Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
5B - Site Review application (LUR2009-00008) - Valmont City Park Phase 1
CITY OF BOULDER PLANNING BOARD AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: June 4, 2009 AGENDA TITLE: Public hearing and consideration of Site Review application LUR2009- 00008, Valmont City Park Phase 1. Applicant/Property Owner: City of Boulder; Parks Department; Perry Brooks, Park Planner REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Ruth McHeyser, Executive Director of Community Planning David Driskell, Deputy Director of Community Planning Elizabeth Lokocz, Landscape Architect OBJECTIVE: 1. Hear applicant and staff presentations 2. Hold public hearing 3. Planning Board discussion 4. Planning Board take action to approve, approve with conditions, or deny SUMMARY: Proposal: Proposal to construct Phase 1 of a three phase development plan for the 132 acre Valmont City Park located at the intersection of Valmont and Airport Roads. Phase 1, the northern 45-acres, proposes bike trails, areas of vegetation, a dog park, rehabilitation of the historic Platt Farmhouse,a tot lot, an entry plaza with public art installations and parking for 149 vehicles on site. The proposal also includes the installation of an 18 hole disc golf course on the south side of the park with minimal associated improvements. Project Name: Valmont City Park, Phase 1 Location: 5325 Valmont Road Size of Lot: 45 acres Zoning: P (Public) Comprehensive Plan: Park, Urban and Other Agenda Item # SC Page # 1 KEY ISSUES: 1. Is the proposed plan compatible with the goals and objectives of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP)? 2. Does the proposed layout address items discussed at the Concept Plan review for the project? 3. Is the proposal consistent with the Site Review criteria of subsection 9-2-14(e), B.R.C. 1981? BACKGROUND: -773 1( L 13 - TTI 44 - nu Lid ~ ,r~ 1 ~ tj jj¢¢ ~ 1111 Ft ~ a ~ r~ ~:Y9ry ~_g - 4 /i :---s fir.` ~K~,ir! y ~ r ~i ~r rr..4,.r ~ ` _ ~•i~..,. Figure 1: The surrounding site context of Valmont City Park outlined in green. 1 Surrounding Context: The property is located east of Foothills Parkway, north of Pearl Parkway and south of the Boulder Municipal airport (see Attachments A & F). There are significant areas of industrial use to the east and south of the site with a mix of warehouse, industrial office and manufacturing activities. A mix of residential housing types exists immediately west of the site including mobile homes, single family homes and condominiums. Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP) Designation: In the BVCP, the park designation is described as: Urban and Other Parks includes public lands used for a variety of active and passive recreational purposes. Urban parks provided by the city include pocket parks, neighborhood parks, community parks and city parks as defined in AGENDA ITEM # 513 PAGE # 2 the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The specific characteristics of each park depend on the type of park, size, topography and neighborhood preferences... Large multi-use city parks are planned for two locations: 1) the Valmont Park site and 2) the Area III - Planning Reserve site, which will be held to meet fixture recreational needs. Existing Site: Following the 1998 approval of the Valmont City Park (VCP) Concept Plan, the following new facilities were developed at the park site: ■ Soft surface trails. ■ An irrigation pond (1.5-acre), pump house, and surrounding landscape. ■ A main entrance at Airport Road and some parking spaces. ■ Benches for sitting and picnicking. ■ A temporary dog park. ■ Plantings for aesthetics. ■ Tree plantings along the eastern corridor of the park for a wildlife corridor. N //y 1 v t y ti i 1y A~L ,>;,k`f • ` qtr ilv Y4MONT ROAD,. - fM7qj Figure 2: The northern 45 acres, Phase 1, of Valmont City Park. AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 3 Planning History: The 1998 Approved VCP Concept Plan. The initial conceptual plamiing process for VCP was completed over 18 months (between January 1997 and June 1998). Between 1999 and 2003, the Parks department sponsored a process to identify interested public, private or non-profit organizations to partner with the city to develop recreation facilities at VCP. After extensive discussions with potential partners, the department determined that the proposed partnership process was not feasible and subsequently discontinued the program. The 1999 Site Review and Annexation. The Site Review (SI-99-13) was approved by Planning Board with conditions on October 7, 1999 and the annexation was approved by City Council on November 9, 1999. 2006 Updated Public-Private Partnership Process. While the initial public-private partnership process proved infeasible, in 2006, the Parks department undertook the development of a more sustainable partnership process. Parks staff convened a working group consisting of representatives from the recreation user groups to create a new process for establishing public- private partnerships for recreational facility development. This process was approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). 2006 Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan. The 2006 Parks and Recreation Master Plan established priorities for future park development. These priorities were determined by the community, the PRAB and City Council during the master plan public process. CIP funding for the development of specific parks was identified based on these priorities. It is anticipated that additional funds will be allocated for these projects over time to fully fund park development. In approving the Master Plan, City Council directed staff to update the 1998 VCP Concept Plan as part of the Parks department's 2007 work plan. A planning team, consisting of external design consultants and department staff, was formed. 2007-2008 Valmont City Park Master Plan Update. In April of 2007, the Valmont City Park Advisory Group was formed and the public process began. Public input was gathered from a community survey, open houses, a web survey, interviews with recreation users and input from PRAB. PRAB and City Council discussed the final two Concept Plans during a study session on February 12, 2008. Phase 1 development includes a partnership with the Boulder Mountain Bike Alliance. 2008 Concept Plan Review. On June 26, 2008 the Planning Board provided comments on the Concept Plan for Valmont City Park. At that time, Planning Board provided a number of suggestions for all three phases of the proposed park. A description of those recommendations pertaining to Phase 1 is provided under, "Key Issue No.2" below and minutes from that hearing are provided as Attachment B. City Council voted to approve the final preferred Concept Plan on July 28, 2008. AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 4 PAWN 1: a This drawing represents the first phases of development at 9 • Valmont City Park. This Phase will be limited to the north side and will include development of the bike park, dog park, multi-use parks, rehabilitated %ft House, and a tot-bf. acr o+a wmN fl ® ®N~ rvene °A •atn wsa:ps am mr.yd.~,rvww.,...w, +~,.ar,~nrn odn•w avenneu..o wnr-..i y 4-1 ~i P ekt~• a•W.l5,ra..r 40 _ n s rs^Ymvs +s.nYl , K.a. narses ry^'n.v rw,uvnnaa - i ai~Y ir..~mY r.lw. i.mM, uw nc,e .i valmontroad". , - 1, q-MWI OWN T"N tksterlingdrive 4n,~e..wr.•.++u~ now 901 LEGEND • -V'--V-ALMONT CITY mYlimai/VY Cwiaawm Iii aapG..O *41M.'~'roEe UY ■ CuNgMrwNMapsasnb nnmveJ1 O eaay:mMUaetW trM r'i -o.a.n.c-..rsw. ]nvanl ® oM^.3V U/ta PARK Draft Coficept - • Figurc 3: Phase I of the Concept Plan Review includes the 45 acres north of Valmont Road and the disc golf course, shown in dark purple, south of Valmont Road. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Facility Site Layout The proposed layout clusters many of the uses around the two parking areas on Airport and Valmont Roads. The interior of the park is a network of bicycle and pedestrian trails, concentrated bicycle terrain and competition areas and vegetation. See the drawing package and additional description below. Structures Few structures are proposed for the site. An existing pump house will remain for irrigation purposes. The existing chicken barn is proposed for minor renovation and conversion into a covered riding pavilion for possible training and competition events. The historic Platt Farmhouse will be relocated closer to the Airport Road parking area and facilities, but its original orientation maintained towards the ditch. The small outbuildings surrounding the farmhouse site will be demolished to allow for trails and landscape enhancements. A new restroom facility will be constructed adjacent to the Airport Road Parking area. No other structures are proposed as part of Phase 1 development. AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 5 - Figure 4: Airport Road Facilities The Airport Road parking area is a soft surface parking lot accommodating 44 cars. The trails in this area, particularly the one to A the north of the parking lot, are ALL 0 ° I designed to accommodate the majority of the bicycle traffic entering the site for events. Bicycle CIN parking for spectators and users of .P.- ° Grt~n the tot lot and relocated Platt j Farmhouse are also provided. { Restroom facilities are designed to i Irpo Road PI 1 appear as an outbuilding to the ° farmhouse and will serve all park ' users. An entry plaza and open green are designed to showcase the l i bicycle community with public art r installations (see Sheet S7 for additional information). I- _ ~ '-s Plalj ' j Farmhouse ' Traffic and Use Characteristics "The following uses and associated traffic generation were identified and evaluated in the Traffic Impact Study: • The tot lot is not assumed to be a driving destination, but a support facility for the bike park users and nearby residential neighborhoods. • The dog park is estimated to have a peak weekday evening use of 30 people, a peak weekend use of 40 people and an auto-occupancy of 1.25 people per vehicle. The proposed 105 space parking lot accommodates the dog park and trail users. • The disc golf course will have peak use times on weekday evenings and weekend afternoons. Half the players were estimated to arrive by bicycle. Based on these factors, the existing 30 space parking lot in the southern portion of Valmont Park is adequate for the additional use. Bicycle Park and Platt Farmhouse meeting space: The bike park is a unique facility with few comparable uses to determine traffic generation. Typical peak use for weekday evening and weekend events estimate 200-300 participants and spectators with up to 60% of participants arriving by bike. An auto-occupancy of 1.25 people per vehicle for weekday use and 1.5 for weekend use was used for those arriving by car. On-site parking will accommodate these events. The Platt Farmhouse users will not be independent trips, but generated from other park uses. AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 6 Special annual or bi-annual events for the bike park are estimated to attract up to 1,000 participants and spectators requiring off-site parking agreements from nearby properties. The Parks Department Staff is in discussion with near-by property owners and the City Attorneys Office regarding the development of an acceptable standard agreement. Each event will require a Parks Event Permit which will establish the parking and traffic management strategy for the specific event. See the draft Conditions of Approval at the end of the memo for additional information. Although Phase 1 of Valmont City Park will add traffic to the adjacent streets and Valmont/Airport intersection, the total traffic volume increase will be roughly 1%, an insignificant increase as stated in the Traffic Impact Study. Other Facilities The disc golf course located in the southern portion of the park is accomodated with existing grading, vegetation and prairie dog barriers. Proposed improvements include only the addition of tee boxes and holes as described on Sheet DG1 in the drawing packet. Future phase development may alter the layout of the disc golf course or identify other priority program elements. O Dog Park u • N / rr 00 Chicken Barn Future Covered Riding Pavilion l r E) ell v` v _ - ont • Figure 5: Valmont Road Facilities AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 7 The Valmont Road parking area accommodates 105 cars and provides access to the trail network for bicycles and pedestrians, the dog park and the future covered riding pavilion. KEY ISSUES ANALYSIS: 1. Is the proposed plan compatible with the goals and objectives of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP)? 3.07 Multi-Purpose Use of Public Lands. Multi-purpose use of public lands, facilities and personnel services will be emphasized. However, in consideration of potential use of parks and open space lands, only activities consistent with the original intent of acquisition will be considered. Valmont City Park brings together a diversity of uses unique within Boulder's existing system of parks. It will combine active and passive recreation including bicycle education and training, connections in the trail system, a dog park, a disc golf course and a tot lot. 3.12 Parks and Recreation. Park facilities and services of the city or other service entities will provide an adequate range of recreational opportunities for its residents. Such facilities and services will be designed in a manner that responds to the needs of the intended users. City park and recreation facilities will provide a variety of landscape types as amenities and recreational resources for urban dwellers, including irrigated green spaces, low water need plantings and natural vegetation areas. A wide range of activities are programmed as part of the future park development to serve both the nearby residents and greater Boulder community needs. The program, initially developed in the 1990s, has been updated through an extensive public process. The existing landscape of the site includes vegetation along the historic ditches, Wonderland Creek, the slight knoll south of Valmont Road and around the existing parking area and trail intersections, but relatively little natural vegetation exists across the site. Focused tree planting will occur along internal roadways and parking areas to shade paved surfaces. The natural knoll south of Valmont Road is shown as a future amphitheater. As the park phasing is implemented, the landscape will change from one that is significantly native vegetation with little diversity in color, surfaces or useable areas, to one that is rich in planting material, natural ground covering, improved surfaces and architectural elements. 3.13 Trail Functions and Locations. Trails serve a variety of functions such as recreation, transportation, education and/or environmental protection. Trails should be designed and managed to minimize conflicts among trail users. Trailheads should be located so they are convenient and safe for those arriving by alternate modes of transportation as well as automobiles. In order to provide environmental protection, informal trails and user widening of trails should be discouraged by ensuring that formal trails are well designed, monitored and adequately maintained. Trail and trailhead locations and alignments should avoid environmentally sensitive areas and minimize environmental impacts. A significant network of trails is planned for VCP. Existing trails cross the site linking the larger existing paved trail system. AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 8 2. Does the proposed layout optimize site and context conditions and address Concept Plan review comments from the Planning Board? Concept Plan Recommendations. On June 26, 2008, Planning Board discussed the Concept Plan for Valmont City Park during which it provided the following comments to be addressed at Site Review. See Attachment B for the complete minutes. 1. Vision: The vision for the park is not grand enough for a city central park, given that only two community wide parks are outlined in the BVCP. Although the design of Phase 2 and 3 will need to further address this concern, staff finds Phase 1 presents a unique vision for what a city park is in Boulder, offering a diversity of program and visual elements. The bike course covers the largest land area by necessity, but the entry plaza and green, dog park, pedestrian trail system and considerable vegetation should not be overlooked as important contributions to Valmont City Park and the overall park and open space system. Visually, the park changes dramatically from one program element to another. For example, the entry plaza is a highly designed space presenting a grand entry into the park that respects the bike course and its users compared to the natural areas surrounding the North Boulder Farmers Ditch and the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch which appear as relatively undeveloped natural areas. 2. Active Recreation: There appears to be a lot of active impacts on the site. Phase 1 proposes a mix of active and passive recreation opportunities. The primary active recreation opportunity, the bike trails, is unique within the parks and open space system. Passive recreation opportunities include soft and hard surface trails, a permanent dog park, and a pocket park made up of the open green, entry plaza, tot lot and the relocated Platt Farmhouse to serve as a small community space. The bike trails layout avoids existing vegetation and takes advantage of existing grade changes. Significant additional planting is proposed to improve the streetscape experience along the perimeter of the park and within the park to enhance wildlife areas. 3. Transportation Network Connections: The plan should include more and better connections, including a connection to the Transit Village Area. Numerous cotuiections have been achieved through the Phase 1 design including (see the Site and Civil drawing sets in the packet): • Construction of the Wonderland Creek multi-use path connection and the crosswalk at the Airport Road entrance. • Extending the sidewalk along Valmont Road from the parking area to the existing sidewalk to the east. • Widening the sidewalk along Airport Road to eight feet. • Construction of the ten foot multi-use path through the park. • Internal connections are achieved with seven ditch crossings. An eighth bridge located at the far east side of the park is to be constructed by the Transportation Department to continue the multi-use path in the future. • Construction of a new RTD bus stop on the north side of Valmont and near the proposed parking lot. A(.ENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE, # 9 • Construction of a new RTD bus stop on the south side of Valmont close to the disc golf course. Additional connections, including the recommended connection to Transit Village Area require evaluation at the time of Phase 2 and 3 design. 4. Use Intensity: Phase 1 uses, while intense, may he appropriate for- the northern side of the site. The location of uses elsewhere on the site need to be reconsidered and the activities should be prioritized. The board was also concerned that the ball f elds inav be inviting increased auto use on the site and questioned the location of the disc golf course. Phase 1 uses have remained consistent with the Concept Plan program and layout. The disc golf is proposed for the southern portion of the park as requested by City Council. Future phases require additional analysis and design to determine the best possible use of the land and evaluate consistency with the previously reviewed concept plan. 5. Alternative Modes of Transportation: The current activities are inviting auto use rather than providing incentives to use alternative transportation modes. Staff finds that the proposed Phase 1 park design provides several mitigations for auto use. Proposed on-site parking for Phase 1 is limited to 149 spaces, the number of spaces needed for daily park use and routine weekend activities as identified in the Traffic Impact Study. Parking required for major events will be accommodated off- site in the nearby industrial use parking lots along Airport Road through parking agreements secured by Parks Department staff and reviewed through the Parks Event Permit process. According to the applicant, these events would also promote arrival by bicycle and other alternative forms of transportation. Similarly proposed activities for Phase 1 focus heavily on educating the public on and promoting travel by bicycle. The additional multi-use path connections as described in Comment #3 also encourage non-auto alternatives. 6. User Safety: The board would like to see a safety plan at the time of'Site Revietiti°. Staff finds numerous separation methods have been proposed to reduce potential pedestrian and bicycle conflicts including separated paths, bridge crossings, fencing, grade changes, a signage system, vegetation and designated viewing areas for major events. The safety of pedestrians and bicyclists moving to the site has been improved through the Wonderland Creek multi-use path connection, increased sidewalk width along Airport and Valmont Roads, and new crosswalk to the Airport Road parking lot access. See the detailed site and landscape plans and the civil drawing set. 3. Is the proposal consistent with the Site Review criteria of subsection 9-2-14(e), B.R.C. 1981? Staff finds the proposed development compliant with all applicable Site Review criteria. Refer to Attachment D for staff's detailed evaluation of all required Site Review criteria. AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 10 PUBLIC COMMENT AND PROCESS: Required public notice was given in the form of written notification mailed to all property owners within 600 feet of the subject site and a sign posted on the property for at least 10 days. All notice requirements of section 9-4-3(g), B.R.C. 1981 have been met. No written comment was received during the review process. A summary of three verbal commentaries can be found in the Development Review Comments (see Attachment Q. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Planning Board approve Site Review #LUR2009-00008, incorporating this staff memorandum and the attached Site Review Criteria Checklist as findings of fact, subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval below: RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the development shall be in compliance with all approved plans dated May 14, 2009 on file in the City of Boulder Planning Department, as may be modified by this approval. 2. Prior to a building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a Technical Document Review application for the following items, subject to the review and approval of the City Manager: a) Final architectural plans, including materials and colors, to insure compliance with the intent of this approval and compatibility with the surrounding area. b) A final drainage report meeting the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards Chapter 7. c) A detailed landscape plan, including size, quantity, and type of plants existing and proposed; type and quality of non-living landscaping materials; any site grading proposed; and any irrigation system proposed, to insure compliance with this approval and the City's landscaping requirements. d) A detailed lighting plan showing location, size, and intensity of illumination units, showing compliance with section 9-9-16, B.R.C. 1981. e) A detailed parking plan showing the arrangement, locations, dimensions, and type of parking stalls (including any areas of the site for bicycle parking or reserved for deferred parking) to insure compliance with this approval and the City's Parking Design Standards. f) Final transportation plans in accordance with City off Boulder Design and Construction Standards, for all transportation improvements. AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # I1 g) Where the proposed Wonderland Creek Path width is constrained by the ditch and shown to be less than 10' on this plan, the City Parks and Recreation Department shall pursue construction of retaining walls along the south side of the ditch to achieve the full 10' width. A feasibility analysis shall be completed and retaining walls shall be installed to the extent practical as determined by City staff. 3. The Applicant shall not hold any event that draws more than 149 vehicles unless the Applicant has obtained a Parks and Recreation Special Event Permit that is intended to address on-site and off-site impacts of such events. Approved By: Ruth McHeyser, Executive Director of Community Planning Planning Department ATTACHMENTS: A: Vicinity Map B: Planning Board Concept Plan Review Minutes 6.26.08 C: Development Review Comments D: Site Review Criteria and Responses E: Applicant's Written Statement AGENDA ITEM # 5B PAGE # 12 Attachment A City of Boulder Vicinity Map IM M H P - = Subject Area R M - 1 Valmont & Airport Rds 7Y o Valmont Rdy - Bc-i IG P EE IS-2 P C6 pearl St IS_1~ - IG IS-2 E IG _.l Subject Legend "ar ® City Limit' Location: 5325 Valmont Road (aka 0 Valmont Road) City of',.. Project Name: Valmont City Park Boulder Review Type: Site Review NORTH The Information depleted on this map is provided Review Number: LUR2009-00008 as graphical representation only. The city or Boulder provides no warranty, expressed or Implied, as to accuracy a ine thntained hereon. /arcompletenessoftheinformatlon Applicant: City of Boulder 1 inch = 1000 feet conta Parks & Recreation Dept ends Item # 6h Pa Attachment B CITY OF BOULDER PLANNING BOARD MEETING AGENDA dr•~ DATE: June 26, 2008 TIME: 6 p.m. PLACE: 1777 Broadway, Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the June 5, 2008 Planning Board minutes. 3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 4. DISCUSSION OF DISPOSITIONS, PLANNING BOARD CALL-UPS/CONTINUATIONS Call-up item: Floodplain Development Permit (LUR2008-00054) Wetland Permit (LUR2008-00027) 4400 North Broadway. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Valmont City Park Concept Review (0 Valmont Road; the intersection of Valmont and Airport roads). Concept Plan Review and comment for consideration, of a 132-acre community park with a proposed three phase development plan. Applicant: City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department; Perry Brooks, Park Planner Case Manager: Elizabeth Lokocz B. Consideration of Site Review and Preliminary Plat application No. LUR2008-00022, Gunbarrel Gateway. The proposal is for redevelopment of the former Hugh M. Woods site located at 63`a Street and Lookout Road in Gunbarrel for approximately 83,000 square feet of commercial floor area. The site is approximately 5.9 acres in size and zoned BC-2 (Business - Community 2). The applicant is pursuing creation of Vested Rights for the uses on the property. Applicant/Property Owner: William McDermid, Boulder Hospitality, LLC Case Manager: Elaine McLaughlin 6. MATTERS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR, AND CITY ATTORNEY 7. DEBRIEF MEETING/CALENDAR CHECK 8. ADJOURNMENT For more information call (303) 441-1880. Board packets are available after 4 p.m. Friday prior to meeting, online at www.bouldercolorado.gov, at the Boulder Public Main Library's Reference Desk, or at the Planning and Development Services office reception area, located at 1739 Broadway, third floor. * SEE THE REVERSE SIDE FOR MEETING GUIDELINES i Agenda Item # 5-45 Page # CITY OF BOULDER PLANNING BOARD MINUTES June 26, 2008 1777 Broadway, Council Chambers A permanent set of these minutes and a tape recording (maintained for a period of seven years) are retained in Central Records (telephone: 303-441-3043). Minutes and streaming audio are also available on the web at: httn://www.bouldercolorado.poy/ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: K.C. Becker Bill Holicky Willa Johnson Andrew Shoemaker Phil Shull, Chair Adrian Sopher PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Elise Jones STAFF PRESENT: Perry Brooks, Park Planner David Gehr, Deputy City Attorney Alice Guthrie, Parks & Recreation Heidi Joyce, Administrative Supervisor Katie Knapp, Wetland and Floodplain Administrator Elizabeth Lokocz, Landscape Architect Planner Elaine McLaughlin, Senior Planner Robert Ray, Land Use Review Manager 1. CALL TO ORDER P. Shull declared a. quorum at 6:05 p.m. and the following business was conducted. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES On a motion by W. Johnson, seconded by A. Sopher, the Planning Board approved (6-0, E. Jones absent) the June 5, 2008 Planning Board minutes as amended. 3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION No one from the public addressed the board. 4. DISCUSSION OF DISPOSITIONS, PLANNING BOARD CALL-UPS Call-up item: Floodplain Development Permit, LUR2008-00054 and Wetland Permit LUR2008- 00027, 4400 N. Broadway. W. Johnson asked why the permit was being sought and what the impacts of the work being done would have on any future uses of the site. K. Knapp replied that tho channel improvement work would remove the lot adjacent to the creek from the floodplain and remove some of the restrictions for development on the site. The city is funding.50% of the project. ~a Agenda Item # Page # The board did not call-up this item at this time. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Valmont City Park Concept Review (0 Valmont Road; the intersection of Valmont and Airport roads).. Concept Plan Review and comment for consideration of a 132- acre community park with a proposed three phase development plan. Applicant: City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department; Perry Brooks, Park Planner Case Manager: Elizabeth Lokocz Staff Presentation E. Lokocz presented the item to the board. A. Guthrie and P. Brooks, Parks and Recreation Department, presented the item to the board. A. Sopher asked what was being considered for the public-private partnerships. P. Brooks replied that the uses would have to be compatible with the park, e.g. an ice arena, swimming pool, skate park, etc. K. Becker asked if the land being considered for partnerships would be sold or leased. P. Brooks. replied that the land would be leased. W. Johnson asked if there will be impacts to the wetlands. P. Brooks said that there are no identified wetlands on the south side of the site. The north side of the site has a raw water irrigation pond built in 1999 which is now classified as a wetland. There are also two ditches running through the north side of the site. P. Shull asked if the existing structures are deemed historic. P. Brooks replied that they are landmarked. W. Johnson asked about the paths on the site. P. Brooks responded that there will be a regional trail connection on the north side of the park. P. Shull asked what will happen to the prairie dogs on the site. A. Guthrie answered that the prairie dogs will either be relocated or euthanized on a phase by phase basis. A. Sopher asked how long the park is expected to satisfy the needs of the community. A. Guthrie responded that the bike park will serve the community for quite a long time. The design of the park is meant to be adaptable to adjust to needs as they change. B. Holicky asked why the disc golf course is taking up so much land since it is ranked as a low priority. A. Guthrie replied that this was based on direction from council. The use of disc golf courses has increased recently. B. Holicky asked if there were any plans to provide rock climbing opportunities within the park. A. Guthrie replied that rock climbing was not included in the plan to date. B. Holicky asked what the wintertime uses of the park would be. A. Guthrie replied that the trails would become Nordic ski trails provided there was enough snow. A. Shoemaker asked about the cost of the disc golf course. A. Guthrie replied that construction of the disc golf course would be approximately $50,000 - $60,000 plus the cost of prairie dog removal and installation of a metal barrier. A. Shoemaker asked what the cost of prairie dog removal is. P. Brooks replied that it costs $200 per prairie dog. Agenda Item # ZO Page # Public Hearing Elizabeth Allen, Boulder, 80301, spoke in support of the project. She suggested that the board consider the location of the amphitheater and suggested that it may be better placed at the knoll. She supported keeping the buildings conducive to the park and its character. Jerry Allen, Boulder, 80301, suggested improving access to the park, specifically from Valmont Road to the northwest quadrant of the park. He was concerned about safety access along Valmont. Board Discussion Role of the park in the city's future (in the context of land use) A. Sopher was concerned about the larger vision of the park in relationship to the city's future. He commented that the current plan appears to be the result of the park satisfying all the constituents and may or may not be addressing the future needs of a community wide park as identified in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan. He suggested looking at reducing the density and intensity of the park. Connections A, Shoemaker suggested focusing on ways to reduce the volume of cars and traffic trips this plan would generate. He also supported improving access to the park that encourages alternative modes of transportation and reduces fossil fuel vehicle'use. A. Sopher mentioned that Goose Creek connections to the park are very important. B. Holicky was concerned about the connections from the park to the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP) and to the existing bike paths. He said it is extremely important to encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. He suggested that an underpass or vehicle differentiated travel path connect between the potential major bike arterial of Goose Creek and the bike paths to the north. He supported enhancing the bike connections in general. He said adding a dog park, a children's play area, or a. community outdoor activity area to the far western side of the park would decrease the walking distance from the TVAP to the park. A. Sopher said pedestrian access needs to be improved in Phase 1. B. Holicky said adding a secondary pedestrian path on the northern side of the site would improve pedestrian'access. Building Uses A. Sopher said if this park is to be considered a central park for the city of Boulder then the ball fields appear to be over weighted for the scale of the park. He questioned if it was necessary to make a dedicated zone specifically for the disc golf area. He suggested wrapping the disc golf area around the park. W. Johnson said the site is jammed packed with active uses. She said the beautiful and enduring parks of the world have a lot more nature. She thought that the three large building pads appeared to be too large and that the overall plan felt suburban or overly zoned and overly active. K. Becker said the disc golf area may have been intended to preserve more of a natural area to the park. She said that it is important to have a low impact zone for the park. She supported improving the connections to the TVAP by adding a children's play area, but also supported locating the kid's splash area next to a parking lot. P. Shull said it makes sense to stage the adventure playground and other children and farnily related activities on the west side of the park. He suggested that staff address safety issues in the Agenda Item # Page # final site plan and include information on the topographical gradients across the 46 acres of the site. He was also surprised that there are no wetlands on the site. He added that the disc golf course seems to be an odd prioritization on an important piece of land. Parkin¢ W. Johnson mentioned that because our park land is'precious, the three acres of parking dedicated just to the ball fields seemed excessive. She supported considering recalculating the parking formula for this site or reducing the number of ball fields in order to reduce the parking. She also recommended reconfiguring the layout of the parking lot on the far eastern side of the site to incorporate more green space. K Becker recognized that the opportunities for families with children to use alternative modes are more limited. B. Holicky felt that since this park is one of two major community parks, (as outlined in the BVCP), the ball fields could be relocated and/or replaced with a use that would reduce car loaded impacts and encourage alternative modes of transportation. He said the parking demand may not have to be so high for some of the fields. He suggested that staff do a parking analysis to determine what parking is necessary and to find ways to reduce parking loads with the existing uses in place. He supported encouraging alternative modes of transit by suggesting miming a bus from the TVAP to the park, providing better connections, relocating some of the ball fields or reducing the number of ball fields. A. Shoemaker proposed that parking spaces could be dedicated to family oriented parking through signage which might encourage people to use alternative modes of transportation. Overall uhasine A. Sopher said it seems logical to develop the connections from the park to Goose Creek and to the TVAP in Phase I. A. Shoemaker suggested that City Council request a cost benefit analysis of any partial use of land in Phase 11 requiring removal of the prairie dogs from the entire portion of the site. Safety P. Shull was concerned with the overall safety in regards to accessing the site. He said the current activities on.the northern side of the site could result in a high probability of injury and interface. He suggested that safety measures such as side lines, refuge and some level of night lighting be included in the plans for site review. He also suggested looking at incorporating a grade separation or underpass to improve safety to the crossing from Vista Village to the bike park. Summary • The vision for the park is not grand enough for a city central park, given that only two community wide parks are outlined in the BVCP. • There appears to be a lot of active impacts on the site. • The plan should include more and better connections, including a connection to the TVAP. • Phase I uses, while intense, maybe appropriate for the northern side of the site. The location of uses elsewhere on the site need to be reconsidered and the activities should be prioritized. The board was also concerned that the ball fields may be inviting increased auto use on the site and questioned the location of the disc golf course. • The current activities are inviting auto use rather than providing incentives to use alternative transportation modes. • The board would like to see a safety plan at the time of Site Review Agenda Item # Page # B. Consideration of Site Review and Preliminary Plat application No. LUR2008- 00022, Gunbarrel Gateway. The proposal is for redevelopment of the former Hugh M. Woods site located at 63rd Street and Lookout Road in Gunbarrel for approximately 83,000 square feet of commercial floor area. The site is approximately 5.9 acres in size and zoned BC-2 (Business Community 2). The applicant is pursuing creation of Vested Rights for the uses on the property.' Applicant/Property Owner: William McDermid, Boulder Hospitality, LLC Case Manager: Elaine McLaughlin Applicant/Owner Presentation Bruce Curr, Fletemeyer and Associates presented the item to the board. Staff Presentation E. McLaughlin presented the item to the board. D. Gehr explained vested rights. Public Hearing No one from the public addressed the board. Board Discussion A. Sopher complimented the applicant's efforts to address the board's concerns from Concept Review. B. Holicky was concerned over the architectural style and suggested more coloration differences or style variations on the site. P. Shull initiated a brief discussion about the future RTD/Fastracks location and connectivity on the site. The board asked for clarification from staff on the FasTracks Working Group. Motion On a motion by A. Sopher, seconded by W. Johnson, the Planning Board approved (5-1, B. Holicky opposed, E. Jones absent) Site Review #LUR2008-00022, incorporating the staff memorandum and the attached Site Review Criteria Checklist dated June 26, 2008 as findings of fact, subject to the following conditions of aptiroval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. The Applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the development shall be in compliance with all approved plans dated June 2, 2008, and on file in the City of Boulder Planning Department, except as modified by this approval. 2. Prior to a building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a Technical Document Review application for the following items, subject to the review and approval of the City Manager: a. Final architectural plans, including materials and colors, to insure compliance with the intent of this approval and the architectural intent shown on the elevation plans dated June 2, 2008. Agenda Item # 53 Page # Iq b. Final transportation engineering plans in accordance with the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards for emergency access lanes, public street, transit stop and sidewalk construction. The final transportation plans also must incorporate the following changes: i. The 63rd Street proposed curb flowline must be revised to be 47.80 feet east of the section line, with the back 'of curb 3.30 feet behind the existing 45-foot right of way; ii. All portions of the emergency access laneleasement must be shown to . accommodate a SU-30 turning template; and c. A final pavement design report and associated geotechnical soils report meeting the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards, for the secondary street connection and emergency access. d. A final utility plan in accordance with the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards and also include fire hydrant locations. e. A final storm water/drainage report and plan in accordance with the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards, which include information regarding the groundwater conditions (geotechnical report, soil borings, etc.) on the Property, and all discharge points for perimeter drainage systems. f. A detailed landscape plan in accordance with the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards, including size, quantity, and type of plant material proposed;, type and quality of non-living landscaping materials; any site grading . proposed; and any irrigation system proposed, to insure compliance with this approval and the City's landscaping requirements. The landscape plans must be revised to accommodate the emergency access lane turning radii and the new 63`d Street curb flowline location. Removal of trees must receive prior approval of the Planning Department. Removal of any tree in City right-of-way must also receive prior approval of the City Forester. g. A revised traffic impact study in accordance with the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards. The revisions shall include the following: i. Figures 2-9 must show correct traffic volume and percentile distribution information; and ii. The study must specify the proposed 63`d/Lookout southbound left turning movement signal timing changes and must have any recommendations approved through the City of Boulder. If the study recommends additional public improvements to accommodate the site generated traffic, the plans must be revised accordingly. h. The preliminary plat dated February 20, 2008 is not approved. A revised preliminary plat in accordance with Chapter 9-12, B.R.C. 1981 which incorporate the changes described below, subject to City review and approval: Agenda Item #6_6 Page # go i. Increase the right-of--way for the proposed secondary street width (across the northeast comer of the property) to 65 feet. An additional foot beyond the back of the sidewalk must be shown as "to be dedicated" as a public access easement; ii. Create an outlot on the last 1 foot of the 65-foot secondary street (on the northeast comer of the property) on the outside border of the plat; and iii. Revise the right-of-way dedication for 63'd Street to become 4 feet in width. The associated right-of-way radius at the comer of 63rd Street and Lookout Road must also be adjusted accordingly to be equidistant behind the bank of the curb. iv. The public access easements must be revised to entirely contain the emergency access lanes as shown on the final transportation plans. i. A final plat for Gunbanrel Business Park Replat B in accordance with Section 9- 12-8, B.R_C,1981. j. A financial guarantee for the initial operation of the RTD EcoPass Program for the benefit of employees of each lot or building, in an amount to cover program operations for no less than three years after the issuance of each certificate of occupancy. 3. Prior to an application for any building permit for the construction of any building on proposed Lot 2 or Lot 3, Gunbarrel Business Park Replat B, the Applicant shall submit a Technical Document Review application for the following items, and subject to the approval of the city manager: a. Final detailed architectural & landscaping plans for the parking lot and common plaza area, including materials, colors, and landscape plants to insure compliance with the intent of this approval 4. Prior to the final inspection for any building on the proposed Lots 2 and 3, Gunbarrel Business Park Replat B, the Applicant shall construct the parking lot and plaza improvements on proposed Lots 2 and 3, Gunbarrel Business Park Replat B, as indicated on the approved plans dated June 2, 2008. 5. The Applicant shall be required to allow any visitors, tenants, owners, and occupants of any building located on proposed Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Gunbarrel Business Park Replat B, to use the parking area shown on the approved plans dated June 2, 2008. 6. At such time as the Applicant submits for Technical Document Review and as the property redevelops, all outstanding conditions of Site Review LUR2008-00022 shall be complied with or a Site Review application for an Amendment shall be filed, subject to approval by the City Manager. Agenda Item # b Page # 02~ 6. MATTERS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR, AND CITY ATTORNEY R. Ray reviewed the Concept Plan/Site Plan Process. He noted that a large amount of staff time and money is being spent on Concept Plans, but the city is not receiving any fees for this part of the process. He asked the board for their opinion on the process. Canceut Plan/ Site Plan Process and Fees B. Holicky suggested that fees could reflect a Simple, Standard and Complex Concept Plan Review. He thought that billing for revisions makes sense. A. Sopher mentioned that if the fees for Concept Plan increase, then the fees for Site Review should decrease. W. Johnson suggested that pre-application comments be sent to the board. P. Shull assumed that the city will determine the fees for these reviews. He noted that Concept Plan reviews with more detail should provide for more efficient Site Reviews before the board. A. Shoemaker supported an initial fee upfront decided by using the categories of Simple, Standard and Complex. A. Sopher said an area of concern is how to make TEC documents more workable and less strained by revising the process. There should be some amount of flexibility built in. R. Ray noted that staff is working on revisions to the TEC doc process. Public Hearing Jeff Dawson; North Creek Ventures, felt that the TEC doc pilot program was moving in the right direction. He suggested projects coming in for one round of TEC doc review as part of a hybrid approach. He questioned whether concept review was always necessary. According to staff, concept review is preferred for applicants to get the board's feedback before they move too far forward with their projects. If a concept review is very detailed, then site review should be more simplified. This idea made sense to him. Having established fees for any of these approaches is necessary. Regarding infill vs. greenfield development he felt that the board was more concerned about infill sites than greenfield ones. He thought that the expectations for these sites should be well-defined enough that they wouldn't require the full review process. P. Shull supported having more information at Concept Review. B. Holicky asked that this item be added to the next agenda. R. Ray noted that they may need to schedule another board meeting to discuss the Crestview East Annexation toward the end of August. Minutes Approved amendments made to board minutes that do not reflect the audio recording will be documented as clarifications. Greenwavs K. Becker gave the board an update on the June 25 Greenways meeting. Boulder Housing Partners Tour W. Johnson invited the Planning Board to attend a Boulder Housing Partners tour scheduled for July 31, 4-5:30 p.m. leaving from 4800 N. Broadway. Agenda Item # 5z Page #,2O" Public Zoning on School Properties A. Sopher gave the board an update on a Boulder Valley School District presentation, which included a discussion on public zoning on school properties. Pons and Scrapes Request for Proposal (RFP) B. Holicky gave the board an update on the RFP for the Pops and Scrapes project. 7. DEBRIEF/AGENDA CHECK The board would have liked more information included in the Valmont Park memorandum and expressed concern over the process of the project. 8. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Board adjourned the meeting at 10:46 p.m. APPROVED BY ArdC DATE Agenda Item Page # Attachment C CITY OF BOULDER Planning and Development Services ' 1739 Broadway, Third Floor • P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306-0791 phone 303-441-1880 • fax 303-441-3241 • web boulderplandevelop.net CITY OF BOULDER LAND USE REVIEW RESULTS AND COMMENTS DATE OF COMMENTS: February 26, 2009 CASE MANAGER: Elizabeth Lokocz PROJECT NAME: VALMONT CITY PARK LOCATION: 5325 VALMONT RD COORDINATES: N05W01 REVIEW TYPE: Site Review REVIEW NUMBER: LUR2009-00008 APPLICANT: CITY OF BOULDER PARKS AND REC DESCRIPTION: Site Review Phase One development Improvements related to Valmont Park REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS FROM THE LAND USE REGULATIONS: 1. Soft surface parking area where paving is required (Section 9-9-6(d)(5)(B) BRC 1981. 1. REVIEW FINDINGS A revision is required. Application will meet criteria if the items listed below are addressed; a staff recommendation of approval will be issued if applicant makes these changes. The applicant has 60 days to submit a revision in response to these comments. Submittals may be made to the project specialists and begin the first and third Monday of the month. Please submit 15 copies of the revised plans and any written information. 11. CITY REQUIREMENTS Access/Circulation (Michelle Mahan, 303-441-4417) Vehicular Connectivity/Circulation 1. City transportation staff would prefer Concept B (primary site access alignment with Butte Street) of the two Airport Road site access alternatives since the site accesses would be aligned meeting driver expectations, creating less vehicle miles traveled by site generated traffic, and eliminating and an additional point of conflict for vehicles traveling along Airport Road. However, Concept A (secondary access alignment with Butte Street) would be acceptable if necessary and would provide the benefit of a lower amount of pedestrian crossing conflicts with west-bound left turning movements. Pursuing Concept A would require the following two analyses to be provided: • Required and provided sight distance around the bend in Airport Road to ensure appropriate site access visibility and reaction time; and • The vehicle queue generated by the site for southbound left-turning movements compared to the existing northbound left-turn bay for the access drive serving Vista Village Mobile Home Park (north of Butte Street). 2. The Transportation Master Plan (TMP) shows several connections and improvements which are not addressed on the plans. The following connections and improvements required by the TMP must be shown on the plans, or a TMP amendment will be required. A change in facility type or deleting a facility requires Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) review and recommendation to City Council, following a public hearing: • The 49P Street vehicular connection and bike route connecting Valmont to the existing portion of 49'h Street, just south of the vacated portion of Pearl Street; • The extension of Sterling Drive to the future 49th Street vehicular connection; and • The necessary public right-of-way dedication for the northern section of the Airport Road extension between Valmont and Pearl Parkway. 3. The following transit improvements must be addressed on the plans at this time: • An 8'x30' concrete boarding area must be provided along the north side of Valmont between the curb and sidewalk. The west end of this boarding area should be located at least 90' west of the Valmont parking entrance. If a pedestrian crossing treatment is installed across Valmont at this location, then the west end of this boarding area should be located at least 90' west of the crossing treatment. This boarding area must allow a 5'x8' Address: 5325 VALMONT RD t 1 Agenda Item # 5-b Page # C'W accessible loading area at the front (west end) of the boarding area. The plans will be required to show this boarding pad and the associated tree grates. In addition, a bench and at least one u-rack should be located within 20' of the bus stop sign post; and An 8'x30' concrete boarding area must be provided along the south side of Valmont between the curb and sidewalk. The east end of this boarding area should be located at least 50' east of the proposed Valmont/49"' Street flowline intersection. This boarding area must allow a 5'x8' accessible loading area at the front (east end) of the boarding area. The plans will be required to show this boarding pad and the associated tree grates. In addition, a bench and at least one u-rack should be located within 20' of the bus stop sign post. 4. Section 4.5 of the Traffic Impact Study recommends the striping of auxiliary lanes on eastbound Valmont and southbound Airport. The proposed striping must be shown to not adversely impact the adjacent site accesses and also must be delineated and dimensioned on the engineering plans. 5. The existing Valmont lane width should be shown on the engineering plans to ensure the placement of the proposed curb and gutter allows for 11 foot wide vehicular travel lanes and 5 foot with bicycle lanes (exclusive of pan width). Revise the plans accordingly. 6. All street signage must be included on the engineering plans to verify conflicts with proposed trees are eliminated. 7. The grading plans must include drive access grade information to ensure compliance with Table 2-2 of the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards. The grade must be positive to a point 10 feet beyond the right-of-way. Pedestrian Connectivity/Circulation 1. The entire width of the existing 4 foot sidewalk along Airport Road is to be removed and replaced with the 10 foot wide multi-use path since longitudinal seams are not allowed on bike paths. This must be labeled as a multi-use path instead of a sidewalk. In addition, an 8 foot wide landscape buffer should be provided where possible. The western Airport right-of-way line must be shown on the plans in order to ensure the proposed multi-use path does not encroach onto the adjacent property. Revise the plans accordingly. 2. The sidewalk along the west side of Airport which connects the proposed multi-use path to the northwest corner of the ValmontlAirport intersection, should be shown to be widened as previously discussed or an explanation provided which describes why it cannot be constructed at this time. 3. The multi-use path ramps on the east and west sides of the Airport Road pedestrian crossing must be shown as directional and 10 feet wide in order to accommodate the multi-use path users. In addition, it is unclear how the multi- use path users will be accommodated after entering the bike park site on the east side of Airport since the path width narrows from 10 feet to 8 feet wide. The plans should address how bicycle and pedestrian traffic will be dispersed during an event and should also consider where visitor bike parking will be located. 4. The applicant will be responsible for constructing the Airport Road pedestrian crossing which will include crosswalk striping and a pair of state law signs in conformance with current city standards. Note this on the plans. 5. The transitions shown for the multi-use path widths along Wonderland Creek should be adjusted to be more gradual. 6. It is unclear how bicycle/pedestrian connectivity is being provided between the bike park and the disc golf course and must be clarified on the plans. Specifically, the trail connection between the Valmont/Airport intersection and the Wonderland Creek path on the south side of Valmont. 7. Although the bicycle/pedestrian bridge along the east side of the property is to be constructed by others, the plans must provide preliminary bridge design at this time in order to ensure the future bridge construction is feasible and in order for construction costs to be estimated. Additional structural details will be required for all public bicycle/pedestrian bridges at the time of final engineering. 8. The plans show sidewalk chases located in the public multi-use path routed through the bike park and the public sidewalk along Valmont and should be replaced with another drainage method. See Drainage comments for additional information. 9. The plans (sheet C6) include a note stating that the existing sidewalk and ramp at the northeast corner of the Valmont/Airport intersection are to be reconstructed, but must also be illustrated in the plans. Directional sidewalk ramps must be provided. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # 53 Page # o26- Traffic Impact Study 1. The study must be revised to include the source and support for all trip (single-occupant vehicle and alternate mode) generation assumptions for the bicycle park, dog park, and disc golf course. 2. The study references a "retail facility" (page 9) and a clubhouse/multipurpose building (page 8), but it is not mentioned in the proposed land uses (page 2). In addition, it is unclear exactly what this building will be used for. Clarify these items in the study. 3. Section 4.5 recommends the striping of auxiliary lanes on eastbound Valmont and southbound Airport. Additional clarification and support should be given regarding why this is recommended. For instance, if warranted by CDOT, the specific warrants met must be specified. If the recommendation is due to existing street geometry, that should be specified in the study. In addition, the proposed striping must be shown to not adversely impact the adjacent site accesses and also must be delineated and dimensioned on the engineering plans. 4. The level of service (LOS) analysis shows the seconds of delay for several movements to decrease due to site generated traffic. For all instances where the number of seconds of delay decreases due to site generated traffic for any LOS below D, the study must give recommendations of how to bring the LOS back up to existing. If the study recommends any signal timing changes, the engineer should contact Joe Paulson (303-441-3289), City of Boulder Signal Operations Engineer, to discuss necessary pedestrian delay time, etc. 5. See Vehicular Connectivity/Circulation comment #1 above regarding necessary analyses if the primary site access is shifted to the north. 6. Revise the Site Plan to show the new Valmont transit stop to be closer to the Valmont site access, in accordance with the submitted site plans. 7. Revise the parking numbers in accordance with the required parking analysis. Building and Housing Codes The converted chicken warehouse must meet the minimum plumbing facilities requirements of IBC sec. 2902.1 and table 2902.1. Kirk Moors 303-441-3172 Building Design Generally the building design seems appropriate offering adaptive re-use of the historic Platt Farmhouse and the existing warehouse on Valmont. Additional information is needed in the following areas: 1. The height of each building must be shown to meet code as defined in Section 9-16 Definitions. Accessory buildings are limited to 20 feet and principal buildings to 35 feet in Public zones unless specifically requested as a modification. Label the site plans and elevations to show the low point within 25 feet of the tallest side of each building. The Platt House and renovated warehouse are both principal buildings; the restroom/storage facility is an accessory building; the pump house should also be shown as an accessory building. 2. Provide additional information on the materials and colors proposed for each building. If possible, include color samples and material images directly on the plan sets for future reference per the site review criteria of Section 9- 2-14(h)(2)(F)• 3. The program and associated renovation of the warehouse seems incomplete. Multiple entry points are clearly shown, but no circulation system is in place to connect them. This area also seems to necessitate bathroom facilities (see Building comments above), but none are provided. These amenities should also be provided based on the dog park, larger parking lot and trail system. See Building comments which list minimum requirements which will be required at building permit review. Drainage Brian Campbell, P.E. 303-441-3121 A Final Storm Water Report per the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards that includes detailed calculations for facility sizing, outlet structures, emergency overflows, level spreader features, water quality features, and curb cut sizes shall be submitted at the time of Technical Document Review (Final Engineering Review). A sidewalk chase drain is shown at the southeast corner of the project that allows the water from Basin D to be conveyed to the ditch along the north side of Valmont. Sidewalk chase drains are not allowed within the city's ROW. The applicant needs to consider other alternatives for conveying the water through this area. It is recommended to size a pipe to convey the water under the sidewalk. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # # Page # 6* A construction storm water discharge permit is required from the State of Colorado for projects disturbing greater than 1 acre. The applicant is advised to contact the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. (http://www.r,dphe.state. co. us/wa/ParmitsUnit'stormwater/index. htm)) The applicant is required to submit a Storm Water Management Plan that details the Best Management Practices (BMP's) that will be used during each phase of construction. This shall be provided at the time of Technical Document Review (Final Engineering Review). A revised grading plan shall be submitted for phase I improvements that reflect the appropriate changes due to the Platt Farm House location. The Preliminary Storm Water Report shall be updated as necessary. These updates shall be included in the revised Site Review Submittal. If the applicant is discharging storm water to the two ditches referenced in the Preliminary Storm Water Report that changes the historicicurrent discharge points or increases the amount of runoff to the ditches, a letter from the appropriate ditch company stating that the proposed changes are acceptable will be necessary. Engineering The applicant is required to include all proposed grading for the Phase II (Disc Golf Course) improvements in the revised Site Review Drawings if applicable. Fees Please note that 2009 development review fees include a $131 hourly rate for reviewer services following the initial city response (these written comments). Please see the P&DS Questions and Answers brochure for more information about the hourly billing system. Fire Protection David Lowrey, 303.441.4356 The West parking lot off Airport Road is acceptable as is, however; Fire has met with the applicants about changes based on the location of the relocated farm house. Reasonable access must be provided to the relocated farm house. The Parking lot must have an "in" and an "out" or turn around for fire use with proper turning radius. A Sprinkler system must remain in farm house. Regarding South parking area off Valmont Road, the current structure has a dry pipe sprinkler system. This will still be considered a structure with the sides removed and the sprinkler system must remain in service. Platt Farm House Alternatives: I could live with Concept A or B. Either would work for fire however, I do not believe the "removable bollards" work for fire. I understand 100% why you have proposed them and they work well with the bike traffic but not for our purpose when needed. With the gravel parking lot comes dirt and small rocks that fall down in-between the removable bollards; they soon become glued in placed and are no longer removable. Floodplain Katie Knapp, 303-441-3273 Where improvement are proposed in the floodplain as defined in Section 9-3-2, B.R.C., no development in the floodplain may occur prior to the issuance of floodplain development permit pursuant to section 9-3-6, "Floodplain Development Permits, " B.R.C.1981. The proposed disk golf course as shown is partially located within the conveyance flood zone of Wonderland Creek. This area of the floodplain is reserved for the conveyance of floodwaters so that flood risks are not increased on adjacent properties and the 100-year floodplain boundaries are not increased. The applicant is required to demonstrate that any obstructions, such as the proposed disk golf holes placed within the conveyance zone will not result in a rise in the 100- year floodwater elevation or increase the flood risk to adjacent properties. Historic Preservation The Parks and Recreation department is proposing to relocate the Landmarked 1908 farmhouse 700' southwest of its current site. Parks and Recreation intends to use the farmhouse as a community meeting facility. The house is historically significant for its association with James M. Platt (the first Water Commissioner for Boulder County) and the Platt family, and for its role in the agricultural development of east Boulder. The house is architecturally significant as an intact example of an early-20th century farm construction and environmentally significant for its proximity to the North Boulder Farmers Ditch and the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch, which played significant roles in the agricultural development of the Valmont community. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # Jr Page #97 On January Ph, 2009, by a vote of 3-2 (Spitzer & Komblum dissenting), the Landmarks Board denied the application to relocate the house finding that it did not meet the standards for issuance of a Landmark Alteration Certificate (lac) and would adversely affect the special character or special historic & architectural value of the landmark. In particular, the Board found that the proposed new location for the building would not preserve its historic "rural" setting. To this end, the Board suggested that the site plan for the park be redesigned by moving the proposed parking lot further north and/or relocating the house further east on the property, nearer to its current location. The Landmark Board's denial of the application was "called-up" by the City Council on January 20t", 2009, per 9-11-16 of the Boulder Revised Code. City Council's review of the decision is scheduled for March 3rd, 2009. Since being called-up, city Parks & Recreation, Transportation, Fire, Planning, and Historic Preservation staff has met to explore alternatives to the proposed plan in an attempt to address the Landmark Board's concern that the existing plan does not appropriately preserve the "rural" setting of the Platt Farmhouse. Based up these discussions, three alternatives have been developed (options A-B). Options A & B do not change the proposed new location of the farmhouse, but both call for the parking area to be moved north and significantly away from the building. Option A calls for the parking area to be accessed from at the north end with a limited access fire lane across from Butte Street. Option B provides access to the parking across from Butte Street. Options A & B do provide for a more rural setting for the house by keeping the parking area at least 90' from the building. Please contact James Hewat at 303.441.3207 if you need more information regarding this matter. Land Uses See informational comments below. Landscaping 1. The proposed multi-use path connection to the west of the site requires additional information. It appears that the path is designed to avoid all existing trees; however, the City Forester has noted that several of the existing trees are in decline and would pose a public safety hazard. Additional tree inventory information should be added to Sheet S3 and any special considerations for the path alignment. 2. Add to the landscape sheets typical notes including soil amendment specifications, mulch application, general irrigation descriptions, reference the street tree planting and tree protection standards of the Design and Construction Standards Chapter 3 available at http://www.bouldercolorado.gov/files/PDS/codes/dcs/ch03.pdf . 3. The proposed street trees require some additional information. Staff acknowledges that existing vegetation and overhead utility lines along Valmont limit the planting of street trees. However, staff recommends creating a visually distinct edge to the park and enhancing the pedestrian experience while demonstrating the streetscape is in excess of minimum landscape requirements. It is not clear which trees are being counted towards the total for Airport Road beyond those in the right-of-way. Staff counts 16 canopy trees and 7 ornamental trees in the right of way. 4. The planting plan overall meets the intent of the code. Staff has the following comments to meet minimum planting requirements, improve the overall design and help address Site Review criteria: 5. Kiosks are labeled throughout the park. How will they integrate into the other design elements? What will their typical materials be? 6. An irrigation plan is a requirement of Section 9-9-12(d) BRC 1981. Although this requirement is typically not completed until Technical Document Review, due to the size of the site and complexity of reaching all proposed planting areas, a preliminary irrigation plan is needed. Tree species and locations could change based upon irrigation type/requirements. Areas of the park essentially fall into two types of irrigation; those that are relatively developed with dense proposed planting requiring permanent automatic drip irrigation systems and those areas that are primarily dispersed trees around the interior of the site. Subsurface irrigation Netafim or tree watering systems are preferred. The second group may present a challenge. A long term approach to watering these areas in the event of future drought years needs to be Identified early in the design process to avoid unnecessary future changes after Site Review approval. 7. The proposed multi-use path west of the Park appears to need some additional tree inventory and possible redesign. Some of the trees appear to be extremely close to the edge of path and may be unlikely to survive construction. Other trees are in decline and present safety concerns. Discuss options with the Forestry Department to develop an inventory and protection plan. Include the plan in the next submittal. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # Page # 8. Staff has the following comments on the Representative Plant List: a. River Birch (Betula nigra) is an outstanding tree; however they need a significant amount of water to establish. Special consideration should be given to the placement and irrigation for these trees. Staff recommends using them only around the parking and public gathering areas to ensure maintenance. b. Honeylocust, although an appropriate street or parking lot tree, seems inappropriate in the interior of the park. Reduce the number of honeylocust by half due to issues with overplanting in Boulder. Do not plant honeylocust in irrigated turf areas. Other native and drought tolerant options should be explored such as Northern Catalopa (Catalpa speciosa), Bur Oak, Swamp White Oak, Ohio buckeyes and Horsechestnuts c. Staff suggests using more native maples. Acer negundo 'Sensation' should be in the canopy category. Acer grandidentatum grows to 50' and should be in the ornamental if not canopy tree category. d. Staff also suggests alternative native evergreens in place of the Austrian pine including limber pine (Pinus flexilis), Colorado spruce (Picea pungens), southwestern white pine (Pinus strobiformis ) and bristle cone pine (Pinus aristata). I expanded your suggestions. e. Final shrub, perennial and grass counts are not needed for the final Site Review approval. However, provide shrub type callouts for an understanding of the shrub massing on site. f. Several plants listed as shrubs should actually be listed under trees: i.e. American plum, chokecherry, Wasatch maple, Rocky mountain maple, gambel oak. g. Valmont streetscaping: Substitute goldenrain trees for American plum and serviceberry. American plum and serviceberry should only be used in wildlife corridors (i.e. along east property boundary, natural thickets; not in streetscaping) h. Substitute 'Valley Forge' American elm for'Brandon' American elm. i. Delete Newport Plum from species list due to insect issues. j. The large turf area just west of the chicken barn is more suited to American elms than the cottonwoods currently indicated for this area. k. Substitute'Hot Wings' variety of tatarian maple for straight genus/species tatarian maple. 9. Provide additional drawings including materials, colors, etc. on the Entry Arch. 10. The follow comments were received from Mike Gurrola of the Parks Department: Planting plan as submitted is ambitious. Applicant is encouraged to review with Forestry and Parks maintenance staff to reduce plant quantity and combine shrub beds. See additional planting comments in this section. Berm placement in dog park area may encourage weed growth and visual obstacles. Applicant is encouraged to review with Forestry and Urban Resource Manager. Clarification is requested from P&DS on gravel parking lot. It is unclear if this element is acceptable per ordinance. Applicant is encouraged to review with Parks maintenance staff on viability and durability of soft surface. See the Parking comments below. 11. The following comments were received from Kathleen Alexander, City Forester (303.441.3406) a) Siberian elm groves at the intersection of Airport and Valmont: Remove 75% of Siberian elms pre- construction and replant heavily with: i) clump type gambel oak, American plum, chokecherry; ii) several large maturing American elms; iii) and additional shrubs including rabbitbrush, wild rose, snowberry. b) Change the note on the landscape plan about existing vegetation along Valmont. The current plan states "existing vegetation to be retained per City Forester". Change the note to read "Siberian elms along Valmont, with the exception of those along the ditch will be removed. All existing plums/chokecherries will be retained per City Forester." c) The east property boundary wildlife corridor: plant heavily with American plum, Rocky Mountain juniper, chokecherry, sumac, rabbitbrush, serviceberry (remove Shumard oak from the landscape plan in this area) to improve wildlife corridor. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # Page # SQL d) Plant additional groundcovers/shrubs in conservation area between ditches. e) Plant additional plum and chokecherries to supplement existing thickets along Valmont and under overhead utility lines. f) All cottonwood plantings should be a minimum 12' off any hardscape (i.e. curbs, sidewalks) and a minimum 30' away from overhead power lines due to massive mature size. Adjust the planting plan as needed to meet these minimums. g) The tree planting "islands" in the Dog Park enclosed by Type 1 fencing should be sized to enclose all associated irrigation. Consider planting additional understory plants in these areas. Keep the bur oak and hackberry, but plant no honeylocust in these areas. Consider enlarging these areas slightly and planting additional trees creating denser shaded oases within the Dog Park. h) On Sheet L1, clarify the comment, "Existing tree to remain and be protected with landscape enhancements". Two very large cottonwoods exist in this area. Planting over the existing root systems may not be beneficial due to their shallow rooted nature. The fenced area around the trees should be enlarged to the approximate dripline to limit future compaction. i) Show the extent of tree protection zones around the existing large cottonwoods. Protection zones should extend to the driplines per DCS Chapter 3. Reference the DCS Chapter 3 protection requirements on the landscape sheets. j) Recommend planting additional trees in bike trail comers to prevent bicyclists cutting thru and damaging existing vegetation. Neighborhood Comments Staff has received two phone calls as of the date of these comments. Both were from adjacent property owners requesting additional information on the timing of the Park development, in particular Phase 2. An editorial published in the Daily Camera during the review period is also included as an attachment. Parking (Michelle Mahan, 303-441-4417) 1. Although the parking provided meets the required number of parking spaces per 9-9-6 BRC 1981 for the buildings on the site, additional information is needed regarding required parking for the park use itself. The Concept Plan Review proposed parking based on a similar park use elsewhere. Staff and Planning Board agreed that such an approach was generally supportable; however, Concept Plan Review does not grant formal approval and all pertinent information should be included in the Site Review application. (Elizabeth Lokocz, 303-441-3138) 2. A parking analysis must be provided supporting the proposed parking. This must include major events and provide a plan to accommodate overflow parking. In addition, the spaces proposed to be used by the disc golf course users appear to be serving an existing user, which must be accommodated. 3. The accessible spaces must be dimensioned in accordance with Federal ADA Standards. I van accessible loading area (8 feet wide) must be provided for each of the parking lots. 4. Per section 9-9-6(d)(3)(B) of the Boulder Revised Code, turnaround spaces must be provided for dead-end parking bays of eight stalls or more. A tum-around space is required for the Airport Road parking lot. Turnarounds must be identified with a sign or graphic and marked "no parking". All required tum-around spaces must be clearly labeled and dimensioned. Revise the plans accordingly. 5. Bicycle parking is required to be provided in accordance with sections 9-9-6(b) and 9-9-6(g) of the Boulder Revised Code and section 2.11(E) of the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards. The proposed bicycle parking locations do not adequately meet these requirements. The portion of the site proposed to be developed as part of Phase 1 clearly has the intent of attracting all types of bicycle enthusiasts to the park. The proposed distribution of bicycle parking is inadequate to meet the bicycle commuting needs of all anticipated users of the site. Users of the bicycle facilities are likely to be many and varied, particularly during events. With spectators and a likely increase of public, recreational users competing for bicycle parking with the event participants, is adequate and thoughtfully located bicycle parking being proposed? Will public users and spectators be able to ride to the proposed seating and viewing areas? Staff recommends adding, redistributing or relocating proposed bicycle parking to several additional locations throughout the site. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # 543 Page # • All bicycle parking areas must be clearly labeled with the number of spaces provided and the pad area dimensioned in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications or the City of Boulder Standard Detail number 2.53 for the inverted "U" bike rack. In addition, the Site plan and Landscape plan should be consistent in the number and location of each proposed bicycle parking area. Revise plans as necessary. • The Site Details page, (sheet S-6), depicts two bike rack styles, but it is unclear where each of these style racks are proposed. Revise plans to clearly identify the type of bicycle rack proposed at each bike parking location. Only proposed bike racks should be included in the details sheet, all others should be removed. • Per section 2.11(E)(2) of the DCS, bicycle parking should generally be provided within 50 feet of the main building entrance(s) for the Community Meeting building and the Covered Riding Pavilion. Revise plans to show bicycle parking added or relocated near the main building entrances. • Per section 9-9-6(g) of the Boulder Revised Code, bicycle parking is required to be located in convenient, highly visible, active, well-lighted areas but shall not interfere with pedestrian movements. Clearly dimension all bicycle parking areas and revise as necessary to provide required spacing for pedestrian movements. • Additional bike racks should be located adjacent to the proposed Valmont Road transit shelter/ stop. Revise plans to show the location of the transit shelter and the adjacent bicycle parking. Further bicycle parking may be provided at other locations in the public right-of-way subject to the requirements outlined above. • If the standard inverted "U" bicycle rack is proposed please add the City of Boulder Standard Detail number 2.53 to the Landscape Plan Detail Sheet. Plan Documents 1. The quality and contrast of many of the (color?) images included is extremely poor and not acceptable for final drawing sets or recording purposes. Resolve these issues prior to the next submittal. 2. Provide the phasing plan for the Park as it was previously presented and approved to PRAB and City Council. The cover sheets may be an appropriate location to show the three phases. Include an explanation of why the disc golf course is part of the Phase 1 process. Site Design and Layout 1. To facilitate confirmation of zoning requirements and ease of information transfer in later applications, add a project data summary table to the overall site plan. Staff has not identified any modifications other than those listed above. Include in the table: a. Total square footage of habitable and uninhabitable space as defined in the code for each proposed and existing buildings, b. The setbacks for each building to front, rear and side yards c. The total parking (standard, compact and accessible) required per Section 9-9-6 BRC and provided, d. The total bike parking required per Section 9-9-6 and provided, e. Required and provided open space meeting the standards of Sec. 9-9-11 BRC and f. Information on the Solar Access Area (3) and a statement than none of the proposed or existing buildings effect adjacent properties per the Site Review Criteria of Section 9-2-14(d)(13). 2. The bike trail system provides ample opportunities for learning and competition. It would be very helpful to understand the typical trail type (width, surface, level of difficulty) throughout the plan set. Staff recommends using a brief verbal description and graphic system to accomplish this. Add this information to the existing legends throughout the plan set. The typical circle (easy), square (more difficult) and diamond (most difficult) identification might be appropriate. Other graphic options, if easily interpreted, may also be used. 3. Also add to the legend the surface and seeding types used throughout the plans. 4. The different fence types are key user separation elements, but are difficult to read. Add the fence types to the legend and adjust graphic representation as needed to show each type as its own line type. The additional legend information may allow some of the labels to be removed. 5. What distinguishes a "Pedestrian Observation" area such as the one labeled on Sheet S2? Will there be any seating or shade provided? How is the "Earthen Spectator Seating" going to be constructed and what will it look like as labeled on Sheet S1? 6. Identify a typical bollard for the site and add it to Sheet S6. 7. During preliminary discussions of how to best communicate the proposed bike amenities, staff recommended Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # Sp Page # keying the typical images to specific trail sections or competition elements on the plan. Staff repeats this recommendation as a tool to communicate how the trails change throughout the park. 8. Add to the explanation of what a "Habitat Improvement Zone" is a description of how these areas will be improved in the short and long term. To some extent this information is provided on the landscape plan, but a verbal description would be very helpful for future reference. 9. The clog park references "nonturf' surfaces. What are the nonturf surfaces and might they present any long term maintenance concerns? 10. Staff recognizes that a high level of separation is needed between pedestrian and bike trail users for safety. With that in mind, clarify how pedestrians reach the spectator plaza as shown on Sheet S1. Also provide additional information on the amenities and design of this area which staff assumes to be a key area for special events. 11. Provide additional information on the Disc Golf Course as discussed in pre-application meetings. Describe the improvements, or lack of, that will be occurring as part of the course development and how the course will change or evolve with future development. Include a summary table for the existing parking on the southern portion of the Park. Labeling the adjacent zoning (Industrial General) and existing structures (warehouses) to the west of the course may reduce concerns regarding negative interactions with neighbors. Indicate any fencing or other physical separation between park and adjacent lots. 12. Platt Farm House Alternative Locations - Although all of the concepts could work based on the Site Review Criteria, additional detail will be needed after City Council determines a preferred location. Staff offers the following comments as the process moves forward. Concept A: Staff questions the location of the secondary access point which may cause confusion in the pedestrian and bicycle system. It also appears to add more, rather than less, paved surfaces around the Platt house which may be contrary to the overall historic context. Concept B: This option presents a more intuitive primary access point and connects the Platt Farmhouse to the public spaces around the parking lot. It is important to note that much of the park will not be accessible to the general public for safety reasons. This location creates the most accessible and functional public connection with the least amount of site disturbance and impervious surface. Wetland Katie Knapp, 303-441-3273 Where improvements are proposed within a delineated wetland or wetland buffer area,, as defined under the City's wetland protection ordinance, an applicant for construction approval shall satisfy and comply with all applicable regulations and requirements as set forth in Section 9-3-9, "Wetlands Protection," B.R.C. 1981, including any necessary identification, analyses, avoidance and mitigation measures, and improvements needed to address wetlands protection requirements. It appears that the proposed disc golf course will encroach into the regulatory wetlands on the new mapping. This project will be subject to the new wetland mapping because it is a city project. Per 9-3-9 B.R.C., the applicant will need to demonstrate that all adverse impacts on a wetland, either directly or through its associated buffer area, have been avoided through a reduction in the size, scope, or density of the project or a change of project configuration or design. If avoidance is not feasible, then the applicant must demonstrate that direct or indirect adverse impacts have been minimized to the maximum extent feasible, the activity will result in minimal impact or impairment to any wetland function and the activity will not jeopardize the continued existence of habitat for the species listed in 9-3-9 B.R.C. Wildlife Matt Claussen 303-413-7258 1. Disc golf course: Holes east of prairie dog fencing must be removed; no disturbance is allowed in prairie dog colonies. 2. The area between the ditches should be low impact construction. Previous discussions included only a single bike trail in this area, but the proposed plans show 3 bike trails here. 3. The trail in-between the existing raw water pond and North Boulder Farmers' ditch should be removed due to wildlife corridor concerns. 4. Any disturbance should take into account avian breeding seasons. III. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS Access/Circulation (Michelle Mahan, 303-441-4417) Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # S~ Page # 1. The Transportation Master Plan (TMP) shows several connections and improvements which are not addressed on the plans. At the time of Site Review for Phase 2, all connections and improvements required by the TMP must be shown on the plans, or a TMP amendment will be required. A change in facility type or deleting a facility requires Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) review and recommendation to City Council, following a public hearing. The following connections would be required to be shown: • An underpass along Valmont which may possibly be replaced with a different type of pedestrian crossing treatment, but would require a TMP amendment; • A multi-use path connection from the Valmont underpass to Wonderland Creek Trail; and • An extension of Airport Road between Valmont and Pearl Parkway. 2. The following transit improvements must be addressed at the time of Site Review for Phase 2: • An 8'x30' concrete boarding area must be provided along the south side of Valmont between the curb and sidewalk. The east end of this boarding area should be located at least 90' east of the ValmonttAirport flowline intersection. This boarding area must allow a 5'x8' accessible loading area at the front (east end) of the boarding area. The plans will be required to show this boarding pad and the associated tree grates. In addition, a bench and at least one u-rack should be located within 20' of the bus stop sign post; and • An 8'x30' concrete boarding area must be provided along the south side of Valmont between the curb and sidewalk. The east end of this boarding area should be located at least 50' west of the proposed Valmont parking entrance and 90' east of any proposed pedestrian crossing treatments. This boarding area must allow a 5'x8' accessible loading area at the front (east end) of the boarding area. The plans will be required to show this boarding pad and the associated tree grates. In addition, a bench and at least one u-rack should be located within 20' of the bus stop sign post. Building and Housing Codes The converted chicken warehouse must have emergency egress lighting according to IBC sec. 1006.3. The gates from the converted chicken warehouse must meet the panic hardware requirements of IBC sec. 1008.1.9. Kirk Moors 303-441- 3172. Land Uses The proposed City Park is consistent with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVRC) which designates the land use as "Park, Urban and Other". Urban and Other Parks includes public lands used for a variety of active and passive recreational purposes. Large multi-use city parks are planned for two locations: 1) the Valmont Park site and 2) the Area III - Planning Reserve site, which will be held to meet future recreational needs. The development of the park supports several specific BVRC goals including 2.29 Urban Open Lands, 2.32 Trail Corridors/ Linkages. Many of the comments listed above are made to further support these goals. Legal Documents Julia Chase, City Attorney's Office, Ph. (303) 441-3020 The applicant should be aware that Cline Trout Farms has easements encumbering the property south of Valmont Road. The design for the portion of the park south of Valmont Road must not adversely impact these easements. A copy of the document is attached for reference. A Memorandum of Understanding from the Parks Department and any other applicable departments must be completed if the project is approved. Miscellaneous Both ditch companies, North Boulder and Left Hand Ditch and North Boulder Farmer's Ditch were sent copies of the submittal package. As of the date of these comments, staff has not received comment from North Boulder Farmer's Ditch. Staff received a phone call from Dan Lisco of North Boulder and Left Hand Ditch Company on Feb. 11, 2009 with the following information. Mike Valentine will be completing the engineering review of the proposed improvements. Parks will be required to sign liability agreements. Police Regarding Valmont City Park, 5325 Valmont Road. In checking the proposed work, I see only a few police related issues that are not inherent with other City Parks. (curfew, patrol, access to and escape from, and the lighting along paths, are always of concern to the police.) Hiking trailhead parking lots in the County that adjoin City property are frequently the target of vehicle trespasses. Potentially contributing to this problem at this location is its proximity to a variety of housing Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # Z Page # units (as with Heuston Park and surrounding business complexes where both vehicles and structures have been targeted). Boulder County Jail work-release foot-traffic into/ out of the area, ARC walk-away clients that will have a short commute (as compared with previous the jaunts they were compelled to make from N. Broadway down to Central Park), and the relative isolation/ remoteness from visual oversight due to the size of the site from any roadway or access (Police could be seen long before they get close to the park from almost any direction, and this because of areas of relative good lighting next to areas of unlighted/ contrasting darkness). The site is surrounded on all sides by industrial parks/ business complexes, which will typically be closed at night. (Except the Jail and ARC). Night-time users of the jogging paths would be highlighted in the existing lights, but then transition into areas poorly lit or not lighted at all, a condition which will prevail over the majority of the park after dark. Will there be emergency phones along the paths? It looks like a great project and is probably how Scott Carpenter Park was viewed as it came to be back in the sixties. These are just some police issues that I anticipate questions about. Thanks for letting us take a look at it. Larry Gibson, CPTED Officer Boulder Police Dept. (303) 441-4485 Review Process Due to the City Council call up of the Landmarks Denial, staff recommends that the next submittal does not occur until the location of the Platt Farmhouse has been approved. The Parks Department and consultants can work towards resolving all other outstanding issues identified in these comments during that time. Zoning Public: Public areas in which public and semi-public facilities and uses are located, including, without limitation, governmental and educational uses, 9-5-2(c)(5) BRC 1981. IV. NEXT STEPS 1. Complete City Council call up for Platt Farmhouse location. 2. Update all materials per these comments and the final approved Farmhouse location. 3. Resubmitted required number of copies to a project specialist. V. CITY CODE CRITERIA CHECKLIST To be completed at the time of final staff recommendation. VI. Conditions On Case None identified at this time. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # Page # CITY OF BOULDER ILp}r Planning and Development Services 1739 Broadway, Third Floor • P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306-0791 phone 303-441-1880 • fax 303-441-3241 • web boulderplandevelopmet CITY OF BOULDER LAND USE REVIEW RESULTS AND COMMENTS DATE OF COMMENTS: 04/03/09 CASE MANAGER: Elizabeth Lokocz PROJECT NAME: VALMONT CITY PARK LOCATION: 5325 VALMONT RD COORDINATES: N05W01 REVIEW TYPE: Site Review REVIEW NUMBER: LUR2009-00008 APPLICANT: CITY OF BOULDER PARKS AND REC DESCRIPTION: Site Review Phase One development improvements related to Valmont Park REQUESTED VARIATIONS FROM THE LAND USE REGULATIONS: 1, Soft surface parking area where paving is required (Section 9-9-6(d)(5)(B) BRC 1981. 1. REVIEW FINDINGS The application will meet all criteria if the corrections listed below are completed. Corrections must be submitted prior to final staff recommendation and board scheduling. Submit 5 copies of all corrected plans to the Project Specialists for the next review. As a correction, plans may be submitted at any time and will be distributed only to those reviewers with outstanding issues. Every effort should be made to addresses issues prior to resubmittal. Staff will review the corrections and respond with a final staff recommendation. Planning Board will be scheduled when final corrections are made. See the next steps section below for additional information regarding process. 11. CITY REQUIREMENTS Access/Circulation/Parking (Michelle Mahan, 303-441-4417) Vehicular Connectivity/Circulation 1. The Context Plan (Sheet CP1) must be revised to conceptually show the following future Transportation Master Plan (TMP) connections and improvements: • The 49" Street vehicular connection and bike route connecting Valmont to the existing portion of 49" Street, just south of the vacated portion of Pearl Street; and • The extension of Sterling Drive to the future 49th Street vehicular connection. These improvements, along with the Airport Road extension between Valmont and Pearl Parkway must also be labeled as: to be constructed and dedicated with Phase 2 & 3 improvements. A change in facility type or deleting a facility requires Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) review and recommendation to City Council, following a public hearing. 2. The required 8'x30' concrete boarding area and 5'x8' accessible loading area (located at the west end of the boarding area) for the transit stop on the north side of Valmont must be dimensioned on the engineering plans at this time. The bench must be relocated outside of the 5'x8' accessible loading area, but within 20' of the bus stop sign post. 3. The required transit stop on the south side of Valmont must be shown and dimensioned on the engineering plans at this time. An 8'x30' concrete boarding area must be provided along the south side of Valmont between the curb and sidewalk. The east end of this boarding area should be located and dimensioned to be at least 50' east of the proposed Valmont/4e Street flowline intersection. This boarding area must allow a 5'x8' accessible loading area at the front (east end) of the boarding area. In addition, a bench and at least one u-rack should be located within 20' of the bus stop sign post. Pedestrian Connectivity/Circulation 1. The paths interior to the park which connect the proposed multi-use path on the west side of Airport to the destinations within the park (event start lines, tot lot, etc.) should be widened to a minimum width of 10 feet rather than the proposed 8 feet wide in order to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians and eliminate safety and conflict restraints. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # J~ Page # 2. Transportation staff has conducted afield visit and recognizes that the 10 foot wide Wonderland Creek multi-use path will have points of constraint which will require narrowing to 8 feet, but the path width must be maximized where possible in order to meet expected path demands and transportation standards. Revise the plans to widen the plans where possible and also clearly demonstrate any constraints on the plans. In addition, all transitions must be shown to be gradual. Coordination with Debbie Ritter (303-441-3253), Transportation Project Manager, is recommended. 3. The applicant should work directly with Debbie Ritter, Transportation Project Manager, in order to coordinate the necessary preliminary bridge design for the bicycle/pedestrian bridge along the east side of the property. Additional information must be provided at this time in order for construction costs to be estimated. Additional structural details will be required for all public bicycle/pedestrian bridges at the time of final engineering. Traffic and Parking Studies 1. Staff has concerns regarding the expected vehicular and bicycle parking accommodation for major events. Planning and Development is working directly with the Parks and Recreation department and will follow up with the applicant the week of April 6, 2009 with additional information. 2. The study must be revised to include the source and support for all trip and parking (single-occupant vehicle and alternate mode) generation assumptions for the bicycle park, dog park, and disc golf course. If based on comparable facilities/uses, then specifics (size, location, number of trips generated, etc.) must be included along with how they relate to the proposal. 3. The level of service (LOS) analysis is showing the LOS for the Valmont/Foothills southbound left to decrease a letter grade due to site generated traffic because the Year 2030 Site Generated traffic includes Phases 2 & 3. Revise the LOS analysis to include Phase 2 & 3 site generated traffic with the Year 2030 background traffic in order to accurately reflect the impact of Phase 1 in the year 2030. Parkin 1. Revise the engineering grading and the architectural site plans to clearly and consistently dimension all accessible spaces and loading areas in accordance with Federal ADA Standards. In addition, update the base drawings to show the accessible parking and pedestrian path alignment illustrated on Sheet C7 and not Sheet S5. 2. The turn-around space provided for the Airport Road parking lot must be clearly labeled and dimensioned on the engineering grading plans. Bicycle Parking (Erik Saunders, 303 441-4493) 1. As stated in the staff comments dated February 26, 2009 bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with sections 9-9-6(g) of B.R.C and 2.11(E) of the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards. The locations of several of the proposed inverted "U" racks do not meet the required clearances to obstructions or travel paths. • Per section 2.11(E)(1)(b) of the DCS, racks oriented perpendicular to a wall or similar obstruction require a minimum clearance of four feet from the obstruction to the center of the rack. Three of the proposed bike racks in the parking cluster adjacent to the Restroom building are positioned too close to the northeast building face. • Per section 9-9-6(g)(2)(F), B.R.C. bike racks shall be positioned to not interfere with pedestrian movements. It appears that two of the bike racks in the parking cluster adjacent to the Restroom building are located such that a bicycle parked on the west side of the rack may encroach into the travel path adjacent to the proposed Tot Lot. A minimum of 3' should be provided from the edge of the path to the bike rack. Please reconfigure or reorient the above mentioned bike racks to meet the minimum clearances and provide the necessary spacing for proper access and circulation through the bicycle parking areas. 2. The clustered bicycle parking proposed near the park activity entrance areas appears adequate in number and convenient for most anticipated users during non-event periods, however, per section 2.1l (E)(2) of the DCS bike parking should be provided within 50' of the main building entrance(s). As stated previously, some bike parking should be relocated to be within 50' of the main building entrance to the Covered Riding Pavilion. Staff feels that a more suitable location, nearer the Covered Riding Pavilion, should be sought for the bike racks proposed outside of the parking lot adjacent to Valmont Road. Please relocate those bike racks or provide additional bicycle parking located within the 50' standard. 3. Bicycle parking proposed oriented with a radial configuration should have the spacing between racks adjusted such that the minimum clearance is met at the location where bikes would be likely to extend. Please reconfigure any Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # Page # proposed radial racks to be spaced no less than 3' apart at a point 2'4", (extended along the line of the rack), from the ends of closest proximity. This will ensure adequate access and circulation within the bicycle parking area. Building and Housing Codes The converted chicken warehouse must meet the minimum plumbing facilities requirements of IBC sec. 2902.1 and table 2902.1. Kirk Moors 303-441-3172. Building Design As previously stated the height of each building must be shown to meet code as defined in Section 9-16 Definitions. Include existing elevations for the pump house to demonstrate it meets the height limits. Staff also requested that the site plans are labeled to show the low point within 25 feet of the tallest side of each building; use a 25 ft. offset (not a radius from the building low point) to demonstrate compliance. This verifies that height is being measured correctly. Drainage Brian Campbell, P.E., 303441-3121 A revised grading plan shall be submitted for the Phase I improvements that reflect the changes due to the movement of the west parking area to the north. The Preliminary Storm Water Report shall be updated as necessary. These updates shall be included in the corrected site review submittal. A Final Storm Water Report per the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards that includes detailed calculations for drainage facility sizing, outlet structures, emergency overflows, level spreader features, water quality features, and curb cut sizes shall be submitted at the time of Technical Document Review (Final Engineering Review). Engineering As previously stated the applicant is required to include all proposed grading for the Disc Golf Course improvements in the revised Site Review Drawings if applicable. The applicant's written response is sufficient, but must be included directly on the plans in general notes or some other format. Fees Please note that 2009 development review fees include a $131 hourly rate for reviewer services following the initial city response (these written comments). Please see the P&DS Questions and Answers brochure for more information about the hourly billing system. Fire Protection David Lowrey 303.441.4356 The existing "chicken" building is currently fire sprinklered and that must remain and be modified as necessary. No additional comments on the parking or farm house. Historic Preservation James Hewat 303.441.3207 The City Council's March 3, 2009 review and overturning of the Landmark Board's denial of the application was based upon an understanding that the parking area would be located further away from the farmhouse, similar to that shown in Option developed by Parks and Recreation and Historic Preservation staff. The current scheme shows the proposed parking area in a similar location, relative to the relocated farmhouse, to the original plan and less that the 120' shown in option B. Staff considers that the parking area should be moved away from the house similar to that shown in option B, (i.e. accessible parking 90' away from house and regular parking at least 120' from the building). The plan also shows the proposed restroom facility to be located 35' northeast of the farmhouse. Staff considers that this new building should be set further away from the main house. Though outside the proposed relocated Landmark boundary, staff considers the proposed design for the restroom building compatible with the character of the farmhouse Drawings show details for the rehabilitation of the house including the orientation of the house to the south as specified in the City Council's approval of the project. These details should be submitted for review by the Landmarks design review committee prior to review of the project by the Planning Board per the approval. Landscaping Elizabeth Lokocz 303.441.3138 1. In regards to the "islands" in the Dog Park staff previously commented to consider enlarging these areas slightly and planting additional trees creating denser shaded oases within the Dog Park. The understory planting has been increased, but not the canopy density or area. Staff acknowledges user safety and maintenance concerns, but still encourages additional shade via canopy cover in the dog park area. 2. In the previous comments staff asked to clarify, "Existing tree to remain and be protected with landscape enhancements". Two very large cottonwoods exist in this area. Planting over the existing root systems may not be beneficial due to their shallow rooted nature. The fenced area around the trees should be enlarged to the Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # 6B Page # 37 approximate dripline to limit future compaction. This comment was intended to add permanent protection around these trees based on their proximity to the bike trails and potential of future compaction. This is especially important given the very close proximity of the proposed trails and their changing nature. Revise the plans accordingly with one of the fence types already in use. 3. During an onsite meeting staff and consultants reviewed the mature cottonwoods requiring removal along the proposed Wonderland Creek multi-use path. At the time Forestry staff could not determine if the first large cottonwood west of Airport Road required removal or pruning. Since that meeting Forestry has completed a complete inspection of the tree and determined that only pruning and not removal is needed. Revise all sheets accordingly (TA1, L3 and C8). 4. It appears that the interior parking lot landscaping has been miscalculated per Section 9-9-14 Figure 9-18. Recheck the areas that have been included and count only those areas indicated in Figure 9-18. Staff completed a quick analysis and it appears adequate square footage is already designed in the Valmont and Airport Road parking lots. Valmont Road also has the minimum number of required trees per 9-9-14(d)(6), but the Airport Road parking lot appears to be short three trees. Staff discussed this with the project Landscape Architect on 3.25.09 and identified potential locations within the existing design for three additional trees. Update the landscape requirements summary accordingly. 5. On Sheet L2 a single black dot exists in the middle of the sheet. If this is a utility pole, please label it or indicate what its purpose is. 6. Check the tree quantities which are generally correct, but appear to have minor errors. For example, the canopy trees have a total of 306 (by adding the quantities column), but only 295 is shown. To remove any future installation or bidding issues, add a note stating that the graphic will govern if discrepancies exist between graphic representation, call outs and plant list quantities. If the landscape architect has preferred or standard office language, that may be used. 7. The Landscape Plan still has too many Austrian and Ponderosa pines. These tree species have several insect problems; city staff is unable to use pesticides to treat these problems so these species do not thrive in our city parks. Substitute more limber pine, southwestern white pine, bristlecone pine, white fir. 8. The multi-use path located along the west side of Airport Road should become attached approximately 15 feet south of the large southern most cottonwood to avoid potential impacts. 9. The existing large cottonwoods surrounding the current Platt Farmhouse site (approximately in the center of the site north of the North Boulder and Left Hand Ditch should be protected from bike user impacts. Indicate permanent fencing chosen from the types already proposed around these trees. 10. Irrigation Plan comments: a. Afthough no irrigation is desired between the ditches in the narrow eastern half, the proposed plantings in the western areas (west of the irrigation pond) in the natural Siberian elm area. Please clarify the current label and arrows. b. Add a note to the irrigation plan stating that quick couplers will be coordinated Parks and Forestry staff at the time of final irrigation and utility plans. c. All rights-of-way areas shall have drip (i.e. Netafim) systems. Indicate this on the plan through a note or and/or graphic method. d. For the rest of the areas to receive drip, clarify what kind of drip will be used. e. Add a standard detail for MP Rotators watering areas less than 30'. f. Irrigation main lines should be located to avoid or minimize boring across the ditches (i.e. run mainline on west side near ROW). If mainlines are under ditches the lines would be susceptible to damage during routine ditch maintenance activities. Previous discussions w/ the irrigation designer suggested that mainlines could be located along bridges and that no boring would be needed. Please clarify the ditch crossing method. g. It is a City of Boulder Park requirement that a "redundant" drip irrigation system be installed for all trees in city parks. The purpose is to retain the ability to water trees during periods of droughttwater restrictions. Add a note to the preliminary irrigation plan explaining the requirement. h. Parks staff questions if the Mainline is adequately sized for the demand and load on the system. Provide overall irrigation demands for the site or some other form of justification for the proposed 4" size. Miscellaneous Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # 63 Page # See the attached Comments dated April 1, 2009 from Michael Ballentine representing the Ditch companies. Plan Documents 1. The phasing plan for the Park reads well, but does not include the full extent of the disc golf. Please revise to include the area with holes 14, 15, 16 and 17. Update the same on Sheet CP1. 2. Staff previous stated include an explanation of why the disc golf course is part of the Phase 1 process. The written response is sufficient, but must be added to the plans for future coordination purposes. 3. On Sheets B4.0-6.0 the labels for Detail, Profile, Section and Elevation are not consistently applied. For example the Cobblestone Hillclimb on the lower right of Sheet B4.0 is a profile, the Easier Trail Flat in the upper left is a Section, the Typical Wall Ride on Sheet B5.0 is an Elevation, etc. 4. Correct the typo "AN existing" in the Project Description on the Architecture and Civil Cover Sheets. Review Process See Next Steps below. Site Design and Layout 1. The Summary Table provided on Sheet LO contains the needed data; however, please divide the landscape requirements and overall project summary data into two tables. Move the project summary to Sheet SO. If any data applies to both tables, duplicate it as need. Also, add the written explanation of the solar access provided to staff on L0. 2. Add the pedestrian connection line type (Sheet S1 and others) to the legend on any sheet it appears. 3. Add the information provided to staff in the written response on the Disc Golf development on the plans (Sheet DG1). Include the parking summaries provided in the parking analysis memo. 4. Coordinate removing the trail between the ditch and irrigation pond as agreed upon during previous discussions. It is shown on Sheets BO.0 and 130.2. Also update the trails between the ditches (now two, formerly three) on BO.0. Check that all sheets accurately reflect these changes. 5. Check the call out for "Removable Gate, TYP" on the east side of the Park on Sheet S2. Is something missing? 6. For consistency, show the trees to be removed on Sheet S3. 7. Correct the Bike Parking detail for the Valmont Road lot shown on Sheet S5 which has an old base (see handicap/path conflict?. Wildlife Matt Claussen 303-413-7258 The following comments regard the disc golf course layout. Most of the course layout seems to work within the parameters of the prairie dog barrier and access/egress gates. However, for the holes marked #1 and #18, it would be helpful to swap those, or move #1 more towards the north end of the site, near Arapahoe Road and install an access gate there. All prairie dog barriers have been installed at this point; please update the "proposed barriers" accordingly. We did not install an access/pedestrian gate in the prairie dog barrier to accommodate the start of the disc golf course layout, as it was undetermined at that time the exact positioning of the 'holes'. While it would be best to have this entry nearest the parking lot, this would also make the prairie dog barrier vulnerable to encroachment or penetration to the remaining course area, should this gate be left open or used in a manner that would allow prairie dogs through (gates being left open are commonly seen at other barrier/gate locations). The remaining area to the south and west is densely populated by prairie dogs and I foresee returning populations right up to the barrier itself. If the #1/starting point would be moved to the north area Oust above where it is labeled 'END' on the drawing), that would help to reduce the chances of prairie dogs inadvertently getting through and is close enough to the parking lot area to be functional as the start point (as well as an end point for #18). III. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS Access/Circulation (Michelle Mahan, 303-441-4417) The following conditions must be met at the time of final engineering: 1. Street signage and trees must be included on the engineering plans to verify conflicts have been eliminated. 2. The grading plans must include drive access grade information for the Valmont site access in addition to both Airport site accesses. The drainage report will be required to verify that the major storm event is contained within the right-of- way. 3. A smoother transition/radius between the existing Valmont sidewalk and the proposed Airport multi-use path near the northwest corner of Airport/Valmont must be provided. Also, additional details of the sidewalk/multi-use path ramps and existing utilities are necessary. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD 2Q Agenda Item # SS Page # 3 Neighborhood Comments One additional phone call was received from a neighbor with concerns about traffic and future Park programming. Plan Documents 1. A complete photometric plan is required at the time of Technical Document Review meeting the standards of Section 9-9-16 BRC 1981 Outdoor Lighting. 2. A complete irrigation plan is required at the time of Technical Document Review meeting the standards of Section 9-9-12(d)(16) BRC 1981 Landscaping and Screening Standards. IV. NEXT STEPS 1. Complete all corrections and submit 5 copies of the final plans as directed above. 2. Staff confirms all corrections have been completed and communicates to applicant to proceed with final Planning Board plan sets (15 copies likely). Planning Board sets must be received a minimum of two weeks prior to the scheduled Planning Board meeting. 3. Staff submits final Planning Board memo for distribution two weeks prior to meeting. 4. Staff and applicant coordinate Planning Board presentations (10 minutes each maximum). 5. Staff and applicant attend Planning Board meeting. 6. If approved, a Memorandum of Understanding is prepared by the Parks Department, Planning staff and the CAO. 7. The final approved plans are printed on mylar and submitted to the case manager for recording. 8. The applicant may proceed with Technical Document preparation and submittal. V. CITY CODE CRITERIA CHECKLIST See attached checklist. VI. Conditions On Case Conditions will be drafted at the time of final staff recommendation to Planning Board. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD / Agenda Item # 6-b Page # YO CITY OF BOULDER Planning and Development Services 1739 Broadway, Third Floor " P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306-0791 phone 303-441-1880 " fax 303-441-3241 " web boulderplandevelop.net CITY OF BOULDER LAND USE REVIEW RESULTS AND COMMENTS DATE OF COMMENTS: 05.04.09 CASE MANAGER: Elizabeth Lokocz PROJECT NAME: VALMONT CITY PARK LOCATION: 5325 VALMONT RD COORDINATES: N05W01 REVIEW TYPE: Site Review REVIEW NUMBER: LUR2009-00008 APPLICANT: CITY OF BOULDER PARKS AND REC DESCRIPTION: Site Review Phase One development improvements related to Valmont Park REQUESTED VARIATIONS FROM THE LAND USE REGULATIONS: 1. Soft surface parking area where paving Is required (Section 9-9-6(d)(5)(B) BRC 1981. 1. REVIEW FINDINGS Staff has determined that the application meets all the Site Review criteria of Section 9-2-14(h), B.R.C. 1981, as listed in Section V below of this document; minor documentation corrections must be submitted prior to final staff recommendation. Planning Board review is scheduled for June 4, 2009. To remain on the Planning Board agenda, final corrections must be received by May 14, 2009. Submit 18 half size sets (12'x18" scaleable) directly to the case manager for final review and approval. These sets should include the color renderings previously submitted and collate the separate plan sets into a single bound document. If any corrections have not adequately been addressed on the resubmittal set, the Planning Board hearing may be rescheduled. Work directly with staff to address all remaining comments. 11. CITY REQUIREMENTS The following corrections are required prior to Planning Board Review. If any additional changes are made other than those listed below, they shall be clouded and called out for staff review. Access/Circulation/Parking (Michelle Mahan, 303-441-4417) 1. Add the following to the Path Width Note on sheet C8: "Where the path width is constrained by the ditch bank, retaining walls will be constructed in order to achieve the 10 foot width. Coordination with Debbie Ritter (303-441- 3253), City of Boulder Transportation Project Manager, will be required prior to final engineering submittal." 2. The Context Plan (Sheet CPI) must be revised to extend the 49th Street vehicular connection and bike route to the existing portion of 491h Street, just south of the vacated portion of Pearl Street per the Transportation Master Plan (TMP). 3. Dimension the minimum 10 foot wide paths interior to the park which connect the proposed multi-use path on the west side of Airport to the destinations within the park (event start lines, tot lot, etc.) on sheet C4. 4. The plans show a proposed transit stop to be located east of the Valmont/47th Street intersection. Revise sheet C14 to correctly label "47th Street" as 49th Street. Building Design 1. Label the low paints for all buildings across the sheets (S1, S3 and S5). 2. As previously discussed, revise the building design for the new restroom building to be below the 20 foot height limit per Section 9-7 BRC 1981 and as defined by the Boulder Revised Code (Section 9-16). Update Sheet A- 4.07 and accordingly and any other sheets effected. Fees Please note that 2009 development review fees include a $131 hourly rate for reviewer services following the initial city Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # 63 Page # response (these written comments). Please see the P&DS Questions and Answers brochure for more information about the hourly billing system. Landscaping 1. For consistency, show the tree to be removed along the proposed multi-use path with an X over it. Site Design 1. Sheet S4 labels the disc golf area as "Phase 2" when it is included as part of this review. Revise accordingly. 2. On Sheet CP1 the transit stops graphics and labels are difficult to read. The use of an additional symbol and a more descriptive label may help to explain the difference between proposed and future transit stop. 3. Fix the line type in the Legend for the "Spectator- Pedestrian Circulation" and label it consistently. III. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS Historic Preservation James Hewat 303.441.3207 Per historic preservation staffs 03.25.09 comments the site plan has been revised to show the proposed parking area in a similar location, relative to the relocated farmhouse as shown in option B developed by Parks and Recreation staff. Likewise, the plan shows the proposed restroom facility and farmhouse to be located at least 50 apart. Drawings show details for the rehabilitation of the house including the orientation of the house to the south as specified in the City Council's approval of the project. On April 9, 2009 information regarding the move and rehabilitation of the farmhouse were reviewed by the Landmarks design review committee (Ldre). The Ldre was generally supportive of the approach, but requested details regarding the front stair and porch rail be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. IV. NEXT STEPS 1. Applicant to submit final corrections for Planning Board hearing; 18 half-size plan sets. Please note that all drawings should have the same correction date. 2. Staff to prepare Planning Board Memo including any staff recommended Conditions. 3. Staff and applicant to attend Planning Board hearing; 10 minute presentation maximum each if needed. 4. If application is approved by Planning Board, submit for Technical Document Review. If application is denied by Planning Board, applicant may appeal the decision or choose to revise and resubmit the application for additional review. 5. The Planning Board decision is followed by a 30 day City Council call-up period. V. CITY CODE CRITERIA CHECKLIST See attached checklist. VI. CONDITIONS ON CASE Staff will draft conditions of approval as part of the Planning Board Memo. The Planning Board may choose to approve the project with those conditions, draft their own conditions or deny the application. Address: 5325 VALMONT RD Agenda Item # ~ Page # DEERE & AULT March 5, 2009 Ms. Elizabeth Lokocz Planning and Development Services Center P.O. Box 791 Boulder, Colorado 80306 Re: City of Boulder, Valmont City Park, Case LUR2009-00008, Boulder and Left Hand Irrigation Company, North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company Dear Ms. Lokocz: This letter is written in response to the City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department proposed Valmont City Park - Phase One development improvements on behalf of the Boulder and Left Hand Irrigation Company and the North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company. Various documents that were obtained and reviewed concerning the Valmont City Park - Phase One development improvements include the following: ■ Project Fact Sheet - Valmont Park Phase 1 - Northeast Corner Valmont Road and Airport Road ■ Valmont City Park - Phase 1 - Site Review Criteria Response dated January 20, 2009 ■ Valmont City Park Vicinity Map ■ Site Review - Landscape Plans Sheet Nos. CS 1, CP1, TAI, DG1, SO-S6, and LO-L5, dated January 20, 2009, submitted by BHA Design, Inc. • Site Review - Civil Engineering Plans, Sheet Nos. CO-C12, dated January 20, 2009, submitted by Drexel, Barrell & Company • Site Review - Architectural Plans, Sheet Nos. CS, Platt Farmhouse T1.1, A2.01-EX, A2.02-EX, A4.01-EX, A5.01-EX, A2.01, A2.02, A4.01, A5.01, Poultry Warehouse TLI, A2.01-EX, A4.01-EX, A2.01, A4.01, A5.01, SLO, Restroom/Storage Building T1.1, A2.01, A4.01, dated January 20, 2009, submitted by BHA Design, Inc. and OZ Architecture ■ Site Review -Bike Amenity Plans, Sheet Nos. B0.0-136.0, submitted by BHA Design, Inc., IMBA, Alta Planning and Design, and Alpine Bike Parks 6011 S. Airymn Road. Budding A. Suite 2115 Longmont, CO 80503 Phone: 3113-651-1468 Faa: 303-651-1469 Q Agenda Item # Z A Page # Ms. Elizabeth Lokocz March 5, 2009 The proposed plans show three bridge crossings of the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch and four bridge crossings of the North Boulder Farmers Ditch. The proposed plans show numerous paths along the ditches, a bike dirt jumping zone just north of the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch, and numerous trees planted within 30 feet of the centerline of the ditches. The proposed plans show the easement for the ditches as being 15 feet on either side of the centerline of the ditches. The following will need to be addressed by the City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department prior to the Ditch Companies approving plans: 1. Any bridge crossing of the ditches shall have 1.5 feet of freeboard between the low bank of the ditch and the low chord of the bridge. This is necessary to prevent trash and people from hanging-up on the bridge. The foundation design for the bridges will have to be submitted for review by the Ditch Companies. 2. The ditch crossings should be designed such that the Ditch Companies can readily get equipment in and out of the ditch at the crossing locations. We have some concern as to how the ditch will be accessed for maintenance between Ditch Crossing Nos. 6 and 7 on the North Boulder Farmers Ditch. 3. The prescriptive easement claimed by the Ditch Companies through the proposed Valmont City Park is 30 feet on either side of the centerline of the ditch. The Ditch Companies do not know where the 15-foot easement on either side of the centerline of the ditch was determined. The Ditch Companies require a minimum of 15 feet clear space on the ditch bank to operate a medium sized backhoe that is utilized to maintain the ditches. Additional easement is needed at bridge crossings to get equipment around these areas. 4. No additional plantings within the prescriptive easements are requested. Access to the ditch becomes difficult with excess vegetation within the easement and roots from vegetation tend to take water from the ditch. 5. The Ditch Companies are concerned about all the paths and bike jumping facilities near the ditch. The Ditch Companies should be held harmless from any liability due to accidents involving its ditch near these biking facilities and paths. 6. The Boulder and Left Hand Irrigation Company does not accept more than the historical drainage into its ditch and does not guarantee there will be any excess capacity in its ditch to accept drainage. The North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company does not accept any drainage into its ditch. Agenda Item # 0 Page # Ms. Elizabeth Lokocz March 5, 2009 7. The Ditch Companies will need a crossing agreement for the bridge crossings proposed by the City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department. The Ditch Companies require all engineering review fees of plans and attorney fees associated with the agreement to be reimbursed. The Ditch Companies assess a fee for bridge crossings of its ditch. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the proposed Valmont City Park - Phase One on behalf of the Ditch Companies. Please call if you have any questions concerning the comments. Sincerely, DEERE & AULT CONSULTANTS, INC. Michael J. Ballantine, P.E. Principal, Project Manager MJB:sp cc: Dan Lisco John Brunner Jay Cope Boyd Sheets Dan Grant P M10 BIJM110017 Vgv Cky PakWdma Cuy Pak Rmml 1)oc Agenda Item # Page # DEERE & AULT April 1, 2009 Ms. Elizabeth Lokocz Planning and Development Services Center P.O. Box 791 Boulder, Colorado 80306 Re: City of Boulder, Valmont City Park, Case No. LUR2009-00008, Boulder and Left Hand Irrigation Company, North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company Dear Ms. Lokocz: This letter is written in response to the City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department proposed Valmont City Park - Phase One development improvements package of information received by Deere & Ault Consultants, Inc. (D&A) on March 18, 2009. The comments are made on behalf of the Boulder and Left Hand Irrigation Company and the North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company. Specific information that was received and reviewed pertaining to the Valmont City Park - Phase One development included the following: • Routing sheet for referral and request for comment ■ City of Boulder land use review results and comments, dated February 26, 2009 ■ Landscape Plans (17 sheets), dated March 16, 2009 ■ Architectural Plans (19 sheets), dated March 16, 2009 • Civil Engineering Plans (14 sheets), dated March 16, 2009 ■ Bike Amenity Plans (9 sheets), dated March 16, 2009 A few of the comments from my March 5, 2009 letter were addressed in the information received; however, most of the comments still need to be addressed prior to the Ditch Companies approving the plans. Specific items that need to be addressed include the following: 1. Any bridge crossing of the ditches shall have 1.5 feet of freeboard between the low bank of the ditch and the low chord of the bridge. The bridge design showing the low chord elevation relative to the ditch bank elevation, as well as the foundation design for each bridge will have to be submitted for review by the Ditch Companies. 2. The ditch crossings should be designed such that the Ditch Companies can readily get equipment in and out of the ditch at crossing locations. We have some concerns as to how the ditch will be accessed for maintenance between Ditch Crossing Nos. 6 and 7 on the North Boulder Farmers Ditch. The proposed fence located north of the North Boulder Farmers Ditch between Ditch Crossing Nos. 6 and 7 and the proposed fence south of the North Boulder Farmers Ditch and north of Valmont Road will make access 600 S. Airport Road. Budding A. Suite 2415 Longmont. CO X11503 Phone: 303.651-1468 Fax: 303.651.140 Agenda Item # '0 Page # Ms. Elizabeth Lokocz April 1, 2009 to the North Boulder Fanners Ditch along the ditch bank impossible without removal of the fences. 3. The Ditch Companies' easement shown on the plans is 60 feet, which is the prescriptive easement claimed by the Ditch Companies. Additional easement will need to be provided at the proposed bridge crossings so the Ditch Companies can get their equipment around these areas. The existing ditch easement shown for the North Bolder Fanners Ditch just east of Airport Road and north of Valmont Road on Sheet C6 of the Civil Engineering Plans appears to be wrong. 4. No additional plantings within the prescriptive easements are requested. There appears to be some shrubs proposed within the North Boulder Farmers easement on Sheet Ll of the Landscape Plans and some proposed deciduous trees located within the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch easement on Sheet L4 of the Landscape Plans. 5. The Ditch Companies are concerned about all the paths and bike jumping facilities near the ditch. The Ditch Companies should be held harmless from any liability due to accidents involving the ditch near these biking facilities and paths. 6. The Boulder and Left Hand Irrigation Company does not accept more than the historical drainage into its ditch and does not guarantee there will be any excess capacity in its ditch to accept drainage. The outlet pipe from the detention pond into the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch located just east of Airport Road should daylight into the bottom of the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch instead of daylighting just north of the ditch bank. The Boulder and Left Hand Ditch bed and banks should be riprapped where the outlet pipe daylights into the ditch. The North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company does not accept any drainage into its ditch. 7. The Ditch Companies will need a crossing agreement for the bridge crossings proposed by the City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department. The Ditch Companies require all engineering review fees and attorney fees associated with the agreement to be reimbursed. The Ditch Companies assess a fee for bridge crossings of the ditch. 8. The concrete walks/paths along the ditch should be designed and constructed to support a rubber-tired backhoe traveling along the ditch bank. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the proposed Valmont City Park - Phase One on behalf of the Ditch Companies. Agenda Item #6;5 Page # Ms. Elizabeth Lokocz April 1, 2009 Please call if you have any questions concerning the comments. Sincerely, DEERE & AULT CONSULTANTS, INC. i t&&' Michael J. Ballantine, P.E. Principal, Project Manager MJB:sp cc: Dan Lisco John Brunner Jay Cope Boyd Sheets Dan Grant PW146N BautlCFu WINMOMT A.In.0 Agenda Item # tp Page # Z1q 7-0 Attachment D CRITERIA FOR REVIEW No site review application shall be approved unless the approving agency finds that: (1) Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan: ✓(A) The proposed site plan is consistent with the purposes and policies of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan. The Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (B.C.V.P.) specifies the project property as "Park, Urban or Other". As the proposed project is a City of Boulder Park and proposes no uses that are not typical park uses, the proposed site plan Is consistent with the purposes and policies of the B. V.C.P. N/A (B) The proposed development shall not exceed the maximum density associated with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan residential land use designation. Additionally, if the density of existing residential development within a three hundred-foot area surrounding the site is at or exceeds the density permitted in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan, then the maximum density permitted on the site shall not exceed the lesser of: N/A(i) The density permitted in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan, or, Not applicable. N/A(ii) The maximum number of units that could be placed on the site without waiving or varying any of the requirements of Chapter 9-8, "Intensity Standards," B.R.C. 1981. Not applicable. N/A(C) The proposed development's success in meeting the broad range of BVCP policies considers the economic feasibility of implementation techniques required to meet other site review criteria. The development would not be rendered infeasible in meeting the BVCP policies or the Site Review criteria. (2) Site Design: Projects should preserve and enhance the community's unique sense of place through creative design that respects historic character, relationship to the natural environment, and its physical setting. Projects should utilize site design techniques which enhance the quality of the project. In determining whether this Subsection is met, the approving agency will consider the following factors: ✓(A) Open Space: Open space, including, without limitation, parks, recreation areas, and playgrounds: ✓(i) Useable open space is arranged to be accessible and functional; Useable open space is accessible and functional. The majority of the project is open space appealing to a variety of user groups. The proposed trail system, bike park, dog park and other amenities have clear entry points and Internal connection. Agenda Item # _go Page # N/A(ii) Private open space is provided for each detached residential unit; Not applicable. ✓(iii) The project provides for the preservation of or mitigation of adverse impacts to natural features, including, without limitation, healthy long-lived trees, significant plant communities, ground and surface water, wetlands, riparian areas, drainage areas, and species on the federal Endangered Species List, "Species of Special Concern in Boulder County" designated by Boulder County, or prairie dogs (Cynomys ludiovicianus) which is a species of local concern, and their habitat; The project is designed to minimize impacts to natural features. Few buildings, minimal impervious surfaces, primarily native landscape enhancement, removal of invasive species and habitat enhancement preserve and mitigate any potential negative impacts. No mature trees will be removed to accommodate the trail system, and the existing tree canopy will be retained and enhanced. Much of the land will be planted with native upland grasses. Significant existing trees, primarily large cottonwoods, will be fenced off and protected throughout construction. Proposed landscaping is an important asset providing habitat and reducing storm water runoff. Site runoff will follow historic patterns, with minimal increase in Impervious areas or sources of potential pollutants. Parking lots shall be gravel to minimize runoff, as well as to keep within the character of the park. In order to assure that the project maintains or improves water quality, runoff from parking lots and bike feature areas will be routed through substantial grass buffers, swales, and water quality depressions/ponds. Existing drainage swales and features of the site will be maintained or improved as part of the project. There are no known existing wetlands located on the site. The project proposes no improvements that will impact the groundwater conditions of the project site or surrounding area. No prairie dogs exist on the site. ✓(iv) The open space provides a relief to the density, both within the project and from surrounding development; The Park presents significant relief from the surrounding development. The proposed Valmont Park provides citywide and neighborhood open space and offers amenities for the surrounding neighborhoods, near-by businesses, City residents and a wider regional audience. It also increases connections to the broader open space network via the City multi-use path network. ✓(v) Open space designed for active recreational purposes is of a size that it will be functionally useable and located in a safe and convenient proximity to the users to which it is meant to serve; The active recreation areas are located in a safe and convenient proximity to the users. ✓(vi) The open space provides a buffer to protect sensitive environmental features and natural areas; and Agenda Item # Page # J5V All park features have been designed to minimize impacts sensitive environmental features and natural areas. The site plan and proposed grading and drainage features do not propose any improvements within 15 feet of each side of the Irrigation ditches, which are the major environmental feature on the site. Nor does it propose any trails or other Improvements around the important natural habitat adjacent to the existing irrigation pond. ✓(vii) If possible, open space is linked to an area- or city-wide system. The Park site is a significant link between existing open space areas. To the east it connects to the Boulder Creek and the Sawhill Ponds conservation area.. To the west Boulder and Left Hand Ditch continues creating a fragmented corridor. Existing and proposed vegetation on the north side of Valmont Road provide a link to Valmont City Park - Phase 2 and 3 south of Valmont Road and still further south to Boulder Creek again. N/A(B) Open Space in Mixed Use Developments (Developments that contain a mix of residential and non-residential uses) N/A(i) The open space provides for a balance of private and shared areas for the residential uses and common open space that is available for use by both the residential and non-residential uses that will meet the needs of the anticipated residents, occupants, tenants, and visitors of the property; and Not applicable. N/A(ii) The open space provides active areas and passive areas that will meet the needs of the anticipated residents, occupants, tenants, and visitors of the property and are compatible with the surrounding area or an adopted plan for the area. Not applicable. ✓(C)Landscaping ✓(i) The project provides for aesthetic enhancement and a variety of plant and hard surface materials, and the selection of materials provides for a variety of colors and contrasts and the preservation or use of local native vegetation where appropriate; The project provides significant aesthetic enhancement. The proposed landscaping offers areas of low water vegetation, native trees and shrubs and limited higher water areas only as appropriate for active play. Although large portions of the land will remain in a relatively natural condition the proposed buildings and pavement compliment the natural character of the park. Parking lots and the shared use path will be soft surfaces. Much of the land will be planted with native upland grasses, and a natural aesthetic employed wherever possible. ✓(ii) Landscape design attempts to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts to important native species, plant communities of special concern, threatened and endangered species and habitat by integrating the existing natural environment into the project; The existing natural environment forms the base for all proposed landscaping. Proposed plant materials include a wide variety of Rocky Mountain native Agenda Item # 63 Page # 6 deciduous trees and shrubs, coniferous trees, native ornamental grasses and groundcovers. Wherever possible, existing native vegetation Is enhanced through additional planting; non-native invasive vegetation is phased out over time. The irrigation ditches offer significant existing vegetation on the property as the bulk of the project has few or no trees. The thick vegetation along the ditches will be retained, less any invasive weed tree species and trees deemed unhealthy or are a public safety concerns. Earth moving and grading shall be minimized with no large scale excavation or rill placed within these areas. Efforts will be made to avoid damaging trees and tree canopy as much as possible during construction. No plant communities of special concern or endangered species have been identified on the site. ✓(iii) The project provides significant amounts of plant material sized in excess of the landscaping requirements of Section 9-9-12, "Landscaping and Screening Standards" and Section 9-9-13, "Streetscape Design Standards," B.R.C. 1981; and The project provides plant material in excess of the landscape requirements. See the "landscape summary" chart and "representative plant list" on the drawings for plant material selection, quantities and sizing. ✓(iv) The setbacks, yards, and useable open space along public rights-of-way are landscaped to provide attractive streetscapes, to enhance architectural features, and to contribute to the development of an attractive site plan. The areas adjacent to the public rights-of-way provides enhancement to the overall Park design. It creates an attractive connection to the interior of the park while also providing an attractive streetscape for the surrounding community. The required street trees will be planted in irregular, native patterns, with no specific / prescribed spacing, given the native/natural/open space feel of the project. Shrubs and grasses used to create the parking lot screening are arranged in "drifts" or "waves" of vegetation, again in an effort to create a native, non-manicured landscape that ties into the overall natural theme of the Park. ✓(D) Circulation: Circulation, including, without limitation, the transportation system that serves the property, whether public or private and whether constructed by the developer or not: ✓(i) High speeds are discouraged or a physical separation between streets and the project is provided; The project discourages high speeds through design elements such as fencing, vegetation and layout. No new streets are proposed as part of the Phase 1 improvements. Existing adjacent streets are classified as Minor Arterials. Sidewalk and multi-use path improvements are proposed along Airport and Valmont Roads with considerable setbacks, grade changes and vegetation. Additional crosswalks are proposed for both now parking lots. Park facilities are located throughout the 45 acres; all gathering areas are buffered from adjacent streets. ✓(ii) Potential conflicts with vehicles are minimized; Potential conflicts are minimized. A combination of timber rail fence, Agenda Item # 5_ Page # landscape boulders, vegetation and parking blocks separates the parking lots from the park facilities. Streetlights will be located at each of the 2 proposed drive cuts / driveways where there are points of conflict between pedestrians and vehicles. An at grade pedestrian crosswalk extending across Airport Road, immediately south of the Butte Street and Phase 1 parking lot driveway will be included within the Phase 1 Improvements in an effort to consolidate pedestrian movements across the road. The pedestrian crossing on Airport Road at Butte Street will direct people away from the main intersection of Airport Road and Valmont Road, and additionally, direct users to the primary entry of the park. A future pedestrian underpass (associated with Phase 2 and/or 3 Valmont City Park improvements) extending beneath Valmont Road from the south will provide additional pedestrian and bicycle connections, minimizing conflicts with vehicles. ✓(lii) Safe and convenient connections accessible to the public within the project and between the project and existing and proposed transportation systems are provided, including, without limitation, streets, bikeways, pedestrian ways and trails; Multiple save and convenient connects are proposed as part of this project. A multi-use path to the west completes a connection to the existing Wonderland Creek Path. This connection will be an 8 foot concrete path paralleling the Boulder and Left Hand Ditch. This path will connect Christensen Park with Phase 1 of Valmont Park and provide a safe and convenient connection for pedestrians. This connection will allow pedestrians to access the site without using Valmont Road or other surrounding streets. A pedestrian cross walk will be extended across Airport Road, immediately south of Butte Street, linking users from the west side to east side at this single crossing. The business park to the east of the project site, has terminated a 6' wide sidewalk at the property line. An 8' wide sidewalk will be extended to the west (taper from their 6' to the proposed 8' located on the Park side of the project), paralleling Valmont Road, and through the proposed driveways into the Valmont parking lots. This walk will follow Valmont Road to the proposed Bus Stop located adjacent to the Valmont Road Parking lot, and will then transition to the 10' multi-use path running west to east north of Valmont Road. The existing north-south 4' wide concrete sidewalk (east side), paralleling Airport Road, will be increased to an 8' overall width, and will extend from the Airport Road-Valmont Road intersection, to the north property line. At the extreme north end, this 8' wide sidewalk will taper down to 4' wide to tie-in to the existing sidewalk below the Boulder County Addiction Treatment Facility. See Item 6. below for discussion of 10' wide multi-use sidewalk connections. Pedestrians 1 park users entering the park from the proposed Valmont Road parking lot will access the site from 2 controlled trail head(entry points. At each of the two parking lot drive cuts where vehicle-pedestrian crossings are necessary, a street light, to meet or exceed C.O.B. standard, will be provided. ✓(iv) Alternatives to the automobile are promoted by incorporating site design techniques, land use patterns, and supporting infrastructure that supports and encourages walking, biking, and other alternatives to the single-occupant vehicle; Automobile alternatives are promoted in a number of ways. A significant focus Agenda Item # 63 Page # 53 of the proposed Park is bicycle education. Bike lanes exist on Valmont Road in both directions. The intersection at Airport Road and Valmont Road currently provides at grade pedestrian crosswalks from the south, which will link future Valmont City Park Phases 2 and 3 and beyond. A pedestrian underpass (linking Phase 1 and Phase 2 park phases) is planned as a future improvement beneath Valmont Road. Pedestrians may access the site from all directions on widened sidewalks or separated multi-use paths. ✓(v) Where practical and beneficial, a significant shift away from single- occupant vehicle use to alternate modes is promoted through the use of travel demand management techniques; The "Bike Park" is a key element of Valmont City Park Phase 1. The intent is to provide a purpose-built, innovative facility for all types of off-road bicycling. Elements include an interwoven network of trails, technical terrain areas, and spectator zones where visitors of all ages and abilities can practice bike skills, participate In programs and races, and enjoy the exercise and camaraderie of bicycling. The trail system will include designated routes for beginner, Intermediate, and expert riders, and will be built to international guidelines for sustainability and both cyclocross and mountain bike racing By providing multiple active and passive uses, the project encourages people to explore alternative transportation modes. The park will provide easy access to the major network of City multi-use trails and bikeways, providing a safe and enjoyable way to get to the park without driving. Parking spaces are limited and are provided in clusters, which will provide more area for paths and pedestrians. Passenger loading zones are provided In both parking lots to provide safe transfer of pedestrians, dogs, bike and other equipment into the various Park amenities. The project provides numerous bicycle racks to secure bicycles once the user has reached the Park. ✓(vi) On-site facilities for external linkage are provided with other modes of transportation, where applicable; Two RTD boarding areas will be constructed on the north and south sides of Valmont Road to promote bus ridership. A 10' wide multi-use path will commence from the back of sidewalk at the corner of Airport Road and Valmont Road and will be routed through the site paralleling Valmont Road eastward to the proposed 100 car parking lot, in as direct (non-meandering) line as possible, given the adjacent land uses and proposed park amenities. The path then parallels the parking lot and dog park amenities as it extends to the northeast corner of the site. ✓(vii) The amount of land devoted to the street system is minimized; and No new streets are Included in the Phase 1 improvements; only one curb cut per parking lot will be made. ✓(viii) The project is designed for the types of traffic expected, including, without limitation, automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians, and provides safety, separation from living areas, and control of noise and exhaust. Parking spaces are limited and built in clusters, providing more space and paths for pedestrians. Additionally, a combination of landscape boulders, parking blocks and a timber rail fence surrounding the parking lot will be provided for additional separation, with the dual goal of keeping vehicles out of Agenda Item # Z'0 Page # f the adjacent native landscaping/drainage areas and also funnel pedestrians to purpose built entry points / trail heads. ✓(E) Parking ✓(i) The project incorporates into the design of parking areas measures to provide safety, convenience, and separation of pedestrian movements from vehicular movements; Vehicular movements will be separated from pedestrian movements by the use of a timber rail fence, landscaping, boulders and earthen berming. ✓(ii) The design of parking areas makes efficient use of the land and uses the minimum amount of land necessary to meet the parking needs of the project; The project proposes two parking lots on the outer perimeter of the site. One at the southeast corner off Valmont Road near the dog park, and the second on the west side of the Park off Airport Road, near the event green and a concentration of the bike features. The Valmont lot Is located in an area that has seen previous disturbance, and is designed to provide multiple water quality and landscaping areas as an integral part of the parking area. This design makes the parking lot part of the park design, instead of a large paved afterthought, without encroaching Into the main site at the more pristine areas. The parking along Airport Road is designed as close to the road as possible while still meeting setbacks and providing adequate landscape buffer. The main park areas are shielded from this lot by the plaza area, in order to separate it from the park experience. Both parking lots will be constructed of gravel instead of asphalt in order to keep with the park atmosphere and be consistent with or trailhead parking lot designs in the area. The gravel design will also limit Impervious areas on the site and help minimize runoff and water quality impacts. ✓(iii) Parking areas and lighting are designed to reduce the visual impact on the project, adjacent properties, and adjacent streets; and There is no proposed parking lot lighting. Light poles and fixtures to meet the City standard will be provided at each of the 2 proposed driveway cuts to serve the are pedestrian crossings. ✓(iv) Parking areas utilize landscaping materials to provide shade in excess of the requirements in Subsection 9-9-6(d), "Parking Area Design Standards," and Section 9-9-12, "Parking Lot Landscaping Standards," B.R.C. 1981. Parking areas exceed the minimum required landscaping. Morethan the required square footage is provided and 100% of the parking lot trees are medium to large deciduous trees. See 'landscape summary chart' on the drawings. ✓(F) Building Design, Livability, and Relationship to the Existing or Proposed Surrounding Area Agenda Item # 2 Page # ~J ✓ (i) The building height, mass, scale, orientation, and configuration are compatible with the existing character of the area or the character established by an adopted plan for the area; The proposed and existing buildings are compatible with the surrounding area. The surrounding area presents a diverse character including residential, industrial and other park and open space properties. The Platt Farmhouse will be relocated and used as Community Meeting Facility,, it has received extensive review through the Landmarks to assure its location and orientation maintains Its historic character. The nearby new public restroom and storage building is suggestive of a farm accessory building in character. Simple farm- like materials and detailing are used, and the exterior siding will be painted white to match the Platt Farmhouse, with a gray or greenish metal roof. The existing poultry warehouse is located far away from the Platt Farmhouse and Restroom/Storage Building. Its relates more to the scale of other larger commercial buildings located along Valmont Road, and It Is a familiar structure in its current location after being there for 40 years. ✓ (ii) The height of buildings is in general proportion to the height of existing buildings and the proposed or projected heights of approved buildings or approved plans for the immediate area; The height of the existing farmhouse, relocated and renovated, will remain unchanged. The height of the new restroom/storage building will be lower than and therefore in scale with the other buildings on the site. The existing Poultry Warehouse will be reduced in area, but the height will remain unchanged after renovation and is in scale with other commercial buildings along Valmont Road. ✓ (iii) The orientation of buildings minimizes shadows on and blocking of views from adjacent properties; There are no other structures or properties adjacent to the sites for the relocated Pratt Farmhouse, Restroom/Storage Building or Poultry Warehouse. ✓ (iv) If the character of the area is identifiable, the project is made compatible by the appropriate use of color, materials, landscaping, signs, and lighting; The majority of the area of Phase 1 of Valmont Park is rural in character, although newer larger development has taken place along Valmont Road. The site of the relocated Pratt Farmhouse and the adjacent Restroom/Storage Building has been chosen to maintain the rural character of the original site of the house. These buildings will have materials, colors (white exterior with gray-green roofs) and landscaping that are similar to the original farmhouse building and its setting. The colors and materials of the renovated Poultry Warehouse will be similar to the existing building (gray-green metal siding and roofing.) All three buildings will be compatible with their natural surroundings. ✓ (v) Buildings present an attractive streetscape, incorporate architectural and site design elements appropriate to a pedestrian scale, and provide for the safety and convenience of pedestrians; The relocated Pratt Farmhouse and adjacent Restroom/Storage Building will be Agenda Item # Page # J fronting toward Airport Road and conveniently located near the Valmont Park entrance, parking lot and associated outdoor event areas. Sidewalks and trails will connect these facilities to each other and provide accessible entrances to the public buildings and spaces. The renovated Farmhouse will enhance the streetscape of Airport Road and will provide visual identification for Valmont Park as a whole. ✓ (vi) To the extent practical, the project provides public amenities and planned public facilities; The entire Valmont City Park is a public facility with numerous public amenities. Within the park the relocated Pratt Farmhouse will serve as a community meeting facility, managed by the Department of Parks and Recreation, available for various public uses- special events, social gatherings, and educational purposes. The renovated farmhouse also serves an educational purpose by preserving an historic structure which represents the architecture and cultural context of Its location and date of construction -1908. The Restroom/Storage Building provides practical functions for the adjacent farmhouse and outdoor event areas, as well as for the entire park. The renovated Poultry Warehouse is intended to be used for certain kinds of biking activities which need weather protection, and will also Include spectator areas for special biking events- local and regional. The east side of the warehouse will adjoin and open onto the Dog Park and will provide weather protection for users of the Dog Park. NIA(vii) For residential projects, the project assists the community in producing a variety of housing types, such as multi-family, townhouses, and detached single- family units as well as mixed lot sizes, number of bedrooms, and sizes of units; Not applicable. N/A(viii) For residential projects, noise is minimized between units, between buildings, and from either on-site or off-site external sources through spacing, landscaping, and building materials; Not applicable. ✓ (ix) A lighting plan is provided which augments security, energy conservation, safety, and aesthetics; Light poles and fixtures to meet the City standard will be provided at each of the 2 proposed driveway cuts where there are pedestrian crossings. No additional security, parking lot or aesthetic lighting is anticipated. Photometrics shall be provided during Technical Document Review. ✓ (x) The project incorporates the natural environment into the design and avoids, minimizes, or mitigates impacts to natural systems; The natural environment forms the basis of the overall design minimizing impacts. One of the three buildings is new construction and both parking areas are already highly disturbed. Although the existing Platt Farmhouse is being relocated, it is being sited similarly to its current site, and the other existing farm buildings (3 small sheds) are being eliminated thus reducing the overall site footprint and impact of the original farm structures. The existing 7 Agenda Item # U Page # Poultry Warehouse is being reduced in size by about 25%, which also reduces its overall impact on the site. None of the buildings will intrude into flood plains, sensitive vegetation or habitat areas, and the surrounding sites will be maintained with existing natural plant materials, or new similar landscaping. ✓ (xi) Cut and fill are minimized on the site, the design of buildings conforms to the natural contours of the land, and the site design minimizes erosion, slope instability, landslide, mudflow or subsidence, and minimizes the potential threat to property caused by geological hazards. The site grading has been designed to maintain historic drainage patterns while providing adequate drainage from parking lots, plazas, and trails. In parking lot areas, Fill is needed to provide adequate drainage due to the flat nature of the existing conditions. Water quality and drainage swales were constructed around the lots in an attempt to balance earthwork needs to the extent feasible. Features on the north side of the site were designed to fit into existing terrain, and grass buffers and swales are being maintained or improved at the toe of the slope above the irrigation ditches. The steeper portion of the existing hillside at the northeast comer will be cut back to help stabilize the slope and generate material for construction in other areas. The central portion of the site will have no significant grading completed, and will be kept in its natural state to the extent possible. The southern portion of the site will be a mix of areas that will be preserved in their original state, and other areas that will have berms created to improve trail design and provide aesthetics. The berms will only be constructed in areas that do not contain valuable habitat, trees, etc. NIA (G) Solar Siting and Construction: For the purpose of ensuring the maximum potential for utilization of solar energy in the city, all applicants for residential site reviews shall place streets, lots, open spaces, and buildings so as to maximize the potential for the use of solar energy in accordance with the following solar siting criteria: N/A(i) Placement of Open Space and Streets: Open space areas are located wherever practical to protect buildings from shading by other buildings within the development or from buildings on adjacent properties. Topography and other natural features and constraints may justify deviations from this criterion. Project is not residential. N/A(ii) Lot Layout and Building Siting: Lots are oriented and buildings are sited in a way which maximizes the solar potential of each principal building. Lots are designed to facilitate siting a structure which is unshaded by other nearby structures. Wherever practical, buildings are sited close to the north lot line to increase yard space to the south for better owner control of shading. Not applicable. NIA(Ili) Building Form: The shapes of buildings are designed to maximize utilization of solar energy. Buildings shall meet the solar access protection and solar siting requirements of Section 9-9-17, "Solar Access," B.R.C. 1981. Not applicable. Agenda Item # 63 Page # k.; 0 N/A(iv) Landscaping: The shading effects of proposed landscaping on adjacent buildings are minimized. Not applicable. N/A(H) Additional Criteria for Poles Above the Permitted Height: No site review application for a pole above the permitted height will be approved unless the approving agency finds all of the following: N/A(i) The light pole is required for nighttime recreation activities, which are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, or the light or traffic signal pole is required for safety, or the electrical utility pole is required to serve the needs of the city; and As described in E. Parking - 3. above, the only pole mounted site lighting will occur at each of the two driveways where there is a pedestrian / vehicular Interface. As with other C.O.B. Parks, night time recreation activities will not be permitted. N/A(ii) The pole is at the minimum height appropriate to accomplish the purposes for which the pole was erected and is designed and constructed so as to minimize light and electromagnetic pollution. The project will provide the C.O.B. standard light pole and fixture for driveway access off a minor arterial frontage. NIA(I) Land Use Intensity Modifications N/A(i) Potential Land Use Intensity Modifications: (a) The density of a project may be increased in the BR-1 district through a reduction of the lot area requirement or in the Downtown (DT), BR-2, or MU-3 districts through a reduction in the open space requirements. (b) The open space requirements in all Downtown (DT) districts may be reduced by up to one hundred percent. (c) The open space per lot requirements for the total amount of open space required on the lot in the BR-2 district may be reduced by up to fifty percent. (d) Land use intensity may be increased up to 25 percent in the BR-1 district through a reduction of the lot area requirement. N/A(ii) Additional Criteria for Land Use Intensity Modifications: A land use intensity increase will be permitted up to the maximum amount set forth below if the approving agency finds that the criteria in Subsection (h) "Criteria for Review" of this Section and following criteria have been met: (a) Open Space Needs Met: The needs of the project's occupants and visitors for high quality and functional useable open space can be met adequately; Agenda Item # 53 Page # y (b) Character of Project and Area: The open space reduction does not adversely affect the character of the development nor the character of the surrounding area; and (c) Open Space and Lot Area Reductions: The specific percentage reduction in open space or lot area requested by the applicant is justified by any one or combination of the following site design features not to exceed the maximum reduction set forth above: (1) Close proximity to a public mall or park for which the development is specially assessed or to which the project contributes funding of capital improvements beyond that required by the parks and recreation component of the development excise tax set forth in Chapter 3-8, "Development Excise Tax," B.R.C. 1981: maximum one hundred percent reduction in all Downtown (DT) districts and ten percent in the BR-1 district; (ii) Architectural treatment that results in reducing the apparent bulk and mass of the structure or structures and site planning which increases the openness of the site: maximum five percent reduction; (iii) A common park, recreation, or playground area functionally useable and accessible by the developmenfs occupants for active recreational purposes and sized for the number of inhabitants of the development, maximum five percent reduction; or developed facilities within the project designed to meet the active recreational needs of the occupants: maximum five percent reduction; (iv) Permanent dedication of the development to use by a unique residential population whose needs for conventional open space are reduced: maximum five percent reduction; (v) The reduction in open space is part of a development with a mix of residential and non-residential uses within an BR-2 zoning district that, due to the ratio of residential to non-residential uses and because of the size, type, and mix of dwelling units, the need for open space is reduced: maximum reduction fifteen percent; and (vi) The reduction in open space is part of a development with a mix of residential and non-residential uses within an BR-2 zoning district that provides high quality urban design elements that will meet the needs of anticipated residents, occupants, tenants, and visitors of the property or will accommodate public gatherings, important activities, or events in the life of the community and its people, that may include, without limitation, recreational or cultural amenities, intimate spaces that foster social interaction, street furniture, landscaping, and hard surface treatments for the open space: maximum reduction 25 percent. Agenda Item # bB Page # C~J N/A(J) Additional Criteria for Floor Area Ratio Increase for Buildings in the BR-1 District N/A(i) Process: For buildings in the BRA district, the floor area ratio ("FAR") permitted under Section 9-7-1, "Schedule of Form and Bulk Standards," B.R.C. 1981, may be increased by the city manager under the criteria set forth in this Subsection. N/A(ii) Maximum FAR Increase: The maximum FAR increase allowed for buildings thirty-five feet and over in height in the BR-1 district shall be from 2:1 to 4:1. N/A(iii) Criteria for the BR-1 District: The FAR may be increased in the BR-1 district to the extent allowed in paragraph (ii) of this Subsection if the approving agency finds that the following criteria are met: (a) Site and building design provide open space exceeding the required useable open space by at least ten percent: an increase in FAR not to exceed 0.25:1. (b) Site and building design provide private outdoor space for each office unit equal to at least ten percent of the lot area for buildings 25 feet and under and at least 20 percent of the lot area for buildings above 25 feet: an increase in FAR not to exceed 0.25:1. (c) Site and building design provide a street front facade and an alley facade at a pedestrian scale, including, without limitation, features such as awnings and windows, well-defined building entrances, and other building details: an increase in FAR not to exceed 0.25:1. (d) For a building containing residential and non-residential uses in which neither use comprises less than 25 percent of the total square footage: an increase in FAR not to exceed 1:1. (e) The unused portion of the allowed FAR of historic buildings designated as landmarks under Chapter 9-11, "Historic Preservation," B.R.C. 1981, may be transferred to other sites in the same zoning district. However, the increase in FAR of a proposed building to which FAR is transferred under this paragraph may not exceed an increase of 0.5:1. (f) For a building which provides one full level of parking below grade, an increase in FAR not to exceed 0.5:1 may be granted. N/A(K) Additional Criteria for Parking Reductions: The off-street parking requirements of Section 9-7-1, "Schedule of Form and Bulk Standards," B.R.C. 1981, may be modified as follows: N/A(I) Process: The city manager may grant a parking reduction not to exceed fifty percent of the required parking. The planning board or city council may grant Agenda Item # Z~ Page # a reduction exceeding fifty percent. N/A(il) Criteria: Upon submission of documentation by the applicant of how the project meets the following criteria, the approving agency may approve proposed modifications to the parking requirements of Section 9-7-1, "Schedule of Form and Bulk Standards," B.R.C. 1981, if it finds that: (a) For residential uses, the probable number of motor vehicles to be owned by occupants of and visitors to dwellings in the project will be adequately accommodated; (b) The parking needs of any non-residential uses will be adequately accommodated through on-street parking or off-street parking; (c) A mix of residential with either office or retail uses is proposed, and the parking needs of all uses will be accommodated through shared parking; (d) If joint use of common parking areas is proposed, varying time periods of use will accommodate proposed parking needs; and (e) If the number of off-street parking spaces is reduced because of the nature of the occupancy, the applicant provides assurances that the nature of the occupancy will not change. N/A(L) Additional Criteria for Off-Site Parking: The parking required under Section 9- 9-6, "Parking Standards," B.R.C. 1981, may be located on a separate lot if the following conditions are met: N/A(i) The lots are held in common ownership; N/A(II) The separate lot is in the same zoning district and located within three hundred feet of the lot that it serves; and N/A(iii) The property used for off-site parking under this Subsection continues under common ownership or control. Agenda Item # 5$ Page #&,2- Attachment E January 20, 2008 t VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE 1 Boulder, Colorado Site Review Criteria Response s 1. Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan: (A) How is the proposed site plan consistent with the purposes and policies of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan? The Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (B.C.V.P.) specifies the project property as "Park, Urban or Other". As the proposed project Is a City of Boulder Park and proposes no uses that are not typical park uses, the proposed site plan is consistent with the purposes and policies of the B.V.C.P. (B) The proposed development shall not exceed the maximum density associated with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan residential land use designation. Additionally, it the density of existing residential development within a 300 foot area surrounding the site is at or exceeds the density permitted in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan, then the maximum density permitted on the site shall not exceed the lesser of: (i) the density permitted in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan, or, ;i Not applicable. 1 (ii) the maximum number of units that could be placed on the site without waiving or varying any of the requirements of Chapter 9-3.2, "Bulk and Density Standards,' B.R.C. 1981. k ~s Not applicable. How is the proposed Site Plan consistent with the above density criteria? Not applicable. j It. Site Design: Projects should preserve and enhance the community's unique sense of place through creative design that respects historic character, relationship to the natural environment and its physical setting. Projects i should utilize site design techniques which enhance the quality of the project. In determining whether this subsection is met, the approving agency will consider the following factors: A. Open Space, including without limitation, parks, recreation areas, and playgrounds: { 1. How is useable open space arranged to be accessible and functional? The majority of the property will be "open space" void of buildings, parking, Irrigated 1 turf, developed sidewalks, ate. Development within the ditches will be limited to natural surface trails, trail terrain features and Items/amenitles with a minimal footprint such as benches, or bike skill arms. Major terrain zones, spectator areas, buildings and parking will not be located within this area. Trails will be designed in this area according to best practices for minimizing Impacts within this critical zone. Trails within the Park will be easy to access, with clear, open connections and entry points and will be constructed with a "Ilght-handed" approach to minimize disturbance. Trails within the Park shall be only wide enough to accommodate the x Valmont Qty Park - Phase 1 Agenda Item # Page # January 20, 2009 intended use. Park visitors will be encouraged to stay on the constructed trails to prevent trampling and impacts outside the trail head. 2. How is private open space provided for each detached residential unit? Not applicable. 3. How does the project provide for the preservation of natural features, including, without limitation, healthy long-lived trees, terrain, significant plant communities, threatened and endangered species and habitat, ground and surface water, wetlands, riparian areas, and drainage areas? The project team is working with Parks and Recreation Department staff to develop steps to minimize Impacts at the site and enhance natural resources. In general, the project will be a relatively environmentally friendly use of the land and will have less Impact than a traditlonal urban park or development Portions of the land will remain in a relatively natural condition, few buildings are planned, minimal pavement/concrete will be required, and an environmentally friendly landscape plan will be implemented. A forestry program will manage existing trees and add new ones where appropriate. No mature trees will be removed to accommodate the trail system, and the existing has canopy will be retained and enhanced. Much of the land will be planted with native upland grasses, and a natural aesthetic employed wherever possible. Significant /specimen trees (mostly large cottonwood) will be fenced off and protected throughout construction. Landscaping shall strive to be site appropriate, offering areas of low water vegetation, native trees whenever possible and limited higher water areas only as appropriate for active play. Landscaping has the potential to be an important asset providing habitat, reducing storm water runoff and buffering different use areas. Developments In the area between the two irrigation ditches will be limited to solt- surface trails and hall features that have a modest footprint Major bike terrain parks, spectator areas, buildings, parking lots, and turf grass will not be located in this area. Construction activity will be light-handed, with effort to minimize disturbance. Site runoff will follow historic patterns, with minimal increase In Impervious areas or sources of potential pollutants. Parking lots shall be gravel in order to both minimize the increase In runoff, as well as to keep with the character of the park. Runoff from parking lots and bike feature areas will be routed through substantial grass buffers, swages, and water quality dspressions/ponds prior to leaving the site, in order to assure that the project maintains or Improves the quality of runoff leaving the site. Existing drainage swales and features of the site will be maintained or improved as part of the project. There are no known existing wetlands located on the site. The project proposes no Improvements that will Impact the groundwater conditions of the project site or surrounding area. 4. How does the open space provide a relief to the density, both within the project and from surrounding development?; and The proposed Valmont Park will provide a large area of open space for public use in this area of the City that is currently not available or Improved as recreational park space. This park has been In planning for a number of years, and will be a great resource for the surrounding neighborhoods as well as the City as a whole due to the connections to the City mufti-use path network. Valmont City Park - Phase 7 Agenda Item # Page # ((/`T January 20, 2009 5. How does the open space provide a buffer to protect sensitive environmental features and natural areas?; and The site plan and proposed grading and drainage features do not propose any improvements within 15 feet of each side of the Irrigation ditches, which are the major environmental feature on the aft. Additionally, the project team has met with City wildilfe staff and forestry staff on site to determine other sensitive areas. The trail system and grading has been designed to minimize impacts on those areas based on staff recommendations. 6. If possible, how is open space linked to an area or a city-wide system? The two Irrigation ditches provide a natural corridor that links the Phase 1 property to areas east of the property line (Sawhill Ponds). At the southwest corner of the site, the Irrigation ditches (and foliage) terminate at Airport Road. Immediately across Aliport Road, north of the Parkside Apartments, a finger of existing vegetation extends from Airport Road to Christensen Park; providing an Important vegetative link to the West. South of the Valmont Road parking lot is an existing grove of White Poplar trees. Wildlife staff has Identified this as an Important vegetation link to the south. Plant material on the north side of Valmont Road will be proposed, which will provide a "gateway" of vegetation, that will /could link Valmont City Park- Phase 2 and 3 to the proposed Phase I Improvements. B. Open Space in Mixed Use Developments: Developments that contain a mix of residential and non-residential uses: 1. How does the open space provide for a balance of private and shared areas for the residential uses and common open space that is available for use by both the residential and non-residential uses that will meet the needs of the anticipated residents, occupants, tenants, and visitors of the property? Not applicable. a 2. How does the open space provide active areas and passive areas that will meet the needs of the anticipated residents, occupants, tenants, and visitors of the property and how is the open 1 space compatible with the surrounding area or an adopted plan for the area? { Not applicable. C. Landscaping: 1. How does the project provide for aesthetic enhancement and a variety of plant and hard surface materials, and how does the selection of materials provide for a variety of colors and contrast, and how does it incorporate the preservation or use of local native vegetation where appropriate? See Representative Plant List (see sheet L5) for a listing of the proposed plant palette. Overall, landscaping shall strive to be site appropriate, offering areas of low water vegetation, native trees and shrubs and limited higher water areas only as appropriate for active play (i.e. - events green area). Portions of the land will remain in a relatively natural condition, few buildings are planned, minimal pavement/concrete will be required, and an environmentally friendly landscape plan will be Implemented. Parking lots are proposed to be gravel, the shared use path will be crusher fines. 3 Valmont City Park- Phase 1 ,t Agenda Item # Page # .7 January 20, 2009 Much of the land will be planted with native upland grasses, and a natural aesthetic employed wherever possible. 2. How does the landscape and design attempt to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts to important native species, plant communities of special concern, threatened and endangered species and habitat by integrating the existing natural environment into the project? The irrigation ditches offer the only significant existing vegetation on the property as the bulk of the project has few or no tress. The thick vegetation along the ditches will be retained, less any invasive weed tree species and trees deemed unhealthy or are a public safety concerns, as recommended by the C.O.B. Forestry staff (see tree analysis and protection plan included with this submittal). Construction activities In areas immediately adjacent or between the ditches will be light-handed, with efforts to minimize disruption /disturbance. Earth moving and grading shall be minimized with no large scale excavation or fill placed within these areas. In the areas proposed for ditch crossings, locations will be selected that minimize the need to disrupt l disturb canopy vegetation. Efforts will be made to avoid damaging 1 trees and two canopy as much as possible during construction. f i Proposed plant materials include a wide variety of Rocky Mountain native deciduous trees and shrubs, coniferous trees, native ornamental grasses and groundcovers. 3. How does the project provide significant amounts of plant material sized in excess of the landscaping requirements of Sections 9-3.3-2 and 9-3.3-3, "Landscaping and Screening Requirements," and "Landscape Design Standards," B.R.C. 1981; and See the "landscape summary" chart and "representative plant list" on the drawings for i plant material selection, quantities and sizing. S 4. How are the setbacks, yards, and useable open space along public rights-of-way landscaped j to provide attractive streetscapes, to enhance architectural features, and to contribute to the 8 development of an attractive site plan? { The portions of Airport Road and Valmont Road along the property frontages are classified as minor arterials. Per Table 2-12 of the C.O.B. Design and Construction Standards, an 8' wide (minimum) sidewalk and 8' wide (minimum) landscape buffer Is required along these frontages. The Individual street frontages related to the landscape concept are described as follows., AirportRoad -The existing native seeded/ non-irrigated landscape buffer adjacent Airport Road varies In width from 12' 16, with a paralleling detached 4' wide concrete sidewalk. A roadside swale ties immediately east of back of curb (between curb and property line) from Butte Street to the north property line. The Intent Is to not disturb this swale, except where culverts will be added to accommodate the driveway servicing the proposed parking lot The native nature /feel of this existing landscape will be extended Into and through the park/ parking lot. The disturbed landscape buffer will be seeded with an appropriate low growing native seed mix, landscaped with native plant materials to exceed the intent of the parking lot screen requirements and Interior parking lot landscaping requirements and lMgated through establishment. Valmont Road - Along the north side of Valmont Road there is currently a drainage swale and no sidewalk To the east of the age is an existing 6' detached walk with an approximately 20' landscape buffer. A new 8' detached walk will be constructed from the existing 6' walk on the east end along Valmont Road to the proposed transit stop south of the parking lot. From this point west, the 8' Welk will tie Into the 10' muRl--use path that runs along the north side of Valmont A landscape buffer matching the property to the east will be maintained In order to maintain the existing roadside swale s Valmont City Park- Phase 1 `j Agenda Item # ~ Page # j i January 20, 2009 that is required for drainage. West of the new bus stop, the landscape buffer width varies to maintain existing vegetation and associated habilat areas. City wlidUfe staff has expressed a desire to maintain this existing vegetation, therefore preventing aligning the path closer to Valmont Road. The south side of the Valmont Road parking lot is located a minimum of 45' from the existing paved surface. The native natural feel of the landscape will be extended into and through the park/parking lot. In general, the Streetscape Design Standards call for a "strip of deciduous planted along the full length of the street" spaced 30-40'0.c. Per the direction discussed at the Site Review Pre-Appgcerion meeting, the required quantity of street bees will be ' planted in Irregular, native patterns, with no specific 1 prescribed spacings, given the native✓naturadopen space feel of the project. Shrubs and grasses used to create the parking lot screening are arranged in "drifts" or "waves" of vegetation, again in an effort to create a native, non-manicured landscape that ties into the overall natural theme/ feel of the Park. Plant material will be grouped together with plants of similar water and cultural requirements. As mentioned previously, disturbed areas shall be 1 in'igated thru establishment. ' r D. Circulation, including, without limitation, the transportation system that serves the property, whether public or private and whether constructed by the developer or not: 1. How are high speeds discouraged or a physical separation between streets and the project ; provided? "s Onsite streets are not being proposed as part of the Phase f improvements. `S Existing adjacent streets are classified as Minor Arterials: Airport Road -Anew 20' wide driveway ramp will be located directly opposite Butte Street per City direction. The west side of the 46 car Airport Road parking lot will be located a minimum of 45' east of the existing flow line. Included within this 45' "setback" is a minimum of 15' of existing roadside "swab" an 8' wide sidewalk and the balance of dimension will be a combination of a water quality swats, ' banning, native landscaping td screerdbuffer the adjacent parking from Alrport Road. Additionally, a combination of landscape boulders, parking blocks and a timber rail fence (see typical example below) surrounding the parking lot will be provided for additional separation, with the dual goal of keeping vehictss out of the adjacent native landscaping(drainage areas and also funnel pedestrians to purpose built entry points/ hall heads. The existing 4 foot sidewalk located along the east side of Airport Rd will be modified to be 8 foot In width to meet standards. ;c The existing landscape butler varies from approximately 121to 1611n width, and in an effort to maintain the existing drainage swats and mature &sea In this area, the additional 4' of width Is proposed to be added on the asst side of the existing walk In the along the majority of the frontage. In areas where grading, existing utilities, trees, and other existing features prevent adding 4' on one side of the existing wally the entire walk will be removed and reconstructed to 8. a i l Valmont City Park - Phase i Agenda Item # $ Page # 47 .a January 20, 2008 y A secondary emergency/maintenance access point will be located north of the main access In the location of an exlating driveway ramp. Use of this access will be blocked by locked bollards, which can be removed by emergency personnel or Parks and Recreation staff when necessary. Valmont Road - A proposed 100 car parking lot paralleling Valmont Road will have a single 20 foot wide driveway ramp access point, per City Staff direction. The access drive will serve a looped parking lot designed with a SU-30 (Fire Truck/Ssrvlce Trucks) turning template as a minimum standard. Along the north side of Valmont Road Is an existing drainage awale and no sidewalk. To the east of the site is an existing 6' detached walk with an approximately 20' landscape buffer. A new 8' detached walk will be constructed from the existing 8' walk on the east end along Valmont Road to the proposed bus stop adjacent to the parking lot. From this point, the 8' walk will tie Into the 10' muff/-use path that runs along the north side of Valmont in the area of the 8' walk an approximate 20' landscape buffer matching the property to the east will be maintained In order to maintain the existing roadside Swale that /s required for drainage. West of the newbus stop adjacent to the 10' muitt-use path the landscape buffer width varies in order to maintain existing vegetation and associated habitat areas. City wildlife staff has expressed a desire to maintain this existing vegetation, therefore preventing k aligning the path closer to Valmont Road. The south side of this parking lot will be d located a minimum of 45' from the existing paved surface. Curb and gutter paralleling Valmont Road will be added along the frontage, starting at the existing i right hand turn lane at the west end, and extended to the existing curb & gutter at the east property line. On the western end of the site adjacent to Valmont Road, there is insufficient room between the Irrigation ditch and road to install the hull multi-use path width all the way to the Intersection with Airport Road. Therefore, the mutt!-use path will cross the Irrigation ditch via a crossing and connect to Airport Rd along the north side of the ditch. At the request of City staff, an additional 4' attached sidewalk will be constructed along the south side of the Irrigation ditch. See the site plans for details of the walk layout. 2. How are potential conflicts with vehicles minimized? As described above, a combination of timber tall fence, landscape boulders and parking blocks will encircle the parking lot to separate vehicles from the adjacent park /open space/ bike park elements. Streetlights will be located at each of the 2 proposed drive cuts / driveways where there are points of conflict between pedestrians and vehicles. An at grade pedestrian crosswalk extending across Airport Road, hnmedlately south of the Butte Street and Phase 1 parking lot driveway will be included within the Phase 1 improvements in an effort to consolidate pedestrian movements across the road. This crosswalk will connect to the existing 4 foot walk on the west side of Airport Rd, which will be improved to be 10 feet wide per discussions with City Staff. The 10 foot width will maintain the existing landscape strip along the street, and not require removal of any existing mature trees. A new 8 foot wide concrete path will be constructed along the Irrigation ditch north of Parksids Village. This path will connect to the existing Wonderland Creek multl--use path at Christiansen Parkin order to provide a safe connection to the park from multiple areas of the City with the need to ride or walk along Valmont Road. The pedestrian crossing on Airport Road at Butte Street will direct people away from the main Intersection of Airport Road and Valmont Road, and additionally, direct users to the primary entry of the park a Valmont City Park - Phase 1 Agenda Item # _ Page # i January 20, 2009 A future pedestrian underpass (associated with Phase 2 and/or 3 Valmont City Park Improvements) extending beneath Valmont Road from the south will provide additional pedestrian and bicycle connections, minimizing conflicts with vehicles. 3. How are safe and convenient connections accessible to the public within the project and between the project and existing and proposed transportation systems provided, including without limitation streets, bikeways, pedestrian ways and trails? An offslte pedestrian connection to the west will be constructed as part of this project. This connection will be an 8 foot concrete path paralleling the Irrigation ditch north of Parkside Village apartments. This path will connect Christensen Park with Phase 1 of Valmont Park and provide a safe and convenient connection for pedestrians. This connection will allow pedestrians to access the site without using Valmont Road or other surrounding streets. A pedestrian cross walk will be extended across Airport Road, Immediately south of Butte Street, linking users from the west aide to east side at this single crossing. fi The business park to the east of the project site, has terminated a 6' wkfe sidewalk at 5 Me property line. An 8' wide sidewalk will be extended to the west (taper from their 6' to the proposed 8' located on the Park side of the project), paralleling Valmont Road, and through the proposed driveways Into the Valmont parking lots. This walk will follow Valmont Road to the proposed Bus Stop located adjacent to the Valmont Road Parking lot, and will then transition to the 10' muffhuse path running west to east north of Valmont Road. The existing north-south 4' wide concrete sidewalk (east side), paralleling Airport Road, will be increased to an W overall width, and will extend from the Airport Road- Valmont Road Intersection, to the north property line. At the extreme north end, this 8' wide sidewalk will taper down to 4' wide to tie-in to the existing sidewalk below the Boulder County Addiction Treatment Facility . See Item 6. below for discussion of 10' wide multi-use sidewalk connections. Pedestrians /park users entering the park from the proposed Valmont Road parking lot will access the site from 2 controlled trail heaMenhy points. a At each of the two parking lot drive cuts where vehicle-pedestrian crossings are necessary, a street light, to meet or exceed C.O.B. standard, will be provided. :i 4. How are alternatives to the automobile promoted by incorporating site design techniques, and z use patterns, and supporting Infrastructure that supports and encourages walking, biking, and other atematves to the single occupant vehicle? Existing bike lanes In both dhections parallel Valmont Road 3 The Intersection at Airport Road and Valmont Road currently provides at grade pedestrian crosswalks from the south, which will link future Valmont City Park Phases 2 and 3 and beyond. No additional pedestrian crosswalks across Valmont Road are being proposed at this time. A pedestrian underpass (linking Phase I and Phase 2 park phases) Is planned as a j future Improvement beneath Valmont Road. 5. Where practical and beneficial, how is a significant shift away from single occupant vehicle use to alternate modes promoted through the use of travel demand management techniques? The Bike Park" is a key element of Valmont City Park Phase 1. The intent is to provide a purpose-built, innovative facility for all types of off-road bicycling. Ingredients include an interwoven network of trails, technical terrain areas, and Valmont City Park - Phase i Agenda Item # S _ Page # January 20, 2009 spectator zones where visitors of all ages and abilities can practice bike skills, participate in programs and races, and enjoy the exercise and camaraderie of bicycling. The park will include an approximately 4-mile system of interconnected trails with a variety of styles and terrain. Loops will connect diflarant segments so that visitors can customize their experiences-choosing the length of trail, technical difficulty, type of terrain, and returning to where they started without having to retrace their steps. The trali system will Include designated routes for beginner, Intermediate, and expert riders, and will be built to international guidelines for sustainablilty and both cyclocross and mountain bike racing. Technical features will be scattered along appropriate trails throughout the park to add challenge and Interest. A "Leaning Loop" ' will provide a specific place for beginning skill development. This project, just by being a public park with multiple active and passive uses, will encourage people to get out of their cars. As part of the travel demand management plan, the park will provide easy access to the major network of City multi-use trails and bikeways, providing a safe and enjoyable way to get to the park without driving. This network is typically easier and often faster way for City residents to get around the i City, and if someone is planning on going to the park to ride their bike, the ease of connection from the main system will encourage them to leave the car at home. Parking spaces are limited and are provided in clusters, which will provide more area for paths and pedestrians. Passenger loading zones are provided in both parking lots to provide safe transfer of pedestrians, dogs, bike and other equipment Into the various Park amenities. The project provides numerous bicycle racks to secure bicycles once the user has reached the Park 6. What onsite facilities for Wernal linkage with other modes of transportation are provided, where applicable? An 8'x 30' concrete boarding area is provided approximately 200' west of the proposed drive cut on the north slds of Valmont Road and south of the proposed parking lot to allow easy access to the site. This location provided a better connection to the dog park pedestrian path system and parking, the 10' multi-use path, and will accommodate the extensive grading required for the future underpass. The remaining concrete boarding areas are required as part of future phases of the park project and are not included In the scope of this Phase 1. A 10' wide multi-use path will commence from the back of sidewalk at the corner of Airport Road and Valmont Road and will be routed through the site paralleling Valmont Road eastward to the proposed 100 car parking lot, in as direct (non-meandering) line as possible, given the adjacent land uses and proposed park amenities. The path then parallels the parking lot and dog park amenities as it extends to the northeast corner of the site. 7. How is the amount of land devoted to the street system minimized? No new street(s) shall be included within the Phase 1 Improvements, other than the driveway cuts off Airport Road and Valmont Road that service the proposed parking lots and these associated drive aisles. i r ,i 3 Valmont City Park - Phase t 1 Agenda Item # 5 Page #70 3 s January 20, 2009 8. How is the project designed for the, types of traffic expected, including, without limitation, automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians, and how does it provide safety, separation from living areas, and control of noise and exhaust?; and Parking spaces are limited and built In clusters, providing more space and paths for pedestrians. Additionally, a combination of landscape boulders, parking blocks and a timber rail fence surrounding the parking lot will be provided for additional separation, with the dual goal of keeping vehicles out of the adjacent native landscaping/drainage areas and also funnel pedestrians to purpose built entry points/trail heads. z Site lighting will be provided at both proposed driveway entrances where there Is a pedestdan/vehicular interface. 9. How will city construction standards be met, and how will emergency vehicle use be facilitated? City construction standards will be met throughout, with handicap ramps, drive cuts, street lighting, curb and gutter, eta being Installed or improved to meet current standards. Drainage and water quality requirements shall met or exceed the required standards. The access point from Airport Road has been aligned with Butte Street, and the Valmont Road is not located in the vicinity of any existing Intersections in order to minimize vehicle confllcts. Existing fire hydrants are located near each parking /of, and an additional new hydrant is proposed near the proposed parking lot access adjacent to Butte Street. The project will provide emergency vehicle access at both parking lots, with either a looped drive for vehicle turn around, or a secondary emergency/maintanance access only point. The main facilities, such as the restrooms and relocated farm house, are located within close proximity to the parking iota In order to allow emergency access. Additionally, the start finish lane extending to the east from the emergency access off Airport Rd will be constructed of road base suitable for emergency vehicle access. This will allow an ambulance or similar emergency response vehicle additional access into the north side of the site In the vicinity of the mountain bike skills areas. The f0' wide concrete multi-use path on the southern portion of the project will also provide additional emergency vehicle and maintenance vehicle access Into the site. E. Parking: 1. How does the project incorporate into the design of parking areas, measures to provide safety, convenience, and separation of pedestrian movements from vehicular movements? i§ As described in D.1. and D.2. above, vehicular movements will be gated from pedestrian movements by the use of a timber rail fence, landscaping, boulders and earthen berming. d 2. How does the design of parking areas make efficient use of the land and use the minimum amount of land necessary to meet the parking needs of the project? The project proposes two parking tots on the outer perimeter of the site. One at the southeast comer off Valmont Road near the dog park, and the second on the west side off Airport Road, near the event green and a concentration of the bike features. The Valmont lot Is located In an area that has seen previous disturbance, and is designed to provide multiple water quality and landscaping areas as an Integral part of the parking area. This design makes the parking lot part of the park design, instead of a large paved afterthought, without encroaching Into the main site at the more pristine areas. Valmont City Park - Phase 1 Agenda Item # - Page # 71 January 20, 2DO9 a 1 The parking along Airport Road is designed as close to the road as possible while still meeting setbacks and providing adequate landscape buffer. The main park areas are shielded from this lot by the plaza area, In order to separate it from the park experience. Both parking lots will be constructed of gravel Instead of asphalt, In order to keep with the park atmosphere and be consistent with or trallhead parking lot designs in the area. The gravel design will also limit impervious areas on the site and help minimize runoff and water quality Impacts. 3. How are parking areas and lighting designed to reduce the visual impact on the project, adjacent properties, and adjacent streets?; and There is no parking lot lighting anticipated. Light poles and fixtures to meet the City standard will be provided at each of the 2 proposed driveway cuts where there are pedestrian crossings. a 4. How do parking areas utilize landscaping materials to provide shade in excess of the requirements in Section 9-3.3-12, 'Parking Area Design Standards,' B.R.C. 1981? a Street and parking lot tram were selected from the `Approved Street Tree List. As ; required by code, a minimum of one tree for every 200 sq.ft. of interior parking lot landscape area has been provided 100% of the parking lot trees are medium to large deciduous asset forth In the C.O.B. Design and Construction Standards. See `landscape summary chart' on the drawings. F. Building Design Livability and Relationship to the Exist or Proposed Surrounding Area: i 1. How are the building height, mass, scale, orientation, and configuration compatible with the existing character of the area or the character established by an adopted plan for the area? Platt Farmhouse- Reuse as Community Meeting Faciitri The Master Plan for Valmont City Park- Phase 1, as conceived by Boulder's Department of Parks and Recreation involves the relocation of the Individually landmarked farmhouse approximately 700 ft. to the west of Its current site, to a location about 180 ft. east of Airport Road. The house will be located slightly south of the main entrance to the party south of the park's Plaza and Event Green, and north of the existing Left Hand Irrigation Ditch. There will be an open landmark site area surrounding the house, similar In size and dimension to Its current landmark site, and the house will be located approximately the same distance north of Left Hand Ditch as at Its current location. The new location Is consistent with the overall master plan of the park, with i consideration for park access, pedestrian circulation, and the general functionality of the park's planned facilities and activities. Also the relocation will allow for better security of the farmhouse, being more visible from Airport Road, in regards to management of the building's uses, and issues of potential vandalism. The Boulder Fire Marshal will require a full road section with 80 ft. diameter turnaround for fire truck access to the w1ding from Airport Road, so the closer proximity to Airport Road allows for a reduction in the distance and area of the park covered by paving material required for fire department use, and better visibility for early defection of fire. The new location will be adjacent to the main park entrance and parking lot, for the convenience of users, and will have more prominent connection to Airport Road for Its intended uses by the general public, not necessarily involved with the activities of the t Valmont City Park - Phase 1 Agenda Item # ~ Page # January 20, 2009 park. In its new location, It Is proposed that the house be reoriented so that its front porch and front door will face west toward Airport Road. The renovation of the Platt Farmhouse will focus primarily on restoring It as closely as possible to its original condition. The large 19700 2 d Floor dormer and balcony on the west side will be removed and the roof and save will be restored. The original exterior materials, most of which remain and are in good condition, wBI be repaired as required, Including siding, windows, doors and trim. The porch floor and railing are deteriorated and will be replaced, but the porch columns, roof end ceiling will be restored. The modem front door will be replaced with a door matching the existing rear door, and the modem Idichen windows at the northeast comer will be replaced with one double-hung one-over-one window to match the existing original windows. Regarding exterior paint colors, It Is presumed that the house was always white, but research will be done to determine what the original colors were, and the house will be painted accordingly. RestrogalStoraae BuOd►no 5 The proposed new public restroom and storage building will be a one story 650 SF building located adjacent to the relocated Platt Farmhouse, so that it can serve the meeting facllity and nearby outdoor events area. It will be small In scale compared to the farmhouse and will be suggestive of a farm accessory building in character. j Simple far m-like materials and detalling are used, and the exhrrlor siding will be painted white to match the Platt Farmhouse, with a gray or greenish metal roof. Poultry Warehouse- Reuse as Covered Biking Fac01tV The existing poultry warehouse Is an existing 34,300 SF, one story, metal industrial j building located at the southeast corner of Phase 1 of Valmont Park. Approximately 25,500 SP of the original 19700 building will be retained and modified as an open air covered bildng facility. The architectural modification will Include removing most of the exterior walls, and repair of the existing roof, exposing certain parts of the original steel structure. This building is located far away from the relocated Platt Farmhouse and ReshooMIStorege Building. its scale relates more to the scale of other larger } commercial buildings located along Valmont Road, and it Is a familiar structure in its current location after being there for 40 years. 2. How is the height of building(s) in general proportion to the height of existing buildings and 31 the proposed or projected heights of approved buildings or approved plans for the immediate v area? i~ The height of the existing farmhouse, relocated and renovated, will remain unchanged. The height of the new restroom/atorege building will be lower than and therefore in scale with the other buildings on the see. The existing Poultry Warehouse will be reduced in area, but the height will remain unchanged after renovation and Is In scale with other commercial buildings along Y+ Valmont Road. 4 3. How does the orientation of buildings minimize shadows on and blocking of views from i adjacent properties? There are no other structures or properties adjacent to the sites for the relocated Pratt Farmhouse, RestroomMorage Building or Poultry Warehouse. j i 3 1 Valmont City Park - Phase t - y2 Agenda Item # Page # January 20, 2009 a 4. If the character of the area is identifiable, how is the project made compatible by the appropriate use of color, materials, landscaping, signs, and lighting? The majority of the area of Phase 1 of Valmont Park is rural In character, although newer larger development has taken place along Valmont Road. The site of the relocated Pratt Farmhouse and the adjacent Restroom/Storage Building has been chosen to maintain the rural character of the original site of the house. These buildings will have materials, colors (white exterior with gray-green roofs) and landscaping that are similar to the original farmhouse building and Us setting. The colors and materials of the renovated Poultry Warehouse will be similar to the existing building (gray-green metal siding and roofing.) All three buildings will be compatible l with their natural surroundings. 5. How do buildings present an attractive streetscape, incorporate architectural and site design elements appropriate to a pedestrian scale, and provide for the safety and convenience of ' pedestrians? The relocated Pratt Farmhouse and adjacent Restroom/Storege Building will be fronting toward Airport Road and conveniently located near the Valmont Park entrance, parking lot and associated outdoor event areas. Sidewalks and trails will f: connect these facilities to each other and provide accessible entrances to the public buildings and spaces. The renovated Farmhouse will enhance the streetacape of Airport Road and will provide visual Identification for Valmont Park as a whole. i, 6. To the extent practical, how does the project provide public amenities and planned public facilities? The entire Valmont City Park is a public facility with numerous public amenities. Within the park the relocated Pratt Farmhouse will serve as a community meeting facility, managed by the Department of Parks and Recreation, available for various public uses- special events, social gatherings, and educational purposes. The renovated farmhouse also serves an educational purpose by preserving an historic structure which represents the architecture and cultural context of its location and date of construction -1908. The Restroom/Storage Building provides practical functions for the adjacent farmhouse and outdoor event areas, as well as for the entire park The renovated Poultry Warehouse Is Intended to be used for certain kinds of biking activities which need weather protection, and will also Include spectator areas for special biking events- local and regional. The east side of the warehouse will adjoin and open onto the Dog Park and will provide weather protection for users of the Dog Park 7. For residential projects, how does the project assist the community in producing a variety of housing types, such as multifamily, townhouses, and detached single family units as well as mixed lot sizes, number of bedrooms, and sizes of units? Not applicable.' 3 8. For residential projects, how is noise minimized between units, between buildings, and from either on-site or off-site external sources through spacing, landscaping, and building materials? i Not applicable. 1 J A Valmont City Park - Phase 1 Y Agenda Item # J~ Page # / 'j January 20, 2009 9. It a lighting plan is provided, how does it augment security, energy conservation, safety, and aesthetics? Light poles and fixtures to meet the City standard will be provided at each of the 2 proposed driveway cuts where there are pedestrian crossings. No additional security, parking lot or aesthetic lighting Is anticipated. 10. How does the project incorporate the natural environment into the design and avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts to natural systems? Only one of the three buildings is a new building - the small RestroomfStorage Building. Although the existing Platt Farmhouse is being relocated, it Is being sited similarly to Its current site, and the other existing farm buildings (3 small sheds) are being eliminated thus reducing the overall aft footprint and Impact of the original farm strictures. The existing Poultry Warehouse Is being reduced In size by about 25%, which also reduces its overall Impact on the site. s None of the buildings will intrude Into flood plains, sensitive vegetation or habitat areas, and the surrounding sties will be maintained with existing natural plant i materials, or new similar landscaping. a t A 11. How are cut and fill minimized on the site, and how does the design of buildings conform to the natural contours of the land, and how does the site design minimize erosion, slope instability, landslide, mudflow or subsidence, and minimize the potential threat to property caused by geological hazards? The site grading has been designed to maintain historic drainage patterns while providing adequate drainage from parking lots, plazas, and trails. In parking lot areas, a flit is needed to provide adequate drainage due to the flat nature of the existing r conditions. Water quality and drainage swales were constructed around the lots In an j attempt to balance earthwork needs to the extent feasible. Features on the north side of the site were designed to fit Into existing terrain, and j grass buffers and sweles are being maintained or Improved at the toe of the slope ;P above the Irrigation ditches. The steeper portion of the existing hillside at the t northeast comer will be cut back to help stabilize the slope and generate material for construction in other areas. The central portion of the site will have no significant grading completed, and will kept in its natural state to the extent possible. The southern portion of the site will be a mix of areas that will be preserved In their . original state, and other areas that will have berms created to improve trail design and # provide aesthetics. The berms will only be constructed in areas that do not contain valuable habitat, trees, etc. G. Solar Sighdno and Construction: For the purpose of insuring the maximum potential for utilization of solar energy in the city, all applicants for residential site reviews shall place streets, lots, open spaces, and buildings so as to maximize the potential for the use of solar energy in accordance with the following solar sighting criteria: J 1. Placement of Open Soace and Streets. Open space areas are located wherever practical to protect buildings from shading by other buildings within the development or from buildings on adjacent properties. Topography and other natural features and constraints may justify deviations from this criterion. How is this criterion met? Project is not residential. F Valmont City Park - Phase 1 Agenda Item # Page # L January 20, 2009 2. Lot Layout and Building Sighting. Lots are oriented and buildings are sited in a way which maximizes the solar potential of each principal building. Lots are designed to facilitate sighting a structure which is unshaded by other nearby structures. Wherever practical, buildings are sited close to the north lot line to increase yard space to the south for better owner control of shading. How is this criterion met? Not applicable. 3. Building Form. The shapes of buildings are designed to maximize utilization of solar energy. Buildings shall meet the solar access protection and solar sighting requirements of Chapter 9-8, "Solar Access,' B.R.C. 1981. How is this criterion met? e Not applicable. 4. Landscaping. The shading effects of proposed landscaping on adjacent buildings are minimized. How is this criterion met? Not applicable. j i H. Additional Criteria for Poles Above the Permitted Height No site review application for a pole S above the permitted height will be approved unless the approving agency finds all of the j following: j r 1. The light pole Is required for night time recreation activities, which are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, or the light or traffic signal pole is required for safety, or the electrical utility pole is required to serve the needs of the City?; and As described In E. Parking - 3, above, the only pole mounted site lighting will occur at each of the two driveways where there is a pedestrian/ vehicular interface. As with other C O.B. Parks, night time recreation activities will not be permitted. 2. The pole is at the minimum height appropriate to accomplish the purposes for which the pole was erected and is designed and constructed so as to minimize light and electromagnetic pollution. If applicable, how are these criteria met? The project will provide the C O.B. standard light pole and fixture for driveway access off a minor arterial frontage. 1. Utilities: 1. Phase 1 of Valmont City Parkproposes minimal utility Improvements. The Improvements will Include abandonment of the existing wafer service and construction of anew service for the Platt Farmhouse and resfroom building off Airport Road, modification of the existing sewer service to serve the relocated farmhouse and restrooms, and construction of a new fire hydrant along Airport Road. All site Irrigation will be from the existing pond and irrigation system owned by the Parks and Recreation department The existing wafer and sewer service for the building located at the southeast comer off Valmont Road will be maintained. A Preliminary Utility Plan is included as part of the Site Plan submittal. 2. Based on the minimal utility Improvements proposed as part of this phase of the project and discussions with City staff, a utility report Is not required for Phase 1. 3. Based on a meeting with City of Boulder Fire Department staff, a new hydrant will be required along Airport Rd near the parking lot entrance and relocated fire house. The existing hydrant located near existing farmhouse driveway access on Airport Rd will be maintained. The farmhouse is currently sprinkled and this system will be maintained as part of the relocation. 3 3 Vaknord City Park - Phase 1 Agenda Item # $ Page # 76 4 January 20, 2009 There is an existing fire hydrant located on the north side of Valmont Road near the proposed parkfig lot, and the existing building Is sprinkled. These facilities will be maintained and no additional fire protection utilities are proposed In this area. 3. Ali proposed public Improvements In Phase f are )orated within public right of way. A new easement to fully contain the existing hydrant on the west side of Airport Road that is located just outside of the right of way will be dedicated during the Technical Document Review process. i 7 a i i 3 3 a i 5 { 1 i Valmont City Park -Phase 1 Agenda Item # ~ Page # VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE LANDSCAPE SHEET INDEX BOULDER, COLORADO 1603 oakndge Drive SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL CS, COVER DESIGN TEAM DIRECTORY, SHEET INDEX Fort Collins, W525 cPl CONTEXT NTExr PLAN (970) 223-7577 n COVER SHEET TAI TREE ANALYSIS iaxl97a121?1827 DGI DISC GOLF CONCEPT PLAN Landscape Archlte m SITE PLANS Urban Design Graph. Design SO OVERALL SITE PLAN EP, Tr 52 SI T DIRECTORY 51 STE PLAN £ a r. • . r i. S3 SITE PLAN t. x ( T sa SITE PLAN rC g 4"' 1 ;1( S5 SITE PLAN !v OWNER: 56 SITE FURNISHINGS, DETAILS, CROSS SECTIONS A >w. - City of Boulder Parks and Recreation S7 PUBLIC ART CONCEPTS ra AIRPORTBOULEV Administration-IRIS Center } g f 3198 Broadway LANDSCAPE PLANS l F Z R Y $UL~ER COLA I JAIL 7 Boulder, CO 60304-2644 o OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN Contact: Perry Brooks Ll LANDSCAPE PLAN r 2": F Phone: 303.413.7226 L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN & SUMMARY CHART y s*` ,S ' • { ` Email: brooksp@bouldercolorado.gov L3 LANDSCAPE PLAN Q L4 LANDSCAPE PLAN W w 3- F ! y _ _ LS LANDSCAPE PLAN & REPRESENTATIVE PLANT LIST Q w L 0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: IRRIGATION PLAN Q Z _ aA aye y , AO = + I r BHA Design, Inc. LLj 1 16030akdgeDrive IRO OVERALL IRRIGATION PUN F - - - - - - - - - - - $UTfEST OI _ Fort Collins, CO 80525 Q I 0 i L • as. Contact: Jeff Kroeger o Phone: 970.223.7577 CIVIL SHEET INDEX a W ff z A:. r s + 4 g Email: Ikroeger@bhodesign.com l yR ?ap, = dLL.~ g Z 0 r," _ - 4,. 00 CIVIL COVER SHEET Z VALMOM ROAD Cl CIVIL NOTES AND LEGENDS o Q - Mwr s{-- ~~v +M CIVIL ENGINEERING/SURVEYOR: C2 U71LITYPLAN-NORTHWEST Q ° ti e yr4. N - v~ - 0- Drexel, Burrell & Co. C3 UTILITY PLAN SOUTHEAST o 1 _ _ - ;~,x }x 1800 38th Street C4 GRADING PLAN (I of 4) u Boulder, Colorado 80301-2620 C5 GRADING PLAN (2 OF 4) 1 I - - " * C6 GRADING PLAN (3 OF 4) c Contact: Curtis Stevens ; L - - - - - - - - - - - - ~;1„,., »R"W,1 C7 GRADING PLAN (4 of 4) U 1 ft4 7 '4j k- 49 Phone: 303.442.4338 PAU 40 C8 WONDERLAND TRAIL CONNECTION J f is Email: cstevens@drexelbarrell.com C9 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER PLAN 1 OF 4) ~ > > o a ~q,s, . ry P CIO PRELIMINARY STORM WATER PLAN (2 Of 4) m 0 Cll PRELIMINARY STORM WATER PLAN (3OF 4) C0 C LL ~U li ARCHITECT: C12 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER PLAN (4 OF 4) L E 0 p W C13 TURN LANE MODIFICATION ,J D VICINITY MAP OZ Architecture ~mJ 1805 29th Street, Suite 2054 C14 VALMONT ROAD SCUTH Bus STOP Q °m' 0 SCALE: I"= 500'-0" Boulder, Colorado 80301 ARCHITECTURAL SHEET INDEX u~ m NORTH Conctact: Chuck Sanders 5 Phone: 303.449.8900 d u j PROJECT DESCRIPTION Email:csonders@ozarch.com CS ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET PLATT FARMHOUSE Phase 1 of Valmont City Park is comprised of the 45 acres sitting between the Boulder County Joil and the north side of BIKE PARK DESIGNERS: >Y 9 Tl,l TITLE SHEET Valmont Road between Airport Road and the Valmont Industrial Park. The site is bisected by the North Boulder Farmers Ditch Alta Planning & Design A2.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS - FLOOR PUNS 8 ROOF PLAN and the Left Hand Ditch. An existing raw water irrigation pond, pump house and short length of a soft surface shared path is 1638 NE Davis Street A2.02-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS - FOUNDATION PLAN & ROOF PLAN l 01 EX EXISTING CONDITIONS - ELEVATIONS also located between these ditches. A dog park has been located south and east of the southern most ditch and east and north Portland, Oregon 97232 A4. Contact: Chris Bernhardt of the existing poultry warehouse building. A 105 stall, gravel parking lot is accessed off Valmont Road immediately south of A5.01 EX EXISTING CONDITIONS. BUILDING SECTIONS Phone: 503.367.2111 A2.01 FLOOR OOR PLANS & ROOF PLAN I this existing building. The balance of the southern third of the site will include a portion of the interconnected bike trail system Email: chrisbernhardt@aItoplanning.com A2.02 FOU NDATION PLAN & ROOF PLAN and the 10' wide multiuse path. The middle third of the site is accessible from the south at four ditch crossings and from the A4.01 ELEVATIONS north at three ditch crossings. Bike trails and a shored use soft surface path will be constructed according to best management IMBA A5.01 BUILDING SECTIONS practices for minimizing impacts to the existing natural resources. All trails in this area will be limited to natural surface trails, 4106 Riverside Avenue terrain features and amenities with minimal footprints such as benches or bike skill features. The northern third of the site will POULTRY WAREHOUSE o Boulder, Colorado 80304 = I contain the balance of the bike trails and terrain features/tracks, spectator areas, the renovated and relocated Platt Farmhouse, Contact: Pete Webber T,.l TITLE SHEET e a detached restroom/storage facility, a 44 car gravel packing lot, tot lot, irrigated turf gross "pocket park" encompassing an Phone: 303.562.7510 ARCHITECTURALLY RENDERED PERSPECTIVE "events" area used for picnicking, a trail head and bike race staging. Email: A2.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS FLOOR PLAN ~to@imba.com A4.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS ELEVATIONS A2.01 PROPOSED FLOOR PUN Alpine Bike Parks A4.01 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 834 Finloyson Arm Road A5.01 EXISTING / PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS PHASING PLAN Victoria, BC V9B-6ES Contact: Judd deVall RESTROOM/STORAGE BUILDING Phone: 250.418.1486 N.T.S. Email: judddevoll@aolcom T1.1 TITLE SHEET ARCHITECTURALLY RENDERED PERSPECTIVE A2.01 FLOOR & ROOF PUNS A4.01 ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS - IRRIGATION: NORTH PHASE I - ' Irrigation Design Consultants PUMPHOUSE BUILDING ffffff~ a PHASE 2 - = 1017 S. Boulder Rood, Suite El PHASE 3 - Louisville, Colorado 80027 A4.01-EX EXISTING ELEVATIONS SCALE any canted: Steve Nelson BIKE PARK SHEET INDEX Designed by Phone: 303.442.7027 Drawn by BHA Email: stevelDC@aolcom checked by, B0.0 COVER SHEET / SITE PLAN Dewing Name BO.1 BIKE PARK TRAIL, TERRAIN AREA, AND TECHNICAL FEATURE PUN COVER SHEET BO.2 CIRCULATION PLAN Y{ BI.O TYPICAL TRAIL FEATURE PHOTOS B2.0 TYPICAL TRAIL / FEATURE PHOTOS _ d.~ B3.0 TYPICAL TRAIL/ FEATURE DRAWINGS ProjecE Number W42 B4.0 DETAILS Sheet Dam-: May 14.2009 B5.0 DETAILS Sheet Number: B6.0 DETAILS CS 1 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO 16030Rkridge Drive (97 (970) z23.75n 7~•7sn SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL Fort 80516 CONTEXT PLAN \ (97D,323.1917 . 4 ' fax H t;Q i~l.r _:ne~rf / - ~ ♦ Landscape Urban DDeesign ✓ r. ;'a + ~eiH i:~l.'.~.'if Lw:.~ o U1F s L I o ` ♦ Ign _ ~ f?r~ p~•.,> Graphic Design '1~J11~x~~ a "SEC MULTIUSE PAT- M b . ! wl _ ED SHARED USE 5Cr i a- MUL➢-USE PATH f l n +i. ..+~~TT III I I ;ENHANCED VEDreos1+ • , T: ~ i ~i~, `lF- rt• g ~ jaoseD ENHaNCbo ~ a. INDUSTRIAL' -r15DNG TRANSIT SL. MANUFACTURRING rt• ~ - ~ } ,appO5E0 tRn'~ x -:ca ~~1~ .~i ~ wlY _ fl -UfURE IRAN-' " YUBLK(Y1 {:}E ESTABLISHED . Z .ISIING UNU'. JI "r LU 6 /A • ~ •s,° -uTURE ulvor a' F 1 1 ~F•~S.*+c ® ivISTING BRIG vla e}r, , `~y Q L ,r,.Pi ER'D;, JJ "ran e , / ` L'~I++ e X11✓• ~ I V) N Q V,f i r(jye, r ; , 7 r ~~Ri. r~Fj~;+•' ~ .i 0. LL l y • SSA,. VMI y MObIIE HOME IMHI 1 1.'^ ' ` ~F Bi Jf tip <I e t~Ml. `~/a,ir~' eT`. + '•f'. 1rt~r A r. y~ 'r-~ b1 ' `r 0 Q ftt RP ~d/_~P I lr" . ~ I• - ► t ;i7` zM _ r 1F Ole 0 d _ 'F •~'l, B_,E 1. R! r/~. ~{y~•y~y•~ lA• INDUSTRUL 4. ' r 3ih G , e,.Ry11 °9^ * GENERAL IIGI r„ 1 r V Q it I a ,.Y awl ` / 1. i d tit 1 ' f~ ii r. i... e Y •r U w qw, 4k Q$ i .00 =EASr)NG ~fM• oaf O f Mf EAt E a,W :ayr BUILDING *L g ~P -J m 0 . 4 R Yf rg~ / ~l N F m 7 E'in RMI E • B .l E) , f 1 E J fR v _ ! IE` IP u E .I V•~. r-..~.....F E - a G I~ (o4sINLS, 4 IE ,•S ~ ai, e 7 r I I t, d~ INDUSTRIAL- SERVICE ! fd 7fI5-2I q1 I 11 ( 9~ e i INDUSTRIAL - E16 GENERAL 116) SIkJh Of~C3 p'"' I I µ r INDUSTRIAL .....-J I , III ` ( r~• PURLI- c _ i I..1• ,P1sG4q ~~a j I ; T~~ r ~s ~'.1' / ` E, o , oaod a of 4e. INDUSTRIAL- •.r INDUSTAIA L- 411; .{~i4". 11 j; 0 • i t 9'ia ((r r}' - }I r { 'S SERVICE 111511 GENERAL(IG) LkJ uC 4c o s oa uaa a¢ r y 10< ~41 NORTH I I. R ,E+Y I" a gw400gQ4 PUBLIC(P) I _ , ~r , i~ lil oao~>9~aQa aaaa ; ~t~ ~ _ ,•.6a f A 7 INDUSTRIIG 1 SCALE: NONE Q INDUSTRIAL- / w Designed by BHA • y GENERALIIGI !:`a- ..~la.. Drawn by Checked by. pf7i 1 Dnwhg None rn ~9 CONTEXT PLAN 71! rl'+ Project Number. BD+t 3 p• V- A r , r i _ bfj'_'' e * ,,yp Sheet Date: eLr Igo 2009 • ,li ~iMsT' N ~tw. 4F4V - f r.~sy8( Sheet Number. CP1 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO 1603 Oakridge Drive 80535 SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL Fort Collins, -7577 I970Jz Tax (90 M- 1827 EXISTING VEGETATION ANALYSIS Land-pe Archie Urban I G-phit I GENERAL NOTES: I, THE INTENT OF THIS PROJECT IS TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE THE NATURALIZED CHARACTER OF THE SITE WHILE PROVIDING IMPROVED RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES. 2. DUSTING TREES ARE SUBJECT TO PRUNING AND OR REMOVAL AT LEGEND THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY FORESTRY DEPARTMENT. 3. TREES WITHIN THE 60 W DITCH RIGHT OF WAY WILL REMAIN H THE EXCEPTION OF THE BRIDGE _ - - Q EXISTING TREE OR SHRUB AND BE PROTECTED WIT INSTALLATION AREAS APPROVED T0.Ef5 AFFECTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF f I _ - - _ _ ; - - , - - - - - - - - - - - FASTING TREE OR SHRUB TO BE REMOVED -x X BRIDGES AND CYCLING TRAILS WILL BE FIELD MARKED AND Y - - _ / - - - _ - _ - W FOR REMOVAL BY THE CITY FORESTRY DEPARTMENT NATURAL AREAS URGE COTTONWOOD TREE IN THIS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. MITIGATION FOR REMOVED TREES WILL AREA 7O 0.E/NJNAND BE PROTECTED BECOORDINATED WITH THE CITY FORESTRY DEPARTMENT. Q 7 ! ) l' ~I j 715 jI I I ✓ / i 1. TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION LOCATED WITHIN THE DITCH J --0. PERCHAPfEP3OF0C5/ (WSiRJG TREE ZONE$ RIGHTOFWAYARECON31DERED TO HAVE HABITAT AND l \R" / \ i % \ Q AESTHETIC VALUE AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND 4. CONDITIONS OF THE DITCH MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, 1 ` J (I) M D0. COTTONWOOD TREE B , Y W W 6. LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS WILL REFLECT A NATIVE - III 77 0IA.SIIA0NWOO0 TREE1O" Z Q CHARACTER INTENDED TO IMPROVE HABITAT AND AESTHETIC I 0 \ -REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED ' / - - - _ _ _ . ` ` / i ~~^fB VALUE. } R_ d PER CHAPTER 3 OF D.C.S. 0 0 6. SIBERIAN ELMS ALONG VALMONT ROAD WITH THE EXCEPTION T - _ - - _ " - - - - - p(26' DN. COTTONWOOD TREE TO ~j,l OF THOSE ALONGAVITHIN THE 60'W DITCH EASEMENT SHALL BE -REMAINAND BEPROTECTED REMOVED. ALL EXISTING PLUM AND CHOKECHERRY SHALL BE PER CHAPTER 3 015 O.C.S.'-_/ RETAINED AND PROTECTED PER THE CITY OF BOULDER DESIGN LAkGECOTTONWOOD AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS - CHAPTER 3 -TREE IN THESE AREAS SHALL PROTECTION. J[Y~0 TREES I:...TRftMAN EES PATHHSHAM AND BE PROTECIEO U W 7. TSH AND HRUBS AL SBE EPR PRUNED BACK THE TO ROVID PROVIDEWAKMINI ANM OF UMRA OF TEDB' 08' D0. COTTONWOOD TREE PER CHAPTER 3 OF D.C.S. ~ PAJ I T _ - - - I CLEARANCE, BY THE CITY OF BOULDER 10 REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED PER CHAPTER 3 Of D.C.S. NATURAL AREAS: 1. HABITAT IMPROVEMENT ZONES WILL BE PLANTED VAMA NATURALIZED PUNTING GEOMETRY WITH NATIVE PUNT 31' DIA. COTTONWOOD TREE I / , X / 0 Ln SELECTION 50 AS TO PROMOTE HABITAT ESTABLISHMENT TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED CL 0 PER CHAPTER 3 OF D.CS U l J 1 W (II 14' DIA COTTONWOOD TREE J (II YC DA COTTONWOOD TREE 0 O (1( IB' DA- COTTONWOOD TREE - LARGE COTTONWOOD TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED LARGE COTTONWOOD 0 131 PER CHAPTER 3 OF OC.S. ~~---9DGHE,ASEMEM-- TREES IN THIS AREA SHALL cc UL. REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED L E O PER CHAPTER 3 OF D.C.S. ~l { Q N 0 LARGE COTTONWOOD TREES IN THIS ~I_ 1111111 / p ° © / AREA To REMAIN PER AND BE PROTECTED ' 00 PER 0 I I . Y ° CHAPIE0. 3 OF D.C.S. oQ J I ~ f V ~ -COTTONWOOD TREES ALONG a U \ EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL `THIS AREA SHALL ° / O I~ REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED. ( ( ; REMAIN AND BE I \ _ 1 PER CHAPTER 3 OF D.CS PROTECTED I 1 o ~ 8 f V I{ op o TREES IN THIS AREA ARE PREDOMINANTLY NON NATIVE SPECIES. \ a r \ /~y/~ © 1 THIS STAND DOES PROVIDE HABITAT AND AESTHETIC VALUE. HEALTHY coo TREES OF 6' CALIPER AND GREATER WILL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED - - I I O O DUPNGCONSTRUCTION AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY FORESTRY DEPARTMENT. A LONG TERM REPLACEMENT PAN WILL BE SET IN C) O 0 \ I r PUCE WITH COORDINATION BETWEEN THE PARKS MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY FORESTRY DEPARTMENT. O I6%OF EXISTING SIBERIAN / a'6\V J O ELMS IN THIS AREA SHALL BE O ^1 F p Y;"VB j` TREES AND SHRUBS MAY BE PRUNED AND OR P.EPUCED ON AN A$ REMOVED AND REPUCEO,8 C) NEEDED BASIS TO PROMOTE PUBLIC SAFETY. Q RE: LANDSCAPE PAN O I f 1 _ ~II r. o fJ 1 L } 7 ~ Lao ~ ~ ~ ~ F T R J f' co WAGE COTTONWOOD STUMPS j - p -,.lei ~ ~ - _ ' , F AND SHOOTS SHALL BE REMOVED - \ - - 60'DM. WILLOW TREE TO r - _ - ` EAST.TREE TO REMAIN BUT REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED SHALL BE PRUNED TO v - PER CHAPTER 3 OF D.C.S. PROVIDE CLEARANCE - VALMONT ROAD VALMONT ROAD ALONG MULTI-USE PATH 16' DW ASH TREE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTIED I' PER CHAPTER ER 3 OF OF D.C.S. I i \ 77 DIAL WILLOW TREE TO THIS ARE IS PREDOMINANTLY MADE UP OF A PLUM AND THIS ARE 6 PREDOMINANTLY MADE UP OF A RUM THICKET WITH REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED CHOKECHERRY THICKET WITH THE INCLUSION OF NON NATIVE TREE THE INCLUSION OF NATTVE AND NON NATIVE TREE SPECIES PER CHAPTER 3 OF D.C.S. N~ SPECIES. THE PLUM THICKET PROVIDES HABITAT AND AESTHETIC VALUE AND THE PLUM THICKET PROVIDES HABITATAND AESTHETIC VALUE AND MAY SEINE AS A WILDLIFE CORRIDOR THOUGH THE PARK 0 SO' I06 SERVES AS A BUFFER BETWEEN THE PARK AND VALMONT ROAD. SCALE 1`-IIXY THE MAJORITY OF THE PLUM THICKET IS 70 REMAIN AND BE THE MAJORITY OF THE PLUM THICKET IS TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED, PRUNING AND THINNING MAY BE REQUIRED TO Designed by' BETA PROTECTED. PRUNING AND THINNING MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROMOTE PUBLIC SAFETY. Drawn by-. BHA PROMOTE PUBLIC SAFETY. THE CITY FORESTRY DEPARTMENT MAY ELECT TO REMOVE THE NON Checked by-. SIBERIAN ELMS ALONG VALMONT ROAD WTM THE EXCEPTION OF NATIVE TREE SPECIES AS PART OF THEIR TYPICAL TREE MAINTENANCE THOSE ALONG/ WITHIN THE 60 W DITCH EASEMENT SHALL BE PROGRAM. Dnvnng Name REMOVED. ALL EXISTING PLUM AND CHOKECHERRY SHALL BE TREE ANALYSIS RETAINED AND PROTECTED PER THE CITY OF BOULDER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS - CHAPTER 3 - TREE PROTECTION. Project Number. Sheet Date May 11 Sheet Number. T) ANTICIPATED PARKING DEMAND: Typical weekday pea use - no 10k in If ! 3 3 out out blcycleevent: Disc Golf -Auto =10 ' Disc Golf - Auto = VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE Bicycle s BOULDER, COLORADO Typical weekday peak use - -bicy bicycle event: t LEGEND 1603 Disc Golf -Auto =l0 in/3out SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL (`70) ~IF DISC GOLF PLAN HOLE IBASKE ARWAY u(9 Bicycle =10 in 13 out t" Typical weekend peak use - bicycle event: NOTE: The proposed disc golf improvements shall include the addition of eighteen (18) "tee /._Ro Disc Golf -Auto =10 in 113 out boxes" (rectangular shaped, 8' wide by 15' long, surfaced with a 3" depth crusher fines CRUSMEREINESTEE , /aggregate mix) and "holes" ("off the shelf galvanized steel post with a chain link "basket" BOX. HOLE NUMBER Bicycle =10 in 113 out (see image, this sheet) that are set into a concrete footing. No grading, landscaping or THE DISC GOLF COURSE IS PROJECTED TO REQUIRE UP TO 20 PARKING SPACES TO MEET THE PEAK irrigation improvements, fencing, concrete pads/walks/trails, benches, etc. are being proposed ' DEMAND. TURNOVER WITHIN THE HOUR IS NOT ASSUMED, SINE MOST DISC GOLF ROUNDS ARE at this time. ANTICIPATED TO TAKE LONGER THAN ONE HOUR. THUS, THIS ASSUMES THAT ALL ARRIVALS AND The course should be considered a "permanent" installation but as future Valmont City Park ^6 t DEPARTURES IN THE PEAK HOUR MUST BE PARKED CONCURRENTLY. THIS PARKING DEMAND CAN Phases are designed and implemented, it is anticipated that portions of the course will need DISC GOLF HOLE, TYP. _ BE MET WITH THE EXISTING LOT SOUTH OF VALMONT ROAD, ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED to be relocated/realigned to accommodate future/other programming needs. FACILITY. J I L7~jii/oow LL' 0 t- VALMONT CITY P (PHASE 1) ~u REUr E A N roF E IL • I a f c,5 t, iEiAiB, t P7% 4 , ^ A JnC. BOARD NG AREA V • l .w ONE I S7NJDARD U 4 WITH R, '5 . 7R'•",~; Sl Q UPED BIKE RACK hNOONE III STANDARD BENCH, RE. CIVIL FOR ~ •r.r.rE ADOma uINFORMATION VALMONT ROAD - r , .air,rR. j A Ay - .7- ~t lU! a I Oooo' AOL I ~ I { \ ~ / ``r~ ~~"~I~~ / Ili P~ I aACK RnnsE5 2 auD3 F \ < . 9 I i 7l f . ' y V. A 11 a +j ! ,a , - - 5TERLI C-4uT -o"F 4- AP~ROKIa TEC OreoucEa ~ I }A` la f I - P,I R R •I SIDa FLOOD CONYEYANC AREA ANI ,Lk M1 RI F F?'I -I A MP y APPROXIMATE CITY OF SOUL".:i J 11. s~ .th - tt wl'UNDS AREA Y q - {1 W 13 11.:- 4L so's ' ell Legend I Existing Metal Barrier Proposed Metal Barrier Lectic)n One ■ *417" De Proposed Metal Barfie.~: Section Two qq~ TREET Dr KARL S Proposed Vinyl Barrier, \ Ch 'I 4V 4- i f L Valmont City Park- Pratr Dog Removal o ob Pro- FF. 0 50100 200 \ I Sh _ r ' ► ~M ti B ►~t updated 0 Feel \ Sh : t► 6, aOfM, F r 109 M ha R 41 ~ 71j - 'a LEGEND KEYMAP 1 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO - TYPE 1FENCE -48-h.,34WL C 1 C 1603( TYPE 2FENCE -48'h, CHANUNK S E J2 FOnC SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL (970); OVERALL SITE PLAN TYPE 3 FENCE - 36'h., 2-RAIL ---------I, c° r Tax (9, TYPE 4 FENCE -36-h., 3-WIRE ' S3 S5 _ TYPE 5 FENCE-36'h. POSTS ONLY GAVEL- SUMMARY ('HART PARKING LOTS, START-FINISH ROAD OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PROVIDED (ASSUMES 20% OF 45 ACRES) (NOT COVERED BY A BUILDING OR PARKING LOT) CRUSHER FINES 392,040 SOFT. (9.0 ACRES) 1,933,100 SQ. FT. 144.83 ACRES) BIKE PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED PROVIDED NATIVE SOIL DOG PARK ONLY TOTAL STALLS 15' -dB"- - SEE PARKING ANALYSIS DATED 03.13.09 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 10% OF OFFSTREET PARKING TOTAL ° PERMANENT INVERTED'U'RACK PER C.O.B. STANDARD BUILDING DATA: HABITABLE UNINHABITABLE FARMHOUSE 1,173 SQA. __-0 SQ.FT. WAREHOUSE/ COVERED RIDING PAVILION 25,574 SQ.FT. 0 SQ.FT. L RESTROOM 554 SQ.FT. 0 SQ.FT. I SPECTATOR - EXISTING PUMP HOUSE 500 SQ.FT. 0 SQ. FT V TOTAL 27,801SQ.FT. 0SQ.FT. I - PARTICIPATN SHADOW ANALYSIS: --.CIRCULATION - - C R IS UNDERSTOOD THAT A SHADOW ANALYSIS DEPICTING SHADOWS ON DECEMBER 2I, AS DESCRIBED IN THE SOUR ANALYSIS INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY I - LJ THE CITY MANAGER, AND DEPICTING SHADOWS CALCULATED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 9.9.17(d),B.R.C. 1981 FOR THOSE BUILDINGS THAT AFFECT _ ADJACENT PROPERDES. THE PROPOSED FARMHOUSE RELOCATION! SUBSEQUENT RENOVATION AND THE PROPOSED RESTROOM BUILDING (AS DESCRIBED ELSEWHERE IN THIS I `i _ ,¢DVANCED SLOPESTYL~ ( K~31CfL-Lg•, 1' PLAIA - r'~ SUBMITTAL, DO NOT AFFECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES, THEREFORE A SHADOW ANALYSIS IS NOT PROVIDED AS A PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL I ' ''r ii 'I •''AT'EIE`''~~ Q BUILDING SETBACK. (ASSUMES FORM MODULE 'CI REQUIRED PROVIDED I/' ~P _-T.,-' 1, 1 DUAL SLALOM 1 FRONT REAR SIDE FRONT REM SIDE FARMHOUSE (PRINCIPAL USE WAREHOUSE ) 25' 25' 12.5 140 6D0' 620' , I - " 11 - , ' /COVERED RIDING PAVILION (PRINCIPAL USE) 25' 25' 125' 145' low 165 93 AESTROOM(ACCESSORY USE) 55' 3' 12.5' 18T 1325' 560' I ) - _ _ J EXISTING PUMP HOUSE )ACCESSORY USED 55' 3 12.5' LOT 1260 294' Q VALMONT PARxNCLOT: BEfINNERIPITERMEDIAT~ - r EMtiKG I °tt ~r-DITCHCROSSING3 ) / r FARMHOUSE--I SLOPE9TYLE " TOTAL PARKING LOT SIZE (INCLUDING DRIVES AND DRIVEWAYS) 61,880 SQ. FT. I _ F I ) ,.EpCATION 1 y~DITCH CROSSING 4 REQUIRED PROVIDED I ' - _ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS( VALMONT PARKING LOT ONLY) SEE PARKING ANALYSIS 105 I I - - ' I~ J FUTURE MULTI-USE AIRPORT ROAD PARKING LOT: TOTAL PARKING LOT SIZE (INCLUDING DRIVES AND DRNEWAYS) 21,612 SQ FT. POCKE I ~LTCN ? PATH DITCH `CRCSING 2 ` CROSSING (BY C REQUIRED PROVIDED I ROW PARK/ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS (AIRPORT RD. PARKING LOT ONLY) SEE PARKING ANALYSIS 44 I EVENTS ~AK~I;,,S;KB,(S OTHERS) AIRPORT ROAD I / D1Rf Ui&1PJPJG~dN , I / = s PARKING LOT I E t'' I r I S' ~ - CROSSING / O RELOCATED / RENOVATED - i i FARMHOUSE Y LILL - -1 ------Z-„=,- ,/EXISTING RAW / WATER ' IRRIGATION POND i I DOG PARK 0 g` DITCH 0 ~ h Q f CROSSING 1 1 f, j 0 0 r I V " EXISTING PUMP A • I COVERED 31 Q HOUSE RIDING WONDERLAND I I I / I AREA f CREEK MULTI-USE PATH CONNECTION , ~ / _ ~ ~ II ( r 1i DITCH I / CROSSING 6 - MULTI-USE PATH _ 2. sCAL VALMONT ROAD-- Desigr DITCH CROSSING 7- i VALMONT ROAD PARKING LOT Check Dnwi I I OVE PLAT Projec Sheer Sheer VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE LEGEND KEYMAP - C TYPE 1 FENCE 3-RRNl J STARTFINISH ISH ROAD BOULDER, COLORADO GRAVEL - PAWING LOTS, ~ ~a TYPE 2FENCF /B'h. C}WNBW, - FIVES ° S2 q Sl SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL CRUSHER - _ F Fax SITE PLAN TYPE 3FENCE -36'h., 2-RAIL 1 NATIVE SOIL -DOG PARK ONLY a SPECTATOR/PARTICIPANT. II,- TYPE dFENCE -36'h, 3-WIRE CIRCULATION PATH S3I.~ _ TYPE5 FENCE-36'h. POSTS ONLY S4 55 BOULDER COUNTY JAIL l .I PUBLIC (PI NTYPE OR 4 FENCE, PERTYELI E TYPE ESTABLISHED _ NORTHERN PROPERLY LINE - I I I DUmNC rwwsFaaMEVS ADVANCED ,rrr•• /-are. r I TAPT1.1 WALK rr- 1 r r r sloPESTnE . - r r / r . / 1 • ♦ / -1 I I MATCH 4w. uK~oRTH l 1 % To REMAIN MORE DIFFIglIT PUA; TR~~ / 00 of PROeFR uNE ♦ / j I _ FI / I 1 EXISTNG 4 SIDE WALK f / / - \ - - / / r 1 / _ ♦ { 40 1, / / TO REMAIN ADDITIONAL 4'TO BE ADDED TO EAST / ' 1I - f I\\..r+r-♦ `\1 y~ { i 41 i '.1-/ \ /r r,rl I 1 I I,~ I ♦ I 1 1 1 1 r• I h / 1 I I 1 SLALOM / -I DUAL SIDE FORAIoul OVERALL / IwIDTHGF I 1 / / 1 1 I I l \ / f I r•.7++'-----• 1+#-^♦•/ PLAZA f I I / l+~ 1~ sEE'BSHEESFORPROPOSED`~\ ♦♦♦r 1 I , I' / ,..--rrrr,•sr~ • I/ IDBmE RE i j/',1{I, /r, `i IMPROVEMENT IN THIS AREA ♦ / FENCE PAP PARAIIEUNG \I / CIRCULlTIONPA1tFICIPAM It// Tea AIRPORT TO BOEH 1 I I, ~~'1 Rb PPERRTYF EE M NRT c,. / 1 l 1 i\„rI rr, f 1, / l PROPOSEID caoss - - - r 1{ WALK 11 r/ - I /'♦`7~ ' /r-\ i / 1 1 1 / 1 11 / /-.r/ % % ! 1 1 Arr... _ ..-..I I \•'v% ♦\v\ IL\\v - CYCLOCROSS STAIRCASE ~i EMERGENC^/MUNTENANkEA E PA $ECONDAC - , • - • r BEGINNER AND LOCATED AI~ EXISTING CU . fNTRANGE / / INTERMEDIATE N 1 L 12' WIDE GAZE LOCATED EASE 0 8W. y~ rv SIGNAGE - / / 1 A Y r - v v l/I SLOPESIYLE SIDEWAixJ / -,'r/ I /--r ♦ _ F- / I I r - Lu a 'r/ -r /~•-vim-.- rr/ v♦♦♦ W DEDICATED~1°fpJ - ♦ ~i' / ♦ L!3 . AROUND SNCE f F I / ,I `-BIKE TRAIL. TYP W 16' ` ~i• \~s• - ` /r I r--1;-rrrr / rrr++ _rr•--` I W EMERGE ACCESS - _ _ I 1 I I - +I I VI B GATE, 24DE IW~ 24 I'PA - 1 ♦ / - I p % CENTERLINE f I I ♦ I r' ".--~r -..r •rr _ I Lu - EKISTING iE I \~.rr+/ ~r.-~._~+ . J IRRIGATION . ' BERMING \ - _ y • EXISTING BARN TO BE REMOVED DITCH L, i I . - r • - - BERMING U I I S n/ - tI I) I ~J o . BERMING 4 PUBLIC AR DONOR - a Q I ~q) 1 SEAT wAUSEESHEET S J I I (9- PURUC ART PODIUM AREA ~I SEE SHEET 57 DUSTING FARMHOUSE EXISTING 6-H. W GRAVEL BIKE STARTFiNISH LANE TO BE RELOCATED WOOD FENCY C PA WOOD I of 00 - OPEN GREEN / d 6 ♦ ter. _ T I - I / • --/-1E55 DIFFICULT" r'- Q GPAYEI I HARDSURFACEPUZAW/~- / PUMP TP4GC -1 - _ WHEEL STOP,M : L_" 7KNGL I DECORATIVE SLOPING AND / 1 1, ar r - EX571NG BlOGS. TO BE r! ' /4 3PAC E5_-_. / + - SANDSTONE BOULDER ART 57 / I r ; -r "SEWING -,REMOVED (1NCLUDE52-HC) I FEATURES SEE SHEET _ I I ( / ♦ r 1 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY! _ J I N - { 1 l 1 1 L SPECTATOR ZONE b 0 p I Li I 1 / I SEE IT SHEETS FOR PROPOSED / IQ p1TCM .0 F 1 BIKE AMENITY I r r~ f r I/ 74 _y. CL~ K Q I % O IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS / ♦ / _ r s ~7n YISU YIL GE-..I r♦ I { I I r r, 00 ;Q H tibai O PRIMARY ENTRANCI ricLK rr/' r// r'+ / • { /+•••-L II I CL S DRO'OFP 1♦-,/ lY_------J0 II Q. 141 -TYPE I BIKEµs2/Ir, aenKayL l 0 rr + i.-- -r 7 r -A. j vt J# RI w PA", BUILDIN ~ / ' / / _ / I r r / , • • fBB -11 SnNGREMOVED FENCE ITPoCYCIFL P r'/trrr• ti. ~ iOBE / d'WIDE SURFACE `4O LOWEST 2-HC STAll • • ?l'~ / EXIST. Q1.711 / S, -CIVIL FROM REST Iowa / ANOS2 f0R uMENSIONS e.r ' 24.8' I r 2r r~ 'irr--••-' > r I4~ 5215.18' *0' r TYPE 1 BIKE A~CKS, SEE S-2 T- - ` - FOR 1) MENSIONED PLAN RELOCATED PA % "001 wlrtl FARMHOUSE i' r + 1 a r I J 'ter - / / r • ♦ \ ~ - ..rrr' 1 / Sc /I + ~1 I' r • - \ I SEE TREE INVENTORY I De cn ♦ AND PROTECTION 1 ~ 54.a ~r C,,~°~ ',mQ ~s ~~r _ -r /I PLAN FOR EXSTING % Dr / I ~K' I TAW rousT 97 / L Pw 1` VEGETATION I I I i7Fr r/ ♦--rf % Dr w . i NEWCONC I~F I/ / /r• r ~BIIYf 1TWL, TYP. / DRIVE PAN 1fnll .I SI FLAGSTONE , EXISTING 7 'WIDE SHARED USE / I PROPOSED 5 EETUGHT I ° / - SURFACE PATH TO REMAIN PA_~P0.1H n51/lLa + r ~ z- SOFT ENHANCED HC RAMP PA DITCH CROSSING /5 \ I/ ►--r/' - ~ AND 5IDEWtIKRFiCIVIL LANDMARK BOUNDARY / '7+ A p" { EXISTING WOOD, RAIL FENCE TO REMAIN N"01 / f Shy OWESr DUST. ELEV. 25'FROM / PA RELOCATED FARMHOUSE - / TI ShI -rt- - I~-------r__ MATCH LINE SEE SHEET~4 - -----T---~,~I- VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE KEYMAP BOULDER, COLORADO LEGEND - s SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL TYPE I FENCE .48'h, 3-RAL 'S l - SL SITE PLAN TYPE 2FENCE -48•h,CHANIINK I i TYPE 3FENCE -36'h,2-RAL S3 BOULDERjP) JAIL TYPE NFENCE-36h,3wIRE S S4 S5 COUNTY F- ' - BUCUC III - I INDUSTRIAL (IM) - ESTABLISHED -=TYPEAFENCE, FULL LENGTH MANUFACTURING OF NORTH PROPERTY UNE I F TYPE5 FENCE-36'h. POSTS 044LY GRAVEL - I r r r r r- r- r r_ r- r-- r PARKING LOTS, START-FINISH ROAD r r i , CRUSHER FINES rr % •rr •r~'~-rr// ,,`r'r.rrrr~rrrrr-rrrrr rr r`~♦ I'' ~I NATIVE SOIL DOG PARK ONLY SEE V SHEETS FOR PROPOSED I BIKEAMENITY/ ,rr / WPROVFMENTS IN THIS AREA i ♦r% / / 41 41 TOTLOT 'o 40P I ♦ _ - -BIKE TRAL, TYP. _ I rrr rrr♦ / r ~I ~rrrrr / i m I rrr - rr-rr _ ♦ i _ r ♦ ,`rrr r r rrr rrr / ~i / \ rr rr-rrrr I/ I .r. rrrrrrrrr rrr-rrr ~r Y' a' TRICYCLE LOOP - - _ ,r DITCH CRO~IIPG I~ / NB W ,rrrrr rr rrr ,rr / i 'f I I SANDSTONE BOULDERS W ' -'rrr ryr rr t _ r ` , ' I PUBLIC V) I . PEDESTRIAN `~.rrrrr ,II. / i~ / 41 \ W / OBSERVATION - _ x r 1/ / - / / f \ W ARIA rrr / ,r Tr'1 / / \ r0 rrr rrrr i I. _ ' A GRAVEL W YAWL jF I --r r r r r r r r BIKE TRAIL STARVAN6H LANE PARKING Z (GRAVEL) LOT LANDMARK BOUNDARY _ i i O~~CH. ,r r.r r/ I / ~F~ - 4 INCVLEER~KS SEEC - d ♦-,.r,/ rr rr, L' / _ DETAIL 2.52 AND 2.53,0.8 e ' DRCH--~ FUTURE DITCH CROSSING SHEET S6 SE I J>ffC(1 C0.0551NG - 4 /I 'CROSSING BY OTHERS = _ j " _ - / r vwanorlT INDUSTRIAL ADA PARKING BIKE PARKING @ AIRPORT ROAD PARKING LOT ♦ r SCALE: I" 10'-0. ♦ / , ~ PARK •~~}'~~L,rrrri ' INDUSTRIAL DG) 0 I GENERAL 'Qf . ~ 1 ~rr~ - i~♦ m. GO~V TCH . rrri - i rrrr f a'/r r r r - - ~r l , I r ' , I MCONDARY ENTRMCE SIGNAGE i r ,r ID WIDE MUIn.usE PATH II " _ 12-INVERTED U. K r,J1 r"~' ♦ I CRUSHER FINES b BICYCLE RACKS, SE C.O.B. I ' I rrr ' i''' - r +c' ~ , r r' / ♦ MAINTENANCE ACCESS DETAIL .52 AN0 2. 3, 4- SHEET 5 /,rr ~ I♦, I'♦ SANDSTONE 9A~JG \L. I i r r r r MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE BOULDERS / Y \ 3' PUBLIC ART ♦ ♦I 1 ENHANCED VADUFE \ I _ r,{ Y - ~ij ♦ - \4 - PA CORRIDOR,TYP. \ SCORED, GREY rr / - RE: LANDSCPE RAN O L-- - CONCRETE WALK :D ♦t i'♦ / _ I'. op SEE TREE ANALYSIS ~PROPERTY IINE.IYP. \ m j ♦ / ' / AND PROTEcnON 7D CRUSHER FINES \ \ / _ i' OWsnue PLAN PA. mow TOT LOT 41 FA \ i~♦ / _ SEAT BOULDERS, TYP. 5247 CRUSHER / - DnLH T FASTING RANT MATEPUl RESTROOM FINES PED TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED BUILDING PATH / / i / ,rrr ► PA THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION WITH BACK, I / - ♦ / PA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN / BENCH H WITH BACK, TYP. r r r i r r r r r r r - CRUSHER FINES L MOW STRIP, TYP. n R M. SANDSTONE I BOULDERS / _ BIKE TRAIL, TYP. PUBLIC ART L l / CRUSHER FINES M _ r ENHANCEDWILDUFE / ♦ MAINTENANCE ACCESS, LIP. • / / I CORRIDOR, TYP. 8'WIDE, SOFT SURFACE MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE RE: VNDSCPf RAN P6 / / SHARED USE PATH - TRASH RECEPTACLE, TYP. REMOVABLE GATE: TYP, q / CRUSHER PINES MOW STRIP -i-- T/~ - - 50 K 200' BALL TOSS AREA, TYP. - - SEAT BOULDERS: TYP. a Ra Ra Ra Ra ~ RRa Ra _ ~`IRa Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra ~ R~ Ra R~ FBI RRa Ra Ra Ra RaCPRa RRRa Ra RRR~ Ra R~ Ram Ra PRR~ "'i7 / / I -Fr WInF SFIFTSHRFArF / R MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S5 BIKE PARKING @ RESTROOM BUILDING SCALE: 1 ' = 10' V VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE LEGEND KEYMAP TYPE 1 FENCE 48-h., 34tAE u,. - BOULDER, COLORADO S1 1 6030aludgeDFWe -y Ea. (92 3 SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL TYPE "E S2 Fort Collins. CO 03J571 SITE PLAN V r I fu(970)223•IB21 TYPE 3 FENCE .36'h., 2JUJl /y LAndLOpe Architecture TYPE A FENCE .36'h.. 3.YARE Urban Design Graphic Design TYPE S FENCE .36'h. POSTS ONLY S4 S3 S5 GRAVEL - - - PAA13NG LOTS, START-FINISH ROAD CRUSHER FINES NATNE SOIL DOG PARK ONLY F. Z W d Q W a W Z o 0 z 0 LLJ V) I Q 1-- M W (EXISTING 3-VA 0 (L UJ ffNCE TO N s' R Tn FE INTERS < Q IN'ORTNTO i z W PARKING LOT " I aaL s Y U2 1 Q Z 10 WIDE ! d J MULTI-USE r a U I /AM I I` U$ J N F~ I RQ.N L J S ffZ ° 0 Y a 0 moo E QOw -j I TI ER N TREES TO J of ~ D, UNABLE TI Q ro7 n P PROPOSED MULTIUSE PATH CONNECTION, RE~. CIVIL FOR RE DGNEN EXTE H m WIDTH, LAYOUT AND GRADING IS UTILMES i 0 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED t S u PER CITY STAFF. RE: TAI FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. U EXISTINGCQNCRETE p - DRIVE PAN ~ iD AfAVJEI - - - EXISTING TREE TO BE RETAINED BUT SHALL EXISTING TREE TO BE RETAINED - BE PRUNED TO PROVIDE CLEARA14CE BUT SHALL BE PRUNED TO ADA)CENT NEW MULTI-USE PATH _ PROVIDE CLEARANCE ADAICENT NEW MULTI-USE PATH j PARKSIDE VILLAGE - - - RESIDENTIAL RM 1 I o EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED. UNABLE TO BE REPLACED GIVEN EXTENSIVE EXISTING UTILITIES 40 NORTH 0 20 10 80 SCALE I' = A0 Designed by Drawn by Checked by Dn-InR Name SITE PLAN Project Number. Sheet Dam May 11, 2003 Sheat Number. S3 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE LEGEND KEYMAP - TYPE - 4w- BOULDER COLORADO'F-48h,3RAR " S2 1603 odini. 805 SITE REVIEW SUBMITTALE2ffN~-ABh,OWNBNK Fort Coln", CO &126 (970) 223-7577 SITE PLAN TYPE 3 FENCE. 36'h., 24tAR - - - , fAx (970) 223-1827 TYPE 4 FENCE. 36-h., 3-WIRE LAnEwpe ArtMtecture Design S 3 S4 S5 GUrbanraphic Desip TYPE S FENCE - 36'h, POSTS ONLY C._! GRAVEL- PARKBJG LOTS, AARTiH6N ROAD - - omma FINES MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S1 NATIVE SOIL-DOG PARK ONLY LLIMSI LA11I. tLtV. lY'KUM Is~ / RELOCATED FARMHOUSE LsR~ R~ R~ ± R~ R~ H~ R~ ~ 0 ~ Lem t• ~ snows ~ ~ R~ Ham L~ JJ` J# i 1 I E t C* DITCH fi- L I DRCH CROSSMG I I I w~ _ I ~ I W VISTAVIlLAGE h i \ / I O Z MOBILE MHI I ♦ % / p HO 1 .'...I I 1 ,..,~/..N. I WIDE SHARE. USE SOFT SURFACE PATH W DUSTING Iw. IDE I 1 I SECONDARY LU F WALK 10 RfAlJN. ( .I I I ENTRANCE TO REMAIN. ADD T I $IGNAGE Ly] / 0 / I I BE ADDONAI ~rO I I ~ 1 f 1 I ew SOFT SURFACE SHARED USE PATH EAST SIDE "A TOTAL 400~00VVVVVVFFEF~~jjjjAAAAAALL 1 f I 1 1 1 - / ` SEE IKE ANALYSIS I CL WID E r r 9U ` X11 1 I / _ PLAN PROTECTION L o I I BIKETRILFIY I Y Z r 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 - rY f 1 / Q 40P J* CL 0 J,~_ 3& r 1 1 SEE a SHEETS FOR PROPOSED Al % Eyc I BIKE AMENITY'/ r f I r I a I I 1 IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS AREAS 1 DUSiR1G RAWWATER 11 / /,1 `$0 OI 1 - I ~l 1 \ WMCATION POND r '1 , I PRIM' ° W E ! Il 1 ( 7 1 - / 1 11 VE HP U n c ? Ya WKETRAU,m.= ♦ l 11 i i7 I 1/~ ♦ ! 1 I am 1) 1 ET STING 3. 21 ' 1 1 .r~' ► (2) Z a OQm 1) Is TO N Y ' I / 11 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I RE: 0 m 3 0 FROM INTf Q r L 1 1 DUr CC G LL O U Z INORTN 10 SED i / - - L E 0o W CU m PARKING LOT J NI I B / I I1 L Q` N T m O w I f / / I I 1 Ln / UM 5 I , / I ♦ H u V) J* / I I W aWIDE - w I MDLTI.usE u PATH 11: ` SEETREE ANALYSIS /(`EasnNCrwroE j 11 / 1 • 1 W ZI R. . AND PROIECDON SHARED USE SOFT SURFACE / , _ 1 1 I W U I ; , ♦ I 1 FLAN PATH TO REMAIN / , / I I 1 I TA / f 1 EASTINGWOOD, PAL FENCE TO REMAIN / 1 1 1 I I W % 1,1 i PRIMARY ENTRANCE IDOSR Z ViESTO / - - I LOWEST EXIST. ELM. 26 RE 0. UNABLE BE I I I / FROM DUST. PUMMOUSE 1 10 WARY ENTRANCE FATS U RE 0 GNEN NSPrti SEE T SHEETS FOR PROPOSED It PRIMARY ENTRANCE KIOSK ~ 1 Si UIRfTES ;o cA BIKE AMEFmr - 1 1 / _'X 21.a Dtl6TRIG IRRIGATION ,;i IMPROVEMENTS N71HHSAIFA I~, \ PUMP HOUSE TO / .4%0' 44 ~I J* >4 1 s s ~~r~y~~ PA m DIIST1NG Cp~+cAETE DITCH / - - DRIVEPusTbw.wN CROMI, I / - ti`* J L E7uSTINC RAR GATE 70 BE , ^ + y y y y yr,{~ ♦d ♦LL~SECONDARY ENTRANCE SGNAGE L a IEMCEO WITH FULL WIDTH ~ r' r r - - LOCKABLE GATE FOR MAIM./ f\~/y~[/\,O r r r - y i / BIKE TRAIL M. GRAVEL PAIR - FNERGEE2CCACCLSSCNLY /V'~, 1D WIDE MULTI-USE PATH 4 A• r r ► SEE TREE INVENTOR/ AND PROTECTION 4 ILIAGE PLANTING AREA (PA) PLAN IAL DTICH oir IP I'IIIIIII EASEMENT CROSSING I PA . - - • - NoaTrl EXISTING TIEE TO M REMOVED. - PROPOSED ATTACHED' - I - - UNABLE TO BE REPLACED GIVEN S WIDE SIDEWALK Ez15FING CURB B I NEW CURB B I I PM 0 20' b' BV 'AMER D(IENSNE EXISTING MLFfhS - E6'N A I B - BL PROTECTED SCALE: I LO' FASTI NG PARK IDENTIFIGDON ROCTE iO RFAWNAND I 1 ~gH RE IVID BE PROTECTED (GYP.) RELOCATED Des*nedbr - - - - - I Drawn by: - - - V 1 ed y! Oma PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS Drawing None VALMONT CITY PARK Paoxc I SITE PLAN PHASE 2 8 3 MOUNTAIN SUN VALMONT CITY PARK - DISC GOLF COURSE - PHASE I BUSINESS/ OMMERCIAL PHASE 2 I PUBLIC I I PUBUC I Protect Number. Sheet Dote: May 14,20M Sheet Number. S4 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE LEGEND KEYMAP BOULDER, COLORADO TYPEIFENCE - -RA 48'h,3 B - 1603O~;*Dri~ TYPE 2 FENCE .48-h., CHAINLINK lo Fort Collins, CO 80525 SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL II S1 S 2 (970)223-7527 SITE PLAN = TYPE 3 FENCE. 36'h., 2APd ~'I F~(970,223.1827 . ~9 I I Land ape Acthkemre TYPE t FENCE 36'h., 3-WIRE - Y Urban Design S4 r Gr phk Div TYPE 5 FENCE - 36'h. POSTS ONLY S4 '',S-5- GRAVEL PARKING LOTS, START-FINISH ROAD 1:77... CRUSHER FINES NATIVE SOIL - DOG PARK ONLY MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S2 m %200 BALL TOSS AREA, TYP. 1- 4 - Sur BOULDERS, TYP. `I•r. •r. a~•.~ ::X `-tea. .ln. nr• aPr•Ra~ eeeel 010011 aeele•. e~~ Z I YI all BWDE, SOFT SURFACE 40P SHAPED USE PATH i 10, PA I i1 \ ♦ SOIL, ttP.-... -BENCH WITH BOCK, TYP. BENCH WITH BACK TR..1 , yI CRUSHER FNES MOW STRIP Q _ _ _ PA II _ y W SHELTER ON CONCRETE PAD WITH TRASH RECEPTACLE, L y g 1 z T BOULDERS, AND TABLES (NOT SHOWN) O Z I BENCH WITH BACK M. W 0 F ♦ IOWIDEMULTI-USE TRAIL / ♦ 50 X 200 HALL TOSS (n SEAT BOULDERS, TYP. AREA, TYP. CRUSHER FINES MOW STRIP Cf) ` NM SEAT BOULDERS, TYP. T u lml~ • / .L a CENTRAL w.AwLn-usEPAm .11 _ CRUSHER FINES - 1 PLANTING AREA la ~ JI a NTENANCEACCESS, IYP jC nwNtfwuEACCESSCAn I DOGAREA 3'bt. F. I TRASH RECEPACLE,TYP. PA -ENHANCED WILDLIFE - / r a Q CORRIDOR, TYP. VIP - - PEDESTRIAN GATES RE: LMIDSCPE PLAN / \ , 1 I Q 0 Y BIKE PACKON CONCRETE DRINKING FOUNTAIN U PAD, 1! USES K+ • - - ON CONCRETE PAD Q - 7 INVERTED U -PACK - c d I BICYCLE RACKS, SEE CAPA - v Inc p PRIMARY ENTRY KIOSK , 1 - • • SHELTER ON CONCRETE PAD :..SCORED, GREY DETAIL 2.52 AND 2.53, ~O T 1 0 Ly Y~ PUNTING AREA CONCRETE WALK SHEET 56 V to Q N VEHICULAR ACCES_S_ ♦ o, PA LSOIL TYP~, WITH TRASH RECEPTACLE, SEAT J BOLLARD 10 _ r J I. BOULDERS, AND TABLES (NOT DOG PARK KIOSK z D}o t IDDG PARK SIGNAGE KIOSK C PA SHOWN) Z a OQm (2) HC SPACES PA SMALL DOG O _ O ca 3 0 I I PE: CIVIL AND55 R - PA c LL CI u DIMENSIONS OD0 SS.FF. l~0.a4AC 1. E o ~ w CURB STOP. TYPI tn~ I M- ~ PA VALMONT INDUSTRIAL PIANDNOARFA J ~ mo 1 ~ PARK - - Q PA T Lu I PA 1 I~ ,1 30 INOUESTRL&L0G) Y 1 m ~U n m 7 (n PLANDNGARU(PA) - \ 2 W I ~'V % ~;r~ I~ coNCRETE PLAZA d u Lu FEDESTRAN GATE, nP. , EXISTING PLANT MATERAIL V I PA TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED _ SHELTER ON CONCRETE PAD 11 I. r I THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION - - / • \I, PA WITH SEAT BOULDERS, AND I SEE LANDSCAPE PUN - W N "4 ~•PAA ,AA~~A, PAS TABLES (NOT SHOWN) -CRUSHER FINES MOW STRIP GRAVEL PARKING LOT Z \ ®`y/ BIKE RACKS ON DRINKING FOUNTAIN _ CONCRETE PAD, ON CONCRETE PAD V PRA: ' ~u ..,L 8 BIKES BENCH WTH BACK, TYP.-SEAT BOULDERS, TYP. %'..G` EXISTING BUILDING TO PA - CRUSHER FINES MOW STRIP :ji BE DEMOLISHED (SEE ARCH.) - v° PA _ 6, i 14 1 EXISTING BUILDING • _ I CONVERTED TO - ` II Q 1 COVERED RIDING PAVILION - '•y 7 )SEE ARCH) -SOIL, TYP.-" Lc{`LL~1 -V13iICUU0.. 1 - `I ENHANCEDWLDLIFE ACCESS - L CORRIDOR TYP. 11u (WATER QUALITY RE: LANDSCPE PLAN BOLW ` FEATURE FF=sn4.a 1 t 2 RE: CIVIL l 1 • 11 PA EXISTING WATER METER 1 c \ MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE - PA /,1 I II PA m -r h YEHICUUR ACCESS LOWEST EXIST EIEY 25 3a l PA I N I_' PA 1 1.. \ RAVEL PARgrNG lOT pA) c BOLLAPD 1 PA FROM EXIST. POULTRY BARN '1:~ 1055PACES J, y t. (INCLUDES4 HC) A 521825 _ PROPERTY uNE, TYP. \N T D j27 HC SPACES r ~ _ ~ ~ Lam/ , PARKING LOT ~Kif~ - ~ ~ ~ I. PA ~ - ~ \/P GRAVEL MAINTENANCE ENTRANCE TAPER FROM STING 6'CONCRETE f N rC SIDEWALK I III' ~ W y T $I _ _ - I - TYPE 3 FENCE, TYP. ENE PROPOSED 8' / i 'WATER WATER QL1AlllY CW~CSiING6G& SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK ' PA PA - GRAVEL MOW STWf~ FEATURE ( I~ m A TYPE 3 FENCE, TYP. RE: CIVIL \ _ U RE: CM L L - - I - m / w. - - - PA < -~--------+-2a"~ - _ 4 ----PA - - ~ _ ~ NORTH ; a - - 0~ .-SCORED, GREY PLOWLI 7 &KE PACKS SEE 56 OPOSED SIREf:T _ CONCRETE PAD 0 20 4a w FIOWIINE OF GRA`hL -'tOF FOR DIMENSIONED PUN NEw CURD 6 rrrFR[ BV.O O fePfF BOARDING - - - SCALE I40 AREA, INCWDES CDY STANDARD - N UiIUIY POLE TO REMAIN AND AE PROTECTED 9w.) Designed by. _ "°"'^'•'N.",'D.BIKF -CK_SE, VALMONT ROAD ~-xi m..cn WATE31dEfER. Dawn Uy - - SHEFTS6FORENLARGEMENT _ \ ,1 Checked by: ASPEN INDUSTRIAL - \ \ 3'-6- Davin Nano VALMONT CITY PARK - PARK SITE PLAN PHASE 2 INDUSTRIAL(IG) GENERAL ?Y~ 4-INVERTED U-RACK PUBLIC BICYCLE RACKS, SEE C.O.B. _ \ /I DETAIL 2.52 AND 2.53, Project Number. I I SHEET S6 Sheet Due: My 14,2W9 BIKE PARKING NEAR VALMONT ROAD PARKING LOT Sheet Number. SCALE: I' =10'-0" S5 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL SITE DETAILS - CROSS SECTIONS ,p 1 -F- f T ~F L.IPE EG 9 rM, EI r_. IEF^ - - _ .+L, 1. Aft . ru TtL' m1,1 to n,cN hr:L -ME RUC IL h MB Nr MEN! R OIFED TP FAD n 1~U T w G CEnA L BUT 111;17 -33" FROM THE CPU +C 1 - ' . I;iFLLT 1 0 ML' f HE PAID P -E , Al „ HA BC N L vE II 11E : C-7 jF THE EAU. L'NCPEIE )NTINJC]S BEND INSIDE AIL dCC I L raxr 111 A HALL BE SLOPED AT 5 5P4N M L FLE PACK IISTALLAl10N. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCT,,' ;W* ' 1. MINIMUM OR 11/4" SCHEDuLE 4~i W • - STEEL PIPE (1 5(8" OUTSIDE DIAME =F' difill Eft 2, MAXIMUM 1 112- SCHEDULE 4r, STEEL PIPE c OUTSIDE DIAM TYPE 1 - BIKE RACK Bmm ONE-DiECE ;LESS Iu_ -r:. TYPE 1 FENCE 1 I ^oanNUDL3 BEND; LEC w--1e- AP+.F ~ + 6Aw4 2ED RBTH BLACK PoacEP (48" TALL, 3-RAIL W/WELDED WIRE MESH) DI Ch CROSSING, TYP. COAT FINISH 5. FLUSH M UNTED MTH 'HELDEC - _ - ■ry■■ 1 ♦ P.AT[S L DIAMETER. ,/I Ti 'Y P / BASE PLATEI HIDDEN DP vANG - I I IT F_ 1 - PESTANT14 RdEP> (,AE_N~ SIDE-BY-SIDE TYPE 2 - BIKE RACK [y TYPE 2 FENCE J4- LoaRr'E3t '+N Sid, +^'F..`. V.;,; O (48" TAIL, VINYL COATED CHAIN UNK) " SEAT BOULDERS ♦ ro nx (18"•24" TALI) s END-TO-END c i,dtr~ ^ C . - x a• L . T TRASH RECEPTACLE IN (City of Boulder Standard) f BICYCLE PARKING .11; INVERTED U" PIT, N, 77 BICYCLE RACK = A - 63~ OP ~ TYPE 3 FENCE (36" TALI - 2 RAID BOUARDS \ PARKING LOT PLANTING AREA LIGHT GRAVEL PARKING LOT PARK BENCH I1 13 \ TYP. d - INVERTED U.PACK I ~A 3'-8,12'TYR.. 1 L BICYCLE RACKS, SEEC.OB. \ \ OFAIL 2.52 AND 2.53, TYPE 4FENCE K / SHEET S6 i.- n (36" TALI, 3-WIRE, ROUND WOOD POST) PLANTING AREA PARK BENCH a * R^ r i~~±- MCI '4 IT. 6 f 4T . DOG PARK SHELTER (wind protection) R.O.W. STANDARD BENCH ® I -INVERTEDGAACKBICYCLE TYPE 5FENCE CONCRETE I RACKS, SEE C.O.B. DETAL2.52 (36"TALL - ROUND WOOD POST ONLY) AND 2.53, SHEET 56 BOARDING AREA I / 5 / / 30' / NEW CURB & GUTTER BIKE PARKING AT VALMONT ROAD TRANSIT STOP SCALE: 1"= 101-0" DOG PARK SHELTER (wind protection) VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL PUBLIC ART CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS adrr.eamn Eb,'Y ~ prepn~ _ ~ ~ xinx YreMnN tl rA"9 - ow+on xe. - - env ~p ieovdR. aMnMi . vme. ~wr . ~.;rJ'1 4. Ml1.MNSe I - t 4 m~o<nl NI M.1aFM. pmxeme ✓ - , oePCtiMe4Nme Oxx, a' 4e.m vwa..p avrPe. u..~~rmi .r. w.rw ravw'rr I wP.tii.~ ( NIY r. C''.M/ I 1 t SECTION THROUGH HUB PLAZA ART (LOOKING EAST) 1 T I if'+ rwwnxm.,ww ada. arw.m ewe J 4ww ~.T.: -3 .xae . ids w.ma a , ~ a 8 c a r m r > F- //J.. I sheele x ' XN 20 SECTION THROUGH HUB PLAZA ART (LOOKING NORTH) wwxaea dnrw wrt oolmn akualion of pmppsen dcnpi wal Donor stone blocks pmpasen 31TeIeCep6Y • " - ~,,~,.„d,,,pY,,„, along 'spoke' lines I ~ =awwm.~W ey norc ter m with bicycle history details ,~•a winw vaecrvze oue incept drawing not to Scale fee 2009 - vend Ino - pwrwadapwad areas. - pier of p-opo5etl tlon 81 PwaibnM.kn.bbd, _ t - - dmsa um. or„xao. nme lne of bicyde h slwy rmtmted chiond ieally on seres.f."e benches. VALMONT B I N E r A R I' Simi h' Kcal kon a d res on each suoot swe block • • • ~JJJ~------ f nemW Um'eo rn o,W I-detdlsln be Elfh pdg tally GN melalIX Sand blaeRN ~'r _ _ _ _ `0 rM1ttd.Ylr.w mwree wY t..tt ne adhl.ted ~I f L 'r t i y oe t d r,d dabseg j • Donned bnks to Dee engraved a m lumnum sae ffi - donorwall - I` wopoxd podium aeaeen L 1) pmpi'nks1 _ _ ~ [ _ r yew l c«e kery~ ew. ner. ~ ` _ `^~1^ devaaa+m prawa<d poaom srm-~: ..aY Mi ax..twn e..di. n. m. ruo eo„.nonr ~ I _ O:ich ]a7yt, ! i © Inr;l hmn it canpnrhtlmi beaW mefiA nnu hru, I uu.saywe .•'~~1, I~in N.'eke ,w3 manlxlii mote tka eeag Mey.... ` °itli ^edpv°I'"' Podium Structure Donor "bike chain links" ` eoncaot tlrawug not to -!!Feb k 2009 Valmont Bike Park ~ * ee o~pnry riq ,no-,^. omptdrarwg rdroscak Febmerv 2009 • s,a rs~~d one le spies nr,m, Yerx ,s ver -v=! a p new arp mm :veoer. Christian Muller Christian Muller Bruno Gilmour Christian Muller Bruno Gilmour Bruno Gilmour VALMONT CITY PARK-PHASE ONE LEGEND KEYMAP EXISTING TREE CANOPY BOULDER, COLORADO O DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE =wm SITE REVIEW 4) EVERGREEN TREE TREE L1 L2 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN o ORNAMENTAL TYPE 1 FENCE 48 h 8- SUMMARY CHART 3 W1 M . - TYPE 2 RNCE-ARIA., QLAIWFNK OPEN SPACE REQUIRED PROVIDED - TYPE 3 FENCE "36'h, 2-RAIL (ASSUMES 20% OF 45 ACRES) (NOT COVERED BY A BUILDING OR PARKING LOT( - TYPE4 FENCE-36'h., 3-WIRE I. 392,040 SQ.FT. (9.0 ACRES) 1,933,100 SQ. FT. (44.83 ACRES) TYPE 5 FENCE - 36'h. POSTS ONLY TOTAL DECIDUOUS SHADE )MEDIUM) (LARGE) 316 -~j l3 1 l4 TOTAL ORNAMENTALS l5 164 TOTAL EVERGREEN TREES 81 _ TOTAL SHRUBS 1247 VALMONT PARKING LOT: TOTAL PARKING LOT SIZE (INCLUDING DRIVES AND DRIVEWAYS) 64,880 SQ. FT. REQUIRED PROVIDED TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS (VALMONT PARKING LOT ONLY) SEE PARKING ANALYSIS 105 TOTAL INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPED AREA 3,244 SQ. FT. 10,073 SQ. FT. TOTAL INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPED AREA of total parking lot area) 5% 15.5% TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES IN INTERIOR LOT LANDSCAPED AREA 17 20(100%Dacial-5hade(lorge) TOTAL PERIMETER PARKING LOT LANDSCAPED AREA 400 L.F. '400 L.F. TOTAL NUMBER OF STREET TREES )VALMONT ROAD) 1,570 LF.140 =39 " 39 existing as shown) AIRPORT ROAD PARING LOT: TOTAL PARKING LOT SIZE (INCLUDING DRIVES AND DRIVEWAYS) 21,612 SQ. FT. REQUIRED PROVIDED TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS (AIRPORT RD. PARKING LOT ONLY) SEE PARKING ANALYSIS U TOTAL INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPED AREA 1,080 SQ. FT. 2,069 SQ. FT. TOTAL INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPED AREA OF TOTAL PARKING LOT AREA) 5% 9.5% TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES IN INTERIOR LOT LANDSCAPED AREA 6 11 (100% Deciduous Shad. (large) - - TOTAL PERIMETER PARKING LOT LANDSCAPED AREA 300 LF. '300 L.F. TOTAL NUMBER OF STREET TREES (AIRPORT ROAD) 1,293 LF.l10' =32 **32 esdstiag as shown) I _ - _ _ - - _ . - - - _ _ - 0 PERIMETER PARING LOT LANDSCAPE AREA WILL UTILIZE MEDIUM AND LARGE SHRUBS /2' TALL (MIN.), ORNAMENTAL TREES, EVERGREEN TREES, SHADE TREES, OPEN SPACE -1. FENCE, AND EARTH BERMING TO SCREEN THE PARKING LOT FROM THE ADJACENT STREET. VALMONT ROAD FRONTAGE REQUIRES 39 TREES AT MY SPACING PER THE C.O.B. STREETSCAPING STANDARD. THERE IS ASTRONG DESIRE BY FORESTRY TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING VEGETATION. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE STANDARD AND GWEN THE NATIVE/ OPEN SPACE NATURE OF THE PROPOSED PARK FACILITY, THE PLAN PROMOTES PRESERVING AND PROTECTING THROUGH CONSTRUCTION, THE EXISTING PUNT MATERIAL PARALLELING THE FRONTAGE FROM THE CORNER OF VALMONT ROAD AND , AIRPORT ROAD EASTWARD TO THE PROPOSED (FUTURE) PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS. THE STREETSCAPE STANDARD WOULD THEN START AT THIS PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS AND - - - EXTEND 780TO THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. 39 TREES ARE INDICATED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALTHOUGH THE SPACING / GEOMETRY OF THE KANi ll - - - - _ - MATERIAL REFLECT THENATIVE / OPEN SPACE RANTING CONCEPT AND NOT A'iYRCAU 400.C. LAYOUT. r AIRPORT ROAD FRONTAGE REQUIRES 32 TREES AT 40'$PACING PER THE C.O.B. STREETSCAPING STANDARD. THERE IS A STRONG DESIRE BY FORESTRY TO MAINTAIN THE . AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE STANDARD, AND GIVEN THE NATIVE / OPEN SPACE NATURE OF THE PROPOSED PARK FACILITY, THE PAN PROMOTES EXISTING PRESERVING AND VEGETATIONPROTECTING, THROUGH CONSTRUCTION, THE EXISTING RANT MATERIAL PARALLELING THE FRONTAGE. THE 32 TREES PROVIDED ARE INDICATED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PUN, ALTHOUGH THE SPACING / GEOMETRY OF THE PLANT MATERIAL REFLECT THE NATIVE / OPEN SPACE PLANTING CONCEPT AND NOT A'TYPICPI' L.i _ 40.O.C. LAYOUT. ( I "__"r - III - 0 / / KI STING I EXISTING TREES AIRPORT ROAD PARKING AREA f. y , f - „f I ~4' L 0 ~xj 0,% I AIRPORT ROAD SiREtTSCAPE 32 TOTAL TREES 22 CANOPY NTALAI 10 ORNAMENTAL TREES 1 +:.0 i : I t ',I - 1 I* Or, EXISTING STAND OF DENSE TREES r,/ ~ O. VALMONT ROAD ~ f 1 'Q / C,%' I•') i ~P.NG AREA AA~~JJII II v mar/ - 0 V 61~ I1> J 11111111 ~ T ~ - - 72 k - - _ _ - ALMONT ROAD OVERHEAD EIECTRKAI UTILITY EXISTING DENSE TREES STFEETSGPE: FASTING PLUM THICKET FUTURE UNDERPASS LOCATION - 39 TOTAL TREES 39 TOTAL 19EE5 9 CANOPY TREES 30 ORNAMENTAL TREES VALMONT CITY PARK-PHASE ONE KEYMAP BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN I L5 L3 3CAa - - I PI ED ----2CEOC 3MP0 - - ^1 PLNI - - 3PI ED - ( 3PLED - I LEGEND 6 6' I' _ + B q O I DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE -"~•'•~-+6~'^'rw-`4r s.+ wr! - I,-- q1.' B Rrr+ w- r ICFOC 2 UL AM CE OC L EVERGREEN TREE i J ♦r r♦ r - SEED TYPED. I ICEOC r---ir rr/rte y2y / ~i 1 t \ L// rf"'7I • rrr '1 I \ saucn,. EXISTING UTILITY BOX TO REMAIN GRAVTTYTRABS,TYP. 3 AC GR I CEOC ` ^ / / wj t UFPEI BkIALI PUNTED Vp I / ` - I O ORNAMENTAITREE / ! Y DUSTING UNDERGROUND _ I/ ! -i ~ - / I 4 t i MLM'M DECIDUWS.SHIIUBSANaRV 0ANM1NTAlI f ! i / t I / i♦' t I ♦r r/ ' T T GRASS TOfNLCUD~COMMON SFI~EBE.I U f 7 K0 PA 1 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS r. J# / i i r~/~ I ! ! ! i 1 + I r 1 , ! I \ (CUPP.,~FIGRASS,H i, uNbcNgRRY,IH.QQ PLAPf[vUiRPM6FST!! f l \EAw MEFALSWTTCH(iiRA.S! q~ 1 r/ rr - r , RED 3 CE a TYPE I - _ / I r - r - r i * ! ♦ i 1 I r t . ' ~MEDG BASS. AN¢ U(plg}1 AkL FORI65TEt iINEY / _ I TYPE I SEED 1 . s I ♦ t I% ED GRASS. PERIMETERENCE UNE PUNT 130L iR/ I - ti-/ .iii i~i ! . - •T w ! .I ✓ MATERIAL KEENING TO INCLUDE Ai 't ! rrr / ► - i i r / / / I . TYPE 2 SEED 1 r / ♦ . / t - MIX OF DEC UOUS SHRUB / S ♦ ♦ \JI / UNDERSTO TO INCLUDE: BLUE uAw I 1 r 1 I r r ♦ ♦ - i r / - / - . V ♦;r I IRRIGATED FESCUE TURF AND GREENP.4BBITBRUSH, so SEED TYP cU RRENr, SUMAC, COMMON / I i t , t ♦ i - i r! I E 1 SNOWBER AND IERVICEBFRRY.. ~ \ t , ♦ i 'r i r - / t~. ~ ` . - / - ♦ - . r r-' r TYPE I PENCE -4B'•h, 34RAFL 40 }CE a i 2QI7 GA - ♦ TYPE2 FENCE-4R"h„CHAINUNK -VI- \ 1 ) - _ rrr (ryy~((~e'' , \ TREE PR0IECTK3NZONE / r i, t - ` r r - - - - - - TYPE 3 PENCE - 36"h., 2-0JJL I 1~ , ♦ - COMPLYWIIH D.C.S.. - / i ! rSR~r~r// - 6ACGR I - I QU SH b I GL T0. ' .I +r•i - _ ~+-+i iA~r ME 4 PENCE 1 ~ t I ~ -36h , 3-WIRE 'STING TO R6MUN ANDBEPRO D, PER / r+ I TYPE5 PENCE -36h. POSTS ONLY D.CS. -GRAPIER 3 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL RE SPARSLEY PUNTED O ou N THr$OU7N / -o ` SH .0 FACING SLOPES TO BETTER DEFINE CYCLO-CROSS TRAIL NETWORK > N r / r +r+rrr - - rr SPECTATOR / PARTICIPANT CIRCULATION PA rr„ - r/ - /r- PLANT MATERNLTO INCLUDE AMIX OF URGE DECIDUOUS SHRUR i J TKO PA - _ rr it TREE PROTECTION ZONE - _ / UNDERSTORY TO INCLUDE: BLUE AND GREEN RABBIIBRUSH,NEW • H - U ' E ♦ - r COMPLYWIIH D,C.S- r I / - MEXICO PRNET, PURPLE LEAF NINEBAFY„ COMMON SNOWBERRY I W NOTE: SEE SHEET L5 FOR SEED MIX TYPES. r 1 OU SH CHAP IER i - - r r r r I / AND ROCKY MOUNTAIN SERVIICEBERRY w r I I IcLSK~ ~ ' , i♦♦ ' !Ir ii.-rr / rrr/ r sAeco W v./ 3 GY DI anr+c To ii ♦ / _ r - r r.. . + , --i / - r-~'_~i"'+.- - "+r- rr - DttPET -hq - c 11 ♦ +..r W mE RFAUWI p Y a3' ICE OC i ♦i. Y rr - r iD `W N ACSBE PROT 0.3Q. PER L I ! IGY DI- -.i i. ,r'rr 3PLAR B. _ +I r p ;I i 6' W 3UlAM 6r 15 's z I -3PI NI TS 7PO SA SEED TYPE ' 3PO SA J L SK --A 'I Q 6 - SOU Mi • 4ACAM IULAM - - 2ACNE I. GC I I IUI AM--~ 1Ga IA GR I UL I AC -SOQ d 3PI AB IUL AM f - r IULAM l1 CA CS am I ` 1P( I Q . - IBITFI30R PAADN(i . • / ~ T I ~ , ,LOTUNQSGIPING ! ~ , - .i ✓ r -3Gl TR ~ IGY Of ~ , . EYJSnNGTPE ? a' - I I - \ i ' r I 1 /~it I ~ ilk AM~ ~ B EEs3a P.EMaN ` - r AND BE PR0IECDED, PER .-I. I UL FR A U(:IBE ` - 1 T---. I ♦ , r r_, > . , d TD' SEED TYPE I/-T r D.C.S..CHAFFER 3 1 \ t 4 \ l , r e I I I I / i♦~, ♦ Ca CS CL. .T .~➢I - _ -1` ~~r I ~DrtCR PIANi 3'; ...r ! / r►-a - I i PARKING L ANDISLAND MATERIAL S REENING TO INCLUDE A S i 1 , ti 1A8 CO, - MIX OFD DUOUS SHRUB AN 3GL DI -q 3• ` 'A'PO y, y / _ _ ♦ [ _ TREE PROTEC~~QN ZONE~- 3- G rr Ti ORNAMENT GRASS UNDERSi0 I yl 1~1 I AC NF/ / J / COMPLY NRIADL.S. ~ I UL fR TOMCLUDf: BLUE AND OREFN `-I / rrr r►/ / rrr CF~pIER3 / RABBITBRUS SQUAW CU4RENT, • SUMAC, SANDCHERRi, COMMON I ,~p3 _ y i r $NOWBERR AND SEINICEBERRY. --EXISTINGfYERr .-t F~/ 3' _ ir_- -.rr / _ I err .,iy!`. r /+--a Y01f 108E --I I . -...r- --fir _ 3 PY CH REMOVED r- I I 3 'ILL fR ^I rlr /r ..I~ ~ rI /I I IULFR I / rr •~,arr r ter. II IUL P1 _ 3GL SK 3GL SKr J40 4 PR AM Tr~ r _7 40 x~ I• rSPY CA ~r 0 r w~/ NO EXISnNG PLANT MATET6A1 WITHIN • ~ i - - , r r r _ ✓ r THE60'WIDE DITCH CTOTSHALL I / • ~ - r rf ~ r r I, r r I BE REMOVED BY BY CONTRATRACTOR I' / ter C I I 3; i~ •sa / / r r r" ~ Z ED /r --r IXISTING iRE S TO BE - 1.. ° ~rf ! / dD ♦t RE GMDINMOVFDT ACCOMMODATE P' G! iHWOPK _ 3AC GR _ ✓ y r r OPERAnONS • = SHRUB RUSH, TOR1• SHALL INCLUDE ' ✓ 11 I L r s / t! . r r 1 SNOWBRUSH, RCOMMON r SANDCMERRY PASPBERRY r: i I r - - r ~ BOULDER WE STERN AND w u q' q , 3POSA --rte r-rr SERV1CEBERRY. SIGHT 045TfE 12 PRVI U 3ULAM d l r' J/ ! 1 3PD 51 - u -1PR AM- %r - - - 5QU GA ROW. _ - f I rr f ~ 1 .GAN•y / //34 / - 6MASs / ILLU _ a 41 _iiiiiiiiiiiim _ T - T / MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L4 VALMONT CITY PARK-PHASE ONE KEYMAP BOULDER, COLORADO II' SITE REVIEW L1 - TT l 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN oj_ LEGEND - - - - - = o~~ DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE L > vI EVERGREEN TREE .w. O ORNAMENTAL TREE N NW Jza' SEED TYPE I _ ' r / + L • DECIDUOUS SHRUBS . r - ✓ + ✓ 1 W IPEES UNI)EN i EES } Q 5'cLV an AND UP rwir. - r yr r*~~v K / ♦F TYPE ISEED ♦ TYPE 7 SEED EVEPGREEN TREE DECIOUOUS TREE STAKING PLAN / JJl'~~~ r - - - - - / / f / ✓ r DPPOS'E SIDE SAME OPPOSITE SIDE SAME I♦/%/~ . r / ~ ' Z NOTES. I, • , . _ . , . , {/r ,C~~ IRRIGATED FESCUE TURF I_ WRAP TRUNK WITH 4' TREE WRAP PER SPECIFICATIONS. J/ 7 ' tom/ / / • t / 'L / TPVNK PLUME AND- SIRAGHT 2 SEE SPECS FOR PLANTING OF TYPE I FENCE-48"h, 3-RAIL VINES AND GROUND COVERS / ~ 1 8' GREEN STEEL ♦ _ e f=~ 3. DETAIL IS TYPICAL IN INTENT ONLY. TEE POSTS WITH TYPE 2 FENCE -4B"h, Qi41NUNK BLADE ON TREE C -RUN DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE I. r♦♦/' fi r/ > r ,I> i /~L ~ SIDE NILE STRAP GROMMETS 2' - - - : NYLON STRAP. RJN NNE 7O O ! / - ♦ / ' TYPE FENCE-86"h, 2-RNA POST AND TWIST FOR SLIGHT -r\ ~t Ayr ✓r. MULCHED . - % SECD TYPEI / TENSION I I, I SOD-PE % OF h E PROTECTIVE CAP BASE AROUND 4 TYPE 4FENCE 76 }WEE TREES I'F- SECURED TO STAKE " R r7/ SPEC IFIEAI Ns - - y! 1 OECJDUOUS EVERGREEN TYPES FENCE,76"h POSTS ONLY PLANT PI' L SHRUB SHRUB TWO 7 TIME LARGER /BACKFILL - TREE PRBTEETION IOFfE / NOTE: SEE SHEET LS FOR SEED MIX TYPES. THAN BA,L ~ ♦ ~ FINISH GRACIE WITH \ ► i► - - _ _ _ \ r ✓ COMITY WITH D.C.S.. .,V ♦ / BA SOD OR MULCH. \V CHAPTERS ROOT OOT BALL TO BE SEE PLAN w------ ►+,,.w.-rrr~\ //i' / FINISHBE BALL L-FX6TING 10WPR Pbf / GRADE f.L PLANT PIT TO BE REMOVED / TWO TIMES I ♦ ' ✓ r+ THAN BALL SCOPE / ♦ / n/' ' LARGER DIAMETER r - UNDISTURBED I ♦ / ROOT BALL ♦ W ♦ L / ~ Y ~ i - ✓ r - r - / 1 BACKFILL UNDISIURBEO SUBGRADE ABOVE I vy- - - " _ rrrww ✓r FINISHED W - \ - r r / r It / /r- REMOVE ALL FOREIGN MATERIALS FROM TRUNK AND BALL GRADE FOLD BACK TOP WAIF Of UNTREATED BURLAP W I. r s! - titer +wr i / ♦ ] l~r, JSH JULY 2. 1998 / ! '.-1 j / amN SRW CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO ca.m -OCT 112 Z DDO I-~`• _`~r TYPE, TREES AND SHRUBS NAWNG NO. r 'rte «o-.. u 1LILAM PLANTING DETAIL 3.02 _ ry 1I J 1 PO AC ~Staay r / NO EXISTING ASENIEN( PIANT~ - r-+ i~ r+ y L WUHINiFj6DWIDE DITCH -REE r N INS SHALL _A'-'-." ♦ i' - / r / _ _ 2PO AC BE A MINIMUM Of Y , . • SHAll BY CONT BERACTORREMOVES I/ - 3' RICH ORANGE p _~'''JI - w r r S, l~ ♦ / .t j POLYETHYLENE t~ LAMINAR SAFETY --UArI~PY ;Flr LNF ♦ D u r JETTING ~ O 1 ' +r"!U. - C - POSTS SETTING TO r ♦ rr 1~ PROE1,11VESCITI a; w 'I 2' RJ GROUND MAUL wr.,w~r ° ' ~dPRN DURN CONSTRUCTION r ♦ - OF DURABLE MEEaL_ I1~ `+rsy' I' ♦ t~ _ . , r OR EXDIVaLENr ` ♦ Y~~ / 6 UNDERSTORY VEGETAPON 70 I I I r✓ / ~ f . . _ r-AERATION INCLUDE SQUAWY,SUMAC, DJRNC AND BEFORE. AFTER RASPBERRY, SQUAW CURRANT, I . 40 ♦ 1 NINEBARK, BLUE AND GREEN r e if NSiRi,~110N 'tir / r - / / " - r ♦ I /}X;(~ RABBITBRUSH AND DOGWOOD. F /I I / _ r I♦ ICE OC / I J 1 t ~ - -2GY DI 4NED 4 I TPROTECTEDROOTZONE'MTHINME +r ✓ / > a / L I I'~:ANOPY DRIP LNE ACTUAL FEEDER R3-` ICE AC. EM TEND WELL BE POND DRIP LINE r, - - y/ -1CEOC / 2.Y PROPERTY LINE, M. T~(i P~ i i _ + EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 2 GY W _ AND BE PROTECTED, PER 1', aT iI I' SEED TYPEI - f 1 WM4 - I - 11 D.C.S..CHAPTER 3 .._Dpi L 11 y DP. LINE i'? I ♦ y - FR -M TRUNK SEE SECTION WHICHEVER GREATER / , i~~ AND SHALL ENCLOSE 'REF / - f 16, 3 Ul fi! --i. .rr1/ 2P0 S, / W BPI PO - / _ /A✓ rr f .1 1 2OU MA • _V 7 4 POLAC t 25_ ' /y /.2.5' 7~ B . 4CACS 76, 5 PI ST I. I PYPG T PI NI 1CE OC R I GY DI 2AC NE - EXISTING WILDLIFE PLArl / 3' 6 /,V 1 t „ . J f CORRIDOR II - - - JSH CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO JULY z, 1998 1AMU - L Wxrsn. OCT, 17 2000 ,.81 I mum er_ RJH - 4 1 .5 PROTECTED ROOT ~I~ ~4.~ ■ or ly DRAWNG No f 1 a -2DUMA ZONE AND MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L5 DRIP LINE 3.12 VALMONT CITY PARK-PHASE ONE KEYMAP BOULDER, COLORADO II Y, SITE REVIEW I!' i, L l L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN _ -o L3 L4 L5 E - ----J-= LEGEND r---R.D.W._ 0 I DECDlI0U5 CANOPY TREE EVERGREEN TREE G 0 ORNAMENTAL TREE 2 OU MA 0'.1 DECDUOUS SHRUBS - L f TYPE I SEED I EXISTING ETO N AND AND BE E PRTC{ECfED, R TYPE ~2® CPR ER Iul I 3 UL AM IRRIGATED FESCUE TURF I 4 AC TA lYPE1 PENCE -48"h., 3-RAIL a TYPE 2 FENCE-48"h., CHAINUNK TYPE 3 FENCE-36"h., 2-RAR -1 TYPE4 FENCE-36"h., 3-WIRE n TYPE 5 FENCE-36'h. POSTS ONLY Q NOTE: SEE SHEET LS FOR SEED MIX TYPES. I 4 GY DI EXISTING TO I AND BE PROTECTED PE D.CS.. CNArIER3 IRRIGATION INE - WATER LIRE EIECT0.C I PY G `I t I: 3 GL TR TREES TO BE REM UNAII T - RE C GIVEN .X EXISDNG TREE TO BE REMOVED ITIN ~ g III PER CITY STAFF. RE: TAI FOR ADDMNAL INFORMATION. _ I" - - - I 2 AM U .J ~I' _ r--~ T I WATERLINE I I,~ R. W.,~.J J EXISTING TREE TO BE RETAINED OWING TREE TO BE RETAINED BUT SHALL BE PRUNED TO BUT SMALL BE PRUNED TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE ADAICENT 1 f PROVIDE CLEARANCE ADA1CENi NEW MULTI-USE PATH I 3 UL AM NEW MULTI-USE PATH I J 41I ~Lw Ilflll IN WBTNG iREET UNABLE TO BE F lL W EXTENSIVE EXIST N I z - ~-L I H _ c I~ VALMONT CITY PARK-PHASE ONE KEYMAP BOULDER, COLORADO II SITE REVIEW I~ Ll L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN / • r' _L3 L4 L5 MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET Ll LEGEND C~ 0 - rr• F.~'~7• //d' DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE .4 LLL EXISTING - d - IRRIGATION I I, a `4 / "d di r r I PO SA LINE EXISTING POWER POLE / / ( I EVERGREEN TREE 1 M F TO BE REMOVED ,o 2QU MAT w i 0 ]PRAM v J THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE 'OPEN SPACE' VOID OF BUILDINGS d 0 ORNAMENTAL TREE I 4 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS { - - _NG, IRRIGATED TURF, DEVELOPED sIDEwA1X5, ETC. DEVELOPMENT WITHIN IOU HE DITCHES WILL BE LIMITED TO NATURAL SURFACE TRAILS, TRAIL TERRAIN I EXISTING TR EIO /1 a AND BE PR I` I I 1 FEATURES AND UFMS/AMENHIES'MTHAMINIMAL FOOTPRINT SUCH AS BENCHES IYPEISEEO I D-C.S. C R3 1 OR BIKE SKILL AREAS, MAJOR TERRAIN ZONES, SPECTATOR AREAS, BUILDINGS AND J 1 I I 1 PARKING WILL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THIS AREA TRAILS WILL BE DESIGNED IN /I THIS AREA ACCORDING TO BEST PRACTICES FOR MINIMIZING NPACIS WITHIN C _ OVERHEAD TYPE 2 SEED - 1( 1 THIS CRBICAL ZONE. TRAILS WITHIN THE PARK WILL BE EASY TO ACCESS, WITH ~ELECDUNE TO BE I 3ULMA CLEAR, OPEN CONNECTIONS AND ENTRY POINTS AND WALL BE CONSTRUCTEJJ I / AC TA - 1 . /1 1 II ` I i 1 I l WITH AUGHT-HANDED' APPROACH TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE. I.. SPl?ll SEE TREE ANALYSIS (TAI ~ IRRIGATED FESCUE TURF I 11 BE ONLY WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE INTENDED USE. PARKVAsrroR6 / / 1r U, _ WILL BE ENCOURAGED TO STAY ON THE CONSTRUCTED TRAILS TO PREVENT / I - r 1 ri A OU GA 1 ^ ' T0.MIRRNG AND IMPACTS OUTSIDE THE TRAIL HEAD. TYPE I FENCE • IB'h., 3-RAIL IB'h., OWNUNK 3 PO AC 1 ~IXISTING BEES i0 : YPE 2 FENCE A I J I'.'; r ! <r d REMAIN AND BE 36•R.. s-0,wL Q I 1 ~ J. IUL AM rJlr,.:'~ ~'a ZS _ rrmTECrEO- TYPE 3FENCE TH"GWOUT CI~.' I ' K I ' /Ir , , _ _ 1. I ' rl. j \ L F 1, 1 t I mo- TYPE I IEJCE. 36•h., 3-WIRE 2 ~5; / ; S 1 1 B: . I - I 0, I r Ir 11 s (rl 1 d 11; 1. ~I 7 1 1. TYPESFENCE 36'h. POSTS ONLY K IJ 2.5' 75% OF SIBERIAN ELMS IN THIS AREA SHALL E J - i - I NO EXISTING RANT MATERIAL WITHIN I 1 I / GY DI - Q ' - I I 1 5 QU GA OREM M~M N NOWBEA~RiC BOULDER RASPBERRY LDROSE. E REMOVED BYI CONTRACTOR S 1 f NOTE SEE SHEET LS FOR SEED MIX TYPES. AND L STING IR TOR / ERVI B AND BE PROtEC E PEs ffEDTYPE I 1 Dcs cA~ER3 I! / ` a EXISTING POWER POLE 1 / ~h IRRIGATION NE W / 2 UL AML TO BE REMOVED j ' . !f a' r WATERLINE J r~• -.-1 / 3ULMA N ELECTRIC U 3 CEQC 2 CE OC f uP I I W w IPCA • 1. I _ W J 3Gl TR-F- 1 IULAM ._2Y1 1 / % 3 PRAM d 1 EXISTING IRRIGATION f r IXG Lu U 1. I / Z N TREES TO BE ~1. 1 I - -]P0. V1 LINE IRO AC PE UNABLE E o POAC U RE C GIVEN EXTEN 'a L ' 1 1 - 5 QU TIN tDIUPES I ( 1 / 'i ~y L SEED TYPEI - 1 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND ~ 1 - / - _ . ( - 5 ? > d/~ 1 . BE RROR{TED THROUGHOUT ` 7 / 2s• / / / d/ 1`QU SH' I3CE CACS OC.~ CONSTRl1CDON 1 d L / - / - - I, 1 2,5' d IUL FR SHRUB UNDERSTORY YULL INCLUDE RABBRB0.USH,' _ / WIlOROE, CO I NINEBARY, CHOKEERRY, WESER BOULDERRYA - 7 AM LA . . , l MMON 5 WESTETN$ANOCHERBY AND 1. WATERUNE Y 1 / SERVICEBERRY. I _ I - F 1 / ` / ! '-OVEA FAD ELECTRIC LINE TO BE REMOVED I Ila .w. K ~ - ~ 1 ro 5A - ~2GY DI 1, A'PE I s` .Q _ r LIPOAC~ I d IACNE 6PQH r 7 r . -1°' 3PR AM 'e' _______~'_i • 1 PO AC I `1YPEI SEED, 7YP - I r- ♦ - _ 3 UL MAT 2 R AR ~6, L - - - - r r d I UL FR (Kl ~3PO SA / n6PRAM 1 (lUIM, . , AC TA 2.r~ I J I • y-A IIIIIIII ~ I~ ~ • ' EXISTING - _ - - _ _ ^ - - . "-P _ - _ - - _ - _ - - ? _ TREE TO E REMOVED. SCAPE S, UNABLE TO BE REPLACED GIVEN ~I ULAM- - IULAM -IULAM 3ULAM - _ -10U SH IUL FR.-`. I EXTENSIVE EXISTING UTILITIES COORDINATELOCATIONSOFSMETTREES.WITHOWNERS -RGHT OF WAY - - PRESENTATIVE TREES SHALL BE , WITH IHE'BICERT101POF THOSE ALONG I WITHIN THE 60'W. DUCH EASEMENT SPAU BE Y'WaONT 0.0A0 STREETSCAPE U ATE R}~_ DO NOT CONFLICT WITH EXISTING CANOPY- _ NGRUARSAND CHOKECH RABBITBRUSH, SQUAW CURRENT, SUMAC, I ' VALMONT ROAD - REM FD NR TI pETAINEAND PROTECTED PER D,Cl$IANneeQS nA.,( CHAPTER oRe v SANDC HERRY EOMa.DN SND6'BHdf AND SERVICEBERRY. - - I I • I - i _ _ L J NOTES: VALMONT CITY PARK-PHASE ONE LEGEND KEYMAP ,.SOD SHALL CONSIST OF3 PRAIRIE VARIETIES OF TURF TYPE TALL ffS(LE. BOULDER, COLORADO IRRIGATED FESCUE TURF Ill- T TYPE 1 SEED PB51 BARLEY[ PRABIE MO( i - . 23% RUE DRAMA 10%BURALOGRASS 20% GREEN NEEDIEGRA5i 20% SIDFOAS GKA{1 SITE REVIEW O - II - 25%WESTERN WHEATGAASS 2% SAND DROPSEED DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE ` I l 12 3. TYPE 2 SEED. PRAIRIE WETLAND MIX IYPEI FENCE-48'h., 3-RAIL L L 12% AMEAGIN SLOUGHGRASS 12%CANADA VAIDRYE LANDSCAPE PLAN 12%SWIi01'FAS5 17% ALKALI BULRUSH { { EVERGREEN iRff TYPE 1RNCE-18'h., CHANUNE 10% PRAIRIE CORDCAASS 75% SOFT STEM BULRUSH Y.~Y 9% MEADOW SAGE 6% CREEPING SnIQRUSH TYPE 3 FENCE-36'h., 2-RAIL It. 6% TREESQUARE BULRUSH 6% MIEE.SQUARE BULRUSH O ORNAMENTAL TREE I~ L3 I' 5% SMALL FRUITED BlAAl15H 9.5% SMALL WINGED SEDGE - L4 L5 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 4. SOIL DDESIIGGN&~DTAANPDAARRlS,PASHALL CLEAN GEO. 5. WOOD CHIPS, BfA OF SOLI ST MAN-MADE DEBRIS WED INTO CCOARSEn ECES RANG09 ING IN SIZE FROM 1i03'. ALL AV3lC1ED BEDS SHALL BE COVEREDWIIHA DEPTHq 4' - 6' OF WOOD OIIPS. RM MULCH AND WEED BARRIER SHAU NOT TYPE I SEED - BEUSW DESIGNB CONSi. STANDARDS, SECTION . I __J . Se; 10.03 B. 8. FOR ADDITIONAL NFORMATION- d. UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS - SEE SECTION 10.05, PAGE 1019. - 7. REFER TO DESIGN 8 CONST. STANDARDS, SECTION 3.03 B.,WD D. -STREET TREES AND HANTS, FOR PLANTING AND PU@ABJT SPECIFICATIONS. TYPE 2 SEED B. REFER TO DESIGN 8 CCNST. STANDARDS, SECTION 3.05 - FOR TREE PROTECTION MQUNEMENIS AND PROCEDURES, ROOT PROTECTION, TREE FENCING SPECIFICATIONS. 9. N THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES MST BETWEEN THE PUNT MATERIAL QUANBBES SH]WN ON THE PLAN AND THE QUAN111FS INDICATED ON THE PLANT UST, THE GRAPHC SYMBOLS INDICATED ON THE RAN SHALL SUPERCEDE TIE QUANIIIES, MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L2 REPRESENTATIVE PLANT LIST ! ■ - i ce. e 1 . 4' 15' Symbol Key Botanical name Common Name Size of ng Root. Spacing Quo" ~ s ~r ra1R ~s . . . . roc On roc T~ r• r• DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES PlanS L - 2 QU MA 1 p '.I AC GR Aker grondidentah;m Wasatch Maple 2' Col. BB See Han 30 I f •t f. SHELTER ON YY AC NE A.cer negundo 5ensalion' SensWion Boxeldw 2' Col. BB See Han 10 7 OU SH - , r - - , coNCREIE ° CA CS Catalpa s ' peaosa Northern Catalpa 2' Cal. BE See Han 13 C ;AD I UL AN CE OC Collis ocademolis Hackherry YCoI. BB See Han 29 I \ ~Y\ 2.5'Cal. BB See Han 3 . I 1 1-y! 8R4 {R 3* Col. BB See Han 2 P . • - GL TR Gleddsiotrocanthos inermis5hademodee Shademoster Honsylocusl 2'Cal. 88 See Han 17 . .1 . I~S. TYPE ~ ~ . LD ' 5 QU SH - e • M I GL SK Gleditsia maconthos inemris Wine, Skyline Honetlaad Y CC. B13 See Han 5 . - 2 CE a ° 3' cal 88 See Han 6 4 - \ _ GY DI Crymnadadw diom Kentucky Coffee Tree 2' Cal. BB See Han 21 - d' a _ „ l 3 PRVI KO PA Koelreuleria ponialoh Gddenmin Tree 2' Cal. BB See Han 17 2 PO AC 4 d• PO AC Populw s acuminate LnnaleoF Cottonwood 22' C. BB See Plan 1 .5' Col. 86 See Han 35 3'Col. BB See Plan d B 3' ~ 1 O ti - I QU MA l PO SA Populw sorgenfii Plains Cottonwood 2' Cal. BB See Ran 30 Y 1 - --2ACOR 3RPO-- r 3' Col. BB See Plan 1 --3 RFL 1 ACNE 10 I DUSTING TREES TO REMAIN QU MA Quergn mavomrya Bur Oak 2' Cal. BB See Ran 15 4 6 I~ 2s'Col BB See PI n 1 1 ULAM T AND BE PROTECTED, PER (rAll 4' r 1- 3'Col. BB See Han 2 D.C.S - CHAPTER 3 QU SH Chmrcus shumardii Shumord Oak 2' Col. BB See Han 18 1 - FT. UL AM Ulmus omericano Volley Forge' Valley Forge Elm 2o Col. BE, See Ran 39 2 QU SH O 2.5' Cal, 88 See Han d ..I ° 2 QIl Gt., e 4 - 3' Cal. B See Plan 5 SEED IYPEI...., .•1GY DI-. -1Gl iR -1CA C8 UL FR Ulmusfrmfiel Frontier Elm 2'Cal. BB See Plan 13 ! '2 pY CH _ I TACGR r 2.5'Col. BB See Han 2 • - h SHELTER ON 3' Col. BB See Han 4 ' - - ' ' - CONCRETE • 2 PI R - : I• - ORNAMENTAL TREES 316 ! P PAD 1 B V !10 b 0. bI 0 AC TA Acer tatormm Hot Wings' Hot Wings Talon-Maple 2'Col. BE See Plan 13 I K _ g SHELTER ON AM IA Amelanchiw lamomkii Lamarck Serviceberry 2'C.I. BE See Plan 12 A -~-3pRw dyvnne grandyvnna Crabapple 2'Col. BE See Plan T I!'I G[SK'- _ v MA BR Molus Bran i CONCRETE MA 55 MolusSPinA Sno+/ SPinA Snow Crabapple 2' Cal. BE See Han N 9 - - TO PAD PRAM Prunus americana American PkGnr 2 Cl 1' PR VI Padw virginona metanuapo Block Common Chokecherry T - Col. BE See Plan 23 l. BB Sea Plan 52 3 AC OR E I - W CA Pyms calleryona Autumn Blare Autumn Blaze Peor 2' Cal. BB See Plan d PY CH Pyrus calleryono'Chonhdeee Chanfideer Pear 2* Col. BE See Plan 5 1 3 PO K .1 / 2 PI ST - , k l 5 PR V1 FY PG Pyrus ussuriens'a Prome Gem' Prairie Gem Peor 2' Cal. BE See Plan 2 10 • UNDERSTORY VEGETATION TO QU GA Quercm gambelii Gambol Oak 2' Col. BE See Plan 40 I UL AM t 2 AC GR _ INCLUDE SERYICEBERRY, SUMAC, 164 \ I 1QUMA EVERGREEN TREES ~ -v •'1 RASPBERRY, SQUAW CURRANT. 1 NINEIIARK, AB CO Abin concolor White Fir d' BE See Plan 5 3A8 C0 I, -H BBTTBRUSITBILUSH AND DOGWOOD. 8' BB See Plan I J 6' ~TMA BR 10 Bg See Pion 3 ` PI ED Pin- ed.h. Pi- Pine 4' BB See Plan 2 LU IPYPG DUSTING VEGETATION 861 BE See Man 9 ' BB See Plan 9 LL - 6 0111 , TO REMAIN AND 10 BB Sea M. 2 BE PROTECTED )PER I NO Is`— nlga Austrian Pine d' BB See Plan 3 I, D AS) EIGSTINGBUILDING c~~ P LEE I GLTR ~E'~H.I 1 CA DS r FIRE HYDRANT HYDRANTTO BE 10 BB See Plan I r' PI PO Pinm ponderosa Ponderoso Pine 6' BB See Plan 4 IACGR - 2CEOC BB See Han 3 10 BB See Plan 2 2 ULAM 1 ~ PI FL Pines flesilia Umber Pine A' BE See Han 2 r I W 6' BB Sea Plan 2 PAFANG LOT AND ISLAND PLANT MATERIAL SCREENING B' ; B8 See Plan 3 TOINCLUDEAMI%OF DECIDUOUS SHRUB AND -ee Han T ORNAMENTAL GRASS UNDERSTORY TO INCLUDE: BLUE k:). r r-IS i' PI ST Pinw shobilannis Southwestern White Pine 14'0 BB BE See Han 2 ' AND GREEN RABBGTBRISH, SQUAW CURRENT, SUMAC, 6' BB Sea Hon 1 „ S SA / 'I i f _:15412 SANDCHERRY, COMMON SNOWBERRY AND SERVICEBERRY. 4 V 10 BBOB See Plan I B See Han 5 3 AM U PI AR Rnw onslota BHsBecane Pine b- BE See Plan 4 \ II f - - 2 CFOU 2POAC IT B' BB See Hon 5 GS I PO SA / I t.0 BB See Han 1 lei IULAA DECIDUOUS SHRUBS Al V -.IGLSK DUSTING TREES TO REM4N - - ar~• t., r. '4/ OQ AMA. Anelonchier Inif lio Rocky Mountain Serveebwry 5Gal. Cont. See Han TBD AND BE PROTECTED, PER AM CA Amaha canescens lead Plant d u .r .a D.C.S. -CHAPTER 3 5 Gal Coral. See Han iBD r i d I AR M Aronio orbufifoha'Bnll anlissima Brilliant Red Chokeberry 5 Gal, Con:. See Han TBD _ i ME Aroma melanocu data Block Chokeber 5 Gal, Cont.. See Han TBD 3 PO POSK U AC f ; ` I Ir M CH AL Chry-olhamnus rwaasue albicwhs Tall Blue Rabbilbrush 5 Gal. Cant See Han TBD 2 UL F 4 - DUST WATER METER CH NA ChrysoHM n s nouseosus groveolens Toll Green Ru66itbmsh 5 Gal. Cant. See Han TBD VV ( y Q} CO CO Dogwood . -26Y DI~~ Comm slolondera mlomdame Colorado CO FL Comes sldandera Plowromeo' Yel 5 Gal. Cont. See Han TBD 1 GL TR AND PROPERTY LINE, WATER NE, UNE TYP. FO NE Fo-Aura neonvaicano New Mmoo Frrrett 5 5 Go Gal. CContt an . See e HHan TBD Plan TBD I • / 1 - ~..L1 r 2~ E - - V 1 QU SH I " i! DUES TO PRPo Pr ~ b~ ffolw Diablo Purple Leaf Ninebork erry 5 Gal. Cant. See Han TIED REMAIN D Western Sanandeherry 5 Gal al Cont.. See Han TIED _ C BE PROTECTED besseyi Pow C prig West.- Smdchemy 5 Gal Carl. See Han TBD e mono Rocky Mountain Sumac 5 Gal. Coral. See Ran TBD RI AU Ribes aureum enro Yellow Flowering Currant 5Gal. Cant. See Han TBD VALMONT RI CE Ri LANDSCAPE bas careum Squaw Currant SGoI. Coral. See Ron TBD y. W • . 'V'' 0 Q - Q STRIP a Cont. See Plan TBD RO W'0 Rosa woodsu cis Rose 5 G I. tl RU DE Rubus deliciosm Boulder IS Rmb 5Gal. Coral. See Han TBD O PA ` - - _ SY AL $ympharimryusalbw Common 5nowwvbe rry SGaI. Coral. See Han TBD • in r i 1,254 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES rt I AC TA ` 4 KOPA 4 AM IA 3 KO PA ACC iA \ - CA AC C.I.-gosis cosh Adam Varier Feolher Reed Grass I Gal. Cont. See Han TBD 1 MASS L 2AC TA 2 MASS 5KO PA CA KF z«naqua 8Snunm8h Kml~fReed Grass Gal. Cant See Plan TBD pA,M-~T1R7'`OGERAE~ PA HM Pan cum groNm Heavy NztaT Heavy Metal Blue S.vikhgrass I GoI Cont. Sae Han ~ _ TELEPHONE LINE FIRE HYDRANT PA Isy po roue' Blue Bluesl Gross I Gal. Cont. See Han TBD PEAL Schchi hyri locopori des'la ~ khgmss IGoL Cant See Han TBD BO GR Boukkw to Blue Gromis o Gross I Gal Cont. Sae Plan TAD F\ mein' DwerF Fountain Gross I Gal Cont. See Han TBD I GREENTROAW UNDERSTOKY RAMINGTOINCWOE: BLUE AND SANITARY SEWER LINE PERENNIALS AND GROUNDCOVERS 250 GREEN N RA8BITBRUSHBRU511, SQUAW CURRENT, NT, SUMAC, SWDLHESLY,COMMON GAS LINE I SNOWBERRY AND SERAICEBERRY. kG AU hhppaskche ouronfiaca Coronado Coronado HHyyssss WATERLINE ~ EC PU Echinoceo pwpuma Purple ConeRewer I Gal. Cont. Sea Han TBD LE SU Leuconthemum r superbum little Miss MufW Dwarf Shasta Daisy 1 Gol. Cord. See Plan TBD I PE ST Perstemon slrictus Rocky Mountain Pemlemon 1 Gol. Cant. See Han TBD RU FU Rudbi leis Fulgida'Goldstmm' Black-Eyed Susan I Gal. Cont. See Han TBD VALMONT CITY PARK-PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW R 1 R 2 OVERALL IRRIGATION MASTER PLAN J~ f o<C t, -c f IR3 'Ily IR4IR5 !I OVER SPRAY OF BIKE AREAS AS REW IREO. 1 Rost IRRIGATION IN SEEDED AREAS. _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 ~ f INSTALL SLEEVING BY BORING (OR ATTACHED BIXE TERRAIN AREAS: r - _ - / TO BRIDGE) ACROSS ROTOR IRRIGATION IS TO BE USED DITCHES. IRRIGATION SCHEDULE ARE IN TO THESE BE AA AS S DIRECTED HEAD LOCATIONS I <Y n - - 1 r` BY BIKE I _ SYMBOL MODEL DFBpfllCN CONSULTANTS. PRIMARILY - HALF ROTORS ARE TO SPRAY INTO BIKE CL 200 B.E. PVC MAINLINE AREAS. WRING CONSTRUCTION, ROTOR LOCATIONS ARE TO BE 111 I y r 'may .-1 7 ~;,".,''Jr t ® IRRIGATION CONTROLLER ADJUSTED AS PER BIKE CONSULTANTS DIRECTIONS. PUMP LOCATION 'ooop NOTES 1. ALL ROTORS, SPRAY HEADS AND DRIP AREAS ARE TO BE ZONED DRIP IRRIGATION IN SHRUB SEPARATELY. ROTORS IN BIKE AREAS DRIP TO TREES IN SEEDED BEDS AND ISLANDS (TSP.) AREAS, DRIP IN SHRUB BEDS AND SOD/SEEDED AREAS ARE TO HRk SEPARATE ZONING. - IVl sf _ 1 l' QUICK COUPLERS TO BE COORDINATED BY PARKS AND FORESTRY 2 ! ^f 1 R STAFF AT THE TIME OF FINAL IRRIGATION AND UTILITY PLANS SPRAY/ROTOR IRRIGATION y h T IN SODDED AREAS (TSP. 3. S~SHTS-OF-WAY AREAS SHALL HAVE atlP (LE NETAF[M) 1 gat 4. DRIP EMITTERS FOR TREES AND SHRUB BEDS TO BE RA[NB IRD - y JXB-PC EMITTER. 5. ALL TREES ARE TO RECEIVE DRIP IRRIGATION. <a NO SPRAY IRRIGATION ~J I ~yi '4~ rtr 't IN AREA BETWEEN d 6. MAINLINE IS ANTICIPATED TO BE 4', WITH 6' MAIN EXTENDING OUT FROM TAP CONNECTION LINE INSTALL SLEEPING B t V 1 DITCHES BORING (OR ATTACHED DIT~EOGE) ACROSS ~ ROTOR / L \ r x i,, - rr 1 IRRIGATION IN SOD 40.000 SO. FT.r' ( oo qq I! 1' SEEDED MEAS. NATIVE SEED 560000 SO. FT. 'ri' SHRUBS 30,OOD SO. FT. Z DRIP IRRIGATION IN SHRUE 'I r ' `r'te ! _ f r1 / / f BEDS AND ISLANDS TIP. USING 1.8' WATER/WEEK FOR 500 k ( ) III 4, rig , 1.0' WATER/WEEK FOR SEED/SHRUBS NETAFIM IRRIGATION TO IRRIGATION TO BE ` - o TF r PO D IIST OF f r t 48HR/WEEK WATERING WINDOWS INSTALLED IN RIGHT OF WAY, Ri ' l r L~ - POND IN N THIS MEIy',~t~ TOTAL GPM Is 14 (TYPICAL) r j c a ~ i(Cy1" - F o ~ rr - r r _ NEW 4' PVC EXISTNG 6' PVC NETAFIM IRRIGATION TO BE SPRAY/BOTOR IRRIGATION IN CONNECTION CONNECTION INSTALLED IN RIGHT OF WAY, SODDED AREAS (TYP.) (TYPICAL) VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW CIVIL SHEET INDEX CIVIL ENGINEERING COVER SHEET SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION CD CIVIL COVER SHEET C1 CIVIL NOTES AND LEGENDS C2 U71UTY PLAN - NORTHWEST C3 UTILITY PLAN - SOUTHEAST C4 GRADING PLAN (1 OF 4) C5 GRADING PLAN (2 OF 4) 08 GRADING PLAN (3 OF 4) DIRECTORY ca CB GRADING PUN AI of WONDERLAND CREEK TRAIL CON NNECTION C9 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER PLAN (1 OF 4) - CIO PRELIMINARY STORY WATER PLAN (2 OF 4) OWNER: C11 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER PLAN (3 OF 4) City of Boulder Parks and Recreation C12 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER PUN (4 OF 4) Administration-IRIS Center CI3 TURN LANE moDinCATIONS 3198 Broadway C14 VALMONT RD. SOUTH BUS STOP Boulder, CO 80304-2644 Contact: Perry Brooks Phone: 303.413.7226 w i Email: brooksp®bouldercolorado.gov 1 rT ' ti + t LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ~ t = AIRPORT BOU •v~'`~*.° BHA Design, Inc. M ,•;w K , T1 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 140' DE COUP -Y JAIL Contact: Jeff Kroeger c., . r r Phone: 970.223.7577 a ~ Email: )kroeger@bhodesign.com 3 r v` 1' - - SEE SITE PLAN DRAWINGS (S-SERIES) FOR f^ a CIVIL ENGINEERING/SURVEYOR: DETAILED SITE LAYOUT INFORMATION, INCLUDING 3; tw p 8a N 4 ire t WALK AND PARKING DIMENSIONS, LAYOUT AND Drexel, Barrell & Co. J 1800 38th Street FINISH INFO, AND LANDSCAPE INFO. _ +:.x ' j BUTTE ST-0 ALMONT CITY PA Boulder, Colorado 80301-2620 j o PHASE 1 -4' Contact: Curtis Stevens wQ Phone: 303.442.4338 x f' Email: cstevens®drexelbarrell.com FALMONT` ROAD r ARCHITECT: OZ Architecture 1805 29th Street, Suite 2054 s aAy,„,,t „ r Boulder, Colorado 80301 i~ .y,► Conctact: Chuck Sanders i1w ALMONT CITY PARK Phone: 303.449.8900 PHASE 2 e + Email: csandersOozarch.com t*_ z p _~~-T QTR BIKE PARK DESIGNERS: • 3l --.'YI P x ".`s'it` 5'" erl " Alta Planning & Design NORTH VICINITY MAP 1638 NE Davis Street _ SCALE: 1" = 500'-0" Portland, Oregon 97232 PHASE 1 NORTH Contact: Chris Bernhardt _ Phone: 503.367.2111 F1 PHASE 2 a Email: chrisbernhardt®altaplanning.com a Q ® PHASE 3 s IMBA 4106 Riverside Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION Boulder, Colorado 80304 Contact: Pete Webber VALMONT Phone: 303.562.7510 Phase 1 of Valmont City Park is comprised of the 45 acres sitting between the Boulder Email: pete@iimba.com i j IIJ County Jail and the north side of Valmont Road between Airport Road and the Valmont i. Industrial Park. The site is bisected by the North Boulder Farmers Ditch and the Left Alpine Bike Parks Hand Ditch. An existing raw water irrigation pond, pump house and short length of a 834 Finlayson Arm Road soft surface shared path is also located between these ditches. A dog park has been Victoria, BC V96 - 6E5 located south and east of the southern most ditch and east and north of the existing Contact: Judd deVall warehouse building. A 100 stall, gravel parking lot is accessed off Valmont Road Phone: 250.418.1486 immediately south of this existing building. The balance of the southern third of the Email: judddevall®aol.com site will include a portion of the interconnected bike trail system and the 12' wide multiuse path. The middle third of the site is accessible from the south at four bridge crossings and from the north at three bridge crossings. Bike trails and a shared use soft surface path will be constructed according to best management practices for minimizing impacts to the existing natural resources. All trails in this area will be limited to natural surface trails, terrain features and amenities with minimal footprints such as benches or bike skill features. The northern third of the site will contain the EPR ~P~ balance of the bike trails and terrain features/tracks, spectator areas, the renovated eP~~ and relocated Platt Farmhouse, a detached restroom/storage facility, a 46 car gravel parking lot, tot lot, irrigated turf grass "packet park" encompassing an "events" area used for picnicking, a trail head and bike race staging. LEGEND DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY. ■ t DRAINAGE BASIN DESIGN PONT 5 YEAR DEVELOPED ROW (d.) 100 YEAR DEVELOPED ROW ( (eh) CITY OF BOULDER GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES UTiLJTY NOTES BASIN IA. BASIN AREA (Ram) 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS' OF THE CITY 1. ALL CONTRACTORS U71UZING THIS PLAN AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREON ARE CAUTIONED TO COMPLY 1. ALL WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO CITY C-3 OF BOULDER, AND SHALL BE COMPLETED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS IN THE EVENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF COLORADO CODE TITLE 9, ARTICLE 1.5, AS AMENDED, CONCERNING PREVENTION OF OF BOULDER UTILITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION THEREOF. 5 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT .45 THAT A DESIGN ELEMENT DOES NOT REFLECT CITY STANDARDS, THE MATTER MUST BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND FACUTIES RESULTING FROM EXCAVATIONS (Ut1lty NotlBoatim Act). LOCATION OF .90 ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES AND FACUTIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED 2. ALL U11UTY TAPS SHALL BE MADE BY CITY OF BOULDER PERSONNEL RECOMMENDING A SOLUTION OR ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL FROM INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF LOCATION AND DEPTH OF UTIUTIES AND 100 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT FACILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PUNS CANNOT BE GUARANTEED. OTHER UTILITIES MAY BE PRESENT AT THIS 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS TO COMPLETE THE PROPOSED 2. THE APPROVAL OF A CONSTRUCTION PLAN DOES NOT REUEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE RESPONSBIUTY OF LOCATION NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLANS THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE DEPTH AND LOCATION OF ALL WORK AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR LIZE HAND EXCAVATION AS REQUIRED. WORK SHALL CONSTRUCTING WORKABLE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. A11 REVISIONS AND/OUR CORRECTIONS REQUIRED WILL BIE SOLELY THE UTILITIES AND FACILITIES BEFORE THE START OF WORK. UTI BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE UTILITY COMPANIES WHOSE FAOUTES ARE IN THE 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL UTUTY STRUCTURES TO FINAL GRADE PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR .............................~Bb~ CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY, AND AT THEIR EXPENSE PROXIMITY OF THE WORK. PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF COLORADO CODE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLOADO AT 1-600-922-1987, AT LEAST 2 DAYS PRIOR TO 5. PROVIDE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING AT AL BENDS TEES, PLUGS AND HYDRANTS PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION........... 54.57 3. THESE PUNS HAVE BEEN CHECKED BY THE CITY OF BOULDER ONLY FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE 'DESIGN AND EXCAVATION. ....x CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS; COMPUARCE WITH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONDITIONS AND FOR GENERAL CONCEPTUAL S. WATER STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER PPE SHALL BE BEDDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH (ALL CIS ELEVATIONS ARE I[ UN.O.) APPROVAL O PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN. THE CITYYS RENEW DOES NOT VERIFY OR ENSURE THE ACCURACY OF 2 ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE N ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE FEDERAL. STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ALL CITY OF BOULDER STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS _ EXISTING OR PROPOSED DIMENSIONS UNES COORDINATES OR GRADES SHOWN, INCLUDING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN REGULATIONS APPURTENANT TO THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970. A: AVIERYEA'A7E COWRY/R ----5J6I--- OR NOT SHOWN. 7. ALL WATER UNES SEAL HAVE A MINIMUM FOUR AND ONE-HALF (4.5) FEET OF COVER 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION AND SUPPORT FOR EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE BROW FINISHED GRADE D: MYOEr CYY/7LOR ---5765--- 4. UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN REFLECT AVAILABLE RECORD DATA THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONARY CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR ANY UTILITY LINE INTERRUPTION AT NO ADDITIONAL CONTRACT COST. MEASURES TO PROTECT ALL UTIUTY UNES SHOWN AND OTHER UTILITY LINES OTHERWISE LOCATED. THE CONTRACTOR & CONTRACTOR SOUL COORDINATE DRY UTILITY LOCATIONS WITH PROPERTY OWNER AND r D: .4bTEEY.IINMS 4554 4. CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS INVERTS, ELEVATIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SNAIL CONTACT THE "UTILITY NOTFlCATICI CENTER OF COLORADO" FOR UTILITY LOCALES 24 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING PROVIDER AGENCY. CONSTRUCTION. THE DENVER METRO TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (303) 534-6700. OUTSIDE THE DENVER METRO AREA, THE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. VARIATIONS BETWEEN DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TOLL-FREE NUMBER IS 1-800-922-1987. TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER AND RESOLVED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 9. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM ROWUNE (O' CURB k GLITTER) PROPERTY LINE, WALL, AND 70 DIRECTION OF ROW 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIR TO ANY SIDEWALKS LAWN. TREES, PAVING, AND OTHER THE CENTERUNES OF MANHOLES INLETS AND URUTY LINES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 5. BEFORE WORK BEANS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PERMIT TO WORN IN THE THE IN RIGHT-OF-WAY ADVANCE OF COMFROM MENCING COMMENCING THEG CITY IMPROVEMENTS DISTURBED OR DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION OR DEAOUTION ACTIVITIES PROPOSED HEREIN. 100 YEAR DETENTION POND OVERFLOW Q® AND MUST NOTIFY THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY INSPECTION STAFF AT LEAST 24 HOURS 10. THE PIPE 9'ECPED FOR SANITARY SEWER UNES SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC). SDR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING O ALL CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOUTION 35• IN ACCORDANCE WITH OR MEETING ASTM D3034. CATCH CURB AND GLITTER 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN A COMPLETE AND APPROVED SET O CONSTRUCTION PUNS THESE WORK N PROGRESS 11. WATER LINES SHALL BE ETHER A.W.W.A. C-151 CLASS 52 LUCITE IRON PIPE OR A.W.W.A. (ALL OTHER SHALL BE SPILL) DRAWINGS AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS, SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BE MADE 7 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE UttX1T, LINE AND GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. C-900 CLASS 200 PVC PRESSURE PPE ALL D.I.P. SHALL BE POLYETHYLENE WRAPPED. ALL HIGH POINT.- HP AVAILABLE TO CITY STAFF UPON REQUEST. IF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE NOT READILY AVAILABLE AT THE PROJECT WATER SERVICES MATH PIPE DIAMETERS UNDER 2 INCHES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER IN SITE, THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY ISSUE A STOP WORK ORDER AND HALT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES & CONTRACTOR SHALL WORT( ALL THE PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECFlCATIONS TOGETHER. ACCORDA NCE WITH ASTM BB& PENDING CGMPLIANCE BY THE CONTRACTOR. GRADE BREAK (8 12. WATERLINE FITTINGS SHALL BE -IRON -IRON CONF TO THE 7. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN AND THE 'MANUAL OF 9. COORDINATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PACKAGES REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN ANSI DA21.1Q A W.AQUO 0 T CAST-RONFITIII NGS 12-INCH Siff LOW POINT LP UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.' PART IV, FOR CONSTRUCTION SIG NAGE AND TRAFFIC CONTROL 10. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN AND SMALLER SHALL BE CLASS 250' TRAFFIC. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL. STATE AND OSHA TOP BACK OF OURB ..................................................TOO & All SURPLUS MATERIALS TOOLS AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SEAL BE REMOVED REGULATIONS 13. STANDARD FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY SHALL INCLUDE THE SWIVEL TEE, VALVE, 6' PPE TO FROM THE PROJECT SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL DEBRIS AND RUBBISH CAUSED BY THE OPERATIONS OF THE THE HYDRANT AND THE HYDRANT. ROWINE [ a R CONTRACTOR SHALLBE REMOVED, AND THE AREA OCCUPIED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE RESTORED TO 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY DEWATERING OF EXCAVATIONS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION, WITHIN 48 HOURS OF PROJECT COMPLETION, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF CONTRACT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. 14. STORM SEWER PPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PPE (RCP) IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUSUC WORKS. ASTI C-76. PPE SHALL BE CLASS 16 WITH WALL 'B'. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON PROPERTY UNE 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITHIN THE DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS, PLAYS 9. THE CONTRACTOR BULL PROVIDE TREE AND LANDSCAPE PROTECTION AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 8-8, 'PROTECTION CODES OR STANDARDS FOR DIRECTION PRIOR TO START OF WORN. EASEMENT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OF TREES AND PLOTS' BOULDER REVISED CODE (S.R.C) 1981 AND THE CITY O BOULDER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 15. ALL STORM SEVER PPE FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL. BE INSTALLED WITH PREFABRICATED STANDARDS (DCS). ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED 11 CONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE ALL REQUIRED SUBMITTAL APPROVALS PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WORN OR ORDERING TRASH RACKS APPROPRIATE FOR THE PPE SIZE AND AS SPECIFIED OR SUPPLIED BY THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. LANDSCAPING PUN, B.R.C. AND DCS MATERIALS. MANUFACTURER. _ STORM 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS REWIRED TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES IN 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF PREEXISTING CONDITIONS O DETERIORATION OR UNDERDESIGN IN PROPOSED STORM SEWER ACCORDANCE NTH THE URBAN DRAINAGE AND ROOT CONTROL DISTRICT 'URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL AREAS OF WORK THAT ARE UNCOVERED OR EXPOSED DURING THE WORK. .SAN SEWER VOLUME 3', THE M-STANDARDS PLANS OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND THE APPROVED PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EROSION CONTROL PUN. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY REWIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL 1& PROFESSIONAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR CONFORMANCE TO THE APPUCABLE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WE TO UNFORESEEN EROSION PROBLEMS OR IF THE PLANS DO NOT FUNCTDN AS STANDARDS AND CODES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY O THE OWNER. SITE OBSERVATION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED WATER UNE XX' WATER INTENDED. ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT IS TO BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. THE 1. MATCH EXISTING C4UDE5 AT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. OWNER OR THE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INSECT ANY PORTION O THE PROPOSED GAS LINE . -G_ 11. THE CITY OF BOULDER REWIRES THAT SIDEWALKS CONSTRUCTED HAVE A CROSS SLOPE OF LESS THAN 2X. WORK AND REQUEST CORRECTION TO THE OWNER'S SATSACTION FOR ALL WORK NOT COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED NTH CROSS SLOPES SUFFICIENTLY LESS THAN 2% TO ENSURE THAT NTH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS INSPECTION OR SITE OBSERVATION OF WORK BY THE ENGINEER DOS 2. IN AREAS OF UTILITY CONSTRICTION OR DEMOUTION, RESTORE SURFACE TO E10STING THEY DO NOT EXCEED TO 2% MAXIMUM. THIS ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE IS PROVIDED TO HELP ENSURE THE PUBLIC NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CONFORMING TO THE DRANNGS AND SPECIFICATIONS GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. PROPOSED BURIED ELECTRIC LINE -E- IMPROVEMENTS ARE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AMERICANS NTH DISABILITIES ACT AS FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE ROWIINE O CURB AND GUTTER OR TOP O PAVING UNLESS REWIRED BY SECTION 208 OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 3m ALL SE NOTED. PROPOSED BURIED TELEPHONE LINE _T 16. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OF BOULDER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND 12. MAINTENANCE OF SAND/OHL INTERCEPTORS AND ALL PRIVATE WASTEWATER AND STORM SEWER LINES AND SPECIFICATIONS LATEST EDITION THEREOF. 4. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO TOP OF FINISHED PAVING AND LANDSCAPED AREAS PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LFH STRUCTURES SHALL REMAIN IN THE RESPONSBIUTY OF THE OWNER. UNLESS OIHERYASE NOTED. l 17. ALL STATIONS PEER 70 CENTERLINE O STREET STATIONS OR OTHER STATIONING LINE SHOWN ON PUN, 13. THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM REWIRES A SEPARATE WATER SERVICE AND METER. A SEPARATE WATER PUNT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED WATER VALVE 9 INVESTMENT FEE MUST BE PAID AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. SERVICE METER AND TAP SIZES WILL BE REWIRED S. MAXIMUM LANDSCAPE SLOPE SHALL BE 4(HOR) TO 1(VERT) UNLESS OIHERNSE NOTED. AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL 18, THE DISC GOLF COURSE CONSTRUCTION ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH SIDE OF VALMONT RD. NLL ONLY 8 REFER TO SOILS REPORT FURNISHED BY OWNER FOR ALL COMPACTION FtEWHREMENTS. PROPOSED WATER METER INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF TEE BOXES AND GOALS AT THE EXISTING GRADE NO SIGNIFICANT GRADING IS PROPOSED N. A CITY O BOULDER RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CITY OF BOULDER PUBLIC AND NO CHANCES TO DRAINAGE PATTERNS IS EXPECTED. 1. ADD 5200 TO ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS TO REACH PROJECT VERTICAL DATUM. PROPOSED MANHOLE RIGHT-CF-WAY OR PUBLIC EASEMENTS . 15. AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPUCAT1 N THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL VALVE BOXES AND MANHOLE COVERS TO THE FINAL PROPOSED UCHT POLE *LP GRADES A THE APPLICANT WILL BE REWIRED TO PROVIDE ACCURATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT DEMOLITION NOTES 9. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN AND PROVIDE FOR PROPOSED POWER POLE W,PP FORMS TO DETERMINE IF THE PROPOSED METERS AND SERVICES ARE ADEQUATE FOR THE PROPOSED USE 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DOCUMENT THE CONDITION O ALL EXISTING FEATURES TO RERAN PRIOR TO THE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE THRGUGH THE SITE DURING THE PROCESS O EXCAVATION, GRADING AND B. WATER AND WASTEWATER PLANT INVESTMENT FEES AND SERVICE LINE SIZING WILL BE EVALUATED. BEGINNING OF WORN. ALL ITEMS DAMAGED OR DISTURBED SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED N KIND TO THE EMBANKMENT. THE GRADE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH CONDITION THAT IT IS WELL DRAINED PROPOSED WATER SERVICE W SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER AT NO ADDITIONAL CONTRACT COST. AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT REDIRECT OR CONCENTRATE ROWS SUCH THAT C. I E EXISTING WATER AND/OR WASTEWATER REQUIRED ABANDONED AND UPSIZED. ALL DAMAGE TO DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES WALL OCCUR. PROPOSED SAN. SEWER SERVICE............. .. s O NEW SERVICE TAPS TO EXISTING MANS SHALL BE MADE BY CITY CREWS AT THE DEVELOPER' 2. NO MATERIAL OR DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSD OF WITHIN THE PROJECT WITS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION S EXPENSE THE WATER OF THE OWNER AND A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 10. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE ADA TITLE III REGULATIONS (28 PROPOSED SAN. MANHOLE DESIGNATOR SERVICE MUST BE E%CAYAT AND TURNED OFF AT THE CORPORATION STOP PER CITY STANDARDS THE SEWER SERVICE MAKE ALL ARRANGEMENTS TO OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM PROPERTY OWNERS FOR DISPOSAL LOCATIONS CFR PART 36, CURRENT EDITION AND THE CURRENT ADA AND ABA ACCESSIBIUTY GUIDELINES MUST BE EXCAVATED AND C CAPPED AT THE PROPERTY LINE, PER QTY STANDARDS. OUTSIDE THE UMITS OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL CONSTRUCTION (7/23/04). ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM CONSTRUCTED CROSS SLOPE OF LESS DEBRIS IN A MANNER WHICH IS LAWFUL THAN 2% AND A MAXIMUM CONSTRUCTED LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF LESS THAN 5X UNLESS PROPOSED STORM INLET DESIGNATOR / n D. SINCE THE LINE WALL BE PERMIT A ED, THE APPROVED FIRE LINE PLANS MUST ACCOMPANY THE FIRE OTHERWISE NOTED. IN THE EVENT THAT A DESIGN ELEMENT DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADA V SPRINKLER SERVICE LINE CCNNECTON PERMIT APPI.ICATONS 3. WHERE PORTIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE REMOVED, THE PORTIONS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN SHALL BE STANDARDS THE MATTER MUST BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE DESIGNATOR 3 PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE ALL DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN IN PUCE SHAT BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE D( S713WW OA VERT CRP EX XX' S 4. WERE NEW CONSTRUCTION TIES INTO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS CURBS THE CARBE GW4ME7ER S715PM SEINER r-= CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO A TRUE LINE WITH A VERTICAL FACE AND TO A D, STCNM/ EX "I S7AYM MINIMUM DEPTH O 2-INCHES OR TO THE DEPTH OF THE REINFORCING STEEL, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. P THE 91 EDGE IS DAMAGED WRING CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE RE-CUT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS Lt. "I S4N 3ELW77 D: SIAFTIRY SE7M64 BASIS OF BEARINGS 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO SITE CLEARING OR DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES SEE EROSION CONTRRO. PUNS EX. WATER CAVE EX WATER THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE SOUTH UNE OF 6. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE SEI/4 OF SECTION 21. TIN. R70W OF THE ACCOMMODATE TRAFFIC AND DRAINAGE or G45 Lm c - 6TH P.M., WITH THE LINE ASSUMED TO BEAR S89'45'26'W. A: 91/RED EZEL'lR/C LWE -E- Er BGW V VE'9W~CWE' CAVE T p~~~C~LI~~~py D:FARR CF776SLoIW,_.___..... Fa - BENCHMARK D: OVERNEID PONY AW EEECMC..... . THE BENCHMARK UTILIZED FOR THESE PLANS IS THE Er AM£NIIDPANT . SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 21, BEING AN .dm ALUMINUM CAP IN A MONUMENT BOX IN THE INTERSECTION OF VALMONT ROAD AND AIRPORT D: WA 70? VALVE yN' ROAD NTH AN ELEVATION OF 5241.11 FEET-CITY OF BOULDER DATUM. D: WATER AE7DP.............................. EX. MGAAVIIXE.... Dr. uGYT PIXE D: POND? PCWE 0( `54A MCUwIXEIE.SYW.47ZN......,.._....___..____.., I`A D: S70WM M9ET LLP9IWA 7WP I Io~,\ D: S70WM MAAQLF DE96WA 7EN......... ..........._........0 NO UTILITY s - w -9GULDER COUNTY JAiL~ ~Sc.J;-=p r,-.:HTY JAIL- WORK \ ° r r (r° r ° r r wov , I ► Ir ~'•.r►rrrrr.' r ° • ) ~.rrflrrr- ` M .r'r rrr r 1 / _ ` , No UTIuTY V SEE SHEEP WORK C3 d~ !r\ti /Ir HILL elm 3 1 yyeK- 1 DUAL SLALOM ZONE ♦ y! ♦I . a IaL 7RAOC ZgNf I ' KEY MAP / °w r i l NO SCALE ILI L s,•\r/l E 1 ti\ 4\\ 1 , / l~~A K~am) y 1 I 1 ~ I i 1 ~ ! 1 1 r/I ~ ~ ) ➢ MAO~ieecN~ r~a~ / / ♦ / I I 1 , I ~ \ r r r ;e rASAu mF 111 \\e n~ r ~..r~ r / .0 NOTES .715 D*R¢AAn (ro mux) \ / / 1 f r r ♦ \ ` 1. THIS PROPERTY IS SERVED BY A PRIVATE IRRIGATION IRRIGA NOT mod[ I I \ 11 ®H / r / / Ae1 1 ! ~ / : \ \ THS EMB CEWATER SUPPLY snTEM, ANDGTHERE FORE NO ~ KKR) D / x 1 I r r r r r r CYCLOCRtt r r r r r IRRIGATION METER IS REWIRED. CY M ` rAroosEU 1 M / ` / " ~ „ , \ • 6 \ _ 2 THE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC RUNNING THROUGH EAS ! T'^ • THE SITE CURRENTLY SERVES ONLY THE EXISTING eASaic EA9]R1YT ueu xAr ~ / / ♦ r o ~ 4 r" • o • ~ . ~ r FARMHOUSE AND RELATED STRUCTURES. ONCE THE H WS (ro.a[xw) M M ` / / SLO°£E$ 'MO ` rfrAL B IS RELOCATED THIS OVERHEAD LINE STALL BE REMOVED. 1KEZOVE \ / / , r _ r r !y ! 1 r r ' \ a ALL FIRE HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATE I ' • . _ WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR PUBLIC EASEMENT. / / / , I I • • \ THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND METER SERVING TH r / 111JJ ' ♦ / t y ` r r r I f / r r r r I~ \ \ T PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ~v ` , _ r.~,r y'' , ` Irr SHALL G¢TRAILS D,WI ,ro+oe Pnc L BE REMOVED/ABANDONED PER CITY STANDARDS Y / I / ~ ~ aTXS[w 5. THE EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE LINES WATER, CAS, s!F4 ° \ ~ ~ rII 1 / ~ I (10 tE AnAlml \ e> r r'Al" = / / r r SHALL ETC.) SERVING THE EASING FAR CITY SITE I / n: ♦ / Ir r ! , \ r ♦ / I I r \ \ SHALL BE RDIOVID OR ABANDONED PER CITY AND ` PItOVeDER STANDARDS. DETAILS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS % • I r r . 8. THE EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE TO THE PROPERTY Id X~'` - - a r _ r r TMC °PAKi °%K SHAH BE INTERCEPTED AND EXTENDED TO THE NEW ' • ?r rrA 9rtO RESTROGAS. THE REMAINING PIPE EXTENDING TO THE OU Q 1 - z' r'~ r (ro a rranitc) f~~'-l~ tl TION r' r r r ` TH" PLUG BO ~ENOSAOF PIPSH TM BE ABANDONED IN RUGS• THE RAJ-~ / w aw ewcrMnv Lunn') K~ ,r' K X EXISTING SEANCE PIPE PORTION THAT IS TO BE ° x'` K Mw ~ nor M x • t x :X~ MAINTAINED SHCC BE INSPECTED TO VERIFY CURRENT CONDITION IS ACCEPTABLE ° u k R x ~S/! X Q 3 J r x z rA4MM"i>MESAVLrr k} Irk 1 ° ~0.^1ROJ r > WRAX v; x~ I A °A s Irrrr x -e r t ° 1 ; ettnR.e ~ II I ~ r r , Aa uR Ax m / / +.g~ 4 ~ 1. ° ~ ~ wenMS - - _ x rtctxtxt xn ! 1 y &KE ~r~ 1 sw Irr r r % rI♦VI,Ir /~\,rrl/ ~ ~ ~ EAS rorr vaP ~ T I 1 / „r /rII lroeE,bnunl X`` ! ♦Ir ?r y~~~~pr I~ I x 4 ~ ~ ~ _ / I „r ~ y rII i.I ♦ ~ ~ ~ GILDS ss i f,. ,r. ~ ~ ,Ir< ",'"'IA' //`I'~ NpND/ ~ I rI ~ v . j(NK !Y ~ I r NG t L sr ~uws paT / R pN , ♦ I' ~~pE / - , fl Eff~ 0~ ♦ r r r ! 0 / ~271C i NVAIL 3/4' WATER METER i~vw A• WATER TAP I . A•FIS TA' I ° Cc i III / Ir IIr •\,`.rr rII Ap• -TER TAP °I °(4F°41F y rII ; M I/ V ,♦I / -TER hl c sEeR TAP. ~ I J DIx r uwfw T• ~3 vA I r • NET: TRAILS InrJ 1 umsr. lxl R sA vARn rII r r`'r/ I ° / ovarrMraMa) %A iI ~9 I I % I r eno¢ BUT1E M H" T ARFO-LLY A45LIMLr t1,f16 r / I r To 9 AM 1RAL cRoss c 7p ~ a r'• I EET 0.Mdl E.%' d ♦ m / cnXwE NMN STR DANE RAP uart T' ~ I ~ mrr RAiAQ 1161L° q ' 'V / tm'ns aAw Q g Q Q ,s ~ / ' fl © / fl _ ot/~ (TO ZMfl POW? Pate Cs~ IT, X 91 / r . r (TO M i, ) 8, PIC Fro er.ma~m) 9A5A2 RAN OF fl/~ fl / ~„i,rz / EbN. r tJ /14 EASD r ! fl CROMM 41 1d WST1-RISE -_r- ♦ CALL unuTY NonFlCanoN CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1981 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE HARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. SEE SHEET C2 NO Unu1Y n UTNLOITY °T..I. ~I I ~ WORK ~ r: IR / I PARRAV KEY MAP 0 ! O NO SCALE •IR / / \ I 40 / low. J % P ° ° ROPERTY . ° EASEMENT I ~ BHRTEA R+Pd v / / I ♦ \ ~ A~RAQ PAM \ ♦ }~7 /('l. ~ / tnsnw~\ vAaWw~ 0 ~ ! cnsrAC mMr \ ? PARK AREA ~ ~I vv m~vam/ vvv / u Pte/ A / \ \ / _ / fONTAN SON ~ \ ! / \ \ NOTES 4p 1. THIS PROPERTY IS SERVED BY A PRIVATE IRRIGATION 3 SYSTEM. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT CONNECTED TO \ \ THE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM, AND THEREFORE NO ° YY IRRIGATION METER IS REWIRED. ° ♦ TER Dn.l 1 2 EMSTING UTILITY SERVICES (ELECTRIC WATER. SEWER. 1 GAS ETC.) CURRENTLY SERVING THE EMTSTING STRUCTURE T a¢ ua I SHALL BE MODIFIED AS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE (Tw) I [ N xy,rt / ORNIONG Q SERVICE ONCE DEMCUnON IS COMPLETE. Y i !7~ ) r 3. THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE SANITARY SEANCE TO THE EASTING BUILDINGUNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL p ~/R RESEARCH ARCH TO DETERMINE E THE L LOCATION SHALL LL B BE d ✓ ' rx COMP FLED OURWG THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENT DESIGN 4 f -I.cx PROPOSED jp~pp~p pR PROCESS ME PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS MILL NOT IMPACT THE SERVICE IN ANY NEGATIVE WAY OUTSIDE OF x',X _ _ spMrC m THE BUILDING LIMITS. mss ° x~ s I cwsmc ns 4. THE E)OSIING BUILDING FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM 9RA11 BE MAINTAINED. N I Mari r k „ r p I 5. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PROPOSED BUILDING h P PROPOSED DOC MODIFICATIONS 6. THE E)OSTINO WATER METER SHALL BE RESET WITHIN f X k x t .Y - - THE RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN. T. X p, x 7. sm EET LIGHTS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC h r nTc q~A~y, fA5 MIpF R pNBR✓I". I x I ryo,MMwl RIGHT OF WAY OR A PUBLIC EASEMENT. ANY EASEMENTS k r SHAH BE DEDICATED DURING THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENT S PROCESS. SERVICE TO BE MOD*1ED AS NECESSARY / m P.uMNe~ WATER SEPMICE rmrewPAMWW . f '.1., ; /C,(t• j I MOOFIED To BE AS NECESSARY I ° X F~ h QTS'1M" dClpw' YANTAM`9AEN SRNZ (M RENO W) EX r S1N1Cn ENSTING ME" VIBE R sw ME" BE RESET RKNT~MAY ~J GAS sorl4m ~,G > f vim/ % xx M ETER To E s~ Y MN FNN6E ~ oTwxAO '~w ~ k ~ f~~ ~ ~ •'k . ✓ x w \ xn(m .MlMI,q X emi[al e'WARM ! Y f X x F r SIROPQM TOW ~na_u (nW (l x T ° T x h / fK/ ° ~K ~r ,N ° MA6'rNC sort L.x r m a aAV~m WWIT OF PROPOSED ~ I• MY - ]pg NWT e.~- - n -Cl~ NIOVAM! WT PdE , I I I I L l _ (kS11W OMICCN mzcTNc m ma TD uMR NeM1a' RJEP PROPOSED _ w ■ w CURB BUS SLOP w ❑CL'!RC' (1a .R1AWJ w D9flA4' 6' Or mane w _ ~ALAIDNl ROAD + w RESET WATER TEETER w RlF (LIP/ . 0 w ANDOU PROPOSED CONCPETE cwsnw e'vTC swswr sMw DRAE RAMP £S Si SS ® SS SS 4 SS 5A SS SS A 55 SS SS r ey roc roc roc Fa roc ~ roc Tae o ~ - ASPEN INDUSTRIAL FAR; `'r v.LHu li CITY PARK; PHASE ? CALL UTIUTY NOTIRCATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. LAST 37MW - ItsncR CDEINT'i JAIL li ~o - - - - ISE fl 4 fl Q IXENI( 7 7 7 BOULDELC OUNit`-lAt~i_ - 77 7-7 k'TN 'L~, + SSV ti K /H - _ 1'"i. Y ~r o N ~CL KEY ♦~W * ` + r.'.~ AEASweA r S. `!'+e- ► NO SOME 'cl f .•=r T7 ~7 , q ¢ I r BIKE TERRAIN GRADING NOTES BICYCLE FREERIDE AND SKILLS ZONES SHALL COMPLY WITH I I i STAR ]M w♦• I GENERAL OVERLOT GRADING ON THIS PLAN AND DRAINAGE 1\ f PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE DRAINAGE PLANS. DETAILED TRAIL r N X51 y FEATURES AND GRADING INCLUDING MOUNDS FROM 2' TO 14' a reMC ~ ' (Tro 1 ~ ~ ` J k bU~ z . HEIGHT NULLBE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THESE ZONES TO CRE, (SIDE ~p>B "*S yO9 ` r~ ~!q ~ y r'm° { p r Lg Np~~ A ' J I 44•f.,a A ROLLING LANDSCAPE EXAMPLES OF BIKE FEATURES ARE 't~'•• P o I 7 7 rv/.. M19 I" ~i V. II J INCLUDED ON THE BIKE PARK DESIGN SHEETS FOR REFEAENC 1 t' J I I i ♦d~~ n awn ; ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF SPECIFIC TRAIL FEATURES SHALL BE ~4p~ / jf' P.I y{ `~I a r. M^, 1 7 .e A I I rxsaNe ,va PROVIDED ON THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS. W4 1 ) AT THE CTE THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION, TERRAIN E FEATURES N CONTRACTOR COONSTRU CCORDAN T ♦ I 1 1 / / ° - _ - - I I r ` !ter aR 7 \ Y4 ``t• J~ a.' _ _ ~f S7N_. WITH THE TECHNICAL DO AND ASSOCIATED PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. GRADE OF THE N ta1.W' Sstlt'` `4 r r _ ri. itl~ ♦ ` `1 e`, 1 r ' I ~r ~I♦ STEEPER THAN 4:1, ALLOWING FOR AN E MOUNDS WILL J E !ro'J I J ,,1 / / / t I / f I ♦ SUSTAINABLE SURFACE GRADE THAT WILL NOT ERODE AND w 1 ® bF ~..}1/ ! + N 1~r ~j ' i ~♦r CAN BE PLANTED WITH NA71VE SPECIES FOR SELF-SUSTAINN % GROWTH. IT AREA ~r l { V J f y - - ~c r. "R'ti"~ "r'~ - _ ✓ I 1 r _ TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY AND PREVENT SEDIMENT NUNOFl THE BIKE TD RAn ZONES WILL FLOW TO WATER QUw Y / r / ✓ 1. 7~ - \ - _ - y f FEATURES OR SHEET ROW THROUGH ADEQUATE GRASS BUFF 1 BEE BE REDUCED THROULEAVING H E uSE OF DIISPER~SIOON CONCENTRATED E i V \ 1 } , _ _ ____ii - _ _ NECESSARY. ADDITIONALLY. WITHIN THE TERRAIN ZONES THE 5280-~` - OPEN SPACE AREAS BETWEEN EACH SET OF MINERS WILL B :E* 00~ = CONSTRUCTED TO FORM SMALL WATERSHEDS THAT DIRECT ✓ a cl - f, J ♦ +,i `n ♦ - , . b~ SURFACE RUNOFF FROM TRAIL 1HRW LANDSCAPE AREAS I $ 0`•, ~e ♦ - _ _ _ PROVIDE WRIER QUALITY TREATMENT. - '!rr r _ - - -4 THE TRAIL CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPORT A SPORT-SPECIFIC G - tY \ s ' . / ~(se~xmcsrnf y r ,t - -AID - s - - SOIL *BINDER MIX TO SURFACE TRAIL TREAD AREAS THAT WIl ::7 NO SURFACE S DESIGNED TO B - - T BE SEEDED. THIS E SUSTAIN U l~~- - - r w,- _ AND MINIMIZE EROSION AND SEDIMENT TRANSFER FROM THE TRAILS. wK'L _ _ . a . • ♦ .r'' - s r v. ♦ r Y. _ ' f YI¢"7WAWSShEJ - - r _a TUM SWIM _ - F ; , w p y _ SySg F. ` ` ~wr r i ! rf - - 51 - ! - - Z U a~, - BD--+l~~ W _ -';R. U y > _ e.. - - ' 11.E I ,K x v ♦ - - - P r w+s r ?~np!! a _ r - 55 _ ' - - - 4 cz, 1 \ ~2 , r 00 ♦ _ AaTSnenvora~c .ter - _51 I Q . I I r Uy " ♦ - - - - IT_ml eus,, _,r I I n~ 3~ r` szeo ~r s25s ~ s2ss Q Ik VISA < w I 'I ~'C 3 5155 - 5.., .I Y LLx-E HATCH LEGEND SJBDirISiOh~ S4!*aNeAaTwx:- offmw fvNCE PROPOSED CRUSHER FINES S \ °N EAST SIDE OF Pnnw k wA9. s r t e N k\J• PROPOSES GRAVEL..... f ^ -m TT - f J w 51'A °~5 5Q~'A .wTwvc wo ree ncv PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK / I .IPM ~T ✓ N~~ a 4 ) _ ~ I10 Af _'I-_~~r." Wt155 ~ 7 I PROPOSED BIKE TERRAIN ZONE.... _ 9AfAQ -tc 1~ ZQVf , I OF rA ~ - 5 - fs,<NObs ns sarO ' ,~„.o - "i's ♦.P ra y'1M ! I , SITE, WANT .x-°' 4 51~ 9p ~\1 AMERICANS W7H DISABIL177ES ACT f ' - H LbNC, iL /`p b. i. ^ . - , J ✓ ! - JI REOULA77AVS REWIRE 9D£WALKS rO NA IMF A MAXIMUM aopE LY 5.T £XC£Pr MH£RE N I _ s'. - r E as ..7's~ ia+ r y _ - • - SIDEWALKS ARE COV57RUCIED ALGIYC i EXIS77NG S7R££7S W7H SLO,°£S IN EX= OF ACA 57ANDARDS 7NENEW SIDEWALK ~e ;L aNarETE r'rpR r - - _ sr+o - ! r ' 5LOPE CANN07 EXCEED THE SL OPE O£ RJE STR££r IN WS LOC,1 Aq✓ AND MUST MEFr ALL APPLICABLE ADA REOUIREMENIS wig , oll ~ , , .;J yNV ''f \ % Ipamnr~is ~d•+ ° Sf~ r° PAIN IwMTID f' i t -_j6 Acp ~~pq~I 2d oawm~ ~r r _ ~t X111' TREES (TV.) I . - w ♦ j . •i - ` I -i'~ - aamc itaa t Er w ~1 7 J/ ,y~~ !m rrmalmJ ' orarE slob rcr a I < ~ ~ram¢ 1~ r! _ _ SOFT ~AbE I _ irtia~ e' suxm-u , w, 52 7 f J ER PAM casolU rEArE WRTANiFA~711N., , , - ~r - ALL UTWTY NOTIFICATION MATCH LINE CENTER OF COLORADO 1~rL6 1-800-922-1987 _wcrr CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. HATCH LFGFNn - - - ! \ - PROPOSED CRUSHER FINES BOLILDER C4UHT'f JAIL'""" PROPOSES GRAVEL J., , PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK L ~j • • PROPOSED FII(E TERRAIN ZONE_ r • - - " r a -saP -rrrrrr-r~~♦ '~~rrrr fEOA, L L~C N NO ~r r}-r_rr r`rr-hrrrrf•,,-, / s~ j -x. SCALE . F" 15 NOTE TOP OF HILL MILL BE RE-GRADED TO CREATE ROLCNG TERRAIN. HISTORIC Siar / / DRAINAGE PATTERNS TO BE MAINTAINED. , r ° ti1D C ' FINAL GRADING TO BE PROVKIED AT TIME r / •y _ _ AMERICANS W7H DISAbXIAES ACT OF FINAL ENGINEERING. R£IX/URQYS R£W/R£ ,57D£WA/XS TD HA Y£ A ' nws 5 eR MA 9tib XIMUM SLC)°£ 6F 5X £XQPT NHPRf r - \ r r - t (^9) ylpp S70£WALX-7 ARE CCN57RUC7£D ACLWD / ♦ / ♦ _ /EITY OF £A7SANG S7R= NFTH SYGP£S IN £XC£SS _ ; / ♦ ; ° # % BOULOEP, OF ACA STANDARDS 1Nf NEW 57DEWALK , ' •S - SL CPL- CANNOT EXCPED 7H£ S CP£ or 7H£ ♦ S7REET IN 7HIS LOCARpV AND MUST MEET rr ,./----yes //r ALLAPPC/CABLf ADAREOUIR£M£N1S - - =C- - Ram BIKE TERRAIN GRADING NOTES _ M = S 1 Ai ~WAs eafar ; P------------- I ♦ - 4,~ •t y I TQ E m' 51p j GENERAL OVERLOT GRAINING AND APPROXMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED 'TRAIL ENHANCEMENT' BERMS ARE SHOWN ON THESE SITE RENEW DRAWNGS TO DEMONSTRATE APPROXIMATE AREAS OF DISTURBANCE AND EFFECTS CW DRAINAGE PATTERNS, G ANY. / THE FINAL DETAILED GRADING DESIGN ALONG RAIL CORRIDORS Aw - _ MAY INCLUDE ADDITIONAL BERMS AND GRADING DEPENDING ON r e.~ , AVAILABILITY OF FILL MATERIAL UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES / / SNAIL THE FN- GIIADWG AFFECT THE OVERALL DRAINAGE _ ff DESIGN. FINAL GRADING DESIGN FOR 04EALOT GRADING WALL BE PRONDETAILEDDE _ - ; /,f r r,!II D AT FINAL ENGINEERING F RENEW AND APPROVAL OR CITY Ir / vW . rrrrr rDr Cl z _ r.Wion _ +f` f rte - "r` STAA17fe01 .r - A• ; ' _ 'Ap . DO PATH AT RICH AND AA01LL 1AIx CLID• , - ~ r~~iLA}t~ Fsown ,yp - / - ! ffim AT A MAIL Yp[ W CSX •r- - BpU/ELI 1-" rrrl _-m E R Wpl IllAll JL rr/ rr/ h Awinw PAN fr / / Y+~ VALMONT N Irrr f / e00 PAIN iFNgiO 5231 ~b % , i' op 94 ' / / DOG 1/ I Ia w.x.~ kkkfff anunw i - J PATH - ~ 7 A,i 7-1 LATCH UNE CALL UTIUTY NOTIFICATION SEE &Y= C7 CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTIUTIES. III SEE -WEEr C+ MATCH UNE~ FLAI wcrrr~~ , ' ti5%k KEY MAP Sr NO SCALE PATH az q >ao Iiaa earl I / s°' f ''o 0 I i~ In m HATCH LEGEND Ern c S I / I~,~ 1. 1 Senor A-1 I = j ~r ~ I QIQ ,w ~e - - ,l ~ Pnavaseo atusxm HIES i r 0 / - Pnorases GRAVEL I A r A / _ I l ♦ PROPOSED CONCRETE WAX... 41. -ol em Ai~3 , y a ` r 1 '\'w, ' `,ti ~'-Mti'Sy PRaroseo BIKE TERRAIN ZONE I' 0~~lr Is a Ih / 1mA • O'A BIKE TERRAIN GRADING NOTES nA \ 1 wrAa Rr T GENERAL OVERLOT GRADING AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED 'TRAIL ENHANCEMENT' BERMS ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE RENEW DRAVANGS TO DEMONSTRATE APPROXIMATE AREA! DITCH ~ , ,j ~ r OF DISTURBANCE AND EFFECTS ON DRAINAGE PATTERNS, IF A THE FINAL DETAILED GRADING DESIGN ALONG RAIL CORRIDORS evu lu81uTO1'E OF LL MATERIAL FlTKINAL BERMS ANGER OI gRCUDM TTANCEs y w I / : i J~~ ' SN,LLL 1HE FINAL (t2ApNG AFFECT THE OVERALL DRAINAGE DESIGN. FINAL DETAILED GRADING DESIGN FOR OVERLOT L GRADING WILL BE PROVIDED AT FINAL ENGINEERING FOR CITY a I 1 1; / 1 1~y ♦ REVIEW AND APPROVAL TrI h sZT "'I A (r1P.) ~ ~ 1 j I ~ I ~ Z RME CTVP.) Z V 1 1 e 1 I , , lror2wxl ✓ ~ ~ ~ ! JI. "cr y ammr m ff Q I 1 / / 5230 NEW c ;1 ' msacawr / V i 1 al atNC WALK { ~ i ~ ISWlENN1Z AQZ6 / 1 - (>.a aim, I I I~ vnd (m gnNA'1 / ~ I`/ s 1 ~i oP 11111 mrnc,rAV Darr "UU/ ,B2.u Hal , / I (m PAIN I, PATH / -Tmm „ II © p U'- f ~'T uioxAx / I AMERICANS HFTH DISA811177£S ACT I / s>eis/anxc . Hui .i REOULAROVS REWIRE' SIDEWALKS TO HA 6£ A MAXIMUM SLOPE CF 5X EXCEPT HHERE _ ,~,sw 1MTM rl+~~ _ / I . l ! A A, ' SIDEWALKS ARE CONSTRUCTED ALONG y__ j i< r ~ «I NAB 9ti EXIS77NG STREETS IWTH SLOPES IN EXCESS ;t rRBIV,E ,-s i ♦ / ' , ~ ^ ' j (rrJ OFAOA S7ANDAROS. THE NEW SIDEWALK yar ro ~R yr+'°"" 'j r ♦ s ! SLOPE CANNOT EXCEED 7HE SCOPE OF THE ' I / sE vor.4Tm 57REFT IN THIS LOCA 77OV AND MUST MEET SIMI, . rm a ALL APPLICABLE AOA REgYIR£MfN7S PA 3H I - IA -/;r °FB mGr wssSwE I-m Gtu run _ wuanug - swswroma nrrml Pxi----- / , Y raur< a aaTarn , - . Jxxu IX arvr = V ~'v Lq 'rear a Ift- Et rbsria ra7sNx'as~ jA m raw r AT v a mj[rwrAwRa DISE-RNIPS m BE - - ` ' NOaAD As.sloEx m a - " _ _ - - - - wsn~c axe Ago " nt xIa ooslVia _ _ _ . _ OIL OMCTC AL AND K w' ° - Ex s4l l - aw~o arYI7.1- ~`t, TO, ri`, nay u .vor w S(r'P _ arena m reaux p aEm Ara CUTTER ,p reorosEB aTerar6 a r nne WE wmn rn E EAST TO 'AEST.` B rnssaar , v AnAnlm'', RS..naNRA. _ ~~~'7 5 Ca- WA UL YALMONf ROAD y - - - - PRaY9Il Ole _ - - IDPM]10W1E m11E16/1E r-SEE SIOIYIMIWI ST , C351X5' a1Ee ao gyyAS m [NI K E"SPAC eJss'ne' ai0/ SR®Iq Sf ST craw Smw 00, m AcO SEE TYPICAL SECTION a.RB AAO WU _ 11ROC1NVC mACINIe CITY OF BOULDER Si--g Sfr RIRIE OIpEfIPAq$~ E,E6E !]Ar QP,W r ®[MIRIgCCRa VALMONT PARK SI0MM ILL NOT BE 2 CITY OF BOULDER, PROAZT. a me NOTE EXSIING CURB AND STRIPING PHASE VALH"uDiT PARh; AT INTERSECTION AND ALONG EXIST. d PHASE ? ENTRANCE LANE TRANSITIONS MILL NOT BE iP a TO R d ZLW - 2WA a m FL IMPACTED BY THIS PROJECT. PAN S' BE2 S BIQ we u' LAZE n' HAIR LANE u' IRE LANE Ix PAl1/940ABEN - PNSEtf SITE IX Avrar a r J71 \ CALL UTIUTY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLOORADO UNODO E1aSr. OO Oi m ff BA'AOR r-T 1 \ ` 11M ING M OE Of ASNVLT AND PAIL M PROVLE CLEW JOINT. 1-800-922-1987 .fUf AA1'AmyaiE far IX A~r n cr axe aP ear a• A.v r (a4EAaRC a nRVe TO a w rAeP11 ST w m o NIO alml Jaeruv W a CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE NVM TM) BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND 0 VALMONT ROAD X-SECTION MEMBER UTIUTIES, NO SCALE HATCH LEGEND PROPOSED CRUSHER FINES , - PROPOSES GRAVEL I Wl -WEET C5 PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK UNE ♦ 2 PROPOSED BIKE TERRAIN ZONE n b o PI 4 n L Jy L NLLL~LL 90PT AKA(E PAM i n ~ 1 / I SCALE ' ~ TE AREA AMERICANS KITH DISABICIA£S ACT REGULA7701VS REQUIRE SIDEWALKS TO HAVE A MAXIMUM SCOPE oF .S.T EXCEPT IfH£RE EW RNG STREETS W7H SCOPES #V XCESS J OF AOA STAND rory ARDS THE NEW SIDEWALK ~ Lvnscwc 5 a \ > VALH7NT SCOPE CANNOT EXCEED THE SLOPE CF 7HE eL>sesAa _d ♦ \ - . % - ' NrJSTPIA.. S7REET IN 7HIS COCA77CYV AND MUST MEET ALL APPUCABL£ ADA REIXIIREMENIS 5,.j ♦ ' PARK v_-21- ♦ F~- P A P d k O IT SEED'-y': Pros aS' a TO R I IPAIN YLLi-USE -,(i x ~ 'q _ # 5 LIE S' NE PAN, r R h. fix kx I ' yse' LANE vc III ma ux n' ve LANE IX PNI/SIOMGFR j k P O.Em STE xR ao I MAINTENANCE lip a A71 6 tn: x 1 57y f _ FRICLIT msr. TO SE EDGE A9 NNTyr S'_p IAJ \ ( PA Fade t EDGE a i . ANI) b r• ! ,1y s L v°rom TO vxmto[ aux nxr. G °wx .1 ~ .ur aure Orr acz A.vs,Kr ~Aawr~ii r erd~ a PARMIN ~[1 iV •i/ lr.JtlAU / PROPOSED STANDARD alm xa arnA LCIr SWW sx •)V EOT 11 Y» ♦ ` ` y__ ~10YM,AIIFD NvAavrAR, i H eti jy O VALMONT ROAD X-SECTION 'u h I I Z NO SCALE t Y K e X1 •*j14J. Eve ~ ~ r4~ T a~ t 14~ fro ~,evoltnl Too 1~ f l ,eYX AT S WAX DOG PARk ` r X, , NO, STORM ~g x lL IQ 5222 J~P 1' BIKE TERRAIN GRADING NOTES 'POP _ \ _ 5220 - GENERAL OYERLOT GRADING AND APPROMMATE LOCATION OF Irv, n POW I PROPOSED 'TRAIL ENHANCEMENT' BERMS ARE SHOWN ON THESE WwTpANCE SITE RENEW DRAWINGS TO DEMONSTRATE APPROAMATE AREAS a, SIRE PARfMG " 4 ACCESS OF DISTURBANCE AND EFFECTS ON DRAINAGE PATTERNS, IF ANY. I THE FINAL DETAILED GRADING DESIGN ALONG RAIL CORRIDORS .4 5219 A21a.&' MAY INCLUDE ADDITIONAL BERMS AND GRADING DEPENDING ON L_P rNgrc PAD 5223 `I I, AVAILABILITY OF FILL MATERIAL UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ro m a t rAaoe SHALL THE FINAL GRADING AFFECT THE OVERALL DRAINAGE - ~oIAMLVUe°xc ( A • ~l' DESIGN. FINAL DETAILED GRADING DESIGN FOR OYERLOT / M1 0 (w er AVroiml 'I GRADING WILL BE PROVIDED AT FINAL ENGINEERING FOR CITY Lip ✓ 5224 SM1ti 9gM1 52L9 p / REVIEW AND APPROVAL n •.~L PRDPCeEU - PMOI ° °alaGm _ ~i "I, POWND u E.tlSRVG OISAIEAQ. - - - PROPOSED WPB WL - g1a0YD 10' RGP 51OOi IROPCSO M® Olf1A/N9TOM~i1 W PRaPastD WISE 3T - SF£'SIUepA1FR PLUI 1°° E COIIOEm DIM RNA --low SmRN°TER PAN 1' W" CON AND GLITTER a m _ rt e)m N6 STOP a in dP9 (m xnwrti, - cnsrPw aEKar ro x _ 2S a TO n ' , - - -x ..,~nr-_ - sroemKO.~s vaw' vlpf ~aDw au _ - roACe AI,gmw ROAD N NE, BEET 03 -~-awn " - SEE SHEET CI3 FOR VALMONT a flRPe100 TO TO RD RE-STRIPING DETAILS AT y ADIAN. exis'r. .AVwAIrx s>zTlrN PARKING ENTRANCE 9,C1I[Ex THIS SHEET CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. 1. I: ~ o 9 ~ VI l - _ O NKEo ~MAAP ~K HATCH LEGEND to r 1REET~ PROPOSED CRUSHER FINES SAWX,P AAO TE f} •ti1 Hm IX WRl( \ f_ EEF~~~'~' 5 PROPOSES GRAVEL , EXIST RRP m PIO14 Fb51. $ IMO WRM 10 PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK _c. AMPO At WNOWA - I I I I PROPOSED CONCRETE WALX... IV YME PANTED OI081WX w/ rAO STATE UN PEDESMAN i ( PROPOSED SINE TERRAIN ZONE r G mom 16MMm PER, att STANDARDS i lOSaG aNE3 mr MAMUnm (MA r OF i Mar n - ,I 10, ATT- AMERICANS WTH DISASILIRES ACT Nk^-~ PA^+- a R£CTILAPONS REOUIRE SIDEWALKS TD HAVE _ MAA7MUU M 00f OF 3S EXCEPT WIERE SIDEWALKS ARE CQVSTRUCMD ALONG EVSTTNG STREETS WTH SLOPES /N EXCESS TW' saW CF AOA STANDARDS THE NEW SIDEWALK SilWf CANNOT EXCX'ED 7H£ •SLO°f 1NE STREET IN THIS LGCADCW AND MUST MEET ALL APPLICABLE ADA RFOUIREMENTS N'lX lA PNU a AoDWaI - _ A~ I' ` r I GRADING NOTES E7n'aF ales m r//, ITHE uuLn-uBE PATH CONSTRUCTION CONNECTION PATH NOTE HNTAPim(RNJ~ PROPOSED WILL YIa WILL NOT REWIRE ANY SIGNIFICANT GRADING OF THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS THE PROPOSED WALKS PER AN ON SITE MEETING WTH CITY OF BOULDER WILL HAVE A MAXIMUM DESIGN CROSS SLOE OF 1.85 STAFF, INCAUDINC PLANNING, FORESTRY, AND PARKS TOWARDS THE DITCH/ROAD AS APPROPRIATE AND RECREATION, THE EXISTING TREES ALONG THE PATH CONNECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO THE (m AIAI-) EXTENT POSSIBLE. BASED ON PRQIMINMY INSPECTIONS. ONE SIGNIFICANT TREE, AS NOTED ON ALL 1 THIS PLAN. WILL BE REMOVED. OTHER EXITING TREES WILL BE TRIMMED/PRUNED AS NECESSARY FOR - SAFETY AND TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 18' CLEM TRANSITION FROM DETACHED TO ATTACHED WADE AS SHOWN 10 ZONE ALONG THE PATH AS REWIRED BY CITY Aw0 EXIST. 11® STANDARDS. 1 _ (OD W DETACHED MMTI-USE PATH PATH WIDTH NOTE M M;EAE~ g I r II rN:IN. NLO BY I ^Z AN' I -A 10' CN -HS Q m - ;-0N S-AL. EC 9MY F k, ,TR F H--',11 IWALKS A_C\C; l SOUT SUL 0( -H_ 0I- TC ACHIEVE THE E F $'ARMm I1vA' ) ?F L7oraaDW01 PU-I. 10 MOTH. A FEASIB.LITY ANALYSIS S- ALL !'ON~LETE7 AND RE-AI\NC WM1-L5 SHA__ ?E F' •C MF F'+'"\' ACif;A Ac rll \(t ~i MI CONCRETE 0. PAIN PA~ i~ S SINE As A S 1xaml ro w ~ Mm j Ex AS ` AS NECESSARY DUE TO 04Y PAN MM SOWN SR WIDTH HIM TM *0 W WLT-Vi PEF ---K \Q- a' OETAOm t 4 PAM WOa IDR PAIN cow_ TO Or (tax ~l7' IX 1M[ZT AS NECESSARY WEB Ma tbSaC / - ppg ` 1W BIDM TO 1' WE PATH M 1[IIHYY 1. 1 1, m AFINN DUE m 06NIG SITE CNRIRMTS II PAIN EXISTWO STE CONSTR KM / VISTA :iLL AGE Wff N NOTE INS SIEET XE PAM WIDTH NWIE INS I i 'UV To IV TxMNSKY ou- PAm SUBDIVISION IvPWmaA>E AND LfFr HAND a 'Y` ti,F rr: R Lf1ADWd Mm v` • I I/~+A, EXISTING as a«mlwn EXIST. TIFF TO K nuWaE OF ma R r.~n N MMMOPraO V I ~~""7 ~P NOM ATn NOTE THIS Floq o: >Aas ` l~ - v r~n-uK a sew l r r - - I uN mAEWN ~r-"•- rt-- 1F PATH SIX T _ -''--\l? t, A "ice - r--~ AADP MS EX au0~ ~>b f a. _ _ _ LE PAID ez aov Ax 1 ab~ - IX f➢AF nan m Ex 9W I/ EX /EM7 IX auc A10 PASO I 1 IX a43 _ COST. PAINS TO K WfPI.N]p .IX5VZ14 rA~priMO N R~NN - - - _ _ _ - ' Ex ak~L PAm cx aPgN .PAa,vn Ma a' mE oacmw I - _ J A>AG ro M, SOOSa' L 504FAYr NHS AE NNIWI IX /LC~ IX a4E` IX PTAcr IX 04 m IX ro x C\ AVNIAAED EXIST. 114 m K IX Y7N191700f 117 Af E r RADIED MD PAID `INST. 114 ro E IIIYIED NAMED P01 CITY, m AXYNt IX SANCRIK ~ TO PIIO'.4 KRSVIY EX IIIK m aAE- PARKSiDE VILLAGE smw CLEARANCE Raw PAm, rApDIEO . II , I SUBDIVISION LU o P MATHAIK W PAIN L C j G 1 N,W" a0v a>~ a ~ q 1 I vALmovr ROAD mown As TD `m K CALL UTIUTY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. 40 20 0 40 80 - REMAIN SCALE: 1"=40' - , QOSIIL Nrr " Q S~ ,c>r¢ ,yam _ n.R I.JJFI -;AlL 7 7- 777 Q,ee / a,1n,rrrL:" `,'r NO SCALE OUAL SXALAV IAYE JWAW'7RAW 24V, a3' 38 39 / J / r',r r~ i i 1 ♦ I / 5" .t II 1' a.61 B jr,' EX 4 I ~ ! ~ ~ * s. ° °i r I l ~l 1 ~ ~ ° r / y~ r ~ / i ♦ 1 °°"e°s¢rmr u M° a i' 1 r ° 1t' 1 ♦ ♦ i / I / % i r sfisT !>D YEW J 1 ;1' 5 , i, • • - 'loll IA 2 ;52819 a II _ 5208 1 rrr..r_r~~ f IAA X 0~7~ ~ ~1 P~ A2 1 1 I I Po v rr I / / ta"ai Y Iri rrl I'r ` ~tEC Dae i r +mo - 1* -aw o.2 °so a Ry~ °`....=..o>p `arr1 ~4° ---i l - I t~ - .I uv+ x ~\ss„_ ''i If / SLA°ES7)1E 1 I - - "`-T=--__----'-_ u d I }R 'JIF~ r,I/ / ♦ / r r _ 0:60 / 11, r r i- r a \ e . x is 0.30 D. 0.30 1 ! 1' `r - 'oi¢iRAtssSSpJ - _ - • -r _ _ _ r r 5ti -Y--- I 11"91 'wEt Rnl 0.60 0.60 r~ 54 i I. rl i ,.r III rr / i-! _ / _ _ RAM OFM ' - - - ' .rr - i I \ u I \ ■ SSS~ W23Aaw sncc~arxe 52604t` mw - - rye 3_~,~►au~1wY^"F +r------------ I I s~~l ry~o ii \ st ~ r ~ f''' - smo•~.~~ • 9Jy _ _ - t. } I b ~_y~`En_ ,-pea ~ralm) 5253 5253 ~..5 5159 - - _ - lkt'~~ Q , 41 l.\ n I $ '-i ♦ , 4 tl KTA - Al ` _ 51--------- cilanlvlcl e•xwllcx alfi 29 10 OGFLSfN9 M9 LANF - _ LEGEND ti P OF DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY. 1 1 - sw4¢ TRAIL i T II 1 / x ' vd4rruRr Ntnsnc tMtzx k " A9N BOUNDARY ■ + _ DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN . muwNC 9MA n 3. 0.34 I ♦ ~e- • + Ixr DRAINAGE BASIN DESIGN POINT 'i{ - ► 7V1; ' t ♦ ♦ 10247 0 YEAR DEVELOPED FLOW (cft 8 ~ ♦ ~ i / 1 ° \ fi ' 10 _ too YEAR DEVELOPED Raw (cF, ti ) BASINI.D _ Q i _ .n - \ (sg siL ,~•n~i - , ♦ - i r' ' yN~ , '.,N - - - BASIN MtEh (Acw) ==i - 114- 10 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIEN J. .45 PEE fw 100 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT ' as 47 I O6 f , r "S PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR rz "sFr r 1♦ tm ON A-1 i I ~ * ,~J PROPOSED INOIX CONTOUR _ ~85- 4 Rt ~ = • .E PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION_ ............."54.67 (ALL C►G ELEvAnoNs ARE [U.N.o.) o> W~ x.c ~1aty oa oao i rarss auFal•= s _ -'.y/ s " _ te a ~a' ♦ Ex 4vre2r aivmaT...... ^0' / rx aaxr CONTOUR ----sres-- `s 6231. C 4.53 { fifty FJ~ r61"► ; r// 4 031 FX .Wi71 EIE'VrI7X1VS xISJ1 .0 _DrPAIH DIRECTION OF Row 1 10 FARM 1~j - J 00 j 100 YEAR DETENTION POND OVERFLOW - % 1w x \ PROPOSED Sf01iM SEWER r EX STOW ou KNI, a? wmw aefi[ ._r r o J 5248 9A'FE EA4gllfl. r' LARGIF sraau sNm u~o" "weq F. w cxsrnw Erw ~ Ex £ET - / ; _ _ EiD'ANC fOMi (fig ; r / / (~L SIT 7I vdytra 4 'xur 9>sr 911FILE r a----f+e+~aw17-------- FX YMYfkE Ram q m°NUL"'' - j, '7 MATCH LINE ,SEE -W C11 40 20 0 40 80 ` SCALE 1"=40' • , 90U.0Eo rrl5: !AIL( r ` i ~ r - - - LLL PROrGR IIIE , i 7,7'777 4~ Z-- - KEY MAP 0 No SCALE 40 "4 , `1 + A 13.66 ! ,v ♦ ' . z °a:ei 38.39 II. : '40 I,; .iw o. OP ;ice, ; ' "zs ,-'~y`; ♦ ' ' ! i I ;'','~iN°l; 012 1:4 qG - ' -FM - i 7 Z ' _ - s" - Ojwl V. - . - - _ - - fit, a* Q . LANE- LEGEND fti'PA+ulc I Ty.' t.0 r/ I ' DRAINAGE BASIN BWNOARY..._......... t~ t ■ r / '.,x; , • ; - f. r r I -tivw~ _ ! 1 DRAINAGE SUB-BASH BOUNDARY sss■ ■ ■ . do- - - _ - - DRAINAGE BASH DESIGN PONT ' 10 YEAR DEVELOPED FLOW (ds (T" l+~; too YEAR DEVELOPED now (0m, 00 mw . ♦ /~'^:'II ~iI BASH I.D. A 1_ . M.-. T BASIN AREA (A-) Y:: ,a6 M7MC rA1N ~rf r ♦ % y% r' I$I~B. 1YI I # TRIAL C-3 tD YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIEN 3.4 .15 _ I i PARK .90 I NIL .0 ► I f r ♦ II 100 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT r 01 I DOG PARK PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTfA1R.......,x•84-- 11 1, 1 C = 4:53 5y.9 (sE Sa rums) J ~(SEE SIE rtxp) _ PROPOSED INDEX CIXITOIIR.......... . _.__.-65 0.61 12. k ice, 54.fi7 / PROPOSED ALL .fu.N.Q,.. , C1O ELEVATIONS ARE tI i" ( S I !7~N I - 100 'irl~ ♦ IBnrAi vAS)grAE EX WitRYEA'Alf CLWRNiR.................. 2 , 10.01 ♦ a fX Sg77 EIEYA7KW5. s 'K 00 f' L, i~ oIRECFIa OF FLOW y ~'rr( I.; ; - ♦ !i sy7p taD YEAR DETENTION POND OVERFLOW w - ~ ~ as ~ I; szze~ 1 i ' ♦ f yM1~,. i f I~ PROPOSED STORN SEVER i ♦ ' IV , EX S7CWY CIA WRT CR , , I 11 hry~` lyary o'vwaw' w%r WAYE1fx S7WM -VXER C______7 Y n ! ' ; : ' , i ♦ PAINN IX S1OPll SEVER I . a1 b \ l l - MATCH UNE SEE SHEET C12 SEE -WEFT C9 MATCH LINE I` 91rfAq. YA1X , J-'/' - 1 $ - Q6AAC BlNN i' ~ple•"~ I r, ' , r PIC 7,7 ! _--L - ~7Y Em'nw'~rsernnv POo 1R N-i ' pper~.. - Jw ' f ^ ,l Q KEY MAP NO SCALE PAN MWALL, A4NIN.- c I, , I erx a1a CO.. r J i r B 21.64 i 'j ~ ~ ~ , r 5.7 0.60 21.61 1 r yr' rl V ' y l i T ry TYR 7 ~~/~'Yn~u ~ II ~ 1♦ ~ ~ r r i r lr4rr' r }I r1~ 1 5M1I ' I % t ~ _ - oos,,,, ~ % it r~, , I ; , , 5_ - ~ ~ ► s` I I/ " " ' / I 1l 4f (m Im-) ► S~ 1 \ 41, x 4A.~rl U mxe W r c"snrc a4rA ,,r te r~ ~ yu, 'I , i Evsracnarnng j r ; ~ Yf' J w raPrww r ut~ ' ro srwl / Y 1 u uAr '4f 40, ( 9) J I\ LEGEND I i r DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY r ~ TYPICAL v mars/aeAnns " I / { 'I DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN BOUNDARY . ■ a f r ,/r~nsnk"(d , / I DRAINAGE BASIN DESIGN PANT 01 MULYI.-u ►rA H 1d rI,` 1 ry 10 YEAR DEVELOPED FLOW (.f. Ns ' ~ w (eh w wma I; 1 a , °T► e~ / mra""` / 11.57 100 YEAR DEVELOPED FLOW (ne)w- - Z ~ ~ % ' I ~ ► i' ~ 121 O. ; i w 29.04 SEM -Am-- BANEO. a p ' rYta 4"R = y.%:~ /!7 it IC iuT-ug i i BASIN AREA IA-a) wsmc wAxAa r / ' J r 5 x ' t~ ~r -U~ , 1fIWr4Np 7 'M 10 YEAR RUNOFF COEFF10EN .45 " - / r r 'AAU .SO ' - - - - r I ' Awxr 100 YEAR RUNOFF COEFF1aERT ~~rAOrrn ~ I rw. fj t.ei f PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR. ..,........_.....`~4- PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR. . DoT a rlua snvc axxx~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ •1' ~ _ _ 1 J _ - F AEAOFIf - PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION. .87 cusnw a+m AAO`, Iccasnarertn w - - - calve wAm mms ro arAUx oAw uro mrrcA`e _ w.wo mmx „ s+ E' G u~•aiAnmv+.ua'~ AT nAa UrE I/ALMON7,ROAD 5ilM a ~°•6 arrrm (ALL CiG ELEVATIONS ARE [ U.N.O.) . ■!Ff ■~-!',l~iF~!'!~!!~!■ IXavrMIllaVA >FCtw(pat.._............... ........"-_-s.Fea__ ' • , ~AiPRp"IUlECartOUrt ' vAtLpli AoA0. ' IX b1tAEA' Cp/RX1P..................... ----5,76 ~Ri\ ` 5/ EtlS1NC dRB AM APPIWXI"Ah lll[A7101 K x 4L 1 st sr ! arnx m 4aAx wruW t+oOroAU ' DIRECTION OF FLOW ' CITY OF 60i.LCE"R sr sr r r SID 20 0 40 80 YALHOH- =qq{ 100 YEAR DETENTION POND OVERFLOW CITY OF B'OUIUEiI PHASE 2 PROPOSED STORN SEWER . V+AI HOivT PArcF: SCALE: 1"=40' PHASE 2 EHTAAA!CE IX s7wm C&%NNRT CR LARGE 01AIkTER S7nW SENER..... EC S70RM-%-NER......... y EX A/ E i MATCH LINE- r / I oKEY MAP / NO SCALE 171aLT-UE / r r PA~ m T a FACIE PAM ♦ A / / / % \ ~BGIG P RK ARfI / r ' 4~ \ / r fnva ~ 5131 I ~r. • v rr 5 i 5'118 b~ ~ v Ms y`lO i l r , 5~6 c. r( n W /VlZ Z3 2s 3 1 mvw r 2 _ WT cwWn; J 0 ,,.s7 / ~ i I 121 0.36 ~ i ~ Z' I ~ ~ ~ 0.83 D--?' r 1,1 D.18 ~ , ~ - ~ asrro aermc ~0 /r N 'r LEGEND 1 , r ~roo Dawn •1 V, w QJAU n 8?~y _.03 . DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY...... _ r i GRANX DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN BOUNDARY N r ea amaM ~ SEIER ;;y gid0f r f DRAINAGE BASIN DESIGN POINT.. 5225- 10 YEAR DEVELOPED FLOW (cfi \L II I f Ci 1, GPA LOT- 100 YEAR DEVELOPED FLOW (Ch)-~ 9R5 5721 r ,D 5219. 4 BASIN I.D. BASIN AREA (Aaaa) - 5218 _ 10 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIEN 3.4 :45 - 90 100 YEAR RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR ....`$4~ pftm~ Tty 1N° anER FnsnvC o tRr ms ac o[Nxr Dl. aAw r w w PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR . aanc a.T Nxr Az aae mr -85- ■ ■ ■ iii~ ■ 0 ■ EmmmV, PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION......... .................._..__.x54.67 yrsbw asb ~=:4- (AIL CAG ELEVATIONS ARE ..O.) _ - - = - IX AVIEApEZYAff cavro,b4...._..._........_....... _ ix 6M:E'A'GYWI"....__......_ .......................--^_SJ65__-• 40 20 0 40 80 IX vaaTeitvAnpus._............................................ .45.14 DIRECTION OF FLOW SCALE: 1 e-40' 100 YEAR DETENTION POND OVERFLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER EX S70AW pk FEAr cm LARL'C CPAACTEB 57OW SE)FN_ C _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 EX S7nW SELLER ST IX YAAW6XE y LEFT TURN LANE MODIFICATIONS AIRPORT ROAD l~ \ /y X p V/~ X i Y X, x ) CONCRETE II I ` UMITS OF I ou°°°o a° I CONCRETE I 0°0° 00 I ` RIGHT OF WAY *LP - - I `CT OF ~T - . r~...__. ~...~I - INSTALL STATE P LAW qTM PROPOSED np ,RVM) e' WALK sTANOUms xfv w - _ _ + NIl1PG4➢ s' 10' NNTED 10' i PROPOSED 4' LEFT PROPOSED 4' LEFT REMOVE IX TIE INTO IX AIRPORT ROAD n STRIPING AS SHOWN STRIPING n 1130, TAPER l~muttl 80' STORAGE d CONCRETE © TURN LANE STRIPING TURN TAPER oN c xur IX it' PAINTED MEDIAN REMOVE IX tm't sFfnC _ STRIPING AS SHOWN = -i 5' REMOVE IX ro - - STRIPING A$ SHOWR PROPOSED 4' LEFT PROPOSED 4' LEFT i Y 80' STORAGE 130' TAPER TIE INTO IX TURN TAPER TURN LINE STRIPING cl; INSTALL STATE LAW APIED. F CROSSING STRIPING r SICK PER CITY STANDARDS MODIFY EXIST. HC RAMP AS EXIST. WAIL( TO pA/ cTatt BE REMOVED w BBEE WALKMOVED 'TO PROPOSED EXIST. IRRIGA77ON DITCH W 4' WALK 10. 1. LT1-USE 10, RIGHT OF WAY PATHkiU RIGHT OF WAY _ USEMPATH TIE INTO FJOST. WALK 17 I I G AIRPORT RD ARE 20 10 0 20 40 LANDONSTRUCTION RN BAY TAPER Y OF BOULDER DESIGN SCALE: 1'=20' $TANDIRDS (D)(1)(S) AND A SPLID PH. STRIPING MODIFICATIONS ALONG VALMONT ROAD 5"Xd11 y x V x a, CONCRETE i WALK i X~ r B' WALK I Si 5f Sf Si .17 51 PROPOSED OSED CURB PROPOSED G1RB UNITS OF 20' CONCRETE REMOVE IX SOLID STRIPE FOR IRO do 1.8 j 1.8xi IT AND GUTTER CONCRETE DRIVE RAMP b if AND REPLACE WITH 4' GUTTER / DA WHITE STRIPE. Jp a PROPOSED EDGE OF PAN u PROPOSED EDGE OF PAIR 23' 3 10 PROPOSED CURB CUT 23' CL TO FL OF FL OF NEW SEE STORMWATFA PLAN INSTALL BIKE LANE J2' HO' NEW CURB CURB ONLY SYMBOL CENTERUNE OF EXIST. ROAD Ex f._ E;OST. STRIPING TO REMAIN. _ _ 32i =:VALAIONT ROAD 32' r~«Rn m a REMOVE IX STRIPING °m 01'x30' CONCRETE BUS PAD W/ AT SITE ENTRANCE u BENCH AND 8'x5' ACCESSIBLE AS SHOWN. LOADING ZONE ON WEST ENO. 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1'=20' AIN" RASE kJ4 THIS SHEET SITE of r Oxae NO SCAU EX15T WALX _ APPROX LOCATION OF - - RlWrCIF WAY EXIST. OErAa4MV WALK EXIST. - ATTAOIED WALK 1~ EXISr. MAINr EXIST. CURB • ACCESS RAMP AND GU77ER EA? Sr CURB VALMONT ROAD AND GUTTER CURB PROPOSED 8'X30' CONCRETE BUS STOP. EXIANDST. GUrlZR aIR8 • ENTIRE CONCRETE PAD IS 'ACCESSIBLE' AND HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN SLOPE OF 1.8x • • EXIST BIKE 100.72' MIN. 5'X8' ACCESSIBLE UNf 1 LOADING AREA 1lII 1 EXIST. UDUTY j - - - u I.e>< ! Left 0- BOXES (TD ~-D7ST. UNDSCAPINC D7ST. 7FMPO4ARY CURB C3 5.7' REMAIN) BIKE RACK CROSSWALK` 30' 1 PROPOSED BENCH EXIST. 3" EXIST. UAL/7Y L DETA10YED WALK BOX (ro TIE INTO BACK OF EXIST. VTREES (10 \ EXIST. WALK 11 REMAIN) REMAIN rM.) DTST. ASPHALT SERNLE ROAD FUTURE 49TH STREET LSr LANDSCXP/NC 1 EXIST EDGE OF ASPHALT --~EX/ST. LANDSCAPING c anal nco CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 1-800-922-1987 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. ABBREVIATIONS VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE AB ANCHOR BUILT NACU MACHINERY CGS ACOUSTICAL LELI~ TD~ BOULDER, COLORADO AD AREA DRAIN , ACCESS DGOIMATL MATERIAL AN ADDENDUM MAX MAXIMUM ADJ ADJACENT, ADJUSTABLE NEC" IECHANE AL AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR tED IEDIUI SITE REVIEW ALL" ALUMINUM MEND MEMBRANE ~ ANODIZED MH ANFACn.REI "`r ALTERNATE MEIN "~"°T ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET APPRM( APPROXIMATE " KI MLLE NRKN ASPHALT TWiL "IN MOUNT" ASPH ASPHALT MISC MILLIMETERS A/V AUDIO/VISUAL NO 'PE'B MASONRY HB>EwNG AUTO AUTOATIL NM ETERRS DIRECTORY SHEET INDEX AVE AVENUE MIT MOUNTED AVG AVERAGE MTL METAL AVP ACOUSTICAL WALL PANEL MBA. MLLI N B BASE N NORiX BD BOARD wC MOT IN CONTRACT BLDG BUILDING N13 NUMBER OWNER: ARCHITECTURAL B BLOCKING 1X, BEAM H aL NOM NOMINAL ON DUCTS, COEFFICIENT City of Boulder Parks and Recreation CS ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET BUT ~ NTS NOT TO SCALE Administration-IRIS Center B9 BASEMENT TD OUTSID~"YE DDIAMETER 3198 Broadway PLATT FARMHOUSE C CAULKING INET OF OITSEEEACE Boulder, CO 80304-2644 CON ITOU°S~ of "IMe' OPPOSITE ""N0 Contact: Perry Brooks T1.1 TITLE SHEET CPNG OPENING CIR CAST IN RACE DPP OPPOSITE Phone: 303.413.7226 A2.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS - FLOOR PLANS & ROOF P COC CONTROL JOINT CJ CORK TILE JOINT P PAR PAINT PARALLEL CX CORM TILE Email: brookspObouldercolorado.gov A2.02-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS - FOUNDATION PLAN & RO CL COLUMN LINE PRO PROVIDED CAST BY OTTERS PLAN B E ci CCent.H EILING" PPC ERF PE ATTED A4.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS -ELEVATIONS uCLOtn_ixeTERS PXP1c" PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: A5.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS -BUILDING SECTIONS PAG LEM MASONRY UNIT PYL PLATE, PROPERTY LINE ` ~ CMU CONCRETE 1D CLEW OUT PLAN PLASTER LAMINATE RT' I BHA Design, Inc. A2.01 FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLAN B t' A ' 111~~. 1 , COL COLUMN PLAT PLASTER 1603 Oakrid a Drive A2.02 FOUNDATION PLAN & ROOF PLAN CONC CONTBE TE PLBG PLLMBING 9 CuE COMERECE POL PLYVD PLYWOOD COSTR CONSTRLCCC ! i" - • dV Fort Collins, CO 80525 A4.01 ELEVATIONS POLISHED Ali CAT CONTI ION NUOUS PR PAM f !'•L . ~ Contact: Jeff Kroeger A5.01 BUILDING SECTIONS CRIER CONTRACTOR PREFAB PREFABRICATED CORR CORRIDOR, COMUGATEB PREFIN PREFMISHEn F! µ !'MOI~fPOR1`ltQlJ Phone: 970.223.7577 CPT CARPET PRESTR PRESTRESSED ow" Lr DERAnc T E ERIN PRIMMY + p Email: ~Croe erObhadesi n.com POULTRY WAREHOUSE CTR PAINTER PSF PONDS PER SMYRE FWT -1_, t ' A j yy, 1 1 9 9 CU CUBIC PSI POUNDS PER SULNRE INCH )l yMI _ PTO PAPER TIVEL DISPENSER U JAIL' DAMP DAMPR 11"G PTR PAPER TOWEL RECEPTACLE Ell r ] T1.1 TITLE SHEET DEL DEGREE Pr PORCELAIN TILE DEG DOUBLE PTN P13REL IN t.. .j . CIVIL ENGINEERING/SURVEYOR: A2.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS FLOOR PLAN A DEHO DEMOL ISH, DEMOLITION PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE )1 { ~9 ,l e I DEPT DEPARTMENT PVMT PAVEMENT Drexel, Barrell & Co. A4.01-EX EXISTING CONDITIONS ELEVATIONS BEA DRINKING IT aPRRY TILE 1800 38th Street A2.01 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN DI F°L"T"'" DIIAAG DIAGONAL QTY OUWTITY Boulder. Colorado 80301-2620 A4.01 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS DIMEN IONS NV DNSION R) RIREMOVE Contact: Curtis Stevens A5.01 EXISTING / PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS DOW DS DOWNSPOUT RAD RADIUS Y Phone: 303.442.4338 _I DTL DETAIL RD RUBBER BASE I 'I A.,A ➢VG DRAWING RBL RUBBER BASE LOVE { Email: cstevensOdrexelbam:ILcom RESTROOM / STORAGE BUILDING .f f RHS RUBBER BASE STRAIGHT CE) EXISTING RBT RUBBER TILE K" EA EACH RD RUROOF E RUIN ROAD ~ ..Y . J . v T1.1 TITLE SHEET ED EXPANSION BOLT RE REFERENCE; EF EACH FACE RECPT RE RAE i{k ~1 ii1 _ A2.01 FLOOR & ROOF PLANS EJ ELEVATImON JOINT REF REFRIG FRIGEATOa ARCHITECT: I f' EL ELEVPiN REAM REINFORCED ELEC ELccATOR REVD RE ILLIE OZ Architecture A4.01 ELEVATIONS & SECTiDN ELEV ELEVATOR RESIL RESILLIENT 1805 29th Street, Suite 2054 PIER REV V S) REVISED EMERGENCY RE LEON' E EO UAL RF RESILIENT FLOORING ' Boulder, Colorado 80301 PUMP HOUSE BUILDING EWID EWIPMENE RR RERECTED :N ES EACH SOLE RH RIGHT HAND - Conctact: Chuck Sanders EST ESSTITIMATE RM ROOT t _ S E WAY RE] RD" OPENING Sim Phone: 303.449.8900 A4.01-EX EXISTING ELEVATIONS EWC ELECTRIC WATER gpLEBROW RIGHT OF WAY ~A a Is Tr- EVH ELECTRIC WATER HEATER RPM REVOUTIONS PER MIM11E- N.; Email: csanders0ozarch.com EXT D(TERICR RVS REVERIE (TIDE) .F" K i. eBMBr ! V FIRE HEIT S SEALED RE ''GENERAL NOTES FA fAC FIRE ALARM CABINET SE S°M DISPENSER VALMOI BIKE PARK DESIGNERS: 1. DEmaleh areas of misting wilding and existing wale as Tam an FBO FURNISHED BY OTHER SEC SECTION D Leeaee'w~ l drsiHgA FD FLOOR DRAIN, FOE DA"POF s"RE FEET - - 2 RemoAe o4sting not FDA FOUNDATION STR SHEET 2 Alta Planning & Design Indicated t n mechanical in the IEPPdR~tinkcleded H"ef"6t °d'"°R' FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER SHTH SHEATHING a , - _ +N , { y' Py 1638 NE Davis Street J. Indicated Remae existing butt InaJoflal of root and MA FF FISHED FLOOR SIN SIMILAR T' FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CAHDEBD SANITARY MAPXIN DISPRSER4 Rapai andJa replace existing metal moMlg and ei6ng ahan to mwh, and FHC FINE HOSE CABINET Sint SNETNrr IoV'KIN RECEPTACLE Portland, Oregon 97232 FX FINE HYDRANT SOFT SOTIT provide oASCWted metal trim. Bmhlng, gutters. dsnapaNA and roohq/eidog ~ Contact: Chris Bernhardt accessories R odify or d supplement NS RAT HEAD MACHINE SCAELPRT SUPPORT S F exixiMg shushed yet- an sham an swaDN FHV FOE HOSE VALVE SPECS SPECIFICATIONS Phone: 503.367.2111 FHVS MT DEAD 1NmD SCREW SPKR SPRINKLER VICINITY MAP Drawing. edetleg count. FIN FLAT SP°R SPEAKER Email: chriebernhardt0altaplanning.cam B Prodde a 4' concrete IappiHq dal oAer all areas of the FLG FLASHING sal SOLARE 11 floor to rem . doping of I/B' per foot to Y thldaves at 16' wide bond of FLR FLOOR SS STAINLESS STEEL 1' ~A~ Bare anNd pelinelr wildig an dwen an amhnedad and ehuahord FOC FACE OF ATE STA STAT04 SCALE: SOON-ON FO FACE D FINISH STD STANDARD NORTH IMBA 7 existing Modify . Od and mechanical ms s deeaMed M Boulder TOONN vA`CECE s ST" Y SroE iT"nD Arf 4106 Riverside Avenue Enoeor Cwgmy deaMMP Report included in these d-nts FR FOE RATED STRUCT STRUCTURAL B. The City of Bedder regiMs that the addin dry he whder system be FT FOOT (FEET) SUSP SUSPENDED Boulder, Colorado 80304 maintained and madded s mated A MAW Tee/manifold dsd a FIG FOITIMG SYM SYMMETRICAL Contact: Pete Webber belo.-grade .At will need to be Prodded as dated M DEB MEP Report, FURN FIRNISHSE➢) SYS SYSTEM ING nI Phone: 303.562.7510 location di to paeewdd A..tKd deal node wrtaaee of meld dung ad roaft run FURREIX FUT FUTURE T TREAD B. oi FVC FIRE VALVE CABINET IB TOWEL BAR am exposed mechanical and d.b Email: pee m a.com e• AND G ~HO T TIF OF BACK BOTTOM CURB PROJECT DESCRIPTION D materials and eypnnt ward ham wiring which an, able to GA GAUGE TOLE TELEPHONE M Zed or need GALV EALVAIM TG TEMPERED GLASS Alpine Bike Parks GB ~RALCONTRACTOR TLG TEMPERATURE TONGUE AND GROOVE 8,34 Finlayson Arm Road GI GALVANIZED IRON cL GLASS T THTHERMOSTAT ICK Phase 1 of Valmont City Park is comprised of the 45 acres sitting between the Boulder Victoria, BC V9B - 6ES GRAPHIC STANDARDS GRT G7 ~ TILE To THRESHOLD County Jail and the north side of Valmont Road between Airport Road and the Valmont Contact: Judd deVall GYP GYP" ~ TIP OF F COIK:E0.~E Industrial Park. The site is bisected by the North Boulder Farmers Ditch and the Left Phone: 250.418.1486 sTRUCruf:aL GRID HAS HEADED ANCHOR STAID TOW TOP OF WALL Hand Ditch. An existing raw water irrigation pond, pump house and short length of a Email: judddevallOool.com 1 COLUMN LETTER HDAS HEADED DEFORMED ANPOBeIUD TOILET PAPER DISPENSER EXTERIOR ELEVATION IDENTIFICATION HB HOSE BIB TS TUBE STEEL soft surface shared path is also located between these ditches. A dog park has been COLUMN REFERENC ,RAVING NUMBER HC HO LOW CORE, HADICAPP®' TELEVISION NOR HEA➢EN TYP TYPICAL located south and east of the southern most ditch and east and north of the existing A COLUMN NUMBER A6 SHEET NUMBER H➢VR HARDWARE HM HOLLOW META. uN-DN UNFINISHED poultry warehouse building. A 105 stall, gravel parking lot is accessed off Valmont Road HCREZ HCRIZONrL UR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEIGHT URINAL immediately south of this existing building. The balance of the southern third of the H AC HEAT W, VENTILATING AND USGS US. A/C GEOLOGICAL SURVEY site will include a portion of the interconnected bike trail system and the 10' wide 2 SECTION NUMBER DOOR IDENTIFICAT "HVH HHOPT WATER HEATER VAR VVARIES multiuse path. The middle third of the site is accessible from the south at four ditch DOOR NUMBER SHEET NUMBER HWY HIGHWAY VVCCTMT VIN COMPOSITION TILE crossings and from the north at three ditch crossings. Bike trails and a shared use O HARDWARE GROUP BUILDING SECTION IDENTIFICATION VENTILATION soft surface ath will be constructed accordin to best mans ement ractices for noDR TYPE O IN INCHES NSID DIAMETER VEE" RT VVE`RRTICAL P 9 9 P INCAN INCANDESCENT VEST VESTIBULE minimizing impacts to the existing natural resources. All trails in this area will be DEL INCLUDE(D) VIF VERIFY IN FIELD DETAIL SECTION IDENTIFICATION INS.L INSULATION VIM SHEET VINYL limited to natural surface trails, terrain features and amenities with minimal footprints ~.-EXISTING DOOR TO I DRAPING NUMBER VOLUME RYTMED IINTERIOR NTERMEDIATE VOL VENT THROUGH ROOF such as benches or bike skill features. The northern third of the site will contain the SHEET NUMBER VIWALL COVERING INW JANITOR V VINYL DE balance of the bike trails and terrain features/tracks, spectator areas, the renovated ROOM/SPACE IDENTIFI ATIDN JC ITIR CLOSET V/ yV VIDE OffieE ROOM NAME JOIS JST and relocated Platt Farmhouse, a detached restroorn /storage facility, a 44 car gravel Jr JOINT WO uWm=D COVERING parking lot, tot lot, irrigated turf grass ?pocket park? encompassing an ?events? area RDDM NUMBER KITCHEN KIT 00 yon KO HI T VF FLOORING used for picnicking, a trail head and bike race staging. BZ DRAWING NUMBER VFL VIEGLASS ELEVATION REFERE SHEET NUMBER LAM LAMINATE V.O. HERE OCCURS DATUM POINT LAW LAVANRY V/O WITHOUT LDR LEADER WP VATERPrasING ENLARGED DETAIL IDENTIFICATION LH LEFT HAND V/R WATER RESISTANT NOTE 1DENTIFILR LP LIGHTING PANEL, LIGHT PNWT WAINSCOT iPTE NUMBER AREA OF DRAWING TO HE ENLARGED LT LIGHT VT WEIGHT VVF VEIO:➢ DED WERE FABRIC YD YARD VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - TITLE SHEET PLATT FARMHOUSE RENOVATION VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE 1 BOULDER, CO J~ SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL MARCH 16, 2009 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FLOOR & ROOF PLAN m'i• Yd 2Y-0 J/4' r- I I I I DA1H ,p arGNEN I D I b 13 f f I I I r I 1 r I I I F- --l FF =H- =tL - p111 L J , II ~ i LE o` BEo~ ; II II II r-- i V B~' 7 rC I 11 V I Y II II II b r " ~LJ - I 1L --41 F K 2 I I I - I \ DINING WANG ROOM ROOM _r ~ I I I I I I I I I I 111 III ~Ii Ni L pal L - - r.'\-LEVEL d-T 2 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN G SNE I/4 I,~ 1 S - I/C - r-P S d ' EXISTING CONDITIONS i+ ,r ii VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - EXISTING CONDITIONS - FOUNDATION PLAN & ROOF PLAN • m- m , ,•-C 2611/2' ? t0-11' Im 1x'11/2' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ir'~ I I 111 I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I H I- I I~ I I, I b I I I' I I I ~ i I a I I I- I I I - I I I I I I - ~ I I I I I I I I I~ I I• I I I I II I I-I II I H!I I I I_ I I I I I I I r-~~ I, I I I I I e I I I I >n I I I I I I I I _ r~_ I m m IM12 1:12 I '•1-N 1 1 1 I E by `T I I I I 1' I I~ I I I I I © I I I I I I u L 1:1 III ` i i o 'r ^ I~ I I I I' I e _ = 'T ' I j a I~ I 1 I I- I ,J i t I I I I I'~I b I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1H' It'-10 I/2' Y-11 3/0 xC-x 11C 1-0 s/,' n ROOF PLAN \ FOUNDATION PLAN a ' EXISTING CONDITIONS ea ii VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - EXISTING CONDITIONS - ELEVATIONS - ---~,ia` - - - - --er~a~ - 0 - A 1£hL 1 NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ dilhihilill 11111b -1 F= n WEST ELEVATION 2 EAST ELEVATION 8 EXISTING CONDITIONS VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - EXISTING CONDITIONS - BUILDING SECTIONS W i 1)ROOM HALL ROOK B BmROOM EOROOH 3 iI I J 1 i Ii it it . mmc _ mxc i r r LINNG BFDIt00N 1 _ PORCH PORCH ~ KI ~ HALL I, iI II it u~eL t . ~ I~ VIII I tE~et t I IL I-1-1-11 II-I III-1 -i 11 '=T-1I_ L -1I 1I~ -1T1 ~I~IIL=I IILI ~I III-III~IHII-IIHI=III HII~II-III~IHI~III~I~III~II~I~II~II-IIH -I-I I~II~II- I- C-I 1- _ 1~1 - II II IHIrlII-111- -11HIHII-111-1IHII _III-111-111-11GIII~II~II-111- -II~II-III-IIHIH HIHII IHII°IIHI~I- HII III- _ - - - 1I I_IIHII_III-IHIHIHIHIHIII°IIHIHIHII~II°JI~I~II-11~111~11°IIHII-I~IIHI-III_nl II~II-1n-11111-ul-III-ul=11111=u1=1 ~IIL~~~~I - III~I-I IIII1~=~ ~I~Ir1-1a1~ II I I I-J n-1 I I-1I I-1 n~ I I-n lu I Id I1-1-1-1 I I-111-1-1-u I-1I I-u 1-1-L-J-1~ I1-1-1-1-1-1I ~I~~ I I-1 11-1I I~ I I-1 111=1-1~ ~ LI-LI-1=111=1-1-1 I Id n=111 I ~1-1=1-1~ I ~IT_I~ I ~I I I~ I1~-~1I I~ 11=1I 1~-1~-1-11 I-1 I1~-~1-1~-1-1I C~-1~ I I-111-1-1-1- =1= =11-1 l l~ I L=111= I ~I I I= =1ll=1I L=1I I=1I I~1=1I _I I= I I_I I _I L-~=I I Id I I=1I ~I I1=III-I I rl I I I I~ I I=III=III=I I1=I I I~ I I=III-I I I~ I I-1I I-1I I-III-1I I~ I I-1I ~I I I~ I H I I-I I H I ~I I I~ I I-III-III I ~I I H H I I- I I -i I I-1-1 -11 r-~_BUILDING SECTION 1 BUILDING SECTION G SGIE 1/P - Pd SY1LLE tµ' - 1'-0' E 8 ' EXISTING CONDITIONS O~ as ;I VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - FLOOR PLANS & ROOF PLAN 2r-r r-c mnMn IL 9R PI/M ,r-s ear e-0• ,.-0. _ RESIROaM STORAGE ROp 2 KITCHEN O O Anm AS01 h COMMON ROOM i3 4 a F FLEX ROOM 1 D § PORCH a i u'-e 1/Y I i 5r 9 SxPe PANA K !IT RNI ,,-~-LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN as-r r-r Ile - LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SHEET NOTES 1 X., 1/A• -1--e 1. rPIACE ALL mASml W IATx AT v AI Dm rtx S/e• W. W. 2 PRn1R IFA b15 metlaAS wTf IL911A1Xr Ai NET FLOOR AREA IIAATTieA M AT KW/~m 1 AFSIOE F: w4HNim5 AIr mM Q PAV.a1: ren m wm ta aMVIa A =PT FIIHR HAfrlgm iLU016 Ai ALL xOM LEVEL 1 - 803 SF w" S RtPAR NOSING OOOOn IEt1 Y-ro• 000x5 AT w11r00Y m wTa mm~xla 8 7. UT PROPOSED ALTERATIONS n IHIKN EY EMAfl11e xAIrINe ~iaaolro wVf mAmcI u AT rmmW AlmA r LEVEL 2 - 370 SF °N °E NO UVA amro~n. AR. n amm moues m a ruler mAnE rot[ C!nNm, wrtAtE WIMTfn n IOIOe01 To xArE tArN1E cafAnm mPS. rp.Y i[ 9q BAAr~E6~91l r~Tl tR4~SY~fRWfATUt TOTAL - 117SF ,n mow` r. PANT Ar ALL MLLS mws ooaa AIO 1t. RWAE valeo cACUa stw[. caNtnm ro Ifft Etalxc axrr. aurr ro a rPrm VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - FOUNDATION PLAN & ROOF PLAN • Aim ASm ]T-X 1/r m 15-11' Im 12-11/1' S-C - - - r 1 -_r - - - I r-------------1 - I I I I I I . ~ ~ I, I I- I I I u lil' i I- I I' I I, C,r j i I I I I I I I b II II II a -ti '~'I I I I I I I. I I I I ; I- I I: I I I 1 II I.I I I I❑ I I I~ I I. I I ~ I I I I I I--~' r- I I L 11 I I I I I I I"~I I❑ I I I I.I I I II I I I - ;I I I I-I I-I ;I y Aim I - Aim 'F- 1:11 ❑ IS 1L' 1 I ; I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I..I I I I I II II I'-I II I I I I - I I I I- I I I I I ❑ I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I r I I I .I -♦t 1o11y I I I' I I I I' I I- I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I ~ '~r Mi II II II I I I.I I I I I 1 1 I''I I I I - 1I I I I- I I I I I I I I L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I j I I _I I I § I I I I I I + ~ 1 h I I ~ I I I 11 I I I L J'I 15a itt lo'_ Yd V-2 1/r PROOF PLAN 1 FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET NOTES 1. RFPIAtE ALL MSIFP AIO um AT NNLS AIO mlXS TTi sA' ml+. B0. 2 PRmVJE IEY X-13 YAM wiT I M. Mn AlID 11 IET RAT 14 IIm VA IXIFIg1 AT7 8-]0 f9RiAE f 11911A1IM AT T 0.06/5/16 w 1 R'SIOS F>mlNO XA4M6V05 AIU 1X11 a PXOVTE 1Er ro wTa m61E. A I F1O5111C IVimT000 MAg15 AT ALL Raal6 mT AIR eAnnnao~ i IMt A FMXIIIC MET Y-lm OOOICi AT w111hb1 No Imool ro MAIM wml MT101 ooa xMOUXE AT AIL E 1 DaDa 1ET IFhR 5111E ' PROPOSED ALTERATIONS XA NOY TO wAE IAVAAWLAVA0 RE AT Aff. AT TAU rm ro1ET 1fRV ro S R AA. L XAnsmm M6XI6M m m iEOw wnr...1E e n cuvm N w4AhiNM>i~iwxmt las IETXXI °~j m4IMME TAAM11W 2r M Mom 15 ffwTwffXATM if M pNAE XFT PMrt AT Al T W5 mNLS ppO S M 11TE 11. PX01TE W11FD RAS-IDO SXTF, E6aE0EO ro EMST10 OYEY. CwEV ro H XSPMm ii VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - ELEVATIONS za wa ma - f~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - low lulux - - 9~ 0 0 © © ,n woo uTn¢ ❑ ❑ ❑ o © ~a PAIEIS uiam mv,ia Fb511FC oom AT FlIXM TE MA M I Fl£w1O1 tY IM 9 RW14 NORTH ELEVATION r,-'~SOLITH ELEVATION ro rmFrrr Tn xaoP m¢ - _ _ _ _ ❑ ❑ aFUOce ooem Am,IIOI _ 94 2LI - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - rnr wm uTna NH. SCREFM4 PNRLS UwFP ❑ MEiffl -1110 POIIW BEII~FQ! PF16 - - - - - - -~-dam IMM-L IER.~ f1051NC I~LVII - m wm wia,x FFxoors M [ mbE Flf!/ATIW 25 oy' mal NQMC. - _ - - - - _ _ _ - - - - -l IXA l l [N WEST ELEVATION ST ELEVATION SHEET-\_L NOTES - .r-0• 2v,..-0 RFS Aw IQP,ACE FXI IYOW mw F mTA fA9114 M PoMI m1G As IEgI1Fn, m wTa awtolA~ z Aurae aaaw Paa cauws 1 mowE Ifll wm Ptl1ol RNN65 9UR ro FMSINa A RFYOK F)SMC DEIFWORAIFU Poml imaF SIRICIUF, d SLV4 Aw RIVOY Aw IFFlA2 tIX 9L1R WIFICIIS a mow[ rcw xaaris m wm~ FJOS,MC tleie oaAEn n m mm. ' PROPOSED ALTERATIONS PRJwE inF IETAI anoa Aw oowisw,s AT Au 7. ApF 5 6 w~. C 6 RFSIOE Em'IMG RED SA91 AwGE IIAI aA4 etaMS • mgr mFr~ ~ ooua wo mmMS •u snw a mArws ,a mow[ Fn PAMT m Au xEwt Ii. mows M 1EfAl mA1FD 1+01BIA,lo1 oPWIAE AOIAI roors Axo ~ VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PLATT FARMHOUSE - BUILDING SECTIONS - 951Im~ - - - O rO ! RO2 ! 7 RO3 STg2AGE I III 0 ~A t i~ - COM MON ORCH KID P~___.~ 0 E I i it ail L=IIHII II III III I I II ICI - _ _ _ Hill ~I III~II~II I~II = 1-I-I r _ rT II II III I I- - - - - _ ~ _ - I ~ ~ I~I I IIIJI III III ~I~111 I - ~ l rn -~III- III - _ -I - =11 _ _ _ - _ _ - - - - MEN _ ~If Illrl7~11=~111~~1' Ill~iill_IIII-nII-IIII~III~II=III IILI=IJ~1~11-111 I~f III-II~I~l11=111 ~~1i=11111-IT~III~~ I-II~~~'IIIIII-IIL=J1 TIIII IIII 11I~III~J ILIIIIIllll 11111 ~I I-II- III-II-IIIIIII III IILIHIIIIHIIIIIIIITIIIT III~I~IIIIIII n BUILDING SECTION BUILDING SECTION 8 ' PROPOSED ALTERATIONS atl VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW POULTRY WAREHOUSE - TITLE SHEET POULTRY WAREHOUSE VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE 1 BOULDER, CO i a SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL MARCH 16, 2009 P x Iowa N /J ~ rid ~ _ i' ry -l = M J4.. L ~ dn.dG r • ' L VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO 1603 O.Wige 13M SITE REVIEW (9m) ~nw u fax(9'M) IM7 POULTRY WAREHOUSE - EXISTING CONDITIONS - FLOOR PLANS A 8 C D E F 0 H I J Lmd~ UAm Dmlbn I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I f ' Q O o I I I I I I I I a w I I I I I I I d a ~ I I I a I I I I I ~I I ' Z E dam O ~ moo a I I I I I i I I Om9 Q Uwn AS0 I I I I I I I ~ u H.m I6Y-C ADI _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b f Y I I I I I I-- I - I I I I I I NoarN SCALE NF- I'C D=Vp br. v N D. br wm to - - - - - - _ - - - - ! - - - - - - - - - Ch¢ br. 6 Dn q Name- Is'-r Is'-lo• POULTRY WAREHOUSE EXISTING CONDITIONS FLOOR PLAN "q Number. IMIAD 1 FLOORFLOOR PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS ~XNE ]nR• = r-D• Shoe[ Number. NORTH A2.01-EX VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE LEGEND BOULDERf COLORADO 6 91IMxc TO ff HDeDNm 1603 O 11 M N Ir c m SITE REVIEW » Ii6D°E° (9~nn POULTRY WAREHOUSE - FLOOR PLAN ~wfT~z~1w~T rnmxc wAUS ARD DDms ro a ta~a.mPe ANlkecwn O e c o B r a H r =d L- NIM)M) 8'-1' 16r-4' Gr*k DWV M 6 1/A' r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J I r l 1 I I $ I I ~ I I 4 a 1 W W L L Z. 6 PfPIM O Z msr. nxalrs Q I SAU -7 LJJ F I 1 I I I ~ I I Q RMIDE NEw COPoYJCAlEO d W ce YOO') A 9D114NI5 ( 0 (1'tlD') w boar Z 1 aroEH/e"Kxi Q areE I/e. E-:1 C -:1 C _ -1 E-:1 1 d CYCLING AMATIES AREA I I ~ I I I 1m I I it I~ ~ a OY1K£ BIlC. aOPED 1 16'-0" Z m = < Z MH11T INDIC M (z' YH 1^ m 3p U C- C C- C C C C_ C TRJ RE: MCI ; O 0 E LL. 1 ~I J m° AS.Ot ' v~-r V m S 1 II I I I A4.01 4 I C~ I C-~ I C_~ I C ~ I 1 1 I AAM 1 I I I i 11 BEND1 SEALING NEw IY III DIJ W/1L (16' HIM) W Y LL~ WALL CAP ~ d 1 - - - - n--_--- - _ _ - aaaaa e - ; I I I I I I aWE1 NR pT " FfXLE (V Ht 6' Hlpl) CYCLING "STAGING AREA _ J NEw r wu COL N I' _ SU9iQMD (T HIGH) _ ~ _ d I I I I NORTH I I I I 0 SCALE IT= I'.D' Dea Vp br. N N D. br. Nvr66 Checked br. a D - - - Dewing Nemc 1s'-r 16'-lv FOR PLWAREHOUSE COVERED FLOOR AREA AA01 Pruett Number. IBDSIAO 61 i ALTERAT ONS 25,54 SF ~ WI`" q FLOOR PLAN PROPOSE 1 sGUa Spr = r-D' A 2.01 NORTH VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE FLAG NOTES P--- I. FASTING SM STR MD ]ANTED 2 6' M. SiA "D BOULDER COLORADO 5. 1r au, SLAD:ED 1603 OilvN6e OFNe BD1D 4. MT UM ~C~n SITE REVIEW & SM ffi IS: S1RUCi, PANTED ry (970) gC08052s 6. S1EIl GAM R 9M M.1 6. CORRUGAIfD flBEWT& 9DS NG/ROsG b><(9](n 113-181] *E4 RT ' POULTRY WAREHOUSE - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS °°~NC YEi ~ W 2' N11C. WNL GIP W Wopo ArcN¢wa Ux Dam Gmpbic Dade - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1, e SRl9 _fi~EAK I -Jf- ELWFNIS BEYWD IW 1 1 OPEN. IW 5 0 i1 - 2 F H-` _ 1 6 3 1 I a-o o~C L T USING DUDE B AM 15' TRW MILDNG, w O_ FW LOCAPW) Z Q SOUTH ELEVATION O o w I SGUL ~ - D Q u 6 fi 6 6 CL W 1 K ll i,! l I III Ili l' _I I' I; !III III I, III JKL2&oDFU.t Q ~ 5-'r R11=1p Q vV~~ ' I I I' i '.I i[I I I 1 I I I O- Y II II II IIII Il III II.!,I ,III III IIII IIII IIII ~ o OPEN, IW 5 ~ ~ W ~~o I , I I , I k ~ y E ~ d 0 m 2 Z z 1 z z z 1 0 moo Od p J eo ~ Unm WEST ELEVATION 2 SCAB I~• ° I'-D' I ~ ~ Ili 71 7 I I, I ' II 7111 I~ ~ j I (I I I ~It) I ~I IIII Ili I IIII ~ 'i I 1 i II II li it I! III III hI~ IIII I'I I III IIII ~TI I II IIII ji~I i( \\i I % I I I 1 5 I I ~ ~ I 1 1 ,r z , z 2 1 z 1 8 NORTH ELEVATION SLATE I/6' ~ 1'-D' 6 6 6 8 III ' Il I I' 'I li 'i III I III I I I I f I I~ li I I I I I I ! i' ~ III II l~ I.I ~II II 1111 I~ ~~I III 'i 1 NORTH 0 5 5 GpFN. Trv 5 SCALE IM- 1'0 1 1 I 1 1 1 I D VI br N'iN D. b, WiN E1ac6M fs 67 Dn MN.- POULTRY WAREHOUSE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS P,oleR Nunber. ItlSNaD Sheea Dae: 05.1..89 4 EAST ELEVATION 56.~N scar: I/e' = r-o• A ^ . 0 1 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE FLAG NOTES P--- BOULDER, COLORADO `MB"`~ SH?UC m"`°""M z Du, VACKE) M Ban 103 Os ln Co bNge feig Delve SITE REVIEW 4. i USE SAGSKED BHO Fort Fart ANµ BOSu a. NOT x91 USED 5. alit ASPACING M FRG arRUO PMIFII f970p n3-= Q WPMMArtU NG 147 SS 9(hLads fix l9Ytp Tai-162] POULTRY WAREHOUSE - EXISTING/PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS NE RMakity N t(R 4 z' ' ester WNL ON landnope ArNirsmn Untan Design - GrtFAk D-16n IN z z W T~ ~I 1=1- - - 'I I I I - i-I- I I I I I- pll=' I I - -I I I - I I I I- I- I-I- h I III ll_I, II~AD pI ~y I 181 I II II I I III I-I I I I~ I I I ..I II I~ ~ II I I I I'll I I I II h r~i' I I I I I - I I III,- I' I I L~~II I' I IIf~ 1' -IEIIEIIIIE121 -1 IB I~I_ -II I_ _ _ _ _-I L- I_ _ I- _ L- - _ -I I- ID-IPl _ _ _ _ -I IO1 III a EXISTING BUILDING SECTION Z o z ' SCNL I/9• - 1O O.Rin _ - 534fi-1B T _ y L) W 6ss ==~e:'~/-_- I I I CYCLING - I - - s2l -a Q ACflMnES AREA ' 2 z 'm 2 z ' DOG PARK ' _ COVERED AREA Q 19 _ 4 - - U FINISH FLDOR k a HI I _ I I I I I I I II~ qqJ~ I II~1 11 11 ~ 1 _ I i I. I41-I I I~1121 III I I i I I L I I I I I I I ~ I I I a19R II I 'I,I l1' z j :0:)<m II I I II III - I I ~ I I I I I I 121 ~ RI_ I I ~ _'I I II I II I I -I - I 2 ~ I ; I .11 - ~ - !=1 I'2111 III II-ll l I_I I~I11- ~i BT-371212111 II -I I~IHT21 121211'ILl 1121 I~~IJI T~11 ~f~Il ll Il 12' l O SOU ise PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION Ono E U THE EVOLVER ENGINEERING CO, October 14, 2008 • Gas fired hese g, evaporative cooling. The Abaft system would Ilse either hot Thee Hs a manhole west of de house which loosen what appears to nd a pooping canon. I water baseboard a radian Omasiprondbdy stapled in underside of aching flora). caddn I tell it the was an abandoned well for domestic weans even m, a a pump for The bailer could be 95% efficient (at leas, must of de time). TM hind arigation. Chuck Serdes approach would be the meet maigltl' ad and m krepng with lh are in which the OZ Arc itenme building was mot regularly used. It would also be more rapmsave Ilan the radial Meet of Ilse sewer appears to be run in the crewepae. 1105 29th Saar, Suite 2054 fbor. Ile maporseive rending rvdd M dorew0h rwrverdaW maporseive molens, Boulder. Colorado WWI or the more modem Cuoleredoes. EWw would requite seasonal renumm ce, with There Is m union] gas on site. I suspect It is avalable on P. road. the Cmdxado requiring a little mere smandi Courmniorel evaporative cooler(s) D. Chuck could be integrated num an am, or cupola(s) could be added on dude them. A There eanel"o, saoragetypewaax homes, whchisofhltleuse. baserrem as Ruder Possible Inealion for some ofthe equipment and ductwork We visited the sale and the existing buildings Wednesday, amber 8, 2008 m re". the Grated secure base pmnps(ga thernep. This is tho of as the mat HVAC IbaiNat layout nutiylayout relevant MEP to sy caung osang 1 and have system ero dececdeumnsar, followed reportlowed by den sby den specific and site appemiwandusesle lryatheleseiug lgswmce. 0 fademst e ddlmrg is bound with a wend hnrarg stove and electric baseboard, which is of little daavatiorus. approxictaresthecosof ofacern synem hisundikely Th henthe then that an would be Laat lazed payboric. The kae e Wrid vis gword Ran ure a a aegoing fawad. bout ealwger in the pad, it te h peed is a eNH l. hear 12 th 12 do,p,reg and strove 91 a a a a a yU~gApLV yea. Alternatively, wolfs rouhi ho drilled if seeded. V He nary were p buy wind neR Is through would M the Ratiocinate wall ed e fudWO urn for some codmg in the kimherdiving room paver fa elaaltlty, dos could nesuh in a rarhwu free system. If tins approach were area This would fa name. . ITa existing MEP systems are of tilde use going fawad. if the putty is to have a to M remidesed, the building should be modeled. My opinion is based on the fact kes nd commercial g Them is a dale er, whse men I couldn't follow. It Is routed inn the sawIsPece.and aral u e wowity, gram eerily ®iure or Wilding. New plumbing p vi accel then the bu0dr 8 will be used relatively infixfleolypaue energy savings syseerrs would uoux d ulna exiting davim, famous, ard wire amortized ' over (ewer haunt Oand h de load profile will involve tsaage'spipkr ought discharge Ihxe. Ekcuiral and plumbing decisions world ld be mater and dchmW leg types of p Bpe types lmdes, water requiringmere welh O eb( thep pad is nee available 12 smnM ayear). a a b Msex laaum.dxmral parellmadon.xcl. excep awatpkearsegy related aspens: ack up Miler. We have been een involved with several ground saucepr jars and are very fasuiEar with Hem, hW these are IM xmorsec realiun. The piumbmg system could avail itself of sole ha water panels These cadd M used to ELEC CAL beet doueaic hot weer a l/or asset with rte Mating system Ahieugh it is unlikely that The following a brief description of 'Ile brldi served overhwd from a e memaed trail ter, rest to. hen south and the laudmaks load would allow puree on the house roof. it might be passible to iaegrde exertugcadluan: ne is pole than into IM m mmoms building (wall moraed panels order an overhang, piped directly to eae dHae louse. 'INS aplanes, overhossaii nesfamer a fed via a Lane a seNm of 3 wdul cast 4 nse baoverhead pimxy in Vdmsa. a radiant floor slab so they coilxt Mat only I. Ile colder mal[hs?) t oe , . an g rnmerdenan a s, if. .else, emending uoth up the IWI PLIIMBPIG Hut u abaudned in plare(tlthoare an e ther amp. Tie eamral system could easily berrefr from due installation of phaovduic panda. TTe evening louse appears to be can city water, winch appeal to come from Amporn Road. There appears no M an underground primary leader an Report blvd with a seaimreliring AMIT gain, Landmarks Henry have del rsdor with dos, but PV puree with M answing nigh have a payback in the range of 10 yeas. A wind powered greenroom might also be liked The wax lire'wya- about It Tads in from the mad. ace birch euendmg in the hale, switch se the transformer for corer of the property, It should d fairly eery to provide a pad NORTH acidness into, pa0edary as a highly visible, symbolic statement. Windimis, d a different type in buildings lothe mnMaa.TM main pppipemey Mermen whchfeeda He cmnddeasl aarsfamw our rdocatedbWldi~.and new underground electrical service for mounted henve, were a comma sigh In the aI when this budding was nae regularly Hand. g0 Wide family ad east.ThebuHdbgpfire ould bass been to Hoestmadsmf don Hue home d ado fa0iua. P NFPAInd Wthe c smgle rnilie piping ng g could have been nun more semiwdy and SCALE IA•=I'P The mechanical ysem d.. Oil hwdve so. agniflrart <lulces. Here are three, some rslodiBratwn IreY M in order, eunhceemoved . In sm hits condivon, ition uv d nd led. dHowever. . for tt will prdnbty rums 0 M mood Ban it al igWy visible ling. e from door fa ~N prssibi.ties (tiwe mayMnwe): 1lereeasewe manhole about the sore latitude as the house, and sanitary sewer form lM aeletk reason. It magi[ have ae He asrmall ancillary dulling. D. III, N?N has probadycmuecn in Airport Road. • Comeltlaal faced air rysixn. Ba fmnere with remae rmdeusing unit prenatally Gedad Ir a two mats one upstairs, one dawn. This would be die men: basic, ad lean It may be possible an the of the 1e~ ces w, would be replaced. ich priR in shancer all the wirin ewer building to in th, r w ime from en rem Aube eery form a plumbing utilities point of view, a fist projects es looked likeoked His to be of h be ofh g and devious Niue, o of f the the light Crown, Name world appear m pm Road. fixistoric Interest. carperW Ve, approach. It woad involve dmtwork(m the oawlepumbasememt and wMwale isg the aner and would have ore or two randxmt- Imm inside. It would M way Haer POULTRY WAREHOUSE dly same everyoueknuows how readjust athermostat. Sincerely, BUILDNG SECTIONSS 24M Reunion, style 301 Pnajtrr Nanber Iams1.W Boulder, c08I ~s ,sit sheet DOB: 05.14" IB931 M4-89]8 'As" Seat Number. A5.01 Gerald F. Novom, VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW RESTROOM 1 STORAGE BLDG - TITLE SHEET RESTROOM STORAGE BUILDING VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE 1 BOULDER, CO limill ONO ~i'' ~11111 r~~►~~ ~~d , ~ ~~r i ~ ~ _ ~ ~ q r~ iii SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL MARCH 16, 2009 1 monk- i I ~ I I pe- I~!• i c ~ _ ~ i it i, f ' ~ I~~~'' ItI~l~; ,tarp. f/~ fir, •t~ l 0 M~~ rr~,.• r Y 1 ~r 1 ~ .•y N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Vii' f• likr'' ~i~ _77 N4 s 00 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW RESTROOM/STORAGE BLDG - FLOOR & ROOF PLANS AAm AAm AAm A{.m r ~ I - I I I I I I I I I - I I I II I I I I STORAGE atz xtz i II II » O 1 I I I I II I~ II II b - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - it L~ O O l I I l I A4.m µ'm ~ AAm AAm O M~ WOMEN 0 IETN. ROOiNO II JL___ II I L------- J L------- J w~uw r PAMARE k t'-Y i1P n a'o AAm OUTBUILDING ROOF PLAN OUTBUILDING FLOOR PLAN sr~ W - r-r U s~ yr - ra NORTH NORTH SHEET NOTES 1. ~ ON YIM fl0IX-wn No ar6os PNIR Ai NL IR.SINOmI WAILS XO PNM AT ROUT 1 15 W. /If . CoCooW°"PANIFO"°ff ° . fl V CK NET FLOOR AREA `n" ~ °F RC fIDOR I1pMlF0. S PNNfm IE'fN. IFAW-0UIY TOI£T PNlIIRWS I,ELIfr 9FFWIF0. S NL XWIIL IOII:f AfR.4p~5- IOIET PN4A lO1FL 554 SF ,.~AiRES RO~mS9 Wm qBl OmgEIE AT RIORNE ROW VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO AA0 SITE REVIEW - - - - UrTwP RESTROOM /STORAGE BLDG - ELEVATIONS & BLDG SECTIONS - - - - - (FALSO TA ~'W la a6 aYlx 1mm 1PAIX n.Am ~ PIATC ww I F6L I ww~ 1 t1F'A lION 75' fllaY RiY°Pla s,am anal coax w oam (PAP11m) (s1[ sl[ RAx ma IDGtmx) ro Ptlld 7RA1K ryAama) EAST ELEVATION ~WEST ELEVATION 3 xvc Iµ• . ra ' RYE 1/r . r-0• IET/L RaCA1XC (M• PAN" L0. Ra61 a - - 5765-1 11r - aim, 1 t2 - - _ _ _ _ _ r 575T{ Ya aAn RoR mommas ea7m a eAmx pr ac) tf1EMRmUS q 11611 CF1.]IRml6 CEIF11mgR 1RY a0Al1a LFIpIRIpS UP $pm (r EmJ aOM' iN10A1x11 - PAMIm SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 3 a I/r.1'-a• G RYE 1/r.1'-0• YEfAL RC6 Y/ RYxY00 x-N aAR I C19 R CF1G (lasmaws m) aa CARIE MM (M-10 owm Pa • Ruff aEIX T a a LEtlam . EAM; PQIx Rah CASE 1fNT (fAlSE) to PIE-PA9ID 1MS95 •P B' 0" 024* R A as N0.a1 BI ~Ym 1GlET vARRm 9m616 RNM Copt ACI ❑ YR I ( NNL-Yla SWiMY fIXNIRS TN vA6mn a aioa on66olc ipMTA66 I fal6oAllalt F1°FIMA xMl m6Mm11a16 am m ars saxc °/ram samxr NOTES .RF1[1FRsvRE,nnc SHEET 6BxA1XAl . rmac e• a i ~ _1~- ~ ~ I mEMllllall] SDIIa 11R sums AIm PAW A4 =1T~ ~L-CI~ I I I-1 I I-1h I 1 1_1= - I I I I-1 I I I-1 I- -11 -I I' -1 I 1 III-I 7 PM RJR T r m s E"A Y -11'I-III =III=1'' - 1 II=1_! =III 1 BAFM 1 =1 M! I- -III--I 1-1 1= aaR x R.°ao axaac 1 T) --I - .~.A a a ~ I_ _ ~ S 1ETAl Gma6 AID a41RW WR AT ALL Rah ARFAS It, no mrcc BUILDING SECTION J IETAL-aAa RLAD Olaa65 CBSa6FD SAfEi'I RYE 1/A• . 1'-G _ _ G. X...... VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW PUMP HOUSE - ELEVATIONS PAN _ _ i.6 0.9Cf f9K£ EA ROOF ACCESS PANEL fOR PUMP ACCESS - - - 8' CMU 1X111 SCORED OXB SHINfi£ ROOFWO _ _ _ _ _ _ Y:SW 1 HAROMM FACIA ] (PANTED M702- MUDDY - (PMMTED KM 219 - PUEBLO C Y) METAL ~ i DOOR AND FRAME K •a pY11ARCE 21':10" STEEL - - (PNN1E0 Km 219 LOUVERED PENT - w PUEBLO CLAY) PuW FROM PIMTFDNALL M3 LCD Hn~ATE B' CMV-SPUT FACE - T ! (PANTED KMI02 s1. MWDY CItEIX) 106f E9STNC 4A.1R DEYAl10X 25 4 9KDXy (4E 91E R/M s~vvM faR LOGTIOI) - X33 naR L.J FPoGAiKN Mv~MC I . rnmui saes 2 NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW BIKE AMENITY COVER SHEET DIRECTORY OWNER: 15 ""a:'~^~ 1i'~~-~ - I ► City of Boulder Parks and Recreation j;~'.'•.~~~%'i~ll +~~'_!ii ♦i Administration-IRIS Center • .~/1-~~ i - 6' -1 #111 Il ` f i t,•'~ 3198 Broadway t . 1 . . / , Y'^.•::,r 'r _ • Boulder, CO 80304-2644 1 r • 1~1•`✓f:~ y uror'~ 1 : ` Contact: Perry Brooks • `-._a F, , ; Phone: 303.413.7226 ' ' ♦ • Email: brooksp@bouldercolorado.gov ilk 40 r'••-'" ' J' - ►M %r + `w.. J* LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BHA Design, Inc. 1603 Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 r 1` r Contact: Jeff Kroeger - - t,' : - Phone: 970.223.7577 rort- +,.•'rjj' r,+r~~ Email: jkroegerOobhodesign.com r.. ` f .,'''O'•~% M, .'••''..1 l ' f i D.• 1 f'~ CIVIL ENGINEERING/SURVEYOR: * ; 0~++ J' Y f r Drexel, Barrell & Co. a J+ i ~z 1800 38th Street 't: ~•f~ , Boulder, Colorado 80301-2620 t ,J ~,",,,J',,+.~ + ~~.~,~Q,y'~ j 1 t1 Contact: Curtis Stevens Phone: 303.442.4338 Email: cstevens@drexelbarrell.com • y° ; 1 r•i ARCHITECT: OZ Architecture ' 1805 29th Street, Suite 2054 1 1 Boulder, Colorado 80301 BIKE PARK GENERAL INFORMATION Gonctact: Chuck Sanders ' 1 V The "Bike Park" is a key element of Valmont 'City Park Phase L t j,f ;p,Phone. 303d.449.8900 h The intent is to provide o purpose-built, innovative facility for all ~1 l~ati ( q f i`0'r~%`j~ Emai: cson ersC4bzarc .cam types of off road bicycling. Ingredients include an interwoven network of ;rolls, technical terrain areas, and spectator zones BIKE PARK DESIGNERS: where visitors of all ages and abilities can practice bike skills, z. - Alta Planning & Design participate in programs and races, and enjoy the exercise and li Ad". 1638 NE Davis Street camaraderie of bicycling. v a( , . , Portland, Oregon 97232 Off-road cycling isn't one-size-fits-all. There are several • X% different styles of riding, including: trail riding, dirt jumping, Contact: Chris Bernhardt freeridin BMX, observed trials, mountain bike racing, j Phone: 503.367.2111 9, 9' and Email: chrisbernhordt@altaplanning.com cyclocross racing. Each requires different types of trails and features. The good news is that these various elements are ' J =MBA compatible and can be blended together to create a varied and 4106 Riverside Avenue appealing park Boulder, Colorado 80304 The Bike Park will not replace traditions dirt trails or m'mic~~ Contact: Pete Webber terrain found in nature. Instead, it will offer unique obstacles and J `'v °{9 - - p Phone: 303.562.7510 flowing trails that stretch the imagination. It will accommodate a 1 I ti~..^.e' f Email: pete®imba.com wide range of abilities, with opportunities for skill building and progressively difficult challenges. Riders will return to the park Alpine Bike Parks again and again to session the obstacles, improve their riding, 834 Finlayson Arm Road compete, and hang out with friends. Victoria, BC V913 - 6ES More... - More specific details are available from the project Note: Artist's rendering, See details in attached sheets. Contact: Judd deVall Phone: 250.418.1486 team. Email: judddevoll@aol.com Trail System - The park will include an approximately 4-mile system of interconnected trails with a variety of styles and terrain. The system will include designated routes for beginner, intermediate, and expert riders, and will be built to international guidelines. SHEET INDEX Terrain Parks - There are several distinct terrain parks for technical riding integrated into the larger park design. Each area includes natural and man-made features to provide progression and fun. Race and Event Venue - The park will include permanent facilities and flexible space for hosting a variety of programs, events, contests and races. Amenities include: an open "event green", a start/finish straight that accommodates a variety of race course configurations, strategic spectator paths and viewing areas, facilities for event officials, and an overall site plan designed for flexibility during events both large and small. BIKE PARK Management - A detailed "Bike Park Management Plan" is being developed to address park operations. The Plan will include information on rules and regulations, staffing, maintenance, risk management, emergencies, steps to minimize user conflict, event permitting, programming, and volunteer partnerships. BO.0 COVER SHEET/SITE PLAN Partnerships - From the very beginning, the project has included a strong partnership with the local cycling community, led by the non-profit Boulder Mountainbike Alliance. Volunteers have played a key role in 130.1 BIKE PARK TRAIL, TERRAIN AREA planning, design, and fund-aising for the project. The partnership includes a written Memorandum of Understanding, and is anticipated to continue through park construction and into the future. AND TECHNICAL FEATURE PLAN Risk Management - Safety and risk management for the park is being implemented by a professional team that includes Parks and Recreation Department staff, City risk managers, and bike park designers. Risk BO.2 CIRCULATION PLAN management tools include a written Park Management Plan, appropriate design and construction techniques, a strategic sign plan, establishment of inspection and maintenance protocols, and a variety of programs 61.0 TYPICAL TRAIL / FEATURE PHOTOS aligned with C'ty policies and commonly accepted best practices for similar facilities. B2.0 TYPICAL TRAIL / FEATURE PHOTOS Natural Resources - The project team is working with Parks and Recreation Department staff to develop steps to minimize impacts at the site and enhance natural resources. No mature trees will be removed to B3.0 TYPICAL TRAIL / FEATURES DRAWINGS accommodate the trail system, and the existing tree canopy will be retained and enhanced. Much of the land will be planted with native upland grasses, and c natural aesthetic employed wherever possible. B4.0 DETAILS Deveopments in the area between the two irrigation ditches will be limited to soft-surface trails and trail features that have a modest footprint. Construction activity will be light-handed, with effort to minimize B5.0 DETAILS disturbance. B6.0 DETAILS More... - More specific details are available from the project team. VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW BIKE PARK TRAIL, TERRAIN AREA, & TECHNICAL FEATURE PLAN !I PUMPiRACK -J (SHEET B2.0) d,re• ,e,. r.,s ...odp,. r......so so .r♦_...... " . . . . ,+_,._...__F...rr •1 1 poop ugry Oµ1 e,1 tr• ,_r Of 1 A~~ ~f,-1L- -uu~ dunm~4fp,ao~N1i: ~1 .~`y rw en~~l r~••' rr...,'-^....+~♦ I~ 1 i ' '•r x•11 s 1 I. ~ ' I I, 1✓' I ty`, I I 1'•~ 1 JM'•'rinnPw • 1 f ' Onnt~ •~`..s+~.1/'11111 { / 11 h~ I r ~ I I' I' ~Fj , • I 14r## 'f~r/~1 ♦ I,i'~1 ,.r o ,I /1 ,I , % ' • - _ _ - ! I ~4%, PLAZA ACCESS ROUTE ~ , . ♦ ~yyy R ♦ I r y pk " I 11 • /~i AND RETURN TRAIL r,.,/ 1 ♦ 1 :'1 f 'j`+' I 1'Y so. ,i,1`+•I ♦♦r_•-`~$ ' ♦•r....yr r •~~i 11 UAL SLALOM RACE COURSE 1• / r,.., _ hr...:~r•~~_,♦ • fir..'' , (SHEET B-0) ♦ ♦ • ~•r ^ I T950 rr... rr.r•+•-r.r,~ Y- ~t 1 Irr'r ~rrr~r CYCLOCROS STAIRCASE LEGEND o f ,•,~s••••o ' - BICYCLE TRAILS (approximate location) •'••..,..••'',so a so "s' .•i•...-LESS DIFFICULT (SHEET 131.0) LOPE LE sous L~ (SHEET 02.0) .-y•r..-MORE DIFFICULT (SHEET 61.0) 'Possome _ I I .►•1 i PUMP~RACK IRiJUMF' b- ~ 1 t a. ♦ lSMMt1.Ar (SHEET B82.0) ~ I , - + . + • '"__._--MOST DIFFICULT (SHEET 81.0) . 1'•,11 Js. .'+,+J^' .,r.,m I,• % BICYCLE TERRAIN AREAS (approximate location) 0 -0 J# '0 .••{fts..•-LESS DIFFICULT ~n , t„ „ ; 0 .••41111111lo. -MORE DIFFICULT oo. 1 ; it " ,pu ♦ ♦ ' _ EXTREME t -OPTIONAL TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURE k r 1 (Note: Typically rated at one difficulty ' ' ,'•'r level higher than main trail. See Sheet B1.0) % CD LEARNING ft 4- LIX)P 1 ~ 1 / 1 1 1 1 I 1 ilk • 1 1 1 1 1 , r♦ , I y II 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ O 1 I s. I 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 r 1 • r~ mot' ; 1 ~ 1 ~ I r~~ INDOOR BIKE PARK I 1 ♦ 1 1 1 ` (TENTATIVE( I ; 1 1 ♦,,I % (SHEET B2.0) I's 1 1 1 1 ~ tt _ 1 I i I i • ~ I I 1 V ~ I~_ - ~Vl~lll I~, St "so a I 1 C7-~ t~ rZ.. VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW BIKE PARK TRAIL, TERRAIN AREA, & TECHNICAL FEATURE PLAN 1 f r 1; ♦ • LEGEND y 1 44iiooo -SPECTATOR PARTICIPANT yawl. ..•~Z'A•RA CIRCULATION j \ j•.oil; ~y,., ..,~,~yli~rr i _ jy Rt+•r•,~:i~l 'a111~'i~ y -SPECTATOR AREAS 1 n , •.RS~ r. „ wr , • -CAR PARKING 1 ~ ` ,.rd' ..fir+•,.r r" ,,y 1 f M• •.ti,ir 'rib ,r j - -PERMANENT FENCING > oo iolo 1 • 1*~ 1 POTENTIAL BIKE PARKING CORRAL 1 •~•~•:a • 1 1 1 f -EVENT GREEN / VENDORS i 1 6PI a 1 1 VI i 1 ~ 1 1 ` I 1 1 1 • 1 ••~••1 1 j :1144 1 ~ .:~1 I 11 i.~♦~-.. • me, 44, + .uo.iu... 1 ♦•...............■u......■.■■■..........■...■■...........■■■■~1 1 1 1 VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW TYPICAL TRAIL BIKE AMENITIES TYPICAL TECHNICAL TRAIL FEATURE The park will include an approximately 4-mile system of interconnected trails with a variety of styles and terrain. Loops will Technical features will be scattered along appropriate trails throughout the park to add challenge and interest. These may take connect different segments so that visitors can customize their experiences--choosing the length of trail, technical difficulty, many different forms, ranging from existing natural features, to enhanced natural terrain, to innovative engineered structures. type of terrain, and returning to where they started without having to retrace their steps. The trail system will include designated Technical features will be provided for all skill levels, and typically positioned as an optional challenge with alternate routes routes for beginner, intermediate, and expert riders, and will be built to international guidelines for sustainability and both provided. The items displayed in this package are examples of features commonly found in bike parks and are intended to cyclocross and mountain bike racing. A "Leaning Loop" will provide a specific place for beginning skill development. convey design intent. The Valmont Bike Park will include a wide range of similar features not displayed here. 41 tl" dill raj ~C ~ ~/r wl ~ ~ a.,,,~a is .".S 7+T is a 1 SHARED USE `ENHANCED TERRAIN LESS DIFFICULT LESS DIFFICULT A; . 44 jj~ -07 Co L;~ 1` Y. ' `.f~,~.~• yop,_, Via' L► -;~s;"" p 4 _ ~!c LESS DIFFICULT STONE PITCHED SURFACE MORE DIFFICULT MORE DIFFICULT I A ~It M. .r ! a f M a`' oi1 MORE DIFFICULT MOST DIFFICULTu MORE DIFFICULT MOST DIFFICULT VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW BIKE AMENITIES TYPICAL SIGNS TYPICAL TERRAIN AREAS There are several distinct terrain parks for technical riding integrated into the larger park design. Each area includes natural and man-made features to provide progression and fun. Terrain park elements include: two pumptracks, a dirt jump zone, a dual slalom race course, and several downhill "slopestyle" trails with berms, jumps and man-made obstacles. The existing steel building will be re-used to create a covered bike terrain area. Careful design of the terrain areas will ensure appropriate progression for beginner, intermediate, and expert riders. The examples provided here are intended to convey design intent, and do not include the full range of potential elements at the park. s ;Irv, r TYPICAL SIGN (PRIMARY ENTRANCE KIOSK) gown" 40 TYPICAL BERM TYPICAL SLOPESTYLE FEATURE t (ON TRAILS AND IN TERRAIN AREAS) (SATELLITE DISH, BOULDER JUMP) y, i~+r^,„, Ri11 EJ" ' TYPICAL WALLRIDE s TYPICAL SIGN r (SECONDARY ENTRANCE) TYPICAL DIRT JUMP AREA TYPICAL PUMPTRACK " (VARIOUS DIFFICULT LEVELS) y { SIG? * ;:+~j~s y , t4DW TYPICAL DUAL SLALOM RACE COURSE INDOOR BIKE PARK TYPICAL SIGN (WAYFINDING) VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO f SITE REVIEW BIKE AMENITIES 01TYPICAL TRAIL (ROLLING CONTOUR)'' ' TYPICAL OPTIONAL LINE J F It 11 l o . TYPICAL ROCK ARMORING TYPICAL TRAIL CORRALING TYPICAL OPTIONAL LINE (STONE PITCHED TECHNIQUE) (FOR CHALLENGE AND USER MANAGEMENT) TYPICAL GRADE REVERSAL (PREFERRED FOR DRAINAGE) ~t F~ p ~G I 00 ROILDG IRS 1 I i Avo oanT+s TYPICAL ROCK ARMORING (MIXED ROCK TYPES) TYPICAL BIKE TRAIL (SLOPING TERRAIN) TiWLSIDE MEOTS 17AS HIGH ROLLERG TB'-94'WIOE TRAIL NATURAL OR IMPORTED) \ SHOULD BE PLACED NS THE INSIDE SIDE APEX OF TURNS yyy~ • BERMED TURNS . i / 1. ,4..: II IS GtMSERED AND SERMEO TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE AND TYPICAL TECHNICAL FEATURE DHAILENGERIDERS TYPICAL TECHNICAL FEATURE (DROP OFF TYPICAL BIKE TRAIL (FLAT TERRAIN) (BOULDER CAUSE VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO BMdBLOPERT/JlOIEOFREPOSE SITE REVIEW E BIKE AMENITIES I-11= I' H 1I- 1=1 I I-1 11- ORDNIIL iAYFR PF PRE3ENC) RCUERS (TAT) -III- FILL I-III-I I I ! I 11111 IIII - °%D~NBER _ I II', I IIII=1 I III I -1--~ TM6TREM = _ IIII III ! piGWIC NYFA OF PRESElIf) MINESUL I ! I I 1-1 I I III III 3%a"x~~r ~I LCWPawsI yNEED FILL SOIL E%IBIIN(•CAROE III III- _ TD BEMMOPEO I I I-I I III-I I III I I I I I I I I LllllllllllilllllllIIII IIII III! Ihll I'llNE1I I I III I I- I I I I I-I I I I l i I NOTES: A B vroENSwEDRUNME aN FUT mouxo. TI~TRENp BNwLO BE ~ f VMBERFO,RTCROWNEO. W NOSTIIL4lNLY3. UIBEPoNO811aAO BE BLCPEOTONIAOS n1E W31DE OFATUW. GPEATERCMISEIBXG NNV~ NOTES REpIIfEDIN WiCERNRNS. GMBERING IBNOT NEEDED a1 THE /$f.E1✓DIND DR oESCENaNC FrcESOF urvaxwnoN3. xTw+LSluu IuvE DErmE IWODUna+s wIm vnmwD NEM~RS. NOTES 1.WSLOPEDniE "YBEDEyRABLEWLCGna1BAMISP PT. F EASIER TRAIL FLAT - SECTION EASIER TRAIL FLAT - PROFILE PROPER DRM NGE CO R0. M.O..OR DE REVFRS4s, SMOMO IS ENR D z. TuRNB Slue BE CwYBEREw awlQO. EASIER TRAIL SIDEHILL - SECTION Vas i 1z~ LOW PONi3IMY NEED ~N , roaE n%roNEo NOTES NOTES 1.nURS LMAM EIUOOEABTEO IINd%ATEWS WIIN VMYIND 1.TRNL SIVll IuVE E%MffA. M NRNS WRN VM WM I. HEIO .uPTON•w1 . UOUNTIONSAMYBECON3IRIFIFOWO T nEY LMY BE Da9IE.M1IMPFD BY SKBIED &CYCU513. 2 TRNLTREM GN SE ROWH, WIIM ROCIa UP Tp C. x cowlEN%A SIMU BE+Bw WwTNU+o aEARaF I+OIESwm PRDARLaNO MORE DIFFICULT TRAIL - PROFILE oB.IECrB. TR,LLTREA000ES xor NEtoro BE CENIEREOwCORROpt a TIULW DE ovECrs (PJSBTNG oR IAIPORIFDI sHOULO wt w,c®nr ne INSIce •PECOFnRiNS. UP TO pF%POSURE rywBESI MORE DIFFICULT TRAIL - PLAN COBNEBT mm RI PTV t•COMPRCIEDa SHED R= ' 157 ~~1o*GN~ I I 1=1 I F] 11=1 11=1 I I -I M IIII=IT-ITI i- III- BWLOERS OIt OTHER OSIECiS C%Y TREATED I III- -III-III-III- -III-III-III-III-III- -III-III-III-III ro%EEPUSERSONIIWL TwLERBORDEA COBBLESTONE HILLCLIMB - PLAN COBBLESTONE HILLCLIMB - PROFILE VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW BIKE AMENITIES 1pG'(VARIES) HN.IFEREp EDGE XCTiFATED TMaERS RV O 1Q RUSXEN FlNE9 - _ O RUSHED RCCI( (VARIES) MASONRY SANDJ - - ,P III-III-I O~R~ xcE GR ~~sFECrATae sPEGTATORCOHINGL = 11I I CYCLOCROSS STAIRCASE - PLAN _ III III-III- (-III III=III== I I~III~ ~=III III ~IIIVIII B' HIGH SOIL BERM CYCLOCROSS STAIRCASE - PROFILE CYCLOCROSS SANDPIT - PLAN aGUIERW PEE TD ANDIaR xTTnsEGTIDN MPRO%MN1ELYf DWAEiER'IE%,URm D_AE' LEVEL OF EKH LINE TO $OW USERS aUl NL01V RKE GpMSESNO P/SM(iE OF LWNIFHUN:F/EI.EIiGENGY VFHILlE3 (EG, AM. SNOW GROGER$) J,1 ' ~ J~ TREE dt9WlDER TO DEFINE INTERSECIIMa p~'(//~ 0000 00 O O O O 00 O P3 E TEC L TRNL FFJ~TIME • • gRpMERTRNLTYFE O WoENT ATINTERMIC TYPICAL OPTIONAL LINE - PLAN FASTENERS:BOLT/WASIIFW NYLIXI tAff (IYPI z%1z ceLKWG CUDdNG RECYCLEON£IT+EPEDYk1Y NIERSEOTX)N APPRO%INATELV+D OIAA,EIEn xz.+oo wALL STEEL FRAUE TE% Au °URFACE RUE6lE STRIP IsTONB PrtbwG OR m.Y ) NOTES 1. DES„W INIERSECTX]N TO A TRAFFIC TO MOVE IN EITHER DIREGTIGH. 3. FOR }WAY NIERSECRIXIS. CREATE V WIT1118UND IN THE NCIDI 75'ANGLE RIDING N`RFKE ASCPPOSEDTO E. HIGH TRAFFIC TRAIL INTERSECTION (4-WAY OR GREATER) - PLAN TRUE LANDING FXISTNGCFAOE aV•ROAp RI3EYCOLVKTFII DEITI ,.IP • +9•.t8• VANES CRUSIEO ROG(fJICEPTIN WELL OPNNEO LIXY.TI0N3 1]'PAp sx cAAwER(rrP) LIL]Lj zRwlus sHORTLAN LEea CgGWIC n E%pERENCEORCER RNERS s s F PRE&!NaErvn -I-I I II I II I _ _ I-III-III-I ll1-~=1 =11= 1=1 -II_- I = I- I =1Tl-iii= =I I IIII-III-IIMlII-III-I I -I ! -II-III-1 I 1=1II-IIII M III =III-III-III-III-I f 41=1I1M II1=i=111=1 1-I Fa„~ aP GDNDRE~FDGrvDA DNFADa I I-1 I I-1 ~ I-1 I I-1 1 11 1 11 11=1'~ I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I_I I I-1 I I-1 I I WALL RIDE - FRONT DETAIL WALL RIDE - SIDE ELEVATION SURFACED TRAIL - SECTION TYPICAL WALL RIDE - ELEVATION VALMONT CITY PARK - PHASE ONE BOULDER, COLORADO SITE REVIEW - N~ ~ BIKE AMENITIES T T T T i i II 1 q l I l l I I ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I 1 / ~ / 1 I I I I I _ 1 I I f 1 ~ i % i/ ~ ~ j I WRAMUS NATIVE W RADUs: r % r sOUARE TUBE r%S OECIQIO l I' 1 - l l- 'I I- I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I. I I I- P I I I I I I I I -I I r 1 I - I I I I I I IaxAONB - I I' I I I I I - I I I I I - I I I 'I I- I I - I I I I 1 - I I CONCPETE PAO I I I ,I I- I I I I- I I I ' I 1 I I' I I - 1. I I I I ~ B I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I' I 'I - I" I I' - I- I I I I I I 1 I I 11 - I I I I'-I I _ I ' I 1- I I - I I - I - 1 f 1 I 11 - I I I I I I- I - I I I I I- I I I - I I I- 1 I- I 1 I I I I - I- I I I - I - I - I I I I I- I I _ I I' I i I I I 'l 1 I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I TYPICAL ELEVATED TRAIL - PROFILE / 1. z ] s' r B B I, P -r z i• n / ' ~ / ~ ~ TrPIULUProcNr WPPOaT % TYPICAL DIRT JUMP - PLAN / ~ ' / l ~ ~ I CCNLRETE PAO / I I I I I I Gl9E PAO~}%5 NApµREO 11P AND WIpXG I I I I I I 1 MOUND NA PA.10 GRAVwPEDNtlCONixACTORMIO suPF suRFACSOwnN TOPSOE -77 i 11 1 \I 11 i BLINDING SLIP 11 11 \I 11 1 I 1 I \ \ 1 1n DISTANCE 1 NOg llAL 1 1 I SPII.wNG BLOCK 1 I 1 I ~ , O 1' S J f \\y+' C T TYPICAL ELEVATED TRAIL - PLAN B' WSTw SUFFACNG MM FINE GNAOMG BY TxNLCCN MCIOR TYPK. L WIN® WALLRCE ENINYIENT RIIN NOTES: START-pN =NONMINOSUNFACESTOBEGgFDFDATAAM\UTA EN0.NMB0 t tAAAMTOPRESENJESUSTABNBILIIY.IEpp WATER `f - X` OLLWIY. NONVEGEFATpX GROMIN Axp ALLON MbMNG \ \f a k TYPICAL DIRT JUMP - PROFILE W 1 T j l l L WRVED T t t / i_Y r~Y / t 1\ II i / / 1 I- ` 39,103 CF ♦`Ci \ \I I / / RADIU3ED TOP ExrRYIEIm RUx NOTES: TYPIrx WINED / 1'4 2834 CF SPECIFIC FEATURE LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO BE WALLRWE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY A FROFEBBIONAL TRNL BUILDER I-DEPICIS ROLLFN PIACELEHT I T'n• PLAN TYPICAL DIFFICULT PUMP TRACK - PLAN TYPICAL 90 DEGREE BERM WITH ROLLER IN/OUT - PLAN TYPICAL 90 DEGREE BERM WITH ROLLER IN/OUT - PROFILE