2008 Annual Budget, Volume 2
2008-09 BUDGET
City of Boulder, Colorado
Volume II
2008-2009 BUDGET
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
City of Boulder
Mayor........................................................Mark Ruzzin
(term ended November 20, 2007)
Deputy Mayor......................................................................................Suzy Ageton
Council Members....................................................................Matthew Appelbaum
(term began November 20, 2007)
Robin Bohannan
(term ended November 20, 2007)
Macon Cowles
(term began November 20, 2007)
Angelique Espinoza
(term began November 20, 2007)
Crystal Gray – Incoming Deputy Mayor
Shaun McGrath – Incoming Mayor
Lisa Morzel
(term began November 20, 2007)
Susan Osborne
(term began November 20, 2007)
Richard Polk
(term ended November 20, 2007)
Andy Schultheiss
(resigned as of August, 2007)
Jack Stoakes
(term ended November 20, 2007)
Ken Wilson
City Manager...................................................................................Frank W. Bruno
2008-09
BUDGET DOCUMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
VOLUME II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
OVERVIEW
Backgroundon CIP.........................................................................................................................................1
Highlights of 2008-2013 CIP........................................................................................................................19
Unfunded Capital Projects............................................................................................................................27
Planning Board Minutes (July 19, 2007)......................................................................................................29
List of 2008 CIP ...........................................................................................................................................39
Graphic of 2008 CapitalBudget...................................................................................................................43
SPECIFIC PROJECTS BY FUND
AirportFund .................................................................................................................................................45
CAGID Fund (renamed the Downtown Commercial District Fund).............................................................49
Capital Development Fund...........................................................................................................................53
Education Excise Tax Fund..........................................................................................................................59
Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund....................................................................................................63
General Fund (including the Fire Training Center ConstructionFund)........................................................69
General Fund - Trash Tax.............................................................................................................................73
Lottery Fund .................................................................................................................................................77
Open Space Fund..........................................................................................................................................83
.25 Cent Sales Tax Fund (1995 Ballot Issue) and Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund...........................93
Transportation Fund....................................................................................................................................117
Transportation Development Fund..............................................................................................................139
Greenways ...............................................................................................................................................147
Utilities ...............................................................................................................................................155
Water Utility Fund...........................................................................................................................164
Wastewater Utility Fund..................................................................................................................182
Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund............................................................................191
OVERVIEW
I. BACKGROUND ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
The City of Boulder's 2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a six-year plan for
public physical improvements. The CIP provides a forecast of funds available for capital projects
and identifies all planned capital improvement projects and their estimated costs over the
six-year period. The first year's program in the CIP is adopted by the City Council as the Capital
Budget, as a counterpart to the annual Operating Budget. Even though fiscal resources are
appropriated only in the first year of the CIP, the succeeding five years of the CIP are important
in providing a longer-term plan for setting spending priorities, scheduling projects in a logical
sequence, and coordinating and targeting capital improvement projects for all city departments.
Capital improvement projects are defined as any major project requiring the expenditure of
public funds (over and above operating expenditures) for the purchase, construction, or
replacement of the physical assets of the community. This broad definition includes those
projects that are bondable and includes new or expanded physical facilities as well as the land
acquisition and site improvements necessary for a project.
The CIP is an essential implementation tool for carrying out the Boulder Valley Comprehensive
Plan's policies of orderly and efficient provision of urban facilities and services. The
Comprehensive Plan provides for the phased growth of the city with annexation to occur only
when the full range of urban services is available. The Capital Improvements Program schedules
projects that correct current facility deficiencies to meet or enhance these levels of service
standards through facility expansions and maintenance.
Each year the CIP is updated by adding a new sixth year of capital improvement projects.
Adjustments are made to costs and revenues forecasted the previous year. Changes may also be
made to the year(s) in which a project is scheduled, reflecting changes in fiscal conditions and
changes in overall funding priorities. New capital projects may be added or deleted based on
new facility needs identified in updated or new city master plans, area plans, or studies.
As stipulated by the City Charter, the city Planning Department coordinates the process for
preparing the annual CIP with other city departments. The Planning Board evaluates and makes
recommendations to the City Manager and City Council on the proposed CIP as part of the
annual budget process.
Planning Board’s role:
1) evaluate CIP projects in the context of the long-term, "big picture" policies of the
Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP);
2) make recommendations on the scope, priorities, and scheduling of CIP projects;
3) make recommendations on resolving policy issues raised by the proposed location and
design of CIP projects;
4) make a determination of which CIP projects will be required to undergo a Community
and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) review. Additionally, in recent years the
Planning Board has identified which projects should have a separate design review.
The Planning Board’s review of the CIP includes the policies and plans of the BVCP, but also
looks to subcommunity plans, area plans and departmental master plans. As defined in the
Comprehensive Plan, subcommunity plans and area plans provide more detailed planning for
land use, urban design, neighborhood revitalization, and public facility needs. Most departments
now have functional master plans for the provision of services and facilities. Master plans are
developed to be consistent with the policies and the growth projections in the Comprehensive
Plan. They typically include level of service standards needed to meet BVCP goals and policies,
more specific policies, and system-wide priorities for scheduling and targeting capital
improvements. In the past few years there has been a city-wide effort to examine long-term
resource needs for system maintenance and deficiency correction. This effort will continue in the
future and will be reflected in future CIPs.
For the 2008 budget process, the city is continuing to use the Business Plan to help make
decisions about funding priorities primarily for the operating budget. The Business Plan is a
decision-making tool which assists the organization in making strategic citywide
recommendations regarding revenue and expense priorities for current and future funding. It
serves as a link between the comprehensive plan, master plans and the recommended budget.
Departments are asked to identify three levels of funding or funding plans: fiscally constrained,
action and vision plans, similar to how this is done at the master plan level. To create these
funding plans staff prioritizes programs and services into categories defined in a city-wide set of
guiding principles. Staff identifies the levels of service currently provided in each functional area
and whether it meets, exceeds or is below service standards and then prioritizes programs and
services. This prioritization helps identify where growth or greater expenditure should occur as
well as identify where cuts should occur, if required.
For the capital budget, the new elements that have been added to the CIP information for the
business plan, are a categorization of each proposed project as “essential”, “desirable” or
“discretionary”. These are shown on the project summary sheets for each project and were used
by all the departments to sort and organize departmental capital priorities as well as program
priorities.
Essential services include programs, services or facilities essential to ensuring health and
safety or that are legally mandated; on-going operation and maintenance of existing facilities
or infrastructure; and investments contributing the most to achieving the core mission of the
city or insuring the integrity of the most fundamental responsibilities of government.
Desirable services include those that enhance programs or facilities in ways that advance
desired community values, or enhance essential services or quality of life improvements.
Also included would be funding for replacement of an existing facility and/or infrastructure;
services valued by the community and created by the legislative action of the city of Boulder
City Council or to meet Council’s budget policies; programs maintained as “seed corn” to
provide a base for restoration in an economic recovery and essential programs that have been
reduced, maintaining the elements of a program necessary in order to make future restoration
possible.
Discretionary services include those that serve limited purposes or specialized interests, are
desired by the community but not required to provide or enhance an essential service or that
people could obtain through other means, private or other governmental and non-profit agencies.
II. THE RECOMMENDED 2008 CAPITAL BUDGET
The 2008 Capital Improvements Program includes proposed funding of $42 million for 77 projects
in 17 funds. The entire six-year CIP includes proposed funding of $217 million for 132 projects. The
graph below generally describes the recommended capital funding by department for 2008. This
varies year to year depending on the type and cost of projects recommended for funding in that year
and the amount of external funding received. Attachment B contains highlights of the recommended
capital improvements program by fund as well as a detailed breakout of recommended funding in
each fund.
III. PLANNING ISSUES FOR 2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
During the budget and CIP process, 12questions were identified that require more information
than what is provided in the fund summaries or project descriptions. This analysis is intended to
provide a city-wide overview of issues affecting the capital budgeting process. Answers to the
following questions are listed below:
1.How are capital projects prioritized in terms of the city’s business plan?
2. How does the recommended capital budget address social, environmental and economic
sustainability goals?
3.Are there capital needs not shown in the CIP?
4.How much of the CIP is from outside or leveraged funding sources?
5.What CIP projects are funded with growth-related excise tax revenue?
6.How are operating or maintenance costs for new capital projects being covered?
7.How will future uses of the Education Excise Tax be identified and shown in the CIP?
8.What FAM projects were delayed last year reallocating $150,000 from Facilities and Asset
Management (FAM) to Boulder TV? Do they show up in the 2008-2013 CIP?
9.What is the progress and timing of the Fire Training Center?
10.What will be the next decision-making points for the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District (NCWCD) Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline?
11.What is in the CIP related to the flood studies in progress? What will be the next steps?
12.What issues were raised by the advisory boards reviewing departmental CIPs?
Additionally, Section IV, beginning on page 11 discusses implementation of
Subcommunity and Area plans.
1. How are capital projects prioritized, especially in terms of the city’s business plan?
In general, capital projects are prioritized to first address essential services. For new projects, the
city also attempts to be opportunistic whenever possible by partnering with outside funding
sources and addressing many goals at the same time (multi-faceted projects that have
components with many city departments).
The essential, desirable, discretionary categories of funding are described below with capital
project (CIP) examples:
Essential Services include operation and maintenance of the existing system to maintain
public safety. CIP examples include Broadway concrete reconstruction, pedestrian facilities
repair and replacement, and most all of the water and wastewater utility funds projects.
Desirable Services include facility expansions or development of new facilities. CIP
th
examples include most of the 28 Street Improvements, bikeway and pedestrian facility
enhancements, park development, stormwater and flood enhancements and tributary
greenways projects.
Discretionary Services include mitigation projects or components of larger projects – CIP
examples include things like noise walls and building new aesthetic treatments. This area of
the budget does not expand the systems or preserve the quality or integrity of the
infrastructure and/or systems. Until the economy recovers sufficiently, we will have few of
this type of project.
2.How does the recommended capital budget address the city’s adopted social,
environmental and economic sustainability goals?
The Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan’s policies on community sustainability provide a
unifying goal to maintain and enhance the livability, health and vitality of the Boulder Valley
and the natural systems of which it is a part, now and in the long-term future. (See BVCP
policies: 1.01 Community Sustainability, 1.07 Leadership in Sustainability)
The purpose of capital improvements planning is to ensure that the city can provide basic
services now and into the future. Most capital projects contribute to improved social conditions
throughout the city and help ensure that the basic health and safety needs of all residents are met.
There are a few exceptions where projects may benefit specific areas of the city or certain
neighborhoods, like pocket parks and multi-use paths, but even these raise the quality of life for
the entire community.
It is important for the city to plan capacity and system improvements over the long term to be
able to anticipate capital costs and potential rate increases over time. This is done primarily in
the master planning process, where the future needs are planned, but also service delivery
systems are evaluated for how they meet sustainability goals. Many projects will make areas of
the city safer: stormwater and flood improvements will reduce street flooding and potential
damage to property; bike and pedestrian improvements make it safer and easier for people to get
from one place to another and also to use alternative modes of transportation. Other projects
invest in entire systems: raw and treated water system improvements will help ensure continued
delivery of safe drinking water to the entire community; wastewater treatment improvements
will improve the quality of the water discharged into Boulder Creek. Improvements to our public
buildings and facilities will ensure their continued viability into the future.
Many of the transportation and trail projects will result in increased mobility which potentially
contribute to reduced auto use and pollution, but also provide better access to nearby, safe trails,
paths, parks. The ability for people to walk or bike to work, school or shopping increases their
transportation options but it also is related to improved physical and mental health. This also
applies to proposed new trails and visitor infrastructure in Open Space and Mountain Parks.
Many of these projects include an environmental benefit like habitat protection or weed control.
Many projects will have a Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) which
will identify impacts and benefits, recommend mitigation and incorporate public outreach and
input. These are listed in Attachment F. For these and other projects, staff will use the
sustainability tools to help identify benefits and impacts and an appropriate public engagement
process.
3. Are there capital needs not shown in the CIP?
The capital improvements program is presented primarily as a fiscally-constrained capital
budget. Included in Attachment C is a list of unfunded projects. This information is provided to
assist in the budget process and for the Planning Board and City Council to be fully informed
about the possible range of capital needs in the city. Some of these needs are outlined in adopted
master plans, some are not. As more plans are developed and updated, they specifically identify
Action and Vision funding plans for needs that are not included in the fiscally constrained
funding plan.
Many of the projects on the unfunded list are related to the Fire and Library Departments which
are currently in the process of updating their master plans where unfunded needs will be
identified and addressed. The parks and recreation projects were identified in the Action and
Vision plans of the recently completed Park and Recreation Master Plan.
Most of these items are associated with departments that are funded from the general fund and
have no other funding source than the general fund. Capital improvements are not typically
funded from the general fund. General fund department projects are funded from the capital
development fund if growth related (generated from development excise tax revenues).
4. How much of the CIP is from external or leveraged funding sources?
Various city departments receive external funds, typically state or federal, that require an
application or selection process to identify specific projects for use of these funds.
Transportation projects typically receive the majority of external funding through the Denver
Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
The program distributes federal Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act –
A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) funding for transportation projects. The Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) also awards funding for specific projects through a
selection process. Council approves applications prior to submittal. Applications are submitted
to DRCOG approximately 4-5 years prior to project implementation. External funding
influences the timing of projects in the CIP because there is usually a requirement for matching
funds and timing of construction. Each year the capital budgets are revised to provide local
match funding where necessary and take advantage of as much external funding opportunities as
possible.
The table below describes external funding anticipated for projects proposed in 2008.
TotalCityExternalSources
FundingFundingFunding
Airport Fund $631,600 $15,800 or $615,800 or FAA, CDOT Division of
3%97%Aeronautics
Transportation$8.5 million $5.6 million $2.9 million or SAFETEA-LU
Fundor 66%34%CDOT
Flood & $8 million $4.2 million $3.75 million SAFETEA-LU, Urban
Stormwater / or 53%or 47% Drainage and Flood
Greenways
Control District (UDFCD)
Total $17.1 million $9.8 million $7.3 million
Additional external funding of $2.5 million for transportation projects is anticipated in 2009.
Funding of $500,000 per year from the UDFCD is anticipated for the 2008-2013 CIP.
Projects include:
Transportation
30th Street Access Improvements BTV: Bluff to Walnut
Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe)
Pearl - 30th Intersection Improvements
Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30th
Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements
East Aircraft Parking Apron Rehabilitation (Airport Fund)
Stormwater, Flood Management and Greenways
Elmer's Twomile Greenways Project, Goose Creek to Glenwood
5. What CIP projects are funded with growth-related excise tax revenue?
The Development Excise Tax (DET) is intended to serve the following purposes:
(a)to provide that new capital improvement needs are met as non-residential and residential
development occurs;
(b)to fund the cost of transportation projects needed due to growth;
(c)to fund the acquisition and development of new neighborhood and community park land
and recreation centers and the development of existing parks and recreation centers to
serve the needs of city residents.
Growth related excise taxes provide capital funding for the capital development fund, the
transportation development fund and a portion of the permanent parks and recreation fund. They
include: (see project summary sheets in Attachment D for specific project descriptions):
th
Construction of bike lanes on 30 Street from Arapahoe to Pearl.
rd
Transportation improvements for cars, bikes and pedestrians on 63 Street from Lookout
to the Diagonal.
Funding for transportation improvements coordinated with new private development.
Some funding from the permanent parks and recreation fund for improvements at the
East Boulder Community Park, Foothills Community Park, and neighborhood pocket
park development.
Funding reserved for public plaza improvements and facility improvements.
Growth-related excise tax revenues have decreased significantly since 2005. Staff is monitoring
this revenue stream to determine long-range trends and potential impacts. Development Excise
taxes are not covering the full capital costs related to growth.
The Blue Ribbon Commission has expressed an interest in assessing the extent that the revenue
from the excise taxes covers capital needs related to growth. Staff believes there is a need to re-
evaluate the current excise tax rates and structure. In 1996, Tischler and Associates Inc.
conducted a study for the city and recommended increases to the city’s impact fees and taxes to
better represent the actual capital costs of growth. The City Council placed a proposed DET tax
increase on the ballot in 1997 that was lower than what the Tischler study recommended and the
ballot issue failed. In 1998, Council reconsidered the issue and proposed increasing the existing
rates by the rate of inflation, which was approved by the voters.
6. How are operating or maintenance costs for new capital projects being covered?
Each fund has an identified source of operations and maintenance funding. Many restricted funds
(e.g. Transportation, Open Space, .25 Cent Sales Tax) can allocate funds for capital projects, as
well as their operations and maintenance. Some restricted funds (e.g. Transportation Excise Tax
Fund, Capital Development Fund, Permanent Parks and Recreation) must be used strictly
for capital projects. For projects associated with these funds, operations and maintenance
funding funds relies on other funding sources, including the Transportation Fund and the General
Fund.
New projects or enhancements to existing infrastructure often result in new or increased
maintenance needs. If the maintenance needs are relatively minor, the costs are absorbed into a
department's existing operating budget. If, however, the new or increased maintenance costs are
substantial, then these costs should be included in the department's operating Action Plan
request. Approval of Action Plan requests depend on available funding and consideration
of competing citywide program/service needs.
7.How will future uses of the Education Excise Tax be identified and shown in the CIP?
In 2003 the City Council approved criteria to evaluate future uses of the Education Excise Tax
(EET). At that time, Council directed that EET revenues be programmed for expenditure as part
of the city’s Capital Improvement Programming process. These funds are intended to be used for
large capital expenditures that exceed $1,000,000 and are not intended to be programmed on an
annual basis. There is approximately $3.5 million currently remaining in the fund.
Pursuant to recent Council action on the city's Social Sustainability Plan, Council expanded the
allowable use of EET beyond capital needs. In order to reconcile that decision with existing
EET guidelines, Council will be asked to consider adopting the following policy language in
July:
1. EET revenues shall be used primarily for capital expenditures. In rare
circumstances, they may also be used for extraordinary one-time operational
expenditures.
The 2008 CIP includes a preliminary estimate for Casey Middle School Improvements to rebuild
the school at a gold certified Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standard.
The funding would be for additional ‘green’ improvements than are not included in the district’s
bond funding. City Council will consider this item in August. No other projects have been
identified for funding at this time. Projects may be identified by the Boulder Valley School
District or the city and will be initially assessed by the City Council School Subcommittee as
they arise.
8.What Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) projects were delayed last year reallocating
$150,000 from FAM to Boulder TV? Do they show up in the 2008-2013 CIP?
For the 2007 budget, Council approved $150,000 for Boulder TV by reallocating general fund
dollars from the FAM budget. FAM received additional funding in 2007 ($40,000 from the city
manager's reserve fund) for major maintenance, renovation and replacement to help offset the
impacts of the $150,000 allocated for BTV. The additional funds have allowed FAM to proceed
with the West Senior Center roofing project and the Municipal Building HVAC replacements in
2007. Traditionally maintenance projects like these are not individually called out in the CIP, but
are prioritized and funded with Facilities Major Maintenance Funds. The remaining deferred
maintenance projects (New Britain elevator refurbishment and Park Central Boiler and Pump
Replacements) are not called out in the 2008-2013 CIP but they will be prioritized and scheduled
for completion in the coming years.
9.What is the progress and timing of the Fire Training Center?
The Fire Training Center Design Team is now under contract (Roth-Sheppard) and design efforts
are underway. Staff is working to identify impacts and mitigation for wildlife and wetlands. It is
anticipated that we will submit the Use Review application in the fall and review and approval
will take a few months, anticipating construction in 2008.
10.What will be the next decision-making points for the NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake
Pipeline?
Utilities staff have recommended funding in 2008 and 2009 for construction of the Northern
Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Conveyance – Carter Lake Pipeline. The
pipeline is estimated to cost $33 million; depending on the number of final participants, the
city’s share of the cost may range from $20 to $25 million. The other water providers
participating in the project include: Little Thompson Water District, town of Frederick and Left
Hand Water District.
Utilities staff and consultants prepared an “Integrated Evaluation of the Boulder Reservoir Water
Treatment Plant (BRWTP) Source Water Protection and Treatment Improvements”, which
evaluated six alternatives for source water protection and treatment and recommends that the city
move forward with the construction of a pipeline from Carter Lake to the Boulder Reservoir
Water Treatment Plant. The pipeline would provide excellent source water protection and a
much more uniform water quality, increasing treatment process reliability. Building the pipeline
would also add increased flexibility in water supply facilities at the BRWTP and might provide a
slight increase in the yield of the city’s Windy Gap water supplies during drought periods.
The Water Resources Advisory Board (WRAB) has reviewed the report and subsequent
additional analysis for treatment alternatives at the BRWTP at several meetings leading up to the
proposed budget. The WRABvoted 3-2 to “recommend that City Council delay construction of
Boulder’s portion of the Carter Lake Pipeline and consider it as a future phase for
implementation after the following actions have occurred:
1)Construction of Boulder Reservoir Water Treatment Plant improvements (ClO2 and UV
or alternates)
2)Implementation of the canal bypasses, BMP’s and other protective measures for the
Boulder Feeder Canal
3)Existing bonded indebtedness has been significantly reduced.”
The board was concerned about the rate increases that would be necessary to fund the pipeline
when the water currently meets regulatory standards. Dissenting board members supported the
staff recommendation and indicated that the pipeline is a necessary improvement to protect the
safety of the water and it is better not to delay the project. The board’s full motion is included in
the Utilities overview in Attachment D.
Staff will provide additional information regarding the impacts and viability of the WRAB
recommendations at the July 31, 2007 Budget Study Session and Council will have an
opportunity to discuss and provide input on the project.
11.What is in the CIP related to the flood studies in progress? What will be the next steps?
The South Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study is complete and will be submitted to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the near future. The mapping study results will
become the basis for future floodplain management, mitigation planning, regulatory restrictions
and flood insurance requirements for the South Boulder Creek corridor. FEMA review will take
nine to12 months.
Funding for South Boulder Creek flood mitigation planning is recommended in 2008 ($150,000).
It is anticipated the mitigation planning will be completed in 2009 ($300,000) and construction
of mitigation improvements will begin in 2010 ($3 million). It is anticipated that the focus of
these efforts would be to primarily mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley, where
flood impacts were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since
occurred. It is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36
Corridor Improvements-Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also pursuing Federal
funding for this project.
Staff and consultants are working to complete a flood mitigation plan that will describe a
recommended approach and mitigation projects for Wonderland Creek and Fourmile Canyon Creek.
It is anticipated that the plan will be complete by the end of this year. Funding has been proposed in
the 2008-1013 CIP for improvements to implement the plan. The proposed funding includes:
$250,000 per year for Fourmile Canyon Creek and $250,000 (in 2009-2010) and $500,000 2011-
2013) for Wonderland Creek improvements.
12. What concerns or issues were raised by the advisory boards reviewing departmental
CIPs?
Questions and concerns raised by the boards are summarized below. Excerpts from the summary
minutes regarding the CIP are included in the fund overviews under Advisory Board Action in
the beginning of each section of Attachment D.
Transportation
The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed the CIP at its May 14 and June 11, 2007
meetings and unanimously recommended approval of the draft 2008-2013 Transportation Capital
Improvements Program (CIP) as submitted by staff. Topics of discussion included: breakout for
th
modal funding and how it is allocated, Pearl Parkway Frontage land exchange, 30 & Pearl
intersection improvements, and increased construction costs and the need for additional revenue
sources.
Utilities
The Water Resource Advisory Board (WRAB) reviewed the draft 2008-2013 Utilities Capital
Improvements Program (CIP) at its May 21 and June 28, 2007 meetings. As described above, the
WRAB voted 3-2 to approve the CIP as presented by staff excluding the funding in 2008 and
2009 for the NCWCD Conveyance – Carter Lake Pipeline.
Parks and Recreation
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) reviewed and recommended approval of the
draft 2008-2013 Parks and Recreation Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at its May 21, 2007
meeting. The PRAB expressed support for continuing to allocate funds to the Unanticipated
Opportunities allocation. Several PRAB members expressed the desire that these funds could be
used to develop a portion of Valmont City Park when the park master plan is updated. Staff
confirmed that the portion of Unanticipated Opportunities funds provided by the Permanent
Parks and Recreation Fund would require the PRAB’s approval once a specific project had been
identified.
Tributary Greenways
The Greenways Advisory Committee reviewed the Greenways CIP unanimously recommended
approval of the CIP at its June 20, 2007 meeting.
Open Space and Mountain Parks
The Open Space Board of Trustees reviewed the 2008-2013 Open Space Fund and Lottery Fund
CIP at their June 27, 2007 meeting. The Board unanimously recommended approval of the CIP
as presented by staff for the Open Space Fund and the Lottery Fund. During its consideration of
this item the OSBT discussed the importance of achieving the goals of the Acquisition and
Management Plan 2005- 2001 including acquisition of approximately 7,000 acres in order
to complete the plan; as well as implementation of the Visitor Master Plan (VMP) within the
projected time frame. Funding for the infrastructure of the VMP is based on $450,000 annually
from the Open Space Fund and will return to the vision plan level in 2009 when the agreed
portion of Lottery Funds is reinstated for OSMP purposes in the amount of approximately
$475,000 annually.
IV.IMPLEMENTATION OF SUBCOMMUNITY AND AREA PLANS
The following questions provide an overview of capital projects related to adopted subcommunity
and area plans as well as information regarding capital projects in specific geographic areas of focus
throughout the city.
1.What projects are proposed in the Transit Village Area?
2.How is the implementation of the North Boulder Subcommunity Plan (NBSP) being
addressed in the CIP?
3.What future capital projects will be proposed associated with the Gunbarrel Community
Center
Plan?
1.What projects are proposed in the Transit Village Area?
Currently there is funding proposed in 2008 and 2009 for transportation improvements in the area
including:
th
Bicycle lanes on 30 Street between Pearl Street and Arapahoe. This project will complete
th
the bicycle lane corridor on 30 Street by constructing the missing links between Pearl and
Arapahoe.
th
Pearl – 30 Intersection Improvements. This project will increase operational efficiency for
vehicles and transit and improve pedestrian crossings and is scheduled for funding in 2008.
The intersection is adjacent to the Boulder Transit Village and will see a significant increase
in bus and pedestrian activity with the upcoming construction of the RTD Transit Station.
th
The intersection improvements include double left turn lanes on 30 for northbound traffic;
raised pedestrian crossings at free right turns and signal controller enhancements for
improved communication, transit priority and bike activation.
th
30 Street Access Improvements from Bluff to Walnut. First phase access improvements
th
include constructing one mid-block crossing of 30 Street between Valmont and Pearl;
constructing two transit super stops, improving access from Goose Creek multi-use path to
thth
30 Street, and a bicycle/pedestrian underpass of 30 Street at the Boulder and Left-hand
Ditch. The Goose Creek access will provide a critical missing link between the Goose Creek
th
Path and the sidewalks and on-street bikelanes on 30 Street.
Capital projects identified in the draft Transit Village Area Plan are not yet shown in the 2008-2013
CIP. Once the plan is approved and the implementation plan is developed, funding sources for
needed capital projects will be identified and projects will be included in future capital budgets.
2. How is the implementation of the North Boulder Subcommunity Plan (NBSP) being
addressed in the CIP?
The development of the Foothills Community Park, development of various neighborhood and
pocket parks and Fourmile Creek Improvements are included in the 2008-2013 CIP (see
description by department below). Additionally, bicycle and pedestrian connections typically
occur in north Boulder annually, but are not specifically called out in the CIP, as they are done
opportunistically, or as part of a larger program (e.g., greenways, bikeway, or sidewalk
improvement programs). Partial funding for the construction of the North Boulder branch
library has been appropriated and is still earmarked for this project; funding for
branch operations has not been secured.
Parks Department: The Foothills Community Park in north Boulder is proposed for continued
funding for phase three construction (2008-2010, 2013). Dakota Ridge Pocket Parks is proposed for
funding to be constructed in 2008. There is proposed funding in 2008 for maintenance projects at
Wonderland Lake Park. The Elks Neighborhood Park is proposed for funding to begin in 2010 with
construction in 2012. Initial funding is proposed in 2008 for flood and drainage improvements at
Violet Park, with construction funding proposed 2012-2013.
Stormwater and Flood Management Utility: Funding for flood mitigation projects for Fourmile
Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are proposed for funding from 2008-2013. Greenways
projects are coordinated with these efforts.
Tributary Greenways: Improvements to Fourmile Creek including environmental restoration and
thth
an off-street trail connecting 26 to 28 Streets are proposed and are projected to be constructed
in 2009 and 2010. Improvements to Wonderland Creek from Foothills to the Diagonal are
proposed in 2011 – 2013.
3. What future capital projects will be proposed associated with the Gunbarrel Community
Center Plan?
Bike, pedestrian and roadway improvements to 63rd St. from Lookout to the Diagonal are
included in the Transportation Development Fund 2008 CIP. Staff will also develop an
implementation plan and schedule for the Gunbarrel Community Center Plan. Staff
will coordinate with other city departments to identify and prioritize public improvements for the
Gunbarrel Community Center and determine approximate costs and timing. Future capital
improvements associated with the Gunbarrel Community Center Plan will include street and
sidewalk improvements and bicycle and trail connections. Improvements in the long-term could
also include potential library and park facilities if appropriate locations and new sources of
funding are identified.
V. IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLANS
1. Which Master Plans are currently being updated or are scheduled for update in the near
future?
Updates in Progress
Library – last update in 1996, anticipated completion in 2007
Fire – last update in 1996, anticipated completion in 2008
Greenways– minor update, last updated in 2002
Water Quality Strategic Plan – begun in 2001, anticipated completion 2008
Updates to begin in 2007
Raw Water – last update in 1988
Utilities enterprise plans
Recently Completed Updates
Wastewater Treatment Plant 2007
Stormwater 2007
Airport Master Plan 2007
Parks and Recreation 2006
Housing and Human Services 2005
Facilities and Asset Management 2005
Open Space and Mountain Parks Visitor Plan 2005
Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater Utility Master Plan 2004
Transportation 2003
Police 2003
Wastewater Collection System 2002
Treated Water 2001
Strategic Technology 2001
2. Is the provision of capital facilities keeping pace with demand or service standards at
the level specified in departmental master plans?
The extent to which capital facilities are meeting adopted standards varies by department as
outlined below.
Transportation
The 2003 Transportation Master Plan's (TMP) first priority is maintenance of the existing
transportation system. The spending for system maintenance and purchasing capacity was
reduced over several years due to budget cuts and material cost increases in items such as fuel,
asphalt, and concrete. An additional increase in the operating budget was implemented in 2007
and has been requested in the 2008 which, if approved, will continue to bring us closer to service
standards but will not completely cover prior budget reductions and material cost increases.
In addition, the TMP contains a set of multi modal transportation investments that were intended
to accomplish the plan's objectives. These objectives are:
Continued progress toward no growth in long-term vehicle traffic;
Reduction in single-occupant-vehicle travel to 25 percent of all trips;
Continued reduction in mobile source emissions of air pollutants; and,
No more than 20 percent of roadways congested (at Level of Service (LOS) F);
Expand fiscally viable transportation alternatives for all Boulder residents and
employees, including the elderly and those with disabilities; and
Increase transportation alternatives commensurate with the rate of employee growth.
Achieving these objectives depends on making investments to provide transportation options for
the population and employment expected in the future. Currently the plan is only approximately
sixty percent funded. Consequently we are currently unable to support the full investment
program in the plan. In the absence of additional funding or other mitigation strategy the city
will be unable to maintain progress toward established plan objectives.
Utilities
The recently updated treated water, wastewater collection and wastewater treatment master plans
as well as the raw water master plan provide direction for capital needs to meet the adopted
service standards. For the Stormwater and Flood Management Utility, staff has reviewed this
question as part of the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Utility Master Plan and
Stormwater Master Plan that was completed this year. These needs have been programmed in the
CIP.
Funding for the Utilities Division capital improvement program is derived primarily from
monthly utility fees but also include Plant Investment Fees (PIFs), hydroelectric sales to Xcel
Energy and some external funding. If these funds are insufficient, projects will be funded by
issuing revenue bonds with the debt service financed by general utility charges. The rates are
evaluated based on proposed capital needs in conjunction with the development of the operating
budget.
Facilities and Asset Management (FAM)
The capital plan is not keeping pace with the standards put forth in the Facilities & Asset
Management (FAM) Master Plan. The FAM Master Plan specifies that 1% of the current
replacement value (CRV) of facilities will be used for renovation and replacement of General
Fund facilities. FAM's operational budgets for routine and major maintenance have been
significantly reduced which may impact renovation and replacement schedules for non-essential
facilities in the future. The FAM Master Plan Update addresses this issue and recommends an
Action Plan to restore funding to provide industry standard service levels for all General Fund
facilities by 2014.
Library
The provision and upkeep of capital facilities for the library has not kept pace with service
standards, as outlined in the 2007 Library Master Plan. The library’s most recent facility addition
at the George Reynolds Branch in South Boulder was completed in 1994. The last addition to the
Main library is over fifteen years old.
The library’s facilities are no longer adequate to address either the rapidly changing world of
libraries or the specific needs of Boulder’s evolving population and service expectations. The
master plan outlines needed improvements in children’s and teen spaces, in meeting, reading and
study spaces, as well as in areas originally designed to house the physical collection and
information technology of the early 1990s.
The draft master plan calls for a comprehensive study of the best use of existing library spaces,
and an analysis of the investments required to adequately serve the community’s needs. The
study will be completed in 2008 or 2009. At that time financing alternatives, including fund-
raising, a specific library tax ballot initiative, and others, will be critically evaluated.
Parks & Recreation
The Parks and Recreation capital plan, as with other fund uses, has been negatively affected by
declining sales tax revenues. In 1995, the .25 Cent Sales Tax was approved to fund land
acquisition, to construct new parks and recreation facilities, to renovate existing assets, and
maintain the assets constructed and funded from its revenue stream. Since 1996 there has been
good progress on building some new park and recreation assets and renovating others. Since
experiencing the revenue decline, however, the funds available for park development, renovation
and new facilities have been reduced from prior levels. The Parks and Recreation 2006 Master
Plan includes goals to maintain existing facilities and assets, as well as fill in the gaps in the
system. Park development projects are prioritized based on several factors, including meeting
service area standards, community needs, and compliance with the 1995 ballot initiative.
Another goal is to become economically sustainable; therefore capital projects are also
prioritized based on the potential to produce revenue and enhance economic vitality.
A long range concern is that the .25 Cent Sales Tax sunsets in 2015 and yet the funds are used
for permanent park and facility maintenance. With or without revenue declines, absent a new
source of funds after 2015 to replace the .25 Cent Sales Tax, the department's ability to
adequately manage its assets will become constrained.
Open Space and Mountain Parks
The Visitor Master Plan (VMP) adopted in April 2005 includes a system-wide trails assessment
and standards for particular services. Areas of priority include: sustainability of the existing trails
system, management of undesignated trails, critical connections and unsafe road crossings. The
plan helps to prioritize these identified needs and proposes implementation options at three
levels: Current Funding, Action Plan Funding and Identified Needs or Vision Plan Funding.
Additional funds totaling $250,000 per year were requested to help implement the plan at the
Identified Needs funding level starting in 2005.
The portion of Lottery Funds that has been divided between Parks and Recreation (P&R) and
OSMP since 2002 will be retained by P&R in 2008 and is intended to be reestablished, which
will return the VMP infrastructure implementation to the Vision Plan level. Sources of
supplemental funds include increases in tax revenues, access to Lottery and GOCO funds, grants
and donations. Volunteer participation is a component of many projects. Increasing visitation
continues to impact the Open Space and Mountain Parks system and a year long visitation study
from June 2004 through June 2005 provides updated information on numbers, densities, times
and types of use, and destinations and origins of visits. Additional funds totaling $250,000 per
year were requested for a total of $450,000 annually, to help implement the plan at the Identified
Needs funding level starting in 2005.
VI. REVIEW AND COMMENTS FROM BOULDER COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
Review of the draft 2008-2013 CIP by county planning staff will be done in July. Any
recommendations will be forwarded to both Planning Board and Council.
VII. SELECTION OF PROJECTS FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT PROCESS (CEAP REVIEW)
The following capital improvement projects proposed for funding in the 2008-2013 CIP are
recommended to complete a Community and Environmental Assessment.
CEAP findings are submitted by departments to their respective advisory board for review as
part of CIP project approval, and City Council has the opportunity to call up projects for their
review and approval. (For those departments that do not have an advisory board, Planning
Board is responsible for reviewing CEAP findings as part of project approval.) Many of these
projects have either completed a CEAP or have been previously recommended to complete one.
Parks and Recreation Department
Recreation Center / Pool Improvements *
East Boulder Community Park (for final phase*)
Elks Neighborhood Park (in conjunction with Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation)
Violet Neighborhood Park (in conjunction with Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood
Mitigation)
Boulder Reservoir Improvements *
Public Works Department
Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Division
Wonderland Creek Flood Mitigation
South Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Improvements
Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Improvements
Elmer’s Two Mile Creek Flood Mitigation Improvements (CEAP Completed 2003)
Upper Goose Creek Drainage Improvements
Transportation Division
th
28 Street (Pearl to Iris) Pedestrian Crossing Improvements (CEAP completed 2002)
28th Street (Baseline to Iris/Diagonal) (completed for the south section: Arapahoe to
Baseline 2001 and north section: Pearl to Iris/Diagonal 2002)
Tributary Greenways
thth
Fourmile: 26Street to 28Street
Wonderland Creek: Foothills to Diagonal
Elmer’s Two Mile Creek: Goose Creek to Glenwood (CEAP Completed 2004)
Wastewater Utility Division
Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Digester
Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit Improvements
Water Utility Division
Cherryvale Pump Station (CEAP Completed 2004)
Iris Pump Station (CEAP Completed 2004)
Lakewood Pipeline Rehabilitation
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Conveyance Improvements
*As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be
determined.
VIII. PROJECTS SUGGESTED FOR DESIGN REVIEW
The purpose of the review is to scrutinize city projects for opportunities to provide higher quality
improvements in the public realm – projects with a ‘public face’. The projects listed here have
been identified as projects that should have some review and consideration about design issues
and would not otherwise undergo a CEAP, or a CEAP may be required but he projects have
specific design issues and should be reviewed by the Downtown Design Advisory Board
(DDAB), the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board (LPAB), Planning Board or staff. Design
review of these projects should be coordinated between the primary city departments listed
below and the planning department.
Recommended for Not Recommended
Design Review for Design Review
PROJECTS THAT WILL HAVE EXTERIOR CHANGES
Parks & Recreation
East Boulder Community Park Yes*
Foothills Community Park Yes*
Neighborhood/Pocket Park Development Yes*
General Fund
Recycle Row Yes*
PW/ Facilities & Asset Management
DDAB review complete
Mustard’s Storefront & ADA
Improvements
DDAB, Planning Staff
Main Library Plaza Maintenance
DDAB, Planning Staff
Construct / Purchase a General Storage
Facility (at the City Yards)
Yes*
Public Plaza Space
Construct Fire Training Center DDAB, Planning Staff,
Planning Board
Project entails only
Stazio Tinsile Canopy Fabric
replacement of
Replacement
existing fabric
North Boulder Park Shelter Repair Exterior paint only
Martin Park Shelter Major Maintenance Exterior paint only
West Senior Center Maintenance Exterior paint only
PW/ Water Utility
Chautauqua Storage Tank Rehabilitation Changes to roof only.
Boulder Reservoir WTP Depends on extent of
Expansion/Improvements exterior changes.
Cherryvale Pump Station Depends on extent of
exterior changes.
Iris Pump Station Depends on extent of
exterior changes.
PROJECTS WITH POSSIBLE EXTERIOR CHANGES
Parks & Recreation
Recreation Center/Pool Improvements Depends on extent of
exterior changes.
Flatiron Golf Course Improvements Depends on extent of
exterior changes.
PW/ Facilities & Asset Management
Municipal Facilities (miscellaneous Depends on extent of
projects not yet defined) exterior changes.
*Review process may include staff, Planning Board or other relevant advisory board depending on the
specific project and magnitude of improvements.
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2008-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY FUND
The 2008 Capital Improvements Program includes proposed funding of $42,164,600 for 75 projects
in 17 funds. The entire six-year CIP includes proposed funding of $217,306,200 for 130 projects.
GENERAL FUND (including the Fire Training Center Construction Fund)
The general fund pays for new facilities and additions or alterations to existing facilities that are not
related to city growth (i.e. level of service improvements and existing needs) as scheduled in various
department’s Master Plans. The money for this fund comes from many different sources and is
allocated for capital projects that meet city goals and are not growth related. The departments that
usually draw from the general fund for CIP projects are: FAM, Fire, Police, and Library.
The proposed 2008-2013 CIP for the Fire Training Center is $3,600,000, 9% of the 2008 CIP
and 2% of the six-year projection. This funding is for the city’s portion of constructing a Fire
Training Facility in 2008 and these monies were appropriated mid-year 2007 and will be carried
over into 2008.
The proposed 2008-2013 General Fund Trash Tax Revenues CIP has only $100,000 proposed in
2008 to develop infrastructure associated with a four acre parcel to be annexed for the purpose of
relocating Eco-Cycle. The improvements to Recycle Row are anticipated to be constructed in
2008 and funding for this project has been approved in the 2006 and 2007 budgets as well. This
project constitutes less than 1% of the six year projection as well as the 2008 CIP.
There are various projects that may need to be prioritized for possible use of general funds in the
future but are not scheduled in the 2008-2013 CIP. The list of unfunded projects is included in
.
Attachment C
DEDICATED FUNDS
CAGID Fund (renamed Downtown Commercial District Fund)
The proposed CAGID CIP includes $1.3 million in 2008 (2% of 2008 CIP) and $4,650,000 (3% of
six year total) over the next six years for major maintenance of the district’s parking garages.
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND (CDF) (Previously called the Development Excise Tax
or DET)
Funding for CDF projects is from the assessment of Development Excise Taxes on new
development.
The proposed 2008-2013 Capital Development Fund (CDF) CIP is $1,220,000 less than 1% of
the six-year projection. Two projects are scheduled for funding in 2008 for a total of $80,000.
These proposed projects constitute less than 1% of the 2008 CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
The Facilities & Asset Master Plan, accepted in 1998, identified the need for funding small
facility projects related to growth at the discretion of the FAM Manager. $50,000 from the DET
fund is proposed for miscellaneous facility DET Projects. Past uses of the money have included
the remodel of the Uni-Hill Police Annex and the Municipal Building west plaza. No projects
have been identified to date for the 2008 funding.
EDUCATION EXCISE TAX (EET)
The Education Excise Tax is an impact fee assessed on new residential units for educational related
purposes, including, without limitation, development of public educational facilities and services or
tax refunds or setoffs relating thereto. It was passed in 1994 and is used as major capital projects
are identified.
City Council has expressed interest in funding additional improvements for the Boulder Valley
School District’s (BVSD) project that will replace Casey Middle School. The funding from the EET
would be to make additional energy improvements to bring the new school to a gold Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standard. The BVSD has estimated the improvements to
cost up to $1.8 million.
FACILITY RENOVATION AND REPLACEMENT FUND
Funding for Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund projects is from a contribution by the
General Fund equal to 1% of the current replacement value of General Fund facilities and from
restricted fund departments as annual contributions to the fund.
The proposed 2008-2013 Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund CIP is $4,524,000 - 2% of the
six-year projection. $597,000 is allocated in 2008 for three projects. These projects make up 1.4%
of the 2008 CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
Main Library Roof Replacement – The project will replace approximately 60,000 square feet of
roofing that is at the end of its service life. The reconstruction is not anticipated to cause
disruption of service for library users.
LOTTERY FUND
The proposed 2008-2013 Lottery Fund CIP is $3,475,000 less than 1% of the six-year projection.
One Parks & Recreation project is included in 2008 for $350,000, constituting less than 1% of the
CIP for 2008. For the 2008 and 2009 budgets, the Open Space and Mountain Parks portion of
Lottery Funds will be allocated to Parks & Recreation to provide a short-term solution to financial
challenges facing that department. $150,000 from the Lottery Fund will continue to be allocated to
the Greenways Program.
Highlighted Projects:
Dakota Ridge Pocket Park – Construction of the park is planned for 2008 with funding from the
Lottery Fund as well the 1995 Parks and Recreation Ballot Fund.
OPEN SPACE FUND
The proposed 2008-2013 Open Space Fund CIP is $24,730,000 - 11% of the six-year projection. Six
projects proposed for funding in 2008 total $3,980,000, constituting 10% of the CIP for 2008.
Highlighted Projects:
New Trails in the Eldorado Mountain and Doudy Draw Trail Study Area – Trail projects in this
Trail Study Area were identified in the planning process that was completed in 2006. Initial trail
projects are to be completed in 2007 and additional trail projects that are planned for 2008
include: undesignated trail closure/reclamation, continued weed management in trail corridors,
and construction of new trail loops west of Flatirons Vista Trailhead.
New Trails and Trailhead Projects in the West Trail Study Area – Trails and trailhead projects in
this part of the system will be identified with the completion of this Trail Study process,
currently scheduled to begin in the fall of 2007. Projects may include: a limited number of new
trails, undesignated trail closure/ restoration, trailhead improvements and revised and or
additional signs.
PARKS & RECREATION FUNDS
Parks & Recreation Department funding comes from various sources including fees, development
excise taxes, property taxes, ballot issue sales taxes, lottery fund monies, etc. The various funds are
specific regarding allowed uses and the funding for many projects is comprised from more than one
funding source.
Capital projects are funded from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund, the Lottery Fund and the
.25 Cent Sales Tax Fund. Parks & Recreation projects for the six-year CIP have $14,983,000
proposed for funding, constituting 7% of the six-year CIP. Capital projects for 2008 have $2,325,000
proposed - 6% of the 2008 CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
– Development of the 3.1 acre site will begin in 2008.
Dakota Ridge Pocket Park
Harlow Platts Park – Projects in this 50 acre park include removal and replacement of damaged
portions of the existing concrete path around the perimeter of Viele Lake and replacement of the
par course consisting of 17 wooden exercise stations.
Boulder Reservoir Improvements – Funding will be used to address deferred capital needs and
major capital improvements and/or facility renovations at the Boulder Reservoir. Specific
st
projects will likely include entry way improvements off of 51 Street, gatehouse renovations, an
ADA-accessible playground, signage improvements, marina, main office, concession and
restroom renovations, docks and walkways replacement and new permanent picnic shelters.
Funding was approved in 2005 and 2006 and is proposed extending at least to 2011 for further
development of the East Boulder Community Park. Approximately 15 acres of the 53 acre park
remains to be constructed. A revised park conceptual design plan will be necessary for the site
since the current plan was developed in 1987.
TRANSPORTATION FUND, TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND
Funding for city transportation projects comes from several different sources. The transportation
Fund is primarily supported by the dedicated sales tax, Highway Users Tax, County Road and
Bridge fund, State Highway Maintenance and Landscape Funds and Safe Accountable Flexible
Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU).
The proposed 2008-2013 Transportation Fund CIP is $28,720,000 - 13% of the six-year projection.
Projects proposed for funding in 2008 total $8,530,000. These thirteen projects constitute 20% of the
2008 citywide CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
Continued funding is proposed (in both the Transportation Fund and the Transportation
th
Development Fund) from 2008-2013 for improvements to 28 Street, Baseline to Iris.
Improvements to the southern section (Baseline to Arapahoe) are substantially complete. The
focus for improvements in 2008 will continue to be for the northern section (Pearl to Iris) and
will include streetscape improvements, transit service and facility improvements, bike and
pedestrian improvements and traffic efficiency improvements.
th
30 Street Access Improvements Bluff to Walnut – The project is the first phase of access
improvements and connections needed for the Boulder Transit Village Station and FasTracks
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and commuter rail. The first phase access improvements include
th
constructing one mid-block crossing of 30 Street between Valmont and Pearl; constructing two
th
transit super stops, improving access from the Goose Creek multi-use path to 30 Street, and
th
constructing a bicycle/ pedestrian underpass of 30 Street at the Boulder and Left-hand ditch.
Broadway Concrete Reconstruction (Pine to Iris) – This project will correct pavement structural
deficiencies on Broadway from Pine to Iris and complete improvements to intersections, signals,
lighting, transit facilities, sidewalks and stormwater drainage. The process and design started in
2005 and is anticipated to be complete in 2008. This project is jointly funded by the city, CDOT
and federal funds.
Funding for growth related transportation projects come from the Transportation Excise Tax –
Transportation Development Fund.
The proposed 2008-2013 Transportation Development Fund CIP is $2,870,000 - 1% of the city-wide
six-year projection. Three projects are scheduled for funding in 2008 for a total of $660,000. These
projects constitute 2% of the 2008 citywide CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
th
30 Street Bikelanes from Arapahoe to Pearl This project will complete an important on-street
th
facility missing link by constructing on-street bike lanes on 30 Street between Pearl and
Arapahoe.
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FUND
The proposed 2008-2013 Municipal Airport CIP is $1,263,200, 1% of the six-year total projection.
One project is scheduled for funding in 2008 for $631,600, 2% of the 2008 CIP.
TRIBUTARY GREENWAYS
Funding for the Tributary Greenways program comes from the Lottery Fund, Stormwater and Flood
Management Utility Fund and the Transportation Fund ($150,000 each). The Greenways system is
comprised of a series of corridors along riparian areas including Boulder Creek and its tributaries,
which provide an opportunity to integrate multiple objectives, including habitat protection, water
quality enhancement, storm drainage and floodplain management, alternative transportation routes
for pedestrians and bicyclists, recreation and cultural resources. Planning for projects along the
greenway involves input from Flood Utilities, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, Water Quality
and Environmental Services, Environmental Affairs, Planning and Open Space and Mountain Parks.
Highlighted Projects:
Elmer’s Two Mile Creek – Goose Creek to Glenwood Drive – The project includes a trail
connection, habitat restoration and flood improvements. Phase I of this project has been
funding in 2003 and 2004 through the Greenways CIP, in addition to Federal transportation
funding. Federal funding for Phase II has recently been granted.
UTILITIES FUNDS
Funding for the city’s Utilities capital improvement projects is derived from general utility fees and
special external agency grants. The primary revenue sources are Plant Investment Fees (PIFs) from
new customers, monthly water sales to customers, hydroelectric sales to Public Service Company of
Colorado (PSCO) and some external federal funding.
STORMWATER AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT UTILITY FUND
The proposed 2008-2013 Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund CIP is $19,526,000 - 9%
of the six-year projection. Eleven projects are scheduled for Stormwater and Flood Management
Utility Fund funding in 2008 for a total of $6,926,000. These projects make up 16% of the 2008
CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
Additional funding for Elmer’s Two Mile Creek is proposed in 2008 in order to construct the
improvements as one large project rather than in phases as originally planned. Utilities funds
will be leveraged with Federal Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) funds. TIP funding in
the amount of $1.5 million is included in the 2008 Stormwater and Flood Management CIP. The
project is being coordinated by the city’s Greenways Program.
Money is budgeted for flood mitigation along Fourmile Canyon Creek. The money will be used
for on-going study, property acquisition and limited construction projects until decisions are
reached through the on-going flood mitigation planning process. The results of this planning
process are anticipated to be available later this year. The study results will also include
recommendations for Wonderland Creek, which is closely associated with Fourmile.
The South Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study is complete and will be submitted to the Federal
Emergengy Management Association (FEMA) in the near future. The mapping study results will
bcome the basis for future floodplain management, mitigation planning, regulatory restrictions
and flood insurance requirements for the South Boulder Creek corridor. Funding for flood
mitigation planning is proposed in 2008. It is anticipated that the mitigation planning will be
completed in 2009 and construction of improvements will begin in 2010.
WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND
The proposed 2008-2013 Wastewater Utility Fund CIP is $25,760,000 - 12% of the six-year
projection. Six projects are scheduled for Wastewater Utility Fund funding in 2008 for a total of
$2,210,000. These projects make up 5% of the 2008 CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
For 2008, projects include improvements to sanitary sewers and biosolids handling and
dewatering improvements at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP).
Larger projects proposed in the next few years will be related to improvements at the WWTP to
anticipate changes in discharge permits and expansion of the Biosolids Digester.
The city has hired a solar contractor, Eyeon Solar, to manage the installation 1 megawatt solar
photovoltaic system to be located at the 75th street wastewater treatment plant. The project will
be third party financed by Eyeon and will not require a capital investment from the city. It will
provide approximately 1/4 of the facility' power requirements, and will result in a power
purchase and lease agreement between the city and Eyeon.
WATER UTILITY FUND
The proposed 2008-2013 Water Utility Fund CIP is $78,285,000 - 36% of the six-year projection.
Fifteen projects are proposed for funding in 2008 for a total of $8,775,000. These projects make up
20% of the 2008 CIP.
Highlighted Projects:
Continued emphasis on the rehabilitation and improvement of the city’s existing water system
infrastructure continues, especially in the area of the city’s deteriorated water distribution
system.This is reflected in funding for the Waterline Replacement project and several other
rehabilitation projects for water system facilities.
Additional money has been budgeted for rehabilitation work at the Betasso and Boulder
Reservoir WTPs. This work is necessary to rehabilitate aging equipment and treatment processes
and to comply with federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations. Major improvements are
planned for both treatment plants in the next few years.
Continued work on repairs to the Barker water system, are needed. Repairs to this water system
are necessary to assure safe and reliable water deliveries to the Betasso Water Treatment Plant.
(WTP).
Funding for analysis and planning is proposed beginning in 2008 and $25 million proposed in
2009 for the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) Conveyance – Carter
Lake Pipeline to construct a pipeline from Carter Lake to the Boulder Reservoir. The pipeline
would provide long-term benefits to the city including source water protection, more uniform
water quality, and improved water source flexibility. Other participants in the project include
Little Thompson Water District, the town of Frederick and Left Hand Water District.
2008 Budget
Capital Improvements Projects
Airport Fund
Rehabilitate East Aircraft Parking Apron$631,578
CAGID Bond Fund
CAGID Major Renovation Projects$1,240,000
Capital Development Fund
Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects$50,000
Municipal Spaces$30,000
Education Excise Tax
Casey Middle School Improvements$1,800,000
Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund
Main Library Roof Replacement$511,000
Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects$58,000
Mustard's Storefront & ADA Improvements$28,000
General Fund
Construct Fire Training Facility$3,600,000
General Fund - Trash Tax Revenues
Recycle Row- Roadway and Utility Infrastructure Improvements$150,000
Lottery Fund
Dakota Ridge Pocket Park - Lottery$200,000
Tributary Greenways Program - Lottery$150,000
Open Space Fund
Acquisition Program$3,400,000
Mineral Rights Acquisition$100,000
OSMP New Trails Eldo Mt & Doudy Draw TSA$170,000
OSMP Trails and Trailhead Projects in West TSA$190,000
Visitor Infrastructure$90,000
Water Rights Acquisition$30,000
Parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot
Dakota Ridge Pocket Park$400,000
Iris Parking$75,000
Pleasant View Fields Accessibility and Safety Improvements$190,000
Recreation Center/Pool Improvements .25 Sales Tax$60,000
Page 1 of 4
2008 Budget
Capital Improvements Projects
Parks & Recreation 1995 Ballot
Unanticipated Opportunities$150,000
Permanent Parks & Recreation Fund
Boulder Reservoir Improvements$220,000
East Boulder Community Park PP&R$470,000
Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R$150,000
Foothills Community Park- PP&R$125,000
Harlow Platts Park$135,000
Unanticipated Opportunities - PP&R$100,000
Violet Neighborhood Park$100,000
Wonderland Lake Park$100,000
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Fund
Boulder Creek$100,000
Elmer's Two-mile Creek$3,529,000
Fourmile Canyon Creek$232,500
Preflood Property Acquisition$500,000
South Boulder Creek$150,000
Storm Sewer Rehabilitation$50,000
Stormwater Quality Improvements$50,000
Transportation Related Stormwater Improvements$250,000
Tributary Greenways Program - Stormwater & Flood$150,000
Wonderland Creek$232,500
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition) - Stormwater$110,000
Transportation Development Fund
30th Street Bike Lanes - Arapahoe to Pearl$450,000
63rd St. (Lookout to Diagonal)$160,000
Miscellaneous Development Coordination$50,000
Transportation Fund
28th St (Baseline to Iris) I$1,010,000
30th St Access Impr BTV: Bluff to Walnut-TR$2,677,000
Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30th$100,000
Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements$125,000
Broadway Concrete Reconstruction (Pine to Iris)$1,600,000
Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements$328,000
Pearl - 30th Intersection Improvements$680,000
Page 2 of 4
2008 Budget
Capital Improvements Projects
Transportation Fund
Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA$680,000
Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatments$75,000
Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe)$578,000
Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation$150,000
Undergrounding Cost Share Program I$100,000
Undergrounding Cost Share Program II$150,000
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition)-Transportation$427,000
Tributary Greenways
Elmers Two Mile Creek - Goose Creek to Glenwood$195,000
Maintenance and Weed Control$100,000
Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating$105,000
Miscellaneous Restoration Projects$50,000
Wastewater Utility Fund
Sanitary Sewers$550,000
Sewer Manholes$100,000
WWTP Biosolids Digester$50,000
WWTP Biosolids Handling & Dewatering$1,200,000
WWTP Permit Improvements$200,000
WWTP Solar Project$1
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition) - Wastewater$110,000
Water Utility Fund
Barker Gravity Pipeline$750,000
Barker Relicensing$1,800,000
Betasso WTP$100,000
Boulder Reservoir WTP$300,000
Cathodic Protection$100,000
Chautauqua Storage Tank$500,000
Cherryvale Pump Station$50,000
Distribution System Water Quality$150,000
Iris Pump Station$100,000
Lakewood Pipeline$100,000
NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline$1,000,000
Water System Security Upgrades$100,000
Waterline Replacement$3,000,000
Page 3 of 4
2008 Budget
Capital Improvements Projects
Water Utility Fund
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition) - Water$225,000
Zone 2 Transmission Facilities$500,000
Page 4 of 4
2008 BUDGET
City of Boulder Uses
(in $1,000s)
Total = $237,771
Capital
16%
Operating
84%
2008 CAPITAL BUDGET
by Fund
(in $1,000s)
Total = $37,294
CDBG
HOME
CHAP
2%
3%
Airport
3%
2%
Transportation
23%
Wastewater Utility
6%
Perm Parks &
Stormwater/ Flood
Recreation
Management Utility
4%
14%
Open Space
Affordable Housing
11%
3%
Capital Development
<1%
.25 Sales Tax
2%
Transportation
Lottery
Development
Water Utility
1%
2%
24%
AIRPORT FUND
AIRPORT FUND
2008 - 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The 2008 Airport Fund Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is $631,578. The 2006 Boulder
Municipal Airport Master Plan Update (AMPU) has informed the 2008 CIP. The AMPU was
presented to the City Council and approved in January 2007. The CIP projects currently on the
2008-2013 schedule only involve replacing or maintaining existing infrastructure.
POLICY ISSUES
None.
HIGHLIGHTS
The project slated for 2008 will rehabilitate portions of the aircraft parking apron located south of
Taxiway Alpha. The rehabilitation will replace degraded pavement as well as correct some drainage
and sub-grade problems. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Aeronautics Division
conducted a pavement evaluation in 2003 and rated the apron with a Pavement Condition Index of
57 (on a scale from 0-100). They recommended rehabilitation be scheduled to prevent further
degradation.
FINANCING
Primary funding for Airport Improvement Projects (AIP) is from the FAA, providing 95% of total
cost. The CDOT Aeronautics Division usually funds 2.5%, with the remaining 2.5% paid out of the
Airport Fund. The pavement project in 2008 is currently slated to cost $631,578. The FAA has
approved $600,000 towards this effort. The Airport Fund and a State of Colorado Discretionary
Aviation Grant each will contribute $15,789 in matching funds.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
The airport operating budget pays for the maintenance of all airport improvements.
BUSINESS PLAN
The project to rehabilitate portions of parking apron is designated as 100% essential.
Replacement of degraded pavement is an issue of maintenance and safety, and must be
performed for the proper functioning of the airport.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Rehabilitate East Aircraft Parking Apron77101078
PW/ Municipal AirportEast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Airport FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The project will rehabilitate approximately 150,000 square feet of asphalt on the aircraft parking apron, located
directly south of Taxiway Alpha as well as repair subgrade and correct drainage issues, as needed and as
funding is available. The project also entails painting aircraft movement lines and parking spaces after
rehabilitation is complete.
Sources of Funding:
FAA $600,000
CDOT Division of Aeronautics $15,789
Airport Fund $15,789
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
CDOT conducted a pavement evaluation in 2003 and rated the aircraft parking apron with a Pavement Condition
Index (PCI) of 57. With PCIs ranging from 0-100, a value of 57 falls into the "Major Rehabilitation" category.
They also noted "block cracking, oil spillage, depression, bleeding, L & T cracking, weathering, and raveling."
Further degradation will occur if a rehabilitation project is not conducted.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is listed in the Boulder Municipal Airport Master Plan Update. It has also been carried on CDOT's
CIP list since the 2003 CDOT pavement evaluation report was published.
Public Process Status, Issues:
This project was included in the Airport Master Plan Update process, which included open house meetings and
mailings to Airport neighbors.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Although pavement drainage will remain the same as existing, a stormwater discharge construction permit with
the Colorado Dept of Public Health and Environment will be needed since the project is more than one acre in
size.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$631,578$0$0$0$0$0$631,578
New Project
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Operating costs will likely decrease with new surface. Costs are absorbed in Airport
Description:
operating budget.
Airport Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND
2008-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The 2008-2013 Capital Development Fund (CDF) Capital Improvements Program is
$1,220,000. Two projects are scheduled in 2008 for a total of $80,000.
HIGHLIGHTS
The 2008-2013 CIP projects reflect the City’s participation in the creation of community
plazas and other municipal spaces / projects. The CIP primarily focuses on construction
of a General Storage facility in 2011 at the City Yards to be used for recycling building
materials, wastes, computers, and furniture and for other city operational needs.
However, as noted in the Budget Policy Issues section of the Development and Support
Services Division 2008-09 Narrative, this project is being revaluated as part of the
Downtown Campus Office Space Needs project.
FINANCING
Funding for the CDF projects is derived from the assessment of excise taxes on new
development. The proposed CDF CIP and fund financials reflect the new excise tax rates
and annual cost of living increases up to the maximum rate allowed by the ordinance.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
Department and tenant operating budgets are to identify any on-going costs and
corresponding funding. FAM typically calculates these operational costs and advises
departments accordingly. Major Maintenance and Facility Renovation & Replacement
(FR&R) costs are applicable to any new, improved, or expanded General Fund facilities.
These costs are each 1% of the current replacement value (2% total) for these facilities.
Major Maintenance costs are charged in conjunction with the project and are added to the
FAM operating budget and FR&R charges are added to the FAM FR&R budget when all
debt on the facility is retired. In the current fiscally constrained budget situation, no
additional funding is available for MM/FR&R. However, funding gaps in MM/FR&R are
addressed in the Action and Vision funding plans as outlined in the FAM Master Plan.
Users of the General Storage Facility will pay their portion of operational costs through a
cost allocation process and should realize an overall budget savings for storage as
compared to fees currently charged by private facilities.
BUSINESS PLAN
Capital projects classified into essential, desirable and discretionary using the
methodology outlined in the FAM Master Plan. Priority is given to the 26 “essential
facilities” noted in Appendix 1 of the FAM Master Plan when completing capital
projects. Essential projects are those projects that allow continued operation of a facility,
repair/replace life-safety systems, or are necessary to fully comply with laws and
regulations. Desirable projects are those projects that extend facility service life or
repair/replace systems other than life safety. Discretionary projects are those projects
that improve efficiency.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Miscellaneous Facility DET Projects511702
PW/ Facilities & Asset ManagementSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Capital Development FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
City's participation in accomplishing small projects and advance project planning , less than $50,000 each, that
are done in conjunction with other new construction or expansion projects related to growth. Previous projects
include: Valmont Butte engineering and environmental studies, Children, Youth and Family Services Addition, and
Outfitting the University Hill Police Annex.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project supports the Council goal of economic sustainability by extending the useful life of existing facilities.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need for funding small facility projects related to
growth at the discretion of the Facilities & Fleet Manager.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be
reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB, DDAB, and/or
Planning Board as appropriate.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with the affected departments.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$300,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects.
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Municipal Spaces511715
PW/ Facilities & Asset ManagementSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Capital Development FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
City's participation in the creation of small plazas, outdoor use areas and other municipal spaces. These are done
in conjunction with new construction or expansion projects related to growth. If the funding is not used in a
particular year, it is carried forward for future uses. Previous uses of funding include constructing the plaza on the
west side of the Municipal Building and providing partial funding for the Sister Cities Plaza in 2006 and 2007.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project supports the Council goal of environmental sustainability by creating natural sites and hardscape
areas for public enjoyment.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need for the creation of small plazas, pocket parks
and other municipal spaces related to new development. These efforts will be coordinated with Parks &
Recreation.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Any public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development. Project design will be
reviewed by the Planning Department. Further design reviews will be conducted by the LPAB, DDAB, and/or
Planning Board as appropriate.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$30,000$30,000$30,000$0$0$0$90,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects.
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
FACILITY RENOVATION AND
REPLACEMENT FUND
FACILITY RENOVATION & REPLACEMENT FUND
2008-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The 2008-2013 Facility Renovation & Replacement (FR&R) Fund Capital Improvements
Program is $4,524,000. Projects scheduled in 2008 total $597,000.
HIGHLIGHTS
The 2008-2013 CIP projects reflect the city’s participation in maintaining and updating
existing facilities. Planned projects in 2008 include main library roof replacement,
storefront and ADA improvements for Mustard’s Last Stand, and miscellaneous
renovation projects (<$50K) such as replacing plumbing systems or small HVAC
systems.
FINANCING
Funding for FR&R projects is derived from an annual contribution by the General Fund
equal to 1% of the current replacement value (CRV) for General Fund facilities.
Additional funding comes from user departments and from restricted fund departments as
annual contributions to the fund. This fund is managed as an internal service fund.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
Department and tenant operating budgets are to identify any on-going costs and
corresponding funding. FAM typically calculates these operational costs and advises
departments accordingly. Major Maintenance and Facility Renovation & Replacement
(FR&R) costs are applicable to any new, improved, or expanded General Fund facilities.
These costs are each 1% of the current replacement value (2% total) for these facilities.
Major Maintenance costs are charged in conjunction with the project and are added to the
FAM operating budget and FR&R charges are added to the FAM FR&R budget when all
debt on the facility is retired. In the current fiscally constrained budget situation, no
additional funding is available for MM/FR&R. However, funding gaps in MM/FR&R are
addressed in the Action and Vision funding plans as outlined in the FAM Master Plan.
BUSINESS PLAN
Capital projects classified into essential, desirable and discretionary using the
methodology outlined in the FAM Master Plan. Priority is given to the 26 “essential
facilities” noted in Appendix 1 of the FAM Master Plan when completing capital
projects. Essential projects are those projects that allow continued operation of a facility,
repair/replace life-safety systems, or are necessary to fully comply with laws and
regulations. Desirable projects are those projects that extend facility service life or
repair/replace systems other than life safety. Discretionary projects are those projects
that improve efficiency.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Mustard's Storefront & ADA Improvements501XXX105
PW/ Facilities & Asset ManagementCentral Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Facility Renovation & Replacement FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Mustard's Restaurant, located at 1719 Broadway, would be improved in apprearance and functionality by
enclosing the area on the north side of the building entry, moving the doorway to align with the street, creation of
a small eating counter, and installation of window awnings. The exterior improvements were recommended by
the Downtown Design Advisory Board (DDAB). Moving the main entry will also improve ADA access to the
building. The scope of work completed in 2004 - 2005 addressed the essential maintenance needs and
significantly improved the appearance of the building by incorporating many of DDAB's recommendations. The
proposed project addresses the remaining DDAB recommendations.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project supports the Council goal of economic sustainability by improving the appearance and functionality o
f
the existing building. Design review by DDAB is complete.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to upgrade the building.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The project was reviewed by DDAB in March 2004. Suggestions will be incorporated in design as possible. Any
public process will be identified in conjunction with the overall project development.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with Mustards.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$28,000$0$0$0$0$0$28,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No additional city operational costs are anticipated from completing this project.
Description:
Mustard's
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Main Library Roof Replacement501XXX96
PW/ Facilities & Asset ManagementCentral Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Facility Renovation & Replacement Fund
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project replaces approximately 60,000 square feet (SF) of roofing that is at the end of its service life.
Temporary roof repairs were made in 2006 by the original roof installer. At the completion of the repairs, the
installer recommended replacing the roof within two years.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life
of the existing building and by implementing energy-saving improvements whenever possible. Proper waste
management practices will be followed to reuse or recycle building materials to the maximum extent possible.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to maintain this facility.
Public Process Status, Issues:
None
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with the Library Department and Channel 8.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$511,000$0$0$0$0$0$511,000
Added to CIP in 2007
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance Projects501452
PW/ Facilities & Asset ManagementSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Facility Renovation & Replacement FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project addresses funding for building replacement and miscellaneous projects costing less than $50,000
each. Facility replacement and projects costing $50,000 or more will be individually listed in the CIP. Facility
maintenance projects costing less than $50,000 will be managed by the Facilities & Fleet Manager.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project supports the Council goals of environmental and economic sustainability by extending the useful life
of the existing building and by implementing energy-saving improvements whenever possible.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The FAM Master Plan Update, accepted in 2005, identifies the need to maintain city facilities. Projects approved
by the Facilities & Fleet Manager will be coordinated with other departments.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Any project associated with these funds will be taken through the appropriate public process and CEAP review as
part of the conceptual design if needed. Project design will be reviewed by the Planning Department. Further
design reviews will be conducted by the DDAB and Planning Board as appropriate.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with the affected departments.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$58,000$60,000$63,000$65,000$68,000$70,000$384,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No additional operational costs will result from completing these projects.
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
GENERAL FUND TRASH TAX
GENERAL FUND – TRASH TAX
2008-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The 2008-2013 General Fund Capital Improvements Program is $150,000 with funding
recommended in 2008 for Recycle Row.
HIGHLIGHTS
The 2008-2013 CIP project reflects the General Fund-Trash Tax contribution to “Recycle
Row.” This project is associated with annexation and development of the old Colorado
Brickyard parcel located at the SW corner of 63rd Street and Butte Mill Road. The 12-
acre Brickyard is being annexed by Western Disposal and ownership of 4 acres will be
transferred to the city for re-locating Eco-Cycle’s Center for Hard-to-Recycle Materials
and ReSource, the used building materials yard operated by the Center for Resource
Conservation. The CIP budget covers a proportional share of roadway and utility
infrastructure costs; no direct costs are anticipated for property acquisition.
FINANCING
Recycle Row project funding began in 2004 as part of the operating budget from the City
Managers Office-Environmental Affairs Trash Tax revenues. The CIP budget has run
from 2005 through 2008, for a total contribution from Trash Tax revenues of $692,000.
Funding for an adjacent section of 63rd Street that adjoins Stazio Ball fields-North will
also come from Parks and Recreation and was included in their 2004 CIP budget.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
The relationship of the operating budget to the CIP primarily involves the staff time
required to manage the property acquisition annexation negotiations and beginning in
2007 also has begun to include project management for infrastructure improvement
design and construction.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Recycle Row- Roadway and Utility Infrastructure Improvements21601692
City ManagerEast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
General Fund - Trash Tax RevenuesArea II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Trash Tax-funded project associated with annexation and development of the old Colorado Brickyard parcel
located at the SW corner of 63rd Street and Butte Mill Road. The 12-acre Brickyard is being annexed by Western
Disposal and ownership of 4 acres will be transferred to the city for re-locating Eco-Cycle's Center for Hard-to-
Recycle Materials from the city Municipal Service Center property. In addition, ReSource, the used building
materials yard operated by the Center for Resource Conservation will be re-located from their current temporary
location to this city recycling parcel. The CIP covers Phase I of roadway and all utility infrastructure costs.
Project funding began in 2004 as part of the operating budget from the General Fund-Trash Tax. The CIP runs
through 2008. Funding will also come from Parks and Recreation for an adjacent section of 63rd Street that
adjoins Stazio Ballfields-North. Phase II roadway improvements including sidewalk, curb & gutter will be funded
by Western Disposal, Inc. Final roadway, utility and site design work expected 2007; construction to begin 2008-
2009.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Recycle Row contributes to Council's Environmental Goal focus area; helps re-locate Eco-Cycle from the city
Municipal Service Center property, which in turn, will help maintain service standards for essential city services.
Creates convenient access for public and businesses to trash and recycling facilities.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Project contained in Master Plan for Waste Reduction adopted April, 2006. Environmental Affairs' Strategic Plan
in process.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Council will review and approve the Annexation Agreement for the 4 acres for Eco-Cycle relocation as well as the
subdivision process. Annexation/ subdivision will come before Council in October 2007; Infrastructure
improvements will commence in 2008. Once property ownership is transferred to the city, this project will be
required to undergo concept and site review.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Transportation Department will be providing project management, Public Works-Utilities will help coordinate utility
improvements; Parks and Recreation Department will provide funding for adjacent roadway and utility
improvements.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$0$0$0$0$0$150,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
LOTTERY FUND
LOTTERY FUND
2008-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The Lottery Fund Capital Improvements Program for 2008-2013 is $3,475,000 and $350,000 is
recommended for park development in 2008.
POLICY ISSUES
The departments of Parks and Recreation, Open Space/Mountain Parks and Tributary Greenways
share the State of Colorado's Conservation Trust Fund (Lottery) revenue. The current fund
sharing agreement was approved in 2001 by the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) and the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB).
Short-Term Budget Policy
For 2007, a budget shortfall totaling $300,000 was identified for Parks and Recreation’s
Recreation Activity Fund (RAF). In response to this budgetary issue, the OSBT agreed to
allocate their portion of Lottery Funds to Parks and Recreation for 2007-08. The generous offer
from Open Space/Mountain Parks to forgo their Lottery Funds will provide a short-term solution
to the financial challenges facing the Parks and Recreation Department. Although Lottery Funds
can not be expended directly on recreation programs, the additional Lottery Funds will free up
monies allocated within Parks and Recreation’s .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund which will then be used
to fund the deficit in the RAF. During the May 23, 2006 City Council meeting, the City Manager
reinforced that funding will resume being shared by the three entities in 2009, based on the
distribution agreement shown below.
HIGHLIGHTS
Projected annual revenues are $1,000,000 per year based on average past collections and
projected interest.
Distribution of Lottery Funds:
$304,000* Payment of debt service on Area III property approved by City Council
$100,000 Department of Open Space and Mountain Parks for Mountain Park
projects
$150,000 Tributary Greenways projects
$554,000
*Debt service in 2008 is $169,835 and in 2009 and thereafter is -0-.
The following numbers will vary depending on the Lottery Revenue amount per year:
Remaining funds: Split 50% to Parks and Recreation for projects and 50% to Open Space and
Mountain Parks for projects.
This funding is a vital element of Open Space and Mountain Parks’ strategy to address ongoing
and deferred maintenance in the Mountain Parks land area.
The funding is utilized by Parks and Recreation to provide habitat restoration, urban park
renovation projects (e.g. playground and shelter renovations), Art in the Park, and to pay debt
service for land acquisitions.
The Parks and Recreation Department has continued to prioritize taking care of the current
system through the capital refurbishment and renovation program. Although these projects do
not technically meet the CIP definition, significant capital funds (over $5,000) are expended to
replace and renovate park and infrastructure, such as playgrounds, shelters, irrigation systems,
gymnasium floors, docks and walkways. The increased funding resulting from Open Space’s
willingness to forego their portion of Lottery funds for 2007 and 2008 is being used to fund park
development and renovation projects.
FINANCING
Lottery funding is provided by the State of Colorado’s Conservation Trust Fund. Funding
distributions are provided to eligible governmental entities based on a per capita formula.
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
On May 21, 2007 the PRAB reviewed the Parks and Recreation CIP and voted unanimously to
approve the staff recommendation for the CIP budget and to forward this recommendation to
City Council.
OPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDATION
On June 28, 2007 the Open Space Board of Trustees unanimously approved, and recommended
that City Council approve $475,000 per year, based on current projections and methodology,
commencing in 2009 and continuing thereafter from the 2007 through 2012 Lottery Fund CIP
allocation to OSMP as outlined in the memorandum and related attachments.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Dakota Ridge Pocket Park - Lottery1
Parks & RecreationNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Lottery FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Dakota Ridge pocket park is a 3.1 acre site located at 5th Street and Dakota Boulevard. Dakota Ridge has
been prioritized for design and development beginning in 2008 because the neighborhood is underserved and the
project helps fulfill the requirement from the 1995 ballot issue. The park design will incorporate public process to
determine the park needs of the Dakota Ridge community.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city
codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A
quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Development of some
park sites fulfills the commitments made under the 1995 .25 Cent Sales Tax. Social Sustainability: Park sites
are community gathering places. Development of this park site will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of pocket park
per 1000 population, and be within the walking distance standard of 1/4 miles.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped
park sites to meet underserved neighborhoods and park service standards.
Public Process Status, Issues:
As the scope of work is defined the specific public review process will be determined. The park design process
will include public involvement to get community input into the design of the park.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning and Transportation as necessary.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$200,000$0$0$0$0$0$200,000
Change from Prior Year:
$24,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, structures, and hardscape features
Description:
Lottery Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Tributary Greenways Program - Lottery
Parks & RecreationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Lottery Fund
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Greenway Program will create a comprehensive greenway corridor system along several drainages. These
corridors will serve as storm drainage and flood channels, bicycle and pedestrian transportation systems, open
space and wildlife corridors, and recreational areas. This project represents the Lottery Fund contribution to the
program.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Greenways projects integrate many goals including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage
and flood management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists and protection of
recreation and cultural resources.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Coordination with the Greenways program is described in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan and the OSMP
Visitor Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
CEAP's are completed for all significant greenways projects and are reviewed by appropriate boards. See
Greenway CIP for more detailed information.
Relationship with Other Departments:
The Greenways program requires coordinating with Transportation, Open Space, Flood Utility, Planning and
Parks Departments.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$900,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
no addiitonal - funding is for the program, specific projects are outlined in the
Description:
Greenways CIP
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
OPEN SPACE FUND
OPEN SPACE FUND
2008-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The proposed2008 CIP for the Open Space & Mountain Parks Department continues funding for
the Acquisition CIP at $3,400,000 and the Mineral Rights CIP at $100,000. The Water Rights CIP
was reduced to $30,000 for 2007-2008 with funds temporarily reallocated to operations, and will be
restored to $200,000 thereafter. The Visitor Infrastructure CIP was increased starting in 2006 to
$450,000 to implement the Visitor Master Plan (VMP). These uses of funds will be sustainable
under the current Budget Office revenue projection of 3.89 % for 2008.
POLICY ISSUES
None at this time.
HIGHLIGHTS
From January 1997 through April 2007, approximately 15,160 acres have been added to the
Open Space system, bringing the total Open Space acreage acquired since 1967 to 43,960 acres.
Properties acquired since 2000, including lands in Jefferson County, have been purchased under
the guidance of the Accelerated Acquisition Program, Acquisition and Management Plan 2000-
2006 and Acquisition and Management Plan 2006-2011. Additionally, 6,555 acres were
acquired via the 2001 merger of the Mountain Parks Division of the Parks and Recreation
Department with the Open Space/Real Estate Department. Staff anticipates acquiring an
additional 6,975 acres under the 2006-2011 Acquisitions and Management Plan subject to
availability of funds.
Land Acquisition
Within the program, additional acres of open space will be acquired, subject
to available funding, within the BVCP Area III, the Mountain Backdrop, the Northern Tier and
in Jefferson County as approved by the OSBT and City Council. Funding is provided from the
projected restricted open space sales tax revenues. The project includes funding for survey,
appraisal and professional fees and related acquisition and immediate management costs.
Visitor Infrastructure
Annual funding for the programwas increased by $200,000 to the current
$450,000 starting in 2006 to meet the work plan identified in the OSMP Visitor Master Plan
approved by Council in April 2005. This program provides funding for capital maintenance of
existing trails and trailheads; construction of new trails and trailheads and other facilities that
improve the visitor experience, such as safe road crossings; and to restore areas where visitor
impacts are high.
Water Rights Acquisition
The program provides funding to purchase additional water shares from
private owners or others for use on Open Space for agricultural and environmental purposes, as
water becomes available in the Coal Creek, South Boulder, Boulder and Lefthand Creek watersheds.
Funds will also be used for professional, legal and engineering fees, and other analysis necessary to
manage and protect the water rights portfolio. The Open Space and Mountain Parks staff will
continue to work with other City departments to assist in enhancing minimum stream flow where
possible.
Minerals RightsAcquisition
The program provides funding to purchase underlying mineral
interests from private owners as they become available on the real estate market. Many of these
interests in minerals, gas, oil and aggregates were severed from the properties before purchase by the
City and could cause future management issues. Funds are also used for research, mapping and
analysis of potential acquisitions.
Historic Structures and Trails Stabilization and Restoration
The program uses Lottery funds
within the Mountain Backdrop to identify, stabilize and renovate significant historic structures and
trails and to protect pre-historic sites identified in cultural resource inventories. These funds will be
reallocated and transferred to Parks and Recreation in 2007 and 2008 and after 2008 the previous
allocation formula will be reestablished, which will return the VMP infrastructure implementation to
the Vision Plan level.
FINANCING
Sufficient funds are available in the Open Space Fund to appropriate the 2008 CIP. Open Space
bonds totaling $20,115,000 were issued in May 2006 under the $45,000,000 general revenue bond
authorization approved by voters in November 1997. Additional series of bonds are projected to be
issued in future years under this and a previous revenue bond authorization. Dates and amounts will
depend on a variety of factors, including future sales tax collections and funding needs for
acquisitions.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
The Open Space and Mountain Parks Visitor Master Plan (VMP) was adopted in April 2005 and
outlines a significant capital expenditure plan in order to address identified needs within the six year
CIP schedule. This, together with the Open Space Long-Range Management Policies adopted in
1995, sets the management direction for the OSMP Department. These policy level plans, along
with area and resource management plans, provide the framework to prioritize and budget specific
resource management actions to further the OSMP Department mission.
Currently, OSMP staff is in the implementation phase of the goals, objectives and actions
recommended in the VMP, the North Boulder Valley Area Management Plan, the South Boulder
Creek Area Management Plan, the Plains Ecosystem Management Plan, and the Forest Ecosystem
Management Plan.
In 2007 and 2008 funds will be reallocated from the Water Rights CIP and the Historic Structures
and Trails Stabilization and Restoration CIP to address immediate operational needs in the OSMP
and Parks and Recreation Departments respectively. These funds are planned to be restored to the
respective CIPs in 2009 and thereafter. As the Accelerated Acquisition Program approaches
achievement of its programmatic goals with the purchase of additional properties recommended by
the Board and approved by the Council, and as the outstanding debt issues are paid off, there will be
a shift of focus and funding from acquisition to management of the Open Space and Mountain Parks
properties.
OSBT ACTION
The Open Space Board of Trustees unanimously recommended "that Planning Board and City
Council approve$3,980,000in 2008 and $4,150,000 annually thereafter from the Open Space
Fund CIP 2008 through 2013 budget; and $475,000 per year in 2009 and thereafter from the
Lottery Fund CIP 2008 through 2013 budget as outlined" in its June 27, 2007 memorandum and
related attachments.
During its consideration of this item the OSBT discussed the importance of achieving the goals
of the Acquisition and Management Plan 2005- 2001 including acquisition of
approximately 7,000 acres in order to complete the plan; as well as implementation of the Visitor
Master Plan (VMP) within the projected time frame. Funding for the infrastructure of the VMP
is based on $450,000 annually from the Open Space Fund and will return to the vision plan level
in 2009 when the agreed portion of Lottery Funds is reinstated for OSMP purposes in the amount
of approximately $475,000 annually.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
OSMP New Trails Eldo Mt & Doudy Draw TSA843020131
Open Space & Mountain ParksSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Open Space Fund
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Trails projects in this Trail Study Area were identified in the planning process that was completed in 2006. Initial
trails projects are to be done in 2007. Additional trail projects that are planned for 2008 include: undesignated trail
closure/reclamation, continued management of weeds (particularly jointed goatgrass) in trail corridors,
management of cattle trail development and construction of new trail loops west of Flatirons Vista Trailhead.
OSMP Trail Suitability and Alternatives Analysis will be completed in 2007-2008 for these trails.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat
preservation and water quality. The Open Space & Mountain Parks program has made the City of Boulder a
nationwide environmental and passive recreation leader and role model for other communities. Open Space &
Mountain Parks lands add to the visual appeal of our community. The management practices followed after
acquiring these properties ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality
of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to Visitor
Infrastructure will assist in Council's goal to reconcile conflicts between environmental and recreational
communities.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adapted by OSBT and City Council in
2005.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also
approved by City Council under the CEAP call up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of
trail and trailhead locations in the trail study area process.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$170,000$0$0$0$0$0$170,000
Change from Prior Year:
$2,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Monitor, maintain, rehab trails when needed
Description:
Open Space Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
OSMP Trails and Trailhead Projects in West TSA843040132
Open Space & Mountain ParksSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Open Space Fund
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Trails and trailhead projects in this part of our system will be identified with the completion of this Trail Study Area,
currently scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2007. Projects may include: limited number of new trails,
undesignated trail closure / restoration, trailhead improvements, and revised and/or additional signs. Appropriate
OSMP Trail Suitability and Alternative Analysis will be completed in 2008.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat
preservation and water quality. The Open Space & Mountain Parks program has made the City of Boulder a
nationwide environmental and passive recreation leader and role model for other communities. Open Space &
Mountain Parks lands add to the visual appeal of our community. The management practices followed after
acquiring these properties ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality
of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to Visitor
Infrastructure will assist in Council's goal to reconcile conflicts between environmental and recreational
communities.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adapted by OSBT and City council in
2005.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also
approved by City Council under the CEAP call up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development
of trail and trailhead locations in the trail study area process.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$190,000$0$0$0$0$0$190,000
new in 2008
Change from Prior Year:
$2,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Monitor, maintain, rehab trails when needed
Description:
Open Space Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Acquisition Program720000
Open Space & Mountain ParksSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Open Space FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project is to acquire additional acres of open space, subject to available funding, within the BVCP Area III as
well as the areas in the Northern Tier and in Jefferson County as approved by the OSBT and City Council.
Funding is provided from the projected restricted Open Space sales tax revenue. The project includes funding for
survey, appraisal, professional fees and related acquisition and immediate management costs.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat
preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program has made the City of Boulder a nationwide
environmental leader and role model for other communities. The Open Space lands add to the visual appeal of
our community and the management practices after acquiring these properties insure that we continue to provide
habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality of our waterways and provide for recreational opportunities for
our citizens.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Funding for the acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the
OSBT and City Council in October 2005. The conceptual acquisition area in Area III is annually coordinated and
incorporated with the Boulder Valley Comp Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Specific purchases are recommended by the OSBTand approved by City Council
Relationship with Other Departments:
The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks,
Greenways, Transportation, Utilities and Planning. The department also works with and promotes inter-
governmental cooperation with national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as
Boulder County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance (COSA),
GOCO, Colorado Dept of Natural Resources, CDOW and others including the Trust for Public Lands, The
Conservation Fund and Nature Conservancy.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$3,400,000$3,400,000$3,400,000$3,400,000$3,400,000$3,400,000$20,400,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
OSMP maintenance costs are primarily related to visitation and visitor infrastructure.
Description:
Acquisition of land does not necessarily increase operating costs at a significant level.
Open Space Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Mineral Rights Acquisition935000
Open Space & Mountain ParksSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Open Space FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This program provides funding to purchase underlying mineral interests from private owners or others as they
become available on the real estate market. Many of these interests in minerals, gas, oil and aggregates were
severed from the lands before properties were purchased by the City and could cause future management
dilemmas. Funds would also provide for researching, mapping and analyzing potential acquisitions.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Contributes to Council's key focus areas. Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including
environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program is one
that has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The
Open Space lands add to the visual appeal of our community and the management practices after acquiring
these properties ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife and protect the quality of our
waterways.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Funding for these acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the
OSBT and City Council in 1999 and in 2000 and 2005.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Annual funding is approved by both the OSBT and City Council.
Relationship with Other Departments:
The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks,
Utilities and Transportation. The department also works with and promotes inter-governmental cooperation with
national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space,
Jefferson County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance (COSA),
GOCO, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, CDOW and others.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$600,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Included in annual appropriations for operations
Description:
Open Space Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
50%50%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Visitor Infrastructure843000
Open Space & Mountain ParksSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Open Space FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
Yes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This program was established to provide funding for maintenance on existing trails and trailheads, construction of
new trails and trailheads, construction of facilities that improve the visitor experience (e.g., safe road crossings)
and restoration of areas where visitor impacts are high. The recently adopted Visitor Master Plan provides
general goals and guidelines for visitation on Open Space and Mountain Parks and, thus, will help determine the
specific projects that are undertaken. This project provides funds for the planning phase of one Trail Study Area,
a couple trail rebuilds and a couple of road/trail crossings. These planning phase costs will include various
surveys that will be needed in the planning process.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including environmental priorities of habitat
preservation and water quality. The Open Space & Mountain Parks program has made the City of Boulder a
nationwide environmental and passive recreation leader and role model for other communities. Open Space &
Mountain Parks lands add to the visual appeal of our community. The management practices followed after
acquiring these properties ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife, protect the quality
of our waterways and address the community's desire for passive recreation. Improvements to Visitor
Infrastructure will assist in Council's goal to reconcile conflicts between environmental and recreational
communities.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Funding for visitor infrastructure supports the Visitor Master Plan that was adapted by OSBT and City Council in
2005.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Projects are approved by the OSBT through the public process. Projects whose scope requires a CEAP are also
approved by City Council under the CEAP call up provision. In addition, the public has input in the development of
trail and trailhead locations in the trail study area process.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$90,000$450,000$450,000$450,000$450,000$450,000$2,340,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
There will be no on-going costs associated with the planning phase of these projects
Description:
Open Space Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Water Rights Acquisition930000
Open Space & Mountain ParksSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Open Space FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This will provide funding to purchase additional water rights from private owners or others for use on Open Space
for agricultural and environmental purposes as water becomes available. Program funding includes water
acquisitions in the Coal Creek, South Boulder, Boulder and Lefthand Creek watersheds. Funding will also be
used for professional fees, legal and engineering fees, analysis and mapping necessary to manage and protect
the water rights portfolio. Because of our continuing wildlife and habitat concerns, the Open Space and Mountain
Parks Resource Conservation staff will continue to work with other City departments to assist in enhancing
minimum stream flow where possible.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Contributes to Council's key focus areas. Supports City Council Goals of environmental sustainability including
environmental priorities of habitat preservation and water quality. The Open Space acquisitions program is one
that has made the City of Boulder a nationwide environmental leader and role model for other communities. The
Open Space lands add to the visual appeal of our community and the management practices after acquiring
these properties ensure that we continue to provide habitat preservation for wildlife and protect the quality of our
waterways.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Funding for these acquisitions supports the Open Space Acquisitions and Management Plan as approved by the
OSBT and City Council in 1999 and in 2000 and 2005.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Annual funding is approved by both the OSBT and City Council.
Relationship with Other Departments:
The Open Space & Mountain Parks department works cooperatively with other City Departments, primarily Parks,
Utilities and Transportation. The department also works with and promotes inter-governmental cooperation with
national, state and local conservation and Open Space programs, such as Boulder County Open Space,
Jefferson County Open Space, Louisville, Lafayette and Longmont, Colorado Open Space Alliance (COSA),
GOCO, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, CDOW and others.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$30,000$200,000$200,000$200,000$200,000$200,000$1,030,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Included in annual appropriations for operations
Description:
Open Space Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
50%50%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
.25 CENT SALES TAX FUND AND
PERMANENT PARK & RECREATION FUND
.25 CENT SALES TAX FUND &
PERMANENT PARK AND RECREATION FUND
2008 - 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMS
OVERVIEW
The 2008 .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund and the Permanent Park and Recreation Fund Capital
Improvements Program (CIP) is $2,275,000. The Park and Recreation Department’s Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) has been developed to meet the vision and goals of the 2006 Parks
and Recreation Master Plan. The master plan includes criteria to prioritize park development
which include community need, identifying underserved areas, evaluating opportunities and
consideration of constraints relative to constructing undeveloped park land. The criteria are
flexible to allow the department to respond to changing community needs. New park needs will
be identified through area plans as land use and zoning changes may allow for higher density
housing in areas such as the Transit Village Area where residential uses were not anticipated.
The park development prioritization will be evaluated annually as part of the CIP budget process
as well as whenever a significant event occurs or a development constraint is resolved
The development of new recreation facilities was identified in the action and vision plans of the
2006 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The renovation and enhancement of aging, inadequate
recreational facilities at the Boulder Reservoir and Flatirons Golf Course was identified as a
priority due to both safety issues and the department’s financial reliance on revenue generated at
these facilities. All CIP projects are prioritized based on health and safety concerns, ADA
compliance, and replacement of existing equipment and infrastructure necessary to ensure
ongoing operations.
POLICY ISSUES
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) and departmental staff believe that it is
crucial to identify park maintenance funding for projects constructed by the Permanent Parks and
Recreation Fund. As a capital improvement fund, the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund can
not be utilized to fund ongoing operations and maintenance functions. The General Fund is
intended to provide maintenance funding for projects built with the Permanent Parks and
Recreation Fund. The department receives general fund monies, however, at this time the
amount is not sufficient to cover maintenance for new parks. The availability of maintenance
funding is one of the criteria for prioritizing park development and the department is open to
partnerships for park maintenance.
HIGHLIGHTS
For 2008 and future years, three funds (Lottery, Permanent Park and Recreation and the .25 Cent
Sales Tax) have been considered jointly to provide funding levels for CIP and non-CIP capital
projects. In addition, major refurbishment and renovation projects (over $50,000) are also
identified individually in the CIP this year. In some cases, funds are allocated and continue to
accumulate so the project can be undertaken. The following are the major CIP projects in the
three funds:
2008 CIP Funding
Dakota Ridge Pocket Park
Violet Neighborhood Park (a portion in conjunction with anticipated private development)
East Boulder Community Park
Recreation Center/Pool Improvements
Flatirons Golf Course Improvements
Boulder Reservoir Improvements
Foothills Community Park – Phase III
Iris Center Parking Lot
Harlow Platts Park
Wonderland Lake Park
Unanticipated Opportunities
2009 to 2013 CIP Funding
Mesa Memorial Pocket Park
Hickory Pocket Park
Elks Neighborhood Park
Violet Neighborhood Park
East Boulder Community Park
Foothills Community Park – Phase III
Wonderland Lake Park
Recreation Facilities Improvements
Recreation Center/Pool Improvements
Flatirons Golf Course Improvements
Boulder Reservoir Improvements
Unanticipated Opportunities
For the purposes of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), staff has included only projects
which meet the CIP definition. Non-project specific fund accumulations, where no actual project
is being proposed in a given year (such as the Art in the Park project) have not been included in
the CIP.
The department has continued to prioritize taking care of the existing system through the capital
refurbishment and renovation program. Although these projects do not technically meet the CIP
definition, capital funds are planned to be expended to replace and renovate park and recreation
infrastructure, such as playgrounds, shelters, irrigation systems, gymnasium floors, docks and
walkways. The department has allocated Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) funding for
On-going and Major Maintenance from its .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund. Urban Park and Recreation
Facility renovation and refurbishment funding has been dedicated to help the department address
the backlog of deferred maintenance, replace aging infrastructure and resolve safety and
environmental issues. For 2008, the budget for capital renovation projects (including
replacement of playgrounds, irrigation systems, docks, sidewalks and parking lots) and FAM’s
portion of the .25 Cent Sales Tax has been increased totals $881,000.
FINANCING
The revenues from the .25 Cent Sales Tax are estimated based on citywide sales tax projections.
The .25 Cent Sales Taxrevenues were pledged for “ ... Payment for the principal, interest, and
premium, is any, on .... bonds; and then for development, operation, and maintenance of the land
and improvements purchased or constructed with the proceeds of the bonds; renovation and
refurbishment or replacement of four pools; renovation and replacement of recreation facilities;
playgrounds, mountain park trails, civic park complex; improvements to recreation centers and
development of new recreation projects to be determined in the future through the Master
Planning Process by the City Council; maintenance of the community park in north Boulder;
development of a mountain parks environmental education program; and for the renovation of
city-owned historical and cultural facilities; with the remainder being dedicated for parks and
recreation purposes...” (Ballot language)
The Permanent Park and Recreation Fund consists of .9 mill levy of assessed valuation of all
taxable property in the city, gifts and donations to the fund, proceeds of the sale of park or
recreation property or equipment. The fund also includes revenues from a portion of a
development excise tax assessed on each new residential unit constructed or annexed to the city
except for those units that are designated as permanently affordable. The City Charter requires
that the “...Fund shall not be used for any purpose other than the acquisition of park land or the
permanent improvement of park and recreation facilities.” (Charter Sec 161) Funds are used for
CIP projects and capital renovations (operating budget) of existing facilities for items based on
the $50,000 CIP definition.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
The .25 Cent Sales Tax ballot language specified that funding for the operating costs for new
park development construction could be allocated from the sales tax fund. The operating costs
for renovation/refurbishment projects are expected to remain the same but increase annually for
inflation. Any increased operating and maintenance budget impacts from new park
development or facility changes are either absorbed within the current operation budget or
recommended for increased .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund allocations addressed through the city’s
business plan and budget process.
As a capital improvement fund, the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund cannot be utilized to
fund ongoing operations and maintenance functions. Additional monies from the city’s general
.
fund or other sources will be needed to fund operations and maintenance of new facilities
BUSINESS PLAN
The department’s investment strategy aligns with the city's business plan and the department’s
master plan. CIP projects are categorized as essential and desirable based on the following
parameters:
Essential
1.)projects are provided to ensure general health and safety maintenance, facility
repair, and ADA requirements (accessibility and inclusion).
Desirable
2.)projects are provided to expand the system to meet ballot measure
commitments, to sustain the community’s parks and recreation assets, and to achieve or
maintain industry standards.
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION
The PRAB reviewed and recommended approval of the draft 2008-2013 Parks and Recreation
Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at its May 21, 2007 meeting. The PRAB expressed
support for continuing to allocate funds to the Unanticipated Opportunities allocation. Several
PRAB members expressed the desire that these funds could be used to develop a portion of
Valmont City Park when the park master plan is updated. Staff confirmed that the portion of
Unanticipated Opportunities funds provided by the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund would
require the PRAB’s approval once a specific project had been identified.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Recreation Center/Pool Improvements .25 Sales Tax
Parks & RecreationSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Parks & Recreation 1995 BallotArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
Yes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This funding is reserved for design, development and renovation of existing and new recreation facilities and
buildings, including outdoor pools, recreation centers, and sports fields. The department is accumulating funding
to address major repairs, such as pool reconstruction.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental
sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of
renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term
durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability
of the community. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life
and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in
facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues.
Public Process Status, Issues:
As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review process will be determined.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation Staff works closely with Facility Asset Management staff on all building and facility
improvements.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$60,000$150,000$150,000$0$100,000$650,000$1,110,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Operating costs may increase when this project is completed. An estimate is not
Description:
currently available..
Recreation Activity Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
25%75%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Iris Parking103
Parks & RecreationNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Parks & Recreation 1995 BallotArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Iris Center is the main administrative building for the Parks and Recreation Department and also contains the
Iris Studio. Parking space for the facility is shared with the North Boulder Recreation Center (NBRC). Parking lot
repavement is necessary to reconstruct the degrading surface, will ehance drainage, as well as ice build-up
during winter months.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental
sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of
renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term
durability. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation system, inclusive of administration buildings,
contributes to the economic viability of the community. This parking lot renovation is necessary to ensure the
safety of the NBRC and Iris Studio users and staff. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to
and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation master plan identifed the need to maintain existing assets.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Repavement will result in temporary closures of small sections of the parking lot, limiting patron and staff parking.
Construction signs will be posted accordingly.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Staff will coordinate efforts with FAM.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$75,000$0$0$0$0$0$75,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Snow removal, lot striping
Description:
.25 Cent Sales Tax Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Pleasant View Fields Accessibility and Safety Improvements
Parks & RecreationPalo Park
Department:Subcommunity:
Parks & Recreation 1995 BallotArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Pleasant View Fields is the city's championship soccer complex. This project will provide accessbility to the main
soccer complex for people with disabilities, mitigate safety concerns with the existing access, and provide ADA
compliance for the facility. The project includes building concrete stairs and a ramp for safe and accessible
access to the main soccer complex, as well as a concrete pad at the top of the stairs and ramp. The current
access is turf and dirt that has eroded and is not easily accessible for people with disabilities. Total project cost is
estimated to be $330,000, with $190,000 coming from Fund 118, the Parks and Recreation 1995 Ballot. An
additional $140,000 has been identified in Fund 117 (the .15 Cent Sales Tax) from the portion dedicated to
maintenance for Pleasant View Fields and the Stazio Ballfield Complex.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental Sustainability: The design and construction of the project will meet current city codes, strive to
meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic sustainability: Quality recreation
facilities contribute to the economic viability of the community. Social sustainability: Quality recreation faciltiies
that are safe and accessible to all contribute to and enhance our quality of life, and allow the department to
engage a broader range of the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in
facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues.
Public Process Status, Issues:
As the scope of work is defined, the necessity of a CEAP or other public review process will be determined.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning and FAM as necessary.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$190,000$0$0$0$0$0$190,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Dakota Ridge Pocket Park1
Parks & RecreationNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Parks & Recreation 1995 BallotArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Dakota Ridge pocket park is a 3.1 acre site located at 5th Street and Dakota Boulevard. Dakota Ridge has
been prioritized for design and development beginning in 2008 because the neighborhood is underserved and the
project helps fulfill the requirement from the 1995 ballot issue. The park design will incorporate public process to
determine the park needs of the Dakota Ridge community. The department has $602,300 in carry-over funds
from approved allocations in 2006 and prior years.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city
codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A
quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Development of som
e
park sites fulfills the commitments made under the 1995 .25 Cent Sales Tax. Social Sustainability: Park sites
are community gathering places. Development of this park site will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of pocket park
per 1000 population, and be within the walking distance standard of 1/4 miles.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped
park sites to meet underserved neighborhoods and park service standards.
Public Process Status, Issues:
As the scope of work is defined the specific public review process will be determined. The park design process
will include public involvement to get community input into the design of the park.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning and Transportation as necessary
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$400,000$0$0$0$0$0$400,000
Change from Prior Year:
$24,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, structures and hardscape features
Description:
.25 Cent Sales Tax Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Unanticipated Opportunities
Parks & RecreationSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Parks & Recreation 1995 BallotArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The unanticipated opportunities CIP allocation is intended to meet changing and unexpected community needs.
The unanticipated opportunities may include, but is not limited to: land acquisition, facility acquisition, capital
renovation or development, city contribution towards potential public-private, public-public or other partnership
agreements and energy efficiency projects. As specific projects are identified, staff will show projects on an
individual basis within the annual CIP budget, which is approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city
codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A
quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Development of som
e
park sites fulfills the commitments made under the 1995 .25 Cent Sales Tax. Social Sustainability: Park sites
are community gathering places. Development of park sites will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of neighborhood
and pocket parks per 1000 population, and be within the walking distance standards. Quality recreation facilities
contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the
community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop, maintain and renovate existing facilities.
The need to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped park sites was also deemed a priority.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Any potential projects will be reviewed and discussed at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meetings.
Large scale projects will encompass additional public process, including scope, design, impacts and timing.
Public comment is included at Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Planning Board and City Council business
meetings.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Planning, Open Space/Mountain Parks, FAM, Transportation and any other identified departmental stakeholder
will be involved in project discussions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$250,000$100,000$100,000$0$100,000$700,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
As projects are determined, operating costs will be calculated
Description:
.25 Cent Sales Tax, Recreation Activity Fund, GF
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Flatirons Golf Course Improvements PP&R5
Parks & RecreationSoutheast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Funding will be used for future improvements to the golf course including, but not limited to, renovation of
irrigation systems, cart paths, tees, greens, other golf course land improvements, driving range, event center, and
pro shop facilities. The department seeks to retain current revenue streams and enhance departmental
sustainability by enhancing the amenities at Flatirons Golf Course. In addition to the department's Master Plan, a
business plan for Flatirons Golf Course will be developed to evaluate the feasibility of the capital renovation costs
and potential increased revenue streams. The business plan and renovation work will involve all city
stakeholders, including Transportation, Planning, Finance and the City Manager's Office, to ensure a common
shared vision of Flatirons Golf Course. As specific projects are identified, staff will show projects on an individual
basis within the CIP process.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental
sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of
renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term
durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability
of the community. These improvements will increase service to the community at the Flatirons Golf Course which
should result in additional revenues. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance
our quality of life and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in
facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed options for renovation of the Flatirons Golf Course buildings
at their May 2001 meeting. As the scope of work is defined, the public review process will be determined.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation will coordinate with Planning, Transportation, CMO, FAM and any other identified
departmental stakeholder
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$100,000$100,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$500,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Changes to operating and maintenance costs will vary depending on improvements.
Description:
Recreation Activity Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
75%25%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Boulder Reservoir Improvements9
Parks & RecreationNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Funding will be used to address deferred capital needs and major capital improvements and/or facility
renovations at the Boulder Reservoir. Specific projects will likely include entry way improvements off of 51st,
gatehouse renovations, an ADA-accessible playground, signage improvments, marina, main office, concession
and restroom renovations, docks and walkways replacement and permanent picnic shelters. An analysis will
evaluate the feasibility of constructing a permanent or temporary stage with the goal of attracting and retaining
more special events. The department seeks to retain current revenue streams and enhance economic vitality
efforts by transforming the Boulder Reservoir into a unique community venue. In addition to the department's
master plan, a business plan for the Reservoir will be developed to evaluate the feasibility of the site, renovation
costs and potential increased revenue streams. The business plan and renovation work will involve all city
stakeholders, including Police, Fire, Transportation, Utilities, Planning, Finance and the City Manager's Office, to
ensure a common shared vision of the Boulder Reservoir. As specific projects are identified, staff will show
projects on an individual basis within the CIP process.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental Sustainability: Facility renovations will be designed and constructed to address environmental
sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project will include efficient use of energy and water, use of
renewable energy sources, use of recycled products, recycling within the building operation plan, and long term
durability. Economic Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities and programs contribute to the economic viability
of the community. Social Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life
and allow the department to engage a broader range of the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to maintain and renovate facilities, as well as invest in
facilities and programs that offer opportunities to increase revenues.
Public Process Status, Issues:
As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be determined.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation will primarily coordinate and collaborate with Utilities, Fire, Planning, Police, Open Space,
FAM, Transportation and any other identified departmental stakeholders will be involved in project discussions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$220,000$250,000$150,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$770,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
An estimate is not available at this time. As specific projects are identified,operating
Description:
costs will be quantified
Recreation Activity Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
75%25%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Harlow Platts Park11
Parks & RecreationSouth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Harlow Platts Park is 50.5 acre site. Project plans include the removal and replacement of damaged portions of
the existing concrete path (approximately four feet wide) around the perimeter of Viele Lake as well as the access
drive area/multi-purpose path (approximately 10 feet wide). The par course, consisting of 17 wooden exercise
stations, will also be replaced.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Repair and renovation of park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet
environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and
recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Park sites are
community gathering places. These park renovations are necessary to ensure the safety of the users, as well as
to meet expressed community demands.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation master plan identifed the need to maintain parks at current service levels, as well as
accelerate the park renovation and refurbishment schedule.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Public process is not anticipated. The project includes the renovation of exiting assets. Construction signs will be
posted as needed. Path diversions and segment closures may occur, but will be limited. Users will have access
to the soft-surface path parallel to the concrete path.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Staff will work with city departments as needed.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$135,000$0$0$0$0$0$135,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Snow removal, normal path maintenance
Description:
.25 Cent Sales Tax and General Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
25%75%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Wonderland Lake Park2
Parks & RecreationNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Wonderland Lake Park is a 32 acre site that consists of a traditional active-use park and natural area. The
traditional area consists of playground amenities, a shelter, and paths. The Wonderland Park path is located
throughout the natural area. Project plans include three phases of removal of the Wonderland Park path,
including 6 feet wide sections of concrete and 4 feet wide sections of asphalt, depending on path location. Path
reconstruction will include a comprehensive repair of 6 inch deep concrete along the entire path totaling
approximately 2250 square yards. Replacement is necessary to restore cracks, slopes, and trip hazards
throughout the path.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Renovation and repair of park sites will meet current city codes, strive to meet
environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and
recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. These park renovations are necessary
to ensure the safety of the users, as well as to meet expressed community demands. Additionally, the
Wonderland Park path serves as a community multi-modal transportation path. Social Sustainability: Park sites
are community gathering places.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation master plan identifed the need to maintain parks, as well as accelerate the park
renovation and refurbishment schedule.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Public process is not anticipated. The project includes the renovation of exiting assets. Construction signs will b
e
posted as needed. Path diversions and segment closures may occur, but will be limited. Precautions will be
taken to ensure contractor vehicles limit disruption to park users andminimize disturbance to natural areas.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Staff will work with other departments as needed.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$228,000$0$0$0$0$328,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Snow removal and normal path maintenance
Description:
General Fund and .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
25%75%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
East Boulder Community Park PP&R4
Parks & RecreationSoutheast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
Yes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
To complete the development of the East Boulder Community Park Site. Approximately 15 acres of the 53 acre
park remain to be constructed. The current site development plan focuses on the development of additional multi-
use fields, an identified deficiency within Boulder, by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Boulder
Valley School District.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city
codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A
quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability:
Park sites are community gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of park
per 1000 population.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a need to develop community park sites. This site is needed
to meet the standard of 1.5 acres of community parks per 1000 poplulation.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The master site plan for the community park site was approved in 1987. The site has been graded, roadway and
other infastructure, community center, playground, soccer fields, court complex and parking installed. Due to the
length of time since the master site plan was developed, extensive public review will be provided prior to the next
phase of development. A new site plan will ensure community needs are addressed and will include opportunities
for public discussion and dialogue. As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public
review will be determined. A development proposal has been submitted for the adjoining private property. P&R
staff is involved in the review, anticapting potential impacts to the park, as well as opportunities for efficiencies in
infrastructure development.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation staff work closely with Planning and Transportation staff as required for property
development.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$470,000$650,000$500,000$300,000$0$0$1,920,000
Change from Prior Year:
$75,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Operating costs will increase when this project is completed. Amount stated is for 15
Description:
acres in 2005 dollars.
General Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Foothills Community Park- PP&R6
Parks & RecreationNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Project funding began with the site acquisition in 1985. The Foothills Community Park site totals 69 acres.
Phase I (44 acres) was completed in 2001. Phase IIA (temporary dog park and parking) was completed in 2004.
Phase IIB (playground, shelters, restrooms, turf areas) was completed in summer 2006. Phase IIA & B
development totaled eight acres. Phase III construction is currently planned for active recreational facilities,
including tennis, basketball and handball courts, however a site planning process will be undertaken before
development proceeds.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental Sustainability: Some of the environmentally sustainable projects within this 69 acre park include
site irrigation from a ditch water source, provision for an organic community garden, restoration and preservation
of native grasslands, use of recycled products, and enhancing water quality by controlled release, landscape
contouring, and cleaning of storm drainage waters. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks and recreation
system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability: Park sites are community
gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of park per 1000 population.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a need for community parks. Project is needed to meet current
acreage standard of 1.5 acres of community park land per 1000 population.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The Master Site Plan for Foothills Community Park went through an extensive public review process. This
process included identifying issues within the Major Site Review process and completion of a CEAP. Public
review of Phase II was provided during a May 2002 workshop and a November 2002 Community Open House.
Phase I (44 acres) was completed in 2001. Phase IIA planning and development began in 2001. Phase IIB
development began in 2005. Prior to Phase II construction, the site plan will be reviewed by the community and
changes made as needed.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordinated efforts with Housing Authority to purchase right of way and to construct Violet Street to serve both
the community park and the Foothills Affordable Housing project.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$125,000$500,000$500,000$0$0$500,000$1,625,000
Change from Prior Year:
$20,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Park maintenance of turf, horticulture, structures and hardscape features
Description:
.25 Sales Tax Fund, General Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Violet Neighborhood Park10
Parks & RecreationNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
Yes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Violet Neighborhood park consists of an eight acre site located at 17th Street and Violet along Fourmile
Creek. The park design will involve extensive public review and dialogue with the community. Significant flood
and drainage work must be accomplished prior to park development. Parks and Recreation staff is working with
Utilities and Tributary Greenways to coordinate the department's respective projects. Some initial work will be
done in 2008 to coordinate with adjacent development. Additional funding for Violet Neighborhood Park will
continue in 2012 and will accumulate for several years until funding is sufficient to begin park development.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city
codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Economic Sustainability: A
quality parks and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Social Sustainability:
Park sites are community gathering places. Development of this park will meet the standard of 1.5 acres of
neighboor park per 1000 population, and be within the walking distance standard of 1/2 mile distance to the park.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a need to develop neighborhood park sites. This site is needed
to help meet the standard of 1.5 acres of neighborhood parks per 1000 poplulation, as well as the standard of a
1/2- mile walking distance to the park.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The Utilities and Tributary Greenways projects along Fourmile Creek will require a CEAP, which will include the
Violet park site.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Parks and Recreation staff will coordinate project development with Utilities, Tributary Greenways, and Planning
staff as required for site.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$0$0$0$800,000$700,000$1,600,000
Some initial work is required in 2008.
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
As the park site design is developed, operating costs will be calculated
Description:
General Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
25%75%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Unanticipated Opportunities - PP&R
Parks & RecreationSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Permanent Parks & Recreation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The unanticipated opportunities CIP allocation is intended to meet changing and unexpected community needs.
The unanticipated opportunities may include, but is not limited to: land acquisition, facility acquisition, capital
renovation or development, city contribution towards potential public-private, public-public or other partnership
agreements and energy efficiency projects. As specific projects are identified, staff will show projects on an
individual basis within the annual CIP budget, which is approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Environmental sustainability: Design, development, and maintenance of new park sites will meet current city
codes, strive to meet environmental goals and utilize best management practices. Facility renovations will be
designed and constructed to address environmental sustainability. Approaches to be considered in every project
will include efficient use of energy and water, use of renewable energy sources, use of recycled products,
recycling within the building operation plan, and long term durability. Economic Sustainability: A quality parks
and recreation system contributes to the economic viability of the community. Sites are needed to meet the
commitments represented under the .25 cent 1995 sales tax and to meet standards of 1.5 acres of park land per
1000 population. Recreation facilities are intended to meet expressed community demands. Social
Sustainability: Quality recreation facilities contribute to and enhance our quality of life and allow the department to
engage a broader range of the community. Park sites are community gathering places.
Relationship to Master Plans:
TheParks and Recreation Master Plan identified the need to develop, maintain and renovate facilities. The need
to develop existing and newly acquired undeveloped park sites was also deemed a priority.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Any potential projects will be reviewed and discussed at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meetings.
Large scale projects will encompass additional public process, including scope, design, impacts and timing.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Planning, Open Space/Mountain Parks, FAM, Transportation and any other identified departmental stakeholder
will be involved in project discussions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$600,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
As projects are determined, operating costs will be calculated
Description:
.25 Cent Sales Tax, Recreation Activity Fund, GF
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
TRANSPORTATION FUND
TRANSPORTATION FUND
2008 - 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The 2008 Transportation Fund Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is $8,530,000. The CIP has
been developed within the context of the Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The plan goals and
priorities were used in allocating funds and prioritizing projects.
The TMP is underpinned by the concept of investing in our transportation infrastructure to
maintain today’s level of service (LOS). The goals/objectives are stated in terms of no increase
in traffic congestion. The investment strategy is based on making significant improvements to
the pedestrian, bicycle and transit systems, and maintaining and making efficiency improvements
to the roadway system.
Transportation Fund 2008-2013 CIP - Modal Investment Breakout
20082008-2013
Modal/Functional Area $ % $ %
Pedestrian 2,448,90729%10,110,441 35%
Bicycle 1,884,44322%6,404,456 22%
Transit 1,280,67015%4,371,520 15%
Roadway 2,388,98028%5,581,583 19%
Travel Demand Management (TDM)* 00%0 0%
Mitigation 00%0 0%
Other 527,0006%2,252,000 8%
Total8,530,000100%28,720,000 100%
.
*Note: TDM programs are included in the operating budget
The TMP is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system. The
TMP advocates that we:
adequately preserve the existing infrastructure;
strive to increase safety;
maximize the efficiency of our existing systems (pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and roadway);
and
enhance mobility through investments in the completion of the alternative transportation
system (pedestrian, bicycle, and transit)
The TMP advocates that this multimodal-based investment strategy be focused in a system of six
east-west and four north-south corridors that constitute the designated multimodal corridor grid.
TMP priorities form the base for funding allocation. Investment on enhancements to the modal
systems is focused in these 10 multimodal corridors. With limited resources, investments are
focused on the highest priority corridors.
Multimodal Corridor Grid
East-West North-South
Iris Avenue Broadway
th
Valmont Road 28 Street/U.S. 36
Pearl Street/Parkway Foothills Parkway
th
Table Mesa Drive – South Boulder Road 55 Street
Arapahoe Avenue
Baseline Road
POLICY ISSUES
None
FINANCING
Funding for city transportation projects comes from several different sources. A dedicated sales
tax, Highway Users Tax, County Road and Bridge funds, State Highway Maintenance and
Landscape Funds and Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy
for Users (SAFETEA-LU) federal funds primarily support the Transportation Fund.
2008 Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement
Program
The city of Boulder applied for funding for the maximum number of project submissions allowed
in 2006, 8 projects. Four projects programmed for the 2008-2013 CIP requires matching funds
from the Transportation Fund. The Transportation Fund projects are:
th
Pearl - 30 Intersection Improvements: $340,000 external; $340,000 match
th
Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30: $768,000 external; $572,000 match
th
30 St Access Improvements BTV: Bluff to Walnut: $2,339,000 external; $1,238,000 match
Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe): $1,202,000 external; $1,202,000
match
In addition, we received funding from CDOT for the following congestion relief project which
also requires matching funds:
Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements - $817,000 external; $150,000 match
DRCOG will be accepting applications for the next round of federal project funding in the fall of
2007 and will have an established list of projects for 2009 to 2011 in the first quarter of next
year. The city plans to submit several projects, up to a maximum of eight, through this process.
There is a project and an amount listed in the 2008-2013 CIP for TIP Local Match/FasTracks
Implementation that will likely be used as the city’s match on projects that are awarded federal
funding through the application process.
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed based on the policy guidance of
the TMP with the identified multimodal corridor emphasis. Expenses in the “Other” category
reflect Transportation commitments in the city’s contract with Pollard Motors to prepare the City
Maintenance Yards frontage along Pearl Parkway for potential Pollard business relocation. The
site preparation includes items such as power line relocation, site grading, and fencing in order
for the Pollard’s to relocate their business if they exercise their option to purchase the Yards
frontage. Revenues associated with the future sale of Yards frontage property are anticipated to
offset these expenses. Transportation and Utilities will share in the acquisition costs of
replacement land adjacent to the Municipal Service Center. Even without the Pollard option
component of the Yards property, the Yards reconfiguration away from Pearl Parkway frontage
and to the west is consistent with the Yards Master Plan.
HIGHLIGHTS
th
28 Street –
th
28 Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue is identified as the top priority corridor in the
th
city’s multi-modal grid. Implementation of the 28 Street Project continues to be a high priority
of the Capital Improvements Program. South segment (Baseline to Arapahoe – Hello Boulder)
funding of $4.3 million (includes $1.1 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed in 2002 and
2004. The public input, design and approval process is complete for the north segment (Pearl to
Iris – Service City) and the Boulder Valley Regional Center Transportation Network plan
process was completed in the middle segment (Arapahoe to Pearl – New Town.) Some median
th
Street development.
replacement work was coordinated in the middle section with the 29
Funding for the north segment of $9.3 million (includes $3.8 million in TEA-21 funding) was
programmed starting in 2004.
-
Broadway Reconstruction (Pine to Iris)
Pavement structural deficiencies will be corrected and improvements to intersections, signals,
lighting, transit facilities and sidewalks will be completed. The process and design began in 2005
with project completion anticipated in 2008. This project is jointly funded by the city, CDOT
and federal funds.
th
30 Street Access Improvements BTV (Bluff to Walnut) –
The project is the first phase of access improvements and connections needed for the Boulder
Transit Village Station and FasTracks BRT and commuter rail. The “hub” area is the vicinity
around the Boulder Transit Village where connections will occur between the regional transit
service and local transit, bicycle and pedestrian modes. The Boulder Transit Village transit
infrastructure will be constructed in phases with the first phase planned by RTD in 2007 to build
a bus-based multimodal station. Future phases as part of FasTracks will add BRT service, build
the rail platform and add rail service. Current land uses in the transit area are characterized by
large scale block sizes, industrial land uses, and few pedestrian or bicycle connections. Changes
are being evaluated in the Transit Village Area Plan.
The first phase access improvements for the Boulder Transit Village include constructing one
th
mid-block pedestrian crossing of 30 Street between Valmont and Pearl; constructing two transit
th
super stops, improving access from Goose Creek multi-use path to 30 Street, and a
th
bicycle/pedestrian underpass of 30 Street at the Boulder and Left-hand Ditch. The Goose Creek
access will provide a critical missing link between the Goose Creek Path and the sidewalks and
th
on-street bikelanes on 30 Street.
Yards Master Plan Implementation -
As part of the Yards Master Plan and the Pollard Motors’ option to relocate to Pearl Parkway,
Transportation will share with the Utilities Division the cost to purchase replacement land
adjacent to the existing Municipal Service Center. Revenues associated with the disposal of the
Foothills Park & Ride and Pearl Parkway frontage are anticipated to offset acquisition costs.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
The 2008 Transportation CIP is predicated on improving Boulder's infrastructure. Any operating
project impacts are either absorbed within operating budgets or addressed through the annual
budgeting process.
BUSINESS PLAN
Classification of Capital projects is done according to the Transportation Division's guiding
principles. Essential projects are those that involve maintenance of the existing system to
maintain the city's investment in the infrastructure and safety improvements. Some examples
include replacement and maintenance of streets such as street resurfacing, replacement of curb,
gutter and sidewalk, taking care of signs and signals, and addressing safety issues. The portions
of projects that are classified as desirable include expansion of the multimodal system and
operational improvements which involves roadway, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and travel
demand management projects, programs and services. Currently no projects or portions of
projects are considered discretionary which would include quality of life improvements such
as neighborhood traffic mitigation projects or the installation of sound walls.
UNDERGROUNDING CREDIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
As part of the franchise agreement with Xcel Energy (Xcel) (formerly Public Service Company
of Colorado - PSCo), the city of Boulder receives an annual credit for work by Xcel to relocate
underground or reconfigure Xcel lines. The amount of the annual credit is 1 percent of the
preceding calendar year’s electric revenue from customers within the city, which is
approximately $600,000 per year.
The Undergrounding Credit Policy, approved by City Council in 1994, specifies that proposed
undergrounding credit expenditures be reviewed annually by the Transportation Advisory Board
during the CIP review process. Using the initial screening factors and prioritization factors
provided in the policy, staff has established the Undergrounding Credit CIP included in the
2008- 2013 Transportation CIP.
Where it is appropriate, staff is utilizing undergrounding credits in a collaborative manner to
facilitate development of a more robust telecommunications infrastructure. This is accomplished
by applying undergrounding credits to burial projects on specific routes that parallel those
designated for telecommunications conduit and cable. The telecommunications facilities then
share the same trench at a small additional cost. The undergrounding projects included in the
CIP are generally consistent with the potential telecommunications needs.
The Undergrounding Credit Policy requires that 25 percent of the credits be made available for
non-CIP projects on a 50 percent match basis. Therefore, the Undergrounding Credit CIP
includes $150,000 annually for the Undergrounding Cost Share Program. If program
participants in a given year do not request all of the $150,000 available for the cost share
program, the amount remaining returns to the overall credit balance.
The current franchise expires in 2010. The current credit balance and program viability is under
review and any necessary changes will be implemented through the budget process.
TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) ACTION
City Council has charged the Board to: "review all city transportation environment assessments
and capital improvements." In the context of the Capital Improvements Program, the Board is
asked to provide a recommendation on the program to the Planning Board and City Council.
The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed and made a recommendation on the 2008-
2013 Transportation Fund Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at their June 11, 2007 meeting.
The TAB recommended approval of the 2008-2013 Transportation Development Capital
Improvements Program as submitted. Topics of discussion included:
How the funding breakout works and how it is decided which items will be funded to
which degree in any given year.
The Yards Master Plan, with specific reference to the Pearl Parkway Frontage land and
its exchange for other land which is more useful within the scope of the project.
30th and Pearl Intersection improvements; federally funded and not to include an
underpass.
Concerns were expressed by the TAB that with increased construction and materials
costs, revenue and hence budget is not sufficient to future needs. TAB urged that more
sources of revenue be found.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
28th St (Baseline to Iris) I78174369
PW/ TransportationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
Yes2001 - Baseline to Arapahoe / 2002 - Pearl to Iris
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
These improvements focus on 28th Street from Baseline to Iris. The planning study and the CEAP for the
southern section-Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section-Pearl to Iris, are complete and have been
approved by City Council. Recommended improvements include: Urban design, landscaping, streetscape
improvements throughout the corridor; transit service and facility improvements including queue jumps, super
stops and route modifications; bike and pedestrian facility improvements including constructing multi-use paths;
adding raised crossing at free right turn lanes; traffic efficiency improvements including adding left turn lanes at
various intersections and widening the Boulder Creek bridge. Funding for the northern and southern sections is
included in this CIP and will be combined with federal funding and the Transportation Development Fund.
Project funding began pre 1997 and will end post 2013. In addtion, the BVRC Connections Plan addresses
improvements in the middle section from Arapahoe to Pearl. Minor improvements have been coordinated with
the 29th St. development but the majority of the BVRC improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl are not included in
the CIP. These will occur over time through redevelopment.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system.
Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air,
reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the 2003 Transportation Master Plan and the plan's focus on Multimodal Corridors.
Multimodal corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian
travel. The project will address and balance the needs of these modes. 28th Street - Iris to Arapahoe is the
highest ranked multimodal corridor and 28th Street - Arapahoe to Baseline is the 3rd highest ranked corridor.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The CEAP for the southern section - Baseline to Arapahoe and the northern section - Pearl to Iris- have been
approved by City Council. Any of the middle section improvements from Arapahoe to Pearl, will implement
Council approved BVRC Connections Plan and will be coordinated with the 29th St. redevelopment.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project requires coordination with the Utility Division for utility upgrades, with RTD, CDOT, CU, Arts
Commission, the Planning Department and the Real Estate Division and with adjacent developments.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$1,010,000$1,010,000$1,010,000$1,010,000$1,010,000$1,010,000$6,060,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs
Description:
which will be prorammed in the Transportation Fund budet.
gg
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
25%75%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Pearl - 30th Intersection Improvements78104373
PW/ TransportationCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will increase the operational efficiency for vehicles and transit and improve pedestrian crossings.
The intersection is adjacent to the Boulder Transit Village and will see a significant increase in bus and pedestrian
activity with the upcoming construction of the RTD Transit Station. The intersection improvements include double
left turn lanes on 30th for northbound traffic, raised pedestrian crossings at free right turns and signal controller
enhancements for improved communication, transit priority and bike activation. Funding: External = $400k; City
Match = $400k.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project will improve the function of the intersection to reduce vehicle delays and air pollution. Providing a
usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s environmental and
transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air, reduced congestion
and lower VMT. It will also provide improved pedestrian crossing at the intersection in all directions for increased
safety and enhanced access to the Boulder Transit Village.
Relationship to Master Plans:
As identified in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) – Roadway Policies, the city will develop and manage
its street network in a manner that places reliance on improving the efficiency of the existing system before
expanding that system. In addition, the TMP supports completing enhanced pedestrian improvements to
increase the safety for pedestrians and encourage walking as the basis of all other travel modes.
Public Process Status, Issues:
This project was submitted to TAB and Council as a Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) prior to submitting
it to DRCOG for federal funding. Design and construction will be coordinated with adjacent property owners and
project updates will be sent to TAB.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with planning and housing and human services in connection with the Boulder
Transit Village area planning and site planning. There will also be coordination with utilities.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$680,000$0$0$0$0$0$680,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Operating and maintenance costs are minimal.
Description:
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
30%70%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition)-Transportation781039
PW/ TransportationEast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundAreas I & II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project provides funds for the acquisition of additional land near or adjacent to the existing city yards
Municipal Service Center.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Improvements to the City Yards are required to sustain transportation and utilities maintenance services for the
city which are considered essential services provided by municipalities.
Relationship to Master Plans:
These acquisitions are consistent with the Yards Master Plan and support achieving elements of the
Transportation Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
None required. Acquisition is solely for city maintenance activity. City council has already supported these
acquisitions and no other public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Land acquisitions will be shared 50/50 between Transportation and Utilities. Staff will work with RE/OS for
property acquisitions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$427,000$0$0$0$0$0$427,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase. The same functions will continue at the site.
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Broadway Concrete Reconstruction (Pine to Iris)78102968
PW/ TransportationCentral Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will correct pavement structural deficiencies on Broadway from Pine to Iris and complete
improvements to intersections, signals, lighting, transit facilities, sidewalks and stormwater drainage. The plan
preparation for this project started in 2005. Public process for this project will start in 2006 and continue in 2007.
This project is jointly funded by the city, CDOT and federal funds. In 2005, the State of Colorado transferred
ownership of Broadway (State Highway 7-Canyon Blvd. north to U.S. 36) to the city of Boulder for $2.25M. This
money will serve as the state portion of this project. This project is a continuation of the Broadway reconstruction
which has occurred from Regent to University and from University to Pine. Funding: 2006-2008: City = $4.36M;
CDOT = $2.25M; Federal = $3.73M. Project funding for this section from Pine to Iris began in 2005 and will end
in 2008.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Intersection improvements, street reconstruction and street resurfacing provide a usable, efficient and safe street
network for bikes, buses and motor vehicles. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal
transportation system addresses Council’s environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and
sustainable transportation options.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This program is consistent with the 2003 Transportation Master Plan which places high priority on transportation
system preservation. System maintenance is listed as the highest priority transportation investment in the
Investment Policies in the 2003 TMP.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Plan preparation for this project started in 2005. Public process and design will take place in 2006 and 2007.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with the Utility Dept, Planning Dept, and the Parks Department.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$1,600,000$0$0$0$0$0$1,600,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Project will result in a decrease in on-going maintenance costs because it will adress
Description:
poor pavement condition that requires frequent maintenance.
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
80%20%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Canyon & Folsom Intersection Improvements781x4575
PW/ TransportationCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation Fund
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Canyon and Folsom intersection improvements include double left turn lanes on Canyon for eastbound
traffic, the addition of a right turn lane for southbound traffic on Folsom and increasing the turning vehicle storage
capacity for southbound left turning vehicles and for eastbound right turning vehicles. Funding: CDOT = $817k;
City Match = $150k.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The intersection provides a critical link for traffic traveling from Canyon (SH 119) to Arapahoe (SH 7) and has
large turning movements on to Folsom. The project will improve the operational efficiency of the intersection
which will reduce vehicle delays and air pollution consistent with Council’s environmental and transportation
goals. It will also provide improved bicycle travel by providing separate bike detection for southbound bikes on
Folsom.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project would implement improvements identified in the city’s 2003 Transportation Master Plan to increase
the intersection’s operational efficiency for vehicles and transit. As identified in the 2003 Transportation Master
Plan (TMP) – Roadway Policies, the city will develop and manage its street network in a manner that places
reliance on improving the efficiency of the existing system before expanding that system.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Staff will work with adjacent property owners and send project updates to TAB.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordination is required with RE/OS for easement and property acquisition, and with forestry concerning existing
street trees.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$328,000$639,000$0$0$0$0$967,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs
Description:
which will be programmed in the Transportation Fund budget.
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
20%80%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
30th St Access Impr BTV: Bluff to Walnut-TR78104772
PW/ TransportationCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project is the first phase of constructing access improvements for the Boulder Transit Village bus station and
FasTracks BRT and rail to be located at 30th and Pearl. The planned improvements include constructing one
mid-block pedestrian crossing of 30th Street between Valmont and Pearl; constructing 2 transit super stops,
access from the Goose Creek multi-use path up to 30th Street, and a bicycle/pedestrian underpass with access
to 30th Street at the Boulder and Lefthand Ditch south of Pearl. The underpass project would include replacing
the existing bridge on 30th Street over the Boulder and Lefthand Ditch. This is the only structurally deficient
bridge in the Boulder city limits. This project is funded from both the Transportation and Transportation
Development Funds. Funding: External Funding = $2.539M; City = $1.24M match
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The 2003 Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multi-modal-based transportation
system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air,
reduced congestion and lower VMT. In addition, the only structurally deficient bridge in Boulder located on 30th
Street, south of Pearl, will be replaced.
Relationship to Master Plans:
As identified in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) – Transit Policies, the city will improve transit access
through a variety of capital improvements including the Boulder Transit Village, transit priority lanes, transit super
stops, improved bike parking and continuous pedestrian crossings. In addition, in the corridor prioritization in the
2003 TMP, this section of 30th Street is included in the 28th Street Corridor between Iris and Araphoe which is
the highest ranking corridor in the Transportation Master Plan. And, system maintenance is listed as the highest
priority transportation investment in the Investment Policies of the 2003 TMP. The Boulder and Lefthand Ditch
corridor is shown as a proposed Greenway in the TMP and is anticipated to become an important off-street
connection to the Boulder Transit Village.
Public Process Status, Issues:
This project was submitted to TAB and Council as a Transportation Improvement Project prior to submitting it to
DRCOG for federal funding.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with planning and housing and human services in connection with the Boulder
Transit Village planning. There will also be coordination with utilities.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$2,677,000$900,000$0$0$0$0$3,577,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
50%50%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Arapahoe Multi-Use Path: Folsom to 30th78104474
PW/ TransportationCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project would complete multi-use paths on both sides of Arapahoe between Folsom and 30th Streets. Street
trees, poles and other obstacles are located in the existing pedestrian facilities. Associated improvements would
relocate traffic signal poles, light poles, utility boxes and fire hydrants out of the walkway, provide enhanced
pedestrian crossings, and relocate or enhance the street trees and landscaping along the corridor. Funding:
External Funding = $908k; City = $607k.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This section of the Arapahoe multimodal corridor is a priority in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan. Multimodal
improvements in the section of the corridor will support the existing Community Transit Network (CTN) JUMP
transit service and the redevelopment of 29th Street. The project will address numerous missing links in the bike
and pedestrian facilities along this section of the corridor as well as poor design of some of the pedestrian
facilities.
The 2003 Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multi-modal-based transportation
system. Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air,
reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the 2003 Transportation Master Plan’s focus on Multimodal Corridors. Multimodal
corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian travel. The
design and project will address and balance the needs of these modes. Arapahoe from Folsom to 33rd is the
second highest ranked corridor in the TMP.
Public Process Status, Issues:
This project was submitted to TAB and Council as a Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) prior to submitting
it to DRCOG for federal funding. Staff will hold public meetings and meet with adjacent property owners to
acquire input for the project.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project will be coordinated with Forestry and BURA.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$1,240,000$0$0$0$0$1,340,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
20%80%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Transit Priority Operational Improvements (Arapahoe)78103176
PW/ TransportationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundAreas I & II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide transit operation improvements intended to support transit service on the Arapahoe
corridor. The proposed improvements include queue jump lanes at intersections as well as sidewalks and bike
connections to transit stops, and transit ammenities. The project is intended to improve the travel time along the
corridor. Intersection improvements for transit operations will occur on east Arapahoe from Cherryvale to east of
63rd. The city's funding is part of a larger CDOT project and CDOT will take the lead on the implementation.
Funding: 2008 - 2009: City = $1.202M; Federal = $1.202M.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multi-modal-based transportation system.
Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air,
reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
As identified in the 2003 Transportation Master Plan - Transit Policies, the city will improve transit access through
a variety of capital improvements including the Boulder Transit Village, transit priority lanes, transit super stops,
improved bike parking and continuous pedestrian connections.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The city funding is part of a larger CDOT project on Arapahoe. CDOT will take the lead on the process.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordinate with Real Estate for easements/ROW. Coordinate with CDOT.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$578,000$1,826,000$0$0$0$0$2,404,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Annual ongoing maintenance costs. Increased maintenance is minimal.
Description:
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements781692
PW/ TransportationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundAreas I & II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Bikeway facilities are included in most all transportation construction projects. This program provides additional
funding for smaller bikeway projects not specifically associated with other capital projects. The projects are
prioritized and coordinated with the approved bikeway plan and represents an ongoing city program. Projects
constructed will be consistent with the TMP Bicycle System Plan and the FastTracks Local Optimization (FLO)
project and are prioritized yearly. This program also allows for construction of opportunistic improvements and
construction of other identified bike projects. Types of projects include providing missing links and enhanced
crossings such as underpasses and overpasses, eg., Boulder Creek/Boulder Community Hospital @ 48th St.
bridge. Project funding is ongoing.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward completing a grid-based
system of primary and secondary bike corridors making the city more walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable
and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s environmental and transportation goals by
creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Relates to the primary goal of the 2003 TMP for completing the City's grid-based Bike System to provide safe
connections and the opportunity for bike travel throughout the city for all levels of riders.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The Public Process for each project will vary. Some projects, depending on the complexity, may require a CEAP.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This program is coordinated with the Greenways program.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$125,000$125,000$125,000$125,000$125,000$125,000$750,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs
Description:
which will be programmed in the Transportation Fund budget.
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Pedestrian Facilities - Repair, Replacement, ADA781773
PW/ TransportationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundAreas I & II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This ongoing program allows for repair, replacement and construction of existing and new sidewalks, and
construction of access ramps. Emphasis of this program is given to existing sidewalk repair. Sidewalk repair
priorities have been established in the Sidewalk Repair Program and yearly funding is spent accordingly. In
2007, sidewalk repairs are planned to continue between Dartmouth and Table Mesa, west of Broadway. The next
sidewalk repair area to complete is between North and Juniper, west of Broadway. This work will begin in 2007
but work in this area will be limited next year because of its proximity to the Broadway reconstruction project.
Compliance with ADA is resulting in additional expenditures for access ramps and driveway modifications.
Project funding is ongoing.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more
walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’
s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in
cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This program is consistent with the 2003 Transportation Master Plan which places high priority on transportation
system preservation and on providing improvements to pedestrian facilities. System maintenance is listed as the
highest priority transportation investment in the Investment Policies in the 2003 TMP.
Public Process Status, Issues:
A neighborhood meeting is held for the identified repair area owners in advance of the work starting and individua
l
notices are mailed out yearly to the adjacent property owners.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordination with the Parks Department - City Forester is required adjacent to street trees. Coordination with the
city Utility Division regarding water meter location is also required. Miscellaneous concrete repairs (driveways,
and curb and gutter) are coordinated with Transportation Maintenance.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$680,000$680,000$680,000$680,000$680,000$680,000$4,080,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Adjacent property owners are generally responsible for sidewalk maint. This project
Description:
does reduce some need to place temporary asphalt patches on sidewalks.
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Pedestrian Facilities Enhancements-Missing Links, Crossing Treatment781002
PW/ TransportationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundAreas I & II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Pedestrian Facilities program includes the installation of missing sidewalk links and pedestrian
crossing/safety treatments and potentially social paths and sidewalk widenings. The list of identified missing
sidewalk links has been prioritized for construction. Crossing treatment improvements are prioritized citywide and
include median refuge islands, crosswalk lighting, flashing signs, neck-downs, signing, lighting and/or pedestrian
signals. The recently approved Pedestrian Crossing Treatment guidelines will be used to evaluate future
pedestrian crossing treatment. Project funding is ongoing.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more
walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’
s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in
cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
According to the Pedestrian Policy Plan of the 2003 Transportation Master Plan, an intermittent pedestrian
system that strands pedestrians at the end of unfinished sidewalks or forces them into awkward traverses or
hazardous street crossings discourages walking. In an effort to increase pedestrian activity and encourage
walking as the basis of all means of travel, a completed sidewalk system is necessary. Adding features to the
pedestrian network such as missing sidewalks links and pedestrian crossing /safety improvements is consistent
with the 2003 Transportation Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
TAB approved the Proposed Prioritized list of Missing Sidewalk Links on May 10, 2004. TAB made a
recommendation to support the use of the Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines in 2005 and the
document went to the City Council as information item in 2006.
The Public Process for installing missing sidewalks links is on-going and may involve one or more locations per
year. Staff works with neighborhoods and adjacent property owners on individual improvements.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordination with the Parks Department - City Forester is required and the utilities department if there are utility
conflicts.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$75,000$75,000$75,000$75,000$75,000$75,000$450,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Adjacent property owners are responsible for sidewalk maintenance by code. Crossing
Description:
treatments have minimal maintenance requirements.
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Tributary Greenways Program - Transportation781630
PW/ TransportationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The program is intended to improve and protect the many riparian corridors that pass through the city. Elements
of this work also advance a primary goal of the TMP by providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and
encouraging the modal shift from automobiles to alternative modes of transportation. Improvements include
pedestrian/bicycle paths, drainage and flood control structures, and preservation and enhancement of natural
features. A portion of the capital funding for this program was shifted to needed maintenance of existing system
beginning in 2002. See Greenways CIP/Budget section. Project funding is ongoing.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system.
Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air,
reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
These projects will advance a primary goal of the 2003 Transportation Master Plan by providing pedestrian and
bicycle facilities to work towards the 2025 objective to reduce single occupant-vehicle travel to 25% of trips.
Public Process Status, Issues:
CEAP's are completed for all significant greenways projects and are reviewed by appropriate boards. See
Greenway CIP for more detailed information.
Relationship with Other Departments:
The Greenways program requires coordinating with Transportation, Open Space, Flood Utility, Planning and
Parks Departments.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$900,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Undergrounding Cost Share Program I781013
PW/ TransportationSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This program was established as an internal accounting mechanism for funds received from participants in the
Undergrounding Cost Share Program II. Participants in the Undergrounding Cost Share Program pay the city
cash for their share of undergrounding project costs. The city uses this cash to pay Qwest and Comcast
undergrounding expenses because we do not have undergrounding credits with these utilities. This program is
not a separate program. It facilitates the transaction processing function for the Undergrounding Cost Share
Program II. It is budgeted as a revenue/expenditure offset and no transportation funds are obligated to this
program.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This program supports a long held city desire to bury overhead lines. Since 1970 through a franchise agreement
with Xcel, the city has been funding undergrounding projects and generally has not allowed new overhead
construction. Often, undergrounding is necessary to make room for transportation corridor improvements
consistent with the TMP.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Staff administers the utilization of undergrounding credits for Xcel Energy because of the historical link between
TMP objectives and utility undergrounding.
Public Process Status, Issues:
If a citizens are interested, they contact Xcel who informs them of the city program and directs them to
Transportation. The current franchise agreement expires in 2010. The current credit balance and program
viability will be assessed as current planned projects are completed and associated costs are known.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordination with Utilities and Transportation Divisions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$600,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Undergrounding Cost Share Program IIXcel 1
PW/ TransportationSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This is a matching fund program per the Undergrounding Credit Policy approved by City Council in 1994. The
Xcel Energy (Xcel) franchise agreement with the City of Boulder requires Xcel each year to make funding
available in the amount of 1% (approximately $600k) of the preceding year’s electric revenues within the city for
the purpose of undergrounding or reconfiguring electric lines. The funding is provided in the form of "credits" for
work, not cash. Approximately twenty-five percent of each year’s undergrounding credit accrual ($150k) is set
aside on a non-cumulative basis to be used as a 50% cost share for property owners willing to pay half the cost to
bury existing utilities adjacent to their properties. This program allows property owners to utilize Xcel credits.
Participants in the cost share program pay the city cash for their share of undergrounding project costs. The city
uses this cash to pay Qwest and Comcast undergrounding expenses because we do not have undergrounding
credits with these utilities. There are no transportation funds expended in this program.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This program supports a long held city desire to bury overhead lines. Since 1970 through a franchise agreement
with Xcel, the city has been funding undergrounding projects and generally has not allowed new overhead
construction. Often, undergrounding is necessary to make room for transportation corridor improvements
consistent with the TMP.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Staff administers the utilization of undergrounding credits for Xcel Energy because of the historical link between
TMP objectives and utility undergrounding.
Public Process Status, Issues:
If a citizens are interested, they contact Xcel who informs them of the city program and directs them to
Transportation. The current franchise agreement expires in 2010. The current credit balance and program
viability will be assessed as current planned projects are completed and associated costs are known.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordination with Utilities and Transportation Divisions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$900,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND
2008 - 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The 2008 Transportation Development Fund (TDF) Capital Improvements Program is $660,000.
The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed within the context of the
Transportation Master Plan (TMP). The plan goals and priorities were used in allocating funds
and prioritizing projects.
Transportation Development Fund 2008-2013 CIP - Modal Investment Breakout
20082008-2013
Modal/Functional Area $ % $ %
Pedestrian 182,500 28%1,050,825 31%
Bicycle 362,50055%1,047,330 31%
Transit 40,000 6%305,631 9%
Roadway 75,000 11%936,214 28%
Travel Demand Management (TDM)* 0 0%0 0%
Mitigation 0 0%0 0%
Other 0 0%0 0%
Total660,000100%3,340,000 100%
*Note:TDM projects are included in the Transportation Fund.
The city Transportation Development Excise Tax is based on the philosophy of assessing a fee
on development to mitigate impacts on the street network. Rates are adjusted annually based on
the CPI.
POLICY ISSUES
None
FINANCING
A significant influence on the 2008-2013 Transportation CIP is the anticipated reduction in
transportation excise tax (TET) revenues. The TET was instituted in the 1980s to fund
transportation improvements related to growth. TET is paid by new commercial and residential
development. Permanently affordable residential units are exempt. Historically the tax has
generated approximately $1 million annually. Revenue in 2006 was approximately $400,000.
The 2008-2013 CIP has been formulated based on anticipated annual revenue of $600,000.
TET is calculated on net new square footage and dwelling units. As the city transitions to a
redevelopment context instead of a green field development pattern, excise taxes will yield lower
revenue. The reduction in revenue required a reduction of $1.4 million from the adopted 2007-
2012 CIP.
HIGHLIGHTS
th
30 Street Bikelanes: Arapahoe to Pearl -
During the development of the Bike System Plan as part of the Transportation Master Plan,
th
constructing bikelanes on the stretch of 30 Street from Arapahoe to Pearl was identified as a
th
high priority bike system need. On-street bike lanes currently exist on 30 Street from the
Diagonal Highway to Pearl and from Arapahoe to Baseline. This project will complete an
th
important on-street facility missing link by constructing on-street bikelanes on 30 between
Arapahoe to Pearl. Funding will be provided by the city (40 percent) and federal sources (60
percent).
th
28 Street –
th
28 Street from Baseline Road to Iris Avenue is identified as the top priority corridor in the
th
city’s multi-modal grid. Implementation of the 28 Street Project continues to be a high priority
of the Capital Improvements Program. South segment (Baseline to Arapahoe – Hello Boulder)
funding of $4.3 million (includes $1.1 million in TEA-21 funding) was programmed in 2002 and
2004. The public input, design and approval process is complete for the north segment (Pearl to
Iris – Service City) and the Boulder Valley Regional Center Transportation Network plan
process was completed in the middle segment (Arapahoe to Pearl – New Town.) Some median
th
replacement work was coordinated in the middle section with the 29 Street development.
Funding for the north segment of $9.3 million (includes $3.8 million in TEA-21 funding) was
programmed starting in 2004.
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
The 2008 Transportation Development Fund CIP is predicated on supporting new growth. Any
operating project impacts are either absorbed within operating budgets or addressed through the
annual budgeting process.
BUSINESS PLAN
Classification of Capital projects is done according to the Transportation Division's guiding
principles. Essential projects are those that involve maintenance of the existing system to
maintain the city's investment in the infrastructure and safety improvements. Some examples
include replacement and maintenance of streets such as street resurfacing, replacement of curb,
gutter and sidewalk, taking care of signs and signals, and addressing safety issues. The portions
of projects that are classified as desirable include expansion of the multimodal system and
operational improvements which involves roadway, bicycle, pedestrian, transit and travel
demand management projects, programs and services. Currently no projects or portions of
projects are considered discretionary which would include quality of life improvements such
as neighborhood traffic mitigation projects or the installation of sound walls.
TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) ACTION
City Council has charged the Board to: "review all city transportation environment assessments
and capital improvements." In the context of the Capital Improvements Program, the Board is
asked to provide a recommendation on the program to the Planning Board and City Council.
The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) reviewed and made a recommendation on the 2008-
2013 Transportation Development Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at their June 11, 2007
meeting. The TAB recommended approval of the 2008-2013 Transportation Development
Capital Improvements Program as submitted. Topics of discussion included:
How the funding breakout works and how it is decided which items will be funded to
which degree in any given year.
The Yards Master Plan, with specific reference to the Pearl Parkway Frontage land and
its exchange for other land which is more useful within the scope of the project.
30th and Pearl Intersection improvements; federally funded and not to include an
underpass.
Concerns were expressed by the TAB that with increased construction and materials
costs, revenue and hence budget is not sufficient to future needs. TAB urged that more
sources of revenue be found.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
63rd St. (Lookout to Diagonal)71101865
PW/ TransportationGunbarrel
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation Development FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will incorporate bike, pedestrian and roadway improvements on 63rd Street between Lookout and the
Diagonal. Bike facilities are proposed from the Diagonal to Lookout to connect to existing on-street shoulders on
Lookout. Pedestrian facilities are proposed from Lookout to improved transit stops. On northbound 63rd
between Lookout and the Diagonal, a right turn lane onto the Diagonal will be added. Transit queue jump lanes
and an additional through traffic lane will be added to the Diagonal in each direction. This is the City's share of
the $4.3M project which is funded by Federal, state and Boulder County funds. Project funding began in 2005
and will end in 2007. This project is related to the growth along the Diagonal corridor and in the Gunbarrel area.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system.
Providing a usable, connected and integrated multimodal transportation system addresses Council's
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air,
reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan and the plan's focus on Multimodal Corridors.
Multimodal corridors are the major transportation facilities which accommodate auto, bus, bicycle and pedestrian
travel. The design and project will address and balance the needs of these modes. This project has been
identified in the Iris/Diagonal multimodal corridor.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Boulder County is the lead agency for this project and will coordinate with COB, CDOT and the railroad. Design is
estimated to be completed in 2007-2008.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This is a Boulder County project. COB is a partner contributing matching funds.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$160,000$0$0$0$0$0$160,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs
Description:
which will be prorammed in the Transportation Fund budet.
gg
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
30th Street Bike Lanes - Arapahoe to Pearl71102066
PW/ TransportationCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation Development FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
During the development of the Bike System Plan as part of the Transportation Master Plan, constructing bike
lanes on the stretch of 30th Street from Arapahoe to Pearl was identified as a high priority bike system need.
Currently on-street bike lanes exist on 30th St. from the Diagonal to Pearl and from Arapahoe to Baseline. This
project would complete an important on-street facility missing link by constructing on-street bike lanes on 30th St.
between Arapahoe and Pearl. Funding: 2005-2008: City = $1.1M; SAFETEA-LU = $3.278M. Project funding
began in 2005 and will end in 2008. This project is growth related due to impacts from the 29th St
redevelopment, East CU campus, and the proposed Transit Village plan. This project will also maximize the
regional transit opportunities to the transit village commuter rail station and bus rapid transit.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Repair, enhancement and completion of the pedestrian and bicycle systems work toward making the city more
walkable and bikeable. Providing a usable and connected multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’
s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options resulting in
cleaner air, reduced congestion and lower VMT.This corridor is the highest ranked corridor on the current
Transportation Master Plan. This project will also maximize the regional transit opportunities to the transit village
commuter rail station and bus rapid transit.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the Transportation Master Plan which gives high priority to completing city bike
facilities thus promoting bicycling and increasing bike mode share. This project is included in the Bike System
Plan and is identified as a project within the 28th Street multimodal corridor.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Public process and design anticipated to take place in 2006/2007. Construction is anticipated in 2008. Some of
the project elements on the west side of the street were constructed with the 29th Street redevelopment project.
This project will be designed based on the adopted BVRC Connections Plan and the 29th Street redevelopment;
any remaining issues would be addressed in the public process and design refinement (including working with
property owners).
Relationship with Other Departments:
If necessary, electrical utility undergounding in this stretch of 30th will be coordinated with Xcel. Construction will
be coordinated with the 29th Street redevelopment and the Transit Village Area Plan.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$450,000$150,000$0$0$0$0$600,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs
Description:
which will be programmed in the Transportation Fund budget.
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
50%50%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Miscellaneous Development Coordination711004
PW/ TransportationMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Transportation Development FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This CIP funding is intended to construct infrastructure improvements in coordination with or prompted by
potential private development. Throughout the year situations arise where infrastructure improvements are
required in the vicinity of a proposed development, should be made at the same time as the development and for
which a developer can not be required to construct. Improvements that are typically included are bike and
pedestrian, functional efficiency, safety, system preservation, and transit system improvements. Project funding
is ongoing. This project is growth related because it addresses needs from new development.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The Transportation Master Plan is based on implementing a balanced multimodal-based transportation system.
Providing a usable, connected and integrated multi-modal transportation system addresses Council’s
environmental and transportation goals by creating viable and sustainable transportation options, cleaner air,
reduced congestion and lower VMT.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Major goals in the Transportation Master Plan include system preservation, safety, bike, pedestrian and auto
functional efficiency projects.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Projects generally require coordination with adjacent neighborhoods and property owners.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Close coordination with the Development Review work group and the Planning Department is required.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$300,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Project may result in minimal incremental increases in on-going maintenance costs
Description:
which will be programmed in the Transportation Fund budget.
Transportation Fund Operating Budget
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
GREENWAYS PROGRAM
GREENWAYS
2008 - 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The 2008 Greenways Capital Improvements Program (CIP) budget is $450,000. The Greenways
CIP has been developed within the context of and is consistent with the Boulder Valley
Comprehensive Plan (BVCP), the Transportation Master Plan (TMP), the major drainageway
plans and the Greenways Master Plan.
The city of Boulder Greenways System is comprised of a series of corridors along riparian areas
including Boulder Creek and its tributaries, which provide an opportunity to integrate multiple
objectives, including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage and
floodplain management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists,
recreation and cultural resources. In order to maximize the overlap of objectives and to
coordinate projects along the Greenways, identification of projects for the 2008-2013 Greenways
CIP was done as a team effort, combining input from Flood Utilities, Transportation, Parks and
Recreation, Water Quality and Environmental Services, Environmental Affairs, Planning and
Open Space and Mountain Parks.
Transportation and flood utility projects were identified from the Transportation Master Plan,
and the major drainageway plans, and intra-departmental meetings to determine project priorities
and timing. Private development activities were also evaluated. Many of the Greenways
projects shown in the CIP are being designed and constructed in coordination with major flood
or transportation improvements. The Greenways funding associated with these projects focuses
on habitat restoration, water quality improvements and trail connections. In addition to
leveraging funding with the Transportation and Flood Utilities budgets, funding for Greenways
projects is also available through the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and Federal
Transportation funds.
In addition to specific project funding for habitat restoration, $100,000 has been dedicated to
habitat maintenance each year, with an additional $50,000 designated for miscellaneous habitat
restoration projects. Maintenance of the Greenways system was reviewed as part of the
Greenways Master Plan update process. Funding for habitat maintenance was first allocated in
the 2002-2007 Greenways CIP to address deficiencies identified in the Greenways Master Plan.
The habitat maintenance program is currently being evaluated by an outside consultant.
Recommendations will be made for future habitat maintenance funding, priorities and activities.
POLICY ISSUES
All projects in the 2008-2013 CIP will go through the CEAP process, either as part of a bigger
flood or transportation project or as a separate project as indicated on the project status reports.
HIGHLIGHTS
Highlights of Greenways projects included in the 2008 CIP focus on the Elmer’s Twomile Creek
corridor from Valmont Road to Glenwood Drive. Phase I of the Elmer’s Twomile Creek project
has been funded in 2003 and 2004 through the Greenways CIP, in addition to Federal
transportation funding. Federal funding for Phase II of this project has recently been granted.
This project includes a trail connection, habitat restoration and flood improvements. Similar
thth
improvements along Fourmile Creek between 26 and 28 Streets, through the Elks Park were
included in 2009 and 2010. Improvements along Wonderland Creek are anticipated to occur
starting in 2011. Flood improvements for all of these projects are being funded through the
Flood Utility.
FINANCING
Greenways projects are funded from the Transportation Fund, Stormwater and Flood
Management Utility Fund, and the Lottery Fund. Existing CIP expenditures are estimated at
$450,000 per year for the next six years. Annual funding distribution for the Greenways
Program for 2008-2013 is as follows:
Transportation - $150,000
Flood Utility - $150,000
Lottery Fund - $150,000
RELATIONSHIP TO OPERATING BUDGET
The Greenways corridors are currently maintained by several work groups within the city, as
well as outside organizations. Tasks are divided up by geographical location as well as by
function. The responsibility of each work group is described below:
•Boulder County Parks and Open Space maintains the Boulder Creek path from the mouth
of Boulder Canyon to Fourmile Canyon.
•The city’s Parks and Recreation Department maintenance staff is responsible for
maintenance of Greenways that traverse a city park, as well as the Boulder Creek Path
th
from Eben Fine Park to 55 Street.
•The city’s Street Maintenance is responsible for snow removal and general path
maintenance (debris removal and sweeping) along all of the Greenways paths, except
those portions of path maintained by the Parks Department.
•The city’s Open Space and Mountain Parks Department is responsible for maintenance of
natural, environmentally sensitive, or re-vegetated areas on open space land and
th
easements. Currently this includes portions of Boulder Creek east of 38 Street and
Arapahoe Avenue and portions of South Boulder Creek from KOA Lake to Marshall
Road.
•Flood Utility Maintenance is responsible for maintaining the flood carrying capacity of
all of the Greenways channels, which primarily involves removing tree limbs and
downed trees from obstructing the flow in the channels, removal of channel sediment,
and bank stabilization.
•Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) performs maintenance on sections
of Boulder Creek and all tributaries included in the Greenways Program.
•City Forestry, University of Colorado (CU), ditch companies, and Xcel Energy are also
involved in maintenance along the Greenways.
GREENWAYS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The Greenways Advisory Committee reviewed the Greenways CIP unanimously recommended
approval of the CIP at its June 20, 2007 meeting.
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Elmers Two Mile Creek - Goose Creek to Glenwood81
PW/ Tributary GreenwaysCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Tributary GreenwaysArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
YesMay 2004
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project includes an off street trail connection, habitat and flood improvements. This project was originally
anticipated to be built in two phases, but is now expected to be constructed in one phase. Total Greenways
funding contributions including 2008 are $714,000. Flood Utilities will be contributing $4 million to this project and
and $3,251,000 in Federal Transportation (TIP) funds has been approved for this project, with a total project cost
of $8 million.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project supports the council goal of environmental sustainablity by improving off street trail connections and
providing environmental restoration.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This proejct is listed in the Greenways Master Plan and the Transportation Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The CEAP for this project was approved by the Greenways Advisory Committee. (May 2004)
Relationship with Other Departments:
All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives
from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning
Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$195,000$0$0$0$0$0$195,000
Change from Prior Year:
$1,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
will be covered by existing maintenance budgets
Description:
bikeways, flood maintenance, Greenways habitat
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Miscellaneous Restoration Projects
PW/ Tributary GreenwaysSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Tributary GreenwaysSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Miscellaneous habitat resoration projects in conjunction with Parks and Open Space departments. Greenways
staff is currently working with Biohabitats Incorporated to develop a work plan of projects to address.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Maintenance of the Greenways habitat supports the Council goal of environmental sustainability.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Habitat resoration projects are listed in the Greenways Master Plan Update.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Projects will be coordinated with Parks and Open Space
Relationship with Other Departments:
Resoration Projects are developed with input from the City's Open Space Department, the Parks Department,
Boulder County and the Environmental Affairs program.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$300,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Greenways habitat maintenance
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Maintenance and Weed Control
PW/ Tributary GreenwaysSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Tributary GreenwaysSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
Proposed enhancements to maintenance practices along the Greenways will include weed control and
maintaining the stream corridor for habitat. Specific tasks include retaining a summer crew, purchase of
equipment, control and removal of noxious weeds, and planting of natives to discourage re-establishment of
weeds.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Maintenance of the Greenways for habitat supports the Council goal of environmental sustainability.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Maintenance and weed control are important components of the Greenways Master Plan update.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Weed control efforts will begin by concentrating on lands owned and managed by the City.
Relationship with Other Departments:
The weed control plan for Greenways will be developed with input from the Open Space Department, the Parks
Department, and Boulder County. Initial weed control efforts will be performed on City owned properties,
therefore the projects will be coordinated with the managing department.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$600,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
This funding provides annual operating costs for maintaining the Greenways habitat.
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Miscellaneous - Greenways Operating
PW/ Tributary GreenwaysSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Tributary GreenwaysSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
On-Going Projects
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
General administration of the program including salaries, as well as small capital projects including rest areas and
signage; Miscellaneous trail connections and improvements.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
These funds are required for the continuation of the Greenways Program.
Relationship to Master Plans:
Improvements made would follow the recommendations of the Greenways Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Any improvement that would have an impact on the public or an adjacent property owner would involve public
input.
Relationship with Other Departments:
All work along the Greenways is coordinated through the Greenways staff group that includes representatives
from the Open Space Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Environmental Affairs, Planning
Department and Transportation and Utilities Divisions.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$105,000$105,000$105,000$105,000$105,000$105,000$630,000
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
UTILITIES FUNDS
SUMMARY OF THE 2008-2013
UTILITIES DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
June 13, 2007
OVERVIEW
The overall program and funding priorities are reflected in the staging and timing of projects
over the 6 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) time period. The following primary factors
were considered in determining the overall program and funding priorities:
Water and Wastewater Utility
1. Reliability of water and wastewater collection, delivery and treatment
2. Water quality and other environmental regulations
3. Worker health and safety
4. Opportunity to collaborate with other city projects, i.e., transportation
5. Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings
6. Accommodating new growth and development
Stormwater and Flood Management Utility
1. Property damage or safety hazard mitigation
2. Water quality and other environmental regulations
3. Worker health and safety
4. Opportunity to collaborate with other city projects, i.e., transportation
5. Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings
6. Accommodating new growth and development
No effort has been made in developing the CIP to target improvements in a certain geographic
area.
POLICY ISSUES
There are no policy issues related to the CIP this year.
HIGHLIGHTS
Highlights of the proposed CIP are as follows:
Water Utility Projects
1.Continued emphasis on the rehabilitation and improvement of the city’s existing water
system infrastructure continues, especially in the area of the city’s deteriorated water
distribution system. This is reflected in the significant funding for on-going waterline
replacement that has been increased in 2008 as well as several other rehabilitation
projects for various water system facilities.
2.Additional funds have been allocated for repair and rehabilitation of the Lakewood
Pipeline. Staff is planning to inspect the existing pipe this fall and evaluate various repair
and rehabilitation alternatives.
3.Additional funding for the Barker Water System has been allocated. Repairs to this water
system are necessary to assure safe and reliable water deliveries to the Betasso Water
Treatment Plant (WTP) from Barker Reservoir. Priority work includes 1) repairs to the
Barker Gravity Pipeline including potential slip lining or portions of the pipe, 2) repairs
and further integration of the Barker hydro equipment and appurtenances and 3) working
with the Federal Emergency Regulatory Commission (FERC) to convert the currently
licensed project to a license exempt project by submitting an application that will require
much technical and legal analysis and supporting documentation.
4.Funding has been allocated for improvements to the Boulder Reservoir WTP. This work
is necessary to expand the treatment capacity and comply with federal Safe Drinking
Water Act regulations. Work at the Boulder Reservoir WTP (and Boulder Reservoir
Intake and Pumping, Iris Pump Station and Cherryvale Pump Station) currently
scheduled in 2009, was prompted by staff review of the city’s water delivery system in
light of the 2002-2004 drought. Water from the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District (NCWCD) Colorado Big-Thompson Project will play an increasingly important
role in the city’s overall water system deliveries. This water is treated and delivered
through these facilities and expansion of the treatment capacity is necessary due to this
situation.
5.Funding has been allocated for the next phase of improvements to the Betasso WTP and
major improvements are anticipated in 2012. A recent analysis indicates that existing
treatment processes will be adequate to meet water demands in compliance with federal
Safe Drinking Water Act regulations until that time.
6.Funding has been allocated for the NCWCD Conveyance – Carter Lake Pipeline project
in 2009. Whereas water conveyed by the Boulder Feeder Canal is subject to water quality
concerns, water conveyed by a pipeline would be protected from contaminant risk. The
NCWCD completed a feasibility study for a new pipeline from Carter Lake in 2006. The
city is currently participating in the NCWCD sponsored permitting process along with
other water providers. Staff initiated an evaluation of various water source protection and
treatment alternatives and this is currently being reviewed by the WRAB. The city is also
pursuing Federal funding for this project.
Wastewater Utility
1.It is anticipated the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment will issue a
revised discharge permit in 2008 for the city’s Wastewater Treatment Plant. The new
discharge permit may include more restrictive limits for ammonia and other nitrogen
based compounds. Funding has been allocated in 2007-2010 for additional treatment
improvements.
2.Additional funding is recommended in 2008 for the Biosolids Handing and Dewatering
project. Staff recently completed a study of the centrifuge return water (centrate) after
problems with existing piping. The study recommends that the existing piping be
abandoned and the centrate stored and redirected to the plant headworks.
3.Funding for the Biosolids Digester project has been reduced because recent analysis
suggests that a new smaller digester in combination with the existing digesters will
adequately meet the biosolids stabilization criteria needed for land application.
4.The city has hired a solar contractor, Eyeon Solar, to manage the installation of a 1
megawatt solar photovoltaic system to be located at the 75th street wastewater treatment
plant. The project will not be funded from the Wastewater Treatment Utility Fund, but
will be third party financed by Eyeon and will not require a capital investment from the
city. The project will provide approximately 1/4 of the facility' power requirements, and
will result in a power purchase and lease agreement between the city and Eyeon.
Stormwater and Flood Management Utility
1.Additional funding for Elmer’s Two-mile Creek is recommended in 2008 and a previous
funding allocation in 2009 has been eliminated. Recent appraisals for property
acquisition are higher than originally expected and staff believes it will be more efficient
to construct the improvements as one large project rather than in phases as originally
planned. Utilities funds will be leveraged with Federal Transportation Improvement
Project (TIP) funds and it is important that this project be completed in a timely manner
so that the TIP funding is not jeopardized. TIP funding in the amount of $1,529,000 is
included in the 2008 Stormwater and Flood Management CIP. This project is being
coordinated by the city’s Greenways Program.
2.Money allocated for flood mitigation work along Fourmile Canyon Creek and
Wonderland Creek has been reduced and/or delayed. This money will be used for
property acquisition and limited construction projects until decisions are reached through
the on-going flood mitigation planning process. It is anticipated the results of this
planning process will be available in the fall of 2007. All projects are being closely
coordinated with the city’s Greenways Program and Transportation Division.
3.The South Boulder Creek Flood Mapping Study is complete and will be submitted to
FEMA in the near future. The mapping study results will become the basis for future
floodplain management, mitigation planning, regulatory restrictions and flood insurance
requirements for the South Boulder Creek corridor. FEMA review will take nine to12
months.
Funding for flood mitigation planning is recommended in 2008. It is anticipated the
mitigation planning will be completed in 2009 and construction of mitigation
improvements will begin in 2010. It is anticipated that the focus of these efforts would be
to primarily mitigate the impacts of flooding in the West Valley, where flood impacts
were previously not identified and substantial urban development has since occurred. It
is also important that flood mitigation planning be coordinated with the U.S. 36 Corridor
Improvements-Environmental Impact Statement. The city is also pursuing Federal
funding for this project.
4.Staff recently completed work on the Stormwater Master Plan (SMP). The SMP focused
on localized drainage and water quality problems. Numerous deficiencies and potential
solutions were identified, the highest priority being Upper Goose Creek Drainage.
Funding allocations in 2010-2013 have been increased for the project, although
additional benefit-cost analysis will be performed before a decision is made to move
forward with the construction.
MASTER PLANNING
Master Planning is an element of the decision making process for proposed CIP projects.
Historically, master plans focused on service area growth and its impact on related utility
infrastructure needs. At this point in time, growth is not as important an issue as the need to
rehabilitate and address deficiencies in the existing infrastructure. Identification of these issues
occurs on an on-going basis and is documented in the Utilities Division Annual Reports as well
as on-going studies and reports.
Master plan summaries are provided in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan and were
recently updated. At this point in time existing master plans provide an adequate basis from
which to formulate the CIP in conjunction with other information. The Treated Water Master
Plan was updated in 2000 and Wastewater Collection System Master Plan in 2003. An update to
the Wastewater Treatment Master Plan was recently completed. The Comprehensive Flood and
Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan was updated in 2004 and the Stormwater Master Plan was
recently completed. The relationship of each CIP project to the master plans and studies is
presented in the detailed project descriptions.
The Utilities Division will update these master plans consistent with the city’s Business Plan
over the next several years. The Business Plan calls for a separate master plan for each of the
Utilities Division three restricted funds. It is anticipated the current Wastewater Treatment
Master Plan and Wastewater Collection System Master Plan will be merged as the Wastewater
Utility Master Plan and work on this will begin in 2007. The Water Utility Master Plan and
Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Master Plan will follow.
Recent changes to the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan including land use designations are
not extensive and so no major changes to existing Utilities Division master plans are required.
Aspects that are more important to the Utilities Division CIP planning include the rate of
deterioration of existing infrastructure as well as changes in water related regulations and
technologies.
FINANCING
Each of the city’s utility funds is established as a separate enterprise fund designed to finance
and account for each utility’s facilities and services. Funding for the Utilities Division capital
improvement program is derived primarily from monthly utility fees. In addition to the monthly
utility fees, significant revenue sources include Plant Investment Fees (PIFs), from new
development or redevelopment and hydroelectric sales to Xcel Energy. Sales from monthly
utility fees are variable and reflect the overall growth of the service area and yearly weather
fluctuations.
Other revenue sources include reimbursements from the Urban Drainage & Flood Control
District (for stormwater/ flood management projects), state and federal grants, and revolving
loans from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (none anticipated at this
time). These revenues are project specific and are highly variable depending on the external
agency's funding situation and priorities. Currently, the following projects are anticipated to
qualify for such revenues:
Stormwater and Flood Management - Elmer’s Two-mile Creek
Stormwater and Flood Management - Preflood Acquisition
If the above mentioned funds are insufficient, projects will be funded by issuing revenue bonds
with the debt service financed by general utility charges. For the years 2008-2013, it is
anticipated that new bonds will be issued for the following projects:
Water – Boulder Reservoir WTP (2009)
Water – NCWCD Conveyance – Carter Lake Pipeline (2009)
Water – Betasso WTP (2012)
Wastewater - Biosolids Digester (2010)
Wastewater - WWTP Improvements (2010)
Stormwater and Flood Management – South Boulder Creek (2010)
Utilities Division staff will complete the evaluation of the proposed CIP on rates in conjunction
with the development of the 2008 operating budget. Rate increases are currently projected as
follows:
Water Utility: 2007 – 4 percent
Wastewater Utility: 2007 – 3 percent
Stormwater and Flood Management Utility: 2007 – 3 percent
RELATIONSHIP TO THE OPERATING BUDGET
There are no projects in the 2008 Utilities Division CIP that are anticipated to impact future on-
going operating costs. The WWTP Permit Improvement and Biosolids Digester project to be
construction in 2010 will impact future on-going operating costs.
BUSINESS PLAN
All projects within the Water Utility and Wastewater Utility Division CIPs are designated as
Essential according to the Business Plan definition with the exception of the following projects
which are designated as Desirable:
NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline
Green Lake 2 Dam
Pearl St. Hydro/PRV Station
All projects within the Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Division CIP are designated
as Desirable with the exception of the Yards Master Plan Implementation which is designated as
Essential.
CONSTRUCTION INFLATION
1
The Engineering News Record (ENR) index indicates construction costs have increased 22.5
percent during the past five years; the CDOT index indicates an increase of almost 50 percent
during the same period of time. The ENR index is more reflective of equipment and building
construction such as at the treatment plants. The Colorado cost index is more reflective of heavy
civil construction such as roadway and major drainageway work. These cost increases have been
programmed into the recommended CIP and this information is provided so that the Water
Resources Advisory Board, Planning Board and City Council are aware of the additional funding
needs for current projects.
PUBLIC PROCESS AND ADVISORY BOARD ACTION
The preliminary CIP was discussed at the Water Resource Advisory Board (WRAB) on May 21,
2007 with a following meeting on June 18, 2007 – draft minutes are included below.
Agenda Item 6 – Final Recommendation on the Integrated Evaluation of Boulder
Reservoir Water Treatment Plant Source Water Protection and Treatment Improvements
Study.
Noble, Harberg, Chris and Linnenfelser made the presentation.
WRAB questions and comment:
1
Construction inflation is tracked using the Engineering News Record (ENR) Cost Index for Denver and the
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Colorado Construction Cost Index. The ENR index is a composite
index based on costs for: 1) local portland cement, 2) local 2x4 lumber, 3) national structural steel, and 4) local
union wages plus fringes for carpenters, bricklayers and iron workers. The CDOT index is a composite index based
on costs for 1) unclassified excavation, 2) hot bituminous pavement 3) concrete pavement, 4) structural steel and 5)
reinforcing steel.
Byers:
Requested clarification on comparison between additional treatment –vs-
protection of source by Pipeline
Byers:
Concerning ROW, inquired about potential ROW conflicts with FasTracks
development.
Miller:
Initiated discussion with WRAB regarding water quality goals and their role in
the assessment.
Public Hearing:
There was no public input.
Motion:
DiNatale:WRAB recommends that City Council delay construction of Boulder’s portion of
the Carter Lake Pipeline and consider it as a future phase for implementation after the
following actions have occurred:
1)Construction of Boulder Reservoir Water Treatment Plant improvements (ClO2
and UV or alternates)
2)Implementation of the canal bypasses, BMP’s and other protective measures for the
Boulder Feeder Canal
3)Existing bonded indebtedness has been significantly reduced.
The actions of other potential participants in the Carter Lake pipeline project should be
monitored to ensure that segments constructed by others would not preclude the possibility
of Boulder constructing a pipeline in the future. Actions by Boulder may include oversizing
of upstream segments constructed by others or acquisition of adjacent right of way.
WRAB has carefully reviewed all of the staff and consultant information and has the
following findings:
1)Construction of the pipeline would require in excess of $22 million in funds from the
city of Boulder and result in significant rate increases and tie up revenues needed
for other unidentified future needs. Staff projections for rate increases beginning in
2009 needed to finance system improvements including the Carter Lake Pipeline are
10%, 10% and 12% for the three year period over and above the 3,4 and 4%
increases the three previous years.
2)The pipeline is an attractive enhancement to the City’s operations and would result
in more consistent, high quality water, but is not essential for the successful
operations of the City’s water system.
3)Water currently delivered out of the Boulder Reservoir Water Treatment Plant is of
good quality, meeting all Safe Drinking Water Act requirements.
4)Water quality goals established by staff for non-primary drinking water standards
are too restrictive and render infeasible any other option than the Carter Lake
Pipeline.
5)Water quality risks in the Boulder Feeder Canal can and should be addressed via
measures such as canal bypasses, stormwater best management practices and land
use controls.
6)The technical peer review of the Black & Veatch report by Dr. Susumu Kawamaura
is consistent with findings 3 & 4.
7)There are minor improvements to the Boulder Reservoir Water Treatment Plant
(alternative 2) that can and should be implemented to ensure continued high quality
water.
nd
2: DeOreo
Friendly Amendment: Knopf: to amend motion as discussed to section 1, items 2 and 3.
Section 2, items 5, 6 and 7 (changes already reflected in the body of the motion above)
Accepted by DiNatale.
Discussion:
The WRAB discussed the merits of delay –vs- proceeding as per staff recommendation.
Conclusion:
Vote: 3-2 (Knopf, DiNatale, DeOreo for; Byers and Miller against)
Byers votes against for the following reasons:
1)She believes it is a health, safety and welfare risk to continue the current system and
that it is necessary for long term community health to ensure the purest source
water possible. It is better to do it now than to wait.
2)Would likely help reduce mitigation costs to all parties involved with the Boulder
Feeder Canal Trail.
Miller votes against for the following reason: “I am not comfortable second guessing the
water quality standards set by staff without concrete evidence that it is in error. I assume
those decisions were made for good reason and based on concrete water quality
information.”
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition) - Water411039
PW/ Water UtilityEast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for the acquisition of additional land near the existing City Yards.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Improvements to the City Yards are required to sustain transporation and utilities maintenance services for the
City.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Yards Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated
Relationship with Other Departments:
Transportation, Wastewater, Stormwater, FAM
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$225,000$0$0$0$0$0$225,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Barker Gravity Pipeline411106
PW/ Water UtilityOutside Planning Area
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundOutside Planning Area
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for repairs to the existing Barker gravity pipeline. The Barker Gravity Pipeline is
over 100 years of age and is need of repair of deterioration due to weather and other environmental factors.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the
community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Raw Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$750,000$1,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000$5,750,000
Funding added in 2008-2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Barker Relicensing411112
PW/ Water UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds to develop a license application to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
for the Barker Water System. The application will include much engineering and legal analysis and is budgeted as
a capital expense because the analysis pertains to a major capital asset of the city.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Raw Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$1,800,000$1,000,000$0$0$0$0$2,800,000
Added funding in 2008 and 2009
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Betasso WTP41194749
PW/ Water UtilityOutside Planning Area
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundOutside Planning Area
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provides funds for rehabilitations and improvements to the Betasso WTP. The Betasso WTP is
the city's primary water treatment facility and has deteriorated during its operation of over 40 years.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$100,000$500,000$5,000,000$0$5,800,000
$100,000 added in 2008 and 2009
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Cathodic Protection
PW/ Water UtilityMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will fund cathodic protection devices to be installed on existing steel water transmission pipes for
protection from corrosion. Existing steel water transmission pipes are subject to external corrosion. Cathodic
protection devices will protect these pipes and extend their useful life.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Non additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$0$0$0$0$200,000
Added funding in 2008 and 2009
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Chautauqua Storage Tank41167246
PW/ Water UtilityCentral Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for the rehabilitation of the Chautaqua Storage Tank. The facility is a partially
buried reinforced concrete tank. The tank is not currently lined and there is evidence of leakage. The tank also
has a built-up roof that has deteriorated due to weather and other environmental factors.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$500,000$0$0$0$0$0$500,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Distribution System Water Quality411425
PW/ Water UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project provides funds for water quality improvements to the distribution system. The project will provide
funds for better hydraulic and water quality modeling of the city's water distribution system as well as
improvements to the system that will assure compliance with Federal and State regulations.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the
community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$900,000
Funding added in 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Lakewood Pipeline411780
PW/ Water UtilityOutside Planning Area
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundOutside Planning Area
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
YesYes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for on-going inspection, testing and repair or rehabilitation of the Lakewood
Pipeline. Issues related to the reconstruction of the Lakewod Pipeline requires on-going inspection of the pipe to
assure its serviceability. There is also the need to monitor and supplement restoration of the pipeline corridor in
accordance with United States Forest Service and Boulder County requirements.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Raw Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$2,100,000$0$0$3,000,000$0$5,200,000
Funding added in 2009 and 2012
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Water System Security Upgrades411440
PW/ Water UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for water system security upgrades. New Federal guidelines call for increased
protection of drinking water systems from terrorist and other threats.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Raw and Treated Water Master Plans.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$600,000
Funding added in 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Waterline Replacement411389
PW/ Water UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project provides funds for the reconstruction of waterlines that are part of the city's water distribution system.
Many of the city's existing waterlines are corroded and must be replaced.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the
community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Transportation
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$3,000,000$3,000,000$3,000,000$3,500,000$3,500,000$3,500,000$19,500,000
Funding increased 2008-2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Zone 2 Transmission Facilities411004
PW/ Water UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project provides for the rehabilitation and improvement to the Zone 2 transmission piping of the city's water
system. An extensive network of transmission piping exists, some of which is over 50 years old. It is projected
this piping will require replacement or other rehabilitation.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the
community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Transportation
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$500,000$0$0$0$0$0$500,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Boulder Reservoir WTP41165243
PW/ Water UtilityGunbarrel
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Boulder Reservoir WTP.
Improvements and capacity expansion are necessary to accommodate on-going growth within the city's service
area in compliance with Federal and State regulations. This additional capacity will allow for greater use of the
city's Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights portfolios.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$300,000$3,000,000$0$0$0$0$3,300,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Cherryvale Pump Station41101048
PW/ Water UtilitySoutheast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundArea II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
YesYes - 2004
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Cherryvale Pump Station. This
additional capacity will allow for greater use of the city's Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights
portfolios.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Improvements and capacity expansion at the Cherryvale pump station was included in the 2004 CEAP for the
Zone 1 Water Transmission Pipeline (Diagonal Highway.)
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$50,000$500,000$0$0$0$0$550,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Iris Pump Station41101241
PW/ Water UtilityCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
YesYes, 2004
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for improvements and capacity expansion at the Iris Pump Station. This additional
capacity will allow for greater use of the city's Colorado Big-Thompson and Windy Gap water rights portfolios.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of
water to the community.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Improvements and capacity expansion at the Iris pump station was included in the 2004 CEAP for the Zone 1
Water Transmission Pipeline (Diagonal Highway.)
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$1,000,000$0$0$0$0$1,100,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pipeline41154745
PW/ Water UtilityOutside Planning Area
Department:Subcommunity:
Water Utility FundOutside Planning Area
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
Yes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for the design and construction of a pipeline from Carter Lake to the Boulder
Reservoir Water Treatment Plant (BRWTP). Protection of the BRWTP source water through investing in the
construction of the Carter Lake Pipeline will provide long-term benefits to the city. The city is placing a greater
reliance on this facility than in the past due to continued planned growth in the city’s water service area. Even
though current regulatory requirements are being met, the risk of contaminants entering the source water and
passing through the treatment process still exists. Investing in a pipeline that will protect the source water for the
BRWTP far into the future is a worthwhile investment similar to that undertaken by prior generations with the
Silver Lake Watershed.
The quality of water in Carter Lake is excellent. It is a deep reservoir with a small natural runoff area and is filled
mostly with high quality water imported from the Western Slope. The quality of the water is negatively affected as
it travels through the Boulder Feeder Canal to the treatment plant and Boulder Reservoir due to drainage into the
canal from existing development and agriculture. Future development and agricultural practices will likely
exacerbate these negative effects. The threat of accidental or intentional contamination is also a concern
because of limited ability to react or dilute such contamination.
The Carter Lake Pipeline will address both the near-term and potential increase in degradation to water quality of
the BRWTP. Preventing source water contamination provides a more robust barrier than subsequent treatment. It
would also provide a more uniform water qualty, substantially simplifying the treatment optimization and
increasing treatment process reliability. Although the capital cost of the pipeline is significant, it is comparable to
the cost of treatment technologies that afford a similar level of water quality protection and with the assurance
that contaminants will be prevented from entering the city's source water in the first place, rather than having to
remove these contaminants via treatment.
The pipeline would provide opportunities and flexibility for improvements in the management and operation of the
city’s raw water facilities. These include possible hydroelectric power generation as well as improvements in the
flexibility of use of the city’s various water sources for the BRWTP. This increased flexibility could provide a slight
increase in the drought year yield of the city’s water rights portfolio.
The city of Boulder is currently participating in the development of right-of-way acquisition plans and permit
applications for the Southern Water Supply Project II (Carter Lake Pipeline). Other participants include Little
Thompson Water District, the town of Frederick and Left Hand Water District. The pipeline is estimated to cost
$33 million. Depending upon the number of participants, the city of Boulder’s share of the cost can range from
$20 to $25 million.
The cost of the pipeline as currently proposed is less than it might be at a later time because there is an
opportunity to share costs in constructing the Carter Lake pipeline with other communities. Additionally, on-going
construction cost inflation suggests that the cost of constructing the pipeline will only increase in the future. The
majority of the pipeline right-of-way (ROW) has been previously secured by the NCWCD. Continued development
pressure along this ROW may make future construction more difficult. Securing the remaining ROW for a
pipeline at this time is also considered important because of these development pressures. Also, the cost of
borrowing money is near an all time low. These factors suggest that now is a good time to proceed with this
project as a long term investment in the city’s water utility infrastructure.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation of the city's water system is required to assure the safe and reliable delivery of water to the
community.
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code the Raw
Water Master Plan and the Treated Water Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The Utilities Division is developing an alternatives evaluation for this project. The alternative evaluation will be
presented to the Water Resource Advisory Board and City Council prior to the 2008 budget process. The
NCWCD will need to apply for a Boulder County permit to construct the pipeline as part of the Matters of State
Interest (1041) review process.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Open Space and Mountain Parks
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$1,000,000$25,000,000$0$0$0$0$26,000,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition) - Wastewater421039
PW/ Wastewater UtilityEast Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Wastewater Utility FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for the acquisition of additional land near the existing City Yards.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic
infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and
wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards.
Improvements to the City Yards are required to sustain transporation and utilities maintnenance services for the
city.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Yards Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Transportation, Water and Stormwater, FAM
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$110,000$0$0$0$0$0$110,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Sanitary Sewers421002
PW/ Wastewater UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Wastewater Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project provides for the rehabilitation and improvement to the existing collector sewer piping of the City's
wastewater collection system.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic
infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and
wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and
the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$550,000$550,000$750,000$825,000$900,000$975,000$4,550,000
Funding increased in 2011 and 2012 and added in 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Sewer Manholes421454
PW/ Wastewater UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Wastewater Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project provides for the rehabilitation and improvement to the existing wastewater manholes that are part of
the city's sewer system.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic
infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and
wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and
the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$100,000$600,000
Funding added in 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
WWTP Biosolids Digester42167122
PW/ Wastewater UtilitySystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Wastewater Utility FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
YesNo
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project funds the construction of a third biosolids digester at the 75th St. WWTP. In 2003, the city’s 75th St.
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) was issued a new discharge permit by the Colorado Department of Public
Health and Environment (CDPHE) requiring improved ammonia removal. Although improved ammonia removal
is driving the need for these improvements, state regulations also require that the improvements include capacity
expansion to handle the anticipated 2025 flows, waste loading and increased biosolids production. As a result,
biosolids digester facilities will need to be expanded and improved. The digester facilities would be located at the
WWTP.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic
infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and
wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code.
Public Process Status, Issues:
This process will be initiated in 2009.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$50,000$600,000$6,000,000$0$0$0$6,650,000
$50,000 funding added in 2008, funding reduced in 2009 and 2010
Change from Prior Year:
$65,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
O&M costs are anticipated to begin in 2011
Description:
Wastewater Utility Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
WWTP Solar Project32
PW/ Wastewater UtilityArea III
Department:Subcommunity:
Wastewater Utility FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Growth Related Facility / Additions
Project Type:
Yes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The city has hired a solar contractor, Eyeon Solar, to manage the installation of a 1 megawatt solar photovoltaic
system to be located at the 75th street wastewater treatment plant. The project will be third party financed by
Eyeon and will not require a capital investment from the city. The project will provide approximately 1/4 of the
facility' power requirements, and will result in a power purchase and lease agreement between the city and
Eyeon. The installation will require excavation equipment, but is not anticipated to cause permanent damage to
the site. The installation will be preceded by a site analysis and preliminary design work, as well as all necessary
city and county permitting requirements.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The 75th Street photovoltaic project strongly represents the city's goals for community sustainability. This project
will successfully promote the use of renewable energy technologies in Boulder through education, training,
workforce development, research, and project facilitation. The project will support clean energy development and
energy conservation as the means to protect the environment, enhance public health, and the city of Boulder to
capture emerging economic development opportunities in the energy sector. Furthermore, the project
represents a significant step towards achieving the council approved emission reduction goals and renewable
energy targets outlined in the city of Boulder Climate Action plan.
Relationship to Master Plans:
The project implements a portion of the renewable element of the Climate Action Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
A CEAP will be completed in 2007 as well as required county permiting processes. Public outreach and input will
be part of the CEAP process.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Project is being coordinated by Environmental Affairs with Wastewater Utility staff and FAM.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$1$0$0$0$0$0$1
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
0%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
WWTP Permit Improvements42161723
PW/ Wastewater UtilityArea III
Department:Subcommunity:
Wastewater Utility FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
YesNo
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
It is anticipated the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment will issue a new discharge permit for
the 75th Street WWTP. This project will provide funds for the design and construction of new treatment facilities
that may be required.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic
infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and
wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and
the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
This process will begin in 2008.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$200,000$1,000,000$10,000,000$0$0$200,000$11,400,000
$200,000 added in 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$210,000
Annual On-going Operating Costs
O&M costs are anticipated to begin in 2011
Description:
Wastewater Utility Fund
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
WWTP Biosolids Handling & Dewatering42167031
PW/ Wastewater UtilityArea III
Department:Subcommunity:
Wastewater Utility FundArea III
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Reconstruction
Project Type:
NoNo
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project funds the construction of centrate storage and return piping at the 75th St. WWTP. Staff recently
completed a study of the centrifuge return water (centrate) after the existing centrate return piping ruptured. The
study recommends that the existing piping be abandoned and the centrate stored and redirected to the head of
the plant.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation and improvement of the city's wastewater treatment system is required to assure that: basic
infrastructure and capital assets are maintained, adopted service standards are continued to be met; and
wastewater is adequately treated prior to discharge to Boulder Creek to maintain water quality standards.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the wastewater utility as articulated in the Boulder Revise Code and the
Wastewater Treatment Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$1,200,000$0$0$0$0$0$1,200,000
Funding added in 2008
Change from Prior Year:
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
Specific Projects
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Boulder Creek43101517
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundAreas I & II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for on-going studies and possible flood mitigation work along Boulder Creek. This
project will identify and mitigate flood hazards in the Boulder Creek floodplain.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as
environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the
Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Evaluation of Boulder Creek flood issues is underway. Current study efforts focus on the area between Folsom
and 28th Streets.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$100,000$0$0$0$0$0$100,000
Funded added in 2008
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Elmer's Two-mile Creek43133219
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageCrossroads
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundArea I
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
YesYes
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Elmer's Two-mile Creek from the Boulder White Rocks
Ditch to Glenwood in cooperation with the Greenways Program and the Transportation Division. The city received
additional federal funding ($3,251,000) through the Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) program which will
reduce the total city cost of this project but requires that the project’s construction be expedited. The city also
received $500,000 from the state Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. This project will eliminate substantial
developed property from the 100-year floodplain and create a greenway corridor connecting the existing Goose
Creek greenway to the existing Elmer's Two-mile Creek greenway at Glenwood.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as
environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is recommended by the Greenways Master Plan and is consistent with the goals of the stormwater
and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and
Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The CEAP for this project was completed in 2004.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project relates to the City's Greenways Program and the City's Transportation Division.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$3,529,000$0$0$0$0$0$3,529,000
Funding increased in 2008 and deleted in 2009 includes TIP funding of $1,529,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Fourmile Canyon Creek43172916
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageNorth Boulder
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
YesNo
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Fourmile Canyon Creek. The revised flood mapping
studies for Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are complete. These were accepted by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in March 2007. Analysis of various flood mitigation alternatives has
been completed by Love & Associates under a contract with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
(UDFCD). The analysis report provides information about various flood mitigation approaches. Flood mitigation
recommendations are provided by Love & Associates and are being reviewed by city staff. The next step is to
develop a draft proposed flood mitigation plan and CEAP.
Budgeted money will be used for on-going study, property acquisition and limited construction projects until
decisions are reached through the on-going flood mitigation planning process. It is anticipated the results of this
planning process will be available in late 2007. The study results will also include recommendations for
Wonderland Creek, which is closely associated with Fourmile Canyon Creek. All projects are being closely
coordinated with the City’s Greenways Program and Transportation Division.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as
environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project was recommended by the Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Study, the Greenways Master
Plan and is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder
Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The CEAP and associated public process will be initiated in 2007.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project relates to the City's Greenways Program and Transportation Program.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$232,500$250,000$250,000$250,000$250,000$250,000$1,482,500
Funding decreased in 2008-2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
South Boulder Creek43120215
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
YesNo
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for on-going studies and possible flood mitigation work along South Boulder Creek.
This project will identify and mitigate flood hazards in the South Boulder Creek floodplain. The flood mapping
study is complete and will be submitted to FEMA. Flood mitigation planning will begin in 2007-2008 with possible
flood mitigation work beginning in 2010, possibly in coordination with US36 improvements.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
This project will identify and mitigate flood hazards in the South Boulder Creek floodplain. The flood mapping
study is on-going and should be completed in late 2006. Flood mitigation planning will begin in 2007-2008 with
possible flood mitigation work beginning in 2010, possibly in coordination with US36 improvements.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the
Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Evaluation of South Boulder Creek flood issues and associated public process is on-going.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Planning Department, Boulder County, University of Colorado, Open Space Department
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$300,000$3,000,000$0$0$0$3,450,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Stormwater Quality Improvements431775
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will fund stormwater quality projects as identified in the Stormwater Master Plan. This project will
improve water quality in Boulder Creek and its tributaries.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Rehabilitation of the city's existing
storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that avoids street
flooding and damage to property.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the
Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater
Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
None
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$300,000
Funding added in 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Transportation Related Stormwater Improvements431780
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will fund the reconstruction of existing storm sewers, the construction of new storm sewers and water
quality improvements as part of on-going Transportation Division improvement projects
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Rehabilitation of the city's existing
storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in a manner that avoids street
flooding and damage to property.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the
Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater
Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Coordination with the City's Transportation Division
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$250,000$250,000$250,000$250,000$250,000$250,000$1,500,000
Funding added in 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Tributary Greenways Program - Stormwater & Flood431630
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The Greenway Program will create a comprehensive greenway corridor system along several drainages. These
corridors will serve as storm drainage and flood channels, bicycle and pedestrian transportation systems, open
space and wildlife corridors, and recreational areas. This project represents the Utilities Division contribution to
the program.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Greenways projects integrate many goals including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage
and flood management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists and protection of
recreation and cultural resources.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the
Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
The Greenways Program is coordinated with parks, utilities, planning, OSMP
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$150,000$0$750,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Wonderland Creek42100312
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundAreas I & II
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
YesNo
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will fund flood mitigation improvements along Wonderland Creek. The revised flood mapping studies
for Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek are complete. These were accepted by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in March 2007. Analysis of various flood mitigation alternatives has
been completed by Love & Associates under a contract with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
(UDFCD). The analysis report provides information about various flood mitigation approaches. Flood mitigation
recommendations are provided by Love & Associates and are being reviewed by city staff. The next step is to
develop a draft proposed flood mitigation plan.
Money is budgeted for flood mitigation work along Wonderland Creek. This money will be used for on-going
study, property acquisition and limited construction projects until decisions are reached through the on-going floo
d
mitigation planning process. It is anticipated the results of this planning process will be available in late 2007. The
study results will also include recommendations for Fourmile Canyon Creek, which is closely associated with
Wonderland . All projects are being closely coordinated with the City’s Greenways Program and Transportation
Division.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as
environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project was recommended by the Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Study, the Greenways Master
Plan and is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the Boulder
Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004.
Public Process Status, Issues:
The CEAP and associated public process will be initiated in 2007.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project relates to the City's Greenways Program and Tranportation Program
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$232,500$250,000$250,000$500,000$500,000$500,000$2,232,500
Funding decreased in 2080 and 2010 and added in 2012 and 2013
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Yards Master Plan Implementation (land acquisition) - Stormwater431039
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Enhancements / Upgrades
Project Type:
No
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project will provide funds for the acquisition of additional land near the existing City Yards.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Improvements to the City Yards are required to sustain transporation and utilities maintnenance services for the
City.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the water utility as articulated in the Boulder Revised Code and the
Yards Master Plan.
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Transporation, Water and Wastewater, FAM
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$110,000$0$0$0$0$0$110,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Storm Sewer Rehabilitation
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageMultiple Subcommunities
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
Existing Facility - Rehab / Repair / Deficiency Correction
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
The project provides funds for the rehabilitation of existing storm sewers.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
Rehabilitation of the city's existing storm sewer is required to assure the continued conveyance of storm water in
a manner that avoids street flooding and damage to property.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the
Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan and the Stormwater
Master Plan
Public Process Status, Issues:
No additional public process is anticipated.
Relationship with Other Departments:
Transporation Division
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000$300,000
Project and funded added
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %
2008-2013 Capital Improvements Program
Project Status Report
Project Name:Project Number:Map Number:
Preflood Property Acquisition431622
PW/ Stormwater and Flood ManageSystem-wide
Department:Subcommunity:
Stormwater & Flood Management Utility FundSystem-wide
Funding Source:BVCPArea:
New Construction - Not Growth Related
Project Type:
NoNA
CEAP Required:CEAP Completed:
Project Description:
This project provides funds for the purchase of properties in areas prone to flooding especially the city's high
hazard regulatory area. Properties have been identified and prioritized along each of the city's major
drainageways. Property owners have been contacted regarding the city's interest. The majority of properties in
the high hazard flood zone are along Boulder Creek, Goose Creek and Fourmile Canyon Creek.
Community Sustainability / Project Justification:
The project will help ensure the basic health and safety needs of all residents. Additionally, other goals such as
environmental protection and increased mobility will be incorporated into the project.
Relationship to Master Plans:
This project is consistent with the goals of the stormwater and flood management utility as articulated in the
Boulder Revised Code and the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan adopted in 2004.
Public Process Status, Issues:
Property owners have been contacted regarding the city's interest in purchasing.
Relationship with Other Departments:
This project relates to the city's Greenways Program and Transportation Program.
Capital Funding Plan
Planned Funding
200820092010201120122013
$500,000$500,000$500,000$500,000$500,000$0$2,500,000
Change from Prior Year:
$0
Annual On-going Operating Costs
No increase, funded by existing operating budget
Description:
Source of Funding:
Business Plan Prioritization of Services:
100%100%
Essential %Desirable %Discretionary %Total %