5D - Landmark Alteration Certificate for 2008 Pine St. - Whittier School (HIS2009-00102)
MEMORANDUM
August 51h, 2009
TO: Landmarks Board
FROM: Susan Richstone, Long Range Planning Manager
Chris Meschuk, Historic Preservation Planner
James Hewat, Historic Preservation Planner
SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of a Landmark Alteration
Certificate to construct approximately 10,000 sq. ft. in
additions to the sides and rear of Whittier School, a local
historic landmark located at 2008 Pine Street per section 9-
11-18 of the BRC. (HIS2009-00102).
STATISTICS:
1. Site: 2008 Pine Street
2. Historic Designation: Individual Landmark
3. Zoning: RH-2 (Residential high-2)
4. Applicant: SlaterPaull Architects
5. Date of Construction: 1882
6. Historic Name(s): Pine Street School, Whittier School
7. Lot Size: 103,693 sq. ft.
8. Building Size: 35,123 sq. ft.
9. Request: Construction of approximately 10,000 sq. ft. in
additions.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board make the following motion:
The Landmarks Board approves the proposal to construct additions to the
Whittier School at 2008 Pine Street which generally meets the standards in
Chapter 9-11-18 B.R.C. 1981, and is generally consistent with the General Design
Guidelines, subject to the conditions below, and adopts this memorandum as
findings of the board.
AGENDA ITEM #51) PAGE 1
S:\PLAN\data\longrang\H[ST\ALTCSRTS\Landmarks\Pine.2008\080.05.09 memo.doc
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the development shall
be constructed in compliance with all approved plans on file in the City of
Boulder Planning Department, except as modified by these conditions of
approval.
2. Prior to a building permit application, the Applicant shall provide details
regarding exterior wall materials, door and windows, and roofing
materials to staff for review and approval. The applicant shall
demonstrate that the design details are in compliance with the intent of
this approval and the General Design Guidelines.
`Mis recommendation is based upon staff's opinion that with the conditions
listed above, the proposed construction will be generally consistent with the
conditions as specified in Section 9-11-18 of the Boulder Revised Code, and the
General Design Guidelines.
Summary:
9 Designated a local Landmark in 1997, the Whittier School
(originally Pine Street School) was constructed in 1882 after plans
by Denver architect Frank Edbrooke. It is the oldest, continually
used school in the state of Colorado.
a This proposal to construct a 5,980 sq. ft. addition at the east and
41022 sq. ft. at the south of the c.1950 addition to the school was
referred to the full Landmarks Board by the Landmarks design
review committee on June 3, 2009.
® Staff considers the proposal generally consistent with Section 9-11-
18(a)&(b)(1-3) of the Boulder Revised Code and the General Design
Guidelines subject to the conditions outlined in this memorandum.
AGENDA ITEM #51) PAGE
S:\PLAN\datallong;ang\HIST\AI;I'CERTS\Landmarks\line.2008\080.05.09 memo.doc
1 6,
Figure 1. Newly Constructed Pine Street School c.1882
Background:
In June of 2009, the application to construct additions at the east and south
elevations of Whittier School was reviewed by the Landmarks design review
committee (Ldre). A member of the committee considered that, because of the
scale of proposed new construction, the Landmarks Board should consider the
application in a public hearing.
J T 4 S t.e,, h r A
- 1
~ ~ }a.Ti'•x i
Figure 2. Whittier School facade, 2009
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE
S:\PI.AN\data\longrang\HISI'\ALTCERTS\Landmarks\Pine.2008\080.05.09 memadoc.
Request:
The application calls for the construction of two one-story additions to the non-
historic 1950 and 1986 portions of the Whittier School. In addition, the proposal
calls for the construction of a two-story elevator tower and relocated stair at the
west elevation of the historic 1916 addition. The building is currently
approximately 36,000 sq. ft. in size.
_ tee. ~i• y r t ' i ~ y` X11} .
. ti!y IITI . - _ -
t ' 411 i 4 ; ~ ti Yrt't~ .tr •
ell,
Ilk
Figure 3. Site Plan showing existing and proposed (hatched area) construction
At roughly 10,000 sq. ft. the proposed additions will increase the floor area of the
school by approximately 27%. A site plan shows the south addition to be located
75' from the 1916 addition to the school, and the east addition 65' away from the
1916 addition. The proposed additions are shown to be 150' and 85' away from
the original 1882 school. Existing mobile classroom units are to be removed to
make way for the south addition.
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE
S:\PLAN\data\Iongrang\TIIST\ALTCBR'I'S\Landmarks\Pine.2008\080,05.09 memo.doc
ya xa ~
--r,-~
Figure 4. Existing west elevation
19
l
Figure 5. Proposed west elevation
Submitted drawings indicate the south and east additions are to be lower than
the portions of building to which they are to be attached and between 25' and 33'
lower than the historic portions of the building. Elevations show the south
addition to have a flat roof, to be constructed of brick and to be simply
fenestrated with windows reflecting the proportions of those found on the
historic school building. The east addition is shown to partially connect with the
1984 library addition and to reference that portion in material, roof form, and
fenestration.
P r. M..
i
1 '
1 ~
Figure 6. Location of proposed elevator tower
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE
S:\PLAMdata\longrang\HISTIALTCERTS\Landmarks\Pine.2008\080.05.09 memoAoc
Drawings show the elevator tower to be 39' in height, to be clad in brick, and to
feature a hipped roof similar in form to the original school and 1916 addition. An
exterior stair is proposed at the south side of the elevator tower and 1916
addition providing access to the 1St level of the 1916 addition. To achieve this
access plans call for a window on the south (tertiary) face of the 1916 addition to
be converted into a door.
_ lr r
~
A-2 soUni E3 F ,4nc,+
Figure 7. Existing south elevation
n-
i_ I_, F
SouTit n r.v,~nov
113 4.....
Figure 8. Proposed south elevation
Board's Decision:
The Historic Preservation Ordinance specifies that a Landmark
Alteration Certificate may not be approved by the Board or City Council unless it
meets the conditions specified in Section 9-11-18 B.R.C. Specifically:
(a) The landmarks board and the city council shall not approve an
application for a landmark alteration certificate unless each such agency
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE (0
S:IPLAN\dataVongranglHIST\ALTCRRTS\Landmarks\Pinc.20081080.05.04 nacmo.doc
finds that the proposed work is consistent with the purposes of this
chapter.
(b) Neither the landmarks board nor the city council shall approve a
landmark alteration certificate unless it meets the following conditions:
(1) The proposed work preserves, enhances, or restores and does not
damage or destroy the exterior architectural features of the landmark or
the subject property within an historic district;
(2) The proposed work does not adversely affect the special character or
special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the
landmark and its site or the district;
(3) The architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of
color, and materials used on existing and proposed structures are
compatible with the character of the existing landmark and its site or the
historic district.
(c) In determining whether to approve a landmark alteration certificate,
the Landmarks Board shall consider the economic feasibility of
alternatives, incorporation of energy-efficient design, and enhanced access
for the disabled.
Analysis:
1. Does the proposed application preserve, enhance, or restore, and not damage or
destroy significant exterior architectural features of the landmark?
Staff finds the proposed additions will not damage or destroy the exterior
features of the historic Whittier School as they are generally compatible and
consistent with the General Design Guidelines.
2. Does the proposed application adversely affect the special character or special historic,
architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark?
Staff funds that the proposed application will not adversely affect the special
character of the landmark. Approximately 10,000 square feet in size, the
proposed additions location, mass, and scale are generally compatible with the
General Design Guidelines, and will not have an adverse effect on the landmarked
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE
SAPLAN\data\1ongrang\IIIST\ALTCHRTS\I2ndmarksTine.2008\080.05.09 inemo.doc
property. However, it may be inappropriate to construct subsequent additions to
the school in the future.
3. Is the architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and
materials used on existing and proposed buildings compatible with the character of the
landmark?
Little detail is provided as to materials proposed for the additions. Elevations do
show the addition to be detailed more simply and with forms that reference the
historic house. However, the general approach in terms of color, texture, and
arrangement of materials appears to be compatible with the historic landmark.
c. The Landmarks Board is required to consider the economic feasibility of alternatives,
incorporation of energy-efficient design, and enhanced access for the disabled in
determining whether to approve a Landmark Alteration Certificate.
Plans call for the location of a universal access elevator in the proposed elevator
tower. Currently the school does not provide adequate accessibility for the
disabled.
Design Guidelines:
The Historic Preservation Ordinance sets forth the standards the Landmarks
Board must apply when reviewing a request for a Landmark Alteration
Certificate and the board has adopted the General Design Guidelines to help
interpret the Ordinance. The following is an analysis of the proposal with respect
to Sections 3.0 and 4.0 of the General Design Guidelines. It is important to
emphasize that design guidelines are intended to be used as an aid to
appropriate design, and not as a checklist of items for compliance.
3.1 Roofs
The roof is one of the primary character-defining features of a historic building, and the repetition of
similar roof types creates part of the visual consistency that defines a historic area. Alterations or
additions to roofs must be given careful consideration to ensure that they do not compromise the integrity
of the historic structure. Typical roof shapes are gabled or hipped. Shed roofs sometimes occur on historic
additions and accessory buildings.
Guideline Meets
Guideline?
Maintain the i•eof form, slope, Because of distance from historic portions
YES
height, and orientation to the of building (between 65' and 150')
street. proposed on-story additions will not
affect the profile and slope of roof of the
AGENDA ITEM 45D PAGE
S:\YLAndataNlongrangUiiST\ALTCLRTS\I.andmarks"iitc.2009\0R0.05.09 mcnio.doc
Whittier School. Shown to be
approximately 8' lower than the 1913
addition, the proposed hip-roof elevator
tower will not disrupt the dominant form
of the historic building; to the street.
GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC
BUILDINGS
4.0 Protection of Historic Buildings and Sites Meets
Guideline?
.1 Construct new additions so that there is The proposed one-story additions are to YES
the least possible loss of historic fabric non-historic portions of the school and
and so the character-defining features of will not result in the loss of character
the buildings are not destroyed. defining features. Construction of the
elevator tower will result in the removal
of two windows and a portico. These
elements are located at the rear of the
1916 addition and set back 20' from the
west face of the building. Staff does not
consider portico and windows to be
important character-defining elements of
the historic school building.
.2 New additions should he constructed so Construction of the one-story additions YES
that they may be removed in the future has no physical connection to the historic
without dama 'n the historic building. building and is therefore reversible.
It is not appropriate to construct an Given their location, profile, and YES
3 addition that will detract from the compatible design, staff does not
overall historic character of the building. consider the proposed one-story
additions will detract from the overall
character of the historic Whittier School.
Likewise, staff considers the proposed
elevator tower a compatibly designed
addition and placed in an appropriate
location at the rear of the 1913 portion of
the building.
4.2 Distinction from Historic Buildings
All additions should be discernible from the historic structure. When the original design is duplicated the
historic evolution of the building becomes unclear. Instead, additions should be compatible with the
historic architecture but clearly reco nizable as new construction.
1 Distinguish an addition from the in mass, scale, height, design and finish, MAYBE
-
historic structure, but maintain visual proposed one-story additions will be
AGENDA ITEM #51) PAGE
S:\PLAN\dataVongrang\HIST\ALTCERTS\Landmarks\Pine.2008\080.05.09 memo.doc
continuity between the two. One clearly distinct from the historic building.
common method is to step the addition Elevator tower scheme is compatible, but
back and/or set it in slightly from the will read distinct from building. Staff
historic structure. Every project is considers that a condition of approval
different and successful designs may should be reviewed and approval of
incorporate a variety of approaches. brick, windows, and roofing on the
elevator tower.
2 Do not directly copy historic elements. Historic forms and elements of the YES
Instead, interpret historic elements in Whittier School and later additions have
simpler wa s in the addition. been incorporated in the design.
3 Additions should be simpler in detail than Proposed detailing is simpler and YES
the original structure. An addition that contemporary yet contextual to and
exhibits a more ornate style or implies an compatible with the historic building.
earlier period of architecture than that of
the on inal is inappropriate.
4 The architectural style of additions Does not imitate design of the historic YES
should not imitate the historic shjle but building and subtly contextual to the
must be compatible with it. historic building.
Contemporary style additions are
possible, but require the utmost
attention to these guidelines to be
successful. The use of two distinct
historic styles, such as adding Tudor-
style half-timbering to a Classic
Cottage, is inappropriate.
4.3 Compatibility with Historic Buildings
Introducing new construction that contrasts sharply with an existing historic building or site detracts
from the visual continuity that marks our historic districts. While additions should be distinguishable
from the historic structure, they must not contrast so sharply as to detract from the original building
and/or the site. Additions should never overwhelm historic structures or the site, in mass, scale or
detailing.
1 An addition should be subordinate to the Proposed additions are subordinate to YES
historic building, limited in size and scale historic building in terms of height,
so that it does not diminish or visually mass, and scale.
overpower the building.
2 Design an addition to be compatible with Relationship of solids to voids on YES
the historic building in mass, scale, additions generally compatible with
materials, and color. For elevations visible historic school. Lack of fenestration on
from public streets, the relationship of solids elevator tower is perhaps
to voids in the exterior walls should also be uncharacteristic of historic building.
compatible. However, given the diminutive size and '
location lack of fenestration on this
element will make it more
inconspicuous.
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE 10
S:IPLAN\dataUongrang\HIST\AI,TCERTS\Landmarks\Pine.20081080.05.09 memadoc
4 Rejlect the original synnuetry or asymmetry Symmetry of proposed additions YES
of the historic building. reflects the symmetry of the historic
school building.
5 Preserve the vertical and horizontal proportion of Vertical. proportion of the historic YES
a building's mass, building has been affected over the
years by construction of additions.
Proposed new one-story additions are
between 65 and 150 feet from the
historic building and will not noticeably
further affect its vertical proportions,
4.4 Compatibility with Historic Site and Setting
1 Design new additions so that the overall With the exception of one or two trees YES
character of the site, site topography, at the south end of the property, the
character-defining site features and trees proposed new construction appears not
are retained. to affect &aracter defining features of
existing site features and overall
school and context.
2 Locate new additions on an inconspicuous Proposed locations for additions are at YES
elevation of the historic building, generally rear and in most inconspicuous
the rear one. Locating an addition to the locations.
front of a building is inappropriate because
it obscures the historic facade o a building.
3 Respect the established orientation of the Neighborhood context is residential. YES
original building and typical alignments Additions do respect the original
in the area. building's orientation and alignment.
4 Preserve a backyard area between the house Lot coverage will more than double YES
and the garage, maintaining the general from existing .33 floor area ratio to .43 if
proportion of built mass to open space addition is constructed. New
found within the area. See Guideline 2.1.1. construction will not significantly affect
open school and area.
4.5 Key Building Elements
Roofs, porches, dormers, windows, and doors are some of the most important character-defining elenients of
any building. As such, they require extra attention to assure that they complement the historic
architecture. In addition to the guidelines below, refer also to Section 3.0 Alterations for related
suggestions.
Maintain the dominant roofline and orientation Maintains dominant roof form to the
1 YES
of the roof form to the street. street.
2 Rooflines on additions should be lower Rooflines are lower and secondary to YES
than and secondary to the roofline of the historic school building.
original building.
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE ~ f
S:\PLAN\data\longrdn.-\HIST\ALTCERTS\iandniarks\Pinc.2008\080.05.09 memo.doc
3 The existing roof form, pitch, eave depth, While roof on the proposed south YES
and materials should be used for all addition is flat, it is compatible with the
additions. 1950 addition onto which it is being
constructed. Adding a hip roof to this
addition would raise the profile and
make it more conspicuous. East
elevation utilizes hip roof reflecting
those on historic and 1980s addition to
which it is being constructed.
5 Maintain the proportion, general style, and Proposed windows reflect proportion YES
symmetry or asymmetry of the existing and pattern of windows on the historic
window patterns. building.
6 Use window shapes that are found on the Window shapes and designs are found YES
historic buildings. Do not introduce odd- on historic school.
shaped windows such as octagonal,
triangular, or diamond-shaped.
Based upon analysis of the application against the General Design Guidelines, staff
considers the proposed application generally meets the conditions of Subsection
9-11-18, B.R.C. 1981.
Findings:
The Landmarks Board finds, based upon the application and evidence presented
that the proposed Landmark Alteration Certificate application, subject to the
conditions of approval above, will be consistent with the purposes and standards
of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and:
1. The proposed alteration preserves, enhances, or restores and does not
damage or destroy the exterior architectural features of the landmark or the
subject property within a historic district. (9-11-18(b)(1), B.R.C. 1981)
2. The proposed alteration does not adversely affect the special character or
special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark
and its site or the district. (9-11-18(b)(2), B.R.C. 1981)
3. The architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and
materials used on existing and proposed structures are compatible with the
character of the existing landmark and its site or the historic district. (9-11-
18(b)(3), B.R.C. 1981)
AGENDA ITEM #5D PAGE / 02
S:IPLAMdata\longranglHIST1ALTCERTS\Landmarks\Pina2008\080.05.09 mcmadoc
Attachments:
A: Historic Building Inventory Form
S: Drawings
C: Photographs
AGENDA [TENT #SD PAGE !
5:'YTANldata'tlongran~,11 iltiTtAL!'C-RT~~] ~an~in~a-ks`?_nc.'OI)3\OSQ0~.09 me_no.dor.
Attachme:,t A
COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY NOT FOR FIELD USE
Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation --ELIGIBLE
1300 Broadway, Denver, Colorado -DET NOT ELIG
HISTORIC BUILDING INVENTORY RECORD _-NOMINATED
CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO Boulder County -CERTIFIED REHAB
DATE
PROJECT-NAME: BOULDER HISTORIC PLACES^ State ID#: 5BL1113
*Building Name: WHITTLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Temporary #-_80__ r----_-_
*Building Address: 2T6'$ PINE STREET- BOULDER, COLORADO 80302---_~_
Building-Owner BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-2 -
Owner Address: 6500 ARAPAHOE BOULDER, COLORADO 80303
USGS Quad BOULDER Quad Year: 1979 7.5'_-
-------r~
*Legal: Tnsp 1N Range 70W Section 30 NE1/4 SE1/4
*Historic Name: WHITTLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL -
District Name:
Block:-12$ Lot: 1~7, 9-14 - Addition: BOULDER EAST _ - -
Year of Addition: 1872
Film Roll By: WHITACRE Film Number: BL1
Number of Negatives: 15,16 Negative Location: BOULDER
Construction Date ACTUAL 1882 -
Source: BLDR DAILY HERALD,JUL 4 1882
Present Use: SCHOOL - Historic Use: SCHOOL
Condition GOOD - - Extent of Alterations: MODERATE -
Description: NEW ADDITION
-
O R I G I N A L If Moved, Date(s):
Style:ITALIANATE~ Stories: 2 1/2
Materials: BRICK Square Footage: 31,694
Field Assessment: ELIGIBLE -District Potential:YES CONTRIBUTING- -
Local Landmark Designation?: NO Name: Date
_
- M
Associated Buildings?: Type -
If Inventoried, List Id Numbers:
Architect FRANK E. EDBROOKE Source
Builder/Contractor: Source:
Original Owner: Source:
2008 Pine Street Page 2
Plan Shape: . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
• • • • • • • • • •
Theme(s):
Architectural Description:
Red brick, white wood trim; carved wood above windows. Segmental arched
brick lintels, stone sills. Soldier course. Hipped roof with gabled
projections and cupola.
Construction History:.
Historical Background:
This school was originally call Pine Street School. It was renamed
Whittier in 1903. After hearing some poems by poet John Whittier, the 6th gra
class wrote him a fan letter, and Whittier wrote a letter thanking the student
Boulder citizens felt that there should be recognition of the exchange of
correspondence with the literary figure of the time, and changed the school's
name to Whittier. The building was designed by Frank E. Edbrooke, who also
designed the original Boulder County courthouse which burned down in the 1930'
.rchitectural Significance:
_X_ Represents the work of a master.
_X_ Possesses high artistic values.
Represents a type, period or method of construction.
Historical Significance:
`X^ Associated with significant persons.
Associated with significant events and/or patterns.
X Contributes to an historic district.
Statement of Significance:
Designed by Frank Edbrooke, one of Denver's most prominent architects,
Whittier School was Boulder's second permanent school and now survives as its
oldest. It is the oldest, continually used school building in Colorado.
References:
Susan Baldwin, Boulder Historic Places Inventory 1977
Boulder County Assessor's Office
Boulder Daily Herald; July 4, 1882
specifications and Plans by F.E. Edbrooke (in possession of Lawrence
Paddock - Boulder Historical Society)
Daily Camera, Jane Barker, February 18, 1973
Sanford Gladden, No. 3A Education-Public Schools, p. 39-45
Surveyed by Whitacre/Simmons Affiliation: Front Range Research
Date: 1986
' w ~L •
-44
- AR
"If 25-
Tom
{ ti lDel5G100L msDw6 9 ~1~ - -..,7, Llr'`, Y
.iF l ~ L HM'IERA4f
jm 31
I- Vh
f ...&r•~ll}.y.'~ 4, Hw er-rv~aer ,r ' ' L
. ~ • ~ ?tsJe: ~,c~ , r ~ ;M ~ \ ;TOy.~w,~. A. ~ ~_i ~ yet 4 ~y. -
~Ap
. f t / •
-AV
Alt
N
SITE PLAN A•101 sawreis.erw, uLz
WHITTIER INTERNATIONAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2008 Pine Street
JULY 09, 2009 Boulder, CO 80302
i
I~ II
A '1 PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION A3 NORTH ELEVATION
J1 t.
-7 r-
A 1 WEST ELEVATION
~wtt-rte
E_ElATION kET !Y7:ES
PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-201
S 1.AT F. A PA4L1.
Whittie. International Elementary School 2008 Pine Sueet ,
JULY 04, 2004 Boulder, CO 80302
I
i
r~
L-
1 zt~ ~ eur, n~ rt-.a ie0 ~4~YPaP•r PwVi+r• Ks>•"P a v ~s..+.~v-_~..r.nc
l4C42 NS! ~
SOUTH ELEVATION
a
HMI fr ~
~n¢f • ~ Y~ - {~}wq~--~ [[mom-~
Ld LLl2"L1 MYrLCii
RHFR-
e`
xKV wnor nu~..r ~ ' r.~..-.+~ ~e:.xr,..xc. r P'r«•w•.~-m..r
A I WEST ELEVATION'
EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-203
Whittier Intemational Elementary School 2008 Pine Street S L A, . a P A U L L
Boulder, CO 80302
JULY 09, 2009
A3 SOUTH ELEVATION
C
s = - I S. r
i '
EAST ELEVA , TION
A2.,.,~,~ ~
NATION K°Y w t' 5
A 1 sU RTV SECTION
PROPOSER BUILDING ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS A-202
5 LATcEB PA9LL
Whittier International Elementary Schook - 2008 Pine Street o , _ . ,
JULY 09, 2009 Boulder, CO 80302
kiN
~Y
a.
- -r~l
•l 1
°
,Mr I o.r;C rl a. ~~I z iEl i I-tP~`ilr
{ I ♦ --~.fl. ~ 'F- ~~'1 ~ +_rlff ~i - ~ .I~I ~r t ~ • - T r. 1 ~G - I.... -.:j
J S. 1 - - _ } ~a 1 11n11 U _ ~ ~i r. Yi ~r_ I i I I s• 11
~.r ~ r C ~ L I~,l~ 4`~+x. ~ ~ ~ ~ -•4- ~ ~ ~ I ..il i~ 1 +'°t ~ E~I ~ ~ ~~•ij 1 I -i
~I;.~ ~,,,~,,~r i. j~- Ml j, - _ - II - 1 I_. I~II~h 1~7ltir.~= -
~'1p uyr* .a.l
l::i
ILI
_ Y s
r'
ii-0- WOMRN ;Lo
t'.
y 77
-
K"lo
I- S7
4. I I Y fi 1~ t~ u t.;;[ T 3
i
_ f 111 4 4 1 a 5 Il
f
~ IN. L V AW
Iea.
,
,Ir r„ " T ie.J.~ i` t~"_
r„~~It,r^f7 t rt...---'3.y-.s. - - - _i& 9 i - _lll siu---;' li ~l III I' .li
A V7
I P7
vo~
J t I
_-.:.h a ,6.~-- r1_,_ C=.,.t _'~-tl •~r:d ~ -j~l r-~ E _ I -a'w... ~nn~. +,i i i,, :~f~ , y...~:
y ~I - I :•I~.I,_;~__ I~1~-•~''~ spent( ;F •F ICI-~II >,~>..~I_ Y~ ,,t~~ ~ ~ ^'4
I Toll,
,a r _ . - 'LEI :":~1._1 lli:.~ 1 rI ~ _
F 6` r7 • _ t T,. ~.-~-c r. I''. r t. r _ . ~ i~ I •~-i '.k ~rY, I~'•-
._f
i ~ 11 I
i r.
-~--rte
i.
~ ~ . r t .-r ,_tr _x r - 't ti - .a z ~Y 1" t l •t
i _
r:
G:
4Ab-
'
R
ossl u` ~ 'i 1
• t )it.' ~ s jet ~ ~ 1
t 17 i
MIT
96 a V ` / jt ry a° 3 r f r ;
f•.
~ R If 1 n'•.Y r+. ~ ....i ~c~Y R 1 l: III ~ ~ 'rf~ YY fJ.-
7.:
• 1 ~ ~ - ,,'-tA~7 _k7 ~t 4''~ r ~.~t~ ~~r jar
d F
"navy
Iy _ r r
00,
r R~' 1 v 1 L '11 5 '~A `~4 •
1 1. S 'f 1 J FlI~~O- j ~I ~~w`
y- ~ x ~ Y} _R R -i f e Z. r.. ~r ~,~.r11~~Ygp~•~.
t r y x 1 n v k' ~ y1.r~ 7y~ i
4 / J/
I CjL{i-~{j~~~J.
4 IL!-~,r-.- r° l ~ I ~ L - ~ ~ ~ ""..gin`♦.~, t
--r :r`~f"'~~~ ~~~.i~ ~rj,F` 1 ~ ✓ ~ ~ ~ III _ _ I~~. ~Y- c_ .
a+.^ ~ s---x Y'^ 9 1' I, ` ac ` J ' 7• ~ ~ -1'e.. i J •+c5 iy -y~i''~j,~. Yr'1 ,.^A'i..~ 1111 _ ~~~lil I - -
'Y~ I'y ~?:f`J wr 1 l` ~.a ~ 1_ n ~ I+ .x j ~ r_;,r:J- • 1 ~.-i I _ ~~,3~ 'C i. ' v~~~ -7 - - ~
- t 6L:.:o- ~ -7
~~f •'F ~ >r`~ -gjfi~ui°""'^~r,,.r I 3 f rte'-ti S~r IL J + s.~ r"y~-B~k ! I;: ~r. I{:: _ '="~'SP?:.~.•~, _
~1. J,~,'. I~ v'~g~y 3{~i4•!'f` ~,1 ~.7,Vy ,r °•r~ _ ~'I + rr~11r,,r'. r.: ,1F~ : k~-:r I -^r -
' .~~If~ j -.-t rt~•~' ~ll~ t r ,~I,~. :.I - }Ir~ ~r 'I ,lr,, ,j~ r ~4~{•. ~I lam-
~Ti.~+~~,~ ~_7 7w:' i ~ ~ I4~V1 ~f•'~.`T~ ti .:~7jp. - ~ 4 r rl~.y ri~'i ~ - _
~~O j'~„t~.. tiy~_ - ~ `t ^il' f +;!C I I d*~., ~I ~ ~ 't~•r - - = ' 7..'~, _ I : ` 31 - _ _
. _ ~rr,l, P w ♦ ~'I ~d,~ ~ t~+L 4 7 ~ `'1 .fit ~r - r y
.i ,c+ r}! _ t,. r7~ ~ - ek' '.:.j "tip r - ~ ' y ~
h
r '
r`4
i
~ r
♦
4
~~AI } I I I I 1 : I i t t r I J~
Attachment C
a
st.
I` 1. - 21~- 170 _
View looking west down 20th Street
si-
r -A, f-
f
I FM
t S
j- 7 M { M
Adjacent residential neighborhood
S L A T E R P A U L L
A n C II I T E C T S
Y .ice 1 ~.t~'•- ` 1 !'~r° ~,Y ~ 'i
North Elevation of original 1882 building
III N
I
Y„
West Elevation of 1882 building and 1916 addition
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C R I T E C T 8
ri
!4
i
•L
> t. .rs ys '~5~' ~ - k i~.AAk.••f y J' f..~.ii~ ib ~
T4
~ ,~C ~-.•j1l' y~i a, T'~ y-. J C✓.✓ f ~ p.~-~T A"rz►a" y"' ...Ai -
East Elevation of 1984 Library addition with historic school beyond
.I r r ~
1
N
Existing portico on Southwest corner of historic building
to removed for new elevator tower
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C(,/~ H- I T E C T S
1F1• ~~~y ri `r ~~1 r
or
I, r {J a i i`
4 -
l ~
t'y•
Reconstructed cupola
South Elevation of historic 1916 building
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C a I T E C T S
r ~ 2~
S~-
I_
_ yN.i 14R+►~.1
East Elevation of 1950 Classroom & Gymnasium addition
r
iZ4,1 /
Jt z~ _ _ I I
T
rf
East Elevation of 1950 Classroom addition with portable classroom to
be removed
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C H I T E C T S
m47!'- fJ ✓f ~ ~ '~f~ ~
' r~ 11111i~~ ~
-44
- _-c,~,tt{. ` PPP 1
4G
West Elevation of 1950 Classroom addition with the 1916 historic
building beyond
_ ra+v~ 'Tat+3tsl~~'4 i~'
ark ~,r ]
I M) P
}
41-
I':tip
i •i
Northwest comer of 1984 Library addition
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C 11 1 T E C T S
.a '
r,
WA,
~ t
Existing playground at south end of site
fir' yS• ~ ~ ' S~ ~t ` f t `f
t:
Looking east towards playfield
S L A T E P P A U L L
R C U 1 T E C T 5/
.ice 51
10,9
f 9
tiffs r
I` M`
I i L ~ 1
1976 Gym Storage addition to be removed
h
Ln'
Y ( y ~ •-Kr~r~`"''-n'om'
4CL
~ l
Portable Classroom building to be removed
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C H I T E C T S
City of Boulder Planning and Development Services
J
LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION
Date of application: July 9, 2009 Case number: HIS 2009-00102
Property address: 2008 Pine Street Historic District/Landmark name: Whittier School
Applicant name: SLATERPAULL ARCHITECTS Relationship to project (e.g., architect, contractor): Architect
Phone: 303-607-0977 Mobile phone: Fax: 303-607-0767
Applicant's mailing address: One Park Central, 1515 Arapahoe St., #400, Deaver, Colorado 80202
Street City State Zip
Property owner's name: BVSD - Dave Compton Daytime phone: 303-447-5081
Property owner's address: 6500 Arapahoe, PO Box 9011, Boulder, Colorado 80301
Street City State Zip
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Please list all exterior alterations proposed for the property in the space provided below. Please
see the fallowing pages for submittal requirements. All 4 pages must be included in the application.
In submitting this information for review and consultation with the City, please understand that the Boulder Valley School
District reserves its ultimate authroity under Colorado law to construct schools, as has been recognized by the City in the
case of other historic school properties.
The project description is attached.
INITIAL CODE REVIEW
The fallowing applications require initial review and sign off by a project specialist or zoning administrator prior to
acceptance of a landmark alteration certificate application, Please mark all applicable boxes.
❑ New detached construction (accessory structure, garage, new residence, shed, etc)
❑ Dormers ❑ Porches ❑ Fences ❑ All new additions
THIS SECTION IS FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Propery Zoning: Lot Size: Required setbacks: Floodplain:
Prior Reviews (Use Review, PUD,.etc)
Other Applications which may be required based on proposed application:
Preliminary Comments:
t'-rr r r ran ► c H n A a+ a a r a H c r e n J •
trel ~ - `e Kr a e a sc° 4 n er ne x_
K s t ICrr rr:Hre cnl rn`A rry- n n Y ere IHn. fat
i L p 1 1- i n J7frC 4 l I ] 7' I A J f H f r .1 1 tl✓ A Y+`} fr K K M1 H►~ 6 M 4 n r•
' f` ! t. Y ! r r[ 6r [~'QT a rF~Yi „Y C.f•G••R Sr` R 4 } ` r. r#F°r r• f,1iY rC~•r_ rtr KnG ar R h ~ AGr •IF -rirG f • G A ° v Al.nr,~rR N ~~r
r L
r r S r HFCC / f M n ff 1 r- t 5`rr F A 1. + Cr- ^ c n r hA. A r A {[hurl fr4`T-2' 4 K r
_t'.:. r r r r . f r t _ t' fuYrlr.'. 9rnA?f fJar.H• I 1!' •:ti 4 .n Y`R--
. - .e" r..r rr~r` r n ` ~R`n"r•°. -w`IIAye [r°Ar. -
Reviewed by Date:
Mis section is a customer service revrew,-und does not constitute o forma! review of off opplicabie codes onci regulogons. All sections of the
Souider Revised Code must s0lbe adhered io prior to erforr~in bn work.
Please submit this completed application, along with the required information outlined on the following pages to a project
specialist. Applications for the design review committee must be received on the Friday prior to your requested design
review meeting. If you have any questions, please call (303)44 7-1880 and ask to speak to a historic preservation planner.
We look forward to working with you on your projectl
LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION (Page 2)
Shown below and on the facing page is a list of the most common types of alterations. Please check off the
type of work you are proposing and follow the application requirements listed to the right.
TYPE OF STAFF REVIEW
ALTERATION: City staff may review common types of applications, which involve rninor alterations. This
(Please check all type of review can have a quick approval turn-around providing the applicant submits a
that apply) complete application form with documentation and the proposed alterotions meet the
® Landscaping applicable design guidelines.
® Paint A complete application submittal includes:
® Roofing ❑ This application: Completely filled out
❑ Fence (rear / side yard only if ❑ Plans and elevations: All drawings should be to scale, with dimensions, and as
maximum 5' tall with minimum detailed and clear as possible, whether or not an architect or contractor is
1" spacing between pickets) involved. Both existing structure and proposed changes should be shown.
Fences: bring to-scale drawings showing dimensions and spacing between
❑ Restoration of Existing Features pickets.
DOWNTOWN ONLY: ❑ Photographs: Comprehensive color photos of the structure and of details that
relate directly to the requested alteration are required.
El Commercial awning
❑ Samples: Color chips of paint are required. Printed samples of roofing types are
❑ Commercial patios helpful.
❑ Commercial signs
TYPE OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (LDRC)
ALTERATION: City staff and two designated members of the landmarks board review applications for alterations
(Plecse check all to buildings or special features and determine within 14 days after a complete application is filed
that, apply) whether or not the proposed work would have a significant impact upon or be potentially
❑ Deck / porch detrimental to a landmark site or historic district. Large projects usually require more than one
Elevator gmeeting and may be referred by toe Committee to the full Landmarks Board for review.
® Doors /windows 1916 bldg
The following documentation is required to initiate review by the Design Review Committee:
❑ Dormers / skylights
Elevator~a ~ This application: Completely filled out
® Additions 1916 bldg I~ Photographs: Photos of existing building and surrounding context
❑ Fence (front yard or
rear / side yard if over DO Drawings: All drawings should be to scale, with dimensions, and as detailed and clear
5' tall or less than 1 " as possible, whether or not an architect or contractor is involved. Both existing structure
spacing between pickets) and proposed changes should be shown. Examples are available if needed.
❑ New garage / accessory The following documentation is required for final review and approval:
building (340 sq. ft. and X Scaled site plans: including existing and proposed site plans
under) N Elevations: usually 1/4" = 1' scale including existing and proposed elevations
❑ Other ® Materials: Specific materials used should be noted on plans. Samples may be requested.
M Colors: paint/stain color chips
IO Photographs: photos of existing building from all sides and existing context
❑ Manufacturers/catalogue "tear' sheets
❑ Fences: bring to-scale drawings showing dimensions and spacing between rails.
* Note the r❑enderingsl in the application packet depict color and materials; samples not provided.
The following may be requested prior to final approval:
❑ Building sections []Methods of restoration []Study model or 3-D simulated model
TIP: For large or complex projects you are encouraged to contact a Historic Preservation Planner early in your project before
detailed drawings are completed.
All completed applications for LDRC review must be turned in by noon on the Friday prior to the requested meeting. Please note
that your requested DRC meeting may not be available due to scheduling. The Committee meets at 9:00 a.m. every Wednesday
(except holidays) at the P&DS Services Center on the 3' floor of the Park Central building, 1739 Broadway. Please call and ask for
a Historic Preservation Planner if you have questions with any of the above alterations or submittal requirements.
LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION (Page 3)
LANDMARKS BOARD (LB)
TYPE OF New free-standing construction greater than 340 square feet, or the demolition or moving of
ALTERATION: structures requires review by the entire Landmarks Board. A public hearing is required in order to
(Please check all issue an alteration certificate under these circumstances. The full board meets once a month,
that apply) usually on the first Wednesday. Submittal deadlines are listed on the following page. All
applications must be submitted to a project specialist by 4:00 pm 20 days prior to the hearing.
❑ New free-standing Public hearings must be held within 60 days after a completed application is received. All public
construction hearings for landmark alteration certificates are conducted as quasi-judicial proceedings. After a
(over 340 sq ft) public hearing, a Notice of Disposition is served to City Council regarding the recommendation of
the Landmarks Board. The City Council has 14 days to call up a decision to approve a landmark
alteration certificate application made by the Landmarks Board. If the Landmarks Board votes to
❑ Demolition deny a landmark alteration certificate application, the City Council has 30 days in which to call up
(includes primary the decision.
and/or accessory buildings) A complete application submittal includes the some as that required for the Design Review
Committee as listed on the proceeding page plus the following items:
® Application called
up from DRC Previous Page requirements (Listed under LDRC)
X Written project description
~I 10 folded copies of project drawings, showing existing and proposed conditions (preferably
24"x36") plans, including:
0 Scaled site plan (existing and proposed)
Scaled elevations for all sides of the building (existing and proposed) at
1/4" or 1/8" scale.
■ Sketches, as needed
X 10 copies of any color renderings or photographs, color samples, etc. (preferably no
greater than 11 "xl 7")
X 1 reduced (8 1/2"x 1 1 copy of all materials submitted
At the request of staff or the board, the following may also be required as part of your application:
❑ Building sections ❑Methods of restoration ❑Study model or 3-D simulated model
TIP: Projects which are required to be reviewed by the full board should be presented to staff early in your project before
detailed drawings are initiated. Please contact us prior to submitting an application as these projects and reviews are usually
complex. We encourage you to complete the initial code review section on page 1 of this application prior to contacting us,
Call (303) 441-1880 and ask to speak with a Historic Preservation Planner.
I agree to perform the work described herein, in accordance with the plans and/or specifications submitted and-wRh-
alf--provisions-of-t-he-Historic-Freservetion.-God- e; $dijdtng--Eode-caning-Ordinence--ar4 eolth--Regulations--of the-Cify-
oi~Boulder-*s-enumerote44n-tie-Betrlder-Revised-Code, 1-981- "See project description
Signature of owner or authorized agent for owner Date
Contact Us:
Planning & Development Services - Historic Preservation Program
1739 Broadway, 3`d Floor
Boulder, CO 80302
(303) 441-1880
Htip://www.boulderhistoricpreservation.nef
LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION (Page 4)
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Date completed application received by Planning and Development Services
Date of initial DRC meeting
Date(s) of follow-up DRC meetings
Date of Full Board Hearing
Date Application Approved/Denied
Date of Building Permit Review
Date Case Closed
Date case sent to imaging
2009 Landmarks Board Meeting Dates and Application Submittal Deadlines
Landmarks Board meetings are generally held the first Wednesday of each month at 6 p.m. in the Municipal Building, Council
Chambers room, located at 1777 Broadway. Landmark Alteration Certificate applications scheduled fora public hearing before
the full Landmarks Board are due by 4:00 pm 27 days before the meeting date. All applications must be submitted through a
project specialist.
Board Meeting Submittal Deadline
February 4 January$
March 4 February 5
April 1 March 5
May 6 April 9
June 3 May 7
July 1 June 4
August 5 July 9
September 2 August 6
October 7 September 10
November 4 October 5
December 2 November 5
ARCHITECTURAL
Existing Building History and Assessment
Built in 1882, Whittier International School is a designated Historic Landmark, Colorado's oldest
continuously operating school. A subsequent historic addition was constructed in 1916, and major
additions added in 1950 and 1984. The site is located on a compact building site bounded by
residential properties. The site constrictions and the historic fagade informed the team on the building
expansion. The playground and fields located to the east will require careful design for efficient use of
space.
Whittier is the only primary International Baccalaureate School in the district. A student population of
323 is funded for this facility.
The current building size is about 35,123 square feet. Additions totaling around 10,000 square feet
are anticipated as noted below.
Architectural Design and Materials
Using the historic building and subsequent additions as architectural influence, the new additions
respond in scale, proportion and materiality to the existing school. The additions have brick veneer
exterior walls with precast concrete banding, window heads and sills. The Kindergarten addition
matches in height to the adjacent 1950 building with similar roof fascia. The Cafeteria addition
includes a shingled, gable roof as a modern response to the language of the roof forms on the historic
building. Aluminum windows are proposed for the building additions, referencing size, proportion and
groupings from both the historic school and the recent Library addition.
In keeping with the guidelines from the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation the intent
of the new additions is to provide a design that is compatible with the existing school while creating
architecture that is clearly of its own time.
Addition Summary
Music, Cafeteria and Kitchen: The 5,920 square foot addition to the northeast, is located adjacent to
the playground and fields. This addition includes a cafeteria with a new kitchen, a music classroom,
student toilets, new group instructional rooms and support spaces. These spaces are included to meet
the schools educational programmatic needs as defined by the bond.
Kindergarten, Art, Computer Classroom: A 4,075 square foot classroom addition to the east adds a
kindergarten a classroom, a new art suite, a computer lab and associated support spaces.
Elevators/Lift for Accessibility
Accessibility issues have been addressed by providing a lift between the main entry level and the first
floor of the 1916 building- In addition, the school district made a decision to add an elevator to the
historic building that will allow ADA access to all floors of the building. The elevator addition is about
64 square feet
Renovation Summary
Administrative Office Area: Interior renovations will move the administrative area to the main entrance
of the school off of Pine to address school safety and security issues. The current school administrative
offices will then be renovated to provide the programmatic need for classrooms and group meeting
spaces within the historic portion of the building.
S~
l
s
.i
i
View looking west down 20th Street
' ire v:+:a ~1,.~ * -
I at
jJ6
-r
AL,
~ r
rH ssb - r,~~.
i
a -
Adjacent residential neighborhood
S L A T E R F A U L L
A R C H I T E C T S
" }At `
North Elevation of original 1882 building
.l f 4 f C
Y ~ w rF
f
West Elevation of 1882 building and 1916 addition
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C H[ 7 R C T 9
1
i
East Elevation of 1984 Library addition with historic school beyond
or
•r
Existing portico on Southwest comer of historic building
to removed for new elevator tower
S L A T E R P A U L L
A H C H I T B C T 9
8* ~ Icy
Reconstructed cupola
South Elevation of historic 1416 building
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C H I T E C T S
AL
East Elevation of 1950 Classroom & Gymnasium addition
v
East Elevation of 1950 Classroom addition with portable classroom to
be removed
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C H I T E C T S
~Iv
s
jjji
I
West Elevation of 1950 Classroom addition with the 1916 historic
building beyond
i
es.
Northwest comer of 1984 Library addition
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C H I T E C T S
R J-
~l
Existing playground at south and of site
C'f'
.rf l ~ry
-
ti - I
Looking east towards playfield
S L A T E R P A U L L
A R C H I T E C T S
r-~~ 5. N -.•L"
4 Tr.•?. ~ ~.~::ey Y.. LafS.~'a.A 1.. ^~Y ,.i-~.. -
1 976 Gym Storage addition to be removed
M
tz~
I
Portable Classroom building to be removed
S L A T E R P A U L L
A H C 9 1 T 8 C T S
r
' ' 11
f' JI II _
11 rr. I _
-
I
a -
n
III
rip! z
I
I:
ELI:,
r
19 A 1-1 In A
n
£
.r_ - ti -,L-'
_ - - _ . - - _ -
;
_ a.. T;R- - - I- -
i ~ . , : . , - ~ .y~
f - -
15- r -.'cy" `G. It t:. ti ' `.t - - - -'f1 s' 1 '
-
L_
«I t rr I r, cj; r - - L 1 H. i,-a, _ ~I F_ 1 _ fF,r re c .
I YU,.
i -'J "I 1 1 r_ ri,.. S JI, _~r-Y - L pT l.~•n "r •1 - - I-
_ -•I~.JY ' - - ::*G . - .tv ,L,..,_ - w'- - f hs~.'Ixr q it
t _ J
~ V t~,111-7!4' 1-- - 11 _ _:_L,- A ;,2, _ . , . ~
` V
, r. - -
' - "I
. - -
~ - - 1
-
y f
. :J. _
! 1 t 1
I _ . ,
, : . ,
`
G , :..r., • - - rf -.r '1: r
M1 1 i'r A t
1 I
t
_
4 r F
.
, -
I
.
_ - _
a _ - a - r x,~....'. •:G:,. q - U.
F-,ti
v a i - i
1
f I J.Z r. T :.L t I' '
'r" - 19•. 4: - - 7 -
r a, ,Y
r JJ
. I : 1 l : 1 ♦ , f'O, I' 1 -
:a. J., . .r, - 1. y.. Phi. .
r
. i r.. Ilr . . -e
a-, w. r,y.. 1- .L. t .L.= ?
r:.
LLL , x r!, - I P, ,
c„ t.,-,. - :.,-.,,s of
,
rte-.-. s, : ,;-I;:._- V,, , r:'P _ Y I .;L
, - t r Y
r - -ia
„ - ,c . el.
L : - v. Irv r .
~a ! c'.
..,I... I.. -4.t :..r „J, r,._, ,4 :cam' 3' , 1'- ti. ,iJ `Y r' 1'
1 3 Y-,
- _ - - r..i -..:i, •..v, J.. t.,, •w; r-%. i C `L t-? t ,i-:.. t - f' R.
h.. ...t,. i.:: : T, -
- f
_ 1 d
t'.- f(i7 .✓r 1 . 1. X - r',,
. - I.
.!r':. N .x.. . y
ti 4'
J„- r,, . '"ems _u. u', . .c 3° \ s h, 4...
r
f
S
rr-JL _r - r. r:.+ T• ..r-. -i w r-:_: y S 2, -.Z / .Z -
-.>r+.. :`-5-..x'74 _ .:•_v ,J- ,.y. . r. 1
-~7, . ,w~.:- r. _r, ii ,..Y.1_ -1` .,5r,,~. h,. =-•v
Y.1' ..c "r ..r_o= r_.., w -r r -•a. _r~ •~"y"' v_ 't ,_i. L1
ro r_
- a.. r rY s s,
r._ 'rfS%. ' _
17 , ..•T- a Jj" r. r w. --d - j I_ - ' T -r - - f .1 : •'•t.
. , _ -.:fir. .m. .:;.t i - Y~
"C' ,at. -J., .r q . - :r.G ,J;...y rs-...I p sr. c/ . - f- ~.a1~~ r f~:. rr cc•,..• s : a r `ti
'sv ,-_N_ ....r vi,."YJ . . 1 f. --.r-„d- ,....Y .,s/~. - -_,v ••..:F ~e~r 7G'- ll _ acMu .3- --Y -f Y:._
. t _.f :a.^` NF I . _~Y- vT.s lr~~ y I_.1`SZLG
yK
t-f''•;:y~. .::.i c. -::T J`.~=• j' .Y -h Z>: !~:x' -
1' -F ~ .C•. N. p. ~ ! ~.`L'-r_. 3`'•-• ,~C 1'~• 'J' l- hb W f ~.•rY-. •l i- - 'ti
-.=:V'"J'~...-..•:.._ ~.'-..y Y w. .T.., ..-:A .....r -Y J4 _.7 -J._.: F.. r ''.'.f '4' _'4r"'.':'L.' ['S
_q ~f"r- . •Gtr,^ r, .j_,.rr ~.I- ''.t;- d-: ~•s:' - %J ~.Ji • .-n - ',F - t
_ - Y _ ,4 r..-_. ✓`:c_, ..~FTr.~: t'• yr i6L• ,7rrf• Y•'r,"'#,,. v
p~:r zi. :r f: Y. t ".1.' •.F i=} :Y?,' - .4 _.7 ~ "~rt(~ r' -^x i..'tr. ~'l
. ,.~I'... «-:.3.-•?. `r-'~..r!~-_ a~~•<-b' _ y..r, ~c .W .e.. Y.r- -"tiS- r. .5 .d' y. .i -F ~In
_ _.r - - : - ~ ea-, r , :f,,.: o- _ .-~,-r ^3-T2't ":,x.a: ii,• - .`;b -
_,,~n?.., _ -.a <P-.: - .r .-.f_-R..-..-_- .rr _ `t, 3-. °"s-:j:av n-'-iti-. cr :~~ti ~-.5'._.: _!'•1--a .rk,'--' .i - N.'
{ra~'ry
f.. 5.> y 'f~ 3--. '%t _4-.r<• ,t.7 1tr'Hi• ..ir`„" :l"
...ern, ,
- '~f" °.f• - r '.rl' a. f, ~,J•.r 1. - ~ ,.T 'Cr3,: .
V - --j• , 1. ~_•a. ...ter-_. s ~ .-`r.. _--.,a .-_~.-r... - . -a r _ - i.
I s
w rf r ' ~
l\ 1
y.
i
F
r _ t
J•• I yy}.'~/:I[~,1/ A%~ Cam' f s""
_ 'iii
r
SYC !
..~'.r-~ i li ~ i .m~o.y ' ~ \ r r,• Ili ~ .tfu - -
r II IvJ f~ _ `
C r':
I
- X41 ~ .Y
s rJ ~ r tit z } ~ ~ 7 •1 ~ I z ~
I •,,ti
h-I
I 1 ~ I' `~Y a-
7