The URL can be used to link to this page

Vision Zero Action Plan 202301Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan BOULDERVISIONZEROACTIONPLAN MAY 20230 02 Glossary Backplate (retroreflective) – shields a traffic signal from background obstructions. Retroreflective backplates introduce contrast and reflect light at nighttime. Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) – the outcome of a benefit-cost analysis, which is a systematic process for identifying, quantifying, and comparing expected benefits and costs of an investment. Big Data – large, datasets, often collected perpetually from mobile or other connected devices. CAN – Boulder’s Core Arterial Network, a proposed connected system of protected bike lanes, intersection enhancements, pedestrian facilities, and transit facility upgrades. CDOT – the Colorado Department of Transportation. Contextual factor – a factor possibly related to crashes, such as roadway data (e.g., number of lanes), intersection data (e.g., presence of a traffic signal), land use data (e.g., commercial areas), operations data (e.g., traffic volumes), or Big Data (e.g., operating speeds from connected vehicles). Countermeasure – an engineering solution that can be implemented to correct a crash problem or mitigate the likelihood of a crash occurring. Crash modification factor (CMF) – used to compute the expected number of crashes after implementing a countermeasure on a street or at an intersection. Cycle length – the time required for a complete sequence of traffic signal phases. Cycle lengths typically range between 80 and 150 seconds. DRCOG – the Denver Regional Council of Governments. Fatal crash – a crash where one or more people is killed. High Injury Network (HIN) – defined by DRCOG, the Regional High Injury Network identifies the roadways with the highest number of fatal and severe injury crashes (also known as killed and severely injured crashes, or “KSI” crashes). High Risk Network (HRN) – defined by the City of Boulder, the network of Boulder streets that features the most contextual factors associated with fatal and serious injury crashes. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) – a federal grant program with the purpose to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. KSI crash - a crash resulting in a fatality (killed) or serious injury. Leading Pedestrian Interval – a three to seven second head start for pedestrians when entering an intersection with a corresponding green signal in the same direction of travel. Level of Service of Safety – a qualitative measure that reflects how a roadway segment or intersection is performing compared to other similar segments or intersections in terms of crash frequency and severity. 03Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Major intersection – an intersection where the major street has multiple lanes in each direction. Protected bike lane - an exclusive facility for bicyclists that is located within or directly adjacent to the roadway and that is physically separated from motor vehicle traffic with a vertical element Protected intersection – an at-grade intersection in which bicyclists and pedestrians are separated from cars. Vehicles turning right are separated from crossing bicyclists and pedestrians by a buffer, providing increased reaction times and visibility. Protected left-turn (or right-turn) – consists of providing a separate phase for left-turning (or right- turning) traffic and allowing left-turns (or right-turns) to be made only on a green left arrow (or right arrow) signal indication, with no pedestrian movement or vehicular traffic conflicting with the turn. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) – rectangular-shaped yellow lights with light-emitting diode (LED) arrays that flash a rapid sequence when activated by a pedestrian; RRFBs are not able to be integrated into nearby traffic signals. Regional Transportation District (RTD) – the regional agency operating public transit services in the Boulder area. Right-turn slip lane – at signalized intersections, right turn lanes that bypass the traffic signal with a triangular shaped island. Risk Factor – a contextual factor shown through statistical and spatial analysis to relate to crashes. Safe Streets and Roads for All (SSRA) – a federal, discretionary grant program providing $5 billion in grants from 2022 through 2026 to prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. Serious injury crash – a crash that results in an incapacitating (life altering) injury. Severe crash – a general term encompassing both fatal and serious injury crashes. Signal head – the portion of a traffic signal containing the red, yellow, and green lights. Systemic Safety – an approach to safety involving widely implementing improvements based on high-risk roadway features correlated with specific severe crash types. Traffic signal – also known as a traffic light or stop light. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – the DRCOG program that identifies all current federal- and state-funded transportation projects to be completed in the Denver region over a four-year period. Vertical separation (bikeway) - a bikeway type defined by the Low-Stress Walk and Bike Network Plan as either a protected bike lane or a multi-use path. 04 Executive Summary Vision Zero is Boulder’s goal to eliminate all severe crashes resulting in a serious injury or fatality. The project team completed technical analysis to define a High Risk Network that informs the Vision Zero Action Plan’s priority actions. A summary of the findings regarding the High Risk Network (HRN) is: The City of Boulder is developing an updated action plan to address areas of concern identified in the city’s Vision Zero Boulder: Safe Streets Report, 4th Edition, 2022. For this update, staff are creating a five-year 2023-27 Vision Zero Action Plan. The updated plan incorporates community engagement, improves on the prior 2019-21 Vision Zero Action Plan, develops a five-year list of implementation strategies and projects, and identifies opportunities for federal, state, regional, and local funding. The city completed two rounds of community engagement: the first in summer 2022 to better understand community members’ attitudes and concerns regarding traffic safety in Boulder, and another in winter 2023 to receive initial feedback on the 2023-27 Vision Zero Action Plan proposals. The Vision Zero Action Plan is oriented towards the implementation of improvements across Boulder’s transportation system, starting with the HRN and expanding to other streets, that will reduce the seven common crash types, as well as address other location-specific safety issues. The Vision Zero Action Plan includes four categories of actions to achieve Vision Zero through 20 specific actions. Red light running crashes Left-turn crashes Right-turn slip-lane crashes Right-turn on red crashes Right-turn crashes Multi-use path crossing crashes THE HRN HAS ROUGHLY FIVETIMES MORE RISK THAN ALL BOULDER ARTERIAL STREETS COMBINED SEVEN COMMON CRASH TYPES ACCOUNT FOR OF MEASURED BY CRASHES PER VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED, CRASHES ON THE HRN: FATAL AND SERIOUS INJURY62% Pedestrian crashes while crossing the street of fatal and serious injury crashes of bike crashes of pedestrian crashes (2016-2020 crash data) THE HRN REPRESENTS JUST OF CITY STREETS BUT ACCOUNTS FOR:7% 48% 56% 57% 05Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Implement and improve engineering solutions to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes. Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 1. Broadly implement low-cost projects on the High Risk Network to address top crash patterns Transportation & Mobility Ongoing A. Leading Pedestrian Interval i. Implement new LPI at Arapahoe Avenue & 17th Street 2023 ii. Proactively implement the LPI Traffic Operations Practice across the High Risk Network, including accessible pedestrian signals where possible 2024 iii. Proactively implement the LPI Traffic Operations Practice at remaining traffic signals, including accessible pedestrian signals where possible 2025 B. No Right-Turn on Red (RTOR) i. Implement no RTOR prohibitions at the following locations: • Broadway & Arapahoe Avenue (westbound right-turn) • Broadway & University Avenue (eastbound right-turn) • Broadway & Table Mesa Drive (northbound right-turn) • 30th Street & Valmont Street (northbound right-turn and westbound right-turn) • Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street (westbound right-turn) • Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street (eastbound right-turn) 2023 ii. Update Boulder’s no RTOR Traffic Operations Practice 2024 iii. Proactively implement the new no RTOR Traffic Operations Practice across the High Risk Network 2025 iv. Proactively implement the new no RTOR Traffic Operations Practice at remaining traffic signals 2026 C. Left-Turn Operation Change i. Update Boulder’s Left-Turn Operation Traffic Operations Practice 2024 ii. Proactively implement the Left-Turn Operation Traffic Operations Practice across the High Risk Network; document relevant HSIP information for locations that lack adequate signal equipment 2025 iii. Proactively implement the Left-Turn Operation Traffic Operations Practice at remaining traffic signals; document relevant HSIP information for locations that lack adequate signal equipment 2026 D. Green Pavement Markings in Conflict Zones i. Add green pavement markings at major intersections, minor intersections, and driveways on CAN corridors that overlap at least in part with the High Risk Network 2024 E. Right-Turn Slip Lanes i. Update right-turn slip lanes on the HRN to feature consistent signing for drivers and pedestrians (See Figure 14)2024 ii. Update right-turn slip lanes on remaining streets to feature consistent signing for drivers and pedestrians 2025 F. Additional Low-Cost Solutions i. Implement additional, high-priority, low-cost solutions (See Table 5)By 2025 2. Strategically implement higher cost solutions on the High Risk Network to address top crash patterns; document relevant HSIP information for these locations (See Table 6) Transportation & Mobility Ongoing Where possible, the city will advance actions ahead of the proposed time frame. 06 3. Implement capital projects to improve safety and comfort including protected bike lanes, protected intersections, and setback multi-use path crossings on high priority High Risk Network and Core Arterial Network corridors: • Arapahoe Avenue • Baseline Road • Folsom Street • Iris Avenue Transportation & Mobility By 2027 4. Upgrade Boulder’s traffic signal system by replacing traffic signal equipment not built to current standards to enable expanded use 12-inch yellow and green lenses, retroreflective backplates, and conduct engineering countermeasures evaluations in accordance with FHWA Red Light Camera Systems Operational Guidelines to reduce red light running Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 5. Update Boulder’s Traffic Operations Practices for right- turn on red (1.B.ii) and left-turn phases (1.C.ii); develop a practice for protected right-turn phases Transportation & Mobility 2024 6. Update the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines; document relevant HSIP information for existing marked crosswalk locations that no longer meet the guidelines Transportation & Mobility 2024 7. Update and implement Boulder’s policies and practices regarding speed limit setting to better align target and actual operating speeds Transportation & Mobility New policy/ practice by 2024; otherwise ongoing 8. Pursue and attract state and federal funding for high cost projects, with a focus on federal Highway Safety Improvement Program, federal Safe Streets for All, and DROCG Transportation Improvement Program funding ; grant funding priorities include: • Traffic signals on the HRN where left-turn operation changes are needed but signal equipment upgrades are necessary (Action 1.C.ii) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A • Traffic signals at remaining traffic signals where left-turn operation changes are needed but signal equipment upgrades are necessary (Action 1.C.iii) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A • Other higher cost solutions (Action 2) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP • CAN corridors (Action 3) Candidate funding source(s): SS4A, DRCOG TIP • Other signals where 12-inch yellow and green lenses and backplates are necessary (Action 4) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP • Pedestrian crossing upgrades on the HRN where new RRFBs or signals are necessary (Action 6) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A • (See Figure 15) Pedestrian crossing upgrades at remaining pedestrian crossings where new RRFBs or signals are necessary (Action 6) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 07Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 9. Design and conduct a robust study or experiment of right-turn slip lane design, addressing locations with no right-turn lane, locations with a right-turn lane and no slip lane, locations with a yield-controlled slip lane, and locations with a signal-controlled slip lane. Based on the findings, develop a strategy for improving right-turn slip lanes across the city, including communication to other city departments regarding updates to design standards or development review procedures. Transportation & Mobility Begin study/ experiment in 2025; evaluation complete by 2027 Pair engineering solutions with education and enforcement Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 10. Facilitate regular collaboration between the Boulder Police Department and Transportation & Mobility Department to identify and enforce unsafe travel behaviors at problem locations or locations with recently installed solutions Police Department (Transportation & Mobility) Ongoing 11. Strategically deploy photo radar van along high- speed corridors where allowed by state law Police Department Ongoing 12. Expand the use of red light camera locations at eligible locations Police Department (Transportation & Mobility) Ongoing 13. Support legislation to enable expanded use of photo radar van (commercial settings, higher speed streets) and red light cameras Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 14. Collaborate with CDOT and DRCOG to implement Vision Zero campaigns, focusing on behaviors of concern such as distracted driving, driving under the influence, drivers/bicyclist/pedestrians sharing the road, and unsafe behaviors by youth drivers Transportation & Mobility (Police Department) Ongoing 15. Combine countermeasure deployment with accompanying events and announcements, such as press releases, news interviews, ribbon cuttings, or project signage Transportation & Mobility Ongoing Improve the city’s internal Vision Zero practices Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 16. For all capital projects, designate a Transportation & Mobility representative to champion Vision Zero goals and strategies; coordinate with Community Vitality and Planning & Development Services staff to elevate Vision Zero within their work Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 17. Continue participation in the national Vision Zero Cities Network to learn and share new ideas and approaches with community leaders Transportation & Mobility Ongoing Improve Vision Zero data and transparency Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 18. Maintain and update the crash data dashboard Transportation & Mobility (Police Department) Ongoing 19. Continue to refine and improve accuracy in and utility of crash documentation Transportation & Mobility (Police Department) Ongoing 20. Annually summarize progress in delivering the Vision Zero Action Plan Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 08 CHAPTER 1. The Vision Zero Goal 08 How We Developed the Action Plan Status of Vision Zero CHAPTER 2.12 CHAPTER 3.22 09Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Engineering Solution Prioritization Monitoring & Next Steps Action Plan CHAPTER 4.56 CHAPTER 5.60 CHAPTER 6.72 10 CHAPTER 1.0 THEVISIONZEROGOAL BOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 07 12 The Vision Zero Goal Vision Zero is Boulder’s goal to reduce the number of traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries to zero. 13Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Boulder first adopted Vision Zero in 2014, aiming to eliminate fatal and serious injury crashes by 2030. Boulder defines severe crashes as those that result in a fatality or serious injury. While the primary focus of Vision Zero is to eliminate severe crashes, it also aims to reduce minor injury or property damage only crashes. Vision Zero is a priority of the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and informs the city’s other transportation plans, projects, and programs. Boulder’s Vision Zero Action Plan contains a series of actions that the City of Boulder will take over the next five years in pursuit of its Vision Zero goal. Boulder’s first Vision Zero Action Plan contained actions for the years from 2019-2021. This Vision Zero Action Plan contains actions for the years from 2023-27, building on the successes and lessons learned from the previous plan, technical analysis of crash and other data, and community engagement. 1414 CHAPTER 2.0 STATUSOF VISION ZERO 15Boulder Vision Zero Action PlanBOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 11 16 Status ofVision Zero A summary of the 2022 Vision Zero: Safe Streets Report is: Total crashes per year in Boulder have been trending down since 2001; however, severe crashes per year have remained steady. The City of Boulder regularly prepares a Safe Streets Report that reports on the progress of crash reduction efforts, summarizes analysis of crash data, and identifies crash trends and other areas of concern. The crash data reported in this document comes from the City of Boulder’s Transportation & Mobility Department database, which is derived from the Police Department’s Record Management System. The information contained in these databases is updated periodically and may change over time Areas of concern include: CRASHES INVOLVING PEOPLE SPEEDING, PEOPLE IMPAIRED, AND PEOPLE MAKING LEFT-TURNS. CRASHES INVOLVING PEOPLE AGES 15-29 AND OLDER ADULTS AGES 65 AND OLDER. BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND MOTORCYCLE CRASHES. 17Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan NINE PEOPLE WERE KILLED Whereas the Safe Streets Report summarizes the most recent three years of crash data (2018 through 2020), this Vision Zero Action Plan used five years of crash data, from 2016 through 2020, to more broadly inform crash patterns and the application of location-specific engineering solutions. Figure 1 shows the locations of all crashes, Figure 2 shows the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes, Figure 3 shows the locations of pedestrian crashes, Figure 4 shows the locations of fatal and serious injury pedestrian crashes, Figure 5 shows the locations of bicyclist crashes, and Figure 6 shows the locations of fatal and serious injury bicyclist crashes between 2016 and 2020. Note: not all crashes were displayed on the maps due to insufficient location data. ELIMINATE CRASHES RESULTING IN SERIOUS INJURIES AND FATALITIES 1.REDUCE OTHER TYPES OF CRASHES 2.IMPROVE TRAVEL COMFORT AND SAFETY 3. Boulder has five Vision Zero objectives: ENHANCE AWARENESS OF AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITH VISION ZERO 4.IMPROVE DATA AND BE TRANSPARENT 5. 150 PEOPLE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED 2 walking 1 on a bike 6 in a car14,500 people were involved in a crash in Boulder. BETWEEN 2018 AND 2020, APPROXIMATELY 25 walking 55 on a bike 70 in a car 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! !!! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!! ! !! !!! !!!! !! !!!!!! !!!!! !!! !! !!!!! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! !! !!!!! !! !!!!! !!! ! !!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! !!! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!! ! !! !!! !!!! !! !!!!!! !!!!! !!! !! !!!!! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! !! !!!!! !! !!!!! !!! ! !!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th St! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! !!! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!! ! !! !!! !!!! !! !!!!!! !!!!! !!! !! !!!!! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! !! !!!!! !! !!!!! !!! ! !!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Figure 1: All Crash Locations (2016 - 2020) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Number of Crashes !≤50 !51 - 100 !101 - 150 !>150 Figure 1: All Crash Locations (2016-2020) USUS 19Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFatal or Serious Injury Crashes 2016-2020 Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan CrashYear 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Figure 2: Fatal or Serious Injury (All Modes) Crash Locations (2016-2020) USUS 20 South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFatal or Serious Injury Crashes Involving a Pedestrian Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!!!! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 3: Pedestrian Involved Crash Locations Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Number of Pedestrian Involved Crashes !1-2 !2-4 !4-6 !>6 Figure 3: Pedestrian Involved Crash Locations (2016-2020) 21Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFatal or Serious Injury Crashes Involving a Pedestrian Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Figure 4: Fatal or Serious Pedestrian Injury Crash Locations (2016-2020) Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes 22 ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 4: Bicyclist Involved Crash Locations (2016 - 2020) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Number of Bicyclist Involved Crashes !1-2 !3-6 !6-13 !>13 Figure 5: Bicyclist Involved Crash Locations (2016-2020) South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFatal or Serious Injury Crashes Involving a Bicycle Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes 23Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFatal or Serious Injury Crashes Involving a Bicycle Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Figure 6: Fatal or Serious Bicycle Injury Crash Locations (2016-2020) Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes 24 CHAPTER 3.0HOW WEDEVELOPEDTHE ACTION PLAN 25Boulder Vision Zero Action PlanBOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 19 HOW WEDEVELOPEDTHE ACTION PLAN 26 How We Developedthe Action Plan Staff were successful in implementing many elements of the 2019-21 Action Plan (see Appendix A), including: Made changes at 49 intersections to add: Advanced Vision Zero improvements like bike lane and/or green pavement marking enhancements with the pavement management mobility enhancements program, including on: • Table Mesa Drive • Lehigh Street • Pine Street • Folsom Street • 17th Street This Vision Zero Action Plan represents a significant shift from the 2019-21 Action Plan. This Vision Zero Action Plan outlines a prioritized set of fundable and actionable projects and programs that can be implemented over the next five years in areas that have the greatest potential to reduce the number and severity of crashes. and other signing/markings to improve safety. Leading Pedestrian Intervals Protected Left-Turns Red Light Cameras 27Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan In 2020, implemented 20 Is Plenty, the 20 mile per hour residential street speed limit. Received $4.8 million in grant funding through the Highway Safety Improvement Program and other regional, state, and federal sources for: • Mesa Elementary Safe Routes to School improvements • Pedestrian crossings • 47th Street sidewalks • New traffic signals • Speed limit setting and signing framework development • Other street design, traffic signal, and pedestrian crossing treatment upgrades Community Engagement The project team completed two phases of community engagement to develop the Vision Zero Action Plan: in the first phase, the public was consulted to understand their transportation safety concerns, and in the second phase we informed the public of the draft plan. The 2023-27 Vision Zero Action Plan was developed using community engagement, Systemic Safety analysis , and corridor analysis on the High Risk Network. The Systemic Safety analysis reflects both crash history as well as contextual factors to proactively mitigate risk and to reduce crashes before they occur, by pairing solutions to the crash types most associated with the risk factors. The resulting project list provides more specific actions that can be undertaken to address transportation safety and achieve Vision Zero. 20 VISION ZERO 28 PHASE 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT From summer to fall 2022, the community was asked to share their traffic safety concerns when travelling in Boulder. The City of Boulder hosted a virtual open house for community members, facilitated stakeholder meetings with Community Cycles and the Center for People with Disabilities, a hosted a survey and web map hosted through the city’s engagement platform, Be Heard Boulder, and hosted an in-person event at the San Lazaro Mobile Home Park. Community members shared over 700 comments on specific locations where they felt unsafe traveling by foot, bike, and/or vehicle. Appendix B includes a summary of Phase 1 engagement activities. This is what the city learned through the online survey and web map: • 37% of survey respondents have had personal experience with a severe traffic crash, either being seriously injured themselves or knowing someone who had been seriously injured or killed • The top four traffic safety concerns of survey respondents were: 1. Distracted driving 2. Drivers not yielding to pedestrians or bicyclists 3. Speeding 4. Drivers and bicyclists sharing the road • 66% of survey respondents choose whether to walk, bike, or drive based on traffic safety concerns for their trip route • The top four traffic safety corridors are: 1. Broadway/South Broadway in the vicinity of Iris Avenue, intersections adjacent to the University of Colorado, Baseline Road, Rayleigh Road, Dartmouth Avenue, and Table Mesa Drive 2. Table Mesa Drive/South Boulder Road from Hartford Drive to Foothills Parkway 3. Arapahoe Avenue between 28th Street and 55th Street 4. 28th Street, primarily from Colorado Avenue to Mapleton Avenue PHASE 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT In winter 2023, the city hosted a virtual open house, office hours with community members for more detailed discussions, stakeholder meetings with Community Cycles and the Center for People with Disabilities, and a questionnaire hosted through Be Heard Boulder. People were generally supportive of the direction of the plan and identified specific areas for enhancement prior to finalization. Appendix C includes a summary of Phase 2 engagement activities. 29Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 30 South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 11: Density of Be Heard Boulder Comments Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Number of Comments Low High Figure 7: Density of Be Heard Boulder Comments 31Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Systemic Safety Analysis This plan uses a national best practice1 Systemic Safety analysis to evaluate risk across the city’s entire roadway system. This approach can identify patterns that may not be reflected in standard crash data sources by pairing the data with contextual factors, such as the number of travel lanes and roadway speeds, the type of on-street bicycle facility, the types and timing of signals at an intersection, if there are schools, businesses, parks, and other land uses along the road, and Big Data2 from connected vehicles on speeds and braking . Appendix D includes a technical memorandum summarizing the Systemic Safety Analysis. From the 61 contextual factors used for the analysis, six Risk Factors were found to account for the most frequent and most severe crashes (Table 1): • Multi-use path present • Daily vehicle traffic between 5,000-10,000 vehicles per travel lane • Signalized intersections • A major intersection with no traffic signal • Businesses and a mix of land uses present • 85% of vehicle speeds at 30 miles per hour or faster 1 Highway Safety Manual and National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Report 893: Systemic Pedestrian Safety Analysis 2 Wejo sourced connected vehicle data 32 Table 1: Systemic Safety Analysis Contextual Factors Roadway Data Intersection Data Land Use/Zoning Data Big Data 3 lanes or less, ≤30 mph Signal Near school 85th %tile speed ≤30 mph 3 lanes or less, ≥35 mph Major unsignalized intersection Near OSMP trailhead 85th %tile speed >30 mph 4-5 lanes, ≤30 mph Minor unsignalized intersection Near bus stop Quick acceleration high 4-5 lanes, ≥35 mph Midblock Near community/ senior center Quick acceleration medium 6+ lanes, ≤30 mph Signal cycle length ≤100s Near alcohol serving business Quick acceleration low 6+ lanes, ≥35 mph Signal cycle length >100s Business zoning Hard braking high Classification: Freeway Signalized/HAWK crosswalk Downtown zoning Hard braking medium Classification: Expressway RRFB crosswalk Mixed-use zoning Hard braking low Classification: Ramp Signing/marking crosswalk Industrial zoning Classification: Principal Arterial Unmarked crosswalk Public zoning Classification: Minor Arterial Single-family residential zoning Classification: Collector Agricultural zoning Classification: Residential Classification: Private Classification: Pedestrian Mall Classification: Alley Protected bike lane On-street bike lane Multi-use path No bike facility/shared lane Sidewalks present Sidewalks missing On-street parking present No on-street parking Streetlight present Streetlight not present Daily traffic <5,000 vpl Daily traffic 5,000- 10,000 vpl Daily traffic >10,000 vpl No on-street parking South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 5: Number of Risk Factors by Roadway SegmentBoulder Vision Zero Action Plan Number of Risk Factors by Segment 1 2 3 4 5 6 Figure 8 shows Boulder's street segments with one to six of the Risk Factors that were found to account for the most frequent and most severe crashes. The six Risk Factors are correlated with past locations of frequent and severe crashes. The cause of crashes is not always directly related to a Risk Factor. For example, multi- use paths and business or mixed use zoning are correlated with crashes, but do not cause crashes themselves. Crash analysis presented later in this plan identifies the causes of crashes at locations with a high number of Risk Factors. 33Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 5: Number of Risk Factors by Roadway SegmentBoulder Vision Zero Action Plan Number of Risk Factors by Segment 1 2 3 4 5 6 Figure 8: Number of Risk Factors by Roadway Segment 34 High Risk Network Boulder’s High Risk Network (HRN) consists of locations with five or six Risk Factors. Figure 9 shows the High Risk Network, Figure 10 shows the High Risk Network where it overlaps with Boulder’s Core Arterial Network (CAN). The Core Arterial Network is a connected system of corridors in Boulder where the city is elevating work to meet Boulder’s transportation goals. These corridors will feature protected bike lanes, intersection enhancements, pedestrian facilities, and transit facility upgrades. In addition to reducing the potential for severe injury crashes, another purpose of this work is to make travel by all modes more comfortable and convenient. Figure 11 shows the High Risk Network where it overlaps with the High Injury Network (HIN) and Critical Corridors from DRCOG ’s Taking Action on Regional Vision Zero. DRCOG developed this High Injury Network based on crash history and uses it to inform regional funding priorities. The High Risk Network accounts for just 7% (26 centerline miles) of City of Boulder streets. Nearly all of the High Risk Network occurs on principal or minor arterial streets; however, the High Risk Network includes only 35% of Boulder’s arterial streets. Measured by crashes per vehicle miles traveled, the High Risk Network has roughly five times more risk than all Boulder arterial streets. Managing risk and mitigating crashes on this small percentage of streets can have an outsized impact on reducing fatal and serious injury crashes. Between 2016 and 2020, • 48% of severe crashes • 56% of bike crashes • 57% of pedestrian crashes occurred on the High Risk Network. Beyond these streets, severe crashes are much more dispersed. South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 6: High Risk Network Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan High Risk Network Street Extents 28th Street Winding Trail Drive to Baseline Road/US 36 30th Street Valmont Road to Colorado Avenue Arapahoe Avenue 14th Street to Foothills Parkway Arapahoe Avenue Foothills Parkway to 56th Street Baseline Road 16th Street to Manhattan Drive Broadway Lee Hill Drive to Mapleton Avenue Broadway Marine Street to Rayleigh Road South Broadway Table Mesa Drive to Darley Avenue Canyon Boulevard 15th Street to 28th Street Colorado Avenue Regent Drive to 35th Street Folsom Street Fremont Street to Taft Drive Foothills Parkway Iris Avenue to Pearl Parkway Iris Avenue 19th Street to 28th Street Iris Avenue 29th Street to Foothills Parkway Lookout Road Gunpark Drive to 71st Street Pearl Street/Parkway 28th Street to Foothills Parkway Table Mesa Drive Stanford Avenue to 55th Street Valmont Road 30th Street to Marshall Road Table 2: High Risk Network Corridors 35Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 6: High Risk Network Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Figure 9: High Risk Network 36 South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 8: Overlay of the DRCOG HIN and Critical Corridors with HRN Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Overlap of DRCOG Critical Corridors with HRN Overlap of DRCOG HIN with HRN Not Overlap of DRCOG with HRN South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 7: Overlay of the CAN and HRN Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Overlap of CAN with HRN Not Overlap of CAN with HRN Figure 10: Overlay of the CAN with HRN No Overlap of CAN with HRN 37Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 8: Overlay of the DRCOG HIN and Critical Corridors with HRN Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Overlap of DRCOG Critical Corridors with HRN Overlap of DRCOG HIN with HRN Not Overlap of DRCOG with HRN Figure 11: Overlay of the DRCOG HIN and Critical Corridors with HRN No Overlap of CAN with HRNNo Overlap of DRCOG Criticial Corridors or HIN with HRN Corridor Analysis Each of the High Risk Network corridors was evaluated to identify proven safety treatments, or countermeasures, that can reduce the common crashes identified by the Systemic Safety analysis. At locations that had a high number of crashes , the team completed two additional analyses: 1) a review of five years of crash data (2016-2020) to identify contributing patterns , and 2) Highway Safety Manual analysis to identify a location’s Level of Service of Safety, which quantifies a location’s potential for crash reduction. Appendix E includes a summary of the crash data review and Appendices F and G include summaries of the Highway Safety Manual analysis. Figure 12 shows the locations where the project team completed Highway Safety Manual analysis. Intersection Total Crashes (2016-2020) Fatal Crashes (2016-2020) Injury Crashes (2016-2020) *Includes all injury crashes: incapacitating, non-incapacitating, and possible 28th Street & Jay Road 46 0 21 28th Street & Iris Avenue 69 0 15 28th Street & Valmont Road 94 0 26 28th Street & Pearl Street 64 0 19 28th Street & Walnut Street 32 0 7 28th Street & Canyon Boulevard 57 0 11 28th Street & Arapahoe Avenue 169 1 32 30th Street & Valmont Road 80 0 26 30th Street & Pearl Street/Parkway 94 0 24 30th Street & Walnut Street 46 0 10 30th Street & Canyon Boulevard 33 0 12 30th Street & Arapahoe Avenue 129 0 31 30th Street & Aurora Avenue 27 0 10 30th Street & Baseline Road 84 0 28 Arapahoe Avenue & Broadway 42 0 13 Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street 59 0 14 Arapahoe Avenue & Foothills Parkway 231 1 61 Arapahoe Avenue & Conestoga Street 29 0 10 Arapahoe Avenue & 55th Street 64 0 21 Baseline Road & Broadway 156 0 42 Baseline Road & Foothills Parkway 102 0 16 Broadway & Iris Avenue 25 0 10 Broadway & Balsam Avenue 30 0 6 Broadway & Alpine Avenue 20 0 3 Broadway & Canyon Boulevard 59 0 15 Broadway & University Avenue 77 0 26 Broadway & College Avenue 18 1 0 Broadway/South Broadway & Dartmouth Avenue 26 0 9 South Broadway & Table Mesa Drive 139 0 42 Folsom Street & Canyon Boulevard 92 1 27 Folsom Street & Iris Avenue 26 0 8 Folsom Street & Valmont Road 17 0 8 Folsom Street & Pearl Street 38 0 11 Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road 173 0 45 Foothills Parkway & Table Mesa Drive/South Boulder Road 66 0 25 Table 3: Highway Safety Manual Analysis Intersections 39Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 9: Highway Safety Manual Analysis Locations Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Figure 12: Highway Safety Manual Analysis Locations 40 South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB l v d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 6: High Risk Network Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction Focus on common crash types and typical solutions. »Running red lights »Left-turn crashes »Right-turn slip lanes »Right-turn on red crashes »Right-turn crashes »Multi-use path crossings »Pedestrian crashes while crossing the street Developed using the Safe Streets Report, an engineer’s review of crash data, and Highway Safety Manual analysis across the High Risk Network. Prioritize locations with the most risk. Implement solutions across the system where possible, and at specific locations where systemic implementation is not feasible. Generally, first the High Risk Network, then other streets. Developed by analyzing contextual factors and crash data so we can manage all locations where risk exists, not just locations where crashes have occurred. »7% of Boulder streets, 26% of Boulder arterials, five times more risk than all Boulder arterial streets »48% of fatal and serious injury crashes (2016-2020) »57% of crashes involving a pedestrian and 56% of crashes involving a bicyclist (2016-2020) THESE SEVEN CRASH TYPES ACCOUNT FOR 62% OF FATAL AND SERIOUS INJURY CRASHES ON THE HIGH RISK NETWORK. Common Crash Types & Potential Solutions Analysis of the High Risk Network revealed some common crash types: running red lights, left-turns, right-turn slip lanes, right-turn on red, right-hooks, multi-use path crossings, marked crosswalks, unmarked and midblock pedestrian crossings, and pedestrians in crosswalks against the signal. 41 42 RED LIGHT RUNNING CRASHES CRASH TYPE DESCRIPTION There are three common factors associated with vehicles running red lights: Signal size, the number of signal heads per lane, and missing signal backplates can contribute to these crashes Some High Risk Network corridors coordinate traffic signal timing; however, some signals may be out of sync which can contribute to these crashes Traffic congestion can create driver frustration which can contribute to these crashes POOR SIGNAL VISIBILITY1.SIGNAL TIMING OUT OF SYNC2.CONGESTION3. Upgrading traffic signals with retroreflective backplates, additional signal heads, or signal heads in more visible locations can provide lower- cost, high impact crash reduction benefits. However, sometimes additional signal equipment can exceed the structural capacity of signal poles and mast arms. In these cases, the costs of these solutions are higher. Where signal coordination is out of sync along a corridor, timing adjustments can be made. Where running red lights is a result of congestion and associated driver frustration, increased enforcement during peak travel periods, including with red light cameras, is an appropriate solution. SIGNAL VISIBILITY1.SIGNAL TIMING OUT OF SYNC2.CONGESTION3. Potential Solutions 43 Other Strategies for Crash Reduction LOCATION-SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS »Signal visibility upgrades »Signal timing adjustments through regular re-timing Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction Related areas of concern from 2022 Safe Streets Report: • Bicycle, pedestrian, and motorcycle crashes • People ages 15-29 and older adults ages 65 and older • People speeding, people impaired, and people making left-turns Red light cameras SYSTEMIC SOLUTION Implement red light cameras based on the number of red light crashes in the past three years STRATEGY FOR MANAGING RISK At suitable locations with the greatest history of red light running crashes WHERE TO DEPLOY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 12. Expand the use of red light camera locations at effective locations (Ongoing) ASSOCIATED VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN ACTIONS 44 LEFT-TURN CRASHES CRASH TYPE DESCRIPTION There are three common types of left-turn crashes: A driver turns left and does not yield to an oncoming through vehicle A driver turns left and does not yield to a pedestrian or bicyclist traveling in the crosswalk A driver turns left and does not yield to an oncoming through bicyclist traveling in the bike lane VEHICLE-VEHICLE LEFT- TURN CRASHES 1.VEHICLE-PEDESTRIAN/ BICYCLIST 2.VEHICLE-BICYCLIST 3. All Types Continued implementation of the city’s Left-Turn Phase Operation Practice, which guides changes to left-turn operation at signalized intersections. And updating the guidance with consideration of: • Lower pedestrian and bicyclist (in crosswalk) volume thresholds • A threshold for oncoming bicyclists in bike lane volume • A threshold for people with disabilities (in crosswalk) • Providing protected left-turn signal phasing when a pedestrian or bicyclist pushes the pedestrian push button Potential Solutions 45 Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction Related areas of concern from 2022 Safe Streets Report: • Bicycle, pedestrian, and motorcycle crashes • People ages 15-29 and older adults ages 65 and older • People speeding, people impaired, and people making left-turns Protect left-turns SYSTEMIC SOLUTION Protect left-turns based on conflicting volumes of left-turning vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk or oncoming bicyclists -or- Protect left-turns when pedestrians push the pedestrian push button STRATEGY FOR MANAGING RISK High Risk Network first, other signalized intersections later WHERE TO DEPLOY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES »1.C.i – Update Boulder’s Left-Turn Operation Traffic Operations Practice (2024) »1.C.ii – Proactively implement the new left-turn operation practice across the HRN (2025) »1.C.iii – Proactively implement the new left-turn operation practice at remaining traffic signals (2026) ASSOCIATED VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN ACTIONS 4646 RIGHT-TURN SLIP LANE CRASHES A driver turns right and does not yield to a pedestrian or bicyclist in the crosswalk or a driver is stopped in the crosswalk creating collision potential with a bicyclist; the free movement of vehicles at slip lanes is also difficult to navigate for people who are visually impaired A driver turns right and stops to wait to enter the intersecting street and a second right-turning vehicle driver does not stop; inconsistency in design of right- turn slip lanes can contribute to this crash type by creating confusion and hard braking VEHICLE-PEDESTRIAN/ BICYCLIST 1.VEHICLE-VEHICLE REAR-END 2. All Types Consistent signing and markings are a low-cost solution that can clarify expected behaviors and reduce the potential for crashes. For example, adding “STATE LAW YIELD,” “2-WAY CROSSING” warning, “LOOK,” and/or “YIELD” signage and painting high-visibility crosswalk markings. At locations where there are many pedestrians and/or bicyclists, right- turn traffic signals should be added or the right-turn slip lane should be removed, when supported by delay and queuing analysis to ensure that other safety issues are not created. Where it is necessary to retain a right-turn slip lane, the slip lane itself can be modified in a number of ways. The slip lane can be changed to lower speeds with tighter angles at corners. Adequate storage can be provided at the crosswalk for drivers waiting to merge. And, increased or consistent yield signage can be provided at the crosswalk and at the merge point. Potential Solutions Right-turn slip lanes exist at many signalized intersections in Boulder, with most including raised crosswalks for people walking or biking to more safely navigate to a pedestrian crossing island near the intersection. A right-turn slip lane allows right-turning traffic to “slip past” an intersection and avoid a red light which can reduce intersection delay. CRASH TYPE DESCRIPTION There are generally two types of crashes that occur at right-turn slip lanes: 47Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 47 Other Strategies for Crash Reduction LOCATION-SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS Signals or other upgrades at locations with crash history Related areas of concern from 2022 Safe Streets Report: • Bicycle, pedestrian, and motorcycle crashes • People ages 15-29 and older adults ages 65 and older • People speeding, people impaired, and people making left-turns Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction »Implement consistent pedestrian crossing and yield signage »Evaluate and decide on a preferred geometric/ signalization solution SYSTEMIC SOLUTION »Implement new signage at all right-turn slip lanes »Upgrade right-turn slip lanes based on conflicting volumes of right-turning vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk STRATEGY FOR MANAGING RISK »High Risk Network first, other signalized intersections later »High Risk Network first, other signalized intersections later WHERE TO DEPLOY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: »1.E.i Update right-turn slip lane signage on the HRN (2024) »1.E.ii Update right-turn slip lane signage on remaining streets (2025) »9 Evaluate right-turn slip lane designs (by 2027) ASSOCIATED VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN ACTIONS: 484848 RIGHT-TURN ON RED CRASHES CRASH TYPE DESCRIPTION Turning right on a red light is legal in Boulder unless a sign prohibits the movement or if the movement is controlled by a red arrow. Vehicle drivers fail to yield and enter the crosswalk where a pedestrian or bicyclist is present while looking in the opposite direction of the pedestrian or bicyclist for oncoming traffic Vehicle drivers turn across an intersecting bike lane where a bicyclist is present VEHICLE-PEDESTRIAN/ BICYCLIST 1.VEHICLE-BICYCLIST 2. All Types Prohibiting right-turn on red, either with signs or traffic signals, can reduce this crash type. Greater compliance can be achieved by prohibiting right-turns at priority locations, such as intersections with high volumes of people walking or biking, while also considering impacts to delay, which can cause driver frustration and non-compliance. Targeted enforcement and red light cameras can also increase compliance. Potential Solutions 49Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 49 Related areas of concern from 2022 Safe Streets Report: • Bicycle, pedestrian, and motorcycle crashes • People ages 15-29 and older adults ages 65 and older • People speeding, people impaired, and people making left-turns Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction »Prohibit right-turn on red (RTOR) SYSTEMIC SOLUTION »Prohibit RTOR based on conflicting volumes of right-turning vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk STRATEGY FOR MANAGING RISK »High Risk Network first, other signalized intersections later WHERE TO DEPLOY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES »1.B.i – Implement no RTOR prohibitions (2023) »1.B.ii – Update Boulder’s no RTOR Traffic Operations Practice (2024) »1.B.iii – Proactively implement the new no RTOR practice across the HRN (2025) »1.B.iv – Proactively implement the new no RTOR practice at remaining traffic signals (2026) ASSOCIATED VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN ACTIONS 5050 RIGHT-TURN CRASHES CRASH TYPE DESCRIPTION There are two common types of right-turn crashes: A driver turns right in front of a bicyclist traveling parallel to the vehicle in the on-street bike lane; this is commonly known as a right-hook crash A driver turns right when a pedestrian or bicyclist is in the crosswalk VEHICLE-BICYCLIST 1.VEHICLE-PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST (IN THE CROSSWALK) 2. Vehicle-Bicyclist or Vehicle-Pedestrian/Bicyclist (in the Crosswalk) Providing a dedicated right-turn lane with adequate queue storage and protected right-turns with a red arrow traffic signal phase, where the number of right-turning vehicles reaches a threshold, can mitigate these crashes . Protected intersection elements can also mitigate these crashes. Implementation of these solutions on Low-Stress Walk and Bike Network Plan vertical separation corridors should be prioritized. Vehicle-Pedestrian/Bicyclist (in the Crosswalk) Leading Pedestrian Intervals give pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk a three to seven second head start when entering an intersection with a corresponding green signal in the same direction. Potential Solutions 51Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 51 Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction Related areas of concern from 2022 Safe Streets Report: • Bicycle, pedestrian, and motorcycle crashes • People ages 15-29 and older adults ages 65 and older • People speeding, people impaired, and people making left-turns »Green pavement markings in conflict zones »Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) »Protected right-turns SYSTEMIC SOLUTION »Add green pavement markings at major intersections, minor intersections, and driveways »Implement LPI based on conflicting volumes of right-turning vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk »Protect right-turns based on conflicting volumes of right-turning vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk or right-hook bicyclists STRATEGY FOR MANAGING RISK »CAN corridors that overlap at least in part with the High Risk Network »High Risk Network first, other signalized intersections later »Priority CAN corridors WHERE TO DEPLOY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES »1.D.i – Add green pavement markings at major intersections, minor intersections, and driveways on CAN corridors that overlap at least in part with the High Risk Network (2024) »1.A.i – Implement LPI at 17th & Arapahoe (2023) »1.A.ii – Proactively implement LPI Traffic Operations Practice across the HRN (2024) »1.A.iii – Proactively implement LPI Traffic Operations Practice at remaining traffic signals (2025) »3. Implement capital projects to improve safety and comfort including protected bike lanes, protected intersections, and setback multi-use path crossings on high priority Vision Zero and CAN corridors (by 2027) ASSOCIATED VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN ACTIONS 525252 MULTI-USE PATH CROSSING CRASHES CRASH TYPE DESCRIPTION There are two types of multi-use path crossing crashes: A driver on a minor street or at a driveway crosses a multi- use path to make a right- turn onto the major street collides with a pedestrian or bicyclist traveling from the opposite direction than a driver is looking. OUTBOUND RIGHT-TURN VEHICLE-PEDESTRIAN/ BICYCLIST 1. Outbound right-turn vehicle-pedestrian/bicyclist Creating setbacks at multi-use path crossings at minor streets and driveways to provide storage for one vehicle past the crosswalk can reduce this crash type by separating drivers’ turning from the multi-use path crossing. Raised crosswalks can also help reduce this crash type. This solution is particularly challenging to implement because of the number of multi-use path crossing locations and the amount of right-of-way needed to create the setback, so this solution should be implemented at select locations, in particular with corridor reconstruction projects. Inbound vehicle pedestrian/bicyclist Access management to restrict inbound left-turns will eliminate the conflict for inbound, left-turning vehicles. Where access remains, and where inbound right-turning vehicles cross a multi-use path, these crashes can be mitigated with appropriate sight distance and high-visibility markings or signage. Potential Solutions A driver on the major street makes a right-turn or left- turn across the multi-use path and collides with a pedestrian or bicyclist. INBOUND VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN/ BICYCLIST 2. 53Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 53 Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction Related areas of concern from 2022 Safe Streets Report: • Bicycle, pedestrian, and motorcycle crashes • People ages 15-29 and older adults ages 65 and older • People speeding, people impaired, and people making left-turns Setback multi-use path crossings with raised crosswalks SYSTEMIC SOLUTION Upgrade multi-use path crossings at minor intersections and driveways based on conflicting volumes of turning vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk STRATEGY FOR MANAGING RISK: Priority CAN corridors WHERE TO DEPLOY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: 3. Implement capital projects to improve safety and comfort including protected bike lanes, protected intersections, and setback multi-use path crossings on high priority Vision Zero and CAN corridors (by 2027) ASSOCIATED VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN ACTIONS: PEDESTRIAN CRASHES WHILE CROSSING THE STREET CRASH TYPE DESCRIPTION There are three types of crashes that involve pedestrians (or bicyclists in the crosswalk) crossing the street: Potential Solutions Vehicle-Pedestrian/Bicyclist at a Marked Crosswalk At locations where the city’s Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines guide staff to install a marked crosswalk, installing pedestrian signals or Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at locations with a lower number of vehicles and lower speed limit streets can reduce this crash type. This would require an update to the city’s Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines, and specifically the criteria for crossing treatments in Table 1, Figure 2a, and Figure 2b. The update to the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines should also address raised crosswalks. Subsequent to updating the Guidelines, existing pedestrian crossings should also be updated incrementally over time as funding and staff resources allow. Vehicle-Pedestrian Outside of a Marked Crosswalk The city can implement new pedestrian crossings at unmarked or midblock locations consistent with Boulder’s Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines. A driver on the major street does not yield at a marked crosswalk (with no pedestrian signal) when a pedestrian or bicyclist is present despite the crossing featuring markings, signs, or flashing beacons. This crash occurs when a pedestrian is struck by a vehicle outside of a marked crosswalk. In some cases, these locations are legal, unmarked crosswalks; however, the rights and duties of pedestrians and drivers are not well- understood by most people in these settings. This crash most commonly occurs at a signalized intersection between a vehicle and a pedestrian or a bicyclist in the crosswalk. For these crashes the crash reports and crash data indicate that the pedestrian or bicyclist was unlawfully in the crosswalk, usually because the pedestrian signal had a “Don’t Walk” signal. A pedestrian or bicyclist may enter a crosswalk unlawfully for a variety of reasons. In some cases, this behavior may be encouraged by high pedestrian delay; however, further evaluation is needed to better understand the role that delay plays in this behavior in Boulder. VEHICLE-PEDESTRIAN/ BICYCLIST AT A MARKED CROSSWALK (WITH NO PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL) 1.VEHICLE-PEDESTRIAN OUTSIDE OF A MARKED CROSSWALK 2.PEDESTRIANS IN CROSSWALKS AGAINST THE SIGNAL 3. 55Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 55 Systemic Approach to Crash Reduction Related areas of concern from 2022 Safe Streets Report: • Bicycle, pedestrian, and motorcycle crashes • People ages 15-29 and older adults ages 65 and older • People speeding, people impaired, and people making left-turns Upgraded and new pedestrian crossings SYSTEMIC SOLUTION Upgrade and install new pedestrian crossings based on conflicting volumes of vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk. STRATEGY FOR MANAGING RISK High Risk Network first, other streets later WHERE TO DEPLOY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES »6. Update the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guideline ASSOCIATED VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN ACTIONS 56 PROTECTING BIKE LANES BEFORE PHYSICAL SEPARATION In addition to physical separation, protected bike lanes feature treatments to reduce risk associated with conflicting turning movements: • Protected left-turns • Prohibiting right-turn on red • Protected right-turns • Protected intersections • Green pavement markings in conflict zones Several Vision Zero Action Plan actions will result in more protection for bicyclists before physical separation can be installed: • Actions 1.C.i through 1.C.iii which will result in more protected left-turns across bikeways • Actions 1.B.i through 1.B.iv which will result in more right-turn on red prohibitions across multi-use paths • Action 3 which will implement protected right-turns and protected intersections on high priority High Risk Network and CAN corridors • Action 1.D.i which will add green pavement markings in conflict zones on CAN corridors that overlap at least in part with the High Risk Network 57Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 57 58 CHAPTER 4.0 ENGINEERINGSOLUTIONPRIORITIZATION 59Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan ENGINEERINGSOLUTIONPRIORITIZATION BOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 55 60 The project team used three criteria to prioritize engineering solutions at specific locations, or projects, that emerged from the Systemic Safety and corridor analysis. This prioritization method applied to higher cost projects and stand-alone, low-cost projects and not the improvements that will apply to broad portions of the street system as described in the previous section: • Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) – for each project, the team produced an order of magnitude cost estimate. The team estimated the project’s benefit according to the crash history at the intersection, relevant Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) for all intersection crashes, and cost data from the National Safety Council’s (NSC) Estimating the Costs of Unintentional Injuries, 2013 per CDOT’s procedures for Highway Safety Improvement Program funding. The project team prioritized projects where the estimated benefits exceeded the estimated costs. • Boulder’s Racial Equity Index – Boulder’s Draft Racial Equity Index evaluates city census block groups for level of need using five variables: 1. Proportion of the population that are people of color 2. Proportion of the population that is Hispanic/Latino 3. Household median income 4. Proportion of households living below the Federal poverty line 5. The proportion of residents that are Housing and Human Services aid recipients Figure 13 shows Boulder’s Racial Equity Index. The team prioritized projects in or adjacent to Equity Index Numbers 4 or 5. • Community engagement feedback – During Phase 1 of community engagement for the Vision Zero Action Plan’s development, the city hosted a web map for community members to identify specific locations of concern. The team prioritized projects that had high levels of BeHeardBoulder feedback. Figure 7 shows a heat map of BeHeardBoulder Web map pin drops. Engineering Solutions Prioritization 61Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 10: Boulder Equity Index Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Equity Index Number 1 2 3 4 5 City of Boulder Limits Figure 13: Boulder Equity Index 62 CHAPTER 5.0ACTION PLAN 63Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan ACTION PLAN BOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 59 64 Implement and improve engineering solutions to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes. Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 1. Broadly implement low-cost projects on the High Risk Network to address top crash patterns Transportation & Mobility Ongoing A. Leading Pedestrian Interval i. Implement new LPI at Arapahoe Avenue & 17th Street 2023 ii. Proactively implement the LPI Traffic Operations Practice across the High Risk Network, including accessible pedestrian signals where possible 2024 iii. Proactively implement the LPI Traffic Operations Practice at remaining traffic signals, including accessible pedestrian signals where possible 2025 B. No Right-Turn on Red (RTOR) i. Implement no RTOR prohibitions at the following locations: • Broadway & Arapahoe Avenue (westbound right-turn) • Broadway & University Avenue (eastbound right-turn) • Broadway & Table Mesa Drive (northbound right-turn) • 30th Street & Valmont Street (northbound right-turn and westbound right-turn) • Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street (westbound right-turn) • Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street (eastbound right-turn) 2023 ii. Update Boulder’s no RTOR Traffic Operations Practice 2024 iii. Proactively implement the new no RTOR Traffic Operations Practice across the High Risk Network 2025 iv. Proactively implement the new no RTOR Traffic Operations Practice at remaining traffic signals 2026 The Vision Zero Action Plan identifies four categories of actions to achieve Vision Zero: Action Plan 1. Implement and improve engineering solutions to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes. 3. Improve the city’s internal Vision Zero practices. 2. Pair engineering solutions with education and enforcement. 4. Improve Vision Zero data and transparency. 20 VISION ZERO Where possible, the city will advance actions ahead of the proposed time frame. 65Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan C. Left-Turn Operation Change i. Update Boulder’s Left-Turn Operation Traffic Operations Practice 2024 ii. Proactively implement the Left-Turn Operation Traffic Operations Practice across the High Risk Network; document relevant HSIP information for locations that lack adequate signal equipment 2025 iii. Proactively implement the Left-Turn Operation Traffic Operations Practice at remaining traffic signals; document relevant HSIP information for locations that lack adequate signal equipment 2026 D. Green Pavement Markings in Conflict Zones i. Add green pavement markings at major intersections, minor intersections, and driveways on CAN corridors that overlap at least in part with the High Risk Network 2024 E. Right-Turn Slip Lanes i. Update right-turn slip lanes on the HRN to feature consistent signing for drivers and pedestrians (See Figure 14)2024 ii. Update right-turn slip lanes on remaining streets to feature consistent signing for drivers and pedestrians 2025 F. Additional Low-Cost Solutions i. Implement additional, high-priority, low-cost solutions (See Table 5)By 2025 2. Strategically implement higher cost solutions on the High Risk Network to address top crash patterns; document relevant HSIP information for these locations (See Table 6) Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 3. Implement capital projects to improve safety and comfort including protected bike lanes, protected intersections, and setback multi-use path crossings on high priority High Risk Network and Core Arterial Network corridors: • Arapahoe Avenue • Baseline Road • Folsom Street • Iris Avenue Transportation & Mobility By 2027 4. Upgrade Boulder’s traffic signal system by replacing traffic signal equipment not built to current standards to enable expanded use 12-inch yellow and green lenses, retroreflective backplates, and conduct engineering countermeasures evaluations in accordance with FHWA Red Light Camera Systems Operational Guidelines to reduce red light running Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 5. Update Boulder’s Traffic Operations Practices for right- turn on red (1.B.ii) and left-turn phases (1.C.ii); develop a practice for protected right-turn phases Transportation & Mobility 2024 66 6. Update the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines; document relevant HSIP information for existing marked crosswalk locations that no longer meet the guidelines Transportation & Mobility 2024 7. Update and implement Boulder’s policies and practices regarding speed limit setting to better align target and actual operating speeds Transportation & Mobility New policy/ practice by 2024; otherwise ongoing 8. Pursue and attract state and federal funding for high cost projects, with a focus on federal Highway Safety Improvement Program, federal Safe Streets for All, and DROCG Transportation Improvement Program funding ; grant funding priorities include: • Traffic signals on the HRN where left-turn operation changes are needed but signal equipment upgrades are necessary (Action 1.C.ii) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A • Traffic signals at remaining traffic signals where left-turn operation changes are needed but signal equipment upgrades are necessary (Action 1.C.iii) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A • Other higher cost solutions (Action 2) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP • CAN corridors (Action 3) Candidate funding source(s): SS4A, DRCOG TIP • Other signals where 12-inch yellow and green lenses and backplates are necessary (Action 4) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP • Pedestrian crossing upgrades on the HRN where new RRFBs or signals are necessary (Action 6) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A • (See Figure 15) Pedestrian crossing upgrades at remaining pedestrian crossings where new RRFBs or signals are necessary (Action 6) Candidate funding source(s): HSIP, SS4A Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 9. Design and conduct a robust study or experiment of right-turn slip lane design, addressing locations with no right-turn lane, locations with a right-turn lane and no slip lane, locations with a yield-controlled slip lane, and locations with a signal-controlled slip lane. Based on the findings, develop a strategy for improving right-turn slip lanes across the city, including communication to other city departments regarding updates to design standards or development review procedures. Transportation & Mobility Begin study/ experiment in 2025; evaluation complete by 2027 67Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Pair engineering solutions with education and enforcement Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 10. Facilitate regular collaboration between the Boulder Police Department and Transportation & Mobility Department to identify and enforce unsafe travel behaviors at problem locations or locations with recently installed solutions Police Department (Transportation & Mobility) Ongoing 11. Strategically deploy photo radar van along high- speed corridors where allowed by state law Police Department Ongoing 12. Expand the use of red light camera locations at eligible locations Police Department (Transportation & Mobility) Ongoing 13. Support legislation to enable expanded use of photo radar van (commercial settings, higher speed streets) and red light cameras Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 14. Collaborate with CDOT and DRCOG to implement Vision Zero campaigns, focusing on behaviors of concern such as distracted driving, driving under the influence, drivers/bicyclist/pedestrians sharing the road, and unsafe behaviors by youth drivers Transportation & Mobility (Police Department)Ongoing 15. Combine countermeasure deployment with accompanying events and announcements, such as press releases, news interviews, ribbon cuttings, or project signage Transportation & Mobility Ongoing Improve the city’s internal Vision Zero practices Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 16. For all capital projects, designate a Transportation & Mobility representative to champion Vision Zero goals and strategies; coordinate with Community Vitality and Planning & Development Services staff to elevate Vision Zero within their work Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 17. Continue participation in the national Vision Zero Cities Network to learn and share new ideas and approaches with community leaders Transportation & Mobility Ongoing Improve Vision Zero data and transparency Action Responsibility (Partner)Time Frame 18. Maintain and update the crash data dashboard Transportation & Mobility (Police Department)Ongoing 19. Continue to refine and improve accuracy in and utility of crash documentation Transportation & Mobility (Police Department)Ongoing 20. Annually summarize progress in delivering the Vision Zero Action Plan Transportation & Mobility Ongoing 68 While not specifically called out as actions to deliver through the Vision Zero Action Plan, the city acknowledges and is committed to a variety of complementary programs and efforts : • Buildout of the Low-Stress Walk and Bike Network Plan • New sidewalk and curb ramp construction via the Missing Sidewalk Links program and associated maintenance • Snow and ice removal program • Ongoing maintenance of existing sidewalks and curb ramps through the Annual Sidewalk Repair Program and Pavement Management Program • Building low-cost pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements along with planned paving through the Pavement Management Program Mobility Enhancements program • Acquiring streetlights from Xcel Energy and upgrading streetlighting throughout the city • Safe Routes to School infrastructure projects through partnership with the Boulder Valley School District • Adoption and implementation of the city’s Americans with Disability Act Transition Plan Complementary Efforts 69Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Figure 14 shows High Risk Network intersections with right-turn slip lanes and Figure 15 shows marked crosswalks on the High Risk Network. Crash Type Reactive Approach Proactive Approach Red light running, poor signal visibility Signal upgrades (12-inch yellow and green lenses, additional signal heads, backplates) at locations where crashes have occurred Action 4 includes locations with signal equipment not built to current standards that have not yet experienced crashes Red light running, signal timing out of sync N/A The City of Boulder regularly updates signal timings, coordination, and offset to keep signal timings in sync Red light running, congestion Action 12 includes the expanded use of red light cameras at effective locations N/A Left-turn crashes The City of Boulder’s Left-Turn Traffic Operations Practice includes crash history as a criterion for choosing left-turn operation type Actions 1.C.ii and 1.C. include the proactive implementation of an updated Left- Turn Traffic Operations Practice Right-turn slip lanes N/A Action 9.A includes the evaluation of different right-turn slip lanes for later systemic upgrades across the HRN and elsewhere in Boulder Right-turn on red crashes Action 1.B.i includes locations where the City of Boulder will prohibit right-turn on red based on crash history or pedestrian volumes Actions 1.B.iii and 1.B.iv include the proactive implementation of an updated Right-Turn on Red Traffic Operations Practice Right-turn crashes, Leading Pedestrian Interval Action 1.A.i includes locations where the City of Boulder will install a Leading Pedestrian Interval based on crash history or pedestrian volumes Actions 1.A.ii and 1.A.iii include the proactive implementation of the Leading Pedestrian Interval Traffic Operations Practice Right-turn crashes, protected right- turns or protected intersections Action 3 includes the implementation of protected right-turns and protected intersections on CAN corridors at locations with crash history Action 3 includes the implementation of protected right-turns and protected intersections on CAN corridors at locations with high conflicting volumes of vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists Multi-use path crossings Action 3 includes the implementation of setback multi-use path crossings on CAN corridors at locations with crash history Action 3 includes the implementation of setback multi-use path crossings on CAN corridors at locations with high conflicting volumes of vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists Pedestrian crashes while crossing the street in marked crosswalks Action 6 and 8 include upgrading pedestrian crossings at locations with crash history Action 6 and 8 include upgrading pedestrian crossings at locations where crashes have not occurred but where RRFBs or signals are necessary Pedestrian crashes outside of a marked crosswalk The City of Boulder installs new crossings based on the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines The City of Boulder installs new crossings based on the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines Systemic Safety & Proactive Implementation Table 4 shows how the Vision Zero Action Plan will implement solutions both reactively and proactively. Table 4: Reactive and Proactive Approaches to Mitigating Common Crash Types 70 South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 12: Intersections with Right-Turn Slip Lanes on the HRN Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Right-Turn Slip Lane HRN Figure 14: High Risk Network Intersections with Right-Turn Slip Lanes 71Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StC anyonB lv d Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl P k w y Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l l aspi eDrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 Valmont Rd Colorado Ave30th StFigure 13: Marked Crosswalks not at Signalized Intersections on the HRN Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Marked Crosswalks HRN Figure 15: High Risk Network with Marked Crosswalks Not at Signalized Intersections 72 Note: each of the project recommendations requires further engineering study or design to verify that recommendations are appropriate. Table 5: Additional Low-cost Solutions (Action 1.E) Corridor Location Solution Cost Racial Equity Index and BeHeardBoulder Feedback High Arapahoe Ave 17th St Increase intersection sight distance on southeast corner for northbound right- turns (routine maintenance) $1.00 Baseline Rd Broadway to US 36 EB At westbound left-turn into Basemar Center, remove trees to increase sight distance $3,000.00 Baseline Rd Broadway to US 36 EB Re-stripe eastbound lanes to add lane at US 36 eastbound to left rather than to right to improve lane utilization for southbound left-turn at Broadway $29,040.00 Racial Equity Index or BeHeardBoulder Feedback High 30th St Pearl Pkwy Add right-turn only signage to nearby frontage roads $10,000.00 Broadway Dartmouth Ave Improve signal visibility for northbound/ southbound directions $25,000.00 Broadway Iris Ave Install advance warning signage with flashing beacon and object markers (westbound direction) $5,000.00 Pearl St/Pkwy 47th St Install high-visibility crosswalk on north leg $900.00 Table Mesa Dr Broadway Install oversized sign and pavement markings on westbound approach $10,000.00 Racial Equity Index and BeHeardBoulder Feedback Low Broadway Pleasant St Improve lighting on west leg $2,000.00 Pearl St/Pkwy Foothills Pkwy SB Install advance warning signage with flashing beacon and object markers (southbound direction) $5,000.00 73Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Table 6: Higher Cost Solutions (Action 2) Corridor Location Solution Cost Racial Equity Index and BeHeardBoulder Feedback High Baseline Rd 27th Way/US 36 EB Signalize southbound right-turn slip lane $100,000.00 Racial Equity Index or BeHeardBoulder Feedback High Pearl St/Pkwy 47th St Reconstruct corners to reduce radii and slow turning vehicles $75,000.00 Racial Equity Index and BeHeardBoulder Feedback Low Broadway Marine St Install raised median $105,600.00 Broadway Pleasant St Signalize northbound left-turn $100,000.00 Table Mesa Dr Stanford Ave Install traffic signal $500,000.00 South Broadway Darley St Bend-out shared use path crossing on west side $20,000.00 Overall Costs & Funding The updated action plan represents a more focused set of actions than what was included in the 2019-21 plan, and it is anticipated that it will more effectively reduce fatal and serious injury crashes due to the robust methodology and analyses supporting the actions. Although the original intent was to develop a fiscally constrained plan, the cost of countermeasures, especially higher cost projects, exceeds the amount of city funds available toward Vision Zero over the next five years. While an action of the plan focuses on the pursuit of competitive external grant funds, the reality is that, due to the nature of competitive grants and limitations on when funds are available, it is possible that some of the recommended projects would ultimately require local funds to be completed in the next five years. For this reason, the plan prioritizes actions so that they can be completed incrementally as resources become available, recognizing that Vision Zero remains a top department priority. 74 MONITORING& NEXT STEPS CHAPTER 6.0 75Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan MONITORING& NEXT STEPS BOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 71 7676 Every year the city analyzes progress in achieving the actions outlined in the Vision Zero Action Plan. The City of Boulder will begin its next Vision Zero Action Plan in 2027. Monitoring & Next Steps Prepared by Fehr & Peers with support from FHU 78 A. 2019-21 VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN PROGRESS SUMMARY B. PHASE 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY C. PHASE 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY D. SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM E. HIGH RISK NETWORK CORRIDOR ANALYSES F. HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM (FHU) G. SUPPLEMENTARY HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM APPENDICES 79Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan A. 2019-21 VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN PROGRESS SUMMARY B. PHASE 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY C. PHASE 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY D. SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM E. HIGH RISK NETWORK CORRIDOR ANALYSES F. HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM (FHU) G. SUPPLEMENTARY HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM BOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 75 APPENDICES 80 2019-21 VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN PROGRESS SUMMARY APPENDIX A 81Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 82 PHASE 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY APPENDIX B 83Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 84 PHASE 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY APPENDIX C- 85Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 86 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM APPENDIX D 87Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 88 HIGH RISK NETWORK CORRIDOR ANALYSES APPENDIX E- 89Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 90 HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM (FHU) APPENDIX F- 91Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 92 SUPPLEMENTARY HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM APPENDIX G- 93Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan 80 2019-21 VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN PROGRESS SUMMARY APPENDIX A Green - met or on track to meet target Yellow - stable but not on track to meet target Red - not on track to meet target Action Timeframe Partners Performance Metrics Status Implement specific countermeasures at high crash locations (peds, bikes, vehicles)Ongoing Transportation, PD % of intersections addressed on an annual basis Target: 45 intersections with specific mitigation identified for implementation Active deployment of changes in left-turn phasing, LPIs, and signing/marking to mitigate crashes. Delivered capital projects and secured funding for future capital projects. Continue to pursue federal funding for and construct Highway Safety Improvement Program projects Ongoing Transportation # of projects funded and completed Target: 3 projects per funding cycle Staff has secured HSIP funding for safety projects. We do need to actively keep projects on the shelf for when future HSIP grants are solicited. Proactively implement new signal timing practices at identified intersections to improve pedestrian, bicyclist, and driver safety (e.g., pedestrian head-start/ leading pedestrian interval (LPI), no right turn on red (to develop standard), and left turn phasing)Ongoing Transportation % of intersections addressed on an annual basis Target: 50 intersections identified for changes in left turn phasing. 20 intersections identified for pedestrian head-start/leading pedestrian interval (LPI) Staff has been ambitiously implementing changes to left-turn phasing and deploying LPIs. Staff also makes signal timing adjustments based on day-to-day operations and other highlighted safety concerns. Always employ proven effective, safe, and innovative intersection and corridor designs to improve safety for all modes (e.g., protected bike lanes/intersections and quick-build solutions)Ongoing Transportation # of projects funded and constructed featuring innovative design aspects on an annual basis Staff continues to investigate and deploy industry best practices for intersection and corridor projects, including experimenting with quick-build solutions. Our Design & Construction Standards update plans align with this goal. Continue and enhance pedestrian, bicyclist, and driver safety education outreach on types of severe injury crashes through existing and future multimedia campaigns and include topics on dangerous effects of speeding, impaired, and distracted traveling.Ongoing Transportation # of people reached through outreach events and social media engagement on an annual basis When COVID-19 hit, most of the city's messaging was related to the global pandemic. We paused our primary outreach campaigns like Heads Up Boulder and Lighten Up Boulder. Staff did social media and press releases: e-scooter, impairement, inclement weather, which wheels go where, on a quarterly basis. Update the city’s Design and Construction Standards and Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Guidelines to reflect best practices to improve safety 2019-2020 Transportation, PD Revised standards and guidelines Last update of Design & Construction Standards was completed in 2020. There is also an ongoing update to the Design & Construction Standards, which is being completed in phases pending staff capacity. Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Guidelines have not been updated. Proactively install green pavement markings in advance and through select intersections to improve bicycle safety Ongoing Transportation # of intersections mitigated on an annual basis Green pavement markings have been deployed along corridors and other specific locations around town with similar contexts. Staff has also deployed green pavement markings more liberally as part of projects/programs. Install signing and markings to mitigate crashes involving bicyclists and pedestrians on multi-use path system 2019 Transportation # of locations of signing and markings installed along multi- use path network on an annual basis Signing continues to meet city practices. Staff continues to investigate new practices that are more effective at mitigating crashes with bicyclists/pedestrians on multi-use paths. Improve routine facility maintenance for all modes, particularly pedestrians and bicycles, such as crosswalks and bike lanes Ongoing Transportation, COMM # of complaints reduced on an annual basis from 2018 baseline Street maintenance continues to investigate and deploy better snow/ice removal. A larger discussion needs to take place as staff is implementing many new bike/ped facilities that will need additional resources to maintain, especially during snow events. Require Bicycle Friendly Driver education to drivers of city, county, and Via fleet vehicles 2019-2020 # of classes provided and # of participants attended on an annual basis Courses are offered, but cannot tell if they are required for Boulder fleet drivers. Identify and enforce specific unsafe travel behaviors at problem locations Ongoing Transportation, PD # of warnings and citations on an annual basis Officers assigned to diversified tasks/duties other than traffic. When officer time is available enforcement occurs. 2019-21 Vision Zero Action Plan Status Summary ELIMINATE CRASHES RESULTING IN SERIOUS INJURIES AND FATALITIES (OBJECTIVE #1) Develop and Implement Speed Management Plan/Program to decrease travel speeds on arterial roadways (e.g., Summer Workshop w/FHWA, CDOT, Boulder, Denver, and Fort Collins)2019-2021 Transportation, PD, VZCP # of collectors and arterials addressed on an annual basis Staff delivered the Neighborhood Speed Management Program for several years before it was paused by Council in Q1 2022. NSMP was focused on local/residential streets, not arterials. Staff did get a grant to establish a speed limit/setting framework for collectors and arterial roadways, including creating policy about design speed for capital projects. This effort is planned to begin in 2023. Replace existing identified signed school zones with school zone flashing beacon displays 2019 – plan 2020-21 – implement Transportation, PD # of school zones identified % of school zones modified # of citations and warnings issued in school zones on an annual basis Staff has not made progress on this goal, primarily due to staff capacity and funding. Strategically deploy photo radar van along high-speed corridors Ongoing Transportation, PD # of locations, # of citations on an annual basis Reduction in number of speeding vehicles Staff continues to deploy the photo radar van at strategic locations, including actively reviewing new locations. There is legislation that does not allow the van to be placed along high- speed corridors. Expand the number of red-light camera locations Ongoing Transportation, PD # of locations identified % of locations implemented on an annual basis Broadway/Pine St, Arapahoe Ave/Foothills Pkwy, 47th St/SH119 Cross-promote “safe ride home” programs with CU Boulder and local establishments that serve alcohol while implementing policies for ride hailing services to not block travel lanes (Curbside Management Plan)Ongoing Transportation, CU # of people reached through outreach events and social media engagement Staff has not made progress on this goal. Increase patrols and enforcement along corridors that experience impaired related crashes.2019 Transportation, PD Location and # of issued summons on an annual basis Fewer DUI arrests; reports are down. No dedicated DUI officer (due to low-volume calls). Sentiment that fewer people are driving under the influence. PD to dedicate one staff and patrol car to enforcing DUI-related offenses Thursday through Saturday from 7:00 p.m. – 5:00 a.m.2019 Transportation, PD Overall # of DUI arrests on an annual basis See above - include statistics for all three areas. Action Timeframe Partners Performance Metrics Status Support state legislation to improve travel safety, including the Vulnerable User Law, lower BAC (DUI) levels, unmanned speed camera installations, red-light-camera operations, and propose local “hands free mobile device” ordinance Ongoing CAO, CMO # of state and local ordinance proposed and passed annually Staff continues to support legislation that would move our Vision Zero program forward. This includes testifying for the continued use of photo red light cameras and general coordination with the city's legislative liason. Deliver enforcement campaigns aimed at reducing distracted driving Ongoing Transportation, PD, COMM # of citations on an annual basis Distracted driving campains (2): writing tickets to people driving while texting. This is also documented as part of a crash, including statistics. Transportation stall also promoted safety messaging via social media. Implement school safety programs (SRTS) and identify projects and funding to improve walk/bike infrastructure near schools and explore driver’s education requirement for high school students Ongoing Transportation, BVSD # of people reached through outreach events and social media engagement # of projects funded for construction Lehigh Corridor Improvements are completed. Manhattan MiddleSschool application to be submitted for '23. Not sure about driver's education requirements for HS students. Review and address school bus stop operations relative to child safety with BVSD Ongoing Transportation, BVSD # of modifications performed on an annual basis Ongoing efforts and coordination with staff, community members, and BVSD. Provide travel safety education to 18- to 24-year-olds in conjunction with CU Boulder Ongoing Transportation, COMM, CU # of people reached through outreach events and social media engagement on an annual basis Shared micromobility program with CU Boulder. Work with Senior Centers/housing developments and children of aging adults to provide senior travel safety education Ongoing Transportation, VZCP # of people reached through outreach events and social media engagement on an annual basis Staff has not made progress on this goal. Continue implementation of Neighborhood Speed Management Program, including a potential reduction of vehicle speeds to 20 mph Ongoing Transportation, PD, COMM, # of streets graduated from NSMP Reduced # of speeding vehicles Per Boulder website, Neighborhood Speed Management Program is paused. 20 mph residential street speed limit was implemented. Examine, refine, and implement right-turn bypass signing and marking standards 2020 Transportation # of bypass intersections modified in 2020-21 Ongoing effort. Recently worked with CDOT to update signing in their jurisdiction. REDUCE OTHER TYPES OF CRASHES (OBJECTIVE #2) Provide education and enforcement campaign related to motorcycle travel Ongoing Transportation, COMM, PD # of people reached through outreach events and social media engagement Item is vague - motorcycle travel is enforced just the same as motor vehicles, rules of the road, etc. Reinforcing to drivers that motorcycles are hard to see (intended focus of campaign). Transportation reused CDOT's safety information and motorcyclists via social media. Provide education regarding other types of crashes and avoidance techniques for all modes, including vehicular cycling techniques (e.g., taking the lane)Ongoing Transportation, COMM # of people reached through outreach events and social media engagement Created short videos that we have been messaging about top types of crashes. They live on the city's Vision Zero website and are share periodically via social media. Action Timeframe Partners Performance Metrics Status Implement Low-Stress Walk and Bike Network Plan, including a potential reduction of 20 mph vehicle speeds on Neighborhood GreenStreets while utilizing innovative, quick-build techniques to achieve lower traffic stress levels Ongoing Transportation # of corridors/miles Low-Stress Routes installed on an annual basis (e.g., protected bike lanes, buffered bike lanes, and neighborhood greenways) Table Mesa, Lehigh, Pine, Folsom, 17th, Neighborhood GreenStreets, and CAN. Implemented 20 is Plenty in 2020. Vision Zero Innovations Program focused on quick-build and low-cost safety improvements. In Q1/2022, Council directed staff to pause the implementation of GreenStreets to focus on the Core Arterial Network. Implement longer pedestrian crossing count-down times at select intersections identified as high-stress by community members Ongoing Transportation # of intersections reviewed and modified on an annual basis Staff has not made progress on this goal. Assist community members with route planning guidance to access and navigate Boulder’s existing low-stress network Ongoing Transportation, VZCP # of engaged community members through one-on-one contact, special events and website visits Staff is always a resource, but have generally relied on Community Cycles who have a great program for this. Develop and implement cycling and walking groups to encourage children to walk and/or bike to school 2019 Transportation, BVSD # of organized groups There are walk to school, bike to school, and bike week activities planned for the 2022-2023 school year; cannot tell if specific groups have been formed. Develop and implement a plan for multiuse path lighting at underpasses and key intersections Ongoing Transportation, VZCP # of maintained underpasses on an annual basis Iterate for each underpass, expanded the lighting to the approaches. Pedestrian scale lighting at the approaches. Fairly controversial, occupation by people experiencing homelessness. There continues to be be feedback about additional pedestrian scale lighting along paths, similar to Boulder Creek at Eben G Fine. Conduct path patrols on bicycle by PD and stewards of Shared Paths Boulder Ongoing Transportation, PD, VZCP # of path stewards and patrols on an annual basis Shared Path Boulder patrols have waned down in the last year. Officer presence on paths only if the Police Department is called to a safety issue. No routine patrols. Action Timeframe Partners Performance Metrics Status Bolster social media engagement with proactive information on travel safety and recent actions; and respond in a timely manner to concerned community members 2019 Transportation, COMM, TAB # of posts, responses, and impressions on an annual basis Staff continues to respond to community members' concerns. We have not bolstered our socal media accounts. Conduct before and after questionnaire of community understanding and awareness of Vision Zero 2019 - baseline data Transportation, COMM Questionnaire released, # of respondents + results Originally this was going to be done as part of the 20 is Plenty project, as "Vision Zero" is on each sign. City Council gave direction to implement only, even though the overall consensus was Vision Zero Awareness. Research, develop, implement, and evaluate new, effective methods to reach target audiences (e.g., surveys, focus groups, testimonials)2019-2020 Transportation, COMM, CU Results from focus groups and other research methods Outside of work that is being done by our Comms team (Racial Equity Framework), not aware of any specifc efforts on Transportation's front. Install signing highlighting Vision Zero logo at site of capital improvement projects Ongoing Transportation # of project locations that include reference to Vision Zero 20 mph speed limit signs reference Vision Zero. Did not do any specific messaging. CU Boulder has done messaging using VMS on Regent Drive on campus. IMPROVE TRAVEL COMFORT AND SECURITY (OBJECTIVE #3) ENHANCE AWARENESS OF AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITH VISION ZERO (OBJECTIVE #4) Expand Vision Zero Community Partnership and encourage district attorney participation to explore diversion programs and higher fines associated with careless driving infractions 2019 Transportation, PD, DA, BC # of members/participation on an annual basis # of and type of new safety initiatives involving stakeholders Recently, Boulder County has been facilitating the community partnership meetings with involvement from county stakeholders. Continue participation and contribution in the national Vision Zero Cities Network and share new ideas and approaches with community leaders Ongoing Transportation Contribute to best practices research and participate regularly in webinars Staff continues to contribute to the sharing of ideas/approaches with other communities. There was a large interest in the 20 is Plenty project, Vision Zero Innovations program, and our Core Arterial Network Plan. Encourage and support leaders of nearby communities, Boulder County, and the Denver Regional Council of Governments to adopt Vision Zero plans Ongoing Transportation, TAB, CC # of additional municipalities, plus Boulder County to adopt Vision Zero No active support, but supporting regional Vision Zero messaging and programs. Host a regional/Front Range Vision Zero Summit 2020-2021 Transportation, COMM, VZCP, TAB Held in 2021 Complete - held in 2021 at CDOT with state and regional partners. Explore an increase in transportation funding for Vision Zero administration, projects, and programs through TMP update Ongoing Transportation, CMO, TAB, CC Annual amount dedicated to administration/projects/programs Staff has not made progress on this goal. Pursue additional resources through grants and partnerships to develop and fund new projects and programs Ongoing Transportation, COMM # of grants and additional $ amounts secured on an annual basis Staff has been successful at securing grants in support of our Vision Zero program. Develop cost-sharing opportunities with community partners, such as CU Boulder and Boulder County, to improve travel safety through projects and programs.Ongoing Transportation, BC, BVSD, CU, VZCP # of $’s contributed by community partners on an annual basis Regional and local projects with stakeholders. Partnered with Google to provide safety messaging at CU games. Action Timeframe Partners Performance Metrics Status Continue to refine and improve accuracy in crash documentation Ongoing Transportation, PD Refined crash data Majority of crash data has been cleaned. Need to clean crashes annually instead of every three years. Cross-reference police crash data with area hospital and first responder data to check for discrepancies Ongoing Transportation, PD, BC, VZCP # of discrepancies discovered on an annual basis Staff has not made progress on this goal. Track Vision Zero Action Plan implementation and post quarterly updates to Boulder Measures Dashboard Ongoing Transportation, IT, TAB, CC, VZCP Quarterly updates performed to Boulder Measures Dashboard Staff has not made progress on this goal. Provide quarterly progress reports to Vision Zero Community Partnership, TAB, City Council Ongoing Transportation, TAB, CC, VZCP Quarterly updates provided and Transportation Report on Progress (2020) Staff gave quarterly updates which turned into periodic updates. There is a give/take with spending time reporting what staff completed vs. implementing Vision Zero work. There is an opportunity to better track in real time the Vision Zero work that staff is completing. This could easily tie into a Vision Zero dashboard. Conduct evaluation studies to measure effectiveness of VZ treatments and capital improvement projects Ongoing Transportation Specific performance measures determined on a per project basis Staff has conducted before/after studies for some projects. Crash summaries in the Safe Streets Report are tracking systemic safety improvements like green conflict markings. IMPROVE DATA AND BE TRANSPARENT (OBJECTIVE #5) 82 PHASE 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY APPENDIX B 1 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Contents Phase 1 Survey Results ......................................................................................................................... 2 Survey Results by People Who Live in Boulder Versus People Who Work in Boulder ..................... 9 Stakeholder Meeting Notes ............................................................................................................... 11 Meeting with Community Cycles on 8/1/2022 ................................................................................... 11 Meeting with Center for People with Disabilities on 7/22/2022 ......................................................... 12 Public Meeting PowerPoint .......................................................................................................... Phase 1 Map Results ............................................................................................................................... 2 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Phase 1 Survey Results What is your connection to Boulder? What is your primary mode of transportation in Boulder? 638 11 350 149 11 3 1 14 3 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 I live in Boulder I attend school in Boulder I work in Boulder My children attend school in Boulder Live in Boulder County Lived in Boulder in the past Own rental property I do my shopping or recreate in Boulder Have family that live in Boulder I have a second home in Boulder 59% 28% 9% 1%1%1%0%0% Personal vehicle Bicycle Walking Bus Other Carpool Public Transit Bike Share or e-Scooter 3 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary How often do you travel by walking or using a wheelchair or other mobility device in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by personal vehicle in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) 47% 26% 9% 18% Daily Weekly Monthly Never 40% 50% 7%4% Daily Weekly Monthly Never 4 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary How often do you travel by bike or scooter in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by public transit in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) 36% 26% 12% 27% Daily Weekly Monthly Never 3%10% 33% 54% Daily Weekly Monthly Never 5 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Have you or someone you know ever been involved in a crash when traveling by any mode of transportation (car, bike, pedestrian, etc.)? If so, how severe was the crash? What are your top traffic safety concerns in Boulder? Please select up to three. 186 246 190 60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 No, I have not been involved in a crash/I don't know someone involved in a crash Yes, those involved experienced no or mild injuries Yes, those involved were treated for serious injury Yes, those involved died as a result of the crash 20 31 33 39 69 87 134 158 254 269 303 318 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Difficulty seeing far enough down the road Missing or inadequate street or path lighting Other drivers unexpectedly slowing or stopping Drunk or impaired driving Tailgating/road rage Unsafe turning or lane changing Inadequate or missing pedestrian crossings or bicycle… Red light or stop sign runners Drivers and bicyclists sharing the road Speding Drivers not yielding to pedestrians or bicyclists Distracted driving 6 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Does safety affect the mode of transportation you choose for traveling in Boulder? Which race or ethnicity do you identify with most? No, 34% Yes, 66% Asian 2% Black or African- American 0% Hispanic or Latino/a 3%I prefer not to say 11% Two or more races 4% White 80% 7 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary What is your age range? How would you describe your annual household income? 18 to 24, 3% 25 to 34, 18% 35 to 54, 37% 55 to 64, 19% 65 and over, 18% Prefer not to say, 3% Under 18, 0% Less than $25,000 a year $25,000 to $49,999 a year $50,000 to $99,999 a year $100,000 to $149,999 a year $150,000 a year or more Prefer not to say 8 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Do you own or rent your home? What is your primary language spoken at home? Own , 74% Prefer not to say, 5% Rent , 21% 667 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 9 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Survey Results by People Who Live in Boulder Versus People Who Work in Boulder "I live in Boulder" Summary (638 Total Responses; 324 responses live in Boulder and don't work in Boulder) Personal vehicle 369 58.5% Daily 315 50%Daily 258 41%Daily 238 38%Daily 19 3% Bicycle 184 29.2% Weekly 161 25% Weekly 311 49% Weekly 162 26% Weekly 66 10% Walking 64 10.1% Monthly 55 9% Monthly 41 6% Monthly 73 12% Monthly 220 35% Bus 8 1.3% Never 106 17% Never 24 4% Never 157 25% Never 328 52% Carpool 3 0.5% Public Transit 2 0.3% Bike Share or e- Scooter 2 0.3% How often do you travel by public transit in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by bike or scooter in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by personal vehicle in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by walking or using a wheelchair or other mobility device in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) What is your primary mode of transportation in Boulder? 10 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary "I work in Boulder" Summary (350 Responses) Personal vehicle 182 52.8% Daily 174 50%Daily 129 37%Daily 158 46%Daily 8 2% Bicycle 122 35.4% Weekly 95 27% Weekly 173 50% Weekly 96 28% Weekly 41 12% Walking 27 7.8% Monthly 21 6% Monthly 29 8% Monthly 34 10% Monthly 132 38% Bus 6 1.7% Never 60 17% Never 16 5% Never 58 17% Never 166 48% Carpool 4 1.2% 350 347 346 347 Public Transit 2 0.6% Bike Share or e- Scooter 2 0.6% How often do you travel by public transit in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) What is your primary mode of transportation in Boulder? How often do you travel by walking or using a wheelchair or other mobility device in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by personal vehicle in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by bike or scooter in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) "I work and live in Boulder" Summary (314 Total Responses) Personal vehicle 156 50.3% Daily 168 48%Daily 155 45%Daily 114 33%Daily 7 2% Bicycle 118 38.1% Weekly 79 23% Weekly 86 25% Weekly 156 45% Weekly 38 11% Walking 26 8.4% Monthly 15 4% Monthly 27 8% Monthly 25 7% Monthly 129 37% Bus 5 1.6% Never 52 15% Never 43 12% Never 16 5% Never 137 39% Carpool 2 0.6% 314 311 311 311 Public Transit 1 0.3% Bike Share or e-Scooter 2 0.6% What is your primary mode of transportation in Boulder? How often do you travel by walking or using a wheelchair or other mobility device in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by personal vehicle in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by bike or scooter in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) How often do you travel by public transit in Boulder? (i.e. for work, school, shopping, recreation, etc.) 11 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Stakeholder Meeting Notes Meeting with Community Cycles on 8/1/2022 Notes: •Community Cycles askes if we are going to publish results of the current Vision Zero action plan. o Deaths or serious injuries caused by young drivers was an example they cited. o They asked if we are going to tie metrics to the current actions and whether we will scrap certain actions in this update. o We concluded that it would be helpful for our team to craft at least one sentence describing the status of each Vision Zero Action Plan action. •Community Cycles described the need to integrate Vision Zero across departments, in addition to producing an action plan and set of projects. o We discussed, philosophically, whether Vision Zero was “about the journey or about the goal.” o We discussed that this current update would be a five-year plan, with an expectation to update it five years from now. o Integration across departments and cultural shift came up again later in the conversation in regards to the proposed CU hotel/conference center. •Community Cycles asked what we will do on the CAN. We described how some safety recommendations from this plan will apply to the CAN and can be incorporated into future CAN plans. •Community Cycles mentioned concerns over the proposed CU hotel/conference center, safety analysis as a part of development review, and an interest in better integrating safety into development review. City staff committed to discussing the idea with others leading updates to the Design & Construction Standards. 12 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Meeting with Center for People with Disabilities on 7/22/2022 Notes: •We discussed how we get crash data (police reports and counter reports); Craig mentioned a concern that we need data regarding near misses and close calls. •Craig mentioned concerns regarding how inadequate infrastructure o This includes missing curb ramps and sidewalks, can lead to safety concerns whereby people are required to walk or wheel in the street. o This also includes routine maintenance issues (keeping sidewalks clear) and in a good state of rehabilitation maintenance. o We discussed how safety comments could differ in summer versus winter depending on the issues people are confronting at a particular time. •Craig mentioned concerns regarding crossing times, in that some people require additional time to cross the street (a crossing of Arapahoe Avenue was mentioned as missing curb ramps and requiring extra time to cross). •Michael and Craig voiced concerns about Be Heard Boulder’s lack of accessibility for blind people and people lacking internet access. •Michael mentioned near misses he has experienced walking with a cane; he has difficulty submitting comments about these concerns online without an e-reader. •We discussed differences between comments received through the ADA self-evaluation and accessibility audit versus comments on near misses from the Web map. •We agreed to filter through Web map feedback to see if there were any quick action items that demand attention. Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Public Meeting PowerPoint Welcome to the Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan public meeting. We will begin shortly. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Public Meeting # 1 June 29, 2022 What is Vision Zero? •Vision Zero is Boulder’s goal to reduce the number of traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries to zero. •Vision Zero operates under the principal that fatal and serious injury crashes are preventable and unacceptable and all should be able to get around safely on our streets. What are Vision Zero’s Objectives? 1.Eliminate crashes resulting in fatalities and serious injuries. 2.Reduce other types of crashes. 3.Improve travel comfort and security. 4.Enhance awareness of and community engagement with Vision Zero. 5.Improve data and be transparent. Vision Zero in Boulder •Adopted in 2014. •Most recently released 2022 Safe Streets Report. •Several Vision Zero projects implemented. •Kicking-off development of Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan. Safe Streets Report •First report in 2012 and three other updates. •Understand where and how crashes are occurring in Boulder. •Understand who the crashes involve. •Highlight areas of concern. •Evaluate prior safety projects. Safe Streets Report Findings 14,500+People were involved in a crash in Boulder between 2018 and 2020 6 1 9 people were killed 2 in a car on a bike walking 150 people were seriously injured 70 55 25 2018-2020 Serious Injury Crashes by Mode Type Safe Streets Report Findings 67% of severe crashes occurred on an arterial roadway between 2018 and 2020 94% of severe left turn crashes occurred on arterial roadways 77% of severe pedestrian crashes occurred on arterial roadways 55% of severe bicycle crashes occurred on arterial roadways Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan •Companion to the Safe Streets Report. •Identify additional strategies the city can use to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes. Goals of the Vision Zero Action Plan •Serve as playbook to achieving Vision Zero. •Seamlessly integrate into departmental work plans. •Allow for direct and candid dialogue with TAB and City Council (regarding project prioritization and funding opportunities). •Assure accountability and bold thinking. Systemic Safety Analysis Evaluate risks across the entire transportation system, rather than only managing risk at specific locations. Compare historical crash data against transportation system risk factors such as: •Vehicle speeds •Traffic volumes •Land uses •Demographics •Other factors •Identify locations that may not have experienced a high number of fatal and serious injury crashes to date but have a higher potential to in the future because they are locations where many risk factors overlap. Schedule Q2 2022 Q3 2022 Q4 2022 Q1 2023 Q2 2023 Crash Analysis Prioritized Action Items & Project List Final Plan, City Council Public Meeting #2 Community & Stakeholder Engagement Public Meeting #1 Achieving Vision Zero •We all have a role to play in achieving Vision Zero whether we are driving, walking, or biking. •Avoid distractions. Be mindful. Stay sober. Slow down. Obey traffic laws. Look out for one another. •Factors that contribute to safe mobility: •Roadway design •Speeds •Enforcement •Human behaviors •Technology •Policy We want to hear from you! •Online Questionnaire & Web Map https://www.beheardboulder.org/vision-zero-action-plan •City Website for Project Updates https://bouldercolorado.gov/projects/vision-zero-action-plan Questionnaire & Web map demo We want to hear from you! •Text Message Survey Text “Boulder vz” to (888) 712-4380 with for English Text “Boulder vz-Spanish” to (888) 712-4380 for Spanish OR scan QR codes below: Spanish English Questions & Answers Select Locations with Safety Improvements between 2018 and 2021 Select Locations with Planned Safety Improvements Boulder Vision Zero Phase 1 Outreach Summary Phase 1 Map Results 28th Street 28th Street Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 1000 28th Street 40.00716739 -105.2588618 I feel unsafe bicycling here At night, the university's sprinklers run for hours, filling this underpass with water. -Multiple people commented regarding interactions between people biking and people driving at intersections with the shared-use path -People biking noted safety concerns when drivers are turning right off of 28th Street, as well as turning right onto 28th Street and not looking both ways for people biking -People biking mention channelized right-turn lanes as locations of safety concern -People using all modes noted high vehicle volumes and speeds as causing multiple types of concerns 9% 73% 0% 15% 3% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern 28th Street 1100 28th Street 40.00781319 -105.2583211 I feel unsafe driving here The left turn from Colorado to 28th is FAR too short. 1200 28th Street 40.00802396 -105.2585989 I feel unsafe driving here This intersection feels very unsafe to me. The one ways and the strange left turns make it very confusing and hard to navigate, also the steep incline on Colorado makes it hard to see cars coming when trying to make a left turn 1345 28th Street 40.01159249 -105.2601868 Other traffic safety concern There's another disused, broken water fountain here. Please repair all the water fountains. 1345 28th Street 40.01178921 -105.2604872 I feel unsafe walking here Hairpin turn for bicyclists with a narrow bridge 1400 28th Street 40.0109841 -105.2588886 I feel unsafe bicycling here Unhoused people congregate in this area and set up large encampments. I've had multiple close calls with this group of people intentionally trying to impede my path as I'm riding downhill on 28th, like it's some kind of game. 1400 28th Street 40.01081179 -105.2589583 I feel unsafe bicycling here This has become a permanent encampment area with people and trash. I don’t like biking through here, and I would feel unsafe walking through this area now. 1601 28th Street 40.01483903 -105.2585006 I feel unsafe bicycling here You have to bike on the sidewalk here. The sidewalk is uneven, it annoys the pedestrians, and no cars look for you when they make turns. 1678 28th Street 40.01623247 -105.2581502 I feel unsafe bicycling here drivers continually pull out into the multi- use path, looking only left at oncoming traffic. Crossing needs to be raised. 28th Street 1700 28th Street 40.02005136 -105.257864 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is no safe way to navigate this parking lot. The lanes are narrow and spots give poor visibility. 1728 28th Street 40.01809284 -105.2581719 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike path that follows 28th can be dangerous if you are riding your bike against traffic on the path, since cars can only turn right, they will not be looking for you. 1728 28th Street 40.01789488 -105.2581429 I feel unsafe bicycling here Too many cars turn into the roads along the 28th St mall without noticing bikes. 1770 28th Street 40.01833023 -105.2581636 I feel unsafe bicycling here drivers continually pull out into the multi- use path, looking only left at oncoming traffic. Crossing needs to be raised. 1770 28th Street 40.01875762 -105.258202 I feel unsafe bicycling here drivers continually pull out into the multi- use path, looking only left at oncoming traffic. Crossing needs to be raised. 1800 28th Street 40.01927158 -105.2581869 I feel unsafe bicycling here There needs to be better ways to PHYSICALLY slowing cars down before creeping over the intersection here. I've nearly been hit multiple times. A stop sign does not solve the problem. 1800 28th Street 40.01939439 -105.2581912 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bike traveling north on the multiuse path are impossible to see from the exit of the McDonald's drive thru (and car's leaving the drive thru are impossible to see from the bike path) 28th Street 1800 28th Street 40.01969018 -105.2582181 I feel unsafe bicycling here Drivers turning onto northbound 29th only look to the left, i.e. to the south. They don't see cyclists approaching from the north. We often must wait for them, or unsafely ride around them. This is the inherent problem of "multi-use paths" as opposed to protected bike lanes. 1800 28th Street 40.01942274 -105.2581859 I feel unsafe bicycling here In case you're wondering, the problem is the McDonald's drive through exit lane, which has poor visibility to northbound bicyclists because of the architecture of the store. This location is also a magnet for panhandlers, who block the sidewalk. 1800 28th Street 40.01944369 -105.258191 I feel unsafe bicycling here drivers continually pull out into the multi- use path, looking only left at oncoming traffic. Crossing needs to be raised. 1800 28th Street 40.01910682 -105.2581912 I feel unsafe bicycling here drivers continually pull out into the multi- use path, looking only left at oncoming traffic. Crossing needs to be raised. 1800 28th Street 40.01918077 -105.2581322 I feel unsafe driving here Cars speeding and running lights, multiple signs and lights, crosswalks, turns, etc. It’s a chaotic intersection 1945 28th Street 40.02042555 -105.2585667 I feel unsafe bicycling here The pavement at this intersection is horrible and has huge dips that are jarring to bicyclists. 1964 28th Street 40.02161691 -105.2581751 I feel unsafe bicycling here People in cars coming out of target only look left, rarely right. Lots of near misses for me here and once was actually hit (no injury or damage though, thankfully. Did not report it.). People in the cars need to pull into multiuse path to see oncoming traffic, unfortunately. 28th Street 2121 28th Street 40.02337473 -105.2580786 I feel unsafe walking here No good pedestrian access to this area after crossing 28th at the crosswalk. Either cut thru bushes or walk along narrow parking lot with no real place for pedestrians to be. 2121 28th Street 40.02335863 -105.2581644 I feel unsafe bicycling here No good way to avoid cars poking out into the multiuse path. Most people don't look right when entering the multiuse path because they are too busy looking at oncoming traffic on their left. Then they block the multiuse path and there's no way to bike around them. 2555 28th Street 40.02673526 -105.2596825 I feel unsafe bicycling here It looks so simple on this map! But when you are leaving the bike path here, you need to meander a bunch to get to where the curb cut is to cut thru the parking lot to 28th St. 2625 28th Street 40.02651361 -105.2582502 I feel unsafe bicycling here Random threats from the homeless here over the years while biking by. It's not the nice ones that I worry about, it's the violent mentally ill people who are on a drinking binge or having some kind of mental crisis. Sometimes the encampment takes up nearly the whole path and it's difficult to navigate through. 2625 28th Street 40.02646579 -105.2588403 I feel unsafe bicycling here visibility is poor and the houseless population take up a chunk of the path on a regular basis 28th Street 3040 28th Street 40.02990585 -105.2581912 I feel unsafe bicycling here Is this supposed to be the sidewalk? It's very dangerous to ride on the sidewalk between Valmont and Iris on the east side of 28th. Lots of sharp turns, parking lot entrance/exits, and poorly maintained concrete 3185 28th Street 40.03270782 -105.2583951 I feel unsafe bicycling here 28th street needs bike lanes. Cyclists end up using the sidewalks to stay safe. 3300 28th Street 40.03445756 -105.2582127 I feel unsafe walking here The sidewalk gets so narrow and is in poor condition right here 3390 28th Street 40.03611274 -105.2575368 I feel unsafe bicycling here This parking lot is really degraded and full of potholes. There is a huge weird paved hill right here that is a road hazard. A camp has dropoff and pickup by the Walgreens and so this area gets a lot of traffic by car and bike. 770 28th Street 40.00073438 -105.2586848 I feel unsafe driving here Very short merge here and cars on 36 have already accelerated out of Boulder and do not make space for merging. 910 28th Street 40.00399507 -105.258556 I feel unsafe driving here The rapid deceleration here always makes me feel on edge 30th Street 30th Street Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 645 30th Street 39.99944468 -105.2530671 I feel unsafe bicycling here This section of 30th has lots of parked vehicles, people coming in and out of parking lots and buses. It's very uncomfortable to make the transition from the 30th street bike lane to the bike path along 36 -Commenters described conflicts occurring between people driving or people walking and biking, including the perceived inadequacy of facilities on 30th Street 18% 55% 0% 27% 0% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern 30th Street 700 30th Street 39.99984655 -105.2529452 I feel unsafe walking here Have nearly been hit several times by drivers making right turns from Northbound 30th onto Eastbound Baseline. 700 30th Street 39.99984971 -105.2530003 I feel unsafe driving here I have had several close calls with people turning left out of the Williams Village area. 985 30th Street 40.00480867 -105.2531219 I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe trying to merge with traffic in the construction zone when on my bike. Drivers do not like giving space to bicycles trying to get through the construction zone. In addition, drivers speed into and out of the zone in their haste and impatience. Vehicles with illegal mufflers also create huge noise problems that are never addressed. I would like to see police stopping and ticketing unsafe, disrespectful drivers here more regularly. 996 30th Street 40.00517027 -105.2531165 I feel unsafe driving here Drivers making left turns into and out of Euclid on the west side (Adams Circle) are frequent causes of near misses, squealing tires, fender benders, and general bad behavior. This is a dangerous intersection made worse with the construction zone. Too many impatient, aggressive drivers trying to get into and out of the apartments west of 30th. 1121 30th Street 40.00716431 -105.253389 I feel unsafe bicycling here The buses and cars that travel on 30th don't stay in their lanes and often crowd the bike lines. I hope the construction project will improve this. 30th Street 1121 30th Street 40.00720012 -105.2534974 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bike lane here is full of potholes and trash. Current reroute onto the sidewalk is even worse. 1121 30th Street 40.00692469 -105.2531026 I feel unsafe driving here 30th is far too narrow to safely accommodate all the bikes and cars. In particular, I hope the construction fixes the intersection at 30th and Colorado. 1480 30th Street 40.01085246 -105.2541143 I feel unsafe bicycling here Found myself forced off the trail while riding eastbound by another eastbound road warrior cyclist who passed me on the left, crossing the yellow line, on a curve. 1520 30th Street 40.01100242 -105.2534502 I feel unsafe bicycling here This part of the creek path is sometimes flooded and the underpass closed. There's no way to safely cross 30th if the underpass is closed and you have to make a really long detour (or run for your life). 1585 30th Street 40.0137618 -105.2538836 I feel unsafe driving here I had an accident around here. I was hit. Having the park entry at such a big intersection and busses pulling over is dangerous 1585 30th Street 40.01465746 -105.2536368 I feel unsafe walking here Huge intersection, scary for everyone. 1585 30th Street 40.01438219 -105.253948 I feel unsafe walking here Even though this is an area fairly heavily trafficked by bikers and pedestrians, people driving cars are not generally paying attention. I have known many people who've gotten hit walking or biking here. 30th Street 1585 30th Street 40.01425482 -105.2539587 I feel unsafe walking here Sidewalk from Arapahoe to Baseline is too narrow and bumps right up against the street. It feels dangerous to walk along it. 1686 30th Street 40.01666799 -105.2537658 I feel unsafe driving here There need to be turn arrow lights here. Eastbound cars on Canyon turning North onto 30th seem to be in danger from Wesbtound cars coming from the road between Concentra Urgent care and Best buy, who accelerate to get around cars in the turn lane to head South on 30th 2500 30th Street 40.02680322 -105.2535696 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very hard to access businesses and neighborhoods on the other side of the street when biking. Narrow bike lanes, lots of round utility clean-out holes drilled but not refilled, heavy traffic, debris in lanes, no pedestrian crossings. 2828 30th Street 40.02797181 -105.2537227 I feel unsafe bicycling here I wish this stretch of road along 30th could continue the wide sidewalk here (between valmont and mapleton). Its hard to cross the street to be in the bikelane going the correct direction and the sidewalk here is the standard 4 ft, while from mapleton to arapahoe is the wide bikelane sidewalk. 30th Street 2995 30th Street 40.02910552 -105.253728 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike lane on 30th (southbound) is uneven and narrow. I feel unsafe biking too close to the curb on a slanted surface, and the pavement meets concrete in almost the exact middle of the bike lane which is uneven and causes me to crowd toward the car lane. Cars go above the speed limit on 30th and I typically try to avoid it because it feels unsafe, but that is not always possible. 3065 30th Street 40.030498 -105.2533901 I feel unsafe bicycling here Wouldn't it be sweet to have a bike line along the farmer's ditch that connects from Howard Hueston, under 30th to the off- street lane along Valmont? 3121 30th Street 40.03364743 -105.2536639 I feel unsafe bicycling here There needs to be a safe crossing of 30th for cyclists and pedestrians here. Lots of E- W demand to get to Naropa, Diagonal Plaza shops, apartments, Howard Heuston Park, etc. 3121 30th Street 40.03259692 -105.2536368 I feel unsafe bicycling here Feels very uncomfortable to bike here. Narrow, sloping bike lanes, fast traffic due to excessively wide street. Needs a road diet to 3 lanes with protected bike lanes and multiple pedestrian crossings. High density neighborhood with many lower- income residents, including many of color. 3350 30th Street 40.03585791 -105.25361 I feel unsafe driving here People unexpectedly play frogger to walk across here to their homes (I would guess they are going home). Maybe they need a safe place to cross here? 47th Street 47th Street Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 3238 47th Street 40.0334184 -105.2442491 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars build up a decent amount of speed on this straight stretch of 47th, and the crosswalk is very subtle. It's common for cars not to stop for me, both when I'm walking and bicycling. -People noted a general concern with travel speeds on 47th Street -Multiple people walking noted that there are no walkways across the train tracks -People walking generally noted the lack of continuous walkways and lack of comfortable crossing locations 56% 12% 0% 4% 28% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern 47th Street 3434 47th Street 40.03849903 -105.244233 Other traffic safety concern This intersection feels unsafe for all modes (and I've personally witnessed a crash). Visibility is poor and Diagonal encourages very high speeds. 3434 47th Street 40.03817003 -105.2443457 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is an extremely sketchy place to turn right from Diagonal/Iris on to 47th street. Cars merge with cycle lane at excessive speed and often do not stop for the turn, regardless of signal status. 3445 47th Street 40.03633363 -105.2440882 I feel unsafe walking here As part of the "quiet crossing" project at this railway, we were told there would be a sidewalk put in. The project is now "complete" but there's no sidewalk either side of the road and pedestrians have to either walk on the bike lane, or in the gravel along the verge. Additionally, the property owner of the office building to the north of this location has allowed the shrubs to completely block the sidewalk, so anyone walking needs to go into the road where there's an island forcing cars towards the shoulder. Where's our damn sidewalk we were promised?! 3116 47th Street 40.03070783 -105.2444572 I feel unsafe walking here The multi use path has a crossing here, but it's a blind curve and cars are going too fast (crossing from multi use path to Edison Ave). 3445 47th Street 40.03674118 -105.2440935 I feel unsafe walking here No sidewalk. Jump through the bushes and run for your life. Especially at dusk. 47th Street 3547 47th Street 40.03886866 -105.2442759 I feel unsafe walking here Cars driving south come very close to the (narrow, dark) sidewalk and turn west onto diagonal without stopping, even if you are crossing at the crosswalk. Many near- misses here. 3434 47th Street 40.03847439 -105.2442062 I feel unsafe walking here Cars do not stop for pedestrians, even when they have the crossing light. 3445 47th Street 40.03625243 -105.2441472 I feel unsafe walking here crossing the train tracks here is super sketchy, you have to walk next to high- speed traffic because the sidewalk just ends on either side. 3805 47th Street 40.04322934 -105.2452683 Other traffic safety concern City only turns on water fountains on soccer game days. Neighbors who walk/ride past here daily could really use a drink on hot days. 3547 47th Street 40.03930389 -105.2453917 I feel unsafe driving here Street lighting frequently burned out, takes months to get fixed. 3445 47th Street 40.03698714 -105.2441204 I feel unsafe walking here Just where are we supposed to walk? There's no sidewalk, the bushes stick way out into the road, and this spot is a choke point for both cars and bicycles because of the traffic divider. I walk here every day and it's extremely dangerous. I end up walking in rocks and mud next to the railway most of the time because it's too sketchy to walk in the bike lane into oncoming traffic. 3445 47th Street 40.03698714 -105.2441204 I feel unsafe walking here Duplicate - please ignore 47th Street 3434 47th Street 40.03826078 -105.2443564 I feel unsafe walking here Cars usually zoom through this right turn area without slowing down much from the high speed they travel eastbound on Iris/Diagonal. This corner is particularly scary in winter when there is ice on the road and it isn't at all certain the cars won't just skid right into the island. 3445 47th Street 40.03667916 -105.2440989 I feel unsafe walking here Sidewalk ends and there's just rocks, gravel, trash, and a toxic pit of sludge that hasn't been cleaned up despite multiple Inquire Boulder tickets over several years 3260 47th Street 40.03461773 -105.2443886 I feel unsafe walking here Please put a bike speed limit sign at the top of this hill. It might not deter anyone, but at least people will be informed they cannot ride ~30mph down the hill on their ebikes. 3260 47th Street 40.03510209 -105.2447963 I feel unsafe walking here This tunnel under the Foothills bridge is poorly lit. Scratch that. It's pitch black at night. 3805 47th Street 40.04225643 -105.2442008 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars excessively speed on 47th and this is a narrow bridge over the highway. 3587 47th Street 40.04005969 -105.2441365 Other traffic safety concern Crossing improvements needed here to improve bike and ped access to/from 47th 3238 47th Street 40.03339786 -105.2441525 Other traffic safety concern Ped/bike crossing does not feel safe. Needs upgrades (e.g. raised crossing) 2736 47th Street 40.02726528 -105.2441794 Other traffic safety concern Ped/bike crossing does not feel safe. Needs upgrades (e.g. raised crossing) 3260 47th Street 40.03532009 -105.2441901 Other traffic safety concern Ped/bike crossing does not feel safe. Needs upgrades (e.g. raised crossing) 2510 47th Street 40.02511279 -105.2442008 Other traffic safety concern Ped/bike crossing does not feel safe. Needs upgrades (e.g. raised crossing) 47th Street 3445 47th Street 40.03701636 -105.2441418 I feel unsafe walking here Where the sidewalk ends.... large gap in sidewalk between the south end of parking lot and just north of Mitchell Lane. No sidewalk on west side of 47th either. 47th Street 40.0472186 -105.2441985 I feel unsafe walking here Drivers almost always stop in the path of pedestrians and often do not even bother actually stopping when coming out of 'hood. Arapahoe Avenue Arapahoe Avenue Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment -Multiple people commented on the inadequacy of bikeways on Arapahoe Avenue -People walking noted difficulty crossing Arapahoe Avenue and the number of driveways on Arapahoe Avenue creating conflicts between people driving and people walking -Multiple commenters noted difficulty or conflicts related to making left-turns at intersections on Arapahoe Avenue 28% 41% 4% 24% 3% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Arapahoe Avenue 224 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01293189 -105.2956885 I feel unsafe walking here Wanted to get out of the sudden rain/hail with my toddler but the mentally ill here had already completely taken over the shelter with their shooting up and pot smoking. Wanted to use the toilets here but someone was shooting up in there. I guess I'll just live here and never get to enjoy this area again? Sorry, I'm just so frustrated at how unsafe this population has made our city over the past few years. 1001 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01434528 -105.2818 I feel unsafe walking here I just want to check out a book or maybe play in the creek with my toddler, not be yelled at or harrassed by boozy mentally ill people here. 1314 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01432638 -105.2772038 I feel unsafe bicycling here I have seen multiple people nearly get hit here on bikes, as well as myself. 1316 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01436137 -105.2770364 I feel unsafe bicycling here This crossing needs better lighting 1920 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01451777 #REF!I feel unsafe bicycling here When biking, one must use either Arapahoe Ave (full of traffic) or the sidewalk (narrow, windey, vegetation encroaching full of people and groups often on phones). Makes it impossible to bike on either side of Arapahoe Ave between Folsom and 17th St 2359 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01461594 -105.2635449 I feel unsafe bicycling here Arapahoe is treacherous for bicyclists from here all the way to downtown. Narrow road, no bike lane of any kind, and a poorly maintained sidewalk with overgrown plants, and often large groups of inattentive pedestrians. At night it's scary to ride west from here. Arapahoe Avenue 2800 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01458046 -105.258404 I feel unsafe driving here 2890 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01457529 -105.2561206 Other traffic safety concern The left turn cycle from Arapahoe EB to 29th NB is way too short, and since the flashing yellow was eliminated, you have a race from 28th to this intersection, with most people in the wrong/left lane who aren't turning, and then left turners sit at an empty intersection for a full light cycle before having to rush to get through before the light inevitably changes before everyone has made it through. At least bring back the flashing yellow so that people are sitting idling for an empty road when it's safest to turn. 3005 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01470676 -105.253728 I feel unsafe walking here Huge intersection, scary for everyone. 3005 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01462459 -105.253787 I feel unsafe driving here Huge intersection, scary for everyone. 3033 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01478028 -105.2530038 I feel unsafe bicycling here Drivers entering or leaving the King Soopers lot often fail to yield to bicyclists. 3216 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01473141 -105.25015 I feel unsafe walking here There is no curb cut at this crosswalk. Very dangerous for anyone trying to cross here using a wheelchair, or for someone who is blind/ low vision. 3620 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01466516 -105.2448404 I feel unsafe bicycling here Biking along Arapahoe here is very uncomfortable. Lots of intersections, narrow bridge. Would love for Arapahoe to only be 2 traffic lanes and 1 bus/bike lane (although i think the modifications here have already been determined) Arapahoe Avenue 3620 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01443116 -105.2449572 I feel unsafe bicycling here The pedestrian walkway on this side of the bridge is way too narrow for safe bicycling. 4410 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01449271 -105.2404726 I feel unsafe bicycling here I've had friends who were crossing Arapahoe at this corner and were hit by cars turning from northbound Foothills onto eastbound Arapahoe. There is no way for cars to easily see if a bike is coming and they travel very fast. 4410 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01490329 -105.2405745 I feel unsafe driving here Drivers often fail to yield when they take this turn lane from westbound Arapahoe onto northbound Foothills. They sometimes come to a complete stop in the traffic lanes on Foothills when they realize how hard it is to merge, and sometimes when I am waiting for a gap, cars behind me will aggressively honk or get antagonistic simply because I'm waiting for my turn to go from behind the raised crosswalk. This would be better served by having the turn ramp have a stripe painted where cars should stop for the yield, by getting its own lane for more than ~50 feet, and there should be those flashing lights embedded in the crosswalk to alert cars when peds/bikes are trying to use it Arapahoe Avenue 4410 Arapahoe Avenue 40.0149204 -105.2402043 I feel unsafe bicycling here There are two safety concerns when biking southbound through the Arapahoe underpass: Bikes go downhill into the underpass in an S-curve. At the bottom of the curve one cannot see what is ahead. Two things are often ahead: 1. Homeless people sleeping in the underpass. 2. A huge patch of ice. There are warning signs about the ice but maybe the drainage problem could be solved? 4785 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01454576 -105.2343818 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here No crosswalk at 48th. I had a bus driver ask if I *really* wanted this stop and not Eisenhower (the next stop) to walk to the hospital 5153 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01464513 -105.2320021 I feel unsafe walking here difficult to use crosswalk here on foot. have to be careful. at least the hospital is nearby if you do get hit (hope not) 5340 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01456074 -105.228143 I feel unsafe walking here busy parking lot at Ozo Coffee and Wendys, very difficult to walk across Arapahoe here to Blackbelly or to Ozo and vice versa without getting hit. usually have to jog to avoid getting hit by vehicles making turns 5340 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01455034 -105.2282041 I feel unsafe driving here I second the other commenter; The parking lot for Wendy's and Ozo is very busy midday and creates a backup onto Arapahoe sometimes. The lot itself is too small for the volume of traffic it generates Arapahoe Avenue 5500 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01475161 -105.2252591 I feel unsafe walking here When trying to walk across Arapahoe at 55th, the cars do not stop on left turn, so you have to run across in order to avoid getting hit by car 5500 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01468622 -105.2255166 I feel unsafe driving here This is a sketchy left turn to make (turning north onto 55th), especially during rush hour. It's a flashing yellow arrow, I believe, and the visibility down Arapahoe is not good. Recommend installing a red turn arrow! 5500 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01469854 -105.2254844 I feel unsafe walking here Repeatedly I encounter drivers southbound on 55th who turn west on Arapahoe without yielding to pedestrians in the crosswalk. Lots of them don't even stop when their light is red. Has been a problem for years. 5863 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01448444 -105.2147931 I feel unsafe bicycling here There's a hairpin turn and a steep hill leading to this tunnel. In winter, it's extremely dangerous for kids biking to Platt Middle, especially because entitled spandex warriors ride through here at top speed with no regard for the safety of others. 5863 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01488317 -105.2147502 I feel unsafe bicycling here The approach and exit to this tunnel is frequently icy in winter 5995 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01486652 -105.2130497 I feel unsafe driving here I often saw near misses when people trying to drive south on Cherryvale through the green light almost got hit by left turners onto westbound Arapahoe. Northbound drivers do not yield properly and create a dangerous situation Arapahoe Avenue 6025 Arapahoe Avenue 40.01466988 -105.2122289 I feel unsafe driving here eastbound traffic on Arapahoe, east of Cherryvale, drivers often speed and aggressively cut one another off as they approach the merge where it becomes one lane for cars. There's often a long line of stopped traffic between here and 63rd street, and drivers unfamiliar with the area and its unusual merge may end up waiting a long time because they don't realize until it's too late they need to merge left 9278 Arapahoe Road 40.01434354 -105.1370933 I feel unsafe bicycling here When cycling, this is the only stretch of road to connect Teller Farms to the paths off of Baseline. It is a high-speed section of road with no shoulder. One of my most feared areas but one I'm forced to take to connect existing infrastructure Baseline Road Baseline Road Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment -Commenters described the area around the US 36 as difficult to navigate because of the complexity of travel lanes in this area -Multiple people described personal security concerns associated with the US 36 overpass -People described seeing people crossing Baseline Road at locations without marked pedestrian crossings 39% 31% 0% 30% 0% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Baseline Road 1001 Baseline Road 40.00001248 -105.2797723 I feel unsafe bicycling here Even though there are signs letting drivers know cyclists have the use of the full lane here, I've had car drivers dangerously pass me when I have been going fast down Baseline eastbound. I hate this road. Parked cars make it even worse. There needs to be a protected bike lane at least on the downhill side of the road. 2260 Baseline Road 40.00005839 -105.2638882 I feel unsafe bicycling here The situation where right turns from Broadway to Baseline cross the multi-use path has been awful for years. Drivers don't check both ways when the path has a Walk signal, and bike traffic is moving faster than drivers expect. 2260 Baseline Road 40.00008579 -105.26362 I feel unsafe driving here People making southbound left are aggressive and cut over on Baseline to get on US 36 EB 2450 Baseline Road 40.00024281 -105.2623916 I feel unsafe driving here There's no indication of the turn-only lane markings until right when you get up to them, so people often have to merge at the last second, which creates a traffic jam. Put some signage for drivers further back east along Baseline so it's clear which lane is going straight vs turn only well in advance, and clearly marked lanes would help too. 2460 Baseline Road 40.00041593 -105.2618176 I feel unsafe walking here There are frequently people sleeping in this tunnel Baseline Road 2460 Baseline Road 40.00012414 -105.261898 I feel unsafe bicycling here Trashy tunnel underpass. This, like many other underpasses, are feeling unsafe and unpleasant with trash, debris, people hanging out and camping out. 2750 Baseline Road 40.00008327 -105.2586 I feel unsafe walking here This blind turn often has people camped out in the hidden corner. 2805 Baseline Road 40.00011461 -105.256928 I feel unsafe bicycling here This underpass is dark, narrow, and usually has debris and people gathering in it. 2805 Baseline Road 40.00019811 -105.2569413 I feel unsafe bicycling here Too many people sleeping in this underpass. 2830 Baseline Road 39.99996799 -105.2568662 I feel unsafe bicycling here 2850 Baseline Road 40.00016113 -105.2559596 I feel unsafe driving here It is difficult to safely turn from SB 29th to EB Baseline without rapid acceleration due to the high traffic volume on Baseline and additional traffic which might be exiting 36 or coming onto Baseline from McDonalds, Dark Horse, etc. 2865 Baseline Road 40.00069241 -105.2572528 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very poor visibility at this intersection 3300 Baseline Road 39.99996388 -105.2505469 I feel unsafe driving here Students regularly jog across the entire stretch of Baseline that borders Will Vill, presumably because there are not any designated pedestrian crossings in this stretch. 3300 Baseline Road 39.99994744 -105.2506918 I feel unsafe walking here Students choose to sprint across here from WillVill at night and it's only a matter of time before one is hit by a car. Baseline Road 3554 Baseline Road 39.99998401 -105.2495116 I feel unsafe driving here People illegally cross here because there's no safe crossing, and when I stop to let them cross, other drivers nearly rear-end me because they're going way too fast westbound on Baseline. Just a total mess all around. This needs a ped tunnel and some crossing lights 3700 Baseline Road 40.0001036 -105.2483422 I feel unsafe walking here People regularly cross at this intersection and it is unsafe. Add a light or crossing lights. 3700 Baseline Road 39.99998032 -105.2483261 I feel unsafe walking here Desperate need for a crosswalk! 3700 Baseline Road 39.99998032 -105.2483422 I feel unsafe driving here I have personally witnessed several traffic accidents here. Also, students from the CU apartments park on the frontage road here, and cross the Baseline to get home. This is so dangerous!! 3840 Baseline Road 40.00017346 -105.2465397 I feel unsafe walking here People often cross here and it is unsafe. 3890 Baseline Road 39.99998032 -105.2453542 I feel unsafe walking here A blind curve on a path. I saw an injury ped-bike accident here the other day, and have had near-misses of my own. 4700 Baseline Road 40.00005666 -105.2362974 I feel unsafe driving here There should be a left turn light here to accommodate the heavy school drop off and pick up traffic. 4770 Baseline Road 40.00012851 -105.2325536 I feel unsafe walking here underpass needed, not a safe crossing 4770 Baseline Road 40.00013439 -105.2329946 I feel unsafe walking here underpass needed, no safe way to get across Foothills here Broadway Broadway Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 299 Broadway 39.99257887 -105.2587837 I feel unsafe bicycling here Needs underpass or stop light. -Multiple people comment on the speed and volume of traffic on Broadway and its proximity to people walking or biking, creating discomfort -Multiple people commented regarding interactions between people biking and people driving at intersections with the shared-use path -People walking noted difficulty crossing Broadway 32% 55% 0%4% 9% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Broadway 805 Broadway 40.00205963 -105.265283 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very dangerous intersection at the bottom of a hill where bike speeds increase greatly and a tunnel where you can’t see through the mirror. I avoid the area rather than slowing down at the bottom of a hill when biking. 805 Broadway 40.00208018 -105.2653366 I feel unsafe bicycling here This underpass is a blind turn after a hill and the mirror for seeing around the corner is in a plastic box that is so scratched up you can't see anything through it 805 Broadway 40.00236331 -105.2651006 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is the nearest non-road underpass for kids riding or walking to New Vista High, and it has poor visibility to the fast-moving bikes on the west side of Broadway. 825 Broadway 40.00338158 -105.2677072 I feel unsafe driving here In general, I've experienced bikes, pedestrians and skateboards acting erratically at nearly every intersection of Broadway and CU. 1005 Broadway 40.00603367 -105.2721387 I feel unsafe bicycling here Drunk students walking in big groups often impede the bike path and create a hazard for cyclists who want to pass them safely. 1111 Broadway 40.00752474 -105.2746385 I feel unsafe bicycling here It's really dangerous to ride north/south here and come upon someone emerging from the tunnel slowly. There needs to be better visibility for cyclists, perhaps convex mirrors at the tunnels. Broadway 1611 CO 93 39.97212123 -105.2374148 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike path along this stretch feels dangerously close to traffic traveling at a high speed. And distracted drivers as they come into the city limits. I’ve seen a number of auto accidents and twice cars that drive off the road, over the bike path and into CU South land. It seems like a guard rail and slower auto speed along this turn is warranted. 1739 Broadway 40.01457015 -105.2792519 I feel unsafe walking here My spouse works out of Park Central and was accosted and nearly pushed into the locked bike storage area by a lunatic. She had to lock herself into the bike storage room and there's no other exit, no emergency phone, and no cell reception in there. This building is unsafe for staff and visitors alike due to large and unruly groups of unhoused people who camp here. 1800 Broadway 40.01548737 -105.2790374 I feel unsafe bicycling here Hard to get from the bike path to Pearl Street safely sometimes. 2514 Broadway 40.02401547 -105.2820146 I feel unsafe walking here Traffic speeds on Broadway make it a stressful experience outside a car, especially when crossing the street. The roadway is too wide and it encourages drivers to go fast, which feels dangerous as a pedestrian. Some of the sidewalks are also insufficiently wide and separated from speeding traffic, as seen at the intersection with North St. Broadway 2826 Broadway 40.02726939 -105.2819127 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is no bike path and the only way to bike here is a narrow, busy, uneven sidewalk that winds side to side and suddenly crosses jutting out driveways. a wide, flat bikepath is needed to connect central and north boulder 2842 Broadway 40.02802932 -105.2821058 I feel unsafe bicycling here I was on Cedar crossing Bwy (eastbound) on my bike, and was almost run over by a car. I came closer to being killed by a car than ever before in my life! The car (traveling northbound) trying to avoid me, ran up on the sidewalk. I reported it to police but they did NOTHING. They said an officer would contact me, but never did. I assume that since I wasn’t injured, although came within an inch of being killed, they didn’t bother investigating the incident. Crossing Bwy on Cedar is a total nightmare. I am 75 years old and I typically bike around town when running errands - which is most days. Broadway 3360 Broadway 40.03657688 -105.2820718 I feel unsafe walking here Light at Iris & Broadway has issues with the giving the "Walk" signal to cross Broadway. If the push the button it often makes you wait several cycles until giving the walk (if it's green for Broadway when you push, it'll then go green for Iris with NO walk, then back to green for Broadway, then again the green for Iris when it'll finally give you the walk to cross). See a lot of elementary kids from Foothill who get frustrated and end up not waiting that long time. 3360 Broadway 40.03665082 -105.2820307 I feel unsafe bicycling here The right turn red arrow from Iris onto Broadway doesn't seem to work properly. It should light when there's peds walking or bikes crossing, but it doesn't. It doesn't ever seem to do anything. Seen a number of close calls with bikes/peds almost hit as cars pull up into crosswalk to right-turn onto Broadway from Iris. 3507 Broadway 40.0372669 -105.2819932 I feel unsafe walking here When traffic backs up at Broadway& Iris, car cut thru the County HHS parking lot both ways and dart across the sidewalks. Not safe in the parking lot either. 3570 Broadway 40.03890973 -105.2819502 I feel unsafe walking here A crosswalk across Broadway here would be nice, next closest is uphill at Linden or downhill at Iris. Broadway 3690 Broadway 40.04053885 -105.2820897 I feel unsafe walking here Light at Linden goes to flashing yellow in winter ice/snow making an already dangerous area much worse. Cars come flying down the hill and there's no way to safely cross Broadway. Crosswalk at Kalmia would help (and car would have time to slow after steep hill) 3690 Broadway 40.04089751 -105.2820629 I feel unsafe walking here When the light changes to flashing yellow on snowy days, peds cannot cross the street at all. The ped crossing signal is deliberately disabled. We cannot get to the bus when the ped signal is disabled. The argument that cars going downhill might not be able to stop is bogus. Instead, they must drive more slowly. City should set a temporary 10mph speed limit for the downhill between Norwood and Linden. 3690 Broadway 40.04124249 -105.2819502 I feel unsafe bicycling here Improvements needed on this segment of north broadway to connect Linden to Norwood as part of N-S low stress route. 4215 Broadway 40.05071645 -105.2820897 Other traffic safety concern Improved Ped crossing needed to connect Sumac to Wonderland lake trailhead. Currently 1800' b/w marked crosswalks. 4295 Broadway 40.05303649 -105.2821058 Other traffic safety concern Ped crossing upgrades (e.g. median refuge island) needed to cross broadway due to unsignalized crossing. Connection to eastside sidewalk is also lacking South Broadway South Broadway Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment -Multiple people comment on the speed and volume of traffic on South Broadway and its proximity to people walking or biking, creating discomfort -Multiple people commented regarding interactions between people biking and people driving at intersections with the shared-use path -People walking noted difficulty crossing South Broadway 11% 65% 12% 8%4% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern South Broadway 250 South Broadway 39.98972736 -105.2560514 I feel unsafe walking here Hands down one of the most dangerous sidewalks in the City. This sidewalk is heavily used for school kids, gets bus and car splashed with snow, water spray, mud, and is within inches of cars traveling 40-50 mph. I'd love to see this sidewalk physically protected with a jersey barrier style stub wall or better yet, a broadway ped crossing with lights installed at Ash. Ash is where most of the neighborhood crosses broadway, especially with bikes that can't fit up the ramp to the north by NOAA. Would really be nice to slow the speed of Broadway down from 40 mph...coming north and down the hill cars are coasting at speeds of +50 mph...again...within inches of Creekside elementary school kids. 250 South Broadway 39.99269559 -105.2583821 I feel unsafe bicycling here Ash is the most-used bike and pedestrian access to the west of Broadway bike path. Cars are going 40-50 mph at this location and would be nice to change this to a flashing ped crossing like so many other locations in the City. Crossing broadway at a light near Darley is a dangerous alternative as the sidewalk is inches from traffic buses, cars, snow plows and routinely splashes the sidewalk users (myself included) with nowhere for the pedestrian to hide. South Broadway 250 South Broadway 39.98954579 -105.2559006 I feel unsafe bicycling here 3 lanes of speeding vehicles, narrow sidewalk, no vehicle barrier, lots of snow/slush splatter in winter 250 South Broadway 39.99251316 -105.2581751 I feel unsafe bicycling here 250 South Broadway 39.99266111 -105.2583629 I feel unsafe driving here 250 South Broadway 39.98966909 -105.2560294 I feel unsafe bicycling here Crazy dangerious section of sidewalk! Very narrow. No room for error at all. Yet, it is an important connection since Lashley is interrupted. 395 South Broadway 39.98927453 -105.255568 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here Access down narrow sidewalk with 3 lanes of speeding vehicles. Have had speeding vehicle jump the curb and almost hit pedestrians waiting for bus when they couldn't stop (winter) 395 South Broadway 39.98929919 -105.2559435 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here Have almost been hit numerous times! by cars from upper Dartmouth speeding through the turn light as I was crossing the street after exiting public transit. 395 South Broadway 39.98935262 -105.2560562 I feel unsafe bicycling here 395 South Broadway 39.98940194 -105.2561152 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here 601 South Broadway 39.98498353 -105.249635 I feel unsafe bicycling here These driveways are the sticking point in sending my kid to school by bike on their own. 601 South Broadway 39.98508079 -105.2496314 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars turning left off Table Mesa Drive often attempt to enter the shopping center here, being pressured from behind by other left-turning traffic. They often don't have time to check for southbound bikes. South Broadway 601 South Broadway 39.98508218 -105.2495599 I feel unsafe driving here I am always anxious about being rear- ended if I need to stop for bike/ped traffic to clear this curbcut into the parking lot. 609 South Broadway 39.98491776 -105.2495652 I feel unsafe bicycling here I have been hit by a car here trying to exit the shopping center. The bike lane is in an extremely vulnerable place as traffic from both Broadway and the shopping center are having to cross through the bike lane, and it's really dangerous for everyone. Is there another bike lane solution for along Broadway here? I try and avoid this area as much as possible, but sometimes I find myself still on this path to get around. 627 South Broadway 39.9845725 -105.2493131 I feel unsafe walking here When getting off the bus I have nearly been hit by bicyclists because the sidewalk is the cyclist lane. There should be a stop and a clear indication to anyone getting off of the bus that they are walking directly into a bicycle lane. A stop sign should be there for cyclists if the bus is unloading. Very dangerous for pedestrians. 629 South Broadway 39.98385319 -105.248546 I feel unsafe bicycling here This bike path is very useful, but the intersections along this path between Table Mesa and Darley are tenuous! Drivers can barely see cyclists when approaching the intersections. This is a route to many schools, and the intersections along this bike path should be made more safe! 629 South Broadway 39.98384908 -105.2485836 I feel unsafe bicycling here I second everything Hollie said about the bike trail along this section of Broadway. South Broadway 629 South Broadway 39.98382857 -105.2485415 I feel unsafe bicycling here Most times I bike here a car waiting to leave the parking lot is blocking the bike path. They have little choice because if they stay further back visibility is insufficient. One way to solve this would be right turn only and force people who want to go NB on Broadway to U-turn at Hanover, exit via the light at Hanover, or go CW around the plaza to Table Mesa Dr at King Soopers. 629 South Broadway 39.98391902 -105.2486587 I feel unsafe bicycling here Here to echo Hollie and Dakota. 629 South Broadway 39.98383058 -105.2485433 I feel unsafe bicycling here Unsafe to bike here and an unsafe turn for cars out of the parking lot heading north on Broadway 629 South Broadway 39.98383058 -105.2485433 I feel unsafe bicycling here I want to add that I think the bike path would make more sense on the other side (East) of Broadway here. I’ve always used the other side (as do my kids biking to school) because it’s safer… 695 South Broadway 39.98326114 -105.248136 I feel unsafe bicycling here Especially bad visibility to cars coming out of the lot when traveling north Canyon Boulevard Canyon Boulevard Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment -Most concerns relate to the comfort of pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure, particularly pedestrian crossings and sidewalks -Many concerns related to interactions between vehicles and people biking at intersections 30% 40% 0% 20% 10% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Canyon Boulevard 37863 Boulder Canyon Drive 40.00715791 -105.3320325 I feel unsafe bicycling here A path has been built along Boulder Creek which encourages riders to utilize it. However, it only travels 3/4 of the distance to Boulder most accessible and popular mountain bike trail, forcing riders onto the dangerous Boulder Canyon Drive. 1000 Canyon Boulevard 40.01511782 -105.2823454 I feel unsafe walking here at this crosswalk, vehicles don't always stop. I realize there are announcements to be sure to be on guard but I think it is still a concern for pedestrians or those in wheelchairs to cross Canyon Blvd at this intersection 1480 Canyon Boulevard 40.01650951 -105.2759557 I feel unsafe driving here With all the people Jay walking here it becomes really unsafe to drive when the road are slick or icy even with crosswalks less than half a block away people still feel the need to cross right here 1812 Canyon Boulevard 40.01714716 -105.2709961 I feel unsafe walking here Canyon between 17th Street and Folsom is terrifying outside of a car. Most of the sidewalks are narrow and within arm's reach of high-speed car traffic. I am afraid to walk with my young daughter here. I feel the street should be redesigned to slow car traffic and expand sidewalk access. 1900 Canyon Boulevard 40.01722933 -105.2704543 Other traffic safety concern Signalized crossing needed to allow bike and peds to safely cross canyon. 19th is a key N-S low stress route and connects to the new bridge over Boulder Creek Canyon Boulevard 2375 Canyon Boulevard 40.01743064 -105.2630407 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very dangerous intersection, despite city's green boxes. Cars go fast; lots of traffic; left-turners don't adequately look ahead. Scary! Already one person killed here, right? Colorado Avenue Colorado Avenue Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 2795 Colorado Avenue 40.00801738 -105.2588511 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars turning right onto southbound 28th from eastbound Colorado do not look to their right as they turn, so they pay no attention to northbound bicycles trying to cross here. -Most concerns related to biking on Colorado Avenue, including interactions with vehicles and the integration of the bike path on Colorado Avenue 25% 75% 0% 0% 0% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Colorado Avenue 3009 Colorado Avenue 40.00758225 -105.2532506 I feel unsafe bicycling here All of 30th street is dangerous for cycling due to high volume of traffic and high vehicle speeds, narrowness of the bike path and its proximity to the road, and drivers not paying attention. 3000 Colorado Avenue 40.00737995 -105.2515769 I feel unsafe walking here A lot of unsafe u-turns, not U-Turn sign here. 3759 Colorado Avenue 40.00719147 -105.2471459 I feel unsafe bicycling here I dislike how the bike path abruptly ends on Colorado here, and crossing the street to get to the path on the other side is difficult to navigate Folsom Street Folsom Street Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 1316 Folsom Street 40.00975173 -105.2640545 I feel unsafe bicycling here -People commented most regarding their concerns for safe bikeways on Folsom Street, both along and across Folsom Street -Multiple people also commented on signal- or beacon-related operational concerns (false detection, timing, etc.) 18% 73% 0%0%9% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Folsom Street 1320 Folsom Street 40.00997785 -105.264076 I feel unsafe bicycling here Road conditions going downhill (northbound) on Folsom from Colorado are abysmal. Large potholes are a danger to everyone who rides in the street. 1321 Folsom Street 40.01079536 -105.2636576 I feel unsafe bicycling here High speeds going down here on a bike with clutter in the bike lane can lead to going into the road with cars not paying attention. 1575 Folsom Street 40.01452599 -105.2629709 I feel unsafe bicycling here Turning right (east) from Folsom to Arapahoe crosses the bike lane. It's sketchy for both the bike and the car. 1595 Folsom Street 40.01529255 -105.2629935 I feel unsafe bicycling here This needs to be a protected bike lane. Continue it similar to the the northern Folsom St bike lane 1595 Folsom Street 40.01540931 -105.2630568 I feel unsafe walking here There's a path through the island here for pedestrians but no painted sidewalks. Retail is dense here and making it pedestrian friendly would improve things. Why not at least paint some crosswalks to invite pedestrians and calm traffic. 1625 Folsom Street 40.01569801 -105.2629267 I feel unsafe bicycling here Extremely narrow bike lane, poor pavement quality, lots of traffic, driveways. Yikes! 1717 Folsom Street 40.01660897 -105.2630299 I feel unsafe bicycling here The stretch from Pine to Arapahoe needs protected bike lanes. North/South through traffic should move to 28th. The bike "lanes" are very narrow (basically gutters) and cars are going very fast. It's great that north Folsom has protected lanes but then it just dumps you into the gutters here. Bicyclists need a safe north/south corridor. Folsom Street 1795 Folsom Street 40.01728685 -105.2630246 I feel unsafe bicycling here Another big, fast intersection where I feel vulnerable to high-speed left-turning cars. Would much prefer a protected intersection, or at least a separate signal phase for bikes. 1855 Folsom Street 40.01896316 -105.2631372 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike lanes on Folsom between Spruce and Arapahoe are narrow and dangerous. Debris often collects in them since they are right up against the curb, and cars pass at high speeds with no protection for adjacent cyclists. This is one of the scariest places to ride a bike in the city given the traffic levels, speeds, and lack of adequate space, and it's a stark contrast from the curb-protected lanes farther north on Folsom. These bike lanes should be upgraded to match that standard. 1884 Folsom Street 40.02024376 -105.2629776 I feel unsafe bicycling here No way to safely turn from northbound Folsom bike lane onto Walnut street. How are we supposed to do this? 1885 Folsom Street 40.01988924 -105.2630266 I feel unsafe walking here It seems like this crosswalk light is falsely active. Almost every day I see these crosswalk lights blinking with no pedestrians in the crosswalk, and cars ignore and do not slow down for the light. I don't feel safe using the crosswalk light as a pedestrian bc drivers have learned to ignore it. 1885 Folsom Street 40.01981247 -105.2630757 I feel unsafe walking here The crosswalk flashes so many times with no one crossing that is makes drivers assume there is no one there most of the time Folsom Street 1890 Folsom Street 40.02031057 -105.2630943 I feel unsafe bicycling here The most ignored light up cross walk in Boulder. Cars don't seem to stop reliably for me here. Maybe because it's been broken so many times. (Broken where is just flashes constantly) 1900 Folsom Street 40.02126361 -105.2630889 Other traffic safety concern The length of the light E/W bound is shorter for pedestrians than for cars. This encourages walking without the pedestrian symbol for the crosswalk when it may not be safe as its not possible to know when the light will change. The time should be increased to match the time for cars. 2110 Folsom Street 40.02265624 -105.263325 I feel unsafe bicycling here Merge zone for cars is chaotic and aggressive, with vehicles frequently merging too late and partially riding the bike lane. Since they are looking left to merge, they are not looking at the bike lane at all. Not safe for cars or bikes. 2160 Folsom Street 40.02339157 -105.2636415 I feel unsafe bicycling here Lots of left turn movements in all directions ... kind of chaotic. Would appreciate some speed management 2800 Folsom Street 40.02772124 -105.2630943 I feel unsafe bicycling here Add bike crossing markings to aid southbound bikes accessing the Goose Creek Greenway. 2991 Folsom Street 40.02913838 -105.2631104 Other traffic safety concern The timing and priority of this light are so frustrating! Could the light be timed so that it changes more frequently? When going eastbound on Edgewood you can wait forever, and if you're on a bike you will most certainly hit the light at 28th street and wait forever as well. Folsom Street 3185 Folsom Street 40.0326421 -105.2631533 I feel unsafe walking here The crosswalk button is hard to access for children. This offset intersection is confusing for cars to navigate which makes me feel unsafe crossing when walking or biking when I take my kid to Columbine 3200 Folsom Street 40.03299499 -105.2631347 I feel unsafe bicycling here Glenwood is a major E-W cycling connection. How should a cyclist handle this offset intersection? Need a design like Portland's at Stark and 41st: https://bikeportland.org/2022/08/03/four- offset-intersections-four-different- treatments-360892 3200 Folsom Street 40.03305292 -105.2631591 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is a route to school from dense apartments east of Folsom to Columbine Elementary west of Folsom. Need a safer crossing of Folsom for cyclists, not just walkers on sidewalks. Foothills Parkway Foothills Parkway Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment Foothills Parkway 40.04550059 -105.240317 I feel unsafe walking here Perpetual unhoused encampment under this underpass on the far side of the creek. Lots of abandoned trash and bike parts found here. No enforcement. -Driving-related comments generally related to the high speeds on Foothills Parkway and the blend of freeway and urban facilities -Multiple people noted the lack of a formal crossing of the railroad tracks -People walking or biking most cited concerns where there are bicycle or pedestrian crossings of Foothills Parkway, given high speeds 35% 29% 0% 24% 12% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Foothills Parkway Foothills Parkway 40.04515995 -105.2387667 I feel unsafe walking here Build a real pedestrian crossing here. Every day I see dozens of people climb over the ridiculous impediments the railroad has erected to stop pedestrians. These two paths need and deserve a real connection here, rather than this sketchy rock climbing exercise. Foothills Parkway 40.04512751 -105.238746 I feel unsafe walking here I love the map shows a path, but the train company has no trespassing signs, we actually need a proper crossing so everyone is safe here. Foothills Parkway 40.04509876 -105.2388364 I feel unsafe walking here I know I've definitely never crossed here, because that would be illegal, but I imagine other people might like to... Foothills Parkway 40.04407977 -105.2407354 I feel unsafe walking here People smoke dope sitting on the overpass above the pedestrian tunnel every single night. Not a great place to walk with my kids. Also has taken months for graffiti to get cleaned up, even though the city paints over graffiti within 24 hours of reporting at the underpass by the soccer field to the north. Foothills Parkway Foothills Parkway 40.03828492 -105.244719 Other traffic safety concern This entire area is a disaster. There is a mixture of high speed highways, merging zones, stop lights, and pedestrian and cycling crossings that take up acres of prime real estate and endanger everyone. The whole thing should be demolished and replaced with a simple interchange like at Valmont, but with underpasses for cyclists and pedestrians. Diagonal highway has many existing stoplights, not sure why there's a whole spaghetti interchange here at all taking up so much space and hindering pedestrians and cyclists movement (and safety). The diagonal project from 5 years ago just made this corridor faster and was a huge waste of resources. Foothills Parkway 40.03435033 -105.2451289 I feel unsafe walking here BNSF installed a chain-link gate in their fence, which unhoused people have cut and used to access the railway right-of- way for their encampments. BNSF came and did a partial cleanup of this area but has not repaired this fence, which is wide open and unlocked. Some of the chain link has been cut with bolt cutters as well, so this needs more than a padlock put on the gate. Foothills Parkway 40.02902337 -105.2445066 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars turning from northbound Foothills to eastbound Valmont often are going fast and do not obey yield signs for bicycles crossing on the multi use path Foothills Parkway Foothills Parkway 40.02652957 -105.2448821 I feel unsafe driving here Driving southbound on Foothills after turning from Valmont can be treacherous, especially if you drive the limit and need to make a left onto eastbound Arapahoe. Cars coming from Diagonal are driving way, way too fast and tailgate or cut around at ~20mph over the limit. This stretch of roadway is really, really bad for speeding but there's rarely enforcement on this road. Foothills Parkway 40.02572445 -105.2450913 I feel unsafe bicycling here There's a steep downhill and a blind 90 degree turn at the bottom. Many near misses with oncoming cyclists. In the winter, people sleep in one lane under the overpass, making it even narrower and less safe to ride through here. Foothills Parkway 40.02554412 -105.2451074 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is a particularly bad blind corner that only gets worse if you add pedestrians to the mix. Foothills Parkway 40.01673161 -105.2415562 Other traffic safety concern This water fountain was thoroughly broken in 2020 and has never been repaired or replaced. We need a water source here! Foothills Parkway 40.01446436 -105.24073 I feel unsafe driving here Agree with other comments. The turn lights are insufficiently long at this intersection. Foothills Parkway 40.01437024 -105.2409124 I feel unsafe driving here Bad light timing means constant red light running by people turning from WB Arapahoe to SB Foothills Foothills Parkway Foothills Parkway 40.01278396 -105.2400005 I feel unsafe bicycling here No guard rail between cars going 50+ mph and the bike path. Watched a cyclist get hit by an out-of control driver going south that jumped the median on Foothills and ended up crossing the bike path Foothills Parkway 40.0003666 -105.2332681 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars turning SB Foothills to WB Baseline speed through this intersection with the Foothills path, bad visibility in crosswalk Foothills Parkway 39.98781135 -105.232088 I feel unsafe driving here Terrible merge here. Traffic coming off of Foothills has the right of way, but traffic waiting at the yield merge try to turn it into a zipper merge. It is super hard to be watching for someone there to start driving while they’re supposed to be waiting and to also pay attention to the traffic in the other two lanes. They only have to watch for space to merge, yet 90% of the time they go when they shouldn’t. I drove this route every day for six years while taking my kids to school and it was a miracle I never got in a wreck. Iris Avenue Iris Avenue Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 1450 Iris Avenue 40.03633422 -105.2779269 I feel unsafe walking here Homeowner here has built their talk fence with no 18" easement. There is no strip of land between pedestrians and the road here. Try passing someone with a stroller, walker, or wheelchair here and see how safe you feel. -Concerns relate to the comfort of pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure, including sidewalks, bike lanes, and crossings 40% 40% 0% 0% 20% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Iris Avenue 1750 Iris Avenue 40.03635511 -105.2754593 Other traffic safety concern Marked pedestrian crossing needed to provide permeability across Iris 2795 Iris Avenue 40.0363302 -105.2589262 I feel unsafe bicycling here Drivers will block the bike lane when trying to squeeze through to make a right turn from Eastbound Iris to Southbound 28th. I'm not a fan of the bollards, but some here might be really useful. 3715 Iris Avenue 40.03650707 -105.2469367 I feel unsafe walking here There is no sidewalk on this city-owned property, next to a childcare center!! It drives me insane that I can almost walk my kids to school but then end up on this dirt lot with no sidewalk. 3393 Iris Avenue 40.03641261 -105.2488089 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike/ped crossing here makes no sense Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment -Multiple people cited concerns regarding conflicts between people driving and people biking -Multiple people made comments about acessing transit in portions of Pearl Parkway 27% 34% 8% 0% 31% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway 2250 Pearl Street 40.02081993 -105.2656049 I feel unsafe walking here The street is too wide for the intended speed limit. Despite the crosswalk and signs, cars frequently ignore pedestrians. I've played chicken with many self- important drivers here. I would recommend the sidewalk be raised to sidewalk height to slow cars approaching downtown to the posted speed limit (probably another will be necessary at 21st) and making use of the road width to add a chicane along this stretch while narrowing the lane. 2603 Pearl Street 40.02178533 -105.2608144 I feel unsafe walking here Left turns from 26th to Pearl happen at same signal phase as pedestrian crossing...geometry allows cars to take a very low angle turn at high speeds. Car visibility facing east is very poor early in the morning due to sun rising. 2660 Pearl Street 40.02195776 -105.2596503 I feel unsafe walking here Almost hit by a car while walking along Pearl across this parking lot outlet. 2803 Pearl Street 40.02229473 -105.2584273 Other traffic safety concern I see multiple drivers headed from westbound to southbound via the turning lanes run the eventual red light every single day. 2835 Pearl Street 40.02251657 -105.2571183 Other traffic safety concern People turning right into here without using their blinker makes it unsafe for people turning and causes drivers to have to go to the other lane 2905 Pearl Street 40.02353124 -105.2554929 Other traffic safety concern Improve bike/ped connections through parking lot to access transit and crossing of Pearl. Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway 3000 Pearl Street 40.0233053 -105.2536368 Other traffic safety concern The signals at this intersection are exceptionally long, even when there is little to no traffic. These long phases without proper countdowns cause many to cross before the phase is complete. 3050 Pearl Street 40.02241348 -105.252623 I feel unsafe bicycling here Disappointing that this bike route does not continue westbound through to 30th street. 3203 Pearl Street 40.02460752 -105.249635 I feel unsafe bicycling here It stinks that this place is surrounded by bike paths but there is no easy way to access BIS when coming from the west or surrounding businesses due to the train tracks and creek. 5200 Pearl Street 40.02564064 -105.2330589 I feel unsafe bicycling here While it doesn't happen often, city vehicles traverse the bike path while driving between the corp yard and old Pearl. The existing yield signage should be more prominent for motor vehicles from the corp yard to yield to bikes on the path. I've had a few close calls as this is a sprint area for bikes. 3100 Pearl Parkway 40.02377361 -105.2518183 I feel unsafe bicycling here I hate biking this stretch of Pearl in either direction. I hate sharing a fake-road with parked cars and having to continually merge with cars in and out several times. A bike gutter would feel safer because at least you would be more visible to traffic. Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway 3140 Pearl Parkway 40.02370788 -105.2502787 Other traffic safety concern The paved train access point here makes it seem like it's a crosswalk/crossing point. It's easier to cross here as a pedestrian or biker than waiting for 5 minutes for the light at junction place. 3160 Pearl Parkway 40.02302593 -105.2502691 Other traffic safety concern It would be nice to have underpass here along the farmers ditch to get safely across Pearl. This stretch of bike path is nice, but it dead ends here and just a few blocks west behind Google. Connections here and behind Google would make it much more useful and you could avoid the high speed crossings at junction place or foothills. 3183 Pearl Parkway 40.02397808 -105.251137 Other traffic safety concern A drug dealer operates an open market trading stolen bicycles and other items for drugs at a ground-level apartment here. BPD has been told about this and is well aware, but nothing has been done for years. It is insane this is permitted to operate openly, trading on stolen goods. 4000 Pearl Parkway 40.02317743 -105.2458209 I feel unsafe walking here Had a severe allergic reaction/hives/rash from brushing past the tall grass here during a walk. Had to use hydrocortisone for three weeks to get rid of it. Trim these weeds please. They're toxic. 4000 Pearl Parkway 40.02306293 -105.2456707 better signage needed here. dangerous b/c cars do not yield to bikes. Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway 4740 Pearl Parkway 40.02280002 -105.2434874 I feel unsafe bicycling here The two signaled interchanges on Pearl at Foothills force bikes on the Foothills MUP to wait an unnecessarily long time at unsafe locations. Currently, left turns from Pearl onto Foothills get a long signal phase in the afternoon at both signaled interchanges on the east and west sides of the highway. The problem is that this same phase also includes a green for traffic continuing straight east or west, even though east- west traffic is blocked by the upstream signal on the opposite side of the highway. Engineers should eliminate the east-west greens from this signal phase to allow for a walk signal across Pearl with the left turn. Alternatively, the city could make the pork- chop island at the south-east corner as large as those at the other four corners, so people could feel safer waiting here. 4740 Pearl Parkway 40.02277537 -105.2458155 I feel unsafe walking here Crossing here, going west or east, is scary. You need to keep an eye out ahead of you and behind you. Most drivers do not yield. Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway 4740 Pearl Parkway 40.0229438 -105.2434444 I feel unsafe bicycling here The light to cross Pearl on the Foothills path has a very long wait cycle, especially during rush hour. People often run the red light during gaps in traffic which is now legal, but still not very safe. See Gabe's suggestion for combining the left turn arrows with a longer walk cycle. 4740 Pearl Parkway 40.0229972 -105.2434391 I feel unsafe bicycling here Island is small for bikes to wait during red lights. Cars don't yield to bikes as they cross these various segments. 4740 Pearl Parkway 40.02286575 -105.2435303 I feel unsafe bicycling here The red light at the bike/pedestrian crossing is way too long. After a very long wait, when the westbound traffic on Pearl finally stops for the left turn signal from the eastbound traffic onto Foothills, bikes/pedestrians often start crossing on red but don't realize that the eastbound light is still green on Pearl. I have seen many near hits because the vision of the eastbound traffic is blocked by the left turners. The red phase needs to be shortened significantly and the left turn green from Pearl onto foothills should be moved to the beginning of the green cycle on Pearl. 5025 Pearl Parkway 40.02185815 -105.2348989 Other traffic safety concern The water fountain indicated at this location is never turned on. 5200 Pearl Parkway 40.02390884 -105.2312833 I feel unsafe walking here There is no safe way to walk to or from this bus stop. Who thought to put a bus stop where there's no sidewalk? Pearl Street/Pearl Parkway 5200 Pearl Parkway 40.02391177 -105.23125 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here There's no way to get from/to the bus stop from the multi-use path 5200 Pearl Parkway 40.02397449 -105.2311814 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here This is the worst bus stop location you could have. There is no sidewalk anywhere leading from this bus stop. It's just a field near the corporation yard. 5200 Pearl Parkway 40.02370739 -105.2315676 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is another steep downhill to a narrow tunnel with poor visibility and neglected lighting inside the tunnel. 5401 Pearl Parkway 40.02621275 -105.2273834 I feel unsafe walking here There is no safe way to walk to or from this bus stop. Who thought to put a bus stop where there's no sidewalk? Table Mesa Drive Table Mesa Drive Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment -Multiple people commented on pedestrian crossing concerns at Table Mesa Drive & Yale Road -Traffic volumes and speeds in general are a concern on Table Mesa Drive -People biking commented on bikeways being inadequate or feeling unsafe, in particular where the bike lane crosses the US 36 EB on- ramp -Multiple people noted concerns when making left-turn on the corridor, either because left-turn lanes are missing our queues spill out of left-turn lanes 35% 47% 0% 15% 3% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Table Mesa Drive 3201 Table Mesa Drive 39.98093105 -105.2562439 I feel unsafe driving here There are so many trees and shrubs that it is difficult to see oncoming traffic and pedestrians at the norther corner of Hartford and Table Mesa. 3202 Table Mesa Drive 39.98165823 -105.2553535 I feel unsafe walking here This is a major unsafe intersection for walking, biking and accessing buses for crossing Table Mesa via Yale Road. The car traffic is heavy and fast. The school crossing light only covers the east bound lanes. The west bound lane (plus the bike lane) which makes crossing two lanes of traffic are not covered by the crossing signal because the city doesn't recognize the danger to pedestrians who have to cross the bike lane first and stand in it while trying to find a break to cross the west bound traffic lane. They claim that the westbound lane is only one lane and thus doesn't need a signal. I watch all our young kids trying to bicycle across that intersection to go to the middle schools and Fairview High and it is dangerous. Please reexamine this decision and make the school crossing signal work for both west and eastbound traffic. Let's be inventive here for safety! 3202 Table Mesa Drive 39.98168577 -105.2553036 I feel unsafe walking here West-bound traffic on Table Mesa often does not yield to pedestrians in the cross walk. Table Mesa Drive 3202 Table Mesa Drive 39.98161712 -105.2552623 I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe letting my children cross this intersection by themselves- the pedestrian light only operates on the east bound and I fear they’ll assume traffic on west bound will stop too. It creates a false sense of security in an intersection where traffic is fast and screened by vegetation. 3202 Table Mesa Drive 39.98167467 -105.2553105 I feel unsafe walking here Traffic usually does not stop for pedestrains. 3202 Table Mesa Drive 39.98161507 -105.2552623 I feel unsafe walking here Table Mesa Drive 3400 Table Mesa Drive 39.98312565 -105.2540606 I feel unsafe walking here Traffic is too heavy and fast on Table Mesa Drive. If we truly want pedestrian/bike safety and 15 minutes neighborhoods, we need to make the areas adjacent to the shopping centers and transit centers safe for peds and bikes. There are few ped crosswalks on Table Mesa drive and on Gillespie. Cars coming down the hill move too fast. Transportation Dept: Please examine traffic flow in South Boulder. Note it is channeled to Gillespie then Table Mesa to access Broadway. For wildfire evacuation, for reducing traffic load on Gillespie/Table Mesa/shopping center and transit center, please consider putting signaled intersections at Darley and Broadway and Grinnell and Broadway to funnel traffic from south Boulder to Broadway as rapidly as possible. 3795 Table Mesa Drive 39.98562296 -105.2502573 I feel unsafe bicycling here Drivers are often looking east as they try to merge onto Table Mesa, so they don't see bikes/peds in the crosswalk. 3795 Table Mesa Drive 39.98487912 -105.2510926 I feel unsafe bicycling here Table Mesa drive is a high-traffic, and the bike lane here is narrow and unprotected. 3795 Table Mesa Drive 39.98496298 -105.2505523 I feel unsafe driving here Too many bikes drive down Table Mesa and then attempt to weave through traffic to access the bike lane to the north. Table Mesa Drive 3795 Table Mesa Drive 39.98489148 -105.250563 I feel unsafe walking here I'd like to add to the calls for safe bike/pedestrian infrastructure here. This is a natural crossing point from the shopping center to the Broadway underpass. The sidewalks across the intersection have curb cuts, but we need striping and yield signs here so people can safely cross all four lanes of Table Mesa Dr. to get to Harvard and the multi-use path. Drivers zoom through this area to make the green light at Broadway. It needs to be safer for everyone. 3910 Table Mesa Drive 39.985933 -105.2458048 Other traffic safety concern Speeding 3910 Table Mesa Drive 39.98583568 -105.2495778 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is a bike lane here, but cars often back up into the bike lane or crowd into (and then get stuck in) the bike lane in an effort to access the slip lane. Slip lanes suck; they need to go. 3910 Table Mesa Drive 39.98582779 -105.2478061 I feel unsafe walking here it takes way way too long when you press the button to get a safe pedestrian crossing at this location 4250 Table Mesa Drive 39.98586154 -105.245009 I feel unsafe walking here it takes way way too long when you press the button to get a safe pedestrian crossing at this location Table Mesa Drive 4401 Table Mesa Drive 39.98582969 -105.2434266 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike gutter here is not sufficient. This is a stressful ride. A lane should be taken to create protected bike infrastructure in both directions and a center turn lane created. But volume is high enough here that a roundabout would then be needed at Broadway and Table Mesa so that cars don't cue unreasonably during rush hour. 4640 Table Mesa Drive 39.98583432 -105.2417511 I feel unsafe driving here Left turns onto Martin are very stressful. Without a turn lane, one is always concerned about being rear ended while waiting for an opportunity to turn. That fear is compounded by the realization that, when stopped to await a chance to turn, cars approach from behind often change to the right lane at the last second, leaving the driver behind them with little time to realize and react to the fact that there is a stopped car ahead. 4655 Table Mesa Drive 39.98584778 -105.2421986 I feel unsafe walking here it takes way way too long when you press the button to get a safe pedestrian crossing at this location 4747 Table Mesa Drive 39.98604362 -105.2362454 I feel unsafe bicycling here The light here takes too long to cycle from red to green when peds or bikes are waiting to cross. It's a tiny island. Table Mesa Drive 4790 Table Mesa Drive 39.98579666 -105.2365083 I feel unsafe driving here As with at Broadway and Baseline, the approaching set of merges and transitions to 36 and Foothills are poorly signed, and drivers often can't figure out where they need to be until the last second, then merge wildly. Please put some better road signage here westbound. 4830 Table Mesa Drive 39.98584627 -105.2357197 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars going fast eastbound on Table Mesa sometimes take this onramp to 36 at 50- 60mph. Crossing this lane is super dangerous when you have to look behind you to see if someone is coming. 4880 Table Mesa Drive 39.98645088 -105.2348077 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is no safe way to cross over 36 by bike without a huge detour. This is a missing link in the Boulder bike path system. 4880 Table Mesa Drive 39.98591972 -105.2357486 I feel unsafe walking here it takes way too long when you press the button to get a safe pedestrian crossing at this location 4882 Table Mesa Drive 39.98654495 -105.2345586 I feel unsafe driving here The left turn here gets backed up and ends up overflowing into traffic lanes, it very hard to make a left here at certain times of the day. 4882 Table Mesa Drive 39.98650391 -105.234282 I feel unsafe bicycling here It's scary to ride your bike along the sidewalk where it becomes a bridge going over 36, and there's no way in hell I'm riding in the road. Cars drive like crap here. 4882 Table Mesa Drive 39.98650802 -105.2342767 I feel unsafe bicycling here This overpass pedestrian crossing is very narrow, too narrow for a bike and ped to get around one another, and the road is way too dangerous to bicycle on. Table Mesa Drive 4882 Table Mesa Drive 39.98657278 -105.2342695 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bike path way too narrow in both directions over this bridge. 4920 Table Mesa Drive 39.98706066 -105.2333787 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars need to quickly enter and exit this merge lane. Everytime I'm here, I feel like I'm going to die since I'm stuck in the middle on my bike. 4920 Table Mesa Drive 39.98697699 -105.2335954 I feel unsafe bicycling here The location of this bike lane between two confusing and high speed merges between traffic on Table Mesa, Foothills and 36 is incredibly unsafe and I am shocked that there has not yet been a fatality accident with a cyclist here. Drivers are barely able to merge between the lanes as-is (some stop at the curve on the offramp, others accelerate and cut in, and trying to merge in this traffic is distracting enough without adding slow-moving bikes directly into the center of this mix. Please re-do the bike path or this entire interchange before someone gets killed. Table Mesa Drive 4920 Table Mesa Drive 39.98661529 -105.2338207 I feel unsafe bicycling here This entire intersection is a mess, tons of people use the Table Mesa park-and-ride and it is directly across from popular cycling routes (Apache road is a direct line into CU campus and on to downtown) yet there is no way to connect between the PnR and this pathway without convoluted and unsafe crossings that are inconvenient and confusing. This is really screaming out for an underpass from the Park and Ride and Apache rd, could be routed under the existing table Mesa bridge and then under the on-ramp onto Apache rd where a separated bike path could be built on the West side of Apache connecting directly to the CU Williams Village property and providing a safe and efficient north- south bike "Highway" for in-commuters to the park-and-ride and points beyond. 4920 Table Mesa Drive 39.98701398 -105.2333003 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike lane in between the westbound traffic on table mesa, the off-ramp off of Foothills, and the on-ramp onto 36 is extremely dangerous. Cars crossing from all sides who have to watch out for too many things all at once. Table Mesa Drive 5170 Table Mesa Drive 39.98656995 -105.2326781 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bicycle thieves have access cards to the secured cage for bikes, and have stolen bikes from here. RTD police do not have an access card to get into the cage so on at least one instance, the thieves just stayed inside the cage and refused to come out until RTD police left. 5176 Table Mesa Drive 39.98713728 -105.2325386 I feel unsafe walking here Cars using the right turn lane here rare driving fast and do not slow down for pedestrians to cross to the intersection 5176 Table Mesa Drive 39.98721499 -105.2325869 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is a very sketchy crossing for bikes. Cars exiting Foothills treat this like a freeway ON ramp and speed up as they turn the corner. Valmont Road Valmont Road Summary Highlighted text indicates that comment is a possible Inquire Boulder-type comment. Grey text indicates that comment is on a High Risk Network corridor Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 2790 Valmont Road 40.02924006 -105.2597523 I feel unsafe bicycling here Friend's bike wheel was stolen while he was at the Rayback and it was abandoned in this tunnel. There seems to be a bike theft ring operating in the area. -Multiple people cited concerns regarding conflicts between people driving and people biking -Multiple people made comments about the condition of the shared-use path crossings underneath Valmont Road -Multiple people commented on long delay at signals for people walking to cross 23% 65% 6% 0% 6% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Valmont Road 3966 Valmont Road 40.02928626 -105.2445924 I feel unsafe bicycling here Island is small for bikes to wait during red lights. Cars don't yield to bikes as they cross these various segments. 3966 Valmont Road 40.02925751 -105.244984 I feel unsafe bicycling here Island is small for bikes to wait during red lights. Cars don't yield to bikes as they cross these various segments. 3966 Valmont Road 40.02942337 -105.2445227 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars turning right on to Foothills from Valmont at this corner often stop on the raised crosswalk. I've been riding down the hill and had to slam on brakes to avoid hitting cars broadside who had stopped right in my path, with no regard for the cyclists. Visibility for car drivers is poor here because they would need to turn and look behind themselves a bit just to see the bikes coming. 3966 Valmont Road 40.02875637 -105.2444208 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is always (!) lots of sand and dirt on the bike path in this location. The prairie dogs dig it up and the rain washes it onto the bike path. Also, I have had a prairie dog run into my bike (the back tire so I couldn't brake in time). As much as I love prairie dogs, mixing them with bikes is not a good idea. Valmont Road 4774 Valmont Road 40.02928177 -105.2417171 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is poor visibility due to overgrown vegetation here, and a very bad transition from the end of the bike path to the sidewalk, with a utility box and other impediments thrown in along with uneven pavement and trash on the sidewalk and along the side of the road here. It can be very dangerous to pull out into the street from the bike path because cars approaching the right lane at 47th often drive right where a bike would come off the path into the street. 4850 Valmont Road 40.02904065 -105.2395273 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here There is no way to cross the street here if you get off the east-bound bus. 5013 Valmont Road 40.0292488 -105.2378172 I feel unsafe bicycling here The southbound approach to this underpass from the north is very steep and needs a convex mirror at the tunnel so cyclists can see oncoming others. My kid had a head-on collision with an electric scooter rider here, which gave them a concussion and totally wrecked their bike. During winter months, water dripping from the roadway freezes into sheets of ice and creates a dangerously slick surface to be going so fast on. The lights in the tunnel are frequently broken or burned out. There's a drainage ditch along one side that kids can fall into. This tunnel is the worst in Boulder. Valmont Road 5095 Valmont Road 40.0292078 -105.2345771 I feel unsafe bicycling here The signal here takes more than 90 seconds to cycle from red to green when the button is pressed, and sometimes doesn't change at all, with the pedestrian light going from green to flashing red and back to green for the Valmont direction. There is poor visibility here. Sheriff deputies going to and from the jail drive dangerously erratically and way too fast, too, but who's going to enforce that? 5095 Valmont Road 40.02915071 -105.2346468 I feel unsafe walking here Light takes a really long time to change. Kids heading to/from the bike park often cross against the light because it's too long 5150 Valmont Road 40.0281607 -105.2333111 Other traffic safety concern I know the open space planners intend to build another giant parking lot here, completely allowing the historic house to dilapidate. It would be so much nicer if there was a Rayback-like food area that incorporates and restores the historic Roney house 5465 Valmont Road 40.02915011 -105.2258437 I feel unsafe bicycling here The priority turn lane that crosses the bike lane is very uncomfortable here with cars speeding up to pass bikes or speeding up once they are clear just to slow into a turn Valmont Road 5500 Valmont Road 40.02795043 -105.2249426 I feel unsafe bicycling here Riding north across Valmont, a car stopped right on the raised crosswalk as I was about to enter it. To avoid hitting the car I slammed on the brakes and slid on loose gravel left over from ice/snow control measures, pretty much sliding underneath the stopped SUV. If you're going to spread gravel here, there must be a concerted effort to clean it up thoroughly with street sweepers and not leave piles of loose sand/gravel in the roadway on the raised crosswalk. 5660 Valmont Road 40.02630796 -105.2219331 I feel unsafe walking here Bikes coming down the hill westbound are moving fast and there's very little room for error on these turns, especially when there ice and snow here. 5684 Valmont Road 40.0285014 -105.2236176 I feel unsafe walking here This underpass has not had working lighting for years, and is poorly maintained because the city says this is county property, and the county never comes out for anything. It's sketchy and always mosquito filled in warmer weather. 5686 Valmont Road 40.02904391 -105.222373 I feel unsafe bicycling here Riding on Valmont from 55th to Indian road at night is difficult as westbound traffic headlights are blinding, making it difficult to ride on very rough road. 5686 Valmont Road 40.02922946 -105.2206403 I feel unsafe walking here Dangerous crossing for Valmont Other Streets Other Streets Address Latitude Longitude Comment Category Comment 2670 13th Street 40.02539025 -105.2805029 I feel unsafe bicycling here Weird blind intersection makes me worried a car is going to blow through the intersection without seeing me. Could make it a roundabout 1513 13th Street 40.01238043 -105.2771866 I feel unsafe walking here 2670 13th Street 40.02548661 -105.280475 I feel unsafe driving here This is an awkward intersection and should be modified and improved. Since 13th st. makes a jog at Alpine, it confuses drivers. Realignment or a roundabout would improve the intersection. 38% 44% 6% 6% 6% Comment Category Summary I feel unsafe walking here I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe accessing public transit here I feel unsafe driving here Other traffic safety concern Other Streets 2129 13th Street 40.01965734 -105.2793646 I feel unsafe bicycling here Hit a pothole here and went over my handlebars into the pavement. Still healing from the injury. All the alleys downtown need road maintenance, mostly pothole fills. 1900 13th Street 40.01720541 -105.2783561 I feel unsafe bicycling here I really miss the bike counter at this location. It hasn't been replaced since a car hit it in 2021 1513 13th Street 40.0124056 -105.2777821 I feel unsafe bicycling here I would rather take my chances going northbound along Broadway than detour through this encampment for unhoused people. Why has the city allowed the Arboretum to become a trash pile? 2037 13th Street 40.01887264 -105.2790052 I feel unsafe bicycling here Too many people walking in the bike path especially with the outdoor dining taking up so much of the sidewalk. I love outdoor dining, but maybe add more sidewalk back here instead to reduce the walker/biker conflicts. 1513 13th Street 40.01244702 -105.2775192 I feel unsafe walking here Lots of weird stuff going on at night in here. Been verbally harassed and threatened by people camping here. Another place to never walk or bike alone at night. 2820 13th Street 40.02694927 -105.2803731 I feel unsafe walking here Homeowners in this area often don't shovel nor trim their bushes back. Walkers end up in the street very commonly here. 2353 13th Street 40.02244632 -105.2801371 I feel unsafe walking here Do NOT try to walk thru this intersection during school pickup times. It's crazy. Cars everywhere doing unexpected things. Other Streets 2441 13th Street 40.02302549 -105.2802765 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars park in the bike lines blocking safe passage by bike through here nearly everyday during school pickup here. I avoid this area at all costs during those times. Driver's are just completely bonkers here then. 1513 13th Street 40.01258252 -105.2773315 I feel unsafe bicycling here No lights biking at night, sharp turns, and unknown people in the bushes. It's like a horror maze not knowing what might pop out of the dark when biking through here at night. Please add lights to this path. 2133 13th Street 40.01988738 -105.2792788 I feel unsafe bicycling here Convert parking to back-in angled to improve sightlines on this key bike route. 1919 14th Street 40.01735669 -105.2769989 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here Contraflow bike lane or two-way conversion needed to provide access to the downtown transit center. There's currently a 2-block gap if you're trying to access the station from the east. 1820 15th Street 40.01679384 -105.2754003 I feel unsafe walking here As a pedestrian, I was struck in the crosswalk with a walk signal by a SB car on 15th street who was turning right onto WB Canyon Blvd. The driver was at a red light and looking left for an opening in vehicle traffic, and did not see me enter the crosswalk (I was traveling EB through crosswalk). I believe that a contributing factor is that the pedestrian traffic along Canyon Blvd is set back further from the street than the other sidewalks, so a driver may not notice approaching pedestrians until they are already to the corner. Other Streets 2224 15th Street 40.02074199 -105.2767659 I feel unsafe walking here I have almost been hit here and have almost hit someone here, both times at night. Overall, street lighting is very poor throughout Boulder. Trees do not seem to be appropriately pruned to allow light to reach the street. 1900 15th Street 40.01771001 -105.2757221 Other traffic safety concern Throughout central Boulder, bicyclists ignore red light signals and stop signs, significantly increasing the chance of being hit by a car or hitting a pedestrian. I see this happen every day when I am in downtown Boulder. Boulder needs a high visibility education campaign to change behaviors and help everyone understand our responsibility to follow the rules to keep everyone safe. Perhaps a bicycle licensing program that requires safety training would help. Bicycle safety required every year in school including videos and photos of injuries and interviews with people whose lives have changed from injuries would help as well. Increased enforcement might help as well. Note this problem is not just a few wild teenagers. I’ve seen parents do this while riding with their kids. 3365 15th Street 40.03591121 -105.278399 I feel unsafe bicycling here The gravel that spills out from private property into the street has caused me several fallsand near falls here. Please, can the gravel be cleaned up much more regularly? Other Streets 3205 15th Street 40.03399331 -105.2783668 I feel unsafe walking here People on bikes go whizzing around this blind corner so fast that my kids and I have nearly been run into several times (actually hit once, but luckily no major injury). Can something be done about bike speed in this area? I've seen other walkers get injured here as well, near the mailboxes. 3230 15th Street 40.03384562 -105.2777177 I feel unsafe walking here Many people on bikes take this corner waaaaay too fast and too sharp and almost run into my family, my pets, and I. It's really been close. I know one person who really got clobbered by a bike here. Is there someway to slow down bikes in this section? 2775 15th Street 40.02672306 -105.276618 I feel unsafe driving here Drivers often do not yield to those already in the circle in this intersection. I think its partly due to poor visibility because the weeds in the circle are so high that its hard to see oncoming traffic. 1965 15th Street 40.01850291 -105.2759421 Crossing one-way streets as a pedestrian doesn't feel safe. 3930 17th Street 40.04631022 -105.2754807 I feel unsafe walking here The new barriers on Quince divert traffic onto 17th. 1328 17th Street 40.01331764 -105.2724874 I feel unsafe bicycling here The road conditions for bicylists coming down this hill northbound are perilous. I've very nearly bit it many times coming down this hill and hitting a patch of pothole or uneven pavement. Other Streets 1511 17th Street 40.01455406 -105.2725196 I feel unsafe driving here Cars turning left from westbound Arapahoe onto 17th have a turn arrow, but must run a gauntlet of high schoolers who cross sometimes when the light is red for them. As a result only maybe one car gets to turn during high-volume times and the backup onto Arapahoe can stretch back more than a block 1205 17th Street 40.0108689 -105.2727878 I feel unsafe bicycling here There's a median in the center of the road that narrows the lanes in both directions right here, and makes cycling on the road very dangerous, because cars cannot stay within their lane lines on this turn. It's a 25 mph speed limit but I find I cannot safely navigate this curve at greater than 15 in a car. 2805 17th Street 40.026797 -105.2748263 I feel unsafe bicycling here The pavement leading up to the stopsign at 17th/balsam is in terrible condition here 4195 17th Street 40.05074109 -105.2756256 Other traffic safety concern Ped crossing and path connection improvements needed to connect to school and park 1205 17th Street 40.01089397 -105.2727073 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars drive over bike lane, which makes a steep climb around a corner unsafe and challenging 3975 19th Street 40.04752576 -105.2728844 I feel unsafe driving here Barriers on the corners of 19th reduce the road width. Cars turning in sometime get too close to each other. Recommend increasing moving the barriers a couple of feet. Other Streets 3840 19th Street 40.04348611 -105.2726139 I feel unsafe bicycling here Near misses from left turns onto 19th, with students going to Centennial down Norwood. Drivers do not stop for crosswalk. 3548 19th Street 40.03924144 -105.2725939 I feel unsafe bicycling here 19th narrows for a short section. I do have a friend who fell at the curb feeling boxed in by cars for this narrow section. Either bike lane or wident this bike lane sidewalk 3325 19th Street 40.03480257 -105.2726912 I feel unsafe walking here Cars drive too fast down 19th, considering it is a residential area. Please consider adding stop signs. 3548 19th Street 40.0392424 -105.2725518 I feel unsafe bicycling here Agree with the other comment. Where this narrows it feels unsafe on a bike with cars whizzing by. 3540 19th Street 40.03882759 -105.272643 I feel unsafe bicycling here I concur about the narrowed lane here. Bicycling here on 19th is not safe. 3595 19th Street 40.04007202 -105.2727234 I feel unsafe bicycling here It is often difficult to cross 19th at Kalmia because 19th St. cars do not have a stop sign nor a yield sign. Some do stop as courtesy, but often there are both thru cars and turning cars and one cannot know that both will yield. 3500 19th Street 40.03725868 -105.2726698 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bike facility upgrades needed due to underutilized on street parking and conflicts at the Iris/19th intersection. 3722 19th Street 40.04207208 -105.2720261 I feel unsafe walking here 19th street between iris and violet is incredibly unsafe. Folks don't stop for pedestrians or bicyclists, very few are doing 30, speeds are ridiculous here! I have watched so many near misses and I live across from Centennial Middle School. I fear for the kids... Other Streets 700 20th Street 40.00068057 -105.2669406 Other traffic safety concern There is no more "Baseline Middle School" - it's just New Vista High School now 2800 20th Street 40.02758658 -105.2712715 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bike lanes are too curved and narrow here to feel safe. I often feel like I'm right next to the cars. 1803 22nd Street 40.01717102 -105.2661896 I feel unsafe walking here Due to the high speeds of traffic and four through lanes, I do not feel safe crossing Canyon using the blinking pedestrian signals. It is also a long distance between protected stoplights getting between 17th and Folsom for such a dense urban area. I would feel safer if at least one more stoplight were added at 19th and/or 22nd St to slow traffic and provide a properly- protected signalized crossing for pedestrians, cyclists, and turning cars. 1692 22nd Street 40.01457529 -105.2662486 I feel unsafe bicycling here Missing link in NS low-stress greenway to CU. Visibility is good but motorists don't stop for pedestrians or bikes here. No median refuge for pedestrians. There is a pedestrian light 0.5 block away but there's typically a significant wait to cross. Bikes need to ride on sidewalks to access this. 2247 23rd Street 40.02287838 -105.2662774 I feel unsafe bicycling here 23rd st. should have a STOP sign, not a yield sign before entering Pine st. In order to prevent cyclists from being hit. Other Streets 4326 26th Street 40.05380845 -105.2635825 I feel unsafe driving here High speed and high volume of traffic on 28th, combine with lack of any acceleration lane when turning onto SB 28th from SB 26th make this a difficult intersection. 2131 26th Street 40.02311223 -105.2613831 I feel unsafe walking here Sidewalks missing on several stretches of 26th Street between Pearl and Mapleton 3434 26th Street 40.03736883 -105.2632075 I feel unsafe walking here I was hit by a car while on my bike at this intersection. Cars regularly move into the northbound bike lane to go around someone waiting to turn left onto Juniper. I've also been intimidated by motorists while trying to cross at the cross walk and I've seen that happen to another pedestrian. Drivers sometimes speed while headed south, probably to make the green light (usually a short green) at Iris which is very close. Vegetation hides the west side of the crosswalk. I think it would help to at least have some posts protecting the bike lane and defining the crosswalk here. 2131 26th Street 40.0236009 -105.2614689 I feel unsafe walking here No sidewalks! 2131 26th Street 40.02337493 -105.2612221 I feel unsafe bicycling here Potholes filled with water in this alleyway makes it hard to bike up to Community Cycles when I want to go work on my bike. The temporary fixes that happen don't last very long. Maybe more of this particular alley should be paved instead since it's so heavily used by bicyclists. Other Streets 645 27th Way 40.00024332 -105.2601385 I feel unsafe bicycling here Coming from Marin Acres and going towards the 28th bike path one has to cross this intersection, which means waiting for 2 and sometimes 3 traffic lights, all with inadequate waiting space, where people often crowd and occasionally occupy the road. Alternatively, I prefer going under the 27th underpass and around the basemar shopping center, but that is a long detour which has several intersection with incoming/outgoing vehicles 836 28th Street Frontage Road 40.00366977 -105.2583282 I feel unsafe bicycling here With the underpass, this intersection does not feel safe for pedestrians and cyclists 28th Street Frontage Road 40.00865421 -105.258331 I feel unsafe bicycling here There's a stop sign here, but it is impossible for a cyclist traveling north to know if a vehicle is exiting 36/28 at an appropriate time to make a choice about when to proceed. Coming South there is too much intersection to get across to know if you will conflict with a driver exiting 36/28. It's a really uncomfortable intersection 28th Street Frontage Road 40.00807091 -105.2583146 I feel unsafe driving here All the weird no turn signs make this a very confusing intersection to drive in 1855 29th Street 40.01978057 -105.2561527 I feel unsafe walking here The current construction has taken over the east-side sidewalk making it not possible to walk. There is no sidewalk on the other side of this street to cross to between the Meta Burger and the Panera Bread. Other Streets 1680 29th Street 40.01700476 -105.2560704 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars blow through this intersection without stopping at the stop sign and the lanes are not marked well and NO BIKE LANE? 3148 29th Street 40.03213278 -105.2565175 I feel unsafe walking here YOU ADDED SPEED BUMPS BUT NOT A CONTINUOS SIDEWALK!! I've almost been hit several times on this stupid stretch of road. 2730 29th Street 40.0277007 -105.2559596 I feel unsafe walking here The sidewalk in here stinks when pushing a stroller. It's too close to the street and the sloping part of every driveway intersects the sidewalk, forcing strollers and im assuming wheelchairs down the ramp into the street over and over. 2845 29th Street 40.02905623 -105.2560079 I feel unsafe bicycling here The priority of this light is given to Valmont traffic. Time between cycles is very long and it's usually just easier to run across without the light because you could be waiting forever for the light to actually change. Zoë's Kitchen 40.01719236 -105.2572954 I feel unsafe driving here Crossing Canyon north-south on this lane is unsafe for everyone, car drivers included. The Canyon drivers have no stop sign. Those driving west often want to speed up to "make" the light at 28th. Make it a 4-way stop. Other Streets 1975 31st Street 40.02250424 -105.2517217 I feel unsafe walking here Since this bridge was re-opened following construction, this road sees a decent amount of through traffic moving at speed and due to the knoll visibility is low. This should be made a semi-porous barrier for cycling and pedestrians as it is not an arterial and the route is well-serviced by adjacent 30th St. Advance Auto Parts 40.01669114 -105.2512497 I feel unsafe bicycling here This whole stretch of road between 30th and 33rd, and adjacent to the police station, is full of potholes and has no lane dividers. Very unsafe to bicycle through here. It's hard to believe this is a public street and not just a badly maintained parking lot. 3390 34th Street 40.03646189 -105.2489322 I feel unsafe bicycling here Disconnect between the official bike routing (when going east cross 34th, then Iris) and what cyclists actually do (cross diagonally), plus cars aren't expecting a bicyclist to cross one street and then the other. A diagonal crosswalk would better capture the situation 3200 34th Street 40.03799386 -105.2489483 I feel unsafe bicycling here Northbound cars on 34th tend to pull into the crossing, blocking eastbound bikes and making it unclear whether the driver sees the bike. 3050 34th Street 40.02886317 -105.2492595 When I get off the bus I want to feel safe, especially at night Other Streets 885 35th Street 40.00368277 -105.248369 Other traffic safety concern I agree with Hollie. The addition of the flexible delineators along Aurora is confusing as well, as it's like having more cars parked along the street, making bicycle riders on Aurora merge with auto traffic more frequently. And there is still a lot of speeding on Aurora, even with the circle and delineators. 880 35th Street 40.00362935 -105.2483046 Other traffic safety concern I agree with other commenters: iron out the traffic circle, and make it permanent. 705 35th Street 40.00026117 -105.2483743 I feel unsafe bicycling here Poor visibility for bicyclists on the frontage road, plus drivers flying off of Baseline or running the stop signs pose a real danger. Bad parking (off the curb, right at the corner) further reduce the amount of space and visibility for bikers. A bike lane here is sorely needed 1060 35th Street 40.00590843 -105.2483375 I feel unsafe driving here Difficult to see east-west traffic when stopped at the stop sign. A 4-way stop here would be great 1060 35th Street 40.0059099 -105.2483368 I feel unsafe walking here Needs 4 way stop. Visibility too poor to reliably cross from the stop sign. 830 35th Street 40.00260298 -105.2482422 I feel unsafe driving here I agree with other posted points. Cross traffic from aurora moves much too easily through the roundabout. I regularly see drivers going 25+ through ignoring the posted rules because theres nothing to make them do otherwise. It needs to be a much more permanent addition, or just a stop sign. The current design is dangerous for all users. Other Streets 700 35th Street 40.000194 -105.2483743 I feel unsafe walking here The City hired a Transportation Consultant that advised us to block of vehicle access to the south end of 35th street. This has not happened and vehicles speed down this road with reckless abandon making it unsafe for pedestrians and cycling commuters. I have Personally witness a commuter getting hit by a car with resulting hospitalization. Please close access to 35th street from Baseline. Thank you. 700 35th Street 40.00018579 -105.2483582 I feel unsafe bicycling here This intersection is a designated bike route, yet crossing the frontage road or fully crossing baseline is terrifying! 880 35th Street 40.00364579 -105.2483153 Other traffic safety concern The recently traffic circle is a step in the right direction, but it is so wonky!! It has been awkward for all users, and most do not properly use. This is a safety issue for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists alike! 1700 38th Street 40.01647709 -105.2414221 I feel unsafe walking here Large encampments of unhoused people under the Foothills bridge here. Stolen bicycle chop shop, drug use, and lots of trash. Feels pretty sketchy walking here. 465 South 40th Street 39.98587083 -105.2473619 I feel unsafe walking here Very busy with traffic during AM and PM rush hour, cars do not stop at crosswalk, no safe way for kids to cross to school 755 South 41st Street 39.98231587 -105.2463895 I feel unsafe walking here See my note for intersection of Hanover and Broadway. Feel unsafe walking, biking, and driving here Other Streets 1589 48th Street 40.01450838 -105.2348228 I feel unsafe walking here I find it very difficult to use crosswalk here on foot. The vehicles make fast turns onto 48th st from Arapahoe and so if you're in the crosswalk to get to Foothills Hospital you have to be very careful. at least the hospital is nearby if you do get hit (hope not) 1795 48th Street 40.01795054 -105.2348346 I feel unsafe walking here There are always RVs and people camping parked along this stretch of road. They set up folding chairs that block the sidewalk. This is not a public campsite for RVs. 1589 48th Street 40.01483782 -105.2347809 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars turning left onto westbound Arapahoe from 48th frequently don't yield to bicycles, who are climbing a hill on southbound 48th until the intersection. 2580 49th Street 40.02550269 -105.2383965 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is one of the worst maintained streets in Boulder, with deep ruts and potholes. Lots of commercial vehicles use this road and it's always like riding on a dirt road, but it's broken up tarmac. 3282 4th Street 40.03459958 -105.2916026 I feel unsafe walking here 4th is a popular route for walkers, runner, and cyclists. But cars are also using it as a Broadway bypass and it gets dangerous, particularly where narrow with parked cars. Would be great to see planter barriers as various places along 4th so cars can't go thru but bikes/peds can. Or make 4th one way for cars. Other Streets 3580 4th Street 40.03899819 -105.2913201 I feel unsafe bicycling here Where 4th bikeway spills out into the corner of Kalmia&4th see a lot of near misses. Cars don't stop because there's no cross street. Bikes come fast down path and it's a blind corner. 2036 4th Street 40.01664594 -105.2908605 I feel unsafe walking here Substantial high speed auto traffic on 4th street to by bass other N/S routes in Boulder. Pedestrians are easily overlooked by drivers at the corner of 4th and Spruce, HP 40.02617688 -105.223918 Other traffic safety concern Unhoused people camp along the creek here, filling the trash cans with rubbish and making a mess of the office picnic area, and they have trashed the water fountain that's here 1595 55th Street 40.01452599 -105.2254415 I feel unsafe walking here Constantly turning vehicles on flashing yellows and right on red. Blind spots and drivers assume no one is in crosswalk. If in cross walk on foot can't walk across here easily without sprinting across Arapahoe. 690 55th Street 40.00021001 -105.2254415 I feel unsafe walking here hard to sprint across baseline/55th here on foot. doesn't feel safe. 808 55th Street 40.00181308 -105.2253127 I feel unsafe walking here vehicles go fast and hardly ever stop here trying to use crosswalk to cross 55th 2901 55th Street 40.02770481 -105.2252162 I feel unsafe bicycling here Road is in poor condition, and it is difficult to negotiate intersection traffic while avoiding potholes and rough road. I usually turn from 55th onto Valmont going east, during the evening when bike path seems a dicey choice. Other Streets 1842 55th Street 40.01692929 -105.2251407 I feel unsafe bicycling here this section of 55th is very unfriendly to bikes. lots of debris in the roadway. not a nice railroad crossing experience 71 55th Street 39.98710029 -105.2235532 I feel unsafe bicycling here This part of 55th is necked down and has a speed bump too. It forces me to take the whole lane. Unlike the new markings on 55th near Baseline, there are none hear to alert cars. 121 55th Street 39.98807439 -105.2235264 I feel unsafe bicycling here This part of 55th is necked down and has a speed bump too. It forces me to take the whole lane. Unlike the new markings on 55th near Baseline, there are none hear to alert cars. 1700 55th Street 40.015211 -105.2252591 I feel unsafe bicycling here This sidewalk is terrible, on both sides of 55th, for bicycles. 2108 55th Street 40.01982534 -105.2256507 I feel unsafe bicycling here The little jogs in the sidewalks on this side of 55th near the pharma plant are very dangerous when there's snow and ice on the ground, and difficult to navigate at any time 1925 55th Street 40.01855847 -105.2255809 I feel unsafe bicycling here These are pretty dangerous crossings for bikes, even after the "silent crossing" improvements, which as far as I can tell are just not that improved 2995 55th Street 40.0292081 -105.2253664 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars exiting Minshal Rd must stop but cars on 55th making the turn to Valmont do not. It makes it very hard to gauge when it's safe to ride across Minshal east and continue to the bike path when one direction of cars does not have to stop or even slow down. Other Streets 2901 55th Street 40.02784447 -105.2252966 Conflicts between bicyclists and cars due to lack of sidewalks/path and narrow lane 2901 55th Street 40.02741727 -105.2250874 Concerned about crossing intersection and homeless encampments. 4189 57th Street 40.05082154 -105.2206654 I feel unsafe walking here Jay is quite bad for speeding and often when turning onto 57th do not yield to bikes or pedestrians 3500 North 61st Street 40.03931222 -105.2114725 I feel unsafe bicycling here !!! This is probably not City, but what is up with this interface? Cars are not expecting this crosswalk, and often cannot stop for cyclists because of traffic behind them. This path, if it connects to the Creek path, will be awesome, but this intersection/interface is crazy bad. Eventually, habitual drivers and cyclists will be aware of this crosswalk in the middle of nowhere, but not everyone travels on the same road everyday, and newcomers will have no idea to be wary of this area. 3500 North 61st Street 40.03931633 -105.2114403 I feel unsafe driving here Very dangerous! Drivers can't see bikes moving at full speed into the intersection. I was going the speed limit and barely had time to avoid hitting a bike that was oblivious to approaching traffic. Other Streets 2650 9th Street 40.0255359 -105.285657 I feel unsafe driving here I cross 9th st on Alpine frequently (in my car), and feel unsafe at this intersection. The hill and dip just south (on 9th) makes this a difficult intersection to negotiate. I would urge the City to engineer a way to lower the hill (sounds crazy but I think very doable) or make it a 4-way stop intersection. 1650 9th Street 40.01423553 -105.2827374 I feel unsafe walking here Bikes often don't stop for pedestrians on this path. 2339 9th Street 40.02056112 -105.2848873 I feel unsafe driving here Lots of inadequate intersections in boulder but I think this is is by far the worse. Hard to see driving off of Mapleton because of the hill. 1909 9th Street 40.01651447 -105.2837151 I feel unsafe walking here I've almost been hit by cars going too fast around right turns here multiple times 1881 9th Street 40.01437356 -105.282771 I feel unsafe bicycling here Pedestrians are blissfully unaware and they stagger into the path of heavy bicycle traffic in this area, paying no attention to anything or anyone else around them. 2650 9th Street 40.02535105 -105.2856088 I feel unsafe driving here People go way too fast down 9th and there aren't enough controlled crossings. Have nearly been hit driving across on Alpine a few times! 2650 9th Street 40.02548661 -105.2856785 I feel unsafe driving here Poor visibility due to hill crossing 9th on Alpine or turning left onto SB 9th. Some cars pick up too much speed going down the hill so it is difficult to judge. I avoid this intersection and cross 9th at Balsam or Maxwell where there are all-way stops. Other Streets 1881 9th Street 40.01444372 -105.2827495 Other traffic safety concern Clearer delineation between where walkers should walk and where bikers should bike would be very helpful here. Often times seeing people walking in the bike path, but it's not really clear that they shouldn't be. They don't really have a good place to be. (I might have the location a little off, it's really close to this area tho. There isn't a separate walking path at the spot I'm thinking of tho.) 1881 9th Street 40.01466978 -105.2832806 I feel unsafe bicycling here auto traffic merging onto 9th st from Canyon is often distracted and only focused on spotting high speed traffic traveling south bound on 9th street. Cyclists can easily be overlooked. 2339 9th Street 40.02052826 -105.2848381 I feel unsafe driving here This should be a 4 way stop intersection. Feel unsafe as it's hard to see other cars coming from other directions. 2339 9th Street 40.02049539 -105.2848363 Other traffic safety concern I feel unsafe walking/biking here because there is no stop control for 9th St. Cars zoom over the crest of the hill and it is hard to cross 9th St 2339 9th Street 40.02050641 -105.2848997 I feel unsafe driving here This intersection regularly has a lot of close calls because the people stopped on mapleton can not see the drivers on 9th and the drivers on 9th can't see pedestrians and bicyclists crossing the road. Other Streets 3100 Airport Road 40.02924933 -105.2346039 I feel unsafe walking here The signal at this intersection frequently fails to switch when someone presses the crosswalk button while it's flashing for the east-west direction and about to change. It will flash red in the E-W direction then go back to green E-W and the light doesn't cycle. This is right by the bike park and families with kids ride here all the time. The light cycle is hostile to the needs of cyclists or pedestrians, advantaging cars on Valmont over everything else. When I called traffic engineering about this, they told me it's because the signals are timed. I don't care about the minor inconvenience to cars. I care about the number of kids I see riding across the red every single day, dangerously crossing Valmont because the signal never seems to change for them. 1911 Alpine Avenue 40.02555075 -105.2725268 Other traffic safety concern There are rocks, sand and other debris in the road from the "private street" that goes up the hill from here. Very sketchy for biking and walking/running Other Streets 880 Alpine Avenue 40.02552006 -105.2856782 I feel unsafe walking here 9th and Alpine is a high traffic intersection, with many people walking to North Boulder park or to the Sanitas open space. There is an all-way stop at Balsam and 9th, but there is not at Alpine, and almost every day I see a motorist ignoring the yield to pedestrian sign and have seen numerous close calls. Motorists often speed over the hill and don't look for pedestrians 1911 Alpine Avenue 40.02546196 -105.2723694 Other traffic safety concern sight lines are terrible. I've had a handful of incidents where cars just didn't seem to see anyone else in the intersection. Bikes also routinely run the stop sign when cars are stopped and signaling to turn. 1310 Alpine Avenue 40.02549509 -105.2803677 I feel unsafe walking here The way the pedestrian striping is set, you are almost guaranteed to have a car/walker conflict here. I've found it safer to ignore the crosswalk striping and just cross where I'm most visible to the people in cars. 3806 Angelovic Court 40.04382158 -105.2526605 I feel unsafe walking here I appreciate the Vision Zero focus on this stretch of Palo. There are still long stretches where folks speed, and frequently vehicles don't actually slow down and instead take up the middle of the road, causing oncoming vehicles to wait rather than both proceed slowly. We still have many vehicles going quite fast through here and vehicles just hitting the plastic bollards. A more durable and impactful solution would be welcomed. Other Streets 4025 Apache Road 39.99244599 -105.2442825 I feel unsafe walking here The sidewalk along apache rd has a lot of busy intersections that people don't stop at completely. The visibility at intersections is bad and there are many large vehicles that are parked nearly full time on apache all the way to pawnee. People often walk in the street because the sidewalks are not wide enough or comfortable to use. This is a core arterial for pedestrian traffic in this part of boulder 4025 Apache Road 39.99259391 -105.2446267 I feel unsafe bicycling here The biking on Apache is a similarly dangerous experience. Drivers regularly drive 30-45 mph down this road with little concerns for cyclists. There is no paint on this road and there a lot of large vehicles that can easily obstruct intersections and visibility. Let's paint apache, get pedestrians off the road and make this a more enjoyable and safer experience for the hundreds of people that use this artery to get around every day. 3355 Apache Road 39.99660386 -105.2490438 I feel unsafe bicycling here CU needs to prune shrubbery to make this path feel safer and have more visibility 4555 Apache Road 39.98748666 -105.2359605 I feel unsafe driving here People do not stop at this stop sign and I have had near hits many times at this frontage road entrance from the 36 on ramp Other Streets 4555 Apache Road 39.98800163 -105.2367129 I feel unsafe bicycling here The road narrows significantly here, but cars don't slow down and there's not enough room or visibility for cars to pass cyclists safely here. 4225 Apache Road 39.99035957 -105.2407569 I feel unsafe bicycling here Road is too wide and people speed on it. This is a core road for cycling transportation around the area. I regularly bike at the speed limit and get constantly passed by cars. 3015 Ash Avenue 39.99280085 -105.2582878 I feel unsafe driving here The combination of traffic from Broadway, Lashley and Ash make this intersection dangerous for cars, bikes, and pedestrians alike. There should be a stop sign where Ash meets Lashley heading west. Turning left from the intersection heading south onto Broadway is also terrifying. I wish the city had put a light at this intersection when they added the light at Rayleigh road. 3015 Ash Avenue 39.99280177 -105.2582944 I feel unsafe bicycling here There are a lot of car, pedestrian & bike conflicts here. 3005 Aurora Avenue 40.00373619 -105.2530199 I feel unsafe driving here When on westbound Aurora Ave and turning right on red (northbound on 30th) it is difficult to see other northbound traffic without pulling out into and past the crosswalk. Other Streets 3190 Aurora Avenue 40.00375751 -105.2510427 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars immediately gun it down Aurora between 35th and 30th, easily going 40+ MPH. This section and the crossing to Arrowwood park is especially dangerous because of speeders! I urge the city to consider physical speed controls in this stretch (e.g. speed table), or better yet traffic control plus making Aurora one way. 3055 Aurora Avenue 40.00370743 -105.2526981 I feel unsafe driving here Visibility is very poor at this intersection, for cars turning onto Northbound 30th from westbound Aurora. 3105 Aurora Avenue 40.00371153 -105.2519685 I feel unsafe walking here There are no speed-control measures along this stretch, so cars tend to drive double the speed limit! I'm concerned about stepping into the street and being hit. 3395 Aurora Avenue 40.0037403 -105.248884 I feel unsafe walking here People drive very fast down Aurora, even though the speed limit is 20 mph. Put more speed limit signs, enforce the speed limit, and or put in the posts to create a median and decrease the width of the street so people will not drive so fast. 4280 Aurora Avenue 40.00487376 -105.2401292 I feel unsafe walking here This is a blind corner, could use some speed bumps. 3190 Aurora Avenue 40.00371153 -105.2514696 I feel unsafe bicycling here Traffic regularly speeds down aurora, need to decrease the width of Aurora to decrease speed. Add a bike lane with protective posts near the sidewalk and then put street parking outside of that with painted lines. Other Streets 2800 Aurora Avenue 40.00370743 -105.2583146 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars need to have a stop sign at this intersection and pedestrians should be favored to cross. Is not safe for bikers. 3005 Aurora Avenue 40.00371975 -105.2530253 I feel unsafe driving here There is an obstruction blocking view for westbound traffic turning north on 30th. Southbound traffic need a protected left onto Aurora. 2990 Aurora Avenue 40.00372386 -105.2531916 I feel unsafe bicycling here The light here does not change for cyclists traveling east or west on Aurora, even though the painted sign on the street seems to indicate that it will. I have waited for the light to change for me and have sat through two cycles. Either make the westbound or eastbound cycle always switch to green or adjust the camera so cyclists will trigger a change. 1201 Balsam Avenue 40.02702626 -105.2818899 I feel unsafe bicycling here No bike lane Baseline Frontage Road 40.0002803 -105.2464968 I feel unsafe bicycling here The frontage road situation is dangerous. People blow through the stop signs. Cars are often illegally parked between the stop sign and the corner, so I can't see traffic. (Hazard is by bike and by car) Other Streets 2910 Baylor Drive 39.98315441 -105.2574287 I feel unsafe bicycling here The 2-way stop signs on Carnegie Dr. are often ignored by motorists. Baylor, the cross street, has a significant grade and because there are no so stop signs on Baylor, it is a common bicycle route. We have witnessed one dog get hit and killed, one child nearly hit, and witnessed dozens of bicycle near-misses, where motorists roll through the stop sign and are in danger if colliding with cyclists. Bear Creek Greenway Trail 40.00701498 -105.2394902 I feel unsafe bicycling here I was hit by a cyclist (youth) coming down the hill from the park as I cycled west on the bike path 3080 Bluff Street 40.02760622 -105.2527195 I feel unsafe walking here Sidewalk is missing. Trees are overgrown, covering the parking spots, forcing pedestrians to walk in the street, and blocking sight-lines. 2890 Bluff Street 40.02729403 -105.2561474 I feel unsafe bicycling here I hate having to cross oncoming traffic around a corner on my bike to access the bike lane 37863 Boulder Canyon Drive 40.00715791 -105.3320325 I feel unsafe bicycling here A path has been built along Boulder Creek which encourages riders to utilize it. However, it only travels 3/4 of the distance to Boulder most accessible and popular mountain bike trail, forcing riders onto the dangerous Boulder Canyon Drive. Central Park 40.01515875 -105.2785385 I feel unsafe walking here My spouse was physically attacked by a mentally ill person here at night. I'm never walking here alone at night anymore here. Other Streets Central Park 40.01505187 -105.2785277 I feel unsafe bicycling here This area is no longer safe or pleasant to bike through or walk through with people hanging out and camping. Trash, smoking, and general destruction have ruined this space. 5220 Centennial Trail 40.00744197 -105.2297279 I feel unsafe bicycling here This trsil has substantially narrow down due to plant encroachment. Particularly icy & not cleared during the winter even though this goes between Eisenhower & Nevin Platt. 2100 Central Avenue 40.02188804 -105.2163541 I feel unsafe bicycling here The path shown here is a desire line from people who bike across a dirt field and down a dusty hill. It isn't paved. 1599 Cherryvale Road 40.01463692 -105.2130979 I feel unsafe walking here cannot run against traffic to get to Old Tale and the bike path from here without crossing Arapahoe and dodging vehicles going 55+mph. The right turn lane to Cherryvale from Arapahoe is poorly designed and dangerous to runners and bikers because there is no shoulder or lane 1599 Cherryvale Road 40.01470265 -105.2130818 I feel unsafe driving here Many drivers fly through the red light on arapahoe, when turning right from cherryvale, ignore the right lane merging lane and merge directly into the 2nd or third lane. The layout of the turning lanes is also uneven and causes much confusion. 652 Cherryvale Road 39.99846539 -105.2126956 I feel unsafe driving here People speed terribly here day and night, both directions. It's very dangerous because people use this as a cut-through to get to 36 Other Streets 2810 College Avenue 40.00710973 -105.2583146 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars don't have a stop sign here. I have seen people almost get into accidents with bikers. This should be an all way stop for all traffic and pedestrians should be favored. Compton Road 39.98944001 -105.2607502 I feel unsafe bicycling here There was a water main break here many months ago and the remaining gravel patch with the exposed, elevated valve covers continues to pose a hazard in particular in the dark. 2 safety cones left over are blown around by the wind. 711 Crescent Drive 40.0003666 -105.2295828 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is a narrow two lane road that is a bus and bicycle route. I feel unsafe biking here as buses and cars cannot pass me safely. I’ve had them pass me at great speed to avoid vehicles coming the other way. 740 Crescent Drive 40.00091725 -105.229615 I feel unsafe bicycling here this is a two lane residential road with parking on both sides that is a bus route and a bicycle route. I’ve been cutoff by buses on the curve right here as the buses are too long to negotiate the curve well. I was nearly hit one time and had to stop so that I wouldn’t be squeezed between the bus and the curb. 4148 Darley Avenue 39.98080324 -105.2459979 I feel unsafe driving here Getting back out of this whole neighborhood and getting north on Broadway to go back into town is tricky and a lot of people pull dangerous U turns doing it. Other Streets 3640 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98985815 -105.2504718 I feel unsafe walking here Cyclists go way over the speed limit along this path. Before and after school, kids are crossing from Dartmouth to Creekside, and there are near-misses. In general, I'd really appreciate some education and enforcement of path speed limits. 3055 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98920877 -105.255906 Other traffic safety concern I avoid biking through this intersection. I've also had a close call as a driver at this intersection. I was waiting at a red light, Eastbound on Dartmouth. The traffic light turned green, and as I was slowly heading towards the intersection, a cyclist blasted through intersection Southbound, not stopping at all. 3055 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98917589 -105.2559274 I feel unsafe bicycling here I worry about my kids biking through here with cars turning west on Dartmouth from either the north or southbound lanes unlikely to slow and watch for cyclists. 3640 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98985404 -105.2503967 I feel unsafe walking here Entrance on the MUP from this footbridge over the creek comes at a point with poor visibility. There is a grade here, so enforcement isn't likely to fix the problem. Better sight lines would. Other Streets 3640 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98973896 -105.2507132 I feel unsafe bicycling here These connections to Dartmouth need to be wider and less angular so that bikes and peds are not in conflict and so that bikes can navigate the turns. This is an important connection for both bikes and peds, so it should be designed to serve both. Lots of kids access Creekside by bike through this connection over the footbridge to the south. 3105 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98966498 -105.2558899 I feel unsafe walking here 3 lanes of speeding trucks and vehicles, narrow sidewalk, no vehicle barrier, lots of slush/snow/rain splatter 3055 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98926631 -105.2559543 I feel unsafe walking here I use this stretch along Broadway between Dartmouth and Lashley for taking RTD, walking and biking. Speeding cars, busses and motorcycles are about 3 feet away. I would love a protective barrier of some kind, or landscaping. A speeding camera may slow vehicles down too. I'm trying to be out of my car as much as possible around town, but it's really unnerving to be on this stretch. Terrifying! 3055 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98925604 -105.2559838 I feel unsafe walking here I agree with joe22, need noise reduction and slower speeds. Also the sign for traffic heading west on Dartmouth to Broadway says no turn on red. It should include “when pedestrians present”. Other Streets 3055 Dartmouth Avenue 39.98919233 -105.2558684 I feel unsafe bicycling here I feel unsafe living a block away from here, and especially biking here where It feels like a sidewalk next to a NASCAR track. Trim to two lanes and add noise reduction landscaping between road and houses. INSANE speeds on cars zipping through here. During rush hour, three lanes are mostly empty, even at a rush hour stop light, no more than 2-3 cars each lane usually piles up. The wide, uncrowded 3 lane road encouraged motorists to rev and race up to 60+mph. and motorcyclists well over 80mph. Living a block away from the intersection it sounds like a RACETRACK for 16 hours a day. Reduce speed and add noise barriers here. Longmont Diagonal Highway 40.03825671 -105.2457833 I feel unsafe bicycling here I was disappointed when an underpass was not added here during the reconstruction a few years back (and I thought it was in the plan drawings). There is no comfortable way to cross this highway going north/south to connect to foothills path given the speeds and long lights (also long lights on 47th to the east). Longmont Diagonal Highway 40.03801439 -105.2456868 I feel unsafe bicycling here Westbound cars turning left have trouble seeing eastbound bikes Other Streets Longmont Diagonal Highway 40.0381412 -105.2457994 I feel unsafe walking here The crosswalk signal at this intersection takes way, way too long to cycle to green when someone pushes the crossing button. I've seen many people decide just to run across multiple lanes of traffic rather than wait. Longmont Diagonal Highway 40.03789533 -105.2461159 I feel unsafe walking here Drivers treat this on ramp like a freeway. They do not stop for peds trying to cross. Sometimes 20 cars go without a break. Longmont Diagonal Highway 40.04555421 -105.2390349 I feel unsafe walking here City says this is county property so the graffiti never gets cleaned up, and all the lights in the underpass are broken or don't light up. Reported many, many times through Inquire Boulder. Longmont Diagonal Highway 40.05104906 -105.2345181 I feel unsafe bicycling here Signals should sense bicycles and hold green long enough to safely cross intersection. 2990 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03782732 -105.2538139 I feel unsafe walking here There is a cross walk here. Often, cars try to speed past people crossing while the walking sign is lit, allowing us to cross. We need a camera facing west at this intersection. a few months back, a car almost ran me over Longmont Diagonal Highway 40.06145365 -105.2211714 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is no bicycle facility along Diagonal. Would be nice to have a direct link from Gunbarrel to Downtown. Other Streets 3400 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03825671 -105.2465558 I feel unsafe bicycling here Good lord, this is one of the scariest place to cross on bike or foot. There's plenty of signage for the cross walk (but no flashy lights). Cars exceed the speed limit and its not clear if they can see you and are slowing down for you to cross (or if the vehicles behind the lead car can see you) -- so many close calls here, I hate it 3705 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.04328948 -105.2437271 I feel unsafe bicycling here A connection to the bike path just west of the bike lane would make it much safer. The long detour towards the soccer fields doesn't make sense for commuters 2990 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03764475 -105.2545595 I feel unsafe bicycling here Eastbound bikes have to cross high-speed motor vehicle traffic 3400 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03822331 -105.2465183 I feel unsafe walking here Frequently have to wait for many, many cars to zoom right through the crosswalk as they're exiting a freeway, and hardly ever stop. This is extremely dangerous crossing on foot or bicycle. 3335 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03855201 -105.2441686 I feel unsafe walking here I can't count the number of times I've been in the middle of crossing 47th street here when someone turning left from eastbound Iris onto northbound 47th just guns it right through the crosswalk, narrowly missing me. I even had a driver aggressively yell at me when I had the light and was crossing. 47th street rises quickly towards the intersection, creating a blind hill that prevents drivers from seeing pedestrians easily until the last second. Other Streets 3400 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03820743 -105.2465022 I feel unsafe walking here Have nearly been hit so many times. If cars do stop, I worry that they will be rear- ended at speed. Cars expect to maintain 45 MPH at exit. 3400 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03822796 -105.2467489 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars coming off 119 onto westbound Diagonal go very fast on this ramp. They don't expect peds and cyclists there. The ramp is designed for speed. Drivers don't even have to merge, as the lane continues, thereby contributing to speedy travel. Crossing the ramp on foot or bike can be scary. 3400 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03812077 -105.2487928 I feel unsafe driving here There's a left turn lane here that has been the site of multiple head-on collisions as drivers turning to southbound 34th street cannot easily gauge the speed of eastbound traffic on Diagonal/Iris. 3335 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.0386058 -105.2440506 I feel unsafe walking here For the past two years, in winter, snowplows traveling westbound have left a three-foot-high, five-foot-deep pile of snow in the crosswalk, rendering it totally impassible for weeks at a time during snowy months. 2880 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.03737297 -105.2554822 Other traffic safety concern This map shows a road here, but no such road exists. As a result, in order to get to the shopping center, you have to drive all the way to 30th and then double back. Other Streets 3400 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.038306 -105.2465934 I feel unsafe bicycling here For being a brand new intersection this is just the worst. A bike lane crossing a slip ramp with cars at high speed, more worried about having to merge than about bicycles crossing 3400 Longmont Diagonal Highwa40.0382526 -105.2497262 I feel unsafe walking here Why is there only a sidewalk on the other side of this divided street? It makes no sense that this is one way and doesn't provide for walking. It's too hard to cross the Diagonal safely here 2953 Eagle Way 40.03276122 -105.255037 I feel unsafe driving here It's difficult to see oncoming traffic when entering glenwood from this neighborhood. 2284 Edgewood Drive 40.02890425 -105.2660877 I feel unsafe bicycling here I'm sure there's some genius traffic design theory to it, but the "Yield to Crosswalk" sign in the middle of the road here is wide and causes timid drivers to swerve into the bike lane to avoid it. I've almost been taken out here this way several times. 2272 Edgewood Drive 40.02857974 -105.2663773 Other traffic safety concern Cars often speed going east on Edgewood Drive. Going west near Folsom there is a speed bump and further west on Edgewood drive where it turns into Balsam Ave are round abouts to slow down drivers. Nothing going east from 19th onwards on Edgewood. Multiple accidents have happened in the last year by cars going east at this pin. 2218 Edgewood Drive 40.02807039 -105.2687162 I feel unsafe bicycling here This road is a major biking route (connecting to Goose Creek Trail), but the bike lanes are small and there is a lot of car traffic. Other Streets 2284 Edgewood Drive 40.02916714 -105.26546 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bikes lanes too narrow on Edgewood Dr. between 23rd St. and Goose Creek Greenway. 4791 Edison Avenue 40.03095806 -105.2423394 I feel unsafe walking here The condo complexes that line Edison Ave between 47th and Kings Ridge routinely fail to shovel the sidewalks on this street, which makes it completely impassible for pedestrians during winter months. Neighbors often have to walk in the street just to safely navigate out of the neighborhood. 4791 Edison Avenue 40.03092518 -105.244174 Other traffic safety concern Ped crossing does not feel safe. Needs upgrades (e.g. raised crossing) 4805 Eisenhower Drive 40.01219756 -105.234547 I feel unsafe walking here There's no safe way to cross Eisenhower, and because of the odd angle and lack of crosswalk, crossing 48th is scary too 1280 Eisenhower Drive 40.00954196 -105.2347858 I feel unsafe bicycling here The stretch of Eisenhower from Harrison to Merritt invites speeding, so lots of cars drive way too fast. Some landscaping that narrows the road would help discourage that. 4805 Eisenhower Drive 40.01226175 -105.2346039 I feel unsafe bicycling here This corner is on the bike route for kids at Eisenhower Elementary. It's a tough place to ride, because the cars ignore bicyclists and cross well over the line as they turn left from northbound Eisenhower to northbound 48th Other Streets 5366 Eldorado Springs Drive 39.95611295 -105.2290624 Other traffic safety concern Bicyclists ignore the stop sign here, zooming down the hill from 93 and straight through this intersection and the next one which also has a stop sign. The street coming from Target has no stop sign. I have had multiple close calls with bicyclists when driving through this intersection. When I ask them if they value their life, they ignore me. We need a high visibility education campaign for bicyclists to help them understand their responsibility to follow traffic rules to protect their own safety. 5001 Ellsworth Place 40.00784498 -105.2325506 I feel unsafe bicycling here I cannot fit my cargo bike through! The bollards in the fencing need to change! 5001 Ellsworth Place 40.00781605 -105.2324742 I feel unsafe bicycling here The bike path here is deliberately impeded by a series of chain link fence pieces that force riders to completely dismount and carefully walk around two 90 degree turns. This has been a real problem for a long time, and is too small even for normal adult sized bikes. Parents who ride with their kids to school have a terrible choke point here. Please remove the fences 5000 Ellsworth Place 40.0074709 -105.2331877 I feel unsafe bicycling here The field just north of the bridge off the main path here is fully contaminated with goat head plants and they have on more than one bike-to-school-day resulted in dozens of flat tires. Please address the goat head problem with the school district landscaping people. Other Streets 5000 Ellsworth Place 40.00741754 -105.2329463 I feel unsafe bicycling here This bike path segment terminates with a terrible maze made out of chain link fence that makes it impossible to navigate without getting off the bike and carefully walking it through. Please change this boundary. 3050 Emerson Avenue 39.97509552 -105.2565658 Other traffic safety concern Bicyclists always ignore the stop sign going down Emerson. Cars do not stop in the other direction. I have seen many close calls. 3795 Emerson Avenue 39.97479131 -105.2497315 Other traffic safety concern Bicyclists often ignore the stop sign, including children on the way to school. I have seen many close calls. 1600 Euclid Avenue 40.00563015 -105.2714883 I feel unsafe bicycling here a family member was hit while biking here by a car that violated the no right on red rule (and ignored the sign) 1665 Exposition Drive 40.01556926 -105.2469099 I feel unsafe driving here Poor visibility for left turners from Exposition into the entrance to Peloton. 1110 Fairfield Drive 39.97863284 -105.2536583 I feel unsafe driving here Many drivers enter from side streets without stopping. Also, pods standing along the curb force bikes out into middle of road, block view from side streets. N-Fuzed 40.01902332 -105.2162683 I feel unsafe bicycling here The path shown here is a desire line from people who bike across a dirt field and down a dusty hill. It isn't paved. 5500 Flatiron Parkway 40.02391321 -105.2252805 I feel unsafe bicycling here BCSO deputies are very bad drivers, driving too fast for conditions and tailgating/aggressively passing other drivers. It's dangerous for everyone who uses the road in this area. Other Streets 4776 Franklin Drive 40.03254167 -105.242562 I feel unsafe walking here Bike path with a curve, with poor visibility and no lane marks, resulting in several near-misses for cyclists and pedestrians. 4770 Franklin Drive 40.03253693 -105.2431173 I feel unsafe walking here Bike path with a curve, with poor visibility and no lane marks, resulting in several near-misses for cyclists and pedestrians. 723 Gapter Road 40.00039638 -105.2147503 I feel unsafe bicycling here The line of sight is blocked exiting the path because of the fence and plants at the end. 777 Gapter Road 40.00143854 -105.2149082 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is the worst and most dangerous intersection that I have ever had to go through. Especially in any kind of wet or icy weather. This is used by hundreds of people especially students to get to Nevin Platt and yet half the winter it is icy and treacherous. we have fallen more times than we can count. It is the only area along our commute to school that makes us want to have to drive instead of bicycle regularly. Neither the school nor the city nor the county ever plows the bike path or the road. The stupid cement turning the lane into a bicycle path blocks the bike path & causes more problems because the snow and ice build up and make it unusable. Very dangerous! Other Streets 1505 Gillaspie Drive 39.97269541 -105.2519181 I feel unsafe walking here During hte school year, when Fairview get out, it is entirely dangerous to try to cross Gillaspie Dr. Many cars speeding and drivers distracted ! This happens every day! Why do the police ignore it? 801 Gillaspie Drive 39.98261185 -105.2512389 I feel unsafe driving here Traffic is too heavy on Gillespie. Turning left to access the shopping center going south or turning right to exit the shopping center onto Gillespie can be dangerous because of the traffic load and visibility at this intersection. Also the driveways into the Table Mesa Shopping center are narrow here and at the entrance from Table Mesa east of King Soopers. 801 Gillaspie Drive 39.98206105 -105.2511746 I feel unsafe bicycling here Gillespie not only carries an unnatural traffic load from South Boulder, but is also designated as a Bike Route. It is the main bike route to the South Boulder Rec center and the middle schools and high school in the area. Reduce the traffic flow by opening up Darley/Broadway and Darley/Grinnel with signaled intersections to carry traffic north on Broadway, relieving Gillespie of the load. Then it could function better as a bike way. 801 Gillaspie Drive 39.98260937 -105.2509707 I feel unsafe walking here Walkway dumps one into the driveway. Also no ramp for the disabled. 885 Gilpin Drive 40.00365704 -105.2437378 I feel unsafe walking here People take this corner way to fast, often times 30+mph. There are lots of young children who live on Aurora and Gilpin who don't always look before crossing Other Streets 2750 Glenwood Drive 40.03276943 -105.2598971 I feel unsafe bicycling here There's a nice stretch of bike path here with underpasses under all of the major roads (Iris, Valmont) except for Glenwood Dr. Southbound cars turning west from Glenwood Ct often make the right turn without checking for bike/ped traffic in the crosswalk. 2751 Glenwood Drive 40.03284706 -105.2604443 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bikes are forced to cross the roadway with little warning here. No safe underpass plus poor marking for the bikes. 2922 Glenwood Drive 40.03278586 -105.2562922 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bollards and the speed van have helped some, but the center stripe really makes this road feel like its just a racetrack for cars. Also, people have figured out when the speed van is there and speed down the street during other times of the day 2750 Glenwood Drive 40.03283104 -105.2598757 I feel unsafe bicycling here A raised crossing would force drivers to slow and acknowledge the right-of-way for path users. Currently crossing is a game of "flinch". 1225 Grandview Avenue 40.01152671 -105.2771544 I feel unsafe bicycling here Paving on Grandview westbound is treacherous for bikes. Very steep hill, poor quality road surface, big ruts and potholes. 1332 Grandview Avenue 40.011046 -105.2753627 I feel unsafe bicycling here The condition of this alley is appalling. But of course it belongs to the University so nothing ever gets fixed. It's like an obstacle course. Other Streets 1445 Grandview Avenue 40.01192926 -105.2748638 Other traffic safety concern This area will test your bike skills. Nothing to change here, no normal person would go this way on their bike. But it's fun, tricky, and you should try it once at least. "Lombardi Street" for bicyclists in Boulder. Fun little weird area that I actually hope goes unchanged. Adding this as a bit of an Easter Egg for others to find. :) 3820 Greenbriar Boulevard 39.96862966 -105.2476072 I feel unsafe bicycling here The street narrows, so there isn't enough room for a car to pass a bike. Most drivers are patient and wait the two seconds it takes for me to clear this stretch, but some still try. 4190 Hanover Avenue 39.98221313 -105.2464807 I feel unsafe walking here See my note for intersection of Hanover and Broadway. Feel unsafe walking, biking, and driving here 1520 Harrison Avenue 40.01303752 -105.2376861 I feel unsafe bicycling here The sidewalk is uneven and narrow, and cars don't look before making turns. It's very dangerous to bike here. 1050 Hartford Drive 39.97924533 -105.2556378 Other traffic safety concern Cars speed down Hartford Drive. There are a number of small children who play as well as seniors who walk on the block. Even backing out of the driveway can be problematic and a safety hazard at times due to the speeders! Other Streets 1095 Hartford Drive 39.97888359 -105.2556109 I feel unsafe walking here Cars turn quickly from Darley and others speed up as they cross over Darley. This is the only street nearby without a speed bump as it empties to Table Mesa. There are no speed signs on our street. It is downhill to Table Mesa, furthering the speed on the street. We have 15 children on our little block and a large number of seniors. 1025 Hartford Drive 39.9795639 -105.2558389 Other traffic safety concern There are so many cars that go by so quickly. I am very concerned that one of my three young kids will be hit by a car. 1105 Hartford Drive 39.9787467 -105.2556186 I feel unsafe walking here The amount of speeding and other unsafe driving behavior on Hartford Drive is unacceptable. With speed humps and other mitigations on Ithaca Drive (parallel to Hartford), many drivers now divert down Hartford in order to speed towards Table Mesa Drive. We have had some near misses with reckless drivers and are concerned about the safety of our 2 yr-old son when crossing the street. 1075 Hartford Drive 39.97926999 -105.2557451 I feel unsafe walking here Cars come speeding down this street from Darley Avenue and all points west, east, and south. Please find a way to discourage drivers from driving down this block so quickly. We have many young kids on the block, as well as seniors. Other Streets 960 Hartford Drive 39.98010033 -105.2559865 Other traffic safety concern Due to the speed bumps on Ithaca, most traffic from the south west now comes through Hartford to get to Table Mesa and cars com speeding down our street. Our kids and other kids on the street have had some close calls. 1005 Hartford Drive 39.97974271 -105.2558631 Other traffic safety concern Would appreciate speed limit signage as well as structural narrowing at entry of Hartford from Darley (vs. a speed bump). It's a downhill slope so cars gain speed easily. With speed bumps now on Ithaca and Edinboro, it's noticeable that drivers are diverting to Table Mesa Drive via this block of Hartford. And more children reside here than ever before. 1070 Hartford Drive 39.97905624 -105.2555948 I feel unsafe walking here My kids, other kids, and seniors live here. People treat it like a speedway. We are all concerned on this street. Edinboro and Ithaca have speed treatments so this is the new favorite speed through street. Its downhill nature further encourages speed. 1095 Hartford Drive 39.97904387 -105.2556431 Other traffic safety concern There needs to be some type of speed reduction mechanism on Hartford. There are too many cars going too fast, and with the number of young children we have on the block, the speeds are unacceptable. 1010 Hartford Drive 39.97973244 -105.2558202 Other traffic safety concern 555 Harvard Lane 39.98504518 -105.2506328 Other traffic safety concern Pedestrians cross here and it's dangerous. Other Streets 505 Harvard Lane 39.98596429 -105.2505691 I feel unsafe bicycling here This area has a lot of sharp turns and poor visibility 555 Harvard Lane 39.98504683 -105.25069 I feel unsafe walking here If you visit this location or look at the satellite imagery, you'll see that this is a frequent crossing point for pedestrians (who, judging by the use path are headed toward the bus stop to the east). A crosswalk and flashing beacon are needed here, especially as it's also a pedestrian entrance to the shopping center. 555 Harvard Lane 39.98507613 -105.2505755 I feel unsafe bicycling here The MUP is great until it vanishes at Harvard Lane. A tunnel with access to the shopping center would be hugely valuable here. 315 Harvard Lane 39.98910191 -105.2558362 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here Other Streets 433 Harvard Lane 39.98781966 -105.2534686 Other traffic safety concern South Boulder Speedway? This stretch of broad ways is louder than when I lived right next to U.S 36. Broadway is 6 lanes here, there is no need for that. It just encourages cars to go even faster. Speed limit is 40 I believe, but everyone does 60, some go 75mph+. It's louder than living next to a highway, and if you close your eyes, it sounds like living next to a racetrack, even from 2 blocks back from the road. This section should be trimmed to 4 lanes, plant trees and bushes on the borders to dampen sound for the neighborhoods and speed limit should be 30. It's obnoxious and it's disgusting this is allowed in a residential area that has no need for 6 lanes and high speeds. It has never once been congested in years, and the traffic is sparse enough for 4 lanes to be plenty. 1520 Hawthorn Avenue 40.03495049 -105.2780449 I feel unsafe walking here In winter, this whole area is an ice skating park. Drainage is very poor and trees block the sun. There's usually several weeks in winter where this is completely unwalkable. Plowing Hawthorn Av or fixing the drainage are the only solutions? Other Streets 1050 Hawthorn Avenue 40.03483248 -105.2836093 I feel unsafe bicycling here During pick up time, two-way traffic, plus parked cars makes Hawthorne unsafe. This ought to be 1-way during school pick up and drop off hours making a loop with Grape to return to broadway. 3660 Hayden Place 40.03388587 -105.245955 I feel unsafe walking here Frequently inhabited with encampments of unhoused people, some of whom are extremely confrontational with any passers- by. 2170 Hermosa Drive 40.03636743 -105.2681261 I feel unsafe bicycling here Improvement bike connection from Hermosa to sidewalk so that cyclists can access the signalized crossing 705 Inca Parkway 40.00021866 -105.2401453 Other traffic safety concern Turning onto EB Baseline from SB Inca Pkwy is rarely easy due to the vehicle volume and high speed of vehicle traffic on Baseline. There is also high foot and bicycle traffic in this area, and Inca Pkwy slopes up to Baseline, so you must choose your moment carefully and accelerate rapidly. 4750 Independence Road 40.04014594 -105.2422214 I feel unsafe bicycling here Turning left from westbound Independence to the Diagonal is frightening. It's extremely wide and cars are going very fast in both directions 280 Iroquois Drive 39.99314196 -105.2298886 I feel unsafe bicycling here Missing traffic control device. I reported to the city and was advised that this intersection was exempt from any stop signs due to low volumes but I feel unsafe riding through as is confusing for cars and bikes which direction has priority. Other Streets 5908 Jay Road 40.05082914 -105.2160402 I feel unsafe walking here When heading East, cars often cross into the shoulder (without slowing down) to go around turning vehicles when there are clear lines as to where they should be driving 2790 Jay Road 40.05109013 -105.2600259 I feel unsafe driving here Lack of yield sign in right turning lane entering 36WB from Jay WB means people try to force their way into heavy traffic trying to make the light on 36, while some stop at unpredictable points in the turn to yield. People are clearly confused about who has the right of way here. 5479 Jay Road 40.05091766 -105.225935 I feel unsafe bicycling here Construct southside path through open space to connect cottonwood trail to 55th 2892 Jay Road 40.05107882 -105.2550876 I feel unsafe walking here There is a crosswalk here that no one stops at. 2790 Jay Road 40.0511226 -105.2600326 I feel unsafe bicycling here Crossing this road on a bike or walking feels like roulette every time. 4709 Jay Road 40.05109834 -105.2442706 I feel unsafe walking here Our house backs to Jay Rd. We frequently hear cars & motorcycles speeding by. This road has many pedestrians & bicyclists, including students crossing the road for bus stops. Scary, dangerous road. Needs speed bumps. The crosswalks are not enough. We’ve personally had 2 cars totaled on this road in accidents that were not our fault. Other Streets 3210 Jay Road 40.05109013 -105.2507508 I feel unsafe accessing public transit here Teenagers cross Jay Rd here to take bus to school. Jay Rd is a high traffic road and is unsafe to cross even with traffic lights. Needs speed bumps. 2892 Jay Road 40.05103264 -105.2549243 I feel unsafe walking here Even with crosswalk this is a dangerous road to have to cross. Tons of traffic, tons of speeders. Our son’s car was hit here and totaled by a speeder when he was crossing Jay. If he had been on foot it would’ve killed him. It scares me thinking of all the young people that bike/walk and use this crosswalk. 2790 Jay Road 40.05102442 -105.2598596 I feel unsafe driving here Dangerous intersection no matter what mode of transportation you are using. Left turn arrow added to light has helped but it is still a scary intersection. Speed limit is too high and people race to make the light. 2360 Junction Place 40.024702 -105.25199 I feel unsafe walking here Many drivers, no doubt unfamiliar with the concept of a shared street, bewildered by the road layout, and oblivious to the plentiful signage, drive on the wrong side of the street. Plastic bollards and other road furniture are frequently damaged. Speed limit (10 mph) is rarely respected. 2407 Junction Place 40.02528322 -105.2510619 Other traffic safety concern Site of a completely unenforced encampment and stolen bicycle chop shop. It's super sketchy. 2657 Juniper Avenue 40.03733672 -105.2620643 I feel unsafe bicycling here Add crossing markings and daylighting to improve access to Elmer's Two Mile Bike Path Other Streets 1225 Kalmia Avenue 40.03910137 -105.2820843 I feel unsafe walking here Kalmia is a popular Neighborhood GreenStreet but Broadway forms a barrier. Needs a crosswalk. See people darting across all the time. 1225 Kalmia Avenue 40.03909181 -105.2819842 I feel unsafe bicycling here Kalmia is a major bike route but no good way to cross Broadway. Have witnessed many near misses. 4732 Kings Ridge Boulevard 40.03341872 -105.2441394 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars often do not stop for pedestrians nor cyclists at this crossing point, which has become considerably busier since the inauguration of the Valmont bicycle park, and the expansion of nearby bike routes. 4732 Kings Ridge Boulevard 40.03343031 -105.2441204 I feel unsafe walking here I have to cross this intersection every day. Cars on 47th rarely if ever stop for pedestrians or bikes. Bikes often don't stop for pedestrians, either, and there are a lot of electric scooter users who ride quite fast down the hill without regard for peds or other multiuse path users. The crosswalk is hard for drivers to see. 3021 Kings Ridge Boulevard 40.02924888 -105.2395606 I feel unsafe driving here This intersection easily ices up in winter, creating a very dangerous unable-to-stop situation for cars southbound on Kings Ridge approaching Valmont. Many near misses when cars slid out into the road. Plows rarely if ever deal with it. Other Streets 3108 Kings Ridge Boulevard 40.03097064 -105.2394855 I feel unsafe driving here The brick apron around this traffic circle becomes a solid sheet of ice in winter months. I've bent the axle on two different cars driving <5 mph around this circle when it slid into the curb on the east side of the circle near the park. Please remove the apron and have it be a non-graded, smooth road surface, please. Also, Parks department trucks sometimes park in the circle, blocking all traffic. 2400 Kittredge Loop Drive 40.00268013 -105.2648699 I feel unsafe bicycling here 150 Lashley Lane 39.99330019 -105.2582529 I feel unsafe driving here I find this to be dangerous intersection for cars and peds and bikes 150 Lashley Lane 39.99322621 -105.2585319 I feel unsafe walking here I hate walking here because cars and buses are too fast and too close. The city does a poor job maintaining it in Winter and I’ve been slushed by cars etc… It’s really hell When there’s a bike or person walking a dog, it’s dangerous. 800 South Lashley Lane 39.98232408 -105.2467328 I feel unsafe walking here See my note for intersection of Hanover and Broadway. Feel unsafe walking, biking, and driving here 800 South Lashley Lane 39.98222543 -105.2466738 I feel unsafe walking here See my note for intersection of Hanover and Broadway. Feel unsafe walking, biking, and driving here Other Streets 597 Lee Hill Drive 40.06298916 -105.2886826 I feel unsafe walking here The automated flashing lights are much worse than nothing at all. When walking, they often flash when I'm not ready to cross or don't flash at all, forcing interactions with drivers I'd rather avoid. When driving, they're so often flashing when there's nobody in sight or not flashing when someone is crossing that I'm trained to ignore them. I've almost hit a child on a bike who didn't slow down or look when entering the intersection, presumably because he expected the lights to keep him safe, when I didn't have time to anticipate him crossing because he approached the intersection so quickly. I was able to stop in time, but the traffic controls should aim to avoid this type of interaction. In this case, they encourage it. Other Streets 1390 Lehigh Street 39.97521268 -105.2601385 I feel unsafe walking here The reconfigured Lehigh included no traffic calming features, so with the smooth repaved road cars speed through here even faster than before and often do not stop for pedestrians at this and other crossings. Central islands with xeriscape or raised crosswalks (like on 55th) at Darley and Emerson would have been better for traffic calming. Perhaps the raised crosswalks could still be added? These are not as jarring as speed bumps, but serve the same purpose as well as making the crossing more noticeable and therefore safer for pedestrians including children headed to the nearby schools. 390 Linden Avenue 40.04078662 -105.2912951 I feel unsafe walking here Even though there is a crosswalk here, families with young children feel intimidated to cross Linden with cars going fast downhill. This creates a barrier for families who want to walk or bike to Foothills Elementary. 3040 Madison Avenue 40.00593886 -105.2531026 I feel unsafe bicycling here Road construction to make biking and walking SAFER has been going on for ~2 years now and has caused trouble for bikers, drivers, and pedestrians alike. Needs better marking and a bike lane that isn't the middle of the road with cars. This has caused at least 1 serious accident, with a biker and I wouldn't be surprised if there have been more. 668 Manhattan Drive 39.99946763 -105.2294497 I feel unsafe walking here speed limit of 20mph here but vehicles regularly speed on this part of Manhattan Other Streets 565 Manhattan Drive 39.99807354 -105.2292717 I feel unsafe bicycling here Lot of cars parked on the side of the road plus bus traffic makes the area feel congested for biking 600 Manhattan Drive 39.99847216 -105.2292985 I feel unsafe bicycling here When school lets out, cars are backed up from Baseline to Tenino. It is difficult to navigate with parked cars on both sides, a line of cars leaving, and cars trying to get to school. Plus school buses and RTD buses. Lots of traffic on a narrow road. 285 Manhattan Drive 39.99318965 -105.2291111 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is a lot of car bicycle conflict during morning commute. We have to Transit this area to get to Nevin Platt at the same time tons of folks are going to this school. There needs to be a better way for cyclists to get to the park. 660 Manhattan Drive 39.99911323 -105.2293253 I feel unsafe walking here There are lots of school bus stops here but also lots of parked cars on both sides of the street. Kids and cars are not a good match. 690 Manhattan Drive 39.99998032 -105.2295452 I feel unsafe bicycling here The red light phase on Manhattan is so long that most bikes cross Baseline on red. Since there isn't much traffic on Baseline in this location I don't understand the long red phase. 904 Mapleton Avenue 40.02043787 -105.2848738 I feel unsafe driving here Blind corner when driving west on Mapleton. Should be a 4-way stop sign. 909 Mapleton Avenue 40.02053852 -105.2848309 I feel unsafe driving here When driving on mapleton to cross 9th street, the hill makes it challenging to see traffic coming up and down 9th street. They do not have a stop sign. Other Streets 2283 Mapleton Avenue 40.02565041 -105.2582127 I feel unsafe bicycling here This stretch of sidewalk sucks. It has hairpin turns and is very old and broken and poorly maintained. 2900 Mapleton Avenue 40.02546568 -105.2556431 I feel unsafe walking here A lot of people sleep in their cars or RVs here. It's very dodgy at night. I try to avoid it at all costs most of the time but at night it's very scary here. 2512 Mapleton Avenue 40.02444731 -105.2636898 Other traffic safety concern Add signage directing SB bikers West on Mapleton and then South on 23rd for a low- stress alternative to Folsom. 2283 Mapleton Avenue 40.02551134 -105.2584648 I feel unsafe bicycling here Near miss by a car turning right here while I was biking south along 28th (with traffic) and crossing Mapleton. 2900 Mapleton Avenue 40.02551125 -105.2557987 Other traffic safety concern Ped/bike crossing does not feel safe due to size of vehicles that park on mapleton. Large daylighting zone needed as well as bulbout/raised crossing to shorten the crossing distance, improve sightlines and reduce vehicle speeds. This is a key N-S crossing from Goose Creek to across Pearl to 29th St 1720 Marshall Road 39.96953944 -105.2360845 I feel unsafe bicycling here Marshall Road is a major City of Boulder bike route connecting city of boulder to it’s open space trails at Marshall Mesa; the road needs proper signage, speed bumps or traffic control to accommodate the constant flow of cyclists, roller skiers, horses, runners etc conflicting with autos, especially considering the potential increased traffic and recreational users CU South will bring to the area- Other Streets 5321 Marshall Drive 39.95585382 -105.2289494 I feel unsafe walking here This 90 degree turn in Marshall Rd is poorly Marked and people "scream" through here way to fast and screech around the corner, often driving off road even. I think better signage, and reduced speed would make this area safer. 1527 Marshall Road 39.95794804 -105.2301046 I feel unsafe walking here Marshall road is one of the busiest biking and running roads in Boulder. It is a gem of a route and yet cars continue to drive very fast through Marshall rd. I think a "no thru traffic" and one or two speed bumps would discourage non local traffic from driving on Marshall road and adding to the danger to bikers and runners. 1031 Marshall Road 39.96536437 -105.2366209 I feel unsafe walking here This is my 2nd attempt. This area is a blind curve. People speed around this curve and there are often runners and walkers and bikers that are at risk of being hit. 1190 Marshall Road 39.96416998 -105.2365136 Other traffic safety concern This curve causes issues with cars not yielding to bikes or pedestrians and going too fast on our road 3965 Martin Drive 39.98977538 -105.2463124 I feel unsafe walking here Cars speed down Martin Dr. There are LOTS of families with little kids these days in the neighborhood. Very dangerous as it is for walking and biking. 3935 Martin Drive 39.98983033 -105.2464405 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars speed down Martin Dr. There are LOTS of families with little kids these days in the neighborhood. Very dangerous as it is for walking and biking. Other Streets 3675 Martin Drive 39.99190079 -105.2498496 I feel unsafe bicycling here Path narrows around a blind curve. 4585 Martin Drive 39.98588224 -105.241701 I feel unsafe driving here Left turns out of the numbered streets in Martin Acres are often harrowing. But it's especially bad at Martin, where westbound cars are often moving well above the speed limit. 4095 Martin Drive 39.98923654 -105.2453738 I feel unsafe bicycling here Martin desperately needs traffic calming because lots of kids use it to access Creekside Elementary. Speeds on this street are often close to 30 mph. 4535 Martin Drive 39.98702539 -105.2416921 I feel unsafe bicycling here Without protected bike infrastructure here, this turn is dodgy. Cars often take the turn wide and high speeds. Mcguckin Way 40.01653853 -105.2625742 I feel unsafe bicycling here There are to many cars and not enough people biking at the Arapahoe village. There is no biking incentive, and that parking lot is extremely dangerous for bikes. No one uses the giant bike parking garage by sprouts and there's no security there where you lock up your bike. People don't even consider biking rather than driving. Biking should be the first form of transit but no one talks about it. 4970 Meredith Way 40.01351176 -105.2321991 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars turning left from eastbound Arapahoe onto Commerce street don't have good visibility to eastbound bikes. Other Streets 3340 Mitchell Lane 40.03568974 -105.2430797 Other traffic safety concern The road experiences significant flooding on a regular basis. It floods to a degree where I don't feel safe driving through the water by car. With a bike you have to go on the sidewalk. Also, this road is shaded in winter and takes up to a week to clean out after each snow storm. Maybe it could be plowed? 435 Mohawk Drive 39.9950343 -105.2381505 I feel unsafe bicycling here People drive very fast on Mohawk and there is no paint so they are often driving down the middle of the road. This gets especially bad during the school year when lots of parents are speeding over to pick up kids from school and parking on the street 825 Mohawk Drive 40.00355539 -105.2390671 I feel unsafe bicycling here The barriers on the side of the street force me to merge with cars all of the time. 865 Mohawk Drive 40.00442242 -105.2397323 I feel unsafe walking here No crosswalk to cross Mohawk where the multi-use path has exits to street level 635 Mohawk Drive 39.99965978 -105.2363795 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very uneven and potholed pavement on northbound Mohawk south of Baseline. As a bicyclist there are very few smooth patches to merge into the center lane to cross Baseline Other Streets 709 Mohawk Drive 40.00162767 -105.2363902 I feel unsafe bicycling here Had a near miss yesterday when a driver exiting one of the driveways on the east side of Mohawk very nearly hit my bike because of the humongously overgrown bushes that obstruct everyone's view here. This whole block between Morgan and Baseline has obstructed views for drivers and obstructed sidewalks for bikes or walkers, due to vegetation. 700 Mohawk Drive 40.0001188 -105.2364443 I feel unsafe walking here This intersection feels very unsafe, I've seen multiple people get hit by cars here. Lots of kids need to cross here for school. Cars often don't seem to understand who's right of way it is or which lane to be in. 1189 Monroe Drive 40.00740464 -105.2432513 I feel unsafe bicycling here I bike here to CU East campus every day. I take Skunk Creek Greenway to Monroe Dr. Crossing this intersection on a bike feels dangerous since cars are going 40 mph from Foothills or towards foothills. There is a warning for pedestrian crossing at this intersection, but I see many times cars ignoring it or breaking very late. I'd like something done to make it safer to cross onto Discovery drive. It's also especially busy during the semester with many students walking to East campus. 1189 Monroe Drive 40.00745687 -105.243372 I feel unsafe driving here This intersection needs a traffic light. Traffic is extremely heavy, a hill blocks visibility, and there is substantial car, bike and pedestrian traffic. Other Streets 1189 Monroe Drive 40.00731517 -105.2433211 I feel unsafe walking here Despite the crossing buttons that pedestrians can turn on to warn traffic that they are crossing, this is a dangerous intersection for pedestrians. In addition to the already high vehicle speeds (which most people exceed anyway), many people aren't paying attention and do not stop. 3665 Moorhead Avenue 39.99346252 -105.2486372 I feel unsafe walking here Path narrows around a blind corner, cyclists pass unsafely. 2760 Moorhead Avenue 39.99908036 -105.2592427 I feel unsafe bicycling here This spot connects two paths, but it's unclear what the expected behavior for cyclists is. Crosswalk and narrow sidewalk? (Which is the wrong way if you're westbound) 2760 Moorhead Avenue 39.99910612 -105.2600007 I feel unsafe driving here This intersection is messy, busy, and backed up. It's hard to see vehicles traveling north on 27th if you're turning right on 27th from moorhead 4295 Moorhead Avenue 39.98993008 -105.242334 I feel unsafe bicycling here The speed at which cars and motorcycles traverse Moorhead- a straight pathway parralel to Highway 36 is concerning. This is an everyday occurrence. Add roundabouts at some intersections or speedbumps to slow traffic. Other Streets 3655 Moorhead Avenue 39.99368856 -105.2487177 I feel unsafe walking here Please help us! We have 12 children Chase Court that use this intersection and they lives are at risk. Coming off the bike path (southbound) onto Moorhead is a death waiting to happen. There are cars parked along the road obscuring the view of the bikes and pedestrians trying to cross in the crosswalk. The "no parking" zone is so small, the cars that are legally parked still obscure the view for both drivers and pedestrians trying to look for cars. You literally have to get into the bike lane on Moorhead in order to see a car coming and for them to see you. No cars can see my children or wheelchair bound people because of this. And no one stops for us hardly ever. This intersection needs more flash to alert drivers (many of whom are speeding) and an big extension of the no parking zone for drivers ability to see pedestrians entry onto the Moorhead/bear creek path crosswalk. We have instructed our children to never use the overpass, but many children and people continue to do so. 3655 Moorhead Avenue 39.99367212 -105.248723 I feel unsafe bicycling here I wrote a response for feeling unsafe walking here, but wanted to stress that biking here is equally dangerous. Other Streets 3655 Moorhead Avenue 39.99367791 -105.2487072 I feel unsafe bicycling here The line of sight here is bad. There are often cars parked illegally blocking the sight line exiting the bike path. Very dangerous and cars often do not stop for pedestrians or cyclists. We need a speed table. 2877 Moorhead Avenue 39.99891187 -105.2573919 I feel unsafe bicycling here 2765 Moorhead Avenue 39.99959814 -105.2583522 I feel unsafe bicycling here 2765 Moorhead Avenue 39.99963513 -105.2584487 I feel unsafe walking here 2765 Moorhead Avenue 39.99938034 -105.2581429 I feel unsafe walking here This part of town has become very uncomfortable over the past 5 years or so. Lots of trash and camping. Lots of heavy drug use. I used to walk to the supermarket this way with my kids, but now I do not. 715 Morgan Drive 40.00175555 -105.236342 I feel unsafe driving here Unsafe turning left onto Mohawk from Morgan here. Morgan is lower than the road surface on Mohawk, drivers on Mohawk frequently speed, and there's a lot of overgrown vegetation in the parking strip along Mohawk south of Morgan that impedes visibility. 990 Morgan Drive 40.00706822 -105.238772 I feel unsafe bicycling here This junction needs better signage for bicyclists. I've often ridden right through this intersection when I meant to turn southbound Other Streets 740 Morgan Drive 40.00262511 -105.2351618 I feel unsafe walking here Between Park East Park and Baseline, this trail is bounded on one side by a high wall and on the other by fences from neighbors' back yards. There's no escape from a random weirdo other than to go all the way back, and on foot, this is very sketchy as a place to walk, because there's no way out, you're trapped in this tunnel between houses and a brick wall 1504 North Street 40.02446672 -105.2774602 Other traffic safety concern This section of North St (13th to Alpine) gets used as a through connector on a regular basis. Thankfully the speed bumps help but we get commercial vehicles using the street as well. Seems like they should be using the main connectors (like Balsam) rather than this street 840 North Street 40.02446374 -105.2856302 I feel unsafe walking here Speeding along 9th street is common, and this crosswalk has hills on both sides blocking the view (and encouraging cars to go faster). This is a common crossing point for pedestrians accessing shopping or public transit, and I have had a number of close calls here. 1850 Norwood Avenue 40.04360725 -105.2736222 I feel unsafe walking here Drivers speed fast down Norwood, the speed tables do not slow drivers down, there is a crosswalk right at the corner, drivers cut the corner and there is no visibility at the crosswalk. Other Streets 1895 Norwood Avenue 40.04369837 -105.2727288 I feel unsafe walking here Northbound cars on 19th cannot adequately see the Norwood intersection as they climb the steep hill. They do not have a stop sign and I'm sure the city thinks they should not have stop sign because of the steepness. But that puts cyclists and pedestrians crossing on Norwood in jeopardy. Much like Linden and Broadway, this prioritizes the convenience of drivers over the safety of vulnerable users. I don't buy the argument that the cars might slip downward on snowy days. This is supposed to be a safe- routes-to-school zone. Peds first! 2801 Palo Parkway 40.04366552 -105.2585077 I feel unsafe driving here We need a left turn arrow (solid green, not blinking yellow) on the signal for northbound cars turning into Winding Trail Village. It is a very dangerous turn when southbound traffic on Hwy 36 is heavy and/or moving fast, often running the light. This leaves residents waiting in the turn pocket vulnerable and at risk when trying to get home. Pawnee Drive 39.9963057 -105.2364492 I feel unsafe walking here This intersection has a lot of people driving quickly through. It makes it difficult to cross to get to the park. Boulder Creek Park 40.01965742 -105.235945 I feel unsafe bicycling here There's a steep hill leading to a blind curve on the approach to this tunnel, and the landscaping sprinklers have turned it into a perpetually flooded mess in warm months, and a frozen sheet of ice in cold months. Other Streets Boulder Creek Path 40.0195049 -105.2359557 I feel unsafe walking here This is a narrow, blind curve on a path that's always, always filled with puddles and slick moss because it's always wet from sprinklers. As you can see people can't see oncoming bikes well and cross the line to avoid the slippery puddles. Many near misses between bikes and peds here. Boulder Creek Path 40.01976195 -105.2367336 I feel unsafe walking here The map shows a path here but there is no legal crossing for the railway right of way here. People do walk through the bushes and across the tracks but there's no road as shown in the map. Boulder Creek Path 40.01987875 -105.2359289 Other traffic safety concern Property owners of the businesses north of this tunnel overwater their lawn and create flooding conditions and a mosquito nuisance throughout the non-freezing months. The water problem is exacerbated by the growth of slippery mold inside the tunnel where water pools, creating hazards for peds and bikes. A lot of peds use this tunnel, especially staff from BCH, who walk here in groups. This has been an ongoing problem for at least 15 years and no amount of reporting to the city or complaining to the property owners has had any effect. Other Streets 4810 Pennsylvania Avenue 40.00715081 -105.2347273 I feel unsafe bicycling here I fear for the safety of bicyclists and this busy intersection between the bike path and the road. Visibility of the bike path from the road is obstructed in both directions by foliage. Even when drivers slow down significantly, it is difficult to see bicyclists especially when they are traveling at high speeds. 5262 Pennsylvania Avenue 40.00636425 -105.2308574 I feel unsafe walking here Not officially part of the city so residents don't shovel snow on this street. It's plowed for the school buses, so peds and kids on bikes have to use the street not the sidewalk. 2642 Pine Street 40.02401598 -105.2607125 I feel unsafe walking here Excessive car speeds and no markings or infrastructure for crossing Pine St safely between Folsom and 28th. 437 Pine Street 40.01847826 -105.2904904 Other traffic safety concern Concerned with cars speeding here. This block has a number of children under 12 who are constantly playing in the yards. We observe cars going above 30 here pretty regularly as there are no stop signs between 4th and 9th. Speed bumps on spruce and on 4th very nearby are effective at slowing cars down on similar stretches with no stop signs. I’d love to see one go in on Pine as well Other Streets 1600 Quince Avenue 40.04789534 -105.277015 I feel unsafe driving here Barriers create single lane. Along with many parked cars and service vehicles frequently found on the highly used cross street; Passing cars get too close to each other; Also witness vehicles speeding up to 'beat' the car approaching in the opposite direction. 4176 Saint Croix Street 40.05097845 -105.2509169 I feel unsafe bicycling here Jay is insanely dangerous 4446 Saint John's Avenue 40.04745229 -105.246202 I feel unsafe walking here Speed limit is 20, but cars are driving 45 in this neighborhood. Pretty unsafe for folks walking and especially kids biking. 295 Seminole Drive 39.99313374 -105.2308381 I feel unsafe walking here non ADA compliant overpass. should move this to Foothills and Baseline with possible underpass and fix the flood issues to all the downstream neighborhoods at same time 295 Seminole Drive 39.99320772 -105.2309883 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very steep overpass, no visibility to what's ahead, hard to see if there are vehicles approaching 2879 Shadow Creek Drive 40.01090218 -105.2562332 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very dark at night, with short visibility under the best of circumstances. Other Streets 5660 Sioux Drive 39.99301045 -105.2242666 I feel unsafe bicycling here This curve needs a curb cut and short concrete path connector so that cyclists traveling between the Rec center and points East can meet up with the bike path in a convenient and safe manner. Currently you have to either turn in to the rec center parking lot and get up on the narrower pedestrian sidewalk, ride over the curb and grass, or go out of your way up to Omaha Place and back down another narrow sidewalk. There is no safe bike path connection and bikes should not have to ride on the sidewalks to get to the great path that lies just to the west of here. 4950 Sioux Drive 39.99322062 -105.2326947 I feel unsafe bicycling here This bridge is extraordinarily Steep and dangerous in any kind of wet or cold weather. It is not obvious to cars and they often do not see cyclists. 5190 South Boulder Road 39.98585901 -105.2290571 I feel unsafe walking here Need better road crossing, rampant jaywalking here for hotel + condo residents and guests to get to PDQ and liquor store 5180 South Boulder Road 39.98636046 -105.2303025 I feel unsafe bicycling here Cars that are taking a left sometimes need to immediately merge to the right here making it dangerous for biking 5180 South Boulder Road 39.98631936 -105.2301943 I feel unsafe bicycling here Very dangerous stretch with many cars missing the entrance to foothills from 36 and thus making a left and then a right immediately. Other Streets 5691 South Boulder Road 39.98598234 -105.2206832 I feel unsafe driving here It is very dark on this road - at night, the only illumination are oncoming headlights from the other side of the road. Could really use a bit of street lighting from here west 2357 Spotswood Place 40.05226863 -105.2665275 I feel unsafe bicycling here Path connection is very narrow for bikes and pedestrians to share. Curb ramps are also not build to ADA standards 2437 Spruce Street 40.02222644 -105.2637442 Other traffic safety concern Cars turning from Folsom Westbound onto Spruce Street often speed, which is hazardous for pedestrian traffic around the park and for residents pulling out of their driveways. I wish there was a speed bump on Spruce across from Greenleaf Park. 2495 Spruce Street 40.02244405 -105.263316 I feel unsafe driving here Just a cluster here. Between the ped crossing and merging to one lane folks just don't pay enough attention. I support the separated bike lane but the merge and the ped crossing need to be separated geographically. Move the merge south of Pearl and make the right lane a turn-only lane. 2307 Spruce Street 40.02190858 -105.2658033 I feel unsafe bicycling here Despite the posted 20 mph limit, vehicles constantly speed through this section. The pavement is also quite rough in the bike lanes on this section of Spruce. It would be helpful to have a more comfortable east/west route downtown that connects to Folsom. Other Streets 1802 Spruce Street 40.02052825 -105.2724606 I feel unsafe bicycling here "Roundabouts" are improperly used by motorists much of the time, with vehicles on the east/west route not yielding and blasting through. The diameter is too small to slow traffic sufficiently. 2653 Spruce Street 40.02309148 -105.2602136 I feel unsafe walking here No sidewalks on North side of road and this street gets traffic. Several blocks around this area have no safe place for a pedestrian to walk. 2052 Spruce Street 40.02134166 -105.2685392 I feel unsafe bicycling here The pinch point for pedestrian crossings is painted to prioritize vehicle traffic, while the bike lanes in both directions just end right into the curb/parked cars, forcing cyclists to merge into the primary lane. I've frequently been passed by cars right as I'm trying to move over. Since this is a vision zero street and a school zone, we should have the bike lane painted to have priority for the merge zone, or some other configuration that doesn't result in the bike lane just disappearing. Chautauqua Park 40.00028852 -105.2634484 I feel unsafe bicycling here Drivers merging from Baseline onto Broadway don’t slow down or yield for bikes and pedestrians in the crosswalk here. 2805 Sundown Lane 40.01075786 -105.2579069 I feel unsafe walking here There are often encampments of homeless in this area. Tents parked right on the public seating areas and bicycle chop shops. Other Streets 2525 Taft Drive 40.01054883 -105.2619731 I feel unsafe walking here A lot of speeding cars between Folsom and Taft year round. Carillon is assisted living and the speeding (as a cut through to 36) is definitely an issue. 2510 Taft Drive 40.01088986 -105.2630192 Other traffic safety concern Parking around this bend narrows the street quite a bit and prevents East bound cars from seeing oncoming traffic. This one parking spot also has the potential to cause damage to the car parked there due to how it sticks out into traffic. 2510 Taft Drive 40.01090013 -105.262987 I feel unsafe driving here 4950 Thunderbird Drive 39.99327324 -105.2320075 I feel unsafe bicycling here Extraordinarily steep approach to this bridge feels like an archaic throwback to 1960s road architecture 4917 Thunderbird Drive 39.98798387 -105.2320236 I feel unsafe driving here Crazy merge going on here 1206 University Avenue 40.01051701 -105.2767045 I feel unsafe bicycling here West bound cars roll through the stop light, not watching for bikers on the path coming up the hill. No right on red light should be enforced there. 1505 University Avenue 40.0104373 -105.2735656 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is no way to legally and safely travel from the CU campus to westbound University without riding on the wrong side of the street until past the weird downhill routing. 1500 University Avenue 40.01051146 -105.274719 I feel unsafe walking here Poor visibility for cars, and they typically do not stop for peds here. US 36 39.99981868 -105.256952 I feel unsafe driving here Sometimes traffic backs up and I'm afraid people will rear-end me at high speed. Other Streets US 36 39.99471742 -105.2488403 I feel unsafe walking here Super narrow and very dark underpass for the volume of people that use it everyday. bad visibility entering and exiting the tunnel US 36 39.99496249 -105.2485952 I feel unsafe bicycling here The previous signage that said northwestbound traffic was supposed to yield here has been removed and it's now confusing who has the right of way US 36 39.98690691 -105.2361246 I feel unsafe driving here Incredibly short on ramp, little visibility, very fast cars on 36 and no one moves over for you to have space to merge on US 36 39.98651665 -105.2346414 I feel unsafe driving here There are far too many cars attempting to turn left here. A light or some other traffic control mechanism is sorely needed. US 36 39.98683313 -105.2354461 I feel unsafe driving here This on-ramp is way too short. 3395 Vista Drive 40.03620725 -105.2723479 I feel unsafe bicycling here Accessible path connection needed to Vista Dr 55 Wagonwheel Gap Road 40.06483605 -105.3016162 Other traffic safety concern Thank you for the climbing hill addition here. Looking forward to it!!! Sketchy here without it. 1095 Waite Drive 40.00720793 -105.2348077 I feel unsafe driving here it's very scary to approach this bike crossing because even though I drive extremely slowly here, bikes sometimes whoosh right through the intersection without even pausing to look Walnut Street 40.02047461 -105.2584254 I feel unsafe driving here I'm not a fan of the double-turn lanes and blinking yellows here. I've sometimes observed close calls with pedestrians and bikers. Other Streets Walnut Street 40.02041733 -105.2580786 I feel unsafe bicycling here From Arapahoe to Iris, there are no great options for crossing 28th, either as a pedestrian or cyclist. Even with the walk signal, it feels as though you're dodging cars and distracted drivers. 1101 Walnut Street 40.016588 -105.2809203 I feel unsafe walking here The entire "downtown loop" makes me nervous every time I cross it because it seems to prioritize fast through car traffic in a busy pedestrian zone. The intersection of Walnut and 11th is a particular problem because pedestrian traffic is high, visibility is poor, and drivers coming southbound on 11th are given a big, swooping turn that they can speed through, potentially hitting someone crossing the street. 2900 Walnut Street 40.0203516 -105.2544415 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bike lane here is frequently blocked by parked cars/trucks. In addition the paint marking the bike lane is so worn away it's basically invisible. 3000 Walnut Street 40.02011845 -105.253492 I feel unsafe driving here The right turn arrow is too short, and there's no turn on a red arrow, so there's only a very short window to turn right from Walnut onto northbound 30th and a looooong wait. As a result, people cut through the Walnut Gardens parking lot instead. 3000 Walnut Street 40.02008455 -105.2536798 I feel unsafe bicycling here Not sure why, but this flashing crosswalk seems to be the most ignored by drivers in Boulder. Plus, it's been broken very often, too. Other Streets 1902 Walnut Street 40.01861383 -105.2703363 Other traffic safety concern Raised crossing and upsizing of southside path needed to connect to new CU bridge over the creek. 3193 Walnut Street 40.02005581 -105.2520436 I feel unsafe bicycling here These blocks of Walnut could be rightsized to improve safety for cyclists. 3193 Walnut Street 40.02006814 -105.2514482 I feel unsafe walking here Improved pedestrian crossing needed (markings and curb ramps at a minimum) 2880 Wilderness Place 40.02668609 -105.2483582 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is a narrow one lane road that forces me into the center of the road. This is an industrial/office area with a 20 MPH speed limit that is rarely followed. 2825 Wilderness Place 40.02546196 -105.250048 Other traffic safety concern Path needed here to connect to daycare (Acorn School). A well-trodden dirt path already exists but it is not accessible. 850 Yale Road 39.98182676 -105.2555251 I feel unsafe walking here This sidewalk is very narrow and cars turn left zooming off of Table Mesa with limited visibility. People going to Bill Bower park are in danger of being run over. Cyclists are in danger of being hit. Installing a wide sidewalk for at least a half block in the city right of way from Yale north toward Carnegie would greatly increase the safety in this area. 890 Yale Road 39.98174629 -105.2552875 I feel unsafe bicycling here The stop bar on southbound Yale Road has an obstructed line of sight onto Table Mesa, which often "hides" cyclists on Table Mesa from view. Other Streets 2525 Taft Drive 40.01054883 -105.2619731 I feel unsafe walking here A lot of speeding cars between Folsom and Taft year round. Carillon is assisted living and the speeding (as a cut through to 36) is definitely an issue. 2510 Taft Drive 40.01088986 -105.2630192 Other traffic safety concern Parking around this bend narrows the street quite a bit and prevents East bound cars from seeing oncoming traffic. This one parking spot also has the potential to cause damage to the car parked there due to how it sticks out into traffic. 2510 Taft Drive 40.01090013 -105.262987 I feel unsafe driving here 4950 Thunderbird Drive 39.99327324 -105.2320075 I feel unsafe bicycling here Extraordinarily steep approach to this bridge feels like an archaic throwback to 1960s road architecture 4917 Thunderbird Drive 39.98798387 -105.2320236 I feel unsafe driving here Crazy merge going on here 1206 University Avenue 40.01051701 -105.2767045 I feel unsafe bicycling here West bound cars roll through the stop light, not watching for bikers on the path coming up the hill. No right on red light should be enforced there. 1505 University Avenue 40.0104373 -105.2735656 I feel unsafe bicycling here There is no way to legally and safely travel from the CU campus to westbound University without riding on the wrong side of the street until past the weird downhill routing. 1500 University Avenue 40.01051146 -105.274719 I feel unsafe walking here Poor visibility for cars, and they typically do not stop for peds here. US 36 39.99981868 -105.256952 I feel unsafe driving here Sometimes traffic backs up and I'm afraid people will rear-end me at high speed. Other Streets US 36 39.99471742 -105.2488403 I feel unsafe walking here Super narrow and very dark underpass for the volume of people that use it everyday. bad visibility entering and exiting the tunnel US 36 39.99496249 -105.2485952 I feel unsafe bicycling here The previous signage that said northwestbound traffic was supposed to yield here has been removed and it's now confusing who has the right of way US 36 39.98690691 -105.2361246 I feel unsafe driving here Incredibly short on ramp, little visibility, very fast cars on 36 and no one moves over for you to have space to merge on US 36 39.98651665 -105.2346414 I feel unsafe driving here There are far too many cars attempting to turn left here. A light or some other traffic control mechanism is sorely needed. US 36 39.98683313 -105.2354461 I feel unsafe driving here This on-ramp is way too short. 3395 Vista Drive 40.03620725 -105.2723479 I feel unsafe bicycling here Accessible path connection needed to Vista Dr 55 Wagonwheel Gap Road 40.06483605 -105.3016162 Other traffic safety concern Thank you for the climbing hill addition here. Looking forward to it!!! Sketchy here without it. 1095 Waite Drive 40.00720793 -105.2348077 I feel unsafe driving here it's very scary to approach this bike crossing because even though I drive extremely slowly here, bikes sometimes whoosh right through the intersection without even pausing to look Walnut Street 40.02047461 -105.2584254 I feel unsafe driving here I'm not a fan of the double-turn lanes and blinking yellows here. I've sometimes observed close calls with pedestrians and bikers. Other Streets Walnut Street 40.02041733 -105.2580786 I feel unsafe bicycling here From Arapahoe to Iris, there are no great options for crossing 28th, either as a pedestrian or cyclist. Even with the walk signal, it feels as though you're dodging cars and distracted drivers. 1101 Walnut Street 40.016588 -105.2809203 I feel unsafe walking here The entire "downtown loop" makes me nervous every time I cross it because it seems to prioritize fast through car traffic in a busy pedestrian zone. The intersection of Walnut and 11th is a particular problem because pedestrian traffic is high, visibility is poor, and drivers coming southbound on 11th are given a big, swooping turn that they can speed through, potentially hitting someone crossing the street. 2900 Walnut Street 40.0203516 -105.2544415 I feel unsafe bicycling here Bike lane here is frequently blocked by parked cars/trucks. In addition the paint marking the bike lane is so worn away it's basically invisible. 3000 Walnut Street 40.02011845 -105.253492 I feel unsafe driving here The right turn arrow is too short, and there's no turn on a red arrow, so there's only a very short window to turn right from Walnut onto northbound 30th and a looooong wait. As a result, people cut through the Walnut Gardens parking lot instead. 3000 Walnut Street 40.02008455 -105.2536798 I feel unsafe bicycling here Not sure why, but this flashing crosswalk seems to be the most ignored by drivers in Boulder. Plus, it's been broken very often, too. Other Streets 1902 Walnut Street 40.01861383 -105.2703363 Other traffic safety concern Raised crossing and upsizing of southside path needed to connect to new CU bridge over the creek. 3193 Walnut Street 40.02005581 -105.2520436 I feel unsafe bicycling here These blocks of Walnut could be rightsized to improve safety for cyclists. 3193 Walnut Street 40.02006814 -105.2514482 I feel unsafe walking here Improved pedestrian crossing needed (markings and curb ramps at a minimum) 2880 Wilderness Place 40.02668609 -105.2483582 I feel unsafe bicycling here This is a narrow one lane road that forces me into the center of the road. This is an industrial/office area with a 20 MPH speed limit that is rarely followed. 2825 Wilderness Place 40.02546196 -105.250048 Other traffic safety concern Path needed here to connect to daycare (Acorn School). A well-trodden dirt path already exists but it is not accessible. 850 Yale Road 39.98182676 -105.2555251 I feel unsafe walking here This sidewalk is very narrow and cars turn left zooming off of Table Mesa with limited visibility. People going to Bill Bower park are in danger of being run over. Cyclists are in danger of being hit. Installing a wide sidewalk for at least a half block in the city right of way from Yale north toward Carnegie would greatly increase the safety in this area. 890 Yale Road 39.98174629 -105.2552875 I feel unsafe bicycling here The stop bar on southbound Yale Road has an obstructed line of sight onto Table Mesa, which often "hides" cyclists on Table Mesa from view. 84 PHASE 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY APPENDIX C- 1 Boulder Vision Zero Phase 2 Outreach Summary Phase 2 Methods City staff implemented a second phase of public outreach in February 2023. This second phase of outreach consisted of: • A virtual public meeting on February 7, 2023 (Spanish interpretation was offered) See attached public meeting slides • Preparation and posting (on bouldercolorado.gov/projects/vision-zero-action-plan) of a one- page plan summary in English and Spanish See attached one-page plan summary • Preparation and posting (on bouldercolorado.gov/projects/vision-zero-action-plan) of short, approximately five-minute, plan summary videos in English and Spanish • A short, online questionnaire (in English and Spanish) with the following questions: o What do you think about the Vision Zero Action Plan? o What do you like best about the proposed actions and recommendations? o What recommendations should staff prioritize for implementation? • Office hours with city staff • Lastly, staff presented the draft plan to the Transportation Advisory Board, Community Cycles, and the Center for People with Disabilities to solicit their feedback Office Hours & Online Questionnaire Responses The public provided feedback on the draft plan by attending city staff office hours or by completing a project questionnaire hosted on the city’s BeHeard Boulder engagement platform (open from January 20 through March 13). Feedback received focused on respondent’s feelings about the plan, what they liked best about the plan and what they wanted staff to prioritize as the plan was implemented. Many respondents to the questionnaire had mixed feelings about the plan (46% of respondents), while others liked (31%) or didn’t like (23%) the plan. Respondents wanted to lower vehicles speeds; provide safer travel through more protection for those walking, biking, and driving; increase enforcement; and have more action taken sooner to achieve Vision Zero. Respondents also pointed to the importance of routine maintenance of sidewalks and roadways, elimination of right-turn slip lanes, traffic signal timing that supports more vehicular flow and reduced visual clutter to achieving Vision Zero. Boulder Vision Zero Phase 2 Outreach Summary Public Meeting PowerPoint Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan public meeting. We will begin shortly. Welcome to the Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Public Meeting #2 February 7, 2023 Vision Zero Background & Project Purpose •Vision Zero is Boulder’s goal to eliminate all crashes that result in a serious injury or fatality –since 2014 •Between 2018 and 2020… •14,500 people were involved in a crash •Nine people were killed •150 people were seriously injured •Current Vision Zero Action Plan: 2019-21 •Creating a new five-year Vision Zero Action Plan for 2023-27 •Community engagement •New analysis methods •Improvements from the 2019-21 plan •Project list and implementation strategy •Funding opportunities 2019-2021 Action Plan Success49Made changes at intersections Leading Pedestrian Intervals –reduce vehicle/ pedestrian crashes Left-turn arrows –reduce left-turn crashes Red light cameras –reduce red light running crashes Signing/markings –reduce multiple crash types 2019-2021 Action Plan Success Implemented 20 mph residential street speed limit 20 Is Plenty 2019-2021 Action Plan Success Advanced Vision Zero improvements, like separated bicycle lanes, with planned annual paving through the pavement management mobility enhancements program: •Table Mesa Drive •Lehigh Street •Pine Street •Folsom Street •17th Street 2019-2021 Action Plan Success Won $4.8M In grant funding through the Highway Safety Improvement Program, Safe Routes to School, and other regional, state, and federal sources •Mesa Elementary Safe Routes to School improvements •Pedestrian crossings •47th Street sidewalks •New traffic lights •Speed limit setting •Other street design upgrades How We Developed the 2023-2027 Plan We developed the Vision Zero Action Plan by incorporating: Successes and lessons learned from the 2019-2021 Vision Zero Action Plan How We Developed the 2023-2027 Plan We developed the Vision Zero Action Plan by incorporating: The city’s 2022 Safe Streets Report, which analyzed crash data and identified crash trends How We Developed the 2023-2027 Plan Phase 1 community engagement in summer and fall of 2022 •Virtual public meeting •BeHeardBoulder survey and Web map •English and Spanish language options •Meetings with Community Cycles, the Center for People with Disabilities, and Community Connectors-in-Residence •Participated in Spanish language Resource Fair at San Lazaro Park Properties We developed the Vision Zero Action Plan by incorporating: Phase 1 Community Engagement 700 surveys and Web map comments provided through BeHeardBoulder 37%of respondents had either been or knew someone who had been seriously injured or killed in a traffic crash The top 4 traffic safety concerns among respondents: distracted driving, drivers not yielding to pedestrians or bicyclists, speeding, and drivers and bicyclists not sharing the road 66%of respondents stated that traffic safety affects whether they walk, bike, take transit, or drive The top corridors that respondents were concerned about: Broadway/South Broadway, Table Mesa Drive/South Boulder Road, Arapahoe Avenue, and 28th Street How We Developed the 2023-2027 Plan New analysis to identify locations with the most risk for crashes, the High Risk Network, and proactive ways of eliminating crashes We developed the Vision Zero Action Plan by incorporating: Systemic Safety Analysis •Analyzing historic crash data alone leads to managing risk only at certain locations •Systemic Safety evaluates risk across the entire roadway system •This approach shifts from reactive to proactive crash reduction strategies Top 6 Risk Factors •Business and mixed-use zoning districts •Higher traffic volume streets •Signalized intersections •Busier intersections without a traffic light •Streets with a multi-use path •Higher speed streets Core Arterial Network Corridors Elevating work on a connected system of corridors to meet Boulder’s transportation goals: •Protected bike lanes, intersection enhancements, pedestrian facilities, transit facility upgrades •Reduce potential for severe crashes •Make travel more comfortable and convenient Project Identification Along each of the High Risk Network corridors, we identified possible solutions based on: •Engineer’s review of crash data (5 years) •Highway Safety Manual analysis •BeHeardBoulder feedback How We Developed the 2023-2027 Plan Racial Equity Index •% of the population that are people of color •% of the population that are Hispanic/Latino •Median income •% of the population below the poverty line •% of the population enrolled in Housing & Human Services financial aid programs 2023-27 Vision Zero Action Plan Four categories of actions: 1. Implement engineering solutions like traffic lights and intersection redesigns 2. Pair engineering solutions with education and enforcement 3. Improve the city’s internal Vision Zero practices 4. Improve Vision Zero data and transparency 1. Implement engineering solutionsKey actions •Implement low-cost solutions on the High Risk Network •Implement higher cost solutions on the High Risk Network •Implement corridor-wide solutions on Core Arterial Network corridors •Upgrade practices/guidelines/policies for pedestrian crossings, speed limit setting, and traffic light operations •Experiment with and evaluate promising solutions •Pursue and attract regional, state, and federal funding Common Crash Types & Engineering Solutions •Running red lights •Left-turn crashes •Right-turn slip lanes •Right-turn on red crashes •Right-turn crashes •Crashes at pedestrian crossings Running Red Lights Low-cost solutions: Review and adjust timings so they are “in sync” with nearby lights Higher cost solutions: •Traffic light replacement to add more signal heads, backplates, or heads in more visible locations •Red light cameras Example location: 28th Street & Pearl Street Left-Turn Crashes Low-cost solutions: Protect left-turns (left-turn on green arrow only) where traffic light equipment allows Higher cost solutions: Protect left-turns where traffic light equipment upgrades are needed Example location: Baseline Road & Mohawk Drive Proactive approaches: •Protect left-turns when there are many pedestrians or bicyclists •Apply customized criteria on vertical bike separation corridors Right-Turn Slip Lanes Low-cost solutions: Consistent signing and markings Evaluation of higher cost solutions: •Signalizing right-turn slip lanes •Changing geometry of right-turn slip lanes •Removing right-turn slip lanes Example location: Broadway & University Avenue (northbound) Proactive approach: Prioritize locations with high vehicle right-turn volumes and high pedestrian/bicyclist volumes Right-Turn on Red Crashes Low-cost solutions: •“No right-turn on Red” signs •Couple right-turn on red restrictions with enforcement for compliance Higher cost solutions: •Protect right-turns (right-turn on green arrow only) with traffic light equipment upgrades •Blank-out signs for dynamic “No right-turn on Red” prohibitions Example location: Broadway & University Avenue (eastbound) Proactive approach: Prioritize locations with high vehicle right-turn volumes and high pedestrian/bicyclist volumes on the intersecting street Right-Turn Crashes Low-cost solutions: •Leading Pedestrian Intervals Higher cost solutions: •Protect right-turns (right-turn on green arrow) with traffic light equipment upgrades •Protected intersections (on vertical bike separation corridors) Example location: Arapahoe Avenue & 17th Street Proactive approach: Prioritize locations with high conflicting volumes of right-turning vehicles and pedestrians/bicyclists Crashes at Pedestrian Crossings Low-cost solutions: •Pedestrian recall (automatic “Walk” signal) •Leading Pedestrian Intervals Higher cost solutions: •Update city’s Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines •Implementation of traffic lights, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (at new crossings and upgrading existing crossings) Example location: Existing RRFB on Baseline Road at Canyon Creek Road Proactive approach: Upgrade existing crossings based on new Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines 2. Pair engineering solutions with education and enforcement Key actions •Regular collaboration between the Police Department and Transportation & Mobility •Deploy photo radar van •Expand the use of red light cameras •Support legislation to enable expanded use of photo radar van •Implement campaigns focusing on behaviors of concern •Combine engineering solutions with public information 3. Improve the city’s internal Vision Zero practicesKey actions •For all capital projects, designate a Vision Zero representative •Continued participation in the national Vision Zero Cities Network 4. Improve Vision Zero data and transparencyKey actions •Maintain and update the crash dashboard •Continue to refine and improve accuracy and utility of crash documentation Proposed Next Steps •Complete prioritization (benefit-cost, Equity Index, and BeHeardBoulder feedback) and project lists •Present to TAB in March 2023 •Present to City Council in April 2023 •Get involved by… •Taking our questionnaire •Signing up for office hours to provide feedback bouldercolorado.gov/projects/vision-zero-action-plan Vision Zero Action Plan Website https://bouldercolorado.gov/projects/vision-zero-action-plan Staff Contact Devin Joslin, PE, PTOE joslind@bouldercolorado.gov 303-441-3289 Questions & Answers Boulder Vision Zero Phase 2 Outreach Summary One-Page Plan Summary How We Developed the Vision Zero Action Plan The city developed the 2023-2027 Vision Zero Action Plan by incorporating: • Successes and lessons learned from the prior plan to make the new Vision Zero Action Plan more specific and actionable •The city's 2022 Safe Streets Report, which analyzed crash data and trends • Community engagement in summer and fall 2022, including a virtual open house, online survey and web map that received over 700 unique responses • New analysis to proactively identify locations with the most risk for crashes • Prioritization of a project list that accounts for project safety benefit, racial equity, and community engagement feedback What is the Vision Zero Action Plan? The Vision Zero Action Plan identifies a prioritized list of actions that the City of Boulder will take between 2023 and 2027 to reduce severe crashes. The Plan builds on the successes of the last Vision Zero Action Plan (2019-2021), which include: •Changes at 46 intersections including traffic signal timing that prioritizes pedestrians, left-turn arrows, and signing/markings • Implemented “20 Is Plenty” speed limits on all residential streets • Advanced a program to incorporate improvements like protected bicycle lanes with annual pavement work • Won almost $5 million in grant funding from state and federal agencies that resulted in Safe Routes to School improvements, pedestrian crossings, sidewalks, new traffic signals, speed limit setting, and other street design upgrades •Increased enforcement by installing red light cameras at three intersections to address drivers running red lights CITY of BOULDERVISIONZEROACTIONPLAN What is Vision Zero? Vision Zero is the City of Boulder’s goal to eliminate all severe crashes (those that result in a fatality or serious injury) . https://www.beheardboulder.org/vision-zero-action-plan South Boulder RdDiagonal Hwy63rd StPearl St 55th StF o o t h i l l s P kw yFolsom StCanyon Blvd Broadway75th StArapahoe Ave Iris Ave Baseline Rd Jay Rd Pearl Pkwy Lookout Rd Table Mesa Dr28th StGi l lasp ie DrViolet Ave 61st StFoothills HwyUs H w y 3 6 CITY of BOULDERVISIONZEROACTIONPLAN Vision Zero Action Plan Completion The city will finalize recommendations and project prioritization in February 2023, and present them at a public meeting on February 7, to the Transportation Advisory Board on March 13 and to City Council on April 6. High Risk Network (HRN) Vision Zero Action Plan Recommendations The city will implement Vision Zero in four ways over the next five years: 1.Changing how a street is built or how it operates (traffic lights, vehicle speeds, etc.) • Focusing improvements on the 18 Boulder corridors with the most risk for crashes, the High Risk Network (map) • Make changes to intersections and other locations where the most common crash types occur: red light running, left-turn crashes, crashes at right-turn slip lanes, right-turn on red crashes, other right-turn crashes, and crashes at pedestrian crossings • Coordinating Vision Zero projects with Boulder’s Core Arterial Network program, which improves connectivity and safety on key high-traffic routes • Pursuing regional, state and federal funding • Updating design practices, guidelines and policies 2.Pairing changes to streets with education and enforcement • Regular collaboration with the Boulder Police Department regarding enforcement of behaviors of concern (speeding, traveling under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and distracted driving) • Deploying the photo radar van, and supporting legislation to enable its expanded use • Expanding the use of red light cameras • Implementing campaigns focusing on behaviors of concern 3.Improving the city’s internal Vision Zero practices • Ensuring Vision Zero strategies are included in all capital projects • Participating in the national Vision Zero Cities Network and other regional Vision Zero collaboration 4.Improving Vision Zero data and transparency • Maintaining and updating the crash dashboard • Refining and improving the accuracy and utility of crash documentation 86 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM APPENDIX D 1919 14th Street | Suite 700 | Boulder, CO 80302 | (720) 457-6370 | www.fehrandpeers.com Memorandum Date: September 9, 2022 To: Devin Joslin, City of Boulder From: Fehr & Peers Subject: Draft Systemic Safety Analysis for Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan DN18-0589.04 The purpose of this technical memorandum is to document the process used to complete a Systemic Safety analysis of five years of crash data provided by the City of Boulder and to identify trends and potential risk factors. With a set of risk factors, we will map overlapping risk factors citywide to identify area of focus for more detailed crash analysis and countermeasure identification. Attachment A contains the Systemic Safety analysis matrices. The matrices summarize crash data as provided by the City of Boulder from 2016 through 2020. The matrices are: • All crashes • KSI crashes (fatal or incapacitating injury) • Bike crashes • Bike KSI crashes • Pedestrian crashes • Pedestrian KSI crashes Devin Joslin September 9, 2022 Page 2 of 5 Data Definitions Table 1 and Table 2 show the various data sources or fields for the contextual datasets and for crash data fields. Table 1: Contextual Datasets (Column-level Data) Dataset File Names/Data Source(s) Roadway type (lanes, speed) “Street_centerline”; City of Boulder Location type (signal, unsignalized, midblock) “Street_centerline”; City of Boulder “Signalizedintersections”; City of Boulder General roadway classification “Street_centerline”; City of Boulder Bike facility “Onstreetbikeped”; City of Boulder “Offstreetbikeped”; City of Boulder Sidewalks “Offstreetbikeped”; City of Boulder “Sidewalks” (contained missing sidewalks); Fehr & Peers, derived for the Low Stress Walk & Bike Network Plan On-street parking “Regulations”; City of Boulder Signals (cycle length) Cycle length data from various sources provided by the City of Boulder, attached to “Signalizedintersections” Crosswalk “Crossings”; City of Boulder Streetlights “Streetlights”; City of Boulder Near school, park, OSMP trailhead, bus stop, community/senior center, alcohol serving establishment “Parks”, “Schools”, “OSMP_trailheads”, “Communityseniorcenters”, “Liquorlicenses”; City of Boulder “RTD_current_runboard”; RTD Zoning districts “Zoningdistricts”; City of Boulder Wejo data Connected vehicle data, processed by and provided by Wejo; Fehr & Peers Daily traffic Intersection turning movement counts from Boulder’s Web-based traffic count data, converted to daily volumes using a citywide K-factor, attached to “Street_centerline” Be Heard Boulder Web map results From data generated through Be Heard Boulder; City of Boulder Source: Fehr & Peers Devin Joslin September 9, 2022 Page 3 of 5 Table 2: Crash Data (Row-level Data) Crash Data Data Field/Method Alcohol, drug, or impaired “T_Alcohol”, “T_Drug”, or “T_Impaired” equal to 1 Distracted “Distracted” contained in R_Contributingfactor_V1, R_Contributingfactor_V2, or R_Contributingfactor_V3 Speeding “Exceeded safe or posted speed” contained in Q_Driveractions_V1, Q_Driveractions_V2, or Q_Driveractions_V3 Bicyclist direction “Bicyclistdirection_Pbcatbike” Bicyclist position “Bicyclistposition_Pbcatbike” Crash type “T_Crashtype” Time of day “Crashtime” Month of year “Crashdate” Movement “M_Vehiclemovement_V1” Injured party age(s) “Age_D1”, “Age_D2”, or “Age_D3”, combined with “InjuryseverityD1”, “InjuryseverityD2”, or “InjuryseverityD3”, Source: Fehr & Peers Devin Joslin September 9, 2022 Page 4 of 5 High-level Findings The purpose of developing the Systemic Safety matrices is to identify crash profiles of significance and risk factors across the transportation system. In doing so, we generally look within individual crash field (rows) and contextual variable (column) categories, looking for datapoints that represent either a high overall number or high percentage of crashes. Based on our review of the Systemic Safety analysis, we have the following high-level findings: • Crash profiles of significance, according to the Systemic Safety matrices, generally align with the findings of the Safe Streets Report, including bicycle and pedestrian crashes, crashes involving people ages 15-29 and 65+, and left-turn crashes. • Other profiles that standout but are more nuanced include bicyclist-involved crashes where the bicyclist is riding against traffic or the driver is making a right-turn at signals or at multi-use paths. • In looking at all crashes, 9 PM through 3 AM is a time period to focus on. However, in just looking bicycle and pedestrian crashes, daytime hours are the area of focus (6 AM to 6 PM for bicycle crashes, 9 AM to 9 PM for pedestrian crashes). • The contextual data identifies some clear differences and informs potential risk factors. Some of these potential risk factors likely overlap, so in mapping risk factors to identify locations for further analysis, we may aim to select different categories of risk factors that do not overlap significantly to provide differentiation. o Near a signalized intersection, especially those with a maximum cycle length great than 100 seconds (this also includes crosswalks at a traffic signal), recognizing that longer cycle lengths correlate to larger intersections with higher entering volumes. o Near a major, unsignalized intersection (any unsignalized intersection where one approach has multiple lanes approaching); minor unsignalized intersections are also notable for pedestrian crashes. o Both of the above overlap with principal arterials and minor arterials, though it should be said there are a fair number of KSI crashes (including bicycle or pedestrian KSI crashes) on smaller streets (three lanes or less, residential, etc.), which is likely representative of the number of roadway miles that these streets comprise. o Locations with on-street bike lanes or no bike facility/shared lane. o Crosswalk locations with signing/marking only or unmarked (in addition to crosswalks at a traffic signal, as described above), which involve both pedestrians and bicyclists. o Locations where streetlights are not present. o Near parks, bus stops, or alcohol serving establishments. o Locations adjacent to business or mixed-use zone districts. Devin Joslin September 9, 2022 Page 5 of 5 o Locations with higher speeds and more quick acceleration, according to Wejo data. o Locations where the daily traffic per lane is <5,000 vehicles per day per lane. Based on these high level findings, Fehr & Peers recommends detailed review of the following risk factors for determination of the final risk factors that will comprise the High Risk Network: • Be Heard Boulder high-concern segments • Wejo hard braking – high • Wejo quick acceleration – high • Wejo 85th percentile operating speeds >30 mph • Daily traffic per lane 5,000-10,000 vehicles per lane per day • Business and mixed-use zoning districts • Nearby uses (parks, bus stops, alcohol serving establishments) • Streetlight not present • Unmarked and uncontrolled crossings • Bicycle facility presence: on-street bike lane and no bike facility/shared lane • Multi-use path present • Signals with cycle length greater than 100 seconds • Major unsignalized intersections • Signalized intersections • Principal and minor arterials • Roadway type: 6+ lanes, 35 mph+ posted speeds Fehr & Peers created a web-based GIS tool to facilitate the review of these risk factors: https://devapps.fehrandpeers.com/devportal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=75520c7253174 bbab31983740038eef5 All Crashes Number of Lanes <4 <4 4 5 >5 >5 Posted Speed Limit <35 >34 <35 >34 <35 >34 Signalized Minor Unsignalized Major Unsignalized Midblock Freeway Express way Ramp Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Residential Private Pedestrian Mall Alley 1 0 Signalized RRFB Marked Unmarked 1 0 Business Downtown Mixed Industrial Public Residential Agriculture <=30 >30 High Medium Low High Medium Low "<5,000 vpl (Or no counts)" "5,000- 10,000 vpl" ">10,000 vpl" Cell Value TOTAL 4777 299 1029 2939 390 3350 5923 1567 3621 1673 140 659 78 5181 2810 878 2768 238 6 26 70 4207 3064 5443 9704 168 4529 8255 1098 4779 6298 229 2183 2890 1334 11450 553 3713 43 2016 231 8964 6213 800 3568 910 481 812 0 5792 6992 3601 7888 1295 3014 3346 3991 8060 4398 326 Alcohol, Drug, or Impaired (T_Alcohol, T_Drug, T_Impaired)1 571 305 23 42 90 11 100 186 133 174 78 2 23 1 189 96 48 203 7 0 2 5 147 100 319 471 15 276 295 48 137 193 7 108 208 46 525 26 173 2 93 6 351 206 37 202 25 24 77 0 312 259 98 370 103 95 125 189 390 170 11 Distracted (use contributing factor to create 'DISTRACTED')1 1145 373 33 82 288 40 329 592 106 314 133 13 78 8 494 261 70 192 28 1 0 6 375 308 456 851 9 337 808 101 487 630 26 176 215 124 1021 65 295 3 205 32 772 564 60 315 86 49 71 0 433 712 382 686 77 343 332 302 674 437 34 Speeding 1 212 102 5 13 47 6 39 75 50 63 24 7 20 2 66 23 18 74 1 0 1 3 50 34 125 149 9 97 115 16 57 72 4 32 65 17 195 15 61 1 32 2 90 51 8 88 25 11 29 0 100 112 46 125 41 48 48 59 154 52 6 Bicyclist Riding Against Traffic (Bicyclistdirection)Facing Traffic 234 58 5 22 64 18 67 125 12 73 24 0 2 10 122 46 7 37 10 0 0 3 68 106 57 187 1 78 156 12 112 130 4 52 39 31 203 11 71 0 39 6 194 142 12 55 8 10 7 0 107 127 53 173 8 46 68 88 140 92 2 Sidewalk / Crosswalk / Driveway Crossing 157 55 3 19 42 14 24 80 11 51 15 0 1 0 63 43 10 34 6 0 0 3 64 35 55 125 0 53 104 20 60 85 5 23 39 24 133 15 66 1 31 6 128 86 16 42 4 2 7 0 87 70 31 118 8 28 43 60 106 50 1 Travel Lane 110 85 1 5 8 3 8 28 37 34 11 0 0 0 17 22 14 54 2 0 1 2 31 10 67 99 1 63 47 11 17 30 2 28 41 6 104 7 51 0 15 7 64 31 9 43 2 3 22 0 78 32 8 82 20 7 22 48 88 22 0 Bike Lane / Paved Shoulder 213 106 10 19 56 5 17 75 13 109 16 0 1 0 37 90 31 52 2 0 0 3 163 32 15 183 3 77 136 12 62 91 8 55 52 9 204 13 83 1 39 6 137 95 4 86 8 13 7 0 129 84 28 170 15 24 52 90 144 69 0 Other 5 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 5 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 0 3 2 0 Unknown 14 4 0 1 2 1 6 7 1 5 1 0 0 0 6 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 5 3 6 8 0 4 10 1 6 9 2 1 2 0 14 0 3 0 3 1 9 5 1 6 0 1 1 0 7 7 2 11 1 1 2 7 9 5 0 Non Roadway 15 6 1 1 3 0 4 5 5 2 3 0 0 0 4 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 5 8 12 0 6 9 0 5 6 2 2 4 1 14 1 3 1 3 0 13 9 1 2 1 0 2 0 8 7 4 6 5 4 3 4 12 3 0 Multi Use Path 222 45 4 20 51 15 87 120 10 66 26 0 6 16 132 31 9 20 8 0 0 0 35 144 43 172 0 56 166 0 120 120 13 63 14 32 190 6 46 0 30 1 171 137 0 48 11 18 8 0 79 143 57 146 19 46 68 76 123 97 2 Driveway / Alley 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 Signs 167 89 8 6 39 2 23 13 33 108 13 0 0 3 51 37 19 51 6 0 0 1 53 72 41 162 2 81 86 0 13 17 6 93 47 7 160 11 71 1 27 8 120 80 2 55 5 3 22 0 92 75 9 141 17 21 50 58 113 52 2 Signals 236 60 1 30 53 21 71 215 1 17 3 0 3 4 107 70 11 34 7 0 0 5 113 63 55 150 0 66 170 36 178 220 0 10 5 41 195 12 60 0 33 7 176 124 17 72 3 18 2 0 124 112 78 155 3 47 57 108 159 77 0 Right Turn By pass island 42 4 0 7 3 9 19 41 0 1 0 0 3 9 22 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 12 23 7 26 0 2 40 0 41 40 0 2 0 12 30 0 7 0 2 1 34 22 1 5 8 6 0 0 19 23 20 22 0 6 17 15 26 15 1 Rapid Flashing Sign 27 2 0 3 16 1 5 0 0 23 4 0 0 0 15 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 14 4 26 0 2 25 0 0 0 22 4 1 3 24 2 9 0 10 3 21 19 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 26 2 24 1 5 13 6 12 15 0 Signs 36 27 1 2 1 0 5 3 8 24 1 0 0 0 7 9 6 14 0 0 0 0 13 6 17 35 3 25 11 0 3 5 0 11 19 1 35 1 10 1 4 1 25 9 0 20 3 1 3 0 21 15 2 28 6 0 9 18 29 7 0 Signals 124 35 2 27 20 9 31 118 0 5 1 0 1 1 65 23 6 27 1 0 0 0 53 25 46 87 0 31 93 42 76 119 0 3 2 27 97 8 31 0 26 2 101 72 21 25 1 4 1 0 46 78 44 80 0 40 27 48 79 43 2 Right Turn By pass island 6 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 0 0 6 0 6 5 0 1 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 1 5 1 0 1 3 1 5 1 0 Rapid Flashing Sign 12 0 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 12 0 1 11 0 0 1 9 1 1 0 12 2 7 0 2 0 11 5 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 12 2 10 0 4 6 2 7 5 0 Head On 169 87 1 17 26 7 31 73 29 45 22 2 0 1 52 38 15 55 4 1 1 1 58 33 77 135 3 71 98 17 55 77 1 27 51 14 155 7 60 1 21 5 117 76 14 47 7 2 23 0 94 75 37 107 25 37 31 59 124 44 1 Parked Vehicle 1158 810 17 56 114 5 156 231 377 331 219 1 2 0 274 190 98 573 13 1 6 0 198 188 772 1072 27 756 402 73 155 258 26 276 477 87 1071 52 365 5 166 28 801 441 88 417 40 17 155 0 784 374 116 726 316 133 205 408 891 262 5 Sideswipe-Same Direction 1094 376 14 102 235 42 325 533 128 296 137 11 60 5 496 223 68 214 13 1 3 13 306 275 500 858 9 353 741 132 400 566 18 160 251 108 986 43 351 4 183 18 789 532 108 278 62 50 64 0 505 589 343 644 107 314 288 309 671 396 27 Rear End 4189 959 118 365 1199 174 1374 2458 223 1032 476 83 387 40 2013 940 218 449 53 1 5 22 1504 1148 1515 2847 42 948 3241 349 2085 2589 67 519 623 556 3633 202 1061 7 679 52 2896 2182 194 1063 388 193 169 0 1418 2771 1720 2292 177 1368 1262 1079 2319 1681 189 Other 737 376 15 58 126 13 149 232 132 225 148 11 12 0 263 160 55 210 21 1 4 2 174 179 382 624 11 358 379 70 160 255 23 190 192 47 690 26 282 4 130 13 576 372 86 176 33 23 47 0 390 347 121 500 116 125 194 237 494 236 7 Right Angle 1415 682 20 87 313 30 283 558 204 505 148 3 37 3 449 360 134 391 35 0 3 6 529 253 627 1161 21 662 753 120 435 587 9 329 384 136 1279 50 444 6 201 41 1013 660 92 421 93 34 115 0 780 635 257 1030 128 234 367 519 966 438 11 Bicycle 745 306 20 66 165 38 150 319 78 274 74 0 8 16 266 200 65 170 19 0 1 8 303 234 200 610 4 265 480 46 272 345 34 177 154 73 672 42 259 3 123 23 530 370 32 231 26 38 48 0 394 351 132 544 69 113 192 288 491 251 3 FixedObject 859 384 37 57 193 11 177 245 166 288 160 22 54 3 302 138 57 269 13 0 1 8 225 148 478 649 18 335 524 56 188 281 9 165 256 60 799 38 265 3 139 12 493 311 44 292 72 45 95 0 404 455 167 520 172 175 179 255 558 266 35 Sideswipe-Opposite Direction 111 62 2 9 20 2 16 39 19 38 15 0 0 0 34 27 12 33 3 0 2 0 29 25 57 100 2 57 54 14 25 38 1 23 39 9 102 7 46 0 22 2 80 37 11 42 6 3 12 0 66 45 13 73 25 17 27 36 74 36 1 Pedestrian 301 118 7 38 54 18 66 164 27 82 28 0 2 2 140 63 20 72 2 0 0 0 101 73 127 242 5 104 197 56 108 172 13 45 61 42 259 18 80 2 62 5 242 156 36 80 9 9 11 0 129 172 68 214 19 70 82 106 199 100 2 Overturning 34 14 6 3 8 0 3 6 6 20 2 1 1 1 10 9 4 8 0 0 0 1 14 5 14 28 0 14 20 2 4 7 0 11 13 0 34 2 13 0 6 1 17 7 1 13 6 2 5 0 14 20 5 26 3 8 7 12 20 14 0 Approach Turn 983 234 17 73 264 30 365 645 54 210 74 1 54 4 459 256 58 126 25 0 0 4 446 248 285 616 14 271 712 75 563 679 6 84 161 102 881 28 234 2 127 19 685 547 33 246 97 31 29 0 407 576 356 598 29 215 235 379 657 305 21 Overtaking turn 208 74 4 20 48 6 56 117 17 54 20 3 9 3 78 59 13 39 4 0 0 0 70 58 80 161 1 76 132 34 83 123 3 27 39 26 182 7 62 0 40 2 157 112 24 37 18 8 9 0 105 103 64 127 17 37 61 66 127 76 5 Animal 71 15 7 5 30 0 14 17 2 33 19 1 15 0 31 10 7 7 0 0 0 0 29 14 28 45 2 11 60 0 17 18 0 12 22 5 66 4 19 1 10 0 22 17 0 35 5 9 5 0 11 60 17 50 4 19 25 13 28 37 6 Bicycle - Pedestrian 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 3 2 0 2 3 0 1 2 3 2 0 Midnight - 3 am 299 155 9 29 43 10 53 97 69 96 37 2 9 2 105 52 25 100 2 0 2 1 62 53 183 237 4 147 152 29 66 105 1 61 103 30 269 16 94 1 46 4 187 94 28 122 11 14 30 0 165 134 50 188 61 50 60 107 216 79 4 3 am - 6 am 160 85 8 8 28 1 30 49 39 56 16 2 19 1 40 19 14 62 1 0 2 1 47 32 80 133 4 81 79 5 44 49 2 32 58 16 144 5 45 1 19 2 89 56 4 69 13 2 16 0 83 77 36 93 31 24 30 51 113 40 7 6 am - 9 am 1388 481 59 91 367 31 359 589 179 413 207 32 122 14 514 283 80 335 8 0 0 12 471 303 602 1024 29 450 938 91 493 643 24 203 322 122 1266 64 389 6 231 22 853 565 59 445 138 66 115 0 589 799 389 860 139 364 343 386 892 443 53 9 am - Noon 2292 824 46 183 540 66 633 1061 282 642 307 23 134 25 932 497 154 481 35 1 10 8 748 570 966 1721 29 777 1515 187 864 1141 44 389 496 255 2037 89 636 8 377 42 1653 1159 127 597 194 89 126 0 1033 1259 667 1397 228 553 612 710 1447 786 59 Noon- 3 pm 2957 1104 39 250 670 90 804 1381 329 825 422 18 111 13 1280 651 217 582 79 1 5 13 946 727 1271 2265 31 1076 1881 265 1108 1471 64 546 637 290 2667 120 875 10 469 54 2193 1553 201 731 190 105 177 0 1332 1625 833 1820 304 700 780 935 1824 1069 64 3 pm - 6 pm 3422 1216 82 298 849 102 875 1604 370 1017 431 39 166 11 1407 832 232 665 64 2 4 21 1165 887 1349 2686 43 1172 2250 301 1289 1699 70 601 775 371 3051 173 1015 14 579 70 2420 1701 207 953 252 126 183 0 1445 1977 988 2163 271 883 927 1053 2055 1281 86 6 pm - 9 pm 1483 559 36 116 306 64 402 786 158 380 159 14 73 7 612 336 99 303 36 1 2 10 528 347 598 1083 15 505 978 151 630 821 19 231 293 166 1317 57 431 1 198 23 1063 752 112 394 80 55 90 0 728 755 454 896 133 319 404 474 979 469 35 9 pm - Midnight 745 338 19 52 127 24 185 339 137 181 88 9 23 5 277 129 55 233 12 1 1 4 226 141 374 527 13 308 437 66 271 350 5 115 196 79 666 28 213 2 91 12 478 317 58 247 28 23 72 0 398 347 175 448 122 114 182 261 508 221 16 June-August 3349 1231 87 274 763 103 891 1530 414 961 444 27 191 27 1406 690 215 730 52 2 9 14 1040 842 1453 2572 34 1206 2143 281 1239 1628 63 584 762 366 2983 124 1026 16 519 70 2410 1665 230 868 251 117 218 0 1514 1835 954 2044 351 807 888 995 2105 1145 99 September-May 9435 3546 212 755 2176 287 2459 4393 1153 2660 1229 113 468 51 3775 2120 663 2038 186 4 17 56 3167 2222 3990 7132 134 3323 6112 817 3540 4670 166 1599 2128 968 8467 429 2687 27 1497 161 6554 4548 570 2700 659 364 594 0 4278 5157 2647 5844 944 2207 2458 2996 5955 3253 227 Going Straight 4787 1663 156 364 1186 172 1246 2250 523 1439 575 84 337 28 1983 1045 314 923 65 1 7 27 1573 1147 2040 3615 73 1582 3205 402 1828 2384 104 803 1039 543 4244 268 1323 12 800 93 3100 2098 250 1522 333 192 392 0 2009 2778 1446 2950 391 1320 1276 1376 2860 1767 160 Making Right Turn 1386 352 22 114 397 49 452 887 111 304 84 14 90 31 612 326 65 220 24 0 4 7 574 381 424 869 10 344 1042 100 785 929 15 185 181 214 1172 37 359 2 161 20 1053 839 52 263 138 61 33 0 578 808 556 746 84 305 417 456 870 463 53 Making Left Turn 1735 570 28 136 444 48 509 960 142 469 164 5 63 6 704 440 107 375 35 0 0 11 716 409 599 1244 28 599 1136 163 788 1000 13 199 389 165 1570 48 495 9 235 26 1223 913 86 459 148 67 62 0 814 921 496 1133 106 332 430 649 1178 533 24 Children <15 76 45 5 7 7 2 10 22 13 34 7 1 0 0 18 19 9 28 1 0 0 0 30 12 34 59 6 33 43 9 13 27 2 22 19 8 68 10 21 1 14 4 44 21 6 33 1 3 12 0 49 27 13 51 12 10 13 24 55 21 0 Youth 15-19 235 82 5 24 56 14 54 106 23 92 14 2 9 5 115 42 8 53 1 0 0 2 66 78 89 175 2 83 152 21 85 113 11 53 46 31 204 17 57 0 43 4 156 106 13 77 5 10 24 0 96 139 61 151 23 64 60 69 147 82 6 Ages 20-29 800 246 19 75 201 44 215 401 67 251 81 11 33 6 336 208 55 142 8 0 1 9 296 215 280 622 10 236 564 50 348 421 21 120 180 86 714 35 240 1 146 16 539 387 27 256 47 45 38 0 359 441 214 533 53 177 208 289 487 299 14 Ages 30-64 1415 382 58 112 416 41 406 770 81 387 177 16 95 17 646 330 96 189 25 0 1 12 574 360 469 1000 13 404 1011 126 639 810 20 211 238 142 1273 49 378 5 245 29 989 732 66 369 128 54 66 0 514 901 441 899 75 398 388 425 849 527 39 Older Adults 65+298 86 14 29 83 5 81 164 26 66 42 1 22 3 125 60 26 56 5 0 0 2 103 82 111 213 7 94 204 22 142 180 7 38 48 31 267 7 83 1 44 5 181 147 11 81 28 14 17 0 119 179 106 168 24 82 72 84 184 106 8 Midblock General Roadway Classification Crash Type (T_Crashtype) Time of Day Month of Year Multi-Use Path Near OSMP Trailhead (500 ft) Near Park (500 ft) Streetlight (≤50 ft)Sidewalks Present (incl. Mult- use Paths) On-street Parking No Bike Facility/ Shared Lane Near School (500 ft) Signals (≤250 ft): Max Cycle Length (s) Crosswalk (≤250 ft) <= 100Missing > 100 Wejo Data Daily Traffic per Lane Hard Braking 85th %tile Operating Speeds (Weekdays 7PM- 6PM) <5,000 vpl (Or no counts) 5,000- 10,000 vpl >10,000 vpl Near Alcohol Serving Establishment (1,000 ft) Quick Acceleration (number of incidents/segment)Business Downtown Mix of Residential and Businesses, Residential Mobile Homes, Higher Density Residential Industrial Public Residential (Single Family) Agricultural (No crashes) Zoning Districts Near Bus Stop (100 ft) Near Community/ Senior Center (500 ft) Location Type Signal (≤250 ft) Unsignalized Intersection (≤250 ft) On-street Parking Present No On- street Parking Signal/ PHB RRFB Signing/ Markings Unmarked Present Not Present Bike Facility Protected Bike Lane On-Street Bike Lane Roadway Type 3 Lanes or Less 4-5 Lanes 6+ Lanes Bicyclist Position Trafficcontrol_Pbcatbike Trafficcontrol_Pbcatped Movement (M_Vehiclemovement_V1) Injured Party Age(s) KSI Number of Lanes <4 <4 4 5 >5 >5 Posted Speed Limit <35 >34 <35 >34 <35 >34 Signalized Minor Unsignalized Major Unsignalized Midblock Freeway Express way Ramp Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Residential Private Pedestrian Mall Alley 1 0 Signalized RRFB Marked Unmarked 1 0 Business Downtown Mixed Industrial Public Residential Agriculture <=30 >30 High Medium Low High Medium Low "<5,000 vpl (Or no counts)" "5,000- 10,000 vpl" ">10,000 vpl" Cell Value TOTAL 102 11 28 70 7 67 132 22 98 33 1 16 4 107 73 26 53 5 0 0 3 114 74 94 216 3 97 188 23 109 140 12 50 54 27 258 11 82 0 50 5 193 136 13 82 17 14 23 0 109 176 64 195 26 61 66 101 173 104 8 Alcohol, Drug, or Impaired (T_Alcohol, T_Drug, T_Impaired)1 32 8 2 3 8 1 10 15 2 11 4 0 4 0 15 8 1 4 0 0 0 0 10 10 12 23 0 8 24 2 13 16 1 4 8 2 30 0 12 0 5 0 20 11 2 14 3 0 2 0 9 23 10 18 4 8 5 14 15 14 3 Distracted (use contributing factor to create 'DISTRACTED')1 21 7 0 0 7 2 5 9 2 7 3 1 2 0 6 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 7 5 9 15 1 7 14 1 8 9 4 2 4 2 19 1 7 0 5 0 13 12 1 2 1 2 3 0 8 13 5 14 2 5 5 8 13 7 1 Speeding 1 5 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 3 0 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 0 Bicyclist Riding Against Traffic (Bicyclistdirection)Facing Traffic 14 4 0 2 5 1 2 8 1 4 1 0 0 0 7 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 5 7 1 11 0 6 8 0 8 7 0 3 3 1 13 1 2 0 5 1 11 7 1 4 0 1 1 0 6 8 3 11 0 4 4 5 8 6 0 Sidewalk / Crosswalk / Driveway Crossing 9 3 0 1 3 0 2 5 0 3 1 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 2 2 6 0 4 5 1 4 6 0 0 3 1 8 1 4 0 3 1 7 2 2 4 1 0 0 0 6 3 4 5 0 2 2 3 6 3 0 Travel Lane 20 14 1 3 2 0 0 5 7 6 2 0 0 0 4 6 3 7 0 0 0 1 3 4 12 17 0 12 8 3 2 5 0 6 6 2 18 1 8 0 2 0 12 6 1 6 1 1 5 0 9 11 1 16 3 1 5 7 14 6 0 Bike Lane / Paved Shoulder 37 19 2 3 10 2 1 10 1 22 4 0 0 0 5 16 8 7 1 0 0 1 29 3 4 31 1 17 20 1 9 15 2 8 9 0 37 2 14 0 5 0 22 18 1 10 3 2 3 0 20 17 1 32 4 2 7 17 25 12 0 Other 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Unknown 4 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 Non Roadway 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 Multi Use Path 29 7 1 5 8 1 7 11 3 6 9 0 1 0 16 3 2 5 2 0 0 0 3 19 7 24 0 5 24 0 11 9 3 9 3 4 25 3 6 0 4 0 18 16 0 8 0 3 2 0 12 17 5 15 9 7 5 7 14 15 0 Driveway / Alley 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Signs 15 8 0 1 6 0 0 2 3 10 0 0 0 0 3 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 14 1 8 7 0 2 2 0 7 5 1 14 0 4 0 4 0 10 7 0 2 0 1 5 0 9 6 1 12 2 2 4 5 9 6 0 Signals 22 7 0 3 5 2 5 19 0 2 1 0 1 0 9 7 1 2 2 0 0 2 11 6 3 14 0 6 16 2 17 21 0 1 0 4 18 2 5 0 3 0 15 10 2 7 1 2 0 0 9 13 5 17 0 3 3 14 11 11 0 Right Turn By pass island 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 Rapid Flashing Sign 6 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 6 0 1 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 4 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 0 Signs 9 7 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 8 1 8 1 0 1 1 0 4 4 0 9 0 3 0 1 1 6 1 0 6 1 0 1 0 3 6 0 8 1 0 2 5 8 1 0 Signals 26 8 1 6 3 1 7 25 0 1 0 0 1 0 12 3 0 10 0 0 0 0 9 5 12 19 0 6 20 9 16 25 0 1 0 7 19 1 5 0 7 0 24 19 3 4 0 0 0 0 7 19 8 18 0 6 8 10 17 8 1 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rapid Flashing Sign 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 1 3 0 1 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 3 0 Head On 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Parked Vehicle 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Sideswipe-Same Direction 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 Rear End 20 5 1 2 7 0 5 8 0 8 4 0 6 0 5 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 5 6 13 0 6 14 2 6 8 0 2 4 4 16 1 9 0 2 1 10 4 1 9 2 1 3 0 3 17 6 12 2 8 1 8 6 11 3 Other 8 3 0 1 2 0 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 5 0 4 4 0 5 5 0 2 1 0 8 0 4 0 1 0 7 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 5 2 5 1 1 1 5 6 2 0 Right Angle 23 7 1 1 4 0 10 13 2 7 1 0 3 0 9 6 1 4 0 0 0 0 13 4 6 17 0 6 17 1 12 13 0 5 4 5 18 1 5 0 4 1 17 16 0 3 3 0 1 0 12 11 9 14 0 8 4 6 16 6 1 Bicycle 103 45 5 12 23 3 15 35 11 40 17 0 2 0 29 34 14 20 4 0 0 3 44 28 28 82 1 39 64 5 30 39 7 23 22 7 96 7 33 0 14 1 64 46 4 31 5 7 10 0 51 52 15 71 17 15 20 36 67 36 0 FixedObject 23 6 1 1 6 0 9 9 1 9 4 1 2 0 12 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 8 7 8 18 0 5 18 0 9 10 0 2 7 2 21 0 4 0 4 0 14 11 0 7 2 2 1 0 4 19 8 12 3 9 4 7 14 7 2 Sideswipe-Opposite Direction 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Pedestrian 62 20 2 10 13 3 14 34 4 19 5 0 2 0 30 10 2 18 0 0 0 0 18 15 29 48 1 24 38 11 23 37 5 9 8 7 55 2 15 0 15 1 53 34 6 16 2 0 4 0 17 45 11 51 0 11 20 24 37 24 1 Overturning 7 3 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 5 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 6 0 2 5 1 1 2 0 1 3 0 7 0 0 0 3 0 6 4 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 5 2 3 2 2 3 1 4 3 0 Approach Turn 27 7 0 0 10 1 9 23 1 3 0 0 0 2 14 7 1 2 1 0 0 0 12 6 9 17 0 8 19 3 20 23 0 1 2 2 25 0 9 0 5 1 15 11 1 9 3 2 1 0 12 15 9 18 0 6 6 11 19 8 0 Overtaking turn 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Animal 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Bicycle - Pedestrian 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 Midnight - 3 am 10 3 0 2 0 1 4 4 0 4 2 0 1 0 6 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 8 0 3 7 1 3 5 0 2 2 1 9 0 3 0 0 0 5 2 0 5 1 0 2 0 2 8 3 6 1 5 0 2 6 4 0 3 am - 6 am 6 1 1 0 1 0 3 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 3 0 2 4 0 4 4 0 0 2 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 5 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 4 4 1 1 0 2 2 3 1 2 6 am - 9 am 31 12 2 2 9 2 4 11 3 13 4 0 1 0 9 9 4 8 0 0 0 0 12 12 7 24 1 10 21 2 9 12 0 7 7 1 30 2 9 0 4 1 18 12 1 7 3 3 5 0 15 16 5 21 5 8 6 8 22 8 1 9 am - Noon 48 16 3 7 13 1 8 22 4 15 7 0 2 1 17 14 3 11 0 0 0 0 19 9 20 39 0 12 36 6 16 23 4 7 10 5 43 3 16 0 12 1 37 26 3 14 0 5 0 0 20 28 10 29 9 10 13 15 31 17 0 Noon- 3 pm 59 24 2 4 8 1 20 28 4 21 6 0 3 0 20 18 10 7 1 0 0 1 28 12 18 43 0 23 36 4 24 28 4 11 9 4 55 1 18 0 12 2 38 30 2 15 4 2 6 0 19 40 11 42 6 8 18 24 37 20 2 3 pm - 6 pm 63 24 1 3 22 2 11 21 5 28 9 0 2 1 23 19 4 12 2 0 0 1 28 16 18 56 1 28 35 3 18 25 2 15 17 4 59 3 13 0 12 1 49 36 2 16 2 1 6 0 25 38 9 53 1 14 15 23 40 22 1 6 pm - 9 pm 42 16 2 9 10 0 5 24 5 12 1 0 1 2 17 8 3 10 1 0 0 1 17 13 11 30 1 14 28 5 19 25 2 7 6 6 36 1 12 0 6 0 26 14 2 18 2 2 4 0 20 22 11 30 1 9 9 12 24 17 1 9 pm - Midnight 25 6 0 1 6 0 12 17 1 3 4 1 4 0 12 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 5 7 13 12 0 5 20 2 15 17 0 1 1 4 21 1 10 0 2 0 15 12 3 6 3 1 0 0 5 20 10 13 2 7 3 14 10 14 1 June-August 85 30 7 8 17 0 23 43 7 29 6 0 5 2 35 15 8 17 3 0 0 0 36 22 27 64 2 25 60 8 35 44 1 9 21 9 76 5 27 0 15 2 57 41 5 23 4 2 10 0 29 56 19 56 10 17 22 28 55 28 2 September-May 200 72 4 20 53 7 44 89 15 69 27 1 11 2 72 58 18 36 2 0 0 3 78 52 67 152 1 72 128 15 74 96 11 41 33 18 182 6 55 0 35 3 136 95 8 59 13 12 13 0 80 120 45 139 16 44 44 73 118 76 6 Going Straight 106 34 2 9 31 1 29 38 8 45 15 1 12 0 36 32 8 15 2 0 0 1 36 30 39 75 2 35 71 7 31 43 10 22 16 11 95 5 32 0 17 4 65 45 6 31 9 4 11 0 37 69 31 66 9 26 23 33 64 37 5 Making Right Turn 25 6 2 2 8 2 5 14 0 11 0 0 0 1 11 7 2 2 2 0 0 1 8 10 6 22 0 10 15 2 12 13 1 5 5 3 22 2 5 0 7 0 21 14 0 8 1 0 2 0 7 18 4 20 1 8 11 6 15 10 0 Making Left Turn 80 30 5 8 17 2 18 51 4 18 7 0 0 2 33 21 4 19 1 0 0 1 41 18 20 61 0 25 55 11 40 53 0 7 14 8 72 1 23 0 17 0 59 44 4 20 5 5 2 0 35 45 18 57 5 15 18 33 49 30 1 Children <15 11 6 2 1 0 0 2 4 1 5 1 0 0 0 2 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 6 1 5 6 1 3 4 0 1 4 0 11 1 2 0 1 0 7 2 0 6 0 2 1 0 7 4 2 6 3 1 0 3 8 3 0 Youth 15-19 29 11 0 5 9 0 4 9 5 12 3 0 5 1 11 4 2 5 1 0 0 0 5 9 15 21 0 12 17 1 8 11 2 6 8 3 26 1 8 0 6 0 16 11 1 9 2 0 6 0 11 18 7 21 1 8 5 11 15 10 4 Ages 20-29 93 34 1 13 14 4 27 46 10 30 7 0 2 0 40 20 9 22 0 0 0 2 40 25 26 75 1 35 58 3 43 48 4 17 19 8 85 2 30 0 15 3 61 42 3 32 4 5 7 0 35 58 19 66 8 13 21 41 54 38 1 Ages 30-64 128 42 4 8 38 3 33 62 6 42 18 1 11 2 46 34 10 20 4 0 0 2 51 33 42 93 1 34 94 14 48 64 5 18 23 16 112 5 37 0 24 2 91 69 6 26 9 8 10 0 46 82 30 87 11 37 27 41 78 46 4 Older Adults 65+41 15 3 2 10 0 11 20 4 11 6 0 1 1 16 10 5 8 0 0 0 0 14 10 17 31 0 14 27 3 17 22 1 8 4 3 38 2 11 0 6 0 26 20 3 12 3 1 2 0 16 25 12 25 4 5 17 11 26 15 0 Bike Facility Sidewalks On-street Parking No Bike Facility/ Shared Lane Present (incl. Mult- use Paths) Missing On-street Parking Present Signals (≤250 ft): Max Cycle Length Crosswalk (≤250 ft)Streetlight (≤50 ft) Near School (500 ft) Near Park (500 ft) Unmarked Present Not Present 3 Lanes or Less 4-5 Lanes 6+ Lanes Signal (≤250 ft) Unsignalized Intersection (≤250 ft)Midblock Protected Bike Lane On-Street Bike Lane Multi-Use Path Near Bus Stop (100 ft) Near Community/ Senior Center (500 ft) Near Alcohol Serving Establishment (1,000 ft) Zoning Districts/Land Use Hierarchy Wejo Data Daily Traffic per Lane Bicyclist Position Trafficcontrol_Pbcatbike Trafficcontrol_Pbcatped Crash Type (T_Crashtype) Public Residential (Single Family) Agricultural (No crashes) 85% Operating Speeds (Weekdays 7PM- 6PM) Quick Acceleration (number of incidents/segment)Hard Braking No On- street Parking <= 100 > 100 Injured Party Age(s) <5,000 vpl (Or no counts) 5,000- 10,000 vpl >10,000 vpl Signal/ PHB RRFB Signing/ Markings Business Downtown Mix of Residential and Businesses, Residential Mobile Homes, Higher Density Residential IndustrialNear OSMP Trailhead (500 ft) Roadway Type Location Type General Roadway Classification Time of Day Month of Year Movement (M_Vehiclemovement_V1) Vehicle Number of Lanes <4 <4 4 5 >5 >5 Posted Speed Limit <35 >34 <35 >34 <35 >34 Signalized 1 Minor Unsignalized Major Unsignalized Midblock Freeway Express way Ramp Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Residential Private Pedestrian Mall Alley 1 0 Signalized RRFB Marked Unmarked 1 0 Business Downtown Mixed Industrial Public Residential Agriculture <=30 >30 High Medium Low High Medium Low "<5,000 vpl (Or no counts)" "5,000- 10,000 vpl" ">10,000 vpl" Cell Value TOTAL 4349 272 925 2719 334 3134 5440 4724 1461 3263 1569 140 649 60 4775 2545 792 2524 217 6 25 62 3800 2755 5116 8847 158 4158 7575 996 4399 5781 182 1958 2674 1219 10514 493 3372 38 1830 203 8189 5686 732 3255 874 433 753 0 5266 6467 3401 7128 1204 2831 3071 3595 7367 4045 321 Alcohol, Drug, or Impaired (T_Alcohol, T_Drug, T_Impaired)1 534 293 21 35 83 10 92 167 292 131 161 75 2 21 1 170 89 45 198 6 0 2 5 136 86 307 439 15 265 269 40 126 173 5 102 200 41 493 24 159 2 89 6 322 189 32 189 24 24 76 0 300 234 92 339 103 88 115 174 372 152 10 Distracted (use contributing factor to create 'DISTRACTED')1 1072 334 31 80 273 37 317 567 377 94 283 128 13 78 7 471 247 61 168 26 1 0 6 350 289 427 785 8 306 766 94 469 606 18 157 194 116 956 61 269 2 195 30 723 535 52 288 82 49 66 0 390 682 375 627 70 330 317 271 623 415 34 Speeding 1 192 91 5 11 46 4 35 66 103 47 56 23 7 19 2 59 21 16 66 1 0 1 3 45 27 117 133 8 85 107 14 50 63 3 27 61 15 177 14 55 1 29 2 80 44 6 83 24 10 25 0 88 104 43 112 37 47 44 53 139 47 6 Bicyclist Riding Against Traffic (Bicyclistdirection)Facing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sidewalk / Crosswalk / Driveway Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Travel Lane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bike Lane / Paved Shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multi Use Path 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Driveway / Alley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rapid Flashing Sign 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rapid Flashing Sign 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Head On 169 87 1 17 26 7 31 73 74 29 45 22 2 0 1 52 38 15 55 4 1 1 1 58 33 77 135 3 71 98 17 55 77 1 27 51 14 155 7 60 1 21 5 117 76 14 47 7 2 23 0 94 75 37 107 25 37 31 59 124 44 1 Parked Vehicle 1158 810 17 56 114 5 156 231 708 377 331 219 1 2 0 274 190 98 573 13 1 6 0 198 188 772 1072 27 756 402 73 155 258 26 276 477 87 1071 52 365 5 166 28 801 441 88 417 40 17 155 0 784 374 116 726 316 133 205 408 891 262 5 Sideswipe-Same Direction 1094 376 14 102 235 42 325 533 424 128 296 137 11 60 5 496 223 68 214 13 1 3 13 306 275 500 858 9 353 741 132 400 566 18 160 251 108 986 43 351 4 183 18 789 532 108 278 62 50 64 0 505 589 343 644 107 314 288 309 671 396 27 Rear End 4189 959 118 365 1199 174 1374 2458 1255 223 1032 476 83 387 40 2013 940 218 449 53 1 5 22 1504 1148 1515 2847 42 948 3241 349 2085 2589 67 519 623 556 3633 202 1061 7 679 52 2896 2182 194 1063 388 193 169 0 1418 2771 1720 2292 177 1368 1262 1079 2319 1681 189 Other 737 376 15 58 126 13 149 232 357 132 225 148 11 12 0 263 160 55 210 21 1 4 2 174 179 382 624 11 358 379 70 160 255 23 190 192 47 690 26 282 4 130 13 576 372 86 176 33 23 47 0 390 347 121 500 116 125 194 237 494 236 7 Right Angle 1415 682 20 87 313 30 283 558 709 204 505 148 3 37 3 449 360 134 391 35 0 3 6 529 253 627 1161 21 662 753 120 435 587 9 329 384 136 1279 50 444 6 201 41 1013 660 92 421 93 34 115 0 780 635 257 1030 128 234 367 519 966 438 11 Bicycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FixedObject 859 384 37 57 193 11 177 245 454 166 288 160 22 54 3 302 138 57 269 13 0 1 8 225 148 478 649 18 335 524 56 188 281 9 165 256 60 799 38 265 3 139 12 493 311 44 292 72 45 95 0 404 455 167 520 172 175 179 255 558 266 35 Sideswipe-Opposite Direction 111 62 2 9 20 2 16 39 57 19 38 15 0 0 0 34 27 12 33 3 0 2 0 29 25 57 100 2 57 54 14 25 38 1 23 39 9 102 7 46 0 22 2 80 37 11 42 6 3 12 0 66 45 13 73 25 17 27 36 74 36 1 Pedestrian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Overturning 34 14 6 3 8 0 3 6 26 6 20 2 1 1 1 10 9 4 8 0 0 0 1 14 5 14 28 0 14 20 2 4 7 0 11 13 0 34 2 13 0 6 1 17 7 1 13 6 2 5 0 14 20 5 26 3 8 7 12 20 14 0 Approach Turn 983 234 17 73 264 30 365 645 264 54 210 74 1 54 4 459 256 58 126 25 0 0 4 446 248 285 616 14 271 712 75 563 679 6 84 161 102 881 28 234 2 127 19 685 547 33 246 97 31 29 0 407 576 356 598 29 215 235 379 657 305 21 Overtaking turn 208 74 4 20 48 6 56 117 71 17 54 20 3 9 3 78 59 13 39 4 0 0 0 70 58 80 161 1 76 132 34 83 123 3 27 39 26 182 7 62 0 40 2 157 112 24 37 18 8 9 0 105 103 64 127 17 37 61 66 127 76 5 Animal 71 15 7 5 30 0 14 17 35 2 33 19 1 15 0 31 10 7 7 0 0 0 0 29 14 28 45 2 11 60 0 17 18 0 12 22 5 66 4 19 1 10 0 22 17 0 35 5 9 5 0 11 60 17 50 4 19 25 13 28 37 6 Bicycle - Pedestrian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midnight - 3 am 281 150 8 25 41 8 49 89 156 68 88 36 2 8 2 94 49 24 98 2 0 2 1 60 47 173 223 4 138 143 26 61 97 1 56 99 27 254 16 89 0 41 4 176 87 26 116 10 13 29 0 157 124 46 175 60 44 56 101 205 72 4 3 am - 6 am 154 82 8 7 27 1 29 44 94 39 55 16 2 19 1 38 18 14 60 0 0 2 1 43 30 80 128 4 78 76 5 39 45 2 31 57 13 141 4 44 1 19 2 85 53 4 66 13 2 16 0 79 75 33 90 31 22 28 50 108 39 7 6 am - 9 am 1253 416 53 82 341 26 335 535 522 157 365 196 32 122 13 476 244 67 291 8 0 0 11 409 273 560 911 25 392 861 77 453 587 20 172 284 111 1142 48 344 6 207 17 773 512 54 393 133 59 102 0 515 738 370 765 118 343 310 340 792 408 53 9 am - Noon 2107 746 42 165 497 59 598 981 837 262 575 289 23 131 18 863 452 139 436 34 1 10 7 672 522 906 1565 28 713 1394 171 800 1057 33 349 457 236 1871 80 571 7 348 36 1511 1073 116 537 187 76 118 0 930 1177 637 1264 206 523 575 627 1319 731 57 Noon- 3 pm 2749 1022 35 232 634 74 752 1279 1075 308 767 395 18 108 9 1199 602 196 537 75 1 4 10 871 667 1201 2107 31 1011 1738 249 1022 1361 54 503 604 266 2483 114 809 10 431 48 2041 1437 190 683 178 95 166 0 1239 1510 792 1675 282 663 724 857 1686 1001 62 3 pm - 6 pm 3132 1099 75 268 780 89 821 1487 1246 344 902 399 39 166 9 1295 748 211 603 55 2 4 19 1052 797 1264 2438 40 1065 2067 270 1204 1564 55 531 712 346 2786 156 919 11 522 64 2194 1549 185 866 247 118 167 0 1303 1829 929 1947 256 826 843 960 1873 1173 86 6 pm - 9 pm 1336 504 31 99 278 53 371 706 479 147 332 151 14 71 5 548 304 87 271 33 1 2 9 478 290 559 960 13 453 883 138 563 740 14 202 264 145 1191 51 390 1 175 21 951 673 103 355 76 49 80 0 656 680 423 787 126 296 359 416 888 414 34 9 pm - Midnight 687 317 19 46 112 22 171 303 301 133 168 83 9 22 3 250 117 53 222 9 1 1 4 203 125 355 490 13 296 391 57 244 312 3 111 187 70 617 24 193 2 81 10 433 288 50 230 27 20 72 0 370 317 163 405 119 108 168 232 474 197 16 June-August 3034 1101 71 241 703 89 829 1405 1224 373 851 405 27 187 22 1288 616 186 651 46 2 9 13 931 738 1352 2304 32 1091 1943 252 1144 1496 46 512 689 325 2709 108 909 12 469 63 2177 1504 207 785 234 106 198 0 1356 1678 900 1817 317 761 809 873 1879 1057 98 September-May 8699 3248 201 684 2016 245 2305 4035 3500 1088 2412 1164 113 462 38 3487 1929 606 1873 171 4 16 49 2869 2017 3764 6543 126 3067 5632 744 3255 4285 136 1446 1985 894 7805 385 2463 26 1361 140 6012 4182 525 2470 640 327 555 0 3910 4789 2501 5311 887 2070 2262 2722 5488 2988 223 Going Straight 4476 1526 146 336 1114 157 1197 2158 1781 481 1300 537 84 333 24 1879 954 286 850 58 1 7 26 1465 1056 1929 3360 68 1469 3007 384 1754 2277 68 718 970 509 3967 242 1214 11 734 78 2887 1963 233 1413 323 179 365 0 1844 2632 1397 2717 362 1277 1191 1266 2647 1669 160 Making Right Turn 1071 262 15 85 325 26 358 702 306 96 210 63 14 87 18 461 255 48 169 16 0 3 3 458 250 360 612 10 254 817 77 623 736 9 117 138 171 900 21 264 0 111 10 802 655 40 182 122 47 25 0 434 637 475 525 71 237 324 342 681 341 49 Making Left Turn 1524 467 23 113 406 37 478 838 539 127 412 147 5 63 6 634 390 87 309 30 0 0 9 607 374 534 1078 27 512 1012 124 705 875 13 169 345 146 1378 42 420 8 198 25 1063 806 67 398 144 55 54 0 701 823 460 972 92 297 379 560 1026 474 24 Children <15 15 7 1 3 1 0 3 7 6 1 5 2 1 0 0 4 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 6 2 7 11 2 4 11 3 4 8 0 1 3 2 13 1 3 0 1 1 8 3 3 6 1 0 2 0 8 7 5 8 2 5 2 3 12 3 0 Youth 15-19 137 51 5 10 32 6 33 60 68 15 53 9 2 7 2 67 20 7 32 0 0 0 2 47 30 58 94 2 52 85 13 47 62 3 30 32 17 120 7 39 0 22 3 84 56 9 46 3 4 19 0 48 89 39 80 18 38 33 37 83 49 5 Ages 20-29 499 134 16 40 131 22 156 265 181 41 140 53 11 31 2 220 123 33 74 4 0 1 5 171 126 197 367 8 142 357 29 233 277 3 56 116 53 446 19 138 1 88 11 321 242 9 158 38 25 27 0 207 292 159 303 37 133 131 159 300 187 12 Ages 30-64 1072 234 43 85 344 27 339 607 330 45 285 135 16 92 10 518 245 60 116 14 0 1 8 427 271 366 726 12 267 805 86 517 638 10 144 163 108 964 38 256 3 182 17 730 558 40 275 110 44 45 0 346 726 381 654 37 333 290 307 619 415 38 Older Adults 65+228 54 11 23 67 5 68 142 59 16 43 27 1 19 3 99 47 21 33 5 0 0 2 82 68 76 159 5 69 159 16 126 152 2 26 33 25 203 4 56 0 35 3 133 113 8 58 24 12 13 0 89 139 93 124 11 71 54 63 137 83 8 Bike Facility Sidewalks On-street Parking No Bike Facility/ Shared Lane Present (incl. Mult- use Paths) Missing On-street Parking Present Signals (≤250 ft): Max Cycle Length Crosswalk (≤250 ft)Streetlight (≤50 ft) Near School (500 ft) Near Park (500 ft) Unmarked Present Not Present 3 Lanes or Less 4-5 Lanes 6+ Lanes Signal (≤250 ft)Unsignalized Intersection (≤250 ft)Midblock Protect ed Bike Lane On-Street Bike Lane Multi-Use Path Near Bus Stop (100 ft) Near Community/ Senior Center (500 ft) Near Alcohol Serving Establishment (1,000 ft) Zoning Districts/Land Use Hierarchy Wejo Data Daily Traffic per Lane Bicyclist Position Trafficcontrol_Pbcatbike Trafficcontrol_Pbcatped Crash Type (T_Crashtype) Public Residential (Single Family) Agricultural (No crashes) 85% Operating Speeds (Weekdays 7PM- 6PM) Quick Acceleration (number of incidents/segment)Hard Braking No On- street Parking <= 100 > 100 Injured Party Age(s) <5,000 vpl (Or no counts) 5,000- 10,000 vpl >10,000 vpl Signal/ PHB RRFB Signing/ Markings Business Downtown Mix of Residential and Businesses, Residential Mobile Homes, Higher Density Residential IndustrialNear OSMP Trailhead (500 ft) Roadway Type Location Type General Roadway Classification Time of Day Month of Year Movement (M_Vehiclemovement_V1) Ped Number of Lanes <4 <4 4 5 >5 >5 Posted Speed Limit <35 >34 <35 >34 <35 >34 Signalized 1 Minor Unsignalized Major Unsignalized Midblock Freeway Express way Ramp Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Residential Private Pedestrian Mall Alley 1 0 Signalized RRFB Marked Unmarked 1 0 Business Downtown Mixed Industrial Public Residential Agriculture <=30 >30 High Medium Low High Medium Low "<5,000 vpl (Or no counts)" "5,000- 10,000 vpl" ">10,000 vpl" Cell Value TOTAL 122 7 38 55 18 66 164 112 28 84 30 0 2 2 140 65 21 74 2 0 0 0 104 75 127 247 6 106 200 56 108 172 13 48 62 42 264 18 82 2 63 5 245 157 36 82 10 10 11 0 132 174 68 216 22 70 83 108 202 102 2 Alcohol, Drug, or Impaired (T_Alcohol, T_Drug, T_Impaired)1 26 8 1 6 5 1 5 12 11 1 10 3 0 1 0 15 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 9 11 6 22 0 7 19 5 7 12 2 5 6 4 22 1 8 0 3 0 21 13 2 10 0 0 1 0 7 19 3 23 0 4 9 11 11 14 1 Distracted (use contributing factor to create 'DISTRACTED')1 27 16 0 1 4 1 5 9 15 5 10 3 0 0 0 10 3 3 10 1 0 0 0 6 5 16 23 0 10 17 4 5 8 5 5 8 2 25 2 13 0 4 0 21 11 6 7 1 0 2 0 12 15 3 22 2 6 7 9 23 4 0 Speeding 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Bicyclist Riding Against Traffic (Bicyclistdirection)Facing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sidewalk / Crosswalk / Driveway Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Travel Lane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bike Lane / Paved Shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multi Use Path 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Driveway / Alley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rapid Flashing Sign 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signs 36 27 1 2 1 0 5 3 32 8 24 1 0 0 0 7 9 6 14 0 0 0 0 13 6 17 35 3 25 11 0 3 5 0 11 19 1 35 1 10 1 4 1 25 9 0 20 3 1 3 0 21 15 2 28 6 0 9 18 29 7 0 Signals 124 35 2 27 20 9 31 118 5 0 5 1 0 1 1 65 23 6 27 1 0 0 0 53 25 46 87 0 31 93 42 76 119 0 3 2 27 97 8 31 0 26 2 101 72 21 25 1 4 1 0 46 78 44 80 0 40 27 48 79 43 2 Right Turn By pass island 6 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 0 0 6 0 6 5 0 1 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 1 5 1 0 1 3 1 5 1 0Rapid Flashing Sign 12 0 0 0 10 0 2 0 9 0 9 3 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 12 0 1 11 0 0 1 9 1 1 0 12 2 7 0 2 0 11 5 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 12 2 10 0 4 6 2 7 5 0 Head On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parked Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Same Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rear End 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Angle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FixedObject 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Opposite Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian 301 118 7 38 54 18 66 164 109 27 82 28 0 2 2 140 63 20 72 2 0 0 0 101 73 127 242 5 104 197 56 108 172 13 45 61 42 259 18 80 2 62 5 242 156 36 80 9 9 11 0 129 172 68 214 19 70 82 106 199 100 2 Overturning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Overtaking turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Animal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle - Pedestrian 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 3 2 0 2 3 0 1 2 3 2 0 Midnight - 3 am 8 2 1 3 0 2 0 3 4 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 7 0 4 4 2 1 3 0 2 2 2 6 0 3 1 4 0 7 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 6 2 1 6 1 3 2 3 5 3 0 3 am - 6 am 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 3 0 1 3 0 3 2 0 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 6 am - 9 am 33 13 1 3 4 5 7 20 12 1 11 1 0 0 0 13 7 3 10 0 0 0 0 17 5 11 24 3 13 20 6 14 20 1 3 7 4 29 5 6 0 4 0 20 14 2 13 2 2 0 0 19 14 6 24 3 10 8 11 25 8 0 9 am - Noon 51 15 1 7 17 0 11 29 19 5 14 3 0 0 0 30 8 3 10 0 0 0 0 17 9 25 39 0 18 33 8 21 32 4 5 9 6 45 2 16 0 13 1 44 25 7 16 1 1 1 0 23 28 14 33 4 9 16 21 37 13 1 Noon- 3 pm 54 25 1 6 5 1 16 31 15 5 10 8 0 1 0 23 10 7 13 0 0 0 0 21 10 23 39 0 18 36 10 21 35 2 8 8 8 46 3 14 0 9 0 42 34 5 8 4 1 2 0 19 35 12 39 3 15 9 21 36 17 1 3 pm - 6 pm 81 38 1 7 14 3 18 39 29 9 20 13 0 0 0 33 23 4 21 0 0 0 0 24 19 38 74 2 26 55 19 20 40 2 16 20 9 72 6 27 1 17 2 71 42 13 19 2 3 2 0 29 52 18 57 6 22 24 21 49 32 0 6 pm - 9 pm 52 17 2 9 11 7 6 28 24 4 20 0 0 0 1 27 10 2 12 0 0 0 0 16 22 14 44 1 19 33 9 19 27 4 11 10 7 45 0 10 0 10 1 42 27 5 12 1 1 6 0 20 32 11 38 3 7 19 19 31 21 0 9 pm - Midnight 21 9 0 2 3 0 7 10 7 3 4 4 0 1 1 7 3 2 6 1 0 0 0 6 4 11 15 0 7 14 2 8 12 0 1 5 4 17 0 6 0 6 0 14 9 2 9 0 1 0 0 12 9 3 16 2 2 3 11 14 7 0 June-August 69 28 5 7 11 2 16 30 32 10 22 7 0 0 0 34 11 8 16 0 0 0 0 17 22 30 60 1 26 43 12 18 32 4 12 19 10 59 3 23 2 11 1 53 30 9 19 5 2 4 0 33 36 15 46 8 14 19 25 53 16 0 September-May 237 94 2 31 44 16 50 134 80 18 62 23 0 2 2 106 54 13 58 2 0 0 0 87 53 97 187 5 80 157 44 90 140 9 36 43 32 205 15 59 0 52 4 192 127 27 63 5 8 7 0 99 138 53 170 14 56 64 83 149 86 2 Going Straight 68 36 0 6 16 2 8 16 41 12 29 11 0 0 1 24 14 7 21 1 0 0 0 16 22 30 59 2 30 38 3 13 18 10 16 21 9 59 4 24 0 12 2 53 27 7 23 2 3 6 0 36 32 7 54 7 7 19 28 51 17 0 Making Right Turn 49 13 1 6 8 4 17 35 13 2 11 1 0 0 0 30 8 3 8 0 0 0 0 17 10 22 37 0 11 38 11 24 36 0 6 6 9 40 4 11 1 11 1 41 28 8 9 2 2 0 0 19 30 22 26 1 16 17 13 29 19 1 Making Left Turn 70 28 3 9 11 7 12 57 12 2 10 1 0 0 0 29 15 4 22 0 0 0 0 34 11 25 56 0 28 42 26 31 56 0 6 8 10 60 3 19 0 17 1 59 39 9 17 2 1 2 0 27 43 18 52 0 22 20 22 52 18 0 Children <15 21 14 1 1 1 1 3 7 12 2 10 2 0 0 0 7 4 2 8 0 0 0 0 8 4 9 16 3 7 14 4 3 8 1 5 5 2 19 4 5 0 6 1 15 7 2 11 0 1 0 0 13 8 3 16 2 1 5 10 14 7 0 Youth 15-19 20 10 0 4 3 2 1 13 6 2 4 1 0 0 0 9 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 3 8 9 18 0 7 13 5 8 12 0 6 2 7 13 6 4 0 4 0 13 8 2 7 0 1 2 0 9 11 6 13 1 8 5 6 9 10 1 Ages 20-29 88 30 0 13 18 7 20 43 39 8 31 6 0 1 0 41 20 3 23 0 0 0 0 29 24 35 69 1 31 57 7 36 45 5 16 21 9 79 4 21 0 19 1 66 44 7 29 1 3 4 0 40 48 20 65 3 13 23 40 60 27 1 Ages 30-64 103 41 5 11 18 6 22 55 36 11 25 12 0 0 1 49 19 8 25 1 0 0 0 38 19 46 84 0 44 59 21 34 59 5 10 24 12 91 1 32 1 23 2 87 56 15 19 6 1 6 0 40 63 17 77 9 24 28 34 70 33 0 Older Adults 65+30 12 0 2 9 0 7 15 9 3 6 6 0 0 0 16 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 9 5 16 23 2 8 22 6 9 20 2 2 5 2 28 0 9 0 6 1 25 17 3 7 2 1 0 0 9 21 7 18 5 7 10 7 18 12 0 Bike Facility Sidewalks On-street Parking No Bike Facility/ Shared Lane Present (incl. Mult- use Paths) Missing On-street Parking Present Signals (≤250 ft): Max Cycle Length Crosswalk (≤250 ft)Streetlight (≤50 ft) Near School (500 ft) Near Park (500 ft) Unmarked Present Not Present 3 Lanes or Less 4-5 Lanes 6+ Lanes Signal (≤250 ft)Unsignalized Intersection (≤250 ft)Midblock Protect ed Bike Lane On-Street Bike Lane Multi-Use Path Near Bus Stop (100 ft) Near Community/ Senior Center (500 ft) Near Alcohol Serving Establishment (1,000 ft) Zoning Districts/Land Use Hierarchy Wejo Data Daily Traffic per Lane Bicyclist Position Trafficcontrol_Pbcatbike Trafficcontrol_Pbcatped Crash Type (T_Crashtype) Public Residential (Single Family) Agricultural (No crashes) 85% Operating Speeds (Weekdays 7PM- 6PM) Quick Acceleration (number of incidents/segment)Hard Braking No On- street Parking <= 100 > 100 Injured Party Age(s) <5,000 vpl (Or no counts) 5,000- 10,000 vpl >10,000 vpl Signal/ PHB RRFB Signing/ Markings Business Downtown Mix of Residential and Businesses, Residential Mobile Homes, Higher Density Residential IndustrialNear OSMP Trailhead (500 ft) Roadway Type Location Type General Roadway Classification Time of Day Month of Year Movement (M_Vehiclemovement_V1) Ped KSI Number of Lanes <4 <4 4 5 >5 >5 Posted Speed Limit <35 >34 <35 >34 <35 >34 Signalized 1 Minor Unsignalized Major Unsignalized Midblock Freeway Express way Ramp Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Residential Private Pedestrian Mall Alley 1 0 Signalized RRFB Marked Unmarked 1 0 Business Downtown Mixed Industrial Public Residential Agriculture <=30 >30 High Medium Low High Medium Low "<5,000 vpl (Or no counts)" "5,000- 10,000 vpl" ">10,000 vpl" Cell Value TOTAL 22 2 10 14 3 14 34 25 4 21 6 0 2 0 30 12 3 18 0 0 0 0 20 16 29 51 2 25 40 11 23 37 5 12 8 7 58 2 16 0 16 1 55 35 6 17 2 1 4 0 18 47 11 53 1 11 21 26 38 26 1 Alcohol, Drug, or Impaired (T_Alcohol, T_Drug, T_Impaired)1 8 2 0 1 2 1 2 3 4 1 3 1 0 1 0 4 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 7 0 1 7 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 7 0 4 0 1 0 6 3 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 7 1 7 0 1 3 4 3 4 1 Distracted (use contributing factor to create 'DISTRACTED')1 6 4 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 4 0 2 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 0 6 1 3 0 3 0 3 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 5 1 5 0 1 1 4 5 1 0 Speeding 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicyclist Riding Against Traffic (Bicyclistdirection)Facing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sidewalk / Crosswalk / Driveway Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Travel Lane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bike Lane / Paved Shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non Roadway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multi Use Path 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Driveway / Alley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rapid Flashing Sign 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signs 9 7 0 0 0 0 2 1 8 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 8 1 8 1 0 1 1 0 4 4 0 9 0 3 0 1 1 6 1 0 6 1 0 1 0 3 6 0 8 1 0 2 5 8 1 0 Signals 26 8 1 6 3 1 7 25 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 12 3 0 10 0 0 0 0 9 5 12 19 0 6 20 9 16 25 0 1 0 7 19 1 5 0 7 0 24 19 3 4 0 0 0 0 7 19 8 18 0 6 8 10 17 8 1 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rapid Flashing Sign 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 1 3 0 1 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 3 0 Head On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parked Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Same Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rear End 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Angle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FixedObject 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Opposite Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian 62 20 2 10 13 3 14 34 23 4 19 5 0 2 0 30 10 2 18 0 0 0 0 18 15 29 48 1 24 38 11 23 37 5 9 8 7 55 2 15 0 15 1 53 34 6 16 2 0 4 0 17 45 11 51 0 11 20 24 37 24 1 Overturning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Overtaking turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Animal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle - Pedestrian 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 Midnight - 3 am 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 am - 6 am 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 am - 9 am 6 2 0 1 1 2 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 3 1 3 3 1 3 4 0 1 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 4 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 5 1 1 5 0 3 1 1 6 0 0 9 am - Noon 11 4 1 1 3 0 2 6 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 6 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 2 7 9 0 3 8 3 3 7 2 1 1 1 10 1 4 0 6 0 10 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 8 3 8 0 3 3 4 8 3 0 Noon- 3 pm 13 4 0 2 1 0 6 10 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 7 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 4 3 6 10 0 6 7 3 7 10 1 1 1 3 10 0 3 0 3 0 12 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 12 3 10 0 1 4 7 8 4 1 3 pm - 6 pm 14 6 0 1 5 0 2 4 7 1 6 3 0 0 0 4 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 2 4 13 0 6 8 1 3 5 0 5 4 0 14 1 3 0 2 1 13 6 1 4 1 1 1 0 4 10 0 14 0 0 7 5 7 7 0 6 pm - 9 pm 14 5 1 5 3 0 0 6 8 2 6 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 6 6 12 1 6 8 3 3 7 2 3 2 2 12 0 3 0 4 0 10 5 1 5 0 0 3 0 3 11 2 11 1 2 5 5 7 7 0 9 pm - Midnight 5 1 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 0 1 4 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 0 1 0 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 4 0 1 0 4 1 4 0 June-August 16 5 2 3 3 0 3 6 9 2 7 1 0 0 0 11 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 5 7 14 1 7 9 4 2 7 1 4 3 1 15 1 6 0 5 1 13 4 2 6 1 0 3 0 4 12 2 13 1 1 3 11 9 7 0 September-May 49 17 0 7 11 3 11 28 16 2 14 5 0 2 0 19 12 2 14 0 0 0 0 16 11 22 37 1 18 31 7 21 30 4 8 5 6 43 1 10 0 11 0 42 31 4 11 1 1 1 0 14 35 9 40 0 10 18 15 29 19 1 Going Straight 16 7 0 2 6 0 1 4 9 2 7 3 0 0 0 6 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 5 5 6 13 1 9 7 1 3 6 4 4 1 1 15 1 6 0 5 1 12 7 2 5 0 0 2 0 5 11 2 14 0 2 5 7 10 6 0 Making Right Turn 5 1 0 0 1 0 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 3 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 2 3 0 1 4 0 3 2 0 Making Left Turn 14 5 2 3 1 1 2 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 6 3 5 13 0 4 10 7 6 13 0 0 1 2 12 0 2 0 6 0 14 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 11 3 11 0 4 5 3 11 3 0 Children <15 4 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 Youth 15-19 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 3 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 4 2 2 0 Ages 20-29 24 8 0 5 4 1 6 12 11 3 8 1 0 1 0 11 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 7 11 6 20 1 10 14 2 10 13 1 7 3 4 20 1 4 0 5 1 19 12 1 8 0 0 3 0 8 16 6 17 1 3 8 10 15 8 1 Ages 30-64 23 7 1 2 6 2 5 13 9 0 9 1 0 0 0 10 5 1 7 0 0 0 0 7 4 12 18 0 9 14 5 8 13 3 3 3 2 21 1 6 0 7 0 21 15 2 3 2 1 0 0 5 18 2 21 0 4 10 9 14 9 0 Older Adults 65+11 4 0 1 4 0 2 6 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 6 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 6 9 0 2 9 3 3 8 1 1 1 0 11 0 3 0 2 0 11 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 3 8 2 9 0 2 4 4 6 5 0 Bike Facility Sidewalks On-street Parking No Bike Facility/ Shared Lane Present (incl. Mult- use Paths) Missing On-street Parking Present Signals (≤250 ft): Max Cycle Length Crosswalk (≤250 ft)Streetlight (≤50 ft) Near School (500 ft) Near Park (500 ft) Unmarked Present Not Present 3 Lanes or Less 4-5 Lanes 6+ Lanes Signal (≤250 ft)Unsignalized Intersection (≤250 ft)Midblock Protect ed Bike Lane On-Street Bike Lane Multi-Use Path Near Bus Stop (100 ft) Near Community/ Senior Center (500 ft) Near Alcohol Serving Establishment (1,000 ft) Zoning Districts/Land Use Hierarchy Wejo Data Daily Traffic per Lane Bicyclist Position Trafficcontrol_Pbcatbike Trafficcontrol_Pbcatped Crash Type (T_Crashtype) Public Residential (Single Family) Agricultural (No crashes) 85% Operating Speeds (Weekdays 7PM- 6PM) Quick Acceleration (number of incidents/segment)Hard Braking No On- street Parking <= 100 > 100 Injured Party Age(s) <5,000 vpl (Or no counts) 5,000- 10,000 vpl >10,000 vpl Signal/ PHB RRFB Signing/ Markings Business Downtown Mix of Residential and Businesses, Residential Mobile Homes, Higher Density Residential IndustrialNear OSMP Trailhead (500 ft) Roadway Type Location Type General Roadway Classification Time of Day Month of Year Movement (M_Vehiclemovement_V1) Bike Number of Lanes <4 <4 4 5 >5 >5 Posted Speed Limit <35 >34 <35 >34 <35 >34 Signalized 1 Minor Unsignalized Major Unsignalized Midblock Freeway Express way Ramp Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Residential Private Pedestrian Mall Alley 1 0 Signalized RRFB Marked Unmarked 1 0 Business Downtown Mixed Industrial Public Residential Agriculture <=30 >30 High Medium Low High Medium Low "<5,000 vpl (Or no counts)" "5,000- 10,000 vpl" ">10,000 vpl" Cell Value TOTAL 310 20 66 166 38 150 319 355 79 276 76 0 8 16 266 202 66 172 19 0 1 8 306 236 200 615 5 267 483 46 272 345 34 180 155 73 677 42 261 3 124 23 533 371 32 233 27 39 48 0 397 353 132 546 72 113 193 290 494 253 3 Alcohol, Drug, or Impaired (T_Alcohol, T_Drug, T_Impaired)1 11 4 1 1 2 0 3 7 4 1 3 0 0 1 0 4 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 3 6 10 0 4 7 3 4 8 0 1 2 1 10 1 6 0 1 0 8 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 5 6 3 8 0 3 1 4 7 4 0 Distracted (use contributing factor to create 'DISTRACTED')1 46 23 2 1 11 2 7 16 28 7 21 2 0 0 1 13 11 6 14 1 0 0 0 19 14 13 43 1 21 25 3 13 16 3 14 13 6 40 2 13 1 6 2 28 18 2 20 3 0 3 0 31 15 4 37 5 7 8 22 28 18 0 Speeding 1 19 11 0 2 1 1 4 8 10 3 7 1 0 1 0 7 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 4 7 8 15 1 12 7 2 6 8 1 5 4 2 17 1 6 0 3 0 9 6 2 5 1 1 4 0 12 7 2 13 4 0 4 6 14 5 0 Bicyclist Riding Against Traffic (Bicyclistdirection)Facing Traffic 234 58 5 22 64 18 67 125 85 12 73 24 0 2 10 122 46 7 37 10 0 0 3 68 106 57 187 1 78 156 12 112 130 4 52 39 31 203 11 71 0 39 6 194 142 12 55 8 10 7 0 107 127 53 173 8 46 68 88 140 92 2 Sidewalk / Crosswalk / Driveway Crossing 157 55 3 19 42 14 24 80 62 11 51 15 0 1 0 63 43 10 34 6 0 0 3 64 35 55 125 0 53 104 20 60 85 5 23 39 24 133 15 66 1 31 6 128 86 16 42 4 2 7 0 87 70 31 118 8 28 43 60 106 50 1 Travel Lane 110 85 1 5 8 3 8 28 71 37 34 11 0 0 0 17 22 14 54 2 0 1 2 31 10 67 99 1 63 47 11 17 30 2 28 41 6 104 7 51 0 15 7 64 31 9 43 2 3 22 0 78 32 8 82 20 7 22 48 88 22 0 Bike Lane / Paved Shoulder 213 106 10 19 56 5 17 75 122 13 109 16 0 1 0 37 90 31 52 2 0 0 3 163 32 15 183 3 77 136 12 62 91 8 55 52 9 204 13 83 1 39 6 137 95 4 86 8 13 7 0 129 84 28 170 15 24 52 90 144 69 0 Other 5 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 5 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 0 3 2 0 Unknown 14 4 0 1 2 1 6 7 6 1 5 1 0 0 0 6 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 5 3 6 8 0 4 10 1 6 9 2 1 2 0 14 0 3 0 3 1 9 5 1 6 0 1 1 0 7 7 2 11 1 1 2 7 9 5 0 Non Roadway 15 6 1 1 3 0 4 5 7 5 2 3 0 0 0 4 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 5 8 12 0 6 9 0 5 6 2 2 4 1 14 1 3 1 3 0 13 9 1 2 1 0 2 0 8 7 4 6 5 4 3 4 12 3 0 Multi Use Path 222 45 4 20 51 15 87 120 76 10 66 26 0 6 16 132 31 9 20 8 0 0 0 35 144 43 172 0 56 166 0 120 120 13 63 14 32 190 6 46 0 30 1 171 137 0 48 11 18 8 0 79 143 57 146 19 46 68 76 123 97 2 Driveway / Alley 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 Signs 167 89 8 6 39 2 23 13 141 33 108 13 0 0 3 51 37 19 51 6 0 0 1 53 72 41 162 2 81 86 0 13 17 6 93 47 7 160 11 71 1 27 8 120 80 2 55 5 3 22 0 92 75 9 141 17 21 50 58 113 52 2 Signals 236 60 1 30 53 21 71 215 18 1 17 3 0 3 4 107 70 11 34 7 0 0 5 113 63 55 150 0 66 170 36 178 220 0 10 5 41 195 12 60 0 33 7 176 124 17 72 3 18 2 0 124 112 78 155 3 47 57 108 159 77 0 Right Turn By pass island 42 4 0 7 3 9 19 41 1 0 1 0 0 3 9 22 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 12 23 7 26 0 2 40 0 41 40 0 2 0 12 30 0 7 0 2 1 34 22 1 5 8 6 0 0 19 23 20 22 0 6 17 15 26 15 1Rapid Flashing Sign 27 2 0 3 16 1 5 0 23 0 23 4 0 0 0 15 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 14 4 26 0 2 25 0 0 0 22 4 1 3 24 2 9 0 10 3 21 19 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 26 2 24 1 5 13 6 12 15 0 Signs 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 Signals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rapid Flashing Sign 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Head On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parked Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Same Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rear End 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Angle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle 745 306 20 66 165 38 150 319 352 78 274 74 0 8 16 266 200 65 170 19 0 1 8 303 234 200 610 4 265 480 46 272 345 34 177 154 73 672 42 259 3 123 23 530 370 32 231 26 38 48 0 394 351 132 544 69 113 192 288 491 251 3 FixedObject 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Opposite Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Overturning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Overtaking turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Animal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle - Pedestrian 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 3 2 0 2 3 0 1 2 3 2 0 Midnight - 3 am 10 3 0 1 2 0 4 5 5 1 4 0 0 1 0 6 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 7 0 5 5 1 4 5 0 3 2 1 9 0 2 0 1 0 4 4 0 4 1 0 1 0 2 8 3 7 0 3 2 3 6 4 0 3 am - 6 am 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 6 am - 9 am 102 52 5 6 22 0 17 34 58 21 37 10 0 0 1 25 32 10 34 0 0 0 1 45 25 31 89 1 45 57 8 26 36 3 28 31 7 95 11 39 0 20 5 60 39 3 39 3 5 13 0 55 47 13 71 18 11 25 35 75 27 0 9 am - Noon 135 64 3 11 26 7 24 51 68 15 53 16 0 3 7 39 37 12 36 1 0 0 1 59 40 35 118 1 46 89 8 43 52 7 35 30 13 122 7 49 1 16 5 99 61 4 44 7 12 7 0 81 54 16 100 19 21 21 62 92 42 1 Noon- 3 pm 154 57 3 12 31 15 36 71 64 16 48 19 0 2 4 58 39 14 32 4 0 1 3 54 50 47 119 0 47 107 6 65 75 8 35 25 16 138 3 52 0 29 6 110 82 6 40 8 9 9 0 74 80 29 106 19 22 47 57 102 51 1 3 pm - 6 pm 211 80 6 23 56 10 36 78 113 17 96 20 0 0 2 79 63 17 41 9 0 0 2 91 71 47 176 1 81 130 12 65 95 13 56 43 16 195 11 70 2 41 4 157 111 9 68 3 6 14 0 114 97 41 161 9 35 61 73 133 78 0 6 pm - 9 pm 96 39 3 8 17 4 25 52 36 7 29 8 0 2 1 37 22 11 20 3 0 0 1 34 36 25 80 2 34 62 4 48 54 1 19 19 14 82 6 31 0 13 1 70 52 4 28 3 5 4 0 52 44 20 71 5 16 26 40 61 34 1 9 pm - Midnight 38 13 0 4 12 2 7 26 11 2 9 1 0 0 1 20 9 0 6 2 0 0 0 18 12 8 23 0 6 32 7 19 26 2 3 5 5 33 4 15 0 4 2 31 20 6 9 1 2 0 0 17 21 9 27 2 4 11 18 21 17 0 June-August 248 104 11 26 49 12 46 95 121 32 89 32 0 4 5 84 63 22 64 6 0 0 1 93 83 71 210 2 91 157 17 77 100 13 61 55 31 217 13 95 2 39 6 180 131 14 66 12 9 16 0 126 122 39 181 28 32 60 98 175 72 1 September-May 502 206 9 40 117 26 104 224 234 47 187 44 0 4 11 182 139 44 108 13 0 1 7 213 153 129 405 3 176 326 29 195 245 21 119 100 42 460 29 166 1 85 17 353 240 18 167 15 30 32 0 271 231 93 365 44 81 133 192 319 181 2 Going Straight 244 102 10 22 56 13 41 76 140 30 110 28 0 4 3 80 77 21 53 6 0 0 1 92 70 81 197 3 83 161 15 61 89 26 69 48 25 219 22 85 1 54 13 161 108 10 86 9 10 21 0 130 114 42 179 23 36 66 82 163 81 0 Making Right Turn 266 77 6 23 64 19 77 150 96 13 83 20 0 3 13 121 63 14 43 8 0 1 4 99 121 42 220 0 79 187 12 138 157 6 62 37 34 232 12 84 1 39 9 210 156 4 72 14 12 8 0 125 141 59 195 12 52 76 101 160 103 3 Making Left Turn 141 75 2 14 27 4 19 65 60 13 47 16 0 0 0 41 35 16 44 5 0 0 2 75 24 40 110 1 59 82 13 52 69 0 24 36 9 132 3 56 1 20 0 101 68 10 44 2 11 6 0 86 55 18 109 14 13 31 67 100 41 0 Children <15 40 24 3 3 5 1 4 8 29 10 19 3 0 0 0 7 11 6 15 1 0 0 0 16 6 18 32 1 22 18 2 6 11 1 16 11 4 36 5 13 1 7 2 21 11 1 16 0 2 10 0 28 12 5 27 8 4 6 11 29 11 0 Youth 15-19 78 21 0 10 21 6 20 33 41 6 35 4 0 2 3 39 17 0 16 1 0 0 0 16 40 22 63 0 24 54 3 30 39 8 17 12 7 71 4 14 0 17 1 59 42 2 24 2 5 3 0 39 39 16 58 4 18 22 26 55 23 0 Ages 20-29 215 84 3 22 52 15 39 93 99 18 81 23 0 1 4 75 66 20 45 4 0 0 4 97 66 48 188 2 64 151 14 79 99 13 50 43 24 191 12 81 0 40 4 153 102 11 70 8 17 7 0 113 102 35 166 14 31 54 92 128 86 1 Ages 30-64 242 108 10 16 55 8 45 108 103 25 78 31 0 3 6 79 67 28 49 10 0 0 4 110 71 57 192 1 93 149 19 88 113 5 58 51 22 220 10 91 1 40 10 174 118 11 75 13 10 15 0 129 113 43 169 30 41 71 84 161 80 1 Older Adults 65+40 20 3 4 7 0 6 7 24 7 17 9 0 3 0 10 8 3 16 0 0 0 0 12 9 19 31 0 17 23 0 7 8 3 10 10 4 36 3 18 1 3 1 23 17 0 16 2 1 4 0 21 19 6 26 8 4 8 14 29 11 0 Bike Facility Sidewalks On-street Parking No Bike Facility/ Shared Lane Present (incl. Mult- use Paths) Missing On-street Parking Present Signals (≤250 ft): Max Cycle Length Crosswalk (≤250 ft)Streetlight (≤50 ft) Near School (500 ft) Near Park (500 ft) Unmarked Present Not Present 3 Lanes or Less 4-5 Lanes 6+ Lanes Signal (≤250 ft)Unsignalized Intersection (≤250 ft)Midblock Protect ed Bike Lane On-Street Bike Lane Multi-Use Path Near Bus Stop (100 ft) Near Community/ Senior Center (500 ft) Near Alcohol Serving Establishment (1,000 ft) Zoning Districts/Land Use Hierarchy Wejo Data Daily Traffic per Lane Bicyclist Position Trafficcontrol_Pbcatbike Trafficcontrol_Pbcatped Crash Type (T_Crashtype) Public Residential (Single Family) Agricultural (No crashes) 85% Operating Speeds (Weekdays 7PM- 6PM) Quick Acceleration (number of incidents/segment)Hard Braking No On- street Parking <= 100 > 100 Injured Party Age(s) <5,000 vpl (Or no counts) 5,000- 10,000 vpl >10,000 vpl Signal/ PHB RRFB Signing/ Markings Business Downtown Mix of Residential and Businesses, Residential Mobile Homes, Higher Density Residential IndustrialNear OSMP Trailhead (500 ft) Roadway Type Location Type General Roadway Classification Time of Day Month of Year Movement (M_Vehiclemovement_V1) Bike KSI Number of Lanes <4 <4 4 5 >5 >5 Posted Speed Limit <35 >34 <35 >34 <35 >34 Signalized 1 Minor Unsignalized Major Unsignalized Midblock Freeway Express way Ramp Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Residential Private Pedestrian Mall Alley 1 0 Signalized RRFB Marked Unmarked 1 0 Business Downtown Mixed Industrial Public Residential Agriculture <=30 >30 High Medium Low High Medium Low "<5,000 vpl (Or no counts)" "5,000- 10,000 vpl" ">10,000 vpl" Cell Value TOTAL 47 5 12 24 3 15 35 53 11 42 18 0 2 0 29 36 15 20 4 0 0 3 46 29 28 85 2 40 66 5 30 39 7 26 22 7 99 7 34 0 15 1 66 47 4 32 5 8 10 0 52 54 15 73 18 15 21 38 68 38 0 Alcohol, Drug, or Impaired (T_Alcohol, T_Drug, T_Impaired)1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Distracted (use contributing factor to create 'DISTRACTED')1 7 2 0 0 2 2 1 3 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 7 1 4 3 0 3 3 2 0 2 1 6 0 2 0 2 0 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 6 1 1 5 1 2 2 1 5 2 0 Speeding 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Bicyclist Riding Against Traffic (Bicyclistdirection)Facing Traffic 14 4 0 2 5 1 2 8 5 1 4 1 0 0 0 7 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 5 7 1 11 0 6 8 0 8 7 0 3 3 1 13 1 2 0 5 1 11 7 1 4 0 1 1 0 6 8 3 11 0 4 4 5 8 6 0 Sidewalk / Crosswalk / Driveway Crossing 9 3 0 1 3 0 2 5 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 2 2 6 0 4 5 1 4 6 0 0 3 1 8 1 4 0 3 1 7 2 2 4 1 0 0 0 6 3 4 5 0 2 2 3 6 3 0 Travel Lane 20 14 1 3 2 0 0 5 13 7 6 2 0 0 0 4 6 3 7 0 0 0 1 3 4 12 17 0 12 8 3 2 5 0 6 6 2 18 1 8 0 2 0 12 6 1 6 1 1 5 0 9 11 1 16 3 1 5 7 14 6 0 Bike Lane / Paved Shoulder 37 19 2 3 10 2 1 10 23 1 22 4 0 0 0 5 16 8 7 1 0 0 1 29 3 4 31 1 17 20 1 9 15 2 8 9 0 37 2 14 0 5 0 22 18 1 10 3 2 3 0 20 17 1 32 4 2 7 17 25 12 0 Other 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Unknown 4 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 Non Roadway 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 Multi Use Path 29 7 1 5 8 1 7 11 9 3 6 9 0 1 0 16 3 2 5 2 0 0 0 3 19 7 24 0 5 24 0 11 9 3 9 3 4 25 3 6 0 4 0 18 16 0 8 0 3 2 0 12 17 5 15 9 7 5 7 14 15 0 Driveway / Alley 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Signs 15 8 0 1 6 0 0 2 13 3 10 0 0 0 0 3 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 14 1 8 7 0 2 2 0 7 5 1 14 0 4 0 4 0 10 7 0 2 0 1 5 0 9 6 1 12 2 2 4 5 9 6 0 Signals 22 7 0 3 5 2 5 19 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 9 7 1 2 2 0 0 2 11 6 3 14 0 6 16 2 17 21 0 1 0 4 18 2 5 0 3 0 15 10 2 7 1 2 0 0 9 13 5 17 0 3 3 14 11 11 0 Right Turn By pass island 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 0Rapid Flashing Sign 6 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 5 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 6 0 1 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 4 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 0 Signs 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 Signals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn By pass island 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rapid Flashing Sign 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Head On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parked Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Same Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rear End 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Angle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle 103 45 5 12 23 3 15 35 51 11 40 17 0 2 0 29 34 14 20 4 0 0 3 44 28 28 82 1 39 64 5 30 39 7 23 22 7 96 7 33 0 14 1 64 46 4 31 5 7 10 0 51 52 15 71 17 15 20 36 67 36 0 FixedObject 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sideswipe-Opposite Direction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Overturning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Overtaking turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Animal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle - Pedestrian 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 Midnight - 3 am 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 am - 6 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 am - 9 am 15 7 1 1 4 0 2 2 10 1 9 3 0 0 0 4 6 2 3 0 0 0 0 6 7 2 13 0 4 11 0 2 3 0 5 5 0 15 1 6 0 3 0 8 5 0 3 2 1 4 0 6 9 2 9 4 2 3 4 9 6 0 9 am - Noon 16 6 1 3 4 0 2 2 8 3 5 6 0 1 0 3 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 7 3 6 14 0 4 12 0 2 2 2 4 5 1 15 1 7 0 0 0 11 8 0 5 0 3 0 0 10 6 0 8 8 1 2 5 9 7 0 Noon- 3 pm 21 10 2 1 3 1 4 5 12 4 8 4 0 0 0 4 9 4 4 0 0 0 1 10 5 5 15 0 10 11 0 5 5 3 7 2 1 20 1 7 0 5 1 11 9 1 6 1 1 3 0 8 13 2 15 4 1 6 9 13 8 0 3 pm - 6 pm 32 12 1 2 10 2 5 13 15 1 14 4 0 0 0 12 11 3 4 2 0 0 1 15 9 7 28 1 13 19 2 11 16 2 6 7 2 30 2 8 0 7 0 24 19 1 9 0 1 2 0 17 15 6 25 1 8 5 12 22 10 0 6 pm - 9 pm 13 8 0 3 2 0 0 6 6 2 4 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 4 1 0 0 1 6 3 3 10 1 7 6 0 6 6 0 3 3 0 13 1 3 0 0 0 7 3 0 8 0 2 0 0 9 4 1 11 1 1 2 6 8 5 0 9 pm - Midnight 6 3 0 1 1 0 1 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 0 1 5 2 3 5 0 0 0 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 4 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 4 2 4 0 1 3 2 5 1 0 June-August 34 18 2 3 5 0 6 13 18 5 13 3 0 1 0 8 8 6 9 2 0 0 0 16 6 12 24 2 11 23 3 10 13 0 5 11 3 31 4 10 0 4 1 19 16 2 10 2 1 3 0 13 21 4 22 8 5 6 11 26 8 0 September-May 72 29 3 9 19 3 9 22 35 6 29 15 0 1 0 21 28 9 11 2 0 0 3 30 23 16 61 0 29 43 2 20 26 7 21 11 4 68 3 24 0 11 0 47 31 2 22 3 7 7 0 39 33 11 51 10 10 15 27 42 30 0 Going Straight 34 10 2 4 8 1 9 9 21 3 18 4 0 1 0 10 15 3 4 1 0 0 1 10 10 13 25 1 10 24 2 7 12 6 8 5 3 31 3 12 0 5 1 17 13 2 12 2 1 4 0 16 18 8 22 4 6 7 8 25 9 0 Making Right Turn 16 4 1 2 6 2 1 9 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 5 1 1 2 0 0 1 6 9 0 16 0 7 9 1 8 8 1 5 2 2 14 2 4 0 6 0 13 10 0 4 0 0 2 0 6 10 2 14 0 5 5 6 9 7 0 Making Left Turn 29 17 1 4 6 0 1 11 12 2 10 6 0 0 0 7 10 3 8 1 0 0 1 19 5 4 22 0 11 18 1 10 13 0 5 7 2 27 0 10 0 2 0 21 13 2 8 2 3 1 0 16 13 3 21 5 2 5 15 15 14 0 Children <15 6 3 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 3 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 5 1 1 3 2 1 0 1 5 1 0 Youth 15-19 13 4 0 2 5 0 2 4 8 2 6 1 0 1 0 6 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 7 4 11 0 5 8 1 3 6 2 3 2 1 12 1 2 0 3 0 8 5 1 4 1 0 2 0 7 6 3 10 0 3 3 4 9 4 0 Ages 20-29 35 16 0 5 5 3 6 12 17 4 13 6 0 0 0 11 12 5 7 0 0 0 2 19 6 8 31 1 13 22 1 11 12 3 9 8 2 33 1 12 0 5 1 21 14 1 14 1 3 2 0 14 21 2 27 6 2 5 18 19 16 0 Ages 30-64 45 22 2 4 12 0 5 15 21 5 16 9 0 1 0 9 16 7 9 3 0 0 2 19 13 11 36 1 16 29 3 12 17 2 10 11 4 41 2 14 0 7 0 31 23 2 11 1 3 5 0 22 23 7 29 9 9 8 14 30 15 0 Older Adults 65+12 6 2 0 2 0 2 2 8 2 6 2 0 1 0 3 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 7 8 0 5 7 0 2 2 0 3 2 1 11 2 6 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 2 1 1 0 6 6 2 8 2 1 5 2 8 4 0 Bike Facility Sidewalks On-street Parking No Bike Facility/ Shared Lane Present (incl. Mult- use Paths) Missing On-street Parking Present Signals (≤250 ft): Cycle Length Crosswalk (≤250 ft)Streetlight (≤50 ft) Near School (500 ft) Near Park (500 ft) Unmarked Present Not Present 3 Lanes or Less 4-5 Lanes 6+ Lanes Signal (≤250 ft)Unsignalized Intersection (≤250 ft)Midblock Protect ed Bike Lane On-Street Bike Lane Multi-Use Path Near Bus Stop (100 ft) Near Community/ Senior Center (500 ft) Near Alcohol Serving Establishment (1,000 ft) Zoning Districts/Land Use Hierarchy Wejo Data Daily Traffic per Lane Bicyclist Position Trafficcontrol_Pbcatbike Trafficcontrol_Pbcatped Crash Type (T_Crashtype) Public Residential (Single Family) Agricultural (No crashes) 85% Operating Speeds (Weekdays 7PM- 6PM) Quick Acceleration (number of incidents/segment)Hard Braking No On- street Parking <= 100 > 100 Injured Party Age(s) <5,000 vpl (Or no counts) 5,000- 10,000 vpl >10,000 vpl Signal/ PHB RRFB Signing/ Markings Business Downtown Mix of Residential and Businesses, Residential Mobile Homes, Higher Density Residential IndustrialNear OSMP Trailhead (500 ft) Roadway Type Location Type General Roadway Classification Time of Day Month of Year Movement (M_Vehiclemovement_V1) 88 HIGH RISK NETWORK CORRIDOR ANALYSES APPENDIX E- 28th Street Winding Trail Drive to Baseline Road/US 36 900 Block to 3700 Block 28th Street Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 11/7/2020 –A fatal crash occurred at the 2500 Block of 28th Street when a vehicle traveling northbound straight struck a pedestrian crossing mid-block. 11/30/2016 –A fatal crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing on the east leg crosswalk. The steady don’t walk hand had just turned when the pedestrian entered the crosswalk. 1123 17 2 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Pedestrian Bicycle Broadside Head on Rear End Sideswipe KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 All Crashes KSI Crashes 28th Street & Iris Avenue •Two pedestrian-involved crashes occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing the channelized right turn area. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection struck a bicyclist traveling southbound on the west crosswalk against the signal. The bicyclist was at fault. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection struck a bicyclist traveling northbound on the east leg crosswalk. The bicyclist entered the intersection when there was 2 seconds left on the FDW, but did not make it all the way across the intersection. The vehicle had the green light and the bicyclist was at fault. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection ran the red light and struck a bicyclist crossing southbound in the east leg crosswalk. •Left-turn crashes (WB-4 in 4 years; SB-13 in 5 years) Total Crashes: 101 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Iris Avenue 28thStreet2 3 7 14 18 54 0 20 40 60 Pedestrian Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 20 25 35 0 10 20 30 40 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action 28th Street & Mapleton Avenue •Two bicycle-involved crashes occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right on red and struck a bicyclist traveling southbound on the east crosswalk. Total Crashes: 18 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Mapleton Avenue 28thStreet2 2 4 7 0 2 4 6 8 Bicycle Head on Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action 28th Street & Spruce Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to a bicyclist traveling southbound on the multi-use path crossing on the east leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to a bicyclist traveling northbound on the multi-use path crossing on the west leg crosswalk. •Two pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound vehicle traveling straight struck a pedestrian crossing at the pedestrian signal north of Spruce Street. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound vehicle traveling straight struck a bicyclist crossing at the pedestrian signal north of Spruce Street. Total Crashes: 12 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Unsignalized Intersection Spruce Street 28thStreet4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rear End Bicycle Most Harmful Event 2 6 0 2 4 6 8 Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action 28th Street & Pearl Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the channelized right-turn island. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the channelized right-turn island. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the channelized right-turn island. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound vehicle traveling straight struck a pedestrian in a wheelchair crossing westbound in the north leg crosswalk. The pedestrian entered the crosswalk at the end of the flash don’t walk signal and did not fully finish crossing the intersection as southbound got the green light. •Left-turn crashes (WB-6 in 5 years; NB-5 in 4 years) Total Crashes: 76 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pearl Street 28thStreet1 3 4 10 20 34 0 10 20 30 40 Pedestrian Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 8 12 16 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 Failed to Stop at Signal Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Driver Action 28th Street & Walnut Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a northbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection ran the red light and struck a southbound left-turning vehicle that head the green light. •A severe-injury crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound on the west multi-use path and crossing the west leg crosswalk. •A severe-injury crash occurred when a westbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection struck an eastbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection in the bicycle lane. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound on the west multi-use path and crossing the west leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle struck an eastbound traveling bicyclist crossing on the north leg crosswalk against the traffic signal. The bicyclist was at fault. Total Crashes: 38 KSI Crashes: 3 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Walnut Street 28thStreet1 2 3 6 21 0 5 10 15 20 25 Sideswipe Head on Bicycle Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 7 8 14 0 5 10 15 Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action 28th Street & Canyon Boulevard •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound bicyclist was crossing on the west crosswalk and fell off their bicycle. Total Crashes: 84 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Canyon Boulevard 28thStreet1 8 13 56 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Head on Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 4 7 21 33 0 10 20 30 40 Failed to Yield ROW Lane Violation Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action 28th Street & Colorado Avenue •A severe-injury crash occurred when northbound left-turning vehicle failed to stop at the traffic signal and rear-ended a vehicle stopped in the left turn lane. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a eastbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling northbound on the multi-use path on the west side. Total Crashes: 45 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Colorado Avenue 28thStreet1 4 6 33 0 10 20 30 40 Bicycle Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 4 15 16 0 5 10 15 20 Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Driver Action 30th Street Colorado Avenue to Valmont Road 1200 Block to 3000 Block 30th Street Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 11/4/2016 –A fatal crash occurred at the pedestrian crossing/RRFB located between Pearl Parkway and Spruce Street when a northbound traveling vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound at the pedestrian crossing. 8/16/2018 –A fatal crash occurred at the intersection of 30th Street & Colorado Avenue when a vehicle ran off the road and then collided with the traffic signal pole on the northeast corner of the intersection. 7/15/2019 –A fatal crash occurred at 30th Street & Bluff Street when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a northbound straight traveling motorcycle. The crash resulted in a fatality of the motorcyclist. 640 22 30 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Broadside Bicycle Pedestrian Rear End Head on KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 30th & Glenwood 3000 Block 30th 30th & Valmont 2900 Block 30th 30th & Bluff 2500 Block 30th 30th & Mapleton 2300 Block 30th 30th & Pearl 2000 Block 30th 30th & Walnut 1700 Block 30th 30th & Canyon 1600 Block 30th Arapahoe & 30th 30th & Marine 1500 Block 30th 30th & Shadow Creek 1200 Block 30th 30th & Colorado Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Not studied in detail due to new infrastructure improvements 30th Street & Pearl Street/Parkway •A serious injury crash occurred when a motorcycle traveling northbound overturned as it approached the intersection of 30th Street & Pearl Street/Parkway. It was a single vehicle accident and the motorcyclist was seriously injured. •A serious injury crash occurred when a southbound left turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection. The left-turning vehicle was at fault and the passenger of the left-turning vehicle was seriously injured. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a vehicle make an eastbound right-turn turned from the wrong lane and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound left turning vehicle struck a bicyclist that was crossing westbound in the south leg crosswalk and had the walk symbol. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a vehicle exiting the driveway just north of the intersection at 30th Street & Pearl Parkway struck a bicyclist traveling southbound approaching the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound in the north crosswalk. •NB –4 in 2 years; SB-8 in 3 years ; WB –4 in 3 years •WB/WB (Rear-end and Sideswipe) -7 in 4 years Total Crashes: 81 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pearl Street Pearl Parkway30thStreet 1 5 8 18 23 23 0 5 10 15 20 25 Pedestrian Bicycle Head-on Sideswipe Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 5 5 10 12 33 0 10 20 30 40 Improper Turn Lane Violation Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action 30th Street & Walnut Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a bicyclist traveling westbound in the north crosswalk was crossing against the signal and struck by a vehicle traveling southbound straight through the intersection with the green light. The bicyclist was at fault and fled the scene as he was using a stolen bicycle. •Left turn crashes –SB-4 in 2 years Total Crashes: 45 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Walnut Street30thStreet 7 9 10 16 0 5 10 15 20 Failed to Stop at Signal Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action 1 1 3 11 27 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Bicycle Head-on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 30th Street & Canyon Boulevard •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle stuck a pedestrian crossing east on the south crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle turned right on red and struck a pedestrian crossing on the east crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound left-turning bicyclist was struck by a vehicle traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. The bicyclist did not yield right-of-way and was at fault. Total Crashes: 34 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Canyon Boulevard 30thStreet0 5 10 15 Pedestrian Bicycle Head-on Sideswipe Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 0 5 10 15 Failed to Stop at Signal Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A severe-injury crash occurred at the RRFB pedestrian signal north of Pearl Street/Parkway when a northbound vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the crosswalk. •A severe-injury crash occurred a southbound traveling vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing mid-block south of Canyon Boulevard. The pedestrian was injured. •A severe-injury crash occurred at the intersection of 30th Street and Glenwood Street when a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the south leg of the intersection. The pedestrian was crossing against the signal. •A severe-injury crash occurred at the driveway access south of Marine Street when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound in the bicycle lane. •A severe-injury crash occurred when a vehicle westbound traveling vehicle failed to stop at the stop sign at a driveway access north of Canyon Boulevard and struck a southbound traveling bicyclist on the multi-use path on the east side of the roadway. •A severe-injury crash occurred at 30th Street and Arapahoe Avenue when a vehicle traveling southbound left crossed the median and struck a vehicle head-on that was stopped in the westbound left turning lane on Arapahoe Avenue. Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A severe-injury crash occurred north of 30th Street & Mapleton Avenue when a northbound vehicle failed to stop and struck a vehicle that was stopped in traffic behind a vehicle that was stopped and waiting to make a left-turn into 2445 30th Street. •A severe-injury crash occurred at 30th Street & Colorado Avenue when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and was struck by a northbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection. •A severe-injury crash occurred at 30th Street & Arapahoe Avenue when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and was struck by a vehicle traveling eastbound through the intersection. •A severe-injury crash occurred at 30th Street & Walnut Street when a southbound straight traveling vehicle struck a bicyclist crossing against the signal eastbound on the north leg crosswalk. •A severe-injury crash occurred at 30th Street & Arapahoe when a westbound traveling vehicle when a motorcyclist traveling eastbound straight through the intersection slammed on his breaks to avoid collision and overturned the motorcycle. There was no collision between the two vehicles, but the motorcyclist was severely injured from overturning his motorcycle to avoid collision. Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A severe-injury crash occurred at the intersection of 30th Street & Arapahoe Avenue when a driver traveling eastbound on a motorized scooter lost control, collided with the curb, and was ejected from the motorized scooter. •A severe-injury crash occurred on the 2900 block of 30th Street when a northbound left-turning vehicle turning into the gas station on the southwest corner of 30th Street & Valmont Road failed to yield right-of-way and was struck by a southbound straight traveling vehicle. •A severe-injury crash occurred at the intersection of 30th Street & Valmont Road when an eastbound driver disregarded the red traffic signal and was struck by a vehicle traveling northbound through the intersection. Arapahoe Avenue Foothills Parkway to Oreg Avenue 4500 Block to 5600 Block Arapahoe Avenue Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 5/7/2016 –A fatal crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Foothills Parkway when there were two westbound vehicles stopped at the red light (one vehicle in the right-most left-turn lane and one vehicle in the left-most through lane). A westbound vehicle changed lanes from the left-most through lane to the right-most left-turn lane and failed to yield right-of-way and struck the vehicle stopped in the left-turn lane and then the vehicle in the through lane. The fatality was of driver that was stopped in the left-turn lane. 496 12 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Broadside Rear End Bicycle Head on Pedestrian KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 50 100 150 200 250 Foothills Parkway MacArthur Drive 4700 Block Arapahoe 48th Street Commerce Street Range Street Patton Drive Conestoga Street 5400 Block Arapahoe 55th Street 5500 Block Arapahoe 56th Street 5600 Block Arapahoe Flatirons Golf Course 5800 Block Arapahoe Old Tale Road 5900 Block Arapahoe Cherryvale Road 6000 Block Arapahoe Oreg Avenue All Crashes KSI Crashes Arapahoe Avenue & 48th Street •A serious-injury crash occurred when a southbound driver traveling straight through the intersection struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the multi-use path on the south side of the intersection. The driver stated that she entered the intersection on a yellow light. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist crossing in the north leg crosswalk. Total Crashes: 37 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 48thStreet1 1 2 13 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 Sideswipe Head on Bicycle Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 3 5 10 14 0 5 10 15 Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Other KSI Crashes •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 55th Street when a eastbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection lost control of the vehicle and drove onto the southeast corner of the intersection. The driver struck a pedestrian walking on the sidewalk and a parked car in the Conoco gas station. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Conestoga Street when a driver making a westbound left-turn failed to yield right-of-way and struck a vehicle traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. The eastbound vehicle had just turned onto Arapahoe Avenue from Patton Drive and was accelerating. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Conestoga Street when westbound left-turning vehicle struck a motorcyclist traveling at an excessive speed eastbound straight through the intersection. The motorcyclist was also driving without a driver's license. The motorcyclist was cited. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 62nd Street when an eastbound vehicle rear-ended an eastbound motorized bicycle. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 63rd Street when an eastbound straight traveling vehicle was in the right-turn lane and tried to switch lanes to the through lane. When trying to change lanes, the driver did not realize the light had turned red and struck a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection. Other KSI Crashes •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Flatirons Golf Course when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to an eastbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Foothills Parkway when a northbound left-turning motorcyclist failed to stop at red signal and rear-ended a vehicle stopped in the left-turn lane. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Foothills Parkway when a northbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection (on a green light) struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound on the south leg crosswalk crossing against the signal. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Foothills Parkway when an eastbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection failed to stop at the signal and struck a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection and then a vehicle stopped at a red light in the westbound left-turn lane. The driver of the eastbound vehicle was citied with a DUI. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & Foothills Parkway when a southbound driver traveling straight through the intersection struck an eastbound driver traveling straight through the intersection. Both drivers stated that they had green lights and there were not witnesses. Arapahoe Avenue 14th Street to Foothills Parkway 1400 Block to 4500 Block Arapahoe Avenue Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 11/30/2016 –A fatal crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing on the east leg crosswalk. The steady don’t walk hand had just turned when the pedestrian entered the crosswalk. 788 14 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Pedestrian Broadside Bicycle Rear End Head on KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Arapahoe Avenue & 17th Street •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing southbound on the east leg crosswalk. The crash was a hit and run. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing westbound on the north leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound traveling vehicle struck a bicyclist crossing southbound in the west leg crosswalk on a red-light. The bicyclist was at fault. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound in the south leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound traveling bicyclist failed to stop at the stop light and was struck by a vehicle traveling southbound straight through the intersection. Total Crashes: 27 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 17thStreet0 2 4 6 8 10 Pedestrian Sideswipe Bicycle Broadside Head on Rear End Most Harmful Event 0 2 4 6 8 10 Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Arapahoe Avenue & 19th Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a westbound vehicle failed to stop at the traffic signal and rear-ended a vehicle stopped at the traffic signal. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a westbound vehicle left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian in a wheelchair crossing eastbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing on the east crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right of way and struck a pedestrian crossing southbound on the east leg crosswalk. Total Crashes: 23 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 19thStreet1 1 3 3 14 0 5 10 15 Sideswipe Head on Broadside Pedestrian Rear End Most Harmful Event 3 4 7 7 0 2 4 6 8 Failed to Stop at Signal Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right on red and struck a bicyclist crossing westbound on the south leg crosswalk/multi-use path. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist crossing westbound on the south leg crossing with the “don’t walk” symbol. The bicyclist was at fault. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing southbound in the west leg crosswalk. •4 of the broadside crashes were caused by westbound vehicles making a U-turn •Left turn crashes (3WB; 2EB) Total Crashes: 58 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Folsom StreetArapahoe Avenue 1 2 4 5 12 22 0 10 20 30 Pedestrian Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 4 4 4 9 9 15 0 5 10 15 20 Failed to Stop at… Improper Turn Lane Violation Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Arapahoe Avenue & Safeway/ Shopping Center •A severe-injury crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian in a wheelchair crossing westbound in the north crosswalk. The pedestrian entered the intersection with 3-4 seconds left of the ‘flash don’t walk’. Neither party was cited. •TWO bicycle-involved crashes occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a bicyclist crossing eastbound on the north leg crosswalk. Total Crashes: 20 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Shopping CenterArapahoe Avenue 2 2 6 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 Bicycle Pedestrian Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 5 5 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Arapahoe Avenue & 29th Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound on the east leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound crossing on the north leg crosswalk. •One of the pedestrian crashes coded to this intersection was miscoded and for 29th Street and Pearl Street. •3 EB Left-turn crashes in 3 years Total Crashes: 25 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 29thStreetArapahoe Avenue 1 2 2 9 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 Bicycle Sideswipe Pedestrian Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 2 3 5 7 0 2 4 6 8 Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Arapahoe Avenue & 33rd Street •No serious injury crashes or pedestrian/bicycle-involved crashes. •5 eastbound left-turn crashes in 3 years (struck by WB through) •4 crashes where westbound vehicles going straight ran red light and struck southbound left-turning vehicle Total Crashes: 24 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 33rdStreetArapahoe Avenue 1 3 6 12 0 5 10 15 Sideswipe Head on Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 5 6 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Arapahoe Avenue & 38th Street/Marine Street •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound on the east leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist crossing westbound on the south leg crosswalk. The light had just turned green and the bicyclist was crossing against the signal. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist crossing westbound on the south leg crosswalk. Both parties stated they had the green light/walk signal and there was not witness so neither party was cited. Total Crashes: 23 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 38thStreet1 1 3 4 10 0 5 10 15 Head on Pedestrian Bicycle Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 5 6 7 0 2 4 6 8 Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Driver Action Marine Street Other KSI Crashes •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street when a northbound right-turning vehicle ran the red light and struck a pedestrian crossing westbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street when a westbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing the right-turn channelized island. •A serious-injury crash occurred at 3200 Block of Arapahoe Avenue when an eastbound vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing northbound mid-block at 3210 Arapahoe Avenue driveway access. The pedestrian was at fault. •A serious-injury crash occurred at 3300 Block of Arapahoe Avenue when a northbound left-turning vehicle was exiting a private driveway and failed to yield right-of-way and was struck by an eastbound vehicle traveling straight. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 23rd Street when a northbound left-turning vehicle was exciting the private driveway and traveled into the lane of a westbound motorcycle traveling straight. The motorcyclist swerved out of the way and collided with the north curb and was ejected from the motorcycle. Other KSI Crashes •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street when a southbound left-turning vehicle crossed the center median and struck a westbound vehicle stopped at the red-light in the left-turn lane. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street when an eastbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection struck a vehicle making a northbound left-turn. The eastbound vehicle tried to beat the red light. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and an eastbound motorcycle traveling straight through the intersection slammed on his breaks to avoid collision and was ejected from the motorcycle. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street when an eastbound traveling motorized scooter lost control and hit the curb and was ejected from the vehicle. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & 15th Street when an eastbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound attempting to make a left-turn. Baseline Road 16th Street to Manhattan Drive 1600 Block to 5100 Block Baseline Road Crash History Map –All Crashes Baseline Road 28thStreet Crash History Map –Pedestrian Crashes Crash History Map –Bicycle Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crash –January 9, 2020 A fatal crash occurred at the intersection of Baseline Road & Mohawk Drive when the driver of an RTD bus for First Transit was making a southbound left turn and failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound in the east crosswalk. 836 19 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Total Crashes KSI Fatal Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 49% 17% 10% 6%5% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 37% 21% 16% 11% 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Bicycle Pedestrian Broadside Sideswipe Head on KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Non-Injury Crashes KSI Crashes 2500 Block of Baseline Road •A severe-injury crash occurred when a bicyclist traveling southbound on the multi-use path collide with a bicyclist traveling westbound on the multi-use path. It is unclear from the crash report who was at fault. Total Crashes: 88 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Mid-Block Baseline Road 28thStreet1 2 7 9 53 0 20 40 60 Bicycle Head on Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 6 8 27 32 0 10 20 30 40 Lane Violation Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Baseline Road & 27th Way/28th Street SB Ramps •A severe-injury crash occurred when an eastbound driver changed lines and struck another eastbound traveling vehicle causing the other vehicle to overturn. The driver of the overturned vehicle was injured and the driver of the vehicle changing lanes was at fault. •A severe-injury crash occurred when a westbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection ran the red light and struck a southbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection. The westbound traveling vehicle was at fault. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound traveling vehicle was stopped in the slip lane waiting for a gap in traffic to make a right-turn. A pedestrian on a skateboard entered the raised crosswalk and struck the vehicle. It is unclear from the crash report who is at fault. •There were five bicycle-involved crashes which occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound on the north multi-use path crossing in the crosswalk. The southbound vehicles were at fault. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection struck a bicyclist crossing against the signal at the north multi-use path. Total Crashes: 81 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 1 2 6 9 10 51 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Pedestrian Head on Bicycle Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 4 10 17 32 0 10 20 30 40 Failed to Yield ROW Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver ActionBaseline Road 27thWay28thStreet Ramp Baseline Road & Foothills Parkway •A severe-injury crash occurred when a westbound driver traveling straight through the intersection ran a red light and struck a vehicle traveling southbound through the intersection. The westbound vehicle was at fault. •A severe-injury crash occurred when a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the north leg crosswalk crossed against the signal and was struck by a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection. The pedestrian was at fault. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling on the sidewalk crossing straight through the intersection. It is unclear from the crash report who was at fault. Total Crashes: 91 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 1 1 8 14 61 0 20 40 60 80 Pedestrian Bicycle Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Harmful Event 3 4 9 22 35 0 10 20 30 40 Improper Turn Lane Violation Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver ActionBaseline Road Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A severe-injury crash occurred at a private driveway access east of 22nd Street when a westbound traveling vehicle vehicle making a right turn into a private driveway struck a motorcyclist positioned in the driveway waiting to turn southbound right. The motorcyclist was severely injured and it is not evident in the crash report who was at fault. •A severe-injury crash occurred at the gas station access west of 29th Street when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a vehicle traveling eastbound on the multi-use path. The bicyclist was severely injured and the driver was at fault. •A severe-injury crash occurred when an eastbound traveling vehicle stuck a bicyclist crossing southbound at the RRFB signal. The bicyclist was severely injured. The driver failed to stop at the signal and was at fault. •A severe-injury crash occurred when an eastbound traveling vehicle stuck a bicyclist crossing northbound at the RRFB signal. The bicyclist was severely injured. The driver failed to stop at the signal and was at fault. Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A severe-injury crash occurred at the Baseline Road & Meadows Shopping Center/Safeway intersection when an eastbound right-turning vehicle turned from a through lane and struck a bicyclist traveling in the bike lane straight through the intersection. The bicyclist was injured and the driver was at fault. •A severe-injury crash occurred at the Baseline Road & Meadows Shopping Center/Safeway intersection when a westbound left-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound straight through the intersection in the bicycle lane. The bicyclist was severely injured and the vehicle was at fault. •A severe-injury crash occurred at the intersection of Baseline Road & Mohawk Drive when a southbound left-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian in a wheel chaircrossing northbound in the east crosswalk. The pedestrian in the wheelchair was severely injured and the driver was at fault. •Does not include the KSI write-up from Broadway, 29th Street, and 30th Street (FHU analysis). Broadway Mapleton Avenue to Lee Hill Drive 2300 Block to 4800 Block Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes None398 16 00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Total Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Pedestrian Broadside Bicycle Rear End KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Removed Broadway & Lee Hill Drive •A severe-injury crash occurred when a westbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection failed to stop at the signal and struck a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound straight through the intersection. •Failed to stop at signal (4 WB; 1NB; 1SB) Total Crashes: 19 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Lee Hill Drive Broadway1 7 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 Bicycle Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 4 6 0 2 4 6 8 Failed to Yield ROW Failed to Stop at Signal Driver Action Broadway & Rosewood Avenue •TWO severe-injury crash occurred when a northbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling southbound straight through the intersection. There was heavy traffic in the area and a southbound vehicle stopped to let the northbound vehicle turn and the southbound bicyclist was not visible. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound vehicle was in traffic that was moving at about 10MPH and a northbound bicyclist took a left turn and crossed in the crosswalk just south of Rosewood Avenue. The bicyclist was at fault. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling southbound straight through the intersection. Total Crashes: 13 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Unsignalized Intersection Rosewood Avenue Broadway3 3 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 Bicycle Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 3 5 0 2 4 6 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Broadway & Violet Avenue •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a southbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a southbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. •5 of the 8 rear-ends were in the northbound direction Total Crashes: 15 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Violet Avenue Broadway2 2 3 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 Bicycle Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 2 3 6 0 2 4 6 8 Failed to Stop at Signal Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Driver Action Broadway & Poplar Avenue •A severe-injury crash occurred when a northbound vehicle that was traveling approximately 75-80 MPH and attempted to make a left-turn lost control and struck a fence. •The other KSI crash involved a pedestrian, but there were no crash details. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound on the west sidewalk crossing Poplar Avenue. Total Crashes: 16 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Unsignalized Intersection Poplar Avenue Broadway1 1 7 0 2 4 6 8 Pedestrian Bicycle Rear End Most Harmful Event 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Broadway & Linden Avenue •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right on red and failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing northbound on the west crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a southbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. Total Crashes: 14 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Linden Avenue Broadway1 2 4 5 0 2 4 6 Pedestrian Bicycle Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action 3100 Block Broadway •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle attempted to make a right-turn-on-red (out of the Boulder Recreation Center) struck a pedestrian traveling southbound on the east crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle (out of the Boulder Recreation Center) failed to yield right-of-way and struck an eastbound traveling pedestrian crossing on the south leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle attempted to make a right-turn-on-red (out of the Boulder Recreation Center) struck a bicyclist traveling southbound on the east crosswalk. Total Crashes: 9 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Mid-block/signalized Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 48thStreetForest BroadwayEvergreen 2 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lane Violation Careless Driving Driver Action 1 2 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Bicycle Pedestrian Rear End Most Harmful Event 3000 Block Broadway (Elder Avenue) •Two southbound left-turn crashes and two westbound left-turn crashes at Elder Avenue. •12 of the 14 rear-end crashes are in the southbound direction Total Crashes: 26 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Mid Block/Unsignalized Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 48thStreetEvergreen BroadwayDellwood 4 5 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 3 8 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 Lane Violation Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Other KSI Crashes •A severe-injury crash occurred at the 3600 Block of Broadway (between Kalmia and Linden) when a southbound traveling vehicle swerved to avoid collision with a deer in the roadway. A bicyclist slammed on their breaks to avoid collision, lost control, overturned, and was severely injured. •A severe-injury crash occurred Broadway & Iris Avenue when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a northbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection. The southbound driver was severely injured. •A severe-injury crash occurred Broadway & Meadow Avenue when a northbound vehicle failed to stop and rear-ended a northbound vehicle stopped in traffic. There was no crash report so it is unclear which driver was severely injured. •A severe-injury crash occurred Broadway & Quince Avenue when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the south leg crosswalk. The pedestrian was severely injured. •A severe-injury crash occurred Broadway & Yarmouth Avenue when a southbound left-turning vehicle lost control of their vehicle as they tried to avoid a westbound left-turning vehicle (westbound vehicle did not have the right-of-way). The driver of the southbound vehicle was severely injured. Other KSI Crashes •A severe-injury crash occurred Broadway & North Street when an eastbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound on the west crosswalk. The pedestrian was severely injured. •THREE severe-injury crashes occurred Broadway & North Street when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the south leg crosswalk. The pedestrian was severely injured. •One of the severe-injury crashes coded to Broadway & North Street actually occurred at Arapahoe Avenue & North. Broadway Rayleigh Street to Marine Street 300 Block to 1600 Block Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 12/27/2020 –A fatal crash occurred at Broadway and College Avenue when a southbound driver on Broadway ran off the right side of the road and hit a sign. The driver was speeding and lost control. The car’s tires rubbed along the curb until reaching a curb cut in an alleyway, at which point the front bumper of the vehicle collided with a street speed limit sign, detaching the sign from its base mount. 649 16 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Head on Bicycle Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Pedestrian Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Broadside KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Broadway & Marine Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound cyclist on the sidewalk slammed their brakes to prevent hitting a westbound driver on Marine Street. Their bike flipped over and hit the driver’s side door. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound vehicle on Broadway made a left turn onto Marine Street and crossed in front of a southbound cyclist on the sidewalk. The cyclist hit the right side of the vehicle and flipped over. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound vehicle on Broadway made a left turn onto Marine Street and crossed in front of a southbound pedestrian in the crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound vehicle turning right onto Marine Street collided with a person on a skateboard going north in the southbound bike lane. The skateboarder did not have the right-of-way and did not stop, so they crashed into the left rear side of the vehicle and rolled over the trunk. Total Crashes: 23 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Unsignalized Intersection 8 5 2 2 1 Rear End Broadside Bicycle Pedestrian Head On Most Harmful Event 7 4 4 3 Failed to Yield ROW Improper Backing Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Broadway & Pleasant Street •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound driver on Pleasant Street hit a northbound skateboarder in the crosswalk so the person was knocked onto the hood of the car. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound driver on Broadway turned left onto Pleasant Street and struck a southbound pedestrian in the crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound driver on Broadway struck two pedestrians out of a large group running across Broadway in the north crosswalk. The driver had the right of way. Total Crashes: 17 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pleasant Street 9 3 2 1 Rear End Pedestrian Sideswipe Bicycle Most Harmful Event 6 4 3 1 Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Failed to Stop at Signal Driver Action Broadway & Euclid Street •A serious injury crash occurred when a westbound driver on Euclid turning right onto Broadway struck a southbound bicyclist in the cycletrack crossing Euclid. The cyclist hit the front side bumper and went to the hospital to treat left hip pain. •Two separate bicycle-involved crashes occurred when a westbound driver on Euclid turning right onto Broadway struck a southbound bicyclist in the cycletrack crossing Euclid. In both crashes, the cyclist was injured but denied hospital treatment (one until later). Total Crashes: 16 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 17thStreet8 3 2 2 Rear End Bicycle Sideswipe Curb/Fixed Object Most Harmful Event 5 2 2 2 Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Speeding Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Broadway & 18th Street •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound driver turning south onto Broadway struck a northbound pedestrian entering the crosswalk so that the person rolled onto the hood of the vehicle. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a pedestrian crossing east-west in the north crosswalk against the light was struck by a driver. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound cyclist in the crosswalk crossed against the light and was struck by a westbound driver on 18th turning southbound onto Broadway. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound driver on Broadway turning right struck a northbound cyclist in the crosswalk. Total Crashes: 34 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 18thStreet23 3 2 2 2 Rear End Broadside Bicycle Pedestrian Sideswipe Most Harmful Event 13 13 3 Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Failed to Stop at Signal Driver Action Broadway & Regent Drive •A serious injury crash occurred when a southbound driver turning left onto Regent Drive struck a southbound cyclist. The driver was alcohol impaired and jumped the curb, driving into the field on the northwest side of the intersection. •A serious injury crash occurred when a southbound driver on Broadway struck an eastbound pedestrian in the south crosswalk against the light. •Two separate serious injury crashes occurred when a southbound driver turning left onto Regent Drive struck a northbound driver on Broadway who had the right of way. Total Crashes: 73 KSI Crashes: 4 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 32 13 8 7 5 2 Rear End Broadside Head On Sideswipe Bicycle Pedestrian Most Harmful Event 19 19 14 4 Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Failed to Stop at Signal Driver Action Other KSI Crashes •A serious injury crash occurred in the 800 Block of Broadway when a southbound driver who was recklessly driving lost control of their vehicle, drove over the median, and ended in the northbound lanes of traffic. •A serious injury crash occurred in the 800 Block of Broadway when two cyclists crashed head on when a northbound cyclist hit a westbound cyclist turning left. •A serious injury crash occurred when a person on a skateboard crossed Broadway at 15th against the light and was struck by a northbound driver. •A serious injury crash occurred when a northbound driver on Broadway turning right onto 15th struck a southbound cyclist in the crosswalk. •A serious injury crash occurred at Broadway & College when two cyclists crashed head on when a southbound cyclist hit an eastbound cyclist turning left. •A serious injury crash occurred when a person on a longboard crossed Broadway at Pennsylvania against the light and was struck by a northbound driver. Broadway Table Mesa Drive to Darley Avenue 600 Block to 900 Block Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes There were no fatal crashes on the corridor. 184 6 00 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Broadside Head on Pedestrian Other Fixed Object Other Non-Collision KSI Crashes 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Table Mesa 600 Block 40th 700 Block Hanover 900 Block Darley Grinnell 1200 Block Ludlow Greenbriar Chambers Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. Broadway & Hanover •A severe injury crash occurred when a northbound driver on Broadway turning left struck the side of a southbound vehicle. Both of the vehicles collided with the traffic pole on the southwest corner. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound driver turning left onto Hanover struck a cyclist travelling north on Broadway in the crosswalk. Total Crashes: 25 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Hanover Avenue 1 5 13 0 5 10 15 Bicycle Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 2 3 4 5 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Failed to Stop at Signal Lane Violation Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Broadway & Darley •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a eastbound driver turning right onto Broadway struck a cyclist travelling north on Broadway in the crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound driver turning right onto Darley struck a cyclist travelling north on Broadway in the crosswalk. Total Crashes: 10 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 1 2 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Sideswipe Traffic Signal Pole Bicycle Most Harmful Event 2 3 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Canyon Boulevard 15th Street to 28th Street 1500 Block to 2800 Block Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 4/21/2016 –A fatal crash occurred at Canyon Boulevard and Folsom Street when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way (FYA) to a northbound crossing pedestrian pushing a small utility cart in the east crosswalk. 350 8 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Total Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Pedestrian Bicycle Head on All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Pedestrian Bicycle Pedestrian on Toy Motorized Veh Broadside KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 15th Street 16th Street 1600 Block 17th Street 1700 Block 18th Street 19th Street 21st Street 2100 Block 22nd Street 2200 Block 23rd Street 2300 Block Folsom 2400 Block 26th Street 2600 Block 28th Street Non-KSI KSI Canyon Boulevard & 15th Street •A serious-injury crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound on the east leg crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a pedestrian crossing westbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound on the east leg crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle attempted to tur right-on-red and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to a westbound traveling bicyclist on the sidewalk. Total Crashes: 33 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 1 3 5 7 13 0 5 10 15 Bicycle Sideswipe Pedestrian Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 5 6 7 0 2 4 6 8 Followed Too Closely Failed to Stop at Signal Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Canyon Boulevard & 19th Street •xxxx. Total Crashes: xx KSI Crashes: xx Fatal Crashes: xx *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 2 2 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 Pedestrian Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 2 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Driver Action Canyon Boulevard 19thStreet•A serious-injury crash occurred when an eastbound traveling bus failed to yield right-of-way to a northbound traveling pedestrian crossing on the east leg when the pedestrian signal was activated. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound traveling vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to a northbound traveling pedestrian crossing on the east leg when the pedestrian signal was activated. Canyon Boulevard & 26th Street/McGuckin Way •A severe-injury crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck an eastbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck an eastbound bicyclist traveling eastbound on the multi-use path on the south side of the street. •Left turn crashes (WB-3; EB-2; SB-1) Total Crashes: 26 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection 4 4 4 7 0 2 4 6 8 Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action 1 4 7 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Bicycle Rear End Sideswipe Broadside Most Harmful Event Canyon Boulevard 26thStreetMcGuckin Canyon Boulevard & 28th Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound bicyclist was crossing on the west crosswalk and fell off their bicycle. Total Crashes: 84 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Canyon Boulevard 28thStreet1 8 13 56 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Head on Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 4 7 21 33 0 10 20 30 40 Failed to Yield ROW Lane Violation Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action •A severe -injury crash occurred at Canyon Boulevard & 18th Street when a southbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the north leg of the intersection (unsignalized intersection). •A severe -injury crash occurred at Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. Other KSI Crashes Colorado Avenue Regent Drive to 35th Street 2600 Block to 3500 Block Colorado Avenue Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 8/16/2018 –A fatal crash occurred at the intersection of 30th Street & Colorado Avenue when a vehicle ran off the road and then collided with the traffic signal pole on the northeast corner of the intersection. 197 6 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 Total Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Broadside Bicycle Rear End Traffic Signal KSI Crashes Crashes by Location Removed from FHU’s study list 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Colorado & Regent 2600-2700 Block 28th & Colorado 2900 Block 30th & Colorado Colorado & 33rd 3400 Block Colorado & Innovation/35th Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Removed from FHU’s study list Colorado Avenue & Regent Drive •Two of the severe-injury crashes occurred a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle began it’s turn and an eastbound straight traveling bicyclist improperly cut through all travel lanes and could not stop to avoid contact with the vehicle due to riding a bicycle with rear brakes that did not work. •Two bicycle-involved crashes occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to an eastbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to an eastbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to an westbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection on the shared-use path. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to a southbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. Total Crashes: 58 KSI Crashes: 3 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Colorado Avenue 26thStreetRegent Drive1 4 9 9 31 0 10 20 30 40 Head on Sideswipe Broadside Bicycle Rear End Most Harmful Event 11 14 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Colorado Avenue & 28th Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a northbound left-turning vehicle was stopped at a red-light and was rear-ended by a vehicle that failed to stop at the signal. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound on the shared use path on the west side of the intersection. Total Crashes: 45 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Colorado Avenue28thStreet 1 4 6 33 0 10 20 30 40 Bicycle Broadside Sideswipe Rear End Most Harmful Event 4 15 16 0 5 10 15 20 Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Driver Action Colorado Avenue & 30th Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a northbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian (on a motorized skateboard) crossing eastbound on the south leg crosswalk (occurred at the start-up of the walk/EB green phase). •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian (on a skateboard) crossing northbound on the west leg crosswalk. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound don the north leg crosswalk. •TWO bicycle-involved crashes occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound on the sidewalk and was crossing on the south leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle turned right-on-red and failed to yield right-of-way to a bicyclist traveling westbound on the south leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck an eastbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. Total Crashes: 54 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 1 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Colorado Avenue 30thStreet3 4 5 6 16 17 0 5 10 15 20 Pedestrian Head on Sideswipe Bicycle Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 6 6 8 10 16 0 5 10 15 20 Failed to Stop at… Improper Turn Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Folsom Street Taft Drive/Stadium Drive to Fremont Street 1400 Block to 3100 Block Folsom Street Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 4/21/2016 –A fatal crash occurred at Folsom Street & Canyon Boulevard when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound on the east crosswalk. The driver was at fault and the crash resulted in a fatality of the pedestrian. 310 12 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Total Crashes KSI Fatal Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Bicycle Pedestrian Broadside Head on Rear End Sideswipe KSI Crashes 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Folsom & Colorado 1200 Block Folsom 1300 Block Folsom Folsom & Stadium Drive Folsom & Taft 1400 Block Folsom Arapahoe & Folsom 1500 Block Folsom Canyon & Folsom 1800 Block Folsom Folsom & South Street Folsom & Walnut Street Folsom & Pearl Folsom & Spruce Folsom & Pine Non KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. Folsom Street & Arapahoe Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the multi-use path on the south side of Arapahoe Avenue and was crossing westbound in the south leg crosswalk with the walk symbol. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist crossing westbound on the south leg crosswalk without a walk symbol. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a pedestrian crossing in the west crosswalk. Total Crashes: 52 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Arapahoe AvenueFolsomStreet 1 2 4 5 12 22 0 5 10 15 20 25 Pedestrian Bicycle Head-on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 4 4 9 9 15 0 5 10 15 20 Failed to Stop at Signal Improper Turn Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Folsom Street & Pearl Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and a northbound straight traveling motorcyclist attempted to avoid collision and swerved to the right and struck a vehicle stopped at a red light in the westbound direction on Pearl Street. The motorcyclist was severely injured. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound left-turning bicyclist was struck from behind by a vehicle that was also making a northbound left-turn behind them. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian traveling northbound on the east leg crosswalk. Total Crashes: 29 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pearl StreetFolsom Street0 5 10 15 Pedestrian Sideswipe Bicycle Head-on Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Followed Too Closely Failed to Stop at Signal Failed to Yield ROW Careless Driving Driver Action Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A serious-injury crash occurred south of the intersection of Folsom Street and Arapahoe Avenue when a northbound traveling bicycle struck a pedestrian exiting the RTD Hop Bus when the pedestrian stepped into the bike lane. •A serious-injury crash occurred at the Newton Court driveway access (south of Arapahoe Avenue) when an eastbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling southbound in the bicycle lane. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Canyon Boulevard when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection in the bike lane. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Canyon Boulevard when a northbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a northbound bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection in the bike lane. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Spruce Street when a southbound straight traveling vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing westbound at the pedestrian signal. Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Spruce Street when a southbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection in the bicycle lane. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Stadium Drive when a pedestrian on a skateboard was traveling eastbound on Stadium Drive and failed to stop at the intersection and was struck by a southbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Stadium Drive when a westbound vehicle was stopped at the driveway access waiting to turn into traffic. A bicyclist was traveling northbound and thought the vehicle was going to turn out and slammed on their breaks and lost control and was seriously injured. There was no contact between the vehicle and the bicyclist and neither party was cited. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Pine Street when a westbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A serious-injury crash occurred at Folsom Street & Pine Street when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound straight through the intersection in the bike lane. Foothills Parkway Pearl Parkway to Iris Avenue Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes None 266 3 00 50 100 150 200 250 300 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Rear End Sideswipe Broadside Head on Bicycle Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Pedestrian Rear End Concrete Highway Barrier KSI Crashes Crashes by Location 0 50 100 150 200 250 Between Diagonal SB on-Ramp and Valmont Between Valmont and Pearl Parkway on/off- ramps Foothills & Pearl Parkway on/off-ramps Foothills SB & Entrance from Diagonal Valmont & Foothills Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road •A severe-injury crash occurred when an eastbound right turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a vehicle traveling southbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound vehicle struck an eastbound bicyclist at the start of the green light. The bicyclist crossed against the signal and the crash occurred at the start-up of the northbound green phase. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the raised crosswalk on the northeast corner channelized right-turn island. •Rear end crashes (EB-31; NB-44; SB-33; WB-8) Total Crashes: 156 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Valmont Road Foothills Parkway2 5 9 17 117 0 50 100 150 Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 9 10 37 79 0 20 40 60 80 100 Failed to Yield ROW Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Other KSI Crashes •A severe -injury crash occurred north of the Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road intersection when a southbound traveling vehicle struck a westbound pedestrian crossing the roadway approximately 1,300 feet north of the Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road intersection. •A severe -injury crash occurred at Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road (non-intersection) when a northbound traveling motorcycle was stopped at the red light. When the traffic light turned green, the motorcyclist was attempting to fix a mechanical issue when driving and struck the center median and was ejected from his motorcycle. Iris Avenue 19th Street to 28th Street 1900 Block to 2800 Block Iris Avenue Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes 85 1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Rear End Broadside Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 1 KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 5 10 15 20 25 19th Street 1900-211 Block 22nd Street/Hermosa 2200-2400 Block 25th Street 2500 Block Folsom Street Iris Walk 2700 Block Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Iris & 19th Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •Rear-end crashes –3 WB; 2SB (1 had no information) •Broadside crashes –3 WB (3 in 3 years) Total Crashes: 17 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Iris Avenue 19thStreet1 5 6 0 2 4 6 8 Bicycle Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 2 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action 2700 Block Iris •A bicycle-involved crash occurred at the west access of the Safeway driveway (west of 28th Street) when westbound left-turning driver failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound in the bicycle lane. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred at the west access of the Safeway driveway (west of 28th Street) when westbound left-turning driver failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound in the bicycle lane. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred at the driveway access on the north side of the street (just west of 28th Street) when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the sidewalk. •8 of the 10 broadside crashes were caused by northbound left-turning vehicles from the safeyparking lot and being struck by eastbound vehicles. The majority of these crashes occurred when there was queuing at the 28th Street & Iris Avenue signal which makes it difficult to see oncoming traffic in both eastbound through lanes. Total Crashes: 22 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Mid-block Location 2700 Block 28thStreet26thStreet/Folsom St1 3 3 4 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Head on Sideswipe Bicycle Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 3 13 0 5 10 15 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Iris Avenue & Folsom (Studied by FHU) •A serious-injury crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. The bicyclist was severely injured. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing northbound on the east leg crosswalk. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle turned right on red and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the sidewalk crossing the south leg. The crash report did not indicate who was at fault. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle turned right on red and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the sidewalk crossing the south leg. The driver was cited for failure to yield. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle turned right on red and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the sidewalk crossing the south leg. The crash report did not indicate who was at fault. Signalized Intersection Iris Avenue 26thStreetFolsom Street Iris Avenue 28th Street to Foothills Parkway 2800 Block to 3800 Block Iris Avenue Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes 81 3 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Head on Bicycle Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Pedestrian Bicycle Overturning KSI Crashes Crashes by Location 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2800-2900 Block Iris Iris & 30th 3000 Block Iris Iris & 34th 3400 Block Iris Iris & Foothills SB Iris & 47th Non KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Iris Avenue and 30th Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the sidewalk and crossing on the south leg crosswalk. The vehicle had a green light and the bicyclist was traveling on the sidewalk in an area where the sidewalk is not zoned for bicycles. Total Crashes: 29 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Iris Avenue 30thStreet1 3 7 15 0 5 10 15 20 Bicycle Head on Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 2 5 7 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Iris Avenue & 47th Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when there was construction occurring in the area and a flagger was directing traffic at the intersection. The flagger stopped eastbound traffic. The first eastbound vehicle stopped, but was rear-ended by the vehicle behind him. The first vehicle was pushed forward and collided with the flagger. The flagger was seriously injured in the crash. •A severe-injury crash occurred when a northbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. Total Crashes: 22 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Iris Avenue 47thStreet0 2 4 6 8 10 Head on Pedestrian Overturning Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 0 2 4 6 8 Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Driver Action Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A severe-injury crash occurred to the east of the 47th Street intersection when a northeastbound traveling vehicle struck a northeastbound traveling bicycle that swerved out of the bicycle lane into the travel lane. Lookout Road Gunpark Drive to 71st Street Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes None 9 0 00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Rear end Sideswipe Broadside Crashes by Location 0 1 2 3 4 5 Lookout & 71st Lookout & Dry Creek Lookout & Idylwild Pearl Street/Parkway 28th Street to Foothills Parkway 2800 Block to 4000 Block Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes 3/19/2016 –A fatal crash occurred at the 2900 Block of Pearl Street at the pedestrian signal. A westbound driver failed to yield right-of-way and struck and killed a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk. The driver stated that due to sun glare, they could not see the pedestrian or the pedestrian light. 367 8 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Head on Bicycle Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Bicycle Broadside Overturning Pedestrian KSI Crashes Crashes by Location 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 28th & Pearl 2800 Block 2900 Block 30th & Pearl Pearl & 31st Pearl & Junction Pearl & Frontier Pearl & Foothills NB Pearl & Foothills SB Pearl & 47th Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes 28th Street & Pearl Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the channelized right-turn island. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the channelized right-turn island. (geocoded to 2900 Block) •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the channelized right-turn island. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the channelized right-turn island. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a southbound vehicle traveling straight struck a pedestrian in a wheelchair crossing westbound in the north leg crosswalk. The pedestrian entered the crosswalk at the end of the flash don’t walk signal and did not fully finish crossing the intersection as southbound got the green light. •Left-turn crashes (WB-6 in 5 years; NB-5 in 4 years) Total Crashes: 76 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pearl Street 28thStreet1 3 4 10 20 34 0 10 20 30 40 Pedestrian Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 8 12 16 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 Failed to Stop at Signal Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Driver Action 2900 Block Pearl Street •A fatal crash occurred at the 2900 Block of Pearl Street at the pedestrian signal. A westbound driver failed to yield right-of-way and struck and killed a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk. The driver stated that due to sun glare, they could not see the pedestrian or the pedestrian light. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when an eastbound vehicle failed to yield at the flashing RRFB and struck a bicyclist crossing northbound in the crosswalk. •The other bicycle crash coded to this block actually occurred at 28th Street & Pearl Street. Total Crashes: 21 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 1 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Mid-block Pearl Parkway 30thStreet28thStreet1 2 2 3 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 Pedestrian Bicycle Sideswipe Broadside Rear-end Most Harmful Event 3 3 5 0 2 4 6 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action 30th Street & Pearl Street/Parkway •A serious injury crash occurred when a motorcycle traveling northbound overturned as it approached the intersection of 30th Street & Pearl Street/Parkway. It was a single vehicle accident and the motorcyclist was seriously injured. •A serious injury crash occurred when a southbound left turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a vehicle traveling northbound straight through the intersection. The left-turning vehicle was at fault and the passenger of the left-turning vehicle was seriously injured. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a vehicle make an eastbound right-turn turned from the wrong lane and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound left turning vehicle struck a bicyclist that was crossing westbound in the south leg crosswalk and had the walk symbol. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling northbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a vehicle exiting the driveway just north of the intersection at 30th Street & Pearl Parkway struck a bicyclist traveling southbound approaching the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling straight through the intersection. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when an eastbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound in the north crosswalk. •NB –4 in 2 years; SB-8 in 3 years ; WB –4 in 3 years •WB/WB (Rear-end and Sideswipe) -7 in 4 years Total Crashes: 81 KSI Crashes: 2 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pearl Street Pearl Parkway30thStreet 1 5 8 18 23 23 0 5 10 15 20 25 Pedestrian Bicycle Head-on Sideswipe Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 5 5 10 12 33 0 10 20 30 40 Improper Turn Lane Violation Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Pearl Parkway & Foothills SB •The broadside crashes were all left-turn related crashes (7 WB left crashes) •The other 4 crashes were miscoded and should be Foothills NB and were EB left crashes •Rear-end crashes (SB-22; SB right turn lane-6; WB-9; EB-9) Total Crashes: 68 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pearl Parkway Foothills SB11 52 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 18 13 32 0 10 20 30 40 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Followed Too Closely Driver Action Pearl Parkway & Foothills NB •A severe-injury crash occurred when an eastbound left turning motorcycle failed to yield right-of-way and was struck by a vehicle traveling westbound straight through the intersection. •A pedestrian-involved crash occurred when a northbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing on the crosswalk of the channelized right-turn island. •TWO bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing on the crosswalk of the channelized right-turn island. •There were 4 EB left crashes coded to Foothills SB that occurred at this intersection. Total Crashes: 13 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Pearl Parkway Foothills NB1 1 2 2 7 0 2 4 6 8 Pedestrian Head On Bicycle Overturning Rear End Most Harmful Event 3 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Careless Driving Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Pearl Parkway & 47th Street •A severe-injury crash occurred when a southbound right turning vehicle failed to yield right- of-way and struck a pedestrian crossing eastbound on the north leg of the roadway. Total Crashes: 8 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Unsignalized Intersection Pearl Parkway 47thStreet1 2 2 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Pedestrian Head On Sideswipe Broadside Most Harmful Event 2 2 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Careless Driving Lane Violation Failed to Yield ROW Driver Action Table Mesa Drive Stanford Avenue to 55th Street 3600 Block –5500 Block of Table Mesa Drive Crash History Map Table Mesa Drive Foothills Pkwy Pedestrian Crash Map Bicycle Crash Map Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crash –January 28, 2018 Driver of vehicle traveling west on Table Mesa Drive collided with curb on the northwest corner of Table Mesa Drive & Moorhead Avenue and then collided with traffic signal light pole. The collision was a suspected DUI and resulted in a fatality. 525 16 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Total Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 48% 18% 11% 5% 2%2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Bicycle Head on Pedestrian All Crashes 25% 19%19% 6%6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Broadside Bicycle Pedestrian Sideswipe Head on KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Table Mesa & Stanford Avenue •A crash occurred when a vehicle making a southbound left turn failed to yield right-of- way and struck a bicyclist traveling west. The driver was at fault and the crash resulted in a serious injury. Total Crashes: 45 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only 2 4 5 31 0 10 20 30 40 Rear End Bicycle Sideswipe Broadside Most Harmful Event Unsignalized Intersection 1 2 3 5 33 0 10 20 30 40 Disregard Stop Sign Carless Driving Followed to Closely Improper Turning Failed to Yield Driver Action Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A crash occurred when a vehicle traveling westbound on Table Mesa Drive failed to stop at the pedestrian traffic signal west of Stanford Avenue and struck a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk. The driver was at fault and the crash resulted in a serious injury. •A crash occurred at South Boulder Road & Manhattan Drive when a vehicle traveling eastbound struck a pedestrian who was crossing against the traffic signal on the east leg crosswalk. The crash resulted in a serious injury and the pedestrian was at fault. •A crash occurred at South Boulder Road & Manhattan Drive when westbound left turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and collided with a vehicle traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. The westbound turning vehicle was at fault and the crash resulted in a serious injury. Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A crash occurred when a driver traveling westbound on Table Mesa Drive between 42nd Street and 43rd Street veered into the eastbound travel lanes and struck a vehicle traveling eastbound. The driver of the westbound vehicle was at fault and the crash resulted in a serious injury. •A crash occurred at Table Mesa Drive & 45th Street when a northbound right turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling westbound on the sidewalk. The driver was at fault and the crash resulted in a serious injury. •A crash occurred at Table Mesa Drive & Martin Drive/46th Street when a southbound left turning vehicle struck a bicyclist traveling northbound through. The crash resulted in a serious injury. Other KSI Crashes Summarized •A crash occurred at the Table Mesa Drive & RTD Park-n-Ride intersection when a westbound left turning vehicle struck a vehicle traveling eastbound straight through the intersection. The westbound left turning vehicle was at fault and the crash resulted in a serious injury. •A crash occurred at Table Mesa Drive & Foothills Parkway SB Off-ramp when a westbound vehicle traveling straight through the intersection failed to stop at the traffic signal and struck a southbound left turning vehicle. The westbound driver was at fault and the crash resulted in a serious injury. •Driver of vehicle traveling west on Table Mesa Drive collided with curb on the northwest corner of Table Mesa Drive & Moorhead Avenue and then collided with traffic signal light pole. The collision was a suspected DUI and resulted in a fatality. •A single bicycle crash occurred when a bicyclist was traveling eastbound east of Stanford Avenue and lost control of his bicycle and resulted in a serious injury. •+additional KSI crashes at Table Mesa Drive & Broadway Valmont Road 30th Street to Marshall Road/55th Street 3000 Block to 5500 Block Crash History Map Pedestrian-Involved Crashes Bicycle-Involved Crashes Corridor-Wide Themes Fatal Crashes None 408 9 00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 All Crashes KSI Crashes Fatal Crashes Top Harmful Events Corridor-Wide 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Rear End Broadside Sideswipe Head on Bicycle Pedestrian All Crashes 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Tree or Fixed Object Bicycle Rear End Broadside Overturning KSI Crashes Crashes by Location To be studied in greater detail by FHU. 0 50 100 150 200 250 30th & Valmont 3200 Block Valmont & 34th 3400 Block Valmont & Wilderness Pl Valmont & Center Green Valmont & Foothills Valmont & 47th 4700 Block Valmont & Sterling Valmont & Kings Ridge 5000 Block Valmont & Airport 5100 Block 5400 Block Valmont & Marshal Non-KSI Crashes KSI Crashes Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road •A severe-injury crash occurred when an eastbound right turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a vehicle traveling southbound straight through the intersection. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a northbound vehicle struck an eastbound bicyclist at the start of the green light. The bicyclist crossed against the signal and the crash occurred at the start-up of the northbound green phase. •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a westbound right turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist crossing the raised crosswalk on the northeast corner channelized right-turn island. •Rear end crashes (EB-31; NB-44; SB-33; WB-8) Total Crashes: 156 KSI Crashes: 1 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Valmont Road Foothills Parkway2 5 9 17 117 0 50 100 150 Bicycle Head on Sideswipe Broadside Rear End Most Harmful Event 9 10 37 79 0 20 40 60 80 100 Failed to Yield ROW Failed to Stop at Signal Careless Driving Followed Too Closely Driver Action Valmont Road & 47th Street •A bicycle-involved crash occurred when a southbound right turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling westbound crossing on the north leg crosswalk. •TWO bicycle-involved crashes occurred when a southbound right-turning vehicle attempted to turn right-on-red and failed to yield right-of-way and struck a bicyclist traveling eastbound crossing on the north leg crosswalk. Total Crashes: 17 KSI Crashes: 0 Fatal Crashes: 0 *Intersection and Intersection-related Crashes Only Signalized Intersection Valmont Road 47thStreet3 4 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 Bicycle Rear End Broadside Most Harmful Event 2 3 4 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 Failed to Yield ROW Failed to Stop at Signal Followed Too Closely Careless Driving Driver Action •A severe-injury crash occurred on the 2900 block of 30th Street when a northbound left-turning vehicle turning into the gas station on the southwest corner of 30th Street & Valmont Road failed to yield right-of-way and was struck by a southbound straight traveling vehicle. •A severe-injury crash occurred at the intersection of 30th Street & Valmont Road when an eastbound driver disregarded the red traffic signal and was struck by a vehicle traveling northbound through the intersection. •TWO severe-injury crashes occurred just east of the intersection of 30th Street & Valmont Road when a southbound vehicle turning out of 3003 Valmont Road failed to stop at the stop sign and struck a bicyclist traveling on the sidewalk. Other KSI Crashes •A severe-injury crash occurred at the 5000 Block of Valmont approximately 230 feet west of Airport Road when a westbound vehicle rear-ended another westbound vehicle and then veered to the right and struck the curb. The driver that rear-ended the other vehicle was cited for a DUI. •A severe-injury crash occurred at Valmont Road & 34th Street when a southbound left-turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way and was struck by a vehicle traveling westbound straight through the intersection. •A severe-injury crash occurred west of Foothills Parkway when an eastbound vehicle crossed into the westbound lanes of Valmont Road and then drove off the road and struck a drainage culvert. The driver was cited with a DUI. Other KSI Crashes 90 HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM (FHU) APPENDIX F- BOULDER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN Intersection Crash Analysis Report Prepared for: City of Boulder 1777 Broadway Boulder, CO 80302 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6400 S Fiddlers Green Circle, Suite 1500 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303.721.1440 Project Manager: Gaurav Vasisht, PE, PTOE, RSP21 Project Engineer: Ryan K. Saline, PE FHU Reference No. 122125-01 January 2023 Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Methodology ............................................................................................................... 4 Safety Performance Functions & Level of Service of Safety .......................................................................... 4 Direct Diagnostics................................................................................................................................................... 5 Data Collection........................................................................................................................................................ 5 III. Intersection Analysis ................................................................................................. 6 1. 28th St & Jay Rd ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Broadway & Iris Ave ................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Iris Ave & Folsom St ................................................................................................................................. 10 4. Folsom St & Valmont Rd ......................................................................................................................... 11 5. 28th St & Valmont Rd ................................................................................................................................ 12 6. 30th St & Valmont Rd ................................................................................................................................ 13 7. Foothills Pkwy & Valmont Rd ................................................................................................................. 14 8. Broadway & Balsam St ............................................................................................................................. 16 9. Broadway & Alpine St .............................................................................................................................. 17 10. Folsom St & Pearl St ................................................................................................................................. 18 11. 30th St & Pearl St ....................................................................................................................................... 19 12. 30th St & Walnut St ................................................................................................................................... 21 13. Canyon Blvd & Folsom St ........................................................................................................................ 22 14. 30th St & Canyon Blvd .............................................................................................................................. 24 15. Arapahoe Ave & Folsom St ..................................................................................................................... 25 16. Arapahoe Ave & 28th St .......................................................................................................................... 27 17. Arapahoe Ave & 30th St ........................................................................................................................... 29 18. Foothills Pkwy & Arapahoe Ave ............................................................................................................ 31 19. Arapahoe Ave & Conestoga St .............................................................................................................. 33 20. Arapahoe Ave & 55th St ........................................................................................................................... 34 21. Broadway & University Ave .................................................................................................................... 35 22. Broadway & College Ave ........................................................................................................................ 36 23. 30th St & Aurora Ave ................................................................................................................................ 37 24. Broadway & Baseline Rd .......................................................................................................................... 38 Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page ii 25. Baseline Rd & 30th St ................................................................................................................................ 40 26. Foothills Pkwy & Baseline Rd ................................................................................................................. 42 27. Broadway & Dartmouth St ..................................................................................................................... 44 28. Broadway & Table Mesa Dr .................................................................................................................... 45 29. Table Mesa Dr & Foothills Pkwy Southbound Off-Ramp ................................................................ 47 IV. Summary................................................................................................................... 48 Appendices Appendix A. Intersection Crash Analysis Worksheets List of Figures Page Figure 1. Intersection Crash Analysis Locations ............................................................................................ 3 List of Tables Page Table 1. Study Intersections .............................................................................................................................. 1 Table 2. Summary of Intersection Crash Histories ................................................................................... 48 Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 1 I. I NTRODUCTION Vision Zero describes the City of Boulder’s goal to eliminate traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries. At its core, this goal is inspired by the belief that traffic collisions are preventable, and even one fatality is too many. To help achieve Vision Zero, Boulder has developed several iterations of Vision Zero Action Plans. The updated Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan seeks to identify and prioritize tangible safety improvements to the transportation network in the City of Boulder and provide a clear methodology for implementing improvements throughout the city. Purpose and Need Safety improvement recommendations for the updated Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan are based on analyses of the existing roadway network. First, systemic safety analysis was conducted throughout the city to identify risk factors related to fatal and serious injury crashes and locations where those risk factors are most prominent. Recommendations developed from the systemic analysis are often applicable to several locations based on site characteristics. Systemic recommendations can be seen as proactive or forward-looking since they do not rely on recent crash history to be warranted. Second, intersection crash analyses were conducted at key locations within the city to assess the magnitude and nature of the safety problem within the project limits. Additionally, intersection crash analyses relate crash causality to several factors such as roadway geometrics, roadside features, traffic control devices, traffic operations, driver behavior, and vehicle type. Review of crash history may identify patterns that are not functions of risk factors present at the intersections. Recommendations developed from the crash analysis are typically site specific but can have applications outside of the study intersections. This Intersection Crash Analysis Report summarizes the results of intersection crash analyses for the Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan. Study Area Through consultation with City of Boulders staff, 29 signalized intersections were chosen for crash analysis. Selected intersections often included at least one cross street on the Core Arterial Network (CAN), and typically had several risk factors from the systemic safety analysis. Figure 1 displays the location of all 29 study intersections. Table 1 lists all 29 study intersections, including the major street, minor street, and average annual daily traffic volume (AADT). Traffic volumes shown in the table are from 2017-2019. Table 1. Study Intersections # Major Street Minor Street Major Street AADT (vpd) Minor Street AADT (vpd) 1 28th Street Jay Road 29,200 14,500 2 Broadway Iris Avenue 29,700 17,700 3 Iris Avenue Folsom Street 27,400 12,100 4 Folsom Street Valmont Road 16,800 12,700 5 28th Street Valmont Road 29,800 18,100 6 30th Street Valmont Road 24,400 21,900 7 Foothills Parkway Valmont Road 56,900 23,400 Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 2 Table 1. Study Intersections # Major Street Minor Street Major Street AADT (vpd) Minor Street AADT (vpd) 8 Broadway Balsam Street 28,200 8,400 9 Broadway Alpine Street 23,600 4,200 10 Folsom Street Pearl Street 19,900 19,000 11 30th Street Pearl Street 31,000 25,200 12 30th Street Walnut Street 30,000 12,700 13 Canyon Boulevard Folsom Street 26,500 20,500 14 30th Street Canyon Boulevard 25,700 6,900 15 Arapahoe Avenue Folsom Street 27,300 18,200 16 Arapahoe Avenue 28th Street 43,000 29,800 17 Arapahoe Avenue 30th Street 33,500 26,000 18 Foothills Parkway Arapahoe Avenue 61,300 42,300 19 Arapahoe Avenue Conestoga Street 32,400 4,200 20 Arapahoe Avenue 55th Street 34,700 25,100 21 Broadway University Avenue 35,000 8,600 22 Broadway College Avenue 37,100 3,400 23 30th Street Aurora Avenue 22,600 2,500 24 Broadway Baseline Road 39,600 31,700 25 Baseline Road 30th Street 29,500 22,200 26 Foothills Parkway Baseline Road 48,300 27,000 27 Broadway Dartmouth Street 36,400 2,400 28 Broadway Table Mesa Drive 39,000 29,500 29 Table Mesa Drive Foothills Parkway SB Off-Ramp 34,700 11,900 Notes: AADT values shown were collected between 2017 and 2019 Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 3 Figure 1. Intersection Crash Analysis Locations Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 4 II. M ETHODOLOGY The goal of this crash analysis process is to determine the magnitude of and nature of existing intersection safety problems using data-driven techniques and statistical analyses. Safety Performance Functions were used to evaluate the magnitude of safety problems. Pattern Recognition and Diagnostic techniques were used to assess the nature of safety problems. Safety Performance Functions & Level of Service of Safety The magnitude of existing intersection safety problems on highway segments was assessed using Safety Performance Functions (SPFs). The SPF reflects the relationship between traffic exposure, measured in average annual daily traffic (AADT), and crash frequency measured in crashes per year. The SPF models provide an estimate of the expected crash frequency and severity for a range of AADT among similar intersection types. Two kinds of SPFs were used: the first addresses the total crash frequency while the second only considers the frequency of crashes involving an injury or fatality (severe crashes). These SPFs aid in assessing the magnitude of existing intersection safety problems from the frequency and severity standpoint. Development of SPFs leads to the conceptual formulation of the Level of Service of Safety (LOSS). The concept of level of service uses qualitative measures that characterize safety of a roadway segment in reference to its expected performance. If the level of safety predicted by the SPF represents an expectation of crash frequency at a specific level of AADT, selected percentiles within the frequency distribution can be stratified to represent specific levels of safety relative to the expectation of the SPF.  LOSS I – Below 20th Percentile • Indicates a low potential for crash reduction.  LOSS II – 20th Percentile to Mean • Indicates a low to moderate potential for crash reduction.  LOSS III – Mean to 80th Percentile • Indicates a moderate to high potential for crash reduction.  LOSS IV – Above 80th Percentile • Indicates a high potential for crash reductions. LOSS boundaries are calibrated by computing the 20th and the 80th percentiles using the Gamma Distribution Probability Density Function. Gradual change in the degree of deviation of the LOSS boundary line from the fitted model mean reflects the observed increase of variability in crash frequency as AADT increases. This increase is consistent with a Gamma Distribution error structure. LOSS reflects how the intersection is performing with respect to its expected crash frequency and severity at a specific level of AADT. It only provides a crash frequency and severity comparison with the expected norm. It does not provide any information related to the nature of the safety problem itself. If the safety problem is present, LOSS will only describe its magnitude from the frequency and severity standpoint. Correcting for Regression to the Mean Bias The average of several years of crash history of an intersection provides an estimate of what is likely to be observed in the future. The precision of this estimate, however, can be improved by correcting for the Regression to the Mean (RTM) bias. RTM phenomenon reflects the tendency for random event occurrences, such as crashes, to move toward the average during an experiment or over time. For instance, if an intersection exhibits unusually high or unusually low crash frequency in a particular year, Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 5 RTM bias recognizes that over the long run the true average is closer to the mean representing safety performance of similar intersections. The existence of the RTM bias has been long recognized and is now effectively addressed by using the Empirical Bayes (EB) method. The EB method is based on combining the information contained in the known crash history with information regarding the safety of similar intersection types using the expected mean value and over-dispersion parameter associated with the SPF. EB corrected values of frequency and severity of crashes are used in the SPF analysis to assess the magnitude of the existing safety problems. Direct Diagnostics The crash history of study intersections was evaluated to identify patterns related to crash type, severity, direction of travel, road conditions, time of day and behavioral attributes. The distribution of crash types and causal factors from the crash history was compared to the distributions of data that was used in the formation of SPFs for similar intersection types. Using the binomial distribution, each crash type and factor was evaluated to determine if the frequency of occurrence at a study intersection was significantly greater than the average frequency observed at similar intersections. Any crash type or factor with at least five occurrences and exceeding the 95 percent confidence level of the binomial distribution is considered a diagnostic pattern. Data Collection Crash History Crash history data was collected from the City of Boulder for all crashes at or related to the study intersections (generally all crashes within 250 feet of an intersection were included). At several study locations, crashes occurred at driveways to businesses or parking lots located near the primary intersection. Generally, these crashes were included in the intersection crash history if the occurred upstream of the intersection (involved traffic units approaching the intersection versus departing from the intersection). Traffic Counts Traffic counts from 2017-2019 were collected from the City of Boulder and were used to establish the expected crash frequency for SPFs. Turning movement counts and K-Factors were used to convert traffic counts from design hourly volume to AADT. SPFs and Diagnostic Norms The Vision Zero Suite software from DiExSys was used to develop SPF models and baseline values for diagnostic pattern analyses. This software collects crash history from several agencies in Colorado to develop a comprehensive database that can be used to calibrate SPF models and diagnostic norms for several different intersection types based on geometric configuration, geographic setting, and traffic control. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 6 III. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Use the Body Text style for paragraph text. Use the Body Text style for paragraph text. Use the Body Text style for paragraph text. Use the Body Text style for paragraph text. Use the Body Text style for paragraph text. Use the Body Text style for paragraph text. 1. 28th St & Jay Rd Classification: Urban 2-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 28th Street AADT: 29,200 vpd Minor Street: Jay Road AADT: 14,500 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 46 crashes (21 injury) LOSS: II (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Injury, Broadside, Approach Turn Both 28th Street and Jay Road are two-lane roads. Between 2015 and 2019, 46 total crashes were recorded at the 28th Street & Jay Road intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (39%), followed by Approach Turn (33%) and Broadside (18%). 21 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Severe crash types included Approach Turn (52%), Rear End (24%), and Broadside (14%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (24%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (26%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (33%). Injury Crashes 21 crashes occurred at the 28th Street & Jay Road intersection that resulted in injury. Approach Turn crashes were the most common Injury crash type (11 of 21). 7 of 21 Injury crashes occurred during Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions. Weather was not a factor in any of the Injury crashes. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 7 of 21 Injury crashes. Broadside Crashes 8 Broadside crashes occurred at the 28th Street & Jay Road intersection, including 3 that resulted in injury. Broadside crashes involved several different vehicle maneuvers:  Northbound motorist ran red light and collided with westbound right-turning motorist  Northbound motorist ran red light and collided with westbound motorist  Northbound left-turning motorist ran red light and collided with westbound left-turning motorist  Eastbound motorist ran red light and collided with southbound motorist  Southbound motorist ran red light and collided with eastbound motorist (3 times)  Southbound motorist ran red light and collided with westbound motorist Rear End 39% Approach Turn 33% Broadside 18% Bicycle 4%Fixed Object 4% Other 2% Total Crashes Approach Turn 52% Rear End 24% Broadside 14% Bicycle 10% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 7 Weather was not a contributing factor in any of the Broadside crashes. 1 of 8 Broadside crashes occurred during Dawn/Dusk conditions. 4 of 8 crashes occurred between 7:00 AM – 10:00 AM and 4 of 8 crashes occurred between 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM. Approach Turn Crashes 15 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the 28th Street & Jay Road intersection, 11 of which resulted in injury. Crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Southbound left-turning motorist, northbound motorist: 12 crashes (10 injury)  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 3 crashes (1 injury) Approach Turn crashes were most common between 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM (6 of 15). Dark-Lighted, Dark- Unlighted or Dawn/Dusk conditions were present for 8 of 15 Approach Turn crashes. Weather was not a contributing factor in any of the Approach Turn crashes. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 8 of 15 Approach Turn crashes. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 8 2. Broadway & Iris Ave Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 3-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 29,700 vpd Minor Street: Iris Street AADT: 17,700 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 25 crashes (10 injury) LOSS: II (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Off Road, Approach Turn, Fixed Object Broadway is a four-lane road, while Iris Street is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 25 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & Iris Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (40%), followed by Approach Turn (28%) and Fixed Object (20%). 10 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Severe crash types included Approach Turn (40%), Rear End (40%), and Fixed Object (20%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (32%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (40%). Off Road Crashes 5 Off Road crashes occurred at the Broadway & Iris Street intersection, 2 of which resulted in injury. Off Road crashes involved motorists driving in several different directions:  Northbound right-turning motorist did not turn properly and collided with landscaping and traffic signal equipment in the northeast corner of the intersection  Southbound left-turning motorist did not turn properly and collided with the south curb of Iris Street before bouncing back into the roadway and striking other vehicles  Southbound left-turning motorist did not turn properly and collided with traffic signal equipment in the southeast corner of the intersection  Westbound motorist collided with a fence on the west side of the intersection  Westbound right-turning motorist slid on the icy roadway and collided with a curb and tree in the median north of the intersection 2 of 5 Off Road crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions. 1 of 5 Off Road crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 4 of 5 crashes. Approach Turn Crashes 7 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the Broadway & Iris Street intersection, 4 of which resulted in injury. All 7 crashes involved southbound left-turning motorists and northbound motorists. Approach Turn crashes were most common between Noon – 5:00 PM (4 of 7); the remaining crashes occurred between 5:00 AM – 9:00 AM. Dark-Lighted or Dawn/Dusk conditions were present for 2 of 7 Approach Turn crashes. 1 of 7 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 2 of 7 Approach Turn crashes. Rear End 40% Approach Turn 28% Fixed Object 20% Broadside 8%Sideswipe (Opposite) 4% Total Crashes Approach Turn 40% Rear End 40% Fixed Object 20% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 9 Fixed Object Crashes 5 Fixed Object crashes occurred at the Broadway & Iris Street intersection, 2 of which resulted in injury. All 5 Fixed Object crashes occurred Off-Road and are described in the preceding section. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 10 3. Iris Ave & Folsom St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Iris Avenue AADT: 27,400 vpd Minor Street: Folsom Street AADT: 12,100 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 26 crashes (8 injury) LOSS: I (Total), I (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Bicycle, Dark-Lighted Iris Avenue is a four-lane road, while Folsom Street is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 26 total crashes were recorded at the Iris Avenue & Folsom Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (42%), followed by Approach Turn (23%) and Bicycle (19%). 8 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for severe crash reduction. Bicycle crashes were the most common severe crash type (50%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (35%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (38%). Bicycle Crashes 5 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Iris Avenue & Folsom Street intersection, 4 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with a westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk (3 times)  Westbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist (2 times) Weather was not a factor in any of the Bicycle crashes. Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 2 of 5 Bicycle crashes. 3 of 5 crashes occurred between 4:00 PM – 7:00 PM. Dark-Lighted Crashes Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 9 crashes at the Iris Avenue & Folsom Street intersection, 2 of which resulted in injury. Several crash types occurred involving Dark-Lighted conditions, including Rear End (3 of 9), Approach Turn (2 of 9), and Bicycle (2 of 9). 5 of 9 crashes occurred between 5:00 PM – 8:00 PM, and 2 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Rear End 42% Approach Turn 23% Bicycle 19% Pedestrian 4% Broadside 4% Other 8% Total Crashes Bicycle 50% Pedestrian 12% Approach Turn 12% Broadside 13% Rear End 13% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 11 4. Folsom St & Valmont Rd Classification: Urban 2-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Folsom Street AADT: 16,800 vpd Minor Street: Valmont Road AADT: 12,700 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 17 crashes (8 injury) LOSS: I (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Injury Folsom Street is a two-lane road. West of Folsom Street, Edgewood Drive is a two-lane road. East of Folsom Street, Valmont Road becomes a four-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 17 total crashes were recorded at the Folsom Street & Valmont Road intersection. This is consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (47%), followed by Broadside (18%) and Approach Turn (17%). 8 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (62%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (29%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 6:00 AM – 9:00 AM (25%), from Noon – 3:00 PM (25%), and from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (25%). Injury Crashes 8 crashes occurred at the Folsom Street & Valmont Road intersection that resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Injury crash type (5 of 8). Pedestrian (1 of 5), Broadside (1 of 5), and Approach Turn (1 of 5) Injury crashes were also recorded. 3 of 8 Injury crashes occurred during Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions. Only 1 Injury crash occurred in inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 3 of 8 Injury crashes. Rear End 47% Approach Turn 17% Broadside 18% Pedestrian 6% Sideswipe (Same) 6% Fixed Object 6% Total Crashes Rear End 62%Approach Turn 12% Broadside 13% Pedestrian 13% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 12 5. 28th St & Valmont Rd Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 28th Street AADT: 29,800 vpd Minor Street: Valmont Road AADT: 18,100 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 94 crashes (26 injury) LOSS: III (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: None Both 28th Street and Valmont Road are four-lane roads. Between 2015 and 2019, 94 total crashes were recorded at the 28th Street & Valmont Road intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (52%), followed by Approach Turn (20%). 26 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (50%), followed by Approach Turn (23%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (25%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (25%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 9:00 AM – Noon (32%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (28%). No crashes were identified as diagnostic patterns, however, 19 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the intersection (6 injury). Approach Turn crashes involved all approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Southbound left-turning motorist, northbound motorist: 7 crashes (2 injury)  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 5 crashes (1 injury)  Eastbound left-turning motorist, westbound motorist: 4 crashes (1 injury)  Northbound left-turning motorist, southbound motorist: 3 crashes (1 injury) Approach Turn crashes were most common between 9:00 AM – 3:00 PM (10 of 19). Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 6 of 19 Approach Turn crashes. 2 of 19 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 6 of 18 Approach Turn crashes. Rear End 52% Approach Turn 20% Sideswipe (Same) 9% Broadside 7% Overtaking Turn 3% Other 9% Total Crashes Rear End 50% Approach Turn 23% Bicycle 7% Broadside 8% Other Non- Collision 8% Other 4% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 13 6. 30th St & Valmont Rd Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 30th Street AADT: 24,400 vpd Minor Street: Valmont Road AADT: 21,900 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 80 crashes (26 injury) LOSS: III (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Approach Turn, Bicycle Both 30th Street and Valmont Road are four-lane roads. Between 2015 and 2019, 80 total crashes were recorded at the 30th Street & Valmont Road intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (45%), followed by Approach Turn (22%) and Broadside (14%). 26 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (35%) followed by Approach Turn (19%) and Bicycle (19%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (31%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 9:00 AM – Noon (38%) and from Noon – 3:00 PM (35%). Approach Turn Crashes 18 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Valmont Road intersection, 5 of which resulted in injury. Crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Northbound left-turning motorist, southbound motorist: 9 crashes (4 injury)  Southbound left-turning motorist, northbound motorist: 5 crashes (1 injury)  Eastbound left-turning motorist, westbound motorist: 2 crashes  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 2 crashes Approach Turn crashes were most common between Noon – 6:00 PM (13 of 18). Dawn/Dusk or Dark- Lighted conditions were present for 4 of 18 Approach Turn crashes. Only 1 of 18 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 2 of 18 Approach Turn crashes. Bicycle Crashes 6 Bicycle crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Valmont Road intersection, 5 of which resulted in injury. All 6 Bicycle crashes involved turning motorists:  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk  Westbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the south crosswalk  Eastbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk  Southbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the bike lane (2 times) 1 of 6 Bicycle crashes occurred in inclement weather. 5 of 6 crashes occurred during daylight hours. Rear End 45% Approach Turn 22% Broadside 14% Bicycle 8% Sideswipe (Same) 5% Other 6% Total Crashes Rear End 35% Approach Turn 19%Bicycle 19% Broadside 15% Pedestrian 4% Other 8% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 14 7. Foothills Pkwy & Valmont Rd Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Foothills Parkway AADT: 56,900 vpd Minor Street: Valmont Road AADT: 23,400 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 173 crashes (45 injury) LOSS: III (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Rear End, Dawn/Dusk, Snow/Sleet/Hail Foothills Parkway is a six-lane road, while Valmont Road is a four-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 173 total crashes were recorded at the Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (75%), followed by Broadside (11%). 45 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (71%) followed by Broadside (11%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (30%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (27%). Rear End 130 Rear End crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road intersection, 32 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred on all intersection approaches:  Northbound Foothills Parkway: 51 crashes (10 injury) • 28 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Southbound Foothills Parkway: 28 crashes (5 injury) • 14 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Westbound Arapahoe Avenue: 8 crashes (3 injury) • 4 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Eastbound Arapahoe Avenue: 41 crashes (14 injury) • 39 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane Rear End crashes were most common between 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (40 of 130). Dark-Lighted, Dark- Unlighted, or Dawn/Dusk conditions were present for 27 of 130 Rear End crashes. 15 of 130 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 30 of 130 Rear End crashes. Dawn/Dusk 13 crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road intersection during Dawn/Dusk conditions, 2 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Dawn/Dusk crash type (10 of 13); the remaining crashes included Broadside (1 of 13), Approach Turn (1 of 13), and Bicycle (1 of 13). 10 of 13 Dawn/Dusk crashes occurred between 4:00 PM – 8:00 PM, while the remaining crashes occurred between 4:00 AM – 7:00 AM. Sun glare was not noted in any of the Dawn/Dusk crash reports. Rear End 75% Broadside 11% Sideswipe (Same) 7%Approach Turn 4% Bicycle 1% Other 2% Total Crashes Rear End 71% Broadside 11% Approach Turn 5% Bicycle 5%Fixed Object 4% Other 4% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 15 Snow/Sleet/Hail 13 crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road intersection during Snow/Sleet/Hail, 3 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Dawn/Dusk crash type (8 of 13); the remaining crashes included Broadside (3 of 13), Head On (1 of 13), and Fixed Object (1 of 13). 5 of 13 crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted, Dark-Unlighted, or Dawn/Dusk conditions. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 2 of 13 Snow/Sleet/Hail crashes. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 16 8. Broadway & Balsam St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 28,200 vpd Minor Street: Balsam Street AADT: 8,400 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 30 crashes (6 injury) LOSS: I (Total), I (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Sideswipe (Same Direction), Dawn/Dusk Broadway is a four-lane road, while Balsam Street is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 30 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & Balsam Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (43%), followed by Broadside (20%) and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (17%). 6 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for severe crash reduction. Severe crash types included Rear End (50%), Pedestrian (33%), and Bicycle (17%). Total crash frequency was highest from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (33%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 9:00 AM – Noon (33%) and from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (33%). Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 5 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred at the Broadway & Balsam Street intersection, all of which were PDO. Crashes occurred in all approach directions:  Southbound Broadway: 2 crashes  Northbound Broadway: 1 crash  Eastbound Balsam Street: 1 crash  Westbound Balsam Street: 1 crash Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 1 of 5 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. Weather was not a factor in any of the Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 1 of 5 crashes. Drivers were making turning maneuvers in 3 of 5 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes, lane changing maneuvers in 2 of 5 crashes. Dawn/Dusk Crashes 6 crashes occurred at the Broadway & Balsam Street intersection during Dawn/Dusk conditions, 1 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Dawn/Dusk crash type (3 of 6); the remaining crashes included Broadside (2 of 5) and Approach Turn (1 of 5). All 5 Dawn/Dusk crashes occurred 5:00 PM – 9:00 PM. Sun glare was not noted in any of the Dawn/Dusk crash reports. Rear End 43% Broadside 20% Sideswipe (Same) 17% Pedestrian 10% Bicycle 3% Other 7% Total Crashes Rear End 50% Pedestrian 33% Bicycle 17% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 17 9. Broadway & Alpine St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 23,600 vpd Minor Street: Alpine Street AADT: 4,200 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 20 crashes (3 injury) LOSS: II (Total), I (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: None Broadway is a four-lane road, while Alpine Street is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 20 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & Alpine Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (25%), followed by Overtaking Turn (20%). 3 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for severe crash reduction. Severe crash types included Approach Turn, Pedestrian, and Sideswipe (Same Direction). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (35%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (67%). Rear End 25% Overtaking Turn 20% Approach Turn 15% Sideswipe (Same) 15% Pedestrian 10% Other 15% Total Crashes Approach Turn 34% Pedestrian 33% Sideswipe (Same) 33% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 18 10. Folsom St & Pearl St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Folsom Street AADT: 19,900 vpd Minor Street: Pearl Street AADT: 19,000 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 38 crashes (11 injury) LOSS: I (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: None Both Folsom Street and Pearl Street are four-lane roads. Between 2015 and 2019, 38 total crashes were recorded at the Folsom Street & Pearl Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (53%), followed by Broadside (16%). 11 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (46%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (32%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (45%). No crashes were identified as diagnostic patterns, however, 5 Bicycle/Pedestrian crashes occurred at the intersection (2 injury). Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with a northbound cyclist in the bike lane  Northbound left-turning motorist collided with a northbound left-turning cyclist in the travel lanes  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with a northbound cyclist in the bike lane  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with a northbound cyclist in the bike lane at a driveway just south of the intersection  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with a northbound pedestrian in the east crosswalk Dark-Unlighted conditions were present for 1 of 5 Bicycle/Pedestrian crashes. Inclement weather was not present in any of the crashes. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 3 of 5 Bicycle/Pedestrian crashes. Rear End 53% Broadside 16% Approach Turn 10% Bicycle 11% Sideswipe (Same) 5% Other 5% Total Crashes Rear End 46% Broadside 18% Approach Turn 9% Bicycle 9% Pedestrian 9%Other 9% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 19 11. 30th St & Pearl St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 30th Street AADT: 31,000 vpd Minor Street: Pearl Street AADT: 25,200 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 94 crashes (24 injury) LOSS: II (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Sideswipe (Same Direction), Approach Turn, Bicycle Both 30th Street and Pearl Street are four-lane roads. Between 2015 and 2019, 94 total crashes were recorded at the 30th Street & Pearl Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (31%), followed by Approach Turn (30%) and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (22%). 24 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End and Approach Turn crashes were the most common severe crash type (29% each), followed by Bicycle crashes (25%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (27%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (33%). Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 21 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Pearl Street intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred in all approach directions:  Westbound Pearl Street: 12 crashes  Eastbound Pearl Street: 3 crashes  Southbound 30th Street: 2 crashes (1 injury)  Northbound 30th Street: 2 crashes Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 4 of 21 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. Inclement weather was present in 2 of 21 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 2 of 21 crashes. Drivers were making turning maneuvers in 8 of 21 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes, versus lane changing/passing maneuvers in 13 of 21 crashes. Approach Turn Crashes 28 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Pearl Street intersection, 7 of which resulted in injury. Crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Southbound left-turning motorist, northbound motorist: 10 crashes (2 injury)  Northbound left-turning motorist, southbound motorist: 7 crashes (3 injury)  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 6 crashes  Eastbound left-turning motorist, westbound motorist: 5 crashes (2 injury) Rear End 31% Approach Turn 30% Sideswipe (Same) 22% Bicycle 8% Overtaking Turn 4% Other 5% Total Crashes Rear End 29% Approach Turn 29% Bicycle 25% Overtaking Turn 9%Sideswipe (Same) 4% Other 4% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 20 Approach Turn crashes were most common between 5:00 PM – 10:00 PM (14 of 28). Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 10 of 28 Approach Turn crashes. 2 of 28 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 5 of 28 Approach Turn crashes. Bicycle Crashes 7 Bicycle crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Pearl Street intersection, 6 of which resulted in injury. All 6 Bicycle crashes involved turning motorists:  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the bike lane  Westbound left-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist on the south crosswalk  Eastbound right-turning motorist (from the through lane) collided with eastbound cyclist in the bike lane  Northbound left-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the bike lane  Southbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the west crosswalk  Eastbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the bike lane at the driveway access just north of the intersection (2 times) 2 of 7 Bicycle crashes occurred in inclement weather. 2 of 7 crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions. Bicycle crashes were most common between 8:00 AM – 9:00 AM (3 of 7) and between 7:00 PM – 11:00 PM (3 of 7). Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 1 of 7 Bicycle crashes. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 21 12. 30th St & Walnut St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 30th Street AADT: 30,000 vpd Minor Street: Walnut Street AADT: 12,700 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 46 crashes (10 injury) LOSS: II (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: None 30th Street is a four-lane road, while Walnut Street is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 46 total crashes were recorded at the 30th Street & Walnut Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (59%), followed by Approach Turn (20%) and Broadside (11%). 10 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Broadside (40%) and Rear End (40%) crashes were the most common severe crash type. Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (35%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (50%). No crashes were identified as diagnostic patterns, however, 9 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the intersection (1 injury). 7 of 9 Approach Turn crashes involved southbound left-turning motorists and northbound through motorists. Additionally, 5 Broadside crashes occurred (4 injury). Broadside crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Northbound motorist & westbound motorist (2 times)  Southbound motorist & westbound motorist (2 times)  Southbound motorist & eastbound motorist Rear End 59% Approach Turn 20% Broadside 11% Sideswipe (Same) 6% Bicycle 4% Total Crashes Broadside 40% Rear End 40% Bicycle 10% Approach Turn 10% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 22 13. Canyon Blvd & Folsom St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Canyon Boulevard AADT: 26,500 vpd Minor Street: Folsom Street AADT: 20,500 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 92 crashes (27 injury, 1 fatal) LOSS: III (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Pedestrian, Sideswipe (Same Direction), Bicycle Both Canyon Boulevard and Folsom Street are four-lane roads. Between 2015 and 2019, 92 total crashes were recorded at the Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (49%), followed by Approach Turn (16%) and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (16%). 28 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (32%) followed by Bicycle (25%) and Approach Turn (21%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (32%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (32%). Fatal Crash One fatal crash occurred at the Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street intersection. A southbound left- turning motorist collided with a northbound pedestrian in the east crosswalk. The southbound motorist had a flashing yellow left-turn arrow at the time of the crash, the status of the pedestrian signal was not noted. The crash occurred during daylight with no inclement weather. No driver contributing factors were cited. Pedestrian Crashes 5 Pedestrian crashes occurred at the Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street intersection, 2 of which resulted in injury, and one of which resulted in a fatality (discussed above). Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with northbound pedestrian in the east crosswalk (2 times)  Northbound left-turning motorist collided with pedestrian standing in median  Southbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound pedestrian in west crosswalk  Eastbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound pedestrian in north crosswalk 1 of 5 Pedestrian crashes occurred in inclement weather. 4 of 5 crashes occurred during daylight hours. Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 15 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred at the Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred in all approach directions:  Eastbound Canyon Boulevard: 4 crashes (1 injury) Rear End 49% Approach Turn 16% Sideswipe (Same) 16% Bicycle 8% Pedestrian 6% Other 5% Total Crashes Rear End 32% Bicycle 25%Approach Turn 21% Pedestrian 11% Broadside 7% Other 4% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 23  Westbound Canyon Boulevard: 5 crashes  Northbound Folsom Street: 3 crashes  Southbound Folsom Street: 3 crashes Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes were most common between Noon – 6:00 PM (8 of 15). Dawn/Dusk, Dark-Unlighted, or Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 3 of 15 crashes. 2 of 15 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 4 of 15 crashes. Drivers were making turning maneuvers in 6 of 15 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes, versus passing/lane changing maneuvers in 9 of 15 crashes. Bicycle Crashes 7 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street intersection, all of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the bike lane  Westbound motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the bike lane  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the bike lane Weather was not a factor in any of the Bicycle crashes. Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 3 of 7 crashes. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 24 14. 30th St & Canyon Blvd Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 30th Street AADT: 25,700 vpd Minor Street: Canyon Boulevard AADT: 6,900 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 33 crashes (12 injury) LOSS: II (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Approach Turn 30th Street is a four-lane road, while Canyon Boulevard is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 33 total crashes were recorded at the 30th Street & Canyon Boulevard intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (31%), followed by Approach Turn (30%) and Broadside (18%). 12 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (59%) followed by Bicycle crashes (25%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (33%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (25%), from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (25%), and from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (25%). Approach Turn Crashes 10 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Canyon Boulevard intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. Crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Northbound left-turning motorist, southbound motorist: 6 crashes (1 injury)  Southbound left-turning motorist, northbound motorist: 2 crashes  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 2 crashes Approach Turn crashes were most common between 3:00 PM – 8:00 PM (7 of 10). Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 4 of 10 Approach Turn crashes. 3 of 10 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 4 of 10 Approach Turn crashes. Rear End 31% Approach Turn 30% Broadside 18% Bicycle 9% Pedestrian 6%Other 6% Total Crashes Rear End 59% Bicycle 25% Approach Turn 8%Pedestrian 8% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 25 15. Arapahoe Ave & Folsom St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Arapahoe Avenue AADT: 27,300 vpd Minor Street: Folsom Street AADT: 18,200 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 59 crashes (14 injury) LOSS: II (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Off Road, Approach Turn, Bicycle, Fixed Object Arapahoe Avenue is a four-lane road east of Folsom Street, but a two- lane road west of Folsom Street. Folsom Street is a four-lane road north of Arapahoe Avenue, but a two-lane road south of Arapahoe Avenue. Between 2015 and 2019, 59 total crashes were recorded at the Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (42%), followed by Approach Turn (24%). 14 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (50%) followed by Bicycle (21%) and Approach Turn (14%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (37%) and from Noon – 3:00 PM (36%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (43%). Off Road Crashes 5 Off Road crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. Off Road crashes involved motorists driving in several different directions:  Southbound left-turning motorist did not turn properly, causing adjacent southbound left- turning motorist to collide with the curb on the south side of the intersection  Southbound left-turning motorist did not turn properly and collided with the median on the east side of the intersection  Northbound motorist collided with the median and a tree on the south side of the intersection  Westbound motorist attempted to avoid a rear end crash and collided with the median on the west side of the intersection  Westbound motorist collided with the north curb and landscaping just west of the intersection 3 of 5 Off Road crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions. Weather was not a factor in any of the Off Road crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 2 of 5 crashes. Approach Turn Crashes 14 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street intersection, 2 of which resulted in injury. Crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 7 crashes (1 injury)  Eastbound left-turning motorist, westbound motorist: 6 crashes (1 injury) Rear End 42% Approach Turn 24% Bicycle 9% Sideswipe (Same) 9% Fixed Object 8% Other 8% Total Crashes Rear End 50% Bicycle 22% Approach Turn 14% Broadside 7%Fixed Object 7% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 26  Northbound left-turning motorist, southbound motorist: 1 crash Approach Turn crashes were most common between 2:00 PM – 8:00 PM (9 of 14). Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 7 of 14 Approach Turn crashes. 2 of 14 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 4 of 14 Approach Turn crashes. Bicycle Crashes 5 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street intersection, 3 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk  Eastbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk  Southbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the bike lane  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist on the sidewalk at a driveway west of the intersection  Southbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the bike lane at a driveway south of the intersection Inclement weather was present in 1 of 5 Bicycle crashes. Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 2 of 5 crashes. Fixed Object Crashes 5 Fixed Object crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. All 5 Fixed Object crashes occurred Off-Road and are described in the preceding section. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 27 16. Arapahoe Ave & 28th St Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Arapahoe Avenue AADT: 43,000 vpd Minor Street: 28th Street AADT: 29,800 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 169 crashes (32 injury, 1 fatal) LOSS: IV (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Rear End, Bicycle Both Arapahoe Avenue and 28th Street are six-lane roads. Between 2015 and 2019, 169 total crashes were recorded at the Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (69%), followed by Sideswipe (Same Direction) (11%). 33 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (70%), followed by Bicycle (15%) and Pedestrian (6%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (31%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (39%). Fatal Crash One fatal crash occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street intersection. A northbound right- turning motorist (driving a truck) collided with a cyclist who was travelling northbound on the east sidewalk. The northbound motorist had a green light at the time of the crash, the pedestrian signal for the east crosswalk was counting down for the Flashing Don’t Walk phase at the time of the crash. The cyclist collided with the trailer of the truck after the motorist had nearly completed their turning maneuver. The crash occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions with no inclement weather. No driver contributing factors were cited. Rear End Crashes 117 Rear End crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street intersection, 23 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred on all intersection approaches:  Westbound Arapahoe Avenue: 41 crashes (8 injury) • 19 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Northbound 28th Street: 32 crashes (7 injury)  Southbound 28th Street: 22 crashes (5 injury)  Eastbound Arapahoe Avenue: 21 crashes (3 injury) • 8 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane Rear End crashes were most common between 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (39 of 117). Dawn/Dusk or Dark- Lighted conditions were present for 14 of 117 Rear End crashes. 7 of 117 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 34 of 117 Rear End crashes. Rear End 69%Sideswipe (Same) 11% Approach Turn 4% Bicycle 4%Broadside 4% Other 8% Total Crashes Rear End 70% Bicycle 15% Pedestrian 6%Broadside 3%Sideswipe (Same) 3% Other 3% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 28 Bicycle Crashes 7 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street intersection, 4 of which resulted in injury, and one of which resulted in a fatality (discussed above). Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the northeast channelized right-turn lane  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the northeast channelized right-turn lane  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk (2 times)  Eastbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the southwest channelized right-turn lane  Eastbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the southwest channelized right-turn lane Weather was not a factor in any of the Bicycle crashes. Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 2 of 7 crashes. 4 of 7 crashes occurred between 2:00 PM – 6:00 PM. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 29 17. Arapahoe Ave & 30th St Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Arapahoe Avenue AADT: 33,500 vpd Minor Street: 30th Street AADT: 26,000 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 129 crashes (31 injury) LOSS: IV (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Bicycle, Fixed Object, Dawn/Dusk, Dark- Unlighted Arapahoe Avenue is a six-lane road, while 30th Street is a four-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 129 total crashes were recorded at the Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (50%), followed by Approach Turn (18%) and Bicycle (8%). 31 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Bicycle crashes were the most common severe crash type (29%), followed by Rear End (26%) and Approach Turn (22%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (24%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (25%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (20%), from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (20%), and from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (20%). Bicycle Crashes 11 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street intersection, 9 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the northeast channelized right-turn lane  Object from an eastbound cyclist in the westbound lanes collided with westbound motorist  Southbound right-turning motorist at driveway east of the intersection collided with eastbound cyclist on the north sidewalk  Northbound cyclist crossing against the signal collided with westbound motorist (2 times)  Westbound left-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk (2 times)  Southbound cyclist crossing against the signal collided with eastbound motorist  Southbound right-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the north crosswalk  Eastbound right-turning motorist at driveway north of the intersection collided with southbound cyclist  Eastbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the north crosswalk Weather was not a factor in any of the Bicycle crashes. Dark-Lighted or Dark-Unlighted conditions were present for 6 of 11 crashes. 6 of 11 crashes occurred between 6:00 PM – Midnight. Rear End 50% Approach Turn 18% Bicycle 8% Sideswipe (Same) 7% Fixed Object 5% Other 12% Total Crashes Bicycle 29% Rear End 26%Approach Turn 22% Broadside 10% Pedestrian 3% Other 10% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 30 Fixed Object Crashes 7 Fixed Object crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. 4 crashes involved eastbound motorists; 3 crashes involved southbound motorists. 1 of 7 Fixed Object crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions. 2 of 7 Fixed Object crashes occurred in inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 3 of 7 Fixed Object crashes. Dawn/Dusk Crashes 8 crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street intersection during Dawn/Dusk conditions, 3 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Dawn/Dusk crash type (7 of 8); 1 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crash also occurred. 7 of 8 Dawn/Dusk crashes occurred in the afternoon/evening. Sun glare was not noted in any of the Dawn/Dusk crash reports. Dark-Unlighted Crashes Despite existing overhead lighting, 5 crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street intersection during Dark-Unlighted conditions, 3 of which resulted in injury. Bicycle crashes were the most common Dark-Unlighted crash type (2 of 5), followed by Approach Turn (2 of 5) and Broadside (1 of 5). 3 of 5 Dark-Unlighted crashes involved southbound motorists attempting to make turning maneuvers. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 31 18. Foothills Pkwy & Arapahoe Ave Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Foothills Parkway AADT: 61,300 vpd Minor Street: Arapahoe Avenue AADT: 42,300 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 231 crashes (61 injury, 1 fatal) LOSS: IV (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Off Road-Median, Rear End, Dark-Unlighted, Snow/Sleet/Hail, Driver Inexperience Arapahoe Avenue is a six-lane road, while Foothills Parkway is a five- lane road (2 northbound lanes, 3 southbound lanes). Between 2015 and 2019, 231 total crashes were recorded at the Foothills Parkway & Arapahoe Avenue intersection. This is consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (68%), followed by Approach Turn (12%). 62 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (63%), followed by Approach Turn (18%). Total crash frequency was highest 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (25%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (26%). Fatal Crash One fatal crash occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Arapahoe Avenue intersection. A westbound motorist rear ended two other motorists who were stopped at a red signal. The crash occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions with no inclement weather. Drug use was suspected in the crash record but not cited as a contributing factor. Off Road-Median Crashes 7 Off Road-Median crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Arapahoe Avenue intersection, all of which were PDO. Off Road-Median crashes involved motorists driving in several different directions:  Northbound motorist crashed into the channelizing island on the southeast corner of the intersection (3 times)  Southbound right-turning motorist did not turn properly and collided with the median on the west leg of the intersection (2 times)  Northbound motorist collided with the median on the north leg of the intersection  Eastbound motorist collided with the median on the east leg of the intersection 4 of 7 Off Road-Median crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted or Dawn/Dusk conditions. 4 of 7 Off Road-Median crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 1 of 7 crashes. Rear End Crashes 158 Rear End crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Arapahoe Avenue intersection, 39 of which resulted in injury, and 1 of which resulted in a fatality (described above). Crashes occurred on all intersection approaches: Rear End 68%Approach Turn 12% Sideswipe (Same) 9% Broadside 5%Fixed Object 4% Other 2% Total Crashes Rear End 63% Approach Turn 18% Broadside 8%Bicycle 6%Sideswipe (Same) 3% Other 2% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 32  Northbound Foothills Parkway: 63 crashes (16 injury) • 15 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Southbound Foothills Parkway: 51 crashes (12 injury) • 6 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Westbound Arapahoe Avenue: 23 crashes (8 injury, 1 fatal) • 7 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Eastbound Arapahoe Avenue: 20 crashes (2 injury) • 7 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane Rear End crashes were most common between 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (41 of 158). Dark-Lighted, Dark- Unlighted, or Dawn/Dusk conditions were present for 24 of 158 Rear End crashes. 19 of 158 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 49 of 158 Rear End crashes. Dark-Unlighted Crashes 5 Dark-Unlighted crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Arapahoe Avenue intersection despite the presence of overhead lighting, all of which were PDO. 3 Dark-Unlighted crashes involved southbound motorists, 2 involved southbound motorists. Inclement weather was not present for any of the crashes. 3 Dark-Unlighted crashes involved motorists making right-turns. Snow/Sleet/Hail Crashes 22 crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Arapahoe Avenue intersection during Snow/Sleet/Hail conditions, 2 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were most common (11 of 22), followed by Fixed Object (4 of 22) and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (4 of 22). Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 9 of 22 Snow/Sleet/Hail crashes. Driver Inexperience Crashes Driver Inexperience was cited as a contributing factor in 23 crashes, 4 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were most common (15 of 23), followed by Sideswipe (Same Direction) (3 of 23). 5 of 23 crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted or Dawn/Dusk conditions. Inclement weather was present in 12 of 23 Driver Inexperience crashes. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 33 19. Arapahoe Ave & Conestoga St Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Arapahoe Avenue AADT: 32,400 vpd Minor Street: Conestoga Street AADT: 4,200 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 29 crashes (10 injury) LOSS: II (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Approach Turn Arapahoe Avenue is a six-lane road. Conestoga Street is a two-lane road north of Arapahoe Avenue and a two-lane private driveway south of Arapahoe Avenue Between 2015 and 2019, 29 total crashes were recorded at the Arapahoe Avenue & Conestoga Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Approach Turn crashes were most common (38%), followed by Rear End (28%). 10 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Approach Turn crashes were the most common severe crash type (50%), followed by Pedestrian (30%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (29%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (29%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (40%). Approach Turn Crashes 11 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & Conestoga Street intersection, 5 of which resulted in injury. Crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 8 crashes (4 injury)  Eastbound left-turning motorist, westbound motorist: 3 crashes (1 injury) Approach Turn crashes were most common between 5:00 PM – 8:00 PM (6 of 11). Dark-Lighted or Dawn/Dusk conditions were present for 3 of 11 Approach Turn crashes. 1 of 11 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 1 of 11 Approach Turn crashes. Approach Turn 38% Rear End 28% Pedestrian 14% Sideswipe (Same) 14%Bicycle 3%Broadside 3% Total Crashes Approach Turn 50% Pedestrian 30% Bicycle 10% Broadside 10% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 34 20. Arapahoe Ave & 55th St Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Arapahoe Avenue AADT: 34,700 vpd Minor Street: 55th Street AADT: 25,100 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 64 crashes (21 injury) LOSS: II (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Bicycle, Dawn/Dusk Arapahoe Avenue is a six-lane road. 55th Street is a four-lane road north of Arapahoe Avenue and a two-lane road south of Arapahoe Avenue. Between 2015 and 2019, 64 total crashes were recorded at the Arapahoe Avenue & 55th Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (52%), followed by Approach Turn (12%) and Bicycle (11%). 21 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Approach Turn crashes were the most common severe crash type (33%), followed by Rear End (33%) and Bicycle (19%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (27%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (29%). Bicycle Crashes 7 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 55th Street intersection, 4 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Southbound right-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the north crosswalk (2 times)  Eastbound right-turning motorist collided with a cyclist who was standing on the southwest corner of the intersection  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the bike lane  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the north crosswalk  Eastbound left-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the north crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist at driveway west of the intersection collided with westbound cyclist on the south sidewalk Inclement weather was a factor in 2 of 7 Bicycle crashes. Dark-Lighted or Dark-Unlighted conditions were present for 2 of 7 crashes. 3 of 7 crashes occurred between 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM. Dawn/Dusk Crashes 5 crashes occurred at the Arapahoe Avenue & 55th Street intersection during Dawn/Dusk conditions, 2 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Dawn/Dusk crash type (4 of 5); the remaining crash was a Bicycle. 4 of 5 Dawn/Dusk crashes occurred in the afternoon/evening; the Bicycle crash occurred during the morning. Sun glare was not noted in any of the Dawn/Dusk crash reports. Rear End 52% Approach Turn 12% Bicycle 11% Broadside 11% Sideswipe (Same) 8% Other 6% Total Crashes Approach Turn 33% Rear End 33% Bicycle 19% Pedestrian 10%Fixed Object 5% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 35 21. Broadway & University Ave Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 35,000 vpd Minor Street: University Avenue AADT: 8,600 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 77 crashes (26 injury) LOSS: III (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Bicycle Broadway is a four-lane road, while University Avenue is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 77 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & University Avenue intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (57%), followed by Approach Turn (13%). 26 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear End crashes were the most common severe crash type (50%), followed by Bicycle (23%) and Pedestrian (11%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (29%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (27%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (27%). Bicycle Crashes 7 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Broadway & University Avenue intersection, 6 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Northbound motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the south crosswalk who was crossing against the traffic signal  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the southeast channelized right-turn lane (3 times)  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the southeast channelized right-turn lane  Eastbound motorist collided with westbound left-turning cyclist who was going towards the west sidewalk Weather was not a factor in any of the Bicycle crashes. Dark-Lighted or Dark-Unlighted conditions were present for 1 of 7 crashes. All 7 Bicycle crashes occurred between 12:00 PM – 8:00 PM. Rear End 57% Approach Turn 13% Bicycle 9% Sideswipe (Same) 9% Pedestrian 4% Other 8% Total Crashes Rear End 50% Bicycle 23% Pedestrian 11% Approach Turn 8% Broadside 4% Other 4% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 36 22. Broadway & College Ave Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 37,100 vpd Minor Street: College Avenue AADT: 3,400 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 18 crashes (1 fatal) LOSS: II (Total), I (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Sideswipe (Same Direction) Broadway is a four-lane road, while College Avenue is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 18 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & College Avenue intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes were most common (50%). 1 severe crash were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for severe crash reduction. The severe crash was a Fixed Object crash. Total crash frequency was highest from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (28%). The Severe crash frequency was highest from Midnight – 3:00 AM (100%). Fatal Crashes One fatal crash occurred at the Broadway & College Avenue intersection. A southbound motorist left the roadway Off Right and struck several Fixed Objects including the west curb, a utility pole, and a concrete barrier for a staircase. The crash occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions with no inclement weather. Alcohol was cited in the crash record as a contributing factor. Sideswipe (Same Direction) 9 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred at the Broadway & College Avenue intersection, all of which were PDO. Crashes occurred in all approach directions:  Northbound Broadway: 7 crashes  Southbound Broadway: 2 crashes Dawn/Dusk, Dark-Unlighted, or Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 3 of 9 crashes. 1 of 9 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 5 of 9 crashes. Drivers were making passing/lane changing maneuvers in all 9 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. Sideswipe (Same) 50% Rear End 17% Fixed Object 17% Approach Turn 11%Broadside 5% Total Crashes Fixed Object 100% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 37 23. 30th St & Aurora Ave Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 30th Street AADT: 22,600 vpd Minor Street: Aurora Avenue AADT: 2,500 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 27 crashes (10 injury) LOSS: III (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: 3+ Vehicles, Sideswipe (Same Direction) 30th Street is a four-lane road while Aurora Avenue is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 27 total crashes were recorded at the 30th Street & Aurora Avenue intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Several different crash types were recorded, including Rear End (18%), followed by Sideswipe (Same Direction) (19%), Approach Turn (15%) and Bicycle (15%). 10 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Bicycle crashes were the most common severe crash type (40%), followed by Pedestrian (20%). Total crash frequency was highest from 6:00 AM – 9:00 AM (22%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (22%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from 6:00 AM – 9:00 AM (30%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (30%). 3+ Vehicle Crashes 5 crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Aurora Avenue that involved three or more vehicles, one of which resulted in injury. 3+ Vehicle crash types included Rear End (2 of 5), Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) (1 of 5), Bicycle (1 of 5), and Parked Vehicle (1 of 5). 2 of 5 crashes with 3+ Vehicles occurred in Dark-Lighted or Dawn/Dusk conditions. 4 of 5 crashes with 3+ Vehicles occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 3 of 5 crashes. Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 5 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred at the 30th Street & Aurora Avenue intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred in several approach directions:  Eastbound Aurora Avenue: 1 crash  Northbound 30th Street: 2 crashes (1 injury)  Southbound 30th Street: 2 crashes All 5 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred during Daylight. More specifically, 3 of 5 crashes occurred between 3:00 PM – 7:00 PM. Inclement weather was not a contributing factor in any of the Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 1 of 5 crashes. Drivers were making passing/lane changing maneuvers in 4 of 5 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes, versus leaving a parked position in 1 of 5 crashes. Bike/Ped Rear End 18% Sideswipe (Same) 19% Approach Turn 15%Bicycle 15% Broadside 11% Other 22% Total Crashes Bicycle 40% Pedestrian 20%Broadside 10% Approach Turn 10% Rear End 10%Other 10% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 38 24. Broadway & Baseline Rd Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 39,600 vpd Minor Street: Baseline Road AADT: 31,700 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 156 crashes (42 injury) LOSS: IV (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Bicycle, Dawn/Dusk Broadway is a six-lane arterial, while Baseline Road is a four-lane road to the west and a two-lane road to the east. Between 2015 and 2019, 156 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & Baseline Road intersection. This is consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (52%), followed by Approach Turn (19%) and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (11%). 42 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear Ends were the most common severe crash type (45%), followed by Approach Turn (26%) and Bicycle (14%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (27%). Severe crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (24%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (24%). Bicycle Crashes 10 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Broadway & Baseline Road intersection, 6 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the northeast channelized right-turn lane  Eastbound motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Eastbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk  Eastbound motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the west crosswalk (2 times)  Westbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the intersection  Southbound motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the north crosswalk  Eastbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the north crosswalk  Eastbound cyclist’s wheel stuck in a pavement gap and overturned Weather was not a factor in any of the Bicycle crashes. Of the recorded Bicycle crashes, 6 occurred during daylight hours. More specifically, 5 crashes occurred between 3:00 PM – 5:00 PM. Dawn/Dusk Crashes 10 crashes occurred at the Broadway & Baseline Road intersection during Dawn/Dusk conditions, 3 of which resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Dawn/Dusk crash type (5 of 10), followed by Approach Turn (2 of 10) and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (2 of 10). All of the Dawn/Dusk Rear End 52% Approach Turn 19% Sideswipe (Same) 11% Broadside 7% Bicycle 6% Other 5% Total Crashes Rear End 45% Approach Turn 26% Bicycle 14% Broadside 7% Pedestrian 5% Other 3% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 39 crashes occurred in the afternoon/evening. Sun glare was not noted in any of the Dawn/Dusk crash reports. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 40 25. Baseline Rd & 30th St Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Baseline Road AADT: 29,500 vpd Minor Street: 30th Street AADT: 22,200 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 84 crashes (28 injury) LOSS: II (Total), III (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Pedestrian, Sideswipe (Same Direction), Approach Turn, Bicycle, Dark-Lighted, Rain Baseline Road is a four-lane road. 30th Street is a four-lane road north of Baseline Road and a two-lane road south of Baseline Road. Between 2015 and 2019, 84 total crashes were recorded at the Baseline Road & 30th Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Approach Turn crashes were most common (36%), followed by Rear End (26%) and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (14%). 28 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for severe crash reduction. Approach Turns were the most common severe crash type (50%), followed by Pedestrian (18%) and Bicycle (14%). Total crash frequency was highest from 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM (23%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 9:00 AM – Noon (36%). Pedestrian Crashes 8 Pedestrian crashes occurred at the Baseline Road & 30th Street intersection, 5 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with southbound pedestrian in the east crosswalk (2 times)  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with northbound pedestrian in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound pedestrian in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound pedestrian in the south crosswalk  Northbound left-turning motorist collided with northbound pedestrian in the west crosswalk  Eastbound left-turning motorist collided with westbound pedestrian in the north crosswalk  Eastbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound pedestrian in the north crosswalk 2 of 5 Pedestrian crashes occurred in inclement weather. 3 of 5 crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions. Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 12 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred at the Baseline Road & 30th Street intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred in several approach directions:  Eastbound Baseline Road: 6 crashes  Southbound 30th Street: 3 crashes (1 injury)  Northbound 30th Street: 2 crashes Approach Turn 36% Rear End 26% Sideswipe (Same) 14% Pedestrian 10% Bicycle 6%Other 8% Total Crashes Approach Turn 50% Pedestrian 18% Bicycle 14% Rear End 7% Broadside 4% Other 7% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 41  Westbound Baseline Road: 1 crash 2 of 12 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred during Dark-Lighted conditions. Inclement weather was not a contributing factor in any of the Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 2 of 12 crashes. Drivers were making passing/lane changing maneuvers in 6 of 12 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes, versus turning maneuvers in 6 of 12 crashes. Approach Turn Crashes 30 Approach Turn crashes occurred at the Baseline Road & 30th Street intersection, 14 of which resulted in injury. Crashes involved several approach directions/vehicle maneuvers:  Eastbound left-turning motorist, westbound motorist: 17 crashes (10 injury)  Northbound left-turning motorist, southbound motorist: 9 crashes (3 injury)  Westbound left-turning motorist, eastbound motorist: 3 crashes (1 injury)  Southbound left-turning motorist, northbound motorist: 1 crash Approach Turn crashes were most common between 6:00 PM – 11:00 PM (15 of 30). Dark-Lighted or Dawn/Dusk conditions were present for 18 of 30 Approach Turn crashes. 3 of 30 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 5 of 30 Approach Turn crashes. Bicycle Crashes 5 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Baseline Road & 30th Street intersection, 4 of which resulted in injury. Several different types of collisions were recorded:  Southbound left-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with westbound cyclist in the south crosswalk (2 times)  Northbound left-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the west crosswalk  Eastbound left-turning motorist collided with eastbound cyclist in the north crosswalk Inclement weather was cited in 2 of 5 Bicycle crashes. Of the recorded Bicycle crashes, 3 occurred during daylight hours. More specifically, 3 crashes occurred between 11:00 AM – 2:00 PM and 2 crashes occurred between 10:00 PM – Midnight. Dark-Lighted Crashes Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 28 crashes at the Baseline Road & 30th Street intersection, 6 of which resulted in injury. Several crash types occurred involving Dark-Lighted conditions, including Approach Turn (16 of 28), Rear End (5 of 28), and Pedestrian (3 of 28). 24 of 28 crashes occurred between 6:00 PM – Midnight, and 6 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Rain Crashes Active Rain events were present for 7 crashes at the Baseline Road & 30th Street intersection, 2 of which resulted in injury. Several crash types occurred involving Rainy weather, including Approach Turn (2 of 7), Rear End (2 of 7), Bicycle (2 of 7), and Pedestrian (1 of 7). 5 of 7 crashes occurred during Dark- Lighted conditions. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 42 26. Foothills Pkwy & Baseline Rd Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Foothills Parkway AADT: 48,300 vpd Minor Street: Baseline Road AADT: 27,000 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 102 crashes (16 injury) LOSS: IV (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Off Road-Right, Rear End, Driver Unfamiliar with Area Foothills Parkway and Baseline Road are both four-lane arterials. Between 2015 and 2019, 102 total crashes were recorded at the Foothills Parkway & Baseline Road intersection. This is consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (67%), followed by Sideswipe (Same Direction) (11%). 16 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear Ends were the most common severe crash type (57%), followed by Broadside (19%). Total crash frequency was highest from 9:00 AM – Noon (25%) and from Noon – 3:00 PM (23%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 9:00 AM – Noon (31%) and from Noon – 3:00 PM (25%). Off Road-Right Crashes 5 Off-Road Right crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Baseline Road intersection, all of which were Fixed Object crashes. 3 crashes involved southbound motorists, and 2 crashes involved northbound motorists. Snow/Sleet/Hail was a contributing factor in 2 of the crashes. Dark-Lighted conditions were present in 2 of the crashes. Rear End Crashes 69 Rear End crashes occurred at the Foothills Parkway & Baseline Road intersection, 9 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred in all approach directions:  Northbound Foothills Parkway: 33 crashes (4 injury) • 13 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Southbound Foothills Parkway: 15 crashes (1 injury) • 2 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Eastbound Baseline Road: 12 crashes (1 injury) • 4 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Westbound Baseline Road: 9 crashes (2 injury) • 1 crash in the channelized right-turn lane Rear End crashes were most common between 9:00 AM – Noon (19 of 69) and between Noon – 3:00 PM (17 of 69). Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 9 of 69 Rear End crashes. 4 of 69 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 16 of 69 Rear End crashes. Rear End 67% Sideswipe (Same) 11% Broadside 6% Fixed Object 6%Approach Turn 5% Other 5% Total Crashes Rear End 57% Broadside 19% Pedestrian 6% Bicycle 6% Sideswipe (Same) 6% Other 6% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 43 Driver Unfamiliar with Area Crashes Driver Unfamiliarity was cited as a contributing factor in 5 crashes at the Foothills Parkway & Baseline Road intersection, though none resulted in injury. Several crash types occurred involving unfamiliar drivers, including Rear End (2 of 5), Approach Turn (1 of 5), Overtaking Turn (1 of 5), and Sideswipe (Same Direction) (1 of 5). Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 2 crashes, and 1 crash occurred during inclement weather. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 44 27. Broadway & Dartmouth St Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 36,400 vpd Minor Street: Dartmouth Avenue AADT: 2,400 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 26 crashes (9 injury) LOSS: II (Total), II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Broadside Broadway is a six-lane road, while Dartmouth Street is a two-lane road. Between 2015 and 2019, 26 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & Dartmouth Street intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (35%), followed by Broadside (23%) and Approach Turn (15%). 9 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for severe crash reduction. Broadside crashes were the most common severe crash type (34%), followed by Approach Turn (22%) and Pedestrian (22%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (35%). Severe crash frequency was also highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (44%). Broadside Crashes 6 Broadside crashes were recorded at the Broadway & Dartmouth Street intersection, 3 of which resulted in injury. 4 crashes involved southbound motorists running the red light and striking an eastbound motorist; 2 crashes involved northbound motorists running the red light and striking a westbound motorist. 1 of 6 crashes occurred during inclement weather. All 6 Broadside crashes occurred during daylight hours. More specifically, 4 of 6 crashes occurred between Noon – 2:00 PM and 2 of 6 crashes occurred between 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM. Rear End 35% Broadside 23%Approach Turn 15% Bicycle 11% Pedestrian 8%Other 8% Total Crashes Broadside 34% Approach Turn 22%Pedestrian 22% Bicycle 11% Rear End 11% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 45 28. Broadway & Table Mesa Dr Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 39,000 vpd Minor Street: Table Mesa Drive AADT: 29,500 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 139 crashes (42 injury) LOSS: III (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Sideswipe (Same Direction), Bicycle Broadway and Table Mesa Drive are both four-lane arterials at this intersection. Between 2015 and 2019, 139 total crashes were recorded at the Broadway & Table Mesa Drive intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (54%), followed by Sideswipe (Same Direction) (16%) and Approach Turn (9%). 42 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear Ends were the most common severe crash type (48%), followed by Approach Turn (12%) and Broadside (12%). Total crash frequency was highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (26%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (24%). Similarly, Severe crash frequency was also highest from Noon – 3:00 PM (24%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (24%). Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 23 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes occurred at the Broadway & Table Mesa Drive intersection, 1 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred in all approach directions:  Westbound Table Mesa Drive: 7 crashes  Southbound Broadway: 6 crashes  Northbound Broadway: 5 crashes  Eastbound Table Mesa Drive: 5 crashes (1 injury) Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes were most common between Noon – 6:00 PM (11 of 23). Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 3 of 23 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes. 3 of 23 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 5 of 23 crashes. Drivers were making turning maneuvers in 9 of 23 Sideswipe (Same Direction) crashes, versus passing/lane changing maneuvers in 14 of 23 crashes. Bicycle Crashes 6 Bicycle crashes occurred at the Broadway & Table Mesa Drive intersection, 4 of which resulted in injury. All 6 Bicycle crashes involved right-turning motorists:  Westbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the northeast channelized right-turn lane  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with northbound cyclist in the east crosswalk  Northbound right-turning motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the east crosswalk (2 times) Rear End 54% Sideswipe (Same) 16% Approach Turn 9% Broadside 8% Bicycle 4%Other 9% Total Crashes Rear End 48% Approach Turn 12% Broadside 12% Bicycle 9% Pedestrian 5% Other 14% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 46  Southbound motorist collided with southbound cyclist in the crosswalk of the northwest channelized right-turn lane (2 times) Weather was not a factor in any of the Bicycle crashes. Of the recorded Bicycle crashes, 5 occurred during daylight hours. More specifically, 5 of 6 crashes occurred between 3:00 PM – 7:00 PM. Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 47 29. Table Mesa Dr & Foothills Pkwy Southbound Off-Ramp Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Ramp Intersection Major Street: Table Mesa Drive AADT: 34,700 vpd Minor Street: Foothills Parkway SB Off-Ramp AADT: 11,900 vpd 2015-2019 Crash History: 66 crashes (25 injury) LOSS: III (Total), IV (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Injury, Rear End Table Mesa Drive is a four-lane road, while the Foothills Parkway ramp is a two-lane facility. Between 2015 and 2019, 66 total crashes were recorded at the Table Mesa Drive & Foothills Parkway Southbound Off-Ramp intersection. This is consistent with LOSS III conditions, indicating a moderate to high potential for crash reduction. Rear End crashes were most common (73%), followed by Sideswipe (Same Direction) (9%). 25 severe crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS IV conditions, indicating a high potential for severe crash reduction. Rear Ends were the most common severe crash type (68%), followed by Approach Turn (12%) and Broadside (8%). Total crash frequency was highest from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (35%). Severe crash frequency was highest from 9:00 AM – Noon (32%) and from 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (32%). Injury Crashes 25 crashes occurred at the Table Mesa Drive & Foothills Parkway Southbound Off-Ramp intersection that resulted in injury. Rear End crashes were the most common Injury crash type (17 of 25). 5 of 25 Injury crashes occurred during Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions. Only 1 Injury crash occurred in inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 6 of 25 Injury crashes. Rear End Crashes 48 Rear End crashes occurred at the Table Mesa Drive & Foothills Parkway Southbound Off-Ramp intersection, 17 of which resulted in injury. Crashes occurred on several intersection approaches:  Southbound Foothills Parkway: 27 crashes (9 injury) • 21 crashes in the channelized right-turn lane  Westbound Table Mesa Drive: 15 crashes (4 injury)  Eastbound Table Mesa Drive: 6 crashes (4 injury) Rear End crashes were most common between 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (17 of 48) and between 9:00 AM – Noon (13 of 48). Dawn/Dusk or Dark-Lighted conditions were present for 7 of 48 Rear End crashes. 3 of 48 crashes occurred during inclement weather. Driver contributing factors (such as distraction, fatigue, inexperience, etc.) were cited in 10 of 48 Rear End crashes. Rear End 73%Sideswipe (Same) 9% Approach Turn 4% Pedestrian 3%Broadside 3% Other 8% Total Crashes Rear End 68%Approach Turn 12% Broadside 8% Bicycle 4%Pedestrian 4% Other 4% Severe Crashes Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 48 IV. SUMMARY Table 2 displays a summary of crash history for each intersection that was evaluated in this report. The summary table includes 2015-2019 crash history aggregated by crash severity, LOSS for total and severe crashes, and all patterns that were identified through the direct diagnostic procedure. Table 2. Summary of Intersection Crash Histories # Intersection 2015-2019 Crash History LOSS Diagnostic Patterns PDO INJ FAT Total Total Severe 1 28th St & Jay Road 25 21 0 46 II III Injury Broadside Approach Turn 2 Broadway & Iris Ave 15 10 0 25 II II Off Road Approach Turn Fixed Object 3 Iris Ave & Folsom St 18 8 0 26 I I Bicycle Dark-Lighted 4 Folsom St & Valmont Rd 9 8 0 17 I II Injury 5 28th St & Valmont Rd 68 26 0 94 III III None 6 30th St & Valmont Rd 54 26 0 80 III III Approach Turn Bicycle 7 Foothills Pkwy & Valmont Rd 128 45 0 173 III IV Rear End Dawn/Dusk Snow/Sleet/Hail 8 Broadway & Balsam St 24 6 0 30 I I Sideswipe (Same) Dawn/Dusk 9 Broadway & Alpine St 17 3 0 20 II I None 10 Folsom St & Pearl St 27 11 0 38 I II None 11 30th St & Pearl St 70 24 0 94 II II Sideswipe (Same) Approach Turn Bicycle 12 30th St & Walnut St 36 10 0 46 II II None 13 Canyon Blvd & Folsom St 64 27 1 92 III III Pedestrian Sideswipe (Same) Bicycle 14 30th St & Canyon Blvd 21 12 0 33 II II Approach Turn 15 Arapahoe Ave & Folsom St 45 14 0 59 II II Off Road Approach Turn Bicycle Fixed Object Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report Page 49 Table 2. Summary of Intersection Crash Histories # Intersection 2015-2019 Crash History LOSS Diagnostic Patterns PDO INJ FAT Total Total Severe 16 Arapahoe Ave & 28th St 136 32 1 169 IV III Rear End Bicycle 17 Arapahoe Ave & 30th St 98 31 0 129 IV III Bicycle Fixed Object Dawn/Dusk Dark Unlighted 18 Foothills Pkwy & Arapahoe Ave 169 61 1 231 IV IV Off Road Median Rear End Dark Unlighted Snow/Sleet/Hail Driver Inexperience 19 Arapahoe Ave & Conestoga Ave 19 10 0 29 II II Approach Turn 20 Arapahoe Ave & 55th St 43 21 0 64 II II Bicycle Dawn/Dusk 21 Broadway & University Ave 51 26 0 77 III IV Bicycle 22 Broadway & College Ave 17 0 1 18 II I Sideswipe (Same) 23 30th St & Aurora Ave 17 10 0 27 III IV 3+ Vehicle Crash Sideswipe (Same 24 Broadway & Baseline Rd 114 42 0 156 IV IV Bicycle Dawn/Dusk 25 Baseline Rd & 30th St 56 28 0 84 II III Pedestrian Sideswipe (Same) Approach Turn Bicycle Dark-Lighted Rain 26 Foothills Pkwy & Baseline Rd 86 16 0 102 IV IV Off Road Right Rear End Driver Unfamiliarity 27 Broadway & Dartmouth Rd 17 9 0 26 II II Broadside 28 Broadway & Table Mesa Dr 97 42 0 139 III IV Sideswipe (Same) Bicycle 29 Table Mesa Dr & Foothills Pkwy SB Off-Ramp 41 25 0 66 III IV Injury Rear End Project Name Traffic Impact Assessment / Study Appendix A APPENDIX A . INTERSECTION CRASH ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:29,200 Crash Type # % AADT:14,500 Rear End 18 39.1% Approach Turn 15 32.6% PDO Injury Fatality Total Broadside 8 17.4% Bicycle 2 4.3% Fixed Object 2 4.3% Crash Type # % Approach Turn 11 52.4% Rear End 5 23.8% Broadside 3 14.3% Bicycle 2 9.5% Category # Prob. INJ 21 99.3% Broadside 8 99.2% Approach Turn 15 99.6% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) 28th Street & Jay Road Urban 2-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection 28th Street Jay Road Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II III25 21 0 46 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 11.97 9.38 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.17 4.34 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:29,700 Crash Type # % AADT:17,700 Rear End 10 40.0% Approach Turn 7 28.0% PDO Injury Fatality Total Fixed Object 5 20.0% Broadside 2 8.0% Sideswipe (Opposite) 1 4.0% Crash Type # % Approach Turn 4 40.0% Rear End 4 40.0% Fixed Object 2 20.0% Category # Prob. Off Road 5 97.9% Approach Turn 7 96.4% Fixed Object 5 98.4% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & Iris Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 3-Leg Intersection Broadway Iris Street Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II II15 10 0 25 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 7.56 5.42 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 25,000 27,000 29,000 31,000 33,000 35,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 2.43 2.39 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 25,000 27,000 29,000 31,000 33,000 35,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:27,400 Crash Type # % AADT:12,100 Rear End 11 42.3% Approach Turn 6 23.1% PDO Injury Fatality Total Bicycle 5 19.2% Pedestrian 1 3.8% Broadside 1 3.8% Crash Type # % Bicycle 4 50.0% Pedestrian 1 12.5% Approach Turn 1 12.5% Broadside 1 12.5% Rear End 1 12.5% Category # Prob. Bicycle 5 100.0% Dark Lighted 9 95.5% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II18 8 0 26 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Iris Avenue & Folsom Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Iris Avenue Folsom Street 12.12 5.93 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 3.60 2.06 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:16,800 Crash Type # % AADT:12,700 Rear End 8 47.1% Approach Turn 3 17.6% PDO Injury Fatality Total Broadside 3 17.6% Pedestrian 1 5.9% Sideswipe (Same) 1 5.9% Crash Type # % Rear End 5 62.5% Approach Turn 1 12.5% Broadside 1 12.5% Pedestrian 1 12.5% Category # Prob. Injury 8 96.4% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III98017 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Folsom Street & Valmont Road Urban 2-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Folsom Street Valmont Road 9.38 3.83 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 3.09 2.08 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:29,800 Crash Type # % AADT:18,100 Rear End 49 52.1% Approach Turn 19 20.2% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 8 8.5% Broadside 7 7.4% Overtaking Turn 3 3.2% Crash Type # % Rear End 13 50.0% Approach Turn 6 23.1% Bicycle 2 7.7% Broadside 2 7.7% Other Non-Collision 2 7.7% Category # Prob. 28th Street & Valmont Road Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection 28th Street Valmont Road Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III III68 26 0 94 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 15.87 18.68 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.51 5.21 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:24,400 Crash Type # % AADT:21,900 Rear End 36 45.0% Approach Turn 18 22.5% PDO Injury Fatality Total Broadside 11 13.8% Bicycle 6 7.5% Sideswipe (Same) 4 5.0% Crash Type # % Rear End 9 34.6% Approach Turn 5 19.2% Bicycle 5 19.2% Broadside 4 15.4% Pedestrian 1 3.8% Category # Prob. Approach Turn 18 95.3% Bicycle 6 99.9% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III III54 26 0 80 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) 30th Street & Valmont Road Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection 30th Street Valmont Road 15.33 16.04 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.42 5.20 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:56,900 Crash Type # % AADT:23,400 Rear End 130 75.1% Broadside 19 11.0% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 12 6.9% Approach Turn 7 4.0% Bicycle 2 1.2% Crash Type # % Rear End 32 71.1% Broadside 5 11.1% Approach Turn 2 4.4% Bicycle 2 4.4% Fixed Object 2 4.4% Category # Prob. Rear End 130 100.0% Dawn/Dusk 13 97.4% Snow/Sleet/Hail 13 97.6% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Foothills Parkway & Valmont Road Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Foothills Parkway Valmont Road Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III IV128 45 0 173 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 25.26 34.33 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 50,000 52,000 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 5.74 8.70 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 50,000 52,000 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:28,200 Crash Type # % AADT:8,400 Rear End 13 43.3% Broadside 6 20.0% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 5 16.7% Pedestrian 3 10.0% Bicycle 1 3.3% Crash Type # % Rear End 3 50.0% Pedestrian 2 33.3% Bicycle 1 16.7% Category # Prob. Sideswipe (Same) 5 95.7% Dawn/Dusk 6 100.0% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II24 6 0 30 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & Balsam Avenue Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Broadway Balsam Avenue 10.10 6.55 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 3.01 1.68 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:23,600 Crash Type # % AADT:4,200 Rear End 5 25.0% Overtaking Turn 4 20.0% PDO Injury Fatality Total Approach Turn 3 15.0% Sideswipe (Same) 3 15.0% Pedestrian 2 10.0% Crash Type # % Approach Turn 1 33.3% Pedestrian 1 33.3% Sideswipe (Same) 1 33.3% Category # Prob. Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II I17 3 0 20 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & Alpine Avenue Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Broadway Alpine Avenue 6.05 4.48 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 1.80 1.06 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:19,900 Crash Type # % AADT:19,000 Rear End 20 52.6% Broadside 6 15.8% PDO Injury Fatality Total Approach Turn 4 10.5% Bicycle 4 10.5% Sideswipe (Same) 2 5.3% Crash Type # % Rear End 5 45.5% Broadside 2 18.2% Approach Turn 1 9.1% Bicycle 1 9.1% Pedestrian 1 9.1% Category # Prob. Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III27 11 0 38 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Folsom Street & Pearl Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Folsom Street Pearl Street 12.38 8.13 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 3.68 2.57 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:31,000 Crash Type # % AADT:25,200 Rear End 29 30.9% Approach Turn 28 29.8% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 21 22.3% Bicycle 7 7.4% Overtaking Turn 4 4.3% Crash Type # % Rear End 7 29.2% Approach Turn 7 29.2% Bicycle 6 25.0% Overtaking Turn 2 8.3% Sideswipe (Same) 1 4.2% Category # Prob. Sideswipe (Same) 21 100.0% Approach Turn 28 100.0% Bicycle 7 100.0% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II II70 24 0 94 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) 30th Street & Pearl Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection 30th Street Pearl Street 19.30 18.90 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 5.23 4.96 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:30,000 Crash Type # % AADT:12,700 Rear End 27 58.7% Approach Turn 9 19.6% PDO Injury Fatality Total Broadside 5 10.9% Sideswipe (Same) 3 6.5% Bicycle 2 4.3% Crash Type # % Broadside 4 40.0% Rear End 4 40.0% Bicycle 1 10.0% Approach Turn 1 10.0% Category # Prob. Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II II36 10 0 46 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) 30th Street & Walnut Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection 30th Street Walnut Street 13.20 9.63 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 3.84 2.42 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:26,500 Crash Type # % AADT:20,500 Rear End 45 48.9% Approach Turn 15 16.3% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 15 16.3% Bicycle 7 7.6% Pedestrian 5 5.4% Crash Type # % Rear End 9 32.1% Bicycle 7 25.0% Approach Turn 6 21.4% Pedestrian 3 10.7% Broadside 2 7.1% Category # Prob. Pedestrian 5 99.3% Sideswipe (Same) 15 99.4% Bicycle 7 100.0% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Canyon Boulevard & Folsom Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Canyon Boulevard Folsom Street Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III III64 27 1 92 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 15.67 18.29 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.49 5.55 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:25,700 Crash Type # % AADT:6,900 Rear End 10 30.3% Approach Turn 10 30.3% PDO Injury Fatality Total Broadside 6 18.2% Bicycle 3 9.1% Pedestrian 2 6.1% Crash Type # % Rear End 7 58.3% Bicycle 3 25.0% Approach Turn 1 8.3% Pedestrian 1 8.3% Category # Prob. Approach Turn 10 98.9% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II III21 12 0 33 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) 30th Street & Canyon Boulevard Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection 30th Street Canyon Boulevard 8.51 6.96 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 2.57 2.58 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:27,300 Crash Type # % AADT:18,200 Rear End 25 42.4% Approach Turn 14 23.7% PDO Injury Fatality Total Bicycle 5 8.5% Sideswipe (Same) 5 8.5% Fixed Object 5 8.5% Crash Type # % Rear End 7 50.0% Bicycle 3 21.4% Approach Turn 2 14.3% Broadside 1 7.1% Fixed Object 1 7.1% Category # Prob. Off Road 5 96.3% Approach Turn 14 95.8% Bicycle 5 99.9% Fixed Object 5 97.0% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Arapahoe Avenue & Folsom Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Arapahoe Avenue Folsom Street Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II II45 14 0 59 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 15.02 12.13 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.34 3.14 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:43,000 Crash Type # % AADT:29,800 Rear End 117 69.2% Sideswipe (Same) 19 11.2% PDO Injury Fatality Total Approach Turn 7 4.1% Bicycle 7 4.1% Broadside 6 3.6% Crash Type # % Rear End 23 69.7% Bicycle 5 15.2% Pedestrian 2 6.1% Broadside 1 3.0% Sideswipe (Same) 1 3.0% Category # Prob. Rear End 117 100.0% Bicycle 7 98.4% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions IV III136 32 1 169 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Arapahoe Avenue & 28th Street Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 28th Street 22.26 33.42 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 5.37 6.54 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:33,500 Crash Type # % AADT:26,000 Rear End 64 49.6% Approach Turn 23 17.8% PDO Injury Fatality Total Bicycle 11 8.5% Sideswipe (Same) 9 7.0% Fixed Object 7 5.4% Crash Type # % Bicycle 9 29.0% Rear End 8 25.8% Approach Turn 7 22.6% Broadside 3 9.7% Pedestrian 1 3.2% Category # Prob. Bicycle 11 100.0% Fixed Object 7 96.1% Dawn/Dusk 8 95.2% Dark Unlighted 5 99.9% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions IV III98 31 0 129 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Arapahoe Avenue & 30th Street Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 30th Street 17.37 25.46 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.56 6.07 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:61,300 Crash Type # % AADT:42,300 Rear End 158 68.4% Approach Turn 27 11.7% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 20 8.7% Broadside 11 4.8% Fixed Object 10 4.3% Crash Type # % Rear End 39 62.9% Approach Turn 11 17.7% Broadside 5 8.1% Bicycle 4 6.5% Sideswipe (Same) 2 3.2% Category # Prob. Off Median 7 100.0% Rear End 158 100.0% Dark Unlighted 5 99.4% Snow/Sleet/Hail 22 100.0% Inexperience 23 99.2% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions IV IV169 61 1 231 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Foothills Parkway & Arapahoe Avenue Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Foothills Parkway Arapahoe Avenue 31.75 45.85 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 6.94 11.92 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 54,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:32,400 Crash Type # % AADT:4,200 Approach Turn 11 37.9% Rear End 8 27.6% PDO Injury Fatality Total Pedestrian 4 13.8% Sideswipe (Same) 4 13.8% Bicycle 1 3.4% Crash Type # % Approach Turn 5 50.0% Pedestrian 3 30.0% Bicycle 1 10.0% Broadside 1 10.0% Category # Prob. Approach Turn 11 99.8% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II II19 10 0 29 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Arapahoe Avenue & Conestoga Street Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Arapahoe Avenue Conestoga Street 8.93 6.12 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 2.65 2.27 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:34,700 Crash Type # % AADT:25,100 Rear End 33 51.6% Approach Turn 8 12.5% PDO Injury Fatality Total Bicycle 7 10.9% Broadside 7 10.9% Sideswipe (Same) 5 7.8% Crash Type # % Approach Turn 7 33.3% Rear End 7 33.3% Bicycle 4 19.0% Pedestrian 2 9.5% Fixed Object 1 4.8% Category # Prob. Bicycle 7 100.0% Dawn/Dusk 5 97.1% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Arapahoe Avenue & 55th Street Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Arapahoe Avenue 55th Street Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II II43 21 0 64 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 17.71 13.05 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.60 4.36 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:35,000 Crash Type # % AADT:8,600 Rear End 44 57.1% Approach Turn 10 13.0% PDO Injury Fatality Total Bicycle 7 9.1% Sideswipe (Same) 7 9.1% Pedestrian 3 3.9% Crash Type # % Rear End 13 50.0% Bicycle 6 23.1% Pedestrian 3 11.5% Approach Turn 2 7.7% Broadside 1 3.8% Category # Prob. Bicycle 7 100.0% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III IV51 26 0 77 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & University Avenue Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Broadway University Avenue 11.77 15.18 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 3.33 4.99 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:37,100 Crash Type # % AADT:3,400 Sideswipe (Same) 9 50.0% Rear End 3 16.7% PDO Injury Fatality Total Fixed Object 3 16.7% Approach Turn 2 11.1% Broadside 1 5.6% Crash Type # % Fixed Object 1 100.0% Category # Prob. Sideswipe (Same) 9 100.0% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & College Ave Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 3-Leg Intersection Broadway College Ave Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II I17 0 1 18 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 5.26 4.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 1.47 0.90 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:22,600 Crash Type # % AADT:2,500 Rear End 5 18.5% Sideswipe (Same) 5 18.5% PDO Injury Fatality Total Approach Turn 4 14.8% Bicycle 4 14.8% Broadside 3 11.1% Crash Type # % Bicycle 4 40.0% Pedestrian 2 20.0% Broadside 1 10.0% Approach Turn 1 10.0% Rear End 1 10.0% Category # Prob. 3+ Vehicle Crash 5 98.5% Sideswipe (Same) 5 97.4% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) 30th Street & Aurora Avenue Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection 30th Street Aurora Avenue Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III IV17 10 0 27 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 4.33 5.39 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 1.23 1.93 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:39,600 Crash Type # % AADT:31,700 Rear End 81 51.9% Approach Turn 30 19.2% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 17 10.9% Broadside 11 7.1% Bicycle 10 6.4% Crash Type # % Rear End 19 45.2% Approach Turn 11 26.2% Bicycle 6 14.3% Broadside 3 7.1% Pedestrian 2 4.8% Category # Prob. Bicycle 10 100.0% Dawn/Dusk 10 97.1% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions IV IV114 42 0 156 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & Baseline Road Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Broadway Baseline Road 21.25 30.86 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 5.24 8.09 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:29,500 Crash Type # % AADT:22,200 Approach Turn 30 35.7% Rear End 22 26.2% PDO Injury Fatality Total Sideswipe (Same) 12 14.3% Pedestrian 8 9.5% Bicycle 5 6.0% Crash Type # % Approach Turn 14 50.0% Pedestrian 5 17.9% Bicycle 4 14.3% Rear End 2 7.1% Broadside 1 3.6% Category # Prob. Pedestrian 8 100.0% Sideswipe (Same) 12 97.0% Approach Turn 30 100.0% Bicycle 5 99.5% Dark Lighted 28 99.4% Rain 7 98.1% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Baseline Road & 30th Street Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Baseline Road 30th Street Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II III56 28 0 84 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 17.52 16.93 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 4.88 5.61 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:48,300 Crash Type # % AADT:27,000 Rear End 69 67.6% Sideswipe (Same) 11 10.8% PDO Injury Fatality Total Broadside 6 5.9% Fixed Object 6 5.9% Approach Turn 5 4.9% Crash Type # % Rear End 9 56.3% Broadside 3 18.8% Pedestrian 1 6.3% Bicycle 1 6.3% Sideswipe (Same) 1 6.3% Category # Prob. Off Right 5 99.1% Rear End 69 99.4% Unfamiliar w/ Area 5 95.2% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Foothills Parkway & Baseline Road Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Foothills Parkway Baseline Road Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions IV IV86 16 0 102 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 7.37 18.83 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000 52,000 54,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 1.75 2.98 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000 52,000 54,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:36,400 Crash Type # % AADT:2,400 Rear End 9 34.6% Broadside 6 23.1% PDO Injury Fatality Total Approach Turn 4 15.4% Bicycle 3 11.5% Pedestrian 2 7.7% Crash Type # % Broadside 3 33.3% Approach Turn 2 22.2% Pedestrian 2 22.2% Bicycle 1 11.1% Rear End 1 11.1% Category # Prob. Broadside 6 97.8% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & Dartmouth Avenue Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Broadway Dartmouth Avenue Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions II II17 9 0 26 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 7.95 5.51 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 2.37 2.07 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:39,000 Crash Type # % AADT:29,500 Rear End 75 54.0% Sideswipe (Same) 23 16.5% PDO Injury Fatality Total Approach Turn 12 8.6% Broadside 11 7.9% Bicycle 6 4.3% Crash Type # % Rear End 20 47.6% Approach Turn 5 11.9% Broadside 5 11.9% Bicycle 4 9.5% Pedestrian 2 4.8% Category # Prob. Sideswipe (Same) 23 99.7% Bicycle 6 99.8% Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Broadway & Table Mesa Drive Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Broadway Table Mesa Drive Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III IV97 42 0 139 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) 24.15 27.68 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 6.01 8.21 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000 44,000 46,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) Boulder Vision Zero Action Plan Intersection Crash Analysis Report AADT:34,700 Crash Type # % AADT:11,900 Rear End 48 72.7% Sideswipe (Same) 6 9.1% PDO Injury Fatality Total Approach Turn 3 4.5% Pedestrian 2 3.0% Broadside 2 3.0% Crash Type # % Rear End 17 68.0% Approach Turn 3 12.0% Broadside 2 8.0% Bicycle 1 4.0% Pedestrian 1 4.0% Category # Prob. INJ 25 96.9% Rear End 48 100.0% Diagnostic Patterns Total Severe Level of Service of Safety2015-2019 Crash History Safety Performance Functions III IV41 25 0 66 Top 5 Crash Types (Severe) Classification: Major Street: Minor Street: Top 5 Crash Types (Total) Table Mesa Drive & Foothills Parkway SB Off-Ramp Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Ramp Intersection Table Mesa Drive Foothills Parkway SB Off-Ramp 12.10 13.18 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Total SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 3.08 4.80 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 28,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 36,000 38,000 40,000 42,000Crash Frequency (crashes/year)Major Street AADT (veh/day) Severe SPF 20%Mean 80%Expected Observed (EB) 92 SUPPLEMENTARY HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM APPENDIX G- 1919 14th Street | Suite 700 | Boulder, CO 80302 | (720) 457-6370 | www.fehrandpeers.com Memorandum Date: February 28, 2023 To: Devin Joslin, City of Boulder From: Charles Alexander, Fehr & Peers Subject: Supplemental Highway Safety Manual Analysis for Vision Zero Action Plan DN18-0589.04 This memorandum documents Highway Safety Manual analysis completed using Vision Zero Suite for six additional intersections. Vision Zero Suite uses Colorado Department of Transportation crash data from 2016 through 2020 and applies Colorado-specific Safety Performance Functions. Daily traffic volumes were estimated using the City of Boulder’s traffic count data. Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 2 of 39 28th Street & Iris Avenue Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 28th Street AADT: 29,600 vpd Minor Street: Iris Avenue/Diagonal Highway AADT: 26,000 vpd 2016-2020 Crash History: 69 total crashes (15 injury crashes) LOSS: LOSS II (Total), LOSS II (Severe) Diagnostic Pattern(s): Rear End, Sideswipe (Same Direction) Both 28th Street and Iris Avenue have four general purpose travel lanes. Between 2016 and 2020, 69 total crashes were recorded at the intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear end crashes were most common (51%), followed by approach turn (19%), broadside (9%), and sideswipe (same direction) (9%). Injury Crashes 15 injury crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Severe crash types included rear end (6 crashes), approach turn (5 crashes), broadside (2 crashes), pedestrian (1 crash), and bicycle (1 crash). Injury crashes primarily occurred during daylight (8 crashes) and dark-lighted (6 crashes) conditions. 13 of 15 crashes occurred during dry road conditions. Driver inexperience and driver preoccupation (driver preoccupied) were cited in 5 of 15 injury crashes. Rear End Crashes 35 rear end crashes occurred at the intersection, including 6 that resulted in injury. • For total crashes, 11 crashes involved north/northeast-bound vehicles, 10 involved westbound vehicles, 7 involved eastbound vehicles, and 5 involved south/southeast- bound vehicles • For injury crashes, 3 involved southbound vehicles, 2 involved westbound vehicles, and 1 involved northbound vehicles Approach Turn Crashes 13 approach turn crashes occurred at the intersection, including 5 that resulted in injury. 11 crashes involved southbound vehicles. 4 injury crashes involved southbound vehicles. Broadside Crashes 6 broadside crashes occurred at the intersection, including 2 that resulted in injury. 2 each involved a northbound or westbound vehicle and 1 each involved an eastbound or southbound vehicle. Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 3 of 39 Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 6 sideswipe (same direction) crashes occurred at the intersection, none resulting in injury. 3 involved northbound vehicles and 3 involved south/southeast-bound vehicles. Location:000000036B 119B02/26/2023 20230226132844Job #:Begin:34.99End:35.03From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers14.1419.0205101520253035400 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)TotalUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Location:000000036B 119B02/26/2023 20230226132945Job #:Begin:34.99End:35.03From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers3.335.1901234567890 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)INJ + FATUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226133123Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03499_03503 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 100.00%Property Damage Only (PDO) 0 0.00% 54 78.26% 0.00%Injury (INJ) 1,639 98.73% 15 21.74% Fatal (FAT) 21 1.27% 0 0.00%N/A Persons Injured 2,358 19 Persons Killed 22 0 N/A 90.64%Single Vehicle Accidents 58 3.49% 4 5.80% 91.92%Two Vehicle Accidents 1,406 84.70% 62 89.86% 3.06%Three or More Vehicle Accidents 196 11.81% 3 4.35% Unknown Number of Vehicles 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 33.34%On Road 1,611 97.05% 66 95.65% 85.31%Off Road 49 2.95% 3 4.35% Off Road Left 20 1.20% 0 0.00%N/A 97.95%Off Road Right 25 1.51% 3 4.35% Off Road at Tee 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road in Median 4 0.24% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Location 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Overturning 22 1.33% 0 0.00%N/A Other Non Collision 1 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Vehicle Cargo or Debris 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 6.70%Pedestrian 103 6.20% 1 1.45% 1.78%Broadside 310 18.67% 6 8.70% Head On 9 0.54% 0 0.00%N/A 98.60%Rear End 638 38.43% 35 50.72% 99.88%Sideswipe (Same Direction) 39 2.35% 6 8.70% Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) 6 0.36% 0 0.00%N/A 19.40%Approach Turn 399 24.04% 13 18.84% 98.14%Overtaking Turn 5 0.30% 1 1.45% Parked Motor Vehicle 3 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Railway Vehicle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 57.30%Bicycle or Pedal Cycle 80 4.82% 3 4.35% Motorized Bicycle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Domestic Animal 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 100.00%Wild Animal 0 0.00% 1 1.45% 88.46%Light or Utility Pole 14 0.84% 1 1.45% 92.30%Traffic Signal Pole or Equipment 11 0.66% 1 1.45% Traffic Sign or Post or Overhead Sign Structure 4 0.24% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Guard Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Cable Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Concrete Barrier 1 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Abutment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Column or Pier or Bridge Structure 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Culvert or Headwall 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Embankment or Ditch 1 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Curb or Island 9 0.54% 0 0.00%N/A Delineator Post 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Fence or Fence Part 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Trees or Shrubs 1 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Large Boulders or Rocks 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 1 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (INJ) (2020) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226133123Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03499_03503 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems Rocks in Roadway 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Barricade 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Wall or Building 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Crash Cushion or Sand Barrels or Impact Attenuator 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Mailbox 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 100.00%Other Fixed Object 0 0.00% 1 1.45% Other Object 3 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Road Maintenance Equipment 1 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Accident Type 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 90.86%Total Fixed Objects 41 2.47% 3 4.35% Total Other Objects 4 0.24% 0 0.00%N/A 3.77%Daylight 1,164 70.12% 41 59.42% 79.88%Dawn or Dusk 75 4.52% 4 5.80% 97.09%Dark - Lighted 399 24.04% 23 33.33% Dark - Unlighted 20 1.20% 0 0.00%N/A 99.68%Unknown Lighting 2 0.12% 1 1.45% 49.53%No Adverse Weather 1,501 90.42% 62 89.86% 91.64%Rain 56 3.37% 4 5.80% 59.19%Snow or Sleet or Hail 78 4.70% 3 4.35% Fog 5 0.30% 0 0.00%N/A Dust 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Wind 12 0.72% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Weather 8 0.48% 0 0.00%N/A 29.30%Dry Road 1,442 86.87% 58 84.06% 86.71%Wet Road 122 7.35% 7 10.14% Muddy Road 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 40.34%Snowy Road 48 2.89% 1 1.45% 66.00%Icy Road 29 1.75% 1 1.45% 98.78%Slushy Road 4 0.24% 1 1.45% Foreign Material Road 2 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A With Road Treatment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Dry with Icy Road Treatment 5 0.30% 0 0.00%N/A Wet with Icy Road Treatment 1 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Snowy with Icy Road Treatment 4 0.24% 0 0.00%N/A 99.68%Icy with Icy Road Treatment 2 0.12% 1 1.45% Slushy with Icy Road Treatment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Condition 1 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A 68.64%Driver 1 - No Apparent Contributing Factor 734 44.22% 32 46.38% 95.60%Driver 1 - Asleep at the Wheel 8 0.48% 1 1.45% Driver 1 - Illness 21 1.27% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Distracted by Passenger 27 1.63% 0 0.00%N/A 99.14%Driver 1 - Driver Inexperience 117 7.05% 10 14.49% Driver 1 - Driver Fatigue 19 1.14% 0 0.00%N/A 45.53%Driver 1 - Driver Preoccupied 215 12.95% 8 11.59% Driver 1 - Driver Unfamiliar with Area 48 2.89% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Driver Emotionally Upset 4 0.24% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Evading Law Enforcement Officer 12 0.72% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Physical Disability 3 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A 47.72%Driver 1 - Unknown Contributing Factor 452 27.23% 18 26.09% Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 2 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (INJ) (2020) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226133123Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03499_03503 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 96.66%Driver 1 - No Impairment Suspected 1,538 92.65% 67 97.10% 31.52%Driver 1 - Alcohol Involved 84 5.06% 2 2.90% Driver 1 - RX, Medication, or Drugs Involved 22 1.33% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illegal Drugs Involved 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Alcohol and Drugs Involved 16 0.96% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Driver/Pedestrian not Observed 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Unknown Condition of Driver/Pedestrian 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Accidents 1,660 69 Total Number of Records 156 0 N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 3 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (INJ) (2020) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 9 of 39 28th Street & Pearl Street Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 28th Street AADT: 33,900 vpd Minor Street: Pearl Street AADT: 20,000 vpd 2016-2020 Crash History 64 total crashes (19 injury crashes) LOSS: LOSS II (Total), LOSS II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Broadside Both 28th Street and Pearl Street have four general purpose travel lanes. Between 2016 and 2020, 64 total crashes were recorded at the intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear end crashes were most common (44%), followed by broadside (20%), approach turn (14%), and sideswipe (same direction) (11%). Injury Crashes 19 injury crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Severe crash types included rear end (11 crashes), broadside (4 crashes), approach turn (2 crashes), sideswipe (same direction) (1 crash), and bicycle (1 crash).16 of 19 crashes occurred during dry road conditions. Driver inexperience, driver illness, and driver preoccupation (driver preoccupied) were cited in 4 of 19 crashes. Rear End Crashes 28 rear end crashes occurred at the intersection, including 11 that resulted in injury. • For total crashes, 13 involved southbound vehicles, 9 involved northbound vehicles, 4 involved eastbound vehicles, and 2 involved westbound vehicles • For injury crashes, 4 involved southbound vehicles, 4 involved northbound vehicles, 2 involved westbound vehicles, and 1 involved an eastbound vehicle Broadside Crashes 13 broadside crashes occurred at the intersection, including 4 that resulted in injury. 8 involved a northbound vehicle, 2 each involved a northbound or westbound vehicle, and 1 involved a southbound vehicle. Location:000000036B02/26/2023 20230226135650Job #:Begin:35.96End:36.00From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers13.1618.17051015202530350 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)TotalUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Location:000000036B02/26/2023 20230226135710Job #:Begin:35.96End:36.00From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers3.984.9501234567890 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)INJ + FATUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226135930Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03596_03600 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 31.25%Property Damage Only (PDO) 3,039 73.69% 45 70.31% 79.24%Injury (INJ) 1,074 26.04% 19 29.69% Fatal (FAT) 11 0.27% 0 0.00%N/A Persons Injured 1,524 22 Persons Killed 11 0 N/A 74.65%Single Vehicle Accidents 165 4.00% 3 4.69% 60.84%Two Vehicle Accidents 3,519 85.33% 55 85.94% 46.84%Three or More Vehicle Accidents 440 10.67% 6 9.38% Unknown Number of Vehicles 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 68.11%On Road 3,974 96.36% 62 96.88% 58.71%Off Road 150 3.64% 2 3.13% 68.09%Off Road Left 74 1.79% 1 1.56% 69.80%Off Road Right 71 1.72% 1 1.56% Off Road at Tee 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road in Median 5 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Location 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Overturning 17 0.41% 0 0.00%N/A 99.90%Other Non Collision 3 0.07% 1 1.56% Vehicle Cargo or Debris 6 0.15% 0 0.00%N/A Pedestrian 51 1.24% 0 0.00%N/A 99.48%Broadside 427 10.35% 13 20.31% Head On 10 0.24% 0 0.00%N/A 3.23%Rear End 2,311 56.04% 28 43.75% 75.02%Sideswipe (Same Direction) 387 9.38% 7 10.94% 92.51%Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) 29 0.70% 1 1.56% 43.53%Approach Turn 650 15.76% 9 14.06% Overtaking Turn 19 0.46% 0 0.00%N/A Parked Motor Vehicle 7 0.17% 0 0.00%N/A Railway Vehicle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 99.23%Bicycle or Pedal Cycle 50 1.21% 3 4.69% Motorized Bicycle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Domestic Animal 3 0.07% 0 0.00%N/A Wild Animal 7 0.17% 0 0.00%N/A Light or Utility Pole 15 0.36% 0 0.00%N/A Traffic Signal Pole or Equipment 21 0.51% 0 0.00%N/A 92.06%Traffic Sign or Post or Overhead Sign Structure 30 0.73% 1 1.56% Bridge Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Guard Rail 2 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Cable Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Concrete Barrier 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Abutment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Column or Pier or Bridge Structure 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Culvert or Headwall 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Embankment or Ditch 2 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A 82.90%Curb or Island 48 1.16% 1 1.56% Delineator Post 4 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Fence or Fence Part 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Trees or Shrubs 3 0.07% 0 0.00%N/A Large Boulders or Rocks 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 1 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT >32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226135930Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03596_03600 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems Rocks in Roadway 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Barricade 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Wall or Building 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Crash Cushion or Sand Barrels or Impact Attenuator 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Mailbox 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Other Fixed Object 11 0.27% 0 0.00%N/A Other Object 4 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Road Maintenance Equipment 2 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Accident Type 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 62.50%Total Fixed Objects 141 3.42% 2 3.13% Total Other Objects 12 0.29% 0 0.00%N/A 0.49%Daylight 2,971 72.04% 36 56.25% 98.53%Dawn or Dusk 167 4.05% 6 9.38% 97.62%Dark - Lighted 942 22.84% 21 32.81% 89.21%Dark - Unlighted 36 0.87% 1 1.56% Unknown Lighting 8 0.19% 0 0.00%N/A 71.19%No Adverse Weather 3,674 89.09% 58 90.63% 47.06%Rain 179 4.34% 2 3.13% 79.88%Snow or Sleet or Hail 201 4.87% 4 6.25% Fog 8 0.19% 0 0.00%N/A Dust 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Wind 12 0.29% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Weather 50 1.21% 0 0.00%N/A 57.64%Dry Road 3,534 85.69% 55 85.94% 43.67%Wet Road 321 7.78% 4 6.25% Muddy Road 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 98.04%Snowy Road 100 2.42% 4 6.25% Icy Road 96 2.33% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy Road 22 0.53% 0 0.00%N/A Foreign Material Road 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A With Road Treatment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Dry with Icy Road Treatment 12 0.29% 0 0.00%N/A Wet with Icy Road Treatment 3 0.07% 0 0.00%N/A 97.98%Snowy with Icy Road Treatment 14 0.34% 1 1.56% Icy with Icy Road Treatment 3 0.07% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy with Icy Road Treatment 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Condition 17 0.41% 0 0.00%N/A 97.67%Driver 1 - No Apparent Contributing Factor 1,777 43.09% 35 54.69% Driver 1 - Asleep at the Wheel 17 0.41% 0 0.00%N/A 93.38%Driver 1 - Illness 27 0.65% 1 1.56% Driver 1 - Distracted by Passenger 56 1.36% 0 0.00%N/A 2.06%Driver 1 - Driver Inexperience 360 8.73% 1 1.56% Driver 1 - Driver Fatigue 29 0.70% 0 0.00%N/A 68.50%Driver 1 - Driver Preoccupied 656 15.91% 11 17.19% 91.74%Driver 1 - Driver Unfamiliar with Area 106 2.57% 3 4.69% Driver 1 - Driver Emotionally Upset 16 0.39% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Evading Law Enforcement Officer 8 0.19% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Physical Disability 7 0.17% 0 0.00%N/A 19.52%Driver 1 - Unknown Contributing Factor 1,065 25.82% 13 20.31% Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 2 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT >32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226135930Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03596_03600 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 96.30%Driver 1 - No Impairment Suspected 3,917 94.98% 63 98.44% Driver 1 - Alcohol Involved 165 4.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - RX, Medication, or Drugs Involved 20 0.48% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illegal Drugs Involved 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 95.39%Driver 1 - Alcohol and Drugs Involved 22 0.53% 1 1.56% Driver 1 - Driver/Pedestrian not Observed 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Unknown Condition of Driver/Pedestrian 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Accidents 4,124 64 Total Number of Records 59 0 N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 3 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT >32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 15 of 39 28th Street & Walnut Street Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 28th Street AADT: 33,300 vpd Minor Street: Walnut Street AADT: 9,400 vpd 2016-2020 Crash History 32 total crashes (7 injury crashes) LOSS: LOSS I (Total), LOSS I (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: No crash type diagnostic patterns 28th Street has six general purpose travel lanes and Walnut Street has two general purpose travel lanes. Between 2016 and 2020, 32 total crashes were recorded at the intersection. This is consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating a low potential for crash reduction. Rear end crashes were most common (53%), followed by sideswipe (same direction) (16%), approach turn (13%), broadside (9%), and bicycle (6%). Injury Crashes 7 injury crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating low potential for crash reduction. Severe crash types included rear end (5 crashes), approach turn (1 crash), and bicycle (1 crash). All 7 crashes occurred during dry road conditions. Driver preoccupation (driver preoccupied) was cited in 2 of 7 crashes. Rear End Crashes 17 rear end crashes occurred at the intersection, including 5 that resulted in injury. • For total crashes, 11 involved north/northwest-bound vehicles and 6 involved southbound vehicles • For injury crashes, 2 involved north/northwest-bound vehicles and 2 involved southbound vehicles Approach Turn Crashes 4 approach turn crashes occurred at the intersection, including 1 that resulted in injury. 2 crashes involved southbound vehicles and 1 crash each involved northbound and westbound vehicles. Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 5 sideswipe (same direction) crashes occurred at the intersection, none resulting in injury. 3 involved northbound vehicles and 2 involved southbound vehicles. Location:000000036B02/26/2023 20230226141358Job #:Begin:36.10End:36.14From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers6.7912.300510152025300 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)TotalUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Location:000000036B02/26/2023 20230226141418Job #:Begin:36.10End:36.14From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers1.823.42012345670 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)INJ + FATUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226141639Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03610_03614 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 72.72%Property Damage Only (PDO) 3,688 74.88% 25 78.13% 43.69%Injury (INJ) 1,227 24.91% 7 21.88% Fatal (FAT) 10 0.20% 0 0.00%N/A Persons Injured 1,720 9 Persons Killed 11 0 N/A 69.67%Single Vehicle Accidents 170 3.45% 1 3.13% 60.68%Two Vehicle Accidents 4,289 87.09% 28 87.50% 64.09%Three or More Vehicle Accidents 466 9.46% 3 9.38% Unknown Number of Vehicles 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 64.06%On Road 4,770 96.85% 31 96.88% 73.56%Off Road 154 3.13% 1 3.13% 93.34%Off Road Left 65 1.32% 1 3.13% Off Road Right 83 1.69% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road at Tee 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road in Median 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Location 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Overturning 26 0.53% 0 0.00%N/A Other Non Collision 10 0.20% 0 0.00%N/A Vehicle Cargo or Debris 9 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Pedestrian 98 1.99% 0 0.00%N/A 50.33%Broadside 557 11.31% 3 9.38% Head On 8 0.16% 0 0.00%N/A 64.80%Rear End 2,527 51.31% 17 53.13% 88.48%Sideswipe (Same Direction) 520 10.56% 5 15.63% Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) 29 0.59% 0 0.00%N/A 33.69%Approach Turn 845 17.16% 4 12.50% Overtaking Turn 29 0.59% 0 0.00%N/A Parked Motor Vehicle 11 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Railway Vehicle 7 0.14% 0 0.00%N/A 97.78%Bicycle or Pedal Cycle 93 1.89% 2 6.25% Motorized Bicycle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Domestic Animal 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Wild Animal 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Light or Utility Pole 19 0.39% 0 0.00%N/A Traffic Signal Pole or Equipment 19 0.39% 0 0.00%N/A Traffic Sign or Post or Overhead Sign Structure 32 0.65% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Rail 2 0.04% 0 0.00%N/A Guard Rail 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Cable Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Concrete Barrier 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Abutment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Column or Pier or Bridge Structure 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Culvert or Headwall 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Embankment or Ditch 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 98.37%Curb or Island 30 0.61% 1 3.13% Delineator Post 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Fence or Fence Part 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Trees or Shrubs 2 0.04% 0 0.00%N/A Large Boulders or Rocks 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 1 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-48000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226141639Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03610_03614 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems Rocks in Roadway 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Barricade 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Wall or Building 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Crash Cushion or Sand Barrels or Impact Attenuator 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Mailbox 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Other Fixed Object 21 0.43% 0 0.00%N/A Other Object 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Road Maintenance Equipment 4 0.08% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Accident Type 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 75.50%Total Fixed Objects 146 2.96% 1 3.13% Total Other Objects 13 0.26% 0 0.00%N/A 56.65%Daylight 3,540 71.88% 23 71.88% 97.16%Dawn or Dusk 180 3.65% 3 9.38% 35.66%Dark - Lighted 1,148 23.31% 6 18.75% Dark - Unlighted 46 0.93% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Lighting 11 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A 14.30%No Adverse Weather 4,372 88.77% 26 81.25% 99.70%Rain 225 4.57% 5 15.63% Snow or Sleet or Hail 290 5.89% 0 0.00%N/A Fog 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Dust 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Wind 15 0.30% 0 0.00%N/A 99.38%Unknown Weather 18 0.37% 1 3.13% 58.99%Dry Road 4,143 84.12% 27 84.38% 94.87%Wet Road 421 8.55% 5 15.63% Muddy Road 2 0.04% 0 0.00%N/A Snowy Road 139 2.82% 0 0.00%N/A Icy Road 144 2.92% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy Road 26 0.53% 0 0.00%N/A Foreign Material Road 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A With Road Treatment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Dry with Icy Road Treatment 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Wet with Icy Road Treatment 8 0.16% 0 0.00%N/A Snowy with Icy Road Treatment 8 0.16% 0 0.00%N/A Icy with Icy Road Treatment 9 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy with Icy Road Treatment 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Condition 14 0.28% 0 0.00%N/A 76.50%Driver 1 - No Apparent Contributing Factor 2,379 48.30% 17 53.13% Driver 1 - Asleep at the Wheel 11 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illness 28 0.57% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Distracted by Passenger 66 1.34% 0 0.00%N/A 52.95%Driver 1 - Driver Inexperience 390 7.92% 2 6.25% Driver 1 - Driver Fatigue 28 0.57% 0 0.00%N/A 50.32%Driver 1 - Driver Preoccupied 709 14.40% 4 12.50% Driver 1 - Driver Unfamiliar with Area 114 2.31% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Driver Emotionally Upset 11 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Evading Law Enforcement Officer 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Physical Disability 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A 78.31%Driver 1 - Unknown Contributing Factor 1,177 23.90% 9 28.13% Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 2 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-48000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226141639Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03610_03614 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 100.00%Driver 1 - No Impairment Suspected 4,725 95.94% 32 100.00% Driver 1 - Alcohol Involved 154 3.13% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - RX, Medication, or Drugs Involved 18 0.37% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illegal Drugs Involved 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Alcohol and Drugs Involved 28 0.57% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Driver/Pedestrian not Observed 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Unknown Condition of Driver/Pedestrian 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Accidents 4,925 32 Total Number of Records 69 0 N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 3 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-48000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 21 of 39 28th Street & Canyon Boulevard Classification: Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: 28th Street AADT: 37,100 vpd Minor Street: Canyon Boulevard AADT: 21,100 vpd 2016-2020 Crash History 57 total crashes (11 injury crashes) LOSS: LOSS II (Total), LOSS I (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Rear End, Side Swipe (Same Direction) 28th Street has five general purpose travel lanes and Canyon Boulevard has four general purpose travel lanes (west of 28th Street). The 6-lane Safety Performance Function (SPF) was applied as a 5- lane SPF is not available. Between 2016 and 2020, 57 total crashes were recorded at the intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear end crashes were most common (63%), followed by sideswipe (same direction) (19%), approach turn (7%), and broadside (4%). Injury Crashes 11 injury crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS I conditions, indicating low potential for crash reduction. Severe crash types included rear end (8 crashes), approach turn (2 crashes), and broadside (1 crash). 10 crashes occurred during dry road conditions. Driver inexperience, driver fatigue, and driver preoccupation (driver preoccupied) were cited in 4 of 11 crashes. Rear End Crashes 36 rear end crashes occurred at the intersection, including 8 that resulted in injury. • For total crashes, 19 involved southbound vehicles, 9 involved north/northwest-bound vehicles, and 7 involved eastbound vehicles • For injury crashes, 4 involved southbound vehicles, 2 involved northbound vehicles, and 2 involved eastbound vehicles Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 11 sideswipe (same direction) crashes occurred at the intersection, none resulting in injury. 5 involved southbound vehicles, 3 involved north/northwest-bound vehicles, 2 involved eastbound vehicles, and 1 involved westbound vehicles. Location:000000036B 7B02/26/2023 20230226210545Job #:Begin:36.32End:36.36From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers11.6917.730510152025303540450 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)TotalUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Location:000000036B 7B02/26/2023 20230226210720Job #:Begin:36.32End:36.36From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers2.594.5401234567890 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)INJ + FATUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226211147Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03632_03636 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 88.05%Property Damage Only (PDO) 3,688 74.88% 46 80.70% 20.65%Injury (INJ) 1,227 24.91% 11 19.30% Fatal (FAT) 10 0.20% 0 0.00%N/A Persons Injured 1,720 14 Persons Killed 11 0 N/A 95.33%Single Vehicle Accidents 170 3.45% 4 7.02% 61.59%Two Vehicle Accidents 4,289 87.09% 50 87.72% 20.01%Three or More Vehicle Accidents 466 9.46% 3 5.26% Unknown Number of Vehicles 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 53.91%On Road 4,770 96.85% 55 96.49% 73.63%Off Road 154 3.13% 2 3.51% Off Road Left 65 1.32% 0 0.00%N/A 92.84%Off Road Right 83 1.69% 2 3.51% Off Road at Tee 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road in Median 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Location 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Overturning 26 0.53% 0 0.00%N/A Other Non Collision 10 0.20% 0 0.00%N/A Vehicle Cargo or Debris 9 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Pedestrian 98 1.99% 0 0.00%N/A 3.66%Broadside 557 11.31% 2 3.51% Head On 8 0.16% 0 0.00%N/A 97.34%Rear End 2,527 51.31% 36 63.16% 98.54%Sideswipe (Same Direction) 520 10.56% 11 19.30% Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) 29 0.59% 0 0.00%N/A 2.34%Approach Turn 845 17.16% 4 7.02% Overtaking Turn 29 0.59% 0 0.00%N/A 99.27%Parked Motor Vehicle 11 0.22% 1 1.75% Railway Vehicle 7 0.14% 0 0.00%N/A Bicycle or Pedal Cycle 93 1.89% 0 0.00%N/A Motorized Bicycle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Domestic Animal 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Wild Animal 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A 97.94%Light or Utility Pole 19 0.39% 1 1.75% Traffic Signal Pole or Equipment 19 0.39% 0 0.00%N/A 94.67%Traffic Sign or Post or Overhead Sign Structure 32 0.65% 1 1.75% Bridge Rail 2 0.04% 0 0.00%N/A Guard Rail 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Cable Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Concrete Barrier 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Abutment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Column or Pier or Bridge Structure 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Culvert or Headwall 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Embankment or Ditch 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Curb or Island 30 0.61% 0 0.00%N/A Delineator Post 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Fence or Fence Part 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Trees or Shrubs 2 0.04% 0 0.00%N/A Large Boulders or Rocks 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 1 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-48000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226211147Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03632_03636 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems Rocks in Roadway 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Barricade 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Wall or Building 3 0.06% 0 0.00%N/A Crash Cushion or Sand Barrels or Impact Attenuator 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Mailbox 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 97.52%Other Fixed Object 21 0.43% 1 1.75% Other Object 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Road Maintenance Equipment 4 0.08% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Accident Type 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 91.13%Total Fixed Objects 146 2.96% 3 5.26% Total Other Objects 13 0.26% 0 0.00%N/A 97.73%Daylight 3,540 71.88% 47 82.46% 37.87%Dawn or Dusk 180 3.65% 1 1.75% 11.49%Dark - Lighted 1,148 23.31% 9 15.79% Dark - Unlighted 46 0.93% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Lighting 11 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A 89.53%No Adverse Weather 4,372 88.77% 53 92.98% 25.94%Rain 225 4.57% 1 1.75% 34.02%Snow or Sleet or Hail 290 5.89% 2 3.51% Fog 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Dust 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 98.68%Wind 15 0.30% 1 1.75% Unknown Weather 18 0.37% 0 0.00%N/A 98.61%Dry Road 4,143 84.12% 53 92.98% 12.44%Wet Road 421 8.55% 2 3.51% Muddy Road 2 0.04% 0 0.00%N/A 51.93%Snowy Road 139 2.82% 1 1.75% 50.06%Icy Road 144 2.92% 1 1.75% Slushy Road 26 0.53% 0 0.00%N/A Foreign Material Road 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A With Road Treatment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Dry with Icy Road Treatment 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Wet with Icy Road Treatment 8 0.16% 0 0.00%N/A Snowy with Icy Road Treatment 8 0.16% 0 0.00%N/A Icy with Icy Road Treatment 9 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy with Icy Road Treatment 5 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Condition 14 0.28% 0 0.00%N/A 3.04%Driver 1 - No Apparent Contributing Factor 2,379 48.30% 20 35.09% Driver 1 - Asleep at the Wheel 11 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A 99.57%Driver 1 - Illness 28 0.57% 2 3.51% Driver 1 - Distracted by Passenger 66 1.34% 0 0.00%N/A 98.67%Driver 1 - Driver Inexperience 390 7.92% 9 15.79% 99.57%Driver 1 - Driver Fatigue 28 0.57% 2 3.51% 41.18%Driver 1 - Driver Preoccupied 709 14.40% 7 12.28% 61.87%Driver 1 - Driver Unfamiliar with Area 114 2.31% 1 1.75% Driver 1 - Driver Emotionally Upset 11 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Evading Law Enforcement Officer 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Physical Disability 6 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A 81.59%Driver 1 - Unknown Contributing Factor 1,177 23.90% 16 28.07% Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 2 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-48000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226211147Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE36B_03632_03636 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 90.59%Driver 1 - No Impairment Suspected 4,725 95.94% 56 98.25% 46.44%Driver 1 - Alcohol Involved 154 3.13% 1 1.75% Driver 1 - RX, Medication, or Drugs Involved 18 0.37% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illegal Drugs Involved 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Alcohol and Drugs Involved 28 0.57% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Driver/Pedestrian not Observed 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Unknown Condition of Driver/Pedestrian 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Accidents 4,925 57 Total Number of Records 69 0 N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 3 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 6-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-48000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 27 of 39 Arapahoe Avenue & Broadway Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 24,100 vpd Minor Street: Arapahoe Avenue AADT: 14,300 vpd 2016-2020 Crash History 42 total crashes (13 injury crashes) LOSS: LOSS II (Total), LOSS II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: No crash type diagnostic patterns Broadway has four general purpose travel lanes and Arapahoe Avenue has two general purpose travel lanes. Between 2016 and 2020, 42 total crashes were recorded at the intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear end crashes were most common (55%), followed by broadside (14%), sideswipe (same direction) (12%), approach turn (12%), and bicycle (7%). Injury Crashes 13 injury crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Severe crash types included rear end (5 crashes), approach turn (3 crashes), bicycle (3 crashes), and broadside (2 crashes). 9 crashes occurred during dry road conditions. Driver inexperience and driver preoccupation (driver preoccupied) were cited in 2 of 13 crashes. Rear End Crashes 23 rear end crashes occurred at the intersection, including 5 that resulted in injury. • For total crashes, 11 involved northbound vehicles, 9 involved southbound vehicles, 2 involved westbound vehicles, and 1 involved eastbound vehicles • For injury crashes, 4 involved northbound vehicles and 1 involved westbound vehicles Approach Turn Crashes 5 approach turn crashes occurred at the intersection, including 3 that resulted in injury. 2 crashes involved westbound vehicles and one crash each involved a northbound vehicle, eastbound vehicle, and southbound vehicle. Broadside Crashes 6 broadside crashes occurred at the intersection, including 2 that resulted in injury. 3 involved a westbound vehicle, 2 involved a southbound vehicle, and 1 involved a northbound vehicle. Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 28 of 39 Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 5 sideswipe (same direction) crashes occurred at the intersection, none resulting in injury. 2 involved northbound vehicles, 2 involved southbound vehicles, and 1 involved westbound vehicles. Location:000000093A02/26/2023 20230226212647Job #:Begin:18.70End:18.74From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers8.7712.160510152025300 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)TotalUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Location:000000093A02/26/2023 20230226212728Job #:Begin:18.70End:18.74From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers2.813.65012345670 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)INJ + FATUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226212849Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE93A_01870_01874 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 43.81%Property Damage Only (PDO) 4,301 71.16% 29 69.05% 70.51%Injury (INJ) 1,723 28.51% 13 30.95% Fatal (FAT) 20 0.33% 0 0.00%N/A Persons Injured 2,451 17 Persons Killed 21 0 N/A Single Vehicle Accidents 283 4.68% 0 0.00%N/A 100.00%Two Vehicle Accidents 5,298 87.66% 42 100.00% Three or More Vehicle Accidents 462 7.64% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Number of Vehicles 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A 100.00%On Road 5,789 95.78% 42 100.00% Off Road 254 4.20% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road Left 111 1.84% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road Right 130 2.15% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road at Tee 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road in Median 10 0.17% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Location 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Overturning 29 0.48% 0 0.00%N/A Other Non Collision 13 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Vehicle Cargo or Debris 8 0.13% 0 0.00%N/A Pedestrian 112 1.85% 0 0.00%N/A 59.51%Broadside 873 14.44% 6 14.29% Head On 20 0.33% 0 0.00%N/A 78.40%Rear End 3,015 49.88% 23 54.76% 84.33%Sideswipe (Same Direction) 528 8.74% 5 11.90% Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) 36 0.60% 0 0.00%N/A 31.61%Approach Turn 968 16.02% 5 11.90% Overtaking Turn 50 0.83% 0 0.00%N/A Parked Motor Vehicle 13 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Railway Vehicle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 99.20%Bicycle or Pedal Cycle 114 1.89% 3 7.14% Motorized Bicycle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Domestic Animal 2 0.03% 0 0.00%N/A Wild Animal 7 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Light or Utility Pole 36 0.60% 0 0.00%N/A Traffic Signal Pole or Equipment 40 0.66% 0 0.00%N/A Traffic Sign or Post or Overhead Sign Structure 51 0.84% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Guard Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Cable Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Concrete Barrier 9 0.15% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Abutment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Column or Pier or Bridge Structure 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Culvert or Headwall 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Embankment or Ditch 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Curb or Island 65 1.08% 0 0.00%N/A Delineator Post 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Fence or Fence Part 6 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Trees or Shrubs 6 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A Large Boulders or Rocks 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 1 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226212849Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE93A_01870_01874 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems Rocks in Roadway 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Barricade 2 0.03% 0 0.00%N/A Wall or Building 5 0.08% 0 0.00%N/A Crash Cushion or Sand Barrels or Impact Attenuator 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Mailbox 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Other Fixed Object 16 0.26% 0 0.00%N/A Other Object 7 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Road Maintenance Equipment 7 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Accident Type 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Fixed Objects 242 4.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Other Objects 22 0.36% 0 0.00%N/A 93.77%Daylight 4,337 71.76% 34 80.95% 70.90%Dawn or Dusk 271 4.48% 2 4.76% 7.22%Dark - Lighted 1,339 22.15% 5 11.90% 87.29%Dark - Unlighted 89 1.47% 1 2.38% Unknown Lighting 8 0.13% 0 0.00%N/A 86.10%No Adverse Weather 5,371 88.86% 39 92.86% 49.46%Rain 242 4.00% 1 2.38% 55.06%Snow or Sleet or Hail 354 5.86% 2 4.76% Fog 15 0.25% 0 0.00%N/A Dust 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Wind 38 0.63% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Weather 23 0.38% 0 0.00%N/A 45.92%Dry Road 5,126 84.81% 35 83.33% 63.07%Wet Road 442 7.31% 3 7.14% Muddy Road 2 0.03% 0 0.00%N/A 63.29%Snowy Road 184 3.04% 1 2.38% 96.53%Icy Road 178 2.95% 3 7.14% Slushy Road 28 0.46% 0 0.00%N/A Foreign Material Road 7 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A With Road Treatment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Dry with Icy Road Treatment 20 0.33% 0 0.00%N/A Wet with Icy Road Treatment 9 0.15% 0 0.00%N/A Snowy with Icy Road Treatment 25 0.41% 0 0.00%N/A Icy with Icy Road Treatment 11 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy with Icy Road Treatment 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Condition 9 0.15% 0 0.00%N/A 66.41%Driver 1 - No Apparent Contributing Factor 2,897 47.93% 21 50.00% Driver 1 - Asleep at the Wheel 25 0.41% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illness 42 0.69% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Distracted by Passenger 83 1.37% 0 0.00%N/A 52.83%Driver 1 - Driver Inexperience 506 8.37% 3 7.14% Driver 1 - Driver Fatigue 55 0.91% 0 0.00%N/A 52.74%Driver 1 - Driver Preoccupied 788 13.04% 5 11.90% Driver 1 - Driver Unfamiliar with Area 191 3.16% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Driver Emotionally Upset 12 0.20% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Evading Law Enforcement Officer 15 0.25% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Physical Disability 15 0.25% 0 0.00%N/A 90.60%Driver 1 - Unknown Contributing Factor 1,415 23.41% 13 30.95% Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 2 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226212849Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE93A_01870_01874 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 88.55%Driver 1 - No Impairment Suspected 5,740 94.97% 41 97.62% 55.92%Driver 1 - Alcohol Involved 214 3.54% 1 2.38% Driver 1 - RX, Medication, or Drugs Involved 46 0.76% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illegal Drugs Involved 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Alcohol and Drugs Involved 44 0.73% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Driver/Pedestrian not Observed 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Unknown Condition of Driver/Pedestrian 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Accidents 6,044 42 Total Number of Records 165 0 N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 3 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Devin Joslin February 28, 2023 Page 34 of 39 Broadway & Canyon Boulevard Classification: Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersection Major Street: Broadway AADT: 24,100 vpd Minor Street: Canyon Boulevard AADT: 14,300 vpd 2016-2020 Crash History 59 total crashes (15 injury crashes) LOSS: LOSS II (Total), LOSS II (Severe) Diagnostic Patterns: Sideswipe (Same Direction) Both Broadway and Canyon Boulevard have four general purpose travel lanes. Between 2016 and 2020, 59 total crashes were recorded at the intersection. This is consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating a low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Rear end crashes were most common (42%), followed by sideswipe (same direction) (20%), approach turn (12%), and bicycle (5%). Injury Crashes 15 injury crashes were recorded at the intersection, consistent with LOSS II conditions, indicating low to moderate potential for crash reduction. Severe crash types included rear end (5 crashes), approach turn (4 crashes), bicycle (3 crashes), broadside (1 crash), pedestrian (1 crash), and fixed object (1 crash). 11 crashes occurred during dry road conditions. Driver inexperience, driver preoccupation (driver preoccupied), and driver emotionally upset were cited in 3 of 15 crashes. Rear End Crashes 25 rear end crashes occurred at the intersection, including 5 that resulted in injury. • For total crashes, 7 involved southbound vehicles and 6 each involved northbound, eastbound, and westbound vehicles • For injury crashes, 3 involved eastbound vehicles and 2 involved westbound vehicles Sideswipe (Same Direction) Crashes 12 sideswipe (same direction) crashes occurred at the intersection, none resulting in injury. 6 involved northbound vehicles, 4 involved southbound vehicles, and one each involved eastbound and westbound vehicles. Approach Turn Crashes 7 approach turn crashes occurred at the intersection, including X that resulted in injury. 3 crashes involved northbound vehicles, 2 crashes involved eastbound crashes, and one each involved southbound and westbound vehicles. Location:000000119A 93A/7B02/26/2023 20230226214528Job #:Begin:41.87End:41.89From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers11.8412.160510152025300 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)TotalUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Location:000000119A 93A/7B02/26/2023 20230226214554Job #:Begin:41.87End:41.89From:01/01/2016To:12/31/2020SPF Model: CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections (2018)DiExSys™ Roadway Safety SystemsFehr & Peers3.133.65012345670 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000Mainline AADTAccidents/YearLower Limit (20%)INJ + FATUpper Limit (80%)Observed (EB)ExpectedPage 1Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived fromits use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407.User: calexander on Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226214653Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE119A_04187_04189 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 76.19%Property Damage Only (PDO) 4,301 71.16% 44 74.58% 35.87%Injury (INJ) 1,723 28.51% 15 25.42% Fatal (FAT) 20 0.33% 0 0.00%N/A Persons Injured 2,451 26 Persons Killed 21 0 N/A 98.00%Single Vehicle Accidents 283 4.68% 6 10.17% 5.45%Two Vehicle Accidents 5,298 87.66% 47 79.66% 83.76%Three or More Vehicle Accidents 462 7.64% 6 10.17% Unknown Number of Vehicles 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A 3.78%On Road 5,789 95.78% 53 89.83% 98.84%Off Road 254 4.20% 6 10.17% 70.48%Off Road Left 111 1.84% 1 1.69% 99.83%Off Road Right 130 2.15% 5 8.47% Off Road at Tee 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Off Road in Median 10 0.17% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Location 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Overturning 29 0.48% 0 0.00%N/A Other Non Collision 13 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Vehicle Cargo or Debris 8 0.13% 0 0.00%N/A 90.35%Pedestrian 112 1.85% 2 3.39% 0.60%Broadside 873 14.44% 2 3.39% Head On 20 0.33% 0 0.00%N/A 15.30%Rear End 3,015 49.88% 25 42.37% 99.85%Sideswipe (Same Direction) 528 8.74% 12 20.34% Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) 36 0.60% 0 0.00%N/A 25.14%Approach Turn 968 16.02% 7 11.86% 98.70%Overtaking Turn 50 0.83% 2 3.39% Parked Motor Vehicle 13 0.22% 0 0.00%N/A Railway Vehicle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 97.47%Bicycle or Pedal Cycle 114 1.89% 3 5.08% Motorized Bicycle 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Domestic Animal 2 0.03% 0 0.00%N/A Wild Animal 7 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A 95.15%Light or Utility Pole 36 0.60% 1 1.69% Traffic Signal Pole or Equipment 40 0.66% 0 0.00%N/A 91.11%Traffic Sign or Post or Overhead Sign Structure 51 0.84% 1 1.69% Bridge Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Guard Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Cable Rail 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Concrete Barrier 9 0.15% 0 0.00%N/A Bridge Abutment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Column or Pier or Bridge Structure 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Culvert or Headwall 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Embankment or Ditch 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A 86.73%Curb or Island 65 1.08% 1 1.69% Delineator Post 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Fence or Fence Part 6 0.10% 0 0.00%N/A 99.84%Trees or Shrubs 6 0.10% 1 1.69% Large Boulders or Rocks 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 1 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226214653Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE119A_04187_04189 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems Rocks in Roadway 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Barricade 2 0.03% 0 0.00%N/A Wall or Building 5 0.08% 0 0.00%N/A Crash Cushion or Sand Barrels or Impact Attenuator 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Mailbox 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 98.92%Other Fixed Object 16 0.26% 1 1.69% 99.78%Other Object 7 0.12% 1 1.69% Road Maintenance Equipment 7 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Accident Type 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 96.96%Total Fixed Objects 242 4.00% 5 8.47% 98.02%Total Other Objects 22 0.36% 1 1.69% 72.97%Daylight 4,337 71.76% 44 74.58% 25.17%Dawn or Dusk 271 4.48% 1 1.69% 68.11%Dark - Lighted 1,339 22.15% 14 23.73% Dark - Unlighted 89 1.47% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Lighting 8 0.13% 0 0.00%N/A 80.04%No Adverse Weather 5,371 88.86% 54 91.53% 91.29%Rain 242 4.00% 4 6.78% 13.27%Snow or Sleet or Hail 354 5.86% 1 1.69% Fog 15 0.25% 0 0.00%N/A Dust 1 0.02% 0 0.00%N/A Wind 38 0.63% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Weather 23 0.38% 0 0.00%N/A 27.86%Dry Road 5,126 84.81% 48 81.36% 99.00%Wet Road 442 7.31% 9 15.25% Muddy Road 2 0.03% 0 0.00%N/A 73.25%Snowy Road 184 3.04% 2 3.39% Icy Road 178 2.95% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy Road 28 0.46% 0 0.00%N/A Foreign Material Road 7 0.12% 0 0.00%N/A With Road Treatment 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Dry with Icy Road Treatment 20 0.33% 0 0.00%N/A Wet with Icy Road Treatment 9 0.15% 0 0.00%N/A Snowy with Icy Road Treatment 25 0.41% 0 0.00%N/A Icy with Icy Road Treatment 11 0.18% 0 0.00%N/A Slushy with Icy Road Treatment 3 0.05% 0 0.00%N/A Unknown Road Condition 9 0.15% 0 0.00%N/A 71.88%Driver 1 - No Apparent Contributing Factor 2,897 47.93% 30 50.85% Driver 1 - Asleep at the Wheel 25 0.41% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Illness 42 0.69% 0 0.00%N/A 80.56%Driver 1 - Distracted by Passenger 83 1.37% 1 1.69% 62.72%Driver 1 - Driver Inexperience 506 8.37% 5 8.47% Driver 1 - Driver Fatigue 55 0.91% 0 0.00%N/A 0.26%Driver 1 - Driver Preoccupied 788 13.04% 1 1.69% 88.38%Driver 1 - Driver Unfamiliar with Area 191 3.16% 3 5.08% 99.37%Driver 1 - Driver Emotionally Upset 12 0.20% 1 1.69% Driver 1 - Evading Law Enforcement Officer 15 0.25% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Physical Disability 15 0.25% 0 0.00%N/A 92.18%Driver 1 - Unknown Contributing Factor 1,415 23.41% 18 30.51% Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 2 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE Direct Diagnostics (Spot Location) Analysis Baseline Statistics CATEGORY # Crashes %# Crashes % Statewide Average This Location Probability % 02/26/2023 20230226214653Job #: Location File:DIRECT_DIAGNOSTICS_FOR_RTE119A_04187_04189 @ 95%Cutoff: 5 Acc's Fehr & Peers DiExSys™ Roadway Safety Systems 17.48%Driver 1 - No Impairment Suspected 5,740 94.97% 54 91.53% 84.39%Driver 1 - Alcohol Involved 214 3.54% 3 5.08% 92.54%Driver 1 - RX, Medication, or Drugs Involved 46 0.76% 1 1.69% Driver 1 - Illegal Drugs Involved 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A 93.09%Driver 1 - Alcohol and Drugs Involved 44 0.73% 1 1.69% Driver 1 - Driver/Pedestrian not Observed 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Driver 1 - Unknown Condition of Driver/Pedestrian 0 0.00% 0 0.00%N/A Total Accidents 6,044 59 Total Number of Records 165 0 N/A Any intentional or inadvertent release of this data or any data derived from its use shall not constitute a waiver of privilege pursuant to 23 USC 407. Page 3 of 3 Highway Class:CO - Urban 4-Lane Divided Signalized 4-Leg Intersections - AADT 0-32000 ADT (2018) User: calexander on DN-CASURFACE