Loading...
2016 Annual Budget, Volume 22016 ANNUAL BUDGET V OLUME II CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO i 2016 Annual Budget Volume II [This page is intentionally blank.] ii iii City of Boulder 2016 –2021 Capital Improvement Program Mayor ................................................................................ Suzanne Jones Mayor Pro Tem ...................................................................... Mary Young Council Members .................................................... Matthew Appelbaum Aaron Brockett Jan Burton Lisa Morzel Andrew Shoemaker Sam Weaver Bob Yates City Manager ................................................................ Ja ne S. Brautigam iv City of Boulder Staff City Manager .............................................................................................. Jane S. Brautigam City Attorney ....................................................................................................................................... Tom Carr Municipal Judge ....................................................................................................................... Linda P. Cooke Assistant City Manager .............................................................................................. Mary Ann Weideman Chief Financial Officer .................................................................................................................. Bob Eichem Director of Finance ............................................................................................ Cheryl Pattelli Director of Public Works for Utilities ............................................................................. Jeffrey M. Arthur Executive Director of Energy Strategy and Electric Utility Development ................ Heather Bailey Director of Support Services/City Clerk ............................................................................. Lynnette Beck Director of Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................ Yvette Bowden Fire Chief .......................................................................................................................... Michael Calderazzo Municipal Court Administrator .................................................................................................... James Cho Interim Director of Labor Relations ................................................................................... Michael Clasen Executive Director of Planning, Housing and Sustainability ........................................ David Driskell Director of Library and Arts ..................................................................................................... David Farnan Director of Information Technology ........................................................................................... Don Ingle Director of Human Resources .................................................................................. Joyce Lira Director of Human Services ........................................................................................................ Karen Rahn Executive Director of Public Works .................................................................................. Maureen F. Rait Interim Director of Public Works for Transportation .............................................. Michael Sweeney* Police Chief ....................................................................................................................................... Greg Testa Director of Communications ................................................................ Patrick Von Keyserling Director of Open Space and Mountain Parks .................................................................... Tracy Winfree Director of Community Vitality ................................................................................................ Molly Winter * Member of the CIP Peer Review Team v City of Boulder CIP Staff Team Executive Budget Officer (CIP Coordinator) ........................................................ Peggy Bunzli* Community Sustainability Coordinator (CIP Coordinator) ...................................... Jean Gatza* Planner II (CIP Coordinator) ............................................................................ Chris Meschuk* Planning, Housing and Sustainability ............................................................. Susan Richstone Community Vitality ......................................................................................... Donna Jobert* Finance ............................................................................................... Milford John-Williams* Fire ............................................................................................................ David Gelderl oos* Information Technology ....................................................................................... Beth Lemur Open Space & Mountain Parks ........................................................................ Lauren Kilcoyne Parks & Recreation ................................................................................................ Jeff Dillon * Parks & Recreation ...................................................................................... Douglas Godfrey* Parks & Recreation ................................................................................................. Jeff Haley * Police ............................................................................................................. Bridget Pa nkow Public Works ..................................................................................................... Joanna Crean Public Works/Airport ............................................................................................... Tim Head Public Works/Facilities & Asset Management .......................................................... Joe Castro Public Works/Facilities & Asset Management ........................................................ John Frazer Public Works/Greenways .................................................................................... Annie Noble* Public Works/Greenways ........................................................................................ Kurt Bauer Public Works/Transportation ............................................................................. Gerrit Slatter* Public Works/Utilities .............................................................................................. Ken Baird Public Works/Utilities .......................................................................................... Bob Harberg Public Works/Utilities .................................................................................... Douglas Sullivan * Member of the CIP Peer Review Team vi City Council .................................................................................................................. iii City of Boulder Staff .......................................................................................................iv Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................vi List of Figures and Tables.............................................................................................. ix How to Use This Document .......................................................................................... xi INTRODUCTION Capital Improvement Program Introduction............................................................. 1 FUNDING SUMMARIES Overview .............................................................................................................. 17 Funding by Department ........................................................................................ 19 Funding by Project Type ....................................................................................... 31 Funding by Fund ................................................................................................... 43 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND Overview .............................................................................................................. 55 2011-2016 Spend Plan ......................................................................................... 61 SEPTEMBER 2013 FLOOD Overview .............................................................................................................. 63 Flood Costs by Department................................................................................... 64 Sources of Funding ............................................................................................... 65 COMMUNITY, CULTURE AND SAFETY PROJECT Overview .............................................................................................................. 67 Project Highlights ................................................................................................. 68 2015-2018 Spend Plan ......................................................................................... 71 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Overview .............................................................................................................. 73 Strategy ................................................................................................................ 75 COMMUNITY VITALITY Overview .............................................................................................................. 79 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department ...................................................... 84 Projects Map ......................................................................................................... 85 Project Sheets ....................................................................................................... 86 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS vii FACILITIES AND ASSET MANAGEMENT Overview .............................................................................................................. 91 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department ...................................................... 98 Projects Map ......................................................................................................... 99 Project Sheets ..................................................................................................... 100 FIRE AND RESCUE Overview ............................................................................................................ 119 Projects Map ...................................................................................................... 125 GREENWAYS Overview ............................................................................................................ 127 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Overview ............................................................................................................ 131 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .................................................... 136 Project Sheets ..................................................................................................... 138 OPEN SPACE AND MOUNTAIN PARKS Overview ............................................................................................................ 145 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .................................................... 156 Projects Map ....................................................................................................... 157 Project Sheets ..................................................................................................... 158 PARKS AND RECREATION Overview ............................................................................................................ 183 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .................................................... 194 Projects Map ....................................................................................................... 195 Project Sheets ..................................................................................................... 196 POLICE Overview ............................................................................................................ 217 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .................................................... 220 Project Sheets ..................................................................................................... 222 TRANSPORTATION Overview ............................................................................................................ 223 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .................................................... 232 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS viii Projects Map ....................................................................................................... 233 Project Sheets ..................................................................................................... 234 UTILITIES Overview ............................................................................................................ 257 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .................................................... 270 Projects Map ....................................................................................................... 273 Project Sheets ..................................................................................................... 274 APPENDIX A: UNFUNDED PROJECTS ........................................................................... 341 APPENDIX B: PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CEAP ............................................... 347 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS ix HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Figure 0-1: Sample Capital Funding Plan Table ................................................ xiii INTRODUCTION Figure 1-1: CIP Guiding Principles ....................................................................... 2 Figure 1-2: 2016 Projects by Category ................................................................ 3 Figure 1-3: Sustainability Framework ................................................................ 11 Figure 1-4: CIP Definition and Criteria .............................................................. 14 FUNDING SUMMARIES Figure 2-1: Total Projected CIP Funding by Year ............................................... 17 Figure 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding by Department ............................................... 20 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department ................................ 21 Figure 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding by Project Type .............................................. 33 Figure 2-4: 2016-2021 Funding By Project Type Excluding Utilities .................. 33 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Project Type ............................... 34 Figure 2-5: 2016-2021 Funding by Fund .......................................................... 44 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund .......................................... 45 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND Table 3-1: 2011-2016 Spend Plan ................................................................... 61 SEPTEMBER 2013 FLOOD Figure 4-1: Flood Costs by Department ............................................................ 64 Figure 4-2: Sources of Funding ......................................................................... 65 COMMUNITY, CULTURE AND SAFETY PROJECT Table 5-1: Community, Culture and Safety Highlights .................................... 69 Table 5-2: Spend Plan for Community, Culture and Safety Projects ................. 71 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Table 6-1: Overall Conditions Index ............................................................... 74 Figure 6-1: Pavement Deterioration and Life Cycle Costs ................................. 75 Table 6-2: Comparative Costs ........................................................................ 76 Table 6-3: Condition of Streets ...................................................................... 76 Table 6-4: Weighted Average OCI Comparison ............................................... 77 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES x DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Table 7-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department ................................ 84 FACILITIES AND ASSET MANAGEMENT Table 8-1: Capital Development Fund Balance - 2014 Year-End ...................... 92 Table 8-2: FAM Priority Codes ......................................................................... 95 Table 8-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department ................................ 98 FIRE Table 9-1: Unfunded Projects ........................................................................ 124 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Table 11-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .............................. 136 OPEN SPACE AND MOUNTAIN PARKS Table 12-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .............................. 156 PARKS AND RECREATION Table 13-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .............................. 194 POLICE Table 14-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .............................. 220 TRANSPORTATION Table 15-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .............................. 224 UTILITIES Table 16-1: Proposed Utility Rate Increases ..................................................... 259 Table 16-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department .............................. 270 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES xi The City of Boulder’s 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) contains information on how the city plans to invest available resources into key infrastructure and facilities between 2016 and 2021. This document contains: planned project funding summaries organized by department, project type, and fund; detail sheets for every project and program included in the plan; links to maps illustrating the location of projects throughout the city; and narratives describing the rationale behind project prioritization. Document Organization The 2016-2021 CIP has five main parts: Introduction Funding Summaries Special Highlights Department Projects Appendices Introduction The Introduction section provides an overview of the 2016-2021 CIP, describes the CIP development process, gives highlights of the CIP, and summarizes factors that influenced the projects included in the plan. Funding Summaries The Funding Summaries section contains analysis of how the 2016-2021 CIP allocates dollars among city departments, project types, and funds. Full financial detail can be found in the tables of this section. Special Highlights The Special Highlights sections include information on a major area of concerted effort related to capital investment: implementation of Capital Improvement Bond projects. The capital bond section contains a narrative describing associated projects and other highlights. There are also highlights of the effects of the following on the CIP: the September 2013 Flood, the Community, Culture and Safety project, and the Pavement Management Program. . Department Projects The department sections each contain highlights of the department’s capital projects and factors that influenced project selection. Following the narrative, the department sections contain department funding summaries, links to maps that identify the locations of department projects, and project sheets for each of the department’s CIP projects. Appendices The 2016-2021 CIP contains two appendices. The first appendix contains information on 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT xii unfunded capital projects, and the second contains a list of CEAP projects. Data Limitations The 2016-2021 CIP provides the funding plan (amount needed by year) for each CIP project. That is, the amounts analyzed in the document’s summary sections and in each project sheet refer to planned budget allocations (sources) and not expenditures (uses). Future versions of this CIP will migrate expenditure information into all sections of the document as it becomes available in the city’s financial systems. How to Read Project Financial Data The Capital Funding Plan section of the project sheets consists of three tables: Estimated Total Cost Capital Funding Plan Unfunded Amount Figure 0-01 shows an example of this table. The Estimated Total Cost table shows the total estimated cost of completing the project. If a project sheet does not have a total cost, then the sheet is for an ongoing program, and the total cost field has been left blank. For most projects in the CIP, the Capital Funding Plan table shows total allocated dollars to the project prior to 2016 and for each year between 2016 through 2021. However, on-going programs, because they have typically received funding for many years before 2016, do not have information about allocated funding prior to 2016. Ongoing programs generally allocate a set amount of funding per year on a continuing basis. Therefore, programs also do not have total cost information. Both blank fields focus the CIP on the coming six years of planned improvements for each on-going program, and by doing so, the CIP does not expect the on-going program to account for prior improvements or future improvements well beyond the CIP’s planning horizon that ends in 2016. Future Unfunded shows any amount of the Total Funding Plan that does not have a funding source. Funding to Completion shows any amount outside of the Total Funding Plan that is outside of the six-year CIP window (2016-2021). As historical data for these projects get collected over time, the aforementioned sections will be populated. 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT xiii Figure 0-1: Sample Capital Funding Plan Table 2016 – 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT [This page is intentionally blank.] xiv 1 City of Boulder INTRODUCTION 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Capital Planning and 2016 – 2021 CIP Summary The City of Boulder’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a comprehensive, 6-year plan for maintaining and enhancing public infrastructure by correcting current facility deficiencies and constructing new service-delivery infrastructure. The CIP provides a forecast of funds available for capital projects and identifies all planned capital improvement projects and their estimated costs over the 6‑year period. A community’s CIP is a guide that lays out the framework for achieving the current and future goals related to the physical assets of the community. Boulder has made significant investments to provide its current level of municipal services. The city owns and maintains 382 buildings and structures, 1,800 acres of parkland, 45,498 acres of Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP), 305 centerline miles of streets, 159 centerline miles of bike facilities, 79 underpasses, three water treatment facilities, and over 800 miles of water and wastewater piping. The city funds the construction and maintenance of these assets using a wide range of sources, including tax revenues, bond proceeds, and fees. The city continues to look for ways to leverage its funding, through federal, state, and local grants and reimbursements, to maximize funding for CIP projects. The CIP development process prioritizes the city’s numerous needs spread across its 17 different departments, bearing in mind the limits of each funding source, progress on ongoing CIP projects, and funding commitments made by prior CIPs. To create a citywide understanding of which projects are chosen for inclusion in the CIP, the city developed nine CIP Guiding Principles to shape capital planning decisions made throughout the CIP process. The CIP Guiding Principles also ensure individual department priorities for CIP funding are aligned with city goals. Figure 1-1 lists the CIP Guiding Principles. Chautauqua Reservoir Construction, 1923. Photo courtesy  the Carnegie Branch Library for Local History, Boulder His‐ torical Society Collection.   2 Introduction Figure 1-1: CIP Guiding Principles The City of Boulder develops a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that addresses the ongoing major business needs and maintenance and repair of city assets as well as enhancements and expansion called for in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan. The CIP is a strategic document that assures that the municipal organization maintains a strong bond rating, implements community values, and has fiscal integrity. The city prioritizes its investments both across and within funds based on the following guiding principles: 1. Capital Improvement Programs should be consistent with and implement Council- accepted master plans and strategic plans. 2. Capital Improvements should achieve Community Sustainability Goals: Environmental – sustainable materials, construction practices, renewable resources, etc. Social – enhancements that improve accessibility to city services and resources provided to the community Economic – effective and efficient use of public funds across the community. 3. As potential capital investments are identified, the city must demonstrate in the CIP process that there are sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project or program. 4. Capital Improvement Programs should provide enough capacity and flexibility in our long-term planning to be able to respond to emerging, unanticipated needs. 5. Capital Improvement Programs should maintain and enhance the supporting city-wide “business systems”, such as information and finance systems, for the city over the long term. 6. Capital Improvement Programs should sustain or improve maintenance of existing assets before investing in new assets. 7. Capital improvements should: Meet legal mandates from federal, state, or city levels Maintain or improve public safety and security Leverage external investments Promote community partnerships Reduce operating costs and improve efficiency. 8. Capital programming should maximize efficiency of investments demonstrated by measurable cost/benefit analyses and coordination of projects across departments within and across funds. 9. The Capital Improvement Program should provide sufficient reserves to allow for a sound fiscal foundation with benefits that include: A strong bond rating The ability to address emergencies and natural disasters. 3 Introduction The 2016-2021 CIP includes funding for $392.7 million for 157 projects. 109 projects are recommended for funding in 2016, totaling $74.5 million. Proposed 2016-2021 allocations are $31.5 million higher than 2015-2020 allocations ($361.4 million) presented in the 2015-2020 CIP. The recommended 2016 allocations are $4.7 million higher than approved 2015 allocations ($69.8 million). The primary reason for the increase in 2016-2021 is the additional major projects in Utilities and Transportation. These projects are partially funded from increased revenues provided through recent tax initiatives and new Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) federal funding (Transportation), and rate increases (Utilities), and are key investments to maintain existing infrastructure. Following the 2013 Flood, assessments in the city’s water, wastewater and stormwater/flood management system has informed key capital investments needed to reduce the city’s vulnerabilities and improve resilience. During the 2015 budget process, there were extensive discussions related to the Utilities CIP and rates at numerous public meetings, including WRAB and council meetings and the result was support for an accelerated plan of system replacement and enhancements. This is reflected in the 2016 – 2021 CIP. To note, the 2011 Capital Improvement Bond proceeds are not included in these totals because allocations for the bond occurred in 2012, and the Community, Culture and Safety Tax proceeds are not included in these totals because allocations are occurring through budget adjustments. The city regularly sets aside money in its CIP to save for future projects. This important budget practice leads to better planning by allowing the city to pay for higher dollar projects over time rather than requiring the city to find funding in a single budget year. The city is spending the majority, over 82 percent, of its 2016 capital funds on capital maintenance and enhancement of its existing assets (See Figure 1-2). Capital enhancements involve upgrades to existing facilities, such as replacement of irrigation systems with updated technologies, materials and equipment that can be more efficient, effective and less costly to operate over time. The CIP focuses on taking care of what the city already owns with an emphasis on making improvements to its core service areas. 4 Introduction CIP Highlights The city anticipates completing a significant number of Capital Projects in 2015 and 2016. These projects benefit the City of Boulder, its residents and visitors by maintaining key infrastructure and functionality, maintaining and improving the transportation network, providing greater safety, maintaining and improving recreational facilities and natural lands, and maximizing the use of technology for greater efficiency and better service delivery. A few examples of these are listed below. Additional details on 2015 accomplishments and highlights of the 2016-2021 CIP are noted in the department overviews. [Please note that Capital Improvement Bond projects are included in this list.] 2015 Accomplishments (see Department Overviews for additional details and highlights) Continued flood recovery (see Special Flood Highlight section ) Completed Main Library renovation Acquired new fire response software (anticipated to be operational by the end of 2015) Figure 1-2: 2016 Projects by Category 5 Introduction Completed construction of Fire Station #8 (Wildland Fire Station) Completed numerous flood mapping studies and flood mitigation plans Commenced Baseline underpass construction (late 2015), Commenced North Trail Study Area (NTSA) Planning Completed West End Streetscape improvements Completed Valmont City Park Concept Planning Replaced approximately 22,000 feet of water main and installed 3,000 feet of new water main for flood impacted properties along Old Tale and Baseline Assessed condition of wastewater collection system and removed debris 2016 and Beyond Planning and Construction (see Department Overviews for additional details and highlights) Betasso Water Treatment Plant Improvements Wastewater Treatment Facility nitrogen upgrades Replace and implement the Police Records Management System Flood mitigation and path improvements along Fourmile Canyon Creek Stream bank restoration work on Boulder Creek at Eben Fine Park Responsive measures to mitigate Emerald Ash Borer threat Enhancements to the North Boulder Recreation Center Pool Newly funded Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Projects: Broadway Reconstruction 30th and Colorado Avenue Underpass Boulder Slough Multi-use Path (30th to 3100 Pearl) 19th Street Improvements (Norwood to Upland) Arapahoe Avenue / Boulder Creek Path Underpass Improvements New shared parking facility between CAGID/ Trinity Commons Realignment of main sanitary sewer interceptor at the Treatment Facility Complete OSMP flood-related trail repairs Renovation and repair of the Foothills Nature Center (near Wonderland Lake) Ongoing network hardware and software replacement Construct Carter Lake Pipeline South Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Phase I West End Streetscape on 9th Street and Pearl  Street.  Fire Station #8.  6 Introduction Special Highlight Sections As in previous years, this document contains a few special highlight sections to provide more detailed information on special initiatives or other areas of focus that warrant additional information to what is provided in the funding summaries and/or department pages. The highlight sections included herein are: Capital Improvement Bond – provides an update to spending and progress of projects funded by the 2011 Capital Bond 2013 Flood Impact - provides an update to spending, progress, reimbursements and other revenues related to flood recovery efforts from the 2013 Flood Community, Culture and Safety Tax – provides an update to spending and planned work on projects funded by the 2014 voter approved Community, Culture and Safety temporary tax, similar to the Capital Improvement Bond highlight, and will continue to be updated until completion of projects Transportation Tax Increases – provides additional information on the pavement management program, implemented with funding from the voter approved tax initiatives supporting Transportation. Challenges Each year, as the CIP is being updated, City Council, advisory boards, and staff consider technical, environmental, and financial challenges that could potentially limit the ability of the city to fund its priority projects. Challenges being identified in the 2016-2021 CIP include, continued flood impact and recovery costs, especially in Open Space and Mountain Parks, response to the Emerald Ash Borer threat, funding constraints, construction cost inflation, operational funding, and conversion to new financial software. Flood Impact The September 2013 flood had a threefold impact on the City of Boulder’s CIP. As a direct result of the flood, some previously planned projects were either deferred or became no longer relevant (for example work on a single element of a park that then needed more extensive repair and restoration, as a result of the flood). In some cases, funding previously identified for regular CIP projects was used to cover the cost of flood repair and recovery, and new or different funding sources have been or will need to be identified to complete high priority projects, within the needed timeframe, or the timelines have had to or will have to shift. Finally, the information learned from the flood has led to reprioritization of CIP projects. Much of the recovery work has The 2011 Capital Bond  is  approximately half way  through the implementation  phase.    7 Introduction now been done, with the majority of remaining projects in OSMP. Additional funding provided in Utilities has allowed for an accelerated CIP program to address vulnerabilities in the water, wastewater and stormwater/flood management systems and FEMA reimbursement has begun coming in, helping to replenish reserves and provide funds for previously deferred projects. In the CIP, this is reflected in new projects, changes in timing of projects, and changes in scope of projects. However, there remains some recovery work that will not be FEMA eligible, especially in for OSMP recovery work. The 2016 – 2021 CIP includes a special flood highlight section, which provides additional information related to the impact of the flood on the CIP. For departments still in the midst of recovery efforts or mitigation work, details specific to their departments are included in the Department Overview sections of the CIP. Emerald Ash Borer Threat In September, 2013, City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Forestry staff discovered an Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) infestation within the city. This is the first known occurrence of EAB in Colorado and is the western-most occurrence of this invasive pest in North America. Eradication and containment efforts across the country have been unsuccessful, resulting in the loss of over 50 million ash trees. EAB management, including tree removal, tree replacement, wood disposal and pesticide treatments will have direct impacts to the City of Boulder and private residents over the next 15 years. Staff estimates the number of public, private and naturalized ash within the city is 98,000 trees. The loss of this tree canopy will have significant economic, social, and environmental impacts for decades. Staff has gathered information and worked interdepartmentally with Parks & Recreation, the city’s Integrated Pest Management team, Open Space and Mountain Parks, Development Review, and other interested divisions, departments and boards to develop an EAB Management Plan to manage the infestation within the city and potentially slow the spread to nearby communities. This plan will be presented to council in September 2015. The CIP includes a multi- year project and funding has been identified to implement the plan. Funding Constraints Revenue has recovered over the past few years and voter renewal of several expiring taxes has helped to stabilize the long-term outlook, however, a structural gap between needs and resources 8 Introduction still remains. The city will continue to prioritize its needs based on its available resources using the CIP Guiding Principles. Construction Cost Inflation The Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for Denver and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Colorado Construction Cost Index indicate that construction costs are escalating at a rate of 2.2 and 4.5 percent respectively, based on a 5-year rolling average. As yearly variations are common, a five-year rolling average is more indicative of the inflationary trend. Staff closely monitors inflation indices and uses this information to determine expected capital cost escalation over the 6-year CIP. A higher cost escalator will reduce the amount of work that can be done with planned revenues, in particular, over the planning horizon of the CIP.  Operational Funding The organization continues to face the challenge of increased operating and maintenance (O&M) costs associated with new and existing capital improvements. The current CIP strives to identify O&M cost increases associated with projects and to identify funding for this. It also identifies O&M savings produced by capital enhancements. Conversion of CIP to Munis Starting in mid-2014, departments, the Transform Boulder Business Initiative (TBBI) project team staff (working on the replacement of the city’s financial and human resource software), and Finance staff worked together to determine how best to use Munis (the city’s new Financial Software) as the replacement project database for the CIP. Previously, CIP projects were held in a stand-alone Access database which did not tie to either project management systems or the city’s financial system. The goal was to include project information and financial data in the system, to allow for integrated financial and project management, as well as to ultimately provide better information on project expenditures over time. With the implementation of Munis, all CIP project information and financial data are now stored in Munis and the system is used for project accounting, budget control and project management. Reporting capabilities are continuing to be refined and will evolve as familiarity with the new system increases. Until there is historical data in Munis (starting with 2015 data), the prior years’ expenses or full project cost information, will not be available. Opportunities Similarly, there are issues that positively impact the city’s capital investment performance. 9 Introduction Opportunities identified in the 2016-2021 CIP include additional funding availability; strategic planning for maintenance and unfunded needs; capital investment plans and studies; and an integrated technology analysis. Funding – New Capital Revenue In November 2014, Boulder voters approved the Community, Culture and Safety tax, a three-year 0.3 percent sales and use tax increase. Projected revenue from this temporary tax increase is anticipated to yield $27.6 million for thirteen specific projects to improve community spaces, bolster cultural projects and organizations, and enhance safety. Projects to implement the Civic Area Plan will be funded by this tax. The 2016 – 2021 CIP includes a special highlight section, which provides additional information on the purpose and schedule of projects funded from the new tax. In November 2013, voters approved a temporary sales and use tax for Transportation, and renewed expiring taxes for the purposes of funding open space, transportation and general city needs. This additional and renewed funding provides continued opportunity for capital investment in the city. The 2016-2021 CIP includes a special highlight section on the Pavement Management Program implemented with these new dollars for Transportation. Strategic Planning for Unfunded Projects As the city embarked upon the capital phase of the Comprehensive Financial Strategy (CFS), staff continued to identify a large number of unfunded capital needs across the city. The 2016-2021 CIP includes information on citywide unfunded capital needs, both in department overview sections and in Appendix A to this document. Moving forward, the intention is to build on the Comprehensive Financial Strategy efforts of the past decade and establish a purposeful and continuous process for capital investment to support the city’s vision. Near term steps include commencing a citywide facility and asset assessment and an ongoing process for planning, funding and scheduling necessary maintenance and replacement of capital assets. While some departments have developed detailed inventories, establishing a citywide baseline inventory is the first step of a multi-year process. In conjunction with asset assessment work, the goal is to establish an ongoing strategic approach to capital planning that is integrated with the city’s comprehensive plan and long term vision. This is envisioned to include a consistent process for prioritizing capital projects, emerging needs, and asset maintenance, as well as securing ongoing operating funding. 10 Introduction A critical element of the new approach is recognizing the need to understand current assets and future maintenance/replacement needs associated with those, as well as to develop the ability and strategic framework to take advantage of new opportunities, as they arise, for the long-term benefit of the community. For example, the city is actively pursuing the possibility of purchasing the Boulder Community Hospital site that is for sale. While this was not a part of the CIP and was not a known potential acquisition until recently, it is crucial to be able to respond quickly to this highly valuable opportunity. Capital Investment Plans & Studies Over the last several years, there have been Master Plan updates in many key areas, such as: Greenways, Fire, Police, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, and Open Space Acquisitions. Numerous assessments are underway or have been completed related to facilities and infrastructure that will directly inform capital planning and investment over the next decade. In some cases there is placeholder funding in the CIP for projects that have yet to be specifically identified but will be forthcoming from these planning efforts. Transportation corridor scoping studies are proposed for funding in 2015 and 2016 that will guide capital planning along East Arapahoe and 30th & Colorado. Other recent planning efforts include an Aquatics Study, Athletics Study, Urban Forest Strategic Management Plan, Recreation Facility Strategic Plan and the North Trail Study Area Plan that will inform future capital investment. Major drainageway flood mitigation plans are currently underway for South Boulder Creek, Gregory Creek, Bear Canyon Creek and Boulder Creek. Flood mitigation plans will be initiated for Skunk Creek, King’s Gulch and Bluebell Creek; and Upper Goose Creek and Twomile Canyon Creek once the mapping studies have been approved by City Council. Integrated Planning Effort for New Technology An emerging city-wide issue is our aging radio infrastructure. FAM has submitted a 2016 budget request for a radio infrastructure analysis and strategic plan development. This strategic plan will impact all users of the city’s radio system including Public Safety, Public Works, Open Space and Mountain Parks and others. The scope and final cost of the project will be determined by the results of the study and future projects will be programmed in the next CIP. 11 Implementation of Subcommunity & Area Plans North Boulder Subcommunity Plan The North Boulder Subcommunity Plan (NoBo Plan) was adopted by the city in 1995. City Council accepted the 2014 Action Plan that outlines a new generation of action items that further advances the original plan’s vision. Much of the planning area has now been developed or is approved for development, and a significant number of Capital Improvements have been made in the area. Proposed Capital Improvements in the next six years include Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood and Greenways Improvements, Violet Park development in coordination with Greenways, transportation improvements to 19th Street, and the North Trail Study Area Plan. Boulder Junction The Boulder Junction area includes the Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP), adopted by the city in 2008, which covers 160 acres. Implementation of the plan is underway, with completion of the Junction Place Bridge at Goose Creek and the Pearl Parkway Multi-Way Boulevard from 30th to BNSF Railroad tracks on the south side of Pearl. Proposed capital investments in the next six years include construction of a new pocket park at Junction Place and Goose Creek, traffic signal installations, and a multiuse path along the Boulder Slough between 30th and 3100 Pearl. Downtown Boulder The future vision for downtown Boulder was developed through the Downtown Alliance, and its final report in 1997. While significant private and public investment has occurred since that time, continual investments in the downtown are needed to continue to ensure downtown remains a primary community gathering place, business and commercial center, and tourism attraction. In the next six years, projects in downtown include ongoing parking garage maintenance, repair and replacement of CAGID parking lots, construction of a shared parking facility at Trinity Commons, and improvements and amenities replacement on the mall and along 15th Street south of Canyon. Civic Area Plan Work on the civic area is under way, focusing on site activation, site transformation and major capital project planning. The new Community, Culture, and Safety Tax revenues will fund projects in the Civic Area over the next three years including enhancements to areas north and south of Boulder Creek; playgrounds and nature play along both sides of the creek; new and improved community spaces; lighting, access and signage enhancements; public art; and renovation of the Introduction Improvements at Goose Creek at Boulder  Junction.   12 underpass at the Boulder Creek Path (13th Street). Projects Recommended for CEAP The projects that are proposed to be evaluated under Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP) review are listed in Appendix B, and the individual project sheets identify if a CEAP is required. The purpose of a CEAP is defined to “assess potential impacts of conceptual project alternatives in order to inform the selection and refinement of a preferred alternative.” CEAP findings are submitted by departments to their respective advisory board for review as part of CIP project approval. Council has the opportunity to call up projects for their review and approval. (For those departments that do not have an advisory board, Planning Board is responsible for reviewing CEAP findings as part of project approval.) CIP Process The annual CIP process can be divided into three parts: Planning, Project Review, and Board Review/City Council Adoption. The responsibility for coordinating the process citywide is shared by the Department of Community Planning & Sustainability and the Finance Department. Planning The first phase of the process identifies and prioritizes the needs of the community. This is done by applying Boulder’s Sustainability Framework to ensure that the CIP aligns with and advances the wide range of goals and priorities of the City Council and community. The seven categories of the Sustainability Framework build upon the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan and the city’s Priority Based Budgeting (PBB) approach: two key initiatives that define long-term community goals and priorities. Both the BVCP and PBB were developed from extensive community input processes and are used to guide long-term decision making as well as the city’s annual budget process. The Sustainability Framework ensures that subcommunity and area plans and departmental master plans are aligned with the CIP. Subcommunity and area plans provide more detailed planning for land use, urban design, neighborhood revitalization, and public facility needs for a specific area of the city. Departmental master plans include details about and funding plans for future needs related to services and facilities. The master plans are used by each department during their decision making and prioritization as part of the annual budgeting and CIP processes. Introduction 13 Figure 1-3 illustrates the relationship between the Sustainability Framework, BVCP, PBB, Subcommunity and Area Plans, Master Plans, and the CIP. Project Review The second phase engages each department proposing projects for the CIP in a citywide review process. Proposed projects are reviewed by the CIP Peer Review Team (PRT). After the PRT’s review of projects, the city’s Executive Budget Team also reviews the project information and provides feedback to departments before departments propose projects for inclusion in the draft CIP. Board Review and City Council Adoption The final phase involves review by department advisory boards, the Planning Board, and City Council. Department advisory boards review their department’s proposed CIP projects and make recommendations to the Planning Board and City Council. Introduction Figure 1-3: Sustainability Framework 14 Introduction Section 78 of the City Charter calls for the city Planning Department to prepare the annual CIP with other city departments for submittal to the City Manager. The Planning Board evaluates and makes recommendations to the City Manager and City Council on the draft CIP. The Planning Board’s re- view of the CIP includes the relationship of projects to the policies of the BVCP, subcommunity plans, area plans and departmental master plans. City Council reviews the draft CIP in August, and provides feedback to the City Manager prior to final budget development. City Council appropriates funds for the first year of the CIP through the budget ordinances. While Colorado state law limits appropriations to the first year of the CIP, the succeeding five years of the annual CIP are important in providing a longer term plan for setting funding priorities, scheduling projects in a logical sequence, and coordinating and targeting capi- tal improvements for all city departments. CIP Process Changes The CIP document and process have undergone significant changes over the past four years to improve the selection of projects and communication of information on selected projects. The CIP Guiding Principles have been the foundation for all project selection and CIP process improve- ments. Many of the changes made to the CIP have focused on improving the financial information in- cluded in the CIP document, through a partnership with the Finance Department and Department of Community Planning & Sustainability. Additionally, as we move to a more fully on-line environ- ment, changes have been made to enhance the electronic viewing of the CIP. This year, GIS map- ping is provided through a link to an interactive site, rather than in static printed map form. With the implementation of Munis, the new financial and human resources Enterprise Resource Plan- ning (ERP) software, CIP project information is now held and managed in an integrated system. The city will continue to make improvements to the CIP in future years. Changes planned for the future include updates to the CIP section of the City Plans and Project Handbook, adding project expenditure and schedule information to the document (through data entered into Munis), con- tinuing to incorporate graphical enhancements to improve the on-line view of the information and document, continuing to incorporate robust strategic planning in the process (as described above), and incorporating performance measures into the plan. 15 Figure 1-4: CIP Definition and Criteria Capital Improvement Program Projects “CIP projects are any major projects requiring the expenditure of public funds (over and above operation expenditures) for the purchase, construction, or replacement of the physical assets of the community. This broad definition includes those projects that are bondable, technology infrastructure, new or expanded physical facilities as well as the land necessary for the project.” Criteria for New Capital Project: Projects resulting in the construction or acquisition of a new asset. Construction resulting in additional square footage of an existing asset. Projects have a discrete start and end date. Projects are location specific. Projects are typically over $50,000 in total project cost, but do not have to be. Projects result in a durable, long lasting asset, with a useful life of at least 15 years. Criteria for Capital Enhancement: Construction resulting in the expansion or significant improvement of an existing facility or asset. Projects have a discrete start and end date. Projects are location specific. Projects are typically over $50,000 in total project cost, but do not have to be. Information Technology projects are typically over $25,000 in total project cost. Projects result in a durable, long lasting asset, with a useful life of at least 15 years. Information Technology projects may be as short as 5 years. Criteria for Capital Maintenance: Projects result in the repair, replacement, or renovation of an existing asset. Projects may or may not have a discrete start and end date. Projects are location specific or programs that cover a geographic area. Projects are typically over $50,000 in total project cost. Information Technology projects are typically over $25,000 in total project cost. Projects result in a durable, lasting physical asset, with a useful life of at least 5 years. Information Technology projects may be as short as 3 years. Criteria for Land & Asset Acquisition: Project or program results in the acquisition of real property, such as land, mineral or water rights, or permanent easements. Projects may have discrete start and end dates, or may be programmatic. Projects or programs may be location specific or city-wide. Projects or programs typically include acquisitions totaling over $50,000. Criteria for Capital Planning Studies: Project results in the development of a study or plan which is intended to identify, plan, or prepare for the construction or acquisition of capital assets or capital program. Projects have discrete start and end date. Projects are typically for studies that are over $50,000 in total cost. Introduction [This page is intentionally blank.] 16 17 City of Boulder FUNDING SUMMARIES 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program The Funding Summaries section provides full detail of the city’s CIP budget needs from 2016 through 2021 by department, project type, and fund. For each of the three funding views, the following information is shown: Total project cost Planned funding allocation in each year 2016-2021 and the six-year total Prior funded amount Unfunded amount The Funding Summaries focus on estimated budget needs (sources) for all projects. The CIP this year shows limited instances of planned or actual expenditures at a project, department, or fund level. In practice, as projects are planned, designed, and constructed, during any given year, appropriated project sources almost always differ from project expenditures. In some circumstances, such as a large project that requires many years of accumulated funds before design or construction can commence, expenditures may significantly lag appropriations. Figure 2-1 shows total CIP funding for 2016-2021. Funding varies year over year depending on specific project plans. For example, 2018 includes the Carter Lake Pipeline project which carries a significant cost. Figure 2-1: Total Projected CIP Funding by Year1 Notes: 1 The Red area is the 2016 portion of the 2011 Capital Improvement Bond funds. These bonds were sold and funding appropriated in 2012. The blue area is planned allocations of 2016-2021 funding for all other projects. $‐ $20  $40  $60  $80  $100  $120  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021MillionsCapital  Improvement  Bond  Expenditure  Plan CIP Budget  2016‐2021 18 All tables and graphs in this section include transfers between departments. These transfers are included in the departments because they will appear in the individual department sections of the overall city budget. The summary information included in the introduction removes transfers to avoid double counting and to correctly express the total project funding of the CIP. Funding Summaries 19 City of Boulder FUNDING BY DEPARTMENT 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program The following city departments are participating in the 2016-2021 CIP: Downtown / University Hill Management Division and Parking Services (DUHMD/PS Fire and Rescue Information Technology (IT) Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) Parks and Recreation Police Public Works (PW) - Facilities Asset Management (FAM) PW-Greenways PW-Municipal Airport PW—Stormwater and Flood Management Utility PW-Transportation PW-Wastewater Utility PW-Water Utility The Public Works divisions of Utilities and Transportation have the greatest allocations of resources in the 2016-2021 CIP. Major renovations to stormwater, water and wastewater facilities are primarily responsible for the large spikes in allocations during 2018 and 2020. Many departments have dedicated revenue sources that keep their CIP funding relatively constant. For example, both Open Space & Mountain Parks and Parks & Recreation have dedicated revenue sources, and their CIP funding remains relatively constant throughout 2016-2020. Figure 2-2 displays the share of total 2016-2021 CIP spending on each department. 20 Funding by Department Figure 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding by Department Other includes DUHMD/PS, Information Technology, and Police $‐ $20  $40  $60  $80  $100  $120  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Millions PW/Utilities PW/  Transportation OSMP PnR PW/FAM Other 21 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2021 ProjectedDUHMD $ 4,434,765 $ 2,156,565 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 958,321 OPEN SPACE & MOUNTAIN PARKS $ 49,060,930 $ 11,900,930 $ 7,945,000 $ 7,455,000 $ 7,290,000 PARKS & RECREATION $ 32,872,000 $ 4,458,000 $ 5,920,000 $ 5,217,000 $ 5,500,000 POLICE $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - PW/FACILITIES & ASSET MNGMT $ 9,647,000 $ 2,307,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 884,000 PW/STORMWATER & FLOOD UTILITY $ 61,417,767 $ 5,209,921 $ 7,119,924 $ 33,256,596 $ 5,129,366 PW/TRANSPORTATION $ 56,338,000 $ 8,774,500 $ 7,788,500 $ 15,692,500 $ 6,527,500 PW/WASTEWATER UTILITY $ 58,052,128 $ 4,355,600 $ 5,987,421 $ 5,571,420 $ 7,242,543 PW/WATER UTILITY $ 126,449,771 $ 33,449,251 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 12,318,146 Total $ 407,533,323 $ 74,402,987 $ 46,557,884 $ 111,808,580 $ 46,249,876 $ 48,272,397 $ 80,241,599 $ - Department Total $ 11,196,676 $ 19,698,521 $ - Department Total $ 7,335,868 $ 27,559,276 $ - Department Total $ 6,527,500 $ 11,027,500 $ - Department Total $ 5,028,682 $ 5,673,278 $ - Department Total $ 2,318,000 $ 1,128,000 $ - Department Total $ - $ - $ - Department Total $ 6,500,000 $ 5,277,000 $ - Department Total $ 7,080,000 $ 7,390,000 $ - 2019 Projected 2020 ProjectedUnfunded AmountDepartment Total $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - Department Total $ 1,885,671 $ 2,088,024 $ - 22 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountDUHMD $ 4,434,765 $ 2,156,565 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,009,000 $ 730,800 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 609,000 $ 330,800 $ 278,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 1,425,765 $ 1,425,765 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,425,765 $ 1,425,765 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ - CAGID Trinity Commons $ - Downtown Parking Garage Major $ 250,000 Downtown Pearl St Mall Amenity $ 125,000 Downtown 14th St Prkg Lot $ 25,000 Downtown Parking Garage $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 400,000 Subtotal $ 400,000 Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 2,088,024 $ 958,321 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 2,088,024 $ 958,321 $ - $ 122,234 $ - $ 41,895 $ 80,339 $ - $ - $ - $ 108,987 $ 10,500 $ - $ - $ 53,604 $ 13,401 $ - $ 4,847,207 $ 703,638 $ 702,115 $ 1,174,388 $ 745,731 $ 770,153 $ - $ 2,409,400 $ 111,090 $ 219,232 $ 241,423 $ 630,026 $ 173,537 $ - $ 49,798 $ 8,117 $ 1,012 $ - $ 6,381 $ 1,230 $ - $ 773,336 $ 7,875 $ - $ 77,322 $ 652,282 $ - $ - Data Backup and Disaster $ - Security Administration $ 33,058 Server Hardware Replacement $ 35,857 Database Hardware Replacement $ 31,482 End User Device Replacement $ 751,182 Network Hardware Replacement $ 1,034,092 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 1,885,671 Subtotal $ 1,885,671 23 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountOPEN SPACE & MOUNTAIN PARKS $ 49,060,930 $ 11,900,930 $ 7,945,000 $ 7,455,000 $ 7,390,000 $ 7,290,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 11,324,600 $ 4,074,600 $ 1,975,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 572,600 $ 572,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ 75,000 $ 175,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 852,000 $ 252,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,700,000 $ 350,000 $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,036,330 $ 1,626,330 $ 270,000 $ 280,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 720,000 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 360,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 991,000 $ 991,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 205,330 $ 205,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 34,200,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 32,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ - Boulder Creek Bikepath Extension $ - Mineral Rights Acquisition $ 100,000 OSMP Real Estate Acquisition $ 5,400,000 Water Rights Acquisition $ 200,000 Hartnagle House Restoration $ - South Mesa Trailhead Bridge $ - Subtotal $ 5,700,000 Farm Site Improvements $ 60,000 Flood Trails $ - Foothills Nature Center $ - Agriculture Facilities Projects $ 120,000 Boulder & S Bldr Crk Flood Repair $ - Cultural Resource/Facility Restorat $ 100,000 Visitor Infrastructure System Wide $ 500,000 WTSA Implementation $ 150,000 Subtotal $ 280,000 S.Bldr Crk at E.Bldr Ditch Const $ - South Boulder Creek Instream $ - STSA - Plan and Implementation $ - OSMP Innovations $ 100,000 OSMP Master Plan Update $ 100,000 Flood Eng. Trails $ - Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage $ - NTSA - Plan and Implementation $ 100,000 Boulder Crk Above 95th $ - ETSA - Plan and Implementation $ 50,000 Facility Modifications-Space $ 100,000 Department Total $ 7,080,000 Subtotal $ 1,100,000 2019 Projected 24 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPARKS & RECREATION $ 32,872,000 $ 4,458,000 $ 5,920,000 $ 5,217,000 $ 5,277,000 $ 5,500,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 11,500,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 3,100,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ - $ 2,900,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 17,048,000 $ 1,558,000 $ 3,620,000 $ 1,393,000 $ 3,677,000 $ 3,900,000 $ - $ 1,100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 1,288,000 $ 238,000 $ - $ 273,000 $ 777,000 $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2,160,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 1,874,000 $ - $ - $ 374,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,874,000 $ - $ - $ 374,000 $ - $ - $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 1,950,000 $ 750,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 750,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Violet Park $ 500,000 Boulder Junction Rail Plaza $ 1,500,000 Subtotal $ 500,000 Boulder Junction Pocket Park $ - Urban Forest Management Plan $ - Yard/Maintenance Facility Site $ - Subtotal $ 1,500,000 Subtotal $ - Reservoir/Tom Watson Site Plan $ - Scott Carpenter/Mapleton Site $ - Parking Lot Repairs $ 250,000 Recreation Facility Repairs $ 1,000,000 Turf Repairs and Replacement $ 200,000 EAB Response Measures $ 500,000 Flatiron Golf Course Repairs $ - Park Structure Repairs and $ 500,000 Aquatics Facility Repairs $ - Boulder Reservoir South $ - Court Repairs and Resurfacing $ 250,000 Playground and Irrigation Repairs $ 600,000 Subtotal $ 2,900,000 ADA Compliance Initiatives $ 200,000 Aquatic Facility Enhancements $ - Athletic Field Development $ 1,000,000 Lighting Ordinance $ - Department Total $ 6,500,000 Subtotal $ 1,600,000 2019 ProjectedEstimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPOLICE $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Records Management System $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ - Subtotal $ - 25 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/FACILITIES & ASSET MNGMT $ 9,647,000 $ 2,307,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 1,128,000 $ 884,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 1,742,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 452,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 7,025,000 $ 1,787,000 $ 1,345,000 $ 1,305,000 $ 898,000 $ 602,000 $ - $ 1,366,000 $ 390,000 $ - $ 723,000 $ 253,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 813,000 $ 120,000 $ 126,000 $ 132,000 $ 145,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 169,000 $ - $ 169,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,545,000 $ 515,000 $ 380,000 $ 400,000 $ 450,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 132,000 $ 132,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING $ 880,000 $ 230,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 480,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Facility Assessments Misc Space Needs and Analysis Radio System Analysis $ - Recreation Facility Repairs Stazio Tensile Canopy Covering Subtotal $ 130,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ 500,000 $ - Misc Facility Maintenance Projects North Boulder Park Shelter Rep Pool Replastering $ - EBCC Replace Pool Air Handlers Fire Stations Major Maintenance Martin Park Shelter Major Maint $ - $ - $ 138,000 $ 400,000 $ - Miscellaneous Facilty DET Proj $ 50,000 West Senior Center Maj Maint & SubtotalAquatics Facility Repairs $ - East Boulder Community Center Outdoor Lighting Improvements Tantra Shop Renovation $ 300,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,088,000 $ 100,000 $ - Upgrade EV Chargers/Battery $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 2,318,000 Subtotal $ 1,100,000 26 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/STORMWATER & FLOOD UTILITY $ 61,417,767 $ 5,209,921 $ 7,119,924 $ 33,256,596 $ 5,673,278 $ 5,129,366 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 25,792,750 $ 3,365,021 $ 5,201,224 $ 6,688,096 $ 3,682,578 $ 3,129,149 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,750,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,250,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - $ 752,646 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,941,298 $ 730,080 $ 759,283 $ 789,655 $ 854,090 $ 986,949 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,076,390 $ 162,000 $ 169,000 $ 175,500 $ 190,000 $ 197,390 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,637,416 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,165,547 $ 1,221,869 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 5,172,732 $ 594,900 $ 618,700 $ 643,500 $ 1,330,700 $ 1,315,932 $ - $ 2,438,766 $ 270,400 $ 281,200 $ 292,500 $ 632,700 $ 657,966 $ - $ 2,668,966 $ 324,500 $ 337,500 $ 351,000 $ 633,000 $ 657,966 $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 3,627,285 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 660,000 $ 684,285 $ - $ 3,627,285 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 660,000 $ 684,285 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 26,825,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 25,325,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 26,825,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 25,325,000 $ - $ - $ - Utility Billing Computer System $ - South Boulder Creek Phase I $ - Subtotal $ 633,000 Preflood Property Acquisition $ 633,000 Subtotal $ - Subtotal $ 669,000 Storm Sewer Rehabilitation $ 304,000 Transportation Coordination $ 365,000 Stormwater Quality Improvements $ 182,500 Twomile Canyon Creek $ - Upper Goose Creek Drainage $ 1,000,000 Gregory Creek Flood Mitigation $ - Local Drainage Improvements $ 821,241 Skunk Creek Flood Mitigation $ - Fourmile - Upstream of Upland $ 1,500,000 Greenways Program - Flood fund $ 97,500 Greenways Program - Lottery $ 125,441 Bear Canyon Creek Flood $ - Bluebell & King's Gultch $ - Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 5,028,682 Subtotal $ 3,726,682 27 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 ProjectedPW/TRANSPORTATION $ 56,338,000 $ 8,774,500 $ 7,788,500 $ 15,692,500 $ 11,027,500 $ 6,527,500 CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 13,772,000 $ 3,884,500 $ 1,877,500 $ 6,127,500 $ 627,500 $ 627,500 $ 257,000 $ 257,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,050,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,300,000 $ - $ - $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 2,880,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 14,402,000 $ 1,694,000 $ 1,694,000 $ 1,864,000 $ 6,050,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 893,000 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ - $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 4,800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 3,774,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ 4,500,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 589,000 $ 338,000 $ 100,000 $ 151,000 $ - $ - $ 289,000 $ 138,000 $ - $ 151,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 27,575,000 $ 2,858,000 $ 4,117,000 $ 7,550,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 1,330,000 $ 1,330,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ - $ 1,350,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 228,000 $ - $ 228,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000 $ 120,000 $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 15,483,000 $ 483,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ - 2019 ProjectedArap Comp St Recon/Bldr Crk Subtotal19th St (Norwood to Sumac) TIP Local Match TMP Department Total $ 6,527,500 Ped Facilities Repair, Replace, $ 97,500 $ 50,000 Greenways Program Misc Development Coordination Broadway Recon Violet to 36 $ - Boulder Junction - Develop Coord 30th St and Colorado Bike/Ped Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements BJ Traffic Signal Bluff St & 30th BJ Traffic Signal Jct & Valmont 28th St - Valmont to Iris (Baseline) SubtotalSignal Maintenance & Upgrade $ 121,000 $ 800,000 $ 629,000 $ - $ 480,000 $ 1,550,000 Rehab Runway & Eastern Taxiway SubtotalBldr County/City Joint TIP Projects East Arapahoe Transp Corridor Trans Corridor 30th & Colorado SubtotalDeficient Street Light Pole Replace Major Capital Reconstruction $ - $ - $ 4,350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 TIP Local Match/TMP $ 627,500 $ - $ - Boulder Slough Multiuse Path 30th Ped Facs Enh Missing Links $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - 28 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/WASTEWATER UTILITY $ 58,052,128 $ 4,355,600 $ 5,987,421 $ 5,571,420 $ 27,559,276 $ 7,242,543 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 29,573,075 $ 570,000 $ 2,050,397 $ 1,476,915 $ 20,731,179 $ 1,867,002 $ - $ 3,749,723 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 1,346,988 $ 1,730,145 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 175,479 $ - $ 175,479 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,320,000 $ 120,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,866,016 $ - $ 674,918 $ 701,915 $ 759,191 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,161,857 $ 150,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 18,625,000 $ 136,857 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 28,479,053 $ 3,785,600 $ 3,937,024 $ 4,094,505 $ 6,828,097 $ 5,375,541 $ - $ 5,380,670 $ 811,200 $ 843,648 $ 877,394 $ 948,989 $ 986,949 $ - $ 1,829,626 $ 216,320 $ 224,973 $ 233,972 $ 253,064 $ 657,966 $ - $ 18,294,276 $ 2,758,080 $ 2,868,403 $ 2,983,139 $ 3,226,563 $ 3,355,626 $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ 184,481 $ - $ - $ - $ 184,481 $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 375,000 $ - WWTF Digester Complex $ 200,000 WWTF Rehabilitation $ - Sanitary Sewer Manhole $ 243,331 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation $ 3,102,465 WWTF Cogeneration $ - Utility Billing Computer System $ - WWTF Permit Improvements $ 1,500,000 Subtotal $ 4,458,286 Condition Assessment Program $ 912,490 2019 ProjectedGoose Creek SS Interceptor $ 647,590 Marshall Landfill $ - Department Total $ 7,335,868 Subtotal $ 2,877,582 WWTF Instrumentation/Control $ 729,992 WWTF Laboratory $ - Wastewater Treatment Facility $ - WWTF Activated Sludge $ - WWTF Electrical $ - 29 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/WATER UTILITY $ 126,449,771 $ 33,449,251 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 19,698,521 $ 12,318,146 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 84,350,608 $ 26,610,000 $ 2,511,322 $ 38,314,303 $ 9,148,194 $ 6,097,907 $ - $ 684,285 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 684,285 $ - $ 115,000 $ 65,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,566,060 $ 100,000 $ 175,000 $ - $ 8,455,509 $ - $ - $ 25,140,000 $ 25,140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 561,773 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 486,773 $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ - $ - $ 430,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,801,585 $ 850,000 $ 2,036,322 $ 37,915,263 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 267,664 $ - $ - $ 24,333 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 540,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,519,534 $ - $ - $ - $ 492,685 $ 4,926,849 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 39,299,163 $ 6,839,251 $ 6,168,263 $ 2,743,289 $ 8,050,327 $ 6,220,239 $ - $ 3,882,997 $ 125,000 $ - $ 341,636 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,003,748 $ 667,416 $ 1,169,859 $ 1,216,653 $ 1,315,932 $ 1,368,569 $ - $ 116,986 $ - $ 116,986 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 860,000 $ - $ 380,000 $ 480,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 168,434 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 118,434 $ - $ - $ 18,613,540 $ 3,352,960 $ 3,487,078 $ - $ 3,922,489 $ 4,079,389 $ - $ 108,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 799,875 $ 799,875 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 316,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,314,000 $ 314,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 171,071 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 171,071 $ - $ 1,294,682 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 343,472 $ 351,210 $ - $ 271,875 $ - $ 271,875 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Zone 3 Transmission Pipes $ 250,000 Watershed Improvements $ - Zone 1 Transmission Pipes $ - Zone 2 Transmission Pipes $ - Skyscraper Dam $ - Source Water Pressure Reducing, $ 150,000 Sunshine Hydroelectric/PRV $ - Reservoir Water Treatment $ - Silver Lake Dam $ - Silver Lake Hydroelectric/PRV $ - Kohler Storage Tank Roof $ - Kossler Dam $ - Lakewood Pipeline $ 316,330 Farmer's Ditch $ 108,160 Goose Lake Dam $ - Island Lake Dam $ - Betasso Storage Tank $ - Boulder Reservoir $ - Distribution Waterline $ 3,771,624 Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair $ 1,265,319 Barker - Kossler Penstock Repair $ - Betasso Hydroelectric / PRF $ - Wittemyer Ponds $ 100,000 Subtotal $ 9,277,794 Albion Dam $ 3,416,361 Source Water $ 100,000 Utility Billing Computer System $ - Water System Security/Quality $ 90,000 NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake $ - Orodell Hydro/PRV Facility $ - Pearl Street Hydro/PRV Facility $ 243,331 Green Lake 2 Dam $ - Lakewood Dam $ - Lakewood Hydroelectric/PRV $ 300,000 Barker Dam and Reservoir $ - Barker Dam Outlet $ 835,551 Betasso Water Treatment Facility $ - Automated Meter Reading $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 11,196,676 Subtotal $ 1,668,882 30 Table 2-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/WATER UTILITY (Cont.) $ 126,449,771 $ 33,449,251 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 19,698,521 $ 12,318,146 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 2,800,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ 2,800,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - Subtotal $ 250,000 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 11,196,676 Carter Lake Hydroelectric $ 250,000 31 City of Boulder FUNDING BY PROJECT TYPE 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Each CIP project has been classified as a city investment in one of five project types: Capital Enhancement Capital Maintenance Capital Planning Studies Land Acquisition New Capital Project There is an additional project type of Transfers that is used to indicate cross departmental funding collaborations. While these transfers are included in departmental totals, they are not included when calculating the total of all planned project funding in the CIP. The five project types are defined by the following criteria: Capital Enhancement: Construction resulting in the expansion or significant improvement of an existing facility or asset Projects have a discrete start and end date Projects are location specific Projects are typically over $50,000 in total project cost, but do not have to be. Information Technology projects are typically over $25,000 in total project cost Projects result in a durable, long lasting asset, with a useful life of at least 15 years. Information Technology projects may be as short as 5 years. Capital Maintenance: Projects result in the repair, replacement, or renovation of an existing asset Projects may or may not have a discrete start and end date Projects are location specific or programs that cover a geographic area Projects are typically over $50,000 in total project cost. Information Technology projects are typically over $25,000 in total project cost. 32 Capital Planning Studies: Project results in the development of a study or plan which is intended to identify, plan, or prepare for the construction or acquisition of capital assets or capital program Projects have discrete start and end date Projects are typically for studies that are over $50,000 in total cost Land & Asset Acquisition: Project or program results in the acquisition of real property, such as land, mineral or water rights, or permanent easements Projects may have discrete start and end dates, or may be programmatic Projects or programs may be location specific or city-wide Projects or programs typically include acquisitions totaling over $50,000 Criteria for New Capital Project: Projects resulting in the construction or acquisition of a new asset Construction resulting in additional square footage of an existing asset Projects have a discrete start and end date Projects are location specific Projects are typically over $50,000 in total project cost, but do not have to be Projects result in a durable, long lasting asset, with a useful life of at least 15 years. Funding by Type 33 Figure 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding by Project Type Figure 2-4: 2016-2021 Funding by Project Type Excluding Utilities Funding by Type $‐ $20  $40  $60  $80  $100  $120  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Millions Capital  Enchancement Capital  Maintenance New Facility/  Infrastructure   Land  Acquisition Capital  Planning  Studies $‐ $20  $40  $60  $80  $100  $120  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Millions Capital  Enchancement Capital  Maintenance New Facility/     Infrastructure Land  Acquisition Capital  Planning  Studies 34 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Project Type Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2021 ProjectedCIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 178,344,033 $ 40,682,121 $ 15,465,443 $ 57,432,814 $ 14,773,558 CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 126,732,240 $ 20,407,101 $ 19,295,441 $ 14,296,766 $ 20,612,033 CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 1,680,000 $ 830,000 $ 330,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 39,701,285 $ 6,200,000 $ 6,250,000 $ 6,674,000 $ 6,384,285 CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 61,075,765 $ 6,283,765 $ 5,217,000 $ 33,275,000 $ 4,350,000 Total $ 407,533,323 $ 74,402,987 $ 46,557,884 $ 111,808,580 $ 46,249,876 Project Title2019 Projected 2020 Projected Unfunded AmountType Total $ 12,700,646 $ 37,289,451 $ - Type Total $ 22,508,751 $ 29,612,148 $ - Type Total $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - Type Total $ 7,833,000 $ 6,360,000 $ - Type Total $ 5,100,000 $ 6,850,000 $ - $ 48,272,397 $ 80,241,599 $ - 35 [This page is intentionally blank.] 36 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Project Type (Cont.) Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected2021 ProjectedCIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 178,344,033 $ 40,682,121 $ 15,465,443 $ 57,432,814 $ 14,773,558 $ 257,000 $ 257,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,900,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 684,285 $ - $ - $ - $ 684,285 $ 115,000 $ 65,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 9,566,060 $ 100,000 $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 25,140,000 $ 25,140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 289,000 $ 138,000 $ - $ 151,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 4,750,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,250,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,050,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,300,000 $ - $ 452,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 152,000 $ 650,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 572,600 $ 572,600 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,250,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 3,749,723 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 1,730,145 $ 561,773 $ - $ - $ - $ 486,773 $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 752,646 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ 430,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 4,941,298 $ 730,080 $ 759,283 $ 789,655 $ 986,949 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 40,801,585 $ 850,000 $ 2,036,322 $ 37,915,263 $ - $ 700,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - 19th St (Norwood to Sumac) (310TR154NG) $ - $ - $ - Project Title2019 Projected 2020 Projected Unfunded AmountType Total $ 12,700,646 $ 37,289,451 $ - Aquatic Facility Enhancements (5152185510) $ - $ 500,000 $ - Athletic Field Development (5153302060) $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ - Arap Comp St Recon/Bldr Crk Underpa (310TR156NC) $ - $ - $ - Bear Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW02300) $ - $ - $ - Barker Dam and Reservoir (610WA11000) $ - $ - $ - Barker Dam Outlet (610WA10900) $ 835,551 $ 8,455,509 $ - Bldr County/City Joint TIP Projects (310TR157NG) $ - $ - $ - Betasso Water Treatment Facility (610WA94700) $ - $ - $ - Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage (555ES16001) $ - $ - $ - East Boulder Community Center Ren (3150558715) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - ETSA - Plan and Implementation (555ETSA001) $ 50,000 $ 200,000 $ - Bluebell & King's Gultch (610SW00900) $ - $ - $ - Flood Eng. Trails (555BOULD33) $ - $ - $ - Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW01500) $ - $ - $ - Boulder Crk Above 95th Restoration (555ES16002) $ - $ - $ - Facility Modifications-Space Needs (555FA16001) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - Broadway Recon Violet to 36 $ - $ - $ - Lakewood Hydroelectric/PRV (610WA90100) $ 300,000 $ - $ - Lighting Ordinance Implementation (5152182070) $ - $ - $ - Gregory Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW02400) $ - $ - $ - Lakewood Dam (610WA62000) $ - $ - $ - Misc Development Coordination (310TD004OC) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - NTSA - Plan and Implementation (555NTSA001) $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ - Local Drainage Improvements (610SW77000) $ 821,241 $ 854,090 $ - Marshall Landfill (610WW07800) $ - $ - $ - NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pi (610WA54700) $ - $ - $ - Orodell Hydro/PRV Facility (610WA33100) $ - $ - $ - Green Lake 2 Dam (610WA62700) $ - $ 75,000 $ - Four Mile - Upland to Violet (610SW02100) $ 1,500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ - Greenways Program - Lottery Fund (610SW63100) $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ - Greenways Program - Flood fund (610SW63000) $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - Greenways Program Transportation (310TR630OC) $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - Goose Creek SS Interceptor Rehab (610WW43300) $ 647,590 $ 1,346,988 $ - Automated Meter Reading $ - $ - $ - 37 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Project Type (Cont.) Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected2021 ProjectedCIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT (Cont.) $ 178,344,033 $ 40,682,121 $ 15,465,443 $ 57,432,814 $ 14,773,558 $ 852,000 $ 252,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 267,664 $ - $ - $ 24,333 $ - $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 267,664 $ - $ - $ 24,333 $ - $ 3,600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,076,390 $ 162,000 $ 169,000 $ 175,500 $ 197,390 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,880,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,637,416 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,221,869 $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 540,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,519,534 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,926,849 $ 1,700,000 $ 350,000 $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 150,000 $ 175,479 $ - $ 175,479 $ - $ - $ 1,320,000 $ 120,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ 2,866,016 $ - $ 674,918 $ 701,915 $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 21,161,857 $ 150,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 136,857 Playground and Irrigation Repairs $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ - TIP Local Match TMP Implementation (310TD052OG) $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ - S.Bldr Crk at E.Bldr Ditch Const (555ES16003) $ - $ - $ - Source Water Monitoring/Protection (610WA44200) $ 100,000 $ - $ - South Boulder Creek Instream Flow (555SBIF001) $ - $ - $ - Signal Maintenance & Upgrade (310TR778OC) $ - $ - $ - Skunk Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW00600) $ - $ - $ - STSA - Plan and Implementation (555STSA001) $ - $ 200,000 $ - Stormwater Quality Improvements (610SW77500) $ 182,500 $ 190,000 $ - Tantra Shop Renovation (3150400415) $ 300,000 $ - $ - Upper Goose Creek Drainage (610SW75000) $ 1,000,000 $ 1,165,547 $ - Utility Billing Computer System (610WA45300) $ - $ 125,000 $ - Twomile Canyon Creek (610SW00800) $ - $ - $ - Upgrade EV Chargers/Battery Storage (3158886116) $ - $ - $ - Visitor Infrastructure System Wide (555VISW001) $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - Wittemyer Ponds (610WA65000) $ 100,000 $ 492,685 $ - Water System Security/Quality Imprv (610WA44000) $ 90,000 $ - $ - West Senior Center Maj Maint & Reha (3150254715) $ 700,000 $ - $ - WTSA Implementation (555WTSA001) $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - WWTF Laboratory (610WW61000) $ - $ - $ - Wastewater Treatment Facility Pumps (610WW60000) $ - $ - $ - WWTF Permit Improvements (610WW61700) $ 1,500,000 $ 18,625,000 $ - Project Title2019 Projected 2020 Projected Unfunded AmountType Total $ 12,700,646 $ 37,289,451 $ - WWTF Electrical (610WW63900) $ - $ - $ - WWTF Instrumentation/Control (610WW63700) $ 729,992 $ 759,191 $ - WWTF Activated Sludge (610WW64000) $ - $ - $ - Outdoor Lighting Improvements (3158883315) $ - $ - $ - Pearl Street Hydro/PRV Facility (610WA36000) $ 243,331 $ - $ - OSMP Master Plan Update (555OSMP001) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - Outdoor Lighting Improvements (3158883315) $ - $ - $ - Pearl Street Hydro/PRV Facility (610WA36000) $ 243,331 $ - $ - 38 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Project Type (Cont.) Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected2021 ProjectedCIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 126,732,240 $ 20,407,101 $ 19,295,441 $ 14,296,766 $ 20,612,033 $ 1,100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 720,000 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ 3,882,997 $ 125,000 $ - $ 341,636 $ - $ 1,288,000 $ 238,000 $ - $ 273,000 $ - $ 1,366,000 $ 390,000 $ - $ 723,000 $ - $ 7,003,748 $ 667,416 $ 1,169,859 $ 1,216,653 $ 1,368,569 $ 116,986 $ - $ 116,986 $ - $ - $ 860,000 $ - $ 380,000 $ 480,000 $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 168,434 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 5,380,670 $ 811,200 $ 843,648 $ 877,394 $ 986,949 $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 122,234 $ - $ 41,895 $ 80,339 $ - $ 108,987 $ 10,500 $ - $ - $ 13,401 $ 893,000 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ - $ 121,000 $ 18,613,540 $ 3,352,960 $ 3,487,078 $ - $ 4,079,389 $ 150,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 609,000 $ 330,800 $ 278,200 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 2,160,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,847,207 $ 703,638 $ 702,115 $ 1,174,388 $ 770,153 $ 360,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 108,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 813,000 $ 120,000 $ 126,000 $ 132,000 $ 152,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 991,000 $ 991,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 205,330 $ 205,330 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 799,875 $ 799,875 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - Kohler Storage Tank Roof (610WA67100) $ - $ - $ - Goose Lake Dam (610WA61200) $ - $ - $ - Hartnagle House Restoration (555CR15002) $ - $ - $ - Island Lake Dam (610WA62600) $ - $ - $ - Flatiron Golf Course Repairs (5153304150) $ - $ - $ - Flood Trails (555BOULD24) $ - $ - $ - Foothills Nature Center (555CR16001) $ - $ - $ - Fire Stations Major Maintenance (3158885515) $ 138,000 $ 145,000 $ - Farm Site Improvements (555AG16001) $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - Farmer's Ditch (610WA55000) $ 108,160 $ - $ - End User Device Replacement (1901901505) $ 751,182 $ 745,731 $ - EAB Response Measures (5152183100) $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - EBCC Replace Pool Air Handlers (3150558815) $ - $ - $ - Downtown Parking Garage Major Mit(620CAGMi) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - Downtown Pearl St Mall Amenity Repl (620CAGFMAL) $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - Downtown 14th St Prkg Lot Improve (620CAGFL t) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - Downtown Parking Garage Elevators (620CAGELEV) $ - $ - $ - Distribution Waterline Replacement (610WA38900) $ 3,771,624 $ 3,922,489 $ - Data Backup and Disaster Recovery (1901901520) $ - $ - $ - Database Hardware Replacement (1901901530) $ 31,482 $ 53,604 $ - Cultural Resource/Facility Restorat (555CR15001) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - Condition Assessment Program (610WW45100) $ 912,490 $ 948,989 $ - Deficient Street Light Pole Replace (310TR001OC) $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ - Boulder & S Bldr Crk Flood Repair (555ES15002) $ - $ - $ - Boulder Reservoir (610WA61000) $ - $ 118,434 $ - Court Repairs and Resurfacing (5152182080) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - Boulder Reservoir South Improvement (5153305020) $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - Betasso Hydroelectric / PRF (610WA97400) $ - $ - $ - Betasso Storage Tank Rehabilitation (610WA67600) $ - $ - $ - Barker-Kossler Penstock Repair (610WA10700) $ - $ - $ - Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair (610WA10600) $ 1,265,319 $ 1,315,932 $ - Albion Dam (610WA62800) $ 3,416,361 $ - $ - Aquatics Facility Repairs (5152186050) $ - $ 777,000 $ - Kossler Dam (610WA11900) $ - $ - $ - Project Title2019 Projected 2020 Projected Unfunded AmountADA Compliance Initiatives (5153302200) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - Agriculture Facilities Projects (555AG15001) $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ - Type Total $ 22,508,751 $ 29,612,148 $ - Aquatics Facility Repairs (3158885715) $ - $ 253,000 $ - 39 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Project Type (Cont.) Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected2021 ProjectedCIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE (Cont.) $ 126,732,240 $ 20,407,101 $ 19,295,441 $ 14,296,766 $ 20,612,033 $ 316,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 169,000 $ - $ 169,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 2,545,000 $ 515,000 $ 380,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,409,400 $ 111,090 $ 219,232 $ 241,423 $ 173,537 $ 120,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 3,774,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ - $ 2,314,000 $ 314,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,829,626 $ 216,320 $ 224,973 $ 233,972 $ 657,966 $ 18,294,276 $ 2,758,080 $ 2,868,403 $ 2,983,139 $ 3,355,626 $ 49,798 $ 8,117 $ 1,012 $ - $ 1,230 $ 773,336 $ 7,875 $ - $ 77,322 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 155,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 171,071 $ - $ - $ - $ 171,071 $ 1,294,682 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 351,210 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 132,000 $ 132,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,438,766 $ 270,400 $ 281,200 $ 292,500 $ 657,966 $ 271,875 $ - $ 271,875 $ - $ - $ 2,668,966 $ 324,500 $ 337,500 $ 351,000 $ 657,966 $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 184,481 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 375,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - Recreation Facility Repairs (3158885615) $ 500,000 $ - $ - Recreation Facility Repairs (5152186150) $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - Lakewood Pipeline (610WA78000) $ 316,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - Major Capital Reconstruction (310TR003OC) $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ - Martin Park Shelter Major Maint (3150340215) $ - Misc Facility Maintenance Projects (3155904615) $ 400,000 $ 450,000 $ - Park Structure Repairs and Replace (5152182015) $ 500,000 $ - $ - North Boulder Park Shelter Rep (3150330215) $ - $ - $ - Network Hardware Replacement (1901901511) $ 1,034,092 $ 630,026 $ - Server Hardware Replacement (1901901515) $ 35,857 $ 652,282 $ - Security Administration (1901901517) $ 33,058 $ 6,381 $ - Parking Lot Repairs (5152182040) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - Ped Facilities Repair, Replace, ADA (310TR773OC) $ 629,000 Records Management System (RMS) (255RMS2015) $ - $ - $ - $ 629,000 $ - Pool Replastering (3158885215) $ - $ - $ - Rehab Runway & Eastern Taxiway (310AP001NG) $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - Reservoir Water Treatment Facility (610WA90000) $ - Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation (610WW40000) $ 3,102,465 $ 3,226,563 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rehabilitati (610WW42000) $ 243,331 $ 253,064 $ - Skyscraper Dam (610WA64000) $ - $ - $ - Stazio Tensile Canopy Covering Repl (3150590815) $ - $ - $ - South Mesa Trailhead Bridge Replace (555PM15001) $ - $ - $ - Zone 3 Transmission Pipes (610WA00500) $ 250,000 $ - $ - Zone 2 Transmission Pipes (610WA00400) $ - $ 250,000 $ - Storm Sewer Rehabilitation (610SW76000) $ 304,000 $ 632,700 $ - Sunshine Hydroelectric/PRV Facility (610WA34700) $ - Turf Repairs and Replacement (5152182065) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - Transportation Coordination (610SW78000) $ 365,000 $ 633,000 $ - Silver Lake Dam (610WA61500) $ - $ - $ - WWTF Digester Complex (610WW60700) $ 200,000 Zone 1 Transmission Pipes (610WA00200) $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - WWTF Rehabilitation (610WW61500) $ - $ 150,000 $ - Silver Lake Hydroelectric/PRV (610WA97000) $ - Source Water Pressure Reducing, P (610WA94000) $ 150,000 $ 343,472 $ - $ - $ - WWTF Cogeneration (610WW62900) $ - $ 184,481 $ - Watershed Improvements (610WA52000) $ - $ 100,000 $ - Utility Billing Computer System (610SW45300) $ - $ 130,000 $ - Miscellaneous Facilty DET Proj (3158885315) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - Project Title2019 Projected 2020 ProjectedUnfunded AmountType Total $ 22,508,751 $ 29,612,148 $ - 40 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Project Type (Cont.) Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected2021 ProjectedCIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 1,680,000 $ 830,000 $ 330,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 480,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - Project Title2019 Projected 2020 Projected Unfunded AmountEast Arapahoe Transp Corridor Study (310TR480NC) $ - $ - $ - Type Total $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - Radio System Analysis (3158886015) $ - $ - $ - Misc Space Needs and Analysis (3158883614) $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - Reservoir/Tom Watson Site Plan (5153305055) $ - $ - $ - Scott Carpenter/Mapleton Site Plan (5153302300) $ - $ - $ - Trans Corridor 30th & Colorado (310TR479OC) $ - $ - $ - Urban Forest Management Plan (5153303050) $ - $ - $ - Yard/Maintenance Facility Site Plan (5153302310) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Facility Assessments (3158885115)Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected2021 ProjectedCIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 39,701,285 $ 6,200,000 $ 6,250,000 $ 6,674,000 $ 6,384,285 $ 1,874,000 $ - $ - $ 374,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 32,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 3,627,285 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 684,285 $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Type Total $ 7,833,000 $ 6,360,000 $ - Project Title2019 Projected 2020 Projected Unfunded AmountBoulder Junction Rail Plaza (5153501050) $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - Mineral Rights Acquisition (555MRA001) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - OSMP Real Estate Acquisition (555REA001) $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ - Preflood Property Acquisition (610SW62200) $ 633,000 $ 660,000 $ - Water Rights Acquisition (555WRA001) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - 41 Table 2-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Project Type (Cont.) Project TypeEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected2021 ProjectedCIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 61,075,765 $ 6,283,765 $ 5,217,000 $ 33,275,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 860,000 $ 860,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 470,000 $ 470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ 1,350,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 228,000 $ - $ 228,000 $ - $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 750,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ 480,000 $ 120,000 $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 1,425,765 $ 1,425,765 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,800,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 26,825,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 25,325,000 $ - $ 15,483,000 $ 483,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - TIP Local Match/TMP Implementation (310TR052OG) $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ - Violet Park (5153302500) $ 500,000 $ - $ - Ped Facs Enh Missing Links Crossing (310TR112OC) $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - South Boulder Creek Phase I (610SW00400) $ - $ - $ - CAGID Trinity Commons Construction (620CAGT i ) $ - $ - $ - Carter Lake Hydroelectric (610WA93000) $ 250,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - Boulder Junction Pocket Park (5153501100) $ - $ - $ - Boulder Slough Multiuse Path 30th (310TR151NG) $ - $ - $ - Boulder Creek Bikepath Extension (555TA16001) $ - $ - $ - Boulder Junction - Develop Coord (310BJ001OC) $ - $ - $ - BJ Traffic Signal Bluff St & 30th (310BJ002NC) $ - $ - $ - BJ Traffic Signal Jct & Valmont (310BJ003NC) $ - $ - $ - Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements (310TR692OC) $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ - 28th St Valmont to Iris (Baseline) (310TD019NC) $ - $ - $ - 30th St and Colorado Bike/Ped Under (310TR153NG) $ - $ - $ - Type Total $ 5,100,000 $ 6,850,000 $ - 28th St - Valmont to Iris (Baseline (310TR743NC) $ - $ - $ - Project Title2019 Projected 2020 Projected Unfunded Amount [This page is intentionally blank.] 42 43 City of Boulder FUNDING BY FUND 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program One or more of the following 17 funds and funding sources are proposed for the CIP projects: .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund Airport Fund Boulder Junction Improvement Fund Capital Development Fund Computer Replacement Fund Downtown Commercial District Fund Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund General Fund Greenways Program Lottery Fund Open Space Fund Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund Stormwater Utility Fund Transportation Fund Transportation Development Fund Wastewater Utility Fund Water Utility Fund Detailed descriptions of all of the city’s funds are available in the introduction section of the Approved 2014 Annual Budget - Volume 1. Many of the funds exist to handle dedicated revenues that can only be used for specific types of capital projects. These restrictions provide consistency in planning for project types, but also requires the city to allocate resources to a specific category of infrastructure and maintain existing priorities. The Greenways Program is not a fund as defined above, but is used within the CIP to illustrate the funding structure of the Public Works - Greenways workgroup, and to call out the CIP projects associated with the work of Greenways. Similar to the department distributions described earlier in this section, the Transportation and 44 Funding by Fund Figure 2-5: 2016-2021 Funding by Fund Other includes the General Fund, Computer Replacement Fund, Boulder Junction Capital Improvement Fund, Airport Fund, Downtown Commercial District Fund, Lottery Fund, Transportation Development Fund, and Capital Development Fund. Utility Funds are the largest contributors to the city’s 2016-2021 CIP. Figure 2-5 shows the distribution of six year funding by fund. $‐ $20  $40  $60  $80  $100  $120  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Millions Water Utility Stormwater  & Flood  Management Utility Wastewater Utility Open Space Transportation .25  Cent Sales Tax Facility Renovation  & Replacement Permanent Parks &  Recreation Other 45 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected.25 Cent Sales Tax $ 18,241,200 $ 2,052,700 $ 3,409,700 $ 3,432,700 $ 2,939,700 $ 3,466,700 Airport $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 Bldr Junction Cap Imprvmt $ 4,006,000 $ 825,000 $ 957,000 $ 724,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - Capital Development $ 800,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 550,000 $ 50,000 Computer Replacement $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 1,885,671 $ 2,088,024 Downtown Commercial District $ 4,434,765 $ 2,156,565 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Facility Renovation & Replace $ 9,247,000 $ 2,157,000 $ 1,425,000 $ 1,485,000 $ 2,268,000 $ 1,078,000 General $ 1,025,000 $ 1,025,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Lottery $ 3,275,076 $ 846,371 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 Open Space $ 48,705,300 $ 11,545,300 $ 7,945,000 $ 7,455,000 $ 7,080,000 $ 7,390,000 Permanent Parks & Recreation $ 8,650,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,450,000 Stormwater & Flood Mgt Utility $ 60,665,121 $ 5,084,480 $ 6,994,483 $ 33,131,155 $ 4,903,241 $ 5,547,837 Transportation $ 46,878,500 $ 7,707,000 $ 6,651,500 $ 14,527,500 $ 5,997,500 $ 5,997,500 Transportation Development $ 3,850,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 530,000 $ 730,000 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 Wastewater Utility $ 58,052,128 $ 4,355,600 $ 5,987,421 $ 5,571,420 $ 7,335,868 $ 27,559,276 Water Utility $ 126,457,271 $ 33,456,751 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 11,196,676 $ 19,698,521 Total $ 407,533,323 $ 74,402,987 $ 46,557,884 $111,808,580 $ 48,272,397 $ 80,241,599 $ - $ 46,249,876 $ - $ 12,318,146 $ - $ 7,242,543 $ - $ 530,000 $ - $ 5,997,500 $ - $ 5,003,925 $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ 7,290,000 $ - $ 485,741 $ - $ - $ - $ 834,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ 958,321 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,939,700 Unfunded Amount2021 ProjectedFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalFund TotalProject TitleFund Total 46 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded Amount.25 Cent Sales Tax $ 17,083,200 $ 894,700 $ 3,409,700 $ 3,432,700 $ 2,939,700 $ 3,466,700 $ 2,939,700 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 4,838,200 $ 889,700 $ 489,700 $ 2,239,700 $ 239,700 $ 739,700 $ 239,700 $ - $ 2,900,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,438,200 $ 239,700 $ 239,700 $ 239,700 $ 239,700 $ 239,700 $ 239,700 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 13,398,000 $ 1,158,000 $ 2,920,000 $ 1,193,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 2,727,000 $ 2,700,000 $ - $ 1,288,000 $ 238,000 $ - $ 273,000 $ - $ 777,000 $ - $ - $ 2,250,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2,160,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Radio System Analysis (3158886015)SubtotalBoulder Reservoir South It(5152185020)Court Repairs and Resurfacing (5152182080)EAB Response Measures (5152183100)Park Structure Repairs and Replace (5152182015)Parking Lot Repairs (5152182040)Recreation Facility Repairs (5152186150)Turf Repairs and Replacement (5152182065)Project TitleAquatics Facility Repairs (5152186050)SubtotalAquatic Facility Enhancements (5152185510)Lighting Ordinance Implementation (5152182070)Playground and Irrigation Repairs (5152182110)SubtotalFundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountAirport $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - $ - $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - $ - Rehab Runway & Eastern Taxiway (310AP001NG)Project Title 47 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountBldr Junction Cap Imprvmt $ 3,181,000 $ - $ 957,000 $ 724,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 1,874,000 $ - $ - $ 374,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,874,000 $ - $ - $ 374,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 2,132,000 $ 825,000 $ 957,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 228,000 $ - $ 228,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 750,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Boulder Junction - Develop Coord (310BJ001OC)Boulder Junction Pocket Park (5153501100)BJ Traffic Signal Junction & V l (310BJ003NC)Project TitleBoulder Junction Rail Plaza (5153501050)BJ Traffic Signal Bluff St & 30th (310BJ002NC)FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountComputer Replacement $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 1,885,671 $ 2,088,024 $ 958,321 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 1,885,671 $ 2,088,024 $ 958,321 $ - $ 122,234 $ - $ 41,895 $ 80,339 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 108,987 $ 10,500 $ - $ - $ 31,482 $ 53,604 $ 13,401 $ - $ 4,847,207 $ 703,638 $ 702,115 $ 1,174,388 $ 751,182 $ 745,731 $ 770,153 $ - $ 2,409,400 $ 111,090 $ 219,232 $ 241,423 $ 1,034,092 $ 630,026 $ 173,537 $ - $ 49,798 $ 8,117 $ 1,012 $ - $ 33,058 $ 6,381 $ 1,230 $ - $ 773,336 $ 7,875 $ - $ 77,322 $ 35,857 $ 652,282 $ - $ - Network Hardware Replacement (1901901511)Security Administration (1901901517)Server Hardware Replacement (1901901515)Project TitleData Backup and Disaster Recovery (1901901520)Database Hardware Replacement (1901901530)End User Device Replacement (1901901505)FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountDowntown Commercial District $ 3,009,000 $ 730,800 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,009,000 $ 730,800 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 609,000 $ 330,800 $ 278,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 1,425,765 $ 1,425,765 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,425,765 $ 1,425,765 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SubtotalCAGID Trinity Commons Construction (620CAGT i )Downtown Parking Garage Major M i t(620CAGM i )Downtown Pearl St Mall Amenity R l(620CAGFMAL)Project TitleSubtotalDowntown 14th St Prkg Lot Improve (620CAGFL t)Downtown Parking Garage Elevators (620CAGELEV)FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountCapital Development $ 800,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 550,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 800,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 550,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - SubtotalProject TitleMiscellaneous Facilty DET Proj (3158885315)Fund TotalViolet Park (5153302500) 48 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountGeneral $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ - $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Radio System Analysis (3158886015)Project TitleRecords Management System (RMS) (255RMS2015)FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountLottery $ 3,069,746 $ 641,041 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 3,069,746 $ 641,041 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ 485,741 $ - $ 155,300 $ 155,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 752,646 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ - $ 2,161,800 $ 360,300 $ 360,300 $ 360,300 $ 360,300 $ 360,300 $ 360,300 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 205,330 $ 205,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 205,330 $ 205,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Foothills Nature Center (555CR16001)Project TitleFlood Eng. Trails (555BOULD33)Greenways Program - Lottery Fund (610SW63100)Playground and Irrigation Repairs (5152112110)FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountFacility Renovation & Replace $ 9,247,000 $ 2,157,000 $ 1,425,000 $ 1,485,000 $ 2,268,000 $ 1,078,000 $ 834,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 1,742,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 100,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 452,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 6,725,000 $ 1,737,000 $ 1,295,000 $ 1,255,000 $ 1,038,000 $ 848,000 $ 552,000 $ - $ 1,366,000 $ 390,000 $ - $ 723,000 $ - $ 253,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 813,000 $ 120,000 $ 126,000 $ 132,000 $ 138,000 $ 145,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 169,000 $ - $ 169,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,545,000 $ 515,000 $ 380,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 450,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 132,000 $ 132,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 780,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 480,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - Facility Assessments (3158885115)Misc Space Needs and Analysis (3158883614)Tantra Shop Renovation (3150400415)West Senior Center Maj Maint & R h (3150254715)Aquatics Facility Repairs (3158885715)EBCC Replace Pool Air Handlers (3150558815)Fire Stations Major Maintenance (3158885515)Martin Park Shelter Major Maint (3150340215)Misc Facility Maintenance Projects (3155904615)North Boulder Park Shelter Rep (3150330215)Pool Replastering (3158885215)Recreation Facility Repairs (3158885615)Stazio Tensile Canopy Covering R l(3150590815)Project TitleEast Boulder Community Center Ren (3150558715)Outdoor Lighting Improvements (3158883315)Upgrade EV Chargers/Battery Storage (3158886116) 49 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountOpen Space $ 48,705,300 $ 11,545,300 $ 7,945,000 $ 7,455,000 $ 7,080,000 $ 7,390,000 $ 7,290,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 11,169,300 $ 3,919,300 $ 1,975,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 417,300 $ 417,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ 75,000 $ 175,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 852,000 $ 252,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,700,000 $ 350,000 $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 2,831,000 $ 1,421,000 $ 270,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 720,000 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 360,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 991,000 $ 991,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 34,200,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 32,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - STSA - Plan and Implementation (555STSA001)Visitor Infrastructure System Wid (555VISW001)WTSA Implementation (555WTSA001)OSMP Innovations (555CO16001)OSMP Master Plan Update (555OSMP001)S.Bldr Crk at E.Bldr Ditch Const (555ES16003)South Boulder Creek Instream Flow (555SBIF001)Project TitleNTSA - Plan and Implementation (555NTSA001)Boulder Crk Above 95th Restoration (555ES16002)ETSA - Plan and Implementation (555ETSA001)Facility Modifications-Space Needs (555FA16001)Flood Eng. Trails (555BOULD33)Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage (555ES16001)Agriculture Facilities Projects (555AG15001)Boulder & S Bldr Crk Flood Repair (555ES15002)Cultural Resource/Facility R t t(555CR15001)Farm Site Improvements (555AG16001)Flood Trails (555BOULD24)Hartnagle House Restoration (555CR15002)South Mesa Trailhead Bridge R l (555PM15001)Radio System Analysis (3158886015)Boulder Creek Bikepath Extension (555TA16001)Mineral Rights Acquisition (555MRA001)OSMP Real Estate Acquisition (555REA001)Water Rights Acquisition (555WRA001) 50 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountStormwater & Flood Mgt Utility $ 59,144,721 $ 3,564,080 $ 6,994,483 $ 33,131,155 $ 4,903,241 $ 5,547,837 $ 5,003,925 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 25,040,104 $ 3,239,580 $ 5,075,783 $ 6,562,655 $ 3,601,241 $ 3,557,137 $ 3,003,708 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,750,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,250,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,941,298 $ 730,080 $ 759,283 $ 789,655 $ 821,241 $ 854,090 $ 986,949 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,076,390 $ 162,000 $ 169,000 $ 175,500 $ 182,500 $ 190,000 $ 197,390 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,637,416 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,165,547 $ 1,221,869 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 5,172,732 $ 594,900 $ 618,700 $ 643,500 $ 669,000 $ 1,330,700 $ 1,315,932 $ - $ 2,438,766 $ 270,400 $ 281,200 $ 292,500 $ 304,000 $ 632,700 $ 657,966 $ - $ 2,668,966 $ 324,500 $ 337,500 $ 351,000 $ 365,000 $ 633,000 $ 657,966 $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 3,627,285 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 633,000 $ 660,000 $ 684,285 $ - $ 3,627,285 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 633,000 $ 660,000 $ 684,285 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 26,825,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 25,325,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 26,825,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 25,325,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - South Boulder Creek Phase I (610SW00400)Storm Sewer Rehabilitation (610SW76000)Transportation Coordination (610SW78000)Utility Billing Computer System (610SW45300)Preflood Property Acquisition (610SW62200)Skunk Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW00600)Stormwater Quality Improvements (610SW77500)Twomile Canyon Creek (610SW00800)Upper Goose Creek Drainage (610SW75000)Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW01500)Four Mile - Upland to Violet (610SW02100)Greenways Program - Flood fund (610SW63000)Gregory Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW02400)Local Drainage Improvements (610SW77000)Bluebell & King's Gultch (610SW00900)Project TitleBear Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation (610SW02300)FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPermanent Parks & Recreation $ 8,650,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 2,200,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 4,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,650,000 $ 400,000 $ 700,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 950,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 1,100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 2,250,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ADA Compliance Initiatives (5153302200)Boulder Reservoir South It(5153305020)Flatiron Golf Course Repairs (5153304150)Reservoir/Tom Watson Site Plan (5153305055)Scott Carpenter/Mapleton Site Plan (5153302300)Urban Forest Management Plan (5153303050)Yard/Maintenance Facility Site Pl (5153302310)Project TitleAthletic Field Development (5153302060) 51 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountTransportation Development $ 3,380,000 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 $ 730,000 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 3,380,000 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 $ 730,000 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,880,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 470,000 $ 470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 470,000 $ 470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 28th St Valmont to Iris (Baseline) (310TD019NC)TIP Local Match TMP Implementation (310TD052OG)Project TitleMisc Development Coordination (310TD004OC)Signal Maintenance & Upgrade (310TR778OC)FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountTransportation $ 46,878,500 $ 7,707,000 $ 6,651,500 $ 14,527,500 $ 5,997,500 $ 5,997,500 $ 5,997,500 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 10,392,000 $ 3,354,500 $ 1,347,500 $ 5,397,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - $ 257,000 $ 257,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,050,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 9,467,000 $ 1,694,000 $ 1,694,000 $ 1,429,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,550,000 $ - $ 893,000 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ - $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ - $ 4,800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ 3,774,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 596,500 $ 345,500 $ 100,000 $ 151,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 289,000 $ 138,000 $ - $ 151,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 26,423,000 $ 2,313,000 $ 3,510,000 $ 7,550,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 4,350,000 $ - $ 860,000 $ 860,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,350,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ - $ 480,000 $ 120,000 $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - $ 15,483,000 $ 483,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ - Boulder Slough Multiuse Path 30th (310TR151NG)Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements (310TR692OC)Project Title19th St (Norwood to Sumac) (310TR154NG)Arap Comp St Recon/Bldr Crk U d (310TR156NC)Broadway Recon Violet to 36 $ - TIP Local Match/TMP Implementation (310TR052OG)Trans Corridor 30th & Colorado (310TR479OC)Greenways Program Transportation (310TR630OC)Deficient Street Light Pole R l (310TR001OC)East Arapahoe Transp Corridor St d (310TR480NC)Radio System Analysis (3158886015)Major Capital Reconstruction (310TR003OC)Ped Facilities Repair, Replace, ADA(310TR773OC)30th St and Colorado Bike/Ped U d (310TR153NG)Bldr County/City Joint TIP P j t (310TR157NG)Ped Facs Enh Missing Links C i (310TR112OC)28th St - Valmont to Iris (B li (310TR743NC) 52 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountWastewater Utility $ 58,052,128 $ 4,355,600 $ 5,987,421 $ 5,571,420 $ 7,335,868 $ 27,559,276 $ 7,242,543 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 29,573,075 $ 570,000 $ 2,050,397 $ 1,476,915 $ 2,877,582 $ 20,731,179 $ 1,867,002 $ - $ 3,749,723 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 647,590 $ 1,346,988 $ 1,730,145 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 175,479 $ - $ 175,479 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,320,000 $ 120,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,866,016 $ - $ 674,918 $ 701,915 $ 729,992 $ 759,191 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,161,857 $ 150,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 18,625,000 $ 136,857 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 28,479,053 $ 3,785,600 $ 3,937,024 $ 4,094,505 $ 4,458,286 $ 6,828,097 $ 5,375,541 $ - $ 5,380,670 $ 811,200 $ 843,648 $ 877,394 $ 912,490 $ 948,989 $ 986,949 $ - $ 1,829,626 $ 216,320 $ 224,973 $ 233,972 $ 243,331 $ 253,064 $ 657,966 $ - $ 18,294,276 $ 2,758,080 $ 2,868,403 $ 2,983,139 $ 3,102,465 $ 3,226,563 $ 3,355,626 $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ 184,481 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 184,481 $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 375,000 $ - WWTF Digester Complex (610WW60700)WWTF Rehabilitation (610WW61500)Condition Assessment Program (610WW45100)Sanitary Sewer Manhole R h bilit ti(610WW42000)Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation (610WW40000)WWTF Cogeneration (610WW62900)Utility Billing Computer System $ - Project TitleGoose Creek SS Interceptor Rehab (610WW43300)Marshall Landfill (610WW07800)Wastewater Treatment Facility P (610WW60000)WWTF Activated Sludge (610WW64000)WWTF Electrical (610WW63900)WWTF Instrumentation/Control (610WW63700)WWTF Laboratory (610WW61000)WWTF Permit Improvements (610WW61700) 53 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountWater Utility $ 126,457,271 $ 33,456,751 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 11,196,676 $ 19,698,521 $ 12,318,146 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 84,350,608 $ 26,610,000 $ 2,511,322 $ 38,314,303 $ 1,668,882 $ 9,148,194 $ 6,097,907 $ - $ 684,285 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 684,285 $ - $ 115,000 $ 65,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,566,060 $ 100,000 $ 175,000 $ - $ 835,551 $ 8,455,509 $ - $ - $ 25,140,000 $ 25,140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 561,773 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 486,773 $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 430,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 40,801,585 $ 850,000 $ 2,036,322 $ 37,915,263 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 267,664 $ - $ - $ 24,333 $ 243,331 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 540,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,519,534 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 492,685 $ 4,926,849 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 39,299,163 $ 6,839,251 $ 6,168,263 $ 2,743,289 $ 9,277,794 $ 8,050,327 $ 6,220,239 $ - $ 3,882,997 $ 125,000 $ - $ 341,636 $ 3,416,361 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,003,748 $ 667,416 $ 1,169,859 $ 1,216,653 $ 1,265,319 $ 1,315,932 $ 1,368,569 $ - $ 116,986 $ - $ 116,986 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 860,000 $ - $ 380,000 $ 480,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 168,434 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 118,434 $ - $ - $ 18,613,540 $ 3,352,960 $ 3,487,078 $ - $ 3,771,624 $ 3,922,489 $ 4,079,389 $ - $ 108,160 $ - $ - $ - $ 108,160 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 799,875 $ 799,875 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 316,330 $ - $ - $ - $ 316,330 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,314,000 $ 314,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 171,071 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 171,071 $ - $ 1,294,682 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 343,472 $ 351,210 $ - $ 271,875 $ - $ 271,875 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - Zone 3 Transmission Pipes (610WA00500)Sunshine Hydroelectric/PRV F ilit (610WA34700)Kossler Dam (610WA11900)Lakewood Pipeline (610WA78000)Watershed Improvements (610WA52000)Zone 1 Transmission Pipes (610WA00200)Zone 2 Transmission Pipes (610WA00400)Source Water Pressure Reducing, P (610WA94000)Reservoir Water Treatment Facility (610WA90000)Silver Lake Dam (610WA61500)Silver Lake Hydroelectric/PRV (610WA97000)Skyscraper Dam (610WA64000)Island Lake Dam (610WA62600)Albion Dam (610WA62800)Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair (610WA10600)Barker-Kossler Penstock Repair (610WA10700)Betasso Hydroelectric / PRF (610WA97400)Betasso Storage Tank R h bilit ti (610WA67600)Kohler Storage Tank Roof (610WA67100)Green Lake 2 Dam (610WA62700)Lakewood Dam (610WA62000)Lakewood Hydroelectric/PRV (610WA90100)NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake Pi (610WA54700)Orodell Hydro/PRV Facility (610WA33100)Pearl Street Hydro/PRV Facility (610WA36000)Utility Billing Computer System (610WA45300)Source Water Monitoring/Protection (610WA44200)Water System Security/Quality I (610WA44000)Wittemyer Ponds (610WA65000)Boulder Reservoir (610WA61000)Distribution Waterline Replacement (610WA38900)Farmer's Ditch (610WA55000)Goose Lake Dam (610WA61200) $ - Betasso Water Treatment Facility (610WA94700)Project TitleBarker Dam and Reservoir (610WA11000)Barker Dam Outlet (610WA10900)Automated Meter Reading 54 Table 2-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary by Fund (Cont.) FundEstimated Total Cost2016 Recommended2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountWater Utility (Cont.) $ 126,457,271 $ 33,456,751 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 11,196,676 $ 19,698,521 $ 12,318,146 $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 2,800,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ 2,800,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - Radio System Analysis (3158886015)Project TitleCarter Lake Hydroelectric (610WA93000) 55 City of Boulder SPECIAL HIGHLIGHT ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Introduction The Special Highlight on the Capital Improvement Bond section details a significant, multi- department, capital improvement effort currently underway in the City of Boulder. Implementation of the bond is consistent with the City Council support, voter approval, stakeholder committee recommendation, and meets the legal requirements of the bond council. A website has been created that allows the community to track the progress of implementation of the bond projects at www.bouldercolorado.gov/bondprojects. Background information on the Capital Improvement Bond, including bond issuance, is available in the 2014-2019 CIP document at: 2014-2019 CIP Special Highlight on Capital Bond. Overview of Capital Investment Strategy and Capital Improvement Bond Implementation In the November 2011 election, City of Boulder voters approved a measure, by a 3-to-1 margin, that would allow the city to leverage existing revenues to bond for up to $49 million to fund capital projects that address significant deficiencies and high priority infrastructure improvements throughout the community. Because the city was able to leverage existing revenues, the measure did not raise taxes. The $49 million bond package has a 20-year payback and 85 percent of the total proceeds of $55.11 million (including the bond issuance premium and accumulated interest) are required to be spent by March 22, 2015. One-hundred percent of the total funding is required to be spent by March 22, 2017. As of July 15, 2015, 98 percent of the total funding had been spent. The city met the three- year spending requirement and is working to ensure 100 percent of the total funding is spent by March 22, 2017. Project Highlights and Status There are 85 individual projects that are being implemented with the bond funds throughout the community. The individual projects are grouped into 26 categories which are briefly Highlights at a Glance 26 categories containing a total of nearly 85 individual projects: 14% under construction 86% completed 98% of total funding has been spent or encumbered as of June 30, 2015. 56 described below along with the current status of the projects as of July 2015. Most of the projects have been completed with approximately 14 percent that are under construction. Details related to each project can be found at www.bouldercolorado.gov/bondprojects. 1. Boulder Reservoir Infrastructure Improvements: This project is complete, including improving the entry gate, roadway, parking lot, utility infrastructure, and grounds and landscape. The new Gateway Enhancement project at the main Reservoir entrance at 51st Street is complete and provides improved traffic access, new entry buildings and an improved inspection station for Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS). Utility upgrades are complete and provide improved water and sanitary sewer facilities at the reservoir. 2. Columbia Cemetery Upgrades and Enhancements: This project is complete, including constructing new fencing, repairing headstones and improving irrigation. A new fence has been installed along the west property boundary in keeping with the historic quality of the cemetery and headstones have been repaired. A new raw- water irrigation system has been installed to improve water conservation and efficiency. 3. Park Shelter Replacements and Improvements: Includes maintaining existing park shelters and providing critical shade amenities within multiple parks. Shade shelters construction at Valmont City Park, Foothills Dog Park, Eaton Park, Martin Park and Pleasant View Fields are complete. New shelters and a restroom at Harlow Platts Park are scheduled to be complete later in 2015. 4. Existing Park and Recreation Facility Renovations: Includes addressing ongoing maintenance and accessibility while improving the overall safety and enjoyment of park facilities. Canyon Park, Columbine Park, Harlow Platts Park, Pineview Park, East Palo Park, North Boulder Park, and Crestview Park are completed with improvements ranging from turf and irrigation renovations, playground replacement, accessibility compliance and replacement of park amenities. Pleasant View Sports facility, Mapleton Ballfields, and Stazio Ballfields all have completed parking lot and ADA compliance upgrades. 5. South Boulder Recreation Center Floor Replacement: Includes replacing water-damaged wooden Capital Improvement Bond Sign highlighting a Capital Improvement Bond Program  off of  Gillaspie Drive.  57 floor at the South Boulder Recreation Center (SBRC) gym and racquetball courts. During the design and investigative stages in January 2012, low levels of mercury and lead contamination were found in the underlying floor membrane in the gym, racquetball and Pilates rooms. Although posing no immediate risks to patrons and staff, it was decided to remove the old flooring system in all three rooms. The floor has been replaced along with installation of necessary ADA compliance upgrades that provide full access to the new gym floor by all members of the community. 6. Downtown Commercial District Improvements: Includes public right-of-way enhancements to downtown commercial district and Pearl Street Mall. 15th Street between Arapahoe and Canyon to improve pedestrian accessibility as well as streetscape character is complete. A new interactive kiosk for public use on the Pearl Street Mall is also complete. Streetscape improvements on West Pearl Street from 11th to 7th Streets are under construction, with an estimated completion date of summer 2015. 7. Main Library Renovation: Includes extensive renovations that were primarily funded by the Capital Improvement Bond, such as: renovating and relocating the children’s area; creating a new, larger Teen Space and a “maker” space; relocating and renovating the fiction, music and movies area; replacing outdated electrical and data distribution systems; repairing clerestory windows; improving Americans with Disability Act accessibility; replacing worn carpeting; providing facilities for café service on the library bridge; and installing additional HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) equipment to improve building cooling. The project is complete and throughout the renovation the library remained open to the public. 8. Replace Financial and Human Resources Software: Includes replacing the outdated financial, human resources and payroll systems with an integrated, more modern and comprehensive software solution. The project has several phases and the first phase of implementing the finance system is complete. The remaining phases are expected to be completed later in 2015 and 2016. 9. Major Business Software Replacement: Includes replacing and augmenting major business software, such as website/eGov, records management, and permit systems. The redesign of the city’s website is complete, including a web-based Constituent Relationship Management (CRM) system. It is anticipated that the citywide records management and document imaging software will be completed in summer 2015 and the city’s permit management system in summer 2017. 10. Facility Electrical, Plumbing, HVAC and Elevator Replacements: Includes infrastructure overdue for replacement and repair projects such as at the Public Safety Building, Municipal Building, Capital Improvement Bond 58 Main Library, Dairy Center, and Fleet Services. These projects have been completed, with the exception of the elevator repairs at the Public Safety Building. These repairs will be completed later in 2015. 11. Facility Parking Lot Repair: This project is complete, including repairs for some of the city's asphalt parking areas, such as downtown facilities, fire stations, and Spruce Pool. 12. Facility Outdoor Lighting: Includes solar canopy, car charging, and lighting projects, which would eliminate electrical conduit runs. Two of the solar canopies/car chargers are complete with one at East Boulder Recreation Center and one at the lot at Broadway and Spruce. New lights with solar powered fixtures will be installed in the public lot next to the Park Central building at the corner of Broadway and Arapahoe later in 2015. 13. Facility ADA Compliance: Includes prioritizing and adapting city facilities that do not meet the 2010 requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Based on an assessment, ADA improvements have been made at the Main Library, and South Boulder Recreation Center. In addition, by using primarily bond funds, a new building is being completed for ADA- accessible restrooms, along with extensive site and infrastructure improvements at Chautauqua Park, completion date is mid-July 2015. 14. Fire Station #8: Previously referred to as the Wildland Fire Station, this station consolidates the operations of the Boulder Fire-Rescue Department’s Wildland Fire personnel into one new 10,500 square-foot facility on the site of the existing Fire Training Center, east of the Boulder Reservoir property. The facility is constructed and provides accommodations for a full-time crew of Wildland Fire Specialists, and storage and maintenance of vehicles and support equipment for the wildland fire management. 15. Replace Substandard Bridges, Structures, Signs and Systems: Includes the replacement of the 63rd Street Bridge, irrigation system replacement on the Foothills Parkway landscaping, replacement of substandard signs and the replacement of signal light bulbs with LED lights. The 63rd Street Bridge is complete and the Foothills irrigation system replacement between Colorado and US 36 is complete. All of the traffic signal lighting (red, yellow and green) has been replaced with LED displays. The substandard sign installations have started with completion anticipated later this year. 16. Arterial Road Reconstruction: Arapahoe is the arterial in highest need of reconstruction. The project has been completed and improvements primarily include a reconstruction of the street with concrete as well as storm sewer and other underground utility improvements, sidewalk, bus stop, landscaping and urban design improvements. In addition, an extension of the existing student-drop off area and multi-use path on the south side of Arapahoe Avenue Capital Improvement Bond 59 along the Boulder High School property was also constructed as part of this work. 17. Road Pavement Repair: Includes overlay and chip seal of various streets throughout the city. Approximately one-third of the funds will be spent each year to overlay approximately 50 blocks, or 5.5 miles, of roadway, in addition to the city’s annual repair schedule. 18. Road Reconstruction: Includes reconstruction of streets that rate below 25, on the Overall Condition Index (OCI) that are mostly lower volume streets and cul-de-sacs. Approximately one-third of the funds will be spent each year to reconstruct approximately 14 blocks, or approx 1.5 miles of roadway, in addition to the city’s annual reconstruction schedule. 19. Transportation Boulder Junction Improvements: Includes the Junction Place Bridge at Goose Creek and the Pearl Parkway Multi-Way Boulevard from 30th to BNSF Railroad tracks on the south side of Pearl. The south side of Pearl Parkway is complete, and the Junction Place Bridge is under construction to be completed later in 2015. 20. Transportation Transit System Enhancements: Includes two projects, the largest of which is the 14th and Walnut Street Transit Center Improvements, including bus, pedestrian, and bicycle access improvements. The second transit project provides additional money for transit stop improvements throughout the city. Both projects are complete. 21. Transportation New Multi-Use Path Connections: Includes various multi-use path connections throughout the city, such as constructing a multi-use path on 28th Street from Arapahoe to Goose Creek, and constructing a new multi-use path at 22nd Street east of Naropa, from Arapahoe to the Boulder Creek Path. All projects are complete. 22. Transportation Pedestrian Enhancements: Includes pedestrian crossing treatments, small and large missing sidewalk links and pedestrian improvements at Manhattan and S. Boulder Road. The enhancements to the pedestrian crossing at Canyon and 21st Street have been completed as well as the missing link on Gillaspie from Greenbriar to Julliard, Folsom south of Arapahoe on the east side, and on Pine Street and 27th Street. 23. Transportation Intersection Improvements: Includes improvements at the Foothills/Baseline intersection and the South Boulder Road/Manhattan Intersection. All projects are complete except the South Boulder Road/Manhattan intersection which will be completed later in 2015. 24. Transportation Bike System Enhancements: Includes additional bike system signage such as the designation of new on-street bike routes and installing way-finding and destination signs along existing greenways. Projects are complete. 25. Police Equipment: Includes upgrading the records management system and adding more in- car video systems to the patrol fleet and personal video systems. Projects are complete. 26. Police Equipment Upgrades and Replacement: Includes replacing the bomb squad robot, and Capital Improvement Bond 60 purchasing equipment to operate a DNA Lab in Boulder in partnership with the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and upgrading the emergency radio infrastructure. These projects are all complete. Implementation To ensure that the city meets the spending and timing requirements of the capital improvement bond, the city has collected spending plans for each project and closely monitors construction progress. Table 3-1 shows the annual expenditure plan for each project for 2011 through 2015. Next Steps Council will continue to be updated on the capital improvement bond progress through memos or heads ups, as appropriate, based on specific milestones. In addition, public updates will be announced through press releases, social media and other commemorative events as some of the key projects are completed. Information on those projects that have traffic or multi-use path impacts will be provided to the public and media through weekly “Cone Zones” reports and other outreach materials. A map of the projects and status updates are available at www.bouldercolorado.gov/bondprojects. Future CIP documents will continue to include a section on the capital bond projects until they are completed. Capital Improvement Bond 61 Capital Improvement Bond Table 3-1: 2011-2015 Spend Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND Total Amount 2011 Actual 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Actual 2015 Projected Arterial Road Reconstruction 5,280,000$ -$ 292,179$ 1,879,397$ 2,682,984$ 425,441$ Boulder Reservoir Infrastructure Improvements 3,300,915 - 794,813 1,312,067 1,110,253 83,782 Columbia Cemetery Upgrades and Enhancements 637,000 - 87,280 237,741 151,387 160,592 Downtown Commercial District Improvements 2,935,000 - 79,089 979,599 1,408,417 467,894 Existing Park and Recreation Facility Renovations 4,215,035 - 1,605,009 874,086 956,841 779,099 Facility ADA Compliance 565,000 - 50,425 49,486 106,546 358,543 Facility Electrical, Plumbing, HVAC and Elevator Rep. 1,580,960 - 466,364 1,008,990 64,400 41,206 Facility Outdoor Lighting 71,688 - 8,611 48,196 13,744 1,136 Facility Parking Lot Repair 413,312 - 19,754 271,706 92,836 29,016 Main Library Renovations 3,200,000 - 12,481 289,353 2,202,879 695,288 Major Business Software Replacement 821,600 - 25,000 451,008 249,524 96,068 New Wildland Fire Station 3,077,718 - 20,327 182,000 2,043,872 831,519 Park Shelter Replacements and Improvements 924,965 - 355,535 239,885 41,018 288,527 P olice Equipment 253,290 - 71,224 63,668 96,412 21,986 Police Equipment Upgrades and Replacement 1,020,050 - 369,938 451,718 - 198,395 Replace Financial and Human Resources Software 4,318,693 - 259,170 763,326 1,368,989 1,927,208 Replace Substandard Bridges, Structures, Signs & Sys. 4,146,977 - 475,563 1,130,808 1,786,381 754,226 Road Pavement Repair 5,000,000 - 1,568,616 1,947,932 1,483,452 - Road Reconstruction 2,500,000 - 525,960 713,741 1,260,298 - South Boulder Recreation Center Floor Replacement 281,748 - 205,237 76,511 - - Transportation Bike System Enhancements 300,000 5,120 106,234 114,836 73,810 - Transportation Boulder Junction Improvements 5,813,023 - 855,192 2,083,198 2,594,511 280,123 Transportation Intersection Improvements 500,000 - 13,454 8,205 142,921 335,419 Transportation New Multi Use Path connections 2,000,000 5,229 354,468 235,076 1,353,185 52,042 Transportation Pedestrian Enhancements 850,000 5,658 285,531 304,954 253,857 - Transportation Transit System Enhancements 608,000 - 127,041 232,653 248,306 - Total 54,614,974$ 16,006$ 9,034,496$ 15,950,138$ 21,786,822$ 7,827,512$ [This page is intentionally blank.] 62 63 City of Boulder SPECIAL HIGHLIGHT ON SEPTEMBER 2013 FLOOD 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Flood Impact to CIP - Overview September 2013 brought unprecedented rainfall to the region causing significant flooding and extensive damage to both private property and city infrastructure. While full recovery is likely to take years, affected critical services were restored by the end of 2013. The flood has also created an opportunity to think strategically about the future. In response on Oct. 15, 2013, City Council approved key objectives to guide near-term flood recovery and the long-term resilience of the Boulder community. City-wide flood recovery costs are currently estimated at approximately $28 million dollars, although that number may change as repairs occur. This includes damage to more than: 50 city buildings/facilities; water, sewer, and stormwater infrastructure; 3 treatment facilities; 46 parks and 7 recreation facilities; Sediment and debris in all 15 drainages; 30 streets and sidewalks; 25 areas with damage to the multi-use path system; and Hundreds of Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) trails, trailheads, irrigation facilities, fences, and natural ecological resources. The city has identified approximately 321 flood related capital projects. As of July 31, 2015, the city is 78 percent complete with flood recovery projects. Key Objectives for Near-Term Flood Re- covery and Long-Term Resilience 1. Help People Get Assistance 2. Restore and Enhance Our Infrastruc- ture 3. Assist Business Recovery 4. Pursue and Focus Resources to Sup- port Recovery Efforts 5. Learn Together and Plan for the Fu- ture 64 The city is utilizing all available resources in the recovery and reimbursement process including city insurance policies, FEMA assistance, and other federal and State agencies (e.g.: Federal Highway Administration, Housing and Urban Development, Urban Drainage & Flood Control District, Colorado Water Conservation Board, etc). It is anticipated that 75% of eligible costs will eventually be reimbursed by FEMA, and an additional 12.5% by the State of Colorado. To be eligible for reimbursement the work must meet certain criteria established by FEMA and be completed within the FEMA deadline, which varies by type of project. Currently, all FEMA related work is projected to be complete by September 30, 2017. As of July 1, 2015, the expected federal/state contribution to flood recovery is $17.3 million. To date, the city has received federal and state reimbursements of $5.3 million. The city has also received over $4 million in non-FEMA grant awards to assist the city and its residents with flood recovery and resilience activities. September 2013 Flood Figure 4-1: Flood Costs by Department Transportation Utilities  FAM/Fleet  OSMP Parks & Rec  CP&S  Police Fire Other  Total  Flood Damage and Response  Costs by Department 65 Additional detail of the impacts of the flood is described in department overviews, including how the flood impacted or delayed various capital projects. Additional information on flood impacts to people, private property and infrastructure citywide and the current status of recovery can be found at www.BoulderFloodInfo.net. September 2013 Flood Figure 4-2: Sources of Funding Sources of Flood Recovery  Funding City Funds FEMA/State/FHW A Reimbursement Insurance [This page is intentionally blank.] 66 67 City of Boulder SPECIAL HIGHLIGHT ON COMMUNITY, CULTURE AND SAFETY PROJECT 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Introduction The Community, Culture and Safety (CCS) project is Boulder’s first citywide, large-scale, “pay as you go” capital improvement project funded by a special sales and use tax increase. Implementation of this multi-departmental, multiyear effort is currently underway, and is consistent with 2014 voter approval, City Council support, and steering committee recommendation. Overview of Community, Culture and Safety Capital Improvement Project In November 2014, Boulder voters approved the Community, Culture and Safety tax, a three-year 0.3 percent sales and use tax increase. The ballot language projected that the revenue from this temporary tax increase will yield $27.6 million for specific projects to improve community spaces, bolster cultural projects and organizations, and enhance safety. At the request of City Council, the city manager prepared a recommendation of city projects to be included in a proposed ballot item, as well as potential options for percentage increases in sales and use tax and the number of years that the increase would be effective. The City Council supported the recommendations on Aug. 19, 2014, and Boulder voters subsequently approved the recommendations through Ballot Measure 2A. The ballot language establishes a sales and use tax increase of 0.3 percent for the period of Jan. 1, 2015 to Dec. 31, 2017, and that all revenues collected be used to fund the capital improvement projects listed below. Up to $8.7 million for capital improvements for the Boulder Civic Area (generally bounded by Canyon Boulevard, Arapahoe Avenue, 9th Street and 13th Street) to create a more vibrant and active urban park and civic area, including recreation amenities, community spaces, safety improvements, and connections and access improvements to and through the Civic Area. Up to $3.27 million for capital improvements in the University Hill commercial district and high-density residential areas, including lighting, irrigation and to improve public streets. Up to $5.13 million for capital improvements to the Boulder Creek Path and its environs, generally between 3rd and 17th streets, including lighting and path improvements to increase 68 safety. Up to $600,000 for public art and to preserve or restore the existing public art collection. Up to $3.85 million to improve the Dairy Center for the Arts property. Up to $1.5 million for improvements to Chautauqua Park and its environs for access, pedestrian, safety, and lighting improvements. Up to $4 million for capital improvements at the Museum of Boulder, provided that the Museum of Boulder has first raised and dedicated an equal amount in compliance with the terms, conditions, and timing approved by the City Council. Any remaining funds are to be appropriated by the Boulder City Council to fund Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. The city is implementing 13 projects throughout the community that are funded by the sales and use tax increase. The city entered into funding agreements with the Dairy Center for the Arts in May 2015 and the museum of Boulder in June 2015. The first project, University Hill irrigation and tree improvements, is expected to begin in late summer 2015. The Community, Culture and Safety project website allows the community to track the progress of implementation of the CCS projects. Project Highlights Thirteen projects will be implemented with the sales and use tax funds. The individual projects are briefly described on the next two pages, and details related to each project can be found on the CCS website. Community, Culture and Safety Project 69 Table 5-1: Community, Culture and Safety Project Highlights Community, Culture and Safety Project University Hill Pedestrian Lighting Existing street lights will be replaced to provide consistent, full-spectrum “white” light in corridors along 11th Street, College Avenue, 12th Street, 13th Street, and 18th Street. $2 mil- lion Event Street Creation of a street designed for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles, as well as the ability to easily close the portion of Pennsylvania Avenue between the alley to the west and 13th Street to the east for events. $750,000 Street Trees Improve-Design and install an irrigation system for the trees along the sidewalk. Re- $520,000 Civic Area Creek at the Core Enhancements to areas north and south of Boulder Creek, including infra- structure to link the main library and creek, playgrounds and nature play areas along both sides of the creek, and improvements in the area near the Gilbert White Memorial. $4.42 million Community Spaces Improvements include the main library café/courtyard, the north library plaza, the north municipal lawn, the sister cities plaza, and areas adjacent to the Boulder Farmers’ Market. $3.07 million Connectivity and Access This includes improvements such as: creating gateways (possibly via art) and related wayfinding; pathway enhancements; signage; and improved $1.2 mil- lion Boulder Creek Path Lighting Design and construction of lighting along five segments of the Boulder Creek Path that will provide adequate and appropriate light levels for night- time visibility and safety by using fully controlled luminaries. $1.04 million Path Improvements Design and construction along four segments of Boulder Creek Path that will add a  generally‐separated pedestrian path to allow a separation of bicycle and pedes‐ trian traffic along the corridor.  $885,000 Arapahoe Avenue and 13th Street Underpass Design and construction to renovate the pedestrian and bicycle underpass at the  Boulder Creek Path, between Boulder Creek and 13th Street.  $2.5 mil- lion Eben G. Fine Park Stream Bank Restora- Stream bank stabilization, erosion protection, habitat restoration, and recreation  enhancements within Eben G. Fine Park between the northern sidewalk and Boul‐ der Creek.  $700,000 70 Table 5-1: Community, Culture and Safety Project Highlights (Cont.) Implementation To ensure that the city meets the spending and timing goals of the ballot measure, the city has collected spending plans for each project and is closely monitoring construction progress. Table 5 -3 shows the annual expenditure plan for each project for 2015 through 2018. Public Art Art Projects Public art projects for the Civic Area, University Hill, Boulder Junction garage  east face, north Boulder, a temporary neighborhood series, and additional art  maintenance projects.  $600,000 Chautauqua Lighting Phase 1 Install pedestrian lighting between the employee/musician parking area and  the Baseline Road bus stop. Lighting controls will ensure that lighting is low‐ ered when pedestrians are not present, while maintaining the lights’ visibility  with minimal energy.  $250,000 Pedestrian Safety Access and Light- ing Improve access and pedestrian safety along Baseline Road via new sidewalks,  realigned parking, enhanced pedestrian crossing treatments, and related safety  enhancements like lighting and wayfinding signs.  $1.25 million Dairy Center Theatre Improve- ments Add soundproofing, dressing rooms, reconfigure one theater into a black box  theater, expand and modernize the building’s lobby and façade, and modify an  outdoor deck area as a special events space.  $3.85 million Museum of Boulder Museum Im- provements Convert the building into an expanded museum that will accommodate larger  displays, Smithsonian‐class traveling exhibits, science and technology exhibits,  as well as enhanced programming and space for children.  $4 million Community, Culture and Safety Project 71 Table 5-2: 2015 – 2018 Spend Plan for Community, Culture and Safety Projects Next Steps City Council will be updated on the CCS project progress through periodic updates as part of Information Packet items and council Heads Up announcements. Public updates will be announced through press releases, social media and commemorative events as some of the key projects break ground or are completed. Information on projects that have traffic impacts will be provided to the public and media through the www.BoulderConeZones.net map and other outreach materials. Project status updates are available on the CCS website. Future Capital Improvement Program (CIP) documents will continue to include a section about the CCS projects until they are completed. Project Budget 2015 Project Expenses 2016 Project Expenses 2017 Project Expenses 2018 Project Expenses Hill Residential Pedestrian Lighting $2,000,000 $138,000 $1,862,000 - - Hill Commercial District Event Street $750,000 $60,000 $690,000 - - Hill Commercial District Irrigation and Street Tree Improvements $520,000 $520,000 - - - University Hill Total $3,270,000 $718,000 $2,552,000 - - Civic Area $8,700,000 $1,631,250 $2,689,750 $4,379,000 - Boulder Creek Path Lighting $1,040,000 $60,320 $347,680 $632,000 - Boulder Creek Path Improvements $885,000 $115,000 $230,000 $540,000 - Boulder Creek Arapahoe Avenue/13th Street Underpass $2,500,000 $135,000 $210,000 $655,000 $1,500,000 Boulder Creek Eben Fine Park Stream Bank Restoration $700,000 $340,000 $360,000 - - Boulder Creek Total $5,125,000 $650,320 1,147,680 $1,827,000 $1,500,000 Public Art $600,000 $410,000 $190,000 - - Chautauqua Phase 1 $250,000 $200,000 $50,000 - - Chautauqua Pedestrian Safety Access and Lighting $1,250,000 $90,000 $660,000 $500,000 - Chautauqua Total $1,500,000 $290,000 $710,000 $500,000 - Dairy Center for the Arts $3,850,000 $2,300,000 $1,550,000 - - Museum of Boulder $4,000,000 $2,522,000 $1,203,000 $275,000 - Contingency $555,000 $175,000 $205,000 $145,000 $30,000 TOTAL $27,600,000 $8,696,570 $10,247,430 $7,126,000 $1,530,000 Community, Culture and Safety Project [This page is intentionally blank.] 72 73 City of Boulder SPECIAL HIGHLIGHT ON PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Introduction The City of Boulder’s budget priorities for transportation funding are the safety and preservation of the transportation system, including maintaining all streets in a good and safe condition. The Transportation Division has established a Pavement Management Program (PMP) for Boulder’s 300-mile street system, which includes inspecting and rating all streets on a three-year interval to maintain awareness of existing conditions and guide where pavement repairs will be made in future years. Funding Between 2011 and 2013, Boulder voters approved additional funding for transportation through the Capital Improvement Bond and two sales tax revenue ballot initiatives. Previous funding levels were not adequate to maintain acceptable street pavement conditions. In 2011, Boulder voters approved a Capital Improvement Bond which provided $12.5 million to fund street resurfacing and reconstruction throughout the city. The Bond fund allowed the city to accelerate street pavement maintenance from 2012 to 2014. In November, 2013, Boulder voters’ passed two ballot measures which dedicated additional sales tax revenues for transportation maintenance and operations through 2029. This additional sales tax included approximately $1.6 million annually for street pavement maintenance, and $800,000 per year for major capital construction and maintenance (which address operational and/or functional deficiencies with existing multimodal facilities). The increased transportation funding levels will help the city continue to maintain and improve street pavement conditions throughout Boulder to meet the goals of the city’s PMP. The Transportation Division is committed to using cost effective treatments to prevent street conditions from deteriorating and requiring more costly maintenance. 74 Pavement Management Program The Transportation Division developed its PMP via creation of a database of the city’s streets with an Overall Condition Index (OCI) rating system. Overall Conditions Index The Overall Conditions Index (OCI) is a numerical rating system commonly used by transportation agencies to indicate the general condition of pavement infrastructure. The OCI was developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers and is based on a visual survey of the number and types of distresses in a pavement. OCI ratings range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible conditions. Table 6-1: Overall Conditions Index Pavement Management Program Pavement Condition Index Description Relative Remaining Life Definition 90 – 100 Excellent 15 to 25 Years Like new condition – little to no maintenance required 80 – 90 Very Good 12 to 20 Years Routine maintenance such as patching, crack sealing with surface treatments such as rubber chip seals and micro surfacing 65 – 80 Good 10 to 15 Years Seal coating required, thin overlay or overlay with more surface preparation 50 – 65 Fair 7 to 12 Years Thicker overlays required, or a thinner overlay with more surface replacement or base reconstruction possible 30 – 50 Poor 5 to 10 Years Sections will require very thick overlays, surface replacement, base reconstruction and possible sub grade stabilization 0 - 30 Failed & Very Poor 0 to 5 Years Failed or high percentage of full reconstruction 75 The city’s goal is to maintain an average OCI rating of 75 to 80 for all streets in Boulder, which is consistent with other communities in the Denver metro area. The average OCI rating for City of Boulder roadways is currently 76.5. PMP Strategy The goal of a PMP is to identify the optimal level of funding, timing, and renewal strategies that will keep the roadway network at or above a “Good” OCI rating. The end result is that the best strategy may be to defer a costly reconstruction on one street in order to complete less expensive treatments on other streets to minimize its deterioration into a more costly type of treatment, such as reconstruction. Streets that need reconstruction may stay in that state for a longer period of time while other streets are moving down the deterioration curve. An early and inexpensive treatment may prevent streets from getting to the point of needing the next level of costly treatment. Figure 6-1 – Pavement Deterioration and Life Cycle Costs As shown in Figure 6-1, streets that are repaired when they are in a good condition will cost less over their lifetime than streets that are allowed to deteriorate to a poor condition. Without an adequate, routine PMP, streets require more frequent reconstruction, thereby costing millions of extra dollars. Pavement Management Program Pavement Quality  Excellent 40% of pavement life   has a 15% drop in quality   Very Good 15% of pavement life     Good $1 spent now   has a 40% drop in quality   Fair     Poor   Costs $8 if delayed   Very Poor       Time 76 Comparative costs for the most typical treatments are shown below. Table 6-2: Comparative Costs Existing Conditions Boulder’s street system is classified by road type (local, collector, or arterial) with local streets comprising 71%, collector streets comprising 12%, and arterial streets comprising 17%, of the City’s street system. Currently, roughly half of the City’s streets have an OCI rating in Very Good and Excellent ranges, with nearly 80% of the street system rated “Good” or better. A summary of the condition of streets by street classification is provided below. Table 6-3: Condition of Streets Peer Comparison A comparison of selected metropolitan regions’ OCI ratings by street classification was conducted in March, 2015. However, all cities in this study did not use the same OCI scale for determining ratings. For example, an Excellent OCI rating is 86-100 in Vancouver, British Columbia, and 80 – 100 in Denver, Colorado; similar variations were found for other OCI ratings. Therefore, though Boulder ranked within the top third for arterial and collector pavement with OCI ratings of Good or Excellent, the analysis was not directly equivalent. Denver To address this, a normalized comparison of Boulder and Denver OCI ratings by street Treatment Type Approximate Cost Crack Seal $1/yd² Chip Seal $4 – $5/yd² Overlay $15 - $17/yd² Reconstruction $30 - $35/yd² Excellent  (90 – 100) Very Good  (80 – 90) Good  (65-80) Fair  (50-65) Very Poor  (< 50) Local % 26% 24% 28% 13% 10% Collector % 23% 25% 34% 12% 6% Arterial % 32% 24% 30% 8% 5% Pavement Management Program 77 classification was undertaken. This exercise found Boulder’s weighted average OCI rating exceeded Denver for both Arterials and Collector streets, and was comparable for Local streets. Table 6-4: Weighted Average OCI Comparison PMP Improvements Approximately 35 miles of streets were resurfaced with asphalt and an additional 22 miles of streets received a chip seal surface treatment from 2012-2014 due to the Capital Improvement Bond funding and the first year of the transportation dedicated sales tax in 2014. As a comparison, approximately 22 miles of streets were resurfaced and 11 miles of streets were chip sealed in the previous 3 year period from 2009-2011. Approximately 8.3 miles of street resurfacing, 7.5 miles of chip seal, and 0.5 miles of street reconstruction are planned for 2015. Supplementary community benefits of the PMP include installation of curb access ramps that meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines; greater inter-departmental coordination including coordinating projects with the sidewalk improvement program, and with water and sanitary sewer and street drainage projects; and greater external coordination, such as with Xcel Energy as they conduct gas line replacements. Conclusions The additional transportation funding provided by the 2011 Bond and 2013 sales tax ballot initiatives have supported progress towards meeting the City’s PMP goals. However, it is still early in the implementation of the PMP and much work remains to be completed. Additionally, there are a large number of potholes, likely exasperated by a hard 2014/2015 winter season, that require repair. Potential future adjustments in funding and practices may be implemented based on results of the next several years. Weighted Average OCI Boulder Denver Local 75.5 73 Collectors 77 66 Arterials 80 62 Pavement Management Program [This page is intentionally blank.] 78 79 City of Boulder COMMUNITY VITALITY 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission Community Vitality (CV) serves the downtown, University Hill and affected communities by providing quality program, parking, enforcement, maintenance and alternative modes services through the highest level of customer service, efficient management and effective problem solving. Funding Overview CV manages programs in five funds: Downtown Commercial District Fund – including restricted Central Area General Improvement District (CAGID) parking and tax revenues and on-street meter revenues University Hill Commercial District Fund – including restricted University Hill General Improvement District (UHGID) parking and tax revenues and on-street meter revenues Boulder Junction Access District (BJAD) Funds – Parking and Travel Demand Management (TDM) funds – including district tax revenues and eventually PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes) payments, and parking revenues General Fund – including on-street parking revenues, Neighborhood Parking Permit program revenues, and parking enforcement revenues. Funding from the Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund supported a number of projects managed by CV. CIB funding is indicated by the following symbol: The Community, Culture, & Safety Tax supports a number of projects managed by CV and are indicated with an asterisk (*). Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 CAGID garage elevator repairs, internal painting and updating and/or replacement of the West End Streetscape at  Pearl and 10th Street.  80 Community Vitality garage lot attendant booths Downtown amenities repairs and replacement on the Pearl Street Mall and along 15th Street south of Canyon The construction phase of University Hill Community, Culture & Safety projects: commercial street tree irrigation, Pennsylvania Event Street and the residential corridor lighting* Construction of shared parking facility between CAGID/Trinity Commons of a 54 space CAGID garage. Highlights Projects expected to be completed in 2015 CAGID Garage Major Maintenance: The 2015 projects included epoxy deck coating on the second level at 1400 Walnut garages; elevator modernization at 1400 Walnut; stair replacement at 1100 Walnut and 1400 Walnut; and CAGID parking garage gate access and revenue control equipment and supporting technology replacement in all five downtown garages. A consultant will be hired to develop a CAGID Asset Maintenance Plan to plan for the long term capital improvements Downtown/Pearl Street Mall Improvements and Amenities Replacement - In collaboration with the Parks and Recreation Department, many projects were completed in 2015 including selected wooden benches repairs, replacement of the mall planter pots, refurbishment of the mall bollards, 1400 block play area surface replacement, sub grade sinkhole repairs (location of coal chutes), repainting all Pearl Street Mall light poles, replacement and repair of wrought iron loop planter fencing  West End Streetscape Improvement Project - All work associated with the West End Streetscape project on Pearl from 11th to 8th will be completed by the end of July. Community, Culture and Safety Tax projects - Design and community outreach phase will be completed for the hill commercial area event street* on Pennsylvania Avenue and the residential corridor lighting. The street tree irrigation project is anticipated for completion by the end of 2015. Priority Projects for 2016 CAGID Garage Major Maintenance: Elevator repair and refurbishment of both elevators at 1100 Spruce garage and the 1500 Pearl St garage 81 Community Vitality Interior painting of parking garages and updating/replacement of select parking attendant booths Downtown/Pearl Street Mall Improvements and Amenities Replacement: Maintenance and repairs of the pedestrian light fixtures and banner arms Trash can replacement Phase two of the wooden bench slat replacements 15th Street banner pole repairs and replacement Community, Culture and Safety Tax projects Construction phase of the hill commercial area event street on Pennsylvania Avenue Hill street tree irrigation and the residential corridor lighting Trinity Commons Partnership - Partnership with Trinity Commons and CAGID for the construction of a project that will provide affordable senior housing, a church fellowship hall, and a CAGID parking garage to serve downtown. Highlights of 2017 – 2021 Projects CAGID Garage Major Maintenance - Projects to be covered include major maintenance of the 1000 Walnut drive lane, and continued epoxy coatings and structural concrete repairs. Also to be included will be the planned projects from the 2015 CAGID Asset Maintenance Plan Downtown/Pearl Street Mall Improvements and Amenities Replacement - Reserve funds for potential replacement of the pop jet fountain, and shade structure awnings. Ongoing maintenance and replacement of Pearl Street Mall, West Pearl Streetscape and 15th Street Streetscape amenities Downtown 14th Street Parking Lots - Reserve funds for repair and replacement of lots Community, Culture and Safety Tax projects - Completion of the projects on University Hill and downtown. Board Action The Downtown Management Commission (DMC) unanimously approved the following resolution in support of both the downtown/CAGID and DUHMD/Parking CIP plan at their July commissioner meeting: Motion to approve the 2016 recommended expenditures from the Downtown Commercial District Fund. 82 Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles All proposed projects in the 2016-2021 CIP are consistent with the CIP guiding principles. All projects have sufficient funds for ongoing maintenance and operations. All projects in the proposed CIP maintain and improve existing assets. The Downtown/Pearl Street Mall Improvements/Replacements support the economic sustainability of downtown Boulder by ensuring long term sustainability of our existing infrastructure and investing in the future economic and social vitality of our community center. The CAGID garage major maintenance, the garage elevator and the downtown 14th Street Parking Lot replacement provide essential on-going major maintenance and reinvestment in the five parking facilities and three surface lots. Prioritization CV has the responsibility to maintain an adequate parking supply in Downtown Boulder and will build or buy assets as available. The division is also responsible for maintaining all CAGID parking garage assets and the surface parking lots on 14th Street, in order to protect the investment and sustain functionality and safety. The Downtown/Pearl Street Mall improvements are prioritized by necessary maintenance, replacement and repair of all amenities in the downtown area. CAGID is responsible for providing parking in the district. Partnering with Trinity church is an opportunity to provide this resource. Funds are currently available in fund balance. Projects Not in Master Plan CV does not have a master plan. Projects are included in the CIP based on stakeholder interest and necessary maintenance of capital assets. Projects not Previously Identified in the CIP Elevator repair and refurbishment of all elevators at 1100 Spruce garage and the 1500 Pearl St garage Construction of CAGID garage in conjunction with the Trinity Commons construction. Community Vitality 83 Operation and Maintenance Impacts The maintenance and replacement projects described in the CV CIP provide essential on-going major maintenance and reinvestment in the Pearl Street Mall, five parking facilities and three surface lots and are intended to maintain all assets in current condition. With the maintenance and operation improvements programs in place, assets will avoid deferred maintenance. New operating and maintenance funding will be required to maintain the parking garage at Trinity Commons garage when completed. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects The stair replacement at 1100 Walnut and 1400 Walnut was moved from 2014 to 2015. The primary reason for the delay was design and fabrication complications. There were some code concerns to be dealt with prior to design, then fabrication took longer than expected. The project is currently underway and expected to be complete by the end of July, 2015. The West Pearl Streetscape Improvement project was originally scheduled for completion in the fall of 2014. However, several factors contributed to its completion in 2015. First, the original scope was expanded to include additional block faces for street tree replacement and installation of an irrigation system. Second, the West Pearl businesses requested the construction be suspended during the 2014 holiday season. With the seasonal winter weather, project construction recommenced in March of 2015. Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs The pedestrian scale lighting in the University Hill commercial district is in need of replacement. Installed approximately 20 years ago, the lights are at the end of their projected lifespan. As poles are damaged, the style is no longer available, and other models must be purchased to replace the lights, leaving an inconsistent appearance. Parts, such as banner arms, globes, etc. are no longer available for purchase and must be fabricated. There is not sufficient replacement funding available to replace all the lights. A major capital investment will be required to replace the system. Options for replacement will be considered during the process of the near-term residential pedestrian scale lighting design to evaluate whether similar lighting fixtures would be appropriate within the commercial district. At this time the scope, timeline and potential costs of the project have not yet been determined, and no funding has been identified for the project. Community Vitality 84 Table 7-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountDUHMD $ 4,434,765 $ 2,156,565 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,009,000 $ 730,800 $ 678,200 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 609,000 $ 330,800 $ 278,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 1,425,765 $ 1,425,765 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,425,765 $ 1,425,765 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ - CAGID Trinity Commons $ - Downtown Parking Garage Major $ 250,000 Downtown Pearl St Mall Amenity $ 125,000 Downtown 14th St Prkg Lot $ 25,000 Downtown Parking Garage $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 400,000 Subtotal $ 400,000 85 Community Vitality Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. 86 Community Vitality 87 Community Vitality 88 Community Vitality 89 Community Vitality 90 Community Vitality 91 City of Boulder FACILITIES AND ASSET MANAGEMENT 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The Facilities and Asset Management Division provides leadership and expertise to promote the efficient and effective use of resources and space, and coordinate or directly manage the maintenance and replacement of city facilities and equipment. Funding Overview The Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) CIP is supported by the following funds: Capital Development Fund The Capital Development Fund accounts for development fees to be utilized for the construction of capital improvements related to new development and growth. Funding for the Capital Development Fund is provided through the development excise tax (DET) and impact fees. In 1987, DET was instituted to fund capital improvements related to growth and is paid by new commercial and residential development. Beginning in 2010, excise taxes previously collected for new construction for Fire, Human Services, Library, Police and Municipal Facilities ceased and were replaced with impact fees. In addition, Parks and Recreation was added to the list of departments collecting impact fees. 92 Facilities and Asset Management Table 8-1: Capital Development Fund Balance – 2014 Year-End Note: The DET balances above reflect the first of five payments that will be made to repay the loan from the Capital Development Fund to the FR&R fund for the 13th Street Clean Up project. The loan amount was $4,000,000 and will be paid back by the General Fund. The final loan payment will occur in 2018. Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund The Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund (FR&R) accounts for major maintenance (projects >$3,000), renovation and building system replacement projects for FAM maintained buildings, structures and property. The majority of FR&R funding is received as a transfer from the General Fund (GF). The FR&R fund also receives funding from restricted and enterprise funds for specific departmental projects including remediation work. The FR&R fund is an internal service fund managed by FAM. Capital Improvement Bond Fund Funding from the Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund supported a number of projects managed by FAM. CIB funding is indicated by the following symbol: Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 The core of FAM’s operation is maintaining city facilities so that residents and employees have a safe and pleasant experience in the various facilities. Focus areas for 2016 include: Major Maintenance and Repairs of multiple facilities across the city. The facilities include fire stations, aquatic facilities, and recreation centers Space Needs Analysis to be able to plan and address current and future office space needs for city operations Account DET Balance Impact Fee Balance Library $646,490 $522,613 Municipal Facilities $411,713 $391,491 HHS $193,773 $177,040 Police Department $89,999 $415,114 Fire Department $80,494 $466,464 Parks and Recreation N/A $2,460,912 Total $1,422,470 $4,433,633 93 Facilities and Asset Management Energy Efficient projects to continue to reduce the Green House Gas (GHG) emissions produced by city operations. Highlights Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Main Library Renovation Project: Included CIB funding for children and teen areas and infrastructure repairs for electrical, carpeting, HVAC upgrades and windows  New Wildland Fire Facility / Station 8: A CIB project, the new station will provide for year-round wildland fire fighting capability Library HVAC Controls Ugrade: Replace obsolete pneumatic controls and improve equipment reliability. Upgrading the controls will allow the HVAC system to be centrally controlled and improve the energy efficiency of the facilities 13th Street Plaza: the approved Voluntary Clean-Up Program has been partially completed and a temporary plaza re-constructed. The city is negotiating with the other responsible party for cost reimbursement and remaining clean-up Renewable Electric Vehicle Charging Systems: Install electric vehicle chargers for workplace charging connected to an existing solar PV and battery storage system in the downtown civic area. Priority Projects for 2016 Upgrade EV Chargers and Battery Storage System: provide more opportunities for electric vehicle workplace charging for city employees to lower GHG emissions from commuting Miscellaneous Space and Analysis: New project added to support space needs facility studies in support of approved and updated master plans Fire Stations Major Maintenance: New project added to address maintenance needs that have developed over time due to the wear and tear of a buildings that are used 24 hours a day, 365 days per year. The majority of the focus for 2016 will be in fire stations four, five, and six Aquatics Facilities Maintenance: New project to address maintenance needs that were identified through the Aquatics Feasibility Plan completed by the Parks and Recreation department. The 2016 focus will be at the North Boulder Recreation Center East Boulder Community Center Pool Air Handlers: Replace pool air handlers that are beyond Inside of the Library post renovation.  94 Facilities and Asset Management their useful life. Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects Fire Stations Major Maintenance: continued major repairs and maintenance scheduled at various fire stations. The total budget for fire station maintenance is approximately $693,000 Recreation Centers Major Maintenance: This project will fund major maintenance and renovations projects at the different recreation facilities. The specific projects will be identified once the Recreation Center Study is completed in the fall of 2015. Approximately $1,000,000 is proposed for funding by FAM Martin Park and North Boulder Park, Park Shelter Repairs: Upgrade electrical, plumbing and renew protective coatings Miscellaneous Facility Maintenance: Multiple major maintenance projects under $50,000 programmed annually such as roof evaluations, pavement repairs, HVAC upgrades and exterior protective coatings. This average budget is approximately $400,000 a year, with funding in the current CIP period totaling $2,030,000. Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles The proposed 2016 – 2021 CIP is consistent with the CIP Guiding Principles. The primary focus of this capital investment is to sustain and improve maintenance of existing assets. As projects are developed, improvements may also require building code updates, safety and security enhancements and added efficiencies to reduce energy consumption and operating costs. Prioritization Projects may also be identified in department master plans or studies, such as the Civic Area Plan, Yards Master Plan, Police Space Study and Fire Response Mapping. In accordance to the FAM Master Plan and under current fiscally constrained funding, essential facilities are maintained to industry standards and remaining facilities at standards commensurate with available funding. Energy efficiency projects, such as the work accomplished through the Energy Performance Contracts, are funded if budget neutral or if there is less than a three year simple payback. In addition, FAM prioritizes its projects based on the type of facility and type of work as shown below. Should a higher priority project need arise during the current year and future years, 95 Facilities and Asset Management projects may be reprioritized, especially to address an immediate health and safety need. Table 8-2: FAM Priority Codes 1Essential Facility: A facility necessary to sustain the most basic core of city services such as public health and safety and/or compliance with federal or state laws particularly during an emergency event. 26 facilities are identified as “essential” in the City of Boulder such as the Municipal Building, Park Central, New Britain, Public Safety Building, Municipal Service Center, Fleet Services, Fire Stations, North Boulder Recreation Center and East Boulder Community Center. 2Essential Work: Work that is performed for life, health, and safety-related situations. Also includes work that is needed so that a city service can be provided. 3Desirable Work: Work that does not meet the essential or discretionary definition. 4Discretionary Work: Work that is not required but would be defined as “nice-to-have.” Examples of priority code projects: Priority 1: repair emergency generator at the Public Service Building Priority 2: repair emergency lighting at South Boulder Recreation Center Priority 3: replace lighting at Park Central Priority 4: replace lighting at Meadows Library Priority 5: paint walls at New Britain after 10 years Priority 6: replace carpet in staff spaces after 7 years Projects Not in master Plans FR&R projects are identified by FAM throughout the year as facilities are serviced and inspected. Even if projects are not previously identified in a Master Plan, when project needs are identified through this process, they are prioritized as noted above. Priority Code Type of Facility Type of Work 1 Essential1 Essential2 2 Non-Essential Essential 3 Essential Desirable 4 Non-Essential Desirable3 5 Essential or Non-Essential Discretionary4 6 Essential or Non-Essential Deferred 96 Facilities and Asset Management Projects not Previously Identified in the CIP Aquatics Facilities Major Maintenance Fire Stations Major Maintenance Recreation Centers Major Maintenance Miscellaneous Space Needs and Analysis Upgrade Electric Vehicle Storage Radio System Analysis Operation and Maintenance Impacts Since the proposed FAM 2016-2021 CIP enhances and maintains current facilities, the impacts to FAM’s Operation and Maintenance (O&M) budget will be positive in the replacement of aging and inefficient infrastructure. However, despite additional ongoing operating dollars allocated to FAM in 2014 to help slow the rate of backlog increase, FAM’s current O&M budget is still funded to a level at which the backlog continues to increase annually. Higher construction costs are also being seen and not adequately accounted for in O&M budgets. The FAM Master Plan update will also identify climate change impacts to building systems such as lower service lives of equipment and building systems, which will require more frequent replacements and possibly larger equipment. Ongoing analysis related to replacement funding has begun to address these issues and strategies will continue to be implemented to identify funding mechanisms to reduce the backlog. Deferred, Eliminated or Changed Projects Boulder Museum of Contemporary Arts Floor Replacement: Delayed till January 2016 to lessen the impact on museum operations Flood Restoration Projects: Completed flood mitigation projects at eight facilities previously approved by FEMA. Installed emergency back-up generators at two facilities approved for hazard mitigation grants. These projects, delayed due to weather and communications issues with FEMA, will be completed in 2015 Municipal Building: Rebuild the flood gates. This project, originally scheduled for 2014 completion was delayed due to other high priority 2013 flood projects and is expected to be completed in 2015  Chautauqua Restroom: This project was funded from the CIB and the FAM CIP budget. It includes site work, utility installations, and complete construction of a free-standing ADA 97 accessible restroom adjacent to the Chautauqua auditorium. Delayed due to weather conditions and permitting requirements, the project will be completed in 2015. Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs Parking Lot Repairs: While the CIB provided funding to address the more publicly used parking lots, full replacement funding is needed for the Municipal Service Center and Public Safety Building parking lots Energy Efficiencies and Renewables: To achieve the city’s new climate action goals, deeper energy efficiency projects and additional renewables may be required for city facilities and operations Electric Vehicle Infrastructure: As the city sees wider use of electric vehicles, support of a regional EV charging system may be needed in the transition away from fossil fuels Facility Space: The city has outgrown existing office space and is leasing space to accommodate needed offices for existing employees. Space studies will inform how to address current needs and any additional space needs for future years With the potential purchase of the Boulder Community Hospital Site, CIP funding may be needed to coordinate an environmental assessment of the site. Facilities and Asset Management 98 Table 8-3: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/FACILITIES & ASSET MNGMT $ 9,647,000 $ 2,307,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 1,128,000 $ 884,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 1,742,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 452,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 7,025,000 $ 1,787,000 $ 1,345,000 $ 1,305,000 $ 898,000 $ 602,000 $ - $ 1,366,000 $ 390,000 $ - $ 723,000 $ 253,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 813,000 $ 120,000 $ 126,000 $ 132,000 $ 145,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 169,000 $ - $ 169,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,545,000 $ 515,000 $ 380,000 $ 400,000 $ 450,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 132,000 $ 132,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING $ 880,000 $ 230,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 480,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Facility Assessments Misc Space Needs and Analysis Radio System Analysis $ - Recreation Facility Repairs Stazio Tensile Canopy Covering Subtotal $ 130,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ 500,000 $ - Misc Facility Maintenance Projects North Boulder Park Shelter Rep Pool Replastering $ - EBCC Replace Pool Air Handlers Fire Stations Major Maintenance Martin Park Shelter Major Maint $ - $ - $ 138,000 $ 400,000 $ - Miscellaneous Facilty DET Proj $ 50,000 West Senior Center Maj Maint & SubtotalAquatics Facility Repairs $ - East Boulder Community Center Outdoor Lighting Improvements Tantra Shop Renovation $ 300,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,088,000 $ 100,000 $ - Upgrade EV Chargers/Battery $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 2,318,000 Subtotal $ 1,100,000 99 Facilities and Asset Management Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. 100 Facilities and Asset Management 101 Facilities and Asset Management 102 Facilities and Asset Management 103 Facilities and Asset Management 104 Facilities and Asset Management 105 Facilities and Asset Management 106 Facilities and Asset Management 107 Facilities and Asset Management 108 Facilities and Asset Management 109 Facilities and Asset Management 110 Facilities and Asset Management 111 Facilities and Asset Management 112 Facilities and Asset Management 113 Facilities and Asset Management 114 Facilities and Asset Management 115 Facilities and Asset Management 116 Facilities and Asset Management 117 Facilities and Asset Management [This page is intentionally blank.] 118 119 City of Boulder FIRE AND RESCUE 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The Boulder Fire-Rescue Department provides emergency response to fires, medical emergencies, disasters, rescues and hazardous materials releases in Boulder. Our 118 firefighters, engineers, station officers, chief officers, wildland division personnel, community risk reduction personnel and management staff work together to prevent emergencies from happening and to mitigate them when they do. Funding Overview The Fire Department is funded by the General Fund. Currently there is no specific capital funding source for General Fund departments and capital needs are addressed on a case by case basis, as funds are available. Strategies for addressing unfunded capital needs are being developed (see Appendix B) . Potential sources of funding for the capital projects noted below include each of the following or any combination of: An increase in sales and use tax, An increase in property tax mill levy, Bond funding, or Use of existing operating funding to build a capital fund or pool of money available for capital projects. Funding from the Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund supported projects managed by Fire- Rescue. CIB funding is indicated by the following symbol: Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 As a part of the overall capital funding strategic work, capital needs for the Fire Department are being evaluated, including capital improvements over the next several years that would allow for 120 Fire and Rescue multiple Light Response Vehicles and potentially provide a more community services model of fa- cility for delivery of human services, parks and recreation facilities and programming, and public safety services. There are no specific CIP projects identified at this time. Highlights Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Fire Station 8, the new wildland fire station, was completed in June of 2015. This CIB project was coordinated with Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) to provide a dedicated facility for year-round wildland firefighting capability. The department has requested proposals for a replacement station alerting system anticipated to be operational by the end of 2015. The new technology will allow for simultaneous dispatch of multiple stations and automated information flow to reduce emergency response times. This pro- ject was not identified in a previous CIP but was identified and presented to City Council at a study session in early 2015. Funding was identified from the General Fund to facilitate this safety im- provement. Priority Projects for 2016 None Highlights of 2017 - 2021 Projects None Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles The fire station projects are guided by strategies and initiatives in the 2012 Fire-Rescue Master Plan. All of the listed projects help the Fire Department maintain and improve public safety. Proper fire station location improves accessibility to services provided to the community by the Fire Department and ensures a timely response to emergencies occurring in the neighborhood. The construction or remodel of facilities will use Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) targets to ensure energy efficiency. Each project listed identifies the estimated on-going funds needed to operate and maintain the project. 121 Fire and Rescue Prioritization Projects listed below in Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs are in priority order based on the critical need, degree of deficiency in each project, and the degree to which the project advances efficiency or community livability goals. Station 3 relocation is listed first because of its suscepti- bility to flooding and impact to our emergency response system if it were out of service. The re- maining facilities’ positions on the list reflect the degree to which each station does not fulfill the department’s needs for effective, efficient and safe fire station design. In the fall of 2014, the City of Boulder hired Trestle Strategy Group to conduct a space needs as- sessment of Fire Station 3, based on recommendations of the 2012 master plan update which identified Station 3 as the highest priority. The master plan update also recommended an evalua- tion of the location, size and design of all our fire stations for effectiveness. Station replacement prioritization is based on preliminary analysis of our stations’ age, size and location. Projects Not in Master Plans The following projects are not specified in the Master Plan and are added here because of their expense, over $50,000, and life cycle of at least 15 years: Fire Training Center (FTC) Phase 2: driving area and storage building FTC Phase 3: additional classroom, office and conference room space. Projects Not Previously identified in the CIP As noted above, the replacement of the system wide fire alerting system had not previously been included in a CIP. Due to the potential life-saving impact of increased response time with an up- graded system and with one-time General Fund dollars identified, this was added to the 2015 CIP. Operation and Maintenance Impacts The primary Fire Department emerging need is to relocate and/or renovate facilities. Three of the seven existing fire stations are over fifty years old and all are inadequately sized for today’s needs and future capacity. A comprehensive community risk analysis is underway including response times from existing stations and emergency call demand loads. Preliminary findings demonstrate potential better locations for some stations and reaffirm others are correctly located. Further analysis is needed before final recommendations on station relocations are made. 122 Fire and Rescue On-going operation and maintenance projections for fire station replacements are listed below. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects None Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs Unfunded projects as presented to City Council at the April 14, 2015 study session: Relocate Fire Station 3 out of the 100-year floodplain, co-locate with Fire Administration Of- fices, and construct a separate storage facility for fire vehicles and equipment In 2011, 13 sites were identified as potential locations for Station 3. After analyzing multiple criteria, six sites remained. Since that time, three of those six could still be possible, each with their own acquisition issues. The top site is still the Mapleton ball fields. This station needs to be 17,000 square feet to house a fire engine, ladder truck, LRV/Ambulance, Dive Team and crews plus a battalion chief. The administration building needs to be 7,500 square feet and the storage building 10,000 square feet Fire will continue to coordinate with Parks and Recreation to evaluate the practicality of, and financial issues related to, relocating Station 3 and Fire Administration to the Mapleton ball fields site Estimated costs are: Buildings $11,412,500, Land up to $8,600,000, on-going $459,000 Replace Fire Station 4 north of the current location of 4100 Darley Avenue. Constructed in 1967 with 2,000 square feet this station is too small and needs to be 6,514 square feet to house one fire engine and crew. Estimated costs are: Building $2,442,750, Land up to $2,000,000, on-going $165,000 Remodel Fire Station 6 currently located at 5145 N 63rd Street Constructed in 1979 with 3,435 square feet this station is too small and needs to be 6,514 square feet to house one fire engine and crew. We are currently exploring the possibility of co-locating our fire engine and crew with Boulder Rural in their station located at 6230 Lookout Rd. The building and land at Sta- tion 6 could be sold. If this is not possible costs are estimated at: One-time $1,154,625, On-going $165,000 Remodel Fire Station 2 at the current location of 2225 Baseline Road. Constructed in 1959 with 4,752 square feet this station is too small and needs to be 123 15,000 to house one fire engine, one type 6 wildland engine and one LRV/Ambulance and crews. Estimated costs are: Building $3,842,000, Land up to $3,500,000, on-going $229,500 Remodel Fire Station 5 at the current location of 4365 19th Street. Constructed in 1992with 3,622 square feet this station is too small and needs to be 6,514 to house one fire engine and crew. Estimated costs are: Building $1,084,500, on-going $229,500 Remodel Fire Station 1 at the current location of 2441 13th Street. Constructed in 1957 at 7,941 square feet this station is too small and poorly designed. It needs to be 17,000 square feet to house one fire engine, one ladder truck and crews plus a battalion chief. Estimated costs are: Building $3,397,125, on-going $128,800 Remodel Fire Station 7 at the current location of 1380 55th Street. Constructed in 2000 with 5,081 square feet this station is too small and needs to be 8,006 square feet to house one fire engine, the Hazardous Materials Team and crew. Estimated costs are: Building $1,096,875, on-going $42,000. Fire Training Center Phase 2 - Driving area and storage building Construct a concrete driver training area totaling approximately 200,000 square feet. This was approved as a future phase of improvements in the original development ap- proval. Construct a 10,000 square foot storage building for training props and equip- ment. Estimated costs are: Concrete $2,500,000, Building $2,250,000, on-going $60,000. Fire Training Center Phase 3 - Additional classroom and office space. To complete the original design of facilities eliminated in the construction due to budget constraints add more classrooms, offices and conference room space totaling 4,000 square feet. Estimated costs are: One-time $1,500,000, on-going $56,000. Fire and Rescue 124 Fire and Rescue Table 9-1: Unfunded Projects Description One-Time On-Going Building Land Equipment Station 3/ Admin/ Storage $11,412,500 $ 8,600,000 $ 0 $ 459,000 Station 4 $ 2,442,750 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 165,000 Station 6 $ 1,154,625 $ 0 $ 0 $ 165,000 Station 2 $ 3,842,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 0 $ 229,500 Station 5 $ 1,084,500 $ 0 $ 0 $ 229,500 Station 1 $ 3,397,125 $ 0 $ 0 $ 128,800 Station 7 $ 1,096,875 $ 0 $ 0 $ 42,000 FTC Phase 2 $ 4,750,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 60,000 FTC Phase 3 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 56,000 TOTAL $30,680,375 $14,100,000 $ 0 $1,534,800 125 Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. Fire and Rescue [This page is intentionally blank.] 126 127 City of Boulder GREENWAYS 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The City of Boulder Greenways System is comprised of a series of corridors along riparian areas including Boulder Creek and its 14 tributaries, which provide an opportunity to integrate multiple objectives, including habitat protection, water quality enhancement, storm drainage and floodplain management, alternative transportation routes for pedestrians and bicyclists, recreation and cultural resources. The Greenways CIP follows an opportunistic approach, contributing funding toward projects that are being completed by other departments or private development in order to meet the various objectives of the Greenways Program. The Greenways CIP also looks to leverage funds with outside agencies in order to move projects forward that meet more than one objective of the Greenways Program, but may not be the highest priority when evaluating any one particular objective. Projects included in the Greenways CIP are typically called out in the Greenways Master Plan and are projects that Greenways staff can take the lead in coordinating. Funding Overview The total 2016 Greenways capital budget is $320,441, with $105,000 in the operating budget. Greenways projects are funded from the Transportation Fund, Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Fund, and the Lottery Fund. Annual funding distribution for the Greenways Capital Program for 2016 is as follows: Transportation $ 97,500 Flood Utility $ 97,500 Lottery Fund $125,441 Historically the Lottery contribution to the Greenways Program has been $150,000 per year. As a result of a projected reduction of the city’s allocation of Lottery funds, starting in 2015, the Lottery contribution to Greenways is expected to be reduced to $125,441 (based on Greenways 128 Greenways receiving 15% of the city’s funding allocation, with a projection of total Lottery proceeds being $836,275). Should the city’s allocation of Lottery funds exceed the projected amount, a budget adjustment will be made to reflect the increase. Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 The focus of the 2016-2021 Greenways CIP is on flood mitigation, bicycle and pedestrian multi- use paths and underpasses, and habitat and water quality improvements along the Fourmile and Wonderland Creek corridors. For more information about the timing and details of these projects, please see the Utilities—Stormwater/Flood Overview section. In addition to the projects along Fourmile Canyon Creek and Wonderland Creek, possible habitat restoration projects during the next few years include: Confluence of Bear Creek and Boulder Creek at Foothills Community Hospital Dry Creek habitat improvements through Flatirons Golf Course Goose Creek, railroad to 47th Street tree plantings Fish Passage enhancement projects in association with Fishing is Fun grants South Boulder Creek minimum stream flow Removal of Russian Olive trees east of 75th Street along Boulder Creek. Board Action The Greenways Advisory Committee met on May 26, 2015 and recommended approval 5-0 of the 2016- 2021 Greenways Program CIP to Planning Board and City Council. Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles Greenways projects address many of the CIP guiding principles. Greenways projects are identified in multiple master plans and meet the community sustainability goals. Most of the Greenways projects leverage outside or interdepartmental funding. Greenways habitat improvements seek to be sustainable and are intended to reduce the future maintenance required. Work on Boulder Creek at the Fish Observatory.  129 Greenways The Greenways CIP has been developed within the context of and is consistent with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP), the Transportation Master Plan (TMP), the major drainageway flood mitigation plans, the Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater Master Plan and the Greenways Master Plan. The Greenways Master Plan was updated in 2011 to reflect improvements that had been completed, and adopted changes that have been made in other master plans, city policies and ordinances that affect the Greenways Program since the last Master Plan update in 2001. Prioritization Many of the Greenways projects shown in the CIP are being designed and constructed in coordination with major flood or transportation improvements. The Greenways funding associated with these projects focuses on habitat restoration, water quality improvements and trail connections. In addition to leveraging funding with the Transportation and Flood Utilities budgets, funding for Greenways projects is also available through the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and Federal Transportation funds. Projects not in Master Plans It should be noted that the city experienced a major flood in September 2013 that resulted in extensive flooding along most of the city’s major drainageways. Following the flood, additional funds have been allocated in the Flood Utility CIP to reflect an increased interest in pursuing flood mitigation efforts along the city’s major drainageways. As a result of updated mapping and the September 2013 flood, flood mitigation plans were initiated for Gregory Creek, Bear Canyon Creek and Boulder Creek to identify economically feasible improvement projects. Flood mitigation plans will be initiated in 2016 for Upper Goose Creek and Twomile Canyon Creek, and Skunk, King’s Gulch and Bluebell Creeks after completion of flood mapping updates on these drainageways. Results from these flood mitigation plans will inform future capital improvements. Continued evaluation of potential improvement may result in additional changes to the Flood Utility and Greenways CIP in upcoming years. Projects Not Previously Included in the CIP None Operation and Maintenance Impacts $105,000 is budgeted each year for Greenways operations and maintenance. $80,000 of the operating budget is dedicated to habitat maintenance. The Greenways habitat crew works closely 130 Greenways with Parks and Open Space maintenance staff to provide on-going maintenance, as well as on collaborative projects as part of the operations budget. Major drainageway improvements are maintained by the flood maintenance staff and multi-use paths and underpasses are maintained by either Transportation or Parks maintenance, depending upon jurisdiction. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects None Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs Since the Greenways Program is opportunistic, taking advantage of projects that are funded through other departments, there are no unfunded needs. 131 City of Boulder INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The mission of the Information Technology (IT) Department is to create an environment of seamless integration between people and technology. Our services include long-range technology planning; citywide hardware/software procurement; support for employee workstations, servers, and databases; disaster recovery and business continuity; systems security; fiber optic network infrastructure; business analysis; custom application development; and support for numerous mission critical applications such as payroll, web technologies, and public safety. Funding Overview Beginning in 2010 the City has appropriated approximately $350k per year from the General Fund to an Information Technology CIP. Though often supplemented by limited operating transfers from departments such as IT, this allocation has been the primary, predictive revenue source for IT capital investments, particularly major software procurements. To date the majority of this funding has been primarily dedicated to supplement the critical, bond-funded finance, human resources and payroll system replacement project. Both the Computer Replacement Fund (CRF) and the Telecommunications Fund (TF) have been used to progressively accumulate replacement reserves for existing personal computers, server equipment, network infrastructure, central telephone systems and associated operating system and database costs. These systems represent the critical IT capital infrastructure upon which all the major IT CIP projects and existing city computer applications fundamentally depend. The City of Boulder website.  132 Information Technology Funding from the Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund supported a number of other software replacement projects managed by IT. CIB funding is indicated by the following symbol: Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 Majority of capital bond funded projects will be completed The Server Replacement project started in 2015 will be completed Several big projects will be started in 2016, but will not be completed until 2017 or 2018. They include: New permits, licensing and land records system implementation (2015 - 2017) Asset and maintenance management software improvements (2016-2017) Incremental central telephone system hardware and software upgrades (2016-2019) Highlights Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 2015 elements of the ongoing document management system implementation program: This project continues the work begun in 2012 to plan and execute the expansion of automated document management and digital imaging technologies to underserved departments and the public. Initial implementation of the new on-line archival records system and initial upgrading and expansion of the citywide LaserFiche document management system. (Funded by bond proceeds and departmental reserves). Priority Projects for 2016 Server Hardware Replacement: The city’s virtual server hardware, software and storage systems are scheduled to begin replacement in 2015. This will include not only upgrades to central computer hardware, but will add an analysis of current and emerging storage and server technologies to ensure an optimal solution with available funds. (Funded by earmarked Computer Replacement Fund reserves). The project will be started in 2015, but not complete until 2016. Complete the implementation of payroll and human resources modules of Tyler Munis system: Following final configuration, testing and staff training activities, the new payroll and human resources modules of the Tyler Technologies “Munis” system are expected to be operational early in 2016. (Funded by bond proceeds and IT CIP) 133 Information Technology Begin implementation of new integrated permits, licensing and land records system: Following a needs assessment and procurement process undertaken in 2013, the EnerGov system was selected in early-2014 and implementation of this critical system replacement project began in early-2015. The new system is estimated to reach live operation by the first quarter of 2017. (Funded by bond proceeds and restricted fund operating reserves) Asset and Maintenance Management software improvements: After concluding that the asset and maintenance management capabilities of the Tyler Munis (financial software) and EnerGov (permits and licensing software) products were not sufficient to meet citywide business needs, a consultant is being engaged to undertake an organization-wide reassessment of automation needs and business process improvement opportunities in these areas. The analysis will consider the capabilities of current systems and recommend whether a single, integrated product or a distributed, “best of breed” approach should be undertaken to address organizational needs. (Funded by IT capital funds) Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects Ongoing implementation of document management implementation program (2015-2017) New permits, licensing and land records system implementation (2017) Asset and maintenance management software improvements (2016-2017) Incremental capital maintenance replacements of network hardware, end user devices and database server hardware Incremental central telephone system hardware and software upgrades (2016-2019) Majority of city’s Network hardware will be replaced beginning in 2019 with project completion in 2020. Guiding Principles and Project Prioitization Proposed projects in the 2016-2021 CIP are consistent with the CIP guiding principles focusing on maintaining and enhancing the supporting city-wide business systems over the long term. Prioritization A major update to the IT Strategic Plan is currently underway covering the period from 2016 to 2019 that will inform future capital needs and priorities. 134 Information Technology Projects Not in Master Plans None. Projects Not Previously Included in the CIP None Operation and Maintenance Impacts Operation of IT systems is included in the department’s operating budget. IT is participating in a citywide effort to analyze and assess replacement needs and funding structures, including a look to how future technological changes and technology use behaviors may inform replacement charging models for the department’s internal service funds. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects None Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs Though critical, short-term technology investment needs have been significantly aided by the one -time funding from the recent capital bond initiative, current annual IT CIP funding allocations of roughly $350k annually will not address the funding needs associated with new, emerging software-based automation opportunities that will continually arise. In addition, current ongoing CIP funding will not address the need to accumulate reserves for future replacements and/or expansion of critical enterprise software (e.g. finance and payroll) and departmental systems (e.g. police records management, parks and recreation registration, court case management and many others). From a broader perspective, the Computer Replacement and Telecommunication internal service funds currently used to accumulate reserves for future IT infrastructure replacement (e.g. PCs, networks, servers, telephones, etc) are based on a funding model that only accounts for the replacement of current systems. As central and mobile computing infrastructure (e.g. mobile devices, wireless networks, virtualized servers, associated security systems), data storage, and use of cloud-based applications and data storage expand significantly over the next several years, we lack capital funding to address infrastructure capacity needs to sustain them. 135 A focus of the pending major update to the IT Strategic Plan (2016-2019) will include identification and costing of expanded automation and deferred capital replacement needs. At a basic level, it is anticipated that the updated Plan will move beyond planning for the needs of only enterprise systems (those impacting nearly all departments) by expanding to include the critical business and automation needs of individual departments – including current critical systems without future replacement funding strategies. The growth of electronic services, mobile computing, hardware and software virtualization and cloud computing (all of which the City is pursuing in current CIP projects or smaller tactical projects) will also be a key theme of the new Plan. Information Technology 136 Table 11-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 2,088,024 $ 958,321 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 8,310,962 $ 841,220 $ 964,254 $ 1,573,472 $ 2,088,024 $ 958,321 $ - $ 122,234 $ - $ 41,895 $ 80,339 $ - $ - $ - $ 108,987 $ 10,500 $ - $ - $ 53,604 $ 13,401 $ - $ 4,847,207 $ 703,638 $ 702,115 $ 1,174,388 $ 745,731 $ 770,153 $ - $ 2,409,400 $ 111,090 $ 219,232 $ 241,423 $ 630,026 $ 173,537 $ - $ 49,798 $ 8,117 $ 1,012 $ - $ 6,381 $ 1,230 $ - $ 773,336 $ 7,875 $ - $ 77,322 $ 652,282 $ - $ - Data Backup and Disaster $ - Security Administration $ 33,058 Server Hardware Replacement $ 35,857 Database Hardware Replacement $ 31,482 End User Device Replacement $ 751,182 Network Hardware Replacement $ 1,034,092 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 1,885,671 Subtotal $ 1,885,671 137 [This page is intentionally blank.] 138 Information Technology 139 Information Technology 140 Information Technology 141 Information Technology 142 Information Technology 143 Information Technology 144 [This page is intentionally blank.] 145 City of Boulder OPEN SPACE AND MOUNTAIN PARKS 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The City of Boulder’s Open Space and Mountain Parks Department (OSMP) preserves and protects the natural environment and land resources that characterize Boulder. We foster appreciation and use that sustain the natural values of the land for current and future generations. In 1986, Boulder residents approved a charter that requires OSMP to acquire, maintain, preserve, retain and use open space land for the following purposes: Preservation or restoration of natural areas characterized by or including terrain, geologic formations, flora, or fauna that are unusual, spectacular, historically important, scientifically valuable, or unique, or that represent outstanding or rare examples of native species Preservation of water resources in their natural or traditional state, scenic areas or vistas, wildlife habitats, or fragile ecosystems Preservation of land for passive recreational use, such as hiking, photography or nature studies, and, if specifically designated, bicycling, horseback riding or fishing Preservation of agricultural uses and land suitable for agricultural production Utilization of land for shaping the development of the city, limiting urban sprawl, and disciplining growth Utilization of non-urban land for spatial definition of urban areas Utilization of land to prevent encroachment on floodplains Preservation of land for its aesthetic or passive recreational value and its contribution to the quality of life of the community Funding Overview Open Space and Mountain Parks’ CIP projects are funded from two sources, the Open Space Fund and the Lottery Fund: Approximately 92 percent of Open Space Fund revenue derives from dedicated sales and use tax collections. There are three sales taxes that support the Open Space Fund: the 0.40 percent sales tax which has no sunset; the 0.33 percent sales tax which will be reduced to 0.22 146 Open Space and Mountain Parks percent on January 1, 2019; and the 0.15 percent sales tax which will be repurposed for Transportation uses as of January 1, 2020, for general city purposes as of January 1, 2030, and expires December 31, 2039. Open Space and Mountain Parks also expends Lottery Funds on CIP projects. The Lottery Fund derives its revenue from the Colorado Conservation Trust Fund. Lottery Funds are not restricted to OSMP. Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 While core service delivery continues throughout the year, OSMP also is pursuing high‑profile community initiatives in support of board and council goals. Those community initiatives translated into department priority projects are as follows: Continue Flood Recovery of Trails and Habitat (will continue into 2017, includes county coordination) Submit Final North Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan to council for approval by mid 2016 Following North TSA approval by council, Begin Visitor Master Plan update to be recast as Open Space Master Plan – establishes policy guidance, priorities and measures of success across services and programs, and addresses overarching issues such as night time and temporal use Implement Top Priorities of West TSA, North TSA, Agricultural Resource Management Plan, and Forest and Grassland Management Plan Continue to Improve the Visitor Experience – distinguish between new initiatives and existing services (New initiatives include such items as Voice and Sight program implementation and monitoring, recycling at trailheads, and dog waste composting. Existing efforts include current day-to-day outreach and education and volunteer programs.) Develop Regional Trails through strategic property acquisition, coordination with other agencies, and other avenues as needed (e.g., Eldorado to Walker Ranch, Joder and the Boulder Creek Path extension). 2013 Flood Impact Recognizing the importance of accessibility to open space to the Boulder community, no Open Space and Mountain Parks trails or trailheads remain closed because of flood damage. However significant recovery work remains to restore trails to sustainable conditions. In addition to the sheer volume of work-- about 150 distinct projects were identified by FEMA, with an estimated 147 Open Space and Mountain Parks recovery cost of over $7 million dollars-- Open Space and Mountain Parks needed to tread new ground with our partners at FEMA and other flood recovery agencies. Trails, trailheads, water delivery structures, and agricultural fences are not typically considered public infrastructure as part of disaster relief for municipalities. In addition to our work with FEMA, OSMP continues to work with other state and federal agencies to identify and secure funding for the restoration of ecological systems and privately owned irrigation ditches. These are neither considered municipal infrastructure by FEMA nor eligible for public assistance from that agency. Over the past two years, OSMP has completed 90 of the projects identified by FEMA and several other ecological restoration projects and partnerships with irrigation ditch companies in which OSMP is a share holder. With the opening of the Gregory Canyon access road and trailhead, OSMP has completed work at trailheads. 2015 also saw the re-opening of the Sanitas Valley Trail. Highlights Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Land and Visitor Services Repaired flood damage on Sanitas Valley Trail – graded and resurfaced Repaired flood damage on Chapman Drive – created water control structures, graded and resurfaced Repaired flood damage to Chautauqua Meadow Trail – designed, graded and resurfaced the trail tread South Mesa Trailhead bridge – designed, built and installed a new bridge over South Boulder Creek at the South Mesa Trailhead South Boulder Creek West Trail – repaired and restored functionality Ertl Pond – installed water level control device in dam and restored the trail over the dam Restored Eggleston #4 irrigation ditch South Boulder Creek Bridge – installed replacement bridge over South Boulder Creek at South Boulder Road Hedgecock Bridge – installed a replacement bridge over South Boulder Creek at the Hedgecock farmstead Gregory Canyon Access Road – graded and resurfaced (asphalt) the access road tread Lion’s Lair Trail – finished construction of this trail on the Wittemyer Property Joder Ranch – repaired and built an interim trail from US 36 to Olde Stage Road Flagstaff Drive Sediment Basin – designed, built and installed the second sediment catch basin on Flagstaff Drive 148 Open Space and Mountain Parks Cherryvale South HVAC – designed and installed new HVAC system for Cherryvale South office building Agricultural fences – cleaned flood debris out of fences, repaired fences Improved and added structures to organic farmsteads Ecological Systems Tall oatgrass control – initiated grazing to manage tall oatgrass in the Shanahan Ridge area Weed management – used a Colorado State Department of Agriculture grant to map and manage 19 state-listed noxious weeds Bluebell Creek - restored two acres of Bluebell Creek by planting 300 trees and shrubs and seeding with native plant species Boulder Creek vegetation management – removed non-native Russian olive and crack willow and planted native trees and shrubs Boulder Creek restoration and relocation – restored flood damaged stream channel and riparian area while providing the Green Ditch its water rights Boulder Creek/South Boulder Creek Confluence area – completed design of repairs of flood damaged stream North TSA inventory report – completed resources inventory Trail repair support – coordinated with trails staff to design, build and repair trails while protecting natural resources Wildlife monitoring — continued to monitor wildlife populations as outlined in Ecosystem and Visitor Access Plans, in association with habitat improvement projects, and to learn more about post-flood responses OSMP Research Program — supported research projects conducted by other agencies and institutions to increase scientific knowledge of ecosystems on OSMP and assist with decision making Habitat restoration — improved habitat conditions for sensitive species like northern leopard frog and shrub-nesting birds Forest Management - thinned 165 acres of forested land in the mountain backdrop to restore forest health and reduce fire risk Cultural Resources Hartnagle House was stabilized Foothills Nature Center design plan was produced and minor Hartnagle Homestead after restoration.  149 Open Space and Mountain Parks repairs/upgrades were implemented. Continued repair of historic buildings on farmsteads Environmental Planning Draft North Trail Study Area Plan completed Priority Projects for 2016 Land and Visitor Services Continue to repair and restore trails, trailheads, ditches, and fences damaged in the September 2013 rainfall event Improve and add structures to organic farmsteads Add trail connections from Baseline Road to Chautauqua Design, build and install bridge across South Boulder Creek in Greenbelt Meadows area Ecological Systems Pollinator surveys - begin pollinator studies within the tall oatgrass grazing area on Shanahan Ridge CDOT wetland mitigation – create and restore 25 acres of wetlands as mitigation for wetland impacts associated with US 36 Highway improvements Boulder Creek/South Boulder Creek Confluence area - complete restoration and repair of flood damaged stream and riparian area Volunteer raptor monitoring program — improve data collection methodology for volunteer raptor monitoring program by developing online data entry Habitat restoration — improve habitat conditions for northern leopard frogs at Fancher ponds OSMP Research Program — support OSMP research program to address departmental-wide research questions; create request for proposals containing staff research priorities Forest Management - treat 200 acres of forested land in the mountain backdrop to restore forest health and reduce fire risk South Boulder Creek restoration – complete restoration of aquatic habitat on South Boulder Creek upstream of South Boulder Road North TSA – begin resource protection measures identified in the North TSA Grassland Ecosystem Management Plan – implement resource conservation projects in the Grassland Management Area Plan Forest Ecosystem Management Plan (FEMP) – continue implementation of the FEMP 150 Cultural Resources Complete Hartnagle House renovation Complete Viele House water mitigation Complete Hunter Kolb House renovation Viele House renovations Foothills Nature Center renovations Environmental Planning North Trail Study Area Plan recommended by Open Space Board of Trustees and accepted by City Council. Initiate early action items. Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects Land and Visitor Services Completion of rainfall and flood damage repairs to all trails and trailheads Completion of trail and trailhead projects called for in the West TSA Plan including establishing a trailhead at Chapman Drive and State Highway 119 Substantial completion of trail, trailhead and agricultural projects called for in the North and East TSA Plans and in the Open Space Master Plan (revised Visitor Master Plan) Substantial completion of agricultural projects called for in the Agricultural Management Plan Completion of the South Boulder Creek in-stream flow improvements in conjunction with the Gross Reservoir expansion memorandum of understanding Implement medium and long term office and work space plans Ecological Systems Goodhue Ditch fish passage project – construct fish passage on the Goodhue Ditch diversion structure to improve habitat for native and sport fish in South Boulder Creek Riparian Area Restoration – substantially complete restoration of streams and riparian areas impacted by flooding Cultural Resources Repair and renovate major farmstead properties, including Viele/Van Vleet and Wright Environmental Planning Complete Open Space and Mountain Parks Master Plan Open Space and Mountain Parks 151 Board Action At its June 15, 2015 meeting, the Open Space Board of Trustees unanimously passed a motion approving the 2016 - 2021 OSMP CIP and recommended approval of the same by the Planning Board and City Council. Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles: All proposed projects in the 2016 – 2021 CIP are consistent with applicable guiding principles. OSMP staff developed budget guiding principles specific to OSMP services and in support of CIP principles. The 2016-2021 CIP continues to include flood-related recovery and habitat restoration projects. Anticipated to be complete during 2017, flood recovery and restoration projects total $2,008,300 million budgeted in 2016. As noted in prior work plan and budget updates and actions, the focus on flood recovery delays work in other areas, including adopted plans’ implementation. Another important theme within the CIP is taking care of existing infrastructure, such as trail, trail -head and other visitor services infrastructure. A relatively recently formalized investment program in OSMP is maintenance and management of historical and cultural assets within the city’s open space system. As the department has acquired properties, structures such as cabins, farm houses, barns and other facilities are included in those properties. In some cases, if structures are of no historical significance or are not needed to serve Open Space purposes, those properties or facilities can be demolished, or subdivided and sold. In other cases, those facilities and structures can be leased as part of maintaining historical and cultural uses. Some facilities and structures are considered a part of the historical and cultural fabric of the Open Space system. The department continues to evaluate this program; however, it appears there is a need to invest in structures to preserve safety, integrity and the potential historical and/or cultural value to the community. Regional partnerships continue to be an important aspect of OSMP’s work as a critical mass of adjacent open space and natural lands managers is connecting to the OSMP system. The draft 2016 CIP includes funding the Boulder Creek Path west extension, which was included in the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) recommended by OSBT and approved by council. OSMP’s Open Space and Mountain Parks 152 local match for that project is approximately $500,000. The city’s Transportation Division is proposing $50,000 in its 2016 CIP to help the city partner with Boulder County on this local match. An additional obligation in the 2016 CIP is a one-time $2 million payment to Denver Water for the South Boulder Creek In-Stream Flow Improvements. A continuing significant investment program is the real estate acquisition program, which also is connected to our regional partnerships. Eventually, as remaining strategic acquisitions largely complete the vision of the Open Space area, the department will need to move more and more toward stewardship of the system. The land system(s) will be similar in character as exists today ranging from natural lands management, striving to balance preservation of valuable and unique ecosystems with access and passive recreation; to agricultural and cultural lands that support livestock and local farming; to open lands providing a defining border and character for the Boulder community. OSMP Facility Modifications (Space Needs), a new line item in the CIP responds to the need to address inadequate space and infrastructure to support OSMP staffing, vehicles, equipment and materials. A study is underway to develop a short, mid and long-term investment program to provide the space and facilities needed to support a quality set of OSMP services. Finally, another new line item in the proposed OSMP CIP is an innovations program that allows the department to experiment with new types of facilities. An example is a design effort focused on “Biomimicry,” a blend of biological sciences and engineering such that the engineering learns from nature’s designs to create more resilient, efficient and effective infrastructure. This innovations program is slated to begin as flood recovery begins to taper. Prioritization Prioity areas are noted above. The department continues to be in a state of transition. Staff is striving to establish a reasonable and responsive direction in the proposed 2016 – 2021 CIP. As leadership and the organization transitions there is ample opportunity to make adjustments in the out years of the CIP while the OSMP fund remains fiscally sound. Projects not in Master Plans Council requested that staff begin the update process for the Visitor Master Plan (VMP) and include addressing overarching issues. Since that time, the department and external consultants Open Space and Mountain Parks 153 have identified the need for an OSMP “Master Plan.” Staff is exploring ways to recast the VMP update as an opportunity to develop an OSMP Master Plan, continuing to address the City Council identified overarching issues, and establishing a set of policies and priorities that help unite the department behind a set of shared goals, objectives and metrics that implement the voter- approved Open Space sections of the City Charter. Also, an OSMP Master Plan would inform and be clearly linked to the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan. As is typical for other city departments, master plans or strategic plans that could result in capital investment are included in the CIP. The OSMP Master Plan, including updates to the visitor element, is scheduled to start in 2016 and will continue into 2017. Other systems plan elements would be updated or refreshed thereafter, which is why there is an ongoing amount in the master plan line item. Ecological Systems Plans (Forest and Grassland) currently are considered as operating intensive, rather than capital. However, it is possible that updates to those systems plans could result in capital investments in future years of the CIP. Projects Not Previously Identified in the CIP Flood repair projects in the Chautauqua area Riparian area flood damage restoration Farm site improvements on OSMP land OSMP facility modifications related to increasing space needs Restore the Goodhue Ditch fish passage Fund innovative capital projects including biomimicry Project contract management of installation of South Mesa Trailhead bridge Provide funding contributing to western extension of the Boulder Creek Bike path Open Space and Mountain Parks Master Plan. Proposed to improve clarity about OSMP initiatives and improve integration with Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan Rehabilitation and improvements to the Foothills Nature Center Operation and Maintenance Impacts As new and rerouted trails are built along with new trailheads, the need for operations and maintenance funds will increase. The impact is slight in the near term and, in fact, may decrease since older infrastructure will be replaced with new. Also, staff has been striving to design and build more sustainable trail systems such that less maintenance is required over time. For example, more sustainable trail design techniques proved to be effective during the September 2013 rain event with those trails requiring substantially less repair work. However, as trails and Open Space and Mountain Parks 154 trailheads age they will need maintenance just as any aging facility does. Maintenance costs on the farmsteads will be needed to keep the buildings in usable condition. It is anticipated additional funding will be required for operation and maintenance as the OSMP infrastructure expands. Current projections indicate that existing revenue sources for OSMP will be adequate to provide needed operation and maintenance funding. Deferred Eliminated, or Changed Projects Due to the September 2013 flood, other projects have been deferred, delayed and/or modified. For example, West TSA overall completion is being deferred by a few years. Some flood recovery projects are in the West TSA, repairing trails and infrastructure in place or through re-routing to allow for more resilient infrastructure. Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs By developing an OSMP Master Plan, the department will develop a clear vision for its future and to determine if the there are unfunded projects or emerging needs. [This page is intentionally blank.] 155 156 Table 12-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountOPEN SPACE & MOUNTAIN PARKS $ 49,060,930 $ 11,900,930 $ 7,945,000 $ 7,455,000 $ 7,390,000 $ 7,290,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 11,324,600 $ 4,074,600 $ 1,975,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 572,600 $ 572,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ 75,000 $ 175,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 852,000 $ 252,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,700,000 $ 350,000 $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,036,330 $ 1,626,330 $ 270,000 $ 280,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 720,000 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 360,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 991,000 $ 991,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 205,330 $ 205,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 34,200,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 32,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ - Boulder Creek Bikepath Extension $ - Mineral Rights Acquisition $ 100,000 OSMP Real Estate Acquisition $ 5,400,000 Water Rights Acquisition $ 200,000 Hartnagle House Restoration $ - South Mesa Trailhead Bridge $ - Subtotal $ 5,700,000 Farm Site Improvements $ 60,000 Flood Trails $ - Foothills Nature Center $ - Agriculture Facilities Projects $ 120,000 Boulder & S Bldr Crk Flood Repair $ - Cultural Resource/Facility Restorat $ 100,000 Visitor Infrastructure System Wide $ 500,000 WTSA Implementation $ 150,000 Subtotal $ 280,000 S.Bldr Crk at E.Bldr Ditch Const $ - South Boulder Creek Instream $ - STSA - Plan and Implementation $ - OSMP Innovations $ 100,000 OSMP Master Plan Update $ 100,000 Flood Eng. Trails $ - Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage $ - NTSA - Plan and Implementation $ 100,000 Boulder Crk Above 95th $ - ETSA - Plan and Implementation $ 50,000 Facility Modifications-Space $ 100,000 Department Total $ 7,080,000 Subtotal $ 1,100,000 2019 Projected 157 Open Space and Mountain Parks Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. 158 Open Space and Mountain Parks 159 Open Space and Mountain Parks 160 Open Space and Mountain Parks 161 Open Space and Mountain Parks 162 Open Space and Mountain Parks 163 Open Space and Mountain Parks 164 Open Space and Mountain Parks 165 Open Space and Mountain Parks 166 Open Space and Mountain Parks 167 Open Space and Mountain Parks 168 Open Space and Mountain Parks 169 Open Space and Mountain Parks 170 Open Space and Mountain Parks 171 Open Space and Mountain Parks 172 Open Space and Mountain Parks 173 Open Space and Mountain Parks 174 Open Space and Mountain Parks 175 Open Space and Mountain Parks 176 Open Space and Mountain Parks 177 Open Space and Mountain Parks 178 Open Space and Mountain Parks 179 Open Space and Mountain Parks 180 Open Space and Mountain Parks 181 Open Space and Mountain Parks 182 Open Space and Mountain Parks 183 City of Boulder PARKS AND RECREATION 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission In 2014 the City Council adopted the Boulder Parks and Recreation Master Plan and guiding principles that provide a focused mission statement to promote the health and well-being of the entire Boulder community by collaboratively providing high-quality parks, facilities and programs. This plan reflected over two years of public input as to the future of the urban park system and identified six core themes to implement the community vision. They include: enhancing community health & wellness; taking care of what we have; financial sustainability; building community; youth engagement; and organizational readiness. These six themes were structured to fit within the city Sustainability Framework Plan. During the leadership transition of 2014 the department focused on staff development and training under the organizational readiness goal accomplishing 30 staffing changes for efficiency, increasing training programs, and hiring a new director. In 2015 the department is focusing on youth engagement through the Year of the Child with expanded youth and family services and development of nature play focus. In addition the department is implementing an Asset Management Program to understand existing conditions on $200 million assets, reduce backlog of deferred maintenance to lower overall facility condition index (FCI) to an industry standard. In 2016 the department will complete implementation of the Asset Management Program and begin work with expanded partnership development to secure capital funding for enhancements and new facilities. Funding Overview .25 Cent Sales Tax Fund With the renewal of this tax in November 2012, the revenues from this funding source were pledged “to fund Parks and Recreational services, development, renovation and refurbishment, and parkland acquisition for passive and active recreational uses” (.25 Cent Sales Tax ballot language). 184 Parks and Recreation Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund The Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund consists of a .9 mill levy of assessed valuation of all taxable property in the city, gifts and donations to the fund, and proceeds from the sale of park or recreation property or equipment. The fund also includes revenues from a portion of a development excise tax assessed on each new residential unit constructed or annexed to the city except for those units that are designated as permanently affordable. The City Charter requires that the “…Fund shall not be used for any purpose other than the acquisition of park land or the permanent improvement of park and recreation facilities.” (Charter Sec 161) Lottery Fund The Lottery Fund is based on proceeds from the Conservation Trust Fund that is distributed by the State of Colorado on a per capita basis to entities. Funding can be used for the acquisition, development and maintenance of new conservation sites, capital improvements for recreational purpose. Capital Development Fund The capital development fund accounts for citywide development impact fee collections allocated to growth-related parks and recreation facility development. Boulder Junction Improvement Fund The Boulder Junction Improvement Fund was created in 2011 for the Boulder Junction Key Public Improvements. Funding is provided from development related revenues generated in the Boulder Junction Area that will be reinvested into key public improvements in this area. Capital Improvement Bond Fund Funding from the Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund supported a number of projects managed by Parks and Recreation. CIB funding is indicated by the following symbol: Current Focus for Capital Planning Projects in 2016 The department will continue to focus on the key themes identified in the department master plan including: Community Health and Wellness - facilities are being improved with upgrades to North Boulder Recreation Center Aquatics Facility and expansion of outdoor fitness and athletic 185 Parks and Recreation facilities as the results of recent plans and studies. Taking Care of Existing Facilities - through implementation of the Asset Management Software and increase in funding for playgrounds, turf and irrigation, court resurfacing and park structures to extend the useful life of critical facilities and increase the condition of many assets. Building Community Relationships - through improvements to the Civic Area, many opportunities exist to enhance the gathering spaces and activation areas to invite all members of the community to enjoy this unique public space in downtown Boulder. Youth Activity and Engagement - many youth sports facilities and play areas will be enhanced and renovated through the 2016 CIP projects that will continue to allow the department to focus on youth and provide opportunities for children in the community. 2013 Flood Impact The magnitude of the 2013 flood to Parks and Recreation was approximately $2 million in damages to many parks and facilities located along urban stream corridors. The majority of parks and facilities damaged during the flood have been fully restored and open to the public. The department is completing final work on the remaining flood damaged properties including Evert Pierson Memorial Kids’ Fishing Pond, Knollwood Tennis Courts and demolition of the Flatirons Event Center after supporting recovery of the Spice of Life private business to a new private location. Highlights Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Boulder Reservoir Infrastructure Improvements: In 2015, major utility upgrades were completed with the construction of a new sanitary sewer system and water line. Additional improvements include dock renovations, parking lot repair and various interior and exterior building improvements Pearl Street Mall Irrigation Replacement: Completed renovation of critical irrigation infrastructure and tree replacement to maintain and enhance the Pearl Street Mall Flatirons Golf Course Irrigation Replacement: Completed the irrigation replacement with a new Boulder Reservoir, North Shore. 186 Parks and Recreation innovative system that allows increased water efficiency, operational efficiencies and improved playability of the course Valmont City Park Planning: Completed the concept plan for the park through research, community engagement and community partnerships. The new plan reflects the current needs and trends of the community for parks and recreation facilities and will allow future funding opportunities to be discovered to allow implementation Parks and Recreation Facility Renovations: Crestview Park has been renovated with turf and irrigation upgrades, ADA compliance and replacement of park amenities as part of the ongoing Capital Bond Funding Park Shelter Replacements / Improvements: A new reservation pavilion will be installed at Harlow Platts Park to serve the park users by allowing for reservations and special events. Priority Projects for 2016 Aquatics Facility Upgrades: Renovations and enhancements for indoor aquatics facilities will start in 2016 with North Boulder Recreation Center pool repairs and enhancements that were identified as part of the Aquatics Study completed in 2014. These projects will be funded from both parks and recreation CIP as well as FAM Historic Railroad Coach Restoration: Renovation of the city-owned railroad coach currently located at the Railroad Museum in Golden, CO. The coach has antique wood siding that is in critical need of repair to maintain the coach at an acceptable standard as indicated in a recent grant from the State Historical Fund. Delaying this project would cause further deterioration and more costly repairs at a later date Coot Lake Restoration: Stabilization and restoration of the north bank of Coot Lake that currently poses a critical safety issue and continued degradation of the resource values of the lake. The project will include trail restoration, bank stabilization and vegetative restoration of this important and highly used natural area within the city’s system Emerald Ash Borer Response Measures: As a result of the recent discovery of the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB), a response plan is currently in development to slow the spread of the pest and maintain a safe community from the potential hazards of multiple dead and dying trees within the urban core of the community. This project would provide annual funding to hire contractors for removal and replacement of the trees affected by the EAB to re-establish streetscapes and park areas. Urban Forest Strategic Management Plan: Comprehensive plan to provide specific management direction through policies that will balance the long-term 187 Parks and Recreation sustainability of the urban forest Recreation Facility Strategic Plan: Planning study and analysis to guide the future repair, renovation and improvement of recreation facilities through an assessment of the existing physical systems, operational efficiencies, improvements and remodeling strategies to ensure the facilities are meeting the needs and demands of the community comparable to other facilities. Scott Carpenter Park: In 2016 the department will be working with the community to develop a site plan for Scott Carpenter Park that will inform the location and priorities for capital improvements to one of Boulder’s parks that serves the entire community. Several amenities within the park are of critical importance and must be carefully redesigned to provide long- term benefit to the community including the pool, playground, baseball field and the skate park. Based on the approval of the site plan next year, the department will be seeking partnership opportunities and leveraging existing capital funds, including the use of impact fees for those capital improvements that can be attributed to growth in the community. Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects Athletic Field Improvements: The upgrade of existing natural grass fields and the conversion of select fields to artificial turf will increase the capacity of field use within the community by extending the season of use of the fields and allow more programmed uses resulting in improved benefits from field rentals and tournament play. The department has recently conducted feasibility studies and intends to design and construct priority field improvements at locations determined through the athletic field study Aquatics Upgrades: Renovations and enhancements for indoor aquatics facilities will start in continue with East Boulder Recreation Center pool repairs and enhancements planned for 2018 and South Boulder Recreation Center or Spruce Pool for 2020. Board Action The Parks and Recreation Board (PRAB) unanimously approved the following two resolutions in support of the BPRD 2016-2021 CIP at the March 23, 2015 meeting: a motion to approve the 2016 recommended expenditures from the Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund and a motion to approve the recommended 2016 – 2021 Parks and Recreation Department Capital Improvement Program (CIP). 188 Parks and Recreation Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles The proposed projects identified in the 2016-2021 CIP are consistent with the CIP Guiding Principles and the current Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The following guiding principles are applied when identifying and evaluating priority capital improvement projects: Safety/Compliance (S): Projects represent important deficiencies or safety and compliance concerns. Project may focus on annual infrastructure repair and replacement and/or refurbishment of park play equipment and amenities, irrigation systems, landscape and turf upgrades and facility improvements Commitment (C): Projects that are required by law or a ballot initiative, or are in-process of development as part of a prior development agreement and/or are required to be completed within a specific period of time Efficiencies (E): The department will consistently seek efficiency improvements in both operational and capital investments. Projects will represent important operational and/or maintenance efficiencies resulting in improved life cycles, cost efficiencies and savings in resources, energy or water usage (e.g., Flatirons Golf Course Irrigation System Replacement, Computerized Irrigation System) Revenue (R): The department will invest in facilities and programs that generate revenues to support valued recreational opportunities in the Boulder community. Projects will enhance the department's ability to earn revenue beyond initial investment and operational costs and may include possible collaboration/ partnership opportunities leveraging outside funding sources. Prioritization A principle objective of the current Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update focuses on maintaining existing parks and recreation facilities by “taking care of what we have.” As a result, the department has prioritized CIP projects based on meeting essential safety and compliance considerations, as well as maintaining existing facilities through ongoing annual repair and refurbishment programs and life-cycle replacement programs of park playground equipment and irrigation infrastructure systems. In most cases, projects identified in the 2016-2021 CIP are intended to improve ongoing maintenance needs by reducing the backlog of deferred maintenance projects that have increased maintenance over time. Projects such as Aquatics Facility Maintenance and court and asphalt Replacements strive to improve long-term operational needs and protect existing assets while 189 Parks and Recreation reducing annual maintenance costs. A second important objective is to improve efficiencies in operational and capital investments resulting in extending life cycles of equipment and facilities whenever possible. The proposed CIP projects contribute to improving citywide energy efficiency and water conservation efforts addressing existing parks and recreational facilities. Projects are also consistent with the community’s overall green house gas (GHG) and carbon footprint reduction objectives. Projects such as the Recreation Facility Strategic Plan will address department-wide efficiencies aimed at improving operational practices and seeking alternative funding opportunities needed to support the department’s mission. In addition, due to new federal ADA regulations, the department is required to respond to specific mandates and timelines to audit all parks and recreational facilities and to improve identified facilities to meet new federal ADA regulations. The ADA Compliance Improvements project will continue to address the new federal mandates and ensure the department remains in compliance with access issues for parks and recreational facilities. The department has also initiated Asset Management Best Practices through the use of Facility Condition Index (FCI) and an Asset Priority Index (API) to refine prioritization of projects. These include the following additional criteria that are reviewed by the department prior to project funding: Economic Impact to the Community - This criterion asks you to think about how the asset contributes economically to the community. Does it increase property values or provide for an activity that will generate income for businesses Substitutability - This measure considers the uniqueness of the asset or the impact if the asset were lost, destroyed, or disposed o Resource preservation - Asset plays a direct role in an agency’s natural and/or cultural resource management programs or improves the ecological functions for the surrounding community Use - Asset facilitates the highest level of affordability, accessibility, and ease of use by all demographic segments of the community Community Benefit - Asset supports community and social values of the department. 190 Projects Not in Master Plan None Projects not Previously Identified in the CIP Athletic Field Improvements: As recommended in the department's master plan and the Athletic Field Study, the Parks and Recreation Department intends to improve existing natural turf athletic fields and to replace some targeted existing turf fields with new synthetic turf in select park sites Aquatic Facility Repairs and Enhancements: As part of recommendations of the master plan and the recently completed Aquatics Facility Study the department has identified deferred maintenance needs within the existing facilities Turf Repairs and Replacement: These projects will provide upgrades to existing park natural turf areas and reduce the overall backlog of work identified in the master plan and the Asset Management Plan Flatiron Golf Restroom: Currently the course is in need of repairs to the restrooms on the course as well as improved cart paths Parking Lot Repairs: The department's master plan includes a key theme of "taking care of what we have" which directs the department to focus on the necessary preventative and restorative maintenance of infrastructure throughout the parks and recreation system General Park Structure Repairs & Replacements: Based on the master plan and the asset management plan a number of park structures from shelters to key buildings have a backlog of deferred maintenance needs. This project will accelerate the repairs and replacement of these facilities to meet design criteria for safe and functional facilities South Boulder Reservoir and Tom Watson Site Plan: This project will provide for community engagement and design / planning services to develop plans and estimates for future improvements at both important facilities. The improvements will continue to support growth in the north of Boulder as well as improve visitor experiences at two aging facilities Scott Carpenter / Mapleton Site Plans: Development of site plans and cost estimates for capital repairs to existing facilities per the athletic field study and related city services proposed to be relocated or expanded Park Operations Yards Master Plan and Maintenance Facility Site Plans: Development of site plans and cost estimates for capital repairs to existing maintenance facilities per the master plan, the General Maintenance and Management Plan and the Yards recommendation. Parks and Recreation 191 Operation and Maintenance Impacts The department prioritizes capital projects based upon maintaining existing assets and decreasing the maintenance backlog of the department’s portfolio of parks and facilities. Therefore, the majority of projects included in the department’s Capital Improvement Program will decrease maintenance costs due to replacement of aging infrastructure and efficiencies associated with new and improved facilities and systems. All of these projects will actually reduce the O&M costs over time. However, as the department fulfills commitments relative to long-term planning needs such as the Boulder Junction Pocket Park and Violet Neighborhood Park in the future, the department will need to further prioritize and explore funding opportunities to maintain these new facilities. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects Due to the September flood of 2013, the department had to focus on some of the critical damages to parks and recreation infrastructure. Overall the department sustained about $2million in damages to infrastructure some of the costs of which are eligible for FEMA reimbursement. Some of the regularly scheduled infrastructure renovations had to be delayed due to this unexpected increase in work load and funding needs. However, as funds are reimbursed by FEMA, the department will have the opportunity to return to the normal prioritization of infrastructure renovations as scheduled through the department’s asset management program and typically funded through the CIP. Projects that were deferred include: Recreation Facility Enhancements – In 2015, funding was identified for key improvements to the City’s recreation facilities. As a result of the increased construction costs for flood recovery in 2015, this project had to be deferred until 2016. This will also allow the department to complete a strategic plan to determine the priority of upgrades to recreation facilities and complete the projects in 2016. Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs In the long-term, additional funding will need to be secured to develop any new major facilities as well as improve service standards for maintenance operations and to fund deferred maintenance. The department’s Master Plan includes a list of priority items to complete based on various funding levels. Staff continues to evaluate deferred maintenance needs, including park sites and recreation facility needs and have implemented an Asset Management Plan (AMP) to assist in capital planning and day-to-day operations. The current maintenance and facility improvements backlog, including major repairs and replacements, is significant. The department anticipates that Parks and Recreation 192 this backlog will continue until funding levels reach appropriate amounts to accommodate life- cycle projections for the department’s assets. The current budget reflects an economic reality that is not predicted to shift anytime soon, and it is within this reality that the department must plan for the future. With maintenance backlog estimated at over $27 million on approximately $200 million in assets, the department faces difficult trade-off decisions about how to manage and operate its facilities and provide its programs. City guidelines regarding capital improvement prioritize the maintenance of current assets over the development of new facilities, and through the Master Planning process, the community has indicated strong support for this concept. Even with the indications of a modest economic turnaround and the passage of the .25 Cent Sales Tax renewal, the department must focus on maintaining and improving all deteriorating assets. Simultaneously the department must respond to the community’s shifting values related to new facilities by providing adequate facilities to meet those needs and by making them accessible to the entire community. To mitigate the impacts of limited funding, staff is: Working collaboratively with Facilities and Asset Management (FAM) to prioritize funding for deferred, major and ongoing facility maintenance Deferring low priority improvements and new capital projects that cannot be funded operationally Reevaluating work plans and investing in projects that mitigate ongoing maintenance and operational expenses Redirecting funding or accelerating projects to achieve energy efficiencies at recreation facilities Developing a long-term capital investment strategy to identify partnerships and non- traditional funding sources to support desired new facilities and enhancements to existing facilities. The department has unfunded significant deficiency and high priority projects included in the current capital investment strategy program. Key unfunded projects include: Work collaboratively with Boulder Fire Department to coordinate Fire Station #3 with potential move to Mapleton including identification of funding for relocation of athletic fields to Stazio Parks and Recreation 193 or Valmont and upgrade of Mapleton Park to a community park serving the surrounding area Full replacement of Scott Carpenter Outdoor Pool System-wide compliance with federal standards for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Increased capacity and additional facilities for youth and adult sports Expansion and enhancement of recreation centers and aquatics facilities that accommodate increased demand for lap swimming, fitness equipment and classroom space Boulder Reservoir infrastructure upgrades to increase operational efficiencies and improve public amenities Park infrastructure upgrades for the Civic Area and Pearl Street Mall Major parking lot renovations at key facilities Infrastructure associated with Valmont City Park Phase 2 development. Parks and Recreation 194 Table 13-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPARKS & RECREATION $ 32,872,000 $ 4,458,000 $ 5,920,000 $ 5,217,000 $ 5,277,000 $ 5,500,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 11,500,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,850,000 $ 3,100,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ - $ 2,900,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 17,048,000 $ 1,558,000 $ 3,620,000 $ 1,393,000 $ 3,677,000 $ 3,900,000 $ - $ 1,100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 1,288,000 $ 238,000 $ - $ 273,000 $ 777,000 $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2,160,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 1,874,000 $ - $ - $ 374,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,874,000 $ - $ - $ 374,000 $ - $ - $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 1,950,000 $ 750,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 750,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Violet Park $ 500,000 Boulder Junction Rail Plaza $ 1,500,000 Subtotal $ 500,000 Boulder Junction Pocket Park $ - Urban Forest Management Plan $ - Yard/Maintenance Facility Site $ - Subtotal $ 1,500,000 Subtotal $ - Reservoir/Tom Watson Site Plan $ - Scott Carpenter/Mapleton Site $ - Parking Lot Repairs $ 250,000 Recreation Facility Repairs $ 1,000,000 Turf Repairs and Replacement $ 200,000 EAB Response Measures $ 500,000 Flatiron Golf Course Repairs $ - Park Structure Repairs and $ 500,000 Aquatics Facility Repairs $ - Boulder Reservoir South $ - Court Repairs and Resurfacing $ 250,000 Playground and Irrigation Repairs $ 600,000 Subtotal $ 2,900,000 ADA Compliance Initiatives $ 200,000 Aquatic Facility Enhancements $ - Athletic Field Development $ 1,000,000 Lighting Ordinance $ - Department Total $ 6,500,000 Subtotal $ 1,600,000 2019 Projected 195 Parks and Recreation Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. 196 Parks and Recreation 197 Parks and Recreation 198 Parks and Recreation 199 Parks and Recreation 200 Parks and Recreation 201 Parks and Recreation 202 Parks and Recreation 203 Parks and Recreation 204 Parks and Recreation 205 Parks and Recreation 206 Parks and Recreation 207 Parks and Recreation 208 Parks and Recreation 209 Parks and Recreation 210 Parks and Recreation 211 Parks and Recreation 212 Parks and Recreation 213 Parks and Recreation 214 Parks and Recreation 215 Parks and Recreation 216 Parks and Recreation 217 City of Boulder POLICE 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The mission of the Boulder Police Department is very simple: Working with the community to provide service and safety. The mission entails a full range of services which includes but is not limited to crime prevention, enforcement, security, investigations, management of public disorder and quality of life issues, emergency and disaster response, and training. Funding Overview The Police Department is funded by the General Fund. Currently there is no specific capital funding source for General Fund departments and capital needs are addressed on a case by case basis, as funds are available. Strategies for addressing unfunded capital needs are being developed (see Appendix B) . Potential sources of funding for the capital projects noted below include each of the following or any combination of: An increase in sales and use tax, An increase in property tax mill levy, Bond funding, or Use of existing operating funding to build a capital fund or pool of money available for capital projects. Another source of funding for capital projects in the Police Department has been the use of Asset Forfeiture funds. These funds are from seized assets that were used during the commission of crimes. The department has been given approval from the U.S. Department of Justice to use the Asset Forfeiture funds, up to $950,000, to purchase a new Records Management System (RMS). Once these funds are used, there will not be sufficient funds remaining for any additional CIP projects. 218 Police Funding from the Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund supported projects managed by the Police Department. CIB funding is indicated by the following symbol: Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 The Police Department will work with multiple departments to update the citywide inventory of the existing radio system infrastructure, and provide a strategic plan for replacements and upgrades needed to have reliable radio communication throughout the city, now and into the future. Highlights Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Priority improvements to the current radio system infrastructure. These improvements will help the current system work better by moving some of the infrastructure closer to the city, building a new transmitter site on the east side of town, and relocating and improving receiver sites in town, as well as moving some equipment off phone lines and allowing for use of radio over internet (ROIP) technology to improve signal strength and clarity. Priority Projects for 2016 Acquisition and implementation of a Records Management System (RMS) to replace the current, outdated system Radio System Infrastructure Assessment (with Facilities and Asset Management) Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects None Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles Projects included in the CIP are in line with CIP Guiding Principles. These projects have been identified in the Police Master Plan, leveraged funding was accessed where possible, and the department is working collaboratively with multiple other departments in a comprehensive look at the radio system infrastructure, in order to maximize public safety and minimize duplicative efforts and costs. 219 Police Prioritization Future and on-going capital needs have been identified and prioritized through the 2013 Police Master Plan and are listed in the unfunded section below. Projects Not in Master Plan None Projects Not Previously Identified in the CIP The RMS was not in the previous CIP. It was added when the ability to use the Asset Forfeiture funds for this purchase was identified and confirmed. Operation and Maintenance Impacts RMS Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs have been built in to the department’s operating budget for the near-term. The department will be working with Information Technology on identifying appropriate replacement funding strategies going forward. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects None Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs In the future, the Boulder Police Department (BPD) will incorporate new initiatives into the planning and budget processes as city resources allow. Examples include: Public Safety Building Expansion and Renovation. Construct a 25,000 expansion for Police functions with additional parking for 165 spaces in a parking garage, along with associated renovations to the existing facility. Estimated cost $16.4 million. City-wide Radio Infrastructure. The Radio Infrastructure study will inform the CIP for replacement and upgrades to this critical city asset. Estimated cost $5.5 million. Gold Elite Radio Consoles. The new narrowing banding mandates, required by the FCC, will make this type of system necessary in the Police/Fire Communications Center. Estimated cost $1.5 million. 220 Table 14-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPOLICE $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Records Management System $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ - Subtotal $ - 221 [This page is intentionally blank.] 222 Police 223 City of Boulder TRANSPORTATION 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The Public Works Department is dedicated to maintaining and improving the quality of life in Boulder by planning for future needs, promoting environmental quality, building and maintaining municipal infrastructure, managing public investments, and protecting health and safety. The mission of the Transportation Division of the Public Works Department is to provide for the mobility of persons and goods by developing and maintaining a safe, efficient, environmentally sound and balanced transportation system with emphasis on providing travel choices through all modes – pedestrian, bicycle, transit and vehicular transportation, including aircraft and airport facilities. Funding Overview Investment in transportation infrastructure is occurring through five separate funds. An update to the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) was completed in 2014. The plan update affirmed policy direction and set the course for Capital Improvements Program (CIP) investments. Transportation continues to implement projects funded out of the Capital Bond and successful federal and state transportation grants. In November, 2013, the Boulder voters passed a transportation tax that will fund deferred transportation maintenance and some key multi-modal improvements. The CIP reflects the results of this new funding. Airport Fund The Airport Fund accounts for the operations of the city-owned municipal airport and supports airport investment. It is supported primarily by lease revenue and entitlement funds from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Transportation Fund The Transportation Fund accounts for construction, operation and maintenance of all major 224 Transportation and Municipal Airport thoroughfares, local streets, bikeways, walkways and other transportation systems. Funding for city transportation projects comes from several different sources: an ongoing 0.6 percent dedicated sales tax, Highway Users Tax, County Road and Bridge funds, State Highway Maintenance and Landscape Funds, and Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP- 21) federal funds. In November of 2013, Boulder voters passed two tax initiatives that increase the transportation fund by .15 percent dedicated sales tax annually for the next 16 years. This is the second year of incorporating the additional funding into the CIP budget process. Transportation Development Fund The Transportation Development Fund accounts for development fees to be utilized for the construction of transportation capital improvements related to new development and growth. Funding for the Transportation Development Fund is provided primarily through the transportation excise tax (TET) revenues. The TET was instituted in the 1980s to fund transportation improvements related to growth and is paid by commercial and residential development. Boulder Junction Improvement Fund The Boulder Junction Improvement Fund was created in 2011 for the Boulder Junction Key Public Improvements. Funding is provided from development related revenues generated in the Boulder Junction Area that will be reinvested into Key Public Improvements in this area. Transportation Excise and Transportation and General Fund Construction Use Taxes collected from development in the area are being used on these improvements in addition to other money budgeted in the Transportation CIP and funds obtained from federal transportation grants (Pearl N. Multiway Boulevard and Multi-use Path). Other department funding sources are also being used for these projects including Public Works Utilities (infrastructure upgrades) and Parks and Recreation (Boulder Junction Fund- new park facilities). Capital Bond Fund Funding from the Capital Improvement Bond (CIB) Fund supported a number of projects managed by Transportation. CIB funding is indicated by the following symbol: Boulder Junction Improvements at Junction Place and Goose Creek. 225 Transportation and Municipal Airport Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 The projects in the capital improvements program are selected and developed to implement TMP priorities. The TMP prioritized a system of “complete street” corridors in the city for strategic investment and completion. Complete Streets not only includes the street itself but also facilities for the associated ¼ mile travel shed on either side. Complete Streets capital projects incorporate commissioned art in the design and infrastructure, typically at a rate of 1 to 1.5 percent, and address or recognize place-making in coordination with land use and zoning, and adjacent land owners. The 2016 Transportation focus for 2016 is on: Newly awarded TIP funding projects Boulder Creek Underpass and Multiuse path improvements, with funding from the Community, Culture, and Safety Tax Highlights Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Pearl Parkway Multi-use Path TIP Project – North side of Pearl from 30th to 47th and Multi-way Boulevard from 30th east to the railroad tracks. Diagonal – 28th Street to East of 30th Street reconstruction and multi-modal improvements Foothills/Valmont Operational Improvements 63rd Street widening between Arapahoe and Valmont including a structure replacement over the Leggett ditch 28th Street Improvements from Pearl to Valmont including the completion of multi-use paths on both sides of 28th Street and the third bus/bike/right-turning vehicle lane 28th Street Multi-Use Path and On-Street Bicycle Facility Improvements from Iris to Yarmouth Baseline Underpass – east of Broadway and associated Multi-use Path and sidewalk Improvements 29th/Valmont Safety Project with Federal Hazard Elimination Grant – installation of a traffic signal and associated pedestrian improvements. Priority Projects for 2016 The 2016-2021 CIP is the significant transition year for integration of the project submittals that were successful in securing federal funding through the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The city was successful in securing $11.6 million in federal matching funds for four projects. Funding identified in the previous 2015-2020 CIP generically as “TIP local match” was redistributed for the required 226 Transportation and Municipal Airport local match for these projects. Boulder Slough Multi-use Path (30th to 3100 Pearl) $480,000 Broadway Reconstruction (Violet to US 36) $6,225,000 30th and Colorado Ave. Ped./Bike Underpass $4,750,000 19th Street Complete Streets (Norwood to Upland) $100,000 In addition to the city TIP projects the city is also a funding partner on two Boulder County TIP projects. This funding is identified in the 2016-2021 CIP under the “Boulder County/City Joint TIP Projects” line item. The total city contribution is $289,000. The two projects are bike/ pedestrian infrastructure improvements: 71st St Multi-use Path (Winchester to Idyllwild Trail) $151,000 Williams Fork Trail Multi-use Path (63rd to Twin Lakes) $138,000 Another significant highlight this year is funding in support of the Arapahoe Ave. /Boulder Creek Path Underpass improvements funded through the Community Culture and Safety Ballot Initiative. Funding of $5.2 million was identified in the ballot item to enhance (widen and improve lighting) the Boulder Creek Path from Eben Fine Park through the Civic Center to 17th Street including replacing the Arapahoe Avenue underpass. In concert with this investment $2.5 million has been programmed for associated complete street and reconstruction elements to complete the previous Capital Bond project from 15th Street to Broadway. 28th Street (Baseline to Iris) Complete Street – construction 30th Street (Baseline Rd. to Arapahoe Ave.) and Colorado Ave. (Folsom St. to Foothills Parkway) Transportation Corridor Scoping – public process and design Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects Highlight projects for the 2017-2021 timeframe of the CIP focus on the projects previously noted in the Highlight section above as these projects transition from the public process design phase to right-of-way acquisition and construction. Leveraged funding is included under the “TIP Local Match/TMP Implementation” line item for the next round federal grant applications and is included as a placeholder in 2019 through 2021. Board Action The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) was briefed on the Transportation Fund, Transportation Development Fund, and the Boulder Junction Improvement Fund Capital Improvement Programs at their April 13, 2015 and May 11, 2015 meetings. At their June 8, 2015 meeting the TAB held a public hearing and unanimously recommended adoption of the staff recommended 2016-2021 227 Transportation and Municipal Airport Capital Improvements Programs. Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization CIP Guiding Principles Airport Fund The Airport Master Plan was updated in 2007, and its purpose is to assess current and future needs of the airport and provide a plan for facility and management improvements for the next 20 years. Recommended projects were identified and categorized into a Fiscally Constrained Plan, Action Plan, and a Vision Plan. Investments are focused on maintaining infrastructure and facilities. The Airport Fund is one of a handful of general aviation airports in Colorado which is not supported by a general fund. The airport is supported through user fees that leverage external funding from federal and state sources for improvements and capital maintenance. In addition to flight training and recreational use, the airport provides an emergency response role and fulfills the demand of the aviation business sector such as weather research and aviation- related design and manufacturing that would move outside of Boulder without the airport. The airport served as a key city facility in the September, 2013 flood emergency response effort. Transportation Funds All proposed projects in the 2016-2021 CIP are consistent with the TMP, updated in 2014, and its budget guiding principles. The citywide CIP Guiding Principles share many of the same traits as the TMP Budget Guiding Principles including focusing on maintenance and safety of the existing system, leveraging external funding, and supporting community sustainability goals. Maintenance of the existing system continues as the highest funding priority of the TMP and is reflected throughout the Transportation CIP and operating budget. Transportation projects meet legal mandates such as ADA requirements for transportation improvements, and for purchasing and contract administration for projects receiving state/federal grants. Public safety is a key focus of all transportation projects – designs meet local, state and federal standards, and some funding is specifically for hazard eliminations like the 29th/Valmont project. Leveraging funding is prevalent in the transportation CIP and extensive outside money is acquired using the limited city transportation dollars. Transportation also promotes community 228 Transportation and Municipal Airport partnerships by working with other agencies such as RTD, Boulder County, CU and CDOT. Transportation coordinates projects with other departments including community planning and sustainability, water/wastewater/storm, parks and recreation, and open space to implement improvements simultaneously to save construction and future maintenance costs. Transportation works to maintain adequate reserves and flexibility in the CIP and operating budgets to respond to emergencies and revenue fluctuations. Prioritization Aligning with the policies of the TMP is an important aspect of the Transportation Budget’s guiding principles. The TMP calls for developing a balanced multimodal system that offers transportation choices. In council/board budget processes, a list of budget guiding principles has been developed and updated to reflect the positive vote in November, 2013 to approve a new tax for transportation maintenance. It includes priorities and strategies that are used to develop the Transportation CIP. The newly revised principles are: Transportation Budget Guiding Principles – Credible, Clear and Consistent As top priority, maintain and operate the existing, valuable multi-modal system, including investments in safety As additions are made to the system, address ongoing operation and maintenance needs Continue to advance innovations in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the system Strategically enhance the Complete Street network, prioritizing projects that have maximum impact improving safety, mobility and efficiency Advance corridor studies integrating the city’s Sustainability Framework and Resiliency Leverage external funds extending the ability of local dollars to implement city goals Continuously strive for efficiency and effectiveness in how work is accomplished Assure budget decisions are sustainable over time Keep in mind the goal of identifying long-term, sustainable funding that is tied to vehicle use Boulder Junction Improvement Fund Guiding Principles As a part of the adopted Transit Village Area Plan (TVAP) (September 2007, Revised August 2010) and related 2007 TVAP Implementation Plan, several Key Public Improvements were identified for public funding with the following key guiding principles: Identify mechanisms to fairly distribute public improvement benefits and burdens among all 229 Transportation and Municipal Airport area property owners. Complete key connections and improvements needed ahead of new development. The publicly-funded Key Public Improvements should benefit the city as a whole or implement the vision and goals for the TVAP area. The proposed transportation connections in this area are consistent with the adopted TVAP Transportation Connections Plan and the TMP. Projects Not in Master Plans The TMP Update process was completed in 2014 with acceptance by City Council on August 5, 2014. Results from the update have been used to inform the 2016-2021 CIP. Projects Not Previously Identified in the CIP The recommended Transportation Fund 2016-2021 CIP includes the following changes: TIP Local Match/TMP Implementation-as mentioned above in the budget strategy section, CIP funding in this line item was reallocated to cover the local match requirements of the successful DRCOG TIP submittals; leveraging $11.6 million in federal funding. Remaining line item funding in the next three years of the CIP (2016-2018) will be focused on TMP implementation with an emphasis on the top corridor priorities (Arapahoe, 30th Street and Colorado Avenue). Arapahoe Ave. (15th to Broadway) Complete Street Reconstruction/Boulder Creek Underpass – in response to the opportunity associated with funding ($5.2 million) from the Community Culture and Safety Ballot initiative to enhance the Boulder Creek Path through the Civic area $2.5 million in transportation funding has been identified to leverage the path funding to make complete street improvements and complete the reconstruction of Arapahoe Avenue from 15th Street to Broadway. Boulder County/City Joint TIP Projects – in addition to the city’s DRCOG TIP projects the city is teaming with Boulder County to make joint pedestrian/bike improvements in the Gunbarrel area. $289,000 of city funding and $364,000 of county funding will leverage $1,492,000 of federal funds to make multi-use path improvements to 71st Street and Williams Fork Trail/ Spine Road. Operation and Maintenance Impacts The City Council approved placing two tax initiatives on the November, 2013 ballot and both were passed by the Boulder voters. One tax is a bridge for six years, starting in 2014, and the other 230 Transportation and Municipal Airport tax is for the following ten years, starting in 2020. The two together result in 0.15 percent tax increase annually that will fund deferred and newly identified transportation maintenance needs and some key public improvements. The Transportation division has been adding a significant portion of the transportation sales tax increases over the last few years into the maintenance and operations of the system and this provided a significant boost with the tax passed in November 2013. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects Transportation Fund TIP Local Match/TMP Implementation – as mentioned above in the budget strategy section, CIP funding in this line item was reallocated to cover the local match requirements of the successful DRCOG TIP submittals Transportation Development Fund TIP Local Match/TMP Implementation - funding for this item has been increased by $930,000 over the 2015-2020 CIP. Funding will be focused on TMP implementation with an emphasis on the top corridor priorities (Arapahoe, 30th Street and Colorado Avenue). Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs The unfunded projects list in the Transportation Fund is informed by the area/corridor planning processes including next phase Civic Area planning, Envision East Arapahoe and 30th Street/ Colorado Avenue planning. The transportation project needs identified in the plans are currently unfunded. Planning and design efforts would help inform future capital bond initiatives and potential leveraged funding opportunities, such as through competitive TIP or state grant opportunities. Also, Boulder Junction implementation may potentially have additional transportation connections needs that are not currently funded beyond the first phase of high priority Key Public Improvements in the Phase 1 area. Quiet zone implementation to allow for quieter railroad crossings continues to come up as a community desire and is not currently funded. The current evaluation identifies approximately $5 million in capital improvements needed for the city’s railroad crossings to be Quiet Zone compliant. 231 For the bigger picture transportation unfunded improvements, the 2014 TMP established updated funding at three levels —Current Funding, Action Plan, and Vision Plan – through 2035. Transportation and Municipal Airport 232 Table 15-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/TRANSPORTATION $ 56,338,000 $ 8,774,500 $ 7,788,500 $ 15,692,500 $ 11,027,500 $ 6,527,500 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 13,772,000 $ 3,884,500 $ 1,877,500 $ 6,127,500 $ 627,500 $ 627,500 $ - $ 257,000 $ 257,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,050,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,880,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ 480,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 14,402,000 $ 1,694,000 $ 1,694,000 $ 1,864,000 $ 6,050,000 $ 1,550,000 $ - $ 893,000 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ - $ 121,000 $ 121,000 $ - $ 4,800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ 3,774,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ 629,000 $ - $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ 4,500,000 $ - $ - CIP-CAPITAL PLANNING STUDIES $ 589,000 $ 338,000 $ 100,000 $ 151,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 289,000 $ 138,000 $ - $ 151,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 27,575,000 $ 2,858,000 $ 4,117,000 $ 7,550,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 4,350,000 $ - $ 1,330,000 $ 1,330,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,350,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ - $ 228,000 $ - $ 228,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ 304,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000 $ 120,000 $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - $ 15,483,000 $ 483,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ - $ 4,000,000 TIP Local Match/TMP $ 627,500 $ - $ - Boulder Slough Multiuse Path 30th Ped Facs Enh Missing Links $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,350,000 $ - $ - $ - SubtotalSignal Maintenance & Upgrade $ 121,000 $ 800,000 $ 629,000 $ - $ 480,000 $ 1,550,000 Rehab Runway & Eastern Taxiway SubtotalBldr County/City Joint TIP Projects East Arapahoe Transp Corridor Trans Corridor 30th & Colorado SubtotalDeficient Street Light Pole Replace Major Capital Reconstruction Boulder Junction - Develop Coord 30th St and Colorado Bike/Ped Bikeway Facilities - Enhancements BJ Traffic Signal Bluff St & 30th BJ Traffic Signal Jct & Valmont 28th St - Valmont to Iris (Baseline) $ - 2019 ProjectedArap Comp St Recon/Bldr Crk Subtotal19th St (Norwood to Sumac) TIP Local Match TMP Department Total $ 6,527,500 Ped Facilities Repair, Replace, $ 97,500 $ 50,000 Greenways Program Misc Development Coordination Broadway Recon Violet to 36 $ - 233 Transportation and Municipal Airport Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. 234 Transportation 235 Transportation 236 Transportation 237 Transportation 238 Transportation 239 Transportation 240 Transportation 241 Transportation 242 Transportation 243 Transportation 244 Transportation 245 Transportation 246 Transportation 247 Transportation 248 Transportation 249 Transportation 250 Transportation 251 Transportation 252 Transportation 253 Transportation 254 Transportation 255 Transportation 256 Transportation 257 City of Boulder UTILITIES 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Overview of Department Mission The Utilities Division is responsible for the oversight of water, wastewater, and stormwater and flood services. The mission of the Utilities Division is to provide quality water services, as desired by the community, in a manner which emphasizes efficient management of fiscal and natural resources and protects human and environmental health. These services include: Wastewater Collection and Treatment Water Resources Management and Delivery Potable Water Treatment Water Quality Protection Flood/Emergency Planning, Management and Response Stormwater Collection and Conveyance Infrastructure Construction and Maintenance The Utilities Division is also responsible for the Greenways Program, which is described following this section. Funding Overview Each of the city’s three utility funds is established as a separate enterprise fund designed to finance and account for each utility’s facilities and services. Funding for the Utilities Division capital improvement program (CIP) is derived primarily from monthly utility fees. Any revenue increases for 2016 will be reviewed by the Water Resources Advisory Board and considered by City Council. In addition to the monthly utility fees, significant revenue sources include Plant Investment Fees (PIFs) from new development or redevelopment and hydroelectric sales. Sales from monthly utility fees can be variable and reflect the overall growth of the service area and yearly weather fluctuations. Other revenue sources include reimbursements from the Urban Drainage & Flood Control District 258 Utilities (UDFCD), for stormwater/flood management projects, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) state and federal grants, and revolving loans from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). These revenues are project specific and are highly variable depending on the external agency's funding situation and priorities. Projects may be funded by issuing revenue bonds with the debt service financed by general utility charges. For the years 2015-2021, it is anticipated that new bonds will be issued for the following projects: Water Betasso Water Treatment Plant Improvements ($24 million in 2016) to fund improvements to maintain compliance with federal Safe Drinking Water Act regulations Southern Water Supply Pipeline II (Carter Lake Pipeline) and the 2018 Waterline Replacement budget ($37.6 million in 2018) Barker Dam Outlet and Boulder Reservoir Water Treatment Facility ($10.3 million in 2020) to fund repairs to the outlet works. Wastewater Sanitary Sewer Bond ($10 million in 2015) to fund replacement of large diameter interceptor pipe Waste Water Treatment Facility (WWTF) improvements ($18.5 million in 2020) to fund phosphorus treatment to meet Regulation 85 requirements. Stormwater and Flood Management Wonderland Creek and Four Mile Canyon Creek projects ($23 million in 2015) South Boulder Creek Improvements ($25 million in 2018) to fund improvements designed to mitigate flood hazards in the South Boulder Creek West Valley area. The preliminary 2016 budget reflects the following revenue increases: 8 percent Water, 5 percent Wastewater, and 4 percent Stormwater/Flood Management. The following table summarizes the 2015 adopted revenue increase and proposed revenue increase projections for 2016-2018. The proposed 2016 increases are in bold. 259 Utilities Table 16-1 Proposed Utility Rate Increases Current Focus for Capital Planning and Projects in 2016 Water Utility The Betasso Water Treatment Facility (WTF) will undergo significant capital investment to address pretreatment, residuals handling and asset management issues. Utilities has budgeted $24,000,000 in 2016 to fund these improvements The Carter Lake Pipeline is a source water project identified to meet the following goals: improve water quality, operational security, and year round water supply to the Boulder reservoir WTF. The City of Boulder is one of several project partners. Utilities has budgeted $34,000,000 for the project’s construction in 2018. Wastewater Utility The WWTF Nitrogen Upgrades construction project will be bid in 2015, but construction will continue through 2016. This project will address more stringent effluent discharge requirements for nitrogen identified in CDPHE Regulation 85 The IBM Lift Station Improvements construction project will be bid in 2015 but construction will continue through 2016. This project will involve major civil, mechanical and electrical issues to meet various CDPHE criteria The wastewater interceptor evaluation will continue in 2016. Utilities staff is investigating alternatives to realign a section of the large diameter pipe downstream of 61st Street to the WWTF. Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Flood mitigation and path improvements along Fourmile Canyon Creek at 19th Street are anticipated to be bid in 2016 A CEAP for the Fourmile Canyon Creek stream reach upstream of Upland Avenue to west of Broadway is expected to be completed in 2016 Flood mitigation plans are anticipated to be completed in 2016 for Boulder Creek and Bear 2015 2016 2017 2018 Water 5% 8% 8% 8% Wastewater 30% 5% 5% 5% Stormwater/Flood Management 75% 4% 8% 8% 260 Utilities Canyon Creek Stream bank restoration work on Boulder Creek at Eben Fine Park, which is being funded by the Community Culture and Safety tax is anticipated to be completed in 2016 Area-wide rehabilitation, repairs, and capacity improvements to the storm sewers serving the University Hill and Downtown areas. 2013 Flood Impact Flood Recovery efforts had a significant impact on the Utilities Division. The costs to date for repair and restoration for all three Utilities including administrative costs is $8.3 million. Two repair projects in the sanitary sewer system that are not yet completed include the stabilization of an interceptor at Boulder Creek and 61st Street and the removal of debris at an interceptor at the Wastewater Treatment Facility. Sections of multi-use path, which were damaged during the removal of sediment from Boulder Creek, are scheduled to be repaired this fall. Highlights Water Utility Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Sunshine Transmission line replacement Betasso capital improvement project design Treated water transmission line design Distribution main replacement program Kossler Reservoir Concrete Facing Rehabilitation Barker Gravity Pipeline Repairs – ongoing repairs in order of priority and availability Barker Dam Outlet Gate Test – ongoing plan to test/inspect gates as reservoir level allows Green Lake No. 2 Assessment and Rehabilitation Study Albion Dam Assessment and Rehabilitation Alternatives Study Priority Projects for 2016 Betasso Water Treatment Facility construction Stream bank restoration work on Boulder Creek at  Eben Fine Park.  261 Utilities Treated water transmission line construction Distribution Main Replacement program Source Water Facilities Rehabilitation program Carter Lake Pipeline planning & land acquisition Lakewood & Silver Lake Hydro Albion Dam repairs Boulder Reservoir inspection. Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects The Barker Gravity line, which conveys water from Barker Reservoir to Kossler Reservoir, is in need of repair. The pipeline will be replaced over a 15 year period at a cost of approximately $20,000,000. Utilities has budgeted approximately $1,200,000 in the CIP annually for this project Albion Dam is in need of repairs. The work involves re-facing the dam, and construction to extend the outlet works. Approximately $4,000,000 has been allocated to this project in 2019 The Barker Dam Outlet Works is in need of repairs. This work involves an alternatives evaluation to investigate the value of micro tunneling the left abutment The Carter Lake Pipeline is a source water project identified to meet the following goals: improve water quality, operational security, and year round water supply to the Boulder reservoir WTF. The City of Boulder is one of several project partners. Utilities has budgeted approximately $34,000,000 for the project’s construction in 2018 The Betasso WTF will undergo significant capital investment to address pretreatment, residuals handling and asset management issues. Utilities has budgeted approximately $24,000,000 in 2016 to fund these improvements The Boulder Reservoir WTF will undergo improvements to address aging filters, backup power, and residual handing issues. Utilities has budgeted approximately $2,000,000 in 2020 to fund these improvements The Treated Water Transmission Main Replacement program will focus on the rehabilitation of water pipelines larger than 12-inch diameter The Distribution main replacement program will focus on the rehabilitation of water lines smaller than 12-inch diameter. This is an annual program funded at approximately $3,500,000 per year. 262 Utilities Wastewater Utility Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Wastewater Collection System Condition Assessment Program (ongoing) Wastewater Collection System Rehabilitation Program (ongoing) Update to the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (WWCSMP) Main Interceptor Realignment at 61st St and Boulder Creek Installation of 9 Permanent Collection System Flow Meters Design of realignment of main interceptor where it enters the WWTF, construction anticipated in 2016 Wastewater Interceptor Evaluation (ongoing). Priority Projects for 2016 WWTF Nitrogen Upgrades construction project IBM Lift Station Improvements construction project Construction of main interceptor realignment at WWTF Wastewater Collection System Condition Assessment Program (ongoing) Wastewater Collection System Rehabilitation Program (ongoing) Wastewater Interceptor Evaluation (ongoing) Wastewater Collection System Flow Monitoring (ongoing). Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects In 2020, the WWTF will undergo additional improvements to meet more stringent effluent phosphorus standards associated with Regulation 85. Utilities has budgeted $18,500,000 for these improvements, which will be required for the next permit cycle Utilities staff has indentified the need for a potential realignment of the large diameter wastewater interceptor downstream of 61st Street. Utilities has budgeted for a $10,000,000 bond to fund this project. Stormwater and Flood Management Utility Projects Expected to be Completed in 2015 Flood mapping studies are expected to be completed in 2015 and submitted to FEMA for Boulder Slough, and Upper Goose and Twomile Canyon Creeks and Skunk, Kings Gulch and 263 Utilities Bluebell Canyon Creeks Flood mitigation major drainageway plans are anticipated to be completed by the end of 2015 for South Boulder Creek and Gregory Canyon Creek The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) also completes maintenance projects along the major drainageways. In 2015 this includes a request for sediment removal along Wonderland Creek from Foothills Parkway to the confluence with Goose Creek. Selective thinning of non-native vegetation is also planned and coordinated through the UDFCD for Bear Canyon Creek. These maintenance projects will help maintain conveyance capacity in these drainageways A Stormwater Master Plan (SMP) Update will be completed in 2015 to integrate flood inundation data from the 2013 flood event A Storm sewer condition assessment program was initiated in 2015 to comprehensively clean and TV inspect the storm sewer collection system A storm sewer rehabilitation program was initiated in 2015 to rehabilitate, repair, or replace storm sewers as necessary based on defects identified in the condition assessment program A Storm sewer expansion program was initiated in 2015 to determine areas of the city where there is not adequate storm drainage infrastructure. Construction of new storm sewers is expected to commence in 2016. Priority Projects for 2016 Wonderland Creek Foothills to Winding Trail Fourmile Canyon Creek at 19th Street Storm sewer rehabilitation and expansion programs. Highlights of 2017-2021 Projects Mitigation plans are currently underway for improvements along South Boulder Creek, Bear Canyon Creek, Gregory Creek and Boulder Creek. CIP projects will be based on the recommendations of the mitigation planning studies. Funding is shown for construction of improvements to mitigate flood hazards in the South Boulder Creek West Valley area using bond money shown in 2018 Mitigation plans for Skunk, Bluebell, King’s Gulch, Twomile and Upper Goose Creeks will be initiated in 2016 after mapping updates have been completed for these drainages. CIP projects will be based on the updated mapping and mitigation planning efforts. 264 Utilities Board Action The preliminary 2016 Utilities budget and 2016-2021 CIP was presented to the WRAB on April 27, 2015 as a discussion item. The WRAB hosted a public hearing and continued their discussion of the preliminary 2016 Utilities budget and 2016-2021 CIP on May 18, 2015. At the June 22, 2015 meeting WRAB hosted a public hearing during which the board voted 3-0 to recommend approval of the proposed CIP. Guiding Principles and Project Prioritization The proposed Utilities Division CIP is consistent with the CIP guiding principles with the primary focus on sustaining and improving existing infrastructure systems, increasing efficiency and planning for adequate funding to care for essential systems. The projects identified in the 2016- 2021 CIP are intended to implement these guiding principles and are consistent with the department master plans identified below. In 2002 it was decided to develop an overarching master plan for each of the city’s three utilities. More detailed plans have been developed for major functional areas. Recent master plans include recommendations for CIP projects over a 20-year time period. The project recommendations consider the prioritization listed below as well as information from the Utilities Division asset management system. This system includes replacement cost, useful life and condition rating which have been documented for each significant utility asset. This information informs the six- year CIP. Current Utilities Division master plans include: Water Source Water Master Plan – 2009 Treated Water Master Plan (TWMP) – 2011 Water Utility Master Plan (WUMP) – 2011 Wastewater Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (WWCSMP) – 2010 Wastewater Utility Master Plan (WWUMP) – 2010 Stormwater/ Flood Management Stormwater Master Plan (SMP) -2007 265 Utilities Comprehensive Flood and Stormwater (CFS) Master Plan – 2004 Various individual Drainageway mitigation plans Prioritization The overall program and funding priorities are reflected in the timing of projects over the six-year CIP time period. In addition to master plan and mitigation plan recommendations, the following factors were considered in determining the overall program and funding priorities: Water and Wastewater Reliability of water and wastewater collection, delivery and treatment Water quality and other environmental regulations Worker health and safety Opportunity to collaborate with other city projects, such as transportation Opportunity to collaborate with other utility providers to leverage funds or obtain federal or state grants Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings Accommodating new growth and development. Stormwater and Flood Management Life safety (high hazard) mitigation Flood emergency response capability Critical facility (vulnerable population) hazard mitigation Property damage mitigation Collaboration with other Greenways Program Objectives Potential for operation and maintenance cost savings Accommodating new growth and development Opportunities to leverage outside funding. Within current appropriations all projects proposed have sufficient funds for ongoing operations and maintenance, and 90 percent of the Water Utility and Wastewater Utility projects are focused on maintaining or improving existing assets. Other Water and Wastewater Utility projects are intended to construct facilities required to comply with new regulations. In the Stormwater and 266 Utilities Flood Management Utility, the majority of the project funding is focused on life safety and critical facility hazard mitigation issues. Projects Not in Master Plans Most Utilities Division projects in the 2016-2021 CIP have been previously identified in associated master plans. However, several projects have been added based on information identified from the September 2013 flood disaster. Projects Not Previously Identified in the CIP The following new projects have been identified in the 6-year CIP: Water Utility Green Lake 2 Dam Skyscraper Dam Automated Meter Reading Wastewater Utility New projects being identified in the 2015 master plan update. Stormwater and Flood Management Utility New projects being identified in the 2015 master plan update. Operation and Maintenance Impacts The majority of the utilities expenditures are for rehabilitating and improving the capital infrastructure either through the capital improvements program (cash financed) or through annual debt payments for revenue bonds that have been issued to fund capital improvements. The infrastructure is core in carrying out the utilities’ mission of delivering safe and reliable water to our customers, ensuring that water is available for fire protection, conveying and treating wastewater and stormwater and mitigating the effects of flood events. Rehabilitating and improving the capital infrastructure reduces the need to react to failures, associated expense and disruption to customers and the community. 267 Construction Cost Inflation Based on various cost inflation indexes, it is recommended to project a capital improvement construction costs inflationary rate of 4 percent during the 2016-2021 planning period. Using an average inflation calculation is in keeping with the principle of consistent rate increases over time rather than periodic large rate increases. Deferred, Eliminated, or Changed Projects Water Utility Funding for the Betasso Water Treatment Facility (BWTF) was increased to $24,000,000 in 2016 to combine various facility upgrades and to take advantage of a favorable bond rate climate. Previously, the BWTF was funded at $12,000,000 in 2016 and $14,000,000 in 2026. Stormwater & Flood Management Utility Funding for the South Boulder Creek project was increased to $25,000,000 in 2018 to fund the proposed US 36 stormwater detention facility to prevent overtopping of US 36 during a 100-yr flood event. Previously, the South Boulder Creek project was funded for $10,000,000 in 2018 and $25,000,000 in 2021, which was outside the 2016-2021 planning horizon Funding shown for Boulder Creek in 2016 was reduced by $250,000 and moved to 2018 so that detailed information can be used to identify projects as part of the mitigation plan that is currently being developed. More detailed information will be available in 2016. Unfunded Projects and Emerging Needs The following unfunded projects have been identified: Stormwater/ Flood Management South Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Phases II and III - Unfunded The Utilities Division has developed and maintains a 20-year CIP and associated financial plan. Large Utilities Division projects require many years for planning and a longer term horizon is needed to capture the time period required for overall project implementation. A 20-year plan provides a basis for longer term financial planning that is needed to support decision making regarding project timing, issuance and retirement of revenue bonds and rate increases. The above mentioned projects are indicated in the 20-year CIP. Utilities 268 Utilities Emerging needs have been identified as part of the recent Water Utility Master Plan. During the development of this master plan, a technical analysis was performed regarding the city’s water treatment facilities and other infrastructure. The analysis indicates that this infrastructure should be adequate to meet water demand needs well into the future with little need for capacity expansion. However, a comprehensive analysis of existing assets pointed to the poor condition and aging of some mechanical and electrical equipment at the Betasso Water Treatment Facility. Betasso is the city's primary Water Treatment Facility and has deteriorated during almost 50 years of continuous operation despite on-going maintenance and rehabilitation. These issues, combined with inherent deficiencies in certain treatment processes, are the reasons that large capital funding is recommended in 2016-2017. Regulatory changes are another source of uncertainty and create emerging needs. For example, as explained in the Highlights section of this memo, the city received a new discharge permit for the 75th Street Wastewater Treatment Facility in 2011 with new effluent limits. Complying with these limits will require a combination of regulatory negotiations, environmental studies and Wastewater Treatment Facility capital improvements. 269 [This page is intentionally blank.] 270 Table 16-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/STORMWATER & FLOOD UTILITY $ 61,417,767 $ 5,209,921 $ 7,119,924 $ 33,256,596 $ 5,673,278 $ 5,129,366 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 25,792,750 $ 3,365,021 $ 5,201,224 $ 6,688,096 $ 3,682,578 $ 3,129,149 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,750,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,250,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 585,000 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ - $ 752,646 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ 125,441 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,941,298 $ 730,080 $ 759,283 $ 789,655 $ 854,090 $ 986,949 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,076,390 $ 162,000 $ 169,000 $ 175,500 $ 190,000 $ 197,390 $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,637,416 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,165,547 $ 1,221,869 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 5,172,732 $ 594,900 $ 618,700 $ 643,500 $ 1,330,700 $ 1,315,932 $ - $ 2,438,766 $ 270,400 $ 281,200 $ 292,500 $ 632,700 $ 657,966 $ - $ 2,668,966 $ 324,500 $ 337,500 $ 351,000 $ 633,000 $ 657,966 $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 3,627,285 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 660,000 $ 684,285 $ - $ 3,627,285 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 660,000 $ 684,285 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 26,825,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 25,325,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 26,825,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 25,325,000 $ - $ - $ - Utility Billing Computer System $ - South Boulder Creek Phase I $ - Subtotal $ 633,000 Preflood Property Acquisition $ 633,000 Subtotal $ - Subtotal $ 669,000 Storm Sewer Rehabilitation $ 304,000 Transportation Coordination $ 365,000 Stormwater Quality Improvements $ 182,500 Twomile Canyon Creek $ - Upper Goose Creek Drainage $ 1,000,000 Gregory Creek Flood Mitigation $ - Local Drainage Improvements $ 821,241 Skunk Creek Flood Mitigation $ - Fourmile - Upstream of Upland $ 1,500,000 Greenways Program - Flood fund $ 97,500 Greenways Program - Lottery $ 125,441 Bear Canyon Creek Flood $ - Bluebell & King's Gultch $ - Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 5,028,682 Subtotal $ 3,726,682 Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/WASTEWATER UTILITY $ 58,052,128 $ 4,355,600 $ 5,987,421 $ 5,571,420 $ 27,559,276 $ 7,242,543 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 29,573,075 $ 570,000 $ 2,050,397 $ 1,476,915 $ 20,731,179 $ 1,867,002 $ - $ 3,749,723 $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 1,346,988 $ 1,730,145 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 175,479 $ - $ 175,479 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,320,000 $ 120,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,866,016 $ - $ 674,918 $ 701,915 $ 759,191 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,161,857 $ 150,000 $ - $ 750,000 $ 18,625,000 $ 136,857 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 28,479,053 $ 3,785,600 $ 3,937,024 $ 4,094,505 $ 6,828,097 $ 5,375,541 $ - $ 5,380,670 $ 811,200 $ 843,648 $ 877,394 $ 948,989 $ 986,949 $ - $ 1,829,626 $ 216,320 $ 224,973 $ 233,972 $ 253,064 $ 657,966 $ - $ 18,294,276 $ 2,758,080 $ 2,868,403 $ 2,983,139 $ 3,226,563 $ 3,355,626 $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ 184,481 $ - $ - $ - $ 184,481 $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 375,000 $ - WWTF Digester Complex $ 200,000 WWTF Rehabilitation $ - Sanitary Sewer Manhole $ 243,331 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation $ 3,102,465 WWTF Cogeneration $ - Utility Billing Computer System $ - WWTF Permit Improvements $ 1,500,000 Subtotal $ 4,458,286 Condition Assessment Program $ 912,490 2019 ProjectedGoose Creek SS Interceptor $ 647,590 Marshall Landfill $ - Department Total $ 7,335,868 Subtotal $ 2,877,582 WWTF Instrumentation/Control $ 729,992 WWTF Laboratory $ - Wastewater Treatment Facility $ - WWTF Activated Sludge $ - WWTF Electrical $ - 271 Table 16-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/WATER UTILITY $ 126,449,771 $ 33,449,251 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 19,698,521 $ 12,318,146 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 84,350,608 $ 26,610,000 $ 2,511,322 $ 38,314,303 $ 9,148,194 $ 6,097,907 $ - $ 684,285 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 684,285 $ - $ 115,000 $ 65,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,566,060 $ 100,000 $ 175,000 $ - $ 8,455,509 $ - $ - $ 25,140,000 $ 25,140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 561,773 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 486,773 $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ - $ 124,707 $ - $ - $ - $ 430,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,801,585 $ 850,000 $ 2,036,322 $ 37,915,263 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 267,664 $ - $ - $ 24,333 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 540,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,519,534 $ - $ - $ - $ 492,685 $ 4,926,849 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 39,299,163 $ 6,839,251 $ 6,168,263 $ 2,743,289 $ 8,050,327 $ 6,220,239 $ - $ 3,882,997 $ 125,000 $ - $ 341,636 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,003,748 $ 667,416 $ 1,169,859 $ 1,216,653 $ 1,315,932 $ 1,368,569 $ - $ 116,986 $ - $ 116,986 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 860,000 $ - $ 380,000 $ 480,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ 292,465 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 168,434 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 118,434 $ - $ - $ 18,613,540 $ 3,352,960 $ 3,487,078 $ - $ 3,922,489 $ 4,079,389 $ - $ 108,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 799,875 $ 799,875 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 316,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,314,000 $ 314,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 171,071 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 171,071 $ - $ 1,294,682 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 343,472 $ 351,210 $ - $ 271,875 $ - $ 271,875 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 1,450,000 $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Automated Meter Reading $ - 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 11,196,676 Subtotal $ 1,668,882 Barker Dam and Reservoir $ - Barker Dam Outlet $ 835,551 Betasso Water Treatment Facility $ - Green Lake 2 Dam $ - Lakewood Dam $ - Lakewood Hydroelectric/PRV $ 300,000 NCWCD Conveyance - Carter Lake $ - Orodell Hydro/PRV Facility $ - Pearl Street Hydro/PRV Facility $ 243,331 Source Water Monitoring/Protection $ 100,000 Utility Billing Computer System $ - Water System Security/Quality Imprv $ 90,000 Wittemyer Ponds $ 100,000 Subtotal $ 9,277,794 Albion Dam $ 3,416,361 Barker Gravity Pipeline Repair $ 1,265,319 Barker - Kossler Penstock Repair $ - Betasso Hydroelectric / PRF $ - Betasso Storage Tank Rehabilitation $ - Boulder Reservoir $ - Distribution Waterline Replacement $ 3,771,624 Farmer's Ditch $ 108,160 Goose Lake Dam $ - Island Lake Dam $ - Kohler Storage Tank Roof $ - Kossler Dam $ - Lakewood Pipeline $ 316,330 Reservoir Water Treatment Facility $ - Silver Lake Dam $ - Silver Lake Hydroelectric/PRV $ - Skyscraper Dam $ - Source Water Pressure Reducing, $ 150,000 Sunshine Hydroelectric/PRV Facility $ - Watershed Improvements $ - Zone 1 Transmission Pipes $ - Zone 2 Transmission Pipes $ - Zone 3 Transmission Pipes $ 250,000 272 Table 16-2: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department (Cont.) Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountPW/WATER UTILITY (Cont.) $ 126,449,771 $ 33,449,251 $ 8,679,585 $ 41,107,592 $ 19,698,521 $ 12,318,146 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 2,800,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ 2,800,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - Subtotal $ 250,000 2019 ProjectedDepartment Total $ 11,196,676 Carter Lake Hydroelectric $ 250,000 273 Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. Utilities 274 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 275 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 276 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 277 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 278 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 279 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 280 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 281 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 282 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 283 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 284 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 285 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 286 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 287 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 288 Utilities - Stormwater and Flood Management Utility 289 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 290 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 291 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 292 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 293 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 294 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 295 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 296 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 297 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 298 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 299 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 300 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 301 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 302 Utilities - Wastewater Utility 303 Utilities - Water Utility 304 Utilities - Water Utility 305 Utilities - Water Utility 306 Utilities - Water Utility 307 Utilities - Water Utility 308 Utilities - Water Utility 309 Utilities - Water Utility 310 Utilities - Water Utility 311 Utilities - Water Utility 312 Utilities - Water Utility 313 Utilities - Water Utility 314 Utilities - Water Utility 315 Utilities - Water Utility 316 Utilities - Water Utility 317 Utilities - Water Utility 318 Utilities - Water Utility 319 Utilities - Water Utility 320 Utilities - Water Utility 321 Utilities - Water Utility 322 Utilities - Water Utility 323 Utilities - Water Utility 324 Utilities - Water Utility 325 Utilities - Water Utility 326 Utilities - Water Utility 327 Utilities - Water Utility 328 Utilities - Water Utility 329 Utilities - Water Utility 330 Utilities - Water Utility 331 Utilities - Water Utility 332 Utilities - Water Utility 333 Utilities - Water Utility 334 Utilities - Water Utility 335 Utilities - Water Utility 336 Utilities - Water Utility 337 Utilities - Water Utility 338 Utilities - Water Utility 339 Utilities - Water Utility 340 Utilities 341 City of Boulder Appendix A, UNFUNDED PROJECTS 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program Capital Funding History and Future Approach to Unfunded Projects The provision of adequate urban facilities and services to support the community’s quality of life is a core tenet of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Improvement Program is a major tool for coordinating and targeting public capital expenditures within changing budget constraints. The goal is to maintain and, in some cases, enhance service levels and standards over time, with new growth paying a fair share of the costs. Historical Funding Patterns in Boulder The city has a rich history of investing in the community and its quality of life. Prior to the 2000s, the community consistently invested significant resources in capital facilities. Funding was provided through a combination of ballot measures for specific facilities and land purchases, federal funds, and discretionary revenues. Examples of investments include: Buying park lands and open space Providing and upgrading public facilities such as libraries, recreation centers and sports fields Building places for community business and services such as the municipal campus buildings, and operations centers, for example, the “Yards” Building multimodal community connections such as the Greenways system, bikeways, and intersection improvements Investing to create special places like the Pearl Street Mall and Chautauqua area. Today, community members and visitors continue to benefit from these many facilities and lands on a regular basis. The 2000s, by contrast, were often economically difficult at local, regional, national, and even global levels. The cost of delivering services and taking care of our infrastructure has increased dramatically. Global demand has resulted in energy and construction costs far outpacing the consumer price index. There is currently no sign that there will be a return to historic prices. At the same time, there have been two economic declines, increased regional competition, and 342 cultural change in shopping habits impacting the revenue side of the equation. The city’s revenue in absolute dollars has not yet returned to where it was in 2000. Furthermore, the purchasing power of current funding is significantly less than in 2000. Continued and ongoing CIP funding exists in certain areas through enterprise funds (e.g. Water, Wastewater, Stormwater/Flood funds), funds with dedicated tax revenues earmarked for capital investment (e.g. Permanent Parks fund) and funds with dedicated taxes or fees intended to ensure that growth pays its way (e.g. Development Excise Tax and impact fees). These sources are dependent on numerous factors, including economic conditions and approved utility rates, and cover only a portion of capital needs in the city, however, they have been steady sources for capital investment over time. Recent Increases in Capital Funding In 2011 the city engaged in a capital investment strategy. At council’s direction, staff engaged a stakeholder group and collected public feedback on capital investment in the city. The result of this was a voter approved capital bond (see Special Highlight: Capital Improvement Bond section of this document), which has provided over $50 million dollars for capital investment in the city. The 20-year debt service for this is being covered from operating General Fund dollars. A second round of the capital investment strategy was put on hold in 2012, as costs and scopes for additional potential capital projects were not yet fully known and polling did not support another ballot issue at that time. However, work continued to identify capital needs across the city with the Comprehensive Financial Strategy (CFS) project. The initial work of the CFS, capital phase involved looking at capital needs and making recommendations to council for short-term capital project funding. Additionally the CFS looked at larger infrastructure investment needs, long -term capital deficiencies, place-making capital investment and long-term operating needs. City staff incorporated information learned from the 2013 Flood in this strategic work. Through the 2015 budget process and in response to community feedback, utility rates were adjusted to perform utility system-wide asset assessment and accelerate maintenance and replacement work, especially in the wastewater and stormwater/flood management areas. This is reflected in current utility CIP funding levels. In November 2014, Boulder voters passed the Community, Culture and Safety tax. This Appendix A, Unfunded Projects 343 temporary, 0.3 percent sales and use tax increase over three years will provide more than $27 million to improve community spaces, bolster cultural projects and organizations, and enhance safety in and around the downtown and University Hill. The passage of this tax addressed only a portion of the capital needs identified in the CFS and was targeted to specific capital enhancements. Strategic Planning for Unfunded Projects Moving forward, the intention is to build on the efforts of the past decade and establish a purposeful and continuous process for capital investment to support the city’s vision. Near term steps include commencing a citywide facility and asset assessment and an ongoing process for planning, funding and scheduling necessary maintenance and replacement of all capital assets. The process is expected to take a few years to complete with the goal of having a strategic approach to citywide capital planning that is integrated with the city’s comprehensive plan and long term vision. This begins with establishing a baseline, developing a consistent process and ongoing system for prioritizing capital projects for asset maintenance as well as emerging needs. The strategic approach will recognize the interconnectedness of capital investment and operating planning to provide the most efficient and effective public service, meeting community needs now and in the future. Finally, in conjunction with ongoing operating analysis and the review of the long-term financial structural gap, and understanding capital funding gaps identified through the asset assessment and capital strategy work, the city will be exploring other options, such as creating a capital fund with annual contributions from ongoing revenues, to address capital needs. Unfunded Projects In each department’s section of this document, departments have identified key unfunded projects and emerging needs. The following bullets provide a summary of the unfunded capital. These items have been identified over time from the capital investment strategy work, department strategic and master plans, CFS analysis, information learned from the September 2013 Flood, and public input. The lists are not exhaustive (and dollar amounts are very rough estimates where they are available at all), but rather they illustrate the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. (Note: the list below does not include OSMP or Utilities projects, as existing and future funding is anticipated to be able to address the emerging and long-term capital needs in these areas.) It is anticipated that the upcoming work on an asset assessment inventory, in conjunction with Appendix A, Unfunded Projects 344 ongoing capital investment strategic work and the updated Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan, will lay out a more comprehensive list of infunded capital , as well as options to address the needs. Citywide An emerging city-wide issue is our aging radio infrastructure. FAM has submitted a 2016 budget request for a radio infrastructure analysis and strategic plan. This strategic plan will impact all users of the city’s radio system including public safety, public works, Parks and Recreation and Open Space and Mountain Parks. Additional costs for replacement will be determined using the results of the study. DUHMD University Hill Commercial District Pedestrian Lighting Alley Master Plan implementation FAM Parking Lot Repairs at the Municipal Service Center and Public Safety Building parking lots Energy Efficiencies and Renewables Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Facility Space / Office Space (existing and future city employees) Fire Relocate Fire Station 3 out of the 100-year floodplain, co-locate with Fire Administration Offices, and construct a separate storage facility for fire vehicles and equipment One-time Buildings $11,412,500, Land up to $8,600,000, On-going $459,000 Replacement or Remodel of Fire Station 4 north of the current location of 4100 Darley Avenue One-time Building $2,442,750, Land up to $2,000,000, On-going $165,000 Remodel Fire Station 6 currently located at 5145 N 63rd Street One-time $1,154,625, On-going $165,000 Remodel Fire Station 2 at the current location of 2225 Baseline Road. One-time Building $3,842,000, Land up to $3,500,000, On-going $229,500 Remodel Fire Station 5 at the current location of 4365 19th Street. One-time Building $1,084,500, On-going $229,500 Remodel Fire Station 1 at the current location of 2441 13th Street. Appendix A, Unfunded Projects 345 One-time Building $3,397,125, On-going $128,800 Remodel Fire Station 7 at the current location of 1380 55th Street. One-time Building $1,096,875, On-going $42,000. Fire Training Center Phase 2 - Driving area and storage building One-time Concrete $2,500,000, Building $2,250,000, On-going $60,000. Fire Training Center Phase 3 - Additional classroom and office space. One-time $1,500,000, On-going $56,000. Information Technology New, emerging software-based automation opportunities that will continually arise. Future replacement and/or expansion of critical enterprise software (e.g. finance and payroll) and departmental systems (e.g. police records management, parks and recreation registration, court case management and many others). IT infrastructure replacement (e.g. PCs, networks, servers, telephones, etc) for central and mobile computing infrastructure (e.g. mobile devices, wireless networks, virtualized servers, associated security systems), data storage, and use of cloud-based applications and data storage. Parks & Recreation Work collaboratively with Boulder Fire Department to coordinate Fire Station #3 with potential move to Mapleton including identification of funding for relocation of athletic fields to Stazio or Valmont and upgrade of Mapleton Park to a community park serving the surrounding area Full replacement of Scott Carpenter Outdoor Pool System-wide compliance with federal standards for the Americans with Disabilities Act Increased capacity and additional facilities for youth and adult sports Expansion and enhancement of recreation centers and aquatics facilities that accommodate increased demand for lap swimming, fitness equipment and classroom space Boulder Reservoir infrastructure upgrades to increase operational efficiencies and improve public amenities Park infrastructure upgrades for the Civic Area and Pearl Street Mall Major parking lot renovations at key facilities Infrastructure associated with Valmont City Park Phase 2 development. Address maintenance backlog estimated at over $27 million on approximately $200 million assets. Appendix A, Unfunded Projects 346 Appendix A, Unfunded Projects Transportation The unfunded projects list in the Transportation Fund is informed by the area/corridor planning processes including next phase Civic Area planning, Envision East Arapahoe and 30th Street/Colorado Avenue planning. Boulder Junction implementation may potentially have additional transportation connections needs that are not currently funded beyond the first phase of high priority Key Public Improvements in the Phase 1 area. Quiet zone implementation to allow for quieter railroad crossings continues to come up as a community desire and is not currently funded. The current evaluation identifies approximately $5M in capital improvements needed for the city’s railroad crossings to be Quiet Zone compliant. 347 City of Boulder Appendix B, CEAP PROJECTS 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program The City of Boulder assesses potential impacts of conceptual project alternatives in order to inform the selection and refinement of a preferred alternative. The evaluation of these alternatives is known as a Community and Environmental Assessment Process or CEAP. CEAP reviews are prepared when projects are in the site location and facility design phase. The primary purpose of the CEAP is to encourage the consideration of potential social and environmental impacts in planning and decision making and, ultimately, to arrive at actions that achieve the objectives of the project with the fewest impacts. The intent of the CEAP is to make project planning more efficient by considering issues in advance of implementation. All CEAPs include an analysis of the project and alternatives, including how the project will further implement the BVCP, master plan goals, or subcommunity or area plans. The alternatives are then analyzed through a checklist of impacts to: natural areas or features; riparian areas and floodplains; wetlands; geology and soils; water quality; air quality; resource conservation; cultural and historic resources; visual quality; safety; physiological well-being; urban services; special populations; and the economy. The Appendix to Title 2 of the Boulder Revised Code instructs that major capital improvement projects should be handled in accordance with the City Plans and Projects Handbook, dated November 2007. The 2007 Handbook provides that a project should be evaluated through a CEAP if it meets any of the following criteria: A project or a potential alternative could have a significant impact on an environmental, social, or cultural resource and the project would benefit from a CEAP. The project is anticipated to generate enough neighborhood or community input to require a public hearing or board review. There is more than one possible conceptual alternative that will require staff or community input in the selection. 348 The project requires alternatives analysis as part of internal or external permitting and review processes at the local, county (1041), state, or federal level (NEPA). (An internal city CEAP should be performed prior to submitting for a local permit or to the external agency.) Annually, the list of Capital Projects is reviewed by the internal city CEAP review group, and the group discusses projects that may need a CEAP. Projects that require Concept and Site Plan Review do not go through the CEAP and are not reviewed by the CEAP Review Group. CEAP findings are submitted by departments to their respective advisory board for review as part of CIP project approval. For those departments that do not have an advisory board, the Planning Board is responsible for reviewing CEAP findings as part of project approval. Council has the opportunity to call up projects for their review and approval. The following capital improvement projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 CIP are recommended to complete a Community and Environmental Assessment Process (CEAP). Open Space and Mountain Parks Department Historical Structures and Trails – Stabilization and Restoration* Visitor Infrastructure – System-wide* Parks and Recreation Department Boulder Reservoir South Improvements* Violet Park (in conjunction with Greenways Fourmile Canyon Creek improvements) Transportation Division 28th Street – Baseline to Iris (CEAP Completed 2001) Baseline Underpass Broadway to 28th (CEAP Completed 2013) Broadway Reconstruction (Violet to US36)* 30th and Colorado Ave. Ped/Bike Underpass* 19th Street Complete Streets (Norwood to Iris)* Utilities Division / Tributary Greenways Barker Dam Hydroelectric and Dam outlet Carter Lake Pipeline NCWCD Conveyance & Carter Lake Hydroelectric Fourmile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation – Upstream of Upland Appendix B: CEAP Projects 349 Appendix B: CEAP Projects Lakewood Pipeline South Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Phase I* Wittemyer Ponds* The following are flood mitigation plans in their early stages. As specific projects and their scope are identified the need for CEAP will be evaluated in annual process. Bear Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Bluebell and King’s Gulch Flood Mitigation Boulder Creek Flood Mitigation Gregory Creek Flood Mitigation Skunk Creek Flood Mitigation Twomile Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Upper Goose Creek Drainage *As the scope of work is defined the necessity of a CEAP or other public review will be determined. [This page is intentionally blank.] 350