Loading...
5B - Application to amend the designation of the Boulder Depot (HIS2008-00175) - 3151 Pearl St MEMORANDUM August 20, 2008 TO: Landmarks Board FROM: Susan Richstone, Long Range Planning Manager James Hewat, Preservation Planner Allison Hawes, Preservation Inte» Chris Meschuk, .Preservation Planner SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of an application to amend the designation of the Boulder Depot, City of Bouldcr Landmark 79-6, per Section 9-11-9 of the Boulder Rcvised Code, 1981 (HIS2008-00175). STATISTICS 1. Site: 3151 Pearl Street (new location address) 2. Zoning: IS-1 (Industrial Service- 1) 3. Owner: Boulder Jaycees/City of Boulder 4. Applicant: Bouldcr Jaycees/City of Bouldcr 5. I.ot Size: n/a 6. Date of Construction: 1890 7. Original Ordinance Number: Ordinance 4444, adopted on August 21, 1979, recorded September 10, 1979, Reception number 358647 S"I'AFF R1ICOMMENI)ATION: Staff recommends that the. f .andmarl~s Board adopt the following motion: "t'hc L<ndmarks Board _recomincnds amendment of the landmark designation for the Boulder Depot to City Council to revoke the existing boundary as described in Ordinance 4444, and establish a new boundary as presented in the memorandum dated August 6, 2008 The board further recommends that the landmark be renamed the Bouldcr Jaycees Depot. As part of this recommendation, the board adopts the following as findings of the board: [NllINGS '['he application and evidence presented in the proposed amendment of designation for the Boulder Depot as outlined in the staff memorandum dated August 6, 2008 is consistent with the purposes and standards of Sections 9-11-1 and 9-1 1-2 of the Boulder Revised Codc. S V'L~1~~ldatn'~~l~~~r ~-r,~n~:`I1!~ I~I ~r~'i ~'~AL:nilntul~ ;:•mcn~~r~a,' ~ i'~:; I I; Ih~;ipe~uinn :At>>uJtc~,it AL m~~:±~~. Agenda Item #SB Page t SUMIVIARY ¦ The purpose of this review is for the Board to determine whether the proposed amendment and revocation conforms with the purposes and standards of Sections 9-11-1 Legislative Lztent and 9-11-2 City Council May designate Landmarks and Historic Districts, as outlined in sections 9-11-9 Amendment to Designation and 9-11-10 Revocation of Designation of the Boulder Kevised Code (BRC). ¦ On June 3, 2006 the City Council passed Ordinance 7473 authorizing the City Manager to purchase the depot #'rom the Boulder Jaycees, and to relocate the depot to the transit village area. ¦ Based upon analysis of the building's history and architecture, it is staff's opinion that it has retained significance under the historic, architectural, and environmental individual landmark significance criteria (1975), and the historic preservation ordinance, and that the landmark boundary proposed for the relocated building will appropriately maintain the setting for the building. ¦ Staff recommends that the board find that the amendment of the Boulder Depot landmark designation conforms with Sections 9-11-1 and 9-11-2 of the Boulder Revised Code and recommend to City Council the approval of the application for an amendment of the landmark designation, adopting this staff memorandum as findings of the Boar-d_ BACK(~1tOlJND The Union Pacific Depot was built in 1890 on the north side of Canyon Blvd. at 14`~ Street. It was used as a railroad passenger station until 1957, and from then until 1973, it was used as a bus terminal and travel agency. In 1973, under threat of demolition by the city, the Boulder Jaycees purchased the building and moved it to the Pow Wow Rodeo Grounds at the northwest corner of 30`I' Street and Pearl Street, adjacent to the then extant railroad tracks running parallel to Pearl Street. In 1979, shortly after the building was moved and rehabilitated, it was designated as an individual landmark by the Jaycees. The rodeo grounds were converted to the Crossroads Commons shopping center in the early 1980s, and since then the depot has been surrounded by commercial development. Several attempts to find a new location for the depot were made in the past several decades, but none were successful in finding a viable location. In 2006, Regency Partners (owner of Crossroads Commons) again expressed a desire for the depot to be moved to accommodate redevelopment of the site. The city, the Jaycees, and Regency collaborated to find a solution. On June 3, 2006 the I3oulder City Council passed Ordinance 7473 authorizing the purchase and relocation of the depot. The city of Boulder is cur~ently under contract to purchase the 1890 Depot from the Boulder Chapter of the Jaycees, with an agreement that transfer of ownership to the city will occur when the building is lifted off its current foundation. The Landmarks Board and the City Council approved a Landmark Alteration Certificate to relocate the building in 2006 arrd 2007. The city of Boulder has applied for the designation amendment, with the consent of the Jaycees (see Attachment B: Letter from the Boulder .laycees). The amendment is to establish a new landmark site, and remove the designation on the 1979 site, as that property will no longer have historic significance. 'T'his amendment is not intended to revisit any of the historical or architectural significance, however, the history since 1979 has been updated and is included as part of this analysis. S:U'LAN\data\lon2rang\H [s"[\DEPO'I\landrnark amendment\08 06.08 LB Designation Amendment Memadoc ~i;enda Item #SB Ya>;e 2 BUILDING DESCRIPTION & 1IIS1'ORY The Union Pacific Railroad constructed the depot at 14`~ Street on the north side of Canyon Blvd, along the Union Pacific railroad tracks which ran down Canyon Blvd, then known as Water Street. The building was built from stone quarried from the Anderson Quarry in Skunk Creek Canyon, located just west of 1\CAR on Open Space. Designed in the Romanesque Revival style during the Victorian period, the Boulder Depot was one of the few depots in Colorado constructed from stone. The building appears to have been designed by the Union Pacific Railroad company, and measured 89 feet by 34 feet, with a bay facing the tracks. The building had a baggage area, men's waiting room and restroom, women's waiting room and restroom, and a ticket office. The original plans depicted an open air pavilion on the end of the building; however it appears it was not constructed until 1901. The building continued to serve as a passenger depot unti 1 1957, when a new passenger depot was constructed just east of 30`h and Bluff Streets. From 1957 to 1973, the building served as a bus depot and travel center. In 1973 the city intended to demolish the building to connect 14"' Street to Canyon. Historic Boulder and the Boulder Jaycees stepped in, purchased the depot from the city, and moved the building to the Pow Wow grounds. The Jaycees restored and rededicated the building on July 4, i 976. In 1979 the Jaycees applied to designate the building as a local individual landmark. During this period, the Pow Wow grounds were being considered for redevelopment as a shopping center. After several attempts to relocate the depot from its present location, in 2006 the city of Boulder, the Jaycees, and Columbia Regency Retail Partners, LLC agreed to relocate the depot. CRITERIA FOR THE BOARD'S DECISION: 'T'his application is to amend the designation of the Boulder Depot, as described in Ordinance 4444. Section 9-11-9 Amendment of Designation states thal "designations of a landmark or historic district may be amended to add or remove features or property to the site or district". The section goes to on state that the procedure to be followed is that of the designation process as outlined in sections 9-11-3 to 9-11-8 of the BRC. Because the building will be moved to a new site, the current property as designated in Ordinance 4444 must be removed. Section 9-11-10 Revocative of Designation states that if a building was lawful]y relocated, the owner may apply to the landmarks board for a revocation of designation. Section 9-11-5(c) Public Hearifzg Before the I.aedmarks Board, of the lstoric Preservation Ordinance specifies that in their review of an application 1'or local landmark designation, "the landmarks board shall determine whether the proposed designation confor-rrrs with the purposes and standards in Sections 9-11-I Legislative Intent, and 9-11-2 City CouncilMay Designate Landmarks and historic Districts". 9-11-1: Legislative Intent states: (a) The purpose of this chapter is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare by protecting, enhancing, and perpetuating buildings, sites, and areas of the city reminiscent of past eras, events, and persons important in local, state, or national history or providing significant examples of architectural styles of the past. It is also the purpose of this chapter to develop and maintain appropriate settings and environments for such buildings, sites, and areas to enhance property values, stabilize neighborhoods, promote tourist trade and interest, and foster knowledge of the city's living heritage. S:\PL.AN\cata\lon ~ran~t\HIS`I1r>fiFO'Nand:nark amcndmenP.08.06 08 Lri Uesi~uation Amcndruertt Memo.dec Aeenda Item #SB Page 3 (b) The City Council does not intend by this chapter to preserve every old building in the city but instead to draw a reasonable balance between private property rights and the public interest in preserving the city's cultural, historic, and architectural heritage by ensuring that demolition of buildings and structures important to that heritage will be carefully weighed with other alternatives and that alterations to such buildings and structures and new construction will respect the character of each such setting, not by imitating surrounding structures, but by being compatible with them. (c) The City Council intends that in reviewing applications for alterations to and new construction on landmarks or structures in a historic district, the Landmarks Board shall follow relevant city policies, including, without limitation, energy-efficient design, access for the disabled, and creative approaches to renovation. 9-11-2: City Council Wray Designate Landmarks and Historic Districts states: (a) Pursuant to the procedures in this chapter the City Council may by ordinance: (1) Designate as a landmark an individual building or other feature or an integrated group of structures or features on a single lot or site having a special character and historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value and designate a landmark site for each landmark; (2) Designate as a historic district a contiguous area containing a number of sites, buildings, structures or features having a special character and historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value and constituting a distinct section of the city; (3) Designate as a discontiguous historic district a collection of sites, buildings, structures, or features which are contained in two or more geographically separate areas, having a special character and historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value that are united together by historical, architectural, or aesthetic characteristics; and (4) Amend designations to add features or property to or from the site or district. (b) Upon designation, the property included in any such designation is subject to all the requirements of this code and other ordinances of the city. To assist in the interpretation of the historic preservation ordinance, the Landmarks Board has adopted significance criteria to use when evaluating applications for individual landmarks. `fhe criteria are included in Attachment C: Sikni~icance CritE:ria. The Board may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the application. Findings must be adopted within 30 days of the hearing date. Should the Board disapprove the application, the Board must notify City Council of that action within fourteen days of the hearng date. City Council may call up a decision disapproving a designation. Should an application be disapproved, the same application may not be submitted for a period of one year. S:\PLANldata\longran~\HIS7IDF.PO'T~landrnark arnendment\08.OGA8 LI3 Dcsignatio~ Amendment Merno.doc Agenda Item #5$ Page 4 1f the Board finds that the proposed designation amendment confor-rns to Sections 9-1 1- I and 9- 11-2 of the code, it shall adopt specific findings and conclusions approving or modifying and approving the application. If the Board approves the proposed designation, the application will be forwarded to City Council (within 100 days) for a public hearing. ANALYSIS: Staff's analysis is based on the criteria for review as delineated above. A. Docs the amendment and revocation request meet the criteria established in the historic preservation ordinance and is the amendment to the designation necessary? B. Does the proposed application protect, enhance, and perpetuate buildings, sites, and areas of the city reminiscent of past eras, events, and persons important in local, state, or national history or providing significant examples of architectural styles of the past? C. Docs the proposed application develop and maintain appropriate settings and environments for such buildings, sites, and areas to cnhancc property values, stabilise neighborhoods, promote tourist trade and interest, and foster knowledge of the City's living I~critagc? D. Does the proposed application draw a reasonable balance between private property rights and the public interest in preserving the City's cultural, historic, and architectural heritage by ensuring that demolition of buildings and structures important to that heritage will be carefully weighed with other alternatives? A. Does thc~ amendment and revocation request meet the criteria established in the historic preservation ordinance and is the amencbnent to the designation necessary? Staff finds that the proposed amendment application is necessary to designate property beneath the relocated building, which was approved through a landmark alteration certificate and ordinance 7473. Furthermore, staff finds that the revocation of designation reyucst is consistent with the criteria in the ordinance, as the building was lawfully relocated through a landmark alteration certificate. B. Does the proposed application protect, enhance, and perpetuate buildings, sites, and areas of the city reminiscent of past eras, events, and persons important in local, stale, or national history or providing significant examples of architectural styles of the past? Staff finds that the proposed application would continue to protect, cnhancc, and perpetuate a building and site of the City reminiscent of past eras, events, and persons important in local history and provide for a significant example of an architectural style of the past to be preserved. Staff believes that the application meets the historic and architectural criteria fo.r individual landmarks as outlined below, which was adopted to assist in the interpretation of this section of the ordinance: ti `f'L~1V~„lat~llon~i.ei~1lll,ti I`l'k {'l ~ I~Lie~lni:,i~. am.ndmcal'J1:i (in UI. I ft ; ~:~-~~u.lticrti Arucu~m.:ni i'~h nr~ A~~enda Item #5B Page 5 Historic Significance Summary: The depot has historic significance under criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4. 1. Date of Construction: September 26, l 890 Flaboration: The Boulder County Herald reported cm April 2, 1890 that men from the LJ.P. Railroad came to Boulder fvr the purpose of locating the new depot. They believed that Boulder was a beautiful town and said that the "U.P. Road would do what it could do tv build up the place." By the end of April 1890 work had begun, and by August the work was almost complete. The depot was formally dedicated on September 2C, 1890, with a band and dancing, speeches and a banquet, with dowers decorating the waiting room. 2. Association with historical Persons or Events: Development in Boulder, World War I, World War II, Spanish American War, Boulder Streetcar system, Pow Wow Grounds, Boulder Jaycees Elaboration: The Union Pacific Depot was the departure and meeting place for many who came and left Boulder, including those soldiers who passed through the building to serve in several wars. "I'rvops would gather with their families upon their departure, as well as their return from their duties. When regiments left or returned, or when dignitaries and presidential candidates arrived in Boulder, the Depot was the meeting place. The Depot is also significant to the development of Boulder, as many settlers who came to Boulder around the turn of the century passed through the Depot. When the depot was proposed for demolition, Historic Boulder and the Boulder Jaycees stepped in and saved the depot, and relocated it to the Pow Wow Rodeo grounds. 3. llistinction in the Development of the Community of Boulder: Settlement, Association with travel, Historic Preservation Elaboration: The LJnivn Pacific Depvt was the departure and meeting place ;for many people in Boulder, including many settlers from the turn of the century. The establishment of a permanent, stone depot in Boulder signified the prosperity and success of Boulder as a developing town. At the time of the proposed demolition of the depot, and its subsequent move by the Jaycees, other significant buildings in Boulder were also saved or demolished, including Central School and Highland School. Many consider the preservation of these three buildings, the genesis of the historic preservation movement in Boulder. 4. Recognition by Authorities: Colorado I-Iistorical Svciety, Numerous Authors Elaboration: The Univn Pacific Depot has been included in publications by several authvrs, including the series Over the Shoulder by Jane Barker Daily Camera, September 19, 1976; The Switerland 'frail of America by Forrest Crosson 1962; Boulder County An Illustrated 1-Iist~ by Thomas J. Noel and Dan W. Corson; Boulder: Evolution of a City by Sylvia Pettem, 1994; Boulder in Perspective: From Search fvr Gold to the Gold of Research by J.B. Schoolland, 1980 as well as being recognized by the Colorado Historical Svciety. Architectural Significance S:IPLAN\dataVom~rang\HIS`11DEP0"illandmark amendment\08.06.08 L.B L)esio anon Arnendrnent Memo.dac A~e~da Item #SI~ Ya~e 6 Summary : The depot has architectural significance under criteria 1, Z, 3, 4 and 5. 1. Recol;nized Period/Style: Victorian Period -Romanesque Revival Style Elaboration: The stone depot is designed in a Romanesque Revival Style during the Victorian period, best described in the book Bonanza Victorian: Architecture and Society in Colorado Mining 'Towns by Eric Stochr•, 1975. In the book, he states: "The Victorian train deport, a place ol~ glamour and excitement, was designed to look the part. 1t was the center of the community and the only reliable link to the outside world, as most roads were blocked by snow and mud for months. ...The railroad depot evolved a uniquely fU11CtlOnal style of its own. The long, narrow structures stretch along the tracks. They are characterized by a hip or pitched roof with a sweeping bracket-suppor-led overhang reminiscent of the ltaiian influence. The overhang sheltered passengers on the platform and made it unnecessary to build pillars. ...Although most depots were constructed of wood with clapboard, tongue-and-groove, or board and batten siding, an occasional brick or stone example can be found. The common one and two story depots include, on the first level, large, open passenger waiting areas, freight and baggage storage areas, a ticket office, and a control room with characteristic bay window for a clear view of the tracks. The second floor, when present, usually served as the stationmaster's quarters. Wainscoting is common both inside and out to protect the walls against baggage cart collisions, and a yellow and brown color scheme is traditional." 2. Architect or 13tiilcier of Prominence: none known Elaboration: It is believed that the building was designed by the Union Pacific Railroad company. 3. Artistic Merit: Stone walls, cupola, roof dominated foam, projecting bay h;laburation: The rough cut, random ashlar pattern of the peach sandstone walls, with lighter buff sandstone quoins and window sills. The mortar joints are ovcrlayed with a nark mortar applied in a vine, or rope style. The cupola on the building is not original, but is a reconstruction done during the Jaycees ownership, but still adds to the artistic merit of the building. The large half round arches, projecting bay, and roof dominated form are all characteristic of the Romanesque Revival style. 4. Example of the Uncommon: none observed indigenous Qualities: Rough cut quarried Stone walls Elaboration: The stone used to construct the depot came from the Anderson Quarry, in Skunk Creek Canyon, near Chautauqua. According to the historic context report Use of native Stone in Boulder Construction by Silvia Pettem and Ed Raines in 1999, references to the Anderson quarry appear as early as 1882, associated with Eric Anderson. The Denver Times on May 23, 1899 stated the "Anderson yuan•y is located 1 '/z miles south of Boulder and is operated by the Wood Brothers. Stone is very compact, grayish, stratified sandstone and dips 70 degrees east. Notwithstanding this extreme pitch, the various openings demonstrate the removal of large quantities of stone. Many houses in the: city of Boulder are built of this stone and present a beautiful appearance. The main product at this lino: is sills, caps, dimension fcir trirnminR corners and rubble. The price of ibis tiAI'I.AM~ctaUoa~_r:~n~?~IIlS I'~I~I~.I'( )'lll~in~l~n;ir:: ;t~ncnd:ncntAO~ 11(,_UR LIS I~c,tiF;n~ir,on Ameudincn[ Al~u:~~ ~I~,c A~cnda Item #SB PaQe 7 stone, delivered on hoard cars, or in Boulder is as follows ~ -building stone $L40 per perch. Rubble stone, $0.90 per perch." C. Does the proposed application develop and maintain appropriate settings a?:d environments for such buildings, sites, a?zd areas to enhance property values, stabilize neiglzboritoods, promote tourist t?-ade and interest, and foster knowledge of the City's living heritage? Staff finds that the proposed application would develop and maintain a more appropriate setting and environment for the building to enhance property values, promote tourist trade and interest, and foster knowledge of the City's living heritage. The setting surrounding the building is not the historic setting, as the building has been relocated twice since its construction in 1890. However, the location of the building (as relocated in 2008) could be considered appropriate as it is adjacent to railroad tracks, and will be located between two significant transit stops (bus and rail), which will continue to promote tourist trade and foster knowledge of the city's living heritage. Environmental Significance: Summary: Staff believes that the depot has environmental significance under criterion 4 only, due to its recent relocation to an area currently vacant, but planned for significant redevelopment in the near future. 1. Site Characteristics: none observed 2. Compatibility with Site: none observed 3. Geographic Importance: none observed 4. F.nvirunmental Appropriateness: Adjacency to the railroad F.laboratiun: The depot has been relocated twice, and since 1973 has not been associated with its historic context. Furthermore, the train depot, in its original location, was not adjacent to railroad tracks from 1957 to 1973. Upon its first relocation to the Yaw Wow grounds, the building once again was sited next to railroad tracks. Shortly after its relocation, the Pow Wow grounds were redeveloped into a commercial shopping center, and the tracks were removed, with the building surrounded by a parking lot, and later a building was constructed between the depot and Pearl Street, reducing its visibility. The depot, in its second relocation in 2008, will be again associated with the railroad, and given a prominent location in an area to be redeveloped for housing and transit and commercial activities. 5. Area Integrity: none observed G. Other: None observed ti-`i'f. ~„n.~`.1.ri^i,i;i,~\IIIS'I\U~F'(71''.I;in~ln~.~r~: ,u~;..nJnn~nlAII'n' Uh 11R f.li (h'sl~2n:~.u~v ,Ac~~ n;lnu~nt V1cmo.dUc Agenda Item #SI3 Page 8 Boundary Analysis _ _ _ When designated in 1 X79, the boundary of the landmark site • matched that of the (ease parcel 1 ,~a, ~,,o*~:.•••.~~~••~-~~~_. - upon which the depot sat, measuring ~ ~ • r 145 feet by 50 feet, or 7,250 square ~r • 7 feet. The depot footprint itself - ~ ~ ~ measures roughly 4,000 square 1•cet. ~i 1 ~ _ • ~-.~i i l-:~~ The 2008 site of the building is ; located on property owned by the ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ` ~•~PF\N•;~• , _ - city of Boulder, directly adjacent to ~ land owned by the Regional " f- ~ Transportation District (R'1'D), aLl of ~ Y~Jfl«A1~,N,~ ~~a:r ao; which is part of an 11-acre site referred to as the Boulder Transit Village. This property is adjacent to the Burlington & Northern Santa Fe Railroad (originally the Union Pacific Railroad). Concept planning for the entire 11 acre site is curYently underway, the majority of the property is presently vacant, the western most portion occupied by Pollard Motors car dealership. The building was sited in a triangle shaped portion of the city parcel, as close to the railroad tracks as possible, and adjacent to a new north-south road is to be constructed, to connect Pearl Street to the existing 33`~ street on the north side ot• Goose Creek. / , i GOOSE CREEk cn . Y U CITY PROPERTY ~ i ~ ~II~~ o O K _J i i FUTURE / I'ro sed I3 • r• • / po ounda y S'I'1Z1~;1~,'t'-'--~ / RTD PROPERTY / Proposed Landmark Rounclary Tllc hrul~t~scd landmark boundary fellows the properly lines on the south and call sides of the building, extending north to the property line at the bank of Goose Creek, and follows the curving cadge of the street right-of-way to complete the western side of the boundary. This boundary encornlr!sses approximately IO,7~1O square feet. Tl!c~ sou~hernrnost anti easternnl~~st ~ `.1'1.;~N`,u:,1a\lon`[rir.,;`IfIS 1'I ~I•I't t l`'.imima:k ;i:r..m!nx'nt\I)r' r~• I it I .,_n,itiua :\n~endiucnt i\1:r~:~ J A t;enda Item #SB Pale 9 corners of the depot are five feet from the property line, and the depot at its closest point is approximately 17 feet from the edge of the street right-of-way, with an average of approximately 22 feet. This boundary will encompass the pzimary view corridors from the street, and from the north looking south clown the street and across Goose Creek. During the landmark alteration certificate process, restoration of the porte cochere and open air pavilion were identified as potential future restoration projects after initial restorative and interior finishes ~u•e constructed, and a use is determined for the building. The siting of the btulding will not allow for the reconstruction of either of these elements completely within the prvposed landmark boundary. Transportation and planning staff believe it will be possible to reconstruct the porte cochere within the future Junction Place sidewalk right of way by use of a revocable agreement with the city. This functional arrangement would allow pedestz-ians to pass beneath the porte cochere on a public sidewalk. If property lines between the city and R"1'D property arc adjusted in the future, or provisions with RTD are made to allow the reconstnzction of the open aiz- pavilion to the southwest of the building on their property, the landmark boundary would need to be amended to encompass the entire pavilion structure. C. Does the proposed application draw a reasonable balance between private property rights and the public interest in preserving the City's cultural, historic, and architectural heritage by ensuring that demolition of buildings and structures important to that heritage will be carefully weighed with other alternatives? Staff considers that the proposed application draws a reasonable balance between private property rights and the public interest. The applicant is the city of Boulder, and supports the designation. ATTACHMENTS: A: Individual Landmark Application B: Written information froze the applicant, Jaycees, and Regency C: Significance Criteria :for Individual Landmarks D: 1979 memorandum related to the designation of the depot. E: Ordinance 4444 F: Historic photographs of the depot G: Current photographs of the depot S:\PLAi'~l\data\longraogllffST\DEYO'IUandmark amendment\USAG.UB LE3 Designation Amendment Memo.doc ~,#;enda Item #SI3 Pa<„c ]0 Attachment A Application for Individual Landman - ~ 2ppg Name of Building: ~/2a ~~,~5,?-v~,`L ~~G~,~/G{,t°,S ~~ij/e~ Date: ~~~/o ~f _ Address: Owner s : _ ~ . ~S Phone: 3v3 ~y/- o~ Address(es): 1 ; .E ^r`' c~-- ~~C1 l Z % e~ ' ~v r-, ''r-~ ~ ~ . A licant: G~ ~(,c~~ o~, ~ hone: 303~y~~- ~ ~ Address: Date of Construction: l~~ ~ Type of Construction: ~f/ n.c- / v C ~g 0~~ Architectural Style / 1'criod: Architect /Builder: ~~C~~o/t.-a/t/~ ~/LZa~C~sSr~ b Condition of Exterior: ~ Additions !Alterations to Exterior: Date of Alteration(s) /Addition(s): Please attacfi a copy ojt/re legal description of the property. Fee X25 (if applicable) ~1 filing fee of $25.00 is required to file an application for designation of an individual landmark. Should the Landmarks Board initiate designation of a property or area, there is no fee involved. I certify that Ure information and exhibits herewith submitted are true acrd correct to the best of my knorvledge.. Signature: ~ i / Address: t ' Desi ation initiated b ~Q ~Ot~- Date: 7 ~D Attachment B MEMORANDUM To: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board From: John Pollak, Housing & Human Services Co-Director Michelle Allen, Housing Planner Date: July 9, 2008 Subject: Request to amend the Individual Landmark Designation for the Historic Jaycees Depot The Union Pacific/Jaycees Depot building, a Boulder landmark, will be relocated soon to land owned by the city Housing Division at the northeast corner of 30''' and Pearl Streets. The move will facilitate the redevelopment of the Crossroad Commons Shopping Center at 28th and Pearl Streets, and provide the opportunity for the building to be restored to serve as a community focal point in the heart of the future Boulder Transit Village. The housing division on behalf of the city is requesting an amendment to the original landmark designation adopted September 9, 1979 by ordinance #4444 to move the landmark boundary to the new site consistent with the tot lines for the housing owned property to the south and east and the proposed new rr>ad right of way to the west (see Attachment A for a map of the proposed boundary}. The building is currently owned by the Boulder Jaycees. "lransfer of ownership to the city will be concurrent with the move. The Jaycees, as current owners, have given the city permission to pursue the amendment and new landmark boundary (see Attachment B, letter of agreement from the Boulder Jaycees). The relocation site is north of Pearl Parkway, and east of Pollard Motors. The Depot will be placed on a permanent concrete foundation. Once the building is positioned over the partially completed foundation, construction will be completed to permanently support the building. Any cracks that may develop along the stone masonry joints during the move will be repaired. The Depot will be placed approximately five feet above the existing grade at the new site to match future grades within the Transit Village that will accommodate development including a new stz-ect and bridge across Goose Creek. The new site and the foundation have also been engineered to enable a basement to be built when the Depot is restored, which will provide additional usable space within the 4,000 square foot building. Once the Depot is relocated to its new site, focus will shift to identifying a permanent use for the building, as well as securing funds to complete its restoration and occupation. The city of Boulder's Housing and Human Services Department will coordinate those efforts. The Depot will remain secured by fencing for several years while fundraising and building restoration activities are completed, and other improvements are constructed on the Transit Village site. For more information please contact Michelle Allen, Division of Housing 303-441. -4076 1 •T Depot Relocation Site ~Y ` ~z~,~ r r ~S } j r1 r ~a 'ir~'~tYfK a-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~5r~ ~ ~d ~ r ° ~ , y F~ ~ r~~~ r.S'-~ Riu ~Tkr r._~ a-_T.~4-T _ > ,,_•.1 ,~'nI z/ r ~t ~]j~,~~„ r1 •i hf 'w'it--~s•r~- ~ 1_ g r tiyxy. ~'_~~y<ti- ~ si 31 , i,~7. JJ1:fS xi~.2~~ ~.~~o ~ _ t ~ •l7 4a",+ t- s _J` w , ~ r, ~ ~ tt J-rY.~ • ~ ~ ,~Si~~, j - f~i .a 1<,.1 np(~~ 1 t,~~Y lrt~f;_-~.~ r ,_.'.11 -~~:~:t tri YN~~ p:~ Relocation Site & proposed t f ~ 1 ~ rl~°r~~~ ,7 . c `~r~ . , landmark boundary • ys ~q 9 r ` s~ .gal ,o, r f t ~ ~ - ~ ~Ft' r ~-71ie r r 1< R- j~ , 1' ~ ~-F'F-'~~{{-~~y j7~`rf' r tr y~ E~ r'xl : rs~ 1. ~ 'i w Ryt ']~~~~IC - ~ k~fl LPi J1Sr'' S~; (:-~1 ti,~ 1 ~ < IK to x~ ~ -p ~ ~ 1 t A - S• i - ~.`js~ x k ? ~ ~ r~ L ••S~~ ~ ~ ~ 114f°!1 l"k~. +a ~a ` S rrA,.'7 1 . ~ jj'pyy~~~JJ ~ i { K i m = 1 yJ la. ~?;k r! ~ Current location~~=~ ~ 1~~ , J ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~YS I~:~; ; r ~ i ~ ~ _ ~ ~y~f~jk~rryi [,s~ 1 • r, pS t r - 3~. Y` 5 •--~iJJiii~,{ r ~ ~ ~ i ~ , I l ~ ~ c n Y 'l:~ ~+y1< _,..t 'p ~~.c'.e~-~'_'= .a i { ~ 'r"'C . 1 jl ~ ~ f 1 , 1 ~ ' .,is . ~e . . ~,~r ,F.;; 1' - - ' lj:~ M 1 S Y ~~q~ a ~ 1 ~ ~ rs-,~'{ '~~ri~' y~j•' y / ~ . ~ t ~ - ~y Jet ~°~.°j~~'~,~'l v';1 ` ~~I r i- r _r~ 5 - , fi a t:t~iy. ~'i~ ~1 } ~ t i~3+~-~a~Rb',?~^"^+~.r~` i t ``^S ~ _ 1lr i , 1 d 1r- - 5 a 2lt~ T •,~„~~ti 1 n ~i w _ rr:. : P45 < 7 7.~ X~! } ` ~+:y.~r ' • ~~~~.~~t/1'.)~~:,f, 257 07-25-2008 117 ~ ,M Borg/her, ~o/®rado Junior Chamber International WorWw~dc Federation of Young Loaders and Enlropreneurs Y. O. l3os lc~.l;;~ - 13onldcr, LO 80308-~;;~ -w~nr.jci.cc/local/boulder-co July 20, 2008 Landmarks Board City of Boulder P.O. Box 791 Boulder, CO 80306 Dear Board members: This letter is to confirm that the Boulder Junior Chamber International (Boulder Jaycees) understands that because of the upcoming relocation of the historic Boulder Jaycees Depot building, the City of Boulder must amend the existing individual landmark designation (Ord. 4444), revoke the landmark designation for the property on which the Boulder Jaycees Depot is currently located, and establish a new landmark boundary consistent with the relocation site. JCI, Boulder understands that the Landmarks Board has agreed to waive the time required between receipt of the application and the hearing considering the request as permitted by Section 9-11-5(a) B.R.C. 1981. That hearing is currently scheduled for your August 6th meeting. JCI, Boulder has agreed to sell the building to the City of Boulder for a nominal fee effective at the time of the move, which is expected in the next several weeks. You may consider the Boulder Junior Chamber International (Boulder Jaycees) co-applicants with the City of Boulder in amending the designation. You may also consider this letter as confirmation that the Boulder Junior Chamber International supports both the amendment application and the waiver of the time requirement. If you have any questions or require further information, please feel free to contact me at the e-mail or phone contacts below. Sincerely, Cz, Curt Darius Williams President, Boulder Junior Chamber International 303-465-5710, curtdariuswilliams@comcast.net _ _ _ t I August 7, 2008 Landmarks Board City of Boulder P.O. Box 791 Boulder, CO 80306 Dear Board members, Columbia Regency Retail Partners, LLC ("Regency") is the owner of the property where the Boulder Depot is etirrently located at 2275 30`x' Street which is more particularly described in City of Boulder Ordinance No. 4444 ("Regency's Property). Regency requests that the Landmarks Board amend the Boulder Depot landmarks designation to do the following: 1) remove Regency's Property from the designated area; and 2) replace the designated area with a new boundary for the location where the Boiildcr Depot will be relocated as generally shown on the attached Exhibit A. This request is consistent with Section 9-11-10 of the Boulder Revised Code, and Section 2(b) of the Contract for Relocation of the 1890 Union Pacific Depot dated December 18, 2006 as amended, between the City of Boulder and Regency. Sincerely, Matt Booth C ~ EYH1131T ~1 Map of Proposed new location for the Boulder Depot vRO f n ~ ~4P ' l.'~ j~ ~ IG . ~ nrrw~ sn~¢r RIOPROPfAT`/ ~J y i I. • .~H . i J~vY QTR , • ~ Y~Dkt i 1 DEPOT LDCATlDtJ N,AP AUG 27 2007 Attachn~cnt C Landmark Preservation Advisory Roard Adopted 9/17/75 Secretary to the Qoard SIGNIrICANCr CRl'1'rRIA Individual Landmark September 1975 On September 6, 1974, the City Council adopted Ordinance #4000 providing procedures for the designation of Landmarks and Historic llistricts in the City of Boulder. The purpose of the ordinance is the preservation of the City's permitted cultural, historic, and architectural heritage. The Landmarks Board is permitted by the ordinance to.adopt rules and regulations as it deems necessary for its own organization and procedures. 'fhe following Significance Criteria have been adopted by the Board to help evaluate each potential designation in a consistent and cyuitable manner. Historical Significance The place (building, site, area) should show character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the community, state or nation; be the site of a historic, or prehistoric event that had an effect upon society; or exemplify the cultural, political, economic, or social heritage of the community. 1. Date of Construction: This area of consideration places particular importance on the age of the structure. 2. Association with Historical Persons or 1?vents: This association could be national, state, or local. 3. Distinction in the Development of the Community of Boulder: "['his is most applicable to an institution (religious, educational, civic, etc) or business structure, though is some cases residences might dualify. it stresses the importance of preserving those places which demonstrate the growth during different time spans in the history of Boulder, in order to maintain an awareness of our cultural, economic, social or political heritage. =1. Recognition by Authorities: If it is recognized by lIistot•ic Boulder, Inc. the Boulder Historical Society, local historians (Barker, Crossen, Frink, Gladden, Paddock, Schooland, etc), State Historical Society, The Improvement of Boulder, Colorado by F.L. Olmsted, or others in published form as having historical interest and value. Other, if applicable. ~~rchitcctural Si ~nificancc 1'hc place should embody those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, a good c~amplc of the a,nunon; he the work of an architect or master builder, known i~ l.i)~tii~;nif-indiv Page 1 of 2 nationally, state-wide, or locally, and perhaps whose work has influenced later development; contain elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant innovation; or be a fine example of the uncommon. 1. Recognized Period/Style: It should exemplify specific elements of an architectural period/style, ie: Victorian, Revival styles, such as described by Historic American Building Survey Criteria, Ging_crbread Age (Maass), 7G Boulder I-Tomes (Barkar), The I-listory of Architectural Style (Marcus/Wiffin), Architecture in San Francisco (Gehhard et al), History of Architecture (Flectcher), Architecture/Colorado, and any other published source of universal or local analysis of "style." 2. Architect or Builder of Prominence: A good example of the work of an architect or builder who is recognized for expertise in his field nationally, state-wide, or locally. 3. Artistic Merit: A skillful integration of design, material, and color which is of excellent visual quality and/or demonstrates superior craftsmanship. 4. Example of the Uncommon: Elements of architectural design, details, or craftsmanship that are representative of a significant innovation. 5. Indigenous Qualities: A style or material that is particularly associated with the Boulder area. 6. Other, if applicable. Environmental Significance The place should enhance the variety, interest, and sense of identity of the community by the protection of the unique natural and man-made environment. 1. Site Characteristics: It should be of high quality in terms of planned or natural vegetation. 2. Compatibility with Site: Consideration will be given to scale, massing placement, or other qualities of design with respect to its site. 3. Geographic Importance: Due to its unique location or singular physical characteristics, it represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community. 4. Environmental Appropriateness: The surroundings are complementary and/or it is situated in a manner particularly suited to its function. 5. Area Integrity: Places which provide historical, architectural, or environmental importance and continuity of an existing condition, although taken singularly or out of context might not qualify under other criteria. fi. Other, if applicable. O~t.t)>signif irldiv Ya;e2of2 Att~ch~nent U ~ . ~;1 City of Boulder '~.,1/-%l„ _ . ~ Council Agenda ~i~Z~~, Abstract Agenda Item ~ ~ Department PLANNING & COJ1f~1UNITY-DEVELOPMENT Dater_~l_r,r:=,/ r r `~l /''i Department Nead Frank B. Gray, Director City Manager Robert G. Westdyke ITEM AND ISSUE: Public Hearing and consideration of the designation of the Boulder Depot as an Individual Landmark, #L-79-6 located approximately at 30th and Pearl Streets: Applicant: Boulder Jaycees BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Boulder Jaycees own the depot and is leasing approximately 7,250 square feet from M & P1 Corporation. This corporation assumed the lease agreement the Jaycees had made with Pow-Wow when the land was purchased from Pow-4Jow. The fity-year lease will expire in year 2029. When P1 & f~l Corporation was appraised that the depot landmark designation would require designating some of their land, the corporation stated that they opposed the landmark designation. The amount of land needed for designation could either be the land immediately beneath the depot, approximately 2,772 square feet, or the land being leased to the Jaycees, 7,250 square feet. The inclusion of either amount of land would not in any way interfere with either the approval of La Belle's site plan nor the construction of the LaBelle's store. the Landmark Preservation Advising Board at its August 1, 1979 public f~~earing unanimously voted on the following motion: >etty Theotokatos moved: the Landmark Board recommended to City Council that the Boulder Depot located approximately at 30th and Pearl Streets and its land leased site be designated as an Individual Landmark. Henry Beer seconded. The vote was unanimous (4-0, King absent). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Planning Department recommends that City Council approve the designation of the 5oulder Depot as an Individual Landmark, #L-79-6 with the amount of land being leased to the Boulder Jaycees ors the accorrpanyinc7 ':andri~arE: site. ' ~ - r } l ~ g~ t Tc-ci'. y,S r.~lrki•"-~_:.{~•,t,' - - ~.t. Memo to City Council - °/&/79 Page 2 Re: Boulder Depot AP.CHITECTURAL SIGNIFICAP•!CE 1. Recognized Period/Style: Victorian - Bonanza Victorian, Stoehr, University of New Mexico Press, 1975 2. Architect or Builder of Prominance: Not applicable 3. Artistic Merit: Not applicable 4. Example of the Uncommon: Plot applicable 5. Indigenous Qualities: The stone used to build the depot came from the Anderson quarry, Skunk Canyon ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE This section does not apply since the depot no longer sits on its original site. .s M E M O R A N D U M August 8, 1979 T0: City Council FROM: Planning Depa rtment RE: Public hearing and consideration of the designation of the Boulder Depot located approximately at 30th and Pearl Street as an Individual Landmark, ~L-79-6 Applicant: Boulder Jaycees STATISTICS 1) SITE: Approximately 30th and Pearl Streets on the site of future LaBe11e's 2) LAND AREA: Approximately 7,250 square feet 3) ZONING: CB-E (Community Business-Established) 4) APPLICANT: Boulder Jaycees Attached to this memorandum is a surr~nary of the research compiled by the Planning Department. The research in its entirety is available for examination in the Planning Department. Based on the analysis of the full report, it is the opinion of the Planning Department that the following Significance Criteria for an Individual Landmark are applicable. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Date of Construction: September 26, 1890 2. Association with Historical Persons or Events: Not applicable 3. Distinction in the Development of the Community: The depot was built in response to the growing need for passenger trains and a more direct link to Denver. 4. Recognition by Authorities: Colorado State Inventory, 1977 Jane Barker, "Over the Sholder," Daily Camera, Septebmer 19, 1976 The Switzerland Trail of America, Forest Crossen, 1962 5. Other: In 1973, the Boulder Jaycees saved the depot from being demolished and moved it to its present location. The depot now stands as a good example of adaptive reuse. BOULDER DEPOT Architecture Eric Stoehr, in his book, Bonanza Victorian best explains the role and the architecture of train depots found throughout Colorado. "The Victorian train depot, a place of glamour and excitement, was designed to look the part. It was the center of the community and the only reliable link to the outside world, as most roads were blocked by snow and mud for months. ...The rail- road depot evolved a uniquely functional style of its own. The long, narrow structures stretch along the tracks. They are characterized by a hip or pitched roof with a sweeping bracket-wpported-overf~ang reminiscent of the Italian influence. The overhang sheltered passengers on the platform and made it unnecessary to build pillars. ...Although most depots were con- structed of wood with clapboard, tongue-and-groove, or board-and-batten siding, an occaisional brick or stone example can be found. The common one- and two- story depots include, on the first level, large, open passenger waiting areas, freight and baggage storage areas, a ticket office, and a control room with a characteristic bay window for clear viewing of the tracks. The second floor, when present, usually served as the stationmaster's quarters. Wainscoting is common both inside and out to protect the walls against baggage cart collisions, and a yellow and brown color scheme is traditional." Early photographs of Boulder's depot show that it was a classic example of western Victorian train stations. The fact that the depot is made of stone clearly indicates that in the 1890's, this community was thriving and prosperous. Additions and Alterations By 1973, when the Jaycees saved the depot from demolition, there had been several changes to the depot. Both the porch and passenger waiting area had been removed and the train station had been converted into a bus station. The conversion, first into a bus depot, and later into the Jaycees headquarters and community meeting rooms exemplify the adaptive reuses of an older structure. 4 !1 1 BOULDER DEPOT POW WOW GROUNDS N~ s tory In 1890, the Union Pacific Railroad built the depot on 14th Street on the north side of Canyon Blvd. (Water Street). It was constructed of Boulder County stone at a cost of X16,000. The Boulder County Herald (W) reported on April 2, 1890, that some men from the U.P. Railroad came to Boulder for the purpose of locating the new depot. They believed that Boulder was a beautiful town and said that the "U. P, road would do what it could to build up the place." Towards the end of April work on the depot had begun. An article dated July 2, 1890, in the Herald stated that, "The new depot at the foot of Fourteenth Street will certainly be an exceedingly handsome building." "The walls are built of Boulder County Stone from the Anderson quarry at Skunk Canon and will certainly satisfy the most fastidious of Boulder cranks of which no city in Colorado can boast of or produce a greater supply." On August 13, 1890 the Herald noted that, "The new depot is practically completed as far as the contractors are concerned. That it is a handsome job and that the builders have done their work well is conceded. The stone work is not to be surpassed in the state. The woodwork is exceedingly well-done and is handsome. A gentleman who has made a critical examination of the work says 'one ounce of putty will cover all the defects in the way of joints, cracks, etc.' The painting is completed and well done. The plumbing is first class and the entire building is a credit to the place...". The depot was formally dedicated on September 26, 189u^^. There was a band and dancing, flowers decorated the reception room. Speeches and a banquet were also a part of the evenings festivities. Over the years the depot survived many attempts to have it removed. It continued to serve as the railroad passenger station until 1957, when a new depot was built east of town. The building was at that time turned into a bus depot and purchased by the Denver-Boulder Bus Comaany and the Travel Center. In 1973, the City made plans to raze the building to complete 14th Street to Canyon. The Jaycees and other concerned citizens thought that tearing down one of Boulder's most prominent landmarks would be a great loss. The Jaycees approached the City and the Pow Wow with the idea of moving the building to the Pow Wow Grounds. IJith the approval of both parties, the Jaycees had the building moved in two parts to its present location at Pearl and 30th Streets. The first half was moved on June 25, 1973, and the second half on September 14 of the same year. `T - BOULDER DEPOT History -2- In addition to moving the depot, the Jaycees restored the building. They replaced the cupola and wood shingles on the roof, and cleaned the sand stone. The interior was remodeled to contain small offices, meeting rooms and a kitchen. It has become the home for Boulder's Jaycees and a meeting place for nor-profit organizations. George Karakehian was the project chairman for the depot restoration. The entire project from start to finish cost $84,688.92. Many businesses donated materials and time to the project as did the Jaycees and other Boulder citizens. The depot was dedicated on July 4, 1976. ~ 1 nFr'_t'rS~`1~'Af`s `-~f> 6~ctr-, f', '7 ~t . z iim .rig;;: - - Attachment E ?tiC ^_?ij£~177 i~k'CIi~1~.~iv~ r''.~':~ir?~~~~'~t~ ~~3 ' t`'-~ "z'Iv~i~z:~.~, it~~>i:,s>3:3~=i.r1~d n f i ~ t?~;~J , ~t~A~.''~':et''c S1 t3F z"I-1.~A-~~`L~~.S~~':?~`v C1~71~ ~'~G~ C:~ ~'Y Y~I(Ja.~~%., L3iJ+ r~1'li.'.1~iL~~ ;.7~~J~`c'.t:]~.~.5_1'#~ A ' G'~'i i?"sr`~x.,{' »((~~77''~~Z c~r,'~l~j f~ tt''~~ri TrLL; iF;~ A ai? 12s ::7.,t: 1 E.i `?tJ' :.d 2a ?:d.:. `S , 3J:l:J ~ jJJ? :`}.i lta 3•.. 3a'`.,_1 ~i rj i <.y.., -a~rr)'~ Tc1H r 'X'' z ~i fi "'S~.~'1~7 a7 >J ty~a~tri~: f~<uu e~~ ix*.r~~,..~3; ai~i.~ ~~~a.~Y~;~i t~_:'~%~ s~a, u .~~3 iR ~filt+t?~~i ~~T. +3Le1t1 . ~~:I~~R~ pu~s~L~r ~~°~,cl'a ~~ha7~s~er ~~1, '°~~-iy.:~t:~z~c lei °S~'Y"<Ji3~`1G~F £_'.t~~~? ~s ~.e u12~'' ?v ' ~ ~ 1~~ z t n ~n ~ ' ~ ~`:'>P o.. ..~;L:~ is .e.~ s7,.~3.~f3E'i ~ ~.~iJ,J, ~.5 ~^~21~~t~., {;~,~;1 ~Gii'CcL':i.~ fc357 L"~£-';y3.i;'~!~%£? i:!B ~ )~F'2t~i:~~~'~ ,3 ~f:;C2tLi:;]X'-.^. ~r^.~~2..Y2~ S~ :i'.7.~~. C~Fr~.~r'iL"L~i {7': :>~:t.:'.l.H.~. >i? } ~ia:C3..iii2 ; 3i:C~1."~ i.~~'i i3y'=s z G~° 2~'>L~~m'~ic ?.rFter~:.~~ en. -sre.~.~i~; ~~?~.%•a, ~,~.5'P_ `l.v :di:~13.(vt1~;I.F,i3(1 C,i %i3E 3'3?J.x-:I~`?- .~3~%:_r'r.'S, ~.~k3uT1'ic1.1?~. ',J~~7C~£'.~3.3;~5 I7EX~~., C~.~ii'S7 r~+T-.ct"lC'T1C't't,~ ~it:~,~Y' ?:e~~ Lc7 ~~k~ :~L~1fi~C:~_s..~ct3~`.t, ~i3Cc'i~C'-a ~`t O~ YF~~?` 31lf.ld c~l':SgY'G 4'r 7~;- ~ b'~~...~.i~:ti~, $ xl7dt~'~i:~^.. ~'ie?iz~!"?~?~ OT'J. i~Ic ;~~'©~~~~rC~ :I.SS'.~~:~ii:..i.~z (.~''c~~Z122 ~Oi3 °,3_tc~ Cs31~.~7 n?LSi r3P,LG~. ~ c~'.t2 ~ .~.,s'~. Fli?~ii~.?°L•:.:u ~Qc3.~ E 'J°1 '130 .I~ t`. t ~ , ~:l~Ii `t".~iCas.t'c1"~'~2?" L_~?s? z~,~3Ci~.3s~~~'x;.^,- ~UcaT.;.A S"?3:~°i`S_~x.'~. i:.i!i? ~~:~~;i•'3,~°C1 ~L;?$Z~i7.~t~~.=.JA7 Vii: ~Yksn.'. iJ :l. i.`y' ~~:fJ lftlt::L~ s=73. ~3:i ~ ~s~l ~)"-l '3~ 2::5 ~ 1 ~r,~~ ;R r :1a .s q T~'F1Lis ~a~C_ fy. 1.~~•'_S~~z~ :i 3i1 ~.L3~:~ L 1 Gii~ ~?`'~sJGS~.1 L"£'~S:L~L?~s,1~C3:? ~'ie g~a~X't'iT~''rA.~; ~f~r1~k..~Au, L1fiCl 1iiF~3~L:it~ ::Li~.2E.'r S.> Y':~i~27~_~'~?Ci ~~i' 3.r2~T ~x t~i.t~~~.a.C ~Ls~`~'t3.i2~ ~'.3 ~~2@ pI'-f"i~~f1s$Q ~°_is33~'YFc.~3.a'722 Y~?~a^ i~Lq~)` tl~.~.tl 3~~~GT'~-' !~i?~ U:'lf';j' 1 Qitra~;zi £?21 c~?3~t.~5:: p~.~, lU4%~, 'It?~ al~.'fJ?Z %~?a ~~3:yi5 vx i~1~ ~:Cp°.~~.Ss~~?.f~4]:~~Ji31~ a3.2s~ '7.2-1r?s"L~ L-~14.. tJ:J~.EC?t..4. ~I'F•It~S {??F'sL f_IlE' }sF~'..5-~~_}.~= SSG'L,3G7_ ;bC'~'P.J ~y p~s„~ss spec:a~ c~s.sa~~~e~• or spec.~3 ai izi~ ~a~7 L.aZ, ares~~~.er~~tia1, } Gtr,!°~~~!°i3 G ~iI'{:SxLS~ O"~' J3~ L1~! :7r'7.~':e,c~i°>?i ~ `zl'y l.~v ~~'Sl~Tia'~? Di1 8S 3 ~.a,S3~iAsa~~s. s 1~:N s 1HFR.Er G , j't` u~ .L~~i ~~T~ w~.d'ti~ff'? ~''~°y`'i2,0?e `~`_rL~i~ 7..S 'L'aC:.%C~~' L~.YS._~zt.c3?"a~ s3~ u. A.caiFC~lriL: L~~ p07.S3:~x?i. ~ .,.......e._.a.e,,...._. De~3Q't iLTle~ c7.S L~'dQ CJ?"~F: C'$DG?`1C~7 i1~., Ldi~.i~i.cZri:. J? `t~ L~'l~ ~f?~.i ~~G~~r;~y ~.~c~«~Pd a.n the i~i~y of ~fluld~~ , Cr~ur~~~ o~ B~~.ltze~ , $~a~E oz Lo ~ rr. aciG , ~arsr~.caaJ.arl~ ~escrz.ue~ r,s fob ? G;,ts z L. t~2Ce: OY .~?T=u ~O:.i3~°f~% :i. tai Jit': i{`~: +3'` `L~!~ s7>V ~ s,' ~?ct3.~23 i~iT ~~.1'Y, il~ui'7 Cep 's:iZ> 7~:1 ~ 1 LC-`5i;»:~~:~£~ =e .4..fl <CSTM1yK> ~..;~I~QXl~Zll~ clL ~~1.: <905'2:'i.3v.~sv t'.`:'t3"ft.'c'2' 4~ $P~t' ~ij ~ j'ri o~r ~°e~. l'[t7 J~', = S to "G.,+-3rJ?"i .,C.i `,.:i1-r:~";~ j J~1°L+~ 31~~,er s i~~~,t'~'~ ~~8% 3ii:JI3~ ti'E~2 :4:3i2:::~~C)t3"~i: i..~~~~e..t~.iaCv f33~' S~.l.i}. e~`~C~7_Oil L'as' ifl n T~4~x2'_' C~2 ti..i3~ ititi~ l.i: Y: 1- ~~1~'^•l"~•tr?C''}' .R.;~ S1E jJ~ ~Iir. vfl fl1c1f3i: ,3'~tC~ F:?~fi'1:1G:CiS ~n O~ ~ , `~11?::__ ~ 1 ~'<`";5' :'sL~?' Fitl ~ ~..'7-~5 .'.r' ~ ~s`'F? %1~ U??~ 8ci 3_C? ~4'~.flT_'~1~L5 "-+~:2~~ ;~iQi1~IY~:~T_z ~ = Y. ~'s.'flr~.t~ c a ~a _~~$1ti°L~:!~=-~rayy~..~.{c~~ ~h~~{~?t~.c `T ?5 C3~ ~~i i~~,~3 ~`'~e~~r ~':.LG', ~~l3L~i L~ V4, a1S':t~:L171K~t.!4170 '~'i3iO~ili."~C'{3:3~x.3I'i~~.22~ ~L`i S~-p".1.~'.~,r.~y" "n5y ~~i,~,s'{j :t~C.E. '~'1?'z-'S'iCr '1!~°~~' ~eV~e' bl, i{~~JI'.~~~yU L~i~'. ~YLZr'iL~a ~ 3.~~~{f .~d ..r. ~}'t 9 a'V . ~1 c '1!3~S'?.:p i'~ ~u°~~a' i?~~.~{~ ~Q~1r ~p tiles "L'ii.~:ir .~iJv.e' `..3.4 ~~0 L'~1~i~.C~.°-?'z;~~:ic:.S fl~ i~1~ ~i~"t1,~:~iG::'.' ~~~:*3v ~'s3~.Cit'? 'p'e.r'v? 1.L,`f ..w... '~°S?~'al~.t~UYI 7.17f;LL`.Ci.`~.. '=~5 i~3.S,'~~?ir'';~C~T2 ~1`i ~h^~. EI:~°~in.4'~%iil~i:~ a!: ~.~3~ ~L~??r!Y2I33~.~:f `e9? »~'11C~ +.3 ~ I.~S f3a=f'i i'~ i?^--.~~ ?3~3:., t'. ~t'.T i-'aSl'.fl~tS£' ~~fl '~3;.;'a il+??t't ~fli l3"+cS$flI3£~.`aN' 't.»r't3.'?.8 °vi1C~i ~~70YJ~.:L 1?»i~': ;mc.~'~~ :iL~F3~.+~~» +_L`i 71.=f~~?~ cfl2T~l::3..~:L'?:~; 1.rS ~Ti.C:~.C~~"?~.71 8»t_`72~2C~.+~»21. St:j'~.~c,. C~:~2cr~'??: Sg3.s: Cel Llv3'3_@,'.iTs =dg~X':3~ C~ ~:~~:3i•S fl?- ~r~'i~ Tl~i2~t~'~i~~i2 +:~'7tf..i1'L';'•T, :1.'Cj Tlt~il:jXl '+.~v~~~a 3v~t?.L "C ~i L3':Il 8~oi~P_ a.?:"f3~: L's1%: d~ifli:"i.~r'~ti ~ c»"~~ ~ L,I~'!p% v~i:~~±Y"1Y3; ..13:t~ i2:'a'L"f21"alp t9F.'e.£ L7i ~~lcv i~t: aL`~f3i' ~ai'~Gt,'. ~i7~» t~.~;':i 1 1T1 ~~o3.C?»~~+i?. ~:tl ~i'~.?I+I ~'SIL'S2 G~'!?s:r~.C: i~e~ ZSf':?trS :~I~ ':JLi~ i~? i"i;~ L ~;y~ ~ 3 e ~ a:: :-t 5,- o ~ a r. 1 ~+.3 t. ST::C'13^~il»~° Si1U'12~C~. ~7~ `~~'~'S~"t'ti~L~.. ~^.Lt:..Ji°!. `l ~ ~:~.1:j' ~+"e1.:13,E:? .I. ~'~?ri~S iSr i~?f~ x~?3~'E~,07.i'3~; .3 ;;,,ilC~iXtiT~t Q~'c:3.uK~'ZLa~1.~1Z1 ~.S i?i^~t~SSiT~ L':J ;S3'~ou'la~fi' t~'12 ~}11~T~..C~3uJ3 i:.'_~3+ 532~?L'~ ~:?'lf~ v~c~ .apt ~ ~itq Cot~`~i:i ~ d~~s it ap~ro~r~ ate ~:I-lr~?: s o»t.z~aaCf~'~ h~ .~u~lishy~ ~y c? t.~ ~ ~:~~y ~ ~.r_ec~.s the a~i~y s~~~_rk ~-o ~Fals,~ awa~la~,~~e ~s ti;;, cf`ri~:~ eo;~~~~ o~ Cie ~;~~t o£ the o-~•;~~~'~.arc~ :~U;" ~aa~lic i.s~s~azc~'?c~n ard -1c~,l~.isi~inn. ~ii:q ~ui~.'clci< fur~Yl~~ ~.ir~crs t~3e ~ ~ ari;~z~:g ~c~ar~3vnt. ~o ~-~Te ~r~~~ notice of tt~e c;e~i.~xtatic~~3 t~ 3 ~,=~1? i.0~1°_1~~ ~;YiTt2S ?2L~ CctllSG' ? C_O~iJ LJF CCtxs 4'~'(~l%?cl?'iC° ~O :7f.'. ;'::CO~"CICd~ as prQ'~rid~Q sec c ~ o~~ 5~ -3C5 ~c~ o£ R2,rz~~c± ~7de _ I:UTF.C~Di.3C;~:D, AiID 0~?}i~P,~;() ~'U13~ ~S~-Lll ~zr ~ ~..CLL Oi~?;_.`.? E.1•t~s 2.?st day or it.t;~t~t ~.i), 7_;'7U, , ~ .~f'Zy jr i^~% S i". / /~1 ~ LY.-O~~iClO Ciii~y C' @T1C r ~.a~? ~;ra s~~~~~ ~~,nz.7c, ~~~ss~.o, ,~~;~rz~n, <<~~1~ cx~~;~~v ~'~i:~LTS~;~J ~Y Ti'R,L 0~•1LY ~~tiz~ _~)-ch ^ day Ui Ssp%em~~ez~ t~ ~ ~ i 9', ~ . 1. ~ ~ ~ ,-~r: ' ` L /I ~ i J ; ~L_~i'?CtGY O{- L'•? :13i1C@ ?12ci~ F~C^,OY'~ ¢i r~ - ~ ~'i~eTi CF COL^.i'.~.~ , ~ CC'JDi?"Y Ps rrCi3T,LEt., t'Y4't CF ~OtiI,7~~, y k, ~.~.h~J? G' ) l "_2: , 17irazt+~r of '~zrsncc ~en3 ?~on3 L>~3 ^cY. GYiitio re t, C3~u a? 4s'-1. C'ii:6 zr, :.i:e _cuat.y aad orate t2:9!~.s:._.f ^,o ~_r::7 c-_:i.y tiaiafi tYa f~:~goirg asr~ra:ta L". inr~~l~;~_,: .+scr aea~ oa :ixst xeatlirg at a x~craszr :zea~+ng az Sae Cisy G~w~c9.:t ~.ai6 C:.'ry, h_.78 ca ~5z ~~S°i;r~ day ~.:agLiSi, 7~ + c--wit: ca 2ne ~`=~~~3aa of t~iif't2afi v....4. 1~.D. 19._..,.....M .:zed that o.£*_zd~ds i..s. 39 r7J , S c-~a3~zd the s:~ Lo be ~.z~s{~i~d ib;+ .~.Y?a c:i;.y, s~.s~';~.f, in Ya`t~ s+=:iaia3 ~~aa of aair] x..12; ft3~~ 3~<• aria , a ~r:rn r of aan-anal Lir.vlation cabi.iats: 3 in ~s3 e'"acyj , an+i tita.C sa.ec3 aublzca^.:ioii a~ :aU.~ L; n c?~ys ~e-.fore '`he ~.-ans~e cf s3id praznarxce. ~ ~`rzcbv •..~~ify t~1 'L a foteyoi..-g prainazeQ wss zzfte±ywa.~3a duly ar.B zegul~Ay ~.:csyd ,a~ ::he C•1±:~ Caauzcix of stick City Gra :;¢cen3 reading s4. II zcyulzr ree^a.irsr~ ire-eof za%r3 0,: pse ~ ~t3 ~iy ~x ~~~'~t2~.3~J£.3, t\. D. ~S_?Q , ._r~d '+.d~at tucrtiai2ter. Lo-,,-zt: 0~1 2h2 f.i: day oA~~ ~2~~:~£'1~i3>31' ~_._~,~,.53_ ~°v~~ r is su~~° LRr. aa=.e o-e ~ ~ui;.J:ed tby i.t].C ~.LC _S.~':11~57S~x~ c'ca official n3~r. ? - r sw. ??~xt~'3_ ~Y ha+:d acs X~.e. ?:eZ'..,3~ ..~,~;~:ri2y c£ ~tu7~ez 3zer7.Lro^l ix¢d. t..i> I A.T.J. i Q ~ ~ `~:4.'~ "~'7.A~ ~ ! 1 ~ ~ / l1 ~ ~I r ~{~pa ~:rf~`'~~'~ ~ '•,1 A?x°~tor;~i t"'ira,tce :_srd fi-~cor7 P °:°j~ n^a; O'=ic:..o Citaa Ci:er:~ S~z~'~t i-J `o t~ ~~•~~'~~~~`snt Kim J . r -r Attachment ~ - - r _ .k ir, - _i ~ -y+ - . ••t ~ t. ~ ~ - .a 4 - __-'--4th' t. ~ "F 1,.._ tT 4~- t`!~ - _ __'Tu!A ' --..~..+.o~ ;lnirw'~l,is~ _ tl~ ~~~Fr~.~:. ..r,s - .i .t ,:J '~;tir T ~ ~__ri -_-u ' - - - - _ t7 l_~. _-~.._~_.c.,~. 1 ~ ilk Parr J' . _ _ _ yy~~r,.~,77_~? i .~,,7,ii'~"` '~~~7' ~ - - - _ i~~~. ~,N _y Y~ t.~ ~ --:ham ~(~j~ i - ~ - ~ ~ L.~ >K~' 'EiY~~i I M. / -'gy'p ~•'.7Li .s_ 4 t. ~ 4t - - _ t, - - _ - - _a_ ~i.•~ u cc~ _ ~ ~r ~ c ~e F ~L _ fir." Il rl~~`t~ fiz u - `y t:., L._.i ~~t ~~-.1T C LJ t. J. 'za Y ~ ,(}fir _ ~ .air _ _ _ _ = 7Mi~. _ _ _ .l - - _ _ ~ zt~/~ ~~i:F"y-~Z.6 {~tn~-c 7~ } .'+~°3 , Y ' 4 1~~~ ~1 ~ o ' ~ ~ ~ Attachment G _a.:~sa:_ _ eLr 4. w1e A __s_~ t _ y~~ _ t y_p_~~s I t~'t~~ i i~t~~rs~'~i t 7. +u.. [`~''t ~ u <t~~~ a -<i E r ~ ~ J ~ ~ 's ' t s :,~n i' °Tyyy"~-T~ ~i:`k r~ ~ L, f L~ ~ ~'V 7 y sF. aouro~a~r„tfs + r~ ' `z• t~' ~ -4= v ~~r ~S. ~ ~ ~ ~'.~a! r"_ :1: f rte. ti}t +~Y 2 YT . : ~ ~t 4'I ,r ~ s i~ - n~ j.. _ _ - _ - - J3~Y 4r r ~ - =~_~;ti ~ ~ ' .rte Y.u•r- t I '°°-EF ~S'R~. l ' f -1 e 1 T" + 7 ~r v ~1 t ~ ~ r~ _ - _ ~ ~rL: Yt i -r~-~- .~.;,.s ~ r ~-'?A +~ca:_ t -rte r ~ J ;r. .E, ~ - _ _ 1. ' S. - _ ~5`+yf'•~.. Wl y. :a ~ ?n i _ - Y'~~~.{ - _-___~4a~x _ - - ~-.e= •-~-star. !y AI ~'L i 1 i'~"~-' "1f .:t,~.. I f.•~. 1 ~ t~v~r--plc ,.t: ,2 lY DTs.' f i~ ! r ~.r . 4 ,t~~a 1~ Lei I t 1~ _ ,~f-~s4.~~ :.aye ~ ~ r1.,.r~ ~ .V• r? 4 ~ er` E~.. ' lac 7~ ~~ii~~, ~ ~rGr ~ `fi't s. J'^ ~ .7e -~t~~ ! F ~ S7j J, ~ _~h - t ~ , I f 5. 1 1 - ~ , . - LCD. _ - - ~f•. - - I [ ~ - - - - - _ - _ - - , _ - - _ ~ 4 X11` ~ I - _ i „ o..__I ~-1i` ~S rte- _ ~-Z ~1.~ • 7,.,F~~lYlfY~wG,t~,`: Yu~ ~Yr 4-~ayt'~ ~.f~ ''.r~i~ 'c'~4 ' its. s... r :.i.. a..--~~Y.--_.. ...sue _ - `G'~ J: 1 _ _ _ ,I '.Y~Jt i J G - - f - i ~ -J C Jt .d.~ I r ~ / is _ ~ , _ - - ~ K± ? Sq= I~, •a.l it ~ .F s _ 1 1 F ~ t ~ - - - , Y. 7f.~ -;Y.~p ~ ~ 4.~4 _ ,E` _fl ~ "b L"i :iy ~~.a,~,rY1~•~`?~~ ~ i ~C• 4' ~,•~:~yy++~i,~?'~ ~ I r wR`+~ ^c4~ ' •exi~ 9 l11'1~ I f--t 3'~ y„- ~~--y } ` ` ~ . t ~ r..i' ~~r3~°"`.~~`•- .e-.~r-~j .l~: y 'Fri ~I !I. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~i:^~'-~~l"`=4:-`r I - - Zs'~cr_ _ 11 ~~''^``~ySk'r `'~'t~ ~ i 'rte ^7 ~j .c.T 1 ~.,Y,: ~t~1 - - ~ t ~S~ $V. 'i ~ ~n1ja~ lCt~~r - kL 1_Y:.('.j { v` 1 •-,ST~_ d.l ~~_3e.-`rH(_.<'i"' N C r"'.: ~ ~ l}. .C tt~'_'1~ ~ ~ ~ _ i _ ~ _ - _3 ~ ~ i ~Y_,\ ~ - .~i!uH~S_'l-.f~i G~~.~a yi~P>.w.'.~Kt~•~i h{w~M%ytr-MC~,~brk~~++t~a-(s•'6w'a1+:t kYr.w TrN~M'f~r+~Yt I•W~2.M ir^Aw.r>t ~ri.p.3'•si~ MA ' 1 i a - ~y;~~ v - _ ~ - - - k. x2 _ - ~ ~ - - - ~ - - ~ ~ ern S~ C• ~ i a,,,j,~,,,,. , I .cu-, 1 1 ~1, - _ _ . ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ - - - _ - ~a ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fp~c. ~ ~ri ~ '`F r 1 ~ ti`_i i . 1 s-.l. 4r "2 ~}'Z`s~, ~ ~ y~~. rfi 4~' ~ L st.~n;vr ~ 1 k ~ ~s ~ ' . 1 fs 1 ~i ~"s 1 1 ~ f : x ail r., a~'~ rN ~ r fi'r` j ~ 1s r . , ~~5 w , ~5~==~--..,. ~ ~Y ~Y-' v,,. - ~ = 1~ ice.- ~.l - ' ~ ~ T _ - .i v..~-r4i :i.. vii ~ ~ .uc4 _ - ,E t t _ r` ` ~ _1a, c , r' Int., ~-S + t 1 ~ ` s r o ~ ` i . .t tii~ ! "1 j''«~ a t~ r ~~t ~ E t < ~',~j wr x ".ty .a... ';r ~ C<; C t j. - s.,:~ I ` r t r t 4., tl s P r' t I a ~ t >t - t t j v, i 1 t ~ t ' y • - T + _ _ ~ t :t: _ _ ~f . - _J - _ - ~ ~ E ' r _ - t ~ ~ ~t a _ 3 ~ ;t` - _ ` ~ ~ - ' nr /1 k. `C tt r sf` ~)r~~~,r Y~,ra•f t I - ~ - , fir-- t -~*-y c , ~ f 1 ~ ~ _ I '~YY c t ~ ~ -i f, Y' f ~ y s ? 1i ~x~~j y. 4Z s: ~ talc t r I l'* .--2 •I L t l < r•~ t ~ t t + c f _ ~ Y I r tr•• _ {t..; { 4 1 t .t }'f t - t. r -I i ~o U ~ar~ mss- r > ,l• 3 b4 y ! C t~ 4' r,1 I y. r ~1? i~^: S' yet r / ~ !:mar ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 j _ - _ ~ ~R"S >li - ~ w a~ - . 'S. Ya y t ~Z ` t _ . i" .,t Jt-~ ~ " w ~ t .,1 4 ~ <y ~ ~ : Yet Il . ( - ~yJ 1~ 11.3~~#la~U!Ur,ry rl Tt• ~i~i3+- MI,... _'F* r 1 't r V ~ t 'n fry ~ q I tea. . . . _ . yrdi Tom' ~ ya." - _ - -