The URL can be used to link to this page

Meeting Packet - DMC - 7/11/2011 DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT COMMISSION July 11, 2011 5:30 p.m. Off Site Meeting 13th Street Conference Room, 1720 13th Street AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of May 2 and June 8, 2011 Meeting Minutes 3. Public Participation 4. Police Update 5. Parks Update 6. BID Update 7. Matters From Commissioners • Civic Use Task Force Update • Committee Assignments 8. Matters From Staff • Garage Signage Project • Downtown Improvements Update/Capital Investment Strategy - Ballot Initiative • Downtown Development and Access Projections Update / DT5 Proposal • Update to Transportation Advisory Board 7:45 to 8:30pm - Open House - Capital Investment Strategy Task Force in Municipal Building Lobby Attachments • Sales and Use Tax Revenue Report - April 2011 • January - March 2011 Revenue and Expenditures • Police Stats - May/June 2011 • Downtown Boulder Open/Close List • Committee List • Energy Smart Card • Update to Transportation Advisory Board • Capital Investment Strategy Materials • 2011 Emerging Trends in Parking - IPI 2011 DUHMD/PS Areas of Focus 2011 DMC Priorities • CAGID Capital Plan Phase II Establish a Sustainable Maintenance and • Hill Redevelopment Improvement Fund for the Pearl Street • Downtown Improvements Mall and Downtown Streetscape. • Civic Use Pad • Support Civic Use Task Force • Boulder Junction Access and Parking Recommendations and Participate in Civic Districts Master Plan/"SoDA" Study. • Encourage Vitality and Excitement of Downtown Boulder as a Revenue Generator and the Heart of the City. Mission Statement: We serve the downtown. University Hill and affected conummities by providing quality prograni parking enforcement, maintenance and alternative modes services through the highest level of customer service. efficient management and effective problem solving. CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING MINUTES FORM NAME OF BOARD/COMMISSION: DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT COMMISSION NAME/TELEPHONE OF PERSON PREPARING SUMMARY: Ruth Weiss - 303-413-7318 NAMES OF MEMBERS, STAFF, AND INVITED GUESTS PRESENT: BOARD MEMBERS: CORNELIUS, DAHL, KOVAL, McNRLLEN, PATTERSON (absent) STAFF: "'INTER, CUNNINGHAM, JOBERT, WEISS, LANDRITH, WEINHEIMER, LA HAIE GUESTS: SEAN MAHER TYPE OF MEETING: REGULAR May 2, 2011 AGENDA ITEM 1- Roll Call: Meeting called to order at 5:32 p.m. AGENDA ITEM 2 - Approval of the April 4, 2011 Minutes: (See Action Item Below) AGENDA ITEM 3 - Election of Officers: Dahl nominated Koval for Chair and McMullen seconded. All commissioners were in favor. McMullen nominated Cornelius for Vice Chair, Dahl seconded. All commissioners were in favor. AGENDA ITEM 4 - Public Participation: None AGENDA ITEM 5- Police Update: Weinheimer mentioned that last month saw another decline in calls from 2010 with the largest decline evident in thefts. Trespasses were up this year from last. Calls in the bars were down from last year. Dahl questioned any negative action on the mall from 420 and Weinheimer said that there was none. AGENDA ITEM65 - Parks Update: La Hale discussed the status of the Family Gathering Area on the 1200 block and mentioned the fence may be pulled by Saturday for graduation and Mother's Day providing the weather holds. The new side walk scrubber works well, perennials are being planted in the raised beds, and Forestry planted 6 trees so far this year on the mall. Winter thanked Forestry and Parks for their efforts on the mall. AGENDA ITEM 7- BID Update: Maher mentioned that the Taste of Pearl was very successful yesterday, May 12`h - 6 -8pm is the kick off Party for Microsoft, May 28 and 29 is the Bolder Boulder event. Both DBI and BID supported the Mobile Food Vending and mentioned that some retailers were concerned with the 100 foot distance to an eating establishment. Winter mentioned council's concern with downtown bricks and mortar and that the ordinance is for private property use only. Maher continued that Carriage House is discouraged and is focusing on the Watershed School and will explore the old Lazy Dog site at 28th and Iris. Maher offered that tomorrow night's Council meeting, DBI will be in support of extending FAR beyond the Daily Camera site. Koval questioned the gateway on Canyon and the DBI Board will discuss the sites being focused on. The discussion continued on the Yocum site, Justice site and DBI's concern with buildings downtown. McMullen mentioned that the CU Architecture School is weighing in with a focus on the Yocum site. Cornelius questioned the time line for purchase by the Carriage House and Maher offered that a donor has offered 5500,000 to be used this year only for a purchase. Koval mentioned the downtown zoning change and can DBI weigh in on business benefits. Maher mentioned that in a meeting with Driskell and others, the DBI Board would like to see affordable housing and create a special fund for the civic pad, or Central Park, to make improvements by cash in lieu. Maher mentioned a tech business in East Boulder is looking to move to downtown Boulder and if the FAR is changed, it would allow the expansion of a major building site to accommodate this user and keep jobs in Boulder. CBS News did a piece on Boulder last Sunday morning that will air on Mother's Day. AGENDA ITEM 8 - Matters from the Commissioners: Standing Committees were discussed and participants selected. McMullen commented on the DT-5 zoning, offered suggestions to certain details that would be a community benefit. Winter suggested a vote / support to take to council regarding the zoning changes proposed. McMullen motioned that Downtown Management Commission supports the recommended changes in Item 5-C to the DT-5 zone as presented, Dahl seconded the motion. Maher was questioned on those that were against the proposed changes and offered that Liquor Mart was opposed. It is a matter of moving the set back from 78 feet to 65 feet. All conunissioners were in favor of the motion as proposed and the motion passed unanimously. AGENDA ITEM 9 -Matters from the Staff. Winter mentioned the multi-year project to maintain the garages, with waterproofing and structural improvements; the current focus is signage, painting and a wireless system that counts spaces. An RFP was put out, a subcommittee will review them and two finalists will be asked to come in to interview with someone on board in the next month or two. Several downtown stakeholders and partners will be included in the selection process. Winter continued that the improvements to the Farmers' Market was close to completion, next project is 15th Street between Arapahoe and Canyon; Cafe Seating was passed by council at their last meeting, and the budget process is gearing up, civic use task force recommendations will be going to council on May 17th along with recommendations to reevaluate the approach since a single developer for the site is not working and looking at a layer cake use by non profit and for performances, an entrepreneur is looking to come to Boulder for a for-profit use of the site with a use that is enticing and would bring people to downtown, perhaps using revenues from the site to reinvest on the site to make uses more affordable and to work more closely with the St. Julien Hotel, and breaking down costs to make it more manageable. Jobert mentioned that Boulder B cycle has begun to install their sites: roll out is scheduled for May 20th. Dahl questioned the memberships. Jobert offered the benefits of 420 were a huge bump in revenue to the downtown garages. The budget process begins next week; the downtown improvements are partially funded and reworked to split out the replacement dollars and it could go forward on a ballot issue. Jobert continued that revenues were up to date compared to the last two years. Cunningham mentioned that Farmers' Market begins Wednesdays this week for the summer and will be selling alcohol. The news box vendor has been replaced. A downtown design firm mentioned that the flyer kiosks need maintenance and should be used to advertise COB events. Meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: MOTION: Dahl motioned to approve the April 4, 2011 meeting minutes. Cornelius seconded. Approved unanimously. MOTION: Dahl nominated Koval for Chair and McMullen seconded. All commissioners were in favor. MOTION: McMullen nominated Cornelius for Vice Chair, Dahl seconded. All commissioners were in favor. MOTION: McMullen motioned that Downtown Management Commission supports the recommended changes in Item 5-C to the DT-5 zone as presented and Dahl seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor of the motion as proposed and the motion passed unanimously. FUTURE MEETINGS: June 6, 2011 Council Chambers Regular Meeting APPROVED BY: DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Attest: Ruth Weiss, Secretary John Koval, Chair 2 CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING MINUTES FORM NAME OF BOARD/COMMISSION: DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT COMMISSION, BOULDER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, DOWNTOWN BOULDER INC. JOINT MEETING NAME/TELEPHONE OF PERSON PREPARING SUMMARY: Ruth Weiss - 303-413-7318 NAMES OF MEMBERS, STAFF, AND INVITED GUESTS PRESENT: DMC BOARD MEMBERS: CORNELIUS, DAHL, KOVAL (absent), MCMULLEN, PATTERSON, STAFF: ASSEFA, BRAUTIGAM, CUNNINGHAM, DRISKELL, HADDOCK, KORBELIK, MATTHEWS, RICHSTONE, WINTER BID/DBI: K.C. BECKER, ED BYRNE, ALEX CASSIDY, BONNIE DAHL, PAUL EKLUND, RICHARD FOY, MARC GINSBERG, REG GUPTON, DAN HAYWARD, PETER HEINZ, SUE HEMPSTEAD, ANDY JAMES, GEORGE KARAKEHIAN, SEAN MAHER, AMY MOYNIHAN, FERN O'BRIEN, RICHARD POLE-, WENDY REYNOLDS, NOLAN ROSALL, PATTY ROSS, JOHN SHOPBACH, PHIL SHILL, ADRIAN SOPHER, MARA SOUTIERE, STEPHEN SPARN, MARY STREET, LEONARD THOMAS, CINDY WARD, JEFF WENGERT, JODI WILLIAMS TYPE OF MEETING: JOINT MEETING MINUTES OFF SITE MEETING: June 8, 2011 ITEM 1- Meeting called to order at 7:40 a.m. ITEM 2 - Sean Maher called the meeting to order. Molly Winter welcomed members of the three downtown organizations: the Downtown Boulder Business Improvement District, Downtown Boulder, Inc. and the Downtown Management Commission. Maher commented on the Camera article regarding Karlin Real Estate's redevelopment concept for the Camera building. Their proposed concept would have more floor area than what is now allowed in the zoning area. City Council directed staff to look at expanding the current FAR bonus to include commercial space. ITEM 3 - DT-5 Zone Bonus Review Project - David Driskell: The purpose of the project was to analyze the potential benefits and impacts of a proposed change to the city's policy for FAR bonuses in the Downtown-5 Zone District. The proposed change would allow the existing 0.5 FAR bonus for onsite housing, and possibly the additional existing 0.5 FAR bonus for either onsite housing or structured, above-grade parking, to be granted for commercial only development through a payment of a "commercial linkage fee" to the city's housing fund. Core principles of the project: respond to changing needs of downtown core to ensure downtown remains vibrant, respond to expressed need for more and larger downtown office space, acknowledge the reality of delivering "market rate affordable" housing units in downtown and recognize the value of downtown to the community at-large. City staff identified the following questions to guide the analysis of the proposed code change. ECONOMY - What are potential economic benefits? (Additional square feet of office space, employees, employee spending and assessment dollars to the BID) - What would be the potential economic benefits to the community at-large? (Additional potential tax revenues) - What would be the benefits to property owners? (Additional development capacity, land value and tenant revenue) ACCESS - What would be additional potential access demands? (Build out projections by use at 5, 10, 15 years, related TDM program and parking demand, relation to existing parking inventory) - What would be additional potential traffic impacts? (Potential additional peak hour trips, impacts to peak hour levels of service) HOUSING -How many potential new housing units might result from existing FAR bonus? (Square feet of potential 1 additional residential space/number of units, potential number of new residents, market realities of housing development) Current project schedule would be to have a public hearing with the Planning Board on August 4`h, First reading with City Council on August 18`' and Second reading and public hearing with City Council on September 6`11 Driskell asked for questions/continents. • Adrian Sopher asked if staff had looked at other options outside of housing for the linkage fee. Driskell said that the no other options were analyzed due to the short timeline for the current review project. Susan Richstone said that the housing demand is created by job growth and Driskell added that zoning evolves to community needs. Driskell also acknowledged that residential properties within the BID District do not contribute to the BID's assessment. • Leonard Thomas questioned whether the funds could be applied to existing infrastructures where demand will increase with the additional building mass. • Nolan Rosall asked if the opportunity exists to look at possible changes in design guidelines. Again, due to the timing this would require additional analysis and not part of the current project. • Phil Shull asked if this type of policy change could be used in other downtown zones. Driskell said that a next phase could address some of these issues. Driskell left the meeting and Maher addressed the boards for comments/feedback regarding the proposed policy change. Adrian Sopher suggested that the idea of other uses for the linkage fee be put on work order for staff. Peter Heinz said that the impact on infrastructure is not part of the mission of the BID (focus on clean and safe). Council members in attendance (Becker & Karakehian) said that there is support on Council for the change, but Karakehian said that asking for changes to the linkage fee at this point could jeopardize/slow down the current proposed changes. City Manager, Jane Brautigam said that anything added to the Council's current work plan could not be addressed this year, and then would have to go before the new Council to be considered to be addressed in 2012. KC Becker noted that there is a current Affordable Housing Task Force and board members should share their feedback with the task force. Overall consensus of the meeting was in support for the current proposed policy change, with hopes that broader discussions regarding the linkage fee and inclusion of additional zones be analyzed in the future, after passage of the current proposal. Meeting adjourned at 8:40 a.m. ACTION ITEMS: None FUTURE DMC MEETINGS: July 11, 2011 Muni Lobby Regular Meeting 5:30 p.m. APPROVED BY: DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Attest: Ruth Weiss, Secretary Christopher Cornelius, Vice Chair 2 City of Boulder Sales & Use Tax Revenue Report April, 2011 Issued June 17, 2011 This report provides information and analysis related to 2011 year-to-date (YTD) sales and use tax collections. Results are for actual sales activity through the month of April, the tax on which is received by the city in the subsequent month. Any questions should be directed to Bob Eichem, Chief Financial Officer at (303) 441-1819. REVENUE COMPARISONS TO COMPARABLE PERIOD IN PRIOR YEAR Table 1 lists the categories of sales and use tax collected by the City of Boulder. It illustrates the percent change in the various areas for April YTD 2011 over the same time period in 2010. As reflected in Table 1, Total sales and use tax has increased from the 2010 base by 7.80%. TABLE 1 ACTUAL REVENUE % CHANGE IN TAX CATEGORY REVENUE % OF Increase/(Decrease) TOTAL Sales Tax 6.38% 81.86% Business/Consumer Use Tax 19.22% 10.51% Construction Use Tax -1.59% 5.09% Motor Vehicle Use Tax 16.96% 2.60% Refunds -86.09% -0.05% Total Sales & Use Tax 7.80% 100.00% The beginning months of 2010 were weaker than the balance of the year. Therefore, it may be more difficult to maintain the level of increases experienced April YTD 2011 as the comparative 2010 results strengthen toward the later part of the year. TABLE 2 3 YEAR APRIL YTD COMPARISON Percent Increase/(Decrease) Category 2009 2010 2011 Retail Sales Tax (5.24%) 4.74% 6.38% Business/Consumer Use Tax 1.10% (15.05%) 18.77% Construction Use Tax 20.08% (36.12%) (1.59%) Total (2.48%) (1.87%) 7.80% ANALYSIS OF RESULTS • Retail Sales Tax - Actual retail receipts are up by 6.38%. • Business/Consumer Use Tax - This category tends to be volatile in nature and the short-term results do not necessarily reflect trends. But after two years of negative results in this category, we are hopeful that the April YTD increase of 19.22% is an indication that business confidence is improving and, combined with temporary changes to Federal tax policy, will result in continuing increases in business investments. • Construction Use Tax - This category is down by 1.59% April YTD. We expect total year 2011 construction use tax revenue to be down significantly from that collected in 2010. • Motor Vehicle Use is up by a healthy 16.96%. Although this category is only 2.60% of total sales and use tax revenue, this increase may be an indicator that the economy is improving. DETAILED ANALYSIS OF MAJOR CATEGORIES Although it is too early in the year to firmly identify trends, the following monthly information will begin to form a data base that will provide a better indication of trends as the year progresses. Retail Sales Tax - April YTD increased by 6.38%. Jan Feb Mar Apr 17.88% -4.71% 8.00% 5.83% Food Stores - Retail sales tax revenue for food stores is up by 3.60% YTD. Jan Feb Mar Apr 24.77% 1.59% (9.54%) 4.78% Sales at Eating Places are both an important revenue source (Eating Places comprise about 12% of sales/use tax) and are a significant indicator of the health of the economy in the city. This discretionary category is correlated with unemployment (disposable income) and consumer confidence. Total April YTD retail tax at Eating Places is up by 10.3 7%. Jan Feb Mar Apr 9.77% 3.08% 9.75% 7.16% Apparel Store sales are up by 6.25% for the year. Jan Feb Mar Apr 6.63% 0.96% 9.89% 21.04% General Retail is up by 7.50% YTD. Jan Feb Mar Apr 7.10% 0.84% 11.14% 10.01% Utilities (primarily retail sales tax on natural gas and electricity) are down by 7.17% YTD. Tax on Public Utilities comprise approximately 6% of total sales and use tax revenue. Jan Feb Mar Apr (10.66%) (0.54%) (8.33%) (11.26%) MEDICAL MARIJUANA BUSINESS SALES TAX In response to the interest expressed in this emerging industry, this section has been added to the monthly revenue report. As a newly emerging industry with no significant previous year history, comparison of current tax receipts to prior year data will not yield much useful information. Instead, monthly sales tax revenue remitted by these businesses in 2011 is presented below. Total April YTD retail sales tax revenue collected in this category is $254,186. This industry represents less than one half one percent of total sales and use tax collections. Jan Feb Mar Apr $55,982 $68,348 $58,134 $71,721 Significant YTD increases / decreases by tax category are summarized in Table 3. TABLE 3 2011 RETAIL SALES TAX Change in Comparable YTD Collections) STRENGTHS: WEAKNESSES: ■ Food Stores up by 3.60% ■ Transportation/Utilities down by 7.67% ■ Eating Places up by 7.47% Computer Related Business down by 9.13% ■ Apparel Stores up by 10.37% ■ UHGID (the "hill") down by 4.49% ■ Home Furnishings up by 20.67% Gunbarrel Industrial down by 11.38% ■ General Retail up by 7.50% Public Utilities down by 7.17% ■ Automotive Trade up by 9.88° o ■ Building Materials Retail up by 3.48% ■ Consumer Electronics up by 102.92% ■ Downtown up by 5.37% ■ N 28t1' Commercial up by 4.41% ■ Univ. of Colorado up by 0.50% ■ Basemar up by 20.33% ■ BVRC (excl 29`h St) up by 2.27% ■ TwentyNinth St up by 6.45% ■ Table Mesa up by 4.40% ■ The Meadows up by 9.99% ■ All Other Boulder up by 17.72% ■ Gunbarrel Commercial up by 6.19% ■ Out of State up by 24.88% ■ Pearl Street Mall up by 10.93% ■ Boulder Industrial up by 14.94% 2011 USE TAX Change in YTD Com arable Collections STRENGTHS: WEAKNESSES ■ Motor Vehicle Use Tax up by 16.96% Construction Use Tax down by 1.59% ■ Computer Related Business Use Tax up by 76.76% ACCOMMODATION TAX Authorized by a vote of the people in November of 2010, Accommodation Tax increased from 5.5% to 7.5% on January 1, 2011. Therefore, the following chart provides information on both the April YTD increase in base revenue (the comparison at 5.50%) and revenue associated with the increase in rate. 2010 2011 % Change Tax at 5.50% $774,580 $827,675 6.85% Additional 2.00% Tax $300,973 Total Accommodation Tax $547,645 $1,128,648 ADMISSIONS TAX Admissions Tax decreased by 2.36%. PROJECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE Nordstrom's Rack opened for business in Boulder on April 28t1i. The store occupies a 39,000 square foot space and opened with 100 employees. The Vectra Bank/BCBR Indicators listed in the May 27 - June 9 Boulder County Business Report, include the following: The recalibrated Boulder Valley Index inched upward, from 114.3 to 114.7, the fourth consecutive quarter of small, but positive gains. Improvement in the index is driven by stronger retail sales, accommodative interest rates, increased payrolls and continued growth in U.S. output. On the job front, Boulder County employment has posted gains in eight of the last 15 months. First quarter employment is about 1,200 workers ahead of the same period last year. On the downside, county employment remains about 10,000 workers below its 2001 peak. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, the nation, Colorado, and the Boulder Valley will continue to add jobs at a rate that is clearly less than robust. An article by Aldo Svaldi in the June 8, 2011 Denver Post includes the following information: Colorado's GDP rose 1.4% last year, adjusted for inflation. That's the 38h-slowest growth rate in the U.S. and behind the 2.6% average, according to...the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Businesses have been substituting capital for labor in this recovery, one reason the rebound hasn't translated into more jobs, said Richard Wobbekind , executive director of the CU Business Research Division. Whether that becomes a long-term trend remains to be seen, he said, but it appears to be holding back the recovery. Government spending contributed 0.29% toward Colorado's overall growth rate, versus 0.04% nationally. "We are (now) seeing a lot of the private-sector job gains being wiped out by declines in state and local governments," Shields said. (Martin Shields is the director of the Regional Economics Institute at CSU.) An effect of govermnent budget cuts is illustrated in an article by Beth Potter in the April 29 - May 12, 2011 Boulder Counhv Business Report. This type of funding cut will both reduce jobs and construction use tax revenue in the City of Boulder. Some area construction workers could lose their jobs as a result of a $10 million cut in federal funding to renovate... "Building 1" at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The March 18, 2011 Colorado Outlook by the Governor's Office of State Planning and Budgeting discusses risks to the budget outlook: The sustainability of the economic recovery is uncertain and there are many risks that the economy confronts over the forecast period. Therefore, there is heightened risk that more unfavorable economic conditions could develop and the economy could perform worse than expected.... Nonetheless, the economy is remarkably resilient and is able to continue to grow amidst difficult conditions. Thus, this forecast assumes that growth, though modest, is expected to continue. According to the December 2010 Economic and Revenue Forecast by the Colorado Legislative Council Staff: The Colorado economy continues along a path of slow and gradual recovery. Several economic indicators have begun to signal growth. Employment in Colorado's private sector has been trending up since May. Initial claims for unemployment insurance have drifted lower, and retail spending has been increasing, albeit slowly. Despite these clear signs that the economy is expanding, there are ongoing struggles and uncertainties that will restrain the strength of the recovery in 2011 and beyond. High unemployment, constrained credit, high debt, and the struggling housing market will dampen growth over the next several years. While there has been a recent rebound in retail sales growth, there are ongoing concerns for 2011 as spending will be constrained by heavy debt, high unemployment, and slow wage growth. In addition, some sales in 2010 may have been boosted by improved consumer confidence and federal stimulus programs. These stimulus programs have largely ended. The State Legislative Council December 2011 forecast for percentage change in various economic indicators follows: 2010 2011 2012 2013 Unemployment Rate 8.0% 8.4% 8.2% 7.7% Personal Income 2.3% 3.1% 3.4% 4.6% Wage and Salary Income 0.8% 1.4% 3.4% 5.4% Retail Trade Sales 4.9% 3.1% 4.6% 4.3% Denver-Boulder Inflation Rate 1.2% 1.9% 2.9% 3.1% The level of uncertainty is further discussed in a January 28, 2011 article titled "Economists concur: rocky path ahead" by Beth Potter in the Boulder County Business Report: BOULDER - Increasingly tight state and federal budgets may very well hurt the local economy, according to a regional economist at Vectra Bank Colorado's Annual Boulder Valley Economic Forecast breakfast held Friday morning in Boulder. Upcoming state budget cuts are expected to impact higher institutions of learning such as the University of Colorado, said Phyllis Resnick, a regional economist for the Denver Regional Council of Governments and the lead economist for the center for Colorado's Economic Future at the University of Denver. Planned federal budget cuts could impact federal laboratories in Boulder County, and local governments also could face increasing fiscal pressures brought on by lower tax revenues, Resnick said - all potential downside risks for the regional economy. "The 'new normal,'... I'm not sure we know what that means yet," Resnick said. "We're in another transitional change." On the plus side, the region continues to have a highly educated work force and numerous high-paying jobs, Resnick said. But business leaders must continue to attract new jobs in "growth sectors," to keep the economy humming, she said. "The 1990s are over, and they're not coming back," Resnick said, alluding to the state's rosy economic period through much of the last two decades. "But Colorado remains a desirable place to live." Other factors leading to uncertainty in the global economy include continued high domestic government spending, and ongoing problems in the euro zone overseas, Feiger said. This report will be updated and will be available on approximately the tenth business day of each month. APRIL I TDActual Total Net Sales/Use Tax Receipts by Tax Category 2010: ZQl l % G hange % of Total Sales Tax 21,479,146 22,849,601 6.38% 81.86% Business Use Tax 2,461,533 2,934,730 19.22% 10.51% Construction Use Tax 1,442,637 1,419,713 -1.59% 5.09% Motor vehicle 619,918 725,066 16.96% 2.60% Refunds -108.967 -15,154 -86.09% -0.05% Total Sales and Use Tax 25,894,268 27,913,955 7.80% 100.00% APRIL YTD Actual Total Net Sales/Use Tax Receipts by Industry Type 2010: 2Q11 °foChange of Total Food Stores 3,634,177 3,830,563 5.40% 13.72% Eating Places 3,356,933 3,604,764 738% 12.91% Apparel Stores 725,629 818,071 12.74% 2.93% Home Furnishings 668,783 803,476 20.14% 2.88% General Retail 5,520,452 5,963,981 8.03% 21.37% Transportation/Utilities 2,741,569 2,519,805 -8.09% 9.03% Automotive Trade 1,592,934 1,820,929 1431% 6.52% Building Material-Retail 795,171 822,115 3.39% 2.95% Construction Use Tax 1,201,018 1,298,945 8.15% 4.65% Construction Sales Tax 161,388 99,255 -38.50% 0.36% Consumer Electronics 530,940 999,842 88.32% 3.58% Computer Related Business Sector 1,473,931 1,862,461 26.36% 6.67% All Other 3,600308 3,484,902 -3.21% 12.48% Refunds -108.967 -15.154 -86.09% -0.05% Total Sales and Use Tax 25,894,268 27,913,955 7.80% 100.00% APRIL FTD'Actual Total Net Sales/Use Tax Receipts by Geographic Area 2010 2011 % Change ~fo of Total North Broadway 365,446 410,463 12.32% 1.47%0 Downtown 1,698,802 1,811,704 6.65% 6.49% Downtown Extension 169,750 72,552 -57.26% 0.26% UHGID (the "hill") 362,705 356,066 -1.83% 1.28% East Downtown 165,706 182,439 10.10% 0.65% N. 28th St. Commercial 1,367,703 1,430,482 4.59% 5.12% N. Broadway Annex 143,553 160,896 12.08% 0.58% University of Colorado 366,505 365,414 -0.30% 1.31% Basemar 480,577 582,439 2110% 2.09% BVRC-Boulder Valley Regional Center 5,044,805 5,333,956 5.73% 19.11% 29th Street 1,898,597 2,052,429 8.10% 7.35% Table Mesa 698,491 741,374 6.14% 2.66% The Meadows 282,069 309,333 9.67% 1.11% All Other Boulder 1,138,292 1,189,301 4.48% 4.26% Boulder County 423,962 275,054 -35.12% 0.99% Metro Denver 1,327,815 1,379,841 3.92% 4.94% Colorado All Other 37,160 60,565 62.99% 0.22% Out of State 2,685,292 3,318,485 23.58% 11.89% Airport 5,031 5,001 -0.61% 0.02% GrnbarrelIndustrial 1,188,313 1,822,345 53.36% 6.53% Gunbarrel Conmiercial 311,683 334,852 7.43% 1.20% Pearl Street Mall 621,261 667,710 7.48% 2.39% Boulder Industrial 2,407,247 2,417,555 0.43% 8.66% Unlicensed Receipts 362,061 239,136 -33.95% 0.86% County Clerk 619,918 725,066 16.96% 2.60% Public Utilities 1,830,491 1,684,651 -7.97% 6.04% Refunds -108,967 -15,154 -86.09% -0.05% Total Sales and Use Tax 25,894,268 27,913,955 7.80% 100.00% APRIL YTD:Actual % Change in . Miscellaneous Tax Statistics 2010: 2Q11 Taxaule Sales Total Food Service Tax 153,308 171,323 11.75% Acconunodations Tax 774,580 1,128,648 6.85% Admissions Tax 180,383 176,121 -2.36% License Fees 10,875 9,625 -11.49% Trash Tax 865,897 427,350 -50.65% USE SALES COMPARISON OF YEAR-TO-DATE ACTUAL REVENUE FOR THE YEAR 2011 TO COMPARABLE PERIOD USE TAX BY CATEGORY SALES TAX BY CATEGORY ::APRIL: YTD:Actual APRII YTI3 Actual : 2010 2(1:11 Chite Standard Industrial Code 201Q[ 2011 °io Cian~e 15,364 81,329 429.34% Food Stores 3,618,813 3,749,234 3.60% 28,179 27,265 -3.25% Eating Places 3,328,753 3,577,500 7.47% 1,013 18,330 1710.32% Apparel Stores 724,616 799,741 10.37% 6,439 4,206 -34.69% Home Furnishings 662,343 799,271 20.67% 503,954 571,030 13.31% General Retail 5,016,499 5,392,951 7.50% 116,939 96,380 -17.58% Transportation/Utilities 2,624,630 2,423,425 -7.67% 626,683 759,189 21.14% Automotive Trade 966,251 1,061,740 9.88% 3,662 3,024 -17.42% Building Material-Retail 791,509 819,090 3.48% 1,201,018 1,298,945 8.15% Construction Use Tax 0 0 na 0 0 na Construction Sales Tax 161,388 99,255 -38.50% 46,110 16,011 -65.28% Consumer Electronics 484,830 983,830 102.92% 608,974 1,076,435 76.76% Computer Related Business 864,958 786,026 -9.13% 1,365,753 1,127,363 -17.4500' All Other 2,234,556 2,357,539 5.5O% 4,524,089 5,079,508 1228°e Total Sales and Use Tax 21,479,146 22,849,601 6.38% USE TAX BY CATEGORY SALES TAX BY CATEGORY APRIL, S'Tp!ictual X010 20 1 o Chiige : Geographic Code 20147: 2011 ° akiange 13,281 17,217 29.63%o North Broadway 352,164 393,246 11.67% 59,178 83,957 41.87% Downtown 1,639,624 1,727,747 5.37% 2,107 7,276 245.32% Downtown Extension 167,643 65,277 -61.06% 8,598 17,870 107.83% UHGID (the "hill") 354,107 338,196 -4.49% 11,293 8,479 -24.92% East Downtown 154,413 173,959 12.66% 28,120 31,886 13.39% N. 28th St. Commercial 1,339,583 1,398,595 4.41% 12,274 27,264 122.12% N. Broadway Annex 131,279 133,632 1.79% 12,684 9,840 -22.42% University of Colorado 353,821 355,575 0.50% 5,052 10,225 102.40% Basemar 475,525 572,214 20.33% 70,016 246,233 251.68% BVRC 4,974,790 5,087,723 2.27% 8,950 40,911 357.13% 29th Street 1,889,647 2,0117518 6.45% 4,671 17,049 265.03% Table Mesa 693,820 724,325 4.40% 2,295 1,608 -29.94% The Meadows 279,773 307,725 9.99% 498,916 436,651 -12.48% All Other Boulder 639,375 752,650 17.72% 201,160 61,600 -69.38% Boulder County 222,802 213,454 -4.20% 496,714 485,806 -2.20% Metro Denver 831,101 894,035 7.57% 4,224 17,826 322.02% Colorado All Other 32,936 42,739 29.76% 135,299 133,949 -1.00% Out of State 2,549,993 3,184,536 24.88% 243 596 144.96% Airport 4,788 4,404 -8.01% 907,708 1,573,663 73.37% Gunbarrel Industrial 280,605 248,682 -11.38% 1,794 5,775 221.82% Gunbarrel Commercial 309,889 329,077 6.19% 23,820 4,945 -79.24% Pearl Street Mall 597,442 662,765 10.93% 1,095,859 910,262 -16.94% Boulder Industrial 1,311,388 1,507,293 14.94% 232,234 155,345 -33.11% Unlicensed Receipts 129,828 83,791 -35.46% 619,918 725,066 16.96% County Clerk 0 0 na 67,678 48,210 -28.77% Public Utilities 1,762,812 1,636441 -7.17% 4,524,089 5,079,508 12.28% Total Sales and Use Tax 21,479,146 22,849,601 6.38% Tax by Mo & Category TOTAL CITY SALES AND USE TAX COLLECTIONS o/oCltange in Taxable REVENUE CATEGORY YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY 1UN 1UL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL > Sales RETAIL SALES TAX 2004 4,394,136 4,170,467 5,327,051 4,339,5944;461,055 5,340,555 433312841749,658 5,542,805 4,450,7314,518,6296,602,036 58,229,844':. 145% Rate 3 41 % 2005 4.255,041 4,453,370 5,232,389 4,3E3,026 4;576,864 5,535,196 4 494,079'. 5,013.379 5,550,916 4,541.7904.769,7006,932 929'. 59,708 680 2.54% 2006 4,734,249 4,645,436 5,537,253 4;6594581 4,882,331 6,129,363 4737773! 5,237,757 6,156,056 4,950,305! 4,387,847 7,891618! 63,949446! 7.10% Rate Chg 3 41%13.56% 2007 5,118,353 5,014,615 6,918,421 4;965,981 ! 5,500,701 6,712,841 5;565T371 6,393,028 6,954,377 5,747.963, 5,695,703: 8,411,484 72,998 8381 9.34% Rate Chg356%>3.41% 2008 5;197400 5,105,109 6,005,946 5,3314475,488,450 6,572,335 5508796'. 6,258,640 6,620,535 5,382,779 5,255,155 7,443,455 70,170045'.. 0.35% Rate3.41% 2009 4;919,570 4,659,632 5,850,038 5,0776485,131,444 6,428,343 5206,770'. 5,790,533 6,093,314 5,170,325'. 4,735,769'. 7,814,230 66,877,613'. -4.69% 2010 4,576,034 5,386,190 6,196,697 5,3202255,470,595 6,895,283 5,522,076 5,943,315 6,855,385. 5,652,938 5,240,2118,414157 71,473106'. 6.87% 2011 5,394,367 5,132,437 6,692,597 5,630,200 22,849,601 -68,03% Change from prior year (Month 17 88% -471% &00% 583%-10100% -100.00% -100,00% -10000% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% Change from prior year (YTD) 17 88% &67% 6.56% 638% -15,21% -32A9% -41 96%-49.57% -56,20% -60.48% 63.76% -68.03% CONSUMER USE TAX 2004 980,229 665,018'. 899,453 742,692 724,614 866,974 810,8741 922,401 941,990'. 728,634 750,971 1,181776 10,215,625! -139% (includes Motor Vehicle) 2005 827,887 507,036 951,085 1,016,614 ! 1,103,592 1,001,048: 864,720'. 788,465 1,094,030 758,937 968,467:- 1,248,300 11,130,180'. 8.95% 2006 686,686 517,101 1,277,146 577,1441 964,529 781,362: 895,4031 776,258 1,054,696 727,776 1,092,224 1,287,15710,637,482 -4.43% Rate Chg 141%13.56% 2007 763,650 574,006: 975,178 888,726'. 733,196 858,072- 975,456 652,501 923,6671 732,463!. 716,317! 1,575,908'. 10,369,140'. -6.63% RateChg3.56%>341% - 2008 - 818,034 991,472 1,109,160 669,214'. 736,901 1,067,769732,3341 596,399 899,934 989,683 ! 599,8761 1,253,26710,464,043 535% Rate3.41% 2009 909,558 657,250 1,062,587 997,891 531,724 790,819, 858,325 1,299,767 989,089 741,578 698,452 1,600457 11,137,497 644% 2010 687,502 778,796 913,223 701,931 662,382 945,800 620,328 633,593 909,315 752,143 618,493 1,366,131 9,589,636 1390% 2011 1,247,135 650,595 1,034,670 727,395 3,659,795 6184% Change from prior year (Month) 8140% -16.46%: 1130% 363% 100.00% -100.00% . -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00%- -100.00%'. Change from prior year(YTD) 81.40% 29.42% 2123% 18.77%'. -224% 2196% -31.08% -38.42% -46.59% -51.88%1 -55.50%1 -61.84%1 CONSTRUCTION USE TAX 2004 210,383 336,148: 387,487 490,426 ! 229,416 181,732 204,851'. 155,409 212,299 119,283 238,459'. 283,087 3,048,978'. -10.50% Rate 3.41 % 2005 912,585 782,540 287,865 461,878'. 456,073 913,197 186,408 235,308 282,503 276,247 288,104 ! 514,975 5,597,684 ! 83,59% 2006 197,263 331,341 420,749 294,094'. 337,237 774,420 352,533'. 261,409 343,749 559,975'. 410,958'. 1,018,272'. 5,302,000'. -5.28% Rate Chg 3 41 %,3.565 2007 293,078 347,860 112,016 293,061 621,413 430,207: 1,119,425 259,226 421,376 286,524 376,978 253 590 4,814,755 -13,02% RateChg3.56%>341% ! 2008 330,080 347,219 748,549 454,797 327,855 241,649 100,759 442,652 347,954 217,885 107,831 381,753 4,048,982 1221% Rate341% 2009 944,905 111,907 425.028 776,511 279,761 995,132 721,209 676,301 235,485 223,169 591,970 1,467,798 7,449,176 8398% 2010 591,599 242,591 245,829 362,619'. 226,230 1,921,675 1,075.078 467,423 245,361 234,021 406,868'. 531,670 6,550,964'. -12.06% 2011 622,872 281,210 274,661 240,970 1,419,713 7833% Change from prior year (Month) 529% 15.92% 1173% -3155% -100.00% -100,00% -100,00% ' -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% Change from prior year (YTD) 529% 8.38% 9.14% -1.59% -14.93% -60A6% -69.57%'. -72.34% -73.60%'. -74.70%'. -76.41%'. -78.33%'. TOTAL FOR MONTH & CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR (MONTH & YTD) 2004 5,584,748 5,171,633 6,613,991 5,572,712 5,415,085 6,389,261 5,348,853 5,827,468 6,697,093 5,298,647 5,508,059 8,066899 71,494,448 0.47% Rate 3.41% 2005 5,995,513 5,742,946 6,471,340 5,831,518'. 6,136,529 7,449,441: 5,545,207 : 6,037,152 6,927,449 5,576,9746,026,271'. 8,696,204 76,436,545'. 6.91% 2006 5,618,198 5,493,878: 7,235,148 5,530,696'. 6,184,096 7,685,145 5,985,709'. 6,275,424 7,554,5001 6,238,056'. 5,891,030'. 10197,046'. 79,888,928'. 4.52% Rate Chg 3.41%>3.56% - 2007 6,175,081 5,936,481 8,005,615 6,147,768'. 6,855,311 8,001,120.: 7,660,252 ! 7,304,754 8,299,420 6,766,951 6,788,999'. 10,240,98288,182,7325.7 3% Ratechg3.56%>3.41% 2008 6,345,513 6,443,800 7,863,654 6,455,459 6,553,206 7,881,753, 6,341,889, 7,297,691 7,868,4236,590,3471 5,962,862; 9,078,475 84,683,0701 026% Rzte341% 2009 - 6,774,033 5,428,789 7,337,653 6,852,0495,942,929 8,214,294'. 6,786,3047,766,601 7,317,887! 6,135,072 1 6,026,19110,882,485 1 85,464,286! 0.92% 2010 5;855,134 6,407,577 7,355,749 6,384,774'. 6,359,207 9,762,758 7,217,482 7,044,332 8,010,061 6,639,102'. 6,265,572'. 10,311 957 87,613 706'. 2.51% 2011 7,264,374 6,064,242 8,001,928 6,598,565 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,929,109 6812% Less Refunds ' 2004 -1,343 -10,505 -636 872 -5,963 151 1,299 -4643 -244 -27,318 -5,758 -4,330 -63,061 2005 -246 -66,044 -909 -2,666 -1,647 10,080. -3,062 3,207 -B46 -1,586! 0! -4,757 -96,051'. 2006 -40,302 -5,272 -22,761 -3631 -5,099 0 0 -7,568 -806.: -5,947!. 406 -16,773 -105,296 2007 0 -38,291 -2,013 -729 -9,326 14,547 -14,440! -677 0 -5,9630-5,015-91,001 2008 -978 0'. 46,974 -1,409'. 0 2,375 445 -91493 -1,429: 0-48,521 -500 -112,1231 Less Refunds 2009 -3,335 0: 0 1,111-602 692'. 967-3,520 -2,747.': -179,087 -65,331-26376'. -283,770, 2010 -3,469 -68,130 -35,924. -1444! 33,920 -3,832 -1,648! 3,204 -7,969: 0! -12480! -214-183,234'. 2011 -8,569 2,479 _.-1,188 2,918 _-15,154 Adjusted total 2004 5,583,406 5,161,128 6,613,354 5,571,840 5,409,121 6,389,110 5347,554 5,822,825 6,696,849 57271,329 5,502,301 8,062,569 71431,386 1.01% Rate 3.41% 2005 5,995,266 5,676,902 6,470,431 5,828 852 6,134,882 7,439,361 5,542,145 6,032,946 6,926,603 5.575,388'. 6,026,271 8,691 446 76,340,493'. 6,87% 2006 5,577,896 5,488,606 7,212,388 5,530333 6;178,998 7,685,145 59857096,267,856 7,553,694 6.232,110: 5,890,624 10.180273! 79,783631! 4.51% Rate Chg3.41%13.56% 2007 6,175,081 5,898,190 8,003,602 6,1470396,845,984 7,986,572 7645,812 7,304,077 8,299,420 6,760,988 6,788,999 10,235,967 88,091,731 5.76% _ 2008 6,344,536 6,443,800 7,816,680 6,454,050 6,553,206 7,879,378 6,341,444 7,288,198 7,866,995 6,590,347 5,914,341 9,077,975 84,570,947 0.23% Rate3 41 % - 2009 6,770,698 5,428,789 7,337,653 6,850,938 ! 5,942,327 8,213,602 6,785,337 ! 7,763,080 7,315,140 57955,985 5,960,860 10,856 109. 85,180,517'. 0,72% 2010 5,851,665 6,339,447 7,319,826 6,383,3306,315,288 9,758,926 7,215,834 7,040,127 8,002,092 6,639,102 6,253,092 10,311744 87,430,472 2.64% 2011 7,255,806 6,061,763 8,000,739 6,595,647 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,913,955 6807% % Change (month) 24.00% -4.38% 9.30% 333% -100,00% -100.00%_ -100.00% I -100.00% -100.00% -100.00%!. -100.00% 1 -100.00%'. % Change (YTD) 24.00% 9.24% 9.26% T80% -1334% -33.49% -43,25% . -50.35% -W54% -60.61%, -6180% -68.07% x U J M N N V M m N to O V (D N M In N In V N V N f~ m r 1n V N M O N ^ 0 0 0 0 F N N M Q N M N CO (D M W I N 0 7 1 M ) V r n n V ~n N m m 0 CO V O O co r (O (n O r M V N (n M O N 'X t\ N CO n O m m N n n (D 00 W O CO N m r` co m co co n f- O O O 0 N W W O O N V a0 O 0 M N O O N Q M O N V V (D 0 cli uj O In t~ M O M M N f~ N M V Q f~ M N M N f~ V V M O CO O N N W Q M O m M p M M V M V C) V V V V M V V Q M V V V In Q V (n Q V 1n (D M M V V I~ ~ 2 In ui Q U N (D N m N V O n M M V O N 1n N r N N O m O p m N m e o e e U t` V N V LO CO O N V co O CO r M M [O N c0 tD V m Co f` V V V O m m N to N V d V O O N M CO IQ (O C7 (D m (D (O m O O N V tD M CO M r N m O M m O N r- co h O O t m n N m V M r v V V Q N ED tD n O N V O In m (n N co O (a m r tD a cd 00 r M r N Q N N M N V N M N N o) M N F- N N (n V ~n N N ty N F- _ co V W Q ~ e o e m C O M V co O m (O N O O Ot O N N N to (D M Q M O O n t{ N co N O 00 u 2 ~ ai o m 0 0 0) > L) N C V C # c O LL U ~ E co V m m V CD O [D m m W m (O m u) m m (D N N Q f~ CO m V O N l17 M O o 0 0 0 u) M O O O m N M M to m N (O to O O r N V N 17 tD r V O m r N co aa (O m (n r m cq r 0 Q N Q In M O OR n rl m n r r 0 (n co w r` (n O r N O O Co IQ Cl) N O N N 0- 6 0 DJ N N N N N N N (n CO N (V N N N N N N N to N r N N C C V N M I t r2 10 N 2 Q P N ~ •a N CO r O (D m m V N M CO O O M 0 t` V m V m n (n n w O m M r Q o 0 0 0 •1 N M M m N N M Q m LO t` m m tD O V O V u) (n r- O V CO m 1n r a0 N_ O) Ln w m (n M V (D O M M O O t+ M M M O M r tD V O M W r N O N r O co (n V N n O) N 01 ;0 [D t` V (D OO (n Q N r V M N (O N m r m m (O M O M O N M O t~ m O tD t'7 to r O C C co co 0 0 N N (n N O M O m O r M V V V V M V M Co O O r M tp ~ N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r e r r r r r r ~ d W (l7 7 u w d 01 ~ C a tD u) N v r n N N CO o Q o to m <D Q n Q m a p 41 m t3i N u7 m n (O m In m Q (D N c (n m O m m m V V M O n N V M N W Q Q tp O tp L m N r V r (N to r O N UC V O r -I r m to (O N M N N V (D r r m Q On t'7 N O N 0 E V N (n M M N (1] N M O D O N 1~ n O CO N O 06 (D N m m CO O W O C N N N D = Q In h h fD 7 4 LL (17 r O W O r O m (O O N O r• O M M r` M N N N O 0 V M V f\ m m N o 0 o a O M M N n (n (D n cp V O N O u) V M r h N O V N m M m N O O O N U m D O O O m N CO V N m M r O N fl m N m O r N M N co M O r O tG ap N (D (D N O V O m N N N fo CO N M t` f` (O (O V (P t'7 f~ CV V (O fv M N 'a C1 O N N M V V V M V V V V Q co N N M M M M M V V M M V co V N M M C V V G • q fn a m to m N Q m u) M r m V N N O M O O W N m m r N M N m m m n m 0 0 0 0 U U') DO M M m N m (n n V In f~ m 1!') 1f7 (D n N (n r M M m r M f~ N N O n 10 m o M m Q n V m N t` V M M tD V O CD N M V r M M O m O O M O r GO to N O m N O m N M M O V O N m f` C) h r (V N f• Co m r` Q M u) P co a d m O Q M V O N Q t~ r CD m m N N N V W (D Q u") N M N O o N M r N N N N N N N N N O r N N N N N N N N N N o N N N N m V C N (V N A 0 m 3 y d M N co M (D co r o m o Q n co (n (D a U m D e o r OO N (n O co co m m tD V LO (D co N n N N tp O > O n M M M~ r M O m I~ CO( t0 O N N O O r O f~ (D O N fn (n (D N r M m N M ((j h tOD• Y. Q r O # LL d R L G O M o E 0 0 8 e a N N N a ob ~ O T Q p ~ O O O ~ c)7 t"7 M N N N p o c c E E E 0 0 o E ca,ciE c c c o ~ Q H Q N ~ L L L ~ to r" -0 a~ v m H U U U n co L w E E E = L N E E LS E E o O C 1) lA > [71 Z > N > o o m N o m m o o a V D d p 0 0 0 0 N LL Q M Q Cn 0 Z O N N LL Q M M Q (n 0 lL Q ^2 M Q (n 0 Z O N H H F- N CD m N L(') O M LO N W M LO m O CD co co co m It U7 O co W M M n n m sY o 0 0 0 O N W O m m co O n V N N n CD 00 n M 0 (D n m LO M W U) N to O O M Ln N M O W V N W n n (D m W LO C(C M CD (D n LO (D m O N V m d• m (0 O Z J W O N (D N (D V M (O M U) W O LO M m w (D (D m N V n r (D n (D (fl r n O CO Q Ln d' V (D m't 0 U) n n (D to Lo Lo M Lo W n O O V W to n O 0) m r x Q H m m V V V 00 V In 'r V co V co V M V V V LO LO LO Lo V IT (D co C' M Lo V O Q W } m 0 ` M M CD O O MIn '53D r N V ti M M M Co O co N (fi moo N N M W (D o e e o 0 N W (D N n m W (D O N CO N O N d' m N co M LC) n (D ~ N h O n M O 0 0 V c) (O ccM CD Ln - N N - cc M m n V O N U) CO ti (D M m CO (`7 0 r L m y (D N W (D O O n- W m r M-7 O m d- 4 (D M N n W M T V n O L() Ln 00 r O N N - N LO M M V Cl) n~ N N~ M CN O M CO m M N m(D N N n M (D N N M N cy~ N U N W W M N M N M V m~J- v n LO W M M LO m 0 C. cO co U) (O n r O O M C U) m m O V O n V O Ln W m Ln W v m w (f) ~ (00 M M O N M LO (D 00 O N W C W M W O m Ln n M n n C M W (D v n W Ln M O (D Ln N C O 'It co m Ih N W U W m Co N m M W m N n W O (dW M V M L) ~ co O) Lo CD (D O N P, N N O co h m (D co Q co V v ~ U U _W 'V d' M R O O W m m W N_ n M n m M V U-1 N M Ln M m 0 n M n W (D o 0 0 0 = 4) V W O co m N V M (D W m CO W V m m Ln n V W n M M ; O N M W 0) O N (9 t" m N O V N 7 U) M O W W f+ m n-- LO U7 W W n Lf) O dw 0 0 W L11 M Q) M r d' 6 0 N N N N N N N N LO (D N n N. N N N N N N W N N N N m r Qj C6 d' LL ~ 7 0 N co 't (D U ~ a v m v v (D M n O O W O d' (D W W V O O (.O (D Ln n T m w m n a o 0 0 '4+ O M to (D Ln m n to N n V m N N W W U) LO Ln n V N O Ln (D W V U) N O r (p (p ti = N M M n O M cM O m W V M V M M W R CD M W W U I a Co LO V n O m ' N O N N r W n v co w LO V N ~ '7 M N 1- Ln CO n m M 00 M O M O Ln W O n O N r d' CD (D M ❑ C C W W O O N N L() N- co M W m 0 M 7 V~ 7 M LC) 00 cO ~ O N c 2 ~ r N L r Q U _U k ~ O Ln M N Ln M O O "Y N n n co Lf) Ln m (D Ln N N a n Ln M n v CN W r e e e e O co OM(DO V N Ommvm O MLO ~COV mNV nn W r Vco nLn co d• r M 0 y L M r O N U') N M W N O N W (O n n N V n( d' V N W"d Ln N C V c N d' O _ N (D M ~M N In N M N O N Ih n 0 DO N O W tb M N CO r co C) U~ Q, ^ co rl_ it co V U. C U) W 00 O n (D W L) O N CD I- O M M n M N W N 0 LO M V n m m N o o e e Co M M N n LO (D V V V N N (D LO V M- U) N O '7 N m M m N co V co p) O N N m (D O (D n co C N M CD N CD m O N (O m C, CO O n N M N W M (D p v co co N (Q 2 (D (D N O O m r N N co N W W LO M n r CD W C) M n N V (D n O d' Lf! r Q O N N M~ V M V V V V V w N N M M m m M M V M V 3 N M M M M L L C Q N V r~ V N U) N_ N V CD W LO O W LO N W W W m O0 n CD (D O n 0 W (D M I~ 0 0 0 0 N n W Ln W n m 0 CO W n m 0) N 0 W V M n N M (D N LO n CO It N (O V M O CO M V m n M"I' M LO P. W O( n M m CO O_ W W n O O O n r O M N LO r- (N C d m W N W V V n M W O O n (D M V V m M M 0 M m n r 6) (D V O d' [t CD N V W N m m m N LO CD r CO (D Ln m N M W r- LO In c{ LA 1.- OD O N N N N N N N N N (O r N N N N N N N N N N W N N N N m C N N W x _ M_ N n Cl) (O n O_ M C) V U) n tO W V co 0) o 0 0 0 N N i W M LO 00 co 00 m m W LO (D M N n LO N r (D r O O n MM (~')f~ "MOm(, c- -M(D (D (DN N O O r N n 0 0 N 0 O U) CD N r M m N M LO PI- 1- 6 r N N C V) c O E d o~° o c C) O r r O r r O O O M a d N N N O O O O 0 0 y y y 0 0 0 N N N G. E E E E x x x 0 0 0 0 F O O N N G) d7 0 a) a) lC a Q M a C C C C 0 -0 O L w j L w E E N _ N E E E w, = L N E 0 E E Lv Lo Lv Lv m 7 ` :5 U a, a), m 0 7 O) 7 O N N O r 7 U 7 L d d r L L L L 0) CL O U o N °o o ~a a~i m>> > m o aUi o o (C6 a~i U o aUi c U U U U o° N 7 N LL Q Q (n 2 Z❑ N N LT Q M M Q (n O Z ❑ N N LL 2i 2i Q Q (n 0 Z❑ N o 0 0 0 Co V r- 0) CO U) O U7 r` r- 0) V N co LO CO o U) O r N U) ^ V) 00 m 0 0 0 0 J DD O O M 00 00 l() O M P, 7 O (D N (D (D O 0) O It I. 0) It In V 00 N M Q (n CO O N CO U) r 00 00 00 CO ~t N (D r` co Cl) O M O N (D U) O c l! W r ~ 01 Cn r x O r- N O U) V 06 (O M (D n U) O r U) (D M O O CO M M n 00 0 0) O I- m O 1A 0 06 d' V (D U) m m n M ti (D M N N M r (D 0) N co Cl) O r` In M V 'Y M I-- (O ~ r U r N N r r N N r N N N N N r N N r r r 0 Z } m O y) V r- CD r N n O O Q) to N M (n y r (D 0) U-) V (r) co V n o m ~ o 0 0 0 ❑ N co O M N co V O N M N r. co N 00 O N M N V O (D CO ~j V (D I~ M (p N M O LO d O O N r r to r O r V' (D r U) CO r O N O N CO C V co U) O o r O M r +t.. M~ M M M V M in M( i (O M C V u-)I~ CO U-) I- tri r`: Ui V Lo t O N In 00 U O N 00 r a ° w o co N N (7 0 o 0 0 o m y > > > > m U V O o M V (D r` O r M M^ CO (D m m (D V m o n r` co m CD r` N P.- co N o 0 0 0 0 0) 0) r- 00 O (D (D m N U) V M Ur) N CO O O N CD r V C M (1) 00 N r- M N O h W M LL N U) O O DD N n M M r O n N O O M M O O N O r O O r m cr O U7 O N M O~ U 10 (D N M m m r- U) m m (r) In c 3i M N _ M C V O (r) C Lr CO lA O Lo Q1 q E T C C M M V M m U) O (D V V V CO N M V V U) O (o O (n 0 U) m~ M M V V r r CD L O a 00 C M V U) co U7 O U) rl- U') 0) M (D O Co N r-- co cc co (D n N CD (D V DO co 0 0 0 0 O r r O 3 N (D (D M O 0) N O O O M O a0 (D 0 O LO M O v N LO OD LO M In v co y L V N^ L V O M M M O v w M 0) o M U) (D n O CD V r M O O LO 00 Q E C co (D r- (O 0) 0) O O O M W n CO r-6 01 M M O M M Wl r- r- 0) m M 00 O O U U) LL 3 = 0 O O W O V CO (D V M N CO ti r-- O m N m m U) CO M CO N N ti 0 0 0 0 CD N r CD (D r-- O CO co V O M M N O N M r- (D r` 0) M V 0) N C) I~r (y N O N t0 O n N O 0) (D 17 r 0) 0) V r U) r- A r-- m m CO d: m m (D N O O N "t (D t} r N CO y U) (D n n O co Q' N M V co CO (D O 06 C 0) (J CO r` U) r\ N D) CO N r` ~ C C. ~p N N N N M M M U) M M M co r N co N co V' V '7 M r m V L" N N V M r r r M N O Q V1 O N (f) N O 0) O N (D 0) M M 0) (n O h U) M O 0) O M r, It to co 0 0 0 0 V O O I'- CO O O U) U) M U7 o M o n V co CO (D Lo Ln M N O~ U) (D ~ O (1 m y N 0) a7 v O a0 r (D V N M Q1 (D 0) C0 M U) a0 O N CD O O 0) o M CO In O M (D O 01 N C CO O O U) CO r- r- O M (D (D M p u) 0) M V O CO - D r O (O (D O I'- t` M ao O CD CO 00 ao UJ U7 CD (D D7 f` co O o o co O U7 n Im (D CO t` N tD M M r V W a U) M (D N N N o m 41 (D I- N r- r- U) M N UJ V r 0) n U) V (D It O U) M V 0 0 0 0 C to N U') 0) V 0) CO N r O M O CO CO N r- co V r` V r- 7: L V U) CO co O f` O G' C a) U) Q) CO Of` r` V Q1 0) CO O) N V U) O o N O O U) Co V d) L M 00 1l ' 0 ~0 v v r CO M g M M CO CO C6 q N V (n M M V M M T n co D W) N M (Y) M r 0) h 1n V' r r r LL x m F- N _d N L c O 0) o r E o r r 0 0 0 m N N N w e c e co OA O O O r N N N N o M M (M E E E 3 0 0 0 0 0 0` d a) w w 4- Q 0) o! c E y x x c' C C O J J J t0 lC lD y.. rp Q N Q N Q L t L~ m U U U c w ~ O w j L n E E H- ti L w E E E E E H o 0 0 00 ~o ate) : cr, m 0 0 Woo m ° a) v o aUi o 0 o ani co ~ > > a) v 0 aa)) o O O O U N LL Q Q (n O Z0 N N LL Q 7 Q (n O Z0 N N LL Q T2 Q O Z0 N H o (n M cD w Ln n (D Oo N Ln Lo rn LD N N O CO M M O M (D cn V (D r n n V N 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O r O n V 0 (D O O CO 0 O (D V M O 0 n u7 M V M n M N 0) O 00 r Q (y 00 M M r r CD W N OO r M a r~ (D 0) M n r O r m CO n CO n n C oc N 01 CO ~ O r N N r M V N LO cT r O V co to n N M V W V Q1 O N V 00 W 01 Ln 0 M n h co (7) CD n V V (D Ifl O O r M O n O M Q M T 00 O M N M M O r n In h V to M n Lb K Q r N N N N r r N N r N N N N N r N M O ~ N N (n z co O W v N V to O O (D n n co 0 0) co N N O r N N to O M N O 0) n n o e o e N r N M n 00 co V U7 N V N° O N CD V N V V V O n V (O O M N Q Q (D 0 `y p r n r r (D r D CO V r M M Ln O V O N M N W O V OO O? O (O O n N N N M O Q t (D Lo V M M 0 M Ln 1 M M n I~ co N V LO 00 V w (D n Lt) n LO '7 O V r r r r V N M r 00 r Q W M CO O) O n O N M ao (D r M M V O) N (D n N CO 0) 0 0 0 o Q C N O (D (o U') CA M O n U) Ln U') V V O O V N O LO 0) r Q r 0 Co r O O N 00 CO V Ln M N In CD- M Q N N ocr N CD Q) Q co O (d 6 N (D Q O N p) n Nr00 ~ O C M U 0 m U_ N N Lr) N E 0 0 0 0 0 3 (D 2 O O) !0 W M V Lo N 00 N W O 0 N M O 0) Ln O M C m p N n O N ~ 0 0 0 o O O 0) Lo O M O O v n r In ti d1 M (D r M N In N CO O n r, r LO CO n aa Q Ln r, q Z> Yti N_ r 0 O M tX) V' r r n V r 0 0) V V r 0) V N N O (c0) O M Ln 0 00 O M M Q 0) N U 'O (n CO Cl) 0) M n LO O CO Ln CO 4- 0) Ln CO N r CO N V O Ln IT LO CO LO (D Lri Q 00 Q 3 M M V M jr) U7 (D (O Lo q V O (D N M V V U) O (D to Lo LO N 0) co Cl) V V r O ~ U Q 0) co V 0 M LO p In P- Ln 0) M 00 n O OD N n 00 (D r to O n N LO V W pOp o 0 0 0 N co n N O) O O M O V 00 M r co O 0) O V) 0) O V N r Ln CO O to M Ln T O O n O 0) N co O O M V N n to V O0 M M Co O V 00 M d) (D M LO O n O O OO 3 r M M 0 0 N OD CDonorn rn OrOOM•-00 n cd n 00 c6 m c; r M O Q nnrnrn M O 00 co O r r O C r M r Cl) = 7 a.+ LL R L r 0 O n n (O N O N M N O w 0 N M co N 0 co O n M~ O n n 0 0 0 0 LnOOOOdr0(ArnLnnr NNON0N0N0Mr q mr(pN D) N 01 r M d rv hoocDOr_rnocn° (On nn(flNnnrvr~Nn r(DCn n O (D o) CD n n f` f\ O Ln V V W O W (o O m O V o co 0) n U7 n 0 m CO N n M (a N N N N N M M M In c,4 M (0 M M Q N M N V 17 U7 V Co V M V Q N N V' M r' N O CO r r M N M O 3 Q M M oO Cl) OO O M 00 n 00 co 0) W O n V M O N IT V co m v co O n 0 0 0 0 O) N cc) t N n (n N O O V r ti r n N p CO Cn LO OD O N r N O O N 0) N O Ln O M 'y p) y) (D r (=Ln V O n M M n C n r O0 Q7 O 0) n r N LD V CO M (rj r CO Ln q O (o D) O Q Li C Q1 co N N Ln n CO OJ O (D N n C N M r (D Ln LO V V (D N 00 r O 20 O n O Co N Q r• K occnn00000)OCoco(Dcc0) (D (D r-,MMOO M M(Onw nOOn N LU a d •-W O~ OpOO n 0 0 0 0 N 0) 00 CO 00 a) a) 00 OO0) r Oa ncM co ON LO V CO 0 N U') N V M 00 N N n V C Q) O O r N D7 O (O m q co u2 O N n CO M p) A M M O O O (D O 1 co N n n n O O O 0) V V (n r O> co M rn cD r° M" O) Ln M Ln co N M O V V N M V M M M M N V Q N V Ln M M V M V M M O W N co M M O O r 00 Ln CD r r r R LL fn U) d R Cl) t C O E A d 0 0 a` O O r O r r v ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ N N N O (rj ( j M DO 01 O > O O O O O r y O O O N N N Q E E E E x x x 0 0 0 0 CD ~ N N E ~ O N Y H CA CA O CT) y (o y E m Lev Lev (tea (tea H a N E a w m L N E E co ` t N 4 L r L t N` L N (a ` o c - - v c c Q> v° r _ C o> U U U U o m o m ° a~ o v o o D o m m Q o moo m a~ m v o o a~ 0 0 Q O Z 0 N N LL Q Q (n 0 Z 0 N 0 0 0 0 N M LL Q C In 0 Z O N N LL Q 2 M 71 d O m m r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M V co (D r t1 O V N O T' co M Il- V (A M N O O O to N r 0 CD O M 00 O M O O r (D n M N N O O r V O n N N V O N o 0 M O 00 (D O M O O O 0) It N 0) 1* (O M 0) O O V (V 0) O) CM pV M 00 r 00 11 N V O r (D 00 00 O (D O N CO N 00 N O IO) r N O V O cc (o n n t-- n cD O n O M n O CO O r N 00 0) 1 r I- M (f) o 0 r N 0) 00 r M 0) r (D O V ~ co m cn n It (D N O Co O V N O r- N 0 0 O rM O N( V V N V rO r- M M O O 00 n (D O V n O M N r M O (V O N V V O O (D O Co n (D CD O (D W N n O O 00 0) n n CO d f, N O T- ? V O (D f` 00 O r t- V 0) O co O N 00 00 n 00 V O N O O r M f- N O) M M O CO n n M M (fl 00 n C \i r (D O O= V M N r M r CD 0) (0 O N Im r N O O co O n n n n (o co O f- 00 N n n M 0) M a) n O V n 0 O) co CD n 0 N I- V N V O CO O M O r= 00 U.) 0 0 > O V 0) N O O O M O r O 00 M O M (0 0 N CV O V O (6 O N O O 00 N 0)O O O r 00 M O r O O O V M O O N co O n Co (D n n n n O O OO e- m O (D O O V 00 n M CO co CD 00 O (D O ('M 0) N V (D r o0 r O CD I- N le M IT CY) O r O O O O O r M n 00 r O Lo n N O r V N P- M 06 (6 N O D) (D O n n C N N= V M n O N M (.0 0) 11 L O O O (D (D n (D n n (fl V 00 n M tO) Q) r r O 0 O (D M r N O Cl) O O n O M O O r O r I- 00 N 00 r O O N M O (D O 00 r n r M r N M r V co T.. N 00 O rr N CO V C- V n V M M CD V N O 00 V Co f` Cl) O co O V 0) M V O O O CD Cp O O O O n N n v M 00 N V O 0) n V co p oo n ~ O M V CD M r O N M O n r O n o 0 O r M V O V M M O V n (D N 1 n N M O M L C5 M CD n n n 0 O 0) r Cl) N O O O M 0) 0) N (D 0) n n O _ V V O O O O O O O O V f- n M ~ (D M O 00 O O O n O M O n r n O to N O N= co O oo n n 0 00 (D I-- O M (O) 0 0 Q) M O (D O O N M M (D 0) r 0) O O N M O r IL N O V O CV O O O V L6 O0 V O j (h V -Q M r 0 O M M r V M r O O n C M V OI~t O O O O O O V (D N (0 O N CV f- N O N CD M O (0 00 r 0 LO) N O 0) O O O (D M (D n n V O M to O° M O CD M O O O M V= CO O r 0) r ~ Q N C'M M V O O O O0 O ('M N O M (D N V N N r N V M CM 00 (.00 n OO Cl n V V O O O O O O O V V (D q 3 (D , _ n M M 0 M V O O r n f- r o j N 0 0 n O n m m M 00 O N M n N O o y O O M N M n 0) r O N O O M M M 0) Ix N M O n (D n Q) 00 CD r O M CD M( O M M n oo M N (D00 O r r O co x V V O V O O O O O O O n O d °o nn 00 Co V (nN000000000 p O CO 0) CO N n n O M C0 r V O Cl N (D (D M O O CD M I,- V r O O j C (D O O N O N OO 0) n M M T O (V O 0) 00 r M O n n r 0) n n Im O 0) O V V O O O n O O O O V 00 «J C- a s c ` o E w U a~ D y O o, o> co d ~ o d d c~ ~'L >+c Tea > O R d CL W 3 3 D 0 t) 0 0 O v rn ;e o be az 3e ac ~ sY :e X 2e a ae ~ o r~ N a vI a )o .o ~ m n m n r o m O pp ppvpp~ yn .G C~ M IV Yi o0 C~ M p d ~ O M1. ° N C O N O N O a O U W '2 O U at Z O ° M d O°I O W d S p C C p O FM^ Tip^m^ m^ ° ^ N' A^ ~ ^ O^ ~O QI h ~N r~r tD~ W Q a O W m Q tO - - w O O w w - - Q n r ~ ao ~ vmi w w w w w w y N M w w N rM t Q°i iD Vl ° t~0 V iD <O ~D N f": A r O W O m n O t°D m n d O o N n Ni ~ ~i a; N ^ Q N Q~ !2 m P ~ ~ .o r ~ ma m ~~ne ae'e eoo a°°°~°e u~o° Qo oe Ho '~o N~ no m~ ° d° °m e° O - pp pfatDOaa°~ NOS O mNm N MNQ°m~aMM N U N V 1': N, A N N N m N ccNpp N N M N M t M Q~ M~ l7 M M M A a C d N f`l ^ N t'1 N p P? O ° O a QI b O N - N N N yC epp/! w in h NM h N w w w w w w N w w M O rnOo In ~ mep ;eM3• Ne tpe Ao ' ~ n \°mo IMp`e I^p\°N°j a°•Oa ^ e paj e N p ~ C~ Q bM~aMQ~ ~O mNMN ~.D tD r r'. r m° °mNr~A~m W m p 0 u = ~ w ~ r r~'i ~ M Nai ny w °w a w °w w .n w' w w w N w N w L ~y O m°° ° ee°ne a~v~a InNao sae ~yp ;4 No ° 3' n a mo Q M N° Q M Ol d N ~ t'J N N n ~ ~ N O Q ~p Q a W ~ A m~ W ~j E N V d d a ~ N~ nom.-~o~ r.- Q N ~Nn w ~ ~ N mw WN ~ M w ~ ~ O w w w A ~ S~ ° w w w ~vl~ao ~ mo e no oa os ~a m= rai m E c um~nvO1vNau`Qio Movnio ~v °4Q '"e'v ~~~M°. c~ .cYi n'-M Z~ P q ¢ N N! o n ^1 n 1-7 N Cmf. W V N W a N N ~ m m I°n ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N a~ w w w V1 ~ M N N N w w w N w ` ~ o ao M s mo o ae Qo ~~o ma a ^ °we M ~d~ e } Y O N~ rM°.-~~ O~ A~ ~ N~ Q ~ I~ ~NN'O 7V NNn N a N O d 0~ ^ m O M A E~ O O a ~p ^ t7 N M N N ^ Vrl N w uai N N LL N w w a m m m w w 2m v m w N .n w w w d O w 4 0 o O ° O O O O ~ o o Qai ~ m m A Q1 Q `N N N N N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ U In d m „ N a~a N a r ~ m M r Y A IR M N T Oa0 Q ~ ti ~ e r ~ )e vI m In ° iVne ^ ~ apeoe MdEadE me ° e~d° ~ o ~o ~ e ^ o MdE W ~ ~ .f~je ne ~ ~ ^ e nm ~ ~ e ^ ° Mep ~ae ,N, o 'n ~ Nom;., aE ~;e?. Q O l(I O Q O ~°D O Of O tD O M O ~ O ~ O ^O m O m 0~ 0° O M O~ O M O C a s°° N M ~ O O M QI ~ ~ ~ N N 0 N W ~ M W d rv ~ ~ o'<v ~c o M a rs MQ ~ o n~if a c°o.rNi^i~ n m vai m m Aw r M N w wN N N m A 0' p O U9 w N W w w w w w w w - m N - r w m w w ~ N w p ` uNl a O N ~2 ID e O O 0~1 1~. Q O t°`: N O Q l~'J gj i7 N IV g, W P N O r (V N O N N Q [V tpO C N N O N l~'1 N n M N: O f^, g°~'~ °V L O ~ O M M N L W tD m r tt~~ pp n a O f° L ~.j ° N N ^ a M r ID m M O N ilI M N CO ^ M~ M a h N h ~ N ~ N t° a M m N N ° N ° h N w aM la/! IFl N N H M O tMD M m m N m O m t0 c4 w w w w w N d Q w w w Q; °f Q O w ~ Mw uMf ~ eM/! ~ IMA U W iD t^D NON r ONO OO Qt°°~O~O ^61 O~OnmmOl ~Om ^OI~Om M°i0~ ° W N A- r jnN NU' Nm°2 NNl V°Vi°~iC, oi!) NN wN°MNN mNQ NJwO U 'o 7, p A 2 W N O N N t° N Q N W N Ol N N w N N N N N M Q M M m A O Y] Q t2~ m r L_ M = C V "i Nm "i M M m ° o N V ^ ^ O u d M f n W ^ O N M m N N m W M ! M ' m d lC"l) a, S O a O f~ r0 C d ~j N N O O v N .N- N m O Q O C '2 M N w Nw M M N ' N N N N N . W a ^ c0 N ° w w w w w w w w (qO~ w w N d! w w Jl w N w y cd O V file ^a W e m~Ne .-e Md= Nd' ~~~~Q^ N^ ^`rm o °m N Of V~ Via` N Q tp (m'] (7r CI I~ ~Sf W C ~O aO aO ~O a° Q ° a^ N~ ~ ^'~~a~° ~O V wa0~ OO t~l pppp VI ~p t7 r t° O O M.- vap.~ ~ ~n aNa° N O v ~ E N Q r O r a M m I m aN~ QMI M V M T e O E N t7 Q ~y N r N Oj N ~G ^ M^ N ° N tO U O a o a M )O Q Q M Q O m ° ° Iq Q c. iNn . t. a O? 10 ci N m _ r S~~ N ~ N W ~ w Mw w N N evAf 19 w In IA N w 0 S ` w t~j N YN t7 M Q LL ° Q v r N f J w w w w t9 w ~ w °w ~ N w w w Nw ~ y LL rI.'aE PO o ice oa°Np ae de ma ,Q~de N- i°Ii°je N e N S .-3°~3° o. 03ep° 3`~~p°e n •-o in °.-a.N~.Q °a dpy m °a CW9 U L N p ^ O N M S t°p .N- N M ~ Q c,21 ^ ro U d 0 N) M M O ('1 N t'1 M M tap N1 M M v P V t'l f7 [V P5 Q! M r {'l N N 07 W OWi ^ N t() W ~ h ^ ~ m m m^ ~ q gj d °1 e e ~D tC tp ~ N h m mN m CQ N A W M x 4 0 N N m T OI ~ m m ~ W a - O n f- ~ ~ ~ a«~ ~ d N W Q M N ~ W N N wM N Vl P E Q N w w w w w ~ M w w w w w w w Q W N ~ ~ N N N ~ M M N - C ~ a2 m,eo o ae~°Q~.-aemdE od` ~y 2'mo N3° N~ay° a ,n ee^c°n2' ° 2' `r~' e~° x v a-m d` oa, oae one Nat ~ppn em W a i°i= ^a °dpp"~ o mopp a t~ r C a W Q m0 Q O ttO° O N Q O {D ° tND Q N Q Q MOM M MO t°~', 1") (M'I O NMI °.6 NNj Ip a Y h g v M m° t o M M N OD ' M c4 m n! a M M b l") ° N N M N N _ E 'm . N m °o m w v° v °n c m o w n n d~ . m$ a$ n m amo m M M1 c n m E E Y W 1 tM t7 N) MVi f7 h w w . VNI N Nw ~ w w N 7 W 4 M~ ~ O O O a W m w mw bm9 N !9 N uw b9 U J N w w N w w ~'9 yi 19 N w ~ co HMO Rio No c~d° W de W o ~o na de ^p de NO°'°dY ~o ~$d°n de~am d= E Mo n°° a~ in cw ao Mo ~o~°,~o~° ~e ^T° a°~ fQ^, of ~'n~ O W I( d0~ O.- Q ° mm ~D~M~ ~O a.-~ MNNN° N M N J W mlppN~ _O v Op M~^ •-M~ ZO m r °a ° o N ° o N ^ ua w ua w° ° Nh No o u c m N m o ^l W N w w M m w w w w w w Y' - M t0 O O OI O N O a tp O w w w w w ~i g N w o c o aw vai uai vai in ev w v~ ~ p D Yy 9 w w w w M w V ° d _O m d p W Q P m Ox ~ o 0 0 o g m 4W'I m M w S ~ c x x O rn o a _ - r~ rv o S o °o 0 0 0 0 25 a a a a Pn' a (7 - o 0 0 °o °o o °o °o °o o c - a+ Q~ ~ N N N N :V N N N N ~a ~ N N N N N N ~ - U W V V MEMORANDUM TO: Downtown Management Commission Molly Winter, Executive Director FROM: Donna Joberl, Financial Manager SUBJECT; January -March 2011 Revenue and Expenditures DATE: 5/1112011 Shown below is a summary January-March 2011 revenue and expenditures. The 2011 budget and 2010 actuals are shown for comparative purposes. Revenue received is 28.15 of budget Y I D for 2011. Short term garage revenue is near budget year to date and nearly $41 k higher than the same time last year Long term permit revenue is near budget to date, and $42k higher than the same time last year. In 2011, there is a difference between the amount of street meters budgeted in CAGID and the total amount budgeted. This difference is due to -bifurcation". The total revenue budgeted in 2011 meters is $2,150,000 but the GF transfer to CAGID is $1,350,000. The $800,000 difference in meter revenue will remain in the General Fund. Rental income is below last year. Vacancies continue, many of the leases have been reworked to help tenants and upgrades are being covered with the lease revenue. Property tax is above last year. May be a result of timing of payments. 1000 Walnut tax revenue is also above 2010 due to timing of payments. Expenditures for 2011 equal 21.4% of budgeted expenes and are $519,033 below last years expenditures at the same point. Operating expenses are 20.7% of budget to date. The variance is due to timing of an annual payment to D81 and moving a .5 FTE to the General Fund. Non operating variances arc primarily due to payments for Mall and Garage improvements and a reduction in debt interest due to refinancing a bond in 2010. Eco Pass is also higher due to an increase in the per person charge from $111 per person to $125 per person in 2011. We are watching expenses closely to match reductions in revenue with decreased spending. GAGID Jan-Mar 2011 REVENUES Jan-Mar 2011 2011 Jan-Mar2010 Revenue Approved %of2011 Revenue 2010-2011 2010-2011 ACCOUNT Collected Budget Budget Collected Collected $ Difference % Difference Property Tax 291,506 1.014,829 28.7% 247,706 43,800 17.7% Specific Ownership 8,263 66,625 12.4% 8,385 (122) -1.5% Subtotal TAXES $299,769 $1,081.454 27.7% $256,091 $43,678 17.1% Broadwayf Spruce 38,099 165,000 23.1% 35,088 3,011 8.6%9 15th & Pearlf S.T. 43,580 178,000 24.5% 35,107 8,473 24.1% 11th & Sprucel S.T. 77,559 320,000 24.2%9 70,122 7,437 10.6% 11th & WalnuU S.T. 52,808 225,000 23.51/0 45,183 7,625 16.9% 14th & WalnuU S.T. 21,161 75,000 28.2% 17,616 3,545 20.1% 10th & Walnut/ S.T. 66,256 280,000 23.7% 61,441 4,815 7.8% Validation Stamps 19,525 65,000 30.0% 16,700 2,825 16.9% Garage 20 day Pass 10,400 31,875 32.6% 5.400 2,000 23.8% Cash Pa5s/Value Card 2,916 6,500 44.9%9 1,799 1,117 62.1% Subtotal SHORT TERM PARKING $332,304 $1,346,375 24.7% $291,457 $40,647 14.0% 11th & 5pruce/ Permits 93,453 357,220 26.2% 93,618 (165) -0.2% 14th & WalnuU Permits 87,475 321,180 27.2% 54,008 33.467 62.0% 14th & Canyon 14,591 56,100 26.0% 14,354 237 1.7% 10th & Walnut 134,516 514,100 26.2% 133.875 641 0.5% 11th & WalnuU Permits 67,898 259,700 26.1% 70,815 (2,917) -4.1% 15th & Pearl/ Permits 188.910 727.160 26.0% 177,750 11,160 6.3% 177514th 10,550 44,220 23.9% 11.231 (681) -6.1% 1745 141h 18,125 72.600 25.0% 17.737 388 2,2% Wait LisVOver-Under/CC fees 150 0 221 (71) -32.1% Subtotal LONG TERM PARKING $615.668 $2,352,280 26.2% $573,609 $42,059 7.3% Tokens 3,415 91000 37.9% 1.759 1,656 941% Meierhoods 9,577 22,000 43.5% 2.855 6.722 235.4% Cash Key 49 0 - 44 5 11.4% Meters (Transfer from G. F.) 535,084 1,350,000 39.6% 502,103 32,981 6.6% One Boulder Plaza 0 15,625 0.0% 7,813 7,813 -100.0°/ Subtotal METERS $548,125 $1,396,625 39.2°/9 $514,574 $33,551 6.5% Interest 6,500 29,500 27.7"/ 6,871 (371) -5.4% 10th and Walnut TIF/IntcrestfMisc 401,236 1,361,000 29,5% 372,344 28,892 7.8% Rental Income-11th & Spruce 135 54,000 0.35% 2,555 (2,420) -94.7% Rental Income-15th 8 Pearl 17,446 166,000 10.5% 22,311 (4,865) -21.8% Rental Income-Kiosks 12,755 44,000 29.0% 3,648 9,107 249.6% Rental Income-ATM Randolph 177 1,600 11.1% 151 26 17.2% Miscellaneous 12,844 19,203 66.9% 5,154 7,690 149.2% TOTAL $2,246,959 $7,846,037 28.6% $2,048,764 $198,195 9.7% CAGID Jan-Mar 2011 EXPENSES Jan-Mar 2011 2011 % of 2010 Jan-Mar 2010 2010-2011 2010.2011 ACCOUNT Expense Budget Budget Expended Expense i Difference % Difference Parking Svcs Personnel 224,504 858,567 26.1% 222,805 1,699 0.8% Parking Svcs Non-personnel 165,527 982,926 16.8% 164,699 828 0.5% DUHMD Personnel 131,020 557,640 23.5% 142,912 (11,892) -8.3% DUHMD Non-personnel 34,672 324.920 10.7% 37,923 (3,251) -8 6% BIDlDBI contractual Services 21,748 67,536 32.2% 0 21,748 #DIV/D! Subtotal OPERATIONS $577,471 $2,791,589 20.7% $568,34.0 $9,131 1.6% Cost AllocationlBenefitfund(transfefs 54,763 219,053 25.0% 53.065 1,698 3.2% Debt Service 119,800 1,005,817 11.9% 196,287 (76.487) -39.0% 10th & Walnut construcUDebt Service 178,289 920,118 19.4% 186,539 (8,250) -4.4% 10th & Walnut excess Tax Increment 0 816,766 0.0% 0 0 #DIV10! Mail Improvements 101,058 342,809 29.5% 502,337 (401,279) -79.9% Capital Mamlenanceflmpravement 17,940 1,335,477 1.3% 129.963 (112,024) -86.2% Eco-Pass Prog. 746,720 792.173 94.3% 678,543 68,177 10.0% Capital Replacement Reserve 0 177,775 0.0% 0 0 ttDIV101 TOTAL $1,796,041 $8,401,576 21.4% ;2,315,074 ($519,033) -22.4% COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL MALL POLICE CALL STATISTICS MONTH Assault Auto Theft Burglary Crim. Mis. Crim. Tres. Disturbance Domestic Drunk DUI Felony Menaci Fight 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 January 5 12 3 2 1 4 5 1 15 9 1 21 12 2 8 5 February 4 4 2 1 5 6 3 2 6 10 4 2 23 9 3 3 10 6 March 5 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 17 11 3 2 15 9 7 2 5 5 April 2 1 2 1 5 8 7 3 2 11 8 2 4 7 May 6 6 1 1 2 4 1 15 8 1 1 17 8 4 3 4 4 June 5 7 2 2 1 2 3 7 16 9 2 10 13 2 1 7 11 July 6 2 5 12 4 2 2 4 August 8 1 1 3 13 9 5 7 September 10 2 3 1 2 11 3 16 4 13 October 2 1 4 4 14 16 4 12 November 4 2 1 5 2 10 21 2 8 December 3 1 2 2 1 11 2 19 2 5 MONTH Fireworks Hang Ups Harassment Indec. Exp. Liq. Law Vio. Littering Loitering Narcotics Noise Open Door Party 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 January 7 3 7 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 5 1 2 February 4 5 5 5 1 3 2 3 1 1 3 2 4 3 March 4 9 6 4 1 2 3 1 3 1 2 8 2 April 6 3 3 2 1 3 3 1 2 5 7 3 3 May 10 6 5 3 1 5 2 1 2 4 12 3 3 June 8 7 10 4 1 1 6 7 4 3 18 16 4 1 July 4 5 1 8 3 13 4 August 7 6 4 7 4 6 1 September 9 3 6 3 1 1 1 October 8 7 1 1 5 2 7 2 November 1 16 12 2 $Shots 2 1 1 1 December 8 5 3 5 1 MONTH Pro wler Robbery Sex Assault Shoplifting Stabbing Suicide Suspicious Theft Trespass Wepon 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 211 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 January 1 2 12 14 17 10 2 February 3 10 10 9 9 1 March 2 3 19 18 10 8 April 1 1 1 3 1 18 8 5 13 May 1 2 2 1 12 18 9 14 June 2 1 29 21 4 3 July 29 3 August 1 21 6 September 1 1 1 20 9 2 October 1 1 20 9 November 2 17 12 December 20 10 Downtown Management Commission Committees and Task Forces 2011/2012 Standing Committees Committee Commissioner(s) Staff Finance/Budaet Meets when needed Koval Jobert 1500 Pearl St., Suite 302 Operations Meets Mondays @ 3pm prior to D11CMtg McMullen Cunningham/Matthews 1500 Pearl St., Suite 302 Public Safety Meets when needed Koval Cunningham 1500 Pearl St., Suite 302 Marketing (with DBI and BID) Meets the 2"d Tuesday, 8:30am Jobert 1942 Broadway, Suite 301 (DBI) Economic Development (with DBI and BID) Jobert 1J 'hen needed Parking Task Force (with BID & DBI) Meets as needed Cornelius Jobert Matthews 1500 Pearl Street, Suite 302 DBI Events Meets when needed McMullen/Comelius Cunningham 1942 Broadway, Suite 301, (DBI) Green Committee Landrith (on hold) Task Forces DUHINID-PS Master Plan on hold Winter Civic Use Task Force McMullen - Chair Winter Downtown Improvements Winter (Goal Area) Council Assignments 2011 Koval - Becker/Wilson Patterson - Karakehian/Osbourne Cornelius - Ageton McMullen - Gray/Morzel Dahl - Cowles/Appelbaum S:\CMO\DUHMDPS\dliic\DMC\BD-MTGS\2011\2011 DMC Commnittees and Task Forces.doc SMART - Your Efficiency S°jutions Schedule a FREE, no-obligation energy assessment for your business. An energy advisor will come to you. Call 877.505.6722 to get started. _ Well help you identify energy-saving opportunities for your business. FREE installation of efficient light bulbs and exit signs are included with your assessment. Start saving! Your advisor will give you an energy assessment report and will help you take advantage of limited- time rebates and incentives. 877.505.6722 1 www.EnergySmartYES.com 877.505.6722 signupbiz[dEnergySmartYES.com Get started saving! www.En,rgySmartYES.com Appointment Date: Time: Notes: SMART _ Your Efficiency 5oluo-, J►l Xcel Energy R Energy5m r 3r_ is dab'.e aL Bo ,d,, -cony r,..... a n,~ - . : -c by • e L^..rcrrcr ur [...gv-„ .,,r FccNervand r.rlA<!ArR4lar-,,-ird ~mr. ol4rvIa Car y. fna C_f Gou.vzr hLOrcna oAaiEne TAB UPDATE DOWNTOWN AND UNIVERSITY HILL MANAGEMENT DIVISION AND PARKING SERVICE July 11, 2011 Downtown Employee EcoPass Program • Through June 2011, the downtown employee EcoPass program has issued 4,932 decals to eligible staff members, representing an 83% pickup rate year-to-date. At this swift pace, we could experience close to 90% pickup by the end of 2011. In addition to incentives like EcoPass Extras offering retail discounts, the eGo Car Share partnership (waiving application fee) has added more incentives for employees to make that "last mile" errand or meeting trip via alternative modes. B-Cycle bike share has indicated they will offer a "last mile" incentive during this year. • In the fall, DUHMD/PS will be participating with Transportation and CU to conduct the downtown employee travel survey. Here are some statistics regarding the downtown employee EcoPass program from past surveys: o Transit use between 1995 and 2005 more than doubled, from 15% to 34%. o Transit use among employees increased from 1.7% in 1990 to 9.5% in 2005, and from 2% to 15% for Boulder residents over the same time period. o Employees holding Eco Passes increased between 2001 and 2005 from 21% to 27%. o Downtown Boulder before-after survey: 80% of new transit trips were shifted from SOV (Single Occupant Vehicles). o Eco Pass holders are 5-9 times more likely to ride transit than non-Eco Pass holders. o Based upon the 2008 survey, Downtown employees (68%) have at least occasionally used a bus for their work commute, and close to half have used transit for non-commute trips (46%). Boulder Junction Access Districts: Travel Demand Management and Parking • Two General Improvement Districts were created by ordinance and elections in November 2010: Boulder Junction Access District: Travel Demand Management and Boulder Junction Access District: Parking. • The Districts enable the implementation of the TVAP goal of transit oriented development through supporting travel demand management programs (EcoPasses, bike share and car share) and managing parking (reduced, paid, shared and unbundled). • The Districts revenue and work program will be dependent on the timing of the final developments. The districts will be funded through: o TDM Districts - Property Tax and PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes) Fees o Parking District - Property Tax, district parking revenues, on-street parking and Neighborhood Parking Permit fees • Potential District participation in a shared parking structure as part of the RTD BRT mixed use development is under consideration. Chautauqua Access Analysis and Recommendations • Interdepartmental effort with DUHMD/PS, Transportation, OSMP, Parks and CP&S working in partnership with the Colorado Chautauqua Association, will focus on Data Collection and Analysis (access and parking, program inventory and facilities and grounds assessment) and development of a 2020 Stewardship Framework and Recommendations. • Parking and access inventory includes past analysis of Fehr and Peers, and traffic counts and duration study using LPR and an intercept survey to be conducted in August 2011. Analysis and recommendations completed by September 2011. Downtown Garage Signage and Interior Enhancement Project • The project will create a consistent graphics, signage and way finding system for our downtown parking facilities. Variable messaging systems will be included to communicate availability of spaces with the goals of enhancing the customer experience and reducing traffic congestion and pollution. The project will start up this fall and is part of a multi-year capital improvement project for the five downtown CAGID garages. University Hill General Improvement District (UHGID) Public/Private Mixed Use Redevelopment Project • In collaboration with Del Mar Interests, UHGID is exploring the potential to redevelop the 101 Street surface parking lot into a mixed use structure incorporating UHGID parking garage and rental units. • Next steps include: o Memorandum of Understanding between Del Mar Interests and UHGID o Access Demand and Analysis Study including future development projections within the district, existing parking supply and utilization, alternative mode use for the district, etc. o Financial feasibility studies regarding financing options. Downtown Development and Access Analysis and Projections • Since the late 1990's, periodic downtown development and access projections have been conducted to understand future growth in the downtown and its impacts on access of all modes of transportation. • The periodic update is underway beginning with the current inventory of existing private and public parking and all available alternative modes statistics. In addition, the project is considering the impacts of a proposal by CP&S to modify the type of uses for an FAR bonus" within the DT 5 Zone (generally the area north and south of Canyon Boulevard) to include commercial uses in addition to housing. The proposal will be presented to Planning Board on August 4. OTHER TRANSPORTATION-RELATED PROJECTS: On-Street Bike Parking • DUHMD/PS oversees over 1,300 bike parking spaces in the public right of way in downtown Boulder, not including the spaces within the CAGID garages. In collaboration with GO Boulder, DUHMD/PS initiated a pilot on-street bike parking project which will be evaluated at the end of the summer. Farmers Market Improvements and Bike Parking • In the spring of 2011, enhancements were completed to increase the productivity of the market and the pedestrian experience including removal of the tree islands, addition of electricity along 13t" Street, additional bike parking and planting of new trees. • Based on bike parking demand, DUHMD/PS will be providing additional temporary bike racks for the Boulder Farmers' Market at the intersection of Arapaho and 13th on the south end, and adjacent to the Atrium Building on the north end of the market. The racks will be available for other special event bike parking. Sponsorship of BCycle • DUHMD/PS invested $50,000 as capital investment in the BCycle bike share infrastructure as a downtown employee TDM program • DUHMD/PS contributed $15,000 as a station and basket sponsor for 2011 Capital Investment Strategy for potential 2011 Ballot Initiative • As part of the Capital Investment Strategy, DUHMD/PS has included a package of $2.5 million pedestrian related improvements within the downtown area including pedestrian enhancements to the 14th and Walnut Transit Center bus improvements, streetscape improvements to 15111 Street within the SODA district and West Pearl, and additional infrastructure improvements for the Farmers' Market area. License Plate Recognition Technology • Operational since mid-May. Additional efficiency with NPP and scofflaw enforcement. • 521 enforced "hits" including 113 scofflaw violations. • Monitoring impacts to enforcement and revenue. Capital Investment Stakeholder Group Small Group Discussion Summary June 26, 2011 Meeting 1. What criteria are most important to consider when selecting projects for your list? Group 1 (Dan, Tally, Miriam, Kristin) : The most important criterion is significant deficiencies - perhaps expanding the definition, including: access and infrastructure improvements, projects that are necessary as opposed to discretionary, and that address safety. Group 2 (Nino, Victoria, Cynthia, Leslie, Max): • Significant deficiencies first and foremost (includes health and safety, maintaining industry standards, and legal/ballot requirements) • Projects that have a critical timing component, or affect a majority of people in the community • Projects that support community values, such as providing facilities for under-served communities (eg, non-profits) Group 3 (Bill, Bob, Jessica, Michael, Leonard): • Projects that improve safety • Projects that have a good "bang for the buck" • Do the high dollar projects that could not be accommodated in the regular CIP (staff note: As a reminder, all projects on the Significant Deflciencies & High Priority Action Plan lists represent the "highest priority " back log of projects that cannot be accommodated in the regular CIP. The,full list of unfunded projects is estimated at over $701 million). • Projects that advance community values, meet multiple objectives, and have visibility • A good diversity of project types and departments 2. Which level of funding do you support? Group 1: Less than $55 million, closer to S49 million, but a different list of projects than in the $49 million option from staff. Group 2: S55 million. Option 2 is closest, but would support a greater number of projects touching more people in the community. Group 3: Less than $55 million, closer to S40 million. We don't have to spend all the money. 3. Are there additional issues/comments you wish to forward onto City Council as part of your recommendation? Group 1: Need to constantly monitor expenditure of funds to ensure efficient spending on highest needs projects. Funding for additional O+M must be identified. Group 2: Balance what will be appealing in 2011 vs 2012 which will be more difficult to pass at the ballot 1 Group 3: Balance what will be appealing in 2011 vs 2012 and some of the more appealing projects might want to be held for 2012. The information below contains the results of the anonymous "clicker" voting from the June 27 CIS meeting. The voting was only performed on those projects which did not have consensus. For those projects where there was a split support, a Yes/No vote was taken. For those projects where there was a desire to fund more or less money to the project, a vote was taken on the change in funding amount. Session Name: CIS Voting 6-27-2011 9-00 PM Created: 6129/2011 9:07 AM 1.) Draft Bond Package Options (multiple choice) (First Vote) Responses (percent) (count) Option 1 ($49M) 42.85% 6 Option 2 ($55M) 50% 7 Option 3 ($40M) 7.14% 1 Totals 100% 14 2.) Draft Bond Package Options (multiple choice) (2nd vote after discussion Responses (percent) count Option 1 ($49M) 50% 7 Option 2 ($55M) 35.71% 5 Option 3 ($40M) 14.29% 2 Totals 100% 14 3.) Arterial Road Reconstruction: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a higher amount? Responses (percent) count No additional (Total: $3M) 21.43% 3 $2M more (Total: $5M) 28.57% 4 $4M more (Total: $7M) 28.57% 4 $6M more (Total $9M) 21.43% 3 E Totals 100% 14 4.) Facility ADA Compliance $500,000 (multiple choice) Do you want to fund this project? Responses (percent) count Yes 57.14% 8 No 42.8( % 6 Totals 100% 14 5.) Road Pavement Repair: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a higher amount? Responses (percent) count No additional (Total: $5M) 78.57% 11 $1 M more (Total: $6M) 14.29% 2 $2.5M more (Total: $7.5M) 7.14% 1 Totals 100% 14 Page 1 of 4 6.) Road Reconstruction: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a lower amount? Responses (percent) count No less (Total: $51M) 14.29% 2 $1M less (Total: $4M) 21.43% 3 $2.5M less (Total: $2.5M) 64.29% 9 Totals 100% 14 7.) Existing Park or Rec. Facility: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a lower amount? Responses (percent) count No less (Total: $3.7M) 50% 7 $1M less (Total: $2.7M) 14.29% 2 5 $2.5M less (Total: $1.2M) 35.71% Totals 100% 14 8.) Facility Outdoor Lighting $50,000 (multiple choice) Do you want to fund this project? Responses percent count Yes 71.43% 10 No 28.57% 4 Totals 100% 14 9.) South Boulder Rec. Center Floor Rehabilitation $100,000 (multiple choice Do you want to fund this project? Responses (percent) count Yes 50% 7 No 50% 7 Totals 100% 14 10.) Facility Parking Lot Repair: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a lower amount? Responses (percent) count No less (Total: $1.34M) 0% 0 $500k less (Total: $840k) 35.71% 5 $840k less (Total: $500k) 64.29% 9 Totals 100% 14 12.) Transportation Transit System: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a lower amount? Responses (percent) count No less (Total: $910k) 42.86% 6 $300k less (Total: $600k) 42.86% 6 $500k less (Total: $400k) 14.29% 2 Totals 100% 14 Page 2 of 4 14.) Transportation New Bike Share Stations $500,000 (multiple choice) Do you want to fund this project? Responses (percent count Yes 38.46% 5 No 61.54% 8 Totals 100% 13 15.) Transportation Multi Use Paths: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a lower amount? Responses percent count No less (Total: $2.25M) 35.71% 5 $500k less (Total: $1.75M) 35.71% 5 $1M less (Total: $1.25M) 28.57% 4 Totals 100% 14 17.) Transportation Ped Enhancements: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a lower amount? Responses (percent) count No less (Total: $850k) 50% 7 $250k less (Total: $600k) 28.57% 4 $450k less (Total: $400k) 21.43% 3 Totals 100% 14 18.) Downtown Commercial District Enhancements $2,500,000 (multiple choice Do you want to fund this project? Responses (percent) count Yes 42.86% 6 No 57.14% 8 Totals 100% 14 19.) Transportation Bike System Enhancements $300,000 (multiple choice Do you want to fund this project? Responses percent count Yes 64.29% 9 No 35.71% 5 Totals 100% 14 20.) Transportation Intersection Improvements $500,000 (multiple choice) Do you want to fund this project? Responses (percent count Yes 71.43% 10 No 28.57% 4 Totals 100% 14 21.) Neighborhood/Comm. Park Shelter Replacements/Improvements $3,000,000 (multiple Do you want to fund this project? Responses (percent) count Yes 57.14% 8 No 42.86% 6 Totals 100% 14 Page 3 of 4 25.) Neighborhood/Comm. Park SheltersA(multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a lower amount? Responses (percent) count No less (Total: $31VI) 28.57% 4 $1 M less (Total: $2M) 28.57% 4 $21VI less (Total: $1 M) 42.86% 6 Totals 100% 14 22.) Flatirons Events Center $1,060,000 (multiple choice) Do you want to fund this project? Responses percent count Yes 0% 0 No 100% 14 Totals 100% 14 23.) Columbia Cemetery Upgrades/Enhancements $550,000 (multiple choice Do you want to fund this project? Responses (percent) count Yes 64.29% 9 No 35.71% 5 Totals 100% 14 24.) Boulder Junction: (multiple choice) Do you want to fund at a higher amount? Responses percent count No more (Total: $2.56M) 35.71% 5 $2.5 M more (Total: $51VI) 35.71% 5 $4.5M more (Total: $7M) 28.57% 4 Totals 100% 14 26.) Main Library - Fund the Childrens area $1,500,000 (multiple choice) Do you want to fund this project? Responses percent count Yes 53.85% 7 No 46.15% 6 F Totals 100% 13 Page 4 of 4 DRAFT STAKEHOLDER GROUP RECOMMENDATION (6/27/2011) 2011 Project Selection Considerations The committee generally agreed that the 2011 bond package should focus on projects that: • Are weighted toward significant deficiencies (improvements or corrections that achieve health and safety, maintaining industry standards, and/or legal/ballot requirements). • Avoid higher cost investments later (when material costs increase and/ or when scope might increase due to advanced deterioration). • Reduce rather than increase ongoing operation and maintenance costs. • Create an ongoing and/or greater efficiency in conducting the city's business. • Focus new, higher priority investments in areas of opportunity which also reflect community values, have a critical timing component, impact a majority of people in the community; or have a good return on investment. Projects Recommended for 2011 Bond Funding Consensus: The committee had consensus on funding the following projects: 1. Replace substandard bridges, structures, signs and systems $4.500,000 2. Arterial road reconstruction $3,000,000 3. Replace Financial and Human Resources Software $2,803,000 4. Facility Electrical, Plumbing, HVAC and Elevator Replacements $ 9253000 5. Boulder Reservoir Infrastructure Improvements $3,000,000 6. Police Equipment $ 328,000 7. Road Pavement Repair $5,000,000 8. *Road Reconstruction $2,500,000* 9. Existing Park or Recreation Facility Renovations $3,700.000 10. *Facility Parking Lot Repair $ 500,000* 11. Major Business Software Replacement $1.602,602 12. Transportation Boulder Junction Improvements $2,560,000 13. New Wildland Fire Facilities $1,150,000 14. *Transportation Transit System Enhancements $ 600,000* 15. *Transportation New Multi Use Path connections $1,750,000* 16. Transportation Pedestrian Enhancements $ 850,000 17. Police Equipment Upgrades/ Replacement $ 660,000 * Reduced funding (total $4,500,000 less than the high priority amount shown in the project list). Total Conspn.cus 93 S 42R 60 Majority Support: A majority of the committee also supported additional projects or increased funding for the above projects as follows: 18. Increase funding for Arterial Road Reconstruction (#2 above)for $5M total (78% support to add $2 M to above amount) $2,000,000 19. Fund Transportation Intersection Improvements at (71% support) $ 500,000 20. Fund Facility Outdoor Lighting (70% support) $ 50,000 21. Increase funding for Boulder Junction (#12) for $5,060,000 total (64% support to add $2.5M to above amount) $2,500,000 22. Fund Transportation Bike System Enhancements (64% support) $ 300,000 23. Fund Columbia Cemetery UpgTrades/ Enhancements (64% support) $ 550,000 24. Fund Facility ADA Compliance project (57% support) $ 500,000 25. *Fund Neighborhood/ Community Park Shelter replacements/ improvements (57% support to fund; 71 % support to fund at lower amount of $1 M) $1,000,000* 1 26. *Fund Facility Upgrades/ Enhancements (Children's area only) (54% support) $1,500,000* * Reduced funding (total $5,080,000 less than the high priority amount shown in the project list). Total majority support S8,900, 000 Total Combined Amount (consensus + majority support) $44,328,602 Bond Amount While the committee focused more on which projects they felt were appropriate for 2011 funding than on the total amount of funding, in discussions and clicker voting, a strong majority (86%) supported funding $49million worth of projects overall. Additional Comments/ Recommendations 1. The city should monitor expenditures to ensure efficient spending on highest needs projects. 2. The issue of funding ongoing operation and maintenance must be identified. 3. Many of the projects not identified above may be more appropriate for considering as part of a potential 2012 initiative. Council may wish to balance what will be appealing to voters in 2011 with what may be more difficult to pass in 2012. Capital Investment Strategy Project Unfunded List for June 27 Stakeholder Group Meeting High Priority Action Items Full Unfunded Highest Priority Highest Priority Estimated Project Identified in Master Score Project Name Department Project Description Project Rationale Impacts Funded Amount Unfunded new Annual Project Scope Amount 0&M or Strategic Plan? Amount Construct public right of way enhancements to the downtown commercial district, including the Pearl Street Downtown's economic vitality and cultural vibrancy depend on Mall, The projects include- pedestrian streelscape Enhancements to the downtown commercial district dynamic and attractive public spaces and public right of ways that No. The Downtown and enhancements to 15th Street, West Pearl and the are a reinvestment which supports the future reinforce the community's commitment to a high level of quality of University HIII Management Downtown northisouth corridors of 11th and 13th Streets, sustainability of downtown, including the highly life for business retention, tourism and community benefit. Private Division & Parking Services Commercial District DUHMDIPS pedestrian improvements as pad of the Downtown visited areas such as the Pearl Street Mall, $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ $ 2,500,000 $ investment follows public Enhancements Transit Center project will increase bus lanes; targeted Downtown transit center, and the 13th Street/Central investment. Should downtown and the does not have a Master Plan, 1B Pearl Street Mall become out-dated and not fully use technology enhancements to the Pearl Street Mall, and Park Improvements which will also accommodate the , it but is in the process of would negatively infrastructure improvements to the 13th Street/Central needs of the Farmers' Market. impact the social and economic sustainabilily of developing one. Park area to accommodate the needs of the Farmers' the downtown own and the community. Market 000 DUHMDIPSTotal $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ $ 2,500,000 $ The wildland fire crew is currently housed in a single Wildland fire crews will continue to be housed in a facility rated in family residence at 19th and Violet, and Wildland fire poor condition. The crew is housed and officed at the'cache' - the equipment is stored in multiple locations in and place where they store and perform maintenance on their tools. This project will construct new facilities for the Fire around the city. A consolidated operation would be This tool repair is done outside under a car port with little The Fire Master Plan is department, including a new wildland fire operations much more effective. Reserve fire apparatus and protection from the weather. There is no garage at the cache. currently in the process of Fire New Facilities FireIFAM building, and a new Fire storage facility for vehicles and equipment are currently stored in existing stations Trucks and equipment that need to be stored inside are stored at $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 17,500 being updated, and this equipment. and in a barn off of the Diagonal Highway. A heated the 'fire barn' at 51st and Jay Road. Not having all of their tools, project has been identified in 29 storage facility would allow storage of reserve fire equipment and vehicles in one place can cause delays in the draft document. apparatus to move out of existing stations opening up mustering forces during an emergency. It also cause the crew to garage space for smaller response vehicles for non- do a lot of driving to perform equipment checks and routine fire operations. maintenance. 000000 • FireIFAMTotal $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 $ $ 1,150,000 $ 17,500 Permits System Replacement: Beginning replacement in 2012 or 2013 will avoid de-support and leads to an effective transition. The system is critical to permit issuance and development review among many city departments. Lack of an automated solution would lead to a need to rely on manual processes or lesser technologies that will not allow the city to maintain critical service levels or collect needed revenue. Maintenance Management The systems in this rategory reflect some of the most System: The city currently has approximately 5 separate asset and operationally-critical applications used across maintenance management systems, many of which do not serve This project would fund the replacement of major multiple city departments. The financial and permit critical business functions adequately. A single product can more business software for the city, including implementing a management applications in particular are facing de- effectively and economically serve city business needs. Records Major Business Information citywide maintenance management software, support from their vendors due to their age and are Management System: Without this investment, many departments Software implementation of the records management software subject to significantly increasing support costs. All will rely on the continued use and storage of paper records which $ 1,602,602 $ 1,870,602 $ 268,000 $ 1,602,602 - Yes Replacement Technology citywide, redesigning the city website software for the systems lack key efficiency-enhancing are difficult to search and expensive to store and protect given 44 public eGov applications, and replacing the permitting technologies and features available in newer required retention schedules. Public-Facing eGovemment management software. technologies. Serious continuity of operations issues Applications: This project will provide an expanded array of will arse if the city does not begin the replacement of automated solutions for providing information and online these in enterprise systems. transactional services, as well as ongoing improvements to the underlying technologies that enable us to effectively and securely create an attractive and content-rich web presence for the city. Without investment in new web infrastructure systems, our website will become technically obsolete as user-facing web technologies continue to advance rapidly. Security of web systems also becomes a major concern as technical threats expand- 61 312011 000 • • Page 1 oI7 Capital Investment Strategy Project Unfunded List for June 27 Stakeholder Group Meeting High Priority Action Items Full Unfunded Highest Priority Highest Priority Estimated Project Identified in Master Score Project Name Department Project Description Project Rationale Impacts Funded Amount Unfunded new Annual Project Scope Amount 0&M or Strategic Plan? Amount Information Technology Total $ 1,602,602 $ 1,870,602 $ 268,000 $ 1,602,602 $ This project would complete reorganization and renovation of existing spaces in the Main Library, as well as the construction of additional space and With dramatic advances in information technology, the way in amenities. This includes relocating and refurnishing which our library delivers services must evolve rapidly. In the children's area (Library Commission priority #1A), addition, the demographics in Boulder are shifting, resulting in a and reusing the vacated space for high demand, This project will complete the top 5 of the 20 wider range of needs and expectations for library services. In Library Facility browser-friendly fiction and media collections and a projects recommended in the 2009 Library Facilities order to keep pace and remain relevant and functional with teen space (Library Commission priority #1B), Sustainability Study . Refer to the 'Self-Guided Tour respect to these changes, the Main Library facility requires Upgrades Enhance Library ! FAM constructing a new entry and filling in the opening on of High Priority Renovation Projects for the Main renovation and upgrades. The level and quality of services is $ 4,580,000 $ 4,580,000 $ 4,SSQODO $ 18,540 Yes menu D ry 9 ty ty the 2nd floor to add 1,000 sq It (Library Commission Library' handout from the tour for more information expected to steadily decline without additional capital funding to 12 priority 93), refinishing and refumishing the 2nd floors about each of these subprojects. make these improvements. The 0&M cost is associated with of the 1974 and 1992 wings with lower height shelving addition of 1000 sq ft of space in #1 B. This 0&M cost would be an and additional computer stations and study tables unfunded liability. Renovation of the Main Library is considered a (Library priorities Commission #4 & 5), and relocating higher priority than the addition of new services or facilities. the cafb to the new entrance (Library Commission Priority 95). 000 000000 Providing a full-service North Boulder rant library as been a This project would provide limited library service long-range (vision plan) goal since 1995. Implementation of options in the north and northeast areas of the city, automated or limited-service locations in north/northeast Boulder Library New either through a drop box, automated materials vending This item addresses providing services to the would begin to address specific library service gaps and to target Facilities Library ! FAM dispenser, ora 1000 -2000 sq R library branch outlet north/northeast area, which currently does not have a services to specific populations in this area. Each of these limited $ 390,000 $ 390,000 $ - $ 390,000 TBD Yes ora combination of these options. This was the Library local branch library. service options carries a 0&M costs which have not been 12 Commission's #2 priority. estimated and would be unfunded liabilities. Therefore providing new services is secondary in priority to renovating existing facilities. 000 Library ! FAM Total $ 4,970,000 $ 4,970,000 $ $ 4,970,000 $ 18,540 The Boulder Reservoir recreation area is a principal ' revenue producing resource for the Parksand - The Boulder Reservoir fs Provide new upgraded playground area . r. prove fieerealionDepartmenL-Over T;r,e, the;c,nasNaetwe-,- idenNfiedanthe-Parks and- Boulder -Reservoir- Outdoor performance n,c signage, address venue aredlifeas install faeifiies-andpark amenities-have -falleninta disrepair- ReereatwreMaslerPlan,and-Parks and Improvements - Ra andamprovementsare required-le- maintain and- 4;008-;006- 4;000-;BAS -4A00g00 - 350,000- the-department-is, in-the- Phase Il th expand uses-at-the-reservoir-This-projeet-will- pwcessofcornpletinga-share trail system, consfiFuet fencing and impf( ve Nor 20 provide access4o-a wide range of users improve- Boulder42esewoir-Master shoi,eiGoot Lake. This V project was determined as a h gh recreational oppoduniliesarrdconserve-natural- Plan. - prienty bond program in t at ve by the Parks a resourees at the -reserveir.- • 00000 612312011 Page 2 of 7 Capital Investment Strategy Project Unfunded List for June 27 Stakeholder Group Meeting High Priority Action Items Full Unfunded Highest Priority Highest Priority Estimated Project Identified in Master Score Project Name Department Project Description Project Rationale Impacts Funded Amount Unfunded new Annual Project Scope Amount 0&M or Strategic Plan? Amount Approximately 7 8 million dollars is estimated to specifically address the upgrades and improvements at the current Event The Flatiron G.C. is a principal revenue producing Center building. The already dated existing facility will continue to resource for the Parks and Recreation Department fall into disrepair and become obsolete and unattractive overtime. The infrastructure and facilities at the current Events At the same time, existing structures conceived and built in the This project would redevelop the existing Flatirons Center continue to fall into disrepair and 70's will continue to become noncompliant with acceptable energy Events Center at the golf course and address improvements are required to maintain use of the efficiency standards aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Flatirons Events Parks and associated course modifications. This project was The result will be a continual increase in annual maintenance $ 9,060,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 140,000 $ 1,060,000 $ 85,000 Yes Center Recreation determined as a high prionty bond program initiative by Center. A comprehensive business plan completed co sts to the city and loss of rental revenues. The funding for this 14 the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB in 201 D indicates that the Events Center at this project is best reviewed in the context of the 2012 bond and is also location has the potential to provide a range of events and increased revenues if a new facility and a potential partnership opportunity with a public private or partnership is developed. partnership. Approximatley 1.2 million dollars of the total shown is for course improvements related to an improved driving range, entry way and changes to holes 9 and 10. Associated 0&M is linked to a city run event facility. 0000 0000910 This project will complete the Phase 2 improvements to The East Boulder Community Park Site Master Plan If alternative and supplemental funding is not identified to support East Boulder Community Park, including pavilion and from has the included a beginning. ng. Phase haled is now improvement recently schedule the completion of the East Boulder Community Park Master Plan, shade structures; resiroom facilities, petanque courts, several constituency groups will be disappointed as expectations East Boulder Parks and completed and funding for Phase II has not been Community Park Recreation and final landscape improvements. This project was Identified. The Parks and Recreation staff and the will go dl addition, needed shade structures will go $ 1,200,000 $ 9,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 5,000 Yes determined as the highest priority bond program unaddressed and ultimately the project will not be fully completed PRAB believe the completion of the project is an 10 initiative by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board important aspect to satisfying the community's desire as envisioned. 0&M is associated with minor new maintenance (PRAB for a community park in the east Boulder area. needs. 000 0000 0 This project will enhance existing recreation facilities, Need to maintain and improve upon existing including the Stazio Ballfields (1 new softball field and 2 recreational facilities and amenities in order to retain multi-purpose fields, replacing the tinsile canopy and a competitive market share in the community. adding shade structures, and refurbishing turf and the Recreational facilities require a significant degree of The exact return on investment assocaled with these enhanced maintenance building), North Boulder Recreation ongoing annual maintenance and repair. At times it recreational facilities has not been calculated. Improved facilities Center (including additional program and office space, is also important to provide periodic restoration and renovations are designed based on current demand i.e fields Yes, this work is identified in remodel the front desk area, expand of the weight room, changes to facilities to accommodate new programs and weight rooms at recreation centers. Improvements to facilities the Parks and Recreation Existing Recreation Parks and concession area, recycling facilities, and improved and equipment designed to address the demands by consider expanded and improved customer use. If funding is not Master Plan, and the Facility Recreation parking), and East Boulder Recreation Center the general public. identified to support improvements to existing recreational $ 13,125,000 $ 13,125,000 $ 13,125,000 $ 100,000 Recreation/ Enhancements (including remodeling the front entry, improvements to facilities, achieving a principle goal of the department's master Program/Facilities Master 11 locker rooms and interior upgrades). Improving the plan to provide cost effective recreational services and programs Plan existing recreational facilities and athletic ballfields was to the community will be impacted. In addition, it will be difficult to determined to be a high priority bond program initiative remain competitive with other areas. by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB 00 •000.00 612312011 Page 3 of 7 Capital Investment Strategy Project Unfunded List for June 27 Stakeholder Group Meeting High Priority Action Items Full Unfunded Highest Priority Highest Priority Estimated Project Identified in Master Score Project Name Department Project Description Project Rationale Impacts Funded Amount Unfunded new Annual Project Scope Amount 0&M or Strategic Plan? Amount The return on investment associated with improved park amenities is significant. If alternative and supplemental funding is not Neighborhood/ This project will upgrade neighborhood and/or identified to support improvements to existing park amenities Community Park Parks and community park shelters and other amenities in existing Need to maintain existing valued park resources and throughout the community, the Parks and Recreation Department Shelter Recreation Parks. Examples Include: North Boulder Park, Martin amenities over time. will be forced to postpone these capital improvements overtime. In $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ 3,000,000 Yes Replacements/ Park, Harlow Plaits Community Park, Tom Watson addition, it will be difficult to meet industry standards aimed at 14 Improvements Park, health, safety and accessibility if periodic shelter replacements/improvements are not regularly considered. This is one of the highest priorities for the Department 00 The return on investment associated with periodic improvements associated with cultural and natural resources in the community is critical in maintaining a high quality of life standard in the Need to maintain existing valued park resources and community. Supplemental funding is needed to support City Arboretum Parks and This project will upgrade the landscaping and irrigation improve water conservation improvements to the city Arboretum, to improve plant quality and $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ $ 250,000 $ 11,300 Renovation Recreation at the City Arboretum efforts when ever irrigation systems because no other funding source is available. - possible. Without a dedicated fund source, this type of project will go 10 unaddressed and only essential maintenance needs will be considered. 0&M is associated with increased maintenance care. 00 0000 0• The return on investment associated with periodic improvements associated with cultural and natural resources in the community is This project includes improvements at the Columbia critical in maintaining a high quality of life standard in the Columbia Cemetery Need to maintain existing valued park resources and community. Funding is needed to support improvements to the Parks and Cemetery, including headstone rehabilitation, fence UpgradeslEnhance improve water conservation efforts when ever Columbia Cemetery, to improve headstones, landscape and $ 550p00 $ 550,000 $ - $ 550,000 ments Recreation repairs, and improvements to the raw water irrigation possible. irrigation systems because currently work is funded through system periodic grants. Without additional funding this type of project will 11 go unaddressed and only essential maintenance needs will be considered. • 0 Parks and Recreation Total $ 31,185,000 $ 23,325,000 $ 140,000 $ 23,185,OOo $ 551,300 6/23!20 11 Page 4 or 7 Capital Investment Strategy Project Unfunded List for June 27 Stakeholder Group Meeting High Priority Action Items Full Unfunded Highest Priority Highest Priority Estimated Project Identified in Master Score Project Name Department Project Description Project Rationale Impacts Funded Amount Unfunded new Annual Project Scope Amount 0&M or Strategic Plan? Amount Radio Infrastructure- Our current radio channels and infrastructure are at near capacity. Because the transmitters for these channels The new industry standard for police and fire will be at a different tower site that our regular primary channels, communications is a narrow-band communication we will have alternate primary channels in the event of a disaster system, and this project would begin the conversion or failure of a radio tower. Bomb Robot: The current robot was process to the new radio systems. Replacement of purchased in 1999, and is obsolete. In order to maintain current Federal bomb squad certification a bomb squad must have an the bomb robot is needed as it is outdated and there Police Equipment This project would upgrade the police radio operational robot platform for render safe operations. DNA Lab: By are ip replacement parts available. The DNA The Police Master Plan is Upgrades/Replace Police infrastructure, provide a new bomb robot, and provide working jointly with CBI on a DNA lab, we will be able to process $ - $ 660,000 $ - $ 860,000 $ 182,000 equipment will allow local processing of DNA currently being updated. ment equipment for a new DNA laboratory. evidence, which is currently sent to the Colorado DNA samples in our lab for all major crimes locally, and also for 18 Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and processing can burglaries, trespasses, and nuisance crimes. This will reduce take 6 months or longer. City is working with the CBI delays, increase the efficiency and likely the clearance rate of on a potential partnership effort on staffing the DNA crimes for detectives. A DNA lab will also address county-wide lab. need. State law changes in 2010 now require all persons arrested on felonies to have DNA samples collected. By processing scene samples from property crimes, there will likely be an increase in clearance rate for all crimes to include the prolific criminals. 0000 •0 Police Total $ $ 660,000 $ $ 660,000 $ 182,000 Currently, Council and board members having public meetings This project would bring Council chambers to current have difficulty hearing other members speaking and also public Facility FAM 41-This project would provide upgrades or standards for audio and visual presentations, comments being made. In addition, TV viewers of public meetings enhancements to the Municipal Building to include are often distracted with miscellaneous noise being picked up by Upgrades/Enhance Public Works t FAM allowing for improved broadcasts to the public. $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 Yes Council chamber communication and audio upgrades the microphones. For those wishing to make presentations, menu and security cameras. Security enhancements would be for cameras at key current equipment cannot easily allow for portable storage devices 15 locations in the publicly-accessible facility- to be plugged in to show items. Also, for late night meetings, the lack of security cameras leaves the downstairs areas unmonitored. 00 00000 Public Works 1 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ FAM Total While the city has a robust bike network, way(nding The city has been investing $10K to $15K per year in wayfinding Transportation Bike This project would enhance the existing bike system by on both streets and pathways is often a challenge. signing. At this rate, it will take between 17 and 25 years to System PW-Transportation completing wa1T ndin0 si0nor0a on paths and routes helps The users installation find of their signs way. This showing prokeyject destina also wouldtions complete the signing Plan without additional funding. Striping and $ 1,695,000 $ 300,000 $ $ 300,000 $17,000 Yes Enhancements ($250K) and adding bike lanes to key corridors ($50K). stripe bike lanes on key corridors where space signing of bike lanes provides new routes for cycling, helps raise 16 currently exists ($50K). awareness and increases safety for all users. 00000 ••000• • 612312011 Page 5 of 7 Capital Investment Strategy Project Unfunded List for June 27 Stakeholder Group Meeting High Priority Action Items Full Unfunded Highest Priority Highest Priority Estimated Project Identified in Master Score Project Name Department Project Description Project Rationale Impacts Funded Amount Unfunded new Annual Project Scope Amount 0&M or Strategic Plan? Amount The 14th & Walnut station is over capacity today with Complete minor improvements at the 14th & Walnut more buses scheduled to arrive with FasTracks bus Without improvements at 14th & Walnut, conflicts and safety rapid transit service. Bike parking is inadequate, and transit station, including better accommodating bus issues are likely to increase as buses, drivers, pedestrians and pedestrian and bicycle access is in need of Transportation stops on the street, improving patron information and improvement. bicyclists share a more crowded space. This bond funding would idThis increment improvements of to current investment will operationshelp, Transit System PW-Transportation pedlblke bicycle access and accommodations. Provide provide modest provide the extra increment of funding needed to bring all of $ 1,310,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 690,000 $ 910,000 $10,000 Yes Enhancements basic access and amenities at all transit stops in accessibility and aesthetics. Currently, approximately Boulder's transit stops up to basic access standards. The city 27 Boulder, and additional amenities such as benches, o recently received FASTER grants of from the Colorado shelters and bike racks at high use stops. 10 /o of Boulder's 1 WO bus stops are inaccessible by Department of Transportation which partially funds these projects. wheelchair, lacking curb ramps and concrete pads for boarding. 00000 This category includes improvements at intersections, Transportation primarily to address pedestrian and bicycle safely at Intersections are the most common location for Accelerating these projects provides a safer system for all users areas with high volumes of turning traffic. The following accidents for all modes of transportation, so and avoids cost escalation in the future. Currently, while the Intersection PW-Transportation projects could be included: improving bicycle and addressing safety issues at these locations is a top projects are identified in the Transportation Master Plan, only a $ 900,000 $ 500,000 $ $ 500,000 $2,700 Yes Improvements pedestrian safety at Foothills and Baseline, and adding priority small amount of funding has been identified to complete them. 16 bikeable shoulders at Diagonal and Foothills. • 00000 000 • The category has two elements: Expand bike share system ($500K) and provide partial funding for a full- Provide an increment of capital funding toward Without this funding, the bike share system would not be service bike station at 14th & Walnut ($500K). The top expanded until other funds could be identified. The current system 50 Bike Share Transportation New Stations PW-Transportation prionty for 2011 is to expand the bike-share system. stations. the full system size p 400 bikes at st may not be large enough to be self-sustaining over time. More $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ $ 500,000 $D Yes The system is owned and operated by a local non- - $SDOK would add approximately 10 efrons and 100 bikes to the stations will increase the utility, user base and cost-effectiveness 20 profit, the City is partnering to identify capital funds for system. of the system. system expansion. 0000 These improvements are necessary for the functionality the Boulder Junction area. Investments from both the With the adoptionnsthe Transit Village area plan, Council of city and developers are required to fully fund the The new street called Junction Place is the major committed that construction use and development excise taxes improvements. The highest pnorry for city investment is north-south connector through the area, linking the would be re-invested in the area. The bond funds would help Transportation address cash-flow liming issues, insuring that public infrastructure the Junction Place bridge over Goose Creek with new bus facility and the future city housing site to the Boulder Junction PW-Transportation bikelped access to the Goose Creek Pathway future Northwest Rail train platform. The pathways is in place as new development is completed. Bond support of $ 8,200,000 $ 2,560,000 $ $ 2,560,000 $25,600 Yes Improvements transportation projects could also free up re-invested tax funds to 96 (estimated $2.56 million Other priorities include along Goose Creek and the slough are the primary support other important area projects such as refurbishment of the extending Junction Place e south over the slough with a non-motorized access routes to the area. Depot A bond investment of $5 million could be spent within the 3 pathway connection to 30th Street and improvements to Pearl Parkway. year time frame. 0 • 612312011 Page 6 of 7 Capital Investment Strategy Project Unfunded List for June 27 Stakeholder Group Meeting High Priority Action Items Full Unfunded Highest Priority Highest Priority Estimated Project Identified in Master Score Project Name Department Project Description Project Rationale Impacts Funded Amount Unfunded new Annual Project Scope Amount 0&M or Strategic Plan? Amount This project will complete missing links in the multi-use An investment of $11.1 million will make significant pathway system that have been identified of p proinjtheects Transportation Master Plan. Example progress toward completing the core multi-use The benefits of completing these projects sooner rather than later Transportation New include improvements along Baseline, 28th, South pathway system along major arterials and on the include both safety improvements, as most of the projects are Multi Use Path PW-Transportation greemway system. The projects identified as highest along major arterials, and cost-savings due to building the projects $ 11,100,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 2,250,000 $30,100 Yes connections Broadway and at Table Mesa and US 36. Others include connecting from Boulder Creek to Arapahoe priorities for the 2011 bond issue include those that sooner rather than later. These projects encourage multimodal 25 near Naropa and sections of pathway along Four Mile are relatively uncomplicated, so can be completed travel and improve access to FasTracks facilities. Creek quickly. •000 000000 • This project will construct missing sidewalk links The Transportation Master Plan states that By completing these projects sooner rather than later, residents Transportation pedestrians are the priority users on the system. This throughout the community and provide pedestrian and visitors will find walking more pleasant, convenient and safer, Pedestrian PW-Transportation crossing treatments at key intersections such investment will accelerate the city's progress in and the city will realize the financial benefit of avoiding cost $ 5,237,000 $ 850,000 $ - $ 850,000 $8,500 Yes Enhancements Baseline at at Canyon as establishing a functional and contiguous network of nyon Creek and Canyon at 21st. 20 sidewalks with frequent street crossing oPPortunities. escalation. •00 000 0 10!~ 04 00 PWTransportation Total $ 29,442,000 $ 8,660,000 $ 690,000 $ 7,870,000 $93,900 Grand Total $ 71,049,602 $ 43,235,602 $ 1,098,000 $ 42,137,602 $863,240 612312011 Page 7 or 7 111nR111IMnoFuu I P1 PARKING INSTITUTE 2011 Emergimng Trends in Parkmingo. Report on a survey conducted by the International Parking Institute The International Parking Institute, the world's largest association representing parking professionals and the parking industry, surveyed its members to determine emerging trends in parking. This report crystallizes the views of a cross-section of these parking professionals. For more information about the International Parking Institute, visit www.parking.org. A supplement to The Parking Professional An online survey was conducted among members of the International Parking Institute in January 2011. Results were tabulated and analyzed by Opinion Works, an independent research firm based in Annapolis, Maryland. Q: What are the Top 10 Trends in Parking? It's a reflection of the economic times that parking professionals cited increased demand for finding ways to increase parking revenues as the top trend impacting the "Parking parking industry. Cash-strapped cities and states are demanding professionals are feeling the squeeze from having to do more with that parking revenues-which traditionally were re-invested in less. There's no doubt this has been a parking and transportation related maintenance and services- source of frustration for our profession, are now being diverted to fund other non-parking related but the counterpoint to that is an services. explosion of new technologies, a focus Demand for green and sustainable parking solutions on sustainability and a wider acceptance is the second leading trend, cited by more than one-third of parking as integral to transportation that is fueling a positive paradigm (36%) of respondents. In a related concern, 19% specifically shift for our industry." Cindy Campbell, identify the need to accommodate electric cars and provide 2009-2011 Chair, International charging stations in the near future. Parking Institute The survey identifies a very strong trend toward technological solutions. Large numbers of professionals see increased demand for cashless or electronic payment (32%). More than one-quarter anticipate increased use of cell phones to find, reserve, or pay for parkTng (27%). A similar number see a move toward innovative technologies to improve access control (24%). Typical operational issues such as customer service and security appear prominently on the list. Different models such as public-private partnerships and alternative uses of the facility during off-peak hours also emerge as trends. Trends with the Most Impact on the Parking Industry International Parking Institute members were asked: "Focusing on emerging trends in parking, please select a maximum of three trends (your Top 3) which you believe will have the most impact on the parking industry or profession in 2011." © Increased demand for finding ways to increase parking revenue © Increased demand for green parking and sustainable parking solutions i._ 36% © Increased demand for cashless or electronic payment O Increased use of cell phones to find, reserve and or pay for parking 27% 0 Increased move toward innovative technologies to improve access control 24% . O Increased need for improving customer service 23% Move toward more public-private partnerships O Improving accommodation for electric cars/charging stations 1.9% Q Increased appreciation for integration of parking in project planning phase 16% O Increased use of wireless sensing devices for traffic management 1496 ©i Increased need for improving security WIN" Q: What is the Next Big Thing in Parking? Technology is the next big thing in parking. Professionals offer many specific visions of the coming technology, whether it is smart phone "Integrated apps, cashless parking, automatic vehicle identification, or simply a technologies and greener, continued push to integrate and expand technology to make both more sustainable parking operations and traffic flow more efficient. When you add it all up, facilities are the "next big nearly half of all respondents mention one of these things"-but we're advancing so rapidly on both these fronts, that technological solutions as the next big thing in parking. the next big things are already Sustainability and green initiatives are the next big thing here. There is a revolution going according to one in five parking professionals. They foresee on in the parking industry. It's parking facilities that are more energy-efficient, plug-ins for electric exciting and it's positive." vehicles, and accommodations for alternative fuel vehicles. Shawn Conrad, CAE, Executive Nearly one-fifth mention revenue-producing measures, new Director, International pricing models, or alternatives like public-private partnerships. Parking Parking Institute professionals are also paying significant attention to changes in parking demand, whether brought about through transportation demand management to relieve stress on facility capacity, or through consumers' shifting to alternatives such as mass transit. The Next Big Thing in Parking International Parking Institute members were asked: "What do you believe is 'the next big thing' in parking?" Leading responses Integrated technology/increased automation for better efficiency 23% Greener/more sustainable facilities 10% Automatic/cashless parking options 9% Smart phone parking apps for customers 9% Ways to enhance revenue/reduce costs/sharing of resources 9% Charging stations for electric cars/ 8% alternate fuel vehicle accommodations Automatic vehicle identification 6% Link with transit stations/parking 4% Public/private partnerships 4% Reduced demand/transportation demand management 4% Alternate pricing models 2% More energy efficiency/use of alternate sources 2% of energy Multiple uses/added services for parking facilities 2% Q: What Are the Most Common Parking Problems? The survey asked parking professionals to identify the most common parking operations, design or management problem or "Parking mistake they encounter that could have been avoided. is at the crossroads of The leading observations all relate to poor planning and so many disciplines- design - whether traffic flow and wayfinding, anticipation of parking transportation, sustainable needs, project planning and funding, automation and technology, mobility, development. When rate structure, equipment selection and placement, or anticipation parking expertise is utilized early of maintenance and capital replacement needs. Taken together, ;n the planning process, many problems can be avoided." the top conceill all relate to poor planning and account Casey Jones, CAPP. 2011-13 for three-quarters of the criticisms levied by parking Chair, International Parking professionals. Institute The remaining comments relate to non-compliance with regulatory and reporting requirements like the American Disabilities Act (ADA), and operational issues such as loss of space during construction or customer service. Most Common Parking Problems International Parking Institute members were asked: "What is the most common parking operations, design or management problem or mistake you've encountered that you feel could have been avoided had competent parking expertise been utilized?" Leading responses: Garage design/vehicle & pedestrian flow/wayfinding (signage) Poor municipal/ public planning/lack of public understanding of parking needs Poor internal project planning/funding - . Poor use/understanding/installation of software/automation/ _ 89b technology Poor rate structures Incorrect equipment choice/placement/utilization/installation - Maintenance costs & issues/ inadequate capital replacement plans ADA/other regulatory requirements (non-compliance) 4% Space counts/reporting 3% . Loss of space during construction 2% Customer service issues 2% Use of facility during off-peak periods/ inefficient usage of facility 2%