ~,~i n? Lour C r South Boulder Rd .J 44 ft[able Mesa Dr ~i 1 Kas er Lake \ ~4 ti s l _I ^ rn 1 ak_e Ma Ke Color Designatig Year of Project i is G ® 2030 2013 2011 2014 `Jy,. fr f' f - 2092 2015 Greenb J r` 15 > !]~3 Department Symbology \ t` r1 2 'f ff/ N Rd f PW! Flood Control Utility \ 5 G~~ , , f/ ~f f~harsra I WlTransportalion f : I W/ Tributary Greenways L S W1 Water Utility 13 4 ~ ~ Pa•ksanERecreation General Fund \ t ~~?Q ~ Open Space & Mountain Parks ~D PWJ Facilities & Asset Management Q PWJ Flood Control Utility ~U PWJ Municipal Airport M r;nnYJ Laky ® PW! Transportation kv PWi Tributary Greenways 0 PWJ Wastewater Utility tiD PWJ Water Utility - ` Q Parks & Recreation 1 m Downtown University Hill ton Municipal Division ' Open Space & Mountain Parks 3"~J~. ~ ~ Crc:cl; ® PWi Flood Control Utility '1 - Roads Arterial 4 Highway Street Hydrology Lake 4 f r Creek 7% = fi i City Limits Sy k Area 2\\ c91M. 9 rte- / V:•x`I G. ✓OrN, Cy.W lVY~ECr lV fiiVlilUx I u~.ern rx~v.: x.6 ...-w ..stt... ~++r.n.•ee~an wr.wr. i- ~s9r Ix.con rwo. x..•. - .+..wv.~~w.+Al~rsr~rwuerryvr.l.w ' ~r.~i f6+e. eur o w~. ease w.st ~btac~ai ~ 1 MVrWlVlxsesmtip•.ray..lr.w. ` ' IL..rn 1. H.vxwJllltwl4 W.y Mll. w~..r n•'~ f x7>•w v.wrwo.nY'.i.><Ip FlaWOmlxw+m~i ~l APPROVED ON AUGUST 7. 2008 CITY OF BOULDER PLANNING BOARD MINUTES July 10, 2008 1777 Broadway, Council Chambers A permanent set of these minutes and a tape recording (maintained for a period of seven years) are retained in Central Records (telephone: 303-441-3043). Minutes and streaming audio are also [ available on the web at: http://www.bouldercolorado.gov/ [ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: K.C. Becker Bill Holicky Willa Johnson Elise Jones Andrew Shoemaker Adrian Sopher PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Phil Shull, Chair STAFF PRESENT: Juliet Bonnell, Administrative Specialist Charles Ferro, Senior Planner David Gehr, Deputy City Attorney Brian Holmes, Zoning Administrator Ruth McHeyser, Acting Planning Director Elaine McLaughlin, Senior Planner ' Chris Meschuk, Planner Abbie Novak, Parks Business and Finance Manager Robert Ray, Land Use Review Manager Susan Richstone, Long Range Planning Manager Jessica Vaughn, Planner Stephany Westhusln, Transportation Project Coordinator Bill Boyes, Acting Facilities and Fleet Manager Robert Harberg, Utilities Planning and Projects Coordinator 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Sopher, acting as Chair, declared a quorum at 5:03 p.m. and the following business was conducted. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES No minutes were scheduled for approval. 3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Ford Brown, 922 Spruce Street expressed concern about the noise and traffic that Spud Brothers (located at 2010 10`h Street) would add if their hours were extended. Sandy Hale, 910 Spruce Street expressed the same concerns and supported staff s denial of Spud Brothers' request to extend their hours. 1 Kim Westover, 6360 S. Federal Way, Boise, ID attended to represent the Spud Brothers. He expressed appreciation for the city of Boulder and noted that Spud Brothers did not intend to appeal staff's decision, but did want to fulfill the needs and desires of their customers. 4. DISCUSSION OF DISPOSITIONS, PLANNING BOARD CALL-UPS Call-up items: 3059 6`h Street, 3945 Broadway, and 2010 10`h Street The Planning Board did not call-up any of these items at this time. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Consideration of a recommendation to the City Council concerning the 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Case Manager: Chris Meschuk Staff Presentation C. Meschuk presented the item to the board. B. Holicky noted that he will need to recuse himself during any conversation about capital improvements in the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP) area. Board Discussion (excluding discussion about TVAP area improvements) A. Sopher questioned how the board can be most useful to staff in discussing this item. He , brought the board's attention to Attachment A of the memo which was the minutes from last year's Planning Board discussion on CIP. Looking at this he questioned how much their comments affected staff's direction on CIP. He recommended approaching this by going through the memo section by section or by listing items that the board felt needed discussion. W. Johnson thought CEAPS and TVAP needed discussion. A. Sopher thought water issues and parks needed discussion. E. Jones agreed that CEAPS needed additional discussion. B. Holicky wanted to discuss CEAPS and design review. A. Sopher questioned where funding comes from for newly developed parks. Abbie Novak from the Parks Department answered A. Sopher's question regarding new park development. She mentioned that maintenance dollars service what is developed in the park system. Maintenance dollars will be identified to serve new park developments. Therefore, maintenance dollars will be included in their operating funds for maintenance of Mesa Memorial in 2009. In the 2009 CIP this is the only new development project that is planned. K. Becker asked if the CEAP process is totally discretionary. R. McHeyser replied that the CEAP process is a process that city departments go through when they are proposing development on a parcel. The CEAP process is intended to provide an analysis and assessment of alternatives. IC Becker asked if there is a section of the code that requires the CEAP discretionary review process. C. Meschuk noted that in the code there is a section that talks about city projects. There is a City Projects and Plans Handbook that is adopted by the City Council and outlines the process for large public or city department projects. K. Becker asked if the board will review the CEAPs for particular projects. 2 i C. Meschuk replied that CEAPs would be reviewed by Planning Board if there is not a specific advisory board related to the project and that all CEAP projects are subject to call-up by City Council. A. Sopher asked what the lead time is for completing a CEAP for a project. C. Meschuk replied that on average CEAPs take at least 6 months to develop, but it depends on the amount of public process and review and the size of the project. P. McHeyser clarified that staff is asking the board to identify whether the projects included in the CIP memo should go through the CEAP process. W. Johnson clarified what a CEAP that has been noted as complete in the memo meant. She also asked if the board would be reviewing projects emphasized with asterisks in the future. C. Meschuk responded that the projects with asterisks are ones that have been identified as needed, but details about them have not been determined, including whether or not they should go through the CEAP process. He noted that CEAPs characterized as complete have been completed but they are still listed in the CIP because the entire project has not been completed yet. K. Becker asked how staff's CEAP list was developed. C. Meschuk replied that a handbook with guidelines has been developed for determining the projects that require the CEAP process. Basically, projects that require CEAPs are usually ones that have enough of an impact on the community that community participation is necessary. CEAP analysis includes neighborhood impacts. K. Becker felt that it would be helpful to have a comprehensive list of the projects that did require a CEAP versus the ones that didn't require a CEAP. A. Sopher requested that references to page numbers of specific projects be included in CIP documentation. B. Holicky asked about the cost of doing a CEAP. C. Meschuk responded that the cost is difficult to estimate. Consultants are often hired to handle CEAPs or staff time is used to manage the CEAP process. R. McHeyser agreed that the cost of a CEAP is difficult to estimate because each project is so different. ' B. Holicky expressed interest in doing a cost/benefit analysis of CEAPs. R. McHeyser replied that the cost may be greater for-projects that go through the CEAI' process because these projects go through more rigorous analysis, but all projects go through some level of analysis. A. Sopher inquired about whether CEAP analysis had been done regarding East Boulder Community Park. 1 A. Novak replied that a CEAP had been done for this project, but there will be a reassessment of how the park is being used and how previous plans will be adjusted. A. Sopher asked why CEAPs are still on the CIP list if they are marked as complete. C. Meschuk clarified that items that are on the CIP list, but have completed CEAPs are still on the list because the projects they are correlated with are still in the CIP process. Design Review W. Johnson inquired when the items with asterisks would be reviewed and by whom. C. Meschuk replied that as the projects get closer to their funding year and the scope of the projects gets narrowed down the design review process will become clearer. Staff's goal is to identify the needs of a project before the project is initiated. Projects might need design review, but only as the project progresses can this be definitely determined. 3 2010 Budget Capital Improvements Projects j` Capital Development Fund Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects $50,000 Municipal Spaces $30,000 Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage $500,000 Downtown Commercial District Fund DCD Major Renovation Projects $1,264,800 r% Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund Main Library - Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System $120,000 Maintainance of Boulder Reservoir - Sewer System Repairs $50,000 Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms $152,000 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects $50,000 Municipal Service Center Bldg. B - Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping $65,000 Stazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement $132,000 Lottery Fund OSMP - Historical Structures & Trails - Stabilization & Restoration $525,000 Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - Lottery $300,000 Tributary Greenways Program - Lottery $150,000 Open Space Fund Acquisition Program $3,400,000 Mineral Rights Acquisition $100,000 OSMP South Trail Study Area $180,000 OSMP West Trail Study Area $80,000 Visitor Infrastructure - System Wide $190,000 Water Rights Acquisition $200,000 Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - .25 $300,000 Stazio Irrigation Renovation $150,000 Valmont City Park (Phase 1) .25 cent $150,000 Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund East Boulder Community Park PP&R $500,000 Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R $250,000 Lighting Ordinance Implementation $100,000 Valmont City Park (Phase 1) $770,000 6 2010 Budget Capital Improvements Projects Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund Boulder Creek $50,000 Fourmile Canyon Creek $250,000 Gregory Canyon Creek $25,000 Preflood Property Acquisition $500,000 Storm Sewer Rehabilitation $53,045 Stormwater Quality Improvements $53,045 Transportation Coordination $250,000 Tributary Greenways Program - Stormwater & Flood $150,000 Upper Goose Creek Drainage $100,000 Wonderland Creek $250,000 Transportation Development Fund 28th St (Baseline to Iris) 11 $455,000 Miscellaneous Development Coordination $25,000 Transportation Fund 28th St (Baseline to Iris) I $860,000 Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements $125,000 Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements $100,000 Broadway - Euclid Multimodal Improvements $4,115,000 Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA $629,000 Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatments $75,000 TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation 11 $130,000 Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation $150,000 Tributary Greenways _u Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Projects $195,000 Greenways Salaries $130,000 Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew $50,000 Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating $25,000 Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements $50,000 Wastewater Utility Fund Marshall Landfill $100,000 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation $106,090 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation $530,450 WWTP Biosolids Digester $4,000,000 WWTP Digester Cleaning $150,000 7 2010 Budget Capital Improvements Projects Wastewater Utility Fund WWTP Instrumentation/Control $75,000 WWTP UV Disinfection $4,434,562 Water Utility Fund Automated Meter Reading $530,450 Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair $371,315 Betasso Storage Tank $265,225 Betasso WTP $200,000 Boulder Reservoir WTP $100,000 Distribution System Water Quality $150,000 Kossler Reservoir $360,706 Lakewood Pipeline $100,000 NCWCD Conveyance - Boulder Feeder Canal $300,235 Water System Security Upgrades $100,000 Waterline Replacement $2,227,890 8 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY FUND The 2010 Capital Improvements Program includes proposed funding of $32,655,813 for 68 projects. The entire six-year CIP includes proposed funding of $146,858,015 for 110 projects. The 2010 CIP budget constitutes 22% of the six-year projection. DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FUND (DCD, formerly CAGID) The proposed 2010-2015 Downtown Commercial District Fund (DCD) CEP is $3,529,600, which constitutes 2% of the six-year projection. One project is scheduled for funding in 2010 for a total of $1,264,800 for major maintenance of the district's parking facilities. Funding of an additional $1,264,800 continues in 2011, and from 2012 to 2015 funding remains at $250,000. No other projects are currently planned for the six year CIP, however the need for maintenance of the Pearl Street Mall infrastructure has been identified as a future need. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (CDF) Funding for CDF projects is from the assessment of Development Excise Taxes on new development. The proposed 2010-2015 Capital Development Fund (CDF) CIP is $1,660,000, which constitutes 1.2% of the six-year projection. Three projects are scheduled for funding in 2010 for a total of $580,000. These proposed projects constitute 1.8% of the 2010 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • The Facilities & Asset Master Plan, accepted in 1998, identified the need for funding small facility projects related to growth at the discretion of the FAM Manager. $50,000 from the DET fund is proposed for miscellaneous facility DET Projects, and $30,000 for Municipal Spaces. Past uses of the money have included engineering and environmental studies at Valmont Butte. Children, Youth, and Family Services addition, the remodel of the Uni-Hill Police Annex atie- the Municipal Building sister cities plaza. FACILITY RENOVATION AND REPLACEMENT FUND Funding for Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund projects is from a contribution by the General Fund equal to 1% of the current replacement value of General Fund facilities and from restricted fund departments as annual contributions to the fund. The proposed 2010-2015 Facility Renovation & Replacement (FR&R) Fund Capital Improvements Program is $3,737,000, which constitutes 3% of the six-year projection. 6 Projects are scheduled in 2010 totaling $569,000. These projects make up 1.8% of the 2010 CEP. Highlighted Projects: • Main Library - Upgrade of Auditorium Lighting & Sound System - The lighting and sound systems have reached the end of their planned service life. This project replaces the existing 9 ~I lighting fixtures with more energy-efficient fixtures, upgrades the control panel, installs a new dimmer system, and integrates the sound system with lighting controls. LOTTERY FUND The proposed 2009-2014 Lottery Fund CIP is $5,850,000, which constitutes 3.4% of the six-year projection. 3 Projects scheduled in 2010 total $975,000. These projects make up 2.6% of the 2010 CIP. $150,000 from the Lottery Fund will continue to be allocated to the Greenways Program. Highlighted Projects: 0 OSMP Historical Structures & Trails - Stabilization & Restoration - Focus for 2010 will be the West Trail Study Area (TSA) process including Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis on lands from Eldorado Springs Drive north to Lee Hill Road. Historic site assessments and related stabilization, reclamation and restoration will be conducted on historic structures on Flagstaff Summit and major maintenance and restoration projects will be completed on the historic trails system that was largely constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) in the 1930s. • Playground and park Irrigation System Renovation - This project partially funds the renovation of a playground and park irrigation system. The department evaluates and prioritizes needs based on criteria including safety and code compliance, age of the equipment, location in the city, and opportunities for efficiencies, collaboration or partnerships with other departments or the surrounding neighborhood. OPEN SPACE FUND The proposed 2010-2015 Open Space Fund CIP is $23,072,165, which constitutes 16% of the six- year projection. Six projects proposed for funding in 2010 total $4,150,000, constituting 13% of the CIP for 2010. Highlighted -Projects: • South Trail Study Area - This Trails Study Area (TSA) includes areas known as the Eldorado Mountain/Doudy Draw TSA west of Highway 93 and the Marshall Mesa/South Grasslands TSA east of Highway 93. It extends from Eldorado Mountain and Bull Gulch in the west, easterly to Highway 36 and lies south of Eldorado Springs Drive and Marshall Drive. Trails projects in this area west of Highway 93 were identified in the planning process that was completed in 2006. Specific trails alignments and designs were initiated in 2007 and major projects undertaken in 2008. Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis was completed for trails in this area in 2007-08. Additional projects that are planned for 2010 and later include continued closure and reclamation of undesignated trials, new trails, etc. based on M1WSG TSA plan objectives. Near the end of this planning cycle, the initiation of the planning process for the whole TSA area wil l begin. 10 PERMANENT PARKS & RECREATION FUND &.25 CENT SALES TAX FUND Parks & Recreation Department funding comes from various sources including fees, development excise taxes, property taxes, ballot issue sales taxes, lottery fund monies, etc. The various funds are specific regarding allowed uses and the funding for many projects is comprised from more than one funding source. Capital projects are funded from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund, the Lottery Fund and the .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund. Parks & Recreation projects for the six-year CIP have $16,365,000 proposed for funding, constituting 11% of the six-year CIP. Capital projects for 2010 have $2,632,500 proposed for funding. These projects make up 8% of the 2010 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • Valmont City Park (Phase 1) - During the process of updating the concept plan for Valmont City Park (VCP), the community has expressed a desire to begin development of part of the park as soon as possible. In response, staff has identified funding for the proposed Phase 1 of VCP (completing the portion of the park north of Valmont Road). This would allow for construction of the bike park, dog park and other associated park amenities. Park development will meet service standards outlined in the department's master plan. • East Boulder Community Park - This project will complete the development of the East Boulder Community Park. Approximately 15 acres of the 53 acre park remain to be constructed. The revised concept plan (adopted in 2008) includes two artificial turf multi-use fields an identified deficiency within Boulder, by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Boulder Valley School District), a permanent dog park, shelter and restrooms, and associated infrastructure, ' utilities and park amenities. TRANSPORTATION FUND, TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND Funding for city transportation projects comes from several different sources. The transportation Fund is primarily supported by the dedicated sales tax, Highway Users Tax, County. Road and Bridge fund, State Highway Mainienance and Landscape Funds and Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A legacy for Users (SAFE TEA-L U). The proposed 2010-2015 Transportation Fund & Transportation Development Fund CIP is $23,359,000, which constitutes 16% of the six-year projection. Projects proposed for funding in 2010 total $6,514,000. These 10 projects constitute 20.2% of the 2010 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • 28th Street, Baseline to Iris - Continued funding is proposed (in both the Transportation Fund and the Transportation Development Fund) from 2009-2014 for improvements to 28`h Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue. The planning study and the CEAP for the southern section-Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section-Pearl to Iris, are complete and have been approved by City Council. Recommended improvements include: Urban design, landscaping, streetscape improvements throughout the corridor; transit service and facility improvements including queue jumps, super stops and route modifications; bike and pedestrian facility improvements including constructing multi-use paths; adding raised crossing at free right turn lanes; traffic efficiency improvements including adding left turn 11 y lanes at various intersections and widening the Boulder Creek bridge. Project funding began pre 1997 and will end post 2015. In addition the BVRC Connections plan addresses improvements in the middle section from Arapahoe to Pearl. Minor improvements were coordinated with the 29th St. development but the majority of the BVRC improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl are not included in the CIP. Portions of the 28th Street corridor implementation completed to date include all of the south section from Arapahoe to Baseline except for the west side of 28th between Colorado Ave. and Baseline Rd. In the north section from Pearl Street to Iris Avenue, the intersections at Iris Ave. and Pearl St. along with a pedestrian crossing and bike/bus/right turning vehicle lanes in the vicinity of the intersections have been completed. The Valmont intersection work is planned to be constructed in late 2008 or early 2009. The next project to be constructed after the Valmont intersection will be the on the west side of 28th Street on the south section between Colorado and Baseline adjacent to the University of Colorado. • Broadwav/Euclid Multimodal Improvements - This project includes the following improvements to address bicycle and pedestrian conflicts at the Broadway/Euclid intersection, adjacent RTD transit stops, and associated bicycle/pedestrian zones: construction of a bicycle/pedestrian underpass under Broadway at or near Euclid; installation of bicycle racks; associated realignment of the multi-use path on the east side of Broadway; relocation of the northbound RTD bus stop to the north of Euclid Avenue; and expansion of the southbound RTD bus stop and other local circulation and access improvements. The proposed project is a partnership between the city, RTD, CU, and BVSD. Funding for this project is included in the CIP and will be combined with federal funding and funding from other partners. This $7.4 million project breakdown is as follows: FHWA ($3.4M), CDOT ($400k), CU ($1.6M), Boulder County ($500k), RTD ($570k), and the City of Boulder ($920k). r AIRPORT FUND The proposed 2010-2015 Airport Fund CEP is $789,474, constituting less than 1% of the city-wide -six-year-projection. No projects are proposed for funding in 2010. One project is scheduled for funding in 2011 for $789,474, associated with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) entitlement funds that are provided to Boulder Municipal Airport every four years, which will be used to rehabilitate a portion of the aircraft parking apron. ' TRIBUTARY GREENWAYS The proposed 2010-2015 Tributary Greenways CEP is $2,700,000, which constitutes 1.9% of the six- year projection. Projects proposed for funding in 2010 total $450,000. These 5 projects constitute 1 % of the 2010 CIP. Funding for the Tributary Greenways program comes from the Lottery Fund, ' Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund and the Transportation Fund ($150,000 each). The Greenways system is comprised of a series of corridors along riparian areas including Boulder Creek and its tributaries, which provide an opportunity to integrate multiple objectives, including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage and floodplain management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists, recreation and cultural resources. Planning for projects along the greenway involves input from Flood Utilities, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, Water Quality and Environmental Services, Environmental Affairs, Planning and Open 12 Space and Mountain Parks. Highlighted Projects: • Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Proiects - This project includes improvements to Wonderland and Fourmile Creek, flood mitigation, environmental restoration and off-street trail. connections. These improvements will be done in conjunction with work being done by the Flood Utilities Division, Transportation Division and the Parks Department. The top three projects include Wonderland at Foothills, Wonderland at 28th and Fourmile 26th to 28th Streets. UTILITIES FUNDS Funding for the city's Utilities capital improvement projects is derived from general utility fees and special external agency grants. The primary revenue sources are Plant Investment Fees (PIFs) from new customers, monthly water sales to customers, hydroelectric sales to Xcel Energy and some external federal funding. STORMWATER AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT UTILITY FUND The proposed 2010-2015 Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund CIP is $19,002,711, which constitutes 13% of the six-year projection. 10 projects are scheduled for Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund funding in 2010 for a total of $1,681,090. These projects make up 4.8% of the 2010 CIP. This includes the $150,000 contribution to Tributary Greenways. Highlighted Projects: ' • Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek flood mitigation work. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2009. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. Projects that provide multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new culvert and pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad and Boulder White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. The city applied for TIP funding for this project and although the project did not make the first funding cut it is still possible the city will receive , matching funds. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND The proposed 2010-2015 Wastewater Utility Fund CIP is $16,611,982, which constitutes 12% of the six-year projection. 7 projects are scheduled for Wastewater Utility Fund funding in 2010 for a total of $9,396,102. These projects make up 29.2% of the 2010 CIP. 13 Highlighted Projects: • WWTF Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection This project has been maintained at $4,400,000 in the 2010 CEP. The UV disinfection project will replace the plant's gas chlorine and sulfur dioxide systems, representing a significant safety upgrade. The UV Disinfection system design was originally a component of the 2006/2008 WWTF Liquid Stream Upgrades project. Because of funding limitations, the city was not able to award that bid item in the l; construction contract. Funds have been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction phases respectively. It is anticipated that bonds will need to y be issued to fund the construction of this project. ll • WWTF Biosolids Digester This project has been reduced from $7,800,000 to $4,000,000 in the 2010 CIP. The plant's digestion process is old and is experiencing various problems and limitations associated with the following: capacity, poor mixing, poor operational flexibility, lack of redundancy, and aging electrical and mechanical facilities. Carollo Engineers recently completed a comprehensive digester evaluation which presented various digester process modifications ranging in cost between $2,000,000 and $10,000,000. City staff is evaluating the various alternatives to determine which improvements will best address the plant's critical needs over both the short-term and long-term. The digester alternatives will also be evaluated relative to other high priority WWTF needs including UV Disinfection and Headworks improvements. Funds have been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction phases respectively. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. WATER UTILITY FUND The proposed 2010-2015 Water Utility Fund CIP is $31,756,083, which constitutes 22% of the six- year projection. 11 projects are proposed for funding in 2010 for a total of $4,705,821. These projects make up 14.6% of the 2010 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • Continued emphasis on the rehabilitation and improvement of the city's existing water system infrastructure continues, especially in the area of the city's deteriorated water distribution system. This is reflected in funding for the Waterline Replacement project and several other rehabilitation projects for water system facilities. Funding for waterline replacement has been reduced. A recent staff analysis indicates that a funding level of $2,100,000 (2008 dollars) should be sufficient to maintain the current service level, as defined by water main breaks, over the next decade. Funding has been adjusted to reflect ' anticipated construction costs inflation of 3 percent each year. The replacement program is coordinated with the Transportation Division street overlay and reconstruction program. • Funding for construction of the proposed Carter Lake Pipeline has been delayed until the 2016-2017 time period, however this project has been left in the CIP packet as a project with no funding in the six-year CIP. Funding of the pipeline in the nearer term without Federal funding assistance would have a significant impact on water rates. Staff continues to recommend the pipeline as the best long-term solution to water quality, operational and security vulnerability issues related to drawing water directly from the Boulder Feeder Canal and Boulder Reservoir. By delaying the schedule for pipeline construction, more time is available to secure Federal funding assistance. 14 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Totals by Funding Source 2014 2015 TOTAL % of 6yr total % of 10 total FUND 2010 2011 2012 2013 7 Airport Fund' AF 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789.474 AF 1 % AF 0.0% Downtown Comm. District Fund DCD 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250.000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 DCD 2% DCD 3.9% Capital Development Fund CDF 580.000 50,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,660,000 CDF 1.2% CDF 1.8% Education Excise Tax EET 0 0 EET 0.0% EET 0.0% Facilt Renovation & Replacement Fund FRRF 569,000 965,000 661,000 521,000 1,021,000 0 3.737.000 FRRF 3% FRRF 1.8% General Fund GF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GF 0% GF 0.0% General Fund - Trash Tax Revenues GFTT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GM 0.0% GFTT 0.0% Greenways GNWY 450.000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 2,700,000 GNWY 1.9% GNWY 1.4% Lottery Fund" LOT 825,000 825,000 825,000 825.000 825.000 825,000 4.950,000 LOT 3.4% LOT 2.6% Open Space OS 4,150,000 2,322,165 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 23,072,165 05 16% OS 12.9% Parks & Rec..25 Sales Tax Fund PR 600,000 950,000 800,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 5,050,000 PR 3.5% PR 1.9% Permanent Parks & Rec. Fund PPR 1,620,000 2,570,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 1,350,000 850,000 8,840,000 PPR 6% PPR 5.0% Transportation Development Fund' TDF 480,000 520,000 620.000 520,000 620,000 520,000 3,280,000 TDF 2% TDF 1.5% Tr_; portation Funds, TF 6,034,000 2,604,000 2,604,000 2,729,000 3,704.000 2,404,000 20,079,000 TF 140 TF 18.7% S.t!n.water & Flood Management Utility Fund`," SFMUF 1,531,090 2,713,909 6,418,826 2,231,855 2,238,811 2,968.220 18,102,711 SFMUF 13% SFMUF 4.8% Wastewater Utility Fund WWUF 9,396,102 1,014,957 1,536.059 1,181,921 932,358 2,548,585, 16.611,982 WWUF 12% WWUF 29.2% Water Utiili Fund WUF 4,705,821 5.682,870 5,746,102 4,874,043 3,805,010 6,942,237 31,756,083 WUF 229° WUF 14.6% TOTAL 32,205,813 22,722,175 26,167,987 19,907,819 20.296.1791 22,858,042 144,158,o15 100% too% % of early total 22% 15% 18% 14% 14% 16% 100% 'Funding listed in this table includes external funding. Funding for Tributary Greenways removed from Transp Fund, Lottery and Stormwater Fund 612812009 2010cip.xfs r r ~r r~ r~ r r r rr r UNFUNDED LIST - ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Fund Name $ Essential $ Desireable S Discretiona $ Total Ai ort Fund" $0 $0 $0 SO Downtown Commercial District Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Development Fund $0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 Education Excise Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 Facil Renovation & Replacement Fund $3,300,000 $2,300.000 $1,800,000 $7,400,000 General Fund $0 $0 $5,700,000 $5,700,000 General Fund - Trash Tax Revenues $0 $0 $0 $0 Greenwa s $0 $0 $0 $0 Lottery Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 Open Space $0 $0 $0 $0 Parks & Rec. 1995 Ballot $0 $0 $0 $0 Permanent Parks & Rec. Fund $23,815,000 $0 $6,600,000 $30,415,000 Transportation Development Fund' $0 $0 $0 $0 Transportation Fund', " $0 $73,000,000 $0 $73,000,000 Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund'," $0 $0 $0 $0 Wastewater Utilitv Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 Water Utility Fund $o $0 $0 $0 $27,115,000 $75,300,000 $14,750,000 $117,165,000 Department Name $ Essential $ Desireable $ Discretiona $ Total CAGID $0 $0 $0 $0 Libra (FAM $3,300,000 $2,300,000 $1,800,000 $7,400,000 Fire-Rescue $0 $0 $6,350,000 $6,350,000 Greenwa s $0 $0 $0 $0 Open Space $0 $0 $0 $0 Parks & Recreation $23,815,000 $0 $6,600,000 $30,415,000 Transportation $0 $73,000,000 $0 $73,000,000 Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Wastewater Utility $0 $0 $0 $0 Water Utility $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,115,000 $75,300,000 $14,750,000 $117,165,000 i 16 2010 - 2015 CIP UNFUNDED PROJECTS -ACTION PLAN CIP Fund Department Project % Essential ; Essesnlial S Discretionary ; Desireable Total' Curren Possible Sources of Project in Notes Desirable Operating Funding Funding (growth related? Master Plan? Discretionary Costs DET funding include?) eneral Fund 1 Fire Wlldland Fire Cache 100% Desirable 5650,000 e@d Partially growth related. N The Fire Department is updating apital Possible ARRA funding in [heir Master Plan in 2009. New evelopment 2009 project put in for 2010. and Fire Fire Station 6 Replacement 100% Desirable 52.350.000 N The Fire Department is updating eneral Fund their Master Pram in 2009 Fire Fire Apparatus Replacement 100% Desirable 52.900,000 950,000 General Fund or Special Tax N The Fire Department is updating Schedule District their Master Plan in 2009 eneral Fund Fire Radio System upgrade 100% Desirable $450,000 N The Fire Department is updating .eneral Fund then Master Plan In 2009 acility Library Marn Library Small Upgrades 100% Desirable $1,200,000 No added Y enovation & (Signage. Elevators, Bridge area, etc) costs. eplacement and lLibrary Main Library-Book Return 1100% Essential $1,000.000 not applicable Partially Additional revenue source Y Replacement and Systemwide funded needed for Systemwide Malerlal Secruity System (W14K) in Material Safety System is library ERF. $466K of total $1M cost. Part of the remainder will acility enovation & come from the library's The Library Department has operating budget and part updated the 2007 Library Master enlacement will be included in future Plan with their 2009 Facilities and budget recrests. SustainabllrtyStudy. Library Main Library Renovation Varies 52.300.000 S1,100,000 $1,800,000 not applicable FAM-FRR Future Library Tax/Bond Y The Library Department has v Issue updated the 2007 Library Master Plan with their 2009 Facilities Sustainability Study. The project is divided Into three parts with the acility highest priorities being relocating enovation 8 Children's Services and eplacement infrastructure repairs. Second Lind hfc hest priorities Include ermanent Parks and Capital Replacement Program - Park 100% Essential 54,500,000 to be $700,0001 Y Capilal replacement analysis is arks and .25 Recreation facilities system wide delermiried year underway for estimating deferred ales Tax mainlenance needs. Cost estimates to date include a round renovation, irrigation ermanent Parks and Complete development of 1oD% Esser ial S1a,440,000 to be $7,700,000 in Y Completion of community, arks and .25 Recreation community, neighborhood and determined P&R CIP neighborhood and pocket parks is ales Tax pocket parks in Action Plan, Transit Village Area pocket park and plaza development are in Vision Plan. Parial fundln is anticipated to 2010 - 2015 CIP UNFUNDED PROJECTS -ACTION PLAN CIP Fund Department Project %Essen tial 5 Essesntlal 5 Discretionary $ Deslreable Total Current Possible Sources of Project in Notes Desirable Operating Funding Funding (growth related? Master Plan? Discretionary Costs DET funding Include?) Permanent Parks and Gapital Replacement Program - 10096 Essential $875,000 to be ceded $300,0001 Y Capital replacement analysis is Parks and .25 Recreation recreation facilities system wide determined year underway for estimating deferred Sales Tax maintenance needs. Cost estimates to dale Include improvements al spurts fields and improvements at recreation centers and other facilities renovations and energy Permanent Parks and Aquatics improvements 100% Desirable $2,500,000 to be 51,100,000 in Y Pool improvements at Scott Parks and .25 Recreation determined 2011 Carpenter Pool. Will coordinate Sales Tax with FAM. Permanent Parks and Flatirons Golf Course Improvements 100X, Desirable $3.000,000 $1,400,000 $I.W.000 Y Includes replacement of irrigation Parks and .25 Recreation system, upgrades to goM course, Sales Tax and replacement of gofi operations center. Spedfrc capital needs will be dentdtee in Permanent Parks and Boulder Reservoir 100% Desirable $1,100,000 $830,000 $600,000 Y The Boulder Reservoir Master Parks and .25 Recreation Plan wits be completed during the Sales Tax 1st quarter of 2010 and will 1include improvements to the buildings, docks, wales. front Permanent Parks and Relocation of Parks Operations 100% Desirable to be determined W.0001per none Y The Yards Master plan is being Parks and .25 Recreation Facility year updated. Staff will coordinate Sales Tax options through that process. Trar OD tenon Public Completion of all Pedestrian Mode 100% Desirable none New revenue source needed Y Fully funded plan would complete Fundrrrans. WorkslTranspo transportation systems as Identified all modal systems (Bike. Development rtation in the TMP Fund Pedestrian, Transit arid Auto) and 59,000,000 Su ort a cafe red level of life Transportation Public Completion al all Bicycle Mode 100% Desirable none New revenue source needed Y Fully funded plan would complete Fund/Trans. WorksfTranspo (transportation systems as identified all modal systems (Bike, Development rtallon In the TMP Pedestrian, Transit and Auto.) and Fund 511,000,000 su rt a referred level of life_ Transportation Public Completion of all Transit Mode 100% Desirable none New revenue source needed Y Fully funded plan would complete Fund/Trans. WorkslTranspo transportation systems as identified all modal systems (Bike, Development nation in the TMP Pedestrian, Transit and Auto) and Fund 52,000,000 support a referred level of life Transportation Public Completion of all Roadway Mode 100% Desirable none New revenue source needed Y Fully funded plan would complete Fund/Trans. Works/Transpo transportation systems as identified all modal systems (Bike. Development rtatlon in the TMP Pedestrian, Transit and Auto) and Fund 58,000,000 support a erefemed level of life Transportation Public Completion of all TDM Mode 100% Desirable none New revenue source needed Y Fully funded plan would complete Fundrrrens. Worksffranspo transportation systems as identified all modal systems (Bike. Development rtation in the TMP Pedestrian, Transit and Auto) and Fund 541,000,000 support a referred level of life i 2010 - 2015 CIP UNFUNDED PROJECTS - ACTION PLAN CIP Fund Department Project % Essential S Essesntial S Discretionary 5 Desireable Total Curren Possible Sources of Project in (Notes Desirable Operating Funding Funding (growth related? Master Plan? Discretionary Costs DET funding Include?) fransportation Public Completion of all Mitigation Mode 100% Desirable note New revenue source needed Y Fully funded plan would complete =und/Trans. WorkslTranspo transportation systems as identified all modal systems (Bike. development nation in the TMP Pedestrian, Transit and Auto) and =und $2.000,000 support a preened level of life Totals 327,115,000 s7s,300,00e $1A 750 t>og VOTES: 1. Cost estimates are very rough and should not be used for long range planning purf f9 UNFUNDED LIST - VISION PLAN SUMMARY Department Name $ Essential $ Desireable $ Discretionary $ Total Downtown Commercial District $1,800,000 $0 51,200,000 $3,000,000 Libra FAM $0 $0 $22,550,000 $22,550,000 Fire-Rescue $0 $0 $5,700,000 $5,700,000 Greenwa s $0 $0 $0 $0 Open Space $0 $0 $0 $0 Parks & Recreation $1,580,000 $20,000,000 $25,500,000 $47,080,000 Transportation $0 $143,287,000 $0 $143,287,000 Stormwater & Flood Management Utility $0 $0 so $0 Wastewater Utility $0, $0 so $0 Water Utility $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,380,000 $163,287,000 $54,950,000 $221,617,000 Note: Cost estimates are very rough and should not be used for long range planning purposes, and are a compilation of estimates from departments 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 20 f r TRANSPORTATION FUND 2010 - 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2010 Transportation Fund Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is $6,184,000. The CIP has been developed within the context of the Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The plan goals and priorities were used in allocating funds and prioritizing projects. The TMP is underpinned by the concept of investing in our transportation infrastructure to maintain today's level of service (LOS). The goals/objectives are stated in terms of no increase in traffic congestion. The investment strategy is based on making significant improvements to the pedestrian, bicycle and transit systems, and maintaining and making efficiency improvements to the roadway system. Transportation 2010-2015 CIP - Modal Investment Breakout 2010 2010-2015 Modal/Functional Area $ % $ % Pedestrian 2,790,908 45% 9,448,447 45% Bicycle 2,120,063 34% 5,423,379 26% Transit 968,694 16% 2,445,165 12% Roadway 304,335 5% 2,437,010 12% Travel Demand Management (TDM)* 0 0% 0 0% Mitigation 0 0% 0 0% Other 0 0% 1,225,000 5% Total 6,1$4 000 100% 20,979,000 100% *Note: TDM programs are included in the operating budget. The TMP is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. The TMP advocates that we: • adequately preserve the existing infrastructure; • strive to increase safety; • maximize the efficiency of our existing systems (pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and roadway); and • enhance mobility through investments in the completion of the alternative transportation system (pedestrian, bicycle, and transit) In the fall of 2008, the TMP was amended to incorporate a "Complete Streets Investment Program" which identifies a strategic set of improvements. The Complete Streets Program augments the TMP's focus on multimodal corridors with priority connections designed to optimize the planned FasTracks regional transit services, and with other community priorities. The Complete Streets Investment Program assumes a funding level between the Current Funding and Action Plan levels of funding. This approach focuses limited resources on the streamlined 21 and strategic set of projects that will most benefit the community. POLICY ISSUES The Transportation Fund is experiencing a reduction in received and expected sales tax of over nine percent compared to what was budgeted last year. Also, as mentioned below, DRCOG TIP federal funding is bringing us fewer funds for capital projects. As a result of the declining revenues, this fund has had to reduce expenditures by approximately $1.1 Million annually. This reduction even accounts for increased revenues from the State's Highway User Tax Fund due to the FASTER bill passed in the latest legislative session. HIGHLIGHTS Broadway/Euclid Multimodal Improvements- This project includes wide-ranging transportation and safety improvements to address bicycle and pedestrian conflicts at the Broadway/Euclid intersection. Included are improvements to adjacent RTD transit stops, associated bicycle/pedestrian zones, construction of a bicycle/pedestrian underpass under Broadway near or at Euclid, installation of bicycle racks, associated realignment of the multi-use path on the east side of Broadway, relocation of the northbound RTD bus stop to the north of Euclid Avenue, expansion of the southbound RTD bus stop, as well as other local circulation and access improvements. Future growth in use at this location due to phased in Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and other transit service expansion will. exacerbate current problems leading to more pedestrian and bicycle conflicts, increased traffic congestion and bus delay and conflicts. Research from the Fastracks Local Optimization Facilities study conducted by the city in partnership with Boulder County, RTD, and the University of Colorado (CU) in 2007, indicates that the Broadway Transit stop at CU/Euclid is one of the busiest locations in the RTD system accommodating over 1,280 bus trips per day and is a major stop in the local and regional transit system. TAB recommended and City Council approved submitting this project for federal funding. The proposed project is a partnership between the city, RTD, CU, CDOT, Boulder County and Boulder Valley School District. Funding for this project is included in the CIP and will be combined with federal and partner funding. 28th Street - 28`}' Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue continues to be identified as the top priority corridor in the city's multi-modal grid. Implementation of the 28th Street Project is a high priority of the Capital Improvements Program. The public input, design and approval process have been completed for the south segment (Baseline to Arapahoe - Hello Boulder) and the north segment (Pearl to Iris - Service City). The Boulder Valley Regional Center Transportation Network plan process was completed in the middle segment (Arapahoe to Pearl - New Town.) Some median replacement work was coordinated in the middle section with the 29`h Street development. Funding has been programmed for 28th Street since 2002. Because the funding is incremental over several years, only short segments of the street can be completed at a time. Improvements started in the south section and then more recently have been completed in the ' north segment. The next project will be at the 281hNalmont intersection and then work will shift back to the south section to complete the multi-use path along the west side of the University of Colorado frontage from Colorado to Baseline. Funding is also provided in the Transportation 22 Development Fund. Because of decreased revenues, funding for this project in the Transportation Fund is reduced by $150,000 annually. TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation - This money has been budgeted to implement smaller transportation connections, and missing links in the transportation system that have been identified through the Fastracks Local Optimization Process to provide better access to the three Transit Centers identified at Broadway/Euclid, 30`-h/Pearl and downtown at Walnut and 15th. Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements - This project provides the city's share of funding from the Transportation Fund for transportation facilities in the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP). The city's share of these improvements pays for improvements with community-wide benefits or enhancements beyond those required of development. These improvements will be phased with the redevelopment of the area over many years. The city's share of funding will contribute to construction of Junction Place as a new collector, the bridge over Goose Creek for Junction Place, bike lanes and pedestrian amenities on Junction Place, multimodal paths, underpasses and connections, pedestrian connections, pedestrian lighting, public art and traffic signals. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act The Transportation Division has received stimulus money funding in 2009 as a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Funds were allocated through the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG), who awarded us funding for two projects. The first is for pedestrian improvements at the intersection of Spruce and Folsom in the amount of $320,000. The second is for the design and construction of ADA curb ramps at various locations throughout the city for $505,000. FINANCING Funding for city transportation projects comes from several different sources. A dedicated sales tax, Highway Users Tax, County Road and Bridge funds, State Highway Maintenance and Landscape Funds and Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) federal funds primarily support the Transportation Fund. Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Program One project remains from the 2007 DRCOG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) submission. The 2010-2015 CIP requires matching funds from the Transportation Fund for this project. The Transportation Fund project is the Broadway/Euclid Multi-modal Improvements Project. The city was able to partner with other agencies to assist with the funding of this project. This $7.4 million project was awarded $3.4 M of federal funds and will be funded through a partnership of stakeholders including CDOT ($400k), CU ($1.6M), Boulder County ($500k), RTD ($570k), and the City of Boulder ($920k). The city of Boulder applied for funding for the maximum number of project submissions allowed in 2007, 8 projects. Leveraging federal funds has become more difficult as the availability of these funds has diminished. Also, there are fewer projects to submit for funding within the city 23 of Boulder that are high DRCOG priorities based not on being in specific corridors or of a certain project type. The next submittal opportunity for DRCOG TIP federal funding will be in 2010 as DRCOG has moved the application process from a two year cycle to a three year cycle. 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed based on the policy guidance of the TMP with the identified multimodal corridor emphasis. Expenses in the "Other" category reflect Transportation commitments in the city's contract with Pollard Motors to prepare the City Maintenance Yards frontage along Pearl Parkway for potential Pollard business relocation. The site preparation includes items such as power line relocation, site grading, and fencing in order for the Pollard's to relocate their business if they exercise their option to purchase the Yards frontage. Revenues associated with the future sale of Yards frontage property are anticipated to offset these expenses. Transportation and Utilities will share in the acquisition costs of replacement land adjacent to the Municipal Service Center. Even without the Pollard option component of the Yards property, the Yards reconfiguration away from Pearl Parkway frontage and to the west is consistent with the Yards Master Plan. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The 2010 Transportation CIP is predicated on improving Boulder's infrastructure. Any operating project impacts are either absorbed within operating budgets or addressed through the annual budgeting process. BUSINESS PLAN Aligning with the policies of the Transportation Master Plan is an important aspect of the Transportation Budget's guiding principles. In Council/Board budget processes, the following priorities and strategies have been used to develop the Transportation budget: ► Maintain Integrity of Transportation Prioritization, in order: - Maintenance and Operations (Essential) - Multimodal System Expansion (Desirable) - Enhancements without system performance benefit (Discretionary) ► Achieve Sustainable Budget Over Time ► Continue Efficiency Improvements ► Maintain Leveraged Funded Projects ► Reduce Boulder Transit Village (BTV) debt through annual operating savings if available The essential, desirable, discretionary categories of funding are derived similarly and are described below with examples: 1.) Essential Services include Operation and Maintenance of Existing System to Maintain Public Safety. Examples include pothole repair, street resurfacing, taking care of signs and signals, addressing safety issues and basic levels of existing direct service for all modes, etc. Quality of life is addressed in this area though air quality, quality of experience in travel (e.g. addressing failing streets, potholes, sidewalk hazards, etc.), and maintaining a reliable system (e.g. traffic signals functioning and in 24 good condition). 2.) Desirable Services include Expansion of Multimodal System - All modal system expansion has been slowed. The expansion of the multimodal system includes roadway, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and travel demand management projects, programs and services. Examples include new sections of path, sidewalk, improved roadway segments and intersections, expanded transit service and increases to Eco Pass enrollment. If a citizen sees a project it is highly likely that it either has p leveraged funds, is associated with a capital maintenance project, or both. Quality of life enhancement consists of improving system performance, providing more travel choices, connecting citizens to basic needs and activities, improved air quality, and increasing mobility. Also, a capital improvements program helps support the community's economic vitality efforts. 3.) Discretionary Services include Mitigation Protects - Examples include noise walls ~ and Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation such as traffic circles, bulb outs, speed bumps, etc. This area of the budget does not improve system performance or preserve the quality or integrity of the infrastructure and/or system. Until the economy recovers sufficiently or new revenue sources are secured, we will not be considering any new mitigation projects. TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) ACTION City Council has charged the Board to: "review all city transportation environment assessments and capital improvements." In the context of the Capital Improvements Program, the Board is asked to provide a recommendation on the program to the Planning Board and City Council. The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed and made a recommendation on the 2010- 2015 Transportation Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at its June 8, 2009 meeting and discussed the CIP at their May 11, 2009 meeting. The TAB recommended approval of the 2010- 2015 Transportation Development Capital Improvements Program. 25 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades 28th St (Baseline to Iris)1 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 5,160,000 Broadway - Euclid Multimodal improvements 4,115,000 685,000 0 0 0 0 4,800,000 Total: 4,975,000 1,545,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 9,960,000 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction City Yards Frontage Site Preparation for Potential Pollard Relocation 0 0 0 125,000 1,100,000 0 1,225,000 Total: 0 0 0 125,000 1,100,000 0 1,225,000 Iv New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 800,000 TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation 11 130,000 130,000 715,000 715,000 715,000 715,000 3,120,000 Total: 230,000 230,000 915,000 915,000 915,000 715,000 3,920,000 On-Going Projects Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 3,774,000 Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatments 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 450,000 Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total: 979,000 979,000 979,000 979,000 979,000 979,000 5,874,000 Total for Transportation Fund 6,184,000 2,754,000 2,754,000 2,879,000 3,854,000 2,554,000 20,979,000 612612009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 10 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Transportation Fund I Essential Desirable Discretionary I Total Project Type/Name Project # Funding % Funding j % Funding -%-I Funding I % Existing Facility - Enhancements I Upgrades 28th St (Baseline to Iris) I 781743 $215,000 25% $645,000 75% $0 $860,00 010 010 07 Broadway - Euclid Multimodal Improvements 781048 T $617,250 15% $3,497,750 ~ 85% F $0 $4,115,000 100% New Construction - Growth Related Facility 1 Additions Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements 781xxx $0 $100,000 100% $0 $100,000 100% TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation II 781x46 $0 $130,000 100% $0 $130,000 100% On-Going Projects _ Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements 781692 $0 $125,000 100% $0 $125,000 100% Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA 781773 $629,000 100% $0 $0 $629,000 100% Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatme 781002 $0 $75,000 100% $0 $75,000 100% Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation 781630 $0 $150,000 100% $0 I $150.000 100% fV 4 Total for Transportation Fund: I $1,461,250 24% 54,722,750 76% $0 I 0% $6,184,000 100% it City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 PW/Transportation 1 I 1 I ~ A6i - ' r/ COI Jay Rd i 61: Boulder Transit Village j Infrastructure Enhancements Iris r 64: City Yards Frontage Site Preparation for Potential Pollard Relocation y - - - Arapahoe Rd. p } - 1 I 60: Broadway/Euclid - ' - Multimodal Improvements 69: 28th St (Baseline to Iris) - - - S Boulder RBI Legend ,i Year of Project S 2010 02011-2015 ~ 2010 = 2011-2015 2010 02011-2015 28 LV 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: 28th St (Baseline to Iris) I 781743 69 Department: PW/ Transportation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Transportation Fund evCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: 2001 - Baseline to Arapahoe 12002 - Pearl to Iris Project Description: These improvements focus on 28th Street from Baseline to Iris. The planning study and the CEAP for the southern section-Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section-Pearl to Iris, are complete and have been approved by City Council. Recommended improvements include: Urban design, landscaping, streetscape improvements throughout the corridor; transit service and facility improvements including queue jumps, super stops and route modifications; bike and pedestrian facility improvements including constructing multi-use paths; adding raised crossing at free right turn lanes; traffic efficiency improvements including adding left turn lanes at various intersections and widening the Boulder Creek bridge. Funding for the northern and southern sections is 1 included in this CIP and will be combined with federal funding and the Transportation Development Fund. Project funding began pre 1997 and will end post 2014. In addtion, the BVRC Connections Plan addresses improvements in the middle section from Arapahoe to Pearl. Minor improvements were coordinated with the 29th St. development but the majority of the BVRC improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl are not included in the CIP. These will occur over time through redevelopment. Portions of the 28th Street corridor implementation completed to date include all of the south section from Arapahoe to Baseline except for the west side of 28th between Colorado Ave. and Baseline Rd. In the north section from Pearl Street to Iris Avenue, the intersections at Iris Ave. and Pearl St. along with a pedestrian crossing and bike/bus/right turning vehicle lanes in the vicinity of the intersections have been completed. The Valmont intersection work is planned to be constructed in 2009. The next project to be constructed after the Valmont intersection will be the on the west side of 28th Street on the south section between Colorado and Baseline adjacent to the University of Colorado. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. I~ Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan and the plan's focus on Multimodal Corridors. Multimodal corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian travel. The project will address and balance the needs of these modes. 28th Street - Iris to Arapahoe is the highest ranked multimodal corridor and 28th Street - Arapahoe to Baseline is the 3rd highest ranked corridor, Public Process Status, Issues: The CEAP for the southern section - Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section - Pearl to Iris- have been approved by City Council. Any of the middle section improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl, will implement Council approved BVRC Connections Plan and will be coordinated with the 29th St. redevelopment. Relationship with Other Departments: This project requires coordination with the Utility Division for utility upgrades, with RTD, CDOT, CU, Arts Commission, the Planning Department and the Real Estate Division and with adjacent developments. Capital Funding Plan } 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $860,000 $860,000 $860,000 $860,000 $860,000 $860,000 $5,160,000 Change from Prior Year: j 29 2010.2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatment 761002 Department: PW/ Transportation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Transportation Fund BvCPArea: Areas I & II Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Pedestrian Facilities program includes the installation of missing sidewalk links and pedestrian crossing/safety treatments and potentially social paths and sidewalk widenings. The list of identified missing sidewalk links has been prioritized for construction. Crossing treatment improvements are prioritized citywide and include median refuge islands, crosswalk lighting, flashing signs, neck-downs, signing, lighting and/or pedestrian signals. The approved Pedestrian Crossing Treatment guidelines will be used to evaluate future pedestrian crossing treatment. Project funding is ongoing. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Plans: According to the Pedestrian Policy Plan of the 2003 Transportation Master Plan, an intermittent pedestrian system that strands pedestrians at the end of unfinished sidewalks or forces them into awkward traverses or I hazardous street crossings discourages walking. In an effort to increase pedestrian activity and encourage walking as the basis of all means of travel, a completed sidewalk system is necessary. Adding features to the pedestrian network such as missing sidewalks links and pedestrian crossing /safety improvements is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: TAB approved the Proposed Prioritized list of Missing Sidewalk Links on May 10, 2004. TAB made a recommendation to support the use of the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines in 2005 and the document went to the City Council as information item in 2006. The Public Process for installing missing sidewalks links is on-going and may involve one or more locations per year. Staff works with neighborhoods and adjacent property owners on individual improvements. Relationship with Other Departments: Coordination with the Parks Department - City Forester is required and the utilities department if there are utility conflicts. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Change from Prior Year: 1 Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Adjacent property owners are responsible for sidewalk maintenance by code. Crossing treatments have minimal maintenance requirements. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable %F_1 0 0% Discretionary Total % 100% 36 1f 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA 781773 Department: PW/ Transportation subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities funding source: Transportation Fund BVCPArea: Areas I & II Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: Project Description: This ongoing program allows for repair, replacement and construction of existing and new sidewalks, and construction of access ramps. Emphasis of this program is given to existing sidewalk repair. Sidewalk repair priorities have been established in the Sidewalk Repair Program and yearly funding is spent accordingly. In 2009, sidewalk repairs are planned to take place between US36, Baseline Road, and Foothills Highway. Compliance with ADA is resulting in additional expenditures for access ramps and driveway modifications. Project funding is ongoing. Community Sustainabillty I Project Justification: Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more ~I walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Plans: This program is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan which places high priority on transportation system preservation and on providing improvements to pedestrian facilities. System maintenance is listed as the highest priority transportation investment in the Investment Policies in the TMP. Public Process Status, Issues: A neighborhood meeting is held for the identified repair area owners in advance of the work starting and individual notices are mailed out yearly to the adjacent property owners. Relationship with Other Departments: Coordination with the Parks Department - City Forester is required adjacent to street trees. Coordination with the city Utility Division regarding water meter location is also required. 1 Capital Funding Plan j3 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $629,000 $629,000 $629,000 $629,000 $629,000 $629,000 $3,774,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Adjacent property owners are generally responsible for sidewalk maint. This project does reduce some need to lace temporary asphalt patches on sidewalks. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 37 I 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: ITIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation II 781x46 a Department: PW/ Transportation Subcommunlty: System-wide Funding Source: Transportation Fund BvcPArea: Areas I & II Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility/ Additions CEAP Required: IVo LEAP Completed: As appropriate Project Description: Funding is for coordination with the FasTracks implementation including bike and pedestrian improvements and transit ammenities. This money will likely be used as local match to leverage against potential federal funding for projects submitted in future year's DRCOG TIP submittal process or for smaller projects identified through the FasTracks local optimization (FLO) process. This project is growth related because it will be coordinated with development in the area of the FasTracks facilities. Community Sustainability 1 Project Justification: The proposed use of this money meets the transportation funding principals of leveraging our dollars where possible and the identified projects will be directed at high priority multimodal corridors and Fastracks facilities. Relationship to Master Plans: As identified in the Transportation Master Plan Update Transit Policies and the Transit Village Area Plan, the city will focus on transit access through a variety of capital improvements including the Boulder Transit Village, transit priority lanes, transit super stops, improved bike parking and continuous pedestrian connections. Public Process Status, issues: Public Process, CEAP and design to be determined in relationship to specific projects. Relationship with Other Departments: ` As the projects are refined necessary interdepartmental coordination will be identified. Capital Funding Plan -1 J 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding ~J)f $130,000 $130,000 $715,000 $715,000 $715,000 $715,000 $3,120,000 U Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: TBD Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 38 P 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation 781630 Department: PW/ Transportation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities i Funding Source: Transportation Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The program is intended to improve and protect the many riparian corridors that pass through the city. Elements of this work also advance a primary goal of the TMP by providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and encouraging the modal shift from automobiles to alternative modes of transportation. Improvements include pedestrian/bicycle paths, drainage and flood control structures, and preservation and enhancement of natural ~q1 features. A portion of the capital funding for this program was shifted to needed maintenance of existing system beginning in 2002. See Greenways CIP/Budget section. Project funding is ongoing. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Plans: These projects will advance a primary goal of the 2003 Transportation Master Plan by providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities to work towards the 2025 objective to reduce single occupant-vehicle travel to 25% of trips. Public Process Status, Issues: CEAP's are completed for all significant greenways projects and are reviewed by appropriate boards. See Greenway CIP for more detailed information. Relationship with Other Departments: The Greenways program requires coordinating with Transportation, Open Space, Flood Utility, Planning and Parks Departments. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs 1which will be programmed in the Transportation or Utilities Fund budget. Source of Funding: Transportation/Utilities operating or Urban Drain. Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 39 i TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND 2010 - 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2010 Transportation Development Fund (TDF) Capital Improvements Program is $480,000. The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed within the context of the 4 Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The plan goals and priorities were used in allocating funds and prioritizing projects. Transportation 2010-2015 CIP - Modal Investment Breakout 2010 2010-2015 Modal/Functional Area $ % $ % Pedestrian 160,570 33% 1,018,022 31% Bicycle 111,978 23% 718,459 22% Transit 53,010 11% 346,796 11% Roadway 154,442 32% 1,196,723 36% Travel Demand Management (TDM) 0 0% 0 0% Mitigation 0 0% 0 0% Other 0 0% 0 0% Total 480,000 100% 3,280,000 100% r The city Transportation Development Excise Tax is based on the philosophy of assessing a fee on development to mitigate impacts on the street network. Rates are adjusted annually based on the CPI. POLICY ISSUES ~J Last year, City Council requested that staff move forward with the consulting firm TischlerBise to prepare an updated Development Excise Tax study. City Council reviewed the initial study on July 22, 2008 and provided staff with direction to move forward. On October 18, 2008, City Council held a study session to review all proposed development-related fee and tax changes comprehensively. On June 2, 2009, staff requested Council direction on implementation of the ' Development Impact Fee and Development Excise Tax studies. Council passed a motion supporting funding fire, human services, library, police, municipal facilities, and parks and recreation capital improvements to serve new growth through impact fees rather than excise taxes. This left increased capacity in the Development Excise Tax, which will be used for transportation and park land. This will result in an increase in the amount assessed on new development for transportation uses, but it is difficult to project the revenue increase because of recent economic conditions effecting development within the city and the timing of implementation. A study session is set for July 28, 2009 to determine the next steps. 40 f HIGHLIGHTS 28th Street - 28th Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue continues to be identified as the top priority corridor in the city's multi-modal grid. Implementation of the 28th Street Project is a high t priority of the Capital Improvements Program. The public input, design and approval process have been completed for the south segment (Baseline to Arapahoe - Hello Boulder) and the north segment (Pearl to Iris - Service City). The Boulder Valley Regional Center Transportation Network plan process was completed in the middle segment (Arapahoe to Pearl - New Town.) Some median replacement work was coordinated in the middle section with the 29th Street development. Funding has been programmed for 28`h Street since 2002. Because the funding is incremental over several years, only short segments of the street can be completed at a time. Improvements started in the south section and then more recently have been completed in the north segment. The next project will be at the 28th/Valmont intersection and then work will shift back to the south section to complete the multi-use path along the west side of the University of Colorado frontage from Colorado to Baseline. Funding is also provided in the Transportation Fund. Due to reduced revenues from development activity, this project has been reduced approximately $43,000 in 2009, and $15,000 in 2010. FINANCING A significant influence on the 2010-2015 Transportation CIP is the reduction in transportation excise tax (TET) revenues. The TET was instituted in the 1980s to fund transportation improvements related to growth. TET is paid by new commercial and residential development. Permanently affordable residential units are exempt. Historically the tax has generated approximately $1 million annually. Revenue in 2008 was approximately $715,000. The 2010- 2015 CIP has been formulated based on anticipated revenue of $450,000 in 2010, and $760,000 in the out years. TET is calculated on net new square footage and dwelling units. As the city transitions to a redevelopment context instead of a green field development pattern, excise taxes will yield lower revenue. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The 2010 Transportation Development Fund CIP is predicated on supporting new growth. Any operating project impacts are either absorbed within operating budgets or addressed through the annual budgeting process. BUSINESS PLAN Aligning with the policies of the Transportation Master Plan is an important aspect of the Transportation Budget's guiding principles. In Council/Board budget processes, the following 41 priorities and strategies have been used to develop the Transportation budget: ► Maintain Integrity of Transportation Prioritization, in order: - Maintenance and Operations (Essential) - Multimodal System Expansion (Desirable) - Enhancements without system performance benefit (Discretionary) ► Achieve Sustainable Budget Over Time ► Continue Efficiency Improvements ► Maintain Leveraged Funded Projects ► Reduce Boulder Transit Village (BTV) debt through annual operating savings if available The essential, desirable, discretionary categories of funding are derived similarly and are described below with examples: 1.} Essential Services include Operation and Maintenance of Existing System to Maintain Public Safety. Examples include pothole repair, street resurfacing, taking care of signs and signals, addressing safety issues and basic levels of existing direct service for all modes, etc. Quality of life is addressed in this area though air quality, quality of experience in travel (e.g. addressing failing streets, potholes, sidewalk hazards, etc.), and maintaining a reliable system (e.g. traffic signals functioning and in good condition). 2.) Desirable Services include Expansion of Multimodal System - All modal system expansion has been slowed. The expansion of the multimodal system includes roadway, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and travel demand management projects, programs and services. Examples include new sections of path, sidewalk, improved roadway segments and intersections, expanded transit service and increases to Eco Pass enrollment. If a citizen sees a project it is highly likely that it either has leveraged funds, is associated with a capital maintenance project, or both. Quality of life enhancement consists of improving system performance, providing more travel choices, connecting citizens to basic needs and activities, improved air quality, and increasing mobility. Also, a capital improvements program helps support the community's economic vitality efforts. 3.) Discretionary Services include Mitigation Projects - Examples include noise walls and Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation such as traffic circles, bulb outs, speed bumps, etc. This area of the budget does not improve system performance or preserve the quality or integrity of the infrastructure and/or system. Until the economy recovers sufficiently or new revenue sources are secured, we will not be considering any new mitigation projects. TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) ACTION City Council has charged the Board to: "review all city transportation environment assessments and capital improvements." In the context of the Capital Improvements Program, the Board is , asked to provide a recommendation on the program to the Planning Board and City Council. 42 The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed and made a recommendation on the 2010- 2015 Transportation Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at its June 8, 2009 meeting and discussed the CIP at their May 11, 2009 meeting. The TAB recommended approval of the 2010- 2015 Transportation Development Capital Improvements Program. 43 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Development Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades 28th St (Baseline to Iris) 11 455,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 2,805,000 Total: 455,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 2,805,000 On-Going Projects Miscellaneous Development Coordination 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 275,000 Signal Maintenance and Upgrade 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 200,000 Total: 25,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 475,000 Total for Transportation Development Fund 480,000 520,000 620,000 520,000 620,000 520,000 3,280,000 r +r ~r s~ s. r r rr r r sr y _ : bowd sand L..d 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 9 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Transportation Development Fund I Essential Desirable Discretionary Total Project Typ"ame Project # Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades _ 28th 5l (Baseline to Iris) 11 711019 $113,750 25% I $341,250 75% $0 5455,000 100% On-Going Projects Miscellaneous Development Coordination 711004 s0 $25,000 100% $0 $25,000 100°!0 Total for Transportation Development Fund: $113,750 24°~ 5366,250 76% $0 $480,000 100% cr J 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: 128th St (Baseline to Iris) 11 711019 69 -1 1 Department: PW/ Transportation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Transportation Development Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility- Enhancements/ Upgrades CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: 2001 - Baseline to Arapahoe / 2002 - Pearl to Iris Project Description: These improvements focus on 28th Streeet from Baseline to Iris. The planning study and the CEAP for the southern section-Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section-Pearl to Iris, are complete and have been approved by City Council. Recommended improvements include: Urban design, landscaping, streetscape improvements throughout the corridor; transit service and facility improvements including queue jumps, super stops and route modifications; bike and pedestrian facility improvements including constructing multi-use paths; adding raised crossing at free right turn lanes; traffic efficiency improvements including adding left turn lanes at various intersections and widening the Boulder Creek bridge. Funding for the northern and southern sections is included in this CIP and will be combined with federal funding and the Transportation Fund. Project funding began pre 1997 and will end post 2014. In addition the BVRC Connections plan addresses improvements in the middle section from Arapahoe to Pearl. Minor improvements were coordinated with the 29th St. development but the majority of the BVRC improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl are not included in the CIP. Portions of the 28th Street corridor implementation completed to date include all of the south section from Arapahoe to Baseline except for the west side of 28th between Colorado Ave. and Baseline Rd. In the north section from Pearl Street to Iris Avenue, the intersections at Iris Ave. and Pearl St. along with a pedestrian , crossing and bike/bus/right turning vehicle lanes in the vicinity of the intersections have been completed. The Valmont intersection work is planned to be constructed in late 2008 or early 2009. The next project to be constructed after the Valmont intersection will be the on the west side of 28th Street on the south section between Colorado and Baseline adjacent to the University of Colorado. Community Sustainability / Project Justiflcation: The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan and the plan's focus on Multimodal Corridors. Multimodal corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian travel. The design and project will address and balance the needs of these modes. 28th Street - Iris to Arapahoe is the highest ranked multimodal corridor and 28th Street - Arapahoe to Baseline is the 3rd highest ranked corridor. Public Process Status, issues: The CEAP for the southern section - Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section - Pearl to Iris- have been approved by City Council. Any middle section improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl, will implement the Council Approved BVRC connections plan. Relationship with Other Departments: This project requires coordination with the Utility Division for utility upgrades, with RTD, CDOT, CU, Arts Commission, the Planning Department and the Real Estate Division and w/ adjacent developments. , Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $455,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $2,805,000 Change from Prior Year: ' 46 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Annual On-going Operating Costs 1 :1 Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be programmed in the Transportation Fund budget. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Business Plan Prioritization of Services: t' Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% i 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 47 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number Map Number: Miscellaneous Development Coordination I 711004 I Department: PW/ Transportation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Transportation Development Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This CIP funding is intended to construct infrastructure improvements in coordination with or prompted by potential private development. Throughout the year situations arise where infrastructure improvements are required in the vicinity of a proposed development, should be made at the same time as the development and for which a developer can not be required to construct. Improvements that are typically included are bike and pedestrian, functional efficiency, safety, system preservation, and transit system improvements. Project funding is ongoing. This project is growth related because it addresses needs from new development. Community Sustalnabllity J Project Justification: The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Plans: Major goals in the Transportation Master Plan include system preservation, safety, bike, pedestrian and auto functional efficiency projects. Public Process Status, Issues: Projects generally require coordination with adjacent neighborhoods and property owners. Relationship with Other Departments: Close coordination with the Development Review work group and the Planning Department is required. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $275,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be programmed in the Transportation Fund budget. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable %F-100-T] Discretionary Total % 100% 48 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Signal Maintenance and Upgrade 711pxx Department: PW/ Transportation subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Transportation Development Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Signal Maintenance and Upgrade project is used for the installation of new traffic signals and upgrades. Due to revenue decreases, funding for this function has been reduced over time. Funding planned for 2010 was removed due to the revenue decreases. Budgeting as a capital project at $100,000 every other year as opposed to budgeting half this amount every year is consistent with the project implementation. ` Community Sustainability ! Project Justification: Growth in traffic volumes and changes in travel patterns periodically result in the need to install new traffic signals to provide safe and efficient traffic flow at intersections for all modes of travel. Decisions to install new traffic r! signals are made on the basis of accident history, traffic delays, and pedestrian and cyclist crossing needs. II Relationship to Master Plans: The goal of the TMP is to provice a multi-modal transportation system. Installation of traffic signals provide access to and accross multi-modal corridors for pedestrians, bikes, automobiles and transit. Public Process status, issues: The public process associated with new traffic signal installations is determined by the location of the new signal and the availability of other alternatives to address the issues to be addressed by the signal installation. Relationship with Other Departments: New traffic signal installations are coordinated with Xcel Energy, which provides power to operate traffic signals. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $200,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be programmed in the Transportation Fund budget. Source of Funding: Existing operating budgets Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 49 AIRPORT FUND 2010 - 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Boulder Municipal Airport Master Plan Update (AMPU) has informed the 2010-2015 CIP. The AMPU was presented to the City Council and approved in January 2007. The CIP projects currently on the 2010-2015 schedule only involves replacing or maintaining existing infrastructure. POLICY ISSUES The Federal Government has reauthorized the FAA spending bill, which is the major source of revenue for this CIP. HIGHLIGHTS The project proposed for 2011 is part of FAA entitlement funds that are provided to the Boulder Municipal Airport on a rotating schedule for maintenance and/or rehabilitation of the airport infrastructure. We received FAA entitlement funds in 2008, which were used for the parking apron , along the taxiway. It is anticipated that the 2011 funds will be used for repaving the aircraft parking ramp. FINANCING Primary funding for Airport Improvement Projects (AIP) is from the FAA, providing 95% of total cost. The CDOT Aeronautics Division usually funds 2.5%, with the remaining 2.5% paid out of the Airport Fund. The maintenance project in 2013 is currently projected to cost $789,474. We anticipate the FAA to approve $750,000 towards this effort. The Airport Fund and a State of Colorado Discretionary Aviation Grant each will contribute $19,737 in matching funds. The Airport Fund is an enterprise fund, which receives no transfer from the General Fund. The Airport supports itself through operating and leasing revenues and federal and state grants. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The airport operating budget pays for the maintenance of all airport improvements. ' BUSINESS PLAN Rehabilitation of airport pavement is designated as 100% essential and is assigned funding by the FAA based on their assessment. Replacement and maintenance of existing pavement is essential for aviation safety and must be performed for the proper functioning of the airport. 50 ■r ~ r r r r~ i r ~ . r r■r lFia.~ ~ V G.~ 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Airport Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Rehabilitate Portion of Aircraft Parking Apron 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789.474 Total: 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789,474 Total for Airport Fund 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789,474 01 City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 PW/Municipal Airport I ~ ~~mg0fV l ~ 79: Rehab of Airport Parking Apron ' ~ gay Rd 'I I 1 I 'j II l 0 I~ r Z M1}. - y - - - _ Ara ahoe Rd. ~ J 1 ~ 1 S Boulder Rd Legend Year of Project • 2010 - - 02011-2015 /"mar>> ! ~ 2010 = 2011-2015 ` =2010 G'~..~' 2011-2015 ~1 . 52 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Rehabilitate Portion of Aircraft Parking Apron 771x09 79 Department: PW/ Municipal Airport Subcommunity: East Boulder Funding Source: Airport Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Rehabilitate a portion of the aircraft parking apron, which will include repairing the subgrade and correcting drainage issues, as needed. Paint aircraft movement lines and install tie-down anchor points after rehabilitation is complete. This project will be primarily funded through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) entitlement program that pays for 95% of the total cost for maintenance and/or rehabilitation of the airport infrastructure. The remaining 5% is split between CDOT and the Airport Fund. f Sources of Funding: FAA $750,000 CDOT Division of Aeronautics $19,737 Airport Fund $19,737 Community Sustainability / Project Jusritlcation: The FAA mandates that the airport infrastructure be properly maintained and provides entitlement funds to pay for repairs. CDOT conducted a pavement evaluation in 2006 and rated the apron with a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 49. With PCIs ranging from 0-100, a 49 falls into the "Major Rehabiliation" category. They also noted "block cracking, depression, bleeding, longitudinal and tranverse cracking, weathering, and raveling." Further degradation will occur if a rehabilitation project is not conducted. t Relationship to Master Plans: This project will be in accordance with the Airport Master Plan Update, which was unanimously approved in January 2007. It has also been carried on CDOT's CIP list since 2003. Public Process Status, Issues: This project was included in the Airport Master Plan Update process, which included open house meetings and mailings to Airport neighbors. Relationship with Other Departments: None at this time. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $789,474 $0 $0 $0 $0 $789,474 i Change from Prior Year: Listed in 2009 CIP as FAA Entitlement Funded Maintainence 2013, funding moved up Annual On-going Operating Costs r Description: Costs are absorbed in Airport operating budget. Source of Funding: Airport Fund Business Plan Prtoritizatlon of Services: E=ssential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % 100% 53 l UTILITIES DIVISION 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW The overall program and funding priorities are reflected in the staging and timing of projects over the 6 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) time period. The following primary factors were considered in determining the overall program and funding priorities: Water and Wastewater Utili 1. Reliability of water and wastewater collection, delivery and treatment 2. Water quality and other environmental regulations 3. Worker health and safety 4. Opportunity to collaborate with other city projects, i.e., transportation 5. Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings 6. Accommodating new growth and development Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 1. Life safety (high hazard) mitigation 2. Flood emergency response capability 3. Critical facility (vulnerable population) hazard mitigation 4. Property damage mitigation 5. Collaboration with other Greenways Program Objectives 6. Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings 7. Accommodating new growth and development No effort has been made in developing the CIP to target improvements in a certain geographic area. This overview memo is consistent with the Utilities Division preliminary budget recommendations. POLICY ISSUES There are no policy issues related to the CIP this year. HIGHLIGHTS Highlights of the proposed CIP are as follows: Water Utility 1. Funding for the next phase of improvements to the Betasso Water Treatment Facility (WTF) has been delayed until the 2015-2016 time period. Water demands have not increased significantly and the existing treatment processes should be adequate to meet 54 water demands in compliance with federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations until that time. 2. Funding for waterline replacement has been reduced. A recent staff analysis indicates that a funding level of $2,100,000 (2008 dollars) should be sufficient to maintain the current service level, as defined by water main breaks, over the next decade. Funding has been adjusted to reflect anticipated construction costs inflation of 3 percent each year. The replacement program is coordinated with the Transportation Division street overlay and reconstruction program. 3. Funds have been budgeted for inspection and possible repair and rehabilitation of the Lakewood Pipeline. Costs would be covered from the Lakewood Pipeline Remediation Reserve. Based on observations made during five internal inspections of Lakewood Pipeline Phase III, immediate and/or extensive repair/remediation efforts are not necessary and monitoring and internal inspections will occur at two-year intervals. The next internal inspection of the pipeline is scheduled for the fall of 2009. Staff is also in the process of developing repair, rehabilitation and replacement alternatives and formulating recommendations concerning a long range plan. Reports on the 2009 inspection and the alternatives analysis will likely be completed in early 2010. The budget recommendations reflect a possible remediation project in 2012 of $1.2 million. This anticipates that the work in 2009 (corrosion rate study, pipe inspection and review of rehabilitation technologies) may result in a project to plan and design in 2010-2011 and construct in 2012. The most likely pilot remediation plan would involve relining the pipeline rather than removal and replacement. 4. Barker Gravity Pipeline is a critical component of the city's source water system because it conveys the city's Barker Reservoir/Middle Boulder Creek water to Betasso WTF. Stored water from Barker Reservoir and direct flows from Middle Boulder Creek are used to meet approximately 35 percent of the city's annual water needs. The city has, as part of an ongoing maintenance effort, already replaced and rehabilitated segments of the I I - mile Barker Gravity Pipeline that showed the most degradation or highest likelihood of 1 failure. The city should continue its annual maintenance program, prioritizing based on the most critical needs, and also consider providing enough cover to protect the pipeline, and anchor the pipeline in areas prone to landslides or other damaging events. Section replacement or lining are options that may each work well in different parts of the pipeline. The city should coordinate with the USFS concerning maintenance activities on federal land. The projected funds will allow for continued minor rehabilitation efforts (repair of leaks, siphons, etc, as has been done over the past several years) and an evaluation of a pilot replacement/lining project through 2014. In 2015 when additional funds are available, the city can potentially begin a full scale replacement/lining project. 55 5. The Barker Dam outlet works should be replaced within the next seven to 10 years as recommended in the SWMP to eliminate the need to empty the reservoir for gate inspection. A design for outlet works replacement was completed by GEI, and initial bids were received in 2002. The cost of the outlet works replacement could be substantially reduced by eliminating one of the proposed microtunnels. ,fl 6. Funding for construction of the proposed Carter Lake Pipeline has been delayed until the 2016-2017 time period. Funding of the pipeline in the nearer term without Federal funding assistance would have a significant impact on water rates. Staff continues to recommend the pipeline as the best long-term solution to water quality, operational and security vulnerability issues related to drawing water directly from the Boulder Feeder Canal and Boulder Reservoir. By delaying the schedule for pipeline construction, more time is available to secure Federal funding assistance. 7. Funding for the automated meter reading project is recommended for the accelerated replacement of the meter's transponders. The original transponders are not lasting as long as originally projected. The recommended funding is $500,000 for 5 years 2009- 2013. 8. A "Future Capital Project Reserve" is reflected in the staff recommended Water Fund Financial in an amount of $1.9 million. This reserve would be available to fund or offset funding for future large capital projects that would likely require the issuance of bonds. Wastewater Utility ' 1. Funding for the 75`h Street Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection project has been maintained at $4,400,000 in the 2010 CIP. The UV disinfection project will replace the plant's gas chlorine and sulfur dioxide systems, representing a significant safety upgrade. The UV Disinfection system design was originally a component of the 2006/2008 WWTF Liquid Stream Upgrades project. Because of funding limitations, the city was not able to award that bid item in the ' construction contract. Funds have been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction phases respectively. It is anticipated that bonds will need to ' be issued to fund the construction of this project. 2. Funding for the 75`h Street WWTF Biosolids Digester project has been reduced from $7,800,000 to $4,000,000 in the 2010 CIP. The plant's digestion process is old and is experiencing various problems and limitations associated with the following: capacity, poor mixing, poor operational flexibility, lack of redundancy, and aging electrical and ' mechanical facilities. Carollo Engineers recently completed a comprehensive digester evaluation which presented various digester process modifications ranging in cost between $2,000,000 and $10,000,000. City staff is evaluating the various alternatives to determine which improvements will best address the plant's critical needs over both the short-term and long-term. The digester alternatives will also be evaluated relative to other high priority WWTF needs including LTV Disinfection and Headworks 56 improvements. Funds have been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction phases respectively. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. 3. Funding for the 75th Street WWTP Headworks Improvements project has been pushed back one year from 2014/2015 to 2015/2016 because of funding limitations in the 6-year CIP. The CIP currently has design and construction funds of $1,560,000 and $15,600,000 identified in 2015 and 2016 respectively for a new headworks facility. The headworks facility is old, and plant staff recently experienced significant operational difficulties when one of the key headworks processes failed during an April 2009 wet weather event. The headworks facility is comprised of four major processes including the following: screenings removal, grit removal, screenings and grit washing and classification, and HVAC. Carollo Engineers is in the process of completing a comprehensive headworks evaluation to identify various individual process upgrades as an alternative to the new facility identified in the 2015/2016 funding. Based on the completed headworks analysis, city staff will incorporate potential headworks improvements projects into the 2011 CIP. 4. Funding for the Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation projects has been reduced to $530,000 in the 2010 CIP. Utilities funded the sanitary sewer rehabilitation line item at $300,000, $625,000 and $720,000 in 2006, 2007, and 2008 respectively. Utilities staff has addressed a significant number of the sanitary sewer collection system's highest priority problems through this effort. The 2009 sanitary sewer rehabilitation CIP funding is ' $800,000. Based on a recent analysis evaluating the sewer collection system facilities "useful life", city staff will be reducing the sanitary sewer rehabilitation line item budget to $500,000 (in 2008 value, escalated at 3% annually) for the CIP as being adequate for the rehabilitation projects. 5. Funding for the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (WWCSMP) projects has been deferred in the Wastewater Utility Fund CIP. The WWCSMP identified numerous potential collection system projects based on hydraulic deficiency. The WWCSMP identified four Tier 1 (highest priority) projects and seven Tier 2 (second highest priority) projects for recommended collection system improvements. The estimated cost (in 2009 dollars) for the Tier 1 and Tier 2 projects was $5,000,000 and $23,000,000 respectively. Additionally, the Master Plan identified ten Tier 3 (lowest priority) projects with an estimated cost of $4,000,000. The recommended collection system projects do not represent the equivalent high priority of the WWTF projects, therefore, the collection ' system projects have been moved outside of the six-year (2010-2015) CIP. Stormwater and Flood Management Utility ' 1. It is recommended that money be budgeted and allocated for flood mitigation work along Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two ' streams should be made by city council in 2009. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. 57 i The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. Projects that provide multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be y, prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new culvert and pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad and Boulder White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. The city applied for TIP funding for this project and although the project did not make the first funding cut it is still possible the city will receive matching funds. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. 2. Money has been allocated for future flood mitigation design and construction for South Boulder Creek. Funding for flood mitigation planning has already been appropriated and the planning work will begin in 2009. On March 25, 2009, FEMA notified the city of Boulder that it intends to officially adopt (effective January 2010) the revised floodplain mapping that resulted from the South Boulder Creek flood mapping study. The new floodplain mapping will be used as the basis for the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that establishes minimum regulatory floodplain boundaries under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and federal mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements. The adoption process for the study results will coincide with the adoption of the related Digital FIRM for Boulder County. It is anticipated that the focus of the mitigation work will be to mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley, where flood impacts were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since occurred. It is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36 Corridor Improvements- Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also pursuing Federal funding for this project. It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2011-2012 to support this work. 3. It is recommended that money be budgeted for flood mitigation design and construction for Gregory Canyon Creek. A recent analysis indicates that several structures could be removed from the high hazard zone based on drainageway and culvert improvements near Pennsylvania Ave. FINANCING Each of the city's utility funds is established as a separate enterprise fund designed to finance and account for each utility's facilities and services. Funding for the Utilities Division capital improvement program is derived primarily from monthly utility fees. In addition to the monthly utility fees, significant revenue sources include Plant Investment Fees (PIFs), from new development or redevelopment and hydroelectric sales to Xcel Energy. Sales from monthly utility fees can be variable and reflect the overall growth of the service area and yearly weather 58 fluctuations. Other revenue sources include reimbursements from the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District (for stormwater/ flood management projects), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) state and federal grants, and revolving loans from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (none anticipated at this time). These revenues are project specific and are highly variable depending on the external agency's funding situation and priorities. Currently, the following projects are anticipated to qualify for such revenues: • Preflood Acquisition • Wonderland Creek • Fourmile Canyon Creek • South Boulder Creek If the above mentioned funds are insufficient, projects will be funded by issuing revenue bonds with the debt service financed by general utility charges. For the years 2010-2015, it is anticipated that new bonds will be issued for the following projects: Wastewater: • Biosolids Digester Improvements ($4.0 million, 2010) • Ultraviolet Disinfection System ($4.4 million, 2010) Stormwater/Flood Management: South Boulder Creek Floodplain Improvements ($3 million, 2012) Construction Cost Inflation Construction cost inflation is tracked using the Engineering News Record (ENR) Cost Index for Denver and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Colorado Construction Cost Index. The ENR index is a composite index based on costs for: 1) local portland cement, 2) local 2x4 lumber, 3) national structural steel, and 4) local union wages plus fringes for carpenters, bricklayers and iron workers. The CDOT index is a composite index based on costs for 1) unclassified excavation, 2) hot bituminous pavement 3) concrete pavement, 4) structural steel and 5) reinforcing steel. The ENR index is more reflective of equipment and building construction such as at the treatment plants. The Colorado cost index is more reflective of heavy civil construction such as roadway and major drainageway work. Construction cost inflation has a dramatic affect on the cost of future project work and has been accounted for in the cost of future projects under the assumption of a 3 percent annual construction cost inflation rate. Staff will continue to monitor and incorporate changes in constructions costs to the CIP. 59 Cummulative Percent Change in ENR Cost Index for Denver 20.00% 18.00% 18.35% 16.00% m 14.00% „ c m t 0 12.00% y A 1069% 10.00% E v 67°.0 aqt 8.00% Q 6.00% 4.00% 2-00% 0.00% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year Cummulative Percent Change In CDOT Colorado Construction Cost Index 120.00% - - - - - 114.05% i 100.00% m can 80-00% r 75 58% U 1 48% E 6000% E U c 40.00% a. 20.00% B 81°.6 O.CO% 2003 2004 2005 20OG 2007 2008 Year 60 RELATIONSHIP TO THE OPERATING BUDGET/ REVENUE INCREASES Utilities Division staff will complete the evaluation of the proposed CIP on rates in conjunction with the development of the 2010 operating budget. The large expenditures associated with the CIP are a major factor that leads to staff recommended rate increases in the future. Various rate increase scenarios are being evaluated as part of the development of the 2010 operating budget in accordance with the city's business plan methodology. For the staff recommended plan, the associated rate increases are currently projected as follows: • Water Utility: 2010 - 3 percent • Wastewater Utility: 2010 - 2 percent • Stormwater and Flood Management Utility: 2010 - 1 percent The proposed 2010 revenue increases would increase a typical residential customer's annual utility bill by approximately $17.00, or an increase of approximately $1.40 per month. BUSINESS PLAN The business plan is intended to be a link between the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP), master plans/strategic plans, subcommunity and area plans, and annual budgets. Master and strategic plans are developed consistent with the policies, plans, and population and employment projections outlined in the BVCP. They provide a common city framework for planning the delivery and funding of services, facilities, and programs. The facility and service priorities and funding plan strategies established through the master and strategic planning process provide the basis for operational budgeting and capital improvement programming. Master Planning is an element of the decision making process for proposed CIP projects. Historically, master plans focused on service area growth and its impact on related utility infrastructure needs. At this point in time, growth is not as important an issue as the need to rehabilitate and address deficiencies in the existing infrastructure. Identification of these issues occurs on an on-going basis and is documented in the Utilities Division Annual Reports as well as on-going studies and reports. Master plan summaries are provided in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan and were recently updated. At this point in time existing master plans provide an adequate basis from which to formulate the CIP in conjunction with other information. Utilities current master plans include: Water • Treated Water Master Plan - updated in 2000 • Source Water Master Plan - accepted by City Council in early 2009 • Water Utility Master Plan -work to begin in 2011 Wastewater • Wastewater Collection System Master Plan • Wastewater Utility Master Plan Both were recommended for acceptance by the WRAB in early 2009 and it is anticipated these will be accepted by City Council in late 2009. ' 61 _j Stormwater/ Flood Mana ement • Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan - updated in 2004 • Stormwater Master Plan -completed in 2007 The relationship of each CIP project to the master plans and studies is presented in the detailed project descriptions. The Utilities Division will update these master plans consistent with the city's Business Plan over the next several years. The Business Plan calls for a separate master plan for each of the Utilities Division three restricted funds. Recent changes to the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan including land use designations are not extensive and so no major changes to existing Utilities Division master plans are required. Aspects that are more important to the Utilities Division CIP planning include the rate of deterioration of existing infrastructure as well as changes in water related regulations and technologies. r The city's business plan methodology calls for the formulation of the following scenarios: 1. Fiscally Constrained Plan 2. Action Plan 3. Vision Plan ADVISORY BOARD ACTION The preliminary CIP was discussed at the Water Resource Advisory Board (WRAB) on May 18, 2009, during which the WRAB requested that an additional revenue option be explored by City staff. At the June 15 meeting, WRAB members voted on the staff recommendations concerning the 2010-2015 Utilities Division CIP as follows: 3-0 in favor of the proposed Water Utility CIP including a 3 percent rate increase 2-1 in favor of the proposed Wastewater Utility CIP including a 2 percent rate increase (the dissenting vote was lodged based on support for a I percent rate increase only) 3-0 in favor of the proposed Stormwater and Flood Management Utility CIP including a 1 percent rate increase r r r 62 City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 PW/ Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Left Hand Creek e N, Sixmile ( 16: Fourmile Canyon ; Creek Improvements ' F04 - ` . 72 Wonderland oQf Jay Rd '60A 'der der n ' Creek , I - - - 0r--meek Fourrpile 1 I Ca on Cr l o$v , WOno, i Ir 12: Wonderland Creek 14: Upper Goose Creek ~_a,___ •.m_ ~-',a ec Drainage Improvements X0'5' .Of GOOst, t.~f Creek:, 1~ \ i ee Y , 17: Boulder Creek Boulder. ~ Ar hoe Rd. CL jD r rC+ ~ S~u fly. Greg Q ; d<N 13: Gregory Canyon Creek s+e~~ne~~ ( S Boulder Rd , ; 4~~1a c"/. V'S" , Beer 15: South Boulder •C" e yOn .o~ Creek Improvements `Ga o`l Bgs~r Canyon CQreek Tr3Y Legend Year of Project ID 2010 02011-2015 1%~ \ t -2010 = 2011.2015°~ =2010 [ / X2011-2015 65.r~ Gc, 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Projecl Name: Project Number: Map Number: Boulder Creek 431015 17 Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPArea: Areas 1 &11 Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project will provide funds for on-going studies and possible flood mitigation work along Boulder Creek. This project will identify and mitigate flood hazards in the Boulder Creek floodplain. Community Sustainabiiity / Project Justification: The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. Public Process Status, Issues: The technical flood mapping study has been initiated and results are anticipated to be completed in 2009. The public involvement process will begin in late 2009 and the flood mapping study submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 2010. Relationship with Other Departments: None c Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 i~ Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2010 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Business Pion Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 1 66 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Fourmile Canyon Creek 431729 16 u Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunity: North Boulder Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: No Project Description: !!II This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Fourmile Canyon Creek. The revised flood mapping studies for Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are complete. These were accepted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in March 2007. Analysis of various flood mitigation alternatives has been completed by Love & Associates under a contract with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD). The analysis report provides information about various flood mitigation approaches. It is recommended that money be budgeted and allocated for flood mitigation work along Fourmile Canyon Creek. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2009. All projects are being closely coordinated with the city' s Greenways Program and Transportation Division. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2009. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. Projects that provide multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new culvert and pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad and Boulder White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. The city applied for TIP funding for this project and although the project did not make the first funding cut it is still possible the city will receive matching funds. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. Community Sustainabillty I Project Justification: The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project. Relationship to Master Plans: This project was recommended by the Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Study, the Greenways Master Plan and is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. Public Process Status, Issues: Flood mitigation recommendations have been approved by WRAB and Planning Board and will be reviewed again by City Council in 2009. Relationship with other Departments: This project relates to the City's Greenways Program and Transportation Program. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $120,096 $1,370,096 Change from Prior Year: Funding extended through 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 67 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% !3 68 i 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number Gregory Canyon Creek 13 Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Gregory Canyon Creek. A recent analysis indicates that several structures could be removed from the high hazard zone based on drainageway and culvert improvements near-Pennsylvania Ave. Community Sustalnability / Project Justification: yl This project will mitigate flood hazards along Gregory Canyon Creek and serve to help meet the city's ~441,I environmental, economic and social sustainability goals. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. Public Process Status, Issues:1 No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Dapartments: This project relates to the City's Greenways Program and Transportation Program. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $25,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2010 and 2011 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prloritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100°/0 1 69 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Preflood Property Acquisition 431622 Department: PW'/ Stormwater and Flood Manage subcommunity: Systern-wide Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides funds for the purchase of properties in areas prone to flooding especially the city's high hazard regulatory area. Properties have been identified and prioritized along each of the city's major drainageways. Property owners have been contacted regarding the city's interest. The majority of properties in the high hazard flood zone are along Boulder Creek, Goose Creek and Fourmile Canyon Creek. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project. Relationship to Master Platys: This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. 4 Public Process status, issues,. Property owners have been contacted regarding the city's interest in purchasing. Relationship with Other Departments: This project relates to the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Program. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $837,852 $3,337,852 Change from Prior Year: Funding extended through 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services- Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 70 I i 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: South Boulder Creek 431202 15 ri Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvcPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: YeS CEAP Completed: F0_ Project Description: This project will provide funds for on-going studies and possible flood mitigation work along South Boulder Creek. On March 25, 2009, FEMA notified the city of Boulder that it intends to officially adopt (effective January 2010) the revised floodplain mapping that resulted from the South Boulder Creek flood mapping study. The new floodplain mapping will be used as the basis for the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that establishes minimum regulatory floodplain boundaries under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and federal mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements. The adoption process for the study results will coincide with the adoption of the related Digital FIRM for Boulder County. 1 It is anticipated that the focus of the mitigation work will be to mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley,' where flood impacts were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since occurred. It is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36 Corridor Improvements- Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also pursuing Federal funding for this project. It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2011-2012 to support this work. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: +@~ This project will identify and mitigate flood hazards in the South Boulder Creek floodplain and serve to help meet the city's environmental, economic and social sustainability goals. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. Public Process Status, Issues: Evaluation of South Boulder Creek flood issues and associated public process is on-going. Relationship with Other Departments: Planning Department, Boulder County, University of Colorado, Open Space Department Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $300,000 $4,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,550,000 Change from Prior Year; Funding delayed and increased Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 ' Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 71 r 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No LEAP Completed: NA Project Description: The project provides funds for the rehabilitation of existing storm sewers. Community 5ustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's existing storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that avoids street flooding and damage to property. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater Master Plan Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: - - f Transporation Division i~ Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $53,045 $109,273 $112,551 $173,891 $179,108 $245,975 $873,843 Change from Prior Year: Funding extended through 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 72 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Stormwater Quality Improvements 431775 Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund stormwater quality projects as identified in the Stormwater Master Plan. This project will improve water quality in Boulder Creek and it's tributaries. Community Sustainabitity 1 Project Justification: The project will help ensure that water quality in Boulder Creek and it's tributaries is maintain and enhanced and serves to help the city meet it's environmental sustainability goals. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $53,045 $54,636 $56,275 $57,964 $59,703 $61,494 $343,117 Change from Prior Year: Funding extended through 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r r t 73 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: r Transportation Coordination 431780 Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: f1 This project will fund the reconstruction of existing storm sewers, the construction of new storm sewers and water quality improvements as part of on-going Transportation Division improvement projects. Community Sustalnability I Project Justification: The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's existing storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that avoids street flooding and damage to property. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: Coordination with the City's Transportation Division Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $307,468 $1,557,468 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Priorltization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 1000/ 74 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program e Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Wonderland Creek 11 421003 12 Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPArea: Areas I & II 111 Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: No Project Description: This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Wonderland Creek. The revised flood mapping studies for Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are complete. These were accepted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in March 2007. Analysis of various flood mitigation alternatives has been completed by Love & Associates under a contract with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD). The analysis report provides information about various flood mitigation approaches. Flood mitigation recommendations have been approved by WRAB and Planning Board and will be reviewed again by City Council in 2009. It is recommended that money be budgeted and allocated for flood mitigation work along Wonderland Creek. The J flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2009. All projects are being closely coordinated with the city' s Greenways Program and Transportation Division. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2009. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. Projects that provide multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new culvert and pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad and Boulder White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. The city applied for TIP funding for this project and although the project did not make the first funding cut it is still possible the city will receive matching funds. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. Community 5ustainability l Project Justification: The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as ~F environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project. Relationship to Master Plans: This project was recommended by the Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Study, the Greenways Master Plan and is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. Public Process Status, Issues: Flood mitigation recommendations have been approved by WRAB and Planning Board and will be reviewed again by City Council in 2009. Relationship with Other Departments: This project relates to the Citys Greenways Program and Tranportation Program Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $250,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $837,852 $3,087,852 Change from Prior Year; Funding extended through 2015 77 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Annual On-going Operating Costs so Description; No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable %F1000/. Discretionary %0 Total %F1000/. 78 i e The Wastewater Utility Fund Overview is included in the Utilities Overview located in the front of the Stormwater & Flood Management section. 79 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 12 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Wastewater Utility Fund Essential Desirable Discretionary Total Project Type/Afame Project # Funding % Funding °!o Funding % Funding % Existing Facility - Rehab ! Repair / Deficiency Correction Marshall Landfill $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation 421454 $106,090 100% $0 $0 $106,090 100% Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 421002 $530,450 100% $0 $0 $530,450 100% WWTP Digester Cleaning 421360 $150,000 100% $0 $0 $150,000 100% WWTP Instrumentation/Control 421437 $75,000 100% $0 $0 $75,000 100% New Construction - Growth Related Facility 1 Additions WWTP Biosolids Digester 421671 $4,000,000 100% $0 $0 $4,000,000 100% Reconstruction WWTP UV Disinfection $4,434,562 100% SO $0 $4,434,562 100% 00 Natal for Wastewater Utility Fund: $9,396,102 100%, $0 0% $0 J~ 0% $9,396,102 100% sow rom l City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 PW/Wastewater Utility .1 1 20: IBM Pump Station / a ~ M - ~ Jay Rd 21: WWTP Pumps 22: WWTP Biosolids Digester iris _ 23: WWTP Permit Improvements 1 24: WWTP Digester Cleaning 10 25: VWVTP Cogeneration Q _ - 26: VWVTP Instrumentation/Control 27: WWTP Headworks 28: WWTP Electrical _ 31: WWTP UV Disinfection 32: WWTP Activated Sludge ahoe Rd- - J 34: WWTP Primary Clarifiers S Boulder R r G) Legend Year of Project 30: Marshall Landfill 0 2010 • 2011-2015 fr ` y 2010 ` =2011-2015 i J M2010 / W2011-2015 $3 ~f 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Collection System Monitoring 421450 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides funds for monitoring of the City's wastewater collection system. This will be accomplished by using temporary flow measuring devices placed in selected manholes. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $53,045 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,045 1111 Change from Prior Year: Funding decreased Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary %r Total % 100% 84 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: IBM Pump Station 421521 20 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Gunbarrel r[ Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project provides funding to expand the capacity of the IBM pump station to accommodate growth in the Gunbarrel area. Community Sustalnabllity I Project Justification: This project is needed to accommodate growth in the Gunbarrel area consistent with the BVCP. Relationship to Master Plans: None Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departrnents: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $56,275 $562,754 $0 $0 $0 $619,029 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: To be determined Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Smvlces: Essential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % 100% 85 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program P Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: s WWTPActivated Sludge 421357 32 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source-, Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area I I I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund the rehabilitation of the existing activated sludge facilities at the 75th Street WWTP, specifically the Turblex blowers. Community Sustainabllily ! Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with other Departments: - None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $67,531 $0 $0 $67,531 ' Change from Prior Year: Funding increased Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % 100% 88 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: JWWTP Biosolids Digester 421671 22 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: No Project Description: Funding for the 75th Street WWTF Biosolids Digester project has been reduced from $7,800,000 to $4,000,000 in the 2010 CIP. The plant's digestion process is old and is experiencing various problems and limitations associated with the following: capacity, poor mixing, poor operational flexibility, lack of redundancy, and aging electrical and mechanical facilities. Carollo Engineers recently completed a comprehensive digester evaluation F: which presented various digester process modifications ranging in cost between $2,000,000 and $10,000,000. City staff is evaluating the various alternatives to determine which improvements will best address the plant's critical needs over both the short-term and long-term. The digester alternatives will also be evaluated relative to other high priority WWTF needs including UV Disinfection and Headworks improvements. Funds have been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction phases respectively. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and A wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards K Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. Public Process Status, issues: This process will be initiated in 2009. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding decreased Annual On-going Operating Costs $65,000 Description: O&M costs are anticipated to begin in 2010 Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund Business Plan Priorltization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% 89 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number; Map Number: WWTP Cogeneration 421329 25 J Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund rehabilitation of the cogeneration (generation of electricty and heat from methane gas produced by the anaerobic digesters) facilities at the 75th Street WWTP. Community Sustainability 1 Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding ' -1 $0 $0 $0 $168,826 $0 $0 $168,826 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed from 2012 to 2013 and increased Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: ' Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 90 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name; Project Number: Map Number: WWTP Digester Cleaning 421360 24 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area III i Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides for cleaning the biosolids digesters at the 75th Street WWTP. Community Sustainebility I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic p infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding accelerated to 2010 from 2012 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 e, funded by existing operating budget Description: r= Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % 100% 91 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program q Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: WWTP Electrical 421439 28 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: % CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund the rehabilitation of the existing electrical systems at the 75th Street WWTP. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. Relationship to Master Plans; This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan, Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Funded added in 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs 1 :1 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritizatlon of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 92 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: WWTP Headworks 421003 27 Department: PWl Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BvCPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund the rehabilitation of the headworks facilities at the 75th Street WWTP. Funding for the project has been pushed back one year from 2014/2015 to 2015/2016 because of funding limitations in the 6-year CIP. The CIP currently has design and construction funds of $1,560,000 and $15,600,000 identified in 2015 and 2016 respectively for a new headworks facility. The headworks facility is old, and plant staff recently experienced significant operational difficulties when one of the key headworks processes failed during an April 2009 wet weather event. The headworks facility is comprised of four major processes including the following: screenings removal, grit removal, screenings and grit washing and classification, and HVAC. Carollo Engineers is in the process of completing a comprehensive headworks evaluation to identify various individual process upgrades as an alternative to the new facility identified in the 2015/2016 funding. Based on the completed headworks analysis, city staff will incorporate potential headworks improvements projects into the 2011 CIP. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,560,661 $1,560,661 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed one year Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritizatlon of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% 93 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: WWTP lnstrumentationlControl 421437__j 1 26 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund the rehabilitation of instrumentation/control facilities at the 75th Street WWTP. Community Sustainability! Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek. This fulfills the following business plan funding screen criteria including: 1) Contributes to city's fiscal health and stability 2) Maintains city capital assets and human resources at adopted standards, 3) Maintains essential services at adopted standards and 4) Contributes to Council's key focus areas. Council goals include a) Affordable Housing , b) Community Sustainability c) Economic Vitality d) Environment and e) Transportation. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. l: Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $75,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Change from Prior Year: Funded added in 2011 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 1 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% 94 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: WWTP Permit Improvements 421617 23 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund aVCPArea: Area III Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: No Project Description: This project will provide funds for the design and construction of new treatment facilities that may be required. It is anticipated the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment will issue a revised discharge permit in 2009 for the city's Wastewater Treatment Plant. The new discharge permit will probably not include more restrictive limits for ammonia and other nitrogen based compounds. Therefore, it is recommended that funding ji during the 2009-2010 time period for additional treatment improvements be reduced. Community Sustainabllity I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: This process will begin in 2013. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,927 $0 $115,927 Change from Prior Year: Funding eliminated in 2013 and reduced in 2014 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: To be determined Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % 1000/. 95 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: WWTP Primary Clarifiers 421005 34 J Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides for rehabilitation of the primary clarifiers at the 75th Street WWTP. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: _ No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding , $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Pian Prioritlzalion of Services: , Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % -0'/-- 1 96 a 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: WWTP Pumps 411339 21 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund the rehabilitation of existing pumps at the 75th Street WWTP. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. Public Process Status, issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000 $450,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2013 and delayed from 2014 to 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% 97 i 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: WWTP UV Disinfection 31 a 1y Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: Reconstruction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: No Project Description: This project provides funds for the design and construction of an ultaviolet (UV) disinfection system at the WWTP. Funding for the project has been maintained at $4,400,000 in the 2010 CIP. The UV disinfection project will replace the plant's gas chlorine and sulfur dioxide systems, representing a significant safety upgrade. The UV Disinfection system design was originally a component of the 2006/2008 WWTF Liquid Stream Upgrades project. Because of funding limitations, the city was not able to award that bid item in the construction contract. Funds have been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction phases respectively. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. Community Sustainabillty I Project Justification: Chlorine gas and sulfur dioxide are hazardous materials and the UV disinfection system will improve worker safety and provide superior disinfection with no adverse impacts to the environment. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the Wastewater Treatment Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $4,434,562 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,434,562 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: To be determined Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund Business Plan Priorilizatlon of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % 100% i 1 98 i 1 The Water Utility Fund Overview is included in the Utilities Overview located in the front of the Stormwater & Flood Management section. 99 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Water Utility Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements ! Upgrades Automated Meter Reading 530,450 546,364 562,754 579,637 0 0 2,219,205 lnstream Flow Structures and Gaging 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 Sunshine Transmission Pipe 0 0 0 927,419 0 0 927,419 Total: 530,450 596,364 562,754 1,507,056 0 0 3,196,624 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair ! Deficiency Correction Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 371,315 382,454 393,928 405,746 417,918 922,405 2,893,766 Betasso Storage Tank 265,225 0 0 0 0 0 265,225 Betasso WTP 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 978,580 1,478,580 O Distribution System Water Quality 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 C) Kossler Reservoir 360,706 939,745 0 0 0 0 1,300,451 Lakewood Pipeline 100,000 0 1,238,060 0 119,405 0 1,457,465 NCWCD Conveyance - Boulder Feeder Canal 300,235 0 0 0 0 0 300,235 Water System Security Upgrades 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 300,000 Waterline Replacement 2,227,890 2,294,727 2,363,569 2,434,476 2,507,510 2,582,735 14,410,907 Barker Dam and Reservoir 0 120,000 0 0 0 430,456 550,456 Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodeil to Fourmile 0 546,364 0 0 0 0 546,364 Chautauqua Storage Tank 0 85,779 857,791 0 0 0 943,570 Watershed Improvements 0 317,437 0 0 0 92,241 409,678 Source Water Transmission System Inspections 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000 Green Lake 2 Dam 0 0 0 86,946 0 0 86,946 Gunbarrel Storage Tank 0 0 0 289,819 0 0 289,819 Kohler Storage Tank 0 0 0 0 113,148 1,131,484 1,244,632 'Lone 3 Transmission Facilities 0 0 0 0 597,029 0 597,029 Barker Dam Outlet 0 0 0 0 0 804,336 804,336 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Water Utility Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total: 4,075,371 5,036,506 5,133,348 3,316,987 3,755,010 6,942,237 28,259,459 New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions Boulder Reservoir WTP 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 300,000 Total: 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 300,000 New Construction - Not Growth Related NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j Total for Water Utility Fund 4,705,821 5,682,870 5,746,102 4,874,043 3,805,010 6,942,237 31,756,083 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 13 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Water Utility Fund Essential Desirable i Discretionary Total Project Type/Name Project # Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding Existing Facility - Enhancements/ Upgrades Automated Meter Reading 411454 $530,450 1 100% $0 1 -1 $0 $530,450 100% Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction _ Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 411106 $371,315 100% $0 $0 $371,315 100% Betasso Storage Tank $265,225 100% $0 $0 $265,225 100% Betasso WTP 411947 $200,000 100% $0 $0 $200,000 100% Distribution System Water Quality 411425 $150,000 100% $0 $0 $150,000 100% Kossler Reservoir $360,706 100% $0 $0 $360,706 100% I Lakewood Pipeline 411780 $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% NCWCD Conveyance - Boulder Feeder Canal 411546 $300,235 100% $0 $0 $300,235 100% Water System Security Upgrades 411440 $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% Waterline Replacement 411389 $2,227,890 100% $0 $0 $2,227,890 100% C) N,w Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions Boulder Reservoir WTP 411652 $100,000 100% $0 $0 i-~ $100,000 100% Total for Water Utility Fund: $4,705,821 100% $0 0% $0 I 0% 54,705,821 100% City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 PW/Water Utility i 1 ~ I 1 ' 50: NCWCD Conveyance - Boudler Feeder Canal 43: Boulder Reservoir WTP Boulder Reservoir a` vl 53: Gunbarrel Storage Tank lI CO is C42, ssv Tank 1 ~ y Arapahoe Rd. 49: Betasso WTP 10 Rehabilitation/Improvements ° - 46: Chautauqua Storage - 5 Boulder Rd Tank Rehabilitation' VS 3 i 1 c Legend 44: Kohler Storage Tank Year of Project • 2010 - • 2011-2015 2010 I, = 2011-2015 M2010 M 2011-2015 103 ' `I 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Automated Meter Reading 411454 Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides funds for the replacement of water meter transponders. Trace transponders will be replaced with Orion transponders. The Orion transponders are considered to be better technology, have a longer life and are compatible with the electronic water monitors (refrigerator magnets). Community Sustainability I Project Justification: t Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The Orion transponders will allow increased monitoring of water use and aid in water conservation which is associated with environmental and economic sustainability goals. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None D Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding! $530,450 $546,364 $562,754 $579,637 $0 $0 $2,219,205 Change from Prior Year: ' 5 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prloritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %~l Discretionary Total % 100% 104 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program r Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Barker Dam and Reservoir ' Department: PWI Water Utility subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: ' This project will provide funds for deficiency corrections at the existing Barker Dam, including a new public toilet and other project identified in the Source Water Master Plan. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The facility is approaching 100 years of age and is need of repair of deterioration due to weather and other environmental factors. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan } 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $430,456 $550,456 Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2011 and 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prloritlzation of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% 105 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Barker Dam Outlet 411109 , Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for repairs to the outlet works of the existing Barker Dam. The Barker Dam outlet works should be replaced within the next seven to 10 years as recommended in the SWMP to eliminate the need to empty the reservoir for gate inspection. A design for outlet works replacement was completed by GEI, and initial bids were received in 2002. The cost of the outlet works replacement could be substantially reduced by eliminating one of the proposed microtunnels. ' Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the , community. The facility is approaching 100 years of age and is need of repair of deterioration due to weather and other environmental factors. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: - No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $804,336 $804,336 Change from Prior Year: Funded delayed Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 106 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Protect Name: Project Number: Map Number: Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 411106 0 Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BvCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for repairs to the existing Barker gravity pipeline. Barker Gravity Pipeline is a critical component of the city's source water system because it conveys the city's Barker Reservoir/Middle Boulder Creek water to Betasso WTF. Stored water from Barker Reservoir and direct flows from Middle Boulder Creek are used to meet approximately 35 percent of the city's annual water needs. The city has, as part of an ongoing maintenance effort, already replaced and rehabilitated segments of the 11-mile Barker Gravity Pipeline that showed the most degradation or highest likelihood of failure. The city should continue its annual maintenance program, prioritizing based on the most critical needs, and also consider providing enough cover to protect the pipeline, and anchor the pipeline in areas prone to landslides or other damaging events. Section replacement or lining are options that may each work well in different parts of the pipeline. The city should coordinate with the USFS concerning maintenance activities on federal land. The projected funds will allow for continued minor rehabilitation efforts (repair of leaks, siphons, etc, as has been done over the past several years) and an evaluation of a pilot replacement/lining project through 2014. In 2015 when additional funds are available, the city can potentially begin a full scale replacement/lining project. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The Barker Gravity Pipeline is over 100 years of age and is need of repair of deterioration due to weather and other environmental factors. Relatlonship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: _ _ r . No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $371,315 $382,454 $393,928 $405,746 $417,918 $922,405 $2,893,766 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % 100% 107 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Betasso Storage Tank 42 Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity: Outside Planning Area t Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BvCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Betasso Storage Tank. The facility is an elevated steel t tank that has deteriorated due to weather and other environmental factors that primarily affect the protective paint coating. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: ' Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: . None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $265,225 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,225 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 108 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program ' Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: ' Betasso WTP 411947 49 Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BvcPArea: Qutside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction ' CL=AP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: ' This project will provides funds for rehabilitations and improvements to the Betasso WTP. The Betasso WTP is the city's primary water treatment facility and has deteriorated during its operation of over 40 years. Large capital funding is required to retrofit the existing coagulation/sedimentation unit process with newer technology that will allow the plant to meet current drinking water regulations at it's original design capacity. Currently, the WTP is ' unable to treat water at this capacity due to this limiting unit process. Funding for the next phase of improvements to the Betasso Water Treatment Facility (WTF) has been delayed until the 2015-2016 time period. Water demands have not increased significantly and the existing treatment processes should be adequate to meet water demands in compliance with federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations until that time. Community Sustainablltty I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: - None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $978,580 $1,478,580 Change from Prior Year: Rehabilitation funding added in 2010 and 2013, design funding delayed until 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 109 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodell to Fourmile Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: System-wide ' Funding source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodell to Fourmile. The pipe is a cement mortar lined steel pipeline that has deteriorated over a period of several decades and needs to be replaced. Community Sustalnability I Project Justificatlon: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: , This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: - - - No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan L 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $546,364 $0 $0 $0 $0 $546,364 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary % Total % 100% ,i 110 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program ' Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Boulder Reservoir WTP 411652 43 Department: PW( Water Utility Subcommunity: Gunbarrel Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility ! Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: 1 This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Boulder Reservoir WTP. Improvements and capacity expansion are necessary to accommodate on-going growth within the city's service area and comply with Federal and State regulations. This additional capacity will allow for greater use of the city's Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights portfolios. Community Sustainablltty / Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: - None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 111 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report t Project Name. Project Number: Map Number: Chautauqua Storage Tank 411672 46 Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Requlred: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Chautaqua Storage Tank. The facility is a partially buried reinforced concrete tank. The tank is not currently lined and there is evidence of leakage. The tank also has a built-up roof that has deteriorated due to weather and other environmental factors. Community Sustalnability I Project Justification: t Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, issues: _ ' No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $85,779 $857,791 $0 $0 $0 $943,570 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget t Source of Funding: Business Plan Prlorttization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 112 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program ' Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: ' Distribution System Water Quality 411425 Department: PWI Water Utility subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-Wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: nJp CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides funds for water quality improvements to the distribution system. The project will provide funds for better hydraulic and water quality modeling of the city's water distribution system as well as improvements to the system that will assure compliance with Federal and State regulations. ' Community Sustalnability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. t Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $150,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2011 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prforltization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 113 O 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ' Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Green Lake 2 Dam 411627 I Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BvcPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA ' Project Description: This project will provide funds for the evaluation of alternatives and design of the rehabilitation of Green Lake 2 t Dam, located in the City's Watershed. Green Lake 2 Dam is in need of extensive rehabilitation to allow continued storage of water. Project alternatives and cost opinions were developed by ECI (2001 a). They found that the two lowest cost alternatives could be completed in one construction season. Community Sustainability ! Project Justification: ' Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. , Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. ' Public Process Status, issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: - ' Capital Funding Plan } 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $86,946 $0 $0 $86,946 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 114 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: ' Gunbarrel Storage Tank 411670 53 ' Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the interior paint of the Gunbarrel Storage Tank, Community SustainabiiityI Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The facility is a ground level steel tank with corrosion resistant paint on both the interior and exterior. Based on a recent inspection of the tank, the interior paint has deteriorated with age and needs to be replaced to provide continued corrosion protection. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: R:~ ~-ti~~ No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $289,819 $0 $0 $289,819 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 115 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ' Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Instream Flow Structures and Gaging 11 4411542__j 1 ' Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Water Utility Fund SVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides funds for rehabilitations and improvements to instream flow structures and gaging. Additional in-stream flow structures and gaging is considered desireable along North Boulder Creek. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. ' Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $o $50,000 $o $o $0 $0 $50,000 Change from Prior Year: I Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 1 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 116 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Kossler Reservoir Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Outside Planning Area ' Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BvCPArea-. Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for dam repairs, outlet repairs, bypass improvements and security improvements at Kossler Reservoir. There are several improvements at Kossler Reservoir that need to be completed based on recommendations in the FERC Part 12D Inspection Report (GEI 2007a). Several of the recommendations are related to the cracked concrete at the reservoir outlet and the seepage that occurs along the low-head section of the penstock. A bypass pipeline, connecting the Barker Gravity Line to the Boulder Canyon Hydro Penstock could meet several objectives: " Allow operation of the Barker System during times when Kossler Reservoir is out of operation for repair or other reasons. If connected downstream of Road 77, the bypass could reduce the seepage in the upper part of the penstock. Halt erosion at the current Barker Gravity Line outlet to Kossler Reservoir. If the bypass structure is constructed, the cracked outlet structure should still be repaired and upgrades should be made to the gate house in order to have multiple methods of operating Kossler Reservoir. In addition, the Barker Gravity Line outlet to Kossler Reservoir should be armored to prevent further erosion and undercutting of the structure. GEI (2007b) prepared construction cost estimates for Kossler Reservoir main dam concrete panel replacement. This estimate recommended replacing panels below elevation 7717 with localized repairs above that elevation by 2009. The FERC Part 12D report also recommended additional maintenance on the main dam seepage weir (by 2009) and piezometers (by 2010) and installation of additional hydraulic monitoring equipment (by 2010) (GEI 2007a). These efforts could be combined with replacement of the concrete plates on the main dam. The integrity of the rock walls at the dam abutments should also be evaluated. Community Sustainability t Project Justification: Security vulnerability of water system facilities is a concern and improvements are needed to assure the safe and reliable delivery of drinking water. Reiatlonshlp to Master Plans, This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: - None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $360,706 $939,745 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,451 Change from Prior Year: 117 2010-2015 Capita! Improvements Program Project Status Report t Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget I Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 1 t My 118 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Kohler Storage Tank 411671 44 Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: South Boulder Funding Source: Water Utility Fund evCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Kohler Storage Tank including design for the replacement of the existing roof. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The facility is a partially buried reinforced concrete tank with built-up roofing that has deteriorated due to weather and other environmental factors. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $113,148 $1,131,484 $1,244,632 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 119 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Lakewood Pipeline _777771 F Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: Yes Project Description: This project will provide funds for on-going inspection, testing and repair or rehabilitation of the Lakewood Pipeline. Issues related to the reconstruction of the Lakewod Pipeline requires on-going inspection of the pipe to assure its serviceability. There is also the need to monitor and supplement restoration of the pipeline corridor in accordance with United States Forest Service and Boulder County requirements. Funds have been budgeted for inspection and possible repair and rehabilitation of the Lakewood Pipeline. Costs would be covered from the Lakewood Pipeline Remediation Reserve. Based on observations made during five internal inspections of Lakewood Pipeline Phase III, immediate and/or extensive repair/remediation efforts are not necessary and monitoring and internal inspections will occur at two- year intervals. The next internal inspection of the pipeline is scheduled for the fall of 2009. Staff is also in the ' process of developing repair, rehabilitation and replacement alternatives and formulating recommendations concerning a long range plan. Reports on the 2009 inspection and the alternatives analysis will likely be completed in early 2010. The budget recommendations reflect a possible remediation project in 2012 of $1.2 million. This anticipates that the work in 2009 (corrosion rate study, pipe inspection and review of rehabilitation technologies) may result in a project to plan and design in 2010-2011 and construct in 2012. The most likely pilot remediation plan would involve relining the pipeline rather than removal and replacement. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $100,000 $0 $1,238,060 $0 $119,405 $0 $1,457,465 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% 120 Al 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Marshall Landfill 30 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility Subcornmuniry: Area Ill Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund BvCPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will fund the decommissioning of the Marshall Landfill Treatment Facility. The facility was originally constructed to eliminate groundwater contamination at the original landfill site. The money will be used for landfill cap maintenance and repair and demolition of the groundwater treatment facility. Based on EPA approval, the groundwater collection system was shut down on Nov. 30, 2004. The treatment plant and collection system equipment will need to be preserved. In addition, there are approximately 180 sampling and monitoring wells located on the site, many of which are no longer used or necessary. Part of the shutdown process will entail sealing the unnecessary wells in place. Community 5ustainability / Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. This project is also necessary in order to comply with a consent decree with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Relationship to Master Plans: None Public Process Status, issues: ` No additional public process is anticipated. ReWonship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $100,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $o $100,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential %F_1 0 0% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% II 121 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: JNCWCD Conveyance - Boulder Feeder Canal 411546 50 Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Area I I I Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair ! Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project will provide funds for the protection of water quality in the Boulder Feeder Canal. Improvements include best management practices for water quality as identifed in a recent report and security vulnerability improvements. Although the city has made progress in conveying stormwater over the Boulder Feeder Canal, there are still several outfalls that discharge directly to the canal. The city should continue to construct stormwater diversions over the canal, prioritizing those outfalls with commercial, industrial, or agricultural land uses with little vegetative buffer between land uses and the canal. The city should take steps to improve operator safety at the water treatment plant diversion point from the Boulder Feeder Canal such as installing a hand rail and/or harness system. Community Sustainability ! Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The Boulder Feeder Canal currently delivers water to Boulder Reservoir from the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District's (NCWCD) Carter Lake. The Canal is vulnerable to water quality upsets due to 1 runoff from adjacent agricultural lands including irrigation return flows. ' Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, issues: ¢ No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: Open Space and Mountain Parks li Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $300,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,235 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services. Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 122 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline 411547 45 Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund avCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related CEAP Required: Les CEAP Completed. Project Description: This project will provide funds for the design and construction of a pipeline from Carter Lake to the Boulder Reservoir Water Treatment Plant (BRWTP). Funding for construction of the proposed Carter Lake Pipeline has been delayed until the 2016-2017 time period. Funding of the pipeline in the nearer term without Federal funding assistance would have a significant impact on water rates. Staff continues to recommend the pipeline as the best long-term solution to water quality, operational and security vulnerability issues related to drawing water directly from the Boulder Feeder Canal and Boulder Reservoir. By delaying the schedule for pipeline construction, more time is available to secure Federal funding assistance. Recognizing mixed overall support to date and based on discussions with the CSG (2008) and recommendations from the staff survey (2007), the city should continue initial project evaluation for the Carter Lake Pipeline. Efforts include development of a CEAP, right-of-way acquisition, preliminary design and permitting activities. Protection of the BRWTP source water through investing in the construction of the Carter Lake Pipeline will provide long-term benefits to the city. The city is placing a greater reliance on this facility than in the past due to continued planned growth in the citys water service area. Even though current regulatory requirements are being met, the risk of contaminants entering the source water and passing through the treatment process still exists. Investing in a pipeline that will protect the source water for the BRWTP far into the future is a worthwhile investment similar to that undertaken by prior generations with the Silver Lake Watershed. The quality of water in Carter Lake is excellent. It is a deep reservoir with a small natural runoff area and is filled mostly with high quality water imported from the Western Slope. The quality of the water is negatively affected as it travels through the Boulder Feeder Canal to the treatment plant and Boulder Reservoir due to drainage into the canal from existing development and agriculture. Future development and agricultural practices will likely exacerbate these negative effects. The threat of accidental or intentional contamination is also a concern because of limited ability to react or dilute such contamination. The Carter Lake Pipeline will address both the near-term and potential increase in degradation to water quality of the BRWTP. Preventing source water contamination provides a more robust barrier than subsequent treatment. It would also provide a more uniform water qualty, substantially simplifying the treatment optimization and increasing treatment process reliability. Although the capital cost of the pipeline is significant, it is comparable to the cost of treatment technologies that afford a similar level of water quality protection and with the assurance that contaminants will be prevented from entering the city's source water in the first place, rather than having to remove these contaminants via treatment. The pipeline would provide opportunities and flexibility for improvements in the management and operation of the city's raw water facilities. These include possible hydroelectric power generation as well as improvements in the flexibility of use of the city's various water sources for the BRWTP. This increased flexibility could provide a slight increase in the drought year yield of the city s water rights portfolio. The city of Boulder is currently participating in the development of right-of-way acquisition plans and permit applications for the Southern Water Supply Project II (Carter Lake Pipeline). Other participants include Little Thompson Water District, the town of Frederick and Left Hand Water District. The pipeline is estimated to cost $33 million. Depending upon the number of participants, the city of Boulder's share of the cost can range from $20 to $25 million. The cost of the pipeline as currently proposed is less th' 23t might be at a later time because there is an 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report opportunity to share costs in constructing the Carter Lake pipeline with other communities. Additionally, on-going construction cost inflation suggests that the cost of constructing the pipeline will only increase in the future. The majority of the pipeline right-of-way (ROW) has been previously secured by the NCWCD. Continued development pressure along this ROW may make future construction more difficult. Securing the remaining ROW for a pipeline at this time is also considered important because of these development pressures. Also, the cost of borrowing money is near an all time low. These factors suggest that now is a good time to proceed with this project as a long term investment in the city's water utility infrastructure. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city s water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. i Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code the Source Water Master Plan and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues. The Utilities Division is developing an alternatives evaluation for this project. The alternative evaluation will be presented to the Water Resource Advisory Board and City Council prior to the 2008 budget process. The NCWCD will need to apply for a Boulder County permit to construct the pipeline as part of the Matters of State interest (1041) review process. Relationship with Other Departments: Open Space and Mountain Parks Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i Change from Prior Year: Funding outside planning period Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 124 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Source Water Transmission System Inspections Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provide funding for on-going inspection of source water transmission pipes. Community Sustainabllily I Project Justification: On-going inspection of the city's source water transmission pipes is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated- Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %0 Discretionary Total % F-1-0-00/7 125 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Sunshine Transmission Pipe Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Sunshine Transmission Pipe. The pipe is a cement mortar lined steel pipeline that has deteriorated during its operation over a period of several decades. Initial funding in 2009 provides funds for pipe inspection, minor repair work and installation of access manholes. Funding allocated in 2013 will provide for a more complete rehabilitation or replacement of the existing cement mortar lining. Community Sustalnabitity 1 Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $927,419 $0 $0 $927,419 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 126 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Waterline Replacement 411389 Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity: System-wide ' Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides funds for the reconstruction of waterlines that are part of the city's water distribution system. Many of the city's existing waterlines are corroded or otherwise deteriorated and must be replaced. The city currently experiences approximately 60-80 main breaks per year and these cause unplanned outages in water service as well as disruption to vehicle travel and damage to public and private property. Although the number of main breaks is not considered excessive, the average age of the city's distribution system is over 40 years and it is anticipated that substantial funds will be required to maintain a functioning water distribution system over time. In some cases deficiencies in this system have been identified due to fire flow requirements of the Insurance Services Office (ISO). Funding for waterline replacement has been reduced. A recent staff analysis indicates that a funding level of $2,100,000 (2008 dollars) should be sufficient to maintain the current service level, as defined by water main breaks, over the next decade. Funding has been adjusted to reflect anticipated construction costs inflation of 3 percent each year. The replacement program is coordinated with the Transportation Division street overlay and reconstruction program. Community Sustainabllity I Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: - No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: - Transportation Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $2,227,890 $2,294,727 $2,363,569 $2,434,476 $2,507,510 $2,582,735 $14,410,907 Change from Prior Year: Funding decreased Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritlzatlon of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 127 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Watershed Improvements Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BvCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project will provide funding for miscellaneous improvements in the city's Silver Lake watershed including valve replacement. Community Sustainabllity / Project Justtfication: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $317,437 $0 $0 $0 $92,241 $409,678 Change from Prior Year: Funded added in 2015 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 100% 128 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Water System Security Upgrades 411440 Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description; This project will provide funds for water system security upgrades. New Federal guidelines call for increased protection of drinking water systems from terrorist and other threats. City staff recently updated the water system security vulnerability assessment. Numerous recommendations for security vulnerability improvements have been made. Community Sustalnabllity I Project Justification: Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Source and Treated Water Master Plans. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: None Capital Funding Plan ` 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: y" Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %C] Discretionary Total % _100-0T] 129 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Zane 3 Transmission Facilities 411005 Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Water Utility Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA Project Description: This project provides for the rehabilitation and improvement to the Zone 3 transmission piping of the city's water system. An extensive network of transmission piping exists, some of which is over 50 years old. It is projected this piping will require replacement or other rehabilitation. In some cases deficiencies in this system have been identified due to fire flow requirements of the Insurance Services Office (ISO). Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. Relationship to Master Plans: This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: No additional public process is anticipated. Relationship with Other Departments: - Transportation Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $597,029 $0 $597,029 ii Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritizatlon of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable %I~ Discretionary Total % 100% 130 TRIBUTARY GREENWAYS 2010 - 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2010 Greenways Capital Improvements Program (CIP) budget is $450,000. The Greenways CIP has been developed within the context of and is consistent with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP), the Transportation Master Plan (TMP), the major drainageway plans and the Greenways Master Plan. The city of Boulder Greenways System is comprised of a series of corridors along riparian areas including Boulder Creek and its tributaries, which provide an opportunity to integrate multiple objectives, including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage and floodplain management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists, recreation and cultural resources. In order to maximize the overlap of objectives and to coordinate projects along the Greenways, identification of projects for the 2010-2015 Greenways CIP was done as a team effort, combining input from Flood Utilities, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, Water Quality and Environmental Services, Environmental Affairs, Planning and Open Space and Mountain Parks. The Greenways CIP follows an opportunistic approach, contributing funding toward projects that are being completed by other departments or private development in order to meet the various objectives of the Greenways program. The Greenways CIP also looks to leverage funds with outside agencies in order to move projects forward that r meet more than one objective of the Greenways program, but may not be the highest priority when evaluating any one particular objective. Transportation and flood utility projects were identified from the Transportation Master Plan, and the major drainageway plans, and intra-departmental meetings were held to determine project priorities and timing. Private development activities were also evaluated. Many of the Greenways projects shown in the CIP are being designed and constructed in coordination with major flood or transportation improvements. The Greenways funding associated with these projects focuses on habitat restoration, water quality improvements and trail connections. In addition to leveraging funding with the Transportation and Flood Utilities budgets, funding for Greenways projects is also available through the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and Federal Transportation funds. During 2007 three Greenways projects were submitted for federal transportation funding, with matching funds anticipated to be provided by the Flood and Greenways CIP. These projects included: Fourmile Canyon Creek from 26`h to 28`h Street, Wonderland Creek at 281h Street and Wonderland Creek at Foothills Highway. All three of these projects include a multi-use path connection, flood mitigation improvements and potential water quality and habitat restoration. None of these projects have been granted federal funds at this time, but there is a possibility that more federal funding will become available. Of these three projects, the Flood Utility program's highest priority at this time is to complete the Wonderland Creek project at Foothills Highway in order to eliminate routine flooding that occurs in the Noble Park neighborhood. Utilities staff has moved forward with this project and is in the process of soliciting proposals from consultants to develop an alternatives analysis and 131 !f complete a Community and Environmental Assessment (CEAP). In the 2009-2014 Greenways CIP, $195,000 was shown in 2009 and 2010 for the Wonderland at Foothills project and $195,000 was shown in 2011 and 2012 for the Fourmile 26`h to 28`h Street project. In the 2010- 2015 Greenways CIP $195,000 is shown each year for a major flood/transportation project, but the funding is not identified for a specific project. A list of possible transportation/flood projects are listed in the CIP. The intent of the funding is to move forward with the planning and design process for all of the projects listed with the hope that outside funding becomes available for constructing these projects. By moving the planning and design process forward, the city will be in a better position to receive this funding. Maintenance of the Greenways system was reviewed as part of the CIP process. Funding for habitat maintenance was first allocated in the 2002-2007 Greenways CIP to address deficiencies identified in the Greenways Master Plan. The Greenways project management staff has been overseeing this effort. A seasonal habitat crew and crew leader have been hired annually to remove noxious weeds and revegetate with native plants along the Greenways. During the 2008 season the oversight of the habitat maintenance crew was transferred to the flood utilities maintenance work group. As part of the Flood Uitlities 2009 operating budget, a new full-time Greenways Maintenance position was requested and approved, along with a $30,000 budget increase request to help fund this position. The balance of the funding needed to support this position will be taken out of the existing Greenways CIP budget, along with the funding to support the seasonal crew. In addition to managing noxious weeds along the Greenways, this position will also be responsible for maintaining the flood carrying capacity of the drainageways. Having a full-time employee serving as a crew lead, rather than a seasonal employee, will provide the much needed continuity that the habitat maintenance program needs. The Greenways project management work group will continue to coordinate habitat restoration proj ects. During the 2009-2014 CIP process, the Greenways Advisory Committee made a motion to restructure the Greenways CIP into the following categories: FTE Salaries $130,000 Seasonal Salaries $50,000 Non-personnel Expenses $25,000 Contributions to major flood & transportation projects $195,000 Restoration, water quality and trail improvements $50,000 The motion also stated that the new habitat restoration maintenance position be a partnership between the Greenways project management and Utilities maintenance work groups. The 2010- 2015 Greenways CIP reflects that change in structure. POLICY ISSUES All large-scale projects in the 2010-2015 CIP will go through the CEAP process, either as part of a bigger flood or transportation project or as a separate project as indicated on the project status reports. HIGHLIGHTS The focus of the 2010-2015 Greenways CIP is on the Fourmile and Wonderland Creek corridors. 132 In addition, Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration, and Trail Improvement projects and possible habitat restoration projects during the next few years include: • Confluence of Bear Creek and Boulder Creek at Foothills Community Hospital in conjunction with the multi-use trail connection to 48th Street, a culvert removal under Bear Creek and drainage improvements to the underpass at Foothills and Arapahoe • Dry Creek through Flatirons Golf Course • Goose Creek, railroad to 47th Street tree plantings • Goose Creek at the Transit Village • Fish Passage projects in association with Fishing is Fun grants FINANCING Greenways projects are funded from the Transportation Fund, Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund, and the Lottery Fund. Existing C1P expenditures are estimated at $450,000 per year for the next six years. Annual funding distribution for the Greenways Program for 2010-2015 is as follows: Transportation - $150,000 Flood Utility _ $150,000 Lottery Fund $150,000 RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The Greenways corridors are currently maintained by several work groups within the city, as well as outside organizations. Tasks are divided up by geographical location as well as by function. The responsibility of each work group is described below: • Boulder County Parks and Open Space maintains the Boulder Creek path from the mouth ? of Boulder Canyon to Fourmile Canyon. ? The city's Parks and Recreation Department maintenance staff is responsible for maintenance of Greenways that traverse a city park, as well as the Boulder Creek Path from Eben Fine Park to 55th Street. • The city's Street Maintenance is responsible for snow removal and general path maintenance (debris removal and sweeping) along all of the Greenways paths, except those portions of path maintained by the Parks Department. • The city's Open Space and Mountain Parks Department is responsible for maintenance of natural, environmentally sensitive, or re-vegetated areas on open space land and easements. Currently this includes portions of Boulder Creek east of 38th Street and Arapahoe Avenue and portions of South Boulder Creek from KOA Lake to Marshall Road. • Flood Utility Maintenance is responsible for maintaining the flood carrying capacity of all of the Greenways channels, which primarily involves removing tree limbs and downed trees from obstructing the flow in the channels, removal of channel sediment, and bank stabilization. • Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) performs maintenance on sections of Boulder Creek and all tributaries included in the Greenways Program. • City Forestry, University of Colorado (CU), ditch companies, and Xcel Energy are also 133 involved in maintenance along the Greenways. BUSINESS PLAN All of the projects identified in the Greenways CIP have been categorized as "Desirable" BOARD ACTION The Greenways Advisory Committee reviewed the Greenways 2010-2015 CIP on May 20, 2009 and recommended approval (5-0). Below are the motions of the GAC related to the CIP: May 20, 2009 GAC motion on Greenways CIP Motion (Jones): Given the project's (Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage Project's) considerable ecological benefits per Greenways dollars spent ($30,000 currently requested by Open Space and Mountain Parks), GAC encourages staff to seriously consider the project pending determination of feasibility of other funding sources. Seconded: Driscoll Vote: 5-0, Motion passed. Motion (Putnam): Move that GAC recommend the 2010 - 2015 Greenways CIP to Planning Board and City Council. Seconded: Driscoll Vote: 5-0, Motion passed. 44 134 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Tributary Greenways 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction - Not Growth Related Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Projects 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 1,170,000 Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Total: 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 1,470,000 On-Going Projects Greenways Salaries 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 780,000 Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Total: 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 1,230,000 w cn Total for Tributary Greenways 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 2,700,000 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 11 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Tributary Greenways Essential Desirable l Discretionary Total Project Type/Name Project# Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding I % New Construction - Not Growth Related Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Projects $0 $195,000 100% $0 $195,000 100% Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements $0 $50,000 100%I $0 $50,000 100% On-Going Projects Greenways Salaries $0 $130,000 100% $0 $130,000 100% Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew $0 $50,000 100% $0 $50,000 100% Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating $0 $25,000 100% $0 $25,000 ` 100% Total for Tributary Greenways: I $0 5450,000 100% $0 1 0% ° ;450,000 100 W 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Projects Department: PW/ Tributary Greenways Subcommunity: North Boulder Funding Source: Tributary Greenways BvcPArea: Area I r Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: Project Description: Project includes improvements to Wonderland and Fourmile Creek, flood mitigation, environmental restoration and off-street trail connections. These improvements will be done in conjunction with work being done by the Flood Utilities Division, Transportation Division and the Parks Department. The top three projects include Wonderland at Foothills, Wonderland at 28th and Fourmile 26th to 28th Streets. Community Sustainabllity I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental sustainability and transportation by improving the off- street trail connections and environmental restoration. Relationship to Master Plans: These proejcts are listed in the Greenways Master Plan and the Transportation Master Plan and the Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek Flood Mitigation Plan and the North Boulder Subcommunity Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: The CEAP for this project will be reviewed by the Greenways Advisory Committee and/or the Water Resources Advisory Board as part of the Fourmile and Wonderland Flood Mitigation Plan or as a separate CEAP. u Relationship with Other Departments: All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $195,000 $195,000 $195,000 $195,000 $195,000 $195,000 $1,170,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $1,000 Description: will be covered by existing maintenance budgets Source of Funding: parks, flood maintenance, Greenways habitat Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 1000/. Discretionary Total % 100% 137 Y 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report 1 Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating Department: PW/ Tributary Greenways Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Tributary Greenways BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: General administration of the program including such operating expenses as seed, plant materials, printing, copies, food for meetings, vehicle for the crew and program expenses for the Circle Boulder by Bike event. Community 3ustainabllity I Project Justification: These funds are required for the continuation of the Greenways Program. Relationship to Master Plans: This funding supports programs that are recommended in the Greenways Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: Any improvement that would have an impact on the public or an adjacent property owner would involve public input. Relationship with Other Departments: All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $150,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $25,000 Description: non-personnel operating expenses Source of Funding: Greenways CIP Business Plan Prioritizatlon of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 1 140 ■ 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements Department: PW/ Tributary Greenways Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Tributary Greenways BvCPArea: System-wide Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Miscellaneous water quality, habitat resoration and trail improvements projects. Community Sustainabiilty i Project Justification: These project support the Council goal of environmental sustainability and alternate modes of transportation. t Relationship to Master Plans: i These projects are listed in the Greenways Master Plan Update. Public Process Status, Issues: Projects will be coordinated with Transportation, Utilities, Parks and Open Space or the developers of a property. U Relationship with Other Departments: Projects are developed with input from the City's Transportation, Utilities, Open Space Department, the Parks Department, Boulder County and the Environmental Affairs program, as well as through coordination with developers. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 4 Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 141 LOTTERY FUND 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM j OVERVIEW The Lottery Fund Capital Improvements Program for 2010-2015 is $5,850,000. Projects scheduled in 2010 total $975,000. HIGHLIGHTS r The departments of Parks and Recreation, Open Space/Mountain Parks and Tributary Greenways share the State of Colorado's Conservation Trust Fund (Lottery) revenue. A fund sharing agreement was approved in 2001 by the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (DRAB). This agreement guided the distribution of Lottery Funds between the three departments and functions through 2008. Beginning with the 2009 budget, $150,000 is allocated to Tributary Greenways and the remaining Lottery Funds are shared by Open Space/Mountain Parks and Parks and Recreation. Distribution of Lottery Funds for 2010 (Includes operating and capital uses): $ 5255000 Open Space and Mountain Parks $ 525,000 Parks and Recreation $ 150,000 Tributary Greenways projects $1,200,000 Projected annual Lottery revenues are $1,000,000 per year based on average past collections and projected interest. The $1,200,000 available for allocation in 2010 reduces the Lottery Fund balance to the target level. This funding is a vital element of Open Space and Mountain Parks' strategy to address ongoing and deferred maintenance in the Mountain Parks land area. The funding is utilized by Parks and Recreation to fund urban park renovation projects (e.g. playground and irrigation projects), habitat restoration and Art in the Park. The Parks and Recreation Department has continued to prioritize taking care of the current system through the capital refurbishment and renovation program. Although these projects do not technically meet the CIP definition, significant capital funds (over $5,000) are expended to replace and renovate park and infrastructure, such as playgrounds, shelters, irrigation systems, gymnasium floors, docks and walkways. FINANCING Lottery funding is provided by the State of Colorado's Conservation Trust Fund. Funding distributions are provided to eligible governmental entities based on a per capita formula. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: 162 On April 27, 2009 the PRAB reviewed the Parks and Recreation CIP and voted unanimously to approve the staff recommendation for the CIP budget and to forward this recommendation to City Council. OPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDATION The Open Space Board of Trustees will be asked to review and approve the 2010 - 2015 CIP budget submittal at either its June or July meeting and will be asked to recommend it be approved by both the Planning Board and City Council. The results of this meeting will be presented verbally to the Planning Board and City Council. l 1 163 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Lottery Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair I Deficiency Correction Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - Lottery 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 Total: 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 On-Going Projects OSMP - Historical Structures & Trails - Stabilization & Restoration 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 3,150,000 Tributary Greenways Program - Lottery 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total: 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 4,050,000 Total for Lottery Fund 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 5,850,000 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 4 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Lottery Fund Essential Desirable Discretionary I Total Project-Type/Name Project # Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - Lottery $75.000 25% $225,000 75% $0 $300,000 100% On-Going Projects _ OSMP - Historical Structures & Trails - Stabilization & Restoration 730000 $525,000 100% $0 $0 $525,000 100% Tributary Greenways Program - Lottery $0 $150,000 100% $0 $150,000 100% Total for Lottery Fund: $600,000 62% $375,000 38% $0 $975,000 1100% 0) Cn 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: OSMP - Historical Structures & Trails - Stabilization & Restoration 730000 0 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Lottery Fund BVCPArea: Area 1II Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: Yes LEAP Completed: As appropriate Project Description: These funds are critical to the implementation of the Visitor Master Plan (VMP). The locational focus for this program is the traditional Mountain Parks system together with its geographic extension along the Mountain Backdrop and contiguous foothills from Eldorado Mountain and Bull Gulch in the south to Lefthand Canyon and Buckingham Park in the north. This area still contains significant deferred maintenance that was inherent at the time of the Mountain Parks consolidation with Open Space in 2001. The historic structures and related visitor infrastructure on these OSMP lands are in need of stabilization, reclamation and restoration. Focus for 2010 will be the West Trails Study Area (TSA) process including Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis on lands from Eldorado Springs Drive north to Lee Hill Road. Historic site assessments and related stabilization, reclamation and restoration will be conducted on historic structures on Flagstaff Summit and major maintenance and restoration projects will be completed on the historic trails system that was largely constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) in the 1930s. Additionally, renovation of various trailheads will be undertaken. Related efforts will continue across this landscape over the planning period. Community Sustainabitity / Project Justification: Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. Stabilization and improvement of our historic infrastructure will help to sustain the community's sense of historic identity. Relationship to Master Plans: Restoration and stabilization of these historic facilities will meet the objectives of the Open Space & Mountain Parks Long Range Management Policies and the Visitor Master Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: Project development will include consultation with appropriate Boards and public meetings. The main issues are to restore and preserve the historic, character-defining features of these facilities. Visitor safety and protection of rare biological resources are important components of these projects. Project will include appropriate public { outreach for the level of work that is proposed and will be determined on a project-specific basis. Relationship with Other Departments: The Open Space & Mountain Parks Department works cooperatively with other city departments including Parks and Recreation and Planning. In addition, OSMP will continue to work with Boulder County Planning, other agencies and state and local programs to promote appropriate restoration of and access to historical structures. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $3,150,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 166 1, 4 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Description: Annual allocation from Colorado Lottery Fund Source of Funding: Colorado Lottery Fund Business Pfan Priorftizatlon of Services: 'I Essential % 100% Desirable % Discretionary Total % 1000/o r~ 167 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - Lottery 0 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Lottery Fund BVCPArea: Area I 11 Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: i Project Description: Upon completion of the master plan, the department committed to renovating one playground and one irrigation system per year. The specific playground and park irrigation system that will be renovated will be decided on an annual basis and communicated to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) and public. Projects are necessary to comply with goals and commitments identified in the department's master plan. The department evaluates and prioritizes needs based on criteria including safety and code compliance, age of the equipment, location in the city, and opportunities for efficiencies, collaboration or partnerships with other departments or the surrounding neighborhood. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: Environmental sustainability: Renovation of playgrounds and irrigation systems will meet current city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Water conservation techniques will be coordinated with the city's Office of Water Conservation. Water and energy conservation best practices will be implemented. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. These park renovations are necessary to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to meet expressed community demands. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. Relationship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation master plan identified the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. In addition, the department committed to renovating one playground and irrigation system per year. Public Process Status, Issues: The department will conduct outreach to the neighborhood on the needs and design of the playground. Typically, two public meetings are conducted - an initial one to gather suggestions and a follow-up meeting to review design options. The project is posted on the department's website and regular updates are posted. A email group may also be created to update interested community members. The PRAB will be updated regularly. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Public Works/Utilities, FAM and Transportation as necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $3,000 Description: Inspection and repair of equipment, graffiti removal, safety inspection, playground surface maintenance Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% 168 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program 1 Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number. Tributary Greenways Program - Lottery 0 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Lottery Fund BVCPArea: Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: Project Description: The program is intended to improve and protect the many riparian corridors that pass through the city. I11 Improvements include pedestrian/bicycle paths, drainage and flood control structures, and preservation and enhancement of natural features. A portion of the capital funding for this program was shifted to needed maintenance of existing system beginning in 2002. See Greenways CIP/Budget section. Project funding is ongoing.This represents the Lottery Fund contribution to the program. Community Sustainablllty 1 Project JustMcation: Greenways projects integrate many goals including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage and flood management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists and protection of recreation and cultural resources. Relationship to Master Plans: Coordination with the Greenways program is described in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan and the OSMP Visitor Master Plan. Public Process Status, issues: CEAP's are completed for all significant greenways projects and are reviewed by appropriate boards. See Greenway CIP for more detailed information. Relationship with Other Departments: The Greenways program requires coordinating with Transportation, Open Space, Flood Utility, Planning and Parks Departments. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Change from Prior Year; Annual On-going Operating Costs , Description: no addiitonal - funding is for the program, specific projects are outlined in the Greenwa s CIP Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100°/o Discretionary Total % _0'/X,_ I r• l~ 169 .25 CENT SALES TAX FUND AND PERMANENT PARK AND RECREATION FUND 2010 - 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMS OVERVIEW The Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed to meet the vision and goals of the 2006 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and in 2010, the .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund and Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund CIP is funded at the level of $2,632,500. The first goal of the master plan includes maintaining parks and recreation facilities and as a result, the department has prioritized CIP projects based on health and safety concerns, ADA compliance and replacement of existing equipment and infrastructure that will be necessary to ensure ongoing safe operations. The master plan outlines the criteria used to prioritize park development. These include assessing community need, developing facilities in underserved areas and evaluating opportunities and constraints relative to constructing undeveloped park land. The criteria are flexible and allow the department to respond to the changing community needs and demographics. New park needs will be identified through area plans, as land use and zoning changes may allow for higher density housing in areas such as, the Transit Village, where residential uses were not originally anticipated. Additionally, the renovation and enhancement of aging recreational facilities at the Boulder Reservoir and the Flatirons Golf Course was identified as a priority due to the financial reliance on revenue generated at these facilities. POLICY ISSUES During the 2008 budget process, total sales and use tax revenues were projected to increase 3.8 percent over 2007 collections. Due to the national economic downturn, sales and use tax projections have been revised downward to reflect 2008 year-end actuals, that are approximately 4 percent less than projected. The 2008 revenue decline will carry into 2009, resulting in reductions to the approved budget. As a result, planned operating and capital expenses must be reduced to maintain the required fund balances between revenues and expenditures. The sales and use tax revenue decline impacts capital funding in the .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund. As part of the 2010 budget process, staff utilized projections from the city's Finance Office, and prioritized and decreased funding for CIP, renovation, refurbishment and major maintenance projects accordingly. To mitigate the impact of reduced funding, staff is: • working collaboratively with the Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) workgroup to prioritize funding for deferred, major and ongoing facility maintenance; • deferring some enhancement-related improvements and development projects; • reevaluating work plans and investing in projects that mitigate ongoing maintenance expenses; • taking advantage of reduced commodity costs or increased revenue-generating opportunities; and • redirecting funding or accelerating projects to achieve energy efficiencies at recreation facilities 142 As new parks are developed and current parks are expanded, additional maintenance funding will be required to manage and maintain these areas and facilities. Identifying park maintenance funding for projects constructed by the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund continues to be a critical issue for the department and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (DRAB). As a capital improvement fund, the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund cannot be utilized to fund ongoing operations and maintenance functions. The General Fund is intended to provide maintenance funding for projects built with monies from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund. The department receives General Fund monies; however, at this time, the amount is not sufficient to cover maintenance for newly developed parks. The availability of maintenance funding is one of the criteria for prioritizing park development. In addition, the department is open to partnerships related to improving and continuing park maintenance efforts. Additional funding sources must be secured to restore service standards for maintenance operations, as well as to fund deferred maintenance and anticipated development. The department master plan includes a list of priority items to complete if additional funding is obtained. Staff is systematically quantifying the deferred maintenance needs of the parks and recreation system including park site and recreation facility needs. Currently, the maintenance backlog is approximately $5M. Additionally, a Development Excise Tax (DET) study analyzed the existing revenues generated from the collection of the DET and recommended options were presented to City Council regarding reallocating revenues from the DET or instituting impact fees for parks and recreation funding. City Council recommended that the DET allocation should include a land component for the acquisition of park land, as well as move forward with the implementation of impact fees for parks and recreation system improvements. HIGHLIGHTS The department's capital budget consists of CIP projects and renovation, refurbishment and major maintenance projects. CIP projects are defined as any major project with a cost greater than $50,000 for purchase or construction, -or major replacement of physical assets. CIP projects are potentially subject to a Community and Environmental Assessment Process (LEAP) review that evaluates any potential environmental, traffic or social impacts to Boulder residents, neighborhoods and businesses. These projects are budgeted within the framework of the city of Boulder's CIP Budget. The only exception to projects not identified as part of the CIP process would be emergency repairs that are needed during the budget year. Also, in some cases, funds are being allocated for projects that will be started once the appropriate amount of monies has been accumulated. The proposed allocation of the CIP budget includes funding from the Permanent Parks and Recreation, .25 Cent Sales Tax, .15 Cent Sales Tax and Lottery Funds. The following are the major CIP projects planned in all funds: 2010 CIP Funding East Boulder Community Park Flatirons Golf Course Irrigation System Replacement Lighting Ordinance Implementation Playground and Irrigation System Renovation Stazio Fields Irrigation Replacement Valmont City Park (Phase 1) 143 2010 to 2015 CIP Funding East Boulder Community Park Elks Neighborhood Park Flatirons Golf Course Improvements Lighting Ordinance Implementation Playground and Irrigation System Renovation Scott Carpenter Pool Improvements Unanticipated Opportunities The department continues to prioritize taking care of the existing system through renovation, refurbishment and major maintenance funding. Although these projects do not technically meet the CIP definition, capital funds are planned to be expended to meet ongoing and unanticipated needs including replacing and renovating park and recreation infrastructure, such as playgrounds and shelters; upgrading irrigation systems; and maintaining or replacing gymnasium floors, docks and walkways. The department has allocated Facilities ad Asset Management (FAM) funding for on-going and major maintenance from its .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund. Park and recreation facility renovation and refurbishment funding has been dedicated to help the department address the backlog of deferred maintenance, replacing aging infrastructure and resolving safety and environmental issues. For 2010, the budget for renovation, refurbishment and major maintenance projects and the FAM portion of the.25 Cent Sales Tax Fund totals $1.06M. FINANCING The revenues from the .25 Cent Sales Tax are estimated and based on citywide sales tax projections. The.25 Cent Sales Tax revenues were pledged for, " Payment for the principal, interest, and premium, if any, on bonds; and then for development, operation, and maintenance of the land and improvements purchased or constructed with the proceeds of the bonds; renovation and refurbishment or replacement of four pools; renovation and replacement of recreation facilities; playgrounds, mountain park trails, civic park complex; improvements to recreation centers and development of new recreation projects to be determined in the future through the Master Planning Process by the City Council; maintenance of the community park in north Boulder; development of a mountain parks environmental education program; and for the renovation of city-owned historical and cultural facilities; with the remainder being dedicated for parks and recreation purposes..." (.25 Cent Sales Tax ballot language) The Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund consists of a .9 mill levy of assessed valuation of all taxable property in the city, gifts and donations to the fund, proceeds of the sale of park or recreation property or equipment. The fund also includes revenues from a portion of a development excise tax assessed on each new residential unit constructed or annexed to the city except for those units that are designated as permanently affordable. The City Charter requires that the "...Fund shall not be used for any purpose other than the acquisition of park land or the permanent improvement of park and recreation facilities." (Charter Sec 161) Funds are used for CIP projects and capital renovations of existing facilities for items based on the $50,000 CIP project definition. 144 RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The .25 Cent Sales Tax ballot language specified that funding for the operating costs for new park development could be allocated from the sales tax fund. The operating costs for renovation and refurbishment projects are expected to remain stable but are increased annually for inflation; however, material costs are increasing at an unknown rate. Any increased operating and maintenance budget impacts from new park development or facility renovations are either absorbed within the current operating budget, or recommended for increased .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund allocations and addressed through the city's business plan and budget process. As a capital improvement fund, the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund cannot be utilized to fund ongoing operations and maintenance functions. Additional monies from the city's general fund or other sources are needed to fund operations and maintenance of new facilities developed with Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund monies. BUSINESS PLAN The department's investment strategy aligns with the city's business plan as identified in the department's master plan. CIP projects are categorized as essential and desirable based on the following parameters: 1. Essential projects are provided to ensure general health and safety maintenance, facilit p Y repair and ADA requirements (accessibility and inclusion). 2.) Desirable projects are provided to expand the system to meet ballot measure i commitments, to sustain the community's parks and recreation assets and to achieve or maintain industry standards. r PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION This year, staff provided the PRAB with a "three touch" approach whereby 1) a study session was held on February 23rd to communicate the policies and processes that guide CIP development; 2) a discussion item was presented at the March 23`d business meeting to communicate CIP definitions/criteria, prioritization and funding, status of the 2009 - 2014 CIP and to seek input on the preliminary 2010 - 2015 CIP; and 3) a public hearing was held to consider motions approving and recommending the 2010 - 2015 Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Program. The PRAB reviewed and recommended approval of the 2010 expenditures from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund (Fund 230) as presented at its April 27, 2009 business meeting. PRAB also made a motion to support the staff recommendation for the planned CIP projects for 2010 through 2015 in all funds. Due to the economic uncertainty, staff recommended deferring the development of Mesa Memorial Pocket Park and eliminating project monies until funding sources are stabilized. PRAB's motion included a recommendation to re-establish funding for construction of Mesa Memorial Park when adequate funding becomes available. 145 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Flatirons Golf Course improvements PP&R 250,000 250,000 425,000 425,000 0 0 1,350,000 Lighting Ordinance Implementation 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 250,000 1,150,000 Scott Carpenter Pool Renovation 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 1,100,000 Total: 350,000 1,450,000 525,000 525,000 500,000 250,000 3,600,000 New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions East Boulder Community Park PP&R 500,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 1,550,000 Valmont City Park (Phase I) 770,000 770,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 2,290,000 Foothills Community Park- PP&R 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 Total: 1,270,000 1,120,000 600,000 600,000 750,000 500,000 4,840,000 On-Going Projects Unanticipated Opportunities - PP&R 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Total: 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Total for Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund 1,620,000 2,570,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 1,350,000 850,000 8,840,000 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation -.25 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 Total: 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Stazio Irrigation Renovation 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 Total: 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 New Construction - Growth Related Facility I Additions Valmont City Park (Phase 1),25 cent 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 4 Elks Neighborhood Park 0 500,000 500,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,800,000 Total: 150,000 650,000 500,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,100,000 Total for Parks & Recreation.25 Cent Sales Tax Fund 600,000 950,000 800,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 5,050,000 an IM OR of s ON-OW on=% 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 7 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund E Essential Desirable Discretionary I Total Project Type/IVame Project # Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R $0 $187,500 75% $62,500 25% $250,000 1000 Lighting Ordinance Implementation $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% -7 New Construction - Growth Related Facility 1 Additions East Boulder Community Park PP&R $0 $500,000 100% $0 $500,001) 100% Valmont City Park (Phase 1) $0 $365,000 50% 5385,000 50% $770,000 100% Total for Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund: $100,000 6% $1,072,500 66% $447,500 28% $1,620,000 100% A OD 6126/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 6 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Essential Desirable Discretionary Total Project TypelName Project # Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - .25 _ $75,000 25% $225,000 75°f° $0 $300,000 100% Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair! Deficiency Correction Stazio Irrigation Renovation I $0 I $150.000 100% $0 050.600 100% New Construction -Growth Related Facility / Additions Valmont City Park (Phase 1) .25 cent so $75,000 50% $75,000 50% $150.000 100% Total for Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund: $75,000 13% $450,000 75% $75,000 13% $600,000 100% J~ City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 Parks & Recreation r= 1 j 6: Foothills Community Park NO a` I ~a _ 8: Elks Neighborhood Park M Jay Rd 10: Valmont City Park i _ Irig -J 7: Stazio Irrigation Replacement - ar - - --I~ -77 Arapahoe Rd. 1 - - - - I 5: Flatiron Golf Course Improvements I 1: Scott Carpenter F Pool Renovation .\1 S Boulder Rif 4: East Boulder Community Park Legend Year of Project • 2010 • 2011-2015 ~ 2010 2011-2015 =2010 D 2011.2015 ~ 150 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Dame: Project Number: Map Number: East Boulder Community Park PP&R 4 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: Southeast Boulder Funding Source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BvcPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: 1!' Project Description: Complete the development of the East Boulder Community Park. Approximately 15 acres of the 53 acre park remain to be constructed. The revised concept plan (adopted in 2008) includes two artificial turf multi-use fields an identified deficiency within Boulder, by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Boulder Valley School District), a permanent dog park, shelter and restrooms, and associated infrastructure, utilities and park amenities. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of park per 1000 population. Relationship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a need to develop community park sites. This site is needed to meet the standard of 1.5 acres of community parks per 1000 poplulation. Public Process Status, issues: A public process to update the concept plan was completed in 2008 and included extensive public meetings and public hearings before the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation staff work closely with Planning and Transportation staff as required for property development. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $500,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350.000 $0 $1,550,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $75,000 Description: Operating costs will increase when this project is completed. Amount stated is for 15 acres in 2005 dollars. Source of Funding: General Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % U Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 151 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Elks Neighborhood Park 6 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: North Boulder Funding Source: Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No LEAP Completed: Greenways/Utilities project through park land may require a CE Project Description: fi The Elks neighborhood park site is a 7.9 acre parcel located at 3995 28th Street. The Elks park site design will t involve extensive public review and dialogue with the community. The park will provide park services to an existing underserved area and has been prioritized for design and development to comply with ballot requirements of the .25 Cent Sales Tax. Significant flood and drainage work must be accomplished prior to park development. Parks and Recreation staff is working with Utilities and Tributary Greenways to coordinate the department's respective projects. Community Sustainability/ Project Justification: tr a Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will comply with current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals, and employ best management practices. Economic Sustainabiiity: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Development of park sites are required to meet the commitments represented under the 1995 .25 Cent Sales Tax. Social Sustainability: Parks are community gathering places. Completion of Elks park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of neighborhood park land per 1000 population, as well as the park standard of a 1/2 mile walking distance to a neighborhood park. Relationship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped park sites to meet underserved neighborhoods and park service standards. Public Process Status, Issues: The Utilities and Tributary Greenways projects along Fourmile Creek will require a CEAP, which will include the Elks park site. Relationship with Other Departments: The department will work with Utilities and Tributary Greenways to ensure that all site work is coordinated !I appropriately. The Utilities and Tributary Greenways work must be completed before Parks and Recreation can begin park development. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $500,000 $500,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,800,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $48,000 Description: Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, structures and hardscape features Source of Funding: .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential %F_2 5 %Desirable % 75% Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 152 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R 5 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: Southeast Boulder Funding Source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BVCPArea: Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements 1 Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Funding will be used for the replacement of irrigation systems. The department seeks to retain and/or increase current revenue streams as well as further departmental sustainability by enhancing the amenities at Flatirons Golf Course. In addition to the department's Master Plan, a strategic plan for Flatirons Golf Course is being developed that assesses several options for capital and operational improvements. Capital costs and revenue streams are also evaluated. Input from the public and all city stakeholders (including Transportation, Planning, Finance and the City Manager's Office) will be included to ensure a common shared vision of Flatirons Golf Course. As specific projects are identified, staff will show projects on an individual basis within the CIP process. Community Sustainabillty ! Project Justification: Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. These improvements will increase service to the community at the Flatirons Golf Course which should result in additional revenues. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. Relatlonship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues. Public Process Status, Issues: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) has been updated regularly. The PRAB will have discussions and public hearings as the strategic plan is finalized and options are evaluated. The public review process for l specific actions will be determined at a future date. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Finance, Transportation, CMO, FAM and any other identified departmental stakeholders. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $250,000 $250,000 $425,000 $425,000 $0 $0 $1,350,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Changes to operating and maintenance costs will vary depending on improvements. Source of Funding: Recreation Activity Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 75% Discretionary % 25% Total % 100% 153 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Foothills Community Park- PP&R 6 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: North Boulder Funding Source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BVCPArea: Area i Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Project funding began with the site acquisition in 1985. The Foothills Community Park site totals 69 acres. Phase 1 (44 acres) was completed in 2001. Phase IIA (temporary dog park and parking) was completed in 2004. Phase 111B (playground, shelters, restrooms, turf areas) was completed in summer 2006. Phase IiA & B development totaled eight acres. Phase I II construction is currently planned for active recreational facilities, including tennis, basketball and handball courts, however a site planning process will be undertaken before development proceeds. Community Sustainabillty / Project Justffication: Environmental Sustainability: Some of the environmentally sustainable projects within this 69 acre park include site irrigation from a ditch water source, provision for an organic community garden, restoration and preservation of native grasslands, use of recycled products, and enhancing water quality by controlled release, landscape contouring, and cleaning of storm drainage waters. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of park per 1000 population. Relationship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a need for community parks. Project is needed to meet current acreage standard of 1.5 acres of community park land per 1000 population. Public Process Status, Issues: The Master Site Plan for Foothills Community Park went through an extensive public review process. This process included identifying issues within the Major Site Review process and completion of a CEAP. Public review of Phase II was provided during a May 2002 workshop and a November 2002 Community Open House. Prior to Phase III design and construction, the site plan will be reviewed by the community and changes made to meet current community needs. Relationship with Other Departments: For initial phases of development, Parks and Recreations coordinated efforts with Housing Authority to purchase right of way and to construct Violet Street to serve both the community park and the Foothills Affordable Housing project. For future phases, the department will coordinate with OSMP regarding wildlife and natural land management. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $20,000 Description: Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, structures and hardscape features Source of Funding: .25 Sales Tax Fund, General Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary %0 Total % 1000/- rr 154 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Lighting Ordinance Implementation 0 Department: Parks & Recreation subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements I Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Based on the departments lighting study, facilities have been identified that are not compliant with the citys lighting ordinance as well as opportunities for energy conservation. The department will implement lighting retrofits in accordance with the city's lighting ordinance and to maximize energy efficiency. The department is accumulating funding in anticipation of replacement and retrofitting lighting fixtures. Criteria for determining the schedule for replacement will include cost, energy savings and safety. Initial, high priority projects include replacing lights at the East Mapleton Ballfields and the tennis courts at the North Boulder Recreation Center. Community Sustalnability 1 Project Justification: Environmental sustainability: Retrofitting lighting fixtures will meet current city codes and reduce energy use. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Energy savings are anticipated from this project. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. Relationship to Master Plans: The approved master plan identifies the need to develop, maintain, and renovate facilities to meet community demands. Additionally, the lightning will contribute to the safety of the community as well as reduce energy demands. Public Process Status, Issues: City lighting ordinance compliance is required by 2017. No public process is anticipated. The public will be notified on a project by project basis. Relationship with Other Departments: The deparment will coordinate with Planning, FAM, OEA, CAO, as needed or required. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 $250,000 $1,150,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Unknown, but will include energy costs and annual maintenance R Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Business Plan Prlorttixation of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 155 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - .25 0 t Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Upon completion of the master plan, the department committed to renovating one playground and one irrigation system per year. The specific playground and park irrigation system that will be renovated will be decided on an annual basis and communicated to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) and public. Projects are necessary to comply with goals and commitments identified in the department's master plan. The department evaluates and prioritizes needs based on criteria including safety and code compliance, age of the equipment, location in the city, and opportunities for efficiencies, collaboration or partnerships with other departments or the surrounding neighborhood. Community Sustainability! Project Justification: Environmental sustainability: Renovation of playgrounds and irrigation systems will meet current city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Water conservation techniques will be coordinated with the city's Office of Water Conservation. Water and energy conservation best practices will be implemented. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. These park renovations are necessary to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to meet expressed community demands. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. Relationship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation master plan identified the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. In addition, the department committed to renovating one playground and one irrigation system per year. Public Process Status, Issues: The department will conduct outreach to the neighborhood on the needs and design of the playground. Typically, two public meetings are conducted - an initial one to gather suggestions and a follow-up meeting to review design options. The project is posted on the department's website and regular updates are posted. A email group may also be created to update interested community members. The PRAB will be updated on a regular basis. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Utilities, Water Conservation and Transportation as necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $3,000 Description: Inspection and repair of equipment, graffiti removal, safety inspection, playground surface maintenance Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% 156 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Scott Carpenter Pool Renovation 1 Department: Parks & Recreation subcommunity: Crossroads Funding Source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Scott Carpenter Pool requires a major renovation, including replacing the pool shell, deck, boiler, pumphouse and renovating the locker rooms. Renovations will result in energy efficiency, water conservation and water technology improvements. Staff from Parks and Recreation and FAM are coordinating on the project to utilize funding from both departments and project management expertise. An assessment of the facility will be completed to determine the scope of the project, cost estimate and opportunities for leveraging outside funding sources. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental i sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs. contribute to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. Relationship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues. Public Process Status, Issues: As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be determined. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation staff works closely with Facility Asset Management staff on all building and facility improvements. FAM is also planning funding for 2011 to contribute to the pool renovation. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Annual operating costs to be determined as specific projects are identified Source of Funding: Recreation Activity Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% 157 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Stazio Irrigation Renovation 7 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity: East Boulder r Funding Source: Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund BvcPArea: Area II Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair 1 Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The irrigation systems at the sports fields have been analyzed and the department has identified a need to renovate the irrigation system at Stazio Fields in 2010. The current systems do not allow for proper coverage of the turf and are inefficient for irrigation needs. The original system includes valves that are no longer manufactured, leaving it virtually impossible to repair. A new computerized clock, including a weather station, has been installed and will be compatible with the new irrigation system and will improve water consumption efficiency. System renovation will ensure that operations can continue, water budgets will be met and current revenue streams are maintained or increased. Community Sustainablilty I Project Justification: Environmental Sustainability: Irrigation system replacements will be designed to address environmental sustainability. These projects will result in long-term efficient use of energy and water. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. These irrigation replacements will help increase the quality of the sports playing fields, which will allow the department to increase the number of events at the sports fields. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life. Irrigation replacement will increase the quality of the playing surface and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. Relationship to Master Plans: The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in facilities that offer opportunities to increase revenues. Public Process Status, Issues: As the scope of work is defined, the necessity of any public process will be determined. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation staff will coordinate with Public Works/Utilities, Water Conservation and any other identified departmental stakeholders. L Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Irrigation system inspection and repair Source of Funding: .15 Cent Sales Tax Fund, Recreation Activity Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 158 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Unanticipated Opportunities - PP&R 0 __J 1 Department: Parks & Recreation Subcommunity; System-wide Funding Source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The unanticipated opportunities CIP allocation is intended to meet changing and unexpected community needs. The unanticipated opportunities may include, but is not limited to: land acquisition, facility acquisition, capital renovation or development, city contribution towards potential public-private, public-public or other partnership agreements and energy efficiency projects. As specific projects are identified, staff will show projects on an individual basis within the annual CIP budget, which is approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Community Sustainability 1 Project Justification: Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city , codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Sites are needed to meet the commitments represented under the .25 cent 1995 sales tax and to meet standards of 1.5 acres of park land per 1000 population. Recreation facilities are intended to meet expressed community demands. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. Park sites are community gathering places. Relationship to Master Plans: ' The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop, maintain and renovate facilities. The need to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped park sites was also deemed a priority. Public Process Status, Issues: Any potential projects will be reviewed and discussed at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meetings. Large scale projects will encompass additional public process, including scope, design, impacts and timing. Relationship with Other Departments: Planning, Open Space/Mountain Parks, FAM, Transportation and any other identified departmental stakeholder will be involved in project discussions. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: As projects are determined, operating costs will be calculated Source of Funding: .25 Cent Sales Tax, Recreation Activity Fund, GF Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 159 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Valmont City Park (Phase 1) 1 L_ __71 10 Department: Parks & Recreation subcommunity: East Boulder Funding Source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: Site Review Approved Project Description: During the process of updating the concept plan for Valmont City Park (VCP), the community has expressed a desire to begin development of part of the park as soon as possible. In response, staff has identified funding for the Phase 1 of VCP (completing the portion of the park north of Valmont Road and a disc golf course on the south side of Valmont Road). This would allow for construction of the bike park, dog park and other associated park amenities. Park development will meet service standards outlined in the department's master plan. Community Sustainability) Project Justification: Environmental sustainability: Design and development of Phase 1 will meet current city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Water conservation and energy efficiency measures will be included. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. This project will meet expressed community demands. The bike park is likely to contribute to economic vitality through special events. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places and this park site will serve the needs of various sections of the community. Relationship to Master Plans: A master plan goal is to fill in the gaps in the parks and recreation system. Revising the concept plan for Valmont City Park was identified as a 2007 work plan item. Completion of Valmont City Park was identified in the department's vision plan. Public Process Status, Issues: An extensive public process has been conducted during the revision of the concept plan, including formation of an advisory group, conducting a community survey, holding three open houses, and numerous public meetings with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). A project website was also developed and updated regularly. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) has been involved and updated regularly on the design and development process. Public hearings have been conducted at the PRAB, Landmark's Board and Planning Board as required. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Utilities, Transportation and other departments as necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding ( $770,000 $770,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $2,290,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: As park is developed, maintenance and operating costs will be determined Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 509/6Discretionary% 50% Total % 100% 160 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Valmont City Park (Phase I) .25 cent 10 Department: Parks & Recreation subcommunity: East Boulder Funding Source: Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: During the process of updating the concept plan for Valmont City Park (VCP), the community has expressed a desire to begin development of part of the park as soon as possible. In response, staff has identified funding for the Phase 1 of VCP (completing the portion of the park north of Valmont Road and a disc golf course on the south side of Valmont Road). This would allow for construction of the bike park, dog park and other associated park amenities. Park development will meet service standards outlined in the department's master plan. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: Environmental sustainability: Design and development of Phase 1 will meet current city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Water conservation and energy efficiency measures will be included. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. This project will meet expressed community demands. The bike park is likely to contribute to economic vitality through special events. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places and this park site will serve the needs of various sections of the community. Relationship to Master Plans. A master plan goal is to fill in the gaps in the parks and recreation system. Revising the concept plan for Valmont City Park was identified as a 2007 work plan item. Completion of Valmont City Park was identified in the department's vision plan. Public Process Status, Issues: An extensive public process has been conducted during the revision of the concept plan, including formation of an advisory group, conducting a community survey, holding three open houses, and numerous public meetings with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). A project website was also developed and updated regularly. The PRAB has been involved and updated regularly on the design and development process. Public hearings have been conducted at the PRAB, Landmark's Board and Planning Board as required. Relationship with Other Departments: Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Utilities, Transportation and other departments as necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding - $150,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Will be determined with final site design Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable %F-5 0% Discretionary % 50% Total % 100% 161 OPEN SPACE FUND 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The proposed 2010 CIP for the Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) Department continues funding for the Acquisition CIP at $3,400,000, the Mineral Rights CIP at $100,000 and the Water Rights CIP at $200,000 annually in 2010 and thereafter except that in 2011, the department has reduced the proposed funding for the Acquisition CIP to $1,732,165 and funding for the Water Rights CIP to $40,000 in order to balance impacts of the loss of revenues over 1 projections that started in early 2008 and has continued into 2009. The Visitor Infrastructure CIP was increased starting in 2006 to $450,000 to implement the Visitor Master Plan (VMP). These uses of funds will be sustainable under the current Budget Office revenue projections. POLICY ISSUES None at this time. W- HIGHLIGHTS From January 1997 through May 2009, approximately 16,275 acres have been added to the Open Space system, bringing the total Open Space acreage acquired since 1967 to 45,090 acres. Properties acquired since 2000, including lands in Jefferson County, have been purchased under ' the guidance of the Accelerated Acquisition Program, Acquisition and Management Plan 2000- 2006 and Acquisition and Management Plan 2006-2011. Additionally, 6,555 acres were acquired via the 2001 merger of the Mountain Parks Division of the Parks and Recreation Department with the Open Space/Real Estate Department. Staff anticipates acquiring an additional 5,815 acres under the 2006-2011 Acquisitions and Management Plan subject to availability of funds. Within the Land Acquisition program, additional acres of open space land will be acquired, subject to available funding, within the BVCP Area III, the Mountain Backdrop, the Northern Tier and in Jefferson County as approved by the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) and City Council. Funding is provided from the projected restricted open space sales tax revenues. The project includes funding for survey, appraisal and professional fees and related acquisition and immediate management costs. Annual funding for the Visitor Infrastructure program was increased by $200,000 to the current $450,000 starting in 2006 to meet the work plan identified in the OSMP Visitor Master Plan approved by council in April 2005. This program provides funding for capital maintenance of existing trails and trailheads, construction of new trails and trailheads and other facilities that improve the visitor experience, such as safe road crossings and to restore areas where visitor impacts are high. The Water Rights Acquisition program provides funding to purchase additional water shares from private owners or others for use on Open Space for agricultural and environmental purposes, as water becomes available in the Coal Creek, South Boulder, Boulder and Lefthand Creek watersheds. Funds will also be used for professional, legal and engineering fees, and other analysis necessary to manage and protect the water rights portfolio. The Open Space and Mountain Parks staff will continue to work with other city departments to assist in enhancing in- 170 stream flow where possible. The Minerals Rights Acquisition program provides funding to purchase underlying mineral interests from private owners as they become available on the real estate market. Many of these interests in minerals, gas, oil and aggregates were severed from the properties before purchase by the city and could cause future management issues. Funds are also used for research, mapping and analysis of potential acquisitions. The Historic Structures and Trails Stabilization and Restoration program uses Lottery funds within the Mountain Backdrop to assess, stabilize and renovate significant historic structures and trails and to protect pre-historic sites identified in cultural resource inventories. These funds were reallocated and transferred to Parks and Recreation in 2007 and 2008 and starting in 2009 the previous allocation formula was reestablished, which will return the VMP infrastructure implementation to the Vision Plan level. FINANCING Sufficient funds are available in the Open Space Fund to appropriate the 2010 CIP. Open Space bonds totaling $20,115,000 were issued in May 2006 under the $45,000,000 general revenue bond authorization approved by voters in November 1997. In 2009, two existing bond issues were refunded resulting in an annual savings of approximately $220,000 per year for four years starting in 2010. Additional series of bonds are projected to be issued in future years under previous general revenue and revenue bond authorizations and have been deferred pending changes in market conditions. Dates and amounts will depend on a variety of factors, including future sales tax collections and funding needs for acquisitions. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The Open Space and Mountain Parks Visitor Master Plan was adopted in April 2005 and outlines a significant capital expenditure plan in order to address identified needs within the six year CIP schedule. This, together with the Open Space Long-Range Management Policies adopted in 1995, sets the management direction for the OSMP Department. These policy level plans, along with area and resource management plans and completed Trails Study Area Plans called for in the VMP provide the framework to prioritize and budget specific resource management actions to further the OSMP Department mission. Currently, OSMP staff is in the implementation phase of the goals, objectives and actions recommended in the Acquisitions and Management Plan, the VMP, the North Boulder Valley Area Management Plan, the South Boulder Creek Area Management Plan, the Plains Ecosystem Management Plan, the Forest Ecosystem Management Plan and other adopted plans and policies. BUSINESS PLAN NARRATIVE 1.) Community Sustainability Philosophy The Open Space and Mountain Parks Department recognizes the importance of the OSMP program to the Boulder community as it is a key to preserving Boulder's environment and natural setting. It protects the context for the high quality of life that helps attract and sustain employment and retention of jobs, providing opportunities for access to and understanding and appreciation of this landscape that is treasured and enjoyed by the community as a whole. Responsible management of the program and its assets always needs to be mindful of this importance to the community. Preservation and protection of the land and its resources through the investment strategies of the Acquisition and Management and the Visitor Master Plans is 171 intended to bring the highest quality of experience to the community. Therefore, the council's goals for community sustainability and its high quality environmental, economic and social values are basic to the philosophy that guides the actions of the department. The 2007 Community Survey indicates very high utilization of the OSMP system with 96% of respondents accessing the land at least annually and over 56% visiting more than once per month. Support is equally strong for more acquisitions and improved access to trails, reaching 91 % each with these factors being very or somewhat important to 68% and 65% of the community respectively. The community supports measures taken by the city to protect the natural environment of Boulder (84%) as well as its quality of life (69%) and agrees with the adequacy of these efforts. Protecting the natural environment and the quality of life have always been keystones of the OSMP programs with specific recitals of these values as purposes for Open Space in the City Charter. Approval for the quality of services provided by the department is at 95% for very good or good ratings. 2.) Business Plan Description OSMP continues implementation of two major plans: The Acquisitions and Management Plan 2005-2011 and the Visitor Master Plan. A Strategic Operations Plan approach developed by staff in 2007-08 will help to focus the department's work plans and accomplishments. Acquisitions and Management Plan Council established and clarified two major priorities in 2005 with approval of the VMP and extension of the Acquisitions and Management Plan from 2006 through 2011. The Acquisitions and Management Plan was first approved by council in 1999 and expanded in 2001. It was again extended by council in 2005 and most recently reviewed by council on January 20, 2009. It sets the framework for completion of the Open Space acquisitions program, which entered its 40th year in 2007, at approximately 51,000 acres extending from Coal Creek Canyon in the south to Table Mountain and the Saint Vrain Creek watershed to the north. Approximately 6,000 acres remain for acquisition including full-fee purchases, purchased and donated conservation easements and Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs). The current economic downturn which affected sales tax collections starting in early 2008 has caused the department to extend the target dates for completion of the plan and some acquisition opportunities may be deferred or lost. Staff continues to utilize a range of available tools to complete the plan including partnerships and IGAs with other entities, as well as utilizing the remaining bonding authorities from previous elections, the Boulder Municipal Property Authority (BMPA) notes and annual Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) appropriations from the Open Space Fund balance. Visitor Master Plan The VMP will enter its fifth full year of implementation in 2010. Major capital projects envisioned in the plan were scheduled within a six-year CIP horizon through 2010 but the plan also acknowledged that it would "require a longer time period to complete all identified capital and non-capital projects." The Fiscally Constrained Budget (Current Funding Scenario) relied on a combination of Open Space capital funds and Lottery funds. OSMP has nearly doubled its contribution for Visitor Infrastructure to $450,000 per year and thus raised the potential for capital implementation toward the Vision Plan (Identified Need) Level when combined with the Lottery funds. The Lottery funds which had been reallocated to Parks and Recreation for two years, in 2007 and 2008, were restored in 2009 and continued access to these funds is essential to 172 return implementation to the Action Plan (Accelerated Funding) level in the future. A particularly dynamic aspect of the VMP is the Trails Study Area (TSA) concept. The VMP identified nine TSAs within the system for further study in order to produce, with extensive public process, a comprehensive and detailed set of recommendations for each area including actions for existing trails, undesignated trails and new trails as well as preservation and protection of natural resources. Completion of the first two TSAs in the Marshall Mesa/Southern Grasslands and Eldorado Mountain/Doudy Draw areas has resulted in visitor infrastructure plans that are more detailed than the broad brush of the Management Area Designations found in the VMP and partial implementation of improved and new visitor infrastructure has been accomplished in both areas. In 2006 the staff condensed the initial nine TSAs into four TSAs, determined so as to complete a system plan that will address and link together resource management needs not addressed in the VMP or other approved area and resource management plans. In 2009 staff began planning for the West TSA extending from Eldorado Canyon to Fourmile Canyon. This process is anticipated to extend into 2011. In 2006 council directed staff to complete a Grasslands Plan which will be completed in 2009. These multiple planning efforts have driven the need for resources, including staff, to implement these plans including construction, maintenance, education, enforcement and monitoring of impacts. The current economic downturn which affected local sales tax collections starting in early 2008 has slowed the ability of the department to implement these plans and, as noted earlier in this narrative, certain capital funding for acquisitions of land and water rights has been reduced in 2011 in order to balance the loss of revenues over projections that has also impacted the city as a whole. OSMP has developed the following set of guiding principles and investment strategy to help prioritize the scope and phasing of projects and programs. { Guiding Principals and Investment Strategy 1.) Essential Services include the Charter goals of land acquisition for open space and mountain parks; preservation and restoration of open space and mountain parks land to protect unusual, spectacular, historically important and valuable terrain, geologic formations, flora and fauna. Other Charter goals include preserving water resources by purchase of water rights; shaping the development of the city; limiting urban sprawl through land acquisitions; and preserving land for its aesthetic or passive recreational value and its contribution to the quality of life of the community. In addition to attaining Charter goals, the department must comply with local, state and federal laws and regulations; for example, state weed laws and dam safety regulations. 2.) Desirable Services include enforcement of city code requirements including dog management, parking on Flagstaff Mountain and trailhead curfews. In April 2005, r the City Council approved the Visitor Master Plan establishing long-term policies and practices designed to improve the visitor experience on OSMP land. Additionally, OSMP is guided by the adopted Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan, the Open Space Long Range Management Policies and resource management plans including Forest Ecosystem Management Plan and the updated Grasslands Plan. All of the plans require that the department take specific actions for implementation and management. 3.) Discretionary Services include certain aspects of facility maintenance, education, enforcement, volunteer management, monitoring and planning that are important to members of the community, as well as management of third tier prairie dog issues 173 which include relocation of prairie dogs from private property in the city to other sites. This relocation is no longer being performed, as it is no longer feasible. 1 Description of Service Standards 1 Adaptive management provides the focus for evaluation of departmental service delivery. This involves processes of information gathering, monitoring, evaluation and adjustment of actions if needed, and utilizes various tools including the concept of Limits of Acceptable Change. This focus on adaptive management is important to effective implementation of the VMP and successive actions including changes to visitor infrastructure in TSAs. Overview of Vision Plan The OSMP Vision Plan includes full implementation of the VMP approved by council in April 2005, as well as outcomes of the TSA public processes now in development together with the goals of the Acquisition and Management Plan 2005-2011 extended by council in October 2005 and most recently reviewed by council in January, 2009. OSBT ACTION The Open Space Board of Trustees will be asked to recommend that the Planning Board and City Council approve $4,150,000 annually from the Open Space Fund CIP 2010, and 2012 through 2015 budget, and approve $2,322,165 from the Open Space Fund CIP 2011 in the summer of 2009. Ok 174 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Open Space Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction - Not Growth Related OSMP South Trail Study Area 180,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 380,000 OSMP West Trail Study Area 80,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 180,000 OSMP North Trail Study Area 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 OSMP East Trail Study Area 0 0 0 50,000 70,000 140,000 260,000 Total: 260,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 120,000 240,000 1,220,000 On-Going Projects Acquisition Program 3,400,000 1,732,165 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 18,732,165 Mineral Rights Acquisition 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Visitor Infrastructure - System Wide 190,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 330,000 210,000 1,480,000 cn Water Rights Acquisition 200,000 40,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,040,000 Total: 3,890,000 2,122,165 3,950,000 3,950,000 4,030,000 3,910,000 21,852,165 Total for Open Space Fund 4,150,000 2,322,165 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 23,072,165 i~ M ~ INO S = ifs rommi 6aJ 6sw i 6=--e 6126/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 5 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Open Space Fund Essential I Desirable I Discretionary Total Project Type/Name Project # Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding New Construction - Not Growth Related OSMP South Trail Study Area 843050 I $90,000 50% $90,000 50% $0 $180,000 100% OSMP West Trail Study Area 843060 $40,000 50% $40,000 50% $0 $80,000 100% On-Going Projects Acquisition Program 720000 $3,400,000 100% $0 $0 $3,400,000 1100% Mineral Rights Acquisition 935000 $50,000 50% $50,000 50% $0 $100,000 100% Visitor Infrastructure - System Wide 843000 $95,000 50% $95,000 50% $0 $190,000 100% Water Rights Acquisition 930000 $100,000 50% $100,000 50% $0 $200,000 100% Total for Open Space Fund: $3,775,000 91% $375,000 9% $0 0% $4,150,000 100% V City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 Open Space and Mountain Parks rrr l~ 1 I ~ 1 I o 0 i 134: OSMP North Trail Study Area Jay Rd i 133:II OSMP East Trail Study Area ~1 I IrII--- ~ 1 a a l Ara ahoe Rd. 133: OSMP East Trail Study Area " s S Boulder R,I 133: OSMP East Trail Study Area 136: OSMP West Trail Study Area 7 135: OSMP South Trail Study Area Legend Year of Project j 02010 1 .2011-2015 ~ 2010 =2011-2015 = 2010 01 20 1 1-2015 177 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report j'. Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Acquisition Program 720000 0 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BVCPArea: Area I I I Project Type: On-Going Projects CFJ1P Required: No CEAP Completed: NlA Project Description: This project is to acquire additional acres of open space, subject to available funding, within the BVCP Area III as well as the areas in the Northern Tier and in Jefferson County as approved by the OSBT and City Council. Funding is provided from the projected restricted Open Space sales tax revenue. The project includes funding for survey, appraisal, professional fees and related acquisition and immediate management costs. Community SustalnablItty I Project Justification: L Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The Open Space lands add to the visual appeal of our community and the management practices after acquiring these properties insure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and provide for recreational opportunities for our citizens. Relationship to Master Plans: Funding for the acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the OSBT and City Council in October 2005. The conceptual acquisition area in Area III is annually coordinated and incorporated with the Boulder Valley Comp Plan. Public Process Status, Issues: Specific purchases are recommended by the Open Space Board of Trustees and approved by City Council. Relationship with Other Departments: The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks and Recreation, Greenways, Transportation, Utilities and Planning. The department also works with and promotes inter-governmental cooperation with national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance (COSA), GOCO, Colorado Dept of Natural Resources, CDOW and others including the Trust for Public Lands, The Conservation Fund and Nature Conservancy. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $3,400,000 $1,732,165 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $18,732,165 Change from Prior Year: Funds are reduced in 2011 to balance the loss of revenues over projections. Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: OSMP maintenance costs are primarily related to visitation and visitor infrastructure. Ac uisition of land does not necessarily increase operating costs at a significant level. Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 1009/6-1 Desirable Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 178 I 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Mineral Rights Acquisition 935000 0 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks 5ubcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: N/A Project Description: This program provides funding to purchase underlying mineral interests from private owners or others as they become available on the real estate market. Many of these interests in minerals, gas, oil and aggregates were severed from the lands before properties were purchased by the City and could cause future management issues. Funds would also provide for research, mapping and analyzing potential acquisitions. Community Sustainabiltty / Project Justification: Contributes to Council's key focus areas. Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program is one that has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The Open Space land system adds to the visual appeal of our community and the management practices after acquiring these properties ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife and protect the quality of our waterways. Relationship to Master Plans: Funding for these acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the OSBT and City Council in 1999 and in 2000, 2005 and 2008. Public Process Status, issues: Annual funding is approved by both the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council. Relationship with Other Departments: The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks and Recreation, Utilities and Transportation. The department also works with and promotes inter-governmental cooperation with national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space, Jefferson County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance (COSA), GOCO, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, CDOW and others. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $600,000 Change from Prior Year: This is a 100% increase over 2009 after funds were cut. Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 I Description: Included in annual appropriations for operations Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% 1 179 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: OSMP East Trail Study Area 843080 133 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BvCPArea: Area III Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related LEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: As appropriate a Project Description: This area contains approximately 10,900 acres and includes the eastern quadrant of the Boulder Valley and extends from Highway 119-Longmont Diagonal south to Highway 36. It includes the Dry Creek , Union Pacific/Whiterocks, and Tailgrass Prairie East sub-areas. Planning for this Trails Study Area (TSA) will include Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis which is anticipated to begin in 2013. Potential projects for this area include: limited number of new trails, designation and major maintenance for some undesignated trails and closure and reclamation of undesignated trails, trail head improvements, new fences and upgrades and/or additional regulatory, way-finding and interpretive signs. Costs for studies, engineering and permits are estimated at $50,000. Funding for construction/studies, engineering and permits will be allocated approximately as follows: 2013: $25,000/$25,000, 2014: $60,000/$10,000, 2015: $125,000/$15,000 Community Suatalnability I Project Justification: Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. Relationship to Master Plans: Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. Public Process Status, Issues: Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. Relationship with Other Departments: Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $70,000 $140,000 $260,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan Pdoritlzatlon of Services: Essential % 50% Desirable % F-57/71 Discretionary Total % 100% 180 1 ;I 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: OSMP North Trail Study Area 843070 134 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BvCPArea: Area III Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related LEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: As appropriate Project Description: This area contains approximately 9,500 acres and includes the North Foothills area north of Lee Hill Road and the Boulder Valley Ranch area extending east to Highway 119-Longmont Diagonal. This includes Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis which is anticipated to begin in 2010. Potential projects for this area include: consultants to help with resource inventories, limited number of new trails, designation and major maintenance for some undesignated trails, closure and reclamation of other undesignated trails, trail head improvements, new fences and upgraded and/or additional regulatory, way-finding and interpretive signs. Costs for studies, engineering and permits are estimated at $60,000. Funding for construction/studies, engineering and permits will be allocated approximately as follows: 2011: $25,000/$25,000, 2012: $90,0001$10,000, 2013: $135,000/$15,000, 2014: $45,0001$5,000, 2015 $45,000/$5,000 Community Sustainabillty l Project Justification: Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. Relationship to Master Plans: Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. Public Process Status, Issues: Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. Relationship with Other Departments: Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $50,000 $400,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan Prtorttlzatlon of Services: Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary %r~ Total % 100% 181 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: ` OSMP South Trail Study Area 843050 135 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks Subcommunity: System-wide M~ Funding Source: Open Space Fund BVCPkea; Area III Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related l~ CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: As appropropriate Project Description: This Trails Study Area (TSA) contains approximately 9,800 acres and includes areas known as the Eldorado Mountain/Doudy Draw TSA west of Highway 93 and the Marshall Mesa/South Grasslands TSA east of Highway 93. It extends from Eldorado Mountain and Bull Gulch in the west, easterly to Highway 36 and lies south of Eldorado Springs Drive and Marshall Drive. Trails projects in this area west of Highway 93 were identified in the planning process that was completed in 2006. Specific trails alignments and designs were initiated in 2007 and major projects undertaken in 2008. Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis was completed for trails in this area in 2007-08. Additional projects that are planned for 2010 and later include continued closure and reclamation of undesignated trials, new trails, etc. based on MM/SG TSA plan objectives. Near the end of this planning cycle, the initiation of the planning process for the whole TSA area will begin. Costs for studies, engineering and permits are estimated at $40,000. Funding for construction/studies, engineering and permits will be allocated approximately as follows: 2010:$160,000/$20,000, 2011: $90,000/$10,000, 2012: $45,000/$5,000, 2015: $45,000/$5,000 Community Sustainabillty 1 Project Justification: Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. Relationship to Master Plans; Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. Public Process Status, Issues: Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. Relationship with Other Departments: Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $180,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000 $380,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan PrloriNzation of Services: 182 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary %C~ Total % 100% 183 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: OSMP West Trail Study Area 843060 136 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks 5ubcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: New Construction - Not Growth Related CEAP Required: No LEAP Completed: As appropriate Project Description: This area contains approximately 11,300 acres and lies west of the city limits and extends from Eldorado Springs of Drive north to Lee Hill Road. Context base for analysis and alternatives for Trails in this Trails Study Area (TSA) was started in 2008 and is scheduled for completion in 2010. This includes Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis. Potential projects for this area include: limited number of new trails, designation and major maintenance for some undesignated trails and closure and reclamation of undesignated trails, trail head improvements, and upgraded and/or additional regulatory, way-finding and interpretive signs. Costs for studies, engineering and permits are estimated at $18,000. Funding for construction/studies, engineering and permits will be allocated approximately as follows: 2010: $72,000/$8,000, 2011: $45,000/$5,000, 2012:$45,000/$5,000 Community Sustainabllky I Project Justification: Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. Relationship to Master Plans. Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by OSBT and City Council in 2005. Public Process Status, Issues: Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. Relationship with Other Departments: Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $80,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan Prloritisation of Services: Essential %F-5 o _%Desirable %F-50'/--] Discretionary Total % 100% 184 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Visitor Infrastructure - System Wide 843000 0 Department: Open Space Mountain Parks Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BVCPArea: Area I I I Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: As appropriate Project Description: This program provides funding on a system-wide basis for capital maintenance and new construction on existing trails and trailheads, new trails and trailheads, other facilities that improve the visitor experience (e.g. safe road crossings), and capital restoration of areas where visitor impacts are high. The 2005 Visitor Master Plan provides a 10-year template for system-wide projects and programs which are studied and planned through the Trail Study Area (TSA) process. There are four such major TSA areas in the system and additional sub-areas. The Visitor Infrastructure CIP provides the funding base for on-going major capital maintenance and large scale projects including connections between and outside of the TSAs. For example, this program includes OSMP participation in the multi-agency IBM Trail Connector lead by Boulder County Transportation in cooperation with the City's Transportation, Water Utilities, OSMP and Parks and Recreation Departments. Planning began in 2008 with construction in 2009. While total project cost is quite large and includes County transportation funds and $920,000 of Federal funds, the anticipated city share of this is relatively small. See CIP line below. Costs for studies, engineering and permits are estimated at $150,000. Community Sustainabillty ! Project Justification: Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. 1 Relationship to Master Plans: d Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. Public Process Status, Issues: Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. Relationship with Other Departments: `s Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $190,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $330,000 $210,000 $1,480,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: 185 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% 186 I i ;d 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ' Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Water Rights Acquisition 930000 0 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BVCPArea: Area III Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: N/A Project Description: This will provide funding to purchase additional water rights from private owners or others for use on Open Space for agricultural and environmental purposes as water becomes available. Program funding includes water acquisitions in the Coal Creek, South Boulder, Boulder and Lefthand Creek watersheds. Funding will also be used for professional fees, legal and engineering fees, analysis and mapping necessary to manage and protect the water rights portfolio. Because of our continuing wildlife and habitat concerns, the Open Space and Mountain Parks Resource Conservation staff will continue to work with other City departments to assist in enhancing in- ii stream flow where possible. Although the average annual expenditures for water rights purchases out of this fund over the past ten years has been $51,000, in some years 100% of these funds has been required for acquisitions due to the high cost of senior water rights which can exceed $100,000 per share. Additionally, the department has spent approximately $17,000 annually over the past 10 years on the attorney fees and engineering fees that are required, as noted in this project's description, to defend the department's water rights portfolio. Community SustainabilityI Project Justification: Contributes to Council's key focus areas. Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program including water rights is one that has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The Open Space resources add to the visual appeal of our community and the management practices after acquiring these properties ensure that we continue to preserve traditional agricultural practices and to provide habitat preservation for wildlife and protect the quality of our waterways. Relationship to Master Plans: Funding for these water rights acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the OSBT and City Council in 1999 and in 2000, 2005 and 2008. Public Process Status, Issues: Annual funding is approved by both the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council. Relationship with Other Departments: The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks and Recreation, Utilities and Transportation. The department also works with and promotes inter-governmental cooperation with national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space, Jefferson County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance (COSA), GOCO, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, CDOW and others. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $200,000 $40,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,040,000 Change from Prior Year: Funds are reduced in 2011 to balance the loss of revenues over projections. Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Included in annual appropriations for operations Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% 187 CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2010-2015 Capital Development Fund (CDF) Capital Improvements Program is $1,660,000. Three projects are scheduled in 2010 for a total of $580,000. POLICY ISSUES None HIGHLIGHTS The 2010-2015 CIP projects reflect the City's participation in the creation of small community plazas and other municipal spaces / projects. The CIP primarily focuses on the construction of a new Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage facility adjacent to Fire Station 6 in Gunbarrel. Anticipated funding for this $3.5M project will come from two sources: $500K from the CDF and $3M from the federal Assistance to Firefighters Grant as part of the American and Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The fire chief has been given approval by the city manager to start the grant application process. This project will move forward only if grant funds are received. A 5,800 square foot General Storage Facility (GSF) at the City Yards is proposed to be built that will used for recycling building materials, wastes, computers, and furniture and for other city operational needs. The scope of this facility may change as a result of a Downtown Office Space Study. However, due to the current economic situation, this study has been placed on hold and the GSF project has been moved from 2011 to 2012. Specific projects will include an emphasis on sustainable design practices, reuse and recycling of materials, and energy efficient design applications. FINANCING Funding for CDF projects is derived from the assessment of excise taxes on new development. Council will be asked to provide feedback on Development Impact Fee and Development Excise Tax Studies prepared by TischlerBise on July 28. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The CDF can not be used for facility maintenance or operational expenses. As such, department and tenant operating budgets are to identify any on-going costs and corresponding funding. FAM typically calculates these operational costs and advises departments accordingly. Users of the General Storage Facility will pay their portion of operational costs through a cost allocation process and should realize an overall budget ' savings for storage as compared to fees currently charged by private facilities. 188 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Capital Development Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Municipal Spaces 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Construct / Purchase a General Storage Facility 0 0 830,000 0 0 0 830,000 Total: 580,000 50,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,660,000 Total for Capital Development Fund 580,000 50,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,660,000 ivw~ ohm* 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 1 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Capital Development Fund Essential I Desirable Discretionary i Total Project Type/Name Project # Funding % Funding I % Funding % Funding % New Construction - Growth Related Facility J Additions Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects 511702 $0 $50,000 100% $0 $50,000 100% Municipal Spaces 511715 $0 $30,000 100% $0 $30,000 100% Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage 501XXX $0 $500,000 100% $0 $500,000 100% Total for Capital Development Fund: $0 0% $580,000 100% $0 0% $580,000 100% co 0 City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2010 - 2015 PW/Facilities and Asset Management I ■ 96: Maintainance of Boulder Reservoir r' - Sewer System Repairs 92: Wildland Fire Station and `erg°r i Apparatus Storage i (I (00 Jay Rd ~ 'k102: Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 91: North Boulder Park Shelter Repair 100: Construct/ Purchase Iris •-'w a General Storage Facility i e 119: Municipal Services Center Bldg. B . ao ~ Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping CL i CO i 107: Stazio Tinsile Canopy i - - Covering Replacement 123: Stazio Restrooms fio and Concessions 106: Maintenance of Scott Carpenter Locker Rooms 94: Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 93: Major Maintenance i 98: Main Library Carpet Replacement Fire Station #3 101: West Senior Center Maint. and Rehab. 109: Reconstruct Main Library North P:97: I I S Boulder Rd 118: Main Library - Upgrade Auditorium hting - ~'h-:t, - - - and Sound System ~ 11f Legend Year of Project Martin Park Shelter Major • 2010 Maintenance • 2011-2015 -2010 = 2011-2015 j` =2010 ® 2011-2015 191 .r- 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage 501XXX 92 is Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: Gunbarrel Funding Source: Capital Development Fund BVCPArea: Area II Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Construct a new wildland fire station (7,725 sf) and fire apparatus storage facility (6,000 sf) adjacent to Fire Station 6 in Gunbarrel. The wildland fire crew currently operates out of several facilities around the city. This arrangement is not efficient; it creates the need to drive from location to location to conduct regular equipment checks and causes delays in emergency response. Their main facility is out of a house at 1888 Violet Street, which is zoned for very low density residential and being used for offices and dorm space. In addition, equipment storage in the fire stations is limited. With specialty apparatus (such as for hazardous materials and water rescue) and reserve fire engines, there is insufficient garage space in the city fire stations. Apparatus is being stored in a barn on Jay Raod. Supply storage is so limited that many items must be ordered only after supply is exhausted. This new facility will consolidate high value fire apparatus in a climate controlled space. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: A new facility will be constructed to LEED Silver standards. Having this facility will reduce vehicle miles traveled with the current need to drive to multiple locations to regularly check equipment and response time would also improve with higher availabiltiy of wildland fire personnel. Equipment life would be extended being housed in a climate controlled facility. Relationship to Master Plans: The 1996 Fire-Rescue Master Plan identified a need for storage and administrative offices for wildland fire operations adjacent to Station 6. The Draft 2009 Fire-Rescue Master Plan identifies an action plan requirement for both a wiland fire facility and a vehicle and equipment storage facility. Public Process Status, Issues: Feasibility of this project will be further explored by the Facilities and Asset Management branch and Fire Department for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 grant possibilities under Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Assistance to Firefighters Grant application was published on May 29, 2009, and it does not allow grant funding for any pre-construction costs such as design, permits, and project management nor construction costs for security, landscaping, land purchases, and furnishings. Those costs can be partially covered with the sale of the vacated property at 1888 Violet after construction is completed. Land use and plan reviews for new construction will be followed - project designs with the Planning Department, design reviews by DDAB and the Planning Board, and land use reviews as required. The grant also requires that construction be completed within 36 months of award of grant funds. Relationship with Other Departments: The Fire Department will be a large part of the development, design and completion of this project. OSMP Real Estate with assist with land transactions. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 r Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 as local match for ARRA funding Annual On-going Operating Costs $90,000 Description: ARRA Assistance to Firefighters Grant ($3,000,000) / Land Sale ($400,000) / CDF $100,000 - Total project estimate $3,500,000 Source of Funding: Grant / Land Sale / CDF 192 J Z 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Business Plan Prloritlzatian of Services: Essential % Desirable %F-1009/71 Discretionary % ~ Total % 100% 193 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Municipal Spaces 511715 0 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Capital Development Fund I BvcPArea: System-wide Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description; City's participation in the creation of small plazas, outdoor use areas and other municipal spaces. These are done in conjunction with new construction or expansion projects related to growth. If the funding is not used in a particular year, it is carried forward for future uses. Previous uses of funding include constructing the plaza on the west side of the Municipal Building and providing partial funding for the Sister Cities Plaza in 2006 and 2007. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: This project supports the Council goal of environmental sustainability by creating natural sites and hardscape areas for public enjoyment. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need for the creation of small plazas, pocket parks 1 and other municipal spaces related to new development. These efforts will be coordinated with Parks & Recreation. Public Process Status, Issues: Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB, DDAB, and/or Planning Board as appropriate. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description; No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects. Source of Funding: l Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 194 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects 511702 0 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Capital Development Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: City's participation in accomplishing small projects and advance project planning , less than $50,000 each, that are done in conjunction with other new construction or expansion projects related to growth. Previous projects include: Valmont Butte engineering and environmental studies, Children, Youth and Family Services Addition, and Outfitting the University Hill Police Annex. Community Sustainability J Project Justlflcation: This project supports the Council goal of economic sustainability by extending the useful life of existing facilities. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need for funding small facility projects related to growth at the discretion of the Facilities & Fleet Manager. Public Process Status, Issues: ' Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB, DDAB, and/or Planning Board as appropriate. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the affected departments. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 ? ~f Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 195 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Construct I Purchase a General Storage Facility 511XXX 100 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: East Boulder Funding Source: Capital Development Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: Construct a storage facility (approx. 5,800 SF) at the City Yards as an addition to the existing B2 Building in the space vacated by the Boulder Emergency Squad. This facility is needed to reduce vehicle miles traveled by FAM to support furniture and waste recycling programs and will address growing city storage needs. Space will also be allocated for storage of Central Records. Purchase of an existing storage facility in the area of the City Yards will be considered and pursued if it is more cost effective or desirable in lieu of constructing new space. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by reducing vehicle miles traveled and by increasing the ability for city departments to store building materials and furniture for reuse and to have a central recycling facility for wastes. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to construct this facility. A 2009 Yards Master Plan update is also being accomplished to verify additional storage needs. Public Process Status, Issues: Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB, and Planning Board as appropriate. The CDF share of project costs (100%) is based on the fact that adequate facilities to accommodate city records and storage existed in 1987 when the CDF was started. Relationship with Other Departments: F This project will be coordinated with Central Records, Parks and Recreation, and other divisions of Public Works Department. A Parks and Recreation project storage requirement for 10,000 sf would be approximately $1,431,000 out of the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund (230). Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $830,000 $0 $0 $0 $830,000 Change from Prior Year: Additional 10,000 SF required from loss of 20,000 sf at Valmont Park identified. Annual On-going Operating Costs $68,000 Description: Includes maintenance and replacement, utilities, and cleaning. Costs to be added to FAM o eratin budget and cost allocated to users. Source of Funding: Central Records, Parks/Recreation and Public Works Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total %F-1 00% 196 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements 1 Upgrades Main Library - Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Total: 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Maintainance of Boulder Reservoir - Sewer System Repairs 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 152,000 0 0 0 0 0 152,000 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 50,000 0 0 60,000 73,000 0 183,000 Municipal Service Center Bldg. B - Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 Stazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 132,000 0 0 0 0 0 132,000 Main Library Carpet Replacement 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000 Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 0 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000 Maintenance of Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms 0 395,000 0 0 0 0 395,000 Fire Station 43 Major Maintenance 0 0 514,000 0 0 0 514,000 Martin Park Shelter Major Maintenance 0 0 0 169,000 0 0 169,000 Stazio Restrooms & Concessions 0 0 0 292,000 0 0 292,000 North Boulder Park Shelter Repair 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 West Senior Center Maintenance & Rehab 0 0 0 0 828,000 0 828,000 Total: 449,000 965,000 514,000 521,000 1,021,000 0 3,470,000 Reconstruction Reconstruct Main Library North Plaza 0 0 147,000 0 0 0 147,000 Total: 0 0 147,000 0 0 0 147,000 r - t: ttiti ter rrAnt Qi t~~ - 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total for Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 569,000 965,000 661,000 521,000 1,021,000 0 3,737,000 N O O 6126/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 3 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund Essential I Desirable Discretionary Total Project Type/Name Project # Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding Existing Facility - Enhancements i Upgrades _ Main Library - Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System 501XXX $0 I $120,000 100% $0 $120,000 100% Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair/ Deficiency Correction Maintainance of Boulder Reservoir - Sewer System Repairs 501-XXX $50,000 100% $0 $0 $50,000 100% Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 501XXX $0 $152,000 100% $0 0% $152,000 100% Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 501452 $0 $50,000 100% $0 $50,000 100% Municipal Service Center Bldg. B - Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping 501XXX $65,000 100% $0 $0 $65,000 100% Stazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 501XXX $0 $132,000 100% $0 $132,000 100% Total for Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund: $115,000 20% $454,000 80% ;0 4% $569,000 100% N O 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Fire Station #3 Major Maintenance 501XXX 93 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity; Crossroads Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund SVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction ' CEAP Required; No CEAP Completed: Project Descriptlow Fire Station #3, located at 1535 30th Street, was built in 1964 and is in need of major maintenance. This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades communications systems, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. Community Sustainability I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, Issues: Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate. Operating funds (FAM Ongoing and Major Maintenance, General Fund 010) will be used to W pay for normal maintenance items. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Fire Department to maintain the station in operation at all times. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $514,000 $0 $0 $0 $514,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing this project. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 202 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Main LibraryCarpet Replacement 501XXX 98 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project replaces approximately 68,000 square feet (SF) of carpeting in the Main Library. This project will be coordinated with another project that replaces the flat wire electrical system in the 1992 section of the library Community Sustainability ! Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainabiiity by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, Issues: None Relationship with other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Library Department and Channel 8. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritizatlon of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total %F-1-00-0/.-] 203 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report 9 Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 501XXX 94 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair ! Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The existing flat wire electrical distribution system has become obsolete and repair parts are no longer available. This project replaces the flat wire electrical system with a new system. This project will be scheduled with carpet replacement. Community Sustainability / Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed ' plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair or replace building systems when they become obsolete. Public Process Status, Issues: None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Library Department- Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operating costs are anticipated Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 204 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Main Library - Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System 501XXX 118 __J I Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: I Central Boulder n Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund avCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The lighting and sound systems have reached the end of their planned service life. This project replaces the existing lighting fixtures with more energy-efficient fixtures, upgrades the control panel, installs a new dimmer system, and integrates the sound system with lighting controls. Community Sustainabliity / Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. , Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, Issues: ' None Relationship With Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Library Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 Change from Prior Year: increase cost due to inflation. Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 205 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program { Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Maintainance of Boulder Reservoir - Sewer System Repairs 501-XX7X 96 _J L Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: Area III Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project repairs two sewage lift stations and associated sewer lines from the facilities at the Reservoir to the sanitary sewer system. Community Sustalnability I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy efficient equipment and properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The Reservoir Master Plan is under development in 2009, but this requirement has already been identified as an essential repair to the operation and use of the Reservoir. ' Public Process Status, issues: None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $50,000 $o $o $o $o $o $50,000 Change from Prior Year: new Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additonal operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: Business Plan Priorltizatlon of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary %Total % 100% 206 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report J Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Maintenance of Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms 501XXX 106 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: Crossroads Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms and Filter Building are in need of major maintenance. This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, replaces the roof, replaces the filtering system, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. Community Sustainablilty I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, Issues: None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with Parks & Recreation Department Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2042 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $395,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing this project. ~t Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 207 2090-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 501 XXX 102 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: Central Boulder D Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: ' The Spruce Pool Locker Rooms are in need of maintenance. This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. Community SustainabiJity 1 Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. ' Public Process Status, issues. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with Parks & Recreation Department Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $152,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $152,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritizatlon of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary % 0% Total % 100% 208 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report .o Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Martin Park Shelter Major Maintenance 501XXX 97 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management 5ubcommunity: South Boulder Funding Source' Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project upgrades the electrical system to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. Community Sustainabillty / Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, issues: None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Parks & Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $169,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 I~ Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prtorltization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 209 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 501452 0 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: System-wide Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BVCPArea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair ! Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project addresses funding for building replacement and miscellaneous projects costing less than $50,000 each. Facility replacement and projects costing $50,000 or more will be individually listed in the CIP. Facility maintenance projects costing less than $50,000 will be managed by the Facilities & Fleet Manager. Community Sustalnability I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to maintain city facilities. Projects approved by the Facilities & Fleet Manager will be coordinated with other departments. Public Process Status, Issues: Any project associated with these funds will be taken through the appropriate public process and CEAP review as part of the conceptual design if needed. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the affected departments. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $50,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $73,000 $0 $163,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 210 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Municipal Service Center Bldg. B - Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping 501XXX 119 I ~J Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: East Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair 1 Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project replaces all exterior fire sprinkler piping due to leaks and rust. Community Sustalnability I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, issues: None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. ' Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with Transportation and Utilities. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 t Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prloritization of Services: Essential %F_1 00% Desirable %Discretionary Total %F-1 00% 211 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: ,I North Boulder Park Shelter Repair 501XXX 91 Department: PWI Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: North Boulder p Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BVCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab ! Repair ! Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project upgrades the electrical system to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. Community Sustalnability I Project Justiflcation: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. ' Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, issues: None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Parks & Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operating costs are anticipated. Source of Funding: Business Plan Priorittzation of Services: Essential % 0 Desirable % 100% Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 212 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Reconstruct Main Library North Plaza 501 XXX 109 Department: PWI Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area Project Type: Reconstruction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Main Library Plaza, located at 1000 Canyon, will require replacement due to its age and condition. Community Sustainability 1 Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair or replace concrete plazas. Public Process Status, Issues: Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate. Relationship with other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Library Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding 1 $0 $0 $147,000 $0 $0 $0 $147,000 Change from Prior Year: ' Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 213 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: IStazio Restrooms & Concessions 501 XXX 123 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management I subcommuniry: East Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BVCPArea: Area ll Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: ' This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. Community Sustainabllity I Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationshlp to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Public Process Status, Issues: ' None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Parks & Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $292,000 $0 $0 $292,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 214 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Fazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 501XXX 107 Department: PW/ Facilities $ Asset Management Subcommunity: East Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BVCPArea: Area 11 Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Stazio Tinsile Canopy was inspected in 2003 by the contractor that originally installed the structure. All cables, structural components and coverings were inspected and found to be sound and fully functional. Preventive maintenance was performed on the structure. The contractor noted in their report that the covering is nearing the end of its service life and should be replaced in approximately five years (2008). The contractor prepared a cost estimate for replacement of the covering. This project was originally scheduled for 2009; the one year delay is necessary due to current budget conditions and higher priority work. Community Sustainability l Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to maintain the structure and renew components as required. Public Process Status, issues: None_ Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with the Parks & Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding '$132,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $132,000 Change from Prior Year: rolled over funding from 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 215 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r;y Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: West Senior Center Maintenance & Rehab 501 XXX 101 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: I Central Boulder Funding Source, Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project provides refurbishment of the facilities including HVAC, electrical, and plumbing systems. It renews all surface finishes including carpet, paint, and ceilings. Provides improvements to restrooms and adds a fire sprinkler system, Community Sustainability ! Project Justification: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Relationship to Master Plans: The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. The ' kitchen was remodeled in 2006 by Meals on Wheels at a cost of approximately $400,000. This cost has been subtracted from the estimated refurbishment cost noted in the FAM Master Plan of $1,228,000, leaving an estimated cost of $828,000. 1 Public Process Status, Issues: None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Relationship with Other Departments: This project will be coordinated with HHS Department and Meals on Wheels. Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $828,000 $0 $828,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100°/0 216 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (DCD) FUND 2010 - 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Downtown Commercial District (DCD, formerly CAGID) is a general improvement taxing district created in 1970 to provide parking and parking related improvements to downtown Boulder. Properties within the district pay property taxes into the district; other revenues are derived from the parking fees. DCD owns 5 parking garages and one surface lot. The parking garages total value is nearly 56 million dollars and breaks down as follows: 11th and Walnut-Randolph = $7,129,037 - built 1979 1400 Walnut-RTD = $5,747,442- built 1989 11 th and Spruce = $ 11,548,104- built 1990 1500 Pearl = $ 16,840,730 - built 1999 1000 Walnut-St. Julien = $ 14,632,517 - built 2004 Due to the construction of 2 parking garages since 1999 funds were not available for major renovations and repairs until 2008. POLICY ISSUES None. HIGHLIGHTS Since 1999, two new parking structures have been constructed by DCD - the mixed use project at 15`h and Pearl and the underground garage at 1000 Walnut, a public/private partnership with the St. Julien hotel. Since the focus has been on constructing new facilities resulting in substantial new debt, funds were not available for major capital maintenance and repairs for 8 years. In 2008, a bond payment was retired and the funds were redirected to a multi-year, phased capital renovation and repair program for all 5 garages. After the garages are restored to an acceptable level, an amount of $250,000 per year in ongoing capital improvements is budgeted. A detailed assessment of all 5 garages was conducted during 2006 and a total of approximately $4 million was phased over three years beginning in 2008. The repairs include structural repairs and renovations such as, concrete and surface, fire suppression systems, replacement of mechanical equipment; as well as aesthetic improvements including painting, elevator improvements, lighting, signage, exterior improvements to 1100 Walnut, landscaping, entry 1 equipment, trash receptacles and benches, and booth replacement. Once the project started, additional repair issues were uncovered and more energy efficient lighting was added. The additional costs will now be added into a 4th year of the capital improvements/major maintenance. Additional costs include the upgrade of lighting systems at 1100 Walnut and 1400 Walnut to LED, a more energy efficient and sustainable system, but more expensive initially than conventional lighting. While replacing the exterior signage was included in the original budget (i.e. the "lollipop" parking P signs and new entry canopies), a comprehensive wayfinding 217 1 directional/graphics system for all the garages will be included to provide clearer directions to our customers and reduce unnecessary driving. In addition, there is an unanticipated foundation wall repair at 1000 Walnut that will cost $236,000. Also, an on-going renovation and repair reserve was increased to $165,675 to more adequately fund the renovation and repair reserve to protect our capital assets. This amount is in addition to the $12,100 that will be used for the renovation and repair reserve for the office and retail spaces at 1500 Pearl and 1100 Spruce. FINANCING Funding for DCD facilities is provided through DCD revenues sources: property taxes and parking revenues from the DCD garages. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The DCD operating budget pays for the maintenance of all DCD improvements and will not change with the capital improvement program. BUSINESS PLAN The DCD major maintenance and repairs are classified as essential in the DUHMD/PS business plan since continued deferred maintenance could begin to impact the integrity of the structures as well as become a deterrent to the downtown experience impacting the areas economic vitality. UNFUNDED Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement and Replacement Plan - 2011 Budget Currently, there are no replacement funds for the Pearl Street Mall infrastructure and downtown streetseape amenities such as benches, trash receptacles, directories, etc. On the Pearl Street Mall, these elements include replacement bricks, the pop jet fountain and the shade structure on the 1300 block, the weeping rock on the 1200 block and the children's' play area on the 1200 block. The Parks Department is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the Mall that includes major maintenance and repairs of the infrastructure but not replacement. Facilities Assets Management ' includes replacement fiends for the downtown public rest rooms and Pearl Street Mall pedestrian lights. Downtown and University Hill Management Division and Parking Services funded the 2000/2001 mall renovations that included retrofitting the pedestrian lighting, redesigning selected areas of the mall and additional pedestrian amenities such as the pop jet fountain, the shade structure and the weeping rock fountain. To finance those improvements, approximately $3 million, DUHMD/PS borrowed the sum from the general fund. The final repayment, $500,000, is scheduled for 2010. In order to maintain and enhance the city's public infrastructure in the historic commercial district and on the Pearl Street Mall and keep the area competitive and attractive to citizens, staff is recommending creating a downtown enhancement and replacement plan to ensure the long term sustainability of the downtown area. Details of the plan will be developed during the completion of the DUHMD/PS Master Planning process including coordination with Parks and Recreation and FAM. 218 we am WO li,4 mum =.-a# WMI-i 'W-WAM =MEMO 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Downtown Commercial District Fund 26-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction DCD Major Renovation Projects 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 Total: 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 Total for Downtown Commercial District Fund 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 N C4 6/26/2009 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 2 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2010 Downtown Commercial District Fund I Essential I Desirable Discretionary I Total Project Type/Name Profecr# + Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair! Deficiency Correction DCD Major Renovation Projects $1,264,800 100% $0 $0 $1,264.800 100% Total for Downtown Commercial District Fund: $1,264,600 100% $0 0% $0 0% $1,264,800 1100% 1 N N C) Kim = 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: DCD Major Renovation Projects 0 Department: DUHMD Subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding Source: Downtown Commercial District Fund avcPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Downtown Commercial District (DCD, formerly CAGID) is a general improvement taxing district created in 1970 to provide parking and parking related improvements in downtown Boulder. Properties within the district pay property taxes into the district fund; other revenues are derived from the parking feeds. DCD owns 5 parking garages in the downtown. The parking garages total value is nearly 56 million dollars and breaks down as follows: 1 11th and Walnut-Randolph = $7,129,037 - built 1979 1400 Walnut-RTD = $5,747,442- built 1989 11th and Spruce = $ 11,548,104- built 1990 1500 Pearl = $ 16,840,730 - built 1999 1000 Walnut-St. Julien = $ 14,632,517 - built 2004 ifs Due to the construction of 2 parking garages since 1999 funds were not available for major renovations and repairs until 2008. A detailed assessment of all 5 garages was conducted during 2006 and a total of approximately $4 million is phased over three years beginning in 2008. The repairs include structural repairs and renovations such as, concrete and surface, fire suppression systems, replacement of mechanical equipment; as well as aesthetic improvements including painting, elevator improvements, lighting, signage, exterior improvements to 1100 Walnut, landscaping, entry equipment, trash receptacles and benches, and booth replacement. Once the project started, additional repairs issues were uncovered and more energy efficient lighting was added. The additional costs will now be added into a 4th year of the capital improvements/major maintenance. Additional costs include the upgrade of lighting systems at 1100 Walnut and 1400 Walnut to LED, a more energy efficient and sustainable system, but more expensive initially than conventional lighting. While replacing the exterior signage was included in the original budget (i.e. the "lollipop" parking P signs and new entry canopies), a comprehensive wayfinding directional/graphics system for all the garages will be included to provide clearer directions to our customers and reduce unnecessary driving. In addition, there is an unanticipated foundation wall repair at 1000 Walnut that will cost $236,000. Community Sustainabiilty ! Project Justification. DCD is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the majority of parking in the downtown. Providing adequate parking is essential to the economic viability of downtown Boulder. Maintaining the multi-million real estate assets of the garages is imperative to the livelihood of downtown. Relationship to Master Plans: DUHMD/Parking Services does not have a master plan. Development of a master plan is underway. Public Process Status, issues: A detailed assessment and report was conducted by Weiss,Janey Elstner, parking engineers, that details projects in all 5 parking structures phased over multiple years. A working group with representatives from the Downtown Management Commission and the downtown community reviewed and contributed to the development of the renovation plan. At the end of 2007, a major debt service payment is retired for the construction of 11th and Spruce and renovations at the RTD garages. Those revenues will be allocated to the major renovation and repairs. Relationship with Other Departments: 221 i 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Capital Funding Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Planned Funding $1,264,800 $1,264,800 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $3,529,600 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $1,500,000 Description: Source of Funding: DCD property taxes and garage revenues Business Plan Prioritization of Services: i~ Essential % F-1-609/6-1 Desirable Discretionary %0 Total %F10-00/0-1 222 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Airport Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Rehabilitate Portion of Aircraft Parking Apron 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789,474 Total: 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789,474 Total for Airport Fund 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789,474 N N W 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Capital Development Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Municipal Spaces 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Construct / Purchase a General Storage Facility 0 0 830,000 0 0 0 830,000 Total: 580,000 50,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,660,000 Total for Capital Development Fund 580,000 50,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,660,000 N N -A 3W 4M as Lima 6mmi -SWXW vm~ 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Downtown Commercial District Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction DCD Major Renovation Projects 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 Total: 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 Total for Downtown Commercial District Fund 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 N N Ln 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Main Library - Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Total: 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Maintainance of Boulder Reservoir - Sewer System Repairs 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 152,000 0 0 0 0 0 152,000 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 50,000 0 0 60,000 73,000 0 183,000 Municipal Service Center Bldg. B - Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 Stazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 132,000 0 0 0 0 0 132,000 N Main Library Carpet Replacement 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000 N Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 0 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000 Maintenance of Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms 0 395,000 0 0 0 0 395,000 Fire Station #3 Major Maintenance 0 0 514,000 0 0 0 514,000 Martin Park Shelter Major Maintenance 0 0 0 169,000 0 0 169,000 Stazio Restrooms & Concessions 0 0 0 292,000 0 0 292,000 North Boulder Park Shelter Repair 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 West Senior Center Maintenance & Rehab 0 0 0 0 828,000 0 828,000 Total: 449,000 965,000 514,000 521,000 1,021,000 0 3,470,000 Reconstruction Reconstruct Main Library North Plaza 0 0 147,000 0 0 0 147,000 Total: 0 0 147,000 0 0 0 147,000 r r r ~a r LWA 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total for Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 569,000 965,000 661,000 521,000 1,021,000 0 3,737,000 N N y 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Lottery Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deticiency Correction Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - Lottery 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 Total: 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 On-Going Projects OSMP - Historical Structures & Trails - Stabilization & Restoration 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 3,150,000 Tributary Grecnways Program - Lottery 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total: 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 4,050,000 N Total for Lottery Fund 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 5,850,000 tb ~ ~ r rs ~ r s 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Open Space Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction - Not Growth Related OSMP South Trail Study Area 180,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 380,000 OSMP West Trail Study Area 80,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 180,000 OSMP North Trail Study Area 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 OSMP East Trail Study Area 0 0 0 50,000 70,000 140,000 260,000 Total: 260,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 120,000 240,000 1,220,000 On-Going Projects Acquisition Program 3,400,000 1,732,165 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 18,732,165 Mineral Rights Acquisition 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 N Visitor Infrastructure - System Wide 190,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 330,000 210,000 1,480,000 fV Water Rights Acquisition 200,000 40,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,040,000 Total: 3,890,000 2,122,165 3,950,000 3,950,000 4,030,000 3,910,000 21,852,165 Total for Open Space Fund 4,150,000 2,322,165 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 23,072,165 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation -.25 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 Total: 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Stazio Irrigation Renovation 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 Total: 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions N Valmont City Park (Phase 1).25 cent 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 C) Elks Neighborhood Park 0 500,000 500,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,800,000 Total: 150,000 650,000 500,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 3,100,000 Total for Parks & Recreation .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund 600,000 950,000 800,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 5,050,000 On M ~ M M M M OW lW- 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund 18-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R 250,000 250,000 425,000 425,000 0 0 1,350,000 Lighting Ordinance Implementation 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 250,000 1,150,000 Scott Carpenter Pool Renovation 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 1,100,000 Total: 350,000 1,450,000 525,000 525,000 500,000 250,000 3,600,000 New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions East Boulder Community Park PP&R 500,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 1,550,000 Valmont City Park (Phase 1) 770,000 770,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 2,290,000 Foothills Community Park- PP&R 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 w Total: 1,270,000 1,120,000 600,000 600,000 750,000 500,000 4,840,000 On-Going Projects Unanticipated Opportunities - PP&R 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Total: 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Total for Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund 1,620,000 2,570,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 1,350,000 850,000 8,840,000 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Boulder Creek 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Fourmile Canyon Creek 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 120,096 1,370,096 Gregory Canyon Creek 25,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 275,000 Stormwater Quality Improvements 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 61,494 343,117 Transportation Coordination 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 307,468 1,557,468 Tributary Grcenways Program - Stormwater & Flood 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 154,500 904,500 Upper Goose Creek Drainage 100,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 552,983 2,652,983 Wonderland Creek 250,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 837,852 3,087,852 South Boulder Creek 0 300,000 4,250,000 0 0 0 4,550,000 N Total: 1,128,045 2,254,636 5,956,275 1,707,964 1,709,703 2,034,393 14,791,016 w N Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Storm Sewer Rehabilitation 53,045 109,273 112,551 173,891 179,108 245,975 873,843 Total: 53,045 109,273 112,551 173,891 179,108 245,975 873,843 New Construction - Not Growth Related Preflood Property Acquisition 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 837,852 3,337,852 Total: 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 837,852 3,337,852 Total for Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund 1,681,090 2,863,909 6,568,826 2,381,855 2,388,811 3,118,220 19,002,711 ~ rr ■■r r ~ ~ r rs r ice- I wi a imemi Omani 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Development Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Eidsting Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades 28th St (Baseline to Ms) 11 455,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 2,805,000 Total: 455,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 2,805,000 On-Going Projects Miscellaneous Development Coordination 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 275,000 Signal Maintenance and Upgrade 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 200,000 Total: 25,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 475,000 w Total for Transportation Development Fund 480,000 520,000 620,000 520,000 620,000 520,000 3,280,000 w 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades 28th St (Baseline to Iris) 1 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 5,160,000 Broadway - Euclid Multimodal Improvements 4,115,000 685,000 0 0 0 0 4,800,000 Total: 4,975,000 1,545,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 9,960,000 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction City Yards Frontage Site Preparation for Potential Pollard Relocation 0 0 0 125,000 1,100,000 0 1,225,000 Total: 0 0 0 125,000 1,100,000 0 1,225,000 N New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 800,000 TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation 11 130,000 130,000 715,000 715,000 715,000 715,000 3,120,000 Total: 230,000 230,000 915,000 915,000 915,000 715,000 3,920,000 On-Going Projects Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 3,774,000 Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatments 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 450,000 Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total: 979,000 979,000 979,000 979,000 979,000 979,000 5,874,000 Total for Transportation Fund 6,184,000 2,754,000 2,754,000 2,879,000 3,854,000 2,554,000 20,979,000 Mai sm M M ' M 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Tributary Greenways 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction - Not Growth Related Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Projects 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 1,170,000 Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Total: 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 1,470,000 On-Going Projects Greenways Salaries 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 780,000 Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Total: 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 1,230,000 N W Cn Total for Tributary Greenways 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 2,700,000 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Wastewater Utility Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Marshall Landfill 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 1001000 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation 106,090 109,273 112,551 115,927 119,405 122,987 686,233 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 530,450 546,364 562,754 579,637 597,026 614,937 3,431,168 WWTP Digester Cleaning 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 WWTP Instrumentation/Control 75,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 Collection System Monitoring 0 53,045 0 0 0 0 53,045 WWTP Pumps 0 150,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 450,000 WWTP Primary Clarifiers 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 WWTP Activated Sludge 0 0 0 67,531 0 0 67,531 N WWTP Cogeneration 0 0 0 168,826 0 0 168,826 WWTP Electrical 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 WWTP Headworks 0 0 0 0 0 1,560,661 1,560,661 Total: 961,540 958,682 975,305 1,181,921 816,431 2,548,585 7,442,464 New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions WWTP Biosolids Digester 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 IBM Pump Station 0 56,275 562,754 0 0 0 619,029 Total: 4,000,000 56,275 562,754 0 0 0 4,619,029 New Construction - Not Growth Related WWTP Permit Improvements 0 0 0 0 115,927 0 115,927 Total: 0 0 0 0 115,927 0 115,927 Reconstruction 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Wastewater Utility Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected WWTP UV Disinfection 4,434,562 0 0 0 0 0 4,434,562 Total: 4,434,562 0 0 0 0 0 4,434,562 Total for Wastewater Utility Fund 9,396,102 1,014,957 1,538,059 1,181,921 932,358 2,548,585 16,611,982 N W 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Water Utility Fund 28-Jun-09 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades Automated Meter Reading 530,450 546,364 562,754 579,637 0 0 2,219,205 Instream Flow Structures and Gaging 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 Sunshine Transmission Pipe 0 0 0 927,419 0 0 927,419 Total: 530,450 596,364 562,754 1,507,056 0 0 3,196,624 Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 371,315 382,454 393,928 405,746 417,918 922,405 2,893,766 Betasso Storage Tank 265,225 0 0 0 0 0 265,225 Betasso WTP 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 978,580 1,478,580 N Distribution System Water Quality 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 W 00 Kossler Reservoir 360,706 939,745 0 0 0 0 1,300,451 Lakewood Pipeline 100,000 0 1,238,060 0 119,405 0 1,457,465 NCWCD Conveyance - Boulder Feeder Canal 300,235 0 0 0 0 0 300,235 Water System Security Upgrades 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 300,000 Waterline Replacement 2,227,890 2,294,727 2,363,569 2,434,476 2,507,510 2,582,735 14,410,907 Barker Dam and Reservoir 0 120,000 0 0 0 430,456 550,456 Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodell to Fourmile 0 546,364 0 0 0 0 546,364 Chautauqua Storage Tank 0 85,779 857,791 0 0 0 943,570 Watershed Improvements 0 317,437 0 0 0 92,241 409,678 Source Water Transmission System Inspections 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000 Green Lake 2 Dam 0 0 0 86,946 0 0 86,946 Gunbarrel Storage Tank 0 0 0 289,819 0 0 289,819 Kohler Storage Tank 0 0 0 0 113,148 1,131,484 1,244,632 Zone 3 Transmission Facilities 0 0 0 0 597,029 0 597,029 Barker Dam Outlet 0 0 0 0 0 804,336 804,336 4"d i" N" i I 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program Water Utility Fund 28-Jun-09 LL 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total: 4,075,371 5,036,506 5,133,348 3,316,987 3,755,010 6,942,237 28,259,459 New Construction - Growth Related Facility ! Additions Boulder Reservoir WTP 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 300,000 Total: 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 300,000 New Construction - Not Growth Related NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fv W Total for Water Utility Fund 4,705,821 5,682,870 5,746,102 4,874,043 3,805,010 6,942,237 31,756,083 Grand Total for all Funding Sources: 32,655,813 23,172,175 26,617,987 20,357,819 20,746,179 23,308,042 146,858,015 ATTACHMENT F PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR A COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS (CEAP) The following capital improvement projects proposed for funding in the 2010-2015 CEP are recommended to complete a Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP). CEAP findings are submitted by departments to their respective advisory board for review as part of CEP project approval, and City Council has the opportunity to call up projects for their review and approval. (For those departments that do not have an advisory board, Planning Board is responsible for reviewing CEAP findings as part of project approval.) Many of these projects have either completed a CEAP or have been previously recommended to complete one. Parks and Recreation Department Recreation Center / Pool improvements * (Page 151 157,15& East Boulder Community Park (for final phase*) (Page Elks Neighborhood Park (in conjunction with Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation) (Page 15 Foothills Community Park * (Page ISM Open Space & Mountain Parks Department Historical Structures and Trails - Stabilization & Restoration * (Page Visitor Infrastructure - System Wide * (Page L~b Public Works Department Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Division Wonderland Creek Flood Mitigation (Page South Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Improvements (Paget) ioulmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Improvenitnts (Page Upper Goose Creek Drainage Improvements (Page Transportation Division 28`h Street (Pearl to his) Pedestrian Crossing Improvements (CEAP completed 2002) (Page Tributary Greenways Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Projects * (Page(,37) Wastewater Utility Division Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Digester (Page Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit Improvements (Page Water Utility Division NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline (Pagega ) *As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be determined. ATTACHMENT G PROJECTS SUGGESTED FOR DESIGN REVIEW The purpose of the review is to scrutinize city projects for opportunities to provide higher quality improvements in the public realm - projects with a `public face'. The projects listed here have been identified as projects that should have some review and consideration about design issues and would not otherwise undergo a CEAP, or a CEAP may be required but the projects have specific design issues and should be reviewed by the Downtown Design Advisory Board (DDAB), the Landmarks Board (LB), Planning Board (PB) or staff. Design review of these projects should be coordinated between the primary city departments listed below and the planning department. Recommended for Not Recommended Design Review for Design Review PROJECTS THAT WILL HAVE EXTERIOR CHANGES Downtown Commercial District Major Renovation Projects Yes* Parks & Recreation Elks Neighborhood Park Yes* Foothills Community Park Yes* Mesa Memorial Pocket Park Yes* Valmont City Park (Phase I) Yes* ' PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Construct / Purchase a General Storage DDAB, Planning Staff Facility (at the City Yards) Public Plaza Space Yes* Stazio Tinsile Canopy Fabric Project entails only Replacement replacement of existin fabric Park Shelter Major Maintenance Exterior paint only Main Library North Plaza Yes* Scott Carpenter & Spruce Pool Locker Depends on extent of Rooms exterior changes Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Yes* (If funded) • ' Storage West Senior Center Maintenance & Rehab Depends on extent of exterior changes PW/ Transportation Broadway - Euclid Multimodal Yes* Improvements Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Yes* Improvements 240 PW/ Water Utility Chautauqua Storage Tank Rehabilitation Changes to roof only. Boulder Reservoir WTP Depends on extent of Expansion/Improvements exterior changes. Betasso WTP Expansion/Improvements Depends on extent of exterior changes. PROJECTS WITH POSSIBLE EXTERIOR CHANGES Parks & Recreation Recreation Center/Pool Improvements Depends on extent of exterior changes. Flatiron Golf Course Improvements Depends on extent of exterior changes. I I PW/ Facilities & Asset Management Municipal Facilities (miscellaneous Depends on extent of projects not et defined) exterior changes. *Review process may include staff, Planning Board or other relevant advisory board depending on the specific project and magnitude of improvements. 241 2010-2015 Capital Improvements Program 26-Jun-09 Map Project Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Area III 21 WWTP Pumps 0 150,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 450,000 23 WWTP Permit Improvements 0 0 0 0 115,927 0 115,927 24 WWTP Digester Cleaning 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 27 WWTP Headworks 0 0 0 0 0 1,560,661 1,560,661 30 Marshall Landfill 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 31 WWTP UV Disinfection 4,434,562 0 0 0 0 0 4,434,562 32 WWTP Activated Sludge 0 0 0 67,531 0 0 67,531 N -9~1 34 WWTP Primary Clarifiers 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 1V 50 NCWCD Conveyance - Boulder Feeder Canal 300,235 0 0 0 0 0 300,235 96 Maintainance of Boulder Reservoir - Sewer System Repairs 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Total for Area III 5,034,797 150,000 300,000 217,531 115,927 1,710,661 7,528,916 Central Boulder 0 DCD Major Renovation Projects 1,264,800 1,264,800 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,529,600 13 Gregory Canyon Creek 25,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 275,000 14 Upper Goose Creek Drainage 100,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 552,983 2,652,983 46 Chautauqua Storage Tank 0 85,779 857,791 0 0 0 943,570 60 Broadway - Euclid Multimodal Improvements 4,115,000 685,000 0 0 0 0 4,800,000 94 Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 0 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000 98 Main Library Carpet Replacement 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000 101 West Senior Center Maintenance & Rehab 0 0 0 0 828,000 0 8287000 Map Project Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 102 Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 152,000 0 0 0 0 0 152,000 109 Reconstruct Main Library North Plaza 0 0 147,000 0 0 0 147,000 118 Main Library - Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Total for Central Boulder 5,776,800 3,355,579 1,754,791 750,000 1,578,000 802,983 14,018,153 Crossroads 1 Scott Carpenter Pool Renovation 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 1,100,000 61 Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 800,000 93 Fire Station #3 Major Maintenance 0 0 514,000 0 0 0 514,000 106 Maintenance of Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms 0 395,000 0 0 0 0 395,000 Total for Crossroads 100,000 1,595,000 714,000 200,000 200,000 0 2,809,000 N .A w East Boulder 7 Stazio Irrigation Renovation 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 10 Valmont City Park (Phase 1) 770,000 770,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 2,290,000 10 Valmont City Park (Phase 1).25 cent 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 64 City Yards Frontage Site Preparation for Potential Pollard Relocation 0 0 0 125,000 1,100,000 0 1,225,000 79 Rehabilitate Portion of Aircraft Parking Apron 0 789,474 0 0 0 0 789,474 100 Construct / Purchase a General Storage Facility 0 0 830,000 0 0 0 830,000 107 Stazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 132,000 0 0 0 0 0 132,000 119 Municipal Service Center Bldg. B - Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 123 Stazio Restrooms & Concessions 0 0 0 292,000 0 0 292,000 Total for East Boulder 1,267,000 1,709,474 1,080,000 667,000 1,350,000 0 6,073,474 Gunbarrel 20 IBM Pump Station 0 56,275 562,754 0 0 0 619,029 Map Project Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 43 Boulder Reservoir WTP 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 300,000 92 Wildland Fire Station and Apparatus Storage 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Total for Gunbarrel 600,000 106,275 612,754 50,000 50,000 0 1,419,029 Multiple Subcommunities 0 Tributary Greenways Program - Lottery 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 12 Wonderland Creek 250,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 837,852 3,087,852 15 South Boulder Creek 0 300,000 4,250,000 0 0 0 4,550,000 17 Boulder Creek 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 53 Gunbarrel Storage Tank 0 0 0 289,819 0 0 289,819 69 28th St (Baseline to Iris) 1 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 860,000 5,160,000 N 41- 69 28th St (Baseline to Iris) 11 455,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 2,805,000 Automated Meter heading 530,450 546,364 562,754 579,637 0 0 2,219,205 Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 Miscellaneous Development Coordination 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 275,000 Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 629,000 3,774,000 Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatments 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 450,000 Storm Sewer Rehabilitation 53,045 109,273 112,551 173,891 179,108 245,975 873,843 Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total for Multiple Subcommunities 3,352,495 3,964,637 7,934,305 4,052,347 3,188,108 3,592,827 26,084,719 North Boulder 6 Foothills Community Park- PP&R 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 8 Elks Neighborhood Park 0 500,000 500,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 2,800,000 16 Fourmile Canyon Creek 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 120,096 1,370,096 I Map Project Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 91 North Boulder Park Shelter Repair 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 Collaboration with Major Flood and Transportation Projects 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 1,170,000 Total for North Boulder 445,000 945,000 945,000 1,045,000 1,665,000 1,415,096 6,460,096 Outside Planning Area 0 Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 371,315 382,454 393,928 405,746 417,918 922,405 2,893,766 42 Betasso Storage Tank 265,225 0 0 0 0 0 265,225 45 NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Betasso WTP 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 978,580 1,478,580 Barker Dam and Reservoir 0 120,000 0 0 0 430,456 550,456 Barker Dam Outlet 0 0 0 0 0 804,336 804,336 4~- Kossler Reservoir 360,706 939,745 0 0 0 0 1,300,451 CJi Lakewood Pipeline 100,000 0 1,238,060 0 l 19,405 0 1,457,465 Sunshine Transmission Pipe 0 0 0 927,419 0 0 927,419 Watershed Improvements 0 317,437 0 0 0 92,241 409,678 Total for Outside Planning Area 1,297,246 1,859,636 1,731,988 1,433,165 537,323 3,228,018 10,087,376 South Boulder 44 Kohler Storage Tank 0 0 0 0 113,148 1,131,484 1,244,632 97 Martin Park Shelter Major Maintenance 0 0 0 169,000 0 0 169,000 Total for South Boulder 0 0 0 169,000 113,148 1,131,484 1,413,632 Southeast Boulder 4 East Boulder Cotnmunity Park PP&R 500,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 1,550,000 5 Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R 250,000 250,000 425,000 425,000 0 0 1,350,000 rr r ~r r ~r r r M Siod L.aa i. Map Project Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total for Southeast Boulder 750,000 600,000 775,000 775,000 0 0 2,900,000 System-wide 0 Acquisition Program 3,400,000 1,732,165 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 18,732,165 0 bighting Ordinance Implementation 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 250,000 1,150,000 0 Mineral Rights Acquisition 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 0 Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 0 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 50,000 0 0 60,000 73,000 0 183,000 0 Municipal Spaces 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 0 OSMP - Historical Structures & Trails - Stabilization & Restoration 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 525,000 3,150,000 0 Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation -.25 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 0 Playground and Park Irrigation System Renovation - Lottery 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,800,000 0 Unanticipated Opportunities - PP&R 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 0 Visitor Infrastructure - System Wide 190,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 330,000 210,000 1,480,000 0 Water Rights Acquisition 200,000 40,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,040,000 22 WWTP Biosolids Digester 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 25 WWTP Cogeneration 0 0 0 168,826 0 0 168,826 26 WWTP Instrumentation/Control 75,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 28 WWTP Electrical 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 133 OSMP East Trail Study Area 0 0 0 50,000 70,000 140,000 260,000 134 OSMP North Trail Study Area 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 135 OSMP South Trail Study Area 180,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 380,000 136 OSMP West Trail Study Area 80,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 180,000 Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodell to Fotumile 0 546,364 0 0 0 0 546,364 Collection System Monitoring 0 53,045 0 0 0 0 53,045 Map Project Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Distribution System Water Quality 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 Green Lake 2 Dam 0 0 0 86,946 0 0 86,946 Greenways Salaries 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 780,000 Instream Flow Structures and Gaging 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Preflood Property Acquisition 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 837,852 3,337,852 Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation 106,090 109,273 112,551 115,927 119,405 122,987 686,233 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 530,450 546,364 562,754 579,637 597,026 614,937 3,431,168 Signal Maintenance and Upgrade 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 200,000 N J~ ~l Source Water Transmission System Inspections 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000 Stormwater Quality Improvements 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 61,494 343,117 TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation 11 130,000 130,000 715,000 715,000 715,000 715,000 3,120,000 Transportation Coordination 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 307,468 1,557,468 Tributary Greenways Program - Stormwater & Flood 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 154,500 904,500 Water System Security Upgrades 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 300,000 Waterline Replacement 2,227,890 2,294,727 2,363,569 2,434,476 2,507,510 2,582,735 14,410,907 Zone 3 Transmission Facilities 0 0 0 0 597,029 0 597,029 Total for System-wide 14,032,475 8,886,574 10,770,149 10,998,776 11,948,673 11,426,973 68,063,620 Grand Total: 32,655,813 23,172,175 26,617,987 20,357,819 20,746,179 23,308,042 146,858,015