4 - Call Up: Site Review Amendment (LUR2007-00010) - proposed development of 23 attached multi-family dwelling units at 1820 Mary LaneMEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Board
FROM: Elaine McLaughlin, Case Manager
DATE: April 8, 2008
SUBJECT: Call Up Item: Approval of a Site Review Amendment (LUR2007-00010) far
Lots 3 and 23 oftl~e Sanitas Subdivision (SI-99-19) approved for 23 units oi~
Lot 3 and one single family dwelliug unit ou lot 23 in April, 2000. For Lot 3, the
subject developmeut proposcs four separate, two stoty multi-family structures
with an interconnccted underground parking garage. The subject property is
located at 1820 Mary Lane at the east end of Sanitas Terrace.
Attached is tlie disposirion for the proposed development of 1820 Mary Lane, Lots 3 and 23 of Sanitas Terrace.
The proposed project is located in thc RMX-2, Residential - Mixed 2 zone district, a medium density residential
area that is intended to have a mix of densities fi-om low to higl~ deusity residential uses and where
complementary uses may be pennitted. The pro~osed residential tnultifainily attached use is permitted by-right
in the RMX-2 zoning district. Within the four buildings of Lot 23, the followii~g is proposed: Building A1 is
proposed to contain six, threo-bedroom flats; Building A2 is proposed to contain six three-bedroom flats;
Building B is proposed to contain four, three-bedroom flats, and one, three-bedroom townhome; and Building C
is proposed to contain two, three-bcdroom flats, and four, two-bedroom townhomes.
A Site Review Amendment is required because the applicant had not provided defined plans far the two lots at
the time of site review approval in 2000. In addition, a Site Review Amendment application was submitted for
staff-level approval in May 2006, but received a detennination of "denial" by the staf£ At that time, staff found
that the buildings as configured and attached to be essentially a long, undifferentiated building with no fa~ade or
wall breaks, which presented "busy" unrelated roof ele~nents and monotonous architecture, inappropriate along
the Higllway corridor.
Since that time, the applicant's resubmitted a new site plan a~~d, workitlg with staff over a period of several
months, revised the project plaus to re-organizc the buildings into more individualized blocks with the buildings
oriented toward the existing allcyway, as well as the internal courtyard space. Similarly, the landscape plan was
redesigned to integrate into the existing landscape benns on-site, as well as enhance and provide additional
landscape screening. Staff notes that the reconfigm-ation and supplemental screcning will enhance noise
mitigation for the units. The singlc family unit for lot 23 is consistent with the surrow~ding context of single
family and is coi~sistent with the original Sanitas Ten-ace development Tllerefore, staff finds the application for
Lots 3 and 23 ineets the Site Review criteria set forth iu 9-2-14(h), B.R.C., 1981.
The proposal was approved by staff on April 7, 2008 and the decision may be called up before Platming Board
on or before April 17, 2008. There is one Planuing Board meeting within the 14 day call up period on
April 17, 2008. Questions about the project or decision should be directed to the Case Manager,
Elaine McLaughlin at (303) 441-4130 or mclauKhline(c~bouldercolorado.gov
1820 Mary Lane ~
CITY OF BOULDER
a,~y~~/ Planning and Development Services
~/////'~~J' 1739 Broadway, Third Floor P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306-0791
phone 303-441-1880 fax 303-441-3241 web boulderplandevelop.net
CITY OF BOULDER PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION
You are hereby advised that the following action was taken by the Planning Department based on the
standards and criteria of the Land Use Regulations as set forth in Chapter 9-2, B.R.C. 1981, as applied to
the proposed development.
DECISION: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
PROJECT NAME: Sanitas Terrace, Lots 3 and 23 (LUR2007-00010)
DESCRIPTION: Site Review Amendment: Proposed development of 23 attached multi-
family dwel{ing units on Lot 3 and one single family unit on Lot 23. The
subject development on Lot 3 proposes three structures each with
underground parking. Buildings A1, A2 and C are proposed to contain 6
units each and Building B is proposed to contain 15 units.
LOCATION: 1820 MARY LN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 3 and 23, SANITAS TERRACE Subdivision
City of Boulder, County of Boulder, Colorado
APPLICANT: PARAGON BUILDERS
OWNER: Porchlight Homes
APPLICATION: Site Review Amendment LUR2007-00010 (amends #SI-99-19)
ZONING: RMX-1
CASE MANAGER: Elaine McLaughlin
VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT: NO; the owner has waived the opportunity to create such right under
Syection 9-2-19, B.R.C. 1981.
Approved On: ~ 7
Date
T~
By:
Ruth McHeyser cling Planning Director
This decision may be appealed to the Planning Board by filing an appeal letter with the Planning
Department within two weeks of the decision date. If no such appeal is filed, the decision shall be
deemed final fourteen days after the date above mentioned.
Appeal to Planning Board expires: ~p~ %L f 7~ Z-CG'~5'
FOR A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TO BE PROCESSED FOR THIS PROJECT, A SIGNED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND SIGNED MYLAR PLANS MUST 13E SUBMITTED TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH DISPOSITION CONDITIONS AS APPROVED SHOWN ON THE
MYLAR PLANS, IF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS NOT SIGNED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS
OF THE FINAL DECISION DATE, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AUTOMATICALLY
EXPIRES.
Pursuant to Section 9-2-19 of the Land Use Regulations (Boulder Revised Code, 1981), the applicant
must begin and substantially complete the approved development within three years from the date of final
1820 Mary Lane
approval. Failure to "substantially complete" (as defined in Section 9-2-19, B.R.C. 1981) the development
within three years shall cause this development approval to expire.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The Applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the development shall be in compliance with all
approved plans dated February 14, 2008, and on file in the City of Boulder Planning Department, except
as may be modified by this approval.
2. The Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions contained in the Development Agreement for
#SI-99-19, except as may be modified by this approval.
3. Prior to a building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a Technical Document Review application
for the following items, and subject to the review and approval of the Planning and Development Services
Division:
a) Final architectural plans, including materials and colors, to insure compliance with the intent of this approval
and compatibility with the surrounding area.
b) A detailed landscape plan, including size, quantity and type of plants existing and proposed; type and
quality of non-living landscape materials; any site grading proposed; and any irrigation system proposed to
insure compliance with this approval and the City's landscape requirements. Removal of trees must receive
prior approval of the Planning Department. Removal of any tree in the City right-of-way must also receive
prior approval of the City Forester.
c) A detailed parking plan showing the arrangement, locations, dimensions, and type of parking stalls
(including any areas of the site for bicycle parking or reserved for deferred parking) to insure compliance with
this approval and the City's Parking Design Standards.
d) Final engineering plans in accordance with the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards for all
sewer, water, drainage and transportation improvements.
e) A final drainage plan and report in accordance with the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards.
4. Prior to a building permit application, the Applicant shall dedicate to the City the following as part of a
Technical Document Review application, subject to the review and approval of the City of Boulder
Planning 8 Development Services: a public access easement of a 10-foot wide area, along the south
side of the site, for a future eight-foot wide pedestrian connection along the south side of the existing
retention pond, tying into the existing multi-use path.
5. Prior to a building permit application, the Applicant shall submit a financial guarantee, in a form
acceptable to the Director of Public Works, in an amount equal to the cost of providing eco-passes to all
residents of the development. The financial guarantee shall insure that eco-passes are made available
for the residents of each dwelling unit for three years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy as
proposed in the Applicant's Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan.
1820 Mary Lane
~ City of Boulder Vicinity Map
-
S - 1 ~
~ Legend
- 1 City Limit i_Subject j-
,
t ~v~ J
Lee Hill Dr- ~
- - ~ ~ _
~i I
I ~
I ~
I ~ ~ ~
Yellow Prne Av ~ sl`
- - Subject Area ~
Mary Ln ~ ~ 1820 Mary Ln i
-
z- ~ V I _,iL I ~ i
i
_ _ ~ ~ ~ t v,I A ~ \t .
,
,t ~ i ~ . ~ 1•• i
YF____,_~~ ~ A~
~ i
-
1.~- - yI
~ ~ _ ' _ i - ~ ~ ~
a mouth. Av ~
I~
.1
~I
i .
I P
- _ -
_ -Violef-Aw- - - _
iI ~
~
i
Location: 1820 Mary Ln ~ I ,A,
Project Name: The Condominiums at NoBo ~ ('rry uJ~
_ Ror~lck~r
Review Type: Site Review ~°e
L f ~ ~ ~=L Itte mbrmation depicted nn Rus m„o i= p~o~.d~-d
Review Number: LUR2007-00010 ~ 099rap"'~"oprescntd°°°°°,~ -f~~,,~,~dF-
provides no warranty rxpre55ed or im phc<i, a5 I°
~ InCfl egUaiS 4~J feet theaccuracy:+nWOicomplrtenesaolu•euilorm2tion
Applicant: Paragon Builders ~ ~-°n'°'nrdficr'°n
1820 Mary Lane a
l] I
i
I / ~RKR ~ ~9 I I , o-"uA ,~`y'"~~~~ ~~y
/ / / / - ~ 551 yS ~ 1 VSHHLFWETRIJL ~ ~ G
' i /j A I ~ ~~.°a PMT _ rue ~ ~S
I ~ / / ~ .0 rY ~i~ / 'J L1LDCi ~A~ ] MKL ~ - \ ` o TYS t ~ ~ C'
~ ';%~i i~ / F/s , I Loix ~ p a~ws <iH ~ 11 C ~ ~L
z ~ ~~S ~ I F_ sM«v eMRn 'SRS 't r i~ ~ ~_~l M~. ~
j G / i?/ ~///ri /ri ~ l c S ~ vl; oTC r sl• ~ Q
f V e/ j~r~~//i '.U=v Q I °"L Trios vO ii° -$W. sMe~A. V~~~'~.
`X i,: / ~ ~ _ G ~ c 9 _ w uuz .1»e' Y[' t a'av ~ ~
S /.i .y~~ oe..wx lv ~ 'PFj ~ p ~ / I ~ Towr eowv w ~ Y ~
n./ ~ RAMP ~ x G/~~ ~ '9 Sr ~ ~ ~ l~.eon ~ _ e _ \ _ r«s \
r` I F?~/e~G~%%~ u, mr H.~ (Q ~ ° ~ ttii' ~ oaniR' ~ . ~ ~ 5'lf ~ ~
_ o
~ u~ ii.%/~~~ sec - ~ r MARY LNG I ~'~.n`'r ~ Rai°...., ~ ~ ~ ? ~ .snoAA ti`~ ~w~,'~
i
/ i'.
_ I c~ % j/~ % ~ /~'i / / ~ Mw+uMervrvcH rmc ~°c ~ wren t;. - A
?i//,/ %%:;/j//i'' ,F< r /i:i~~ ~ ' ~ ~ rs< ~ ~ was ~~L w.meL ~ } wsa ~ ~
/ i - ~ a~ eon' sFR' m Ric 6u1 ~o1rJG. ~ \ ~
~ /i / @: i./ /i i/ ? _ ,_-Rr, a
MRr ' i i r.o '
~ ~ 4 \
I ~i/~j?/i 6UILDINC B j / z i?/ `S a . - 'ss~ .A' s° °'~`s:~ Typos-...:'3
n
ro, ~ ; i, /~i% ii%`ii ?>/i ~r i ,i /i;!i/ / ~ ~ ~ s l • °ei da
i~N ` inn n-MKV :e~Mki ~~a r"O i .".A .vv HLC'$;', ` ~ _
~ / .ONE STORY~~~ /~~%~/y~~ j ~ ~ O I 0{MO iG C°0 ~ ,e JOnG K FRG _ ivzV•~OT . _~~~~z
1 ~ 9 M L t~ i
I - ~ _ ~ ~ 6UILDING 6 rc f siiu tnR~~
I _ -
_
1
r i ME I _
I _ _ _ _ _ y
LLLY~~~~
I wv. I I uwtrv w~ncin.p rzrcml I ~ _
c
1
~ I I _ I i ~ncrz2 / - ~ iMWS SRLB 0-M6 _ i SMH - Y~
' I 1 / II
' I I I x~r~d+e I ~ Q/~/ .~I ~ I I 1-SMN I ° ~=l~ly , Mp55 ROC1(0 VLOE0.S N RIItELMOtS - _ ~
I I
I ~ I i i I war u~c 1 0 ~ %f3' S... 1 'i I ~ I 391uE MIXS - ~ j ~w~SM~ ~ ~ _ o'~
V
I F I ~ I~ I I I ~.R O,m ~ 1 ~ T manes <
I w ~L~ 5 i LvI a I ~O1~~1O i LO I~ 1 ~ ~ I -~I ~ ~ ~I ~ I°MxL ~ as ~
~ I I i i ~ r~H ~ o
I } I I I I ++r /%~j L ~ I I Fe. I I / /I~ I,o M0. ..S ~~95-PM Y ~ iT~N! ti~G~
1 1 I p\ ~ I~ GR
F
0
I ~ ~ I I °Re r B~nG ~ ~I \ " I I S I.. ~I ~ I ~iq<H-- F Y
I
I N i I i ~ y ~ DG _
I I I - 1 ~ ~ I I n6 Bii b I 6 TXB -
1
I I
F~ I
_ - _ _ _ - i- - - I e'~k~ a i~v . . SIC
_ ~/~ji/
/ /
$ L` .
~~/ai/ o.l 't. -~----1-'-- - 1 ._.-I w~
YAUPON STREET ~ -
saa3s ~ iii~~~~ YAU PON STREET cMC ~ r~~ - ° -*ne
- , ~ ~ ;c RETE~TION I
r
1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0~, ;z: ~ _i ' omecroav MODUMtlaezi^L e^oes*.
e
L1 saLC ~ zo o - ~ ~I,I ~ ~ - ~ !i SFSIN I - "SRS
H" 3T~~
;
_ _ _ ~ I rE Yr I _ _ _ ' . -
~ I , I
I
Previously Reviewed and Denied Site/Landscape Plan Resubmitted/ Redesigned Site/Landscape Plan of Current Application
1820 Mary Lane ~
~.K~~~
5.6,~ - - - -
i,~o,~ - - - - - - -
--------a--
--------xn~~~,~ - -
_ - T i - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
o.~,~F~~ - -
~~a~,
2 SOUTH ELEVATI~JR
SCALE: t/b" = t'-0"
Previously Reviewed and Denied Architecture
_ _..i::' i y _ _ ~~v 'i
_ -
- W~
00 00
?0 00 0
0 oa o
_ 0 00 °o ao
i i ii
,-..-gs
i
Resubmitted/Redesigned Architecture Example of Current Application
1820 Mary Lane
. ,
t a~ S
~ n
.l'1~,. ~m: '4 M`i<3- C ~ f d' a ;y.i x exz `f GMs r'T6g _ c ^~e.,-„~.. 'a$'~F~ -
A'.ic
~ : ~ i:. hye, d ~ :l# ~ .~+r -~s- b J$~^~,y~ .Z.t ~:4~ 'Se9~ a~ y "4~ xa' ~S
o~. d~k<•~:~-~-' "r r v ''c~'~'~-~""5,~..,ti > ~5r'. ~+~i ti.~b~~ 3~+~y~~~~" fit.
~~3m ~ ltcr. ~ ~ 5"i -ft~. -#.fv ? yS,,~s ~ ~~.~.fi t'~~~"F ev.`~' ~,'i-';„ ~ z r ~..y,
r~ ~ ~ ,
~ -
~ ``mss / 1 t~z,,,,e~, e~ u i~ a
x`
1 ~ ~ • _
1
r
r-
' :ci.^,: ,sass ` { . ° r.
. _ rr**~2
S ~ ~ •1
i~4~~
1{ir'1..
d.. ~ Y ~
x~f- r,;k - ~ 1
r~
,'y _ a
4 ~ ~ ~ , ~ 3tti x 4..
-a.,~ ~ - ~ a~~P~. ~ht.R~pJ~ aE , f
''-r ~1.. ~ i r~ `y Y i^y~y'.. ' : f
'i, l~ ygk`kt?°'t4 i. „i
k~ { ~ ~ 7"~r__. `Y~~ r~~~C., ~ T',. , n ^'-594.
z
s` 6 ' ti.~Ly` 4~ ~Y~ y
- ~ i,. F -
C..
n ~ a
-
I ~
t- - j
Sketch-Up Image of Proposed Project within Landscaped Courtyard Sketch-Up Image of East Side of Proposed Project, Building A2
1820 Mary Lane