Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
5B - Consideration of a recommendation to the City Council concerning the 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
„ CITY OF BOULDER PLANNING BOARD AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: July 10, 2008 (Agenda Item Prepazation Date: June 30, 2008) AGENDA TITLE: Public hearing and consideration of a recommendation to the City Council concerning the 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). r REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development Services Ruth McHeyser, Acting Planning Director Susan Richstone, Long Range Planning Manager Chris Meschuk, Planner Bill Boyes, Facilities and Asset Management Cazl Castillo, City Manager's Office Alice Guthrie, Pazks & Recreation Bob Harberg, Public Works /Utilities Tim Head, Public Works /Airport Jim Mazshall, Library Annie Noble, Public Works /Utilities & Tributary Greenways Jim Reasor, Finance Department Stephany Westhusin, Public Works /Transportation Delani Wheeler, Open Space and Mountain Parks r I. BACKGROUND ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM The City of Boulder's 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a six-yeaz plan for public physical improvements. The CIP provides a forecast of funds available for capital projects and identifies all planned capital improvement projects and their estimated costs over the six-year period. The first year's program in the CIP is adopted by the City Council as the Capital Budget, as a counterpart to the annual Operating Budget. Even though fiscal resources are appropriated only in the first yeaz of the CIP, the succeeding five yeazs of the CIP are important in providing a longer- term plan for setting spending priorities, scheduling projects in a logical sequence, and coordinating and targeting capital improvement projects for all city departments. Capital improvement projects are generally defined as any major project of $50,000 or more requiring the expenditure of public funds (over and above operating expenditures) for the purchase, construction, or replacement of the physical assets of the community. This broad definition includes those projects that are bondable and includes new or expanded physical facilities as well as the land acquisition and site improvements necessary for a project. AGENDA ITEM # SB Paee 1 The CIP is an essential implementation tool for carrying out the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan's policies of orderly and efficient provision of urban facilities and services. The Comprehensive Plan provides for the phased growth of the city with annexation to occur only when the full range of urban services is available. The Capital Improvements Program schedules projects that correct current facility deficiencies to meet or enhance these levels of service standards through facility expansions and maintenance. Each year the CIP is updated by adding a new sixth year of capital improvement projects. Adjustments are made to costs and revenues forecasted the previous year. Changes may also be made to the yeaz(s) in which a project is scheduled, reflecting changes in fiscal conditions and ' changes in overall funding priorities. New capital projects may be added or deleted based on new „ facility needs identified in updated or new city master plans, area plans, or studies. As stipulated by the City Charter, the city Planning Department coordinates the process for • preparing the annual CIP with other city departments. The Planning Boazd evaluates and makes recommendations to the City Manager and City Council on the proposed CIP as part of the annual budget process. Planning Board's role: 1) evaluate CIP projects in the context of the long-term, "big picture" policies of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP); 2) make recommendations on the scope, priorities, and scheduling of CIP projects; 3) make recommendations on resolving policy issues raised by the proposed location and design of CIP projects; - 4) make a determination of which CIP projects will be required to undergo a Community and Environmental Assessment Process CEAP review. Additionall ` ( ) y, in recent years the Planning Boazd has identified which projects should have a separate design review. The Planning Board's review of the CIP includes the policies and plans of the BVCP, but also A looks to subcommunity plans, area plans and departmental master plans. As defined in the ` Comprehensive Plan, subcommunity plans and azea plans provide more detailed planning for land use, urban design, neighborhood revitalization, and public facility needs. Most departments now have functional master plans for the provision of services and facilities. Master plans are developed ` to be consistent with the policies and the growth projections in the Comprehensive Plan. They .r typically include level of service standards needed to meet BVCP goals and policies, more specific policies, and system-wide priorities for scheduling and targeting capital improvements. In the past few years there has been achy-wide effort to examine long-term resource needs for system maintenance and deficiency correction. This effort will continue in the future and will be reflected in future CIPs. For the 2009 budget process, the city is continuing to use the Business Plan to help make decisions about funding priorities primarily for the operating budget. The Business Plan is adecision-making tool which assists the organization in making strategic citywide recommendations regarding ` revenue and expense priorities for current and future funding. It serves as a link between the comprehensive plan, master plans and the recommended budget. Departments aze asked to identify three levels of funding or funding plans: fiscally constrained, action and vision plans, similar to AGENDA ITEM # SB Paee 2 how it is done at the master plan level. To create these funding plans, staff prioritizes programs and services into categories defined in a city-wide set of guiding principles. Staff identifies the levels of ' service currently provided in each functional area and whether it meets, exceeds or is below service a standards and then prioritizes programs and services. This prioritization helps identify where growth or greater expenditure should occur as well as identify where cuts should occur, if necessary. Consistent with the business plan, each proposed project is categorized as "essential", "desirable" or "discretionary". These are shown on the project summary sheets for each project and were used by all the departments to sort and organize departmental capital priorities as well as program priorities. In general, capital projects are prioritized to first address essential services. For new projects, the city also attempts to be opportunistic whenever possible by partnering with outside funding sources ~ and addressing many goals at the same time (multi-faceted projects that have components with many city departments). • Essential services include programs, services or facilities essential to ensuring health and safety or that are legally mandated; on-going operation and maintenance of existing facilities or ® infrastructure; and investments contributing the most to achieving the core mission of the city or insuring the integrity of the most fundamental responsibilities of government. CIP examples include Broadway concrete reconstruction, pedestrian facilities repair and replacement, and most all of the water and wastewater utility funds projects. • Desirable services include those that enhance programs or facilities in ways that advance desired community values, or enhance essential services or quality of life improvements. Also included would be funding for replacement of an existing facility and/or infrastructure; services valued by the community and created by [he legislative action of the city of Boulder City Council or to meet Council's budget policies; programs maintained as "seed com" to provide a base for restoration in an economic recovery and essential programs that have been reduced, .e maintaining the elements of a program necessary in order [o make future restoration possible. CIP examples include most of the 28`" Street Improvements, bikeway and pedestrian facility enhancements, park development, stormwater and flood enhancements and tributary greenways projects. • Discretionary services include those that serve limited purposes or specialized interests, are desired by the community but not required to provide or enhance an essential service or that people could obtain through other means, private or other governmental and non-profit agencies. CIP examples include things like noise walls and building new aesthetic treatments. This area of the budget does not expand the systems or preserve the quality or integrity of the infrastructure and/or systems. Until the economy recovers sufficiently, we will have few of this type of project. r AGENDA ITEM # SB Paae 3 1 II. THE RECOMMENDED 2009 CAPITAL BUDGET The 2009 Capital Improvements Program includes proposed funding of $36.8 million for 95 projects in 15 funds. The entire six-year CIP includes proposed funding of $216 million for 165 projects. The chart below generally describes the recommended capital funding by department for 2009. This varies year to year depending on the type and cost of projects recommended for funding in that year and the amount of external funding received. Attachment B contains highlights of the recommended capital improvements program by fund as well as a detailed breakout of recommended funding in each fund. 2009 Recommended CIP Wastewater, 8 Transportation /Airport, ,r 24% Water, 29 CAGID, 3% FAM, 6% r Storrnwater & Flood, 7 % Parks 8 Recreation , 11% OSMP, 11 III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR 2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The following questions provide more information than what is provided in the fund summaries or project descriptions. This analysis is intended to provide acity-wide overview of these issues affecting the capital budgeting process. Answers to the following questions are listed below: 1. How does the recommended capital budget address social, environmental and economic ~ sustainability goals? 2. Are there capital needs not shown in the CIP? 3. How much of the CIP is from outside or leveraged funding sources? 4. What CIP projects are funded with growth-related development excise tax revenue? 5. How are operating or maintenance costs for new capital projects being covered? ~ 6. What energy efficiency upgrades are part of Facility and Asset Management projects? 7. What will be the next decision-making points for the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Conveyance -Carter Lake Pipeline? 8. What is in the CIP related to the flood studies in progress? What will be the next steps? AGENDA ITEM # SB Paae 4 9. What issues were raised by the advisory boards reviewing departmental CIPs? Section N, beginning on page 10 discusses capital improvements related to the implementation of Subcommunity and Area plans. ® 1. How does the recommended capital budget address the city's adopted social, " environmental and economic sustainability goals? The Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan's policies on community sustainability provide a unifying goal [o maintain and enhance the livability, health and vitality of the Boulder Valley and the natural systems of which it is a part, now and in the long-term future. (See BVCP policies: 1.01 Community Sustainability, 1.07 Leadership in Sustainability) The purpose of capital improvements planning is to ensure that the city can provide basic services now and into the future. Most capital projects contribute to improved social conditions throughout the city and help ensure that the basic health and safety needs of all residents are met. There are a few exceptions where projects may benefit specific areas of the city or certain neighborhoods, like pocket parks and multi-use paths, but even these raise the quality of life for the entire community. Many projects will also make areas of the city safer: stormwater and flood improvements will reduce street flooding and potential damage to property; bike and pedestrian improvements make it r safer and easier for people to get from one place to another and also to use alternative modes of transportation. A It is important for the city to plan capacity and system improvements over the long term to be able to anticipate capital costs and potential rate increases over time, thereby mitigating sudden economic impacts. This is done primarily in the master planning process, where the future needs are planned, but also service delivery systems are evaluated for how they meet sustainability goals. Many of the transportation and trail projects will result in increased mobility which also further environmental goals by potentially reducing auto use and pollution, but also provide better safe ,s access to nearby trails, paths, parks. The ability for people to walk or bike to work, school or shopping increases their transportation options but it also is related to improved physical and mental health. This also applies to proposed new trails and visitor infrastructure in Open Space and Mountain Parks. Many of these projects include an environmental benefit like habitat protection or weed control. Other projects invest in entire systems: raw and treated water system improvements will help ensure continued delivery of safe drinking water to the entire community; wastewater w treatment improvements will improve the quality of the water dischazged into Boulder Creek. Improvements to our public buildings and facilities will ensure their continued viability into [he future. Many grojects will have a Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) which will identify impacts and benefits, recommend mitigation and incorporate public outreach and input. " These are listed in Attachment F. For these and other projects, staff will use the sustainability tools to help identify benefits and impacts and an appropriate public engagement process. r AGENDA ITEM # 5B Paee 5 2. Are there capital needs not shown in the CIP? The capital improvements program is presented primarily as afiscally-constrained capital budget. Included in Attachment C is a list of unfunded projects. This information is provided to assist in the - budget process and for the Planning Board and City Council to be fully informed about the possible range of capital needs in the city. Some of these needs are outlined in adopted master plans, some are not. As more plans are developed and updated, they specifically identify Action and Vision ` funding plans for needs that are not included in the fiscally constrained funding plan. Many of these items are associated with departments that are funded from the general fund and ` have no other funding source than the general fund. Capital improvements are not typically funded ~ from the general fund. General fund department projects are funded from the capital development fund if growth related (generated from development excise tax revenues). w Restricted fund capital improvements are typically funded within the fund itself (e.g., Transportation Fund, Open Space Fund) based on available funds, bonding or leveraged funds from external sources. 3. How much of the CIP is from external or leveraged funding sources? Various city departments receive external funds, typically state or federal, that require an s application or selection process to identify specific projects for use of these funds. Transportation projects typically receive the majority of external funding through the Denver Regional Council of ~ Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The program distributes federal Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) funding for transportation projects. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) also awards funding for specific projects through a selection process. Council approves applications prior to submittal. Applications aze submitted to DRCOG approximately 4-5 years ~ prior to project implementation. External funding influences the timing of projects in the CIP because [here is usually a requirement for matching funds and timing of construction. Each year the capital budgets are revised to provide local match funding where necessary and take advantage of as much external funding opportunities as possible. The table below describes external funding anticipated for projects proposed in 2009. Total City External Sources r Fundin Fundin Fundin Transportation $8.24 million $4.7 million $3.54 million SAFETEA-LU Fund or 57% or 43% CDOT, CU, RTD, BVSD Total $8.24 million $4.7 million $3.54 million Additional external funding of $3.43 million for transportation projects is anticipated in 2010. " Funding of $500,000 per year from the UDFCD is anticipated for the 2009-2014 CIP. AGENDA ITEM # SB Pa¢e 6 ~ w Projects include: Transportation • 30th Street Access Improvements BTV: Bluff to Walnut Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe) • Broadway/Euclid Multimodal Improvements • Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30th Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements 4. What CIP projects are funded with growth-related development excise tax revenue? The Development Excise Tax (DET) is intended to serve the following purposes: (a) to provide that new capital improvement needs are met as non-residential and residential development occurs; (b) to fund the cost of transportation projects needed due to growth; ~ (c) to fund the acquisition and development of new neighborhood and community park land and recreation centers and the development of existing parks and recreation centers to serve the needs of city residents. r Growth related excise [axes provide capital funding for the transportation development fund, a portion of the permanent parks and recreation fund, and the capital development fund (municipal services, including Police, Fire, Library, Human Services, and general municipal purposes). They include: (see project summary sheets in Attachment D for specific project descriptions): • Construction of bike lanes on 30`s Street from Arapahoe to Peazl. 28`s Street improvements • Funding for transportation improvements coordinated with new private development. • Some funding from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund for improvements at Valmont City Park, Wonderland Lake Park, Flatirons Golf Course, neighborhood pocket park development. • Funding reserved for public plaza improvements and facility improvements. • Downtown Office Space Deficiency The city has contracted with the firm of TischlerBise to prepare a new Development Excise Tax Study. The purpose of the proposed study is to bring the city's fees and taxes more in line with the " actual costs of growth. The study includes the components currently included in the city's development excise taxes and housing excise tax (affordable housing, fire, human services, libraries, municipal facilities, pazks, police, recreation, transportation). The study will be completed by mid July in order to enable City Council to place an item on the November ballot, should they decide to do so. City Council will receive the study and provide direction at the July 22 City Council meeting. 5. How are operating or maintenance costs for new capital projects being covered? Each fund has an identified source of operations and maintenance funding. Many restricted funds (e.g. Transportation, Open Space, .25 Cent Sales Tax) can allocate funds for capital projects, as well as their operations and maintenance. Some restricted funds (e.g. Transportation Excise Tax Fund, Capital Development Fund, Permanent Parks and Recreation) must be used strictly AGENDA ITEM # SB Pa¢e 7 for capital projects. For projects associated with these funds, operations and maintenance funding o_ relies on other funding sources, including the Transportation Fund and the General Fund. New projects or enhancements to existing infrastructure often result in new or increased maintenance needs. If the maintenance needs are relatively minor, the costs are absorbed into a R department's existing operating budget. If, however, the new or increased maintenance costs are substantial, then these costs should be included in the department's operating Action Plan request. Approval of Action Plan requests depend on available funding and consideration of competing ~ citywide program/service needs. 6. What energy efficiency upgrades are part of Facility and Asset Management projects? Facilities and Asset Management projects related to maintenance and updating of existing facilities emphasize energy efficiency and use of renewable materials and sustainable design, such as energy efficient lighting and mechanical systems and computerized controls. Specific projects include an emphasis on sustainable design practices, reuse and recycling of materials, and energy efficient design applications. 7. What will be the next decision-making points for the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Conveyance -Carter Lake Pipeline? Funding for construction of the proposed Carter Lake Pipeline has been delayed until 2014. Funding of the pipeline in the nearer term without Federal funding assistance would have a significant impact on water rates. Staff continues to recommend the pipeline as the best long-term solution to water quality, ~ operational and security vulnerability issues related to drawing water directly from the Boulder Feeder Canal and Boulder Reservoir. By delaying the schedule for pipeline construction, more time is available to secure Federal funding assistance. Recognizing mixed overall support to date the city should continue initial project evaluation for the t Carter Lake Pipeline. Efforts include development of a CEAP, right-of-way acquisition, preliminary ~ design and permitting activities. Therefore, no decisions for approval of the pipeline construction will be required in the near future. 8. What is in the CIP related to the flood studies in progress? What will be the next steps? The following flood studies in progress included in the CIP are: 1. Fourmile Canyon and Wonderland Creek Flood Mitigation Planning -The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2008. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property r damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. Projects that provide ~ multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new R culvert and pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northem and Sante Fe Railroad and Boulder AGENDA ITEM # SB Pase S ~ White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. The city applied for TIP funding for this project and although the project did not make the firs[ funding cut it is still possible the city will receive matching funds. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Progam and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. r 2. South Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study -The study is complete and has been submitted to FEMA for review. The mapping study results will become the basis for future floodplain management, mitigation planning, regulatory restrictions and flood insurance requirements for the South Boulder Creek corridor. Funding for flood mitigation planning began in 2008 and this work is likely to continue during 2009 and 2010 with construction bond funding anticipated in 201 I. It is anticipated that the focus of these efforts would be to primarily mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley, where flood impacts were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since occurred. It is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36 Comdor Improvements-Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also ~ pursuing Federal funding for this project. It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2009-2011 to support this work. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. 3. Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study -Staff has initiated an update to the Boulder Creek flood mapping. The work has been initiated and preliminary results should be available in late 2008. The study wil] recognize recent work completed by the city including the reconstruction of the Broadway Bridge, the 29th St development as well as the acquisition and removal of several properties along Boulder Creek as part of the city's pre-flood property acquisition program. The study will be based on recent aerial mapping and topography that is vastly superior to base mapping used in previous flood studies. 4. Gregory Canyon Creek Flood Mapping Study -This study is almost complete and it is anticipated the public involvement process will begin in mid 2008 and the study submitted to FEMA in late 2008. 5. Elmer's Two-mile Canyon Creek -This study is almost complete and will be submitted to FEMA in the near future. The study considers modifications to the flood hazard azeas based on the anticipated Elmer's Two-mile Canyon Creek Greenways project. 9. What concerns or issues were raised by the advisory boards reviewing departmental CIPs? „r Questions and concerns raised by the boazds are summarized below. Excerpts from [he summary minutes regarding the CIP are included in the fund overviews under Advisory Board Action in the beginning of each section of Attachment D. Transuortation The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed and made a recommendation on the 2009- . 2014 Transportation Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at their June 9, 2008 meeting and discussed the C1P at their May 12, 2008 meeting. The TAB recommended approval of the 2009- 2014 Transportation Capital Improvements Program as submitted. AGENDA ITEM # SB Paee 9 Utilities The preliminary CIP was discussed at the Water Resource Advisory Board (WRAB) on May 19, 2008. WRAB was concerned about the magnitude of rate increases that might be needed to support the preliminary work program formulated by staff. - Staff has made significant modifications to the proposed work program (action plan) and has also formulated alternative scenarios for consideration. A public hearing with the WRAB is scheduled ` for July 7, 2008 and staff will request [hat WRAB review the proposed 2009-2014 CIP work program and provide a board recommendation on the proposed plan. Parks and Recreation The Parks and Recreation Advisory Boazd (PRAB) discussed staff's recommended CIP at its April M 28 business meeting. The PRAB agreed that development of Phase One of Valmont City Park was a priority. In an effort to be fiscally responsible, PRAB deferred funding for East Boulder Community Park and Violet neighborhood pazk in order to maintain healthy fund balances. After the master plan for East Boulder Community Park is revised, the PRAB will reconsider the project priority and allocate funding accordingly. The PRAB also reviewed the deferred maintenance needs for the parks and recreation system and expressed concern about the level of funding available, as it is insufficient. The PRAB approved the revised CIP at its May 19 business meeting. Tributary Greenwavs " The Greenwavs Advisory Committee reviewed [he Greenwavs 2009-2014 CIP on June 25, 2008 and unanimously approved the CIP, with the recommendation to restructure the operating and miscellaneous project categories into the following categories: standard salaries, temporary salaries, operating expenses and miscellaneous restoration, water quality and trail improvements. ~ Open Space and Mountain Parks The Open Space Board of Trustees will be asked to review and approve the 2009 - 2014 CIP ~ budget submittal at either its June or July meeting and will be asked to recommend i[ be approved by both the Planning Boazd and City Council. The results of this meeting will be presented verbally to the Planning Boazd and City Council. w IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF SUBCOMMUNITY AND AREA PLANS The following questions provide an overview of capital projects related to adopted subeommunity and area plans as well as information regazding capital projects in specific geographic areas of focus throughout the city. 1. How is the implementation of the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP) being addressed in the CIP? 2. How is the implementation of the North Boulder Subeommunity Plan (NBSP) being addressed in the CIP? 3. What future capital projects will be proposed associated with the Gunbatrel Community Center Plan? AGENDA ITEM # SB Paee 10 w r 1. How is the implementation of the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP) being addressed in the CIP? Implementation of the Transit Village Area Plan is still in its infancy, and decisions on financing implementation strategies are currently being discussed. However, there are several projects within the 2009-2014 CIP, including: ® Boulder Transit Village Stormwater Improvements provides funding for stormwater improvements in the Boulder Transit Village area. The improvement cost would be reimbursed by redevelopment that is anticipated to occur in this azea over the next several decades. It is recommended that money be allocated in 2010 and 2011 for the proposed redevelopment associated with [he Boulder Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP). City staff recently completed an analysis to identify the stormwater infrastructure which would be required to meet water quality and detention requirements identified in the city's Design and Construction Standards (DCS) for the area's redevelopment. City staff is currently working to develop a funding mechanism (ie: development district) to provide up-front money for regional stormwater facilities. It is intended that the utility would recoup its investment as the redevelopment occurred. For this reason bond money is allocated in 2011 and is intended to coincide with bond funding associated with the South Boulder Creek flood mitigation project. Bicycle lanes on 30`" Street between Pearl Street and Arapahoe. This project will complete the bicycle lane corridor on 30s' S[reet by constructing the missing links between Pearl and Arapahoe. $325,000 is proposed in 2009. Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements provides the city's share of funding for transportation facilities in the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP). The city's share of these improvements pays for improvements with community wide benefits or enhancements beyond those required of development. These improvements will be phased with the redevelopment of the azea over many years. The city's share of funding will contribute to construction of Junction Place as a new collector, the bridge of Goose Creek for Junction Place, bike lanes and pedestrian amenities on Junction Place, multimodal paths, underpasses and connections, pedestrian connections, pedestrian lighting, public art and traffic signals. The Transportation Fund is proposed to pay $100,000 in 2010 and 2011, and $200,000 in 2012-2014. Additionally, a one time appropriation from the General Fund of $600,000 is planned in 2004. Any upfront funding would be paid back through development excise tax and constriction use tax collected in the area. 30`" Street Access Improvements from Bluff to Walnut. First phase access improvements include constructing one mid-block crossing of 30`~ Street between Valmont and Pearl; " constructing two transit super stops, improving access from Goose Creek multi-use path to 30"' Street, and abicycle/pedestrian underpass of 30`s Street at the Boulder and Left-hand Ditch. The Goose Creek access will provide a critical missing link between the Goose Creek Path and the sidewalks and on-street bikelanes on 30th Street. $900,000 is proposed in 2009. AGENDA ITEM # SB Pase 11 w 2. How is the implementation of the North Boulder Subcommunity Plan (NBSP) being addressed in the CIP? P The development of the Foothills Community Park, development of various neighborhood and - pocket parks and Fourmile Creek Improvements are included in the 2009-2014 CIP (see description by department below). Additionally, bicycle and pedestrian connections typically occur in north Boulder annually, but are not specifically called out in the CIP, as they are done opportunistically, or as part of a larger program (e.g., greenways, bikeway, or sidewalk improvement programs). Partial funding for the construction of the North Boulder branch library has been appropriated and is still earmarked for this project; funding for branch operations has not been secured. Parks and Recreation Department: The Foothills Community Park in north Boulder is proposed for continued funding for phase three construction (2014). There is proposed funding in 2009 for maintenance projects at Wonderland Lake Pazk. The Elks Neighborhood Park is proposed for funding to begin in 2011 with construction in 2013-2014. Stormwater and Flood Mana¢ement Utility: Funding for flood mitigation projects for Fournule Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are proposed for funding from 2009-2014. Greenways projects are coordinated with these efforts. Tributary Greenways: Improvements to Fourmile Creek including environmental restoration and an r. off-street trail connecting 26's to 28'~ Streets are proposed and aze projected to be constructed in 2011 and 2012. Improvements to Wonderland Creek from Foothills to the Diagonal are proposed in ~ 2009 - 2010. 3. What future capital projects will be proposed associated with the Gunbarrel Community s Center Plan? ` Future capital improvements associated with the Gunbarrel Community Center Plan will include street and sidewalk improvements and bicycle and trail connections. Improvements in the long- ` term could also include potential library and pazk facilities if appropriate locations and new sources ~ of funding are identified. s, V. IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLANS 1. Which Master Plans are currently being updated or are scheduled for update in the near future? Updates in Progress ¦ Fire -last update in 1996, anticipated completion in 2008 • Water Ouality Strateeic Plan -begun in 2001, anticipated completion 2008 i • Source Water Master Plan -begun in 2007, anticipated completion in 2008 ¦ Wastewater Utilitv -begun in 2007, anticipated completion in 2008 • Transportation Master Plan - plan in process of being refreshed with updated project list from FasTracks Local Optimization and updated costs due to cost escalation and in coordination with Blue Ribbon Commission efforts AGENDA ITEM # SB Paee 12 ~ r. Updates to begin in 2008 ¦ Raw Water -last update in 1988 ti Recently Completed Updates ¦ Library 2007 • Wastewater Treatment Plant 2007 Stormwater 2007 • Airport Master Plan 2007 Parks and Recreation 2006 Housing and Human Services 2005 ¦ Facilities and Asset Management 2005 r ¦ Open Space and Mountain Parks Visitor Plan 2005 Comprehensive Flood and S[ormwater Uti]ity Master Plan 2004 r Transportation 2003 • Police 2003 Wastewater Collection System 2002 Treated Water 2001 ¦ Strategic Technology 2001 2. Is the provision of capital facilities keeping pace with demand or service standards at the level specified in departmental master plans? °r The extent to which capital facilities aze meeting adopted standards varies by department as outlined below. r Transportation The 2003 Transportation Master Plan's (TMP) first priority is maintenance of the existing transportation system. The spending for system maintenance and purchasing capacity was reduced over several years due to budget cuts and material cost increases in items such as fuel, asphalt, and concrete. An additional increase in the operating budget was implemented in 2008 and has been .r requested in 2009 which, if approved, will continue to bring the city closer to service standards but will not completely cover prior budget reductions and material cost increases. In addition, the TMP contains a set of multi modal transportation investments that were intended to accomplish the plan's objectives. These objectives are: • Continued progress towazd no growth in long-term vehicle traffic; a. • Reduction in single-occupant-vehicle travel to 25 percent of all trips; • Continued reduction in mobile source emissions of air pollutants; and, • No more than 20 percent of roadways congested (at Level of Service (LOS) F); • Expand fiscally viable transportation altematives for all Boulder residents and employees, including the elderly and those with disabilities; and y Increase transportation alternatives commensurate with the rate of employee growth. Achieving these objectives depends on making investments to provide transportation options for the population and employment expected in the future. Cutrently the plan is only approximately AGENDA ITEM # SB Paee 13 sixty percent funded. Consequently we are currently unable to support the full investment program in the plan. In the absence of additional funding or other mitigation strategy the city will be unable to maintain progress toward established plan objectives. Utilities The recently updated treated water, wastewater collection and wastewater treatment master plans as well as the raw water master plan provide direction for capital needs to meet the adopted service standards. For the Stormwater and Flood Management Utility, staff has reviewed this question as part of the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Utility Master Plan and Stormwater Master Plan that was completed this yeaz. These needs have been programmed in the CIP. f Funding for the Utilities Division capital improvement program is derived primarily from monthly utility fees but also include Plant Investment Fees (PIFs), hydroelectric sales to Xcel Energy and some external funding. If these funds are insufficient, projects will be funded by issuing revenue bonds with the debt service financed by general utility charges. The rates aze evaluated based on proposed capital needs in conjunction with [he development of the operating budget. Construction cost inflation has a dramatic affect on [he cost of future project work and has been accounted for in the cost of future projects under the assumption of a future 3 percent yearly construction cost inflation rate. Construction cost inflation is tracked using the Engineering News r Record (ENR) Cost Index for Denver and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Colorado Construction Cost Index. The ENR index is a composite index based on costs for: 1) local portland cement, 2) local 2x41umber, 3) national structural steel, and 4) local union wages plus fringes for cazpenters, bricklayers and iron workers. The CDOT index is a composite index based on costs for 1) unclassified excavation, 2) hot bituminous pavement 3) concrete pavement, 4) structural steel and 5) reinforcing steel. The ENR index indicates construction costs have increased 21 percent during the past five years; ~e the CDOT index indicates an increase of over 80 percent during the same period of time. These cost increases are significantly greater than the 25 yeaz average 3 percent construction cost inflation rate based on the ENR index (compazable data for the CDOT index is not available) and have had a r dramatic affect on the ability of the city to accomplish needed project work. The ENR index is more reflective of equipment and building construction such as at the treatment plants. The Colorado cost index is more reflective of heavy civil construction such as roadway and major 1e drainageway work. Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) The capital plan is not keeping pace with the standazds put forth in the Facilities & Asset Management (FAM) Master Plan. The FAM Master Plan specifies that 1% of the current replacement value (CRV) of facilities will be used for renovation and replacement of General Fund ~ facilities. FAM's operational budgets for routine and major maintenance have been significantly reduced which may impact renovation and replacement schedules for non-essential facilities in the ~ future. The FAM Master Plan Update addresses this issue and recommends an Action Plan to restore funding [o provide industry standazd service levels for all General Fund facilities by 2014. AGENDA ITEM # SB Paee 14 Iw Library The provision and upkeep of capital facilities for the library has not kept pace with service standards, as outlined in the 2007 Library Master Plan. The library's most recent facility addition at ~ the George Reynolds Branch in South Boulder was completed in 1994. The last addition to the Main library is over fifteen years old. The library's facilities are no longer adequate to address either the rapidly changing world of libraries or the specific needs of Boulder's evolving population and service expectations. The master plan outlines needed improvements in children's and teen spaces, in meeting, reading and ~ study spaces, as well as in areas originally designed to house the physical collection and information technology of the eazly 1990s. The draft master plan calls for a comprehensive study of the best use of existing library spaces, and an analysis of the investments required [o adequately serve the community's needs. The study will be completed in 2008 or 2004. At that time financing alternatives, including fund-raising, a specific library tax ballot initiative, and others, will be critically evaluated. Parks & Recreation The master plan was approved in December 200b and includes park service azea guidelines and criteria for prioritizing pazk development. The capital budget reflects the goals and priorities identified in the master plan and aze aligned with the master plan recommendations. The department has prioritized capital projects based on the master plan goals of 1) maintaining and protecting our parks and recreation facilities and programs and 2) becoming economically sustainable. New park development projects are prioritized based on several factors, including meeting service area standards, community needs, and compliance with the 1995 ballot initiative. Staff has begun quantifying the deferred maintenance and renovation and refurbishment needs of the pazks and recreation system. At [his goint, most deferred maintenance and renovation and refurbishment needs have been identiSed, but not all quantified. Projects will be prioritized and W included in future CIP budgets or on the unfunded project list. A long range concern is that the .25 Cent Sales Tax sunsets in 2015 and yet the funds aze used for on-going pazk and facility maintenance. With or without revenue declines, absent a new source of funds after 2015 to replace the .25 Cent Sales Tax, the department's ability to adequately manage its ,r, assets will become constrained. " Open Space and Mountain Parks The Acquisitions and Management Plan was updated and extended through 2011 in November 2005. The Visitor Master Plan (VMP) adopted in Apri12005 includes asystem-wide trails assessment and standazds for particulaz services. Areas of priority include: sustainability of the existing trails system, management of undesignated trails, critical connections and unsafe road crossings. The plan helps to prioritize these identified needs and proposes implementation options at three levels: Current Funding, Action Plan Funding and Identified Needs or Vision Plan Funding. AGENDA ITEM # SB Pa¢e 15 Sources of supplemental funds include increases in tax revenues, access to Lottery and GOCO funds, grants and donations. Volunteer participation is a component of many projects. Increasing p visitation continues to impact the Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) system and a year long visitation study from June 2004 through June 2005 provides updated information on numbers, densities, times and types of use, and destinations and origins of visits. Additional funds totaling $250,000 per year were requested for a total of $450,000 annually, to help implement the plan at the Identified Needs funding level starting in 2005. s VI. REVIEW AND COMMENTS FROM BOULDER COUNTY LAND USE DEPARTMENT Review of the draft 2009-2014 CIP by county land use staff will be done in July. Any recommendations will be forwazded to both Planning Boazd and Council. VII. SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS (CEAP REVIEW) - The projects that are proposed to be evaluated under Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) review are listed in Attachment F. w CEAP reviews are prepazed when projects aze in the site location and facility design phase. The primary purpose of the CEAP is to encourage the consideration of potential social and environmental impacts in planning and decision making and, ultimately, to arrive at actions that aze achieve the objectives of the project with the fewest impacts. The intent of the CEAP is to make project planning more efficient in considering issues in advance of implementation. CEAP findings are submitted by departments to their respective advisory board for review as part of CIP project approval. Council has [he opportunity to call up projects for their review and approval. (For those departments that do not have an advisory boazd, Planning Boazd is responsible w. for reviewing CEAP findings as part of project approval.) VIII. QUESTIONS FOR PLANNING BOARD 1. Does the 2009-2014 CIP further the goats and policies of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan, Subcommunity and Area Plans, and Depaztment Master Plans? 2. Does the boazd have any comments or questions on the scope, priorities, and scheduling of CIP projects? 3. Does the board have concerns with any of the proposed location or design of CIP projects? 4. Does the board have any comments on the projects recommended for a CEAP or separate design review process? AGENDA ITEM # SB Pa¢e 16 ~ VIV. SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that Planning Board: a, recommend approval of the 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program as submitted; b. recommend approval of the list of CIP projects to undergo a Community and Environmental Assessment Process as presented in Attachment F; and c. recommend approval of design review processes recommended by staff in Attachment G. ApprhoAved By: I11 r V Ruth McHeys Acting Planning Director w~ r ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A contains the action minutes of the Planning Boazd's recommendations to Council for last year's CIP. Attachment B summarizes the highlights of the 2009-2014 CIP by fund. Attachment C includes a table showing Unfunded Capital Needs Attachment D provides the CIP submissions by Depazment, including each fund /department overview and project status reports. Attachment E provides spreadsheets for the 2009-2014 CIP by fund. Attachment F is a list of projects recommended for a CEAP. Attachment G is a list of projects suggested for design review and a list of projects with exterior changes. Attachment H is spreadsheets of projects by Subcommunity. r AGENDA TTEM # SB Paae 17 ATTACHMENT A :APPROVED ON AUGOST 23, 2007 CITY OF BOULDER PLANNING BOARD ACTION MINUTES July 19, 2007 Council Chambers Room, Municipal Building ^ 1777 Broadway A permanent set of these minutes and a recording of the meeting (maintained for a period of seven years) are retained in Central Records (telephone: 303-441-3043). Streaming audio is also available on the web at: htp://www.bouldercolorado.gov/ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Phil Shull, Vice-Chair Adrian Sopher, recused from Washington School Item Richazd Sosa Willa Johnson Bill Holicky Andrew Shoemaker PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Elise Jones, Chair STAFF PRESENT: Juliet Bonnell, Administrative Specialist II Bill Boyes, Facilities and Fleet Manager Jean Gatza, Planner I Jerry Gordon, Deputy City Attorney Kazl Guiler, Planner I Alice Guthrie, Pazks and Planning Superintendent Robert Harberg, Engineering Project Management Coordinator ^ James Hewat, Planner II Heidi Joyce, Administrative Supervisor Ruth McHeyser, Acting Planning Director Elaine McLaughlin, Senior Planner Chris Meschuk, Planner I i° Robert Ray, Land Use Review Manager Mary Ann Weideman, Administrative Services Manager Stephany Westhusin, Transportation Project Coordinator Ned Williams, Director of Public Works for Utilities 1. CALL TO ORDER a Acting Chair, P. Shull declazed a quorum at 6:05 p.m. and the following business was conducted. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES r ^ ~ w On a motion by B. Holicky, seconded by W. Johnson, the Planning Board approved (6-0, E. Jones absent) the June 21, 2007 Planning Boazd minutes as • amended. ¦r 3. DISCUSSION OF DISPOSITIONS, PLANNING BOARD CALL-UPS The board did not call-up the following dispositions: Harlem Yards Use Review #LUR 2007-00035 Valleylab Amended Site Review #LUR 2007-00024 4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION No one from the public addressed the board. 5. ACTION ITEMS " . B. Public hearing and consideration of a recommendation to the City Council concerning the 2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Case Manager: Jean Gatza Staff Presentation - R. McHeyser and J. Gatza presented the staff recommendations to the board. Public Hearing No one from the public addressed the boazd. Board Discussion The Planning Board discussed the following key items: undergrounding of Excel ~ distribution lines, coordination of multimodal corridors, Carter Lake Pipeline, Casey Middle School, and greenways. Motion On a motion by P. Shull, seconded by W. Johnson, the Planning Board recommended (6-0, E. Jones absent) that City Council approve the 2008-2013 C1P as submitted, the ~ CEAP plan as submitted and the projects suggested for design review process as submitted. The boazd requested that the following discretionazy items be forwarded to City Council: • The boazd asked staff to consider, and potentially include, the issue of undergrounding the east-west power lines along Goose Creek in the Transit Village Area Plan. • The boazd encouraged staff to coordinate the timing of transportation capital improvement planning with upcoming azea planning efforts. • The boazd concurred with the staff recommendation on the Carter Lake Pipeline. • The board expressed their concern for maintenance of existing vegetation (particulazly trees) in the city's greenways when flood improvements are being constructed. • The board encouraged council to explore what can be done to ensure that pazks are contemporaneous with development (i.e., avoid what has happened in recent developments such as Holiday and Dakota Ridge where residents had to wait a 2 r. a r long time before the parks were developed). This ties to/ implements the city's ~ community sustainability goals. . The board asked for more information on Casey Middle School to determine if the use of EET for the school should be tied to something related to preserving the historic character-defining aspects of the existing building. r r a r r r r a r r r 3 ATTACHMENT B 2009 Budget Capital Improvements Projects CAGID Bond Fund CAGID Major Renovation Projects $1,264,800 Caaital Development Fund Downtown Office Space Deficiency $250,000 Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects $50,000 Municipal Spaces $30,000 Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 1301 Arapahoe Interior Renovation $200.000 BMOCA Elevator & ADA Improvements $122.000 Carnegie Library -Exterior Repairs $276,000 Dairy Center for the Arts -Correct Entry ADA Deficiencies $70,000 Dairy Center for the Arts -Replace Roof $90,000 Downtown Office Space Deficiency Correction $250,000 Fire Station #1 -Renovate showers and restrooms $75,000 Fire Station #3 - HVAC Systems Replaced $50,000 Fire Station #4 Major Maintenance $135,000 Fleet Services Roof Replacement $130,000 r Main Library -Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System $105,000 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects $60,000 New Britain -Elevator Refurb/Replace $65,000 New Britain -Replace North Exterior Stairs $60,000 Replace Chautauqua Radio Tower $180,000 Lottery Fund OSMP -Historical Structures & Trails -Stabilization & Restoration $475,000 Park East Playground Renovation $360,000 r Tributary Greenways Program -Lottery $150,000 Oaen Space Fund Acquisition Program $3>~>~ ® Mineral Rights Acquisition $100>~ OSMP North Trail Study Area $20.000 OSMP South Trail Study Area $262.000 r OSMP West Trail Study Area $20,000 Visitor Infrastructure -System Wide $148,000 Water Rights Acquisition $200,000 r a 4 2009 Budget Capital Improvements Projects Parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot Mesa Memorial Pocket Pazk $405,000 ' P&R Administration Facility Renovation $150,000 Playground and Park Irrigation System Replacement $400,000 Pleasant View Imgation Replacement $215,000 Recreation Facility Improvements $100,000 ~ Thunderbird Lake Water Management $200,000 Valmont City Pazk (Phase I) .25 cent $150,000 r. Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund Boulder Reservoir Improvements $100,000 Boulder Reservoir Master Plan $100,000 Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R $400,000 Lighting Ordinance Implementation $150,000 Valmont City Park (Phase I) $770,000 Wonderland Lake Park $228,000 Stormwater & Flood Mana¢ement Utility Fund Broadway Storm Sewer $550,000 Fournule Canyon Creek $25Q000 Preflood Property Acquisition $500,000 South Boulder Creek $300,000 Storm Sewer Rehabilitation $50,000 Stormwater Quality Improvements $50,000 r Transportation Coordination $250,000 Tributary Greenways Progam - Stormwater & Flood $150,000 Wonderland Creek $250,000 Transaortation Development Fund 28th St (Baseline to Iris) II $400,000 30th Street Bike Lanes -Arapahoe to Peazl $325,000 ° Miscellaneous Development Coordination $50,000 Transnortation Fund 28th St (Baseline to Iris) I $1,010,000 30th St Access Impr BTV: Bluff to Walnut-TR $900,000 Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30th $1,240,000 Bikeway Facilities -Enhancements $125,000 Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements-General Fund $600,000 5 it 2009 Budget Capital Improvements Projects Transaortation Fund Broadway - Euclid Multimodal Improvements $1>~.~ Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements $639,000 Pedestrian Facilities -Repair, Replacement, ADA $680,000 Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatments $75,000 Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe) $1,826,000 Tributary Greenways Program -Transportation $150,000 Tributary Greenways ® Greenways Salaries $130,000 Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew $50,000 Miscellaneous -Greenways Operating $25.000 Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements $50,000 Wonderland Creek Foothills to Diagonal $195,000 Wastewater Utility Fund Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation $100>~ Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation $750,000 WWTP Biosolids Digester $781,883 WWTP Cogeneration $200,000 WWTP Digester Complex $50,000 s WWTP Headworks $300,000 WWTP Secondary Clarifiers $200>~ w, WWTP UV Disinfection $443,456 Water Utility Fund Automated Meter Reading $500,000 Bazker Gravity Pipeline Repair $618,000 Barker Relicensing $1 Betasso WTP $100,000 Boulder Reservoir Intake and Pumping Improvements $100,000 Boulder Reservoir WTP $3,090,000 Cathodic Protection $100,000 Cherryvale Pump Station $515,000 Distribution System Water Quality $150,000 Iris Pump Station $1,030,000 Island Lake Dam $108,150 ~ Lakewood Pipeline $100>~ 6 2009 Budget Capital Improvements Projects Water Utility Fund Nederalnd Wastewater Treatment Plant $300,000 Source Water Transmission System Inspections $80,000 Sunshine Transmission Pipe $200,000 Water System Security Upgades $100,000 R Waterline Replacement $2,575,000 e r r 7 ~r HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY FUND The 2008 Capital Improvements Program includes proposed funding of $36,827,289 for 95 projects. The entire six-year CIP includes proposed funding of $213,670,470 for 158 projects. The 2009 CIP budget constitutes 17% of the six-year projection. w CAGID FUND The proposed CAGID CIP for 2009 is $1,264,800 for major maintenance of the district's parking facilities. No other projects aze currently planned for the six year CIP. •s CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (CDF) Funding for CDF projects is from the assessment of Development Excise Taxes on new development. v The proposed 2009-2014 Capital Development Fund (CDF) CIP is $1,690,000, which constitutes less than 1% of the six-yeaz projection. Three projects are scheduled for funding in 2009 for a total of $580,000. These proposed projects constitute 0.9% of the 2009 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • The Facilities & Asset Master Plan, accepted in 1998, identified the need for funding small facility projects related to growth at the discretion of the FAM Manager. $50,000 from the DET fund is proposed for miscellaneous facility DET Projects, and $30,000 for Municipal Spaces. i Past uses of the money have included engineering and environmental studies at Valmont Butte, Children, Youth, and Family Services addition, the remodel of the Uni-Hill Police Annex and the Municipal Building sister cities plaza. FACILITY RENOVATION AND REPLACEMENT FUND Funding for Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund projects is from a contribution by the General Fund equal to 1% of the current replacement value of General Fund facilities and from restricted fund departments as annual contributions to the fund. The proposed 2009-2014 Facility Renovation & Replacement (Flt&R) Fund Capital Improvements Program is $5,872,000, which constitutes 3% of the six-year projection. 15 Projects are scheduled in 2009 totaling $1,868,000. These projects make up 5.1% of the 2009 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • Main Library Auditorium Li¢htinQ and Sound System upgrade -This project replaces the existing lighting fixtures with more energy-efficient fixtures, upgrades the control panel, installs anew dimmer system, and integrates the sound system with lighting controls. • Carnegie Library Exterior Repairs -This project includes highly leveraged funds from the State Historical Fund for the exterior rehabilitation of the Carnegie Library as identified in a historic structure assessment performed by Merrill Ann Wilson, Historical Architect, in 2005. The r w 8 r planned work includes foundation work, masonry repairs, roof replacement, ADA ramp corrections, and installation of a fire alarm system. • Downtown Office Soace Deficiency Correction - A recent evaluation of office space on the downtown campus indicates a space deficiency of approximately 10,000 SF. This project would allow interior tenant finish of leased space and backfill of space [o maximize department efficiencies. The growth related portion of this project is being funded by the Capital Development Fund. The portion of the project not related to growth is being funded by the „ Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund. n LOTTERY FUND The proposed 2009-2014 Lottery Fund CIP is $4,060,000, which constitutes 1.9% of the six-year " projection. 2 Projects scheduled in 2009 total $835,000. These projects make up 2.3% of the 2009 CIP. $150,000 from the Lottery Fund will continue to be allocated to the Greenways r Program. W Highlighted Projects: • OSMP Historical Structures & Trails -Stabilization & Restoration -Focus for 2009 will be the West Trails Study Area ("I'SA) process including Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis on lands from Eldorado Springs Drive north to Lee Hiil Road. Historic site assessments and related stabilization, reclamation and restoration will be conducted on historic structures on Flagstaff r Summit and major maintenance and restoration projects will be completed on the historic trails system that was largely constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) in the 1930s. • Park East Playground Renovation -Park East is a 11.3 acre neighborhood park a[ Aurora and Mohawk which includes a portion of the Beaz Creek drainage. The park contains a playground, basketball couR and picnic azea and a portion of the greenways trail goes through the park. The existing playground equipment will be removed and the materials recycled, if possible. New equipment will be installed in 2009. The basketball court will also be refurbished. OPEN SPACE FC1ND w The proposed 2009-2014 Open Space Fund CIP is $24,900,000, which constitutes 12% of the six- yearprojection. Seven projects proposed for funding in 2009 total $4,150,000, constituting 11% of the CIP for 2009. Highlighted Projects: • New Trails and Trailhead Projects in the South Trail Studv Area-This Trails Study Area (TSA) includes areas known as the Eldorado Mountain/Doudy Draw TSA west of Highway 93 and the r Mazshall Mesa/South Grasslands TSA east of Highway 93. It extends from Eldorado Mountain and Bull Gulch in the west, easterly to Highway 36 and lies south of Eldorado Springs Drive and ~ Marshall Drive. Trails projects in this area west of Highway 93 were identified in the planning „ process that was completed in 2006. Specific trails alignments and designs were initiated in 2007 and major projects undertaken in 2008. Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis was completed for trails in this azea in 2007-08. Additional projects that are planned for 2009 will include continued closure and reclamation of undesignated trials. 9 ~ ' PARKS & RECREATION FUNDS ° Parks & Recreation Department funding comes from various sources including fees, development excise taxes, property taxes, ballot issue sales taxes, lottery fund monies, etc. The various funds are specific regarding allowed uses and the funding for many projects is comprised from more than one funding source. Capital projects aze funded from the Permanent Pazks and Recreation Fund, the Lottery Fund and the .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund. Parks & Recreation projects for the six-year CIP have $18,643,000 proposed for funding, constituting 8.6% of the six-year CIP. Capital projects for 2009 have $4,203,000 proposed for funding. These projects make up 11% of the 2009 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • Mesa Memorial Pocket Pazk -The Mesa Memorial pocket park site consists of a 1.7 acre parcel located at Table Mesa and Yale. Mesa Memorial has been identified for development in 2009 in order to meet commitments from the 1995 ballot measure and because Table Mesa Road functions as a barrier to community access. The pocket park site design will involve an extensive public review process to determine community needs. Park design and development is anticipated to occur in 2009. " . Thunderbird Lake W ater Manaeement -The water level in Thunderbird Lake has decreased over the past several years. The department is investigating several options for replenishing the lake with water, including 1) drilling a well, 2) retrofitting the existing file drain, 3) collecting stormwater, and 4) using potable water. The costs and feasibility of each option aze being calculated and will be presented to PRAB and Council in the summer of 2008 for a decision. Funds aze being reserved to implement the chosen course of action. • Valmont City Park (Phase I) -During the process of updating the concept plan for Valmont City Park (VCP), the community has expressed a desire to begin development of part of the park as soon as possible. In response, staff has identified funding for the proposed Phase 1 of VCP (completing the portion of the park north of Valmont Road). This would allow for construction of the bike park, dog park and other associated park amenities. Park development will meet service standazds outlined in the depaztment's master plan. TRANSPORTATION FUND, TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND Funding for city transportation projects comes from several different sources. The transportation Fund is primarily supported by the dedicated sales tax, Highway Users Tax, County Road and " Bridge fund, State Highway Maintenance and Landscape Funds and Safe Accountable Flexible ~ Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The proposed 2009-2014 Transportation Fund CIP is $26,775,000, which constitutes 13% of the six- , yeaz projection. Projects proposed for funding in 2009 total $8,095,000. These 11 projects constitute 22% of the 2009 CIP. Highlighted Projects: r • 28's Street. Baseline to Iris -Continued funding is proposed (in both the Transportation Fund and the Transportation Development Fund) from 2009-2014 for improvements to 28`" Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue. This corridor is identifed as the top priority corridor in l0 the city's multi-modal grid. Implementation of the 28`s Street Project continues to be a high priority of the Capital Improvements Program. South segment (Baseline to Arapahoe -Hello Boulder) funding of $4.3 million (includes $1.1 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed in 2002 and 2004. The public input, design and approval process is complete for the north segment (Pearl to Iris -Service City) and the Boulder Valley Regional Center Transportation Network plan process was completed in the middle segment (Arapahoe to Peaz1-New Town.) Some median replacement work was coordinated in the middle section with the 29`" Street development. Funding for the north segment of $9.3 million (includes $3.8 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed starting in 2004, and funding is also r provided in the Transportation Development Fund. • 30`" Street Access Improvements -The project is the first phase of access improvements and connections needed for the Boulder Transit Village Station and FasTracks BRT and r commuter rail. The Boulder Transit Village transit infrastructure will be constructed in d phases with the first phase planned by RTD in 2009 to build abus-based multimodal station. Future phases as part of FasTracks will add Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service, build the rail platform and add rail service. The first phase access improvements for the Boulder Transit - Village include constructing one mid-block pedestrian crossing at 30`s Street between Valmont and Pearl; constructing two transit super stops, improving access from Goose Creek multi-use path to 30'" Street, and abicycle/pedestrian underpass of 30`" Street at the Boulder and Left-hand Ditch. The Goose Creek access will provide a critical missing link between the Goose Creek Path and the sidewalks and on-street bikelanes on 30`" Street. • Broadway/Euclid Multimodal Imnrovements -This project includes improvements to address bicycle and pedestrian cont7icts at the Broadway/Euclidlntersection, adjacent RTD transit stops, and associated bicycle/pedestrian zones, including construction of a bicycle/pedestrian underpass under Broadway at Euclid; installation of bicycle racks; associated realignment of the multi-use path on the east side of Broadway; relocation of the northbound RTD bus stop to the north of Euclid Avenue; and expansion of the southbound RTD bus stop and other local circulation and access improvements. The proposed project is a partnership between tfie city, RTD, CU, CDOT, Boulder County and Boulder Valley School District. Funding for this project is included in the CIP and will be combined with federal and partner funding. Funding for growth related transportation projects come from the Transportation Excise Tax - Transportation Development Fund. The proposed 2009-2014 Transportation Development Fund CIP is $3,675,000, constituting 2% of the city-wide six-year projection. Three projects are scheduled for funding in 2009 for a total of $775,000. These projects constitute 2% of the 2009 citywide CIP. Highlighted Projects: ` • 30`" Street Bikelanes from Aranahce to Pearl This project will complete animportant on-street facility missing link by constructing on-street bikelanes on 30`~ Street between Pearl and Arapahoe. 11 ~ MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FUND The proposed 2009-2014 Municipal Airport C1P is $631,578, constituting less than 1% of the city- wide six-year projection. No projects are proposed for funding in 2009. One project is scheduled for funding in 2013 for $631,578, associated with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) entitlement funds that are provided to Boulder Municipal Airport every four years. TRIBUTARY GREENWAYS » Funding for the Tributary Greenways program comes from the Lottery Fund, Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund and the Transportation Fund ($150,000 each). The Greenways system is comprised of a series of corridors along riparian areas including Boulder Creek and its tributaries, which provide an opportunity to integrate multiple objectives, including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, stonn drainage and floodplain management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists, recreation and cultural resources. Planning for projects along the greenway involves input from Flood Utilities, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, W ater Quality and Environmental Services, Environmental Affairs, Planning and Open Space and Mountain Parks. Highlighted Projects: • Wonderland Creek Foothills toDiagonal -This project includes anoff-street trail connection along Wonderland Creek between Foothills Parkway and the Diagonal Highway, environmental preservation, habitat restoration, and water quality best management practices (BMPs) in conjunction with flood improvements. The initial project would focus on Wonderland Creek, west of Foothills Highway. These improvements will be done in conjunction with work being done by the Flood Utilities Division. UTILITIES FUNDS Funding for the city's Utilities capital improvement projects is derived from general utility fees and special external agency grants. The primary revenue sources are Plant Inveshnent Fees (PIFs) from W. new customers, monthly water sales to customers, hydroelectric sales to Xcel Energy and some external federal funding. STORMWATER AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT UTILITY FUND The proposed 2009-2014 Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund CIP is $16,442,321, which constitutes 8% of the six-year projection. 9 projects aze scheduled For Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund funding in 2009 for a total of $2,200,000. These projects make up 7% of the 2009 C1P. Highlighted Projects: • Fourmile Cann Creek and Wonderland Creek flood mitigation work. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regazding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2008. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. r, 12 Projects that provide multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new culvert and pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railroad and Boulder White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's , Greenways Program and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required [o support this project. • The South Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study is complete and has been submitted [o the a Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA). The mapping study results will , become the basis for future floodplain management, mitigation planning, regulatory restrictions and flood insurance requirements for the South Boulder Creek corridor. Funding for flood mitigation planning began in 2008 and this work is likely to continue during 2009 and 2010 with construction bond funding anticipated in 2011. It is anticipated that the focus of these efforts would be to primarily mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley, ~ where flood impacts were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since occurred. It is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36 Corridor hnprovements-Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also pursuing s Federal funding for this project. It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2009-2011 to ` support this work. Land acquisition will be required to support [his project. ~ WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND The proposed 2009-2014 Wastewater Utility Fund CIP is $23,860,561, which constitutes 11% of the six-year projection. 8 projects are scheduled for Wastewater Utility Fund funding in 2009 for a total of $2,825,339. These projects make up 7.7% of the 2009 CIP. iw Highlighted Projects: • For 2009, projects include ongoing maintenance and rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer system, ~ improvements to headworks, biosolids handlins and cogeneration at the Wastewater Treatment Plan[ (WWTP). A large project for the design and construction of an ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system to replace the existing chlorine gas disinfection and sulfur dioxide de- chlorination system will occur in 2009 and 2010. • Larger projects proposed in the next few years will be related to improvements at the W WTP for expansion of the Biosolids Di eg_ster. WATER UTILITY FUND The proposed 2009-2014 Water Utility Fund CIP is $81,701,114, which constitutes 38% of the six- ` year projection. 17 projects are proposed for funding in 2009 for a total of $10,666,150. These projects make up 29% of the 2009 CIP. Highlighted Projects: • • Continued emphasis on the rehabilitation and improvement of the city's existing water system infrastructure continues, especially in the area of the city's deteriorated water distribution system. This is reflected in funding for the Waterline Replacement project and several other 13 ~ rehabilitation projects for water system facilities. • Additional money has been budgeted for rehabilitation work at the Betasso and Boulder Reservoir WTPs. This work is necessary to rehabilitate aging equipment and treatment processes in compliance with federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations. Major improvements are planned for the Boulder Reservoir WTP in 2009. • Funding for the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline to construct a pipeline from Carter Lake to the Boulder Reservoir has been delayed unti12014. Funding of the pipeline in the nearer term without Federal funding assistance would have a significant impact on water rates. Staff continues to recommend the pipeline as the best long-term solution to water quality, operational and security vulnerability issues related to the drawing water directly from the Boulder Feeder Canal and Boulder Reservoir. By delaying the schedule for pipeline construction, more time is available to secure Federal funding assistance. Initial project evaluation is continuing, including development of a CEAP, right-of-way acquisition, preliminary design and permitting activities. a r r r a a r r n• w~ r a r l4 2009-2074 Capital Improvements Program Totals by Funding Source FUND 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL % of 8 total %of 09 total \I rtFund• pF 0 0 0 0 631,578 0 631,578 AF 0% AF 0.0% :AGID Bond Fund CAGID 1,264,800 1,290,096 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,554,896 CAGID 2% CAGID 3.4°h :a ifel Deveb merit Fund CDF 330,000 330,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,690,000 CDF 0.8% COF 0.9% :duration Excise Tax EET 0 0 EET 0.0% EET 0.0% =adl Renovation & Re lacement Fund FRRF 1,888,000 849,000 1,015,000 661,000 658,000 1,021,000 5,872,000 FRRF 3% FRRF 5.1% ienerel Fund GF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GF 0% GF 0.0% 3aneral Fund • Trash Tax Revenues GFTT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GFff 0.0% GFT7 0.0% ireenwa GNWY 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 2,700,000 GNWy 1.3% GNWY 1.2% .otte Fund LOT 835,000 875,000 875,000 675,000 675,000 525,000 4,060,000 LOT 1.9% LOT 2.3% en S ce OS 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 24,900,000 OS 12% OS 11.3% 'arks 8 Rec. 1995 Balbt PR 1,820,000 1,200,000 1,050,000 1,150,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 7,720,000 PR 3.6% PR 4.4% •ermanent Parka&Rec. Fund PPR 1,748,000 1,720,000 2,620,000 1,275,000 1,275,000 1,450,000 10,088,000 PPR 5% PPR 4.7% trans nation Develo merit Fund' TDF 775,000 620,000 520,000 620,000 520,000 620,000 3,675,000 7DF 2% TDF 2.1 % trans rtatlon Funds, TF 8,095,000 8,235,000 2,805,000 2,805,000 2,930,000 3,905,000 28,775,000 TF 13% TF 22.0°h itormwater 6 Food Maria ement Utili Funds, SFMUF 2,200,000 1,909,072 6.693,727 2,168,826 1,731,885 1,738,811 16,442,321 SFMUF 8% SFMUF 6.0°h Nastewater Utili Fund WWUF 2,825,339 13,330,160 1,285,093 2,094,437 1,345,383 2,980,149 23,860,561 WWUF 11% WWUF 7.7% Nalet Ut0i Fund WUF 10,666,150 5,295,406 6,669,506 7,040,436 9,740,827 42,288,789 61,701,114 WUF 38% WUF 29.0% TOTAL 36,627,269 37,853,734 29,063,326 23,369,699 25.757,673 60,778,749 219,670,470 100% 100% %of yearly total 17% 18% 14% 11% 12% 28% 100 Funding Ilsted in this table incWdes external funding. • Funding for Tributary Greenways removed from Trensp Fund, Lottery and Stonnwater Fund 7/1@006 2009cip.xls ! f ! r ! t 1 ! ~ r ! ! ~ F ! i 1 r ! r ! ~ + ~ * - - f, Attachment C: Unfunded Capital Projects 06/2008 Fund Department Project Year -Estimate Action / % Essential Action Plan Vision Plan Total Operating Current Possible Sources of Funding (growth related? DET Project in Notes Vision Plan Desirable Capital Costs Capital Costs Costs Needed Funding Nntling inelude?) Master Diseretiona PIan1 ' General Fund / Fire Wildland Fire Cache Action 100% Desirable $650,000 Partially growth related. N The Fire Department is updating their Master Capital Deveopment Plan in 2008 Fund Fire Rre Station 6 Replacemem Action 100% Desirable $2,350,000 N The Fire Department is updating their Master General Fund Plan in 2008 Fire Fire Apparatus Replacement Schedule 2009 Action 100% Desirable $2,900,000 950,000 General Fund or Special Tax District N The Fire Department is updating their Master General Fund Plan in 2008 Fire Rad'ro System Upgrade 2009 Acton 100% Desirable $450,000 N The Fire Department is updating their Master e General Fund Plan in 2008 Fire New Administrative Orcces Visbn 100% $3,000,000 N The Fire Department is updating their Master - General Fund Discretiona Plan in 2008 General Fund / Rre Fire Station 8 Land and Constmction 2011 Vision 100% $2,700,000 $900,000 Partially growth related. N The Fire Department is updating their Master r , Capital Development Discretionary Plan in 2008 Fund General Fund / HHS Depot Imerior and S8e Utilities 2011 Visbn 100% $500,000 $40,000 Partially growth related. N Capital Deveopment Discretionary Fund t ~ Library Main Branch Signage 2009 FC 100% Desirable No added costs. Library Operations Y Ubre Fund $50,000 Ubrary Main Library -Improve HVAC systems 2009-2010 action 100% Essential No added costs. FAM -FRR Y Libre Fund to rovide better coolin $1,000,000 Ubrary Meadows library sewer line replacement 2009-2010 action 100% Essential $50,000 not applicable FAM Major Maintenance, GF N Project viable only el a new space lease is Libra Fund successful n tiated Ubrary Main Library•Book Retum Replacement 2010.2011 action 100% Essential $fi60,000 not applicable Partially Addttional revenue source needed for Beck Retum Y and Systemwide Material Securely funded Replacement is $250K of total $400K cos? PAdelional The Ubrary Depadmem has updated the + ~ System ($240K) in revenue source needed for Systemwide Material Safety Ubrary Master Plan in 2007 and this project library ERF System is $410K of total $SOOK cost. Grand total of is included as a high priority technology t. Libra Fund _ ro'ect is $900K. strata Library Main Library Elevator replacement (2 2009-2010 action 100 % Essential $100,000 not applicable FAM Major Maintenance, GF, other Y , Libra Fund units Library Main & Branch Libraries -General 2012 or later action 100 % Essential $3.19 - $7.8 not applicable Future Library Tax/Bond Issue Y Libra Fund Refurbishment million Library Main Library -Bridge Upgrade 2009-2010 action 100% $50,000 not applicable FAM Major Maintenance, FAM -FRR Y Libra Fund Discretiona Library East Branch Ubrary Replacement - 2008.2009 vision $3,500,000 No added costs. Future (Library Tax/Bond Issue Y Includes land purchase; relocation Planning and Construction dependent on if the existing Meadows lease t - is re-negotiated. Meadows Branch operating Libra Fund bud et transfers to new facili ' Libra Funtl Libra Data/telecommunicetions U rade 2010 or later vision _ $100,000 not a fable IT re acemen[ Fund, GF, FAM Maior Maintenance Y Library Carnegie Carnegie Library Facilkies Plan vision Carnegie Library Endowment Y a' Ubra Fund Libra Fund Libra Cam ie -Story e S ce Needs vision Cam ie Libra Endowment Y Basement and/or Mezmnine Library Carnegie - Digttize Loral History vision Carnegie Library Endowment V Libra Fund Amhives a Library Integrated Library System (ILS) 2010-2012 vision $100,000 not appliceble Partially Library ERFor other revenue sources. Total project cost Y replacement tunded $350K ($250K) in library budget Library Funtl Library Addttion to Main Library 2013 or later vision $5.9 to $23t $500,000 New revenue source needed; DET Y Libra Fund million _ library North Boulder Branch 2012 or later vision $3.85 million $400,000 $1.SM in DET New revenue source needed; DET V $1.5 million of capital already reserved in DET; implementation plans dependent on (1) " outcome of Service Delivery analysis in the master plan update and (2) outcome of regional library service delivery decisons Libra Fund _ Library Gunbarrel Branch Library unknown vision Unknown TBD Annexation agreement or Regional library tax Y Implementation plans dependent on outcome of regional library service delivery library Fund decisions Permanent Parks Parks and Capital Replacement Program -Park 2009 and later Action Plan 100 % Essential $3,500,000 to be $650,000/ Y Capital replacement analysis is underway for ? ~ and .25 Sales Tax Recreation facilities system wide determined year estimating deferred maintenance needs. Cost estimates to date include playground renovation, inigation system replacement, shelter replacement, sidewalk renovation. i, 6/29/2008 ) 6 UNFUNDED-2009_breakoul.xls r Attachment C: Unfunded Capital Projects 06/2008 _ Permanent Parks Parks and Complete development of community, 2014 or later Action 100 % Essential $16,440,000 $1,580,000 to be $7,160,000 in V Completion of community, neighbodood and and .25 Sales Tax Recreation neighborhood and pocket parks PlanNision determined P&R CIP pocket parks is in Action Plan. Transit Plan Village Area pocket park and plaza development are in Vision Plan. Funding is antx:i tad to wine from DE . Permanent Parks Parks and Capital Replacement Program - 2009 and later Action Plan 100% Essential $675.000 to be $300,000 / Y Capital replacement analysis is underway for and .25 Sales Tax Recreation recreation facilities system wide determined year estimating deterred maintenance needs. r mproetmems at sports fieldse(Pleasantview, East Mapleton, Tom Watson) and improvements at recreation centers and other faciliies (renovations and energy efficie u rsdes . Permanent Parks Parks and Aquatics improvements 2010 or later Action Plan 100% Desirable $2,100,000 to be $1,100,000 in Y Pool improvements at Scott Carpenter Pool determined 2011 and .25 Sales Tax Recreation Permanent Parks Parks and FlaOrons Golf Course Improvements 2010 or later Action 100% Desirable $3,000.000 $1,800,000 $5,000 $2,100,000 Y InGudes replacement of irrigation sys em, r upgrades to tees and greens, and ~ Plan re acement of 0 o rations center and .25 Sales Tax Recreation P~sion j Permanent Parks Parks arM Boulder Reservoir 2010 or later Action 50% Desirable, TBD TBD to be $800,000 Y Boulder Reservoir area master plan will be PlanNision 50% Discretiona determined completed which will determine priorities and i f ant .25 Sales Tax Recreation ry projects, such as improvements to main Plan office, Concessions, Restrooms, axessible playground, signage, entry way i improvements, docks and walkways. Y Valmont Ciry Park first phase will be Permanent Parks Parks and Valmont City Park Development -south unknown Action 100 % Desirable $25,000,000 to be none completed with .25 Cem Sales Tax funding Plan ($4 million is allocated for development of and .25 Sales Tax Recreation side PlanNision determined north side). Cost estimates for entire Dark are based on draft concept plan. Development of the park is in the vision plan of the master plan. Permanent Parks Parks and Relocation of Parks Operations Facility unknown Action Plan 100 % Desirable $4,200,000 $160,000/year none Y Staff is exploring other locations for the Park and .25 Sales Tax Recreation Operations facility. Relocation will be necessary when south portion of Valmont C' Park is develo ed. Permanent Parks Parks and Develop concept plan for for 191 acres 2016 or later Vision 100 % TBD 76D none Y and .25 Sales Tax Recreation of cit -owned lantl located in Area III Discretiona Permanent Parks Packs and Build a new sports field complex with unknown Vision 100 % $6,000.000 TBD none Y and .25 Sales Tax Recreation s thetic curt. Discretiona Public Completion of all modal transportation unknown Action and 100 % Desirable $73 million $143 million none New revenue source needetl Y Fully funtled plan would complete all modal Works?ransporta systems as ident~ed in the TMP -See Vision systems (Bike, Pedestrian, Transit and Auto) and support a preferred level of life cycle maintenance t Cxxl Below for Modal Breakdown - Public Replacement of Bridges over Boulder Unknown 100 % Desirable $287,000 none General Fund N $ estimate was from 2000. Costs are likely to be more than this original estimate. Not in Works/1'ransporta Creek any Master Plan. Project is part of CU /City tion a reement. TOTALS $40,375,000 $44,567,000 , NOTES: 1. Cost estimates are ve rou hand should not be used for Ion ran tannin ur oses 2. The Fire De rtment will be coin Ietin an u e to their Master Plan in 2008 3. OSMP -With the ssa of the Visitor Mastor Plan in 2005 and the needs assessment that it r aired, OSMP CIP will be funded at the "identified needs' level commencing 2006 and extendin for the six ears of the CIP. Unfunded CIP from the Transportation Master Plan Estimated Unfunded CIP Mode Current Ae[lon Action Plan vision Vision Plan Pedestrian 23,000,000 3z,oo0,000 $9,000.000 s3.000,000 $20,000,000 Bi le 27,000,000 3e,aoo.oo0 11,000,000 s3,aao.ooo 26,000,000 Transit 13,000,000 ls.0oo.000 2,000,000 ts,oo0.000 2,000,000 Roadwa 37.000.000 45,000,000 8.000,000 sl,ooo.000 24,000.000 TDM 6.000.000 a7,ooo.ixlo 41.000.000 sz.ooo,oo0 56,000,000 Miti anon 2,o0o.ao0 2,000.000 ls.coo,oo0 15.000.000 106,000,000 179,000,000 $73,000,000 249,000,000 $143,000,000 Note: Fstirtare0 adtlilional funding for born Pciion and Yvon Rans is the 4iHerence bervreen each plan an4 the Current Fiscally Constrainetl Ran. j ~ UNFUNDED-2009_breakoW.xls 6/29/2008 ATTACHMENT D-1 TRANSPORTATION FUND 2009 - 2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2009 Transportation Fund Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is $7,645,000. The CIP has been developed within the context of the Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The plan goals and priorities were used in allocating funds and prioritizing projects. The TMP is underpinned by the concept of investing in our transportation infrastructure to maintain today's level of service (LOS). The goals/objectives are stated in terms of no increase in traffic congestion. The investment strategy is based on making significant improvements to the pedestrian, bicycle and transit systems, and maintaining and making efficiency improvements to the roadway system. Trans ortation Fund 2009-2014 CIP -Modal Investment Breakout 2009 2009-2014 Modal/Functional Area $ % $ % Pedestrian 2,656,107 32% 11,363,891 41% Bicycle 2,466,043 30% 7,484,506 27% Transit 1,983,]70 24% 4,236,769 15% Roadway 1,139,680 14% 3,364,834 12% Travel Demand Management (TDM)* 0 0% 0 0% Mitigation 0 0% 0 0% Other 0 0% 1,225,000 5% Total 8,245,000 100% 27,075,000 100% *Note: TDM programs are included in the operating budget. The TMP is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. The TMP advocates that we: • adequately preserve the existing infrastructure; • strive to increase safety; • maximize the efficiency of our existing systems (pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and roadway); and • enhance mobility through investments in the completion of the alternative transportation system (pedestrian, bicycle, and transit) The TMP advocates that this multimodal-based investment strategy be focused in a system of six east-west and four north-south corridors that constitute the designated multimodal corridor grid. TMP priorities form the base for funding allocation. Investment on enhancements to the modal systems is focused in these ] 0 multimodal corridors. With limited resources, im~estments are focused on the highest priority corridors. 18 a ~ r ma East-West North-South • Iris Avenue • Broadway • Valmon[ Road 28ib StreeW.S. 36 • Pearl SVeeUParkway Foothills Parkway • Table Mesa Drive -South Boulder Road • 55'" Street • Arapahoe Avenue • Baseline Road POLICY ISSUES None HIGHLIGHTS 28`s Street - 28a' Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue is identified as the top priority corridor in the city's multi-modal grid. Implementation of the 28s' Street Project continues to be a high priority of the Capital Improvements Program. South segment (Baseline to Arapahoe -Hello Boulder) funding of $4.3 million (includes $1.1 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed in 2002 and 2004. The public input, design and approval process is complete for the north segment (Pearl to Iris - Service City) and the Boulder Valley Regional Center Transportation Network plan process was completed in the middle segment (Arapahoe to Pearl -New Town.) Some median replacement work was coordinated in the middle section with the 29°i Street development. Funding for the north segment of $9.3 million (includes $3.8 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed starting in 2004, and funding is also provided in the Transportation Development Fund. Broadway Reconstruction (Pine to Iris) - Pavement sttuctural deficiencies will be corrected and improvements to intersections, signals, lighting, transit facilities and sidewalks will be completed. The process and design began in 2005 with project completion anticipated in 2010. This project is jointly funded by the city, CDOT and federal funds. 30`h Street Access Imnrovements BTV (Bluff to Walnut) - The project is the first phase of access improvements and connections needed for the Boulder Transit Village Station and FasTracks BRT and commuter rail. The "hub" area is the vicinity around the Boulder Transit Village where connections will occur between the regional transit service and local transit, bicycle and pedestrian modes. The Boulder Transit Village transit infrastructure will be constructed in phases with the first phase planned by RTD in 2009 to build a bus-based multimodal station. Future phases as part of FasTracks will add BRT service, build the rail platform and add rail service. The first phase access improvements for the Boulder Transit Village include constructing one mid-block pedestrian crossing of 30`s Street between Valmont and Pearl; constructing two transit super stops, improving access from Goose Creek multi-use path to 30`~ Street, and a bicycle/pedestrian underpass of 30`h Street at the Boulder and Left-hand Ditch. The Goose Creek access will provide a critical missing link between the Goose Creek Path and the sidewalks and on-street bikelanes on 30'h Street. 19 Broadwav/Euclid Multimodal Imorovements- This project includes the following improvements to address bicycle and pedestrian conflicts at the Broadway/Euclid intersection, adjacent RTD transit stops, and associated bicycle/pedestrian zones: construction of a bicycle/pedestrian underpass under Broadway at Euclid; installation of bicycle racks; associated realignment of the multi-use path on the east side of Broadway; relocation of the northbound RTD bus stop to the north of Euclid Avenue; and expansion of the southbound RTD bus stop and other local circulation and access improvements. Future growth in use at this location due to FasTracks, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and other transit service expansion will exacerbate current probiems ieading to more pedestrian and bicycle conflicts, increased traffic congestion and bus delay and conflicts. Research from the Fastracks Local Optimization Facilities study conducted by the city in partnership with Boulder County, RTD, and the University of Colorado (CU) in 2007, indicates that the Broadway Transit stop at ° CU/Euclid is one of the busiest locations in the RTD system accommodating over 1,280 bus trips per day and is a major stop in the local and regional transit system. The proposed project is a partnership between the city, RTD, CU, CDOT, Boulder County and Boulder Valley School District. Funding for this project is included in the CIP and will be combined with federal and partner funding. r Boulder Transit Vi11aQe Infrastructure Enhancements - w This project provides the city's share of funding from the Transportation Fund for transportation facilities in the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP). The city's share of these improvements pays for improvements with community wide benefits or enhancements beyond those required of development. These improvements will be phased with the redevelopment of the area over many yeazs. The city's share of funding will contribute to construction of Junction Place as a new collector, the bridge of Goose Creek for ]unction Place, bike lanes and pedestrian amenities on Junction Place, multimodal paths, underpasses and connections, pedestrian connections, pedestrian lighting, public art and traffic signals. Another project associated with the Boulder Transit Village Underprounding_Credit Carta] Improvements Program - Two line items related to the Undergrounding Cost Share Program (UCSP) that have previously been included in the annual Transportation Fund budget submittal have been omitted from the proposed 2009 budget. The items supported receiving matching funds and expending undergrounding credits to accomplish utility undergrounding projects through the UCSP. r Since 1995, a portion of the of undergrounding credits accrued annually through the Xcel Energy franchise agreement with the city of Boulder has been made available as matching funding for property owners willing to pay at least half the cost to bury existing utilities adjacent to their properties. Major undergrounding projects to be completed in coordination with approved Transportation CIP projects wilt require alt of the anticipated undergrounding credit accrual through the expiration of the current Xcel franchise in 2010. Therefore, no credits are expected to be available for UCSP projects through 2010, and the program has been suspended. 20 It is anticipated that the city will enter into a replacement franchise agreement with Xcel Energy, which will likely include the continuation of undergrounding credits, At such time that additional credits become available, staff will review the UCSP to see if it should be resumed in its current form. FINANCING Funding for city transportation projects comes from several different sources. A dedicated sales • tax, Highway Users Tax, County Road and Bridge funds, State Highway Maintenance and Landscape Funds and Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) federal funds primarily support the Transportation Fund. w° Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Program Three projects remain from the 2006 DRCOG submission. The 2009-2014 CIP requires matching funds from the Transportation Fund for these projects. The Transportation Fund projects are: • Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30`h: $718,000 external; $522,000 match • 30's St Access Improvements BTV: Bluff to Walnut: $350,000 external; $550,000 match • Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe): $913,000 external; $913,000 match In addition, we received funding from CDOT (Colorado Department of Transportation) for the following congestion relief project which also requires matching funds: • Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements - $564,000 external; $75,000 match ~ The city of Boulder applied for funding for the maximum number of project submissions allowed ` in 2007, 8 projects. Leveraging federal funds has now become more difficult as the availability ~ of these funds has diminished. Also, there are fewer projects to submit for funding that are high DRCOG priorities based not on being in specific corridors or of a certain project type. There was ` a project listed in the 2008-2013 CIP for TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation that will be ~ used as the city's match on the one project that was awarded federal funding through the application process. This project is also receiving funding from the University of Colorado, Boulder County, CDOT, and RTD (Regional Transportation District): • Broadway/Euclid Underpass & Multimodal Improvements - $4,430,000 external; $1,370,000 match r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed based on the policy guidance of e the TMP with the identified multimodal corridor emphasis. Expenses in the "Other" category reflect Transportation commitments in the city's contract with Pollard Motors to prepare the City Maintenance Yards frontage along Pearl Parkway for potential Pollard business relocation. The site preparation includes items such as power line relocation, site grading, and fencing in order '6 for the Pollard's to relocate their business if they exercise their option to purchase the Yards frontage. Revenues associated with the future sale of Yards frontage property are anticipated to offset these expenses. Transportation and Utilities will share in the acquisition costs of 21 •r replacement ]and adjacent to the Municipal Service Center. Even without the Pollard option component of the Yards property, the Yards reconfiguration away from Pearl Parkway frontage and to the west is consistent with the Yazds Master Plan. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The 2009 Transportation CIP is predicated on improving Boulder's infrastructure. Any operating project impacts are either absorbed within operating budgets or addressed through the annual budgeting process. BUSINESS PLAN _ Aligning with the policies of the Transportation Master Plan is an important aspect of the Transportation Budget's guiding principles. In Council/Board budget processes, the following priorities and strategies have been used to develop the Transportation budget: ? Maintain Integrity of Transportation Prioritization, in order: -Maintenance and Operations (Essential) „r -Multimodal System Expansion (Desirable) -Enhancements without system performance benefit (Discretionary) w ? Achieve Sustainable Budget Over Time ? Continue Efficiency Improvements r ? Maintain Leveraged Funded Projects ? Reduce Boulder Transit Village (BTV) debt through annual operating savings if available The essential, desirable, discretionary categories of funding are derived similarly and are described below with examples: 1) Essential Services include Operation and Maintenance of Existing Svstem to Maintain Public Safety. Examples include pothole repair, street resurfacing, taking caze of signs and signals, addressing safety issues and basic levels of existing direct service for all modes, etc. Quality of life is addressed in this area though air quality, quality of experience in travel (e.g. addressing failing streets, potholes, sidewalk hazards, etc.), and maintaining a reliable system (e.g. traffic signals functioning and in good condition). 2) Desirable Services include Expansion of Multimodal Svstem -All modal system " expansion has been slowed. The expansion of the multimodal system includes roadway, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and travel demand management projects, programs and services. Examples include new sections of path, sidewalk, improved r roadway segments and intersections, expanded transit service and increases to Eco Pass enrollment. If a citizen sees a project it is highly likely that it either has ~ leveraged funds, is associated with a capital maintenance project, or both. Quality of life enhancement consists of improving system performance, providing more travel choices, connecting citizens to basic needs and activities, improved air quality, and increasing mobility. Also, a capital improvements program helps support the community's economic vitality efforts. 22 3) Discretionary Services include Mitigation Projects -Examples include noise walls and Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation such as traffic circles, bulb outs, speed bumps, etc. This area of the budget does not improve system performance or preserve the quality or integrity of the infrastructure and/or system. Until the economy recovers sufficiently or new revenue sources are secured, we will not be considering any new mitigation projects. TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) ACTION City Council has charged the Board to: "review all city transportation environment assessments and capital improvements." In the context of the Capital Improvements Program, the Board is ` asked to provide a recommendation on the program to the Planning Board and City Council The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed and made a recommendation on the 2009- 2014 Transportation Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at their June 9, 2008 meeting and ~ discussed the CIP at their May 12, 2008 meeting. Discussion on the CIP included support for the Blue Ribbon Commission's recommendations, support for reinstituting undergrounding credits when franchise negotiations occur, and FasTracks Local Optimization initiative as one means of addressing loss of federal funding. The TAB recommended approval of the 2009-2014 Transportation Capital Improvements Program. R r s r w t R s i rs 23 r i t~ ! i ~ l [ it 1 1 ft t 1 ? 1 i [ i k i i s a s E 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Fund 29-lun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades 28th SI (Baseline to his) I 1,010,000 1,010,000 1,010,000 1,010,000 1,010,000 1,0]0,000 6,060,000 Broadway -Euclid Mul[imodal Improvements 1,000,000 4,115,000 685,000 0 0 0 5,800,000 Total: 2,010,000 5,125,000 1,695,000 1,010,000 1,010,000 1,010,000 11,860,000 Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Canyon & Folsom intersection Improvements 639,000 0 0 0 D 0 639,000 Ci[y Yards Fronuge Site Preparation for Po[ential Pollard Relocation 0 0 0 0 123,000 1,100,000 1,225,000 Total: 639,000 0 0 0 125,000 1,100,000 1,864,000 N ' New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions 30th St Access Impr BTV: Bluff to WalnuhTR 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 900,000 Boulder TransitVlllage NfrasWCture Enhancements-General Fund 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 600.000 Boulder Transit Village Infraswcture Enhancements 0 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 800.000 TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation II 0 130,000 130,000 715,000 715,000 715,000 2,405,000 Total: 1,500,000 230,000 230,000 915,000 915,000 915,000 4,705,000 New Construction -Not Growth Related Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30th 1,240,000 0 0 0 0 0 ],240,000 Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe) 1,826,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,826,000 Tote?: 3,066,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,066,000 On-Going Projects Bikeway Facilities -Enhancements 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 Pedestrian Facilities -Repair, Replacement, ADA 680,000 680,000 680,000 680,000 680,000 680,000 4,080,000 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatments 75,000 75.000 75,000 75,000 75.000 75.000 450,000 f Tributary Greenways Program -Transportation 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total: 1,030,000 1,030,000 1,030,000 1,030,000 1,030,000 1,030,000 6,180,000 Total for Transportation Fund 8,245,000 6,385,000 2,955,000 2,955,000 3,080,000 4,055,000 27,675,000 N ' ) 1 1 t 1 f B 1 A { Z ~ ~ if F ~ s 1 , 2 1 r e , ) r ~ >t e ~ rw r~ i r, ~ I~ t t ~ t~ i~ r i:. r, 6/2s/2oo6 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan Zoos r-- Transportation Fund I, Essential Desirable Discretionary ~ total I Pro/act Type/Name Protect X Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding ~%I Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades 28th St (Baseline to Iris) I 781743 $252,500 25% $757,500 75% $0 $1,010,000 100% Broadway Euclid Multimodal Improvements 718048 $150 000 15% $850 000 85% $0 $1,000,000 100% Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair / Deficiency Correc0on Canyon 8 Folsom Intersection Improvements 781046 $127 800 20 % $511 200 80% $0 $639,000 100% New Construction • Growth Related Facility /Additions 30th St Access Impr BTV: Bluff to WalnubTR 781045 $0 $900,000 100% $0 $900,000 100% Boultler Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements-General Fund 7811 xx $0 $800 000 100 % $0 $600,000 100% New Construction • Not Growth Related Arapahoe Multi•USe Path: Folsom to 30th 781044 $248,000 20°h $992,000 80% $0 $1,240,000 100% a Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe) 781031 $0 $1 826 000 100% $0 $1,826,000 100% On-Going Projects Bikeway Facilities -Enhancements 781692 $0 $125,000 100% $0 $125,000 100% Pedestrian Facilities • Repair, Replacement, ADA 781773 $660,000 100% $0 $0 $680,000 100°k Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatme 781002 $0 $75,000 100 % $0 $75,000 100% Tributary Greenweys Program • Transportation 781630 $0 $150,000 100% ~ $0 $150,000 100% 7ofal for Tranaportatlon Fund: $1,458,300 ta% $8,786,700 82% $0 0°k $8,245,000 100°h f City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 PW/Transportation r r '~,r.; ' a` oc a°~ O~ 72: 30th St Access Improvements BTV - Bluff to Walnut ~ I ri 66: 30th St Bike Lanes ~ Arapahoe to Pearl m 64: City Yards Frontage Site ~ Preparation for Potential Pollard Relocation 75: Canyon and Folsom Ara shoe Rd. Intersection Improvements ~r~~i s 76: Transit Priority Operational ~ Improvements -Arapahoe 60: Broadway/Euclid Multimodal Improvements ..r 69: 28th St (Baseline to Iris) 74: Arapahoe Multi-use S Boulder R Path -Folsom to 30th US `~6 Legend Year of Project ~ 201o-201a • zoos = 2070-2014 ~ 2009 ®2o1o•zo~a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Pro)ect Number. Map Number: 28th St (Baseline to Iris) I 781743 69 Department: PW/Transportation subcommunity: Multiple SubCOmmunities Funding source: Transportation Fund BvcPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades r~ LEAP Required: Yeg CEAP completed: 2001 -Baseline to Arapahoe ! 2002 -Pearl to Iris Project Description: These improvements focus on 28th Street from Baseline to Iris. The planning study and the CEAP for the southern section-Baseline to Arapahoe and the northem section-Pearl to Iris, are complete and have been approved by City Council. Recommended improvements include: Urban design, landscaping, streetscape improvements throughout the corridor; transit service and facility improvements including queue jumps, super stops and route modifications; bike and pedestrian facility improvements including constructing multi-use paths; adding raised crossing at free right turn lanes; traffic efficiency improvements including adding left turn lanes at a various intersections and widening the Boulder Creek bridge. Funding for the northern and southern sections is included in this CIP and will be combined with federal funding and the Transportation Development Fund. Project funding began pre 1997 and will end post 2014. In addtion, the BVRC Connections Plan addresses improvements in the middle section from Arapahoe to Pearl. Minor improvements were coordinated with the 29th St. development but the majority of the BVRC improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl are not included in the CIP. These will occur over time through redevelopment. Portions of the 28th Street corridor implementation completed to date include all of the south section from Arapahoe to Baseline except for the west side of 28th between Colorado Ave. and Baseline Rd. In the north section from Pearl Street to Iris Avenue, the intersections at Iris Ave. and Pearl St. along with a pedestrian crossing and bike/bus/right turning vehicle lanes in the vicinity of the intersections have been completed. The Valmont intersection work is planned to be constructed in late 2008 or early 2009. The next project to be constructed after the Valmont intersection will be the on the west side of 28th Street on the south section between Colorado and Baseline adjacent to the University of Colorado. Community SustalnabiHty,1 Project Justii9catton:.'" _ The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's ~ environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to"Master Alans; - ' .~r~-~~"" ~ ~ s ~ ~~~~,a, s~, This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan and the plan's focus on Multimodal Corridors. Multimodal corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian ~ travel. The project will address and balance the needs of these modes. 28th Street -Iris to Arapahoe is the highest ranked multimodal corridor and 28th Street -Arapahoe to Baseline is the 3rd highest ranked corridor. Publlc Process Status, Issues: The CEAP for the southern section -Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section -Pearl to Iris- have been approved by City Council. Any of the middle section improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl, will implement Council approved BVRC Connections Plan and will be coordinated with the 29th St. redevelopment. Relationship wtthilther bepartments: This project requires coordination with the Utility Division for utility upgrades, with RTD, CDOT, CU, Arts Commission, the Planning Department and the Real Estate Division and with adjacent developments. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding - $1,010,000 $1,010,000 $1,010,000 $1,010,000 $1,010,000 $1,010,000 $6,060,000 Change from Prior Year: 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% I 6'. p 'rll :y 7 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Pro ect Number: _ Ma Number; ProjecCName: ~ - ~ ` ~ j P 30th St Access Impr BTV: Bluff to Walnut-TR 781045 72 Department: PW/Transportation subcommunity: Crossroads Funding source: Transportation Fund BvcPArea: Area I ~ Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project is the first phase of constructing access improvements for the Boulder Transit Village bus station and ..F FasTracks BRT and rail to be located at 30th and Pearl. The planned improvements include constructing one mid-block pedestrian crossing of 30th Street between Valmont and Pearl; constructing 2 transit super stops, access from the Goose Creek multi-use path up to 30th Street, and abicycle/pedestrian underpass with access to 30th Street at the Boulder and Lefthand Ditch south of Pearl. The underpass project would include replacing the existing bridge on 30th Street over the Boulder and Lefthand Ditch. This is the only structurally deficient ~ bridge in the Boulder city limits. Funding: External Funding = $2.539M; City = $1.24M match Community 5ustainab'tlity /Project Justification: The 2003 Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multi-modal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, ~ reduced congestion and lower VMT. In addition, the only structurally deficient bridge in Boulder located on 30th Street, south of Pearl, will be replaced. Relationship to Master Plans: ! - As identified in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) -Transit Policies, the city will improve transit access ~ through a variety of capital improvements including the Boulder Transit Village, transit priority lanes, transit super stops, improved bike parking and continuous pedestrian crossings. In addition, in the corridor prioritization in the 2003 TMP, this section of 30th Street is included in the 28th Street Corridor between Iris and Araphoe which is the highest ranking corridor in the Transportation Master Plan. And, system maintenance is listed as the highest priority transportation investment in the Investment Policies of the 2003 TMP. The Boulder and Lefthand Ditch corridor is shown as a proposed Greenway in the TMP and is anticipated to become an important off-street r~ connection to the Boulder Transit Village. Pubtic Prw:ess Status., bsttes ~ ~ ' ` m e This project was submitted to TAB and Council as a Transportation Improvement Project prior to submitting it to DRCOG for federal funding. Relationship wlth Other Departments: ~ > _ . v ' ` ~ . m ~a~,~, ~ This project will be coordinated with planning and housing and human services in connection with the Boulder Transit Village planning. There will also be coordination with utilities. Capital Funding Plan 11s 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Tran ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Businass'Plsm Pr~rtti~tlon of Services:. ~ - - ` Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 30 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number Map Number: Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30th 781044 74 Department: pW/Transportation subcommuniry: Crossroads Funding source: Transportation Fund evcPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project would complete multi-use paths on both sides of Arapahoe between Folsom and 30th Streets. Street trees, poles and other obstacles are located in the existing pedestrian facilities. Associated improvements would relocate (as needed) traffic signal poles, light poles, utility boxes and fire hydrants out of the walkway, provide enhanced pedestrian crossings, and relocate or enhance the street trees and landscaping along the corridor. Funding: External Funding = $908k; City = $607k. Community Sustainability /Project Justification: This section of the Arapahoe multimodal corridor was listed as a priority in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan. 'a Multimodal improvements in the section of the corridor will support the existing Community Transit Network (CTN) JUMP transit service and the redevelopment of 29th Street. The project will address numerous missing ` links in the bike and pedestrian facilities along this section of the corridor as well as poor design of some of the , existing pedestrian facilities. The 2003 Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multi-modal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Ptans: This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan's focus on Multimodal Corridors. Multimodal corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian travel. The t design and project will address and balance the needs of these modes. Arapahoe from Folsom to 33rd is the second highest ranked corridor in the TMP. Pubtic Prescsss Status, Issues: This project was submitted to TAB and Council as a Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) prior to submitting it to DRCOG for federal funding. Staff will hold pub?ic meetings and meet with adjacent property owners to acquire input for the project. Relationship with Other Departments: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; This project will be coordinated with Forestry, and the private utility companies. 'r. Capital Funding Plan , 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $1,240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,240,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs , Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. " Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget u Business Plan Prtoritlzation of Services: ~ Essential % 20% Desirable % 80% Discretionary Total % 100% 31 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ':project Name: a~ Project Nurr?ber: Map Number: Bikeway Facilities -Enhancements 781692 Department: PW/Transportation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Transportation Fund svCPArea: Areas I & II Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: rJp CEAP Completed: Project D®scription: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Bikeway facilities are included in most all transportation construction projects. This program provides additional „p funding for smaller bikeway projects not specifically associated with other capital projects. The projects are prioritized and coordinated with the approved bikeway plan and represents an ongoing city program. Projects constructed will be consistent with the TMP Bicycle System Plan and the FastTracks Local Optimization (FLO) project and are prioritized yearly. This program also allows for construction of opportunistic improvements and construction of other identified bike projects. Types of projects include providing missing links and enhanced ~ crossings such as underpasses and overpasses, eg., Boulder Creek/Boulder Community Hospital @ 48th St. bridge. Project funding is ongoing. Community Sustainabifity l Project Justification: Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward completing agrid-based system of primary and secondary bike corridors making the city more walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. Rsiationship to Master Plans: Relates to a primary goal of the Transportation Master Plan for completing the City's grid-based Bike System to provide safe connections and the opportunity for bike travel throughout the city for all levels of riders. PUbtiC Proc@ss StBtUS f88lleS: 2 ~ftx ~ ~ , 3 ~ ~xx e6 ~=a4 ~ ~i i~rb' a~s# . ~ g ...tom ~x5~ ~ ' 3 ~ k ~f , a E' s t The Public Process for each project well vary Some projects depending on the complexity, may require a CEAP i7etatlonship vitith Otherr Departments: ~ ' _ ~ ~ , ~ # ~ ~ ' # ~ : This program is coordinated with other departments depending on the particular project. Currently projects are being coordinated with the Greenways program and the Open Space Dept. s. ~ _ h. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $750,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs ~ Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ¦ 32 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number. y Broadway -Euclid Multimodal Improvements 718048 60 Department: PW/Transportation Subcommunity: Funding Source: Transportation Fund BVCPArea: Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project includes the following improvements to address bicycle and pedestrian conflicts at the Broadway/Euclid intersection, adjacent RTD transit stops, and associated bicycle/pedestrian zones: construction of a bicycle/pedestrian underpass under Broadway at Euclid; installation of bicycle racks; associated realignment of the multi-use path on the east side of Broadway; relocation of the northbound RTD bus stop to the north of Euclid Avenue; and expansion of the southbound RTD bus stop and other local circulation and access improvements. The high volume of bicycles and pedestrians crossing Broadway along with heavy use of the Broadway multi-use path by bicyclists and pedestrians and vehicular traffic regularly create conflicts and safety issues among the pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders and vehicles in this area. Future growth in use at this location due to FasTracks, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and other transit service expansion will exacerbate the , problems leading to more pedestrian and bicycle conflicts, increased traffic congestion and bus delay and conflicts. Research from the Flo Facilities study conducted by the city, in partnership with Boulder County, RTD, , and the University of Colorado (CU) in 2007, indicates that the Broadway Transit stop at CU/Euclid is one of the busiest locations in the RTD system accommodating over 1,280 bus trips per day and is a major stop in the local and regional transit system. Peak hour bus volume at these locations is double the bus volume than that of the Market Street Station in downtown Denver. An estimated 750 passengers board buses at the Broadway transit center at CU and ridership is projected to nearly double over the next 20 years to approximately 1,400 passengers. There are continual conflicts caused by the proximity of the multi-use path to the bus stop creating on-going safety issues between bicyclists and pedestrians needing to access the transit stops. This proposed project is intended to ameliorate these conflicts and improve conditions at this intersection for all modes. The proposed project is a partnership between the city, RTD, CU, and BVSD. Funding for this project is included in the CIP and will be combined with federal funding and funding from RTD. Goinmuntt~r 8ustainaWllty! ~PrajectJustlfici+tlan: , The Transportation master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. Providing these improvements is consistent with addressing Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options and reduced congestion. It also supports the Fastracks (bus rapid transit) that will be added to the corridor. _ , Ralatlonshi !o Master Plan This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan and the plan's focus on multimodal corridors. The location of this project on Broadway is one of the most heavily used multi-modal corridors in the city system and is F ranked 5th in the prioritized list of multi-modal corridors. This project accommodate existing and future expansion needs of the bus system due to bus rapid transit service that was added as part of FasTracks and future ' increases in pedestrian and bicycle traffic in this area. It will also improve conflicts between the modes that currently exist at this location. Putr11G Process Sfdtus, issuots: ~ _ , , e. ,_._.a, This project was part of the FLO Facilities study and included significant public input, council and multi- jurisdictional input as part of FasTracks Local Optimization (FLO). Relatlonehlp with other Departments: .i This project requires coordination with Utility Division, the Planning Department, RTD, Colorado Department of Transportation, University of Colorado, and Boulder Valley School District and private utility companies such as Xcel and Qwest. k4 33 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ' Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $1,000,000 $4,115,000 $685,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,800,000 Change from Prior Year: New TIP Project -Money moved from TIP Local Match budget Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Operating Funds and/or CU maint. ~ Buslness,Plan Pdorititation of Services: , Essential % 15% Desirable % 85% Discretionary Total % 100% 1 34 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ~ Project Name: - Protect Number: Map Number. ~ Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements 781 xxx ° Department: PW/Transportation Subcommunity: Crossroads Funding source: Transportation Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description: This CIP project provides the city's share of funding from the Transportation Fund for transportation facilities in the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP). The city's share of these improvements pays for improvements with community wide benefits or enhancements beyond those required of development. These improvements will be phased with the redevelopment of the area over many years. The cites share of funding will contribute to construction of Junction Place as a new collector, the bridge of Goose Creek for Junction Place, bike lanes and pedestrian amenities on Junction Place, multimodal paths, underpasses and connections, pedestrian connections, pedestrian lighting, public art and traffic signals. , Community Sustainability!Pmject Justification: These improvements support the redevelopment of the transit village area into a mixed use, pedestrian oriented environment and support multimodal access from the community to the regional transit facilities. Changes in this area are prompted by passage of FasTracks, which will build a regional mass transit system with both bus rapid transit (BRT) and rail stops in this area. Redevelopment of the area will support housing and employment ~ centered on transit access. A pedestrian oriented environment,excellent access to local and regional transit and a comprehensive transportation demandment management program will significantly reduce automobile use in the area. Retattonshlp to Master Plans: The NAP contains a detailed connections plan and streetscape guidelines. The improvements that will be constructed as part of this project are specifically identified and costed out in the NAP. , Public Process Status, lasues: The TVAP was the result of a three year planning process that included design charrettees, open houses and numerous meetings with property owners in the area. The plan was approved by Planning Board and City Council. Relationship with Other Departments: The NAP was a joint effort between the Planning, Public Works and Housing and Human Services ~ Departments. These departments continue to be involved with the implementation activities of the plan. The city will also coordinate with RTD in the construction of the RTD facility to be located in this area. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $800,000 Change from Prior Year: New budget to cover transportation's BTV commitments Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs ~ which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Operating Fund Business Plan Prioritization of Services: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 35 ~ ,.r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report 'Project Name: Project Number. Map Number. Boulder Transit Village Infrastructure Enhancements-General Fund 7811xx l~partment: PW/Transportation subcommunity: Crossroads Funding source: Transportation Fund BvCFArea: Area I ~ Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: _ , PnaJect Description: This CIP project provides the city General Fund share of funding for transportation facilities in the Transit Village ~ Area Plan (NAP) for 2009. NAP implementation calls for investment of General Fund excess reserves to be repaid by Use Tax and Development Excise Tax generated by redevelopment within the area. The city share pays for improvements with community-wide benefit and/or enhancements beyond those required of development. These improvements will be phased with redevelopment of the area over many years. The city share of funding will contribute to construction of Junction Place as a new collector, the Junction Place bridge over Goose Creek, bike lanes and pedestrian amenities on Junction Place, multi-use paths, underpasses and connections, pedestrian lighting, public art and traffic signals. ~ ~ ~ ..~.wa ~.u., ,~a~~.. d.__.._ x___._ . _ . p pp p ~ g a mixed use, pedestrian oriented Theseui~m ~ovement nsu tort the redevelo ment of the transit villa e area Into e } environment and support multimodal access from the community to the regional transit facilities. Changes in this area are prompted by passage of FasTracks, which will build a regional mass transit system with both bus rapid transit (BRT) and rail stops in this area. Redevelopment of the area will support housing and employment centered on transit access. A pedestrian oriented environment,excellent access to local and regional transit and a comprehensive transportation demandment management program will significantly reduce automobile use in the area. Rstatlonshi to Master Plans: - The NAP contains a detailed connections plan and streetscape guidelines. The improvements that will be constructed as part of this project are specifically identified and costed out in the NAP. Public ProcessSkatus, Issues: ~ . , .a The TVAP was the result of a three year planning process that included design charrettees, open houses and numerous meetings with property owners in the area. The plan was approved by Planning Board and City Council. Rstattor?ship ±~rith':Other Dsparbmnts ~ = ~s . v~9 ~ ~ ~ , ` 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~. , ~ t y .gym,,., , _ _ -s~.x,~.:aua+ssi~zs~. ss~sE'i~ . ,a , .,g 6 . sr..e..5 "%Sr_a a:rr~r_ ..,,.,....+..a, .sM,... :~r.,. < n h..rtx,~a~EYk z . The NAP was a joint effort between the Planning, Public Works and Housing and Human Services Departments. These departments continue to be involved with the implementation activities of the plan. The city will also coordinate with RTD in the construction of the RTD facility to be located in this area. _ _ . Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Change from Prior Year: New budget to cover transportation's BTV commitments Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Operating Fund Buslr~e»s'Pian Prtoritiza0ort of Services: _ _ ' Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Tvtal % 100% 36 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program ~ Project Status Report ~ Project Name; Project Number. Map Number. Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements 781046 75 Department: PW/Transportation Subcommuniry: Crossroads Funding source: Transportation Fund BVCPArea: Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair !Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: Project Description: The Canyon and Folsom intersection improvements include double left tum lanes on Canyon for eastbound traffic, the addition of a right turn lane for southbound traffic on Folsom and increasing the turning vehicle storage capacity for southbound left turning vehicles and for eastbound right turning vehicles. Funding: CDOT = $817k; City Match = $150k. Community Sustalnability t Project Justification: The intersection provides a critical link for traffic traveling from Canyon (SH 119) to Arapahoe (SH 7) and has large turning movements on to Folsom. The project will improve the operational efficiency of the intersection which will reduce vehicle delays and air pollution consistent with Council's environmental and transportation goals. It will also provide improved bicycle travel by providing separate bike detection for southbound bikes on Folsom. .N Relationship to Master Plans: This project would implement improvements identified in the city's Transportation Master Plan to increase the intersection's operational efficiency for vehicles and transit. As identified in the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) - Roadway Policies, the city will develop and manage its street network in a manner that places reliance on improving the efficiency of the existing system before expanding that system. Public Process Status, Issues: ~ = Staff will work with adjacent property owners and send project updates to TAB. Relationship with Other Departments: Coordination is required with RE/OS for easement and property acquisition, and with forestry concerning existing street trees. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $639,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $639,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget business P? P~lorit)ration of sorvices: r Essential % 20% Desirable % 80% Discretionary Total % 100% 37 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report 'Project Name: Project Number: Map Number. City Yards Frontage Site Preparation for Potential Pollard Relocation 781042 64 Department: PW/Transportation Subcommunity: East Boulder Funding source: Transportation Fund i3vCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab !Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Project Description; This project reflects the Transportation Department's commitments in the city's contract with the Pollard's to ~ prepare the City Maintenance Yards frontage along Pearl Parkway for Pollard business relocation if they exercise their option to purchase the Yards frontage. In addition, these site changes/improvements are in alignment with the Yards Master Plan. The site preparation includes (with approximate timing which will depend on the Pollard's notice of taking possession of the site): 2007 to 2009: power line design and relocation; One year prior to Pollard relocation: prairie dog mitigation and site grading and fencing. Revenues associated with the future sale of Yards frontage property are anticipated to fully offset these expenses. Community Sustainability!! Project Justification: These improvements are defined and required by executed contracts between the City of Boulder and the Pollard Motor Company as part of the Transit Village Site purchase at 30th Street and Pearl. Relationship to Master Plana: , As identified in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan -Transit Policies, the city will improve transit access through a variety of capital improvements including the Boulder Transit Village, transit priority lanes, transit super stops, improved bike parking and continuous pedestrian connections. This project works towards the implementation of the Transit Village. x..~..... p ~ , Pubitc Process Status Issues: ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ None Required. Improvements will occur entirely on city Maintenance Yard site. E Relationship with Other Departments: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ti , ~ zs . . This project will be coordinated with Utilities, Fleet, and Parks maintenance. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $1,100,000 $1,225,000 - Change from Prior Year: The option for Pollard to purchse the sight expires In 2014. Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Property will be sold to the Pollard's - no on-going operating costs after sale of property. Source of Funding: ~r. Business Plan Prioritizatlonof Services: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Essential 100 Desirable ~ Discretionary Total % 100% 1 38 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program ~ Project Status Report ~ Project Name: Protect Number: Map Number. ~ Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatment 781002 N department: PW/Transportation 5ubcommuniry: Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Transportation Fund BvcPArea: Areas I & II Protect Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: nJo CEAP Completed: Protect Description: ~ The Pedestrian Facilities program includes the installation of missing sidewalk links and pedestrian crossing/safety treatments and potentially social paths and sidewalk widenings. The list of identified missing sidewalk links has been prioritized for construction. Crossing treatment improvements are prioritized citywide and include median refuge islands, crosswalk lighting, flashing signs, neck-downs, signing, lighting and/or pedestrian signals. The recently approved Pedestrian Crossing Treatment guidelines will be used to evaluate future pedestrian crossing treatment. Project funding is ongoing. Community Sustainabifltyl Protect.tustification: Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's h environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. 12elationship to Master Ptans: According to the Pedestrian Policy Plan of the 2003 Transportation Master Plan, an intermittent pedestrian system that strands pedestrians at the end of unfinished sidewalks or forces them into awkward traverses or hazardous street crossings discourages walking. In an effort to increase pedestrian activity and encourage walking as the basis of all means of travel, a completed sidewalk system is necessary. Adding features to the pedestrian network such as missing sidewalks links and pedestrian crossing /safety improvements is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan. Pubfic Process Status, Issues: d TAB approved the Proposed Prioritized list of Missing Sidewalk Links on May 10, 2004. TAB made a recommendation to support the use of the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines in 2005 and the document went to the Ciry Council as information item in 2006. The Public Process for installing missing sidewalks links is on-going and may involve one or more locations per year. Staff works with neighborhoods and adjacent property owners on individual improvements. RalatlonsbipwithOtherDepartment~... ~ ~ ~ Coordination with the Parks Department -City Forester is required and the utilities department if there are utility _ conflicts. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Change from Prior Year: ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Adjacent property owners are responsible for sidewalk maintenance by code. Crossing treatments have minimal maintenance re uiements. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Business Plan Priorlttzatlon of Services: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ° 39 ~ „rl 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number. Map Number: Pedestrian Facilities -Repair, Replacement, ADA 781773 llepartment: PW/Transportation subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Transportation Fund svcPArea: Areas I & II Project type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: rJp CEAP Completed: Project Description: This ongoing program allows for repair, replacement and construction of existing and new sidewalks, and construction of access ramps. Emphasis of this program is given to existing sidewalk repair. Sidewalk repair priorities have been established in the Sidewalk Repair Program and yearly funding is spent accordingly. In 2008, sidewalk repairs are planned to take place between US36, Baseline Road, and Foothills Highway. Compliance with ADA is resulting in additional expenditures for access ramps and driveway modifications. Project funding is ongoing. Community Sustainability /Project Justification: Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. ~ Ralatfanship to Master PFans: This program is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan which places high priority on transportation system preservation and on providing improvements to pedestrian facilities. System maintenance is listed as the highest priority transportation investment in the Investment Policies in the TMP. rW Public Process Status, Issues: A neighborhood meeting is held for the identified repair area owners in advance of the work starting and individual notices are mailed out yearly to the adjacent property owners. Reiationship with Other Departments: a ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ . .,,.M_E ~ ems. Coordination with the Parks Department -City Forester is required adjacent to street trees. Coordination with the R city Utility Division regarding water meter location is also required. ' Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $4,080,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Adjacent property owners are generally responsible for sidewalk maint. This project does reduce some need to lace tem ore as halt etches on sidewalks. Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization. of Services: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 40 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program ~ Project Status Report "E Pro}ect Name: Pro}ect Number: Map Number. ~ Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe) 781031 76 Department: PW/Transportation subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Transportation Fund svcPArea: Areas I & II Project Type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: Project Description: This project will provide transit operation improvements intended to support transit service on the Arapahoe corridor. The proposed improvements include queue jump lanes at intersections as well as sidewalks and bike connections to transit stops, and transit ammenities. The project is intended to improve the travel time along the corridor. Intersection improvements for transit operations will occur on east Arapahoe from Cherryvale to east of 63rd. The city's funding is part of a larger CDOT project and CDOT will take the lead on the implementation. Funding: 2008 - 2009: City = $1.202M; Federal = $1.202M. Community Sustainabitity l Project. Justification: -d The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multi-modal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, ~ reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Plans: As identified in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan -Transit Policies, the city will improve transit access through a variety of capital improvements including the Boulder Transit Village, transit priority lanes, transit super stops, improved bike parking and continuous pedestrian connections. Public Process Status, Issues: The city funding is part of a larger CDOT project on Arapahoe. CDOT will take the lead on the process. rp Relationship with Other Departm®nts: Coordinate with Real Estate for easements/ROW. Coordinate with CDOT. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $1,826,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,826,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Biistnsss Plan Prlorjtizattcn at Services: s E.: -:-w Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ¦ 41 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number, Map Number; TIP Local Match/FasTracks Implementation II 781x46 Department: PW/ Transportation Subcommunity: System-wide Funding source: Transportation Fund BvCPArea: Areas I & II Project Type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions f CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: Ir, Isroject description: Funding is for coordination with the FasTracks implementation including bike and pedestrian improvements and transit ammenities. This money will likely be used as local match to leverage against potential federal funding for projects submitted in future year's DRCOG TIP submittal process or for smaller projects identified through the FasTracks local optimization (FLO) process. This project is growth related because it will be coordinated with development in the area of the FasTracks facilities. Community Sustalnabfllty /Project Justification: The proposed use of this money meets the transportation funding principals of leveraging our dollars where possible and the identified projects will be directed at high priority multimodal corridors and Fastracks facilities. Reiationshlpto Master Plans: ~ ~ ~ . As identified in the Transportation Master Plan Update Transit Policies and the Transit Village Area Plan, the city will focus on transit access through a variety of capital improvements including the Boulder Transit Village, transit priority lanes, transit super stops, improved bike parking and continuous pedestrian connections. x Public Process Status Issues: k ~ ~ Y,.tom.. .x.U .,.diet Public Process, CEAP and design to be determined in relationship to specific projects. Relationship with Othar Departments: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ As the projects are refined necessary interdepartmental coordination will be identified. L' Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $130,000 $130,000 $715,000 $715,000 $715,000 $2,405,000 Change from Prior Year: Money moved to new TIP and FLO projects Mnual On-going Operating Costs Description: TBD Source of Funding: Business Plan Prioritization of Servlcea: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 1 n 42 ..o. 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Project Name: Project Number: Map Number: Tributary Greenways Program -Transportation 781630 Department: PW/Transportation Subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding Source: Transportation Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: Project Description: The program is intended to improve and protect the many riparian corridors that pass through the city. Elements of this work also advance a primary goal of the TMP by providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and encouraging the modal shift from automobiles to alternative modes of transportation. Improvements include pedestrian/bicycle paths, drainage and flood control structures, and preservation and enhancement of natural features. A portion of the capital funding for this program was shifted to needed maintenance of existing system beginning in 2002. See Greenways CIP/Budget section. Project funding is ongoing. Community SastatnabiRty /.Project Justification: The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's ~ environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, , reduced congestion and lower VMT. Relationship to Master Platte: These projects will advance a primary goal of the 2003 Transportation Master Plan by providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities to work towards the 2025 objective to reduce single occupant-vehicle travel to 25% of trips. Public Procress Status, Issues; CEAP's are completed for all significant greenways projects and are reviewed by appropriate boards. See Greenway CIP for more detailed information. Relationship with Other Departments: The Greenways program requires coordinating with Transportation, Open Space, Flood Utility, Planning and Parks Departments. e Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation or Utilities Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation/Utilities operating or Urban Drain. Business t?fan Prto~ltiratlon of Services: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 43 u i TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND 2009 - 2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2009 Transportation Development Fund (TDF) Capita] Improvements Program is $775,000. °r The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed within the context of the Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The plan goals and priorities were used in allocating funds and prioritizing projects. Trans ortation Develo ment Fund 2009-2014 CIP -Modal Investment Breakout 2009 2009-2014 Modal/Functional Area $ % $ Pedestrian 242,864 3]% 1,105,316 30% Bicycle 330.146 43% 941,626 26% ~ Transit 46,602 6% 350,388 9% ' Roadway 155.388 20% 1,277670 35% Travel Demand Management (TDM)* 0 0% 0 0% r Mitigation 0 0% 0 0% Other 0 0% 0 0% Total 775,000 100% 3,675,000 100% *No[e: TDM projects are included in the Transportation Fund. The city Transportation Development Excise Tax is based on the philosophy of assessing a fee on development to mitigate impacts on the street network. Rates are adjusted annually based on the CPI. r POLICY ISSUES None r HIGHLIGHTS 30`h Street Bikelanes: Aranahoe to Pearl - ~ During the development of the Bike System Plan as part of the Transportation Master Plan, constructing bikelanes on the stretch of 30°i Street from Arapahoe to Pearl was identified as a high priority bike system need. On-street bike lanes currently exist on 30`s Street from the Diagonal Highway to Pearl and from Arapahoe to Baseline. This project will complete an important on-street facility missing link by constructing on-street bikelanes on 30'" between Arapahoe to Pearl. Funding for this project has been provided by city (40 percent) and federal sources (60 percent). 28`h Street - 28'h Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue is identified as the top priority corridor in the city's multi-modal grid. Implementation of the 28'h Street Project continues to be a high priority of the Capital Improvements Program. South segment (Baseline to Arapahoe -Hello Boulder) funding 44 of $4.3 million (includes $1.1 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed in 2002 and 2004. The public input, design and approval process is complete for the north segment (Pearl to Iris - Service City) and the Boulder Valley Regional Center Transportation Network plan process was completed in the middle segment (Arapahoe to Pearl -New Town.) Some median replacement work was coordinated in the middle section with the 29~' Street development. Funding for the north segment of $9.3 million (includes $3.8 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed starting in 2004, and funding is also provided in the Transportation Fund. FINANCING A significant influence on the 2009-2014 Transportation CIP is the reduction in transportation excise tax (TET) revenues. The TET was instituted in the 1980s to fund transportation improvements related to growth. TET is paid by new commercial and residential development. Permanently affordable residential units are exempt. Historically the tax has generated approximately $1 million annually. Revenue in 2007 was approximately $530,000. The 2009- 2014 CIP has been formulated based on anticipated annual revenue of $600,000. TET is calculated on net new square footage and dwelling units. As the city transitions to a M~ redevelopment context instead of a green field development pattern, excise taxes will yield lower revenue. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The 2009 Transportation Development Fund CIP is predicated on supporting new growth. Any operating project impacts are either absorbed within operating budgets or addressed through the annual budgeting process. BUSINESS PLAN Aligning with the policies of the Transportation Master Plan is an important aspect of the Transportation Budget's guiding principles. In Council/Board budget processes, the following priorities and strategies have been used to develop the Transportation budget: ~ r ? Maintain Integrity of Transportation Prioritization, in order: ~ - Maintenance and Operations (Essential) - Multimodal System Expansion (Desirable) -Enhancements without system performance benefit (Discretionary) ? Achieve Sustainable Budget Over Time ? Continue Efficiency Improvements ? Maintain Leveraged Funded Projects w ? Reduce Boulder Transit Village (BTV) debt through annual operating savings if available r" The essential, desirable, discretionary categories of funding are derived similarly and are described below with examples: 1) Essential Services include Oaeration and Maintenance of Existing System to Maintain Public Safetl'• Examples include pothole repair, street resurfacing, taking care of signs and signals, addressing safety issues and basic levels of existing direct ~ 45 w~ r ,r service for all modes, etc. Quality of life is addressed in this area though air quality, quality of experience in travel (e.g. addressing failing streets, potholes, sidewalk hazards, etc.), and maintaining a reliable system (e.g. traffic signals functioning and in good condition). 2) Desirable Services include Expansion of Multimodal System -All modal system expansion has been slowed. The expansion of the multimodal system includes roadway, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and travel demand management projects, s programs and services. Examples include new sections of path, sidewalk, improved roadway segments and intersections, expanded transit service and increases to Eco Pass enrollment. If a citizen sees a project it is highly likely that it either has leveraged funds, is associated with a capital maintenance project, or both. Quality of life enhancement consists of improving system performance, providing more travel choices, connecting citizens to basic needs and activities, improved air quality, and increasing mobility. Also, a capital improvements program helps support the community's economic vitality efforts. 3) Discretionary Services include Mitigation Projects -Examples include noise walls and Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation such as traffic circles, bulb outs, speed bumps, etc. This area of the budget does not improve system performance or preserve the quality or integrity of the infrastructure and/or system. Until the economy recovers sufficiently or new revenue sources are secured, we will not be considering any new mitigation projects. r TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) ACTION City Council has charged the Board to: "review all city transportation environment assessments and capital improvements." In the context of the Capital Improvements Program, the Board is y asked to provide a recommendation on the program to the Planning Board and City Council. The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed and made a recommendation on the 2009- _ 2014 Transportation Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at their June 9, 2008 meeting and discussed the CIP at their May 12, 2008 meeting. Discussion on the CIP included support for the Blue Ribbon Commission's recommendations, support for reinstituting undergrounding credits when franchise negotiations occur, and FasTracks Local Optimization initiative as one means of addressing loss of federal funding. The TAB recommended approval of the 2009-2014 Transportation Development Capital Improvements Program. Yr r 46 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Development Fund 29-Jun-OS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades 28th St (Baseline [o Iris) 11 400,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 2,750,000 Total: 400,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 470,000 2,750,000 New Construction • Growth Related Facility /Additions 30th Street Bike lanes -Arapahoe to Pearl 325,000 0 0 0 0 0 325.000 Total: 325,000 0 0 0 0 0 325,000 On-Going Projects A Miscellaneous Development Coordination 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 J Si nal Maintenance and U de 8 PBra 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 300,000 Total: 50,000 150,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 150,000 600,000 Total for Transportation Development Fund 775,000 620,000 520,000 620,000 520,000 620,000 3,675,000 t. ~ t ~ e ~ a ~ ~ i t 1 ~ r >w r i ~ ~ r 4 ~ ! t ! ~ ! ~ ~ ~ a ~ e ± e t i t { i i 1 1 1 1 { 1 k t t t i i f i iE i ~ f ! , i E a i ! ~ a ~ ~ ~zs~zoo6 Business Plan Budget Submission Page 9 of 13 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 Transportation Development Fund ~ Essential f Desirable f Discretionary ~ Total Pro/eet TypMName Pro/eet X Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility- Enhancements /Upgrades 28th St (Baseline to Iris) II 711019 $100 000 25% $300 000 75% $0 $400,000 100% New ConstruMlon -Growth Related Facility / Additlona 30th Street Bike Lanes -Arapahoe to Peen 711020 $162 500 50°/ $162,500 50% $0 $325,000 100% On-Going Pro)eMs Miscellaneous Development Coordination 711004 $0 $50,000 100°k $0 $50,000 100% Total for Transporlatlon Development Fund: $262,500 34% $512,500 66% $0 0% $775,000 100°k A 0° P' 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report . _ _rr _ _ 28th St (Baseline to Ins) II 711019 69 Department: pW/Transportation Subeommunity. Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Transportation Development Fund avcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility - Enhancements I Upgrades CFJ1P Required: Yes cEAP completed: 2001 -Baseline to Arapahoe / 2002 -Pearl to Iris as -~y~_~,.g _ ~4aptlaR 2.r~:~ s ~ ~ , ~ a: i'S: ~?ff;;;`.~y 4. ~ s a.u..ga ' y?-' .~,.".x''~, v These improvements focus on 28th Streeet from Baseline to Iris. The planning study and the CEAP for the southern section-Baseline to Arapahoe and the northem section-Pearl to Iris, are complete and have been approved by City Council. Recommended improvements include: Urban design, landscaping, streetscape improvements throughout the corridor; transit service and facility improvements including queue jumps, super stops and route modifications; bike and pedestrian facility improvements including constructing multi-use paths; adding raised crossing at free right turn lanes; traffic efficiency improvements including adding left turn lanes at various intersections and widening the Boulder Creek bridge. Funding for the northem and southern sections is included in this CIP and will be combined with federal funding and the Transportation Fund. Project funding began pre 1997 and will end post 2014. In addition the BVRC Connections plan addresses improvements in the w. middle section from Arapahoe to Pead. Minor improvements were coordinated with the 29th St. development but the majority of the BVRC improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl are not included in the CIP. Portions of the 28th Street corridor implementation completed to date include all of the south section from A Arapahoe to Baseline except for the west side of 28th between Colorado Ave. and Baseline Rd. In the north section from Pearl Street to Iris Avenue, the intersections at Iris Ave. and Pearl St. along with a pedestrian crossing and bike/bus/right turning vehicle lanes in the vicinity of the intersections have been wmpleted. The w Valmont intersection work is planned to be constructed in late 2008 or early 2009. The next project to be constructed after the Valmont intersection will be the on the west side of 28th Street on the south section between Colorado and Baseline adjacent to the University of Colorado. The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. ~ ,Fy- _ _ This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan and the plan's focus on Multimodal Corridors. ~ Multimodal corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian travel. The design and project will address and balance the needs of these modes. 28th Street -Iris to Arapahoe is the highest ranked multimodal corridor and 28th Street -Arapahoe to Baseline is the 3rd highest ranked ~r corridor. The CEAP for the southern section -Baseline to Arapahoe and the northem section -Pearl to Iris- have been s approved by City Council. Any middle section improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl, will implement the Council Approved BVRC connections plan. ` ¦ This project requires coordination with the Utility Division for utility upgrades, with RTD, CDOT, CU, Arts ~ Commission, the Planning Department and the Real Estate Division and w/ adjacent developments. Capkal Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned funding -:r $400,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $2,750,000 _ ~ r Change from Prior Year: Additional funding added in out years of this budget ® 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Mnual On-going Operating Costs r Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be r rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% ~w wr m1 w -w V 50 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report 30th Street Bike Lanes -Arapahoe to Pearl 711020 66 Departmene: pW/Transportation suboommunlty. Crossroads Funding source: Transportation Development Fund BvCPNea: Area I Project Type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: rjp CEAP Completed: ar Pi+ble~' CfrG~Ir?rY~ '~`~y~~* i~1~..7.«. r a During the development of the Bike System Plan as part of the Transportation Master Plan, constructing bike lanes on the stretch of 30th Street from Arapahoe to Pearl was identified as a high priority bike system need. ~ Currently on-street bike lanes exist on 30th St. from the Diagonal to Pead and from Arapahoe to Baseline. This project would complete an important on-street facility missing link by constructing on-street bike lanes on 30th St. ~ between Arapahoe and Pearl. Funding: 2005-2008: City = $1.1 M; SAFETEA-LU = $3.278M. Project funding began in 2005 and will end in 2008. This project is growth related due to impacts from the 29th St redevelopment, East CU campus, and the proposed Transit Village plan. This project will also maximize the regional transit opportunities to the transit village commuter rail station and bus rapid transit. CQl11 . Se . .memo-- ~,yw.s~w- . t a ~ y" . a1 Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in s cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT.This corridor is the highest ranked corridor on the current Transportation Master Plan. This project will also maximize the regional transit opportunities to the transit village commuter rail station and bus rapid transit. wp~e .t ~ This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan which gives high priority to completing city bike facilities thus promoting bicycling and increasing bike mode share. This project is included in the Bike System ~ Plan and is identified as a project within the 28th Street multimodal corridor. W Public process and design anticipated to take place in 2006 to 2009. Construction is anticipated in 2009/2010. Some of the project elements on the west side of the street were constructed with the 29th Street redevelopment project. This project will be designed based on the adopted BVRC Connections Plan and the 29th Street redevelopment; any remaining issues would be addressed in the public process and design refinement (including working with property owners). If necessary, electrical utility undergounding in this sUetch of 30th will be coordinated with Xcel. Construction will be coordinated with the 29th Street redevelopment and the Transit Village Area Plan. s Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 Change from Prior Year: increase funding to address project cost escalation Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be ro rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget y`i Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary %0 Total % 100% 51 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Miscellaneous Development Coordination 711004 Department: PW/Transportation subcommuniry: Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Transportation Development Fund avcPnrea: Area I Project type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CIJ1P Completed: r This CIP funding is intended to construct infrastructure improvements in coordination with or prompted by potential private development. Throughout the year situations arise where infrastructure improvements are required in the vicinity of a proposed development, should be made at the same time as the development and for which a developer can not be required to construct. Improvements that are typically included are bike and pedestrian, functional efficiency, safety, system preservation, and transit system improvements. Project funding " is ongoing. This project is growth related because it addresses needs from new development. The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. "A" Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council's „a environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT. ~ F Major goals in the Transportation Master Plan include system preservation, safety, bike, pedestrian and auto functional efficiency projects. Projects generally require coordination with adjacent neighborhoods and property owners. Close coordination with the Development Review work group and the Planning Department is required. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: T Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be r rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. ~ Source of Funding: Transportation Fund Operating Budget W Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 52 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Signal Maintenance and Upgrade 7110xx oepartrnent: PW~ Transportation Subcommunity. System-wide Funding source: Transportation Development Fund 6vcPArea: System-wide Project type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: • The Signal Maintenance and Upgrade project has previously been funded (most recently at a rate of $100,000 per year) as an operating budget. This budget is used for the installation of new traffic signals and upgrades. Due to revenue decreases, funding for this function was reduced 50%. Budgeting as a capital project at $100,000 every other year is more consistent with the project implementation. ' Growth in traffic volumes and changes in travel patterns periodically result in the need to install new traffic signals to provide safe and efficient traffic Flow at intersections for all modes of travel. Decisions to install new traffic signals are made on the basis of accident history, traffic delays, and pedestrian and cyclist crossing needs. The goal of the TMP is to provice a multi-modal transportation system. Installation of traffic signals provide access to and accross multi-modal corridors for pedestrians, bikes, automobiles and transit. mafw~ & The public process associated with new traffic signal installations is determined by the location of the new signal aq and the availability of other alternatives to address the issues to be addressed by the signal installation. .r - "n New traffic signal installations are coordinated with Xcel Energy, which provides power to operate traffic signals. maw:: - . v mra: ; ~ ate- . _ ~r Capital Funding Plan r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $300,000 ~ _ r........,,,v _ r Change from Prior Year: Relocated expenditure from operating to capital Mnual On-going Operating Costs Description: Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs which will be r rammed in the Trans ortation Fund bud et. ~ Source of Funding: Existing operating budgets a° Essential % Q Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ar ¦r 53 r. q AIRPORT FUND 2009 - 2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM1I OVERVIEW The Boulder Municipal Airport Master Plan Update (AMPU) has informed the 2009-2014 CIP. The AMPU was presented to the City Council and approved in January 2007. The CIP projects currently on the 2009-2014 schedule only involve replacing or maintaining existing infrastructure. POLICY ISSUES The Federal Government has not yet taken action on reauthorization ofthe FAA spending bill, which is the major source of revenue for this CIP. We will continue to track this legislation and make r adjustments if necessary. HIGHLIGHTS The project proposed for 2013 is part of FAA entitlement funds that are provided to the Boulder Municipal Airport every four years for maintenance and/or rehabilitation of the airport infrastructure. We received FAA entitlement funds in 2008, which was used for the aircraft parking apron and portion of the taxiway. As the 2013 project date nears, more information will be available on the specifics of this project. FINANCING Primary funding for Airport Improvement Projects (AIP) is from the FAA, providing 95% of total cost. The CDOT Aeronautics Division usually funds 2.5%, with the remaining 2.5% paid out of the Airport Fund. FAA funding hasn't been approved for 2013 yet, but the airport has been told it can expect approximately $600K. After adding the 5% matching funds from the airport and a State of Colorado Discretionary Aviation Grant, the total CIP amount would be $631,578. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The airport operating budget pays for the maintenance of all airport improvements. BUSINESS PLAN Rehabilitation of airport pavement is desi}~rated as ] 00% essential and is assigned funding by the FAA based on their assessment. Replacement and maintenance of existing pavement is essential for aviation safety and must be performed for the proper functioning of the airport. r 54 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Airport Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction FAA Entitlement Funded Maintrnance 2013 0 0 0 0 631,578 0 631,578 Total: 0 0 0 0 631,578 0 631,578 Totalfor AirportFund 0 0 0 0 631,578 0 631,578 cn City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 PW/Municipal Airport n ~ 3 ~ ! ~ g ~ 15 ~ L r tS' ~1 yy ~ 1 y „ 'iYY t~ ~Si ~ t 1 u„~. ~ ~ ' ~ 31~ , w _ ,tyt v rv ~ . _ . `is. $ .ti sid, ~ t ~..r'tytt,, Mr r ~i a~ ~ ,'t_ ' . R `p".'a sI Y~ha,. , °--3a- . ~ a F r~ v~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~9 C l~1Gk5 4 ~ ]i"~ h Ao fi~Vyi~ i~[~ { . Ivy s ~s~~ ~ d{NYC Q` ~ ~~a ' ' ~ ~ ~m 79' FAA F~tttlernent Funded Maintenance 213 ~ Jay Rd G G r~ G Y G'1 'Ri. {PGi 9y t i! i'f : { Y V L `s.+4 ~ ~ ~ ~ fi cG., r S ~vE' _ ~iiapy ~eLti i 4 ~ 4 s.. -~6 r~YvEiw~ `Y" _ - .v'GMcs~i ""~.~t ~ € Ara ahoe Rd. - , t'~f ~ U r~ rN :may ~ 's.., r 4 ~ ~ i ~ ~~t .o i 5Li M Y N~1 ~y ' ~Y ff yy~. G S Boulder R . R'~ yc96i~' $ . ~ E i 'F` S ~ s ~sa~ ~ i ~ic M1~~~, 'i ~ ~ ~Y3~Ih 1! ~ Legend Year of ProJact • ~ zo~azoia ~ .zoos -zoio-zau ra ~ zoos ~zoio-zwa 56 a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report „ _ .._es . :r FAA Entitlement Funded Maintenance 2013 771x09 79 Department: PW/Municipal Airport Subcommunity. East Boulder ` Funding source: Airport Fund svcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: ¦ PrtjAl~ ,.I~.~ n t s,S' Y.~~'°. i ,~'~,'F~S r This project is from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) entitlement funds that are provided to Boulder Municipal Airport every four years for maintenance and/or rehabilitation of the airport infrastructure. More r information will be entered as project date nears. a i aim ~..,ri.~~'' - - s~- The FAA mandates that airport infrastructure be maintained and provides entitlement funds to pay for such s improvements. The year prior to receiving the funds (i.e. 2012), the airport will submit the projects for FAA approval and then can submit more information about project justification and benefits. 9fl w•,n _ ssmM~F~„'. ~.rv ~t~s '4. „k t m s::~'t~.~s'. ~F This project will be in accordance with the Municipal Airport Master Plan Update. - - , ~ This project was included in the Airport Master Plan Update process, which included open house meetings and mailings to Airport neighbors. None at this time. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding „LL $0 $0 $0 $0 $831,578 $0 $631,578 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Costs are absorbed in Airport operating budget. ~ Source of Funding: Airport Fund Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% w M R 5/ Yb ATTACHbIENT D-2 UTILITIES DIVISION M 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW The overall program and funding priorities are reflected in the staging and timing of projects over the 6 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) time period. The following primary factors were considered in determining the overall program and funding priorities: Water and Wastewater Utility r 1. Reliability of water and wastewater collection, delivery and treahnent 2. Water quality and other environmental regulations 3. Worker health and safety 4. Opportunity to collaborate with other city projects, i.e., transportation 5. Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings 6. Accommodating new }~'owth and development Stormwater and Flood Management Utility I. Property damage or safety hazard mitigation 2. Water quality and other environmental regulations 3. Worker health and safety r 4. Opportunity to collaborate with other city projects, i.e., transportation 5. Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings 6. Accommodating new growth and development No effort has been made in developing the C[P to target improvements in a certain geographic area. This overview memo is consistent with the Utilities Division recommended Action Plan budget recommendations. POLICY ISSUES There are no policy issues related to the CIP this year. • HIGHLIGHTS " Highlights of the proposed CIP are as follows: Water Utility 1. Continued emphasis on the rehabilitation and improvement of the city's existing water ~ system infrastructure continues, especially in the area of the city's deteriorated water distribution system. This is reflected in the significant funding for on-going waterline replacement as well as several other rehabilitation projects for various water system 58 facilities. The city currently experiences approximately 60-80 main breaks per year and these cause unplanned outages in water service as well as disruption to vehicle travel and ` damage to public and private property. Although the number of main breaks is not considered excessive, the average age of the city's distribution system is over 40 years and it is anticipated that substantial funds will be required to maintain a Functioning water distribution system over time. The replacement program is coordinated with the Transportation Division street overlay and reconstruction program. 2. Funds have been allocated for repair and rehabilitation of the Lakewood Pipeline. An inspection of the pipeline in October 2007 revealed little to no change in corrosion and other deterioration of the pipe. Therefore staff is recommending that additional funds be allocated in 2010 for follow-up inspection of the pipe. More significant funding for possible rehabilitation has been delayed until 2012 and this is speculative. Funds will be transferred from the Lakewood Pipeline Remediation Reserve to cover the costs. R 3. It is recommended that funding for the Barker Water System be allocated. Repairs to this water system are necessary to assure safe and reliable water deliveries to the Betasso ~ Water Treatment Plant (WTP) from Barker Reservoir. Priority work includes 1) repairs to the Barker Gravity Pipeline including potential slip lining of portions of the pipe, and 2) the on-going Federal permitting issues. This project will provide funds to support on- going Federal permitting issues associated with the Barker Water System. A request has been made to convert the current Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensed project to a FERC small conduit exemption from licensing. The current license expires in 2009. The preliminary license exemption application was submitted in November 2007. It is anticipated the final exemption application will be submitted in early 2009. There are significant technical and legal analysis and documentation required to support this request and to obtain a separate land use authorization from the U.S. Forest Service for continued occupancy of federal land by the Barker Gravity Pipeline. It is anticipated the application to the U.S. Forest Service will be submitted in early 2009. 4. Funding for improvements to the )boulder Reservoir WTP is recommended in 2009. This work is necessary to expand the treatment capacity so that the city continues to comply with federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations. Other related projects are the Boulder Reservoir Intake and Pumping, Iris Pump Station and Cherryvale Pump Station. This work was prompted by review of the city's water delivery system subsequent to the 2002 drought conditions. Water from the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) will play an increasingly important role in the city's overall water system deliveries. lfiis water is treated and delivered through these facilities and expansion of the treatment capacity is necessary due to these factors. ` 5. Funding for the next phase of improvements to the Betasso WTP has been delayed until 2014. Water demands have no[ increased significantly and so the existing treatment processes should be adequate to meet water demands in compliance with federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations until that time. 59 w~ r r 6. Funding for construction of the proposed Carter Lake Pipeline has been delayed until 2014. Funding of the pipeline in the nearer term without Federa] funding assistance would have a significant impact on water rates. Staff continues to recommend the pipeline as the best long-term solution to water quality, operational and security vulnerability issues related to the drawing water directly from the Boulder Feeder Canal and Boulder Reservoir. By delaying the schedule for pipeline construction, more time is available to secure Federal funding assistance. Recognizing mixed overall support to date the city should continue initial project evaluation for the Carter Lake Pipeline. Efforts include development of a CEAP, right- of-way acquisition, preliminary design and permitting activities. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. r 7. Funding for assistance with the construction of improvements to the Nederland Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is recommended in 2009. The funds would be used ' to increase the level of treatment provided by the WWTP to further protect water quality in Barker Reservoir. Considerations include removal of phosphorus and micro- contaminants such as endocrine disruptors. The recommended funding is $300,000. 8. Funding for the automated meter reading project is recommended for the accelerated replacement of the meter's transponders. The original transponders are not lasting as long as originally projected. The recommended funding is $500,000 for 5 years 2009- 2013. 9. City staff recently updated the water system security vulnerability assessment. Numerous recommendations for security vulnerability improvements have been incorporated in the m, 2009-2014 CIP including the following projects -Water System Security, Kossler Reservoir and Boulder Feeder Canal. Wastewater Utility 1. It is anticipated the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment will issue a revised discharge permit in 2008 for the city's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The new discharge permit will probably not include more restrictive limits for ammonia and other nitrogen based compounds. Therefore, it is recommended that funding during the 2009-2010 time period for additional treatment improvements be eliminated. The city plans to continue to treat the wastewater in the most efficient and effective manner available and in order to meet and exceed all current discharge permit requirements. 2. Because of funding limitations, the city was not able to replace the existing chorine gas disinfection and sulfur dioxide de-chlorination system as part of the recent WWTP ~ improvements. Money has been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction of an ultraviolet (UV) disinfection system which will replace these existing systems. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. r 60 s 3. Funding is recommended during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction of an additional biosolids digester. Since the start-up of the new activated sludge treatment system in 2007, the W WTP has been experiencing difficulty in the operation of the existing biosolids digesters. Analysis indicates the existing digesters are at the limits of their capability to handle additional biosolids generated by the new activated sludge treatment system. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to s fund the construction of this project. Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 1. It is recommended that money be budgeted and allocated for flood mitigation work along Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2008. The proposed work is comprised of multiple individual projects that allow funding to be spread out over the next 20-30 years. ~ The city will prioritize those projects that have the most significant benefit from either a life safety or property damage mitigation perspective and are within the incorporated city limits. Projects that provide multiple benefits and allow the city to leverage funding with private developers or other agencies such as the Denver Regional Council of ~ Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funding will also be prioritized. One of these projects is envisioned to be a new culvert and pedestrian underpass at the Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railroad and Boulder White Rocks Ditch just upstream of Foothills Parkway on Wonderland Creek. The city applied for TIP ~ funding for this project and although the project did not make the first funding cut it is r still possible the city will receive matching funds. All projects will be closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Division. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. 2. The South Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study is complete and has been submitted to FEMA for review. The mapping study results will become the basis for future floodplain management, mitigation planning, regulatory restrictions and flood insurance requirements for the South Boulder Creek corridor. Funding for flood mitigation planning began in 2008 and this work is likely to continue during 2009 and 2010 with construction bond funding anticipated in 201 It is anticipated that the focus of these efforts would be to primarily mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley, where flood impacts ~ were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since occurred. It is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36 Corridor Improvements-Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also pursuing Federal funding for this project. It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2009-2011 to support this work. Land acquisition will be required to support this project. 3. It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2009 to fund the rehabilitation of existing storm sewers and construction of new storm sewers as part of the North Broadway road construction project located between Pine and Iris. The city's Stormwater Master Plan , (2007) identified the N. Broadway corridor for potential storm sewer improvements because there are limited storm sewer facilities in the vicinity. The city's Transportation 61 Division will be constructing the road improvements with concrete paving which has an estimated 40-year design life. Utilities is coordinating with Transportation to ensure that new storm sewer infrastructure is included as part of the road construction project. Money has been allocated to fund a major section of storm sewer to be located in Broadway, as well as numerous inlet structures and water quality devices to be located on the side streets along the corridor. 4. It is recommended that money be allocated in 2011 for the proposed redevelopment associated with the Boulder Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP). The 160-acre Transit Village area is located northeast of the recently developed Twenty Ninth Street. The azea is bounded by Pear] Street and 30th Street on the south and west respectively, and by " Valmont Road and Foothills Parkway on the north and east respectively. The Transit Village area will be a hub for new regional bus rapid transit and commuter rail services, as well as commercial and residential development within walking distance of the Goose Creek Drainageway and local shopping centers. The TVAP vision will be carried out by the City, private property owners, and RTD. City staff recently completed an analysis to W identify the stormwater infrastructure which would be required to meet water quality and detention requirements identified in the city's Design and Construction Standazds (DCS) for the area's redevelopment. City staff is currently working to develop a funding mechanism (i.e.: development district) to provide up-front money for regional stormwater facilities. It is intended that the Utility Fund would recoup its investment as the redevelopment occurred. For this reason bond money is allocated in 2011 and is .e intended to coincide with bond funding associated with the South Boulder Creek flood _ mitigation project. FINANCING Each of the city's utility funds is established as a separate enterprise fund designed to finance and account for each utility's facilities and services. Funding for the Utilities Division capital improvement program is derived primarily from monthly utility fees. In addition to the monthly utility fees, significant revenue sources include Plant Investment Fees (PIFs), from new development or redevelopment and hydroelectric sales to Xcel Energy. Sales from monthly utility fees are variable and reflect the overall growth of the service area and yearly weather fluctuations. Other revenue sources include reimbursements from the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District (for stormwater/flood management projects), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) state and federal grants, and revolving loans from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (none anticipated at this time). These revenues aze project specific and are highly variable depending on the external agency's funding situation and priorities. ~ Currently, the following projects are anticipated to qualify for such revenues: ~ • Stormwater and Flood Management - Elmer's Two-mile Creek • Stormwater and Flood Management - Preflood Acquisition ~ • Stormwater and Flood Management -Wonderland Creek • Stormwater and Flood Management - Fourmile Canyon Creek .r ' 62 r If the above mentioned funds are insufficient, projects will be funded by issuing revenue bonds with the debt service financed by general utility charges. For the years 2009-2014, it is anticipated that new bonds will be issued for the following projects: Water: • Betasso Water Treatment Plant Improvements ($9.2 million, 2014) e • NCWCD Conveyance -Source Water Protection (Carter Lake Pipeline) ($26.8 million, 2014) Wastewater: ~ • Biosolids Digester Improvements ($7.8 million, 2010) • Ultraviolet Disinfection System ($4.4 million, 2010) Stormwater/Flood Management: • South Boulder Creek Floodplain Improvements ($3 million, 2011) • Boulder Transit Village ($1.5 million, 2011) R Construction Cost Inflation ~ Construction cost inflation is tracked using the Engineering News Record (ENR) Cost Index for Denver and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Colorado Construction Cost Index. The ENR index is a composite index based on costs for: 1) ?ocal portland cement, 2) local 2x4 lumber, 3) national structural steel, and 4) local union wages plus fringes for carpenters, bricklayers and iron workers. The CDOT index is a composite index based on costs for 1) unclassified excavation, 2) hot bituminous pavement 3) concrete pavement, 4) structural steel and 5) reinforcing steel. The ENR index indicates construction costs have increased 21 percent during the past five years; the CDOT index indicates an increase of over 80 percent during the same period of time. These cost increases are significantly greater than the 25 year average 3 percent construction cost inflation rate based on the ENR index (comparable data for the CDOT index is not available) and have had a dramatic affect on the ability of the city to accomplish needed project work. ~ The ENR index is more retective of equipment and building construction such as at the treatment plants. The Colorado cost index is more reflective of heavy civil construction such as roadway and major drainageway work. Construction cost inflation has a dramatic affect on the cost of future project work and has been accounted for in the cost of future projects under the assumption of a future 3 percent yearly construction cost inflation rate. ~ 63 r s r w Cummutetlve Percent Change In ENR Cost Intlex for Denver a 2500% _ 1 w I~ 21.13% 20.00% ~ ] 02% a O 15 00% x. ~ I 3 r• u € taoo% ~ e a w s]1% 5.00% r o Do% ' zaoz zoo3 zaa zoos zoos zoo] r.ar r r w Cummulative Percent Change in CDOT Coloratlo Construction Lost Index m tb oo% _ _ - ea oa% ]a.oo% g ea.oo% a ~ 5000% +a E r ~ 40 DO% # i 00 DO% ~ za oo% m oo% 11 s3~. r es% a oo% 2002 2003 2004 zW5 200P 200] w Year 4 rr 64 r RELATIONSHIP TO THE OPERATING BUDGET Utilities Division staff will complete the evaluation of the proposed CIP on rates in conjunction with the development of the 2009 operating budget. The large expenditures associated with the CIP aze a major factor that leads to staff recommended rate increases in the future. Various rate increase scenarios are being evaluated as part of the development of the 2009 operating budget in accordance with the city's business plan methodology. For the staff recommended action plan, the associated rate increases are currently projected as follows: • Water Utility: 2009 - 8 percent R • Wastewater Utility: 2009 - 5 percent • Stormwater and Flood Management Utility: 2009 - 3 percent A The proposed increases would increase the annual utility bill for a typical residential customer by about $42.00 or $3.50 per month. Revenue Considerations w The city implemented a new water rate structure that uses water budgets in calculating monthly s water bills in January 2007. In February 2008, a study session was held with council to review the first year of the new rate structure and to discuss additional changes to how water budgets are established. Adjustments to wastewater billing for the Commercial/Industrial/Institutional customers are also being implemented as part of these changes, such that assessing wastewater charges for water that is used for outdoor irrigation will be minimized. These changes are effective with the June 2008 utility bills and are anticipated to result in a reduction to the water and wastewater utilities' revenue base. It was projected that these changes could result in a potential ongoing revenue reduction of $1.27 million to the water fund and $197,000 to the wastewater fund. These estimates have been incorporated into the fund financials and influences ~ the proposed 2009 revenue increases. The new rate structure and the 2008 changes will provide a bit of uncertainty as to water revenue projections for the next several years. Revenue forecasts have been made with the best available information and staff will continue to monitor and ~ evaluate 2008 actual revenues on a monthly basis. s BUSINESS PLAN The business plan is intended to be a link between the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP), master plans/strategic plans, subcommunity and area plans, and annual budgets. Master ,.e and strategic plans are developed consistent with the policies, plans, and population and e employment projections outlined in the BVCP. They provide a common city framework for planning the delivery and funding of services, facilities, and programs. The facility and service priorities and funding plan strategies established through the master and strategic planning process provide the basis for operational budgeting and capital improvement programming. Master Planning is an element of the decision making process for proposed CIP projects. Historically, master plans focused on service area growth and its impact on related utility infrastructure needs. At this point in time, growth is not as important an issue as the need to rehabilitate and address deficiencies in the existing infrastructure. Identification of these issues occurs on an on-going basis and is documented in the Utilities Division Annual Reports as well as on-going studies and reports. 65 r w w Master plan summaries aze provided in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan and were recently updated. At this point in time existing master plans provide an adequate basis from which to formulate the CIP in conjunction with other information. The Treated Water Master Plan was updated in 2000 and Wastewater Collection System Master Plan in 2003. An update to the Wastewater Treatment Master Plan was completed in 2007. The Comprehensive Flood and Stonnwater (CFS) Master Plan was updated in 2004 and the Stormwater Master Plan was completed in 2007. The relationship of each CIP project to the master plans and studies is presented in the detailed project descriptions. An update to Source Water Master Plan and the Wastewater Utility Master Plan are anticipated to be completed in 2008. The Utilities Division will update these master plans consistent with the city's Business Plan over the next several yeazs. The Business Plan calls for a separate master plan for each of the Utilities Division three restricted funds. Recent changes to the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan including land use designations are not extensive and so no major changes to existing Utilities Division master plans are required. Aspects that are more important to the Utilities Division CIP planning include the rate of deterioration of existing infrastructure as well as changes in water related regulations and W. technologies. The city's business plan methodology calls for the formulation of the following scenarios: 1. Fiscally Constrained Plan r 2. Action Plan 3. Vision Plan ,r The staff proposed CIP included in this submittal is consistent with the Action Plan scenario. ADVISORY BOARD ACTION The preliminary CIP was discussed at the Water Resource Advisory Board (WRAB) on May 19, 2008. WRAB was concerned about the magnitude of rate increases that might be needed to . support the preliminary work program formulated by staff. v Staff has made significant modifications to the proposed work program (action plan) and has also formulated alternative scenarios for consideration. A public hearing with the WRAB is scheduled for July 7, 2008 and staff will request that WRAB review the proposed 2009-2014 CIP work program and provide a board recommendation on the proposed plan. 66 Background Information 3.TheWindyGapProject The city gets its water from the Boulder Creek Basin The Windy Gap Project delivers western slope water and from the western slope though the Colorado-Big to municipal and industrial water users on the east Thompson (CBT) Project and Windy Gap Project. slope through CBT facilities. The city has an allot- Flows in the watershed basins supplying each source ment contract for 37 units out of a total of 480 units are highly variable from year to year. Because of this, in the project. These units, when used in conjunc- ` the amount of water derived from each of Boulder's tion with storage space in Boulder and Barker ~ water sources and delivered into the municipal sys- Reservoirs and "borrowing" of GBT water, can deliv- tem also varies. er up to 3700 acre-feet per year. Unlike much of the rest of Boulder's water, the Windy Gap water is fully E I. Boulder (reek Basin Water Rights consumable, meaning that the return flows (waste- The city's water rights in the Boulder Creek Basin water effluent and lawn watering runoff) from this source can be reused either for exchange back into include direct use and storage rights on both Middle Boulder's water system or by leasing to other down- ~ and North Boulder Creek and exchange rights. The stream users. city's exchange rights allows the city to release water into lower Boulder Creek near 75th Street from Boulder and Baseline Reservoirs in exchange for Boulder's water supply system includes many storage, increased diversion at the city's direct use and stor- conveyance, hydroelectric and treatment facilities. age poirrts on Middle and North Boulder Creeks. Most of the city's water rights are absolute. The city The city owns approximately 7,200 acre-feet of reser- also has several conditional rights that are being voir storage space in the North Boulder Creek water- developed for future use. shed, 11,686 acre-feet of storage in Barker Reservoir on Middle Boulder Creek, and 8,500 AF in Boulder Z. The Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) Project Reservoirs. Boulder's two water treatment facilities are the Betasso plant, with approximately 45 rnillion gal- Boulder receives western slope water at Boulder lons per day (MGD) of treatment capacity and the ~ Reservoir from the CBT Project facilities. The city ` utilities own 21,015 CBT units out of a total of rrr 310,000 units in the pro- d' ~ jest. At present, CBT deliv- ~.r-a.. edes to Boulder can only be made from April i. through October of each ~ `u~eoowar ~ year due to winter operat- ing limitations on canals. Boulder uses CBT water for waw direct treatment at the Boulder Reservoir Water rrswsr Treatment Plant, either diverted duectly from the ~ ~ Boulder Feeder Canal or ~'r Mow ~ L~ pumped out of Boulder f wr~ar Reservoir, and as a source e of exchange water to increase water deliveries to .~-wiw1~~ the Betasso Water ~aar?r~oauoaw ~ Treatment Plant. 67 ~ F Boulder Reservoir plant at about 16 MGD. a storage tank at each of the treatment The city operates eight hydroelectric plants plants. located within the municipal water supply system. Four of these hydro plants aze Due to the geographic location of Boulder, located on raw water pipelines, and four the Water Utility serves low areas adjacent aze on treated water transmission pipelines. to Boulder Creek in the eastern section to Electricity generated at these plants is sold high azeas against the mountains in the to Xcel Energy. western section. To adequately serve this wide variation in ground elevation, the water distribution system is divided into 4. Treated Water Facilities three pressure zone areas. The treated water facilities include the There aze seven pressure-regulating water treatment plants, reservoirs, pump stations in the system that regulate pressure stations, hydroelectric facilities, pressure and flow between pressure zones or into ' reducing station and the transmission/ storage reservoirs. There aze four booster distribution lines (water mains). pumping stations in the system, as well as a pumping station at the Boulder Reservoir The city operates six covered storage Water Treatment Plant. These booster tanks, ranging in capacity from 2.0 million pumping stations are able to pump water gallons (MG) to 9.5 MG, with a total from a lower elevation pressure zone into a r storage capacity of 38.9 MG. There is also higher elevation pressure zone. .r r A. r s s r 68 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund z9-Jun-oa 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades Broadway Storm Sewer 550,000 0 0 0 0 0 550,000 Fourtnile Canyon Creek 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 ],500,000 South Boulder Creek 300,000 300,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 3,600,000 Stortnwater Quality Improvements 50,000 53,045 54,636 56,275 57,964 59,703 331,623 Transportation Coordination 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 Tributary Greenways Program - Stormwater & Flood 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Wonderland Creek 250,000 250,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Upper Goose Creek Drainage 0 100,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,100,000 Total: 1,800,000 1,353,045 4,704,636 1,706,275 1,707,964 1,709,703 12,981,623 a Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Storm Sewer Rehabilitation 50,000 53,045 109,273 112,551 173,891 179,108 677,868 Total: 50,000 53,045 109,273 112,551 173,891 179,108 677,868 New Construction -Not Growth Related PreFlood Property Acquisition 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0 2,000,000 Boulder Transit Village Stormwater Improvements 0 152,982 1,529,818 0 0 0 1,682,800 Total: 500,000 652,982 2,029,818 500,000 0 0 3,682,800 Total for Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund 2,350,000 2,059,072 6,843,727 2,318,826 1,881,855 1,888,811 17,342,291 e ~ s ~ I i 1 t 1 R ? # e 1 ~ 9 1 I 1 t ~ r ? ~ € a t ~ i t r i r i r t r t t t t e" i i t t t r t r r t r r r~ r r i r i r t r i sns/zoo5 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 r_ r Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund Essen4lai Destrable Discretionary Total Pro/act ryptJName Protect X Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Exlsting Facility- Enhancements / Upgratles Broadway Storm Sewer 431013 $0 $550,000 100% $0 $550,000 100% Fourmile Canyon Creek 431729 $0 $250,000 100% $0 $250,000 100% South Boulder Creek 431202 $0 $300,000 100% $0 $300,000 100°h Stormwater Duality Improvements 431775 $0 $50,000 100 % $0 $50,000 100% Transportation Coordination 431780 $0 $250,000 100% $0 $250,000 100% Tributary Greenways Program • Stormwater & Flood 431630 $0 $150,000 100°h $0 $150,000 100% Wonderland Creek 421003 $0 $250,000 100% $0 $250,000 100°h Exlsting Faellhy -Rehab /Repair / Deficiency Correction Storm Sewer Rehabilitation $50,000 100% $0 $0 $50 000 100 New Construction - NOt Growth Related ~ Preflood Property Acquishion 431822 $0 $500 000 100 % $0 $500 000 100% Total for Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund: $50,000 2% $2,300,000 98% $0 0°k 52,350,000 100 r City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 PW/ Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Left Haoy 4~ x C•~k er O~ep s Sixmile ~ t' ~ aE ~ r ~ .S:A i .rn'.~i: ~ 18: Founnile Canyon Creek improvements n - Jo K a~ Q°J~~'~68: ~ HOC ~ n,. o<`, ~ ~ i~ 5 ~ r.. vc: ~ L k ~ ,,,0x ~ ulder Boulde s ~ ~ s,~~ Jay Rd Bo Greek U. ?__...-,-r....,, 18: Broadway Storm Saver ~4 ~ ~ 12 Wonderland Creek 'ae 14: Upper Goose Cree&= ~x . . 3: r" . l'lrainage Improvements' y '~fi ~ ~ ~ ,n . m. r ~ T x~ o n ~ G ~ - f a BOU ' ` ` ~ p, ~ Ara ahoe Rd. N Y' S A'a a~ o ~ ~ e _j~x + a m`C 4. ~ ~ x t 'm Ofd `1-: _ O~ ~ fJ h m. G: reek r :mss: ~ i a.~ ~i~~'- xhx~ ~ ~ ` ~ S Boulder R sear I~Ya~^~~6``if,~t 1~Otlir~~ .,t'= tit Im .CrCa~YO ~'J' Eita9lkJfrrlBrltS ~ . eat- n t~ ~fi" ~.aear 2nyo ~`cjSa~g.+ -a _.i~ C ~7Rek f wV,~'~ w Le end 8 Year of Protect ~zo~o-zoia ~zooe ~~J =zoiazoia yo ~zow ~ x~ a " 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Broadway Stonn Sewer 431013 18 Departrnent: PW/ stormwater and Flood Manage subeommunity: North Boulder Funding source: stormwater 8 Flood Management Utility Fund svcPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA r It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2009 to fund the rehabilitation of existing storm sewers and construction of new storm sewers as part of the North Broadway road construction project located between Pine and Iris. The citys stormwater Master Plan (2007) identified the N. Broadway corridor for potential storm sewer improvements because there are limited storm sewer fadlities in the vicinity. The citys Transportation Division will be constructing the road improvements with concrete paving which has an estimated 40-year design life. Utilities is coordinating with Transportation to ensure that new storm sewer infrastructure is included as part of the road constriction project. Money has been allocated to fund a major section of storm sewer to be located in Broadway, as well as numerous inlet structures and water quality devices to be located on the side streets along the corridor. r. The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Rehabilitation of the city's existing storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that avoids street flooding and damage to property. This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the stormwater y Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. Transportation Division Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding increased in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget " Source of Funding: r Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% a 72 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Boulder Transit Village Stormwater Improvements ^:=:zc.. ..,car ~e' mxe '~~•xv~-e::.m::: cr ~ :+'-e:..:ii b. .'n®w~c.emm. Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage subcommunity. Crossroads Funding source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund evcPArea: Area I ~ Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: w rr i TThis project provides funding for stormwater improvements in the Boulder Transit Village area. The improvement cost would be reimbursed by redevelop that is anticipated to occur in this area over the next several decades. It is recommended that money be allocated in 2011 for the proposed redevelopment associated with the Boulder Trensit Village Area Plan (NAP). The 160-acre Transit Village area is located northeast of the recently developed Twenty Ninth Street. The area is lwunded by Pearl Street and 30th Street on the south and west R respectively, and by Valmont Road and Foothills Parkway on the north and east respectively. The Transit Village °1 area will be a hub for new regional bus rapid transit and commuter rail services, as well as commercial and residential development within walking distance of the Goose Creek Drainageway and local shopping centers. w, The NAP vision will be carried out by the City, private property owners, and RTD. City staff recently completed an analysis to identify the stormwater infrastructure which would be required to meet water quality and detention requirements identified in the citys Design and Construction Standards (DCS) for the area's redevelopment. City staff is currently working to develop a funding mechanism (ie: development district) to provide up-front money for ~ regional stormwater facilities. It is intended that the Utility would recoup its investment as the redevelopment occurred. For this reason bond money is allocated in 2011 and is intended to coincide with bond funding associated with the South Boulder Creek flood mitigation project. s The project supports the redevelopment of the Boulder Transit Village area. None as The city's Long Range Planning Department is taking the lead on the public process. .r Planning and Transportation ~ Capital Funding Plan r° 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $0 $152,982 $1,529,818 $0 $0 $0 $1,682,800 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: r E ~ Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 73 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Fourmile Canyon Creek 431729 16 Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subeommuniry: North Boulder Funding source: Stormwater 8 Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPArea: System-wide Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CFJ1P Required: Y0S CEAP Completed: NO r This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Fourmile Canyon Creek. The revised flood mapping studies for Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are complete. These were accepted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in March 2007. Analysis of various Flood mitigation alternatives has been completed by Love 8 Associates under a contract with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD). The analysis report provides information about various flood mitigation approaches. Flood mitigation recommendations are provided by Love & Associates and are being reviewed by city staff. The next step is to develop a draft proposed flood mitigation plan and CEAP. „ It is recommended that money be budgeted and allocated for flood mitigation work along Fourmile Canyon Creek. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2008. All projects are being closely coordinated with the citys Greenways Program and Transportation Division. The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project. This project was recommended by the Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Study, the Greenways Master Plan and is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. The CEAP and associated public process will be initiated in 2007. This project relates to the Citys Greenways Program and Transportation Program. Caplhl Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2014 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: .r ESSential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary TOtal % 100% 74 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report w Preflood Properly Acquisition 431622 _W R Department: PW/ stormwater and Flood Manage subeommunity: System-wide Funding source: stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPaea: System-wide Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ar a. This project provides funds for the purchase of properties in areas prone to Flooding especially the citys high hazard regulatory area. Properties have been identified and prioritized along each of the city's major w drainageways. Property owners have been contacted regarding the citys interest. The majority of properties in the high hazard flood zone are along Boulder Creek, Goose Creek and Fourmile Canyon Creek. ~ G a The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project. - - - ' - This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the _ Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. - Property owners have been contacted regarding the city's interest in purchasing. This project relates to the citys Greenways Program and Transportation Program. ~ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 w Change from Prior Year: r Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Souree of Funding: " aw Essential % ~ Desirable °h 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r °r .R 75 ar r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report .r South Boulder Creek 431202 15 Department: PW/Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunity. Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Stormwater 8 Flood Management Utility Fund evcPaea: System-wide Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: No r This project will provide funds for on-going studies and possible flood mitigation work along South Boulder Creek. This project will identify and mitigate flood hazards in the South Boulder Creek floodplain. The flood mapping study is complete and will be submitted to FEMA. The mapping study results will become the basis for future floodplain management, mitigation planning, regulatory restrictions and Flood insurance requirements for the South Boulder Creek corcidor. Funding for flood mitigation planning began in 2008 and this work is likely to continue during 2009 and 2010 with construction bond funding anticipated in 2011. It is anticipated that the focus of these efforts would be to primarily mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley, where flood impacts were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since occurred. It is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36 Corridor Improvements-Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also pursuing Federal funding for this project. It is recommended that money be budgeted in 2009-2011 to support this work. r. This project will identify and mitigate flood hazards in the South Boulder Creek floodplain and serve to help meet ` the citys environmental, economic and social sustainability goals. This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and Flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. Evaluation of South Boulder Creek flood issues and associated public process is on-going. Planning Department, Boulder County, University of Colorado, Open Space Department CaplWl Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $300,000 $300,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,600,000 Change from Prior Year: Construction funding delayed until 2011 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: r Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total °h 100% r 76 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program - Project Status Report F Storm Sewer Rehabilitation _ Department: PWI Stormwater and Flood Manage subcommunity. Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund avcPNea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab / Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA The project provides funds for the rehabilitation of existing storm sewers. Rehabilitation of the citys existing storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that avoids street flooding and damage to property. e....... ~,~~k`p~_~.ve ~ c' g ~ ~:~t'i S*,bk. A 1 hm:1-. h'~4, This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater Master Plan _ _ „ ~ _.°_=i. s^ ~._r„ter '.fi,%«F ..~h,,.,:',~Ma Y -c ~x~.:'.._m.e...~ _ :'~.s3 , ~i5...=':~.s ~ rue's; No additional public process is anticipated. Transporation Division Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $50,000 $53,045 $109,273 $112,551 $173,891 $179,108 $677,868 Vn } Change from Prior Year: Funding increased and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 R Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: ~r r¦ Essential % 100% Desirable °h ~ Discretionary Total % 100% ~ r r r 77 a., 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Stormwater Quality Improvements 431775 Department: PW/Stormwater and Flood Manage subeommuntty. System-wide Funding source: Stormwater 8 Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPArea: System-wide _ Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project will fund Stormwater quality projects as identified in the Stormwater Master Plan. This project will improve water quality in Boulder Creek and it's tributaries. The project will help ensure that water quality in Boulder Creek and it's tributaries is maintain and enhanced and serves to help the city meet it's environmental sustainability goals. This project is consistent with the goals of the Stormwater and Flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. ,w None ~ Capital Funding Pian 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $50,000 $53,045 $54,636 $56,275 $57,964 $59,703 $331,623 Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2014 and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs, $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary %O Total % 100% 78 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report y„ v _ _ Transportation Coordination 431780 - Department: pW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage subcommunity. System-wide Funding source: Storrnwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvCPArea: System-wide ~ Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades r. CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA R "ter-"'"a~m~, i:--r'~ ~~~-z:~ m _ s-..-~ ~ i ~ This project will fund the reconstruction of existing storm sewers, the construction of new storm sewers and water quality improvements as part of on-going Transportation Division improvement projects. --~N ~ ~ ~ ~~r~,~ ~ • The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys existing storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that ~ avoids street flooding and damage to property. This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the ¦ Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater Master Plan. ; No additional public process is anticipated. Y~ ` P#t 4C ~ i e'r`r- ~ t'v_'s' '4S~i%Ym ssa g~^u~iFfid . ~ Coordination with the Citys Transportation Division Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000. $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 s Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100°k Discretionary Total % 100% r s r` 79 ~ s 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Tributary Greenways Program - stormwater 8 Flood 431630 Department: PW/ stormwater and Flood Manage subcommunity. System-wide Funding source: Stonnwater & Flood Management Utility Fund avcPaea: System-wide Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA r The program is intended to improve and protect the many riparian corridors that pass through the city. Improvements include pedestrian/bicycle paths, drainage and flood control structures, and preservation and enhancement of natural features. A portion of the capital funding for this program was shifted to needed maintenance of existing system beginning in 2002. See Greenways CIP/Budget section. Project funding is ongoing. This project represents the Utilities Division contribution to the program. Greenways projects integrate many goals including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage and Flood management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists and protection of recreation and cultural resources. ,r This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. No additional public process is anticipated. r The Greenways Program is coordinated with parks, utilfties, planning, OSMP Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding - $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r r r 80 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program - Project Status Report _ a Upper Goose Creek Drainage 431459 14 _ Department: PW/Stormwater and Flood Manage subeommunity. Central Boulder " Funding source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund BvcPnrea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ` ¦ p"°' _ Fix=.~y ~'m~i~~g i This project will fund the construction of a drainage improvements in the Upper Goose Creek drainage between Broadway and 19th Street. Gity staff has observed localized flooding in this area. The scope and need for this w project has been confirmed by the recently completed Stormwater Master Plan. r The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Rehabilitation and improvement of v the citys existing storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that avoids street flooding and damage to property. This project is consistent with the goals of the sormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004 and the Stormwater Master Plan, u y ~ "a:ffi i No additional public process is anticipated. ~ ~~~':h Coordination with the Citys Transportation Division ~r, o~~.-, ~ro,~rc,w~ ~:~:~,;r Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding - $0 $100,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,100,000 ~ m. .r Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Totat % 100% R R s I 4. 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program ' Project Status Report r. Wonderland Creek 421003 12 Department: PW/ Stormwater and Flood Manage Subcommunlly: Multiple Subcommunities Fuming source: Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund avcPaea: Areas I & II r Proiectrype: Existing Facility- Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: YeS CEAP Completed: NO - . ~ - a u ~ ~rS G .o-N,Rvi ~E jj((~y~yS~S~°++~ieu. r ~ ,e vi'~'kw„a3'.x., .9vY6~:%%5d? 'Y.tt2~#.''a' This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Wonderland Creek. The revised flood mapping studies for Fourrnile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are complete. These were accepted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in March 2007. Analysis of various flood mitigation alternatives has been completed by Love 8 Associates under a contract with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD). The analysis report provides information about various flood mitigation approaches. Flood mitigation recommendations are provided by Love 8 Associates and are being reviewed by city staff. The next step is to develop a draft proposed flood mitigation plan. It is recommended that money be budgeted and allocated for flood mitigation work along Wonderland Creek. The flood mitigation planning process is nearing an end and a decision regarding the flood mitigation approach for these two streams should be made by city council in 2008. All projects are being closely coordinated with the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Division. The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project. h This project was recommended by the Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Study, the Greenways Master Plan and is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004. The CEAP and associated public process will lie initiated in 2007. This project relates to the City's Greenways Program and Tranportation Program Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2014 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: r a. Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 82 ATTACHMENT D-3 The Wastewater Utility Fund Overview is included in the Utilities Overview located in the front 1- of the Stormwater & Flood Management section. r r r w a w w 83 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Wastewater Utility Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation 100,000 106,090 109,273 112,551 115.927 119.405 663,246 Sanitary Sewu Rehabilitation 750,000 795,675 819,545 844,132 869,456 895.539 4,974,347 WWTP Cogeneration 200,000 0 0 125,000 0 0 325,000 WWTP Digester Complex 50.000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 WWTP Headworks 300,000 0 0 0 0 1,515,205 1,815,205 WWTP Secondary Clarifiers 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 Marshall Landfill 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 WWTP Instmmentatioo/Convol 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 Collection System Monitoring 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 150,000 ~ WWTP Pumps 0 0 150,000 0 0 150,000 300,000 A WW7P Digestu Cleaning 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 150,000 WWTP Primary Clarifiers 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 300,OW W WTP Activated Sludge 0 0 0 0 60,000 0 60,000 WWTP Electrical 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 200,000 Total: 1,600,000 1,076,765 1,228,818 1,531,683 1,145,383 2,780,149 9,362,798 New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions WWTP Biosolids Digester 781,883 7,818,833 0 0 0 0 8,600,716 IBM Pump Station 0 0 56,275 562,754 0 0 619,029 Total: 781,883 7,818,833 56,275 562,754 0 0 9,219,745 New Construction -Not Growth Related WWTP Permit Improvements 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 400,000 t~ a! ~ 1!~ i 1 t t r t! i i i 6 1 1! i i i i 1 i i i i~ f i i 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Wastewater Utility Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total: 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 400,000 ReconstruMion WWTP UV Disinfection 443,456 4,434,562 0 0 0 0 4,878,018 Total: 443,456 4,434,562 0 0 0 0 4,878,018 Total for Wastewater Utility Fund 2,825,339 13,330,160 1,285,093 2,094,437 1,345,383 2,980,149 23,860,561 00 U srzs/2oo6 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 W83teWater Utlllty Fund Essential Desirable Discretionary ~ Total Pro/ect Type/Name Pra/ect k Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility-Rehab /Repair / Deficiency Conecdon Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation 421454 $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 421002 $750,000 100% $0 $0 $750,000 100°h WWTP Cogeneration 421329 $200,000 100% $0 $0 $200,000 100°k WWTP Digester Complex 421360 $50,000 100% $0 $0 $50,000 100% WWTP Headworks 421003 $300,000 100% $0 $0 $300,000 100% WWTP Secondary Clar'rfiers 421006 $200,000 100 % $0 $0 $200,000 100% New Construction -Growth Related Facility / Adtlitions WWTP Biosolids Digester 421671 $781,883 100°/ $0 $0 $781,883 100% Reconstruction WWTP UV Disinfection $443,456 100°k $0 $0 $443,456 100% 00 rn Total for Wastewater Utlllty Fund: 52,825,339 100% SO 0% SO 0% 52,825,339 100% r ! ? 1 e 1 0 ! [ ! f w f # t l ~ ~ ! ! li # R # ~ ~ ! ¦ ~ # e +1 [ ! r i f t City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 - PW/Wastewater Utility - - 20: IBM Pump Station ~ I€,€; ~v i i i i '1 I~I{~ E d I p':' ,N t ~ ~ s s ~y a' c'° E v i::. ~ ~ m ~ Jay Rd ' s 21: W W rP Pumps ~ , x 22: WWTP 8iosolids Digester: ~~rk~Gv 23: WWl'P Fermlt improvements ~ 4 ~ 24: YWY(P Qigester Cteanjng tq + r. 25: WWTP cogeneration, - 26: VWVFP InsirurimentatknlControl ' a>, ~ 27: \NV1fTP Headuvaks ~ 1 ,q, - . ~ ~ 28:~kV41Ff P Electrical 29`.VWV1`P Sec4ndarl+,Claft~ers `~1: ViN~t°P Biosolkls Hend~ing & [>ewatering „ . € ` '32: W W'rP Activated ti7ge ce Rd. vF ~ ~ ~~WW 34. uV1IVFP Primary Ciaritfeks . NN~~g>~:~} d4 ~w,~,~ EI'~~ a t v~ k a 7 ~ ty SJ2 S k~, ~ vI Bt~4E3 ?f # ~ S °:~s t5~~ ~ ~ .~~~:_F S Boulder R ~ ..~a~ vat ~ x-- ~5t,"! I "r 'tr1 ' ~ 'dtim ~ c ~ q ~ t v. P~ ~ i ,I ~ ~ ~y Legend ' . ' 30: Marshall Landfill Year of Project stl€ ~ ~ .201P2014 "r ~ 2009 =20102074 ~ ~ 2009 X20/02014 87 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report :_m . : Collection System Monitoring 421450 Department: pW/Wastewater Utility subcommunity: System-wide Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund evCPArea: System-wide ~ Protect type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction ~ CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project provides funds for monitoring of the Citys wastewater collection system. This will be accomplished by using temporary flow measuring devices placed in selected manholes. s e -i::;ess PY "aid#~'~tF$...w.u`~a~.kEi;~u:e ~ Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater freatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and a~ wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. !tefrRnsh " ~ Plms. '°x~°a . ~ ~ - ~ a ~ This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. ~ ~"ea= ;g - ~xx~~sa ~yx ~2;;;' ~'S ' x%s'~~':ly,t I _ -,s No additional public process is anticipated. None ¦s CaplWl Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding , $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 ~ . a. a.. .:M : ..may. ~::::::a~n Change from Prior Year: ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable °h ~ D'ISCretlonary Total % 100% ~ r 88 ~ s. 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report IBM Pump Station 421521 20 Department: PW/Wastewater Utility subcommunlty: Gunbarrel Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund svcPnrea: Area I Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: r This project provides funding to expand the capacity of the IBM pump station to accommodate growth in the Gunbarrel area. This project is needed to accommodate growth in the Gunbarrel area consistent with the BVCP. None No additional public process is anticipated. ~~fl None Capital Funding Plan .m 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $56.275 $562,754 $0 $0 $619,029 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: To be determined Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund Essential % 100% Desirable %O Discretionary Total % 100% w ® 89 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Marshall Landfill 30 Department: PW/ Wastewater Utility subeommunity. Area III Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund avCPArea: Area III ~ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction r. CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA S .ter x~i Kcr~~ This project will fund the decommissioning of the Marshall Landfill Treatment Facility. The facility was originally constructed to eliminate groundwater contamination at the original landfill site. The money will be used for landfill ~ cap maintenance and repair and demolition of the groundwater treatment facility. r Based on EPA approval, the groundwater collection system was shut down on Nov. 30, 2004. The treatment plant and collection system equipment will need to be preserved. In addition, there are approximately 180 sampling and monitoring wells located on the site, many of which are no longer used or necessary. Part of the r shutdown process will entail sealing the unnecessary wells in place. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic r infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. This rr project is also necessary in order to comply with a consent decree with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. None r s No additional public process is anticipated. e" a,~r.x.,,,._._____ t None Capital Funding Plan r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 ~ - r Change from Prior Year: ei Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget R Source of Funding: _ ra ~ . Essential % 100% Desirable %O Discretionary Total % 100% 90 ~ a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program „ Project Status Report Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 421002 Department: PW/Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund avcParea: System-wide Protect type: Existing Facility -Rehab / Repair I Deficiency Correction a CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA This project provides for the rehabilitation and improvement to the existing collector sewer piping of the Citys wastewater collection system. Rehabiltation and improvement of the citys wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. ' No additional public process is anticipated. r ~ None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding d. $750,000 $795,675 $819,545 $844,132 $869,456 $895,539 $4,974,347 Change from Prior Year: Funding increased and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% Yr b. r r r 91 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program - Project Status Report Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation ~ 421454 w Department: PW! Wastewater Utility subeommunity: System-wide ` Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund avcPArea: System-wide ~ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CFAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA t iii{ t wsw.ij- ro:~.. - q :i a C . Iii This project provides for the rehabilitation and improvement to the existing wastewater manholes that are part of the citys sewer system. ~ ~ Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and ~ wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. W e'y ~'Y p This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. _ µ{{s ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ ~~1 ~-vas"' la ~ ~ xW~R+~i[ No additional public process is anticipated. m ~ . None e? Capital Funding Plan E: ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $106,090 $109,273 $112,551 $115,927 $119,405 $663,246 ~ Change from Prior Year: Funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ 92 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r W WTP Activated Sludge 421357 32 Department: PW/Wastewater Utility subeommunity: Area III Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund avCPArea: Area II I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ,r This project will fund the rehabilitation of the existing activated sludge facilities at the 75th Street W WTP, specifically the Turblex blowers. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater treatment system is required to assure that wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek. This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. 1. No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% .r 93 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report WWTP Biosolids Digester 421671 22 Department: PW/Wastewater Utility Suluommunity. System-wide ` Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund svCPArea: Area III Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: yes CEAP Completed: NO ~ ~ r. Funding is recommended during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction of an additional biosolids digester. Since the start-up of the new activated sludge treatment system, the W WTP has been ~ experiencing difficulty in the operation of the existing biosolids digesters. Analysis indicates the existing digesters are at the limits of their capability to handle additional biosolids generated by the new activated sludge Vestment system. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater Vestment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and ~ wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. - hps.,iv~ This process will be initiated in 2009. f ~ None - Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $781,883 $7,818,833 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,600,716 Change from Prior Year: Funding increased and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $65,000 Description: O&M costs are anticipated to begin in 2010 Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% w' w 94 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report WWTPCogeneration 421329 25 Department: pW/Wastewater Utility subcommunlty. System-wide Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund svCPMea: Area III Proied Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction r CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA r This project will fund rehabilitation of the cogeneration (generation of electricty and heat from methane gas produced by the anaerobic digesters) facilities at the 75th Street W WTP. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater Vestment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately Vested prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. r No additional public process is anticipated. a. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $200,000 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $325,000 - Change from Prior Year: Funding increased in 2009 - Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r r. 95 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report _ _ _ W W WTP Digester Cleaning 421360 24 Department: PW/Wastewater Utility Subeommunity: Area III Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund BvcPArea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction rr CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA "'~i'fa~~1~~.A'.~`N.~~ ~ vgd rr This project provides for cleaning the biosolids digesters at the 75th Street W WTP. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. ~ r•+r>«s--... +adLx~..,yy~~.~~.~;x..; w~n~ -+.~.n^""" = s a~.x=~ .ai_s ~En~ ~ v ~;m5 , ; ~ This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. ~r . m:c t: _ R: Ci.:G~. °'v::. x 1 'hGi ~~s '^v vy ~ yM ,rg;x_ .~d4. 4%1~+'~dx*Y.~C'fd..Gb4r°~:: No additional public process is anticipated. m.a_~ : : e........r ...m a .:ma :e¢ :m__mern c~__ ,r.....-:r.-'_v_ww~' _~.t. ;a„c:~rv_.::: . . CapMal Funding Plan - 2009 2010 2011 2012. 2013 2014 ~ Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 ~ r< Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: r Essential 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% w R 96 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r W WTP Digester Complex 421360 24 Department: pW/Wastewater Utility subeommunity: System-wide Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund evCPArea: System-wide Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction W. CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA r This project will fund cleaning and rehabilitation of the existing digester complex at the 75th Street W WTP, specifically the digester gas detection system. Environmental and Economic Sustainability -Public Health °r This project is necessary to continue to meet the BVCP urban service standards for public sewer. It is for facility maintenance. No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable °h ~ Discretionary Total % 100% r r r 97 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report WWTP Electrical 421439 28 Department: pW/ Wastewater Utility Subcommunity: System-wide ` Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund svCPArea: System-wide ~ Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab / Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA _ I~~rtiit~lck'~? ~n v~rs~'~~~~~"ax +H ~ ~,k f r This project will fund the rehabilitation of the existing electrical systems at the 75th Street W WTP. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic ~ infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. ~ -S`."'K85„~.1°~: k. ~'`'iS4'~..:sR- r.:~r'frt .t~. °aa=~ ..,z#a n' :a ~r:° This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. ~ No additional public process is anticipated. } ~ dr-an- ,i2," llf![N ~ u.x,.m~.~ M !E w`F I'~ ~ ~,rNS 'ru~~e~~R£~. r. None . Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ; ~ " $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 ~ ~ rr Change from Prior Year: Additional funding in 2014 Annual On-going Operating Costs O ~ Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: ~ Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ °w r °A 98 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report WWTP Headworks 421003 27 'r Department: PWI Wastewater Utility subcommunity: Area III Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund evcPnrea: Area III Protect type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA - r This project will fund the rehabilitation of the headworks facilities at the 75th Street W WTP. Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek. This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. No addkional public process is anticipated. r~ !3d .r None _ .,.ten,.. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,515,205 $1,815,205 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction inflation • Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operaflng budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r 99 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report - WWTP Instrumentation/Control 421437 26 e Department: PW/Wastewater Utility subcommunity. System-wide ` Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund evCPArea: System-wide ~ Project rYPe: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA a..~ qa . Prow,. ,~-•,~-Ys~R ~ ,~{~j~,!X#=.7i ..~.:`TM.'~.~:7~xTd'3a ~ s ~ k.°.i:ti This Project will fund~~t+he rehabilitation of instrumentation/control facilities at the 75th Street W WTP. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys wastewater Vestment system is required to assure that wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek. This fulfills the following business plan funding screen criteria including: 1) Contributes to city's fiscal health and stability 2) Maintains city capital assets and human w resources at adopted standards, 3) Maintains essential services at adopted standards and 4) Contributes to ~ Council's key focus areas. Council goals include a) Affordable Housing , b) Community Sustainability c) Economic Vitality d) Environment and e) Transportation. This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. w No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 ~ Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: s Essential °h 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 100 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report WWTP Permit Improvements 421617 23 Dapanment: pW/ Wastewater Utility subcommunity: Area III Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund avCPArea: Area III Project Type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: YeS CEAP Completed: NO This project will provide funds for the design and construction of new treatment facilities that may be required. It is anticipated the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment will issue a revised discharge permit in 2008 for the citys Wastewater Treatment Plant. The new discharge permit will probably not include more restrictive limits for ammonia and other nitrogen based compounds. Therefore, it is recommended that funding during the 2009-2010 time period for additional treatment improvements be reduced. Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. This process will begin in 2013. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $400,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: To be determined Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r a. r ,o r 101 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report W WTP Primary Clarifiers 421005 34 Department: PW/Wastewater Utility Subeommunlty. Area III ` Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund avcParea: Area III a,, Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction ~ CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA A This project provides for rehabilitation of the primary clarifiers at the 75th Street WWTP. t i= Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. w Ra'g' _a This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the W astewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. - No additional public process is anticipated. nsa£;~ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ; $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 ~ Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs ® ~ r Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: ¦ r Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ 102 e,. a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report WWTP Pumps 411339 21 oepartmenc: pW/Wastewater Utility subeommunity-. Area III Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund svCPnrea: Area III d Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project will fund the rehabilitation of existing pumps at the 75th Street W WTP. Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. r This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. n -_m._ None . Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding escalated for construction cost inflation and added to 2014 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ` Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% w ro r 103 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report WWTP Secondary Clarifiers 421006 29 Department: PW/Wastewater Utility Subeommunity: Area III ` Funding Source: Wastewater Utility Fund svcPMea: Area III Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project provides for rehabilitation of the secondary clarifiers at the 75th Street W WTP. ~,,,N. p YRehabilitaGon and improvement of the citys wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic ~ infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and wastewater is adequately Veated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards. 1r ss men u ~ : - - This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan. ~ .Edv°kk -"st No additional public process is anticipated. rt ;:~aa~t. KG _ None -o-+numv- ~-i'~:::ir .::u xvN ~.r'...v::v.iV :.tos~::t3 CapHal Funding Plan W 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding " $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding increased in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 ~ Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 104 m 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report a. WWTP UV Disinfection 31 " Depanment: PWI Wastewater Utility subcommunlry: Area III „ Funding source: Wastewater Utility Fund avCPMea: Area III Proles type: Reconstruction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: No r This project provides funds for the design and construction of an ultaviolet (UV) disinfection system at the WWTP. Because of funding limitations, the city was not able to replace the existing chorine gas disinfection and sulfur dioxide de-chlorination system as part of the recent W WTP improvements. Money has been budgeted during the 2009-2010 time period for the design and construction of an UV disinfection system which will replace these existing systems. It is anticipated that bonds will need to be issued to fund the construction of this project. i? Chlorine gas and sulfur dioxide are hazardous materials and the UV disinfection system will improve worker safety and provide superior disinfection with no adverse impacts to the environment. - a - This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the ~ Wastewater Treatment Master Plan. r _ . ur No additional public process is anticipated None ~.m,~,„ , n Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $443,456 $4,434,562 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,878,018 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: To be determined Source of Funding: Wastewater Utility Fund .r Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% i M° W r ~ 1~5 W • ATTACHMENT D-4 The Water Utility Fund Overview is included in the Utilities Overview located in the front of the ' Stormwater & Flood Management section. 4 106 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Water Utility Fund 29-Jun-OS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades Automated Meter Reading 500,000 530,450 546,364 562,754 579,637 0 2,719,205 Sunshine Transmission Pipe 200,000 0 0 0 927,419 0 1,127.419 Insveam Flow Structures and Gaging 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Pearl Street HydrdPRV Station 0 0 0 0 24,597 245,975 270,572 Total: 700,000 530,450 596,364 562,754 1,531,653 245,975 4,167,196 Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 618,000 636,540 655,636 675.305 695.564 716,431 3,997,476 Barker Relicensing 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1.000,000 of Betasso WTP 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 922,405 9124,054 10,546,459 Cathodic Protection 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Distribution System Water Quality 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 Island lake Dam ! 08,150 0 0 0 0 0 108,150 Lakewood Pipeline 100,000 100,000 0 1,238.060 0 119,405 1,557,465 Source Water Transmission System Inspections 80,000 0 0 80,000 0 0 160,000 Water System Security Upgrades 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 400,000 Waterline Replacement 2,575,000 2,652,250 3,278,181 3,376,526 3,477,822 3,582,157 18,941,936 Betasso Storage Tank 0 265125 0 0 0 0 265,225 Kossler Reservoir 0 360,706 939,745 0 0 0 1,300,451 NCWCD Conveyance -Boulder Feeder Canal 0 300,235 0 0 0 0 300,235 Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodell to Fourrttile 0 0 546,364 0 0 0 546,364 Chautauqua Storage Tank 0 0 85,779 857,791 0 0 943,570 Watershed Improvements 0 0 317,437 0 0 0 317,437 Grcen lake 2 Dam 0 0 0 0 86,946 0 86,946 Gunbarrel Storage Tank 0 0 0 0 289,619 0 289,819 t 1 f f i i i i i i i i t 6 i i i i i i i i 1 i t t ; t L € i E i tt ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Water Utility Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Barker Dam Outlet 0 0 0 0 0 780,908 780,908 Kohler Storage Tank 0 0 0 0 0 106,653 I W,653 Zone 3 Transmission Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 597,029 597,029 Total: 4,931,150 4,664,956 6,023,142 6,427,682 5,472,556 15,126,637 42,646,123 New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions Boulder Reservoir lotake and Pumping Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Boulder Reservoir WTP 3.090,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 3,390,000 Cherryvale Pump Station 515,000 0 0 0 0 0 515.000 Iris Pump Station 1,030,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,030,000 o°, Total: 4,735,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 5,035,000 New Construction -Not Growth Related Nederalnd Wastewater Treatment Plant 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 NCWCD Conveyance -Carter lake Pipeline 0 0 0 0 2,686,618 2G,8G6.177 29,552,795 Total: 300,000 0 0 0 2,686,618 26,866,177 29,852,795 Total for Water Utility Fund 10,666,150 5,295,406 6,669,506 7,040,436 9,740,827 42,288,789 51,701,114 s/zs/2oo6 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan Zoos Water Utility Fund - - _ ~ - - ~ ~ Essential ~ Desirable ~ Discretionary Total Project TypeMame Protect M Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding j % Exlating Facility • Enhancements /Upgrades Automated Meter Reading 411454 $500,000 100°h $0 $0 $500,000 100% Sunshine Transmission Pipe $200 000 100 % $0 $0 $200 000 100 Exlating Facility -Rehab /Repair / Detlelency Correc0on Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 411106 $618,000 100% $0 $0 $618,000 100% Barker Relicensing 411112 $1,000,000 100% $0 $0 $1,000,000 100% Betess0 WTP 411947 $100,000 100°h $0 $0 $100,000 100°k Cathodic Protection $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% Distribution System Water Quality 411425 $150,000 100% $0 $0 $150,000 100% Island Lake Dam $108,150 100% $0 $0 $108,150 100% Lakewood Pipeline 411780 $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% Source Water Transmission System Inspections $80,000 100% $0 $0 $80,000 100°h c Water System Security Upgrades 411440 $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% ~ Waterline Replacement 411389 $2,575,000 100% $0 $0 $2,575,000 100% New Construction -Growth Related Facility/ Additions Boulder Reservoir Intake and Pumping Improvements 411655 $100,000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100% Boulder Reservoir WTP 411852 $3,090,000 100% $0 $0 $3,090,000 100°k Cherryvale Pump Station 411010 $515,000 100% $0 $0 $515,000 100% Iris Pump Station 411012 $1,030,000 100% $0 $0 $1,030,000 100°k Naw Construction -Not Growth Related Nederalnd Wastewater Treatment Plant $0 $300 000 100 % $0 $300 000 100 Total for Water Utility Fund: $10,366,150 87% $300,000 3% SO 0°k 570,666,750 100% t 4 ~ 1 r l : # r # f ~ 1 # ~ ~ ~ ! e 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 [ ! ~ ~ ! f! ! ! ! ! ! 7 + City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 - PW/Water Utility 5ti: NCWCD Conveyance - Boudier Feeder Canal . ~ ~ ~ ~F 51: Sadder Reservoir Intake and Pumping Improvements ~ a , ,x? 43: Boulder Reservoir WTP ~ ~ ~ ~ { 45: NCWCD Conveyance -Carter Lake Pipeline ~ < ~ aA i .MNk~,. w t ~ ~ , }3~ E9 O nth ^txt. ]6~' y~ . 53 Gunbarrel Storage Tank ,era _ € ~ +;;I: ~a:, :sS ~,ez a r ~ u;i' ca s's ° i, i ~ ~ ~~f in~ B8iaS5O ._~r,. ~ ~ pEln'~ StatiOR Storge Tank ~ IT Ara ahoe Rd. Pear! Street 4lydro ~ 48 Chen~vale~ PRV~Stattbn~i~provements ~!~Stadiin; _ , 49 Betassq WTP m ~ ~ . . =r bNitationllmprovemerds s ~ T,+~~' N '~dAuaC 3 [ 1 46; Ctiaautauqua Storage. n ~ s souider R "Fankl2ehabilitation ~ " ~y~'w ,at~j +el ~ Legend qq; Kohler Storage Tank Year of ProJed .r • 20162014 a .2009 =2oi6zoia r ~ 2005 ~2aio-zoia 110 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report _ _ _ w Automated Meter Reading 411454 Department: PW/Water Utility subeommunity. Multiple Subcommunities ` Funding Souree: Water Utility Fund evcPnrea: System-wide Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades ~ CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ~.a ~ ~ " . ' ' fi{ Wit, ~P=~~~: ~nnli. This project provides funds for the replacement of water meter Vansponders. Trace transponders will be replaced with Orion transponders. The Orion Vansponders are considered to be better technology, have a longer life and ~ are compatible with the electronic water monitors (refrigerator magnets). -v ~b _ - ~ Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of w water to the community. The Orion transponders will allow increased monitoring of water use and aid in water ~ conservation which is associated with environmental and economic sustainabiliry goals. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. ~ No additional public process is anticipated. . $~~{ta~~ n ~xmm. None w Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $500,000 $530,450 $546,364 $562,754 $579,637 $0 $2,719,205 ~ r Change from Prior Year: Funding added for years 2009-2013 a. Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ 111 °r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Barker Dam Outlet 4111pg w Department: PW/ Water Utility Subwmmunity: Outside Planning Area Funding source: Water Utility Fund evcPaea: Outside Planning Area W Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA :w This project will provide funds for repairs to the outlet works of the existing Barker Dam. A design for outlet works replacement was completed by GEI, and initial bids were received in 2002. The cost of the outlet works replacement could be substantially reduced by eliminating one of the proposed microtunnels. Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The facility is approaching 100 years of age and is need of repair of deterioration due to weather and other environmental factors. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw Water Master Plan. m .p No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $780,908 $780,908 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary TOtal % 100% r y r W ~ 112 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ~ Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair 411106 Department: pW/ Water Utility subcommunity. Outside Planning Area Funding source: Water Utility Fund BvCPArea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction ~ CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ¦ tr. ~ x~ ~~360 d_,u ...~~_e_ eM This project will provide funds for repairs to the existing Barker gravity pipeline. The city has, as part of an ongoing maintenance effort, already replaced segments of the 11-mile Barker Gravity Pipeline that showed the ~ most degradation or highest likelihood of failure. The city should continue its annual maintenance program, prioritizing based on the most critical needs, and also considering the recommendations of the FERC Part 12D inspection report (GEI 2007a) to provide enough cover to protect the pipeline, and anchor the pipeline in areas prone to landslides or other damaging events. Section replacement or lining in place are options that may each ~ work well in different parts of the pipeline. ~ Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the ~ community. The Barker Gravity Pipeline is over 100 years of age and is need of repair of deterioration due to weather and other environmental factors. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw Water Master Plan. {~y ,fie g~ S~,G~~ No additional public process is anticipated. „ ~ None Capital Funding Plan R 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $618,000 $636,540 $655,636 $675,305 $695,564 $716,431 $3,997,476 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed and escalated for construction cost inflation r Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 113 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Barker Relicensing 411112 Department: pW/ Water Utility subcommuniry: System-wide Funding source: Water Utility Fund evCPArea: System-wide _ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction e. CFJ~P Required: NO CFJW Completed: NA This project will provide funds to support on-going Federal permitting issues associated with the Barker Water System. A request has been made to convert the current Federal Energy Regulatory Commission(FERC) licensed project to a FERC small conduit exemption from licensing. There are significant technical and legal analysis and documentation required to support this request and to obtain a separate land use authorization from the U.S. Forest Service for continued occupancy of federal land by the Barker Gravity Pipeline. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. ~ This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r 114 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Betasso Storage Tank 42 ~:~.,_,-~,3:.... ~ ; w n ..:=x..:~. it Department: pW/Water Utility subeommunity: Outside Planning Area ` Funding source: Water Utility Fund evcpArea: Outside Planning Area ~ Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair /Deficiency Correction r. CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: NA s This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Betasso Storage Tank. The facility is an elevated steel tank that has deteriorated due to weather and other environmental factors that primarily affect the protective paint coating. r Rehabilitation and improvement of the citt/s water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of ¦ water to the community. r ,r, ~a,,x , f. mm; This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. ~hd al~+ fir. kviaR vrv. No additional public process is anticipated. r r - r None ~ Capital Funding Plan x- 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $265,225 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,225 ~ Change from Prior Year: New funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 r<. Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ 115 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Betasso WTP 411947 49 s Department: pW/Water Utility subcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding source: Water Utility Fund svcPaea: Outside Planning Area r Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CFJ1P Required: No CEAP Completed: NA r This project will provides funds for rehabilitations and improvements to the Betasso WTP. The Betasso WTP is the citys primary water treatment facility and has deteriorated during its operation of over 40 years. The large capital funding in 2014 will be used to retrofit the existing coagulation/sedimentation unit process with newer technology that will allow the plant to meet current drinking water regulations at iYs original design capacity. Curcently, the WTP is unable to treat water at this capacity due to,~this limiting unit process. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. ~a~~~,`. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Nra- a. m No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $922,405 $9,224,054 $10,546,459 Change from Prior Year: Numerous, funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% w~ r w. mr r 116 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report - - - - _ Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodell to Fourmlle ~ _ Department: PW/ Water Utility Subcommunity. System-wide Funding source: Water Utility Fund avcPaea: Outside Planning Area ~ Project type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction e. CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Boulder Canyon Transmission Pipe - Orodell to Fourmile. The pipe is a cement mortar lined steel pipeline that has deteriorated over a period of several decades ~ and needs to be replaced. _ r Rehabilitation and improvement of the cit~/s water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of R water to the community. r ,fix-„-wnr.~ t**nh.:*at;~ "'a^,fi ~c"°3~'° s. ter, « ~r r~s.:_._.a~.. ~ ~;~~°+s~.P ,u ~ •r ~ d#~ ,$~"'i. ~n.h:. .Fa ^~~,i~r x~___:_:- This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the ~ Treated Water Master Plan. n. No additional public process is anticipated. ,m None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $546,364 $0 $0 $0 $546,364 ~ Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual Ongoing Operating Costs ® Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential °k 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% R rr a? 117 a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Boulder Reservoir Intake and Pumping Improvements 411655 51 Department: pW/Water Utility subcommunity. Gunbarrel Funding source: Water Utility Fund BvcPaea: Area I _ Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Boulder Reservoir Intake and m Pumping Facility. This additional capacity will allow for greater use of the citys Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights portfolios. Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. _ ~ ~ This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 3 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% a I18 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Boulder Reservoir WTP 411652 43 Department: pW/Water Utility suluommunity: Gunbarrel ` Funding source: Water Utility Fund evcPaea: Area I wf Project Type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions ClJ1P Required: pjp CFJ1P Completed: NA w P.nt:N:rYu t7u~e~~ Na -uws ~ ~ • ~ ~o- ETC . .ur~~ r _ This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Boulder Reservoir WTP. Improvements and capacity expansion are necessary to accommodate ongoing growth within the citys service ~ area and comply with Federal and State regulations. This additional capacity will allow for greater use of the citys Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights portfolios. ~ tdo" :7n"`.. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. °t kM.i;•w 9I .fi'nu. ".3'd`. 1 ' i' ~ m f c 4 ; This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the ~ Treated Water Mastery Plan. 1Ki/~n""w-°;: ~ w~ ~iua ~AfNaBSifiS`'va 2-'.P4 e~ `rte ~ u.~s: § _~pa; ° re ~z°x,~~; a x~} ~ No additional public process is anticipated. r None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $3,090,000 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $3,390,000 „ o~~ Change from Prior Year: Numerous, funding escalated for construction cost inflation ar Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: A Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% a. a~^ 4 119 " 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Cathodic Protection Department: PW/ Water Utility subcommunity. Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Water Utility Fund evcPaea: System-wide _ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA .r This project will fund cathodic protection devices to be installed on existing steel water transmission pipes for protection from corrosion. Existing steel water transmission pipes are subject to external corrosion. Cathodic protection devices will protect these pipes and extend their useful life. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. This project is wnsistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Non additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% w r • r 120 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Chautauqua Storage Tank 411672 46 r Departrnent: PW/ Water Utility subeommunity. Central Boulder Funding source: Water Utility Fund svCPArea: Area I ~ Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab / Repair I Deficiency Correction ~ CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ~ g~ ~ This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Chautaqua Storage Tank. The facility is a partially buried reinforced concrete tank. The tank is not currently lined and there is evidence of leakage. The tank also has a ~ built-up roof that has deteriorated due to weather and other environmental factors. Rehabilitation and improvement of the cit~/s water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of w water to the community. r .r This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. ~ m ~ ~f, a None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $85,779 $857,791 $0 $0 $943,570 ~ Change from Prior Year: New funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total °k 100% ~ a' a° a. 121 ' 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Cherryvale Pump Station 411010 48 Department: pW/ Water Utility subcommunity. Southeast Boulder Funding source: Water Utility Fund svCPArea: Area II Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: YBS CEAP Completed: YeS - 2004 This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Cherryvale Pump Station. This additional capacity will allow for greater use of the citys Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights portfolios. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. u Improvements and capacity expansion at the Cherryvale pump station was included in the 2004 CEAP for the Zone 1 Water Transmission Pipeline (Diagonal Highway.) , None .v:.r, - .w Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $515,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $515,000 Change from Prior Year: Funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r 122 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report w r Distribution System Water Quality 411425 Department: pW/Water Utility subeommunity. System-wide ` Funding source: Water Utility Fund svcParea: System-wide ~ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CFAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project provides funds for water quality improvements to the distribution system. The project will provide funds for better hydraulic and water quality modeling of the citys water distribution system as well as improvements to the system that will assure compliance with Federal and State regulations. ._:yau~4~:x mbb 9kR' a .__~~'m~ncm...'°®.~'8t~a + Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the E community. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the ~ Treated Water Master Plan. r` No additional public process is antigc~^ippated. G~[ ..:~x~ 4:. ~St_ ~ rE old rr x None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $150,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 ~ ~w -:,1u,: r, Change from Prior Year: Eliminated funding in 2011-2013 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable DISCretionery Total °h 100% ~ r r- aF A 123 .r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Green Lake 2 Dam 411627 Department: PW/Water Utility subcommunlty: System-wide Funding souse: Water Utility Fund svcPaea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA w.. 3. This project will provide funds for the evaluation of alternatives and design of the rehabilitation of Green Lake 2 Dam, located in the Citys Watershed. Green Lake 2 Dam is in need of extensive rehabilitation to allow continued storage of water. Project alternatives and cost opinions were developed by ECI (2001 a). They found that the two lowest cost alternatives could be completed in one construction season. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,946 $0 $86,946 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r „e 124 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report F Gunbarrel Storage Tank 411670 53 Department: pW/ Water Utility subcommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Water Utility Fund evcPl4ea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction ~ CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA ¦ This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the interior paint of the Gunbarrel Storage Tank. Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the ~ community. The facility is a ground level steel tank with corrosion resistant paint on both the interior and exterior. Based on a recent inspection of the tank, the interior paint has deteriorated with age and needs to be replaced to ¦ provide continued corrosion protection. • Ra~a~: ~ x ~ a sr~-•': ~5$axe-s~'vk'~;::=r ~-~.4~.~',~ This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the ~ Treated Water Master Plan. i, No additional public process is anytlapated. ~ un ra _~"3?~ jam. r nur y'y.,._ 'yz.oY, None . , w,: m,.. _ a Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $289,819 $0 $289,819 ~ i~F:ti m sur-av~:sr_s.::~rnc.'-c !V a-mt :__'^x:~':.:::mo:..^. W` Change from Prior Year: New funding escalated for construction cost inFlation ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 ~ Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: a° Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ r. .n 125 w 0 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Instream Flow SUuctures and Gaging 411549 Department: PW/Water Utility sul,eommuniry: System-wide Funding source: Water Utility Fund avcPaea: System-wide ti Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA This project provides funds for rehabilitations and improvements to instream flow structures and gaging. Additional in-stream flow structures and gaging is considered desireable along North Boulder Creek. - Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. - This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. - None _ ~mw..,::,:~z Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100°k Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r .°I a 126 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Iris Pump Station 411012 41 m. __::a____~_..~a., _ Department: pW/Water Utility Subeommunity: Crossroads ` Funding Source: Water Utility Fund avCPMea: Area I ~ Proied type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: YeS CEAP Completed: YP.S, 2004 ¦ 'PHD CIE " ix a° This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Iris Pump Station. This additional s capacity will allow for greater use of the citys Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights portfolios. ~ m_ ~;t.y=~ . rw yRehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. ¦ This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. Improvements and capacity expansion at the Iris pump station was included in the 2004 CEAP for the Zone 1 Water Transmission Pipeline (Diagonal Highway.) "1° None aw Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $1,030,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,030,000 ~ Change from Prior Year: Funding escalated for construction cost inflation ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: r Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ s 127 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Island Lake Dam Department: PW/Water Utility subeommunity: Outside Planning Area Fuming source: Water Utility Fund avcPnrea: Outside Planning Area Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project will provide funds for repairs to Island lake Dam, located in the citys Watershed. Damage to the dam crest and upstream face need repair in order to continue operation of the dam. Patches are recommended in 5 to 7 locations near the high water mark. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. i This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. No additional public process is anticipated. None ,.~cu Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $108,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,150 k Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r r r 128 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Kossler Reservoir Department: PW/Water Utility subcommunity. Outside Planning Area ` Funding source: Water Utility Fund BvCPNea: Outside Planning Area ~ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction ~ CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA r u~ r This project will provide funds for dam repairs, outlet repairs, bypass improvements and security improvements at Kossler Reservoir. ~ There are several improvements at Kossler Reservoir that need to be completed based on recommendations in eY the FERC Part 12D Inspection Report (GEI 2007a). Several of the recommendations are related to the cracked concrete at the reservoir outlet and the seepage that occurs along the low-head section of the penstock. A bypass pipeline, connecting the Barker Gravity Line to the Boulder Canyon Hydro Penstock could meet several objectives: ' Allow operation of the Barker System during times when Kossler Reservoir is out of operation for repair or other reasons. ' If connected downstream of Road 77, the bypass could reduce the seepage in the upper part of the penstock. ' Halt erosion at the current Barker Gravity Line outlet to Kossler Reservoir. ~ If the bypass structure is constructed, the cracked outlet structure should still be repaired and upgrades should be made to the gate house in order to have multiple methods of operating Kossler Reservoir. In addition, the Barker R, Gravity Line outlet to Kossler Reservoir should be armored to prevent further erosion and undercutting of the structure. GEI (2007b) prepared construction cost estimates for Kossler Reservoir main dam concrete panel replacement. ~ This estimate recommended replacing panels below elevation 7717 with localized repairs above that elevation by 2009. The FERC Part 12D report also recommended additional maintenance on the main dam seepage weir (by 2009) and piezometers (by 2010) and installation of additional hydraulic monitoring equipment (by 2010) (GEI 2007a). ~ These efforts could be combined with replacement of the concrete plates on the main dam. The integrity of the rock walls at the dam abutments should also be evaluated. ~ r Security vulnerability of water system facilities is a concern and improvements are needed to assure the safe and reliable delivery of drinking water. r This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. s No additional public process is anticipated. None mss:-,::-..~ 4>:~,~, - ,-r<: ;„.....G . , , r.~::~ . Capital Funding Plan ee 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $360,706 $939,745 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,451 x ~ _ ,..-,:.:m w RM., ~ ~ a ~ Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction cost inflation 129 ~ r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: r Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r A 130 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report . _a Kohler Storage Tank 411671 44 Department: PW/Water Utility subeommunily: South Boulder Funding source: Water Utility Fund svCPArea: Area I Proles Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ~ - m--,. , i~u ~ Ski=.m«._ ~ This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Kohler Storage Tank including design for the replacement of the existing roof. ~ Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The facility is a partially buried reinforced concrete tank with built-up roofing that has deteriorated due ¦ to weather and other environmental factors. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. fir.? M None Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,653 $106,653 ~ Change from Prior Year: New funding escalated for construction cost inflation la, Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 .e Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: Essential °f° 100°1° Desirable Discretionary Total 100°!° ~ 131 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Lakewood Pipeline 411780 Department: pW/Water Utility subcommuniry: Outside Planning Area Funding source: Water Utility Fund avCPaea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Corcection CEAP Required: Y@S CEAP Completed: YeS This project will provide funds for on-going inspection, testing and repair or rehabilitation of the Lakewood Pipeline. Issues related to the reconstruction of the Lakewod Pipeline requires on-going inspection of the pipe to assure its serviceability. There is also the need to monitor and supplement restoration of the pipeline corridor in accordance with United States Forest Service and Boulder County requirements. An inspection of the pipeline last fall revealed little to no change in corrosion and other deterioration of the pipe. Therefore staff is recommending that funding be reduced in 2009 and additional funds be allocated in 2010 for follow-up inspection of the pipe. Major funding for possible rehabilitation has been delayed until 2012. Funds will be transferred from the Lakewood Pipeline Remediation Reserve to cover the costs. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. None Caplhl Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $0 $1,238,060 $0 $119,405 $1,557,465 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: ESSential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r a 132 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report rk NCWCD Conveyance -Boulder Feeder Canal 411546 50 Department: pW/ Water Utility subcommunity: Area III ` Funding source: Water Utility Fund avcPnrea: Area III e, Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair !Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: E ,.mom x.~~~.,,.,:,..~:.: g~"~ ,a,mm r This project will provide funds for the protection of water quality in the Boulder Feeder Canal. Improvements include best management practices for water quality as identifed in a recent report and security vulnerability ~ improvements. ay Although the city has made progress in conveying stormwater over the Boulder Feeder Canal, there are still several outtalls that discharge directly to the canal. The city should continue to construct stormwater diversions over the canal, prioritizing those ouffalls with commercial, industrial, or agricultural land uses with little vegetative ~ buffer between land uses and the canal. a. The city should take steps to improve operator safety at the water treatment plant diversion point from the Boulder Feeder Canal such as installing a hand rail and/or harness system. ~rnnf . ~".~`iltQ~tffi - ~ ~".~5uaa- s n~~, rz= i Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. The Boulder Feeder Canal currently delivers water to Boulder Reservoir from the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District's (NCWCD) Carter Lake. The Canal is vulnerable to water quality upsets due to runoff from adjacent agricultural lands including irrigation return flows. a' 4 ~ e...m. YY This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the ~ Raw Water Master Plan. No additional putNic process is anticipated. ¦r Open Space and Mountain Parks Capital Funding Plan r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $300,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,235 ¦r Change from Prior Year: New project with funding escalated for construction cost inflation r w Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary °!°O Total 100°f° 133 r. 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Nederalnd Wastewater Treatment Plant "r Department: pW~ Water Utility subcommunlty. Outside Planning Area Funding source: Water Utility Fund svCPArea: Outside Planning Area .r Protect type: New Construction -Not Growth Related w CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA This project provides funds to increase the level of treatment provided by the Nederland Wastewater Treatment Plant (W WTP) to further protect water quality in Barker Reservoir. Protection of source water quality is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. No additional public process is anticipated. None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 eP Change from Prior Year: Funding added in 2009 W. Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: On-going operation and maintenance costs for the additional treatment will be required W- Source of Funding: New funds must be allocated Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r s 134 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report NCWCD Conveyance -Carter Lake Pipeline 411547 45 . ,~Q ~ - , ~ : ~ w Department: PW/ Water Utility subeommunity. Outside Planning Area Funding source: Water Utility Fund Bvcpaea: Outside Planning Area ~ project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: Yes CEAP Completed: This project will provide funds for the design and construction of a pipeline from Carter Lake to the Boulder Reservoir Water Treatment Plant (BRWTP). R Funding for construction of the proposed Carter Lake Pipeline has been delayed until 2014. Funding of the r' pipeline in the nearer term without Federal funding assistance would have a significant impact on water rates. Staff continues to recommend the pipeline as the best long-term solution to water quality, operational and security ~ vulnerability issues related to the drawing water directly from the Boulder Feeder Canal and Boulder Reservoir. By delaying the schedule for pipeline construction, more time is available to secure Federal funding assistance. Recognizing mixed overall support to date and based on discussions with the CSG (2008) and recommendations from the staff survey (2007), the city should continue initial project evaluation for the Carter Lake Pipeline. Efforts include development of a CEAP, rightof-way acquisition, preliminary design and permitting activities. Protection of the BRWTP source water through investing in the construction of the Carter Lake Pipeline will provide long-term benefits to the city. The city is placing a greater reliance on this facility than in the past due to continued planned growth in the cites water service area. Even though current regulatory requirements are being met, the risk of contaminants entering the source water and passing through the treatment process still exists. Investing in a pipeline that will protect the source water for the BRWTP far into the future is a worthwhile n investment similar to that undertaken by prior generations with the Silver Lake Watershed. The quality of water in Carter Lake is excellent. It is a deep reservoir with a small natural runoff area and is filled mostly with high quality water imported from the Western Slope_ The quality of the water is negatively affected as it travels through the Boulder Feeder Canal to the treatment plant and Boulder Reservoir due to drainage into the ~ canal from existing development and agriculture. Future development and agricultural practices will likely exacerbate these negative effects. The threat of accidental or intentional contamination is also a concern r because of limited ability to react or dilute such contamination. w The Carter Lake Pipeline will address both the near-term and potential increase in degradation to water quality of the BRWTP. Preventing source water contamination provides a more robust barrier than subsequent treatment. It ` would also provide a more uniform water qualty, substantially simplifying the treatment optimization and increasing treatment process reliability. Although the capital cost of the pipeline is significant, R is comparable to the cost of treatment technologies that afford a similar level of water quality protection and with the assurance that contaminants will be prevented from entering the citys source water in the first place, rather than having to remove these contaminants via treatment. ~ The pipeline would provide opportunities and flexibility for improvements in the management and operation of the citys raw water facilities. These include possible hydroelectric power generation as well as improvements in the flexibility of use of the citys various water sources for the BRWTP. This increased flexibility could provide a slight ~ increase in the drought year yield of the citys water rights portfolio. The city of Boulder is currently participating in the development of right-of-way acquisition plans and permit ~ applications for the Southern Water Supply Project II (Carter Lake Pipeline). Other participants include Little Thompson Water District, the town of Frederick and Lek Hand Water District. The pipeline is estimated to cost $33 million. Depending upon the number of participants, the city of Boulder's share of the cost can range from $20 to $25 million. The cost of the pipeline as currently proposed is less than it might be at a later time because there is an r opportunity to share costs in constructing the Carter LaK~Spipeline with other communities. Additionally, on-going .r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report construction cost inflation suggests that the cost of constructing the pipeline will only increase in the future. The majority of the pipeline right-of-way (ROW) has been previously secured by the NCWCD. Continued development pressure along this ROW may make future construction more difficult. Securing the remaining ROW for a pipeline at this time is also considered important because of these development pressures. Also, the cost of borrowing money is near an all time low. These factors suggest that now is a good time to proceed with this project as a long term investment in the citys water utility infrastructure. . Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. ~~*i:, This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code the Raw Water Master Plan and the Treated Water Master Plan. The Utilities Division is developing an alternatives evaluation for this project. The alternative evaluation will be presented to the Water Resource Advisory Board and City Council prior to the 2008 budget process. The NCWCD will need to apply for a Boulder County permit to construct the pipeline as part of the Matters of State Interest (1041) review process. Open Space and Mountain Parks Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,686,618 $26,866,177 $29,552,795 Change from Prior Year: Delayed funding and escalated for construction cost inflation .Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r w I r 136 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Pearl Street Hydro/PRV Station 47 Department: pW/Water Utility Subeommunity: Central Boulder Funding source: Water Utility Fund evcParea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: Np CEAP Completed: NA a-.'tea' ' aa~ This project provides for the installation of a hydoelectric turbine and generator at the city's Pearl Street pressure reducing facility. Currently water pressure is reduced using a pressure reducing valve which wastes the available t energy in the water. This energy could be used to produce electricity and transmitted through the electrical distribution system. ~ Production of electricity through the dissapation of excess energy in the cit~Is wale system is appropriate and serves to help meet the citys environmental and economic sustainabitity goals. The project was not specifically identified in the Veated water master plans, but in response to the city's general ~ goal of environmental sustainability, was identified by City staff as a possible source of hydroelectricity. Actual funding of the project would depend on executing a beneficial power sales contract with Excel Energy that would w provide for the recovery of any capital costs. - - .-ew ac,=.,~:;,, _ Fez: - ,a No addkjonal public process is anticipated. ~k?k r Environmental Affairs Capital Funding Plan r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding . $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,597 $245,975 $270,572 ~ Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs ® ~ r Description: No increase, funded by existing opera0ng budget Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ere 137 ar 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program w Project Status Report r Source Water Transmission System Inspections Department: PW/Water Utility Suboommuniry: System-wide Funding source: Water Utility Fund svcPaea: Outside Planning Area Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA w. This project provide funding for on-going inspection of source water transmission pipes. _ On-going inspection of the citys source water transmission pipes is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. awn 6p _ _ m This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw Water Master Plan. ,,.rem-~ ~ _ . . No additional public process is anticipated. ~~v a@I!'&~?~?~v' None Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $80,000 $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $160,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ar r r r 138 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Sunshine Transmission Pipe Department: pW/Water Utility subeommunity. Outside Planning Area Funbing source: Water Utility Fund evCPArea: Outside Planning Area ~ ~ Project Type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA t'~ ¦ ~j 'tea i~ ~ 6`.~3rv ~ ~ _ ~fi,Sz°a~-~-' yk.::: r°: This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Sunshine Transmission Pipe. The pipe is a cement mortar lined steel pipeline that has deteriorated during its operation over a period of several decades. Initial ~ funding in 2009 will provide funds for pipe inspection, minor repair work and installation of access manholes. Funding allocated in 2013 will provide for a more complete rehabilitation or replacement of the existing cement ~ mortar lining. ..l~~*, $~g~ p~~ . ~ . ;-v~.LL^ ~ . bmk~ailaGA0Rr1i S~`~:~'RU~ ~ ,x:,w ® { r' ''~YtFt{'~`. ~a€~~"° ~ :ate Rehabilitation of the citt(s water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the ` community. i This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. 1~ll~irllCv ~ ` a'a ~ ?a -yr ~ ~ i &,.u. ~x~ No additional public process is anticipated. None _ . . Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $927,419 $0 $1,127,419 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 ¦r Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: R r Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 4.. r 139 w 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Water System Security Upgrades 411440 Department: PW/Water U61ity subeommunity: System-wide Funding source: Water Utility Fund evcpaea: System-wide project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA This project will provide funds for water system security upgrades. New Federal guidelines call for increased protection of drinking water systems from terrorist and other threats. City staff recently updated the water system security vulnerability assessment. Numerous recommendations for security vulnerability improvements have been W made. Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. - This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Raw and Treated Water Master Plans. ~,W No additional public process is anticipated. ` Ei. None a. Capital Funding Ptan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $400,000 Change from Prior Year: Eliminated funding in 2011-2013 Mnual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget " ~ Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r „w iao r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Waterline Replacement 411389 Department: pW/Water Utility Subcommunity: System-wide Funding source: Water Utility Fund svcPaea: System-wide ar Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA R ~~^.IT.f ice. rz®"~P _ „'~y i This project provides funds for the reconstruction of waterlines that are part of the citys water distribution system. Many of the city's existing waterlines are corroded or otherwise deteriorated and must be replaced. The city ~ currently experiences approximately 60-80 main breaks per year and these cause unplanned outages in water service as well as disruption to vehicle travel and damage to public and private property. Although the number of main breaks is not considered excessive, the average age of the citys distribution system is over 40 years and it is anticipated that substantial funds will be required to maintain a functioning water distribution system over time. In some cases deficiencies in this system have been identified due to fire flow requirements of the Insurance Services Office (lS0). tea'-' - "ATM' '~.x--x . ~ ~ Rehabilitation of the cihls water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. ~ ~ ae This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. No additional public process is anticipated. Transportation W Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $2,575,000 $2,652,250 $3,278,181 $3,376,526 $3,477,822 $3,582,157 $18,941,936 ~ Change from Prior Year: Funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: e~ Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% sa F' 141 it 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report a Watershed Improvements Department: PWI Water Utility sutrcommunity: Outside Planning Area Funding source: Water Utility Fund evCP/4ea: Outside Planning Area Protect Type: Existing Facility -Rehab / Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: NA This project will provide funding for miscellaneous improvements in the city's Silver Lake watershed including valve replacement. Rehabilitation and improvement of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. uY G This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code. No additional public process is anticipated. None ern i> 4 . Capital Funding Pian 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $317,437 $0 $0 $0 $317,437 Change from Prior Year: New project and funding escalated for construction cost inflation Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% a r r 142 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report . _ Zone 3 Transmission Facilities 411005 n. Department: pW/ Water Utility subcommunity. System-wide Fuming source: Water Utility Fund svcPaea: System-wide n, Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: NA ~ „s ~ ~ ; ~ w~__,. - : ~u E sue.- m' r PIN '.~L~,1 > ~ ~ ~.--`:.~®..c~'.? ,u , . ~ This project provides for the rehabilitation and improvement to the Zone 3 transmission piping of the citys water system. An extensive network of transmission piping exists, some of which is over 50 years old. It is projected this piping will require replacement or other rehabilitation. In some cases deficiencies in this system have been identified due to fire flow requirements of the Insurance Services Office (ISO). a" ww a irc;. r - su ai-a;eti~. "2u: ' 'y,^.."t ~ pvr an' i~~~,tt+tlr.',',~`~~.~~ ~ . ' , ~v`X~a_wa{s 'n&+. ~caii E Rehabilitation of the citys water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the community. - ~ ,...y. '4Pr .:~~£'iR„vxY °'..."PL ~ .'.~'u ::P h. ifit . '*,C,-m,~,,. ,~:n.~iS,~w~r Gs~` ~a~s~.3S£~.me~:e~x"-... :a~a,.a5~........:Ym.r ..`~~sa~~., This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Treated Water Master Plan. PYb 'ab`$l~fiifl ' ° ~ ,y r_°* ~y~~t~t~. ~ E r„ *a. ~ ~ w ,u,~.,k..y.y,.~ , ..mat ,:~xi=~u-...c~k~.,am ~w~.:..- . ~„..~__,~:.-w~,;~.: - ~ ~ _v. ~ w No additional public process is anticipated. Transportation' S~ ~ a r.... ....u:: .m Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Fundin 9° $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $597,029 $597,029 Change from Prior Year: Funding delayed and escalated for construction cost inflation Annual Ongoing Operating Costs Description: No increase, funded by existing operating budget ~ Source of Funding: r: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% w °a 143 ATTACHMENT D-5 TRIBUTARY GREENWAYS 2009 - 2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2009 Greenways Capital Improvements Program (C[P) budget is $450,000. The Greenways CIP has been developed within the context of and is consistent with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP), the Transportation Master Plan (TMP), the major drainageway plans and the Greenways Master Plan. .Y. The city of Boulder Greenways System is comprised of a series of comdors along riparian areas including Boulder Creek and its tributaries, which provide an opportunity to integrcate multiple objectives, including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, stone drainage and floodplain management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists, recreation and cultural resources. In order to maximize the overlap of objectives and to coordinate projects along the Greenways, identification of projects for the 2009-2014 Greenways CIP was done as a team effort, combining input from Flood Utilities, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, Water Quality and Enviromnental Services, Environmental Affairs, Planning and Open Space and Mountain Parks. The Greenways CIP follows an opportunistic approach, contributing funding toward projects that are being completed by other departments or private development in order to meet the various objectives of the Greenways program. The Greenways r CIP also looks to leverage funds with outside agencies in order to move projects forward that meet more than one objective of the Greenways program, but may not be the highest priority when evaluating any one particular objective. Transportation and flood utility projects were identified from the Transportation Master Plan, and the major drainageway plans, and infra-deparhnental meetings to determine project priorities and timing. Private development activities were also evaluated. Many of the Greemvays projects shown in the CIP are being designed and constructed in coordination with major flood or transportation improvements. The Greenways funding associated with these projects focuses on habitat restoration, water quality improvements and trail connections. In addition to leveraging funding with the Transportation and Flood Utilities budgets, funding for Greenways projects is also available through the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and Federal Transportation funds. During 2007 three Greenways projects were submitted for federal transportation funding, with matching funds anticipated to be provided by the Flood and Greenways CIP. These projects included: Fourmile Canyon Creek from 26`h to 28`x' Street, Wonderland Creek at 28`h Street and Wonderland Creek at Foothills Highway. All three of these projects include amulti-use path connection, flood mitigation improvements and potential water quality and habitat restoration. None of these projects have been granted federal funds at this time, but there is a possibility that more federal funding will become available. r a s 144 Of these three projects, the Flood Utility progRam's highest priority at this time is to complete the Wonderland Creek project at Foothills Highway in order to eliminate routine flooding that occurs in the Noble Park neighborhood. Utilities staff plans to move forward with this project regardless of the availability of federal funding. Funding for this project in the Greenways CIP was moved forward from what had been shown in previous CIPs in order to coordinate other ~ Greenways objectives with the construction of the flood mitigation improvements. As a result funding for [he Fourmile project from 26'x' to 28'h has been delayed by two years in this CIP submittal. [f federal funding becomes available for any of these projects, the Greenways CIP ¦ project funding will be reshuffled to coordinate with the selected project. Maintenance of the Greenways system was reviewed as part of the CIP process. Funding for ¦ habitat maintenance was first allocated in the 2002-2007 Greenways CIP to address deficiencies identified in the Greenways Master Plan. Starting in 2002, 1/3 of the Greenways capital budget ($150,000) was earmarked to address on-going maintenance. Money has been carried over every ~ year from this line item. In 2004, in an attempt to utilize the earmarked funds for Greenways r, habitat improvements, $50,000 of the $150,000 was set aside to fund small-scale restoration projects that could be carried out by the seasonal crew. Projects like the Martin Park restoration project were completed using these funds. In an effort to evaluate the effectiveness of the r habitat maintenance program, an outside consultant, Biohabitats, Incorporated was hired in 2007. E Based on Biohabitat's evaluation, the recommendation was made to continue funding the routine habitat maintenance (weed control) at the same level. The 2009-2014 CIP includes a yearly allocation of $80,000, consistent with previous years' expenditures, to fund a seasonal habitat maintenance crew. In addition, $30,000/year has been designated for miscellaneous habitat r restoration projects. This was reduced from the $50,000/year allocation shown in previous CIPs. The $20,000 reduction is being used to cover salary expenditures and more accurately reflect actual costs in future budgets. The recommendation was also made to transfer the oversight of the habitat maintenance seasonal crew from the Greenways project management work group to a maintenance work group. The Utilities Division is currently contemplating the transfer of the routine maintenance to the Flood Maintenance work group. As part of the Flood Utilities operating budget, a new full-time R Greenways Maintenance position is being requested, along with a $30,000 budget increase request to help fund this position. The balance of the funding needed to support this position will ~ be taken out of the existing Greenways budget, along with the funding to support the seasonal crew. In addition to managing noxious weeds along the Greenways, this position will also be responsible for maintaining the flood carrying capacity of the drainageways. Having afull-time employee serving as a crew lead, rather than a seasonal employee, will provide the much needed continuity that the habitat maintenance program needs. The Greenways project management " work group will continue to coordinate habitat restoration projects. POLICY ISSUES All large-scale projects in the 2009-2014 CIP will go through the CEAP process, either as part of a bigger flood or transportation project or as a separate project as indicated on the project status reports. 145 i i HIGHLIGHTS The Elmer's Twomile Creek comdor from Goose Creek to Glenwood Drive is the highlight of the Greenways CIP projects in 2008 and 2009. Funding for this project was allocated in years 2003-2008 through the Greenways and Flood Utilities CIPs. In addition, Federal transportation funding and the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District are contributing toward the construction ofthis project. In addition to the projects listed in the CIP, possible habitat restoration projects during the next few years include: • Founnile near 30`" Street (funded through the UDFCD) • Elmer's Twomile north of Glenwood (funded through the UDFCD) • McGinn Ditch fish passage in conjunction with Open Space • Fish Passage Research in conjunction with Open Space and CDOT • Confluence of Bear Creek and Boulder Creek at Foothills Community Hospital in conjunction with the multi-use trail connection to 48'h Street, a culvert removal under Bear Creek and drainage improvements to the underpass at Foothills and Arapahoe • Dry Creek through Flatirons Golf Course • Goose Creek, railroad to 47`h Street tree plantings The Greenways program is also anticipating contributing toward funding improvements in signing along the Greenways and the Gilbert White memorial. FINANCING ~ Greenways projects are funded from the Transportation Fund, Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund, and the Lottery Fund. Existing CIP expenditures are estimated at $450,000 per year for the next six years. Annual funding distribution for the Greenways Program for 2009-2014 is as follows: Transportation - $150,000 Flood Utility - $150,000 Lottery Fund - $150,000 RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The Greenways corridors are currently maintained by several work groups within the city, as well as outside organizations. Tasks are divided up by geographical location as well as by function. The responsibility of each work group is described below: w Boulder County Parks and Open Space maintains the Boulder Creek path from the mouth of Boulder Canyon to Fourmile Canyon. The city's Parks and Recreation Department maintenance staff is responsible for maintenance of Greenways that traverse a city park, as well as the Boulder Creek Path from Eben Fine Park to 55°i Street. • The city's Street Maintenance is responsible for snow removal and general path + maintenance (debris removal and sweeping) along all of the Greenways paths, except those portions of path maintained by the Parks Department. 146 r • The city's Open Space and Mountain Parks Department is responsible for maintenance of " natural, environmentally sensitive, or re-vegetated areas on open space land and easements. Currently this includes portions of Boulder Creek east of 38`h Street and Arapahoe Avenue and portions of South Boulder Creek from KOA Lake to Marshall Road. r • Flood Utility Maintenance is responsible for maintaining the flood carrying capacity of all of the Greenways channels, which primarily involves removing tree limbs and downed trees from obstructing the flow in the channels, removal of channel sediment, ¦ and bank stabilization. • Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) performs maintenance on sections of Boulder Creek and all tributaries included in the Greenways Program. ¦ • City Forestry, University of Colorado (CU), ditch companies, and Xcel Energy are also involved in maintenance along the Greenways. ¦ BUSINESS PLAN All of the projects identified in the Greenways CIP have been categorized as "Desirable". BOARD ACTION The Greenways Advisory Committee reviewed the Greenways 2009-2014 CIP on June 25, 2008 and unanimously approved the CIP, with the recommendation to restructure the operating and miscellaneous project categories into the following categories: standard salaries, temporary salaries, operating expenses and miscellaneous restoration, water quality and trail improvements. ¦ rR 147 [ i t l I t t ~ ! t t P t c e r s ~ 3 t t i ~ I ii t ii i L i 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Tributary Greenways 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction • Not Growth Related Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Traillmprovements 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Wonderland Creek Foothills to Diagonal 195,000 195,000 0 0 195,000 195,000 780,000 Foumtile Canyon Creek - 26th to 28th 0 0 195,000 195,000 0 0 390,000 Total: 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000 1,470,000 On-Going Projects Greenways Salaries 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 780,000 Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Miscellaneous -Greenways Operating 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 oAO Total: 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 1,230,000 Total for Tributary Greenways 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 2,700,000 s~2s/2oo5 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 Tributary GreenWeyS ~ - ~ Essential ~ Desirable i ~ Discretionary l Total Pro/ect 7ypeJName Pro/ect ar Funding % Funding % Funding Funding % New Conalructlon • Not Growth Related Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements $0 $50,000 100°~ $0 $50,000 700°k Wonderland Creek Foothills to Diagonal $0 $195,000 100% $0 $195,000 100 On-Going Projects Greenways Salaries $0 $130,000 100% $0 $130,000 100% Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew $0 $50,000 100°k $0 $50,000 100° Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating $0 $25 000 100% $0 $25 000 700 Total for Tributary Greenways: SO 0% 5450,000 100% SO 0 % 5450,000 100% A r ! r s! r i t ~ I ! ! >A I A 1 ~ r l r # ~ S f~ r 1 r r r a t a - City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 PW/Tributary Greenways yen Ha„a E C:eek x t' Q~{ ae. ~ ~ rs Sixmile rs~ ~ ~ S t' ~ rs,~, E a, ~ _ .a yet! rµ; w46 i P adv Yt til _ "Y>~'k,,'.~ 4,:'' dnd4 ~r~ ~ aN~iatj6 rF ~ ' I ya ,rrs ~ k.9. ^ s ~2 3~' iad3 ~ Fqt ~ ~ ~1',~tt~}G ~~tt _ i[,ez ~y r~`~ e ~ tai,.,. ~ f t rY ~,}IY~3~2Fi.~;r~ ~ ,y,,m.~ s S 44 + d u ,ti i++ars t ~a ~ ~ ° s ~ J~~n F°~'~G`B' ~ Fourmile .~aA° u ~rsr~tYe~., .W Ga°~~ ` ' 3 26th to 28th ~ ~ m~ U d9 ~ goulde f`.~3~ t is ~ Jay Rd goukier Creek tk a Hwy 4 ~`'~mF^ 4 r };:~r - r-er"° Cdr ,k 85:YYaarideriaridCteek - ~ ~ Fcxtfi+gs @D Oi~gcxtat ~ ' ~ ~ . d J•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i& a .-t m ` gOU Ara ahoe Rd. N ~ ~ ° v G e G~ m i x F4 ~EF( t ~I ~ t YYY } '4 ~ ~ S Boulder R k , e - - ~r tw, . s"y ' t. sr ",iBear Can 'r c s ' tl~~ :"~t ~ ~ i S ` iron Craek 1 ~";3~ ~'F ` ` - ~ Legend rs.... =C. Year of Project - • zoos ` . ~zotasoia .zoos m r ,p -207a207a o~ G' 5 - ~2oos .il'~, a~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Fourmile Canyon Creek - 26th to 28th 86 _ . Departmene: pW/Tributary Greenways subcommunity. North Boulder Funding source: Tributary Greenways evcPArea: Area I Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CFJ1P Required: Yes CEAP Completed: R !P~-.~u- :~-..;s ue:r~ ~ ; r"-:.: ~ : a zsRS,. ca:~.:?r`"!m".~ " d p,~~ Project includes Improvements to Fourmile Creek, environmental restoration and an off-street trail connecting 26th to 28th Streets. These improvements will be done in conjunction with work being done by the Flood Utilities Division and the Parks Department. :r.-~v~~w`^- """'a'te - nx-~es!'.G` , ~pw..m ~ . ~ .,•~r~i ten' This project supports the Council goals of environmental sustainability and transportation by improving the off- s street trail connections and environmental restoration. r faetoiis.Rot,~tastarn:, ~ r ~ a i '~S ~ ° ~°.at~`"' .'~,a~'`''rA. F y ~ This proejct is listed in the Greenways Master Plan and the Transportation Master Plan and the Fourmile Canyon R Creek Flood Mitigation Plan and the North Boulder Subcommunity Plan. ~ The CEAP for this project will be reviewed by the Water Resources Advisory Board as part of the Fourmile Flood ~ Mitigation Plan, with the Greenways Advisory Committee review a an information item. - u . w, All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning o Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions. Capital Funding Plan °r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $195,000 $195,000 $0 $0 $390,000 ~ Change from Prior Year: shifted funding from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012 s Annual On-going Operating Costs $1,000 Description: will be covered by existing maintenance budgets Source of Funding: parks, flood maintenance, Greenways habitat r` Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% I51 ar 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Greenways Salaries Department: PW/Tributary Greenways sul,eommunity. System-wide Funding source: Tributary Greenways evcPaea: System-wide Project type: On-Going Projects CF1W Required: NO CEAP Completed: This line item includes salaries for 1 Full time employee (Greenways Coordinator) and 112 of a full time employee (Maintenance Person). These funds are required for the continuation of the Greenways Program. w This funding supports programs that are recommended in the Greenways Master Plan. s: -s N/A All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives 'from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $780,000 Change from Prior Year: shift from habitat crew to 1/2 standard FTE Annual On-going Operating Costs $130,000 „ Description: supports 1 FTE (Greenways Coordinator) plus 1/2 FTE (Maintenanne Person) Source of Funding: Greenways CIP Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r r 152 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Maintenance and Weed Control Seasonal Crew a+ Department: PW/Tributary Greenways subeommunity: System-wide Funding source: Tributary Greenways svCPArea: System-wide a, Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: Mp CEAP Completed: ¦ . S4~ °va° 5 ~ c'4.' { gn`'`"h`m~romw~~" ~s+ h x3:. - d:L: ~...aSde~+§,rt" ka. ~ 3,93 rerxhhC;,tea ~ :A ~ E This line item includes funding to hire a sesonal crew that supports on-going habitat maintenance practices along the Greenways, primarily weed control. Purchase of equipment, materials and general operating expenses for the crew are included in a separate line item. l.m r 'uc2u: 'fi+3 ~~s'J' Maintenance of the Greenways for habitat supports the Council goal of environmental sustainability. s ~t41 _ „f,,.',~."_,~_..7"~.-~ r,.k-~ ~ m. ` s."zir`~[E~~ a..~*~ ' P~ . vr`,i~~a~~%ap ° .~_'s, T v ~a' IY~ Maintenance and weed control are important components of the Greenways Program. 'p w5'_°`~`1~.6~a sb ~ . r p, ~ °`x'+c"" w'~°~e 5s+'; ~ Weed control efforts well begin by concentrating on lands owned and managed by the Clty. The weed control plan for Greenways will be developed with input from the Open Space Department, the Parks Department, and Boulder County. Initial weed control efforts will be performed on City owned properties, therefore the projects will be coordinated with the managing department. Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 R Change from Prior Year: Reduced funding from $100,000 to $50,000 to reflect temporary salaries only. a„ Mnual On-going Operating Costs $50,000 Description: This funding provides salaries for temporary employees. Other annual operating costs ~ are shown as a se crate line item. Source of Funding: Greenways CIP ~ _ ~ Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 153 s 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report - Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating _ _ Department: PW/ Tributary Greenways subeommunity. System-wide Funding source: Tributary Greenways avcPaea: System-wide Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: r h"~ General administration of the program including such operating expenses as seed, plant materials, printing, espies, food for meetings, vehicle for the crew and program expenses for the Circle Boulder by Bike event. r These funds are required for the continuation of the Greenways Program. This funding supports programs that are recommended in the Greenways Master Plan. Any improvement that would have an impact on the public or an adjacent property owner would involve public input. .~v, ~,t. - - All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $150,000 Change from Prior Year: Decreased from $105,000 to $25,000 to reflect non-personnel operating expenses. Annual On-going Operating Costs $25,000 Description: non-personnel operating expenses Source of Funding: Greenways CIP Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r r r s r 154 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report m.. Miscellaneous Water Quality, Restoration and Trail Improvements - Department: PW~ Tributary Greenways Sutuommunity: System-wide Funding source: Tributary Greenways svcPArea: System-wide ~ Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: i [des ~ Fp ~ Miscellaneous water quality, habitat resonation and trail improvements projects. ~ ~ These project support the Council goal of environmental sustainability and alternate modes of transportation. ~ an_ _ . These projects are listed in the Greenways Master Plan Update. r arm k' ~mx-"..,~ _ ta- to 'y Y` r, ~ Petit ~ ~suoa.. ~ e `ter ~s xeam~a`, Projects will be coordinated with Transportation, Utilities, Parks and Open Space or the developers of a property. ¦ Projects are developed with input from the Citys Transportation, Utilities, Open Space Department, the Parks Department, Boulder County and the Environmental Affairs program, as well as through coordination with developers. . w ~ .:..~~~m.~~,,,,: Capital Funding Plan w,r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding _ $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 m .~a, ~m,:H~: c~r. i _ ~ Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs ® Description: combined all misc. Greenways Improvements into one line item. ~ Source of Funding: s Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% s. 155 ar 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Wonderland Creek Foothills to Diagonal 85 A au ax _ ,m a x7aa':~.. !IS:n:.' ..:is m: Department: PW/Tributary Greenways Subcommunity: Crossroads Funding source: Tributary Greenways avcPaea: Area I _ Proieet type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: YeS CEAP Completed: i. This project includes an off-street trail connection along Wonderland Creek between Foothills Parkway and the Diagonal Highway, environmental preservation, habitat restoration, and water quality best management practices (BMPs) in conjunction with flood improvements. The initial project would focus on Wonderland Creek, west of Foothills Highway. These improvements will be done in conjunction with work being done by the Flood Utilities Division. M. p4~ .::tea tw ':fiP. i^ k 5 v m. 11 This project supports the Council goals of environmental sustainability and transportation by improving the off- street trail system and including environmental restoration of the stream corridor. r This project is listed in the Greenways Master Plan and the Transportation Master Plan and Wonderland Creek Flood Management Plan. ~ i The CEAP for this project will go to the Water Resources Advisory Board as part of the Wonderland Creek Flood Management Plan, with the Greenways Advisory Committee review as an information item. Costs of underpasses and major Flood improvements are not included as part of the Greenways CIP. r All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $195,000 $195,000 $0 $0 $195,000 $195,000 $780,000 Change from Prior Year: Shifted funding from 2011-2012 to 2009-2010. Annual On-going Operating Costs $3,000 Description: will be covered by existing maintenance budgets Source of Funding: bikeways, flood maintenance, Greenways habitat Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary %O Total % 100% r 156 ATTACHMENT D-6 PERDIANENT PARKS & RECREATION FUND AND 1995 BALLOT FUND (.25 CENT SALES TAX) 2009 - 2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMS OVERVIEW The 2009 Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund and 1995 Ballot Fund (.25 Cent Sales Tax) Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is $3,368,000. The Pazks and Recreation Department's Capital Improvement Prognam (CIP) has been developed to meet the vision and goals of the 2006 ,w Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The first goal of the master plan includes maintaining parks and recreation facilities. The department has prioritized CIP projects based on health and safety concerns, ADA compliance and replacement of existing equipment and infrastructure necessary to ensure ongoing operations. The master plan outlines criteria to prioritize park development including community need, identifying underserved areas and evaluating opportunities and consideration of constraints relative to constructing undeveloped park land. The criteria are flexible allowing the department to respond to changing community needs. New park needs will be identified through area plans as land use and zoning changes may allow for higher density housing in areas such as the Transit Village area where residential uses were not originally anticipated. Staff evaluates park development prioritization annually as part of the CIP budget process. The development of new recreation facilities was identified in the master plan action and vision plans. The development of Valmont City Park (Phase I) was a high priority for the Parks and ' Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) during its discussion and approval ofthe CIP budget. Funding from the sale of the Kentucky and Papini properties to the Open Space and Mountain Pazks Department will be allocated to fwrd a significant portion of the project. Additionally, the renovation and enhancement of aging recreational facilities at the Boulder Reservoir and the Flatirons Golf Course were identified as a priority because of the financial reliance on revenue generated at these facilities. POLICY ISSUES „ The PRAB and departmental staff believe that it is crucial to identify park maintenance funding for projects constructed by the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund. As a capital improvement fund, the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund cannot be utilized to fund ongoing operations and maintenance functions. The General Fund is intended to provide maintenance fm~ding for projects built with monies from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund. The department receives General Fund monies; however, at this time the amount is not sufficient to cover maintenance for newly developed parks. The availability of maintenance funding is one of the criteria for prioritizing park development and the department is open to partnerships for park maintenance. HIGHLIGHTS For 2009 and future years, four funds (Lottery, Permanent Park and Recreation, . I S Cent Sales Tax and the .25 Cent Sales Tax) have been considered jointly to provide funding for the 157 department's capital projects. Major renovation and refurbishment projects (over $50,000) are identified individually in the CIP. In some cases, funds are being allocated for projects that will be started once the appropriate amount of monies has been accumulated. The following are the major CIP projects planned in all funds: ¦ 2009 CIP Funding Boulder Reservoir Improvements (including Master Planning) ~ Flatirons Golf Course Improvements Iris Center Remodel ~ Lighting Ordinance Implementation ` Mesa Memorial Pocket Park ~ Park East Neighborhood Park Renovation Playground and Irrigation System Renovation ` Pleasant View Fields Irrigation Replacement R Recreation Facilities and Pool Improvements ~ Thunderbird Lake Improvements Valmont City Park (Phase I) ~ Wonderland Lake Park (sidewalk repair) 2010 to 2014 CIP Funding Boulder Reservoir Improvements East Boulder Community Park Elks Neighborhood Park Flatirons Golf Course Improvements Foothills Community Park (Phase III) Lighting Ordinance Implementation ~ North Boulder Recreation Center Weight Room Remodel Playground and Irrigation System Renovation ~ Recreation Facilities and Pool Improvements Stazio Fields Imgation Replacement ` Valmont City Park (Phase I) Unanticipated Opportunities r For the purposes of the CIP, staff has included only projects that meet the CIP definition. Non- !r project specific fund accumulations, where no actual project is being proposed in a given year, ~ such as an Art in the Park project, have not been included in the C[P. w The department has continued to prioritize taking care of the existing system through the capital refurbishment and renovation program. Although these projects do not technically meet the CIP definition, capital funds are planned to be expended to meet ongoing and unanticipated needs including replacing and renovating park and recreation infrastructure, such as playgrounds and .e shelters; upgrading irrigation systems; and maintaining or replacing gymnasium floors, docks and walkways. The department has allocated Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) funding for on-going and major maintenance from its .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund. Park and recreation facility renovation and refurbishment funding has been dedicated to help the department address the backlog of deferred maintenance, replacing aging infrastructure and resolving safety and 158 ~ r environmental issues. For 2009, the budget for capital renovation projects and the FAM portion of the .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund totals $924,000. FINANCING The revenues from the .25 Cent Sales Tax are estimated based on citywide sales tax projections. The .25 Cent Sales Tax revenues were pledged for, " Payment for the principal, interest, and premium, if any, on bonds; and then for development, operation, and maintenance of the land and improvements purchased or constructed with the proceeds of the bonds; renovation and refurbishment or replacement of four pools; renovation and replacement of recreation facilities; playgrounds, mountain park trails, civic park complex; improvements to recreation centers and development of new recreation projects to be determined in the future through the Master Planning Process by the City Council; maintenance of the community pazk in north Boulder; development of a mountain parks environmental education program; and for the renovation of city-owned historical and cultural facilities; with the remainder being dedicated for parks and recreation purposes..." (.25 Cent Sales Tax ballot language) The Permanent Park and Recreation Fund consists of a .9 mill levy of assessed valuation of all taxable property in the city, gifts and donations to the fund, proceeds of the sale of park or recreation property or equipment. The fund also includes revenues from a portion of a development excise tax assessed on each new residential unit constructed or annexed to the city except for those units that are designated as permanently affordable. The City Charter requires that the "...Fund shall not be used for any purpose other than the acquisition of pazk land or the permanent improvement of park and recreation facilities." (Charter Sec 161) Funds are used for CIP projects and capital renovations of existing facilities for items based on the $50,000 CIP project definition. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The .25 Cent Sales Tax ballot language specified that funding for the operating costs for new pazk development could be allocated from the sales tax fund. The operating costs for renovation and refurbishment projects are expected to remain stable but aze increased annually for inflation; however, material costs are increasing at an unknown rate. Any increased operating and maintenance budget impacts from new pazk development or facility renovations are either absorbed within the current operating budget or recommended for increased .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund allocations addressed through the city's business plan and budget process. a As a capital improvement fund, the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund cannot be utilized to fund ongoing operations and maintenance functions. Additional monies from the city's general fund or other sources are needed to fund operations and maintenance of new facilities developed with Permanent Parks and Recreation funding. BUSINESS PLAN The department's investment strategy alilms with the city's business plan and the deparhnent's master plan. CIP projects are categorized as essential and desirable based on the following parameters: 159 R 1) Essential projects are provided to ensure general health and safety maintenance, facility repair and ADA requirements (accessibility and inclusion). 2) Desirable projects are provided to expand the system to meet ballot measure ~ commitments, to sustain the community's parks and recreation assets and to achieve or maintain industry standards. ¦ PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Pazks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) discussed staff's recommended CIP at its ¦ April 28 business meeting. The PRAB agreed that development of Phase One of Valmont City Pazk was a priority. In an effort to be fiscally responsible, PRAB deferred funding for East Boulder Community Park and Violet neighborhood park in order to maintain healthy fund ¦ balances. After the master plan for East Boulder Community Park is revised, the PRAB will ~ reconsider the project priority and allocate funding accordingly. The PRAB also reviewed the deferred maintenance needs for the parks and recreation system and expressed concern about the ¦ level of funding available, as it is insufficient. The PRAB reviewed and recommended approval r of the draft 2009-2014 Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at its May 19, 2008 business meeting. ¦ E r ¦ r ¦ r ¦ r s r 160 E t , F t ? ~ ~ ~ [ 1 t t : i t t c - P : t fl t 3 t t t , D i 1 i Y J 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund z9-rR,t-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R 400.000 250,000 250,000 425.000 425,000 50,000 1,600,000 Lighting Ordinance Implementation 150,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 1,050,000 Recreation Facility Improvement PPdtR 0 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 1,100,000 Total: 550,000 350,000 1,450,000 525,000 525,000 SSO,OW 3,950,000 Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Boulder Reservoir Improvements 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 Wonderland Lake Park 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 228,000 Total: 328,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 628,000 rn New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions Valmont City Park (Phase q 770,000 770,000 770,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,060,000 East Boutder Community Park PP&.R 0 500,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 1,550.000 Foothills Community Park- PP&.R 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 Total: 770,000 1,270,000 1,120,000 600,000 600,000 750,000 5,110,00(1 On-Going Projects Unanticipated Opportunities - PP&R 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 1011,000 300,000 Total: 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 Study or Analysis Boulder Reservoir Master Plan 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total: 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Total for Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund 1,748,000 1,720,000 2,620,000 1,275,000 1,275,000 1,450,000 10,088,000 a N e # ~ # r ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 11 ! l ~ # [ i s 1 ~ 1 f # ! ! ~ A ! ~ # e # r ~ r ~ i 1 t l l it t t P ~ t i t d i l 1 i c ; 1 l ~ l i , I ~ r~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades Iris Centtt Remodel 150.000 0 0 0 0 150,000 Playground and Park Irrigation System Replacement 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,400,000 Recreation Facility Improvements 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Noah Bouldtt Recreation Center Weighrroom Remodel 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 400,000 Total: 650,000 900,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,450,000 Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Pleasant View hrigation Replacement 215,000 0 0 0 0 0 215.000 Thunderbird lake Water Management 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 w Stazio Irrigation Replacement 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 Total: 415,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 565,000 New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions Valmont City Park (Phase 0 .25 cent 150,11()0 150,000 150.000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total: 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 New Construction • Not Growth Related Mesa Memorial Pocket Park 405,000 0 0 0 0 0 405,000 Elks Neighborhood Park 0 0 500,000 500,000 700,000 700,000 2,400,000 Total: 405,000 0 500,000 500,000 700,000 700,000 2,805,000 Total for Parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot 1,620,000 1,200,000 1,050,000 1,150,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 7,720,000 s~29reoo3 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund Essential ~ oestrabie Discretionary ~ Total I Project 7ypeMame Protects Funtling % Funding % Funding % Funtling % Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PPBR $0 $300,000 75% $100,000 25% $400,000 100% Lighting Ordinance Implementation $150,000 100% $0 $0 $150,000 100% Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Boulder Reservoir Improvements $0 $75,000 75% $25,000 25% $100,000 100 Wonderland Lake Park $57,000 25% $171,000 75% $0 $228,000 100% New 6onatructlon -Growth Related Facility /Additions Valmont City Park (Phase I) $0 $385 000 50% $385,000 50% $770,000 100% Study or Analysis Boulder Reservoir Master Plan $100 000 100% $0 $0 $100,000 100 A Total for Permanent Parka & Recreation Fund: 5307,000 18°h 5931,000 53% 5510,000 29% 51.748,000 100°/ ~ ~ ! [ ! ? ! ? ! r # e # r # r # r # r # r # r # r ¦ r # r # • ~ . . r 'r t i t i t ~ t r t t t a t s t a i t t ~ e ~ t i tt j s , s~2sizooa Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan Zoos ar s ecreat on 7995 Ballot i Essential j Desirable i Discretionary f Total Pro(ed TypeMame ProJecf X Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility -Enhancements / Upgratles Iris Center Remodel $37,500 25% $112,500 75% $0 $150,000 100°h Playground and Park Irrigation System Replacement $100,000 25°~ $300,000 75% $0 $400,000 100°k Recreation Facility Improvements $50,000 50% $50,000 50% $0 $100,000 100% Existing Facility • Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Pleasant View Irrigation Replacement $0 $215,000 100% $0 $215,000 100% Thunderbird Lake Water Management $0 $200 000 100°h $0 $200,000 100% New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions Valmont City Park (Phase I) .25 cent $0 $75 000 50% $75 000 50% $150 000 100°~ Naw Construction -Not Growth Related ~ Mesa Memorial Pocket Park $0 $405 000 100 % $0 $405 000 100°~ Total for Parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot: 5187,500 12°k 51,357,500 84% S75,000 5°k 51,620,000 100% City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 Parks & Recreation 14ti: Boulder t2eseivoir Master. Ptah rf 9: Boulder Reservoir Improvements , F ~ , ' f ,~x r.4 .r FoothNls Community Park \ ~ ~ ! . ca aA° P ~ a. 8: Elks Neightwrhooel Park ~ s. ~ Jay Rd R sL tm ~ ~ v+„ . ~ 142: Pleasant View ~ Ingation Replacement Wonderland Lake Park ~ 3 ° 4 ~ ~ n ~ ~ 5 ~ s ~ p,e~` 143: Stazio Irrigation ~ ~ . ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ i . Replacement ~4 R x 4 -L ~ ,vE ~ i R J d$ .147 Iris Cer,Ner Remodel ~ A ~ ~ { ~ 14#: NBRC 1Nteight-Room Remadek _ ~ ~ x L ~:.145:`Vaimont City Park ~ ~ rv~><r~ ~:•:3~ Ara hoe Rd. : 1411: Park Est Playground. w} tmprovemerts - ~ 5: Flatiron Gdt Cause a!:n >x Improvements a ,~u t wawa 144: Tlumde[iard LakB:y µ s } ~ WaterManageunsatfi "`n~'lo+'~# +4,~~~~ L~~``~y~~~~~!}~~~tpppf p.. rt V ii' ~d~ ~ [ 4 a ~ _ _ S Boulder R } 3: Mesa Memorial ~ ~ y' + Pocket Park ~ 3 ~ 4: East Boulder Community Park p.y ar.. _ . d F. yj. f r. Legend V Year or Proled ~ ~ zaw ~zo~azou =zoia-zou t• zoos t•m~azoia 166 .s - 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Boulder Reservoir Improvements 9 Department: Parks 8 Recreation subcommunity: Area III Funding source: permanent Parks & Recreation Fund evcPArea: Area III Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab !Repair /Deficiency Correction CF.AP Required: No CFJ1P Completed: r Funding will be used to address deferred capital needs and major capital improvements and/or facility renovations at the Boulder Reservoir. Specific projects will likely include entry way improvements from 51st Street, gatehouse renovations, signage improvements, marina, main office, concession and restroom renovations, docks and walkways replacement. Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues. Additionally, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop management plans for all developed outdoor recreation facilities, induding finandaf management, operations, event management, hardscapes, turf management and water resources. As the scope of work is defined, the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be determined. Parks and Recreation will coordinate and collaborate with Utilities, Fire, Planning, Police, Open Space, FAM, Transportation and any other identified departmental stakeholders will be involved in project discussions. Caplfal Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $400,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: An estimate is not available at this time. As specific projects are identified,operating costs will be uantified Source of Funding: Recreation Activity Fund a ,e Essential % ~ Desirable % 75% Discretionary % 25% Total % 100% 167 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Boulder Reservoir Master Plan 146 Department: Parks & Recreation subeommunity. Area III Funding source: permanent Parks & Recreation Fund svcPaea: Area III e, Project type: Study or Analysis CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: i i. ~ A Master Plan for the Boulder Reservoir will be developed to establish the management strategy for all city- managed lands, outdoor activities and developed outdoor recreation facilities, including financial management, ~ operations, event management, hardscapes, turf management and natural resources (land, wildlife and water resources). ° ¦ aEnvironmental sustainability: Development of a master plan will provide for improved water quality, wildlife habitat, energy and water conservation and sustainable uses of the area. Economic Sustainability: The master r plan will identify additional opportunities for the area to contribute to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: The area is a popular gathering place more many segments of the community. ~ `w~, The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifed the need to develop management plans for all developed i outdoor recreation facilities, including financial management, operations, event management, hardscapes, turf management and water resources. ~ m R As the plan is developed, a public process will be conducted to get community input regarding the future operations and uses of the reservoir. Appropriate boards will be involved, include the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Open Space Board of Trustees and Water Resources Advisory Board. County and state agencies will also be consulted as necessary. • r The department will coordinate all planning and resultant operational changes with Utilities, Fire, Planning, Police, Open Space and Mountain Parks, Transportation and FAM. 1° _ _ r Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ! $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Change from Prior Year: new project ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Will be determined through the planning process. ~ Source of Funding: Fund 230 Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 168 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report East Boulder Community Park PPBR 4 Department: Parks & Recreation subeommunlry: Southeast Boulder Funding source: permanent Parks 8 Recreation Fund BvCPArea: Area I _ ProjeetType: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: YeS CEAP Completed: To complete the development of the East Boulder Community Park Site. Approximately 15 acres of the 53 acre park remain to be constructed. The current site development plan focuses on the development of additional multi- use fields, an identified deficiency within Boulder, by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Boulder Valley School District. Environmental sustainability. Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: _ Park sites are community gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of park per 1000 population. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a need to develop community park sites. This site is needed to meet the standard of 1.5 acres of community parks per 1000 poplulation. The master site plan for the community park site was approved in 1987. The site has been graded, roadway and other infastructure, wmmunity center, playground, soccer fields, court complex and parking installed. Due to the length of time since the master site plan was developed, extensive public review will be provided prior to the next phase of development. Anew site plan will ensure community needs are addressed and will include opportunities for public discussion and dialogue. As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be determined. A development proposal has been submitted for the adjoining private property. P&R staff is involved in the review, anticapting potential impacts to the park, as well as opportunities for efficiencies in infrastructure development. Parks and Recreation staff work closely with Planning and Transportation staff as required for property development. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $500,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,550,000 r Change from Prior Year: Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $75,000 Description: Operating costs will increase when this project is completed. Amount stated is for 15 ° acres in 2005 dollars. w Source of Funding: General Fund Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r 169 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Elks Neighborhood Park 8 - Oeparement: Parks & Recreation subcommunity. North Boulder ` Funding source: Parks 8 Recreation 1995 Ballot evcPl4ea: Area I ~ Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: A Pro ~`~:N,Y~i..,~=" v '2i>s~. ~y.. ,~+i,..<~ ms ~ ars six 2~+ #„~,&s«P.-':a~".~'° " r The Elks neighborhood park site is a 7.9 acre parcel located at 3995 28th Street. The Elks park site design will involve extensive public review and dialogue with the community. Elks park will provide park services to an existing underserved area and has been prioritized for design and development to comply with ballot requirements of the .25 Cent Sales Tax. Significant flood and drainage work must be accomplished prior to park development. Parks and Recreation staff is working with Utilities and Tributary Greenways to coordinate the department's respective projects. e' e: - x~ v.p....;~: ; 5 t' t3r~,.,k.;. ,:ate= " t e P C ~ r _ " ,..va.z.." ~ 't"r~ .i; ~§~'_tP ~Rat~:~tm ~~IT ~_'_,:5'.a Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will comply with current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals, and employ best management practices. Economic ar Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Development of park sites are required to meet the commitments represented under the 1995 .25 Cent Sales Tax. Social Sustainability: Parks are community gathering places. Completion of Elks park will meet the ~ standard of 1.5 acres of neighbwrhood park land per 1000 population, as well as the park standard of a 1/2 mile walking distance to a neighborhood park. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped park sites to meet underserved neighborhoods and park service standards. - ar The Utilities and Tributary Greenways projects along Founnile Creek will require a CEAP, which will include the Elks park site. " _ _ K;~, R The department will work with Utilities and Tributary Greenways to ensure that all site work is coordinated appropriately. The Utilities and Tributary Greenways work must be completed before Parks and Recreation can begin park development. ¦ r Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $700,000 $700,000 $2,400,000 i Change from Prior Year: Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $48,000 Description: Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, structures and hardscape features a¦ Source of Funding: .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund u~ ar Essential °k 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% .d 170 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R 5 Department: Parks & Recreation subeommuniry: Southeast Boulder Funding source: permanent Parks & Recreation Fund avcPaea: Area I r Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: .r Funding will be used for future improvements to the golf course including, but not limited to, replacement of irrigation systems, cart paths, tees, greens, other golf course land improvements, driving range, event center, and pro shop facilities. The department seeks to retain current revenue streams and enhance departmental sustainability by enhancing the amenities at Flatirons Golf Course. In addition to the department's Master Plan, a business plan for Flatirons Golf Course will be developed to evaluate the feasibility of the capital renovation costs and potential increased revenue sVeams. The business plan and renovation work will involve all city stakeholders, including Transportation, Planning, Finance and the City Manager's Office, to ensure a common shared vision of Flatirons Golf Course. As specific projects are identified, staff will show projects on an individual basis within the CIP process. Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and consVucted to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. These improvements will increase service to the community at the Flatirons Golf Course which should result in additional revenues. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed options for renovation of the Flatirons Golf Course buildings at their May 2001 meeting. As the scope of work is defined, the public review process will be determined. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Transportation, CMO, FAM and any other identified departmental stakeholder «w Capkal Funding Plan dYW 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $400,000 $250,000 $250,000 $425,000 $425,000 $50,000 $1,800,000 ,r Change from Prior Year: Annual Ongoing Operating Costs ~ Description: Changes to operating and maintenance costs will vary depending on improvements. Source of Funding: Recreation Activity Fund r ESSential % ~ Desirable % 75% Discretionary % 25% Total % 100% w 171 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Foothills Community Park- PP&R _ 6 _ r Department: Parks & Recreation subcommunity: North Boulder Funding source: permanent Parks 8 Recreation Fund BvCPArea: Area I ~ Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: r~ P`Si?~€~~~!!~.~w a'~ d ~ &~&`~ _a.E ~~F-sue--_. .~~,..r'-a.~~ ~k Project funding began with the site acquisition in 1985. The Foothills Community Park site totals 69 acres. Phase I (44 acres) was completed in 2001. Phase IIA (temporary dog park and parking) was completed in 2004. Phase IIB (playground, shelters, restrooms, turf areas) was completed in summer 2006. Phase IIA & B development totaled eight acres. Phase III construction is currently planned for active recreational facilities, including tennis, basketball and handball courts, however a site planning process will be undertaken before development proceeds. ~ Pommu~ ~s~+Y,.~_ ect' - ~9 ` «s~ ' . tries ~ ~ ~ .R = i~ ;,-`~a ~ ~ r> ...s . w:_= _ Environmental Sustainability: Some of the environmentally sustainable projects within this 69 acre park inGude site irrigation from a ditch water source, provision for an organic community garden, restoration and preservation • of native grasslands, use of recycled products, and enhancing water quality by controlled release, landscape contouring, and Leaning of storm drainage waters. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of park per 1000 population. ra _ usf- The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a need for community parks. Project is needed to meet current °P acreage standard of 1.5 acres of community park land per 1000 population. The Master Site Plan for Foothills Community Park went through an extensive public review process. This process included identifying issues within the Major Site Review process and completion of a CEAP. Public review of Phase II was provided during a May 2002 workshop and a November 2002 Community Open House. Phase I (44 acres) was completed in 2001. Phase IIA planning and development began in 2001. Phase IIB e„ development began in 2005. Prior to Phase II construLion, the site plan will be reviewed by the community and changes made as needed. Coordinated efforts with Housing Authority to purchase right of way and to construct Violet Street to serve both the community park and the Foothills Affordable Housing project. ,....,„w _ _ Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Iw Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $20,000 Description: Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, struLures and hardscape features Source of Funding: .25 Sales Tax Fund, General Fund a Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total °k 100% r. 172 s 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Iris Center Remodel 147 Department: parks & Recreation subcommunity-. Central Boulder Funding source: parks 8 Recreation 1995 Ballot BvCPArea: Area I Project Typo: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades A CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: Project to reconfigure the first floor of the building to create additional space for administrative staff and include energy efficiency retrofits. 4~ r Environmental sustainability: Renovation and repair of department facilities will meet current city codes, reduce water and energy use and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Economic Sustainability: Renovations will reduce energy consumption. The Parks and Recreation master plan identified the need to maintain facilities. The renovations will have minimal impact on the public and the department will provide information to the public so as not to disrupt services. Efforts have been coordinated with the citys Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) and OEA staff. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Change from Prior Year: New project Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Building maintenance, energy and water utility costs Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Essential °k 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary °h~ Total % 100% W Mw Y alP sill i 173 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report . r Lighting Ordinance Implementation Department: Parks 8 Recreation Subeommunity: System-wide Funding source: Permanent Parks 8 Recreation Fund evcPaea: System-wide Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: ~ r. Based on the evaluation of the 2007/2008 Lighting Ordinance Compliance Study, the department will implement lighting retrofits in accordance with the citys lighting ordinance and to maximize energy efficiency. The e department is accumulating funding in anticipation of replacement and retrofitting lighting fixtures. Criteria for determining the schedule for replacement will include cost, energy savings and safety. ~ }w ft v Environmental sustainability: Retrofitting lighting fixtures will meet current city codes and reduce energy use. ~ Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Energy savings are anticipated from this project. Social Sustainability: Park sRes are community ~ gathering places. - d~ The approved master plan identifies the need to develop, maintain, and renovate facilities to meet communty ~ demands. Additionally, the lightning will contribute to the safety of the community as well as reduce energy demands. rr u ;m~,~~ra~ 6' rw City lighting ordinance compliance is required by 2017. No public process is anticipated. The public will be notified on a project by project basis. a~ " Iw The department will coordinate with Planning, FAM, OFJ~, CAO, as needed or required. Capkal Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $150,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 $1,050,000 r w Change from Prior Year: implementation of lighting compliance study Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Unknown, but will include energy costs and annual maintenance e Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund R Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 174 s " 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Mesa Memorial Pocket Park 3 Department: Parks 8 Recreation subeommuniry: South Boulder Funding source: parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot evCPArea: Area I Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related t CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: The Mesa Memorial pocket park site consists of a 1.7 acre parcel located at Table Mesa and Yale. Mesa Memorial has been identified for development in 2009 in order to meet commitments from the 1995 ballot measure and because Table Mesa Road functions as a barrier to community access. The pocket park site design will involve an extensive public review process to determine community needs. Park design and development is anticipated to occur in 2009. '°r Environmental Sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability. A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Development of some park sites fulfills the commitments made under the 1995.25 Cent Sales Tax. Social Sustainability. Park sites are community gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of pocket park per 1000 population, and be within the walking distance standard of 1/4 mile distance to the park. W. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped park stes to meet underserved neighborhoods and park service standards. As the scope of work is defined, the specific public review process will be determined. The park design process will include public involvement (specifically from the neighborhood) to get community input into the design of the Park. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning and Transportation as necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $405,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $15,000 Description: Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, structures and hardscape features Source of Funding: .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund ,r Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% i 175 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report _ _ North Boulder Recreation Center Weightroom Remodel 141 Department: parks & Recreation Subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding source: parks 8 Recreation 1995 Ballot BvCPArea: Area I ~ Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: The community demand for the weight room at the North Boulder Recreation Center exceeds the capacity. Funding will be used for expansion of the weight room. This project includes evaluating the current facility and determining the most viable option for expansion. s uawr •x+ 54 u9r4PdX~. ~e^~ss-:.. ~ .^tAL wssteal' 'x~" ~i Yr' ~la ~~~Aft$1~ 'i~f~N}_ Gam' ~vs. - 6f~g ,y,~~pn~H ~ ro,i;. ~ a ±°s _ ,rsBas~,,:.`'~"-.-..#'~v ~ Id-~: Environmental Sustainability:~Renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental ¦ sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, and long term sustainability. As part of the North Boulder Recreation Center, the expansion will also maintain the LEED standard. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to the economic viability of the community. The ~ current weight room is not large enough to attract new customers or retain current customers. r Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. Current customers are frustrated with the ~ lack of adequate facilities and the expansion would help retain them and create a more positive experience for our customers. ` r ~.v .A ^n~: x * w co-`-1 a s. ~ : r' w::4~ _rS~ _ c-~sE*"~ rnh>?: a '"rit ~p , :t The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identfed the need to maintain and renovate facilities. as well as invest in facilities that offer opportunities to increase revenues. - ~ _ 1 of As the scope of work is defined, the necessity of any public process will be determined. Parks and Recreation staff will coordinate with FAM, Public Works/Utilities, Planning and any other identified departmental stakeholder as necessary r< Capital Funding Plan A 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ,r $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 „s-s ~ Change from Prior Year: New project ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs I_~ Description: Annual equipment service and repair, typical building maintenance Source of Funding: Recreation Activity Fund Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% r r 176 s a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report .r Playground and Park Irrigation System Replacement Department: Parks 8 Recreation subeommunity. System-wide Funding source: parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot avcPaea: System-wide Protect type: Existing Facilky -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: r r Upon completion of the master plan, the department committed to renovating one playground and one irrigation system per year. Formerly, the department identified the projects and funded them from the Urban Parks R&R budget. As part of the effort to provide Dearer information on large projects, the department is including these annual projects in the CIP. The specific playground and park irrigation system that will be renovated will be decided on an annual basis and communicated to the PRAB. This allows the department to make the decision based on the most up-to-date information. Projects are necessary to comply with goals and commitments identified in the department's master plan. Criteria include safety and code compliance, age of the equipment, location in the city, and opportunities for efficiencies, collaboration or partnerships with other departments or the surrounding neighborhood. Environmental sustainability: Renovation of playgrounds and irrigation systems will meet curent city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Water and energy conservation best practices will be implemented. Economic Sustainability. A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. These park renovations are necessary to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to " meet expressed community demands. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. The Parks and Recreation master plan ident~ed the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. In addition, the department committed to renovating one playground and one irrigation system per year. The department will conduct outreach to the neighborhood on the needs and design of the playground. Typically, two public meetings are conducted - an initial one to gather suggestions and afollow-up meeting to review design options. The project is posted on the department's website and regular updates are posted. A email group may " also be created to update interested community members. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Utilities, Water Conservation and Transportation as " necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding .r $400.000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400.000 $2,400,000 Change from Prior Year: ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs $3,000 Description: Inspection and repair of equipment, graffiti removal, safety inspection, playground r surface maintenance Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund r Essential % 25% Desireble % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% 177 F 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Pleasant View Irrigation Replacement 142 m a„ Department: Parks 8 Recreation subeommunity. Palo Park ` Funding source: parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot BvCPArea: Area I Pro)Bet Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction ~ CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: I FY~•. Fr111V dNFFkv~+~ j•~• •:P.m ~ The irrigation systems at the sports fields have been analyzed and the department has identified a need to replace the irrigation system at Pleasant View Fields in 2009 and Stazio in 2010. The current systems do not w allow for proper coverage of the turf and is inefficient for irrigation needs. The original system includes valves that are no longer manufactured, leaving it virtually impossible to repair. Anew computerized clock, including a weather station, has been installed and will be compatible with the new irrigation system and will improve water consumption efficiency. System replacement will ensure that operations can continue, water budgets will be met R and current revenue streams are maintained or increased. r, ...+f.. b!.+;::_ va. ^ . 'miPM"s^ mmmq. m _ r'°v m...r?-TMY::. " ,n:., ~ ne ~W S r J i . _,:,G~~ _ ~a ~ to ~ Environmental Sustalnablliry: Imgation system replacements will be designed to address environmental sustainability. These projects will result in long-term efficient use of energy and water. Economic Sustainabiliry: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. These irrigation replacements will help increase the quality of the sports playing fields, which will r. allow the department to increase the number of events at the sports fields. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life. Irrigation replacement will increase the quality of the playing surface and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. ~ i'L .r e..y'~ Ilx The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in ~ facilities that offer opportunities to increase revenues. -Y As the swpe of work is defined, the necessity of any public process will be determined. ar Parks and Recreation staff will coordinate with Public Works, Water Conservation and any other identified departmental stakeholders. ¦ a. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $215,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,000 r. Change from Prior Year: New project ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs ~ Description: Inspection and repair of irrigation system ~ Source of Funding: .15 Cent Sales Tax Fund, Recreation Activity Fund .A Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 178 ~ aw a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Recreation Facility Improvements Department: Parks 8 Recreation sul,eommunity: System-wide Funding source: Parks 8 Recreation 1995 Ballot avCPArea: Area I _ Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: YeS Ck2AP Completed: W This funding is reserved for design, development and renovation of existing recreation facilities and buildings, including outdoor pools, recreation centers, and sports fields. 4 Y Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues. w. As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review process will be determined. Parks and Recreation Staff works closely with Facility Asset Management staff on all building and facility improvements. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $100,000 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Operating costs may increase when this project is completed. An estimate is not current) available.. Source of Funding: Recreation Activity Fund + Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary %O Total % 100% a r 179 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report _ Recreation Facility Improvement PP&R Department: Parks 8 Recreation subcommunity: System-wide Funding 5ouree: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund evCPArea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: ty 1 R ~"~r xr OLbe^a~tR~ -mss r'i k: ° ' ~ r.Ff 4d$a F .`xi: ~t'~" ~ _ „r, a~ d,~~q,.~x i ri ~aaan~. ~:,r5~UdCH25.+„«I ~'ii~''~a+s~, fitl e i~i~.r ~ _~=u:=~a~~ ..T r Funding is being accumulated for the design, development and renovation of existing and new recreation facilities. These facilities may include pools, recreation centers, sports fields, and other recreation facilities. At this point, a specific project has not been finalized, but it is anticipated that Scott Carpenter Pool will receive a major capital renovation. The updated Parks and Recreation master plan and the Parks and Recreation Advisory ~ Board will provide future guidance in project selection. As specific projects and funding are identified, staff will show projects on an individual basis with~ign the CIP process. R (dD _ ~ tolna~l:.. `f r4,~Gt,'(p _ ,ems: ,:fk` x ~ =mea `-s` _.'~'~'s~`.t~~*.~:~.~~ a` Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. f. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in w facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues. i. mrM - fi}!a~.~-:.Arur.r~.z.°,~-~~, ,*A.~.+,leima~,c As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be determined. Parks and Recreation staff works closely with Facility Asset Management staff on all building and facility improvements. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding rr $0 $0 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 a„ Change from Prior Year: ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs ~ r Description: Annual operating costs to be determined as specific projects are identified °1 Source of Funding: Recreation Activity Fund Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% v 180 w 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Stazio Irrigation Replacement 143 Departmene: Parks & Recreation subcommunlty: East Boulder Funding source: parks 8 Recreation 1995 Ballot BVCPArea: Area II Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction r w CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: The irrigation systems at the sports fields have been analyzed and the department has identified a need to replace the irrigation system at Stazio Fields in 2010. The current systems do not allow for proper coverage of the turf and are inefficient for irrigation needs. The original system includes valves that are no longer manufactured, leaving it virtually impossible to repair. Anew computerized clock, including a weather station, has been installed and will be compatible with the new irrigation system and will improve water consumption efficiency. System replacement will ensure that operations can continue, water budgets will be met and current i revenue streams are maintained or increased. Y'°9Vti Environmental Sustainability: Irrigation system replacements will be designed to address environmental sustainability. These projects will result in long-term efficient use of energy and water. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability of the community. These irrigation replacements will help increase the quality of the sports playing fields, which will allow the department to increase the number of events at the sports fields. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life. Irrigation replacement will increase the quality of the playing surface and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in facilities that offer opportunities to increase revenues. As the scope of work is defined, the necessity of any public process will be determined. - Parks and Recreation staff will coordinate with Public Works/Utilities, Water Conservation and any other ident~ed departmental stakeholders. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2074 Planned funding $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 r Change from Prior Year: New project "'r Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Irrigation system inspection and repair Source of Funding: .15 Cent Sales Tax Fund, Recreation Activity Fund a. Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r 181 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program ° Project Status Report „ Thunderbird Lake Water Management 144 Department: Parks & Recreation subcommunity. Southeast Boulder Funding source: Parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot OvcParea: Area I ~ Project type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: ,w- ~ . ri:~. ~ Fps N., 3.. ea The water level in Thunderbird Lake has decreased over the past several years. The department is investigating several options for replenishing the lake with water, including 1) drilling a well, 2) retrofitting the existing file drain, ~ 3) collecting stormwater, and 4) using potable water. The costs and feasibility of each option are being calculated and will be presented to PRAB and Council in the summer of 2008 for a decision. Funds are being reserved to implement the chosen course of action. m:;"~ flta~ina'~3'~Ity~ ~.y,~~ ~ _ a~ Environmental sustainabllity: Renovation and refurbishment of park sites will meet current city codes, strive to ~ meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Water rights and water budgets are topics that will be considered. Economic Sustainability. A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic ~ viability of the community. These park renovations will meet expressed community demands. Social r Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places and used by various segments of the community. liei,.: The Parks and Recreation master plan identified the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. u, . x The department has conducted public meetings and outreach to the neighborhood on the history, maintenance background, ecology and geology of the lake and area. Information is posted on the department's website and regular updates are provided to interested community members via email and regular mail. The department will ~ conduct additional public meetings as new information and changes occur. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning and Utilities regarding permits, fees and water rights. m w r ..~:Rw~ Capkal Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 r Change from Prior Year: New project ~ e. Annual Ongoing Operating Costs Description: Annual operating costs are unknown, but could include fees for potable water, water ri hts, water uali testin Source of Funding: .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total °h 100% I$Z R r r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Unanticipated Opportunities - PPBR Department: Parks 8 Recreation subeommunlty: System-wide Funding source: permanent Parks 8 Recreation Fund evcPaea: Area I Project type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: The unanticipated opportunities CIP allocation is intended to meet changing and unexpected community needs. r The unanticipated opportunities may include, but is not limited to: land acquisition, facility acquisition, capital renovation or development, city contribution towards potential public-private, public-public or other partnership agreements and energy efficiency projects. As spec'rfic projects are identified, staff will show projects on an individual basis within the annual CIP budget, which is approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Sites are needed to meet the commitments represented under the .25 cent 1995 sales tax and to meet standards of 1.5 acres of park land per 1000 population. Recreation facilities are intended to meet expressed community demands. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community. Park sites are community gathering places. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop, maintain and renovate facilities. The need to develop existing arid newly acquired undeveloped park sites was also deemed a priority. Any potential projects will be reviewed and discussed at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meetings. Large scale projects will encompass additional public process, including scope, design, impacts and timing. Planning, Open Space/Mountain Parks, FAM, Transportation and any other identified departmental stakeholder will be involved in project discussions. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: As projects are determined, operating costs will be calculated Source of Funding: .25 Cent Sales Tax, Recreation Activity Fund, GF iO Essential % O Desirable % 100% Discretionary TOtal % 100% 183 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Valmont City Park (Phase I) 145 _ Department: Parks 8 Recreation subeommunity. East Boulder " Funding source: permanent Parks & Recreation Fund BvCPNea: Area I ~ Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions r. CEAP Required: YeS CEAP Completed: N:~ ~ ..r-~,~ ~r~ w: 5`~ r DuringYthe process of updating the concept plan for Valmont City Park (VCP), the community has expressed a desire to begin development of part of the park as soon as possible. In response, staff has identified funding for t the proposed Phase 1 of VCP (completing the portion of the park north of Valmont Road). This would allow for construction of the bike park, dog park and other associated park amenities. Park development will meet service ~ standards outlined in the department's master plan. ,sum _ ¦ Environmental sustainability: Design and development of Phase 1 will meet current city safety standards, strive to °Y meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled andlor sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Water conservation and energy efficiency measures will be included. ~ Economic sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. This project will meet expressed community demands. The bike park is likely to contribute to economic vitality through special events. Social sustainability$$: Park sites are community gathering places. ~ a _ i A master plan goal is to fill in the gaps in the parks and recreation system. Revising the concept plan for Valmont City Park was identfed as a 2007 work plan item. Completion of Valmont City Park was identified in the e department's vision plan. An extensive public process has been conducted during the revision of the concept plan, including formation of an advisory group, conducting a community survey, holding three open houses, and numerous public meetings with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). A project website was also developed and updated regularly. As Phase 1 design and development proceeds, the PRAB will be involved and interested community members ~ and user groups included. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Utilities, Transportation and other departments as necessary. s „ _ _ . ~ y. Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding Iw $770,000 $770,000 $770,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $3,060,000 Change from Prior Year: New project .o Annual On-going Operating Costs ~ Description: As park is developed, maintenance and operating costs will be determined Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Essential % ~ Desirable % 50% Discretionary % 50% Total % 100% 184 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Valmont City Park (Phase I) .25 cent 145 Department: parks & Recreation suncommunity: East Boulder Funding source: Parks 8 Recreation 1995 Ballot avcPnrea: Area I Protect type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility !Additions CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: M ..y....... „..ier ..v :::av - c0 During the process of updating the concept plan for Valmont City Park (VCP), the community has expressed a desire to begin development of part of the park as soon as possible. In response, staff has identified funding for the proposed Phase 1 of VCP (completing the portion of the park north of Valmont Road). This would allow for 'i construction of the bike park, dog park and other associated park amenities. Park development will meet service standards outlined in the department's master plan. Environmental sustainability: Design and development of Phase 1 will meet current city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced ® materials will be used when feasible. Water conservation and energy efficiency measures will be a° included.Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. This project will meet expressed community demands. The bike park is likely to contribute to economic vitality through special events. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. ~iI . A master plan goal is to fill in the gaps in the parks and recreation system. Revising the concept plan for Valmont City Park was identified as a 2007 work plan item. Completion of Valmont City Park was identified in the department's vision plan. An extensive public process has been conducted during the revision of the concept plan, including formation of an advisory group, conducting a community survey, holding three open houses, and numerous public meetings with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). A project website was also developed and updated regularly. As Phase 1 design and development proceeds, the PRAB will be involved and interested community members and user groups included. « Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Utilities, Transportation and other departments as necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Change from Prior Year: new project Annual Ongoing Operating Costs Description: Will be determined with final site design ~ Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Essential % O Desirable % 50% Discretionary % 50% Total % 100% .r 185 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Wonderland Lake Park 2 n~~::=.~.:....... x -mart ~ Department: Parks & Recreation sutxommunity: North Boulder Funding source: Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund avcPMea: Area I ~ Proles TYPe: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction CFrW Required: NO CFr4P Completed: ¦ Wondedand Lake Park is a 32 acre site that consists of a traditional active-use park and natural area. The traditional area consists of playground amenities, a shelter, and paths. The Wonderland Park path is located R throughout the natural area. Project plans include three phases of removal of the Wonderland Park path, including 6 feet wide sections of concrete and 4 feet wide sections of asphalt, depending on path location. ~ Replacement is necessary to restore cracks, slopes, and trip hazards throughout the path. - h~ T Environmental sustainability: Renovation and repair of park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability. A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. These park renovations are necessary to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to meet expressed community demands. Additionally, the Wonderland Park path serves as a community multi-modal transportation path. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. The Parks and Recreation master plan identifed the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. ~ Public process is not anticipated. The project includes the renovation of exiting assets. Construction signs will be posted as needed. Path diversions and segment closures may occur, but will be limited. Precautions will be taken to ensure contractor vehicles limit disruption to park users andminimize disturbance to natural areas. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning and Transportation as necessary. r Capital Funding Pran 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000 r s Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Snow removal and normal path maintenance Source of Fundtng: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% 186 ~ r ATTACHMENT D-7 LOTTERY FUND 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Lottery Fund Capital Improvements Progam for 2009-2014 is $4,910,000. Projects scheduled in 2009 total $1,035,000. HIGHLIGHTS The departments of Parks and Recreation, Open Space/Mountain Parks and Tributary Greenways share the State of Colorado's Conservation Trust Fund (Lottery) revenue. A fund sharing ageement was approved in 2001 by the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB). This ageement guided the distribution of Lottery w- Funds between the three departments and functions through 2008. For 2007, a budget shortfall totaling $300,000 was identified for Parks and Recreation's Recreation Activity Fund (RAF). In response to this budgetary issue, the OSBT ageed to allocate their portion of Lottery Funds to Parks and Recreation for 2007-08. The generous offer from Open Space/Mountain Parks to forgo their Lottery Funds provided ashort-term solution to the financial challenges facing the Parks and Recreation Department. During the May 23, 2006 City Council meeting, the City Manager reinforced his intent that funding in 2009 would resume being shared by the three entities. For 2009, the Lottery funds are being shared by Parks and Recreation, Open Space/Mountain Parks and Tributary Greenways. Distribution of Lottery Funds for 2009: $ 525,000 Open Space and Mountain Parks $ 525,000 Parks and Recreation $ ] 50,000 Tributary Greenways projects $1,20Q000 y Projected annual Lottery revenues are $1,000,000 per year based on average past collections and projected interest. The $1,200,000 available for allocation in 2009 reduces the Lottery Fund balance to the target level. .r This funding is a vital element of Open Space and Mountain Parks' strategy to address ongoing and deferred maintenance in the Mountain Parks land area. r The funding is utilized by Parks and Recreation to fund urban park renovation projects (e.g. playgound and shelter renovations), habitat restoration and Art in the Park. i s r 187 .r The Parks and Recreation Department has continued to prioritize taking care of the current system through the capital refurbishment and renovation program. Although these projects do not ~r technically meet the CIP definition, significant capital funds (over $5,000) are expended to replace and renovate park and infrastructure, such as playgrounds, shelters, imgation systems, gymnasium floors, docks and walkways. FINANCING Lottery funding is provided by the State of Colorado's Conservation Trust Fund. Funding distributions are provided to eligible governmental entities based on a per capita formula. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION ~ On May 19, 2008 the PRAB reviewed the Parks and Recreation CIP and voted unanimously to approve the staff recommendation for the CIP budget and to forward this recommendation to City Council. OPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDATION ~ The Open Space Board of Trustees will be asked to review and approve the 2009 - 2014 CIP budget submittal at either its June or July meeting and will be asked to recommend it be approved by both the Planning Board and City Council. The results of this meeting will be s presented verbally to the Planning Board and City Council. ~ R r a w r s 188 ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¦ ~ ~ ~ ~ t a ¢ z 1 s t f t i - t i t ~ t i t t t ~ ~ it 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Lottery Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility • Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Park East Playgound Renovation 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 3G0,000 Playground Renovation 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total: 360,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,360,000 On-Going Projects OSMP -Historical SWC[ures & Traik -Stabilization & Restoration 475,000 475,000 475.000 475,000 475,000 475,000 2,850,000 Tributary Greenways Program -Lottery 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 750,000 Total: 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 475,000 3,600,000 Total for Lottery Fund 985,000 825,000 825,000 825,000 825,000 675,000 4,960,000 s~29/2006 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 Lotte Fund - _ - - _i rY Esaentlal ~ Desirable I Discretionary Total ~ Project Type/Name Pro/act N Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility • Rehab /Repair / Deficlancy Correc0on Park East Playground Renovation $90,000 25% $270,000 75% $0 $360,000 100% On-Going Protects OSMP -Historical Structures & Trails -Stabilization & Restoration 730000 $475,000 100% $0 $0 $475,000 100% Tributary Greenways Program -Lottery $0 $150 000 100% $0 $150 000 100% Total for Lottery Fund: 5565,000 57% 5420,000 43% 50 0% $885,000 100% 0 1 1 e # r ! ` # t # t # ! # ! # [ # ~ I R # l # A # ~ # ~ # ! # ~ # r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report OSMP -Historical Structures & Trails -Stabilization 8 Restoration 730000 Department: Open Space 8 Mountain Parks subcommuntty: System-wide Funding source: Lottery Fund svCPaea: Area III Project type: On-Going Projects ceAP Required: yes cEaP completed: As appropriate These funds are critical to the completion of the Visitor Master Plan (VMP). The locational focus for this program is the traditional Mountain Parks system together with its geographic extension along the Mountain Backdrop and contiguous foothills from Eldorado Mountain and Bull Gulch in the south to Lefthand Canyon and Buckingham Park in the north. This area still contains significant deferred maintenance that was inherent at the time of the Mountain Parks consolidation with Open Space in 2001. The historic structures and related visitor infrastructure on these OSMP lands are in need of stabilization, reclamation and restoration. Focus for 2009 will be the West Trails Study Area (TSA) process including Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis on lands from Eldorado ' ~ Springs Drive north to Lee Hill Road. Historic site assessments and related stabilization, reclamation and restoration will be conducted on historic structures on Flagstaff Summit and major maintenance and restoration projects will be completed on the historic trails system that was largely constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) in the 1930s. Related efforts will continue across this landscape over the planning period. „ - Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our M, waterways and address the communitys desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system Is equally available to all members of our community. Stabilization and improvement of our historic infrastructure will help to sustain the communitys sense of historic identity. Restoration and stabilization of these historic facilities will meet the objectives of the Open Space & Mountain Parks Long Range Management Policies and the Visitor Master Plan. ' Project development will incude consultation with appropriate Boards and public meetings. The main issues are to restore and preserve the historic, character-defining features of these facilities. Visitor safety and protection of rare biological resources are important components of these projects. Project will include appropriate public outreach for the level of work that is proposed and will be determined on aproject-specific basis. The Open Space 8 Mountain Parks Department works cooperatively with other city departments including Parks and Recreation and Planning. In addition, OSMP will continue to work with Boulder County Planning, other agencies and state and local programs to promote appropriate restoration of and access to historical structures. w ~ CaplWi Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $475,000 $475,000 $475,000 $475,000 $475,000 $475,000 $2,850,000 uti w . . . _ Change from Prior Year: + $475,000, was re-allocated to Parks and Recreation in 2007 and 2008. Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 191 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Description: Annual allocation from Colorado Lottery Fund Source of Funding: Colorado Lottery Fund r Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% s r. r r r R r °r r r s r s 192 .r r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Park East Playground Renovation 140 Department: Parks Recreation subcommunlty. Southeast Boulder Funding Source: Lottery Fund BVCPNea: Area I _ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: y. Park East is a 11.3 acre neighborhood park at Aurora and Mohawk which includes a portion of the Bear Creek - drainage. The park contains a playground, basketball court and picnic area and a portion of the greenways trail goes through the park. The existing playground equipment will be removed and the materials recycled, if possible. New equipment will be installed in 2009. The basketball court will also be refurbished. r - Environmental sustainability: Renovation of park playgrounds will meet current city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system " contributes to the economic viability of the community. These playground renovations are necessary to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to meet expressed community demands. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. The Parks and Recreation master plan identified the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. In addition, the department committed to renovating one playground per year. The department will conduct outreach to the neighborhood on the needs and design of the playground. Two public meetings are anticipated - an initial one to gather suggestions and afollow-up meeting to review design W, options. The project will be posted on the department's website and regular updates are posted. A email group may also be created to update interested community members. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, FAM and Transportation as necessary. ~ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $360,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360,000 Change from Prior Year: New project Annual On-going Operating Costs $3,000 Description: Inspection and repair of equipment, graffiti removal, safety inspection, playground surface maintenance Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund a Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total °h 100% r M 193 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Playground Renovation Department: parks 8 Recreation subeommunity: System-wide ` Funding source: Lottery Fund svcPnrea: Area I Proles Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction r CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: ?piITM iQ ec- 'i~4~''a~-s4" N" _~.•3~'~v-'+''°R'~``uU Upon completion of the master plan, the department committed to renovating one playground and one irrigation system per year. Fonnerly, the department identified the projects and funded them from the Urban Parks R&R ~ budget. As part of the effort to provide clearer information on large projects, the department is including these annual projects in the CIP. Each year, a specific playground will be identified for renovation. Criteria include ~ safety and code compliance, age of the equipment, location in the city, and opportunities for efficiencies, collaboration or partnerships with other departments or the surrounding neighborhood. Once a playground is ~ identified, staff conducts outreach to the neighborhood and develops a design for the playground with input from the neighborhood. Designs are evaluated for sustainability in construction, materials and ongoing maintenance. Existing playground equipment will be removed and the materials recycled, if possible. Landscaping ~ improvements may also be made, as well as picnic area and/or shelter improvements. ~ Environmental sustainability: Renovation of park playgrounds will meet current city safety standards, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Recycled and/or sustainably produced materials will be used when feasible. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. These playground renovations are necessary to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to meet expressed community demands. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. The Parks and Recreation master plan identified the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. In addition, the department committed to renovating one playground per year, i The department will conduct outreach to the neighborhood on the needs and design of the playground. Typically, r two public meetings are conducted - an initial one to gather suggestions and afollow-up meeting to review design options. The project is posted on the department's website and regular updates are posted. A email group may ~ also be created to update interested community members. ~ Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, FAM and Transportation as necessary. ~ r Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $0 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $3,000 Description: Inspection and repair of equipment, graffiti removal, safety inspection, playground r"` surface maintenance Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Essential % 25% Desireble % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% ` 194 ~r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program y Project Status Report Tributary Greenways Program -Lottery Department: Parks & Recreation subeommunity: Multiple Subcommunities Funding source: Lottery Fund BVCPNea: Project type: On-Going Projects ti CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: 1 , .m; a The program is intended to improve and protect the many riparian corridors that pass through the city. Improvements include pedestrian/bicycle paths, drainage and flood control structures, and preservation and enhancement of natural features. A portion of the capital funding for this program was shifted to needed maintenance of existing system beginning in 2002. See Greenways CIP/Budget section. Project funding is ongoing.This represents the Lottery Fund contribution to the program. _ 51~ Greenways projects integrate many goals including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage and flood management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists and protection of recreation and cultural resources. Coordination with the Greenways program is described in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan and the OSMP Visitor Master Plan. .e CEAP's are completed for all signficant greenways projects and are reviewed by appropriate boards. See Greenway CIP for more detailed information. The Greenways program requires coordinating with Transportation, Open Space, Flood Utility, Planning and Parks Departments. ~,~e Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $750,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: no addiitonal -funding is for the program, specific projects are outlined in the Greenwa CIP a Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total °k 100% r r r 195 r ATTACHMENT D-8 r OPEN SPACE FUND 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM " OVERVIEW The proposed 2009 CIP for the Open Space & Mountain Pazks Department continues funding for the Acquisition CIP at $3,400,000 and the Mineral Rights CIP at $100,000. The Water Rights CIP has been restored to $200,000 annually in 2009 and thereafter. In 2007 and 2008 these funds were temporarily reallocated to operations in the amount of $170,000 per yeaz. The Visitor Infrastructure CIP was increased starting in 2006 to $450,000 to implement the Visitor Master Plan (VMP). These uses of funds will be sustainable under the current Budget Office ~ revenue projections. POLICY ISSUES None at this time. HIGHLIGHTS " From January 1997 through Apri12008, approximately 16,275 acres have been added to the Open Space system, bringing the total Open Space acreage acquired since 1967 to 45,079 acres. Properties acquired since 2000, including lands in Jefferson County, have been purchased under the guidance of the Accelerated Acquisition Program, Acquisition and Management Plan 2000- 2006 and Acquisition and Management Plan 2006-2011. Additionally, 6,555 acres were acquired via the 2001 merger of the Mountain Parks Division of the Parks and Recreation Department with the Open Space/Real Estate Department. Staff anticipates acquiring an additional 5,815 acres under the 2006-201 I Acquisitions and Management Plan subject to availability of funds. Within the Land Acquisition program, additional acres of open space land will be acquired, subject to available funding, within the BVCP Area III, the Mountain Backdrop, the Northern Tier and in Jefferson County as approved by the OSBT and City Council. Funding is provided from the projected restricted open space sales tax revenues. The project includes funding for ~ survey, appraisal and professional fees and related acquisition and immediate management costs. Annual funding for the Visitor Infrastructure program was increased by $200,000 to the current $450,000 starting in 2006 to meet the work plan identified in the OSMP Visitor Master Plan approved by Council in April 2005. This progam provides funding for capital maintenance of existing trails and [railheads, construction of new trails and trailheads and other facilities that ~ improve the visitor experience, such as safe road crossings and to restore azeas where visitor impacts are high. r The Water Rights Acquisition program provides funding to purchase additional water shares from private owners or others for use on Open Space for agricultural and environmental purposes, as water becomes available in the Coal Creek, South Boulder, Boulder and Lefthand 196 Creek watersheds. Funds will also be used for professional, legal and engineering fees, and other analysis necessary to manage and protect the water rights portfolio. The Open Space and Mountain Pazks staff will continue to work with other City departments to assist in enhancing minimum stream flow where possible. r The Minerals Rights Acquisition program provides funding to purchase underlying mineral interests from private owners as they become available on the real estate market. Many of these interests in minerals, gas, oil and aggregates were severed from the properties before purchase by ¦ the City and could cause future management issues. Funds are also used for reseazch, mapping and analysis of potential acquisitions. ¦ The Historic Structures and Trails Stabilization and Restoration program uses Lottery funds r within the Mountain Backdrop to assess, stabilize and renovate significant historic structures and trails and to protect pre-historic sites identified in cultural resource inventories. These funds were ~ reallocated and transferred to Parks and Recreation in 2007 and 2008 and starting in 2009 the previous allocation formula will be reestablished, which will return the VMP infrastructure implementation to the Vision Plan level. ~ FINANCING s Sufficient funds are available in the Open Space Fund to appropriate the 2009 CIP. Open Space bonds totaling $20,115,000 were issued in May 2006 under the $45,000,000 general revenue bond authorization approved by voters in November 1997. Additional series of bonds are projected to be issued in future years under this and a previous revenue bond authorization. Dates and amounts will depend on a variety of factors, including future sales tax collections and funding needs for acquisitions. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The Open Space and Mountain Parks Visitor Master Plan (VMP) was adopted in Apri12005 and ~ outlines a significant capital expenditure plan in order to address identified needs within the six year CIP schedule. This, together with the Open Space Long-Range Management Policies adopted in 1995, sets the management direction for the OSMP Department. These policy level plans, along with area and resource management plans, provide the framework to prioritize and r budget specific resource management actions to further the OSMP Department mission. Currently, OSMP staff is in the implementation phase of the goals, objectives and actions recommended in the VMP, the North Boulder Valley Area Management Plan, the South Boulder Creek Area Management Plan, the Plains Ecosystem Management Plan, the Forest Ecosystem Management Plan and other adopted plans and policies. .w In 2009 funds will be restored to the Water Rights CIP (Open Space Fund) and the Historic Structures and Trails Stabilization and Restoration CIP (Lottery Fund). These funds had been re- allocated to address immediate operational needs in the Open Space and Mountain Parks and Parks and Recreation depaztments respectively and are planned to be restored to the respective CIPs in 2009 and thereafter. As the Accelerated Acquisition Program approaches achievement of its programmatic goals with the purchase of additional properties recommended by the Board and w approved by the Council, and as the outstanding debt issues aze paid off, there will be a shift of 197 ~n focus and funding from acquisition to management of the Open Space and Mountain Parks properties. y. OSBT ACTION The Open Space Board of Trustees will be asked to review and approve the 2009 - 2014 CIP budget submittal at either its June or July meeting and will be asked to recommend it be approved by both the Planning Board and City Council. The results of this meeting will be presented verbally to the Planning Board and City Council. rr a. r q. r s r a~ • s +r i 198 AIYI 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Open Space Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction -Not Growth Related OSMP North Trail Study Area 20,000 70,000 40,000 0 0 0 130.000 OSMP South Trail Study Area 262,000 150,000 0 50,000 0 0 462,000 OSMP West Trail Study Area 20,000 60,000 42,000 0 0 0 122,000 OSMP East Trail Study Area 0 0 50,000 70,000 190,000 40,000 350,000 Total: 302,000 280,000 132,000 120,000 190,000 40,000 1,064,000 On•Going Projects Acquisition Program 3.400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 20,400,000 Mineral Rights Acquisitlon 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 ~ Visitor Infrastructure-System Wide 148,000 170,000 318,000 330,000 260,000 410,000 1,636,000 Water Rights Acquisition 200.000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Total: 3,848,000 3,870,000 4,018,000 4,030,000 3,960,000 4,110,000 23,836,000 Total for Open Space Fund 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000 24,900,000 r t ~ t ~ ? ~ t 1 1 1 1 # ~ ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! # ~ ~ f ~1 ~ s ~ ~ 1 , t! ~ i i J ! ~I F ~ i f i~ t i t ~ t a E s t ~ t >q i i s~z9l2ooe Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 Open Space Fund ~ Essential ~ oesirabie T Discretionary Total Pro/ect TyprJName Pro(ect N Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % New Construction • Not Growth Related OSMP North Trail Study Area 843070 $10,000 50 % $10,000 50% $0 $20,000 100°k OSMP SOUth Trail Study Area 843050 $131,000 50% $131,000 50% $0 $262,000 100% OSMP West Trail Study Area 843060 $10,000 50% $10,000 50°k $0 $20000 100°k On-Going Proiocta Acquisition Program 720000 $3,400,000 100% $0 $0 $3,400,000 100% Mineral Rights Acquistion 935000 $50,000 50°k $50,000 50% $0 $100,000 100 Visitor Infrastructure -System Wide 843000 $74,000 50% $74,000 50°k $0 $148,000 100% Water Rights Acquisition 930000 $100,000 50% $100,000 50% $0 $200,000 100°~ Total for Open Space Fund: $3,775,000 91% $375,000 9°k SO 0% 54,150,000 100% I N O O City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 Open Space and Mountain Parks J A I .J 7 ~ a ~~o O~ 134: OSMP North Trail Study Area ~ Jay Rd 133: OSMP East Trail Study Area Iri J a Q v 133: oSMP East Trail Study Area nra ahce Rd. ~~r u+ 'O S Boulder R VSO 133: oSMP East Trail Study Area 136: oSMP West Trail Study Area 135: oSMP South Trai[ Study Area Legend " Year of Project , 1 ~ zoos rl ~ zo~azo~a • zoos = zo~azo~a ~ zoos zoi o-zoia 201 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Acquisition Program 720000 - Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks sul,community: System-wide Fuming source: Open Space Fund evCPaea: Area III Project type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: N/A This project is to acquire additional acres of open space, subject to available funding, within the BVCP Area III as well as the areas in the Northern Tier and in Jefferson County as approved by the OSBT and City Council. Funding is provided from the projected restricted Open Space sales tax revenue. The project includes funding for survey, appraisal, professional fees and related acquisition and immediate management costs. Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The Open Space lands add to the visual appeal of our community and the management practices after acquiring these properties insure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and provide for recreational opportunities for our citizens. Funding for the acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the OSBT and City Council in October 2005. The conceptual acquisition area in Area III is annually coordinated and incorporated with the Boulder Valley Comp Plan. Specific purchases are recommended by the Open Space Board of Trustees and approved by City Council. The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks and Recreation, Greenways, Transportation, Utilities and Planning. The department also works with and promotes inter-governmental cooperation with national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance (COSA), GOCO, Colorado Dept of Natural Resources, CDOW and others including the Trust for Public Lands, The Conservation Fund and Nature Conservancy. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $20,400,000 4r Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: OSMP maintenance costs are primarily related to visitation and visitor infrastructure. A uisition of land does not necessaril increase o eratin costs at a si n~cant level. " Source of Funding: Open Space Fund r Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary TOtal % 100% , r 202 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Mineral Rights Acquisition 935000 ,,R::~~ w~--__ ,_~w~:- Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks subcommunity. System-wide Funding source: Open Space Fund svcPaea: Area III ~ Protect type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: N/A This program provides funding to purchase underlying mineral interests from private owners or others as they become available on the real estate market. Many of these interests in minerals, gas, oil and aggregates were ¦ severed from the lands before properties were purchased by the City and could cause future management issues. Funds would also provide for researching, mapping and analyzing potential acquisitions. ~ - ~a"~dav: rs- ~ Contributes to Council's key focus areas. Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program is one a` that has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The Open Space lands add to the visual appeal of our community and the management practices after acquiring w these properties ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife and protect the quality of our waterways. Funding for these acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the OSBT and City Council in 1999 and in 2000 and 2005. Annual funding is approved by both the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council. a~,. s; The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks and Recreation, Utilities and Transportation. The department also works with and promotes intergovernmental cooperation with national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space, Jefferson County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance s' (COSA), GOCO, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, CDOW and others. :mom,, ~-a~m_-.gym rx::: Capital Funding Plan ~r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding r $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $600,000 w Change from Prior Year: N/A Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Included in annual appropriations for operations Source of Funding: Open Space Fund ar Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% ar r' s 203 ~r r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report OSMP East Trail Study Area 843080 133 ~ At' tkparbnent: Open Space 8 Mountain Parks subeommunity: System-wide Funding source: Open Space Fund avCPArea: Area III Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related r CEAP Required: NO LEAP Completed: AS appropriate This area includes the eastern quadrant of the Boulder Valley and extends from Highway 119-Longmont Diagonal south to Highway 36. It includes the Dry Creek ,Union Pacific/Whiterocks, and Tallgrass Prairie East sub-areas. Planning for this Trails Study Area (TSA) will include Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis which is anticipated to begin in 2011. Potential projects for this area may include: limited number of new trails, designation and major maintenance for some undesignated trails and closure and reclamation of undesignated Vails, trail head improvements, and revised and/or additional regulatory, way-finding and interpretive signs. y. Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure.that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the communites desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. Funding for visttor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the Vail study area process. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $50.000 $70,000 $190,000 $40,000 $350,000 Change from Prior Year: N/A r Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 Description: Monitor, maintain,rehabilitate Vails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% 204 m 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program = Project Status Report w OSMP North Trail Study Area &43070 134 Department: Open Space 8 Mountain Parks subcommunity: System-wide Funding source: Open Space Fund evcPaea: Area III Proleet Type: New Construction -Not Growth Related cFrtP Required: No cF_nP completed: As appropriate ~ryv _:-p~v~ _,b ~ Lei a*- sv... h.~ yw1'fayx, ~te~ em@~¢~~ :.v7FATh~#'F?;+6 ~ rS'k~~5::!4ndt c.. ~ri This area includes the North Foothills area north of Lee Hill Road and the Boulder Valley Ranch area extending east to Highway 119-Longmont Diagonal. This includes Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis which is ~ anticipated to begin in 2009. Potential projects for this area may include: limited number of new trails, designation and major maintenance for some undesignated trails, closure and reclamation of other undesignated trails, trail ~ head improvements, and revised and/or additional regulatory, way-finding and interpretive signs. w xr K'P ~x~g~re a ~'s ._ar vl ~a ~s ~ 8a19{alnattl~itlt t ~:i ta... ~~g _ .r.~; .:.,~:r-''~~,! ar Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and ~ visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways-.and address the communites desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land °i system is equally available to all members of our community. Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space~Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. ae Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development w, of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. R Capkal Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $20,000 $70,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 ~ Change from Prior Year: N/A Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund r Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% r r 205 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report OSMP South Trail Study Area 843050 135 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks Subcommunity. System-wide Funding source: Open Space Fund evcPArea: Area III Project rype: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: NO LEAP Completed: AS appropfOpriate This Trails Study Area (TSA) includes areas known as the Eldorado Mountain/Dowdy Draw TSA west of Highway 93 and the Marshall MesalSouth Grasslands TSA east of Highway 93. It extends from Eldorado Mountain and Bull Gulch in the west, eastedy to Highway 36 and lies south of Eldorado Springs Drive and Marshall Drive. Trails projects in this area west of Highway 93 were identified in the planning process that was completed in 2006. Specific trails alignments and designs were initiated in 2007 and major projects undertaken in 2008. Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis was completed for trails in this area in 2007-08. Additional projects that are planned for 2009 will include continued closure and reGamation of undesignated trials. Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and ••r visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the communitys desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. 'Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and Vailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. " CapMal Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $262,000 $150,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $462,000 Change from Prior Year: N/A Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund r Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% rr 206 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report OSMP West Trail Study Area 843060 136 e A Departrnent: Open Space & Mountain Parks subcommunily: System-wide Funding source: Open Space Fund 6vCPArea: Area III Project type: New Construction -Not Growth Related CEAP Required: NO cEAP completed: As appropriate ~ht Ian. _ rm This area lies west of the city limits and extends from Eldorado Springs Drive north to Lee Hill Road. Context base for analysis and alternatives for Trials in this Trails Study Area (TSA) was undertaken in 2008 and is scheduled for completion in 2009. This includes Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis which was begun in 2008 and will be completed in 2009. Potential projects for this area may include: limited number of new trails, ~ designation and major maintenance for some undesignated trails and closure and reclamation of undesignated trails, trail head improvements, and revised and/or additional regulatory, way-finding and interpretive signs. R ~:a~-aiirndi,~~iutbi~~ i~ -.:.x ~ Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Ewnomic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that ~ have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and o° visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and address the communitj/s desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to rewncile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. „t, ~ . lEN Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adapted by OSBT and City Council in 2005. ~ r Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also s approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. e Is _ r CapRal Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $20,000 $60,000 $42,000 $0 $0 $0 $122,000 Change from Prior Year: N/A Annual On-going Operating Costs $2,000 R Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% a. 207 ar 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Visitor Infrastructure -System Wide 843000 Department: Open Space & Mountain Parks SubcommuNty: System-wide Funding Source: Open Space Fund BvCPArea: Area III Project Type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: YeS LEAP Completed: AS appfopfiate a M This program provides funding on a system-wide basis for capital maintenance and new construction on existing trials and trailheads, new trails and trailheads, other facilities that improve the visitor experience (e.g. safe road crossings), and capital restoration of areas where visitor impacts are high. The 2005 Visitor Master Plan provides a 10-year template for system-wide projects and programs which are studied and planned through the Trail Study Area (TSA) process. There are four such major TSA areas in the system and additional sub-areas. The Visitor Infrastructure CIP provides the funding base for on-going major capital maintenance and large scale projects including connections between and outside of the TSAs. For example, this program includes OSMP participation in the multi-agency IBM Trail Connector lead by Boulder County Transportation in cooperation with the City's Transportation, Water Utilities, OSMP and Parks and Recreation Departments. CEAP will be completed in 2008 and construction in 2009. While total project cost is quite large and includes County transportation funds and $920,000 of Federal funds, the anticipated city share of this is relatively small. See CIP line below. Supports City Council goals for Environmental, Economic and Social Sustainability. The Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) land system sustains environmental qualities and passive recreational opportunities that have made the program a leader and role model for other communities. These lands add to the quality of life and visual appeal of our community that helps to attract employment opportunities and sustain job retention. Projects on the OSMP land system help provide work for local employers. Community supported management practices on the land ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our watervvays and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to the visitor infrastructure will further Council's goals to reconcile interests of the environmental and recreational communities. The land system is equally available to all members of our community. Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adopted by the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council in 2005. Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also approved by City Council under the CEAP call-up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of trail and trailhead locations and alignments in the trail study area process. CaplWl Funding Plan "0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding „ $148,000 $170,000 $318,000 $330,000 $260,000 $410,000 $1,636,000 r Change from Prior Year: Modified to re-allocate to the four (4) major Trail Study Areas. Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Monitor, maintain, rehabilitate trails when needed ® Source of Funding: Open Space Fund Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% pg Discretionary Total % 100% W,. 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Water Rights Acquisition 930000 w Departmene: Open Space 8 Mountain Parks subcommunity. System-wide Funding source: Open Space Fund avCPArea: Area III Project type: On-Going Projects CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: N/A This will provide funding to purchase additional water rights from private owners or others for use on Open Space for agricultural and environmental purposes as water becomes available. Program funding includes water acquisitions in the Coal Creek, South Boulder, Boulder and Lefthand Creek watersheds. Funding will also be used for professional fees, legal and engineering fees, analysis and mapping necessary to manage and protect " the water rights portfolio. Because of our continuing wildlife and habitat concerns, the Open Space and Mountain Parks Resource Conservation staff will continue to work with other City departments to assist in enhancing minimum stream flow where possible. 7 ~ R Contributes to Council's key focus areas. Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program including water rights is one that has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The Open Space lands add to the visual appeal of our community and the management a. practices after acquiring these properties ensure that we continue to preserve traditional agricultural practices and to provide habitat preservation for wildlife and protect the quality of our waterways. k ~ Funding for these water rights acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the OSBT and City Council in 1999 and in 2000 and 2005. r .m~ - r" Annual funding is approved by both the Open Space Board of Trustees and City Council. The Open Space 8 Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks ~ and Recreation, Utilities and Transportation. The department also works with and promotes inter-governmental cooperation with national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space, Jefferson County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance s (COSA), GOCO, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, CDOW and others. _ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 nr . r:.. Change from Prior Year: Funds restored in 2009, was $30,000 in 2008 and 2007 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Included in annual appropriations for operations Source of Funding: Open Space Fund - - Essential % 50% Desirable % 50% Discretionary Total % 100% as 209 wr ATTACHMENT D-9 CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2009-2014 Capital Development Fund (CDF) Capital Improvements Program is $1,690,000. Three projects are scheduled in 2009 for a total of $330,000. POLICY ISSUES None. HIGHLIGHTS The 2009-2014 CIP projects reflect the City's participation in the creation of community plazas and other municipal spaces /projects. The CIP primarily focuses on Downtown Campus Office Space Deficiency and construction of a General Storage Facility at [he City Yards to be used for recycling building materials, wastes, computers, and furniture and for other city operational needs. Specific projects will include an emphasis on sustainable design practices, reuse and recycling of materials, and energy efficient design applications. FINANCING Funding for the CDF projects is derived from the assessment of excise taxes on new development. The proposed CDF C1P and fund financials reflect the new excise tax rates and annual cost of living increases up to the maximum rate allowed by the ordinance. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET r. Department and tenant operating budgets are to identify any on-going costs and corresponding funding. FAM typically calculates these operational costs and advises departments accordingly. Major Maintenance and Facility Renovation & Replacement (FR&R) costs are applicable to any new, improved, or expanded General Fund facilities. These costs are each 1% of the current replacement value (2% total) for these facilities. Major Maintenance costs are charged in conjunction with the project and are added to the FAM operating budget and FR&R charges are added to the FAM FR&R budget when all debt on the facility is retired. In the current fiscally constrained budget situation, no additional funding is available for MM/FR&R. However, funding gaps in MM/FR&R are addressed in the Action and Vision funding plans as outlined in the FAM Master Plan. Users of additional office space in the Downtown Campus and the General Storage Facility will pay their portion of operational costs through a cost allocation process and should realize an overall budget savings for storage as compared to fees currently charged by private facilities. 210 s BUSINESS PLAN Capital projects classified into essential, desirable and discretionary using the methodology outlined in the FAM Master Plan. Priority is given to the 26 "essential facilities" noted in Appendix 1 of the FAM Master Plan when completing capital projects. Essential projects are those projects [hat allow continued operation of a facility, repair/replace life-safety systems, or are necessazy to fully comply with laws and ` regulations. Desirable projects are those projects that extend facility service life or repair/replace systems other than life safety. Discretionary projects aze those projects that improve efficiency. ! R R w wr r r r w r. wee wP r r- 2~~ ~ r. 1 i 1 1 ! i E >I r~ t i t i E : 1 i r r i t + t t i t s t i t t r j 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Capital Development Fund o/-rug-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions Downtown Office Space Deficiency 250,000 250.000 0 0 0 0 500,000 Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Municipal Spaces 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 60,000 Construct / Purchase a General St~ege Facility 0 0 830,000 0 0 0 830,000 Total: 330,000 330,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,690,000 Total for Capital Development Fund 330,000 330,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,690,000 N_ N 7/1/2ooa Business Plan Budget Submission Page i of t Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 Capital Development Fund Eesennal r Desirable I Discretionary ~ Total Pro/ect 7~peMame ProJectX Fund/ng % Funding % r Funging % Fund/ng % New Construction -Growth Related Facility/ Addttions Downtown Office Space Deficiency 511XXX $0 $250,000 100% $0 $250,000 100°h Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects 511702 $0 $50,000 100% $0 $50,000 100°k Municipal Spaces 511715 $0 $30,000 100% $0 $30,000 100% Total }or Capital Development Fund: SO 0% 5330,000 100% SO 0°h 5330,000 100°h N W R w~~ r¦ I! ~ r¦ r e r s r¦ r¦ r¦ r t r¦ r¦ r¦.¦. w r City of Boulder Captial Improvement Projects, 2009 - 2014 PW/Facilities and Asset Management 'w 96: 13Ufi•Aiepahoe=Interior Renovation 94. Mthin Lucy Electrical System Ivtaintenance - S$= A!Faat LitaCary Carpet Replacement 101: West Senfor Center Maim. and Rehab. 1U9: Recxmstnlct Main Library North Plaza '=s 11©. BMoCA Ejevator & ADA Improvements Y t , 11$: Main library - t)pgrdde Auditorium Lighting a K ::,G 711: INakttenance of Boulder . ~ ,and Sound System 42©~ New Btl~n - Elevator tZefurb./Repjace m Reseivoir Secud~uty House '13'E: NeWt~itam Replace North Exterior Steir6~~ fu`~'~°~~.x ~ri ~ ! E. j3l _ ~jd~WSH 2P :•~i=: ' ~t 1t)2: Maintenance of S rues ! ~ { i;~4t$ q'CY P s 5 4 yTiP ,'a,~tr ~PcmflodcerRooms ~rr - 115. Fire Statllwi #1 `3' Renovate Showers/Restrooms Dairy Centeria' the Arts - 113: Corgi ~tiir~r ADA Deficienaes 114: Replaoe Roof W ~ 91: North Boulder j ~ ~ 1tkl Cob~stntet /Purchase Park Shelter Repair - f~ aG~it~ ~ e~FaeNity a~~ ~ ~ ~ 1~?1 F'te~ Sege Eioof-Replacement 95: Camegle Ljbrary : i~ ~',~ervices Center 8ttlg: B Exericx~Yepeir's. ! . ~ ,~~ire-~uinkjer Piping - ' ! ~ Stazb Tnaile Canopy- Ong Replacement . , :'~'~~t~fo'Bsstn»n~: 1~{d€incessiokis - t,:: ; ~ tin I'~:' art ~ a '"!a!''S't ~~,~~r~k. ~l ''i° E ~ ! ~et~nGe of,SCOtt` ~ It I44"i ' ~ t'` i. Lter Rooms , ~ ` x ~_E.siE,!p'~ ~ ~ anCe e~ ~~a ~ ~_._,mmm_. '#eplaoement sum s ulder R t22: Replace Chautauqua ~ { E `•~a' r E . ~i:e t? ~ ib9: a'f`antra Park x, ~ Shr~ tutaintenance ~ ~ ~ s ~ 1iM"Fire Station #4 Legend 97: Martin Park ~ Majof Maintenance Year of Projac! Shelterfdajor X2009 Maintenance ~ zoio-zoid ~ X2009 = 20142014 ~ 2009 s ~2oio-zoia 214 i 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Construct / Purchase a General Storage Facility 511XXX 100 _ w Department: pW/Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: East Boulder Funding source: Capital Development Fund evcPaea: Area I w Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions r CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: p-i,?aaKu'~Ecv'''~~~t .4 ~ ~ Rn .zc~ ~ } :;a ~~i~ IY Construct a storage facility (approx. 5800 SF) at the City Yards as an addition to the existing B2 Building in the space vacated by the Boulder Emergency Squad. This facility is needed to reduce vehicle miles traveled by FAM ~ to support furniture and waste recycling programs and will address growing city storage needs. Space will also be allocated for storage of Central Records. Purchase of an existing storage facility in the area of the City Yards a' will be considered and pursued if it is more cost effective or desirable in lieu of constructing new space. 4v_~y,y:um s:'.- s u:.r :.~sa ~ } xdY~ a`... ~ ~FDI~f~? ~ 3 '-:xe4i This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by reducing vehicle miles ` traveled and by increasing the ability for city departments to store building materials and fumiture for reuse and to have a central recycling facility for wastes. w The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to construct this facility. t~ w r-.,Ap Baer ?1~~1i`v'' 4 ry~ _ g ~ h.,~"o-."'.k ~CkF~'..`s.'S r Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB, and Planning w Board as appropriate. The CDF share of project costs (100%) is based on the fact that adequate facilities to accommodate city records and storage existed in 1987 when the CDF was started. This project will be coordinated with Central Records and other divisions of Public Works Department. .a _a. Capital Funding Plan w 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding , $0 $0 $830,000 $0 $0 $0 $830,000 ` ~ n-: A. _ ~ K,n..:.~,~H. , s Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $25,000 s Description: Includes maintenance and replacement, utilities, and cleaning. Costs to be added to ~ FAM o ratin bud et and cost allocated to users. Source of Funding: Central Records and Public Works w Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% R" R 215 w M 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report s Downtown Office Space Deficiency 511XXX a Department: pW/Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. Central Boulder Funding source: Capital Development Fund BvCPnrea: Area I Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: NO Cl=J1P Completed: ~ v. A recent evaluation of office on the downtown campus indicates a space deficiency of approximately 10,000 SF. This project would allow interior tenant finish of leased space and backfill of space to maximize department efficiencies. The growth related portion of this project is being funded by the Capital Development Fund. The portion of the project not related to growth s being funded by the Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund. - This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of existing buildings, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed _ plan. x~ 3e I" Several department master and strategic plans show the need to add staffing and associated office space in the downtown area as plans are implemented. Examples include: Information Technology, Housing and Human Services, and the Climate Action Plan. None m This project will be coordinated with user departments including Information Technology, City Managers Office, Finance, Public Works, and others. ~h:d Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: See the Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund Souree of Funding: ESSential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% s w ya 216 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report _ _ Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects _ 511702 ar Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. System-wide Funding source: Capital Development Fund svcPArea: System-wide er Project type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility I Additions CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: Citys participation in accomplishing small projects and advance project planning ,less than $50,000 each, that are done in conjunction with other new construction or expansion projects related to growth. Previous projects s include: Valmont Butte engineering and environmental studies, Children, Youth and Family Services AddBion, and Outfitting the University Hill Police Annex. ` ~r ~ ham„..,. ~,rn w:~._ This project supports the Council goal of economic sustainability by extending the useful life of existing facilities. ~ . aNww ~y " FIS._2. .:a~cfi`~l 4xi~_ a':.,d.,_.. ,ma4 d,., ~„t 1" v _ The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need for funding small facility projects related to growth at the discretion o~fythe Facilities & Fleet Manager. PHry ~ 'yf' ' °~s'.Y'fi `m.,,:'~" r,arsw~ N ~r y,2&t'w' a' ~mm JR'~~dii ~ W ° ,.a'~.i+~°:' Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be ~ reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB, DDAB, and/or Planning Board as appropriate. This project will be coordinated with the affected departments. ~x :~_.m:....~ _ .,.r- ~fl,,,:„,~„_, Fes::-,-,.,.. _ , .__,_e_ ,~fim _ Capital Funding Plan ~ f 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding il $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Change from Prior Year: ` Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Ir Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects. a° Source of Funding: u 5n:. ar Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% s ¦r 217 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Municipal Spaces 511715 Department: PW/ Facilities 8 Asset Management subeommunlty: System-wide Funding source: Capital Development Fund svcPnroa: System-wide Project Type: New Construction -Growth Related Facility /Additions CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: s j ~ti s 3~1e Cites participation in the creation of small plazas, outdoor use areas and other municipal spaces. These are done in conjunction with new construction or expansion projects related to growth. If the funding is not used in a particular year, it is carried forward for future uses. Previous uses of funding include constructing the plaza on the west side of the Municipal Building and providing partial funding for the Sister Cities Plaza in 2006 and 2007. This project supports the Council goal of environmental sustainability by creating natural sites and hardscape areas for public enjoyment. ~ n= The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need for the creation of small plazas, pocket parks and other municipal spaces related to new development. These efforts will be coordinated with Parks & Recreation. - uµ(°q~~r ~z~i Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB, DDAB, and/or Planning Board as appropriate. ~n ' This project will be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $30,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 " Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects. Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ae r r ~ 218 r ° FACILITY RENOVATION & REPLACEMENT FUND 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The 2009-2014 Facility Renovation & Replacement (FR&R) Fund Capital Improvements Program is $5,872,000. Projects scheduled in 2009 total $1,868,000. POLICY ISSUES No policy issues for the 2009 CIP. HIGHLIGHTS ° The 2009-2014 CIP projects reflect the city's ongoing participation in maintaining and updating existing facilities with an emphasis on energy efficiency and use of renewable materials and sustainable design, such as energy efficient lighting and mechanical ° systems and computerized controls. Where applicable, projects efforts will also include energy systems audits, mechanical systems re-commissioning and environmental and indoor air quality assessments and action plans. Planned projects in 2009 include ° remodeling offices space for additional staff in the Downtown Campus, interior renovation for 1301 Arapahoe, upgrading the auditorium lighting and sound system for the Main Librazy, and miscellaneous renovation projects (<$SOK) such as replacing ° plumbing systems or small HVAC systems. The 2009 CIP also includes exterior r rehabilitation work for the Carnegie Library. The total project cost is $276,147 of which sixty-two percent ($171K) of the project costs will be paid for by a grant from [he State ° Historical Society. FINANCING Funding for FR&R projects is derived from an annual contribution by the General Fund equal to 1% of the current replacement value (CRV) for General Fund facilities. Additional funding comes from user departments and from restricted fund departments as ° annual contributions to the fund. This fund is managed as an internal service fund. ~ RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET ~ Department and tenant operating budgets aze to identify any on-going costs and corresponding funding. FAM typically calculates these operational costs and advises departments accordingly. Major Maintenance and Facility Renovation & Replacement ~ (FR&R) costs aze applicable to any new, improved, or expanded General Fund facilities. These costs are each 1% of the current replacement value (2% total) for these facilities. Major Maintenance costs are chazged in conjunction with the project and are added to the FAM operating budget and FR&R charges aze added to the FAM FR&R budget when all debt on the facility is retired. In the current fiscally constrained budget situation, no additional funding is available for MM/FR&R. However, funding gaps in MM/FR&R aze addressed in [he Action and Vision funding plans as outlined in the FAM Master Plan. BUSINESS PLAN Capital projects classified into essential, desirable and discretionary using the methodology outlined in the FAM Master Plan. Priority is given to the 26 "essential facilities" noted in Appendix 1 of the FAM Master Plan when completing capital 219 projects. Essential projects are those projects that allow continued operation of a facility, " repair/replace life-safety systems, or are necessary to fully comply with laws and regulations. Desirable projects are those projects that extend facility service life or repair/replace systems other than life safety. Discretionary projects are those projects [hat improve efficiency. r w 220 a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund o/-Jul-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility - EBhancements /Upgrades BMOCA Elevator & ADA Mprovements 122,000 0 0 0 0 0 122,000 Dairy Center far the Arts -Correct Enhy ADA Deficiencies 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000 Downtown Office Space Deficiency Correction 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 Main Library -Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System IOS,000 0 0 0 0 0 105,000 Replace Chautauqua Radio Tower 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 Total: 727,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 977,000 Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction 1301 Arapahoe Interior Renovation 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 N Carnegie Library -Exterior Repairs 276,000 0 0 0 0 0 276,000 Dairy Center for the Arts -Replace Roof 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 90,000 Pire Station #1 -Renovate showers and restrooms 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Fire StallOn #3 - HVAC Systems Replaced 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Fire Station #4 Major Maintenance 135,000 0 0 0 0 0 135,000 Fleet Services Roof Replacement 130,000 0 0 0 0 0 130,000 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 60,000 50,000 0 0 60,000 73.000 243,000 New Britain -Elevator Refurb/Replace 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 New Britain -Replace North Exterior Stairs 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 0 152,000 0 0 0 0 152,000 Municipal Service Center Bldg. B -Replace Fue Sprinkler Rping 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 65,000 Stazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 0 132,000 0 0 0 0 132,000 Main Library Carpet Replacement 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 350,000 Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 0 0 220,000 0 0 0 220,000 Maintenance of Boulder Reservoir Security House 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Main[enaoce of Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms 0 0 395,000 0 0 0 395,000 t~ s t t t l iJ r e r¦ r¦ r s~ e r w?~ r >t lr r i rr s r e r a r~ r i 4 t i i ~ 1! Y 3 t a € ~ i ~ t i C i t t t t ~ E f 1 I E l t~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund o~-?ut-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Fre Station 83 Majw Maintenance 0 0 0 514,000 0 0 514,000 Martin Park Shelter Majw Maintenance 0 0 0 0 ]69,000 0 169,000 Stazio Restrooms & Concessions 0 0 0 0 292,000 0 292,000 Tan[ra Park Shop Maintenance 0 0 0 0 137,000 0 137,000 North Boulder Park Shelter Repair 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 120,000 West Seoiw Center Maintenance & Rehab 0 0 0 0 0 828,000 828,000 Total: 1,141,000 399,000 1,015,000 514,000 658,000 1,021,000 4,748,000 Reconstruction Reconstruct Maia Labraty North Plara 0 0 0 147,000 0 0 147,000 N N Total 0 0 0 147,000 0 0 147,000 Total for Facility Renovation & Replacement Fuad 1,868,000 649,000 1,015,000 661,000 658,000 1,021,000 5,872,000 7/1/2ooe Business Plan Budget Submission Page 1 of 1 Fiscally Constrained Plan 2009 Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund Essential i oesi~ebie Discretionary ~ Total ~ Pro/act Typp~Name Pro/act X Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades BMOCA Elevator &ADA Improvements 501 XXX $0 $122,000 100% $0 $122,000 100 Dairy Center for the Ans • Correct Entry ADA Deficiencies 501 XXX $70,000 100 % $0 $0 $70,000 100% Downtown Office Space Deficiency Correction 501 XXX $0 $250,000 100% $0 $250,000 100% Main Library -Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System 501 XXX $0 $105,000 100°h $0 $105,000 100 Replace Chautauqua Radio Tower 501XXX $160,000 100% $0 $0 $180,000 100°h Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair! Deficiency Correctlon 1301 Arapahoe Interior Renovation 501 XXX $0 $200,000 100°h $0 $200,000 100% Carnegie Library - EMerior Repairs 501 XXX $276,000 100 % $0 $0 $276,000 100% Dairy Center for the Arts • Replace Roof 501 XXX $90,000 100 % $0 $0 $90,000 100 Fire S1a0on p1 -Renovate showers end restrooms 501 XXX $75,000 100% $0 $0 $75,000 100% Fire Station fF3 - HVAC Systems Replaced 501 XXX $50,000 100 % $0 $0 $50,000 100% N Fire Station fF4 Major Maintenance 501 XXX $135,000 100% $0 $0 $135,000 100% w Fleet Services Roof Replacement 501XXX $130,000 100% $0 $0 $130,000 100 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 501452 $0 $60,000 100% $0 $60,000 100 New Britain -Elevator Refurb/Replace 501XXX $65,000 100% $0 $0 $65,000 100 % New Britain -Replace North EMerior Stairs 501 XXX $60,000 100°h $0 $0 $60,000 100 Tolal for Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund: $1,131,000 61% $737,000 39% SO 0°k 51,668,000 100%. 1 ~ ~ ~ t 'I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ l< ~ ~ 1 ~ It (i ~ R ~ ~ ' / ~ lw ¦ t< ¦ a ~ ~ A ~ ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report 1301 Arapahoe Interior Renovation 501XXX 90 Department: PWI Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity: Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPaea: Area I _ Protect Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: r. Project includes replacing HVAC and Lighting systems with more efficient equipment. Plumbing fixtures would be replaced and plumbing systems would be brought up to current codes. Interior finishes would be replaced. y. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. ~:+~~~~;,,r.n . y Wig=: r.,. - sa' The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. „ « None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the user department. CaplWl Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $20,000 Description: Includes maintnenace and utility costs Source of Funding: Cost allocation to user department Essentlel % ~ Deslreble % 100% Discretionary TOtal % 100% W. r r r 224 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report BMOCA Elevator &ADA Improvements 501XXX 110 Department PWI Facilities & Asset Management subeommunlty. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund svcPaea: Area I Project TYPe~ Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: ¦ w3 ~ .s 'wRa, Ra~~`.,o'~°--x"~-..s~ ['`'-,a 3~ - a 2~ s~p..m::'.' °F. The Boulder Museum of Contemporary Arts, located at 1750 13th Street, requires modifications to meet current ADA standards. This project includes installation of a new elevator and ADA restrooms. This work will be coordinated with BMOCA and will be coordinated with their long range plan. aW This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life _ w of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. w ° ,r..... i, ' ~ : M ~ .l-. ~ ^rr.~ -a~~ ~ ~ ~ ";tilt. ~ n u-d. .gin ftl ifLietcP~rlBa._~ ~ u - .~.,u'" r-~c^'n.~~wam ,~~s; _ ~R' ~ 9~...'~` R The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. In May 2008 Council approved spending $65,000 in 2008 for procurement of the elevation to meet tenant construction schedule. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB and Planning Board as appropriate. Operating funds (FAM Major Maintenance, General Fund 010) will be used to pay for any additional maintenance work completed in conjunction with this project. r amt This project will be coordinated with the Library Department and BMOCA. w Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $122,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $122,000 Change from Prior Year: ~r Annual On-going Operating Costs $500 ` Description: Elevator certification and restroom maintenance costs will be paid by BMOCA. R Source of Funding: Tenant operating funds - ~ Essential °fo O Desirable % 100% Discretionary °fo~ Total °!0 100% W °IS !y 225 ! r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Camegie Library -Exterior Repairs 501XXX 95 Department: PW/Facilities 8 Asset Management suoeommunily: Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund avCPArea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: This project includes highly leveraged funds from the State Historical Fund for the exterior rehabilitation of the Carnegie Library as identified in a historic structure assessment pertormed by Merrill Ann Wilson, Historical Architect, in 2005. The planned work includes the following: 1. Create anon-saturated zone of soil around the foundation known as a "dry zone "and at north section of the building, re-grade and provide improved access. 2. West side of the building: install an underground drainage system/ provide improved drainage to help conduct water away from foundation. 3. Replace the deteriorated concrete front entry steps. 4. Masonry repairs: a. Repair the significant diagonal crack that is present in the east foundation wall near the southeast corner in the crawl space with mortar. b. Repair the cavities in the exterior foundation walls and tightly fill with brick mortar. c. Selectively re-point all defective (loose, cracked, eroded or missing) mortar joints in the stone and brickwork ,W throughout the building, carefully matching the original mortar in composition, color, aggregate and tooling. Repair all cracks in the stone and brickwork with the same matching mortar. d. Replace the badly spalled bricks with new bricks. 5. Replace the rubber roof membrane, a.k.a. EPDM membrane, on the top of the projecting stone cornice on the east, west and south elevations with a new membrane system that allows a tiny drip edge that would not visually impact the building. Also, in the installation of the new membrane, install the material to slope to drain. 6. Remove all rust, prime and repaint the steel plates, strapping and tie rods on the library exterior. 7. Install a fire alarm system 8. At east side of building, widen the handicapped ramp and adjust its pitch in conformance with Secretary of Interior Standards and to achieve compliance with contemporary accessibility code requirements. The State Historical Find grant will fund $171,000 and the Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund will contirbute $105,000 toward the project. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB. Operating funds (FAM Major Maintenance, General Fund 010) will be used to pay for any additional maintenance work completed in conjunction with this project. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. ..n„,. , a 4 This project will be coordinated with the Library Department. ~ 'ia:.-::uev:va M!! ~ ~ Nk6Y i'i. ..:i:-.-YV.ii: 'e .rz.~.n .Y t Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $276,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $276,000 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: _ E e, Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r ¦ ¦ r A R ir, E t R r s r 227 w r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Dairy Center for the Arts -Correct Entry ADA Deficiencies 501 XXX 113 Departmene: PW/Facilities 8 Asset Management subeommunity. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund avcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: W. This project addresses existing ADA access deficiencies at the facility. Specific changes include inproving access to the building from the parking area and installing a safety curb and railings. In addition, the main entry ramp will be shortened to a maximum of 30 feet and a flat resting area will be installed. Additional handrails are needed to meet ADA regulations. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. i The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. 'None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. Project will be coordinated with the Dairy Center for the Arts. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary TOtal % 100% v. 'A i r v 220 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Dairy Center for the Arts -Replace Roof 501 XXX 114 Department: PW/ Facilities 8 Asset Management Subcommunity. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area I ~ Proles type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: The roof has exceeded its planned service life and leaks in several areas. A roofing contractor has evaluated the roof and recommends replacing the center and south sections. The Wort section of the roof was replaced about 8 years ago and is in satisfactory condition. a T 4x1 tt a - i -we ice. '~~5u.r#;- ~?t~.:.s: This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life Iw of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. n - - ":c~.~ ~r:. -mss:. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. ~ - _.,~s. _..._,..m M._Ar a NoneNone. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. 3~~ ~ A Project will be coordinated with the Dairy Center for the Arts Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 ~ Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ r i 4 Y Y 229 4 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Downtown Office Space Deficiency Correction 501XXX Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding source:. Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades y CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: A recent evaluation of office on the downtown campus indicates a space deficiency of approximately 10,000 SF. This project would allow interior tenant finish of leased space and backfill of space to maximize department efficiencies. The growth related portion of this project is being funded by the Capital Development Fund. The portion of the project not related to growth s being funded by the Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of existing buildings, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. Several department master and strategic plans show the need to add staffing and associated office space in the downtown area as plans are implemented. Examples include: Information Technology, Housing and Human Services, and the Climate Action Plan. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. ~ sz, , This project will be coordinated with user departments including Information Technology, City Manager's Office, Finance, Public Works, and others. ,m. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $280,000 Description: Rent = $180,000 plus operating costs = $100,000 Source of Funding: Cost allocation to user departments Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% 230 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report m - Fire Station #1 -Renovate showers and restrooms 501XXX- 115 Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity-. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund avcPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: rl This project removes existing non-friable asbestos building materials and replaces plumbing fixtures, plumbing systems, and ceramic file finishes in restrooms and showers. Lighting systems will be upgraded with energy- Ir saving fixtures. u_tl~" ~q . _ - -~k,-a,'~n=:.~es w- arm ~ d m'.: ~ v 7,t~ t. r "ss''~~°°.. r, ,seaw~~w ~~r~~s,a::.:wCwi~ This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. - ~r_--• ,i ,'~n~'"&~-+~ 'M!~'~`"ia ^.d, ,per ._x : h t~~atTpntaMa~@c; na' ai`„,~„ r ~ ~ , The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. rE p,. ~~•2 _ ,+_~a. srN:.. 3. .R3"?°?:"~'k 'fi'b::='~-' ~ ~:I !1~ '~M ..^^„rG+i ko2 =c„~ "".r:~z3+u~"~~:E`G~' ~,dR'~ ..z,.~t:i None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the Fire Department. f Capital Punding Plan r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 rr Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 s. Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: llr Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% s w s ¦ 231 ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Fire Station #3 -HVAC Systems Replaced 501 XXX 116 y y+ Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. Crossroads Funding source: Facility Renovation $ Replacement Fund evcPnrea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: re ~e The existing equipment has exceeded its planned service life. This project replaces existing HVAC systems with more energy-efficient equipment. m wvev This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the Fire Department. ~ Capital Funding Plan _r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% .r w a r 232 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Fire Station #3 Major Maintenance 501XXX 93 A Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity. Crossroads " Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund svcPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: y ~y(i .a= "s'i`s' #fi.3*- ~ R c ~ a Y "''^c'fq~'3°u a~:.u~ Fire Station #3, located at 1535 30th Street, was built in 1964 and is in need of major maintenance. This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades communications systems, and e, renews interior and exterior surface finishes. r. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life 11r of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. r. Any public process ~nnll be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate. Operating funds (FAM Ongoing and Major Maintenance, General Fund 010) will be used to pay for normal maintenance items. This project will be coordinated with the Fire Department to maintain the station in operation at all times. Capital Funding Plan ~ ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $514,000 $0 $0 $514,000 a. m:,:r.,,,..,..__n. Change from Prior Year: Rescheduled from 2011 to 2012 Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 r. Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing this project. Source of Funding: _ r~ Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ru r 233 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program „ Project Status Report Fire Station #4 Major Maintenance 501XXX 104 - '"r Department: PWI Facilities 8 Asset Management subeommunity: South Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair !Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: J Y t~,~,tg,,n, Y4?h k"~i91'. i~4 i~~~ Fire Station #4, located at 4100 Darley, was built in 1967 and is in need of major maintenance. This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades communications systems, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. This project also installs a fire sprinkler system. The sand trap, roof, and windows were rep{~la~~ced in 2002 using major maintenance funding. ~[j ~.x v "~P` ' This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. ~N!'~ Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate. Operating funds (FAM Ongoing and Major Maintenance, General Fund 010) will be used to pay for normal maintenance items. This project will be coordinated with the Fire Department to maintain the station in operation at all times. Capital Funding Plan . ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ,y $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000 ° Change from Prior Year: Mnual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing this project. Source of Funding: 1 pp~ Y' a99pp~ ,w a'~. ~ d Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r ar r 234 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Fleet Services Roof Replacement 501XXX 117 g • Department: PW/Facilities 8 Asset Management sulxommunity: East Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: ¦ F1b fi This project replaces the roof coverings at the end of its expected service life (20 years). This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful lifer r of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. it IMF ,~Pa~'~`~~ Q ~ . ~k i The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. ¦ None. Pro'ect desi n will be reviewed Burin the normal rmittin ~ g g pe g process. m,~ ~ s This project will be coordinated with Fleet Services. Capital Funding Plan ~ 1 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding & $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 ~R . Change from Prior Year: Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: ¦ Essential % 100% Desirable D'ISCretionary TOtal % 100% ow w' r s* 235 ar r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Main Library Carpet Replacement 501XXX 98 Department: PW/ Facilities 8 Asset Management subcommunlty: Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area I Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: arT ~ r w 3. ic~ex, . •,wet v- 5 late This project replaces approximately 68,000 square feet (SF) of carpeting in the Main Library. This project will be coordinated with another project that replaces the flat wire electrical system in the 1992 section of the library This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. m The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None This project will be coordinated with the Library Department and Channel 8. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Change from Prior Year: Rescheduled from 2010 to 2011 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% a° 236 .r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 501XXX 94 a, _ ~._.ra.ao,.~, Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. Central Boulder ` Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evCPArea: Area I I,, Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction 0 CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: R 2. i~'P _ n The existing flat wire electrical distribution system has become obsolete and repair parts are no longer available. This project replaces the Flat wire electrical system with a new system. This project will be scheduled with carpet w replacement. r r ~ v-e:r.i' 'YM. ..p~.. yo :vcgz. -~&'t.r This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life rr of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. - _ M4tN"'Y "Y'.C:.rtS~k:' td -.-K.~x yY i~.-i' ~ i Ia'La ` p _ The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair or replace building systems when they become obsolete. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. r, This project will be coordinated with the Library Department. _ _ ~ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 s Change from Prior Year: Rescheduled from 2010 to 2011 ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No adddional operating costs are anticipated ~ Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% r 237 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Main Library- Upgrade Auditorium Lighting 8 Sound System 501XXX 118 Department: pW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity: Central Boulder Funding Source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evCPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: The lighting and sound systems have reached the end of their planned service life. This project replaces the existing lighting fixtures with more energy-efficient fixtures, upgrades the control panel, installs a new dimmer system, and integrates the sound system with lighting controls. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by propedy managing wastes through a managed plan. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None This project will be coordinated with the Library Department. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $105,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% «e w rl W 238 R" 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Maintenance of Boulder Reservoir Security House 501XXX 111 Deparemene: pW/ Facilities & Asset Management Subeommunlty: Gunbarrel Funding source: Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund svcPArea: Area III ~ Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab / Repair I Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: l~lp CEAP Completed: ,-u.µg ,.r. v ~ ~ _ 3~c.,-xk._ S= i The Boulder Reservoir Security House, located on the eastern portion of the Reservoir property, is in need of major maintenance. This project upgrades the kitchen area, electrical system and HVAC systems to current ~ building codes and renews interior and exterior surface finishes of the building. .~...a & .~e-der'-w~e!Pt!L _ _ ..I me .v EMI m y' - ' u This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life ¦r of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. - . The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. u,F None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. m..xw ...:3 This project will be coordinated with Parks & Recreation Department Capital Funding Plan e. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding . $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 ~ a Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable °h 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ~ A' R 239 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Maintenance of Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms 501XXX 106 A Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subcommuniry: Crossroads Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: : - The Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms and Filter Building are in need of major maintenance. This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, replaces the roof, replaces the filtering system, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. r This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. mm:. y The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with Parks & Recreation Department „ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $395,000 $0 $0 $0 $395,000 Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 e Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing this project. Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r •r r a i :r 240 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Maintenance of Spruce Pool Locker Rooms 501 XXX 102 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPArea: Area I e Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction r CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: w~ v _ ~ ~w ~ .:rte,. xl'. 1 " t>~~.sa _ ax _"5=:r'~ xt I v,~?1::.~eu. ~ it ~ >.e xn..a: f The Spruce Pool Locker Rooms are in need of maintenance. This project upgrades elecVical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. a> t~ttimiw~ f~+rtl++lht1' fi~1tlc~ _s ~ 3- -..„..,,,mom. a ~ ,YY. n v.'ra . . _ ' a? This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life ~r of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. r #tu~M~,~hrisa Rte' ~ " ~ .w The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. ~ _ ~ ~ ~r~a~~~ ..win-~ w~u~ ~.^.w} .:e Ymx_sa~~ K u.uG2-P'! None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process ~ n„min ~ This project will be coordinated with Parks & Recreation Department ~ Capital Funding Plan re 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $152,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $152,000 , Change from Prior Year: e, Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: r Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary % 0% Total % 100% ~r r f r w e r ra 241 w 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report r Martin Park Shelter Major Maintenance 501XXX 97 Department: pW/ Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity: South Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evCPArea: Area I Proieet Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. _ ":x The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the Parks 8 Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $169,000 Change from Prior Year: changed from 2012 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Oescriptbn: Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary TOtal % 100% ,a a ~w 242 a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report m _x _ _ _ _ m_ . Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects 501452 p e, ~ : s. .,_1. ~~6 . _ ~..~.~-u, -t,,~r , ~ Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity. System-wide ` Funding source: Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund svcPaea: System-wide Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: s - xF- vsa.~ c pti~ 'e m z This project addresses funding for building replacement and miscellaneous projects costing less than $50,000 each. Facility replacement and projects costing $50,000 or more will be individually listed in the CIP. Facility maintenance projects costing less than $50,000 will be managed by the Facilities & Fleet Manager. r This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life IR' of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. ` m_ lla.a -ism ~..,.,a,=~ '4,~ s -t",~. , r" ' a. P ~n..a...y. y ~,sm. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to maintain city facilities. Projects approved ~ by the Facilities 8 Fleet Manager will be coordinated with other departments. t~+~ ~ ~ .non, ~ sue. F%ue~ rI'~ `ii ~ ~ Any project associated with these funds will be taken through the appropriate public process and CEAP review as o part of the conceptual design if needed. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate. ~ e, ~ ~ tl~~~ ~ ~ Ems' ~~~,o- ;=s This project will be coordinated with the affected departments. w Capital Funding Plan er 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $60,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $73,000 $243,000 we Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 r Description: No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects. Source of Funding: ~ Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% aw r e. s 243 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Municipal Service Center Bldg. B -Replace Fire Sprinkler Piping 501XXX 119 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunlty: East Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: i This project replaces all exterior fire sprinkler piping due to leaks and rust. W. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with Transportation and Utilities. CaplWl Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% .W w y r r 244 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report New Britain -Elevator Refurb/Replace 501 XXX 120 Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPnrea: Area I R Project type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: The existing elevator needs to be overhauled or replaced to meet current codes. te_ n ~x -u. r~ *e~ "t~ R This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life ~ of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by propedy managing wastes through a managed plan. ~,n t ~ _ _ P ` The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, ident~es the need to repair and maintain city facilities. 9i fi ~$.lr" ~ y None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. ` Q$! This project will be coordinated with HHS and IT departments. ism ~~m a,,.ww. _ .~wem: Capital Funding Plan ~ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned funding ' $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 t ,m a,:,~n-mss „~s~,.~,:.,ro,- Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: w r Essential 100°!o Desirable Discretionary Total 100°!0 s as t 245 w r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report New Britain -Replace North Exterior Stairs 501 XXX 121 Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subeommunlty. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund avCPMea: Area I ProJeet type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: The stairs on the north side of the building are rusting and the concrete steps are cracking. The stairs have open risers and do not meet current codes. This project replaces the stairs. _ , W. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. m _ _ "ice The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the HR, HHS, and IT Departments. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% 246 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report North Boulder Park Shelter Repair 501XXX 91 ~ ~w_ _ ~ r Department: PW/Facilities 8 Asset Management subeommunity: North Boulder ` Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund svcPnrea: Area I R Protect type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: R ww_. ~ Cr tM.. ~ w .Y ,~=~:M.zm..-aai t °~':i..,,..;~R jaw: k . ?~g=_ t U4.+as.<„k., .~.a:u~~v;s3F-#-~~ Ex.,~ ra'.~!~t>z._. eM This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. ~ . [~rT"PFgY:iUBUity r: ~ ...„,v5u+w'aE;~ 's 9i ~~~~,y~~ a . a° This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed ~r plan. ply ~ .uxners ~ ntir' Y w~'-t ~ Y G: e. ~ v~ 6 L~ ~ 'h,wt" Y- s#F.:,v-..~m~3'__ 19v k ._.F9k fi4.5a..t~P.2 The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. ¦ J- ter,, ~ ~ w _ ~s :.~g - None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the Parks 8 Recreation Department. „ _ . _ ~::..v - - :_..:,:,x_ :m~,.~~- ,.k u.....:::.. wr Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 Change from Prior Year: Rescheduled from 2009 to 2014 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operating costs are anticipated. Source of Funding: ° r Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% ~ .k .P 247 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report ReconsWct Main Library North Plaza 501XXX 109 Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management Subcommunlty. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund evcPArea: Area I Project type: Reconstruction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: The Main Library Plaza, located at 1000 Canyon, will require replacement due to its age and condition. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by propedy managing wastes through a managed plan. .w The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair or replace concrete plazas. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate. _ This project will be coordinated with the Library Department. ~.w„ ` Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $147,000 $0 $0 $147,000 W Change from Prior Year: Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No additional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total °k 100% r a r „ 248 a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Replace Chautauqua Radio Tower 501XXX 122 m ~ . ,~~=m Department: PW/ Facilities & Asset Management subcommunity. South Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund svcPnraa: Area I e Project type: Existing Facility - Enhancements I Upgrades CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: r. This project replaces the communications building, communications equipment, and the tower. In addition, a propane-powered emergency generator will be installed. This project is a joint County /City project with each organization funding 50% of the upgrade ($80,000 each). In addition, the Boulder Police Department will be ~ adding some communications equipment for city use and fund 100% of those improvements ($20,000). C+'±m.-8us~lnris(1(Ly1'1?[~j!+ - c~ ~ ~ r~ z T._.r :da" ~ The purpose is to replace the obsolete building and tower and improve security and the reliability of the communications system. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. ~ Boulder County will be submitting an application for a site review. t saxe~rpW. r f'+~Ma-'a This project will be coordinated with Boulder County Sheriffs Office, Boulder Police, and Public Works /Utilities. ' Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: ¦ Source of Funding: E55ential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ~ 249 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program M Project Status Report Stazio Restrooms & Concessions 501XXX 123 Departmene: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. East Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund 13vcPaea: Area II Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: c This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to curcent building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. - This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the Parks & Recreation Department. Capital Funding Plan 'y^ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,000 $0 $292,000 w Change from Prior Year: Added in 2009 Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 Description: Source of Funding: M Essential % ~ Desirable % 100°k Discretionary Totel % 100% r a a oa 250 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Stazio Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 501XXX 107 Department: PW/Facilities 8 Asset Management Subcommunity. East Boulder ` Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund svcPaea: Area II e, Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction _ CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: R The Stazio Tinsile Canopy was inspected in 2003 by the contractor that originally installed the structure. All cables, structural components and coverings were inspected and found to be sound and fully functional. Preventive maintenance was performed on the structure. The contractor noted in their report that the covering is nearing the end of its service life and should be replaced in approximately five years (2008). The contractor ~ prepared a cost estimate for replacement of the covering. This project replaces the covering in 2009. The one year delay is necessary due to current budget conditions and higher priority work. ~ CQirrrli $Ua18tn8trta~..~ p,~~~~^~..~~s. ~erh m.^~.. ~i ~,=`^1::.,. '+~J vn.t` ;s~; '%'--fM'"~,° °r '_"-"_-'„!".wav-,+~ ..aa~".•: L _ ;!~I"~em+.a~vw :T Y+~.'u~°.z'N' ~'<:s d~ Tx'~datu" `~.'"a:'s This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed ~ plan. - -4Q"~t$BtRIPTeliit'a~' ~ ~ ~ . ti,:... _ ,~w. . - -g;,E }ay.. m rte.. ",may The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to maintain the structure and renew components as required. s None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. r This project will be coordinated with the Parks & Recreation Department. ir+ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ' $0 $132,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $132,000 r Change from Prior Year: Rescheduled from 2009 to 2010 ~ Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: No addRional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. ~ Source of Funding: ~ Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r r 25 I - 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program - Project Status Report Tantra Park Shop Maintenance 501XXX 108 Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subeommuniry: South Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation 8 Replacement Fund avcPaea: Area I Project type: Existing Facility - Rehab I Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: The Tantra Park Shop, located at 585 Tantra Drive, is in need of maintenance. This project upgrades electrical and HVAC systems to current building codes, upgrades plumbing systems and fixtures, and renews interior and exterior surface finishes. This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. mom; The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, ident'fiies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. This project will be coordinated with the Parks & Recreation Department. -ten - Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $137,000 $0 $137,000 Change from Prior Year: Rescheduled from 2012 to 2013 Annual On-going Operating Costs $0 Description: No addRional operational costs are anticipated from completing this project. Source of Funding: Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% r A W firl r 252 r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report West Senior Center Maintenance & Rehab 501XXX 101 _ ~ m.4,:~ Department: PW/Facilities & Asset Management subeommunity. Central Boulder Funding source: Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund BvCPArea: Area I e, Project type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CE`A~P R!!,,eq~'uired: rJo CEAP Completed: ~!nljlC~-anry~~p~Cli1'~ ~ u~:., x~~ .a ..~vk_~' r~; ~ v ,+s q~~:: } ",r:i r§ i~.a+r` ~~~~'r ~Y,s~. ,4:, • a~ r5!:~'l' °o-3~m c m,.. ~ihW a-]nre: 3i._ ale This project provides refurbishment of the facilities including HVAC, electrical, and plumbing systems It renews all surface finishes including carpet, paint, and ceilings. Provides improvements to restrooms and adds a fire ~ sprinkler system. i tt~tTm :as-ss s ~ -•~:x;~ z,,. x - ~ ~--33~~v;4 ~'~""d ~'t Y , Y This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life ~ of the existing building, installing energy-saving equipment and by properly managing wastes through a managed plan. ~~~y-~ -mot ~v~..k~~'rc. , ~~.i,Nri- ut~~r r ~ms`~'«4fi:.,"u~, :..~:~'io-,~':~'~"-.~~m~rv~a; ~ i ~ The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to repair and maintain city facilities. The ~ kitchen was remodeled in 2006 by Meals on Wheels at a cost of approximately $400,000. This cost has been subtracted from the estimated refurbishment cost noted in the FAM Master Plan of $1,228,000, leaving an estimated cost of $828,000. ~ sue..- ~ w..... .,:_.r.~. sr__.... None. Project design will be reviewed during the normal permitting process. ~ xr ,iUi~~i~ ~~vzF ~ r°t ~~^ks r This project will be coordinated with HHS Department and Meals on Wheels. n ~ : ~ : M.,..~ _ er Capital Funding Plan r 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $828,000 $828,000 ~ n.~_. Change from Prior Year: Project prostponed from 2013 to 2014 Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $0 ~ r Description: Source of Funding: ~ Essential % ~ Desirable % 100% Discretionary Total % 100% w, ar 253 ak b 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report Wonderland Lake Park 2 nepartment: Parks 8 Recreation subcommuniry: North Boulder Funding source: permanent Parks & Recreation Fund svcPaea: Area I Protect type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction r. CEAP Required: NO CEAP Completed: _ ..y_ ~ r. Wonderland Lake Park is a 32 acre site that consists of a traditional active-use park and natural area P The traditional area consists of playground amenities, a shelter, and paths. The Wonderland Park path is located throughout the natural area. Project plans include three phases of removal of the Wonderland Park path, including 6 feet wide sections of concrete and 4 feet wide sections of asphalt, depending on path location. Replacement is necessary to restore cracks, slopes, and trip hazards throughout the path. ~I ~ a " Environmental sustainability: Renovation and repair of park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability. A quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. These park renovations are necessary w. to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to meet expressed community demands. Additionally, the Wonderland Park path serves as a community multi-modal transportation path. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community gathering places. ~„J. The Parks and Recreation master plan identified the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule. 9r Public process is not anticipated. The project includes the renovation of exiting assets. Construction signs will be posted as needed. Path diversions and segment closures may occur, but will be limited. Precautions will be taken to ensure contractor vehicles limit disruption to park users andminimize disturbance to natural areas. Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning and Transportation as necessary. Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000 Change from Prior Year: ,W Annual On-going Operating Costs Description: Snow removal and normal path maintenance Source of Funding: General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund r+ Essential % 25% Desirable % 75% Discretionary Total % 100% r 254 a a ATTACHMENT D-10 CAGID FUND 2009 - 2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Central Area General Improvement District (CAGID) is a general improvement district created in 1970 to provide parking and parking related improvements to downtown Boulder. Properties within the district pay property taxes into the district; other revenues are derived from the parking fees. CAGID owns 5 parking garages and one surface lot. Due to the construction of 2 parking structures in the last 9 years, funds have not been available for major renovation and repairs until 2008 when a substantial renovation and repair program will begin to address the deferred maintenance. POLICY ISSUES None. " HIGHLIGHTS Since 1999, two new parking structures have been constructed byCAGID -the mixed use project at 15`h and Pearl and the underl~round garage at 1000 Walnut, apublic/private partnership with the St. " Julien hotel. Since the focus has been on constructing new facilities resulting in substantial new ~ debt, funds have not been available for major capital maintenance and repairs over the last 8 years. In 2008, a bond payment will be retired and the funds will be redirected to a multi-year, phased capital renovation and repair program for all 5 garages, some dating to the late 70's. A total of $3,795,000 is budgeted over three years, 2008-2010. Afrer the garages are restored to an acceptable level, an amount of $250,000 per year in ongoing capital improvements is budgeted. Also, an on-going renovation and repair reserve will be increased to $165,675 to more adequately fund the renovation and repair reserve to protect our capital assets. This amount is in addition to the $12,100 that will be used for the renovation and repair reserve for the office and retail spaces at 1500 Pearl and 1100 Spruce. FINANCING Funding for CAGID facilities is provided through CAGID revenues sources: property taxes and r parking revenues from the CAGID garages. RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET The CAGID operating budget pays for the maintenance of all CAGID improvements and will not change with the capital improvement program. BUSINESS PLAN +r The CAGID major maintenance and repairs are classified as essential in the DUHMD/PS business plan since continued deferred maintenance could begin to impact the integrity of the structures as ' well as become a deterrent to the downtown experience impacting the areas economic vitality. 255 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program CAGID Bond Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CAGm Major Renovation Rnjec[s 1,264,800 1,290,096 250,000 250.000 250,000 250,000 3,554,896 Total: 1,264,800 1,290,096 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,554,896 Total for CAGID Bond Fund 1,264,800 1,290,096 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,554,896 N lA CT r# r # i t 1 i! # r¦ r¦ r# r # t 1 1 ! P # ! # R¦ r¦ w w r ~ ~ ~ ~ t t f f t! t i E 3 E ~ t a € ~ t i i 1 i f ! i Y I h t # t Y i i s size/2oo6 Business Plan Budget Submission Fiscally Constrained Plan 2ooe CAGID Bond Fund Essential ( Desirable ~ Dlacretionary f Total Pro/ect TypdName Pro/ect F Funding % Funding % Funding % Funding % Exlating Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CAGID Major Renovation Projects $1,264,800 100% $0 $0 $1,264,800 t00q° 7ota1 for CAGID Bond Fund: 51,264,800 100°h SO 0% SO 0°k 51,264,800 100% N to J 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Project Status Report w CAGID Major Renovation Projects ~ ar Department: DUHMD subcommuntty. Central Boulder ` Funding source: CAGID Bond Fund avcPArea: Area I ar Project Type: Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CEAP Required: No CEAP Completed: ! ! s='it %4i , Afi=s.. !E t y?~' isA 'I ^ El { h Y i . :~Y4ta'f~s+~' ,~t'~:''.,-x ~ ~ ~q;': `{c ¥i~"" ~s^.~E4 f4'~~wi~i lk`"_~`vi~'~~ 1="?:~~}'.. ~~~E..::: aw The Central Area General Improvement District (CAGID) is a general improvement taxing district created in 1970 to provide parking and parking related improvements in downtown Boulder. Properties within the district pay pr property taxes into the district fund; other revenues are derived from the parking feeds. CAGID owns 5 parking structures in the downtown. Due to the contraction of 2 parking structures in the last 8 years, funds have not been available for major renovations and repairs until 2008. A detailed assessment of all 5 garages was conducted during 2006 and a total of approximately $4 million is phased over three years beginning in 2008. to (jai' t~~{.~7..pry-..- i a~pi~tW Qlf ~ ~ yy~ ~ ,amz.~ ~ ~ " s€'; fr k 1.~4.:` ¢ ~ ~ xE ~s qsy,,,,~-v e, s Kb~a.?~e', •ce Aei tlmW%Y /+a:.:ux ~M1im'~a."i'v.`~-a4~/'~! l.f..prf.~_v"rt:tfrs~R~i-i-m Ak°.el.._. ~ CAGID is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the majority of parking in the downtown. Providing ~ adequate parking is essential to the economic viability of downtown Boulder. Maintaining the multi-million real estate assets of the garages is imperative to the livelihood of downtown. ~,~+>*+.,Fw rye," m ~ i~erP - m T t~«,:-! ~ x~' "a".;! e~iS~. ~F. o '~.,.ca:aw,dii s! ~?i!-,:. ~ DUHMD/Parking Services does not have a master plan. Development of a strategic plan is undervvay. ~,E:®. .sue°~,.: d ~.~~i'a-~x~`~ A detailed assessment and report was conducted by Carl Walker, parking engineers, that details projects in all 5 parking structures phased over multiple years. A working group with representatives from the Downtown Management Commission and the downtown community reviewed and contributed to the development of the renovation plan. At the end of 2007, a major debt service payment is retired for the construction of 11th and Spruce and renovations at the RTD garages. Those revenues will be allocated to the major renovation and repairs. wv; : .a~ .F'.S~{Y~~ Y w { ~ Capital Funding Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Planned Funding ~ $1,2114,800 $1,290,096 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $3,554,896 r. w Change from Prior Year: Annual Ongoing Operating Costs $1,500,000 air Description: Source of Funding: CAGID property taxes and garage revenues ~ Essential % 100% Desirable Discretionary Total % 100% ar 258 as ii r r r i r ii i1 11 ! i t t 1 ~ r t i i E A f a [ i t i i i r r 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Airport Fund 29-Jun-08 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Reconuneuded Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair / Deftcieucy Correction FAA Entitlement Funded Maintenance 2013 0 0 0 0 631,578 0 631,578 Total: 0 0 0 0 631,578 0 631,578 Total for Airport Fund 0 0 0 0 631,578 0 631,578 N U n x z a 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program CAGID Bond Fund 29-Jun-OS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction CAGm Major Renovation Projects 1,264,800 1,290,096 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,554,896 Total: 1,264,800 1,290,096 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,554,896 Total for CAGID Bond Fund 1,264,800 1,290,096 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,554,896 N O r s ~ r t i ! ~ # [ a s ~ r ~ ~ # r ~ r ~ ~ ~ r ~ r ~ e a ~ t ~ - ~ ~ _ i i ii if t l ii f t ~ t t t t 1 E t I i f ~ t i 1 l i It ~ 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Capital Development Fund o/-?ui-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Tota? Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected New Construction • Growth Related Facility /Additions Downtown OfTce Space Deficiency 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 Misce0aneous Facility DET Projects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Municipal Spaces 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 60,000 Consbuct / Purchase a General Storage Facility 0 0 830,000 0 0 0 830,000 Total: 330,000 330,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,690,000 Total for Capital Development Fund 330,000 330,000 880,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,690,000 N 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund ot-rui-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Enhancements /Upgrades BMOCA Elevator & ADA Mprovements 122,000 0 0 0 0 0 122,000 Dairy Center for the Arts - Correct Entry ADA Deficiencies 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000 Downtown Office Space Deficiency Correction 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 Main Library -Upgrade Auditorium Lighting & Sound System 105,000 0 0 0 0 0 105,000 Replace Chautauqua Radio Tower 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 Total: 727,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 977,000 Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction 1301 Arapahoe Interior Renovation 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 N N Carnegie Library -Exterior Repairs 276,000 0 0 0 0 0 27G,000 Dairy Center for the Arts -Replace Roof 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 90,000 Fire Station kl -Renovate showers and restrooms 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Fire Station k3 - HVAC Systems Replaced 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Fire Station k4 Major Maintenance 135,000 0 0 0 0 0 135,000 Flee[ Services Roof Replacement 130,000 0 0 0 0 0 130,000 Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects G0,000 50,000 0 0 60,000 73,000 243.000 New Britain - Elevamr Refurb/Replace 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 65.000 New Britain -Replace North Exterior Stairs 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Maintenance of Spruce Pcol Locker Rooms 0 152,000 0 0 0 0 152,000 Municipal Service Ceu[er Bldg. B -Replace Fve Sprinkler Piping 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 65.000 Stazoo Tinsile Canopy Covering Replacement 0 132,000 0 0 0 0 132,000 Main Library Carpet Replacement 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 350,000 Main Library Electrical System Maintenance 0 0 220,000 0 0 0 220,000 Maintenance of Boulder Reservoir Security House 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Maintenance of Scott Carpenter Pool Locker Rooms 0 0 395,000 0 0 0 395,000 # # e ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ! ! 1 E# t# II >f R ! ! it t ~ f li ~ l 1 ~ s 1 ~ s f a t t t i 1 t 1 1 1 i t ! [ ~ t F 1 F k i i f i i 1 t j i ( ~ ~ C i i i 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund o~-?ut-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Firc Station ti3 Major Maintrnaace 0 0 0 514,000 0 0 514,000 Martin Park Shelter Major Maintwance 0 0 0 0 169,000 0 169,000 Stazio Restrooms & Concessions 0 0 0 0 292,000 0 292,000 Tanna Park Shop Maintenance 0 0 0 0 137,000 0 137,000 North Boalder Park Shelter Repair 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 120,000 West Senior Center Maintenance & Rehab 0 0 0 0 0 828,000 828,000 Total: 1,141,000 399,000 1,015,000 514,000 658,000 1,021,000 4,748,000 Reconstruction Reconstruct Main Library North Plaza 0 0 0 147,000 0 0 147,000 a Total: 0 0 0 147,000 0 0 147,000 Total for Facility Renovation & Replacement Ftimd 1,868,000 649,000 1,015,000 661,000 658,000 1,021,000 5,872,000 2009-2014 Capital Improvements Program Lottery Fund z9-rurt-os 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Recommended Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Existing Facility -Rehab /Repair /Deficiency Correction Park East Playground Renovation 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 Playground Renovation 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total: 360,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,360,000 On-Going Projects OSMP -Historical Swctures & Trails - Stabiliradon & Restoration 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 2,850,000 Tributary Greeoways Program -Lottery 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 750,000 Total: 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 475,000 3,600,000 N A Total for Lottery Fund 985,000 825,000 825,000 825,000 825,000 675,000 4,960,000