Study Session - Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
CITY OF BOULDER
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Members
FROM: Kirk Kincannon, CPRP, Director, Parks and Recreation
Alice Guthrie, Recreation Superintendent
Bev Johnson, Planner, Project Manager
SUBJECT: Boulder Reservoir Master Plan Study Session
DATE: October 18, 2010
PURPOSE
The purpose of the study session on October 18, 2010 is to provide the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board (DRAB) with an update on the Boulder Reservoir Master Plan project and,
specifically, to present the evaluation of the policy options for use of the West Shore
(Attachment A) and North Shore/Coot Lake (Attachment B) for board review and discussion.
A study session on the evaluation of the boating policy options and the proposed special events
policy is scheduled for October 25, 2010 after the regular PRAB business meeting.
The role of the PRAB at the study sessions is to provide informal feedback to staff on the
evaluation of the master plan policy options. Comments from PRAB study sessions will be
considered, as the Department prepares a recommendation to City Council on the preferred
options. The board will review the evaluation and Department recommendations on the
preferred options under consideration for the specific motion to City Council at a public hearing
on November 22, 2010.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the Boulder Reservoir Master Plan project is to establish management goals and
objectives for the Parks and Recreation Department managed land and activities, at the Boulder
Reservoir, that will guide long-term facility investment strategies. The plan is being developed
in the following three phases:
I: Vision, Goals and Issues (May 2009 -January 2010)
II: Policy Options (January December 2010)
III: Draft and Final Master Plan (January - April 2011)
Staff completed Phase I of the project in January 2010, after providing several opportunities for
public input on the plan. These included two public meetings, a user survey and three focus
group discussions. Phase II of the project involved drafting of preliminary options for the
following key policy areas:
• Boating
+ West Shore use
• North Shore/Coot Lake use
• Special events
A public meeting was held on April 7, 2010 to collect feedback on the preliminary options and
policies. The PRAB and City Council reviewed the options at study sessions in April and May of
2010, prior to the evaluation. Please see the following web site for a more background and
information on the project:
www.bouldercolorado.gov > Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder Reservoir >
Reservoir Master Plan Project
The Department is completing Phase II of the project, which involves identification and
evaluation of the policy options. The questions that guided the evaluation include the following:
1. How does each option help to achieve the city's environmental, economic and social
sustainabiiity goals?
2. How does each option help to achieve the vision and goals for the Boulder Reservoir
and Coot Lake area?
3. What are the overall cost and revenue implications of each option to the city?
4. What are the impacts of each option to capital facilities and infrastructure? (relative to
capital needs identified or planned under current master plans)
5. What additional facilities and services would be needed to meet current service
standards under each option?
6. What would be the cost of new facilities and services and would current revenue
sources adequately pay for those facilities?
7. What are the impacts to other existing or planned services (transportation, utilities,
police, fire, open space, etc.)?
8. What are the impacts to visitors to the Boulder Reservoir area?
9. What regulatory changes would need to be made to implement each option?
10. How well does each option reflect best practices in the industry?
11. How well does each option position the city to respond to emerging trends?
A public meeting was held on October 13, 2010 to get feedback on the option evaluation and a
preferred option. Approximately 45 people attended the meeting. Public comment from the
meeting is included in Attachment C.
MEETING AGENDA:
Introductions and staff presentation 6:00 - 6:15 p.m.
Board questions and comments 6:15 - 7:30 p.m.
2
NEXT STEPS:
After the PRAB study sessions in October, the Department will make any accepted revisions to
the options evaluation and develop a Department recommendation. The evaluation of the boating
policy options and recommendation will be presented to the Water Resources Advisory Board
(WRAB) on November 15 and WRAB will make a recommendation on the boating policy
options to City Council. The PRAB is asked to provide a recommendation to council on all the
policy options after the PRAB public hearing on November 22, 2010. City Council is scheduled
to review the evaluation and provide final direction on the preferred policy options at a public
hearing on December 7, 2010.
The final phase of the project will involve development and review of a draft master plan and
will identify additional management plans and operational procedures that should be developed
for the facility, including those listed below:
1. Recreational use policies (programs, camps, swimming, picnics).
2. Wildlife, resource and habitat protection and management objectives.
3. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and management of aquatic and terrestrial
species.
4. Facility and infrastructure needs.
5. Water quality monitoring protocols and thresholds.
6. Drought response plan.
6. Standard operating procedures.
7. Safety and security procedures.
8. Interdepartmental management and coordination.
9. Actions, responsibilities and timeline to implement the plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
A Evaluation of the West Shore Use Policy Options
B Evaluation of the North Shore/Coot Lake Policy Options
C Public Comments
3
ATTACHMENT A
Evaluation of West Shore Use Options
Option 1: Option 2: Option 3: Option 4:
Status Quo Habitat Conservation Area Low-Impact Use Expanded Use
(To emphasize protection of wetlands, sensitive wildlife (To provide a safe, multi-use trail system around the (To enhance the user experience and maximize user
and water quality on the West Shore) reservoir while minimizing impacts to wetlands and safety)
wildlife)
• No city-initiated trail development in the West Shore • Designate area as Habitat Conservation Area (restrict • City-initiated and funded soft-surface, multi-use
trail • A multi-use trail through the wetlands and closer to the
area (a county-initiated trail detached from the road use and access to the road right-of-way) primarily along the east side of the 51St Street right-of- west shoreline
primarily on city land. The trail would be
could still be developed in the road right-of-way) • No city-initiated trail development in the West Shore way, connecting the North Shore trail system to the a combination
soft-surface trail and boardwalk
• Continue aeromodeling use with seasonal wildlife area area (a county-initiated trail, detached from the road main entry gate area of the reservoir. (Trail may be .
Restrict use and access to the multi-use trail
closures as needed could still be developed in the right-of-way) partially in county right-of-way where there are . Modify aeromodeling fly zone to minimize
conflicts with
Description . Phase out aeromodeling use resource protection conflicts such as wetlands, mature trail use and continue seasonal wildlife area closures
trees or prairie dogs) as needed
• Designate area to the east of the trail as Habitat
Conservation Area (restrict use and access to multi-
use trail)
• Continue aeromodeling use with seasonal wildlife area
closures as needed
Option 1 continues the current level of use and habitat Option 2 has the least amount of impact on wetlands Option 3 provides an off-road, multi-use trail connection
Option 4 provides the most pleasant and safe off-road
protection with no additional costs. However, there and wildlife on the West Shore among all the options around the reservoir while maintaining the current experience
for pedestrians, runners and cyclists.
Key would be no city-initiated trail development in the area to and reduces impacts relative to current use. However, habitat protection level on the West Shore. Significant However
, there are significant impacts to wetlands and
Conclusions improve connectivity and safety for pedestrians and there would be no city-initiated trail development to capital costs are involved in construction of the trail
and wildlife habitat, resulting in very significant capital costs
cyclists. improve connectivity in the area and there would be supporting facilities. for mitigation.
capital costs of removing the aeromodeling facility and
restoring the area.
ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS: $10,000 ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS: $100,000 ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS: $600,000+ ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS: $1,000,000+
Estimated (fencing and signage) (fencing, signage, removal of aeromodeling facility and (trail and bridge construction, 55th St. parking lot (trail and boardwalk
construction, wetland mitigation, 55th
Costs restoration of habitat) improvements and toilets, fencing, signage and wetland Street parking lot improvements and toilets, fencing)
(includes unmet ESTIMATED OPERATIONAL COST: $30,000 mitigation)
needs) (weed management) ESTIMATED OPERATIONAL COST: $30,000 ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATIONAL COST: $60,000
(weed management) ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATIONAL COST: $45,000 (weed management, trail, habitat maintenance and
(weed management, trail maintenance and enforcement enforcement staff)
staff)
Current Conditions: Removal of aeromodeling use and restoration of area Same as Option 1 except: • Permanently impacts roughly 1 acre of wetland which
• The area is one of the largest and most diverse, lower would improve wetland and wildlife habitat conditions • Potentially impacts wetlands along the right-of-way
would require 2 acres of mitigation
elevation, habitat blocks in the Boulder Valley. relative to Option 1. • Increases potential weed infestation • Fragments wetland and significantly impacts
habitat by
Wetlands, riparian areas and robust native grasslands . Increases use of the area by pedestrians, dogs and altering hydrology, and introducing weed species
contribute to the productivity and habitat complexity of cyclists may have some indirect impact on bird • Significantly impacts use of the habitat by many
rare
the area species nesting and foraging in the area and declining birds and other sensitive animal species
Wetlands and • Over 150 acres wetland rated by the city as one of the by reducing size of buffer and introducing people and
Wildlife most exemplary wetlands in the Boulder Valley Dense equipment to the area
vegetation along the creeks helps remove sediment • Direct loss of wetlands and grassland decreased the
and nutrients from flows entering the reservoir. The overall effectiveness of the overall habitat in the area.
large size of the wetlands, their dense vegetation and • Fragments the prairie dog habitat and reduces the
their location in a semi-protected landscape greatly viability and use of this area by raptor species
increases wetland value
• Several animal species of local, county or state
concern including Bald Eagles, Osprey, American
Bittern and Northern Harriers are found in this wetland
complex
1
Option 1: Option 2: Option 3: Option 4:
Status Quo Habitat Conservation Area Low-Impact Use Expanded Use
(To emphasize protection of wetlands, sensitive wildlife (To provide a safe, multi-use trail system around the (To enhance the user experience and maximize user
and water quality on the West Shore) reservoir while minimizing impacts to wetlands and safety)
wildlife
• Upland area is either private land, prairie dog habitat
or aeromodeling facility. The prairie dog habitat
provides a food source for many of the bird species
that nest, roost or forage in the area
• No direct impacts to water quality in the reservoir due Same as Option 1 except that there is a decreased risk Same as Option 1. • Potentially increases
impacts to water quality in the
Water Quality to extensive wetlands and limited access to the area of aquatic nuisance species infestation by further limiting reservoir from sedimentation, human-caused
impacts
and Aquatic • Some risk of aquatic nuisance species infestation from access to the West Shore. and other parameters currently mitigated by the
Nuisance small watercraft launching existing wetland systems
• Potential increase in risk of aquatic nuisance species
Species infestation through non-motorized boat launching off
the West Shore
Currently, there are safety issues for pedestrians and Same as Option 1. . Provides a safer and more desirable trail connection Same as Option 3 except that the
trail may impact one
cyclists using roadway. around the reservoir (relative to the status quo) which property owner on 51St Street.
will enhance the experience for hikers, runners and
Social Impacts cyclists to this area of the reservoir
• Supports community athletic events and commuter
use and results in fewer road closures for small events
Boulder County Open Space and Mountain Parks Open Space and Mountain Parks Same as Option 3.
• Transportation Department periodically receives • Removal of the aeromodeling field would provide • Trail would increase operational costs and demand for
comments from the public about safety concerns and greater protection for the wildlife in the adjacent additional facilities at the Eagle trailhead. (Estimated
Impacts to undesirable condition of 51st Street for pedestrians, grassland preserves. annual cost for maintenance -$5,000. Estimated
cyclists and runners capital cost for parking lot improvements - $100,000)
Other • Although 51St and 551" streets are signed as "no Boulder Countv
Departments parking", cars are often parked in the right-of-way near • Closure of 55th Street parking lot may result in more Boulder County
and Agencies the 55 Street trailhead on busy weekends illegal parking along the road. Safety concerns would • Trail improves safety along 51S' Street and reduces
continue. number of road closures for special events
Trail could potentially impact functioning or
maintenance of roadway and drainage
Comparison to • Consistent with trend toward providing safe, detached • Consistent with trend toward providing safe, detached
Best Practices multi-use trails along roadways multi-use trails along roadways
• Consistent with best management practice to avoid • Not consistent with best practice of avoiding impacts
and Emerging impacts to wetlands and sensitive wildlife species and disturbances to wetlands and sensitive wildlife
Trends habitat through fragmentation
Potential ordinance needed to designate Habitat . Potential ordinance needed to designate Habitat • Under city code, new trails (including boardwalks)
are
Conservation Area. Conservation Area prohibited in regulatory wetlands. A variance to this
Regulatory • May require local and federal wetland permits and restriction would be required
Implications wetland mitigation • Wetland mitigation (2X impacted acreage) would be
required
• May require a federal wetland permit and city prairie
do permit
2
ATTACHMENT B
Evaluation of North Shore and Coot Lake Use Options
Option 1: Option 2: Option 3:
Current Use and Access Current Use/Reduced Access Expanded Use and Access
(To maintain a balance between recreational use of the North Shore and (To emphasize protection of wildlife habitat and water quality, and reduce the (To allow swimming
on the North Shore)
habitat protection by continuing with the status quo) risk of aquatic nuisance species infestation)
• Continue the current passive uses along the North Shore and Coot Lake Same as Option 1 but including: . Allow swimming in designated area along the north shoreline
during summer
• Improve the existing trail system and build a pedestrian-only trail for • Closure of the 55th St. parking (while maintaining a multi-use trail season (May through
August) and provide support staff and facilities
access to the north shoreline of the reservoir connection) in order to reduce risk of illegal swimming, access to the West • Implement a user or parking fee system
• Maintain the 55th Street parking lot at current capacity Shore and non-motorized boat launching from the North Shore • Allow dog swimming in designated areas only
along the north shoreline to
• Continue voice and sight control requirement for dogs and continue to • Reduce access to northwest shoreline in the Dry Creek inlet to protect keep dogs out of the
swim beach area (current dog swimming along the
Description allow dog swimming in Coot Lake and on the North Shore wetland and aquatic habitat south and east sides of Coot Lake would continue).
• Require dogs to be on leash on the trail west and north of Coot Lake
Allowed uses include: hiking, biking, dog walking/swimming, horseback (current voice and sight regulations in all other areas would continue). Allowed uses include:
swimming (human), hiking, biking, dog
riding, picnicking walking/swimming, horseback riding, picnicking
Allowed uses include: hiking, biking, dog walking/swimming, horseback
Prohibited uses include: riding, picnicking Prohibited uses include:
Swimming (human), boat launching, skydiving Boat launching, skydiving
Prohibited uses include:
Swimming (human), boat launching, skydiving
Option 1 maintains the current balance between habitat protection and Option 2 increases wildlife habitat protection by reducing access to the Option 3 expands swimming
opportunities in the reservoir and generates
recreational use of the North Shore and Coot Lake. Current parking at 55th northwest area of the reservoir. Removal of the 55th Street parking lot revenue from North Shore
and Coot Lake use. However, it has very
Street, Coot Lake, and Tom Watson Park accommodates current visitation reduces the risk of aquatic nuisance species in the reservoir by discouraging significant capital and
operational cost implications. A user fee system would
Key levels, however, does not provide for any future increase in visitation to the potential boating access from that area. The option has the lowest capital be implemented
to recoup some of the operational costs. The option,
Conclusions North Shore, Coot Lake or Tom Watson Park. improvement costs of all the options but increases parking demand however, increases potential water quality
impacts from shoreline
somewhat at Tom Watson Park and Coot Lake. development and human-body related contaminants and significantly
increases parking demand at Tom Watson Park and Coot Lake.
Estimated CAPITAL: $400,000 CAPITAL: $350,000 CAPITAL: $2,000,000+
Costs (trail improvements, toilets at Coot Lake, new bridge over canal, 55th Street (Same as Option 1 less 55th Street improvements) (Option 1 costs plus beach improvements,
Coot Lake parking expansion, user
(includes unmet parking lot improvements, new fishing pier at Coot Lake) ANNUAL OPERATIONAL: $30,000 fee system, operations building, water and sewer utilities,
fencing)
,000
needs) ANNUAL OPERATIONAL: $30,000 (maintenance, enforcement, habitat restoration) ANNUAL OPERATIONAL: $300,000
(maintenance, enforcement, habitat restoration)
Estimated ESTIMATED ANNUAL REVENUE: $0 ESTIMATED ANNUAL REVENUE: $0 ESTIMATED ANNUAL REVENUE: $100,000
Annual
Revenue
• The area is one of the largest and most diverse, lower elevation, habitat • Reduced impacts to wetlands with access in designated areas only. • Increased access and
use of the shoreline and water will decrease habitat
blocks in the Boulder Valley. Wetlands, riparian areas and robust native effectiveness in what is one of the largest and most diverse habitat blocks
Wetlands grasslands contribute to the productivity and habitat complexity of the area found in lower elevations of the Boulder Valley
and Wildlife • Continued impacts to wetlands and wildlife on the west side of Coot Lake • Creation of beach would reduce amount of shoreline habitat
and areas along the North Shore from unmanaged access by pedestrians
and dogs
1
Option 1: Option 2: Option 3:
Current Use and Access Current Use/Reduced Access Expanded Use and Access
(To maintain a balance between recreational use of the North Shore and (To emphasize protection of wildlife habitat and water quality, and reduce the (To allow swimming
on the North Shore)
habitat protection by continuing with the status quo) risk of aquatic nuisance species infestation)
Water
Quality and • Potential for contaminants in the reservoir from illegal swimming/body • Reduces potential for contaminants in the reservoir from illegal swimming • Significantly
increases likelihood of contaminants in the reservoir from
contact on the North Shore and dog access to the water on the North Shore swimming/body contact and dog access to the water
Aquatic • Illegal boat launching on North Shore from 55th Street parking lot poses • Reduces risk of mussel infestation from potential boat launching on the • Reduces
risk of mussel infestation from potential boat launching on the
Nuisance some risk of mussel infestation North Shore North Shore (increased staff presence)
Species
• Provides a quiet venue for passive recreation including hiking, cycling, Same as Option 1 plus: Option 2 plus:
running, and wildlife viewing and dog running • Increases parking demand somewhat at Tom Watson Park and Coot Lake • Increases swimming opportunities at the reservoir
and increases visitation
• Current annual visitation through the 55th Street trailhead is roughly to the North Shore
150,000 and 500,000 through the Coot Lake trailhead • Changes the quality of the experience on the North Shore and Coot Lake
• Current parking at 55th Street, Coot Lake, and Tom Watson Park generally for visitors from a quiet, passive use area to a more populated use area
Visitors and accommodates current visitation levels (except on busy summer • User fee would be charged to all visitors to the area (runners, swimmers,
Neighbors weekends) cyclists, etc.)
• Annual visitation to the area is expected to increase by 100,000 if Lyons to • Significantly increases parking demand at 55'" Street, Coot Lake and Tom
Boulder Trail is developed, which will increase parking demand at both Watson Park
trailheads . Likely increases ambient noise levels from increased number of people and
• Little ambient noise from North Shore and Coot Lake area swimmers in the area
• Significantly increases traffic on 63rd Street
Open Space and Mountain Parks Open Space and Mountain Parks City Police and Fire - Increases need for safety and enforcement services
Impacts to • Increasing use of the 55th Street trailhead will create increasing demand for Closure of the 55th Street parking lot without eliminating the trailhead will
Other and use of the Eagle Trailhead as an alternate parking location. put more demand on the Eagle Trailhead and may result in a need for Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District - Increased use of the area
Departments OSMP to make improvements to the parking lot at an approximate cost of could cause conflict with maintenance access to canal, dams or spillway.
and $100,000 (e.g. lot expansion, pit toilets).
Agencies City Transportation Department and Boulder County - Increases traffic on 63`"
Street and potential for accidents. Also increases potential for illegal parking
along 55'" Street to access trailhead.
• Development of swim beach and additional trails will require city wetlands
Regulatory permit and possible mitigation
implications • Amendments to dog leash regulations may be needed
2
ATTACHMENT C
Public Comment
I support all the suggestions made by Audubon regarding the master plan, and would like to see their
suggestions implemented:
Preservation of extremely vulnerable and valuable wetlands habitat, protection of Coot Lake wetland area
by keeping dogs on leash there, protection of mudlfats and shallts to the north and northwest through
exclusion of motorized vehichels, and improvement and expansion of trails in the North Shore or Coot
Lake area, but not to the south along the dams.
Nola Chow
TO: Boulder City Council and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
FROM: Laura Osborn
RE: Master Plan for Boulder Reservoir
I am a member of Audubon and the Boulder County Nature Association. For the past 4 years, I have
been an Eco-Steward volunteer at Meyers Gulch for Boulder County Parks and Open Space. In this
capacity, I perform seasonal breeding bird counts and surveys for the County. I support preservation of
the natural areas and wildlife species surrounding the Reservoir area. The wetlands area surrounding the
Reservoir is vital to many nesting bird species such as the Northern Harrier, which is rapidly declining in
the Boulder County vicinity. This area is so.small and barely viable that no trails should be considered. in
these wetlands, just as staff has suggested.
The surrounding area has been the home to nesting Burrowing Owls. Osprey breed here during the
spring and summer and a variety of raptors visit and nest in the immediate and adjacent areas. The
mudflats and shallow areas to the north and northwestern side are home to many types of birdlife. Due to
this, Jet Ski Cove should be off-limits to motorized traffic. Disturbance from this traffic has severe
impacts on the resident and visiting birds.
The natural habitat surrounding Coot Lake and the wetlands has been severely affected by off leash dogs.
This area needs to be a leash-only designation to preserve what remains of the bird habitat. Dogs off-
leash impact all wildlife species.
I hope that when you formulate a plan that wildlife and habitat preservation will be your primary
consideration. Thank you.
I read in this morning's paper that you will be devoting Tuesday's Council meeting to the Boulder
Reservoir Master Plan . I hope that the Plan you pass will make preservation of the wetlands habitat a top
priority for two reasons:
1. In addition to the more obvious recreational uses that capture front-page attention, Boulder Reservoir
provides rich recreational opportunities to the numerous birders and nature-lovers in our city.
2. The wetlands, grasslands and mudflats provide valuable habitat for at-risk species. Increasingly,
ecologists are calling for habitat preservation as the key approach for sustaining native species in the face
of alterations due to Climate Change. (see West, et al; U.S. Natural Resources and Climate Change:
Concepts and Approaches for Management Adaptation; Environmental Management, 2009,44: 1001-
1021).
Karen S. Hollweg
1
I'm writing in support of the Boulder County Audubon position regarding the Master Plait for Boulder
County Reservoir. I lived in the greater Boulder area for many years, and support efforts which help
preserve our natural areas and the wildlife that use these areas.
Sincerely,
Susan Harris
I am writing add my support to the Audubon's stance for the preservation of the nesting areas around
Boulder Reservoir. I'll keep it short since I'm sure you are receiving many similiar letters. Please
consider their alternatives while malting your decisions. Thank you.
David Lawry
name: Janet McLachlan
comments: I support all of the recommendations in the Boulder County Audubon Society letter in regard
to the Boulder Reservoir Master Plan. I have been fortunate enough to observe and learn about birds who
live and nest in the area surrounding the reservoir and I consider this area one of Boulder's most important
wildlife habitats. I urge you to do all you can to protect the areas mentioned in the Audubon letter.
Thank you.
TO: Boulder City Council
We have been volunteer naturalists for Boulder County Parks and Open Space for over ten years and have
seen a reduction in many species of birds and other important species over that time due to habitat
destruction. PLEASE protect and preserve the remaining wildlife habitats and wetlands in the Boulder
Reservoir area. This region is a critical wildlife area for many species, both large and small. We both
support all suggestions made by Audubon in regard to protecting the wildlife and wetlands in the Boulder
Reservoir area, including the points made below:
® Preservation of extremely vulnerable and valuable wetlands habitat. The wetlands around
Boulder Reservoir support a higher concentration of nesting birds of special concern than any other
comparably-sized area of Boulder County. It is today a mere fragment of a once huge mosaic of
wetlands and grasslands but vital in its support of a high number of at-risk species. Harriers and
Bitterns, both rare and declining, and Osprey all depend on this combination of wetlands, grasslands
and mudflats.
An alternative. Because we know there has been interest in a trail through this area, we want to
stress the only option we see that would peep the habitat protected while also affording a high-quality,
multi-use trail experience. SO Street is wide enough that it could encompass a narrowed paved road
and a multi-use paved trail within the present right of way and between the present fences. With the
speed limit reduced to 25, this could create the same feel offered by national parks, with excellent
running, bicycling and viewing opportunities for all, without the flying gravel and high-speed traffic
that go through at present.
e Protection of Coot Lake wetland area by keeping dogs on leash around that small
circumference. Protecting this tiny area of wetlands is a major goal of the Coot Lake
proposals, and we urge requiring that dogs be on leash around the wetlands. Harriers and
bitterns both used to nest in the area, but with dogs actually seen running through the
wetlands, it has sadly been the case that neither species has been seen or heard there in the
last couple of years.
Protection of mudflats -and shallows to the north and northwest through exclusion of
motorized vehicles fi-om Jet Ski Cove. Many birds and waterfowl have relied on these shores
~d 2
for foraging and nesting, but they are doing so with less frequency in every passing year. We
enthusiastically support the idea of protecting the northwestern shore by making the area
called Jet Ski cove off limits to motorized conveyances. We would like to see the protected
areas around the Dry Creels and Little Dry Creels inlands extended as well. Any means of
protecting these areas from hikers and roaming dogs are also welcomed.
Improvement and expansion of trails in the forth Shore or Coot Lake area, but not to the south
along the dams. Improving and expanding main trails and shutting off social trails in the North
Shore and Coot Lakes areas is an excellent idea. A trail alongside the dam on the northeast,
however, would run too far into burrowing owl territory, a species which is rare and declining, and
which will already be under pressure by a new trail being constructed on the northeast of the colony.
A trail along the southeast darn would run too close to prairie dog habitat, which is needed for both
prairie dogs and the species such as hawks and eagles for whom they are a keystone prey species.
Donn and Cathy Cook
I support the Audubon Society's recommendations for preserving public lands as undeveloped wildlife
habitat at the Boulder Reservoir. As our population pressure increases we need to limit the impact of
people.
Elaine Hill
name: Brad Lindseth
comment: Please remove all fees and restrictions to use Boulder reservoir. Costs should be paid for by
Colorado income tax or local property tax. All fees unfairly make using Boulder reservoir unaffordable
for low and middle income families. Most states don't have any boating fees. Boats already have to pay a
fee to Colorado State Parks to register the boat. Where is that money going? Swimming should be
allowed anytime. We don't need to have a babysitter lifeguard. Boulder reservoir is man-made. It's not a
wildlife refuge. Most of Boulder county is already treated like a wildlife refuge. Open up all shoreline to
recreational use temporary boat landing picnicking. Making boaters drive to other Reservoirs such as
Union Reservoir in Longmont doesn't seem to help the city's effective carbon footprint. I got a message
today that Boulder Sailing Club and CU Sailing Team are now driving to Longmont to sail. This is sad. I
live in Nederland partly because of the high housing prices in Boulder caused by Boulder growth policies.
Unfortunately Boulder doesn't allow boating on Barker reservoir which is 5 minutes from where I live.
Therefore I must drive 45 minutes to Boulder Reservoir. Or if I don't want to pay the outrageous fees
drive 1 hour to Union Reservoir in Longmont. Don't ban anything. Banning any kind of boating will
make those people drive 1 hour to Carter Lake or other lakes increasing carbon footprint. I'm tired of
hearing of Boulder thinking of more restrictions. I'd like to hear Boulder thinking of more freedom.
name: Sean Burns
comment: To Whom It May Concern:
I support the Audubon recommendations for the Boulder Reservoir master plan. This includes items
such as:
The wetlands around Boulder Reservoir support a higher concentration of nesting birds of special
concern than any other comparably-sized area of Boulder County. It is today a mere fragment of a once
huge mosaic of wetlands and grasslands but vital in its support of a high number of at-risk species.
Harriers and Bitterns both rare and declining and Osprey all depend on this combination of wetlands
grasslands and mudflats
thanks.
r
L°3
Dear City Council,
I am writing to say that I support all the suggestion made by the Audubon Society
re: the preservation of the extremely vulnerable--and valuable--wetlands habitat in Boulder.
As we know--and if we don`t, we need to do strong public education on this topic-- the wetlands around
Boulder Reservoir support a higher concentration of nesting birds of special concern than any other
comparably-sized area of Boulder County. It is today a mere fragment of a once huge mosaic of wetlands
and grasslands but it is still vital in its support of a high number of at-risk species: harriers and bitterns,
both rare and declining, and osprey all depend on this area.
Re: the trail through this area--- there is one option that could possibly keep the habitat protected while
also affording a high-quality, multi-use trail experience. 51st Street is wide enough that it could
encompass a narrowed paved road and a multi-use paved trail within the present right of way and between
the present fences. With the speed limit reduced to 25, this could create an area for excellent running,
bicycling and viewing opportunities for all, without the flying gravel and high-speed traffic that go
through at the present.
I am writing also to support the protection of the Coot Lake wetland area by keeping dogs on leash
around it. Harriers and bitterns both used to nest in the area, but with dogs actually seen running through
the wetlands, neither species has been seen or heard there in the last couple of years. We hope that
leashing dogs can encourage remedying this.
I am writing to support protection of mudflats and shallows to the north and northwest through exclusion
of motorized vehicles from Jet Ski Cove. Many birds and waterfowl have relied on these shores for
foraging and nesting, but they are doing so with less frequency every year.
Please make Jet Ski Cove off limits to motorized conveyances. We would like to see the protected areas
around Dry Creels and Little Dry Creek inlands extended as well. Please protect these areas from hikers
and roaming dogs as well for the same reasons.
Improvement and expansion of trails in the Nor th Shore or Coot Lake area is supportable, but not to the
south along the dams. Improving and expanding main trails and shutting off social trails in the North
Shore and Coot Lakes areas is an excellent idea. A trail alongside the dam on the northeast, however,
would run too far into burrowing owl territory. This species is rare and declining, and which will already
be under pressure by anew trail being constructed on the northeast of the colony. A trail along the
southeast dam would run too close to prairie dog habitat, which is needed for both prairie dogs and the
species such as hawks and eagles for whom they are a keystone prey species.
Thank you very much.
Yours Truly,
Pamela Sherman
member, Boulder County Nature Association
name: Ruth Carol & Glenn Cushman
comments: We support all the Boulder Audubon suggestions for the Master Plan for Boulder Reservoir
and urge you to make choices that preserve habitat and protect wildlife. The wetlands especially are
crucial for many birds of special concern such as bitterns & harriers.
Years ago dogs were required to be on leash around Coot Lake. Changing that regulation to voice control
(a joke!!) was a mistake. Please return to the on-leash rule or (better yet) make that area off limits to dogs.
We are avid hikers but strongly believe in preserving a few areas for wildlife instead of encouraging
unfettered recreation.
Ruth Carol & Glenn Cushman
Co-authors Boulder Hiking Trails
I just found out about the comment period for the Boulder Reservoir Master Plan. Given the short notice,
I just want to say that I support all the suggestions made by Audubon. Please preserve habitat for wildlife!
4
It is so important that we protect them.
thanks for your time,
Bay Roberts
Dear Ms. Johnson and Boulder City Council,
I am an active wildlife watcher and Boulder taxpayer. I spend time in our local parks to relax, hike and
watch birds, and also spend many hours each year volunteering in the eco-steward partnership program to
gather long-term data to monitor the ecological health of our local ecosystems. I chose to live in this
community for many reasons, including the high value it places on preserving open space - not just for
recreational use, but to preserve intact ecological communities that represent the spectacular biological
diversity native to this region. Thus I write to urge the council to actively protect the important wildlife
habitat that encompasses Boulder Reservoir. These grasslands and wetlands provide the best remaining
habitat in the county for rare and declining bird species, such as the American Bittern, Northern Harrier,
and Osprey. To protect this habitat and all of its native residents, the Master Plan for the Reservoir must:
- Prevent habitat fragmentation by stopping or minimizing new trail development
- Protect nesting birds from disruptions caused by dogs off leash, particularly in the sensitive Coot Lake
wetlands
- Maintain the mudflat and shallows crucial bird habitat in the area known as "Jet Ski Cove" by
closing this area to motorized vehicles on the water and to off trail hikers and dogs on land
- Keep new and existing social trails out of east-side areas near the dam to preserve habitat for burrowing
owls, prairie dogs, and raptors:
Specific recommendations to address these concerns have been thoughtfully prepared by the Boulder
County Audubon Society, drawing on the best data available about past and present wildlife use of the
Reservoir and its surrounds. I support their recommendations in full.
Sincerely,
Sandra Laursen
Council Correspondence:
I'm writing in support of the Boulder County Audubon position regarding the Master Plan for Boulder
County Reservoir. I lived in the greater Boulder area for many years, and support efforts which help
preserve our natural areas and the wildlife that use these areas.
Sincerely,
Susan Harris
Council Correspondence:
I am writing to add my support to the Audubon's stance for the preservation of the nesting areas around
Boulder Reservoir. I'll keep it short since I'm sure you are receiving many similar letters, Please consider
their alternatives while malting your decisions. Thank you.
David Lawry
From: Michael Delaney
Date: 10 May 2010
Re: Boulder Reservoir master plan study session
Greetings, and good luck in tomorrow's study session.
I am a resident of the city. I am also the current president of the Boulder County Nature Association
which for the past 28 years has been devoted to learning about, protecting and educating the public about
our natural environment. Boulder Reservoir and the land around it are critically important habitat.
6-5
I support the designation of the west shore as a habitat conservation area. The wetlands are of critical
importance. For instance, this is the only place that the locally-threatened northern harrier has bred in the
county for the last several years. I also would favor the elimination of motorized craft from what is
known as Jet Ski Cove. This is wonderful habitat for water and shore birds. Concerning the desire of
some for a west side trail, I think Boulder Audubon has come up with a great idea in using the 51 st Street
right of way for a multi-use trail as well as road, and would support the paving of both IF the auto speed
limit were 20 or 25 miles per hour. But I oppose any off road trail through the area. The habitat is just
too valuable to cut it up.
Thank you for considering the above.
Council Correspondence:
I want to express my support for all of the suggestions made by the Audubon for the master plan for
Boulder Reservoir. It is important that the sensitive environment, invaluable to so many critical species,
be protected to the maximum extent possible.
Thank you
Wendy Sydow
Dear Mayor and Members of Council,
I'm writing to add my personal comments on the Boulder Reservoir Master plan. In doing so, I'd like to
include areas of my background that have helped me frame my comments. I am President of Boulder
FIDOS, served on: the North Shore - Coot Lake Focus Group, Valmont Park Advisory Group, Boulder
Dog Roundtable, as well as, participating in negotiations and implementation of the Visitor Master Plan.
In addition, I have been a frequent visitor to the "Res" both with and w/out my dog for thirty-two years.
Dog Related Issues
* Coot Lake and the North Shore are important to dog owners because it's one of the few places that
their dogs can swim in Boulder.
* Habitat/wetlands at Coot Lake can be protected by adding more fencing (as recommended by BCNA)
rather than malting dogs be leashed.
* There is no data that suggests dogs' presence on the North Shore is contributing to the decline of the
bird species in the area (specifically the West Shore). Good signage (which is now lathing) and/or
fencing can direct people with their dogs away.
Options should be open to considering building a multi-use trail around the West Shore.
Dogs do not pose any more of a threat of aquatic nuisance species than boats, ? w!n~n s xvimmers,
geese.
* Coot Lake is a place where people who are physically-limited and children can enjoy nature with
their dogs under V&S (short walls in and nice benches/table)
* Coot Lake is great outing for families to learn about nature while walking/playing with their dogs.
Some data from the User Survey dated Sept, 2009 proves that:
* Users exercising their pet at Coot Lake was why 71% of the people were there.
When asked what they lilted the most about visiting the Rez:
45% said dog friendly/dogs off leash and 22%o dog swim at Coot Lake
33% said dog friendly/dogs off leash at Tom Watson Park
30% dog friendly/dogs off leash at trailhead at 55th
South shore - 3% asked to allow dogs on beach
* 84% say enforcement of dog leash laws was the "right amount" - so apparently no problem
* 71% of people polled were there to exercise their pet - very important to people
* No one in survey suggested banning dogs.
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
Page 7: West Shore Use, designate as "Habitat Conservation Area".
6
This should remain an official "WETLANDS" definition/designation.
To the best of my knowledge outside of OSMP this is not a legal definition /designation in the BRC or
elsewhere. And if fact, would not even be consistent with OSMP's definition VMP pg 49 and therefore
add confusion and inconsistency system-wide..
Habitat Conservation Area Designation Characteristics ® Tend to be located in more remote areas.
® Typically represent the largest blocks of an ecosystem type with few, if any, trails or roads.
Lower level of visitor use; no or few trails and trailheads.
Naturally functioning ecosystems (but may contain areas with evidence of human use and impacts).
Criteria for Inclusion of Management Areas in the Habitat Conservation Area Designation o Large habitat
blocks with a low density of trails, roads, or development.
High potential for restoration of natural ecosystems (including areas with restoration underway).
Plant communities that are rare or unique on Open Space and Mountain Parks lands.
o Habitat for species 'of concern such as threatened, endangered, rare, and other species.
a Areas with high biodiversity such as wetlands and riparian areas (especially un-trailed riparian reaches).
Comparatively lower, visitation levels.
v Compatibility with adjacent land use (i.e., opportunities for coordinating habitat protection and
connections and recreational activities/trail linkages).
2) Pg 8 North Shore and Coot Lake under Option 3, I would add:
Option 4: Expand access and use (no swimming). Including the continued use and expansion of the 55th
street parking lot.
3) Pg. 15, 4.Special Events Policy I would support the last sentence and ask for a year-by-year
comparison of the income from special events for the last five years. "If City Council's interest, however,
is in placing more emphasis on attracting more special events to this venue, staff will include evaluation
of this option in the next steps of the project."
4) Pg. 16, 5. Alcohol Use Policy I would not support an inconsistent policy on different areas of the
Reservoir and Coot Lake vs. the South Shore and on boats unless they are only referring to parties of (7)
or more which would require a permit. This section needs clarification in that it sounds like a solution in
search of a problem. If it means someone sitting on the North Shore sipping on a class of wine or a
fisherman at coot lake with a "cool one" would need a permit-that's absurd. The current policy is
sufficient.
Thanks for your Attention,
Ed Mills
name: Mark-Kloster.
comment: I have been a sailboat permit holder and Rez visitor for a number of years. Given the
impending changes and resulting discussion that are taking place relative to the Rez I would like to offer a
few comments. Any sailor would have a hard time not endorsing the idea that some or all motorized craft
be banned from the Rez. We do not mix well. The degree to which a few (not to mention a horde) of
motorboats can reduce the quality of the Rez experience not only for sailors but for everyone cannot be
overstated. I have long taken the live and let live angle with all boaters but it is not reciprocal. Lake
etiquette is rarely acknowledged much less understood. I have taken on water and nearly been capsized
many times in my 12 foot boat due to threatening thoughtless and careless piloting by motorboat
operators. Malting matters worse much of the time such boaters are oblivious as to how their actions
impact others. The Rez is well suited to all of the various non-motorized water craft. The chain of ski
boats circling the Rez - ironically towing mostly flotation devices and not shiers- interrupt all other
visitors and activities on shore and on the water. I had never thought that banning motor boats was a
viable option. They are a significant revenue enhancer or so I have been told. I am not sure that is the
solution but as it stands a few ruin the experience of the many. Motorboats routinely tie up on the sail
boat launch dock and block access dedicated to launching and docking. Prople also swim off this dock
creating a real safety hazard. Plus I have seen folks board moored boats and use them as a place to
~~7
sunbathe swim etc. More personally, I am concerned about the rising costs associated with sail boat
registration. I have a small boat. I pay the same fees as a large boat. At some point a breaking point is
reached as far as what can be considered a reasonable cost given the experience. The cost has been
increasing while the quality of the experience has been deteriorating. Back when it was more affordable
one expected less in return. I would suggest that you not drive the little guy in a 12 foot sail boat off the
lake with prohibitive costs. Perhaps graduated fees would be more fair. A guy who sails a 30 foot boat
pays more than a guy in a 12 foot boat. I derive great pleasure from using the Rez and my impact on the
environment and others is minimal. (Hey it can even be said that small craft even create a certain
ambiance) I am worried that I will eventually be priced out of this. Or that the solutions may end up being
worse than the present problems. I realize that we all have to bear costs associated with making recreation
possible at the Rez and am more than willing to accept a commensurate share of those costs relative to my
use of the Rez. Take away the motor craft and who becomes the cash cow? Maybe the solution is to
encourage more non motorized boating sailing and rowing classes and programs for kids more
windsurfing canoeing and kayaking. As it stands this is a dilemma. You need the motorboat revenue but
they ruin the atmosphere. I have a lot of additional perspective based on my substantial experience as a
regular Rez visitor. For now I appreciate your considering my comments and I hope they are useful. Good
luck with this.
I am writing to you with a comment concerning the Boulder Reservoir Master Plan. We live in the
Valhalla neighborhood which is directly opposite the main entrance to the Boulder Reservoir. We have
two children age 13 and 14 - both have ADHD which in this context means that they have difficulty
quieting themselves and going to sleep. When we bought our house in 2002 there seemed few events but
recently events at the reservoir have become much more frequent. For the sake of those including children
trying to get a good night's sleep it would seem reasonable that the master plan includes a requirement
that music and loudspeakers at evening events are turned off at 9;30pm and that at morning events music
and loudspeakers are not turned on before 7:30am.
Regards
Charles de Bartolome and family
name: Andrew Eiss
comment: I would just like to comment on the rumblings I am starting to hear about banning motorized
boats altogether on the Res: I am all for conservation and healthy water which it seems we are doing a
great job with at the res with ? :at conservation and wildlife zones where boats cannot go as well as with
water quality levels well within guidelines for safe sound water - even though boats have been on the res
forever and the older technology boats are not that clean running frankly. Now with newer quieter more
eco-friendly 4 stroke and Eco Tech engines being used boating is cleaner than ever. In addition boating
in the res represents a huge recreational gettaway for hundreds and hundreds of people in Boulder.
Indeed I would like to see the res used by all people safely and cleanly. There are already ample rules to
be followed out there quite enough already I would think. As our only real source of water recreation let's
keep the res open to all types of recreation and not take away yet another piece of our right to pursue
happiness as they do all over this country and state on reservoirs and lakes. Thank you.
From: David Paulo
Council Correspondence:
I read in the Camera about the debate over how to use the Res. As a long-time city resident and Reservoir
user, I've got to say that it really needs to be kept open to jet-skis, water skiing, and similar usage. Even
two-cycle engines should be permitted, since no adverse effects have been reported in city water testing.
8
My reasoning is that there's very few locations where people can enjoy these activities. We need to look
at the usage from a regional point of view instead of a narrow "it's ours" viewpoint.
You'd be wrong to think that my cornments reflect my own usage. I use the Res primarily for kayaking
and have used it for my sailboat. I don't water ski, and the only boat motor I have is for the sailboat, at 8
hp. And that just gets used for docking. In fact, I buy my gasoline, all three gallons, about every three
years. I'll bet that some of you use more than that for mowing your lawns.
Regards to all,
David Paulo
From: Spenser W Havlick
Council Correspondence:
Dear Friends,
I want to salute those of you who, after studying the issues, have determined that motorized boats at
the rez are inconsistent with health and safety and quality of life values. There will be editorials (not
mine) and power boat advocates to blast your policy, if you outlaw power boats.
If some argue about lost revenue from power boat permits, please ask your staff to get data from our
city water purification treatment plant staff at Betasso to get an estimate on what the annual
INCREASED water treatment techniques and costs are as a result of having benzene toulene, and other
persistent petrochemical/gasoline and oil products introduced into our major summer raw water
supply.
You should halt giving out power boat permits immediately.... just like the Department of Interior
should halt offshore oil drilling until proven oil spill techniques are shown to be effective. Don't do a PB.
Once you eliminate the noisy, polluting, and very disruptive power boat activity, you will have more
canoeists, kayakers, belly-boat fisher people, and more swimmers frequent the reservoir..... probably
malting up the lost power boat revenue. In fact most of us would be willing to pay a higher fee for passive
uses in order to protect the entire protected aquatic ecosystem experience. You don't allow motorcycles in
the green belt, even on alternate days. You do not permit motorized craft on Barker reservoir for the same
good reasons. Have you ever enjoyed the tranquility and purity of Gross Reservoir?
Many U.S. cities do not permit any human activity in their water supply such as New York city and
the Boulder owned watershed. And please don't drag this decision out by hiring consultants, or going
to third reading. This should be a slam dunk (no pun) for all the good reasons including your
sustainability lens.
Spense Havlick
Professor Emeritus
University of Colorado-Boulder
Dear member of the Boulder City Council,
I have been a resident of Boulder since 1988 and have had a boat permit since the year 2000. During that
time I have also volunteered my boat for the city Expand program.
The Boulder Reservoir is the only public body of water that allows water skiing in Boulder county. The
use of the reservoir has been a great source of pleasure for me and my family and friends. I go to the
reservoir 4-5 x a week during the summer months and I use my boat. But, like most people, I don't drive
or run my boat most of the time I am on the water. We ski or wakeboard or tube and we also hang out on
the boat or swim.
In addition to paying for the boat permit we also bring revenue to the city by purchasing food and gas
while we are at the reservoir. In addition to taking our family to the Rez to use the boat we also invite our
friends--who pay the admission fee to enter the Rez.
We have been doing this for many years and will continue to do it as long as there is motorized boating
on the Rez. As you consider the amount of money raised by selling boat permits and mooring permits
9
you should also consider the money raised by guests and others who go to the Rez to boat with boat
owners.
I can promise you that I will never return to the Reservoir if there is no motorized boating allowed. I can
drive to Carter Lake to water ski or spend my summers in another state and my money.
I am at the Reservoir a lot and I can tell you that the "problems" with motorized watercraft are greatly
exaggerated by those who have their own agenda for the Rez.
Thank you,
Carol Espinoza
name: Doug Golkiher
comment: One of your objectives is to Promote and support the safety of visitors to the reservoir area. I
believe the current off-leash dog policy and the current lack of enforcement of this policy due to staff
limitations violates this objective. Unfortunately many of the dog guardians in the area do not have their
animal under sight or voice command nor have they certified that their dog is able to be off leash. This
policy should be discarded and dogs should be back on-leash to provide a safer more enjoyable
experience for all.
name: Tammy Thramann
other-topic: Petition for no motorboat use in Boulder Reservoir
comments: Our family is in the process of purchasing a boat to be used in the Boulder Reservoir this
summer. We have just been informed that there is a particular matter in discussion as to whether the use
of motorboats in the Boulder Reservoir will continue to be allowed.
I would sincerely appreciate any information you could supply as this would definitely hinder our boat
purchase.
Thank you
Tammy Thramann
name: Gary Schulz
comments: Hello my name is gary schulz. Something must be done about the completely out of control
dog situation on the north shore of the rez. I have been nearly attacked 3 times in the last 2 weeks by
viscious dogs and it's not just that these always wet dogs rum into you run over you run over your stuff
take your stuff and shake themselves off on you. There is no way to enjoy any peace and relaxation on the
north shore anymore. There needs to be a ban on dogs there as there is on the south shore before someone
is badly hurt. Please take action on this immediately.
Thank You
Gary Schulz
name: Jeff Sandri
connnent: On tlnusday afternoon I tried to take my boat out on the reservoir only to be told that now all
thursdays after 5pm are wakeless only. I have had a 5 day permit for a while now and this is obviously a
new change that is an unwelcome surprise. The long and short of it is now I have a 5 day pass that is only
really good for 4 days. For those who work normal hours getting to the res before 5 pm simply is not
possible and shutting down one entire afternoon is unfair to an extreme. I was told about the need for
additional quiet hours as the reason for this but I think taring peals hours away is not the answer. Should
there be a need to do this then noon to five one weekday seems a better time so as not to unfairly punish
permit holders. I have been to meetings have seen other boater complaints not heard and now had my own
ability as a permit holder greatly harmed. I feel that all users of the reservoir need to be treated fairly and
it seems as if boaters have been unfairly singled out to the point where it seems as if we are now being
10
actively forced out. As I stated I now have (and paid for) a five day pass that is only really valid for 4
days and feel I am either due 20% of my money refunded or afforded some time on the weekend in order
to make up for this unwarranted uncommunicated and unfair policy.
I have a modest suggestion. Last weekend I was attempting to sail with no less than 14 speedboats with
skiers and 4 pwc's. I gave it up after 45 minutes. Why not try to limit the number of large motored boats
at any one time so the sailors can have some quality time on the reservoir also.
Dennis Newman
Dear Bev and Matt -
I thought you might find it useful at some point to know that the very recent survey done by the County
(I'm on POSAC)---a survey with about 600 respondents, a high-quality random phone survey-showed
that 70% thought our number of trails was "just about right." Another 6% said we have "too many
trails."
So 76% are clearly *not* clamoring for more trails, much less through wetlands or other sensitive areas.
We were told that the trail questions from Boulder city residents tended to be about 10% more positive
than other areas, and that still leaves us around 65% saying we're fine at present in regard to number of
trails.
It sometimes seems to me that both the city and county receive tremendous pressure for more trails. Yet
the numbers suggest that it's a matter of *loud* voices, not *numerous* voices that are saying. And the
trend has gone slightly more in the direction of saying "just fine" since the last survey in 2002.
This information is on p. 9 of the attached survey. Other interesting information is a page above.
Sometimes it seems very difficult to keep the trails *are* in existence or planned for the future of the
status that Audubon describes as "nature trails"-for people who want to hike and enjoy nature only, not
for walking dogs or running over the other trails users with one's mountain. (I personally don't find that
the `yield' to others works with mt. bikes whenever I share a trail with one ) There you'll see that
people who describe themselves as "hikers" is twice that of those who describe themselves as bikers or
dog walkers.
Cathy Comstock
name: Floyd Bebler
comment: Just moments ago I was writing comments about the Rez Master Plan and I either accidentally
sent it or erased it before I was finished. I apologize if my unfinished e-mail was sent to you.
I'll keep these shorter:
My family has began motor boating at the Rez in 1997 logging approximately 210 hours of motor run
time in the 10-12 years we purchased annual boat passes. This is based on the engine xun time hour
meter. Most of our time on the Rez is spent tied up to one of the floating docks.
1. One complaint voiced about motor boats on the Rez is that they don't fit in with Boulder's philosophy
of limiting the city's carbon footprint. Having spent considerable time at Boulder Reservoir (biking
through on nay way to and from work located east of Boulder boating hiking our dogs at Coot Lake etc.) I
can say that boating and tow vehicles only contribute a small fraction to the Rez carbon footprint. One
only needs to look at the number of single occupancy SUVs and cars parked outside of the main gate
while the drivers don running shoes for a quick workout. Even the majority of C.U. crew team members
show up for training in single occupancy vehicles based on my numerous bike commutes home through
the Rez. And the inner parking lots are busy on weekends and special events while bilce racks remain
almost empty. Boaters contribute only a small fraction to the carbon footprint at the Rez.
2. There are concerns voiced about potential contamination from hydrocarbons and combustion by-
products due to boaters. According to a recent study conducted by a consultant and the city's Water
6,11
Quality and Environmental Services work group hydrocarbons and combustion by-products were not
detected at or above the analytical minimum detection limits and MCLs.
Based on analytical results the Reservoir is not being contaminated by motor boats even with boats
powered by 2-stroke engines. If the water quality data are going to be ignored in a rush to limit 2-stroke
engines please at least grandfather in those annual pass boaters who currently have these engines.
Perhaps permits would not be given to new boaters with 2-cycle engines or in a worst case rule allow a
gradual phasing out of 2-stoke engines over tune.
3. Please don't further regulate out diversity of interests in Boulder. My wife and I probably fit the model
Boulder resident; bike commuters relatively low energy and water consumers cross-country skiers
mountain and road bikers hikers etc. But these aren't the only interests that a community that views itself
as an open accomodating and diverse interest city should allow. Certainly there is room for a multi-use
reservoir in Boulder. The city's Parks and Recreation Department should be commended for how they
have developed and maintained such a beautiful multi-use reservoir. Please continue to allow boating as
part of the Reservoir management plan. And the city can ill afford to lose the hundreds of thousands of
dollars that boat pen-nit sales bring into the cash-strapped Parks and Rec Department on an annual basis?
Thanks
Floyd Bebler
name: Brendan Reilly
comment: I would like to suggest that the city or some athletes' group put accurate mile and kilometer
markers along the 5.25-mile course around the Reservoir. This course is used by thousands of rrumers and
walkers each year and mile markers would be a welcome addition. I help athletes train in many sites
around the world and many towns are much more athlete-friendly by doing such simple things as placing
accurate distance markers along some of their more popular running and cycling courses.
Most lakes in the Boulder area are privately-owned or are closed to the public. Low-cost camping should
be allowed at the reservoir year-round. The entrance fees are too high and staff should be reduced to cut
costs. Walls-ins should be admitted free. The beach area should be open during the day year-round, there
is no good reason to shut it down on Sept. 7. The beach should open but posted for no lifeguard after
hours or off-season.
No permits should be required for non-motorized boating. The nearby lakes to the east that were drained
about 40 years ago should be filled and open to the public at no charge for alternate lifestyles uses.
Thar-Ac you,
Steve Norwood
name: Peter Yumi
I enjoy eating my lunch at Coot Lake (rather a pond) and I was continually approached by unleashed dogs
who were swimming in the lake. As far as I know dog owners must have their dogs on a leash in the city
and county of Boulder. I may be confused and unaware that Coot Lake is actually a city and county
sanctioned dog park however I have researched the issue and have found no evidence to support this. I did
read this
* Dogs must be on a held leash unless they meet Voice and Sight Control Standards and display a City
of Boulder Voice and Sight Tag.
Why are the leash laws not enforced at Coot Lake ?
12
name: Andy Neff
comment: 1) Just as the city has no bike prohibitions on Sat/Wed at Betasso trails I'd like to see similar
no motor prohibitions a couple days at the res (yes that would include the take patrol). Motors make a
huge auditory impact on everyone else but I realize it's futile to hope they'd be banned altogether.
2) I see no reason to restrict human-powered craft in any way. I would like to be able to use the north
trailhead lot just as hikers bikers dog walkers and everyone else for free access. I think it unfair to matte
me pay a fee to use the expensive facility access that was built for motor boats.
3) Take that a step further and get eliminate the sticker fee too for human-powered craft. As a whitewater
kayaker Hind it laughable that you feel the need to inspect my boat or restrict anything I do on flat water
for nay safety. It's just another tax.
Thanks for planning for fair and equitable use.
name: Alicia Brillon
comment: When considering water uses please think about creating and area for true open water
swimming. With the huge (and growing) population of triathletes in the area it would be wonderful if
there was a space where we could get a real workout in. The roped off swim area is way too small and
dodging kids playing and random people floating arowad does not help. If there was a dedicated area for
people to swim for a workout (even if it's narrow and we just do laps) that would be very much
appreciated. Thanks!
name: Leslie M Kannan
comment: Our family came to the Boulder area in September of 2009 from the Washington DC area
where there are virtually no legal areas for dogs to exercise off leash. We were delighted to discover the
green tag program Dog Beach at Boulder Reservoir and Coot Lake. We quickly became daily users of
these areas. Our Lab mix Riley is a young athletic dog and in consequence we are his third family in three
years. In the past year we have met many other families who are trying to get enough exercise for
themselves and their dogs. The swimming opportunities at the Res and Coot are invaluable especially for
Lab-types who simply cannot nun off their energy in the heat of the summer. The benefits to the human
visitors are obvious not least of which are the wonderful peals of laughter as all those Labs launch
themselves after their balls. The Res area is a treasure not to be taken for granted. And yet the
concentration of dogs and dog waste there is troublesome. I know of two people in addition to myself
wlrn have adopted the north shore of the Res and Coot Lake as our personal clean-up project. Every week
I g;, o the supermarkets and get several bundles of plastic bags from the recycle bins and stuff them in the
dispensers at Coot Lake. Almost every day we walk around Coot and down to the Res scooping as we go.
I remove between five and ten pounds of dog waste every day in addition to trash and broken glass.
The cleanliness of the Coot Lake trail is especially important. It is a handicapped-access area and we see
plenty of wheelchairs on the trail. Families with strollers abound. The picnic and fishing areas are irr
constant use. The overwhelming majority of trail users understand that wheelchair and stroller wheels and
little kids eating at the picnic tables dongYmt benefit from dog waste on the trail. IaYmm, sure the
environment food chain. and water benefit from removing the waste too.
I understand that it is not always possible for owners to remove dog waste. Runners or people on the
phone might not notice where their dogs go. Sometimes the area runs out o'f bags. Naturally many of us
who love the area step in to help clean it up. I am willing to organize a more formal M-adopt-a-traildYm
program if you think that itAMTMS needed to keep the Res and Coot area trails clean. One area that needs
more regular cleanup for example is the trail from the 51 st Street parking lot to Dog Beach on the north
shore. We seldom use that trail and when we do we spend most of the time cleaning it up. Thank you for
considering my comments. The accommodations here for canine family members are a huge part of what
makes Boulder the best place our family has ever lived.
Leslie Kannan
C- 13
name: MONIQUE MUDAMA
The only reason I go to Coot is to walls my dog off-leash. Please keep this valuable off-leash resource for
Boulder area dog owners.
My dog Cooper and I have a great time whenever we visit Coot Lake. We usually walk to the back of the
Res where he chases sticks and plays with other dogs. Sometimes I ride my bike along the back dirt roads
and Cooper runs next to the bike. But mostly I walls he trots and I feel good about being able to take him
to a place where his good behavior is rewarded by a little off leash exploration. I'm also starting to work
jogging into. my exercise routine and I'm looking forward to being able to jog around Coot Lake with
Cooper at my side off-leash so that I don't have to stop every time he wants to have a sniff.
Cooper is the reason I visit Coot Lake. A dog park just couldn't compare. For me it's a beautiful relaxing
place to wall{. For Cooper it's the only place I can take him between work and dinner where he can trot
along sniff interesting smells and splash in the water with a few doggie pals.
Cooper is well-trained and he stays on the trail side of the fences. I don't allow him to venture into the
protected areas. I have seen a few - rare! - owners allow their dogs to roam past the fences. I speak up
but I wonder if people think Oh well my dog is an animal so he doesn't do any harm. If there's a concern
about protecting the area from dogs I wonder if the signs couldn't be updated to make it clear that neither
humans nor their dogs are allowed in the protected area.
Cooper and I love hanging out at Coot and the back part of the Res. It's a high point to our day and Coot
Lake is the main reason I bought a voice and sight tag. Please let us continue to use this area for
responsible off-leash recreation.
name: Tracy Keseric
comment: Please keep voice and sight control at Coot Lake. It is truly a wonderful asset to Boulder
County for both dog owners and dogs!
e, -14
5 May 2010
TO: Boulder City Council and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
FROM: Laura Osborn,
RE: Master Plan for Boulder Reservoir
I am a member of Audubon and the Boulder County Nature Association. For the past 4 years, 1 have
been an Eco-Steward volunteer at Meyers Gulch for Boulder County Parks and Open Space. In this
capacity, I perform seasonal breeding bird counts and surveys for the County. I support preservation of
the natural areas and wildlife species surrounding the Reservoir area. The wetlands area surrounding
the Reservoir is vital to many nesting bird species such as the Northern Flarrier, which is rapidly declining
in the Boulder County vicinity. This area is so small and barely viable that no trails should be considered
in these wetlands, just as staff has suggested.
The surrounding area has been the home to nesting Burrowing Owls. Osprey breed here during the
spring and summer and a variety of raptors visit and nest in the immediate and adjacent areas. The
mudflats and shallow areas to the north and northwestern side are home to many types of birdlife. Due
to this, let Ski Cove should be off-limits to motorized traffic. Disturbance from this traffic has severe
impacts on the resident and visiting birds.
The-natural habitat surrounding Coot Lake and the wetlands has been severely affected by off-leash
dogs. This area needs to be a leash-only designation to preserve what remains of the bird habitat. Dogs
off-leash impact all wildlife species.
hope that when you formulate a plan that wildlife and habitat preservation will be your primary
consideration. Thank you.
~.-®f t~
research 44trategy, inc.
The 2010 Boulder County Open Space Issues Survey was conducted on behalf of the Boulder County
by Ialmey--Drake Research & Strategy, Inc., a public opinion research Kim in Boulder, Colorado.
The results of this survey are based upon 603 telephone interviews with Boulder County voters. A
random sample of voter telephone numbers was provided to Ialmey--Drake by the County, which
was then randomly sampled Interviews were conducted from April 19 to 27, 2010. Quotas were
established to obtain approximately equal numbers of males and females, as well as approximate
age and geographic distribution. A random sample of 603 has a worst-case 95% conridence interval
ofplus or minus 4. 0% about any one reported percentage.
BOULDER COUNTY OPEN SPACE ISSUES SURVEY
Hello, my name is . First, I want to assure you that we're not selling anything, or asking
for money. I'm with Tahney-Drake Research, a public opinion company in Boulder, Colorado. We are
conducting an interesting survey with registered voters about local issues in your community, and we would
like to include your opinions. Your telephone number was selected purely at random.
SCREENER
A. First, I would like to confirm that you are at least 18 years old, and registered to vote in Boulder County?
[re= 603]
Yes ..........................................................................................................................100%
No - -
DK/NS
B. [Ask only if R says "No" or "DWNS' in ScreenerA; else go to Screener C] Is there someone in this
household I can speak to who is at least 18 years old and is registered to vote in Boulder County?
Yes ..........................................................................................................100%=> Start over
No Terminate
DK/NS - Terminate
C. In which Boulder County City do you live? If you live in an unincorporated area of Boulder County, life
Gunbarrel or other unincorporated areas, just say so? [n=603]
Boulder 37%
Erie 31/0
Gunb arrel 21/0
Lafayette 9%
Longmont 24%
Louisville 6%
Superior 3%
Unincorporated area/small towns of Boulder County 16%
D. Sex [Do Not Ask] [n=603]
Male 49%
Female 51%
n asterisk, wherever it appears, means that the result for that response rounds to less than 1%.
1
C-
1. Generally speaking, would you say things in Boulder County are going in the right direction, or do
you feel things here have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track in the past few years?
May10 Juf09 2002 2000 1999 1998 1997
(n=603.] n-=xi fn=x] In=x] (n=x] In=x] (n=x]
Right direction 59% 58% 55% 47% 53% 49% 44%
Wrong track 24% 26% 331/0 42% 37% 32% 39%
No opinion/DK/NS 17% 16% 12% 11% 10% 19% 17%
2. When you think of Boulder County, what image comes to mind? '
May10
[n=603]
Outdoors/Open space 28%
Liberal/Liberalism/Liberal lifestyle 16%
Mountains/ Geological 13%
Flatirons 7%
Its people 7%
Elite/Wealthy 6%
Nice/Great/Good/Fantastic Place 6%
Small Town/Rural Character 5%
Healthy environment/Lifestyle 4%
Positive images/General 4%
University of Colorado/ Education 3%
Negative images/General °
Growth issues/ Traffic 2%
Too much government 29/0
Other 11%
DK/NS °
3. What do you consider to be the single most important issue facing Boulder County today? [Do not read list]
May10
[n=603]
Environmental /Slow, manage growth issues
Concerns about the economy/Jobs 14%
Public school issues/Education.
Transportation issues/ Congestion 6%
Government financial issues 5%
Taxes too high 4%
Affordable housing/High costs 4%
Open space issues 3%
Planning/Land use/Building issues 3%
Social issues
Legalization of marijuana/ Drugs 31)/o
Other 11%
Nothing in particular 2%
DK/NS 15%
2
4-1. [Ask Sample A] Because land is so expensive in Boulder County, in order to buy the few remaiiung
large tracks of land for open space, the County has to sell bonds to raise the money for these
purchases. And the people who buy the bonds require that the County specifically set aside future
open space sales tax revenues to guarantee that they will be repaid. Unfortunately, because almost all
existing sales tax revenues from the current open space tax which expires in 2019 have been set aside,
and unless the tax is extended beyond 2019, the County will not be able to buy any more large
parcels of land as they come up for sale. Knowing this, if there is a ballot proposal on this
November's ballot to extend the current open space tax beyond 2019, will you vote for or against it?
If you ate not sure how you would vote, just say so.
4-2. [Ask Sample B] Because land is so expensive in Boulder County, in order to buy the few remaining large
tracks of land for open space, the County has to sell bonds to raise the money for these purchases. And
the people who buy the bonds require that the County specifically set aside future open space sales.tax
revenues to guarantee that they will be repaid. In this year's November election, there may be a proposal
on the ballot for a new one-tenth of a cent increase in the County sales tax over the next 15 years to
provide more funding for managing and acquiring additional open space. Now suppose the election were
held today on whether or not to approve a new one-tenth of a cent increase in the County sales tax for
the next 15 years. Would you vote in favor of or against this proposal?
24- Q4-2
[n=300] fn=3031
Vote in favor 48% 63%
Vote against 30% 33%
Undecided at this time/Not sure 22% 4%
Refused
4a. [Ask only if R says "Vote in favor" in Q4-1 or 4-2; else go to Q4b ] And would you definitely
vote in favor of fif Sample A read: "extending the open space tax'lif Sample B read "this
new open space tax"], or would you only probably vote for it?
Q4-1 Q4-2
[n=1461 fn=190]
Definitely vote for it 72% 69%
Probably vote for it 27% 31%
DK/NS 1%
4b. [Ask only if R says "Vote against" in Q4-1 or 4-2; else go to Q4c ] And would you definitely
vote against [if Sample A read. "extending the open space tax"/ if Sample B read "this
new open space tax"], or would you only probably vote against it?
Q4-1 Q4-2
fn=891 fn=loo]
Definitely against it 75% 83%
Probably against it 23% 17%
DK/NS 2%
4c. [Ask only if R says "Undecided/not sure" in Q4-1 or 4-2; else go to Q4d ] And even
though you are undecided on [if Sample A read. "extending the open space tax"/ if
Sample B read "this new open space tax"], which way are you leaning? Are you leaning
towards voting in favor or against it?
Q4-1 Q4-2
[n=65] fn=93]
Leaning towards supporting 50% 51%
Leaning towards opposing 31% 8%
DK/NS.......................................................................................... 19% 41%
3
4d. (Ask only if R says "Probably vote in Favor" in Q4a, or "Against" or "Undecided/not
sure" in Q44 or 4-2, else go to. Q5 I Suppose you learned that if this open space tax
proposal is defeated, Boulder County could not afford to purchase properties like the
rest of the Hall Ranch and the Heil (Pronounced "High el"] Ranch in the foothills, and
other large properties spread throughout Eastern Boulder County, that might otherwise
be purchased by developers? Knowing this, would you now definitely vote in favor of
the open space tax proposal, probably vote in favor of it, probably vote against it or
definitely vote against it?
Q4-1 Q4-2
fn=193) in=9711
Definitely vote for it 14% 12%
Probably vote for it 34% 32%
Probably against it 10% 9%
Definitely against it
Undecided/DK/NS 14°/a 4°/a
Summary: Q4
Q4-1 Q4-2
in=3001 [n=303]
Definitely vote for 34% 44a/o
Probably vote for 14% 19%1
Leaning vote for 11% 2%
Undecided/DID/NS 40/0 2%
Leaning against 7%
Probably against 8% 6%2
Definitely against 22% 27%
Refused T
5. On a different topic, would you say that the taxes you pay to the Boulder County government are
way too higb, high but acceptable, about right or would you say that they are lower than you would
expect for the services your County government provides.
5110 7109 6108 7107 5106 4105 6104 4195
(n=603) (n=600] - ^ [n507]
Too high 20% 21% 231/6 24% 22% 25% 221/0 16%
High but acceptable 34% 40% 37% 28% 35% 31% 31% 34%
About right 35% 32% 32% 41% 36% 37% 40% 41%
Lower than what one would expect 6% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 5%
No opinion/DK/NS 5% 3% 4a/o 3% 3% 4% 3% 5%
1 "DK/NS" responses are included in the "Probably vote for" category.
2 "DK/NS" responses are included in the "Probably against" category.
4 a
6. Next I would Eke to read you three statements about a variety of local Boulder County issues. As I read
each statement, please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly
disagree with the statement. If you don't have any feeling about the statement, one way or the other, just
say so.. [Read list - randomize] [Probe to distinguish between TKINS" and "Neutral.']
Agree--- ---oDisagree-- 06(1
Strong Some Neut Some Strong. ~ S
a. Boulder County has gone so far in terms
of protecting the environment and
preserving open space, that it is hurting the
local economy
May10 [n=6031 18% 12% 6% 28% 33% 3%
Apr92 [n=5041 '12% 17% 4% 27% 38% 2%
b. Boulder County government should be
preserving additional open space areas
May10 [n=603] 40% 27% 7% 9% 16% 1%
Apr92 [n=504] 42% 32% 4% 12% 8% 2%
C. Open space preservation benefits our local
economy
May10 [n=6031 40% 26% 8% 12% 11% 3%
7. While last November's election ballot did not have any races for Congress, the US Senate or
statewide offices lilte Governor, in Boulder County there were local city races as well as several
County-wide ballot proposals. Do you recall if you happened to vote in last November's election?
Mav10
[n=603]
Yes, I voted 73%
No, I did not vote 21%
DK/NS 6%
7a. [Ask if R says "Yes, ! voted" in Q7; else go to Q8] In that election, voters turned down a
ballot proposal that would have extended for an additional fifteen years the current point 25
percent County open space sales tax, which is currently set to expire in 2019. Do you recall
if you voted in favor or against extending the County's open space tax, or did you not vote
on that paracu[ar issue?
Mav10
fn=4431
Voted in favor 44%
Voted against 30%
Didn't vote on issue °
DK/NS/Can't recall 21%
5
1
7b. [Ask if R says "Voted against" in Q7a, else go to QB] What was the number one
reason why you voted against extending the County's open space tax? ('Do not read list]
MaM10
(i7=133]
We have enough open space 34%
Taxes are too high/Can't afford higher taxes 27%
No need to extend it now/expires n 2019 9%
2009 was the wrong time vote for tax increase/
Budget tight 7%
Mismanagement of money 41/o
Against open space 4%
Should Not Be Buying Land 4%
Other 9%
DK/NS I"... 3%
8. elf R lives in the City of Boulder in Screener C, read.• "I will now read you some questions that
are about just Boulder County Open Space lands, as opposed to the City of Boulder Open
Space lands." ] Regardless of how you voted on last year's Boulder County open space ballot
proposal, to what extent do you approve of the Boulder County Open Space Program? Do you
strongly approve of the County's open space program, nuldly approve, mildly disapprove or strongly
disapprove of it?
May10 2002 1997
[n=603] jn=x] (n=x]
Strongly approve 44% 53% 50%
Mildly approve 35% 28% 27%
Mildly disapprove 10% 7% 11%
Strongly disapprove 7% 7% 3%
Other 2%
DK/NS 4% 5% 7%
6
9. Next I am going to read you a list of four different reasons for having open space land. While some
people feel all reasons for leaving open space are important, to most people they are not all of equal
importance. After I read each way open space is being used today, please tell the whether that use of
open space is extremely important to you, very important, somewhat important, not too important or
not at all important. The first is: [Read list, Randomize]
Importance --.Not Important— DM
Extremely Very Somew't Not Too Not At All NS
a. Open space used to create buffers of
undeveloped land between cities and
communities
May10 [n=603] 22% 30% 29% 11% 6% 2%
2002 fn=x] 79°/x3 11% 5% 5%
1997 (n=x] 86% 10% 3% 1%
b. Open space to preserve wildlife habitat.......
Mayl0 fn=6031 37% 33% 22% 4% 3% 1%
2002 [h=x] 93% 5% 2% 1%
1997 fn=x] 96% 3% 1%
c. Open space to provide trails
May10 fn=6031 25% 33% 28% 8% 6%
d. Open space to keep farm and ranch land
from being developed
May10 fn=6031 20% 29% 30% 12% 5% 4%
2002 (n=X] 89% 7% 3% 1%
1997 (n=x] 90% 6% 2% 2%
10. Next I will read you reasons County officials give for periodically closing off to the public certain
Boulder County open space lands. After I read each one, please tell me if you strongly agree with
that reason, mildly agree with it, mildly disagree or strongly disagree with it. The first is: (Read list;
Randomize all but 10e, which is to be read last]
Agree Disagree DKI
Strongly Mildly Mijldly Strongly NS
a To protect wildlife during certain times
of the year
May10 fn=6031 69% 21:% 5% 5%
2002 fn=x] 72% 22% 3% 3%
b. To lease land to farmers for agricultural
production.
May10 [n=6031 39% 39% 12% 5% 5%
2002 fn=x] 37% 40% 12% 8% 3%
c. To create a management plan, even if it
takes 2-3 years to create.
May10 fn=6031 27% 39% 13% 13% 8%
2002 fn=x] 27% 40% 180/0 12% 40/a
3 In 2002 & 1997, the importance categories for Q13-16 were "Very" and Fairly." The number under the "Very" column for Q13-16
represents the combined "Very" and "Faitly" columns for those two years.
Agree tl------- ------Disagree----- DKI
Strongly Mildly Mildly Strongly hfS
d. To create preservation areas in certain
sensitive wildlife areas.
May10 fn=6031 60% 28% 5% 5% 211/o
2002 [n=x] 62% 29% 5% 4% 1%
C. It is never acceptable to close open
space to the public.
May10 fn=603] 15% 10% 26% 47% 2%
2002 [n=xj 17% 13% 27% 43% 1%
it. Next I will read you a Est of activities that are typically done in the Boulder County Open Space
lands. After I read each one, please tell me if that activity is very important to you, fairly important,
not too important or not at all important. The first is: [Read list, Randomize]
.--Important.-- -----Not Important----- DKl
Y M Fairly Not Too Not At All NS
a. Fishing
May10 [n=603] 21% 34% 23% 21% 1%
2002 [n=xj 26% 42% 20% 9% 3%
1997 (n=x] 33% 41% 18% 6%
b. Picnicking
May10 fn=6031 29% 47% 14% 9% 1%
2002 jn=xj 31% 50% 15% 4% 1
1997 [n=x] 43% 46% 8% 3%
c. Mountairi'Biking
May10 fn=6031 24% 37% 0 20% 17% 2%
2002 (n=xj 25% 46% 20% 7% 2%
1997 (n=x] 21% 40% 25% 13% 1%
d. I-liking
May10 fn=6031 64% 250/b ' 4% 6% 1%
2002 fn=x] 57% 34% 5% 3% 1%
1997 fn=x] 64% 29% 4% 3%
e. Enjoying Nature
May'10 fn=6031
71% 24% 3% 211/o
20024 fn=xj 39% 45% 10% 4% 1%
1997 (n=x] 46% 41% 8% 4% 1%
f Walling Dogs
-
Mayl0 fn=6031 36% 30%° 15% 18% 1%
2002 fn=x] 32% 41% 17% 8% 2%
1997 fn=xj 29% 32% 22% 17%
g. Horseback Riding
May10 fn=6031 14% 28% 26% 30% 2%
2002 [n=xj 12% 39% 31% 14% 41/'o
i
1997 [n=xj 15% 42% 29% 14% 1%
4 Wording in 1997 and 2002 was "Nature study."
12. To what extent do you support the closure of trails to dogs in sensitive areas in order to minimize
impacts to wildlife and the ecosystem? Do you strongly support, mildly support, mildly oppose or
strongly oppose the closure of trails to dogs under these circumstances? If you don't have a feeling
one way or another on tlus issue, just say so.
IUlay10 2002
[n=603] fn=x]
Strongly support 43% 45%
Mildly support 26% 30%
Neither support nor oppose.......... 9% 15%
Mildly oppose 12% 9%
Strongly oppose 8% 1%
DK/NS 2%
13. Does Boulder County Open Space have too many trails, about the right number or not enough trails?
Mav10 2002
[n=603] [n=x]
Too many trails ` 6%' 5%
About right...:`. 70% 67%
Not enough 16% 22%
DK/NS 8% 6%
14. Next I will read you a list of different types of open space trails. If Boulder County were to construct
more trails, and you could add just one type of trail, which would it be? Would it be: [Read list;
Single response only]
Mav10
[n=603]
Trails in the foothills and
mountains 30%
Regional trails that connect
communities 240X)
Trails that connect
neighborhoods to regional
trails and open space
properties 39%
We don't need more trails 3% No Prompt
Other 1% No Prompt
Dl,,-/,NS 3%
15. I will now read you two statements about different uses of Boulder County open space land. After I
read each one, please tell me if that use is very important to you, fairly important, not too important
or not at all important. The first is: [Read list; Randomize]
---Important--- -----Not Important----- DKl
Very Fairi Not Too Not At All NS
a. Preserving the productivity of agricultural
lands
May10 [n=603] 43% 39% 11% 5% 2%
2002 fn=x] 53% 35% 8% 2% 2%
b. Providing prairie dog habitat
May10 [n=603] 13% 22% 25% 38% 2%
2002 [n=xJ 16% 36% 27% 19% 3%
9
c~
16. When there is a conflict between existing ranching and farnvng operations on Boulder County open
space and prairie dogs, which is more important, preserving ranching & farming operations or
providing habitat for prairie dogs? [Read list; Single response only]
May1U 2002
fn=6031 fn=x1
Preserving ranching & farming
operations 73% 76%
Providing habitat for prairie dogs 16% 13%
DK/NS 11% 11%
17. Some people like to use the open space traits, while others may never use them, but they like the idea
that the County has preserved open space areas. How often do you or someone in your family use
Boulder County Open Space trails? Do you use them frequently, occasionally or never? [if not
never; ask] And could you tell me approximately how many times, if any, that you have gotten out
to use one of the Boulder County open space areas in the past year?
May10 2002
fn=6031 fn=x1
Frequently 45% 47%
Occasionally 39% 43%
Never ° 10%
DK/NS 3%
Median 12.0 na
Median amoung users 20.0 na
17a. (Ask if R does not say "Zero" or `DK/NS" in Q17; else go to DEMOS ] Some people walk, run,
ski, snow shoe, bike or pursue other activities on County open space. How about you? For what
kinds of activities do you typically use Boulder County open space? (Multiple Response OKJ
May9 o
fn=5061
Walls 71%
Bike 37%
Hiking 30%
Run 25%
Snow shoe 11%
Ski 10%
Dog walking 5%
Picnics/Picnicking °
Fishing 2%
Enjoying/viewing Nature...... 2%
Horseback riding 2%
Other 7%
DK/NS
17b. (Ask if R does not say "Zero" or `DKINS" in Q 17; else go to DEMOS J Most Boulder
County open space trails are multi use trails - in other words, several kinds of non-
motorized uses are allowed, like hiring and running, mountain biking and horseback riding.
Do you support this kind of multi-use trail?
May10
fn=5061
Yes 94%
No 5%
DK/NS 1%
10
C✓ t®
17c. [Ask if R does not say "Zero" or "OWNS" in Q17, else go to DEMOS] %K le using the
Boulder County open space areas, have you ever experienced conflicts that have developed
because of multiple uses permitted on the same open space trails-that is, for example,
conflicts between mountain bikers, hikers, horseback riders or runners?
Mav10
[n=506J
Yes, experienced conflicts 27%
No, have not experienced
conflicts °
DK/NS
17d2. [Ask if R says "Yes" in Q17c; else go to Q17e J Next I will read you three
statements about conflicts you have personally experienced while using Boulder
County open space. After I read all three, please tell me which one comes closest to
describing your personal experiences with these conflicts. First: [Read statements]
[Do not randomize]
May10
[n=934]
1. All or most of the conflicts you have
experienced were serious conflicts involving
confrontations 4%
2. Some conflicts you have experienced were
serious involving confrontations, while some
were not too serious and were resolved
without much or any confrontation 16%
3. All or most of the conflicts you have
experienced are not too serious and were
resolved without much or any confrontation... 80%
Can't remember/DK/NS
17e. [Ask if R does not say `Zero" or "OWNS" in Q17,• else go to DEMOS ] If significant
conflict exists among the different kinds of users on open space trails, there are ways of
managing the conflict. I will now read you two ways such conflict could be addressed. After
I read each one, please tell me whether you support or oppose that way of resolving trail
conflicts. The first is: [Read list; randomize]
Support QppoSe DKINS
1. Building separate trails for different users, that is
trails for mountain bikes and for oJ-cr users.
May10 [n=5061 57% 38% 5%
2a. [Ask Sample A ] Having alternating use days
where some days all users can be on the trails and
other days the trails will be closed to mountain bike
riders, but open to all other uses
May10 [n=255) 46% 52% 2%
2b. [Ask Sample 6 ] Having alternating use days
where some days only bikes can be on the trails and
other days the trails will be closed to mountain bike
riders, but open to all other uses
May10 [n=259J 33% 640/a 3%
11
1r
17f. [Ask if R does not say "Zero" or `DK/NS" in Q 17, else go to DEMOS ] If you know that a
trail is used extensively by mountain bikes, do you continue to use that trail or do you find
another trail that has less mountain bike usage?
May10
[n=506]
Will continue to use it 41%
Will find another trail with less
. mountain bike usage 52%
DK./NS 7%
17g. [Ask if R does not say "Zero" or "DK/NS" in Q17, else go to DEMOS ] If you know that
horseback riding is allowed on trails, do you continue to use that trail or do you find another
trail that doesn't allow horses?
May10
[n=506]
Will continue to use it 76%
Will find another trail that
doesn't allow horses 18%
DK/N S 6%
Our last questions are about you and your family. The answers to these questions help us statistically classify
the results we obtain and will only be used when combined with the hundreds of other interviews conducted
for this study.
D1. Some people are always following what's going on in politics and public affairs. Others just aren't
that interested. Do you follow what's going on politically and in government all of the time, most of
the time, some of the time or almost never? [n=603]
All of the time 27%
Most of the time 37%
Some of the time 31%
Almost never 5%
Refused *
DK/NS
D2. About how long have you been registered to vote in Boulder County? fn=603]
5 or less years 28%
6-15 years 32%
16-25 years 17%
26-40 years 17%
41 or more years 5%
Refused 1%
Median number of years 11.0
12
D3. Thinking about next November's election for, Governor, U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of
Representatives, using a scale of zero to 10, where a zero means you will definitely not vote in this
coming November's election, and a 10 means you will definitely vote in that election, how likely are
you to vote next November? You can use any number from zero and 10. [n=603]
10 75%
9-10 81%
6-8 14%
4-5 2%
0-3 2%
DK/NS °
Mean 9.3
Median 10.0
D4. Have you or anyone in your household lost your job or taken a significant pay cut in the past six
months? [n=603]
Yes 27%
No 72%
DK/NS 1%
D5. And do you or anyone in your household fear that you may lose your job, or be required to take a
pay cut at some point in the next 6 to 12 months? fn=603]
Yes 28%
No 69%
DK/NS 3%
D6. May I ask how old you are? [n=603]
18-24 years 12%
25-34 years 20%
35-44 years 16%
45-54 years 19%
55-64 years 16%
65 years or more 13%
Refused 4%
Mean age 44.9
Median age 44.0
D7. And which of the following income groups includes your family's total annual income from all
sources in 2009. [Read list except refused and DK/NS] [n=603]
Up to $20,000 9%
$20,000, but less than $30,000 6%
$30,000, but less than $40,000 8%
$40,000, but less than $50,000 8%
$50,000, but less than $60,000 8%
$60,000, but less than $75,000 9%
$75,000, but less than $100,000 15%
$100,000, but less than $150,000 12%
$150,000 or over 11%
Refused 11% Do not read
DK/NS 3% Do not read
13
e-
D8. Finally, so we can ensure that all groups are statistically represented, would you please tell me what
racial or ethnic group or groups you consider yourself to be a member of? [n=603]
White/Caucasian 85%
Black/African-American 1%
Hispanic/Latino 7%
Oriental/Asian-American/Asian/Pac. islander
American Indian/Native American
Multi-Ethnic/Mixed race 1%
Other 2%
Refused 4%
=answers u for taking our survey, your
ave been extremely helpful.
14
Dear Council,
Well I see it is that time again, the boating season is upon us and a very few, very selfish
individuals want to close the reservoir to power boats and the water sports associated with them.
My question is, for what purpose? Water skiing and wake boarding are great family sports. In a
time when families are falling apart, boating keeps families together. Boating gets kids off the
couch, away from the TV & video games and out doing something physical. Go ask 10 kids what
would get them off the couch on an 80 degree day. A bike ride, a run or hike, or trying to wake
board or water ski? I'll bet 9 out of 10 pick water skiing/wake boarding and the last one will just
want to stay on the couch!,
. 1st the anti boating crowd tried the gas in the water/pollution angle to get rid of boats. That
didn't work. The water tests came back no harm done from boats. Now they are going for the
peace & quiet enjoyment, natural beauty/wildlife and carbon foot print angles.
Lets talk about peace & quiet and the birds that live out there. So you are worried that a few ski
boats 4 months a year are going to disturb nesting birds. That is pure B.S. I live in the Valhalla
subdivision right next to the reservoir. While I can hear the faint drone of a power boat in the
summer, 1 can clearly hear the loud amplified P.A. systems & music nearly every weekend all
summer long as the reservoir hosts 1 major event after another. This goes on every weekend all
summer long, typically starts at lam (i don't care what they say they are going to do in terms of
volume & hours, that is what happens). I can also hear the train whistles along the Diagonal at
the 55Th & Jay road intersections day & night along with traffic on the Diagonal. i am sure all the
fire trucks heading to the new fire training center will not make the birds (or squished prairie dogs
on 51 ST) very happy, but that did not stop you from letting the fire center go in. Also the model
airplanes are far more scary to birds than boats. They fly right over the nesting areas. In the 20
years I have lived in Valhalla, the reservoir has never seen so much use as it does now, yet we
have far more animals & birds of prey in our neighborhood than ever before. It seems they can
get along living with people just fine as long as you don't shoot theml Why does the city have to
over manage everything?
Now about the natural beauty of the reservoir. I know people like Rob Smoke would like to
return It to the way It was. (of course it's people like him that migrate to this town and then want to
may it THEIR WAY is the real problem) Flow far back does he want to go? How about 100
years? Let's try out your knowledge of Boulder history. 1.00 years ago, 1902-1910, Valhalla and
the reservoir were in the middle of the "Boulder oil fields" the 1St well made a big headline in the
New York times back in 1900+-. They eventually drilled over 200 oil wells in the area. When ! 1st
moved to Valhalla & before the land south of Kelso & west of 51 st was open space, there were
remains of the old oil wells & tanks in those fields, One of my neighbors found an old uncapped
oil well on his property, The well that still operates in the middle of the Diagonal and Jay is the
National Register of Historic places. More oil was spilled on the that land in the early 1900's than
will ever be burned by boats on the reservoir for the next 100 years. Google the "Boulder oil
fields" & you will be amazed as to what once was their. It.1s a better place than now than it was
100 years ago with our boats!
Now we have the Carbon footprint and climate change angle to work. Ok, so we have a few
boats mainly 4 months a year on the lake. Never on any weekend are there more than 50, most
weekdays it is under 10 at a time. I know, I live there.. So we have all these powerboats burning
fossil fuels. Well, our boats do not burn nearly as much gas as do the cars of the 1,000's of
people that decend on the reservoir every weekend and many week nights all summer long for
some special event or another. I have been water skiing on the reservoir since 1983. Back before
the beach, the concession house, the boat house, the 4 lane wide ramps were there. There used
to be a one lane ramp and a steel quansit hut. Nobody used to go out there. Even until the mid
1990's few people went there except to boat. Now the parks & rec department have turned that
place into a 3 ring circus every weekend. One major event after another. It is typical to have
traffic lined up all the way down 51st on weekends going to and from these events, usually with 1
person per car. On weekends we can't even get out of our neighborhood at times because of the
traffic. Now we have people driving out in their cars'from Boulder to park in our neighborhood
only to unload their bikes & go for a ride, or a run. That is a fine use of fossil fuels! Drive your bike
on your car somewhere only to park & ride your bike to no where. Stop all special events at the
reservoir and you would lower your carbon footprint far more than banning powerboats. Do a little
research people, come on out on any special event day & count the cars going to the reservoir &
wasting fuel to get to a city sponsored event.
Finally let's play-fair. If you want to ban powerboats because of Boulders commitment to
lowering the carbon footprint, should not you ban all recreational activities that rely on motorized
vehicles. Lets make a list. 1) no more sailplanes/gliders at Boulder airport. What a waste ...1 very
thirsty plane towing another 1 or 2 seat glider up in the air for nothing more than a joy ride. 2) no
more recreational flying out of the Boulder Airport. 99% of the planes out there are rich peoples
toys spewing crap into the .air. 3) no more skydiving. You know they land at the reservoir. Again
back to a very thirsty plane taking a bunch of people for a joy ride only to land at the reservoir.
Not only that, but then they got in some old (20+ years) old bus spewing more crap out of it's
tailpipe to take them back to their cars at the airport. 4) close down the model airplane park those
little model planes are 2 stroke engines creating smoke and make noise along with the RV's
some people drive to get the plane out there. 5) have all special events that do not require a lake
to be held in the middle of Boulder. Only triathlons need a lake to swim in. That would save
1000's gallons of gas from being burned up driving down 51 ST to the Reservoir. Think how that
would lower the carbon footprint. 6) no more driving your car with a bike on it or in It unless it is to
or from a bike shop. Why waste fuel by driving to-where you want to ride. Ride your bike from
where you live like 1 do. 7) ban all citizens of Boulder from vacation air travel. Think of all the jet
fuel saved. Now far do you want to take this?
think you should consider just confiscating all powerboats, planes, motorcycles (most are just
used for recreation) & all other motorized toys that any resident of the city of Boulder owns. If you
ban those sports in Boulder, the residents will just take their toys somewhere else to use them.
Since Boulder is basically it's own communist country, and you want to protect us from ourselves,
just pass a law. Take all the toys, crush them, then get a federal grant to buy offsetting carbon
credits. You will all be the hero's' of Al Gore and the entire free world. Then make it illegal to own
any'of the above toys.. It's just one more law for the communists to pass to take away more
individual rights freedoms.
Thank vou, Bill Delacroix
Boulder, co
As you review and plan the Reservoir's future please consider the following major safety
issue:
By your own estimates of just events over the course of 2010 15,500 people will make
their way to the reservoir. Of this number roughly half will participate in an event that
will leave the Reservoir property on foot or bicycle. The vast majority of those
individuals (-7,750) will use 51st Street in part or in whole during their event and 100%
of attendees will use 51St to access the event.
From Jay Road to the entrance of the Reservoir the average shoulder on 51St Street is less
than 24" in width with ditches on either side and a posted 40mph speed limit.
If ever there was a set up for catastrophe this combination of factors presents an
inevitable meeting point.
With the addition of the BRFTC on the East side of the Reservoir and the introduction of
fire apparatus to the bottleneck on 51St you have a volatile mix.
Please take the steps necessary to add a main entrance directly onto HWY 119 before
someone is seriously injured or worse. As hard as this process may be it is going to be
much harder to explain why you didn't do anything to someone who has been injured as a
result of not doing it.
- cee
1~~
I
C 3~
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
p~ October 13, 2010
Comment Form
is , Ptions Do You. Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
_.~.Y..
Boating Policy:
Option 1 (Status Quo) (VI
CA 41
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? IL_itiitslr C~( e- LR K~~
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option i (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? 4~1~Cy~-°~ /'-yE~ V 0 r42 J1 h=am
! . • I / ~GJ / • t 1,~.~J f .c,S Y
West Shore Use: m/G ~7
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why? l~ C j W5 i,c-r k?U~' J ~
Special Event
so
C_`urrent practice
Proposed Policy
f
Why?. ~S~ 46W t,
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Gt i,.~(Z ~G ~ ~4`~-1 ~}~t• ~r~ / i ,~~'-~°i` 1 ~ ~ ~ ; L J~'~- 1 ca
r/ CA L ! tltij~~7 f;: VA l,f t91 7x'01 C It.I°J7110
r
/-s q 167 ~ y~r r ~r 71.0 e21A ~°i r ~~G{r v
/Ja, 2 e- q -y
1-1 1 f 1
L 4-1
~T
Name
Street Address, Zip _12
Phone -
E-mail A .
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 803o6 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
r7 S
'2,01 o
& j
CEXG6~) 7 PO- - r7t
I If -I
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating PolYC~:
Option 1(Status Quo}
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Whys 0041~t:T,LiU
i
t,vi
U~,G '~~1t)
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?'
`Nest Shore Use:
Option i (Status Quo)
Option z (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why
Please use the teach of this form for additional comments.
0-7
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
r
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
a ~J . Boulder Reservoir Faster Plan
October 13, 2010
cl$:
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer:
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
Option 1 tatus Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No_Boats)
Why?
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use.
Option i (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use}
W h37?
h37?
' L
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional eomments.
Name
Street .Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plaza Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.U. Box 791, Boulder, CO 803o6 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
4~ ~~yv
Comment Form
Which Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your -preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Poll
(,Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why?
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1 (Current Use and Access
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
O Lion 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
% ProposedPolicy
W11y9.
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
61 C
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site- www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan. Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment .Coen
Which Options Do. You Prefer.
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Polieya -
4Option 1(Status Quo) r
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
l Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? N)o ')VV-'e-
C~~~`= S~ t~•~ ~ 1 { -tom°~ ~ ~ ~ r~ "~c`+: `E~ ~~\.o~ t~ [.~.L LL" U-i' ~ ~s ~ f\t~ ~ ~}'C. ~ S`e~.~ 1ti
North Shore/Coot Lake Uses
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? c CC?_L `s C;s1~-~~)\L.~c \C~,~CL ~s>t ~~+~_C' r~ 4~ci~!~~ ~~-S
West Shure Use: -
Option 1 (Status Quo)`''
,
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why? oo AA\~_- U C`E
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
ae79..y;p - ~)k'6 V C:-_ - t,_4 C`•,_AL~i_~' `Er`~L. i ~1 t E~-.
•a
~A~N
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
4
Wit: C'(.r lE 1! jlr 74 ~CCL__ Q-I (;_`t Ctrs J . ~ ( L
Q t t'1 Uk' C~~n r to 0..t~
{l R~ ll i o 4+ k.t l t ( C' ~ 1>'i,;) SQ t l ~ V c- \Av4 I I'\ v"'Io (A } Lz~ ~Ct* ic.(y ;Ok"~N' ~\CNc' L C_+;117C ~1 t~ CC{~ ~i~~0•'.~`'r
\L1-`_t c"kOe i`'C (lce(.L
C_C`'i 1 ~Z`'\t~ Y1e Ll: p i;
v
C'~r;.(`~~.~ ~~L_ C U">-L- 4~~ct_•-I ~li~ _ 1~~,~c~'~~ ~.tl~`~iS_
h"l l"`-~ : ~ l..=.lt•.~ 5~~'_~~~ t1 E''<<fi^a~('~;`t~ titi t_!i\ct V~-~i,-- ,
\ mbAur~, c 7
V 1-s\\\C { j 1 ~j~i✓ f~v~ ` lL's C'F"••- ` ,.cc_c~i_,j \`i ~~\C.FLCLS~t_ sjC4 \S t'~ct~lf
W C Lid-{ l J1d\~~ L\ Lei+~ jDC' l(~} ~~u {\11Lf..\ i.~J~l 11~ Y\~J
A r1\ ti)'~lt, C~C ~ii4ti\ C-`
Li t\~ fy T NA Q ~v4\(_1 P ~',I 0_ ~'X%.('j!♦ lfl CsQ~ei\1 S` 4_\~ L ;I sS
tt'Q
1
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone A
E-mail -
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parizs & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
CI_
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
is Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Eoatigg Policy: , n._......._
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option z (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? 0,i Cc E~,5
XJ g . 1 i i C_ Lc
North Shore/Coot Lake Used op on 1 {Cur
rent Use and Access
{7( tiond2 tCYur el'k~t Usk- ed rc ~sess~o/~t f
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? O V-
f
West Shore tUse°
Option 1 (Status Quo)
~O~tion 2 (Hab~tat~Coris~e~uati°~~-Ar
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Special Events:
Current practice..
Proposed Policy
Why?
l1G(I [~r~°"t JrLr7
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
1--46 1
i~>i~'a
I
Name C z-
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 803o6 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
n Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
)Boating Po icv°
_ Qption 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
1 Option 5 (No Boats)
j
F)
Why?
be Gu4cQ'I;~), 17
North Shore/Coot Lake Use;
'Option 1(Current.Use,andAccess)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
C- r T A- 0 C cA , ~ jlc-C-r~ ~C'_? v►-v5 1A'nVLC._C:1j
West Shore Use:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why: D0G' j r 'bY~ll~ ~4 L'I c °rE PI fi 'O 16
'
Special Events:
~~.t~r`ent practice
Pro
Why? '.,.n -L~.
IIV~{t i VA a a`kv ve7tj q l c'yf e- 3n `rEL 4~C G.i~U 1
C1%-L
x- UIj I YlM`t}~ lF CJ}1s Y~ }c~. C~stJ'il~h~ 4G~~'(~
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name ~v),n~
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web sited www.bouLldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plata Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO $0306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list,
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
]Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
~Jb
Comment Form.
Which Options o You Prefer?
After you ha-ve reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards) .
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats) i ) l
Why? ~ v_ O,9 I- Ccs/I,Jot
0 NR.vi° r~pIlLl1a c'
North Shore/Coot Lake Use: -
(10ption 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Usel- educed Access)
_Otion 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? tii f ci! kN G~Iyli ` z);-_0daS ct l `I dl," cl),t Ze t ty,Jc~~, ~dal e
. ~ ~t f 1 ~i
r_ - ` ~~vt"ia'T bO'd- oar /V S
"Wr1n L'GrGh 1 Lt~Ir G( C.l/4cz Cast d ~ .
Wes Shore se:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
C7 Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
_,000n (Expanded Use)
_ 2s ~1G
Why? CA hu1 c tis,oJv
L
Special Eventso
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
f ,
.Ltfr;1 i~ ~ 110 iv~e~ t~tk epp1~II-~f~i~e.'UO i'S.~-, r~ ~2~~> G c1r~.
~)~6f~/~ •~~'Cl.~~~'~~ci:lnc;~ ~Ud~~til~~t~t~ t(~~'.~'i~i~5ci1'~1 ~;~d~~ 6~~rZn;V~rl~~i ~~~i~i.l R't~r; ~~t, l~(/~
~G~ b'~ ~ ti c~'`' C i r.~~ f~ r~ ~ ~~ci~~ L~Ir:• ~ d' ! ~'l~ ~r ~ ~ S 'r:~=~; - f>r ~ j ~ ~ ~ L~ r~ ~ !~J ~ -r~ ~ - ~
f»N cf)) `(~U('~~`i.(r('
~ ` 1 + I
~(~~Za l~dtl ye,-i l~i,L:r~f , r~cri
7 rnu~" GU tt+s i Liw~\v:~ ~i~~f L~ tNt~~lt~t c~-` d ~i1-k_s -'r' e( p Jv% _C L_oxc A A (2
C Gd'`!2~'
~()~CI4G( t"b'1"l{' ~iJ' f~(Jk~'fi (~~I,l"1 rtC1,S'i)~~r~ i%1 /~(~.CIn i`°11~~1 f f i.(~ ldV-'tR.6~ ~J C~/~~j i C ~i ~ / t~ ~Cjt1 C~•y
k'J
CA II61 &V-0 I d ~Jd '7~
Name l~ 4 m6i t
Street Address, Zip 2
Phone
~wT - - - -
E-mail
-
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o, Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this.project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
50
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
$ Boulder Reservoir Master Plana
October 13, 2010
Comment For
is Options o You. Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option mall Watercraft Only)
1
Option 5 (No Boats)
aw~ Z~/ taskSr`f
Why? U Ov?~a's t✓~v `T ~ti1~ s v~ f ~A'r ~'x u arc-~~
Wiz.z Lam" vz yV . ors
North Shore/Coat Lake Uses .
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option x-f-a`a us no
Optiq,H-abitg~ onsezvation Area)
0pti0r4-3 (-t QwJ4 Pad_lJse)
0ption-4-(Exp M-ded se
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why? Da N-v'T
l C- `FAi T PAW" .i
_ Please use the bai&k of this for for additional? ~o nnj{aents.
afi\ ~i 4 ~~l %f. .,i 55-~~ ~S' n11 •.e.14 /1"-~ .t~ ,'>~1. i i~-t£.~ ~,1~^f~ 7 dl~.~is-l-i l
n
Lx"
16,12,
A~J~> rv t a sT''~t~' ~r /EGc L
VE Z-J 0 C -1-t Z fi 'Z~
- z ' L✓~JT/~ L~~ ~ ~i'r-.t~`- ~P~'w~ sf}v~' ~ ; f'~+-~ X`~ 1 ~ 11 G'~!/
Name L /2-4-c-
Street Address, Zip - " - ' • ' , ` ' r
Phone
E-mail
web site, www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 7911, Boulder, CO 803o6 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment forma at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
°A October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options ® You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell its why.
Boating Policvo
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
( Option 5 (No GBoats) A ]
Why'P 7 `t, s a t _l?xt. a F3. ~i
~j.]UC.
North Shore/Coot Lake^iJsee A
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
COption 2 -(Current Use/Reduced Access)
k Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? <~C
West Shore Use°
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option g (Low-Impact Use} _~T
s~~, 4a Option 4 (Expanded Use) y
...y) °R 1•~ Al-:WLS ~~Fi~ ~ ~c _i 'L'=, ~a°T ~L~'~, y~Al+,.'ta,.d~S~•l
Why?
Special Events° ~ - -
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
0.-f e.,,~ ;7e} 2a.-..:a ll, F`L•l ~..48J~~~~ ~i`- :~,=R ~(w8 1. '~-Sa ~1,.~ `.J "U t'a..L
Please use the hack of this form for additional comments.
€y~, ~.sk'. °J iJ(~y~•~`g.''.l.i:j,,,'~~'~c~1'-(~.~ ( ~-LL(~ 1"/~'9 ~.r~''~ "::~..:(~„`'3~Y: -p1.~; ~ tS~.~'.4 M.~~::~-'q-7'~ ~a=.., 4r:F~.,,f~9'+;,`f ~'r'L~,:`;
awti'~r.
,y~A.1 -oM 4;::__ Y-it}rlFd~l4~~~L~t~y\...F".w\ /r,..~1~'~t60d=' \~'~4`'•~`•Sk_:J
Named
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail _
Web site: www.boulclercolorado. ov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
'You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
a Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Mich Options Igo You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
FsoatangPolicy: > /,_v
Option 1(Status Quo) (C -
Option 2 Motorboat Standards
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only) J0/
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only) "SyccA>~~~
Option5 (No Boats) .
Why?
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:,,------,- . _ ` 7-
Option 1(Current Use and Access) / j C
~u._...-~o..ss,.....1...P•.~-c.....~r.,.ce. ~ „e ~~~-y' ~ ~'~.47~- ..~9 r/ ~l.-C,JC..~~~L. ~ ~ 1= F'
Option 2 (Current Use/ Reduced Access) _
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why'.
/ !
f.f t
West Shore Use: .I (K ~ ~.l y~ fl l~ 7 _(1_4 .lr -
Option 1(Status Quo) . j !
y~- _ j
f 1 ~ .f M
( >Option 2 (Ha 5rtat°Uoiiseivatzon Area)
Option (Low-Impact Use '
c/o
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
4`r.- J ~t ;.fir 1
V W ily? - / '
rte. /%~~.•r;1'~: / r i:..-...~ •,-r
Special Events: ~C
Current practice
-
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: vvww.bouldereolo~do.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail tojobnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the.City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment forays at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
0~ . Boulder Reservoir Master Plata
°l October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options o ® prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
BoatiYag Policy:
Option i (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 {Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why-
North Shore/Coast Lake Use: -
'Option 1(Current Use and Access) o~
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?-
Nest Shore Use:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events: _
Current practi
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments. _
e G~~' l S - o
S 's
0_(U
~a.~€-r`~~ w-idao ~ ~V~'v-,-,G.Q 'f
Name Deb SL 1 ~ v a"L G ira-Vi1"
Street Address, Zip -
Phone
E-mail
Web site: wvv<v.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plaza. Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or avail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO $0306 or call 303-441-3272• 5,
if you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the „Reservoir email list. a
0
Please leave this comment form at the welcome fable,
C~
F 5
hp C_~ e., 6 5 -
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Faster Plan
A~ v® October 13, 2010
Comment Form.
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
North Shore/Coot Lake Ilse: ~
COption 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? `z Cc <-L- c Des ~'~Yr
Nest Shore Ilse:
~ , Option x (Status Quo) N
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why? / Aec..(0_ 6416-1 0(1tqte< Ukc(
Special Events-. , :
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why? f.~,✓ ' 4str L Vt ~'fiL t~U ~~,.-t~' Ito
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
a~~~~ Ls,-!C% ~,~'~~Y~~, ~~'~y. d~~~Z.~ s~'/_`~ G~.C~.~ ~t.+~~41/'!~•- ~''!.~`Gt.;,~... L~~F.'~'..'va
U J9 ~ j l
s r
t ,per _ 1
f
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail 3.
c.~ v
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
CAP 0
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
. Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options ® You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
boating Polic~o
Option 1 (Status Quo)
tiU on 2 (Motorboat Standards 5
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? _
Forth Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
,,Current practice ~Propose Po T1cy
Why? LLiz fw !jy Yl-Q *e°,i f 1! Y'~ • J~ r c4/,
IM~~-~... ~~",-~j',~-~ (f r im k
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.lboiddercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, F.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
a~ ® October 13, 2010
,
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boatine Pol va
Option r (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
yt, Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? 1 1 ` \ `~..c_ ~i i~ C 3 1 / t i7` ~~_~°I r~
North Shore/Coot Lake Used
L Option t (Current Use and Acces) i
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? N~
West Shore Use°
Option :t (Status Quo)
Option z (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
0001 14 (Expanded Use)
Why? • ~y fti=~'~ y~~;~~~~ 1-
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Please use the bath of this form for additional comments.
Name
Street .Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail - -
Web site: www.bouldercolorado gov_>Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsoxzb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
®p ~,yb
Comment Form
Which- Options D® You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy° ,..:.,r.,_..,.
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why, j r.r ll~ ~1 /Z ! s~ )l j
North Shore/Coat Lake Use:
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced-,-ce, s)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? LJ,)W_.P - 4 RA t'-f- (-),./Tr j IJ06
West Shore Use°
Option :t (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
WW~ly? Z +r'd~ i7A f~,~frn,
f
Special Events°
~ r Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why? ~~~~iJr~"~~T`>G~•~c~ ;~~~~S~A -
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name -1If {FJr~~
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: rwww.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
o Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form.
Mich Options o Y® Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
No l ,1 Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? No b.YV\6w4ra+'e~ lmpck(~S J~ s,!\1\1T1 coly~2 -
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option i CCurrent Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access) p l
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access) ` N° oP~oS e
Why? doSi~M, lDi =A 1Ma~e ~P-V-etin v+~orQ +I MMI- aV-rdSS
West Shore Use: rr ~
Option 1 (Status Quo) L Mk, VncAS A 4
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why? V2ry 1vAesreSkG~ B~2q oVho(~e~~Y See w-Ve+rSe~
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why? ~ncreU3e 'l~n SHnct`~eY' g~Jev~~S Coc~~~ tJ2 Ain d's e~ UVA
\f'2.Vt V\(AQ,
Please use the back of this form for additional comments. ~
Qr0'P 0&ZkiV\ ~Q-CA CV\ QSSf-. In a C0V'yN 'X(AAA11y
eOVIAWNl~Yli i2 0V o~@~®v~ot e~er5 o.cTos5 e, coAvNkN. A(Ie ~e ov` ~f' et~
~.ck~ W~ dV~ Co eKis~ ~1vi~~r ~nriy tt wi~~~~ 2 mews,.
e C-6 ,\A, e Q Of Oven- 3d c u, s S,(AC s Ul
vu i v\ 1hO Q 004 4k Rk t r~~eV`V~5 0- o VJ r
c u 'eS Lt~c~+~$~iv~ ov~~ h4 4.Q
Q- Q\rA0kQIVIVV4 uv4 c&V\. SLAQCe&~ UPI,, r~. a x1s~.
P~~~se ka~C~ Y~;s r"_S0LkrCQ. Oae.~n o ~C4.e Cov~vhLXV\' y .
Name J0,mes MA C
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.ggv>Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plain Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO $0306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you'would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
a~
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
SAS b~' October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why_
Boating Policy:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option S (No Boats)
Why?- -
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
4"ya
West Shore Use:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Wlay?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
C, AJ 1 d ~c) _ r~C _c is t[ c ( (J
fJ ! s
f.,~-+~LJ~ f~ C] f~~_---L.-L iJ ~-C Gc_S ~ Z La ~ <G
V\ ELt-~ Lt tt -1 CAS: ~J 2 c~ i~L IBS t3 tir C -c_ k-. '7` Lam` /L"I) 4 I-L
{c7~~. lr ~r~6~5 ~~-Sa
_ t 1~ ~C i^'~yif v /~~C_C ~.S }~[ltf,Vd AC3i~ we)''. I_ G~N~iu iC?t.'` c ~trlf J
[ • iv f 1 D l (r£ / e C 3 q4 1 / j~CS t• it- < c : t cr ~t s~ f 6G st 1 L] E E "c
L o des LL S' c. J 1,,J Ij
! 1•[~v+.~9 L 1 2 t' r1 -G'~ {l/// C`C"2S r->fr~~~< <l'y2 Cc7i `x y f~]c~E'[icy U 1~ ty ~ ~Gi( Lf ti
"a, /-~Q,^G,:~ ~-~,~"i~:f). ~a'('6i-ti_~J2.. Cy6Lli~l1 t.l' /mod i1 ~CIC:IC-~!1✓:, ~ G~w:'~c~
' .~i'47,'-t til-~~d~-5•if i)t,~••C /`q
4.0 f'e CA J7-le0o Lr W "'t t, dol, ~ to C'
i
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreations > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plata Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
C- 70
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October x3, 2010
Comment Form
Bch Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Polito
Option i (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why?
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 7 (Current Use and Access
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
(Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)'
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why'? 'Pe-r-- C,p '-1?.."c i'n'- }-r
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional commentso -71
yq IvC•9'~.~i 1 ~'ts rqJ ~r'3e`® 3/ Il:fi`~S' C.~y ^7 hY' ~r~ ~~dj
"I VIM ! i r e^' ) 1.r.7;` ;L'. 6 lt~i (~fll't>1 t iF i t^ ra""~T GIB r 1C-- ? 4w--- 4;t~t . weA /~`ryf
af-}'•' ---L P"-
!l
0 ;'C5 1%
~+a.~ ~a a~~z~ t°e=.es~f.~~° '~d,::T i°.~ ~31~~~ 't 'f'r~nrao:~.t~__2.~fF~t~~ia-,r~.s"~S~t~~t`u r~~'~'~z . • .
"~~TT J
r 9 1 P' "
~Rc3 j~' lib C~ 7~z r~ t.> ry. ~r {
=1rf~.,-.ter ~h~.,r•'~rR.~~Y"~ `C'lc-t., t ~-'+'~Cl ~ r c~ p~ f,~?.''~_~.
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone,
E-mail
Web sites www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 803o6 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservolir Master Plan
A~6 October 13, 2010
Comment Form
AA%I*ch Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Poli
Option i (Status Quo)
O tion 2 (Motorboat Standards~'"4y
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why?
North Shore/Coat Lake Use:
Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
Gtion 2Current Use R edAc ess
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?'
West Shore Use:
Option ((Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
why?
r_.
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
W,P,.5k b-ALz-a CrJhC9r•n L'36o1,~f ~ /v- yf+ewTip
na c-{ s x 71~ 5'P1~ jP/ e~ p- ci~rBtt fd~, d-&,
.4z.+ t r it
Name
Street Address, Zip - "
Phone
E-mail - - x • _
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parlds & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to'johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Faster Plan
October x3, 2oro
Comment Form
Which Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating PPoli :
Option z (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
f 7 ~ Option 5 (No Boats)
f _i
North Shore/Cola Lake Use:
Option i (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option x (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option. 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Wh3,?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this forma for additional comments. A
~5~ j ~ / " l n..' fir` f' ~ f~;:~..: 1,,,''' ,L.~' ~'f f ~i~e~~f y ,r
y
"~7G -'rte, cA ; - f'
y ~1 T _ s a r~
r ~
Inc l
-
27-
C~
Name S Tz~vu/
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail tojohnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Tease leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Whya
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
May?
West Shore Use°
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why9 q oil, wt%jl LD Asl~ ~A (\A \1 WA
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?-
Please use the back of this form for additional comments. ~
U c
A-V\ S3
r ) ]
'aA
' d ij~p 4 r t CSC (_t,.,-
= 4 Y' P ~ \1 I 1 i1
I
7 1, ~ ,pp r OA F (2 NA F~ i D
V1/1~~ +x.1/1. { - i QL, _u_~
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phoney _
E-mail c
Web site: vvww.bouldereolorado.gov >P'aarks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
-70
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
$ Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options o Your Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Poli
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option d (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
W11ya
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option i (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why? e x~ c
U
c~
West Shore Use:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events °
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this foram for additional comments.
U1 1 `1 t ? 1C +~'L ,J'd.~ c1_U cW? fl_ i CCL 'A j 0 J 1
~a~ t l (1 41I 2S S1 1 Qya..1 VUA
j~y
'
U t Q
M6 Y 47 t3'~ Cl. l ~ ,yi 7 k _ 'O
~s
Name 44 ` - -x
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
J
Wi6b site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plata Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
]Please leave this comment forth at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
~ ~Jv
Comment Form
Which Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policvo
Option 1 (Status Quo) )
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why?
North Shore/Coot I.alre 1Jseo
Option x (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?,
West Shore Use° CO
tion x (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
ropose OT, y
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
t
Name AG
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail OyA
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, F.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO $0306 or call, 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment forma at the welcome table.
02-
p
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment For
Which Options Do You prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and fell us why.
Boating Policy: ,
Option x (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
_ Option 5 (No Boats)
Why?. 0 .~OLD BI 0- hv,-; t--,N
North. Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1(Current Use and Access
- .~.r•_--ate'
Option P- (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Wlay?
'west Shore Use:
C-Lpn i (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-.Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
~•~49•~ 1~, d~(.f~~~ f~ l~•f4 rf °r" ~6'L.: 'L..~ ~vy1~~`r•1 ~ `/~/['r•~
r
-T-
tl / ° r e l
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone - - <~e
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > luster flan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment forage at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
a Boulder Reservoir Masten Plan
A~ October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer .9
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy: - -
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (11%10
`torfioat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats) pp
V.o
why?~ :~lfi'`~ _.Ci. .,~.'f/ l~ C/K-~1~1.`,!~`f '•'~'t~~ G`'~'Gi~Lrt'
North Shore/Coot Lake Uses ~
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2~Cirrei~t i7se%educe~Access)1
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?'
West Shore Use:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
may.,("f C~ ~,dt '~,/~'°~c~`) /Z~f~?4w~'. -a°c_ . C ° f '
Special Events° F k_¢m=
Current practice
Proposed Policy
why?r`, e,
t
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johmonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your-preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy°
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
.Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
W1ay?
North Shore/Coot Lake Use: ~~N
Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
p ha r.
Wlny? 1 v e CM - C~;a\
i v"If t~ ~~C yet' o ~
k k(A Ccr (~j~ C' _0"
West Shore Ilse:
Option i (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
why"
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
i n r^ c e f]`a G'S 1, rC
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov_>Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail tojohnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO $0306 or call 303.441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
® October x3, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boatint Polgc'~.~. wY
Option 1(Status Quo) r~
Option z (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
11Ly? r~.''-C.: 1 ! ..r[✓l,Y
C"- L (3 ° ' 7 C , 30
1
Ym'
or .t ore J oot La ewes m
Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3.(Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option x (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
ya
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Vl1hy?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments. ~
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plata Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planting, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
CA;!
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
o Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options ® You Prefer .9
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy®
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
j)
Why?1
rb►1~
North Shore/Coot Lake Used
4Option 1(Current Use and Access
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?'
West Shore Use°
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-hnpact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Us
Why? l 1► f : j I ' t Jj~ `(i1
Special Evexnts°
4 Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why? i =1f(_~,~ ; .JAe- 1)[6-
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
1 I~~G\ il{v~ is lliiv' +a ! S ]f.i'1
r
Name ! 11-I" .Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plaza Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johalsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev .Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
u Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options o You prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy: _
Option i (Status Quo) tS,)I~t l{1
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
C~ Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? i. l? tt1=:~ l C C:J~I S
11410 ` 1 ao. r c t r i) i ftr? l Jam- , i!"f C ~i y
North Shore/Coot Lake Use: a~_ _ - - -
Option 1(Current Use andAccess) Option 2 (Current: Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option 1 {StatusyQuo) ry y ~ f
~ (.:~t I<~tkr r.~
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use).
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why? -z / L)
Special Events: L w r e
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why? lL~?r °<i)o x G! ~r r. rrt`;_ -t7 -c`r l'1 [ :_C"~~ _t j S c~ 3t ~C. j J rc
t - t
o~~tvl r~}f~C~o'~tr.~~ i--lL~~ f}'~ 11~tt=i %if~~' f t~~ _
G C4" 1 l'L= fr - , f A(`~7r'
f
Please use the back of this foam for additional comments.
ra
f
Name
/~v~
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation. Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441°3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
n Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which tiny ® You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Polic~o
Option 1(Status Quo
tai l '2 o'o'r , all Jiar' lar
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
~lr'1~ lk~l ~x 1~v~ tt h a- Q . G`'-~'C~ 7J D ' ` }
Wlay? 'L`-
4~ ~ 'jj. l_~5,~l.t••~y'~-~_C d ~~L~~~~ ..~.c_l•Wic:..~?~~--s~'~3~~"G~?~'~.t,~~f~-
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
....-..W__
Option z (Current Use/Reduced Access) )
1{ ff Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
why? F~~Ltt!\s~rh.l ~..li. Lit! lC;~~':v'(C~ l.;!!.({~.iC:~C.' C~ ~l.~,i~~ ~t t~.L•L.c .~1.~~ t.rL'_~~
West Shore Use° y
Option i (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
t
S]2ecial Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Wily?
Please use the back of this fora for additional comments.
1/~r.~ E.r_~4+:.t..~Jl.::r'~ i 1`.-~Jirt 1~~~~f~f:ii.,/} 1~,~ f...~~ (..~i-t~!JCi~--f=~E~c~ [~'--i~'~ ~^~;1+-~✓ C..r-~
~~.i:.1_~- {CJ:~~L1-t~.~ ' ~7 ~,Q./LC'. jl~,.,~~!l,~`~.~s~n ~~,rt;'° ~ c.(,~--~L~"v ~ i_~, ,1,~p;~ r :L, ; ~ ; d.-C~~J =ct3
~~.>'vY~J~,4rS~j~~ trit_~.:'t.c? '4~.L.2 •~~'t=~ ~fJ I ~~-fj'T .r L~~L<-`(-'~ ~i:.~.~ ~`-':f ~~d5 i
Name Ard i-ca- tz_MI
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail _F -
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 8ogo6 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
o Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment :Fore
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
Option 1(Status Quo),,-*'
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option S f(No /Boats)
Why? Gi 4 r' al~~ %~tl:~t,i7t.~ f]Z~1 s~t I S fi 6~ ,e it t; erpe I-Lel` j t')." ILL
{
North Shore/Coot Labe Use:
'Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
)<''Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)'
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy-
why?
Please use the bath of this form for additional comments.
47 -7
- f~
44
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone - - - - - Y
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment For
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Polio o
-Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
may? -
North Shore/Coot Fake Used
Option 1 (Current Use and Access}""')
Option 2 {CurreiitU§e/Rei3uced,Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore tTse:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habrtat-ConservatioTArea)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option q (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
,r Current practice
Proposed Policy+Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name 4 6 ',rAV J
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site. www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Playa Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 1.3, 201.0
~Jv
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer .9
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Poli
(,Option 1. (Status Quo),
Option 2 (NMtoruoaf Standards}
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option d (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why?
North ShorelCoot Labe Use: ................_..m-
(Opt~on x (Current Use and Asues~)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Used
(Option i (Status Quo) Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events° P_V practi
.Current ce
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name wi!)wcLuGe'f
Street Address, Zip _
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bonldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail tojohnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
o . Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
OPP
Comment Form.
Which Options o You Prefer.9
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policy:
' Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why?
North Shoref Coot Lake Use:
-),°'`Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?.
Please use the back of this forma for additional comments.
a
Name
Street Address, Zip J y
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 803o6 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options Do Y® Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Polio:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Why? L Ss ra•ll~f~rR v 1 t r t,s.~.. r ,dg;~
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option i (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access) '
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access) p / r f /
Why? L1 e 4-41 t h . 1- f• ! IF
West Swore Use:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
r1t f{ ::L r - ' ! ~fl t_ s L . ~s ! f) ( ! ~ i~ L r'z r_ /Y,-
C pp s c. U 5 tih is r r E'r'r' • l ->-"r L e.i t~ ~.a [ 4.1c r_ (ii rt
:[LL r. +"r,. `-mac ; -•s
' 4 J { ! l-l GL ✓i. J~ •:1
Name
Street Address, Zip _
Phone
E-mail
'wATeb sate: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plana Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441•-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment foram at the welcome table.
6e,
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment For
Which Options Igo You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Polio.
C06Pn Status Quo) AY K /2" /V Option 2 (Motorboat. Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
N ~C%!-~% /~,7t 1 ~ru_.=,,~ %`t-` L' lG•'' J~GJ~ti~"72- .y~~~ /U ~ j`~~~ _ ~~i~-7~ j~!_%'i~`-~ ~ ~C-~1 a
North Shore/Coot Lake Use: ;
Option 1 Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore ITse.
Option (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
Special Events: - -
rcurrent practice
Proposed Policy
Why?
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
XS
6s-'5v
~'s 5 /r~~ ~~.~~J1 f~ fi~~~/-~') ,.'.~-y~~i?-j'- Si~~/.-e;'~,' a;i?`2.GCrr=>>~ ;~•,.r N ~ i Lr5 ~i1~ j~~;~~~ ,
v ~Cf l t-~ /S X111 Jl~~ I✓I/~' rL.~_ >1
t S ~A1f io2(.~'~/ L'// `"•i~ / 71 5 .f ~~Lt/.~ /7/~.S l CJ 1 L. L- A ( /
21 ~ A-11('.- / ~,U L/% ~C'~ l! G ? ~,1 • /~c SC ~~%i7~
77'%-
Name J,~1 A5,
z S1fi1l ~ ~
Street Address, Zip _
Phone „ .
E-mail _
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation ]Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plana Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldereolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 803o6 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would life to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Boulder Reservoir Faster Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Poli
Option 1 (Status Q up)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
Whys ! 1~~ lJV`r d, ~i~~ ! 6 gv ~+r S 8 8 .S L l Y
Of-
177 0 A/ 4e e, j J
North Shore/Coot Lake Nle6 1 ° C d-
Option 1 (Current Use and Access)
Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
W1ay?
West Shore Use:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact _Use)
Option 4 (Expanded1Use)
i"11-1 ,
Why? I' l' L'? . d q -`1 ®71 ISO v A.
Jv [Vs Alit/dom. ®°d !°.+e,~ A
Special Events: p ► ~ G ls'1 s~e 41) k-Q 6 /X cE
Proposed Policy
Why? 6 "s-) l O c~ [ f - r P i A/3 ~1 ~ f•~ ` /.1 ^ tom- t it 10
: t
Please use th ack of this form for a `tional comments.
Name
Street Address, Zip
Phone
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldereolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plan Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the city of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272.
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
g Boulder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
Comment Form
xe Options o You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Policyo
Option (Status Quo)
otorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Option 5 (No Boats)
North Shore/Coot Lake Use:
Option 1(Current Use and Access)
Option 2 Vurrent Use/Reduced Access)
Option 3 (Expanded Use and Access)
Why?
West Shore Use:
Option 1 (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 Low-Impact Use)
Option 4 (Expanded Use)
Why?
rte...-.~`1•`
Special Events:
Special
Current practice
Pro osed Policy ,
Whys
r}' ~ ~`~s ~t { 1 j/r. ~ri'l-I. "I }
U r U'y~ p sr/~,a(
Please use the back of this form for additional comments.
Name .U
Street Address, Zip
Phone _
E-mail
Web site: www.bouldercolorado.gov >Parks & Recreation > Recreation Facilities > Boulder
Reservoir > Master Plats Project
You may also send your comments or questions by e-mail to johnsonb@bouldercolorado.gov or mail to the City of Boulder,
Department of Community Planning, c/o Bev Johnson, P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306 or call 303-441-3272•
If you would like to be notified about this project in the future, please subscribe to the "Reservoir" email list.
Please leave this comment form at the welcome table.
FID®S Petition:
i support dog access undercurrent Voice and. Sight guidelines all around. Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed?
First Name (Please Print) Last Nje (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zi3p
i
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
First Nye (Please Print) Last Naive (Please Print)
M,-fling Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
r E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
1 1 .t~l ' 1 r I iiS I '~JI^^r ,4 _ Y
Telephone (f Signature
First Name (Please Print) .Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
E )
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
E
Return to Tian giiIdf-. 7637 Sth qt_. Boulder. CO 80,304 (»a .qnnn nc no.e.qihlP)
DOS Petition:
I support dog access under•cuffent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name ;(Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
ele' hone Signature
~f"
First Name (Please Print) Last Nance (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not 've out our e-mail address.)
Telephone S%~f~'~l7'
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
1A C1 i0 A,1 CA mi~ f! ~
Mailing Addriess or Post Office Roy
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (n- DOS will not 've out our e-mail address.
Tele home Signature
l
First ame (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
M
Mailing Address or P st Office Box . n
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our, e-mail address.) J
c 5 .,..a t _ 1
(Tele home Signature
l J
Return to Pan giildfP. 9,637 ,5th Rt". Rni lder- CO 80304 (as snnn as nnssihlP)
FIDOS. Petition:
I support dog access undercurrent Voice and. Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational sngnage at "sensitive"' areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed?
First N uue (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post O%ce Box _
0 Of
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FTDOS will not give chit our a-mail address.)
ti _ r
Telephone ~j Signatur
First Names (Please Print) Ias Name (Pl e Print) -
Q1 zfe 12D-
Mailing Address or Post Office }fox .11
City, if Dot Boulder ~ Zip /
j
Q Fl
E-mai (FIDOS will not ve out our e-mail address.)
f9
Telephone Signature
First°Name (Please Print) Name}(P~lease Print)
1, L/ 1
rT.,.N- AddrPCC rrr-Pnet nfftrP Anw
City, f not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not 've out our e-mail address.)
Telephone ; Signature
First Name (Please ]Vint) t /e+(Please Print)
Mail's Dr-i fflice Box /]f a r
City, if not Bould rl Zip
E-mail (F1DOS will not give out our e-mail address-)
Telephone Signature
Rotnrri to Tian 4nk1P. 7647 5th St.. Rrmlde.r. C..0 80104 lay .coon a.. nossible)
D®S Petition:
I support dog access undercurrent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cars at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please, Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
C tt y,. if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not ive out our e-mail address.)
Telephone
f i tore jy c~ / J[r~ q
Firs Name (Please Print) Last \Name (Please Print)
L"I I--, 5- 1,~(---C &I
Mailing Address`orPost Office Box City, if not Boulder Zip
lrmail (MOS will not give out our e-mail address.) /
r - E. r r~ ✓
Tele hone Signai, I
First N e (Please Print) Last Na e (Please Print)
M.;Una Addr SS or Post Office. Rnx
City, if not .Boulder / Zip
E-mail y(FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signatures )
J),
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
!L
Mailine Addre-, ~r P ~r ncr. n_ .
~city, if not Boulder " Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
( nn f-n
`6~`•' ~ - > i r r .~I 1 ~1 `^to [ f -V J i r ~a -
Telephone Signature's
f
Return to Dan gukh-. 9.637'% St__ Rnidder. CO ft0304 (ac .cnnn nq nnssihle) s
FI DOS Petition:
I support dog access under-current Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the ]boulder lies, Better fencing and educational signage at `°senflsitive', areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print), Last Name (Please Print)
I
Mailing Address or p~°t
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out o r e-mail address.)
Telephone Sig I .
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
o uz +0
Mailing Address or Post Office, ox
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.
Ti i
Telephone - Signature f
.p
_ 1
6
First Nam (Please Print) Last Name (Please Erint)L
Mailinv- Address or Post Office Box A
e _
City, ikof Boulder Zip
J
l I
C:I
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
TI
Telephone r Signatur - - - -
First Name (Please P ' t) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box _
City if not Boulor r Zip
7rAAk6
E-mail .(FIDOS will not 've out our E-mail address.)
Telephone Sigaatu>~
Rptpm to 1()an Snk1P. 9.647 5th t_. RnAder. CO 803W (a.g.-nnn aS nns.aihle) ~~~t
F ID OS Petition:
I support off-leash dog access (under current Voice and Sight guidefines) all around Coot
Lake and on the North Shore of the ]boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at
"sensitive" areas, and additional garbage cans at popular arbas are the only changes needed?
First Name (Please Print) t Name (Please Print)
LLVV 1 r.r Yp _
c(ly,-lift of ouldPrF L/ tZip
E-mail (FIpOS will not give out our e-mail address.) -
'Fels `hone _ Signature ~ y
` ~ - r r r tv r r r ~ ff~ ' ~ f f s"` ~ 1,// 6
a { F' \l V fib: f 9 1/ 1 ~ l✓'~~, ; ~ <f ~F'
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.
Telephone Signature
1
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (F1DOS will not 'give out our e-zn€ail address.
fTele hone Signature
First Name (Please Print) Last Naine (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
city, if not Boulder Zip
&mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
Return to Dnn Rulde.. 7637 ith Rt.. Bnitidnm-. CO S0304• (a, cnnn a-, nnscihW
C-1
F TD®S Petition:
I support off-leash dog access (under current Voice and. Sight guidelines) all around Coot
Lake and on the North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at
11sensltitve" areas, and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
t 1 •;3•l. `1" ~.''Liil.~ c"\.{,~ . ~V 1. e L1 (/(/~.,01 V I ~-1: Sf ~
Mailing Acfrf=-°- Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not ig~ve.out vour e_,-;I
Telephone Signature
First-Name (Please Print) F Last Name (Please Print)
MniFi„v Address ox'POS1'offlce R-'-/!
~ Ir,r ~f d
Ofy) if (Jar's P 6~/~ ~i
E-mail (FiDOS will not give out your e-mail address.
Telephone ° Signature
First Name Please Print Last Name Please Print)
1
Mailing Address or Post Offic"ox
City, if not Boulder - _1 Zip
Fload LFIDOS will not give ont vni,r P-maiS address.)
Signature
First_*ame (Please Print) st Name (Please Print) G
Mailine AdYrecc nr Pno+ nar.--
jol
city, if not Boulder - - - - Zip -
E-mail (FIDOS will not 've out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature J f
Rehlrn to Tian Rllkle_ 1.637 5th Rt-- Bolder. CO R0304 (as -,non as no.Rsilale)
C~.°Il
PIDOS Petition:
I support off-leash dog access (under errant Voice and. Sight guidelines) all around Coat
Lake and on the North Shore of the Boulder Res. ]fetter fencing and educational signage at
11sensitive." areas, and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
r i $ fir! ?
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FTDOS will not give out vow P-m 10 nrjrtrP.cq I
1'eleolFone - Signature
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
Fo3 C)
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-rrzazl (FDOS will nat give out your e-mail address,
,3• •tt~- : t~- tv t"'~f ifJ I~ t t I" t ~ t ,
Telephone Signature
P t Name (Please Pri t~ `Nast Name (Please riot)
Ak:
Mailing Addre_cc nr Pnet 4)ffirn Rnx 1 y
91ty, if not Boulder - Zip '
E-mail ( OS will not Rive out voFr n mai3 address.)-',
_-.-fir= ohm i t ^.l 1 I
let~hone Signature
„1=iTSt;~Name (Ply~eas`e Prrint} r Last N ~e (l.'iease Prins}
Cif, °g not Bo der
(vo
E-mail DOS will not give out our e-mail address.
TP _ Signature„
r . aF'
Return to nqn Ruld€.. 'x.63'7 5tkt
FIDOS Petition:
1 support dog access undercurrent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed?
First Name (Please Print) last Name (Please Print)
I~
Mailing Address or Post OF
Box 1
s
City, if rapt Boulder Zip
I{E-mail (RDOS will not Qive out your e-mail address.) .
C_ _elephon; ` Signature
i ~
t.
First Name ('lease Print) I t Name (Please Print)
off ' fi
Mailing AFirirF.4C or Post Officpf Box f 91 i ~
City, if 11 t Boulder r f - ZIP
/ 17
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.
T(ele home Signature
f
ff f
First Names (Please Print) Last~l`Jame (Please Print) L
City, if n Boulder Zip
_ f
E-mail (111 05 will g _T_ iv-e- on't our e-mnot ail address.] ti
( -
%
i ere hone Sign/tore
l
First NamefPiease Print) Last,Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or, P , sZ Offire. Box
City, if not Bojilder zip
E-mail FIDE w5 i11 not 've out our a-mail address.)
Tele hone Signature
Rnhirn to l)nn ,SiAdra. ?.617 5th St.. Rniflder. RMO-I-(a.- anon ac nnG~ihlPl
R DOS Petition:
I support dog access undercurrent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signagc at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (.Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
? ailing Address or Post Office Box,4' '
City, if not Boulder Zip
I) Cie ~A-I h _6
E-mail {FIDOS will not in out our a-mail address.)
F. g
Telephone Signature
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address nr P- n-rr-- b---
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.) ,..._-7
J
[Telephone Signature
t ~ - d Vv r .r r'~rP
First Name (Please Print) Last Nay e (Please` print)
Mailin- Address or Post Office Box
0 3()
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
First Name (yPy lease Print) Last N e (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Offi,P Rox
City, if not Boulder 3 Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone ✓ Signature
Rnhirn to T)an nkle. 7.1137 9th qt_. T'nitldnr. C.0 80304, (AC snnn .9S nnssihle.)
FIDOS Petition:
I support dog access under,current Voice and Sight guidelines all around. Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
M2ilino A
Cityy if not Boulder Zip Co b_;0 I
&m(FIDOS will not Eve ont urns P mail arlrlrPaR 1
i
Teleltone Signature f
C_
First Name (Please Print) - -7 Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Pont nff,rP Rn r
City, is not Rfulder Zip
s
ry b C-4
1j`~ \ e ivy
1-px ail (FIDOS will not give out vour e-mai) aclrires5 1
t`
Signature
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
city, . noutder Zip
E-mail (RDOS will not aive out vcnir P_mniI arlcirPSC 1
Tele hone Ii Signature
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing AddressT o ost O ice Box
P~
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
Tele liu~_ 1 Signature
RPtimn to Din Siik1P. 9.67 411 St.. RcmiciPr, cc) Pn,) -4 fa.c Conn ac nnCsible)
FID®S Petition:
I support dog access undercurrent Voice and Sight guidelines-all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.
Tele hone Signature f a
First Name (Please Print) Last Name Please Print)!
Mailing Address or Post Off rn. Rn-x
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail TOS will not give out our e-mail address.
TPIPnhone Signati e
F trgt Name (Pl eam Print) Last Name (Please Print)
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not 've out our e-mAaddress.) P,
Tele hone
First Name (P ease Print)\y bast Name-Wlease Print) '
Mailing Address or Pnc} r)"`-
C_, ti ILUL nuLLEuer J ( Zip
S
l 5 ~
E-mail (FIDOS will not give ou our e-mail address.) i7fr i
/Tele hone w V Signature
l ~ .
RPYu3-n to T7an 5i+kle.. ?.637 5th St.. Rnllldfa,-_ C..0 ROM!! (ac Gnnn aS nns~ill1f.)
FIDOS Petition:
I support dog access undercurrent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Labe and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed?
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing- ' - '1ff;rn BOX
Gr
City, if not Boulder Zip
8,10 51 ty~-
E-mail (FLDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
F-
Telephone Signature
First Name Please Print) t Nance (Please t
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not moulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
--Telephone Signature L )
f t 1 l " t (fJ/J~~fj
First-Nary (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
CA
• aa_ nr Post Office Box ~
City, if t t Baulder - - - - - - Zip - - -
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
L
'i o-lepttone ` Signature f
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
c 6, M
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
TZotttt-n to T)an ;7~1r1P. 9.617 5th .it.. Rnl bier. CC) R03W (a, .qnnn ri.q nns.eihle.)
FIDOS Petition:
I support dog access under-current Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shone of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational sngnnage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First lame (Plea{se Print) lstIa>xie (Please Print)
Ivlailing`Addrgss or Post Office Box J r
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address,)
Tele hone Sign
E
First Nand (Please Print) East Name (Please Print)
'Ark
Mailing Address or Pnc4 nssri> D- v
City, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature hf//(
First N <
,Pleas Prim ~ Lash (/PI~ease(Prin9
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder ~Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not 've out our e-mail address.)
Telephone 'gnature
- i
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing AddrP~^ yt jJS
cryTf nof Boul(der~ Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not ve out our e-mail address.)
III El
Telephone Signature
Rehirn to Dan Sickle. M337 nth :t.. Roulde.r. C..n 90M4 l is Bonn ae no.qsihl-,l J
FIDOS Petition:
1 support dog access under'cuffent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed?
First Dame (PIeq Pript) Last Name (Please Print)
City, if °l Boulder Zip
2 P0
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail
I _
Telephone f 1 Signature
First Na~ue (Please Print Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Pn~~ nsr;rP a^
City, Pot Boulder - - - - Zip -
( :3
E-mail FIDOS will not 've out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
v
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
o
Ity, if not Boulder Zip _
E-mail (FIDOS will
F- J
Telephone Signature
First ame (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Off;- R^,.
City, if not Boulder _ Zip
E-mail (FI>l^~ _ your e-mail address.)
TP' ~,uune Signature
nnc~ihlel _f _
Rehirn to T)an Siilde. 9.617 '5th St.. Rnnmer. rn Pmw. fa..q ,nnn as,
FID®S Petition:
I support dog access undercurrent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Labe and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
City, if not Boulder Zip
n
E-mail (FIDOS will notgive out your e-mail address.)
I I I- I t° I AI I I - -
Tele hone Signature
Awl, n (rl ` 4j L1 L `
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
1
Mailing Address or Post Office Box _ j
City, if not Boulder zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not eive out your e-mail address.)
I 7 1" l 1 y~ Q 1 ~ ~ 1 ` I - I 1I I II I~-. 1 x 1' - I ` I 1 1 1 1 I t I
'I ele hone Signtur.s
First.N@Lme (Please Print) / Last Naine•(Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
city, if no Boulder Zip
Prmail (F'IDOS will not give out your a-mail address.) ,
5 i- I I- i 1' 1 1 ! 3 1 1 1 L 1 1 I I'° _J
TPla..h...A Signature
Fil , st Name (Please Print) Last Nance (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Offire, unY
Cit)?,if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
i\7-
RPtiin-i to T)nn Snkh-. 9.617 Sth St.. Rnniri n cn Rt 304 (sic coon a~ nn.csihlPl
DOS Petition:
I support dog access undercurrent Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes heeded!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Off e-
City, if not Boulder - Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
TO hone Sign ure
First Name (Please Print)' Last Nance (Please Print) /
Mailing Address or Post Office Box r
City, if not Boulder Zip
lrmail FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Sure
l
First Name (Please Prjn J ` Last Nam (P ase Print)/
! 1
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
,
, -
City, if not Boulder A ~ Zip
I ~-{lf
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signature
4
)
First Name (Please Print) tt Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address, nr Post Office Box 4
1 _ _0
City, if not Boulder Zip `
E-mail (FIDOS will not 've out our e-mail address.)
Telephone Signatu e f~
Rc-hirn to lean S»Ir1P. 7.637 5th St:. Rnuiciex. c..n Rm(?4 (a.c snnn as nn.eSihlP)
FIDOS Petition:
I support dog access under-current Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cares at popular areas are the only changes needed!
Firs game (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
ailftl
Marling Address or Post Office Box
_ -.ier 'Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your a mail address.)
l . I t
~ 1 Ifs t 1 ,
Telephone Signature
/n -
L
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Paint)
Md U-61111--
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
C Zip
bouU e"l- 7-
E-mail IDOS will not 've out our a-mail address.)
Telephone Signaturz
d r} f J J~
First Name (Please Piintj_._., Last Name (Please Print)
I M M , &4 i2w
Mailing Address or Post Office Dox -Mr
City, if not Boulder Zip
¢ E-mail (FLpOS will not give put your e-mail address.)
T~ e hor y y-A` Signature
I
First Name (Pleas YLast Name (Please Print)
VfAA T i ~ -
Mailing Address or Post OVe Box
City, if not Boulder Y s Zip, r~
r F-mail (FIDOS will not give out our email address.) `
Signat.6re ( .
L ]r , cuu . UG
'Behan to Dnn.gn1dP. 9.637 4th St- Ran di-.r. R(}3()4 (ac goon aC n gsihle)
FIDOS Petition:
1 support dog access under-current Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at .popular areas are the only changes .needed!
Firs Name (Please Print) Last Nf ame (Please Print)
x~ ~ G~ ~ r.,- l~f-.;`1;x.1_
Mailing AdO---- nFt n
,
City, if .not Boulder Zip
E-ro,-t fT- - -t. give out your e-mail aa'
Telephone, / Signature
Fir ame (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Rair f1wl~L
Mailing Address
City, if not Boulder Zip
I
E-mail (F1DOS will not give out vour e-mail address.)
Tele none Signature
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
A AA-q (),r POO (")ff+,P P- '
City, if not Cinder Zip ~j
E-mail (F1DOS will not Eve o„t. vour e-mail,address,Z
t Tele houa a ; Signature
-
First Naive (Please Print / Lai IKme (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Pos;Office Box
City, At nor Boulder Zip
Er mail (FTDOS will not glue out your e-mail address.)
rele~h~nP Signature
L -
Return to Dan gnkh-. ?,6.37'% St-. Rcnilrler- CO 80 304 la.q -non ac nosRihlPl n r~ p
FID®S Petition-
I support dog access under,current Voice and Sight guidelines all around Coot ]Lake and the
North Shore of the Boulder Res. Better fencing and educational signage at "sensitive" areas,
and additional garbage cans at popular areas are the only changes needed!
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
F 1
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
o
pfd "
City, if not Boulder Zip
-E-mail (FIDOS will not give out vour e-mail address,)
rT ,
Telephone Signatures
First, ame (Pleas Prin Last Na e (Please Print)
Mai ' A , aYo~~ o ~4 nsr v v
Zip
City, if not Boulder
'Ij
A'+L
E-mail MI n° ' - ^ -f --r r e-mail address.)
v
11 ,r v
TeIe hone Signature
First Name (Please Print) ;Last Name W pease Print),
Mailing Address or Post Off`--
City, if not Boulder J Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out your e-mail address.)
Telephone wgaraeure
First Name (Please Print) Last Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address or Post Office Box
i y, if not Boulder Zip
E-mail (FIDOS will not give out,you re-mail address. I
r it !T
i" Signatu + / r ~V
Telephone
Rohim to T)an Snide. '2,637 5th St.. Boulder. CO 90104 fa, ..qnnn a.s nnscihlPl dd
City of Boulder
Department of Parks and Recreation
Sonlder Reservoir Master Plan
October 13, 2010
o~
Comment Form
Which Options Do You Prefer?
After you have reviewed the evaluations of the different policy and use options, please circle your preferred
options and tell us why.
Boating Poles:
Option t (Status Quo)
Option 2 (Motorboat Standards)
Option 3 (Rental and Program Boats Only)
Option 4 (Small Watercraft Only)
Why? My concern would be to retain access for small boats so that the model airplane enthusiasts may
retrieve their models and continue to overfly the reservoir in their existing location.
North Shore/Coot Lake Use.
n> Option i (Current Use and Access)
`~V Option 2 (Current Use/Reduced Access)
Why? The Boulder Aeromodeling site has been a good steward of the Reservoir property and
cooperated with Parks and Rec through the years. Aeromodeling is a legitimate use of Boulder
parks property
West Shore Use:
Option 1(Status Quo)
Option 2 (Habitat Conservation Area)
Option 3 (Low-Impact Use)
Why?
Special Events:
Current practice
Proposed Policy
Why? Please don't change what has been working
Additional Comments: I am presently a resident of Larimer county but have lived and worked in Boulder
county for 30 years. Still, most of my disposable income goes to Boulder County for dining and
recreation. I am a member of the Boulder Aeromodeling Society and use the reservoir flying field. The
club has been a responsible user of the property and deserves the opportunity to continue their
operations at the reservoir
* Bob Pederson
_ nttJ E