Loading...
5B - Request for Landmark Alteration Certificate for 1936 Mapleton Ave (HIS2007-00337) - to remove an existing 454 sq ft garage an...uct a 1 12 story, 814 sq ft two-car garageMEMORANDUM January 9'h, 2008 TO: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board FROM: Susan Richstone, Director of Long Range Planning James Hewat, Historic Preservation Planner Chris Meschuk, Historic Preservation Planner Marcy Cameron, Preservation Intem SUBJECT: Request for a Landmark Alteration Certificate to remove an existing 454 sq. ft. garage and in its place construct a one and one- half story, 814 sq. ft. two-car garage at the landmarked property at 1936 Mapleton Avenue per Section 9-11-18 of the Boulder Revised Code (HIS2007-00337) STATISTICS: 1. Site: 1936 Mapleton 2. Zoning: RL-1 (Residential Low-1) 3. Applicant/Owner: John Hickman 5. Site Area: 6,900 square feet 6. Proposed Bldg: 814 square feet 7. Proposed Ht: 2Q' STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board make the following motion: The Board finds that the proposal for the demolition of the existing garage and in its place, the construction of a one and one-half story, two-car garage (as shown on drawings dated December 7th, 2007), meets the standards in Chapter 9-11-18 (a)(b, 1-4), B.R.C. 1981, is consistent with the General Design Guidelines, in that the proposed work will not damage the historic character of the property, and adopts this memorandum as findings of the Board. Aeenda Item #SB Paae #1 S:\PLAN\da~a\longrang\HIST\ALTCERT$\Landmacks\Maplemn1936\019.08 memo.doc CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the development shall be constructed in compliance with all approved plans on file in the City of Boulder Planning Department, except as modified by these conditions of approval. 2. Prior to submitting a building permit application and final issuance of the Landmark Alteration Certificate, the Applicant shall submit the following, subject to the final review and approval of the City Manager final architectural plans that include materials and colors to insure that the approval is consistent with the General Design Guidelines and the intent of this approval. This recommendation is based upon staff's opinion that with the conditions listed above, the proposal meets the standards in Chapter 9-11-18 (a)(b, 1-4), B.R.C. 1981 and is consistent with the General Design Guidelines in that the work will not damage the historic character of the landmarked property. SUMMARY: • This application calls for more than 340 sq. ft. of free standing construction within the boundaries of a landmarked property and, as such, a public hearing is required per 9-11-14(3)(b) of the Boulder Revised Code. • The entire property was designated an individual landmark by the Boulder City Council on September 4~, 2007. • Staff does not consider removal of the existing garage would damage or adversely affect the historic or architectural value of the landmark property in that the bu$ding is of marginal architectural or historic significance and not a notable character-defining feature of the landmark property. This is reflected in the fact that (while included within the landmark boundary), the garage is not mentioned as acharacter-defining historic or architectural feature of the property in the 20061andmark designation ordinance. • Staff considers that the proposed construction of a two-car garage and studio is consistent with the historic preservation ordinance and the General Design Guidelines. • Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board find that the proposal for the demolition of the existing garage and in its place, the construction of a one and one-half story, two-car garage (as shown on drawings dated December 7 2007), meets the standards in Chapter 9-11-18 (a)(b, 1-4), B.R.C. 1981, is consistent with the General Design Guidelines, uT that the Agenda Item #5B Paee #2 S:\PLAN\da[a\longcang\FI]ST\ALTCERTS\Landmacks\1vlaplemn.1936\01.9.08 memo.doc proposed work will not damage the historic character of the property. Y.:. a ! i ~ ~ ' . I 2 L 4 ~ ~ .j t Y r~~ ; a "v ~s ~ ~ , i t w d - n ..y. • 1936 Mapleton Avenue, northeast corner PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The 6,900 square foot lot at the north-east corner of Mapleton Avenue and 20th Street is the site of a one and one-half story, 1,912 square foot vernacular house that is representative of vernacular masonry dwellings built in Boulder during the late 19th century. Apre-1906 frame garage is located at the southeast corner of the lot. The entire property was recently designated as an individual landmark and is considered a contributing resource to the identified, potential Whittier Historic District. ' ~l ~ 1936 Mapleton t ~l r . ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ t~ ~~1 ~ . ~ `l` 4 5Fztjl'1 Location map Agenda Item #5B Pale #3 S:APL,1\\daca'`~lon~rang\HIS1'\AL'I'C:>JR'1'S\Landmarks\~~laplccoo.l93G\01.9.Ob memo.doc GARAGE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY: The garage is a simple one-story frame, gable-roof building, with simulated brick asphalt shingle siding. The building appears on the 1906 Sanborn Fire insurance map (the year the area was first covered by the maps). While the pre-1906 date of construction is early for an automobile related building, it was likely modified after this date with the installation of a sliding door on the east elevation (to provide access to the building by a small car), and the application of asphalt shingle siding. The garage is mentioned in the 1929 notes from the tax assessor's card for the property. Currently, the building is in deteriorated condition and showing signs of water damage. The walls of the building rest on grade which has caused wicking of moisture into the frame resulting in deterioration of wood members. h ~'r,: ~ ' ~:,4 , ~ ~f •Y ~ f ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t a r_ 4- ~a 7 ~ _ TM, L,_40.: ~ tom. k ~~y, _ a`- L 1'~..~Vt /ice! _ _ _ _ ~ _ r y _ '.3. j~ ~ ~ f ~ c- _ k y i , f _ lit ` 1 i ~r f~ ~ t' ~ _ n~'t `4 {fir, ~s:~ ~ ~ .~K. ~ t.k. ~ ~7: ~ y~~~ ~ ~ Existing garage at 1936 Maplei~>n, south~~~ist corner. .~~enda item #5B Pale #4 SI'I V[~,~.u.i~l~nit~i.u~e~,ll[S'f\,AI:I'(~F.R'LS\J..iuhn:rF.`\Ly,l~i~~nl~>i(~,nL'l~~ti¢~~n,~~~i„~ ~.i; , i, ~ ~ ~ ! ~i I: i ' 1336 MAPLFTON AVF ~ ~I - exsr:~w rwo 14: iT_OR^NE^al lE_HC ~ I i i ~ ~ ,~~~I } ~ ~ ,d t I ~ -L~-- 1936 Mapleton Avenue Site Plan REQUEST: This application requests the demolition of the pre-1906 existing 454 square foot garage located on the southeast edge of the property and, in its place, the construction of an 814 square foot, two-car, one and one-half story garage. Dimensions of the proposed garage shown are 20' wide by 25' deep. The site plan for the property shows the garage to be set back 12', 6" from the adjacent east (201h Street) and west property line and 4' from the south (alley) property line providing for the required 24' back-out required by code. As shown, the north wall of the proposed garage will be located 23' south of the approved two- story addition to the main house.l ~ This addition was approved by the Landmarks Design Review Committee on 11/21/2007. Agenda Item #SB Page #5 S:APLAN\data\Iungrang\HIST\AL'PCERTS\Landmazls\Mlplecoal93G\OL9A8 memo.doc ~ ~ _ _ o o - - 1 _ - _ k _ ~ -t I III'--~' I - - I J-- - ~ . - ~ 'NEST ELEJAI ~,ON ^;GaT-. ELe'dATiGN Proposed west and north elevations Elevations show the proposed 20' high wood frame garage to be simply detailed with across-gable design featuring east and west facing dormers, a small one- story shed roof extension, clapboard sided exterior walls with shingled gables, a set of wood garage doors referencing those on the existing garage, three and six over one, double hung windows, and pedestrian door on the north (garden) elevation. The wood clapboard siding and cedar shingle on the proposed garage is shown to be painted cream with cream trim and windows as an accent. An effort has been made to reference the historic building on the property and this is evident in the proposed building's roof pitch, dormers, and general fenestration. _ _ _ ~ r ~ - ~ -x. M - rf ~f - - - 1, _ rr = .r_y T ttt ~ , _ , .~I_:J Prc~pu5ed east and south elevations CRITERIA FOR THE BOARD'S DECISION: Subsection 10-13-18(b), B.R.C. 1981, sets forth the standards the Landmarks Board must apply when reviewing a request for a Landmark Alteration Certificate. Agenda Item #SB Pale #6 I'I . Aft\~Lua~~,lun~nin~\111$"I ,AI : I'(:LR~I~ti~~ i _u uiinxrk~'v Af ~.y~lcu ~n,1~) i(>'~ Il I i is m~ m~ ~ , (b) Neither the landmarks board nor the city council shall approve a landmark alteration certificate unless it meets the following conditions: (1) The proposed work preserves, enhances, or restores and does not damage or destroy the exterior architectural features of the landmark; (2) The proposed work does not adversely affect the special character or special historic, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark; (3) The architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and materials used on existing and proposed structures are compatible with the character of the existing landmark and its site; (4) With respect to a proposal to demolish a building in an historic district, the proposed new construction to replace the building meets the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) above. (c) In determining whether to approve a landmark alteration certificate, the landmarks board shall consider the economic feasibility of alternatives, incorporation of energy-efficient design, and enhanced access for the disabled. ANALYSIS: 1. Does the proposed application preserve, enhance, or restore, and not damage or destroy significant exterior architectural features of the landmark or the subject property within an historic district? Response: Staff finds the proposed removal of the c.1906 will not damage or destroy significant architectural features of the landmark property as the building is of marginal architectural significance and not a notable character- defining feature of the designated site. The proposed new construction is consistent with the General Design Guidelines (see design guidelines analysis section) and will not compromise the landmark property. 2. Does the proposed application adversely affect the special character or special historic, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark? Response: Staff finds that the proposed application will not adversely affect the special character of the landmark as the garage proposed for removal is of marginal significance to the property's special historic, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value. Staff also considers that the proposed new construction is generally compatible with the General Design Guidelines. 2. Is the architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and materials used on existing and proposed structures compatible with the character of the historic district? Agenda Item #SB Paee #7 S:\PLAN\data\longrang\HIST\ALTCERTS\Landmarks\Mapleron.1936\01.9.08 memo.doc Response: The staff finds the new construction will be compatible with the architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and materials on the historic building. 4. The Landmarks Board is required to consider the economic feasibility of alternatives, incorporation of energy-efficient design, and enhanced access for the disabled in determining whether to approve a Landmark Alteration Certificate. Response: No information has been provided to suggest that energy efficient design or accessibility has been considered beyond that required by the city's building code. 5. Is the proposed application consistent with the purposes of Chapter 9-11, "Historic Preservation," B.R.C. 1981? Response: The proposal respects the character of the setting, does not imitate surrounding buildings, and represents a contemporary, yet compatible design for an accessory building (see design guidelines analysis section). Furthermore, staff considers that the proposal represents a "reasonable balance' between private property rights and the public's interest. Design Guidelines The Board has also adopted the General Design Guidelines to help interpret the historic preservation ordinance. The following is an analysis of the proposed new construction with respect to relevant guidelines. Design guidelines are intended to be used only as an aid to appropriate design and are not intended as a checklist of items for compliance. New accessory buildings should follow the character and pattern of historic accessory buildings. While they should take design clues from the primary building, they must be subordinate to that building in size, massing and detailing. Alley buildings should maintain a scale that is pleasant to walk along and comfortable for pedestrians. r~ti~8. _ ~--~tvatYSr~ ' "ts- .2 New garages and accessory The proposed new building Yes buildings should generally be location is at the rear of the located at the rear of the lot, property and consistent. respecting the traditional Agenda Item #5B Paae #8 S:\PLAN\data\bngrang\HIST\ALTCHRTS\Landmarks\Mapletoa193G\01.9.08 memo.doc relationship of such buildings to the primary structure and the site. .3 Maintain adequate spacing Property is individually N/A between accessory buildings so landmarked -this guideline alleys do not evolve into tunnel-like refers to properties located in passageways. designated historic districts. .4 Preserve a backyard area between The proposed garage Yes the house and the accessory represents an increase in lot buildings, maintaining the general coverage of about 50 sq. ft. over proportion of built mass to open existing garage. Proportion of space found within the area. built mass to open space appears appropriate to landmark property. .5 New accessory building should take The new building references Yes design cues from the primary the main house in terms of structure on the site, but be architectural details and subordinate to it in terms of size materials, though is and massing. subordinate to it in terms of mass, scale and height. .6 New garages for single family The proposed new one and Yes residences should generally be one one-half-story building to story tall and shelter no more than shelter two cars. At 20' in two cars. In some cases, atwo-car height, garage will be 4', 8" garage may be inappropriate. shorter than main house. .7 Roof form and pitch should be The form and pitch of roof Yes complimentary to the primary (including shed extension) structure. fenestration, and detailing references main house. .8 Accessory buildings should be The proposed garage is Yes simpler in design and detail than relatively simple in scale and the primary building. detail. .9 Materials for new garages and Materials as proposed, Yes accessory structures should be including wood clapboard Aeenda Item #SB Pase #9 5:\PLAN\da~a\longrang\MST\ALTCERTS\Landmacks\Mapkron.193G\01.9.08 memo.doc compatible with those found on the siding, shingle, doors, and primary structure and in the appear generally appropriate. district. Vinyl siding and prefabricated structures are inappropriate. .10 Windows, like all elements of Proposed cream colored clad Maybe accessory structures, should be wood windows are simpler in detailing and smaller in appropriate, though perhaps scale than similar elements on 3/1 should be specified on all primary structures. double hung rather than 6/1 and 3/1 as shown. .11 If consistent with the architectural As shown, dormers are Yes style and appropriately sized and appropriately located, located, dormers may be an proportioned, and detailed. appropriate way to increase storage space in garages. .12 Garage doors should be consistent Proposed doors reference Yes with the historic scale and doors on existing garage and materials of traditional accessory are appropriate. structures. Wood is the most appropriate material and two smaller doors may be more appropriate than one large door. While the building is clearly an early accessory building, dating from before 1906, staff does not consider its removal would damage or adversely affect the historic or architectural value of the landmark property. In staff's estimation the building is of marginal architectural or historic significance and not a notable character defining feature of the landmark property. This is reflected in the fact that the building was only discussed only briefly during the June 13th, 2007 Landmarks Board designation memo and is not mentioned in the landmark designation ordinance (see Attachment A) . Preserving and re-using the existing garage on the property would be preferable to its removal. However, staff considers that its demolition will not damage or adversely affect the historic or architectural value of the landmark property. Likewise, staff considers the construction of the submitted one and one half-story Agenda Item #SB Paae #10 5:\PLAN\dataUoograog\HIST\ALTCGRTS\Landmarks\Mapletoa193G\01.9.08 memo.doc new garage in its place, is generally appropriate in terms of site planning, mass, scale, and materials. FINDINGS: As outlined in the staff recommendation, the proposed demolition and proposed new construction at 1936 Mapleton Avenue will be consistent with the purposes and standards of the Historic Preservation Ordinance in that: 1. The proposed work will not damage or destroy the exterior architectural features of the landmark. 2. The mass, scale, height, architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and materials used the proposed new construction and window and door replacement on the contributing building will be compatible with the character of the landmark. 3. The request is generally consistent with the historic preservation ordinance and the General Design Guidelines. ATTACHMENTS: A: Designating Ordinance for 1936 Mapleton Avenue B: Application and Plans C: Photographs Agenda Item #SB Paee #11 S:\PLAN\data\longrang\HIST\ALTCERTS\Landmatks\bfaplema193G\01.9.08 memo.doc ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO. 7551 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE BUILDING AND SITE AT 1936 MAPLETON AVENUE, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT A, CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO, ALSO KNOWN AS THE FRAKES HOUSE, A LANDMARK UNDER CHAPTER 9-11, B.R.C. 1981, AND SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO. BE TT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO: Section I. The council enacts this ordinance pursuant to its authority under Chapter 9-11, B.R.C. 1981, to designate as a landmark a property having a special character or special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value. Section 2. The council finds that: 1) on or about March 7, 2007, the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Boazd initiated designation of the property at 1936 Mapleton Avenue as a landmark; 2) the boazd held a public hearing on the proposed designation on June 13, 2007; and 3) on June 13, 2007 the board recommended that the council approve the proposed designation. Section 3. The council also finds that upon public notice required by law, the council held a public hearing on the proposed designation on September 19, 2007 and upon the basis of the presentations at that hearing finds that the property at 1936 Mapleton Avenue does possess a special character and special historic, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value warranting its designation as a landmazk. Section 4. There is hereby created as a landmazk the property located at 1936 Mapleton Avenue, also known as the Frakes House, whose legal landmark boundary description is as follows, and as shown in Exhibit A: ~11~MIA7~5a Pap.~J,2_ LOT 1, BLOCK 142 CORRECTED AND ENLARGED PLAT OF EAST BOULDER, COUNTY OF BOULDER, STATE OF COLORADO. Section 5. The chazacteristics of the subject property that justify its designation as a landmazk are: 1) its historical significance including the 1896-1897 date of construction,; 2) its architectural significance as a representative example of vernacular masonry architecture with Queen Anne styling, and its artistic merit with the corner entrance porch, decorative shingle and brick work; and 3) its environmental significance for the siting of the house on a corner lot with the corner entrance to the porch to address both street faces, and its importance as part of an area identified to have historic integrity. Section 6. The council further finds that the foregoing landmark designation is necessary to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the city. Section 7. The council directs that the planning department give prompt notice of this designation to the property owner and cause a copy of this ordinance to be recorded as described in Subsection 9-11-6(d), B.R.C. 1981. Section 8. The council deems it appropriate that this ordinance be published by title only and orders that copies of this ordinance be made available in the office of the city clerk for public inspection and acquisition. /IpMd~ Nem i ~"~Page ~ 1 ~ INTRODUCED, READ ON FIRST READING, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY TITLE ONLY this 4~' day of September, 2007. Mayor Attest: City Clerk on behalf of the Director of Finance and Record READ ON SECOND READING, PASSED, ADOPTED, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY TITLE ONLY this 19~' day of September, 2007. Mayor Attest: City Clerk on behalf of the Director of Finance and Record ~IQAtdi qem # ~ Pep®#~. PROPOSED LANDMARK LOCATION & PROPER'CY BOUNDARY Location Map • ~ _ , o fT~ 1936 Mapleton ~ ~ ~ o.. • © ~ ~ t Q o 6 ~ T ~ - - ~ , , ~ - - _ s~ 1 r- F _ . . l Desi nation Boundary 0 r . t ti ~ - T ~ R MaplQton Aye ' - ~m ~ k 1 . I' _ N ! ~ 1 e _ I~sV, _0 ~ Q - Q { _ Designation Boundary ~ '~1 ~ 1 ~ n~ ~ "5 ~ P~~ 1~„ City of Boulder Planning and Development Services Attachment B LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION G~~ Date of application: _1 t, NOVEMBER 2007 Case ntm?ber. HIS Property address: _1936 MAPLETON Historic District/landmark name: Applicant name: -SCOTT COBURN & ASSOCIATES- Relationship m project (e.g., architect, contractor): _ARCHITECT Phone: _(303)443-7557 Mobile phone: _(303) 408-5533 Fax _(303)443-0143 Applicants mailing address: 2600 30th STREET BOULDER CO 80302 Street City State Zip Properly owner's name: -JOHN HICKMAN Daytime phone: (303)245-0554 Properly owner's address: _2090 PEARL ST. BOULDER CO 80302 Street Cily State Zip PRO JECT DESC RIPTIO N: Please list all exterior alterations proposed for the property in the space provided below. Please see the following pages for submittal requirements. All 4 pages must be included in the application. DEMO EXISTING ONE CAR STORAGE GARAGE AND REPLACE w/NEW TWO CAR GARAGE dt OWNER WORK/STUDIO ABOVE. SEE ATTACHMENT. INITIAL CODE REVIEW The following applications require initial review and sign off by a project specialist or zoning administrator rip 'or to acceptance of a landmark alteration certificate application. Please markall applicable boxes. ~ewde~ched constnution (accessorystrtxt~re garage, new residence, shed, etc) ? Dormers ? Porches ? Fences ? All new additions THIS SECT10 N IS FO R STAFF USE O N LY Property Zoning: Lotsine: Required setbacks: Floodplain: Prior Reviews (Use RevievK PUD, etc) 0 ther Applications which may be required based on proposed applicatjon: Prelimina ry C omments: Reviewed by. ~ Datie• This section Is a customer service review, and does not constitute a formal review of all applicable codes and regulations. AI I sections of the Boulder Revised Code must still be adhered to riot to rformin an work. Plea,,;P,submit this completed application, along with the required information outlined on the following pages to a project specialist. Applications for the design review committee must be received on the Friday prior to your requested design review meeting. ff you have any questions, please call (303)441-1880 and ask to speak to a historic preservation planner. We look forward m working with you on your projecC • LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION (Page 2) ' Shown below and on the facing page is a list of the most common types of alterations. Please check off the type of work you are proposing and follow the application requirements listed to the right. ~-=dYPE OF, STAFF REVIEW ALTERATION: City staff may review common types of applications, which involve minor aherations. This (Please check all type of review mn have a gpick approval tum-around providing the applicant submits a that apply) mmplefe application form with documentation and the proposed alterations meet the ? Landscaping applicable design guidelines. ? Paint A mmoleta aoolicafion submittal includes: ? Roofing ? This appliaalion: Completely filled out ? Fence (rear /side yard only if ? Plans and elewlions: All dmwings should be to scale, w8h dimensions, and as maximum 5' tall with minimum detailed and dear as possible, whether or not an archBect or contractor is 1"spacing between pickets) involved. Both existing stmdure and proposed changes should be shown. Fences: bring to-scale dmwings showing dimensions and spacing between ? Restoration of Existing Features pickets. DOWNTOWN ONLY: ? Photographs: Comprehensive color photos of the structure and of details that relate directly to the requested alteration are required. ? Commercial awning ? Samples: Color chips of paint are required. Printed samples of roofing types are ? Commercial patios helpful. ? Commercial signs TYPE OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (LDRC) ALTERATION: City staff and two designated members of the landmarks board review applications for aherations (Please check all to buildings or special features and determine wBhin 14 days after a complete application is filed thaT apply) whether or not the proposed work would have a signfficanT impact upon or be potentially ? Deck /porch detrimental to a landmark site or historic district. Large projects usually require more than one meeting and may be referred by the CommiNee io the full Landmarks Board for review. ? Doors /windows ? Dormers /skylights The following documentation is required to initials review by the Design Review Committee: ? This application: Completely filled out ? Additions ? Photographs: Photos of existing building and surrounding context ? Fence (front yard or rear /side yard ff over ? Drawings: All drawings should be io scale, with dimensions, and as detailed and clear 5' tall or less than 1" as possible, whether or not an archBect or contractor is involved. Both existing structure spacing between pickets) and proposed rhonges should be shown. Examples are available ff needed. 0 New garage /accessory The following daamentaHon is required for final review and approval: building (340 sq. ft. and ? Scaled site plans: including existing and proposed site plans under) ? Elevations: usually'/: = 1' scale including existing and proposed elevations ? Other ? Materials: Specific materials used should be noted on plans. Samples may be requested. ? Colors: paint/stain wlor chips ? Photographs: photos of existing building from all sides and existing context ? Manufacturers/catalogue °tear" sheets ? Fences: bring to-scale dmwings showing dimensions and spacing between mils. ? Details The kllowing maybe requested prior to final approval: ? Building sections ~'~Aethods of restoration study model or 3-D simulated model TIP: For large or complex projects you are encouraged To contact a Historic Preservation Planner early in your project before detailed dmwings are completed. All completed applications-for LDRC review musT be fumed in by noon on the Friday prior to the requested meeting. Please note that your requested DRC meeting may not be available due to scheduling. The Committee meets at 9:00 a.m. every Wednesday (except holidays) of the P&D$ Services Center on the 3'~ floor of the Park Cenfral building, 1739 Broadway. Please call and ask for a Historic Preservation Planner if you have questions with any of the above aherations or submittal requirements. AOBIdY Nltll # ~ Pees! 1 LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION (Page 3) LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD (LPAB) TYPE O F New free-standing construction greater than 340 square feet, or the demolition or moving of - ALTERATIO N: structures requires review by the entire Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board. A public hearing is (Please check all required in order to issue an alteration certificate under these circumstances. Thefull board meets that apply) once a month, usually on the first Wednesday. Submittal deadlines are listed on the following page. ~f All applications must be submitted to a project specialist by 4:OOpm 20 days prior to the hearing. NJ N~f~''~~~] Public hearings must be held within 60 days after a completed applicaYron is received. All public conslucton hearings for landmark alteration certificates are conducted as quasiyudkial proceedings. After a (over 340 sq. ft) public hearing, a Notice of Disposition is served to C'rty Council regarding the recommendation of the landmarks Board. The City Council has 14 days to call up a decision to approve a landmark ateration certificate application made by the Landmarks Preservation Board. If the Landmarks ~Demol'i6on preservation Board votes to deny a landmark alteration certificate application, the City Council has (includes primary 30 days in which to call up the decison. and/or accessory buildings) A complete application submittal includes the same as that required for the Design Review Committee as listed on the proceeding page Ip_usthe following items: ~ AppBcation called ? Prevbus Page requirements Nsl~d under LDRC) up from DRC ? Written project descripTon ? 10 folded wples of project drawings, showing existing and proposed condltlora (preferably 24'x36') plarss, Including: • Scaled site plan (existing and proposed) • Scaled elevations for all sides of the building (existing and proposed) at 1 /4" or 1/$' scale. • Sketches, as needed ? 10 copies of any cobr renderings or phot~graplu, cobr samples, etc. (preferably ra greater than 11 "x17') ? 1 reduced (8 14'x 11 mpy of all materials wbmil~d Atthe request of staff or the board, the folowing may also be required as part of your applicatlorc ? Building sections ?Methods of restoration aStudy model or 3-D simulated model TIP: Projects which are required to be reviewed by the full board should be presented to staff early in your project before detailed drawings are initiated. Please contact us prior to submitting an application as these projects and reviews are uwally complex We encourage you to wmplete the initial code review section on page 1 of this application prior to contacting us. Call?(303) 441-1880 and ask to speak with a Historic Preservation Planner. I agree m perform the work described herein, in accordance wtth the plans and/or speciflcatiorts submitted and wflh all provislorts ofihe Histnrfc Preservation Code, Building Code, Zoning Ordinance and Health Regulatlons ofthe City of r as ~ merated in le Boulder Revised Code, 1481. jK- l~L Q'1 or a agenifor owner Datie Contact Us: Planning & Development Services -Historic Preservation Program 1739 Broadway, 3 Floor Boulder, CO 80302 (303)441-1880 Http://www.boulderhistoricpreservationnet LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION (Page 4) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Date completed application received by Planning and Development Services Date of initial DRC meeting Dote(s) of follow-up DRC meetings Date of Full Board Hearing Date Application Approved/Denied Date of Building Permit Review , Date Case Closed Date case sent to imaging 2008 Landmark Preservation Advisory Board Meeting Dates and Application Submittal Deadlines landmarks Preservation Advisory Boord meetings ore generolly held the first Wednesday of each month at 6 p.m. in the Municipal Building, Council Chambers Room, located at 1777 Broadway. Landmark Alteration Certificate applimtions scheduled for o public hearing before the full Landmarks Board are due by 4:OOpm 20 days before the meeting date. All applirnfions must be submitted through a project specialist. Board Meeting Submittal Deadline January 9 December 18 Februory 6 January 17 March 5 February 14 April 2 March 13 May 7 April 17 June 4 May 15 July 2 June 12 August 6 July 17 September 3 August 14 October 1 September 11 November 5 October 16 December 3 November 13 Mrr1e lee.w! ~R cd..u SCOTT COBURN & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS December 7, 2007 To: James Hewat Historical Preservation Planner City of Boulder Project: Hickman Garage 1936 Mapleton Ave. Boulder, CO 80302 Scope: Landmark Alteration Certificate Application Project Description: Demolition of an existing one story storage garage of approximate 350 square feet. Replace with a new two car garage and second floor (for home owner use) office/studio. New Garage level: 499 Square feet. Office/Studio level: 300 square feet. The following documentation are attached for review and approval: 1. LAC Application form 2. Site Plan 3. Floor Plans: First and Second levels & Roof Plan 4. Exterior Elevations & Building Sections 6. Material list and Color Board 7. Photographs of the existing and neighboring structures 8. Colored renderings of east & south exterior elevations 2IOO PEARL STREET SUITE B BUULDF,R, CO $0302 303.443.7SS7 u r ~ ~ SCOTT COBURN 6z ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS Decmber 7, 2007 To: James Hewat Historical Preservation Planner City of Boulder Project: Hickman Garage 1936 Mapleton Ave. Boulder, CO 60302 Scope: Landmark Alteration Certificate Application Final Review and Approval Material & Color List 1. Wood siding 1x4 ship lap: New to match existing main house. Paint color: Benjamin Moore "Gentle Cream" 2. Wood shingle siding: New to match existing main house. Paint color: een~amin Moore "Gentle Cream" 3. Trim & Fascia Board paint grade wood to match existing main house. Paint color: Benjamin Moore, "Cream Froth" 4. Roofing: Presidential or Equal Asphalt comp. shingle to match existing main house. Color: Weathered Wood 5. Windows: Wood frames paint color: Benjamin Moore "Cream Froth" New window to be Sierra Pac'rfic or equal Clad exterior/Wood interior. 6. Doors: New doors paint grade wood, color: Benjamin Moore, "Cream Froth" 7. Door & Window trim paint grade wood, color: Benjamin Moore, "Cream Froth" 210() PEARL STREET SIIITR ~ B!)I11.OFR. ~,n R03f12 3()3 44'i.7557 SCOTT COBURN & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS December 7, 2007 To: James Hewat Historical Preservation Planner City of Boulder Project: Hickman Garage 1936 Mapleton Ave. Boulder, CO 80302 Scope: Landmark Alteration Certificate Application Final Review and Approval I r List 1 FIELD COLOR: Wood siding, (ship lap & shingle) New to match existing main house/addition. Benjamin oore "Gentle Cream" 2 ACCENT COLOR: Trim and Fascia, New to match existing main house/addition Benjamin Moore "Cream Froth" 2 ] OO PEARL STREET SUITE B BOULDER. CO SO3O2 303.443.7557 Attachment C Project: Hickman Garage EXISTING STORAGE GARAGE 1936 Mapleton Ave. CORNER OF ALLEY& 20TH ST. Boulder, CO 80302 SCOTT CUBURN 6~ ASSOCIATES ~.a~~,~~t~~~;~~ '41~~"... ~J I 1 T-~ T 1 ~ 1 i n 1 ~ k ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~ 1.. , L i7, ~ ,.~_1 T J~_ i_: J ~ 3 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' r~ ~ l r L n ~ ~ ^i 1~ _y'd.' S _~y~. sip _ ~ ~ ~ 4 # ~ ~ 1~ f~ r „r.[4'~. ~ r Sir d~~ 4 4~ ~ 4 f ,4 € ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ` .F'__ Y3 n ~F. q r ~ yf yy k ~ ~ 1 ~1(jl) ~t--~',I~~ ;~'I(;-_I- ~ ~i t`~.-..._..-... i ~ f A _i,j~ iJ_.~ Project: Hickman Garage 1936 Mapleton Ave. NEIGHBORING ALLEY GARAGE Boulder, CO 80302 i`' SCOTT COBURN ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT _ _ :f _ r f ~i i e - :.a„ ay ~ k faro r , ,la ~ Cwt .:.:4 1yj~ ~ ~ y 1~ 3 ~i ~ ~ _ III I!i t~ l I ~I r f f~- i mot' - ~ ~ - ~ _ - - - ; r f - r - x ~ ' 1 ~ '~a.,.,,,,,~ w .i p 23(i(i PFARI ~TR FFT ~lilTF R Rnlll T1FR A~)in2 ~n~ 44.7557 Project: Hickman Garage RESIDENCE ACROSS FROM 1936 Mapleton Ave. `i, EXISTING STORAGE GARAGE Boulder, CO 80302 ~ CORNER OF ALLEY & 20TH ST SCOTT COBURN ~ ASSOCIATES A RCHITEC'T~ ' ~ Y . .r"'~J ~ ~ ` ~ ~ s 'g I~ F ~ "Gyp rte' ~x, -k, ,S fil' ~ i .y a ,4 ~i --a~~- 3~ s ~ w . a ~ "S~r. C _ ".t _~..E~ w ff M~ r ^ - # r . $ Y ~1 e ice' a~ ~ ~ `.x.'~y S~1-_- lu ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ s s,~ w Fn. _ 4 y ~ . ~ _ r R~ ~ ~ : ~ _ s - r r~ ~ f' _ i ,-r',. ~ ; a ~3 ~ ~ 'M~:: k. ~ 3~ .'s z~ If t~ s . .:r a r Y!~~~ •i~-*• ~ C ~~,v~ n_._. c_..,,-..,.. c'~.....-,- t? L~..: i~(1 4(1(1'1 2(12 ~!~7 iCf~ ~ Hickman Garage Hickman Garage EXISTING STORAGE GARAGE ojRC: Hickman Garage RESIDENCE ACROSS FROM 1936 Mapleton Ave. I} NEIGHBORING ALLEY GARAGE 1936 Mapleton Ave CORNER OF ALLEY& 20TH ST 1936 Mapleton Ave EXISTING STORAGE GARAGE Boulder, CO 80302 IU Boulder, CO 80302 Boulder, CO 80302 CORNER OF ALLEY & 20TH ST SCOT_I' CdBURN SCOTT COBURN SCOTT COBL'RN & Assoctaz-~s ~ ~ssactArES Ass~~c>ArE~ ?.6C~iiTE r'"E ARCHI?"c C75 'i i' ~ i , ~ ^4 I i {y~.l, ~ W I w } o tpr~ ~ l~ NW ~ ~ NE _ t II ~ ~ ~ ~1~ 4, a , 7 . Y i ,y.~4- 1 ' 1. Ill ~.,'~`t ~ l1 ~ ~f.;k' 4M i I ~ ~ - x~ I - r J ,r e ` fl. 3 ~ . t r ~ _ .a i 1 _ - .PY f Q't S E ~c ~ SCOTT COBURN r & AS50C1ATE5 ARl'HITECTS w _ y _ 2I(IO PEARL STREF:1 I f SUITE B r i ; . . - BQU~dER, C~ 80302 303.443.7557 • I f n, ~ i i i i F ANTHOVI' GRANT _ ~ i ~ ~ i i'i I` ~ F ~ anthom'Igranl~~i eahoo.cotn T - ~l I _ - ' ~ ~a, _ - ! - - - EAST (20TH STREET VIEUV) ELEVATION HICKMAN GARAGE 114"=1'-0" 136 MAPLETON AVENUE BOULDER COLORADO