2 - Draft Minutes - Landmarks - December 3, 2008 CITY OF BOULllER
LANDMARKS BOARD
December 3, 2008
1777 Broadway, Council Chambers Room
6 p.m.
The following are the action minutes of the December 3; 2008 City of Boulder Landmarks Board
meeting. A digital recording and a permanent set of these minutes (maintained for a period of
seven years) are retained in Central Records (telephone: 303-441-3043). You may also listen to
the recording on-line at: www.boulderplandevelop.net.
BOARD MEMBERS:
Nancy Kornblum
Leonard May
Tien Plass, Chair
Lisa Podmajersky
Jolui Spitzer
*Andrew Shoemaker *Planning Beard representative without ~ vote
STAFF ME1'IBERS:
Sue Ellen Harrison, Assistant City Attorney
Debra Kalish, Assistant City Attorney
Susan Richstone, Long Range Planning Manager
James Hewat, Historic Preservation Planner
Chris Meschuk, Historic Preservation Planner
Juliet Bonmell, Administrative Specialist
1. CALL TO ORDER
The roll having been called, Chair T. Plass declared a c{uorum at 6:10 p.m. and the
following business was conducted.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On a motion by N. Kornblum, seconded by J. Spitzer, the Landmarks Board approved (5-0)
the minutes of the November 5; 2008 board meeting.
On a motion by N. Kornblum, seconded by J. Spitzer, the Landmarks Board approved (5-0)
the minutes of the November 19, 2008 board meeting.
3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
4. DISCUSSION OF LANDMARK ALTERATION AND DEMOLITION
APPLICATIONS ISSUED AND PENDING
Acacia Fraterl~ity Building, 955 Broadway Street
C. Meschuk informed the board that the stay-of-demolition on this building expires in
January which makes the January Landmarks Board meeting the board's last opportunity to
1
schedule an initiation hearing. Staff did not recommend that the board schedule an initiation
hearing. The staff recommendation was based on examination of the building and discovery
of the numerous alterations that had been made to it.
Ron Mitchell, 955 Broadway noted that this building was not functionally, socially, or
economically viable and supported its demolition in order to replace it with a more
appropriate and functional building..
Abby Daniels of Historic Boulder, 1123 Spruce Street, noted that Historic Boulder does
not currently have a position on this item.
On a motion by J. Spitzer, seconded by L. May, the Landmarks Board moved (3-2, N.
Kornblum and L. Podmajersky opposed} to schedule an initiation hearing for the Acacia
Fratenuty building located at 9S5 Broadway Street before the stay of demolition expires in
January 2009.
5. ACTION 1TEMS
LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS
A. Public hearing and consideration of an application to designate the house and property
at 89617th Street as a local historic landmark per Section 9-11-5 of the Boulder Revised
Code, 1981 (HIS2008-00188) Applicant: Landmarks Board, Owner: Estate of Hazel Barnes
Board members were asked to reveal any ex parte contacts they may have had on this item.
T. Plass made a site visit and received. a phone message from an attorney at Hutchinson, Black,
and Cook, the law firm that is representing the estate of Hazel Barnes, who expressed concern
about the process that is moving forward, but that they would not be opposing the designation.
N. Kornblum, L. Podmajersky, and J. Spitzer made site visits.
L. May and A. Shoemaker had no ex-parte contacts.
Staff Presentation .
J. Hewat presented the item to the board.
Public Hearing
Abby Daniels, Historic Boulder, 1123 Spruce Street, spoke in support of landmark
designation.
Motion
On a motion by N. Kornblum, seconded by L. May, the Landmarks Board recommended (5-0)
to City Council to designate the house and property at 896 17`h Street as a local historic
landmark, to be known as the Hazel Barnes House, Ending that it meets the standards for
individual landmark designation in Sections 9-I1-1 and 9-11-2, B.R.C., 1981 and adopted the
staff memorandum dated 12.3.08 including the following as findings of the board:
The Landmarks Board found, based upon the application and evidence presented that the
proposed designation application, subject to the conditions of approval, will be consistent with
the puzposes and standards of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and:
1. The proposed designation will protect, enhance, and perpetuate a building reminiscent of past
eras, events, and persons important in Iocal and state history and provide a significant
example of architecture from the past. (9-11-1(a), B.R.C. 1981)
2. The proposed designation will develop and maintain appropriate settings and environment
and will enhance property values, stabilize the neighborhood, promote tourist trade and
interest, and foster knowledge of the city's living heritage. (9-11-1{a), B.R.C. 1981)
3. The proposed designation draws a reasonable balance between private property rights and the
public interest in preserving the city's cultural, historic, and architectural heritage by
ensuring that demolition of buildings important to that heritage will be carefully weighed
with other alternatives. (9-11-1(b), B.R.C. 1981).
B. Public hearing and consideration of an application to designate the house and property
at 1904-1912 & 1918 ~/2 Pearl Street as a local historic landmark per Section 9-11-5 of the
Boulder Revised Code, 19$1(HIS200$-OU263) Applicant: Landmarks Board, Owner:
R.ingsby Family LLLP c/o Wise McIntire
Board members were asked to reveal any ex pane contacts they may have had on this item.
T. Plass, N. Kornblum, L. May, and A. Shoemaker made site visits.
L. Podmajersky and J. Spitzer made site visits and received public emails.
Staff Presentation
C. Meschuk presented the item to the board.
Public Hearing
Brad Hahn, 623 Concord, property purchaser who also represents the property owner. He
spoke in support of landmark designation for the cottage at 1918 '/2 Pearl Street.
Public Hearing
Leonard Thomas, 3135 23`d Street, spoke in support of the staff's recommendation to limit the
landmark boundazy to the area directly surrounding the cottage. He also felt that the Landmarks
Board should not review new construction.
Abby Daniels, Historic Boulder, 1123 Spruce Street, spoke in support of landmarking the
alley house at 1918 %2 Pearl Street.
Motion
On a motion by J. Spitzer, seconded by L. May, the Landmarks Board recommended (2-3, T.
Plass, L. Podmajersky, and N. Kornblum opposed) to the City Council to designate the alley
house and a portion of the site at 1918 '/2 Pearl Streeet (including the entire site east of the west
wall of the current Lund Hotel) as a local historic landmark, to be known as the Lund Summer
House finding that it meets the standards for individual landmark designation in Sections 9-11-1
3
and 9-II-2, B.R.C., 1981 and adopted the staff memorandum dated 12.3.48 including the
following as findings of the board:
FINDINGS
The Landmarks Board found, based upon the application and evidence presented, that the
proposed designation application, subject to the conditions of approval, will be consistent with
the purposes and standards of the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and:
1. The proposed designation of 1918 '/2 Pearl Street will protect, enhance, and perpetuate
builduigs, sites, and areas of the city reminiscent of past eras, events, and persons
important in local, state, or national history and providing significant examples of
architectural styles of the past. (9-11-1(a), B.R.C. 1981)
2. The proposed designation of 1918'/2 Pearl Street will develop and maintain appropriate
settuigs and environments for such buildings, sites, and areas to enhance property values,
' stabilize neighborhoods, promote tourist trade and interest, and foster knowledge of the
City's living heritage. (9-ll-1(a), B.R.C. 1981)
3. The proposed designation of 1918 '/2 Pearl Street draws a reasonable balance between
private property rights and the public interest in preserving the City's cultural, historic,
and architectural heritage by ensuring that demolition of buildings and structures
important to that heritage will be carefully weighed with other alternatives. (9-11-1(b),
B.R.C. 1981).
4. The primary building at 1944-1912 Pearl Street, known as the Lund Hotel, has been so
significantly altered that it is not considered to be eligible for local landmark designation.
The above motion failed.
On a motion by N. Kornblum, seconded by L. Podmajersky, the Landmarks Board
recommended (3-2, L. May and J. Spitzer opposed) to the City Council to designate the alley
house and a portion of the site at 1918 '/2 Pearl Street as a local historic landmark as defined in
scenario 1 on pages 13 and 14 of the staff memorandum dated 12.3.08, to be known as the Lund
Summer Ilouse, finding that it meets the standards for individual landmark designation in
Sections 9-11-1 and 9-11-2, S.R.C., 1981 and adopted the staff memorandum dated 12.3.08
including the following as findings of the board:
1. The proposed designation of 1918 %2 Pearl Sheet will protect, enhance, and perpetuate
buildings, sites, and areas of the city reminiscent of past eras, events, and persons
important in local, state, or national history and providing significant examples of
architectural styles of the past. (9-11-1(a), B.R.C. 1981)
2. The proposed designation of 1918 %2 Pearl Street will develop and maintain appropriate
settings and environments for such buildings, sites, and areas to enhance property values,
stabilize neighborhoods, promote tourist trade and interest, and foster knowledge of the
City's living heritage. (9-11-1(a), B.R.C. 1981)
4
- - ~ -
3. The proposed designation of 1918 '/2 Pearl Street draws a reasonable balance between
private property rights and the public interest in preserving the City's cultural, historic,
and architectural heritage by ensuring that demolition of buildings and structures
important to that heritage will be carefully weighed with other alternatives. (9-11-1(b),
B.R.C. 1981).
4. The primary building at 1904-1912 Pearl Street, known as the Lund Hotel; has been so
significantly altered that it is not considered to be eligible for local landmark designation.
L. Podmajersky offered a friendly amendment to provide appropriate signage to celebrate the
rich cultural history of the Lund Hotel on Pearl Street and to direct pedestrians to the alley house
at the rear of the property.
N. Kornblum accepted the friendly amendment.
Brad Hahn expressed commitment to celebrating the history of this property and is amenable to
providing signage.
J. Spitzer and L. May supported landrnarking the house, but voiced that their dissent to the
motion was specific to the desire far a larger landmark boundary.
The board recessed at 8:47 p.m. and resumed at 8:57 p.m.
C, Public hearing and consideration of an application to designate property at 1777
Broadway Street as a local historic land~m?ark per Section 9-11-5 of the Boulder Revised
Code, 1981 (HI:52UU8-UU227} Applicant/Owner: The city of Boulder
Board members were asked to reveal any ex parte contacts they may have had on this item.
T. Plass, N. Kornblum, L. May, J. Spitzer, L. Podmajersky, and A. Shoemaker have all
made site visits.
Staff Presentation
C. Meschuk presented the item to the board.
Public Hearing
Abby llaniels, Historic Boulder, 1123 Spruce Street spoke in support of landmark
designation.
Motion
On a motion by T. Plass, seconded by J. Spitzer, the Landmarks Board recommended (5-0) to
City Council to designate the building and a portion of the site at 1777 Broadway Street as a
local historic landmark, finding that it meets the standards for individual landmark designation in
Sections 9-11-1 and 9-11-2, B.R.C., 1981 and adopted the staff memorandum dated 12.3.08 as
findings of the board. The board recommended the landmark be named the Boulder Municipal
Building, and the landmark boundary be established as shown and described on page l5 of the
staff memorandum dated 12.3.2008.
5
DEMOLITIONS
D. Public hearing and consideration of a demolition permit for the house located at 607
Forest Avenue, per Section 9-11-23 of the Boulder Revised Code, 1981 (HIS2008-00234)
Applicant/Owner: John Goodson
Board members were asked to reveal afzy ex parte contacts they may have had on this item.
T. Plass made a site visit, reviewed the project at a Landmarks Board design review committee
meeting, received emails froze the public, and received e-mails from Council Member Cowles.
A. Shoemaker has passed by the house numerous times.
N. Kornblum received emails from the public and made site visits.
L. May made a site visit and discussed the ordinance with someone in the neighborhood.
L. Podmajersky has passed by the house frequently.
J. Spitzer made a site visit, reviewed the project at a Landmarks Board design review committee
meeting, and received emails from the public.
Staff Presentation
J. Hewat presented the item to the board.
Applicant Presentation
John Goodson, 607 Forest Avenue, spoke in support of demolition.
Public Hearing
Kay Bingham, 3235 6tn Street, spoke in support of a stay of demolition to ensure that the
character of the neighborhood and the surrounding environment will be protected. She supported
changing the process so that buildings could not be demolished wiles it is known what will
replace them.
Fiona Schlacter, 3251 11th Street, noted that if the process is changed it must be changed for
everyone to ensure fairness.
J. Goodson replied that he was waiting to obtain the demolition permit before developing
definite construction plans since it is a costly undertaking.
Motion
On a motion by J. Spitzer, seconded by L. May, the Landmarks Board imposed (4-1, L.
Podmajersky opposed) astay-of-demolition for the building located at 607 Forest Avenue, for a
period not to exceed I $0 days from the day the permit application was accepted by the city
manager, in order to explore alternatives to the demolition of the building, and adopted the
following as findings of the board:
A stay-of-demolition for the building at 607 Forest Avenue is appropriate based on the building's
historic significance {constructed in 1937), and the building's architectural sigtuficarace (it is an
intact example of pre-WW II Minimalist Traditional architecture in Boulder).
E. Public hearing and consideration of a demolition permit for the house located at 3119
11th Street, per Section 9-11-23 of the Boulder Revised Code, 1981 (HIS2008-00241)
Applicant: Ellis Construction, Owner: Mark and Dana James
6
Board memfiers were asked to reveal any ex parte contacts they may have had ora this item. '
T. Plass made a site visit, received emails regarding this project, and reviewed the project at a
Landmarks Board. design review committee meeting.
N. Kornblum made a site visit, received e-mails regarding this project, and received a phone call
from a neighbor inquiring about the process.
L. May received e-mails regarding this process.
L. Podmajersky revealed no ex-parte contacts.
J. Spitzer made a site visit and received e-mails regarding this project.
A. Shoemaker made a site visit, received e-mails regarding this project.
Staff Presentation
C. Meschuk presented the item to the board.
Applicant's Presentation
Dana and Mark James, 311911"' Street, owners, spoke in support of a demolition permit.
Public Hearing
Fiona Schlacter, 3151 llth Street, spoke in support of a demolition permit.
Beverly Potter, 3201 11th Street, spoke in support of a demolition pernlit.
David Ellis, 1037 Diamond Ct., contractor for the project, spoke in support of issuing a
demolition permit. I le argued that this is an opportunity to create a more "green" house by
improving insulation by allowing their requested remodel.
Rob Fisher, 29803 State Highway 72, Golden, CO, architect for the project, spoke in support
of issuing a demolition permit. As a preservation architect he did not see aspects of this home
that would qualify it as a landmark- he thought this building was an old building rather than an
historic one.
Motion
On a motion by N. Kornblum, seconded by I.. Podmajersky, the Landmarks Board approved
(S-0) the demolition permit for the house located at 3119 11 t'' Street, finding that the building is
not eligible for designation as an individual landmark and does not contribute to the character of
the neighborhood.
LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE
ITEM SF HAS BEEN POS"lPONED TO THE FEBRUARY 2009 LANDMARKS BOARD
MEETl'NG.
F. Public hearing and consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate to rehabilitate
and construct atwo-story, 5,000 sq. ft. rear and side addition to the landmarked
Temple Bowron House at 1547 Pine Street, per Section 9-11-18 of the Boulder Revised
Code (HIS2008-04055). Applicant: Craig Bundy, Architect, Owner: Clifford 1. Neuman
6. MATTERS FRO.NI THE LANDMARKS BOARD, PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND
CITY ATTORNEY
A. Planning Board Calendar
7
C. Meschuk updated the board on 800 Arapahoe.
J. Hewat updated the board on the code changes issues and penalties which the board will
discuss further at their January meeting.
J. Spitzer inquired about the status of 1507 Pine Street and why it keeps getting postponed.
J. Hewat replied that this item will be reviewed in February because the applicants were unable
to attend tonight's meeting.
T. Piass drafted language for revisions to the Historic Preservation Code to increase protection
for non-designated historic resources that he requested the board's feedback on during their next
special meeting.
The Landmark Board's next special meeting will be scheduled for Wednesday, December 10,
1:30-3:30 p.m.
The University Hill plan will be discussed by Plantung Board on 12/18 during which a member
of the Landmarks Board should be present. T. Plass and L. May volunteered to attend the
meeting.
A. Shoemaker announced that he is taking a 3 month sabbatical to spend time in Australia and
New Zealand. The next Landmarks Board meeting that he will attend will be in April 2009.
The Landmarks Board was interested in scheduling a joint meeting with the Planning Board once
new board members are chosen in. March.
7. DEBRIEF MEETING/CALENDAR CHECK
8. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:57 p.m.
Approved on December 30, 2008.
Respectfully submitted,
Chairperson
8