12.06.23 LB Packet
If you need Spanish interpretation or other language-related assistance for this meeting, please call 303-441-1905 at least three
business days prior to the meeting. Si usted necesita interpretación o cualquier otra ayuda con relación al idioma para esta junta,
por favor comuníquese al 303-441-1905 por lo menos 3 días laborales antes de la junta.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of minutes from the November 1, 2023 meeting
3. Public Participation for Non-Public Hearing Items
4. Discussion of Landmark Alteration, Demolition Applications issued and pending
• 1015 Juniper Ave. stay expires March 25, 2024
5. Public Hearings under the procedures prescribed by chapter 1-3, “Quasi-Judicial Hearings,” B.R.C. 1981.
A. Public hearing and consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate application to construct a perimeter wall and
fence and other hardscaping at 946 Spruce St. (HIS2023-00193) a contributing house in the Mapleton Hill Historic
District, pursuant to Section 9-11-18 of the Boulder Revised Code 1981. Owner: Marybeth Emerson and William
Bishop / Applicant: Laura Baker, Marpa Landscape Architecture and Construction
6. Matters from the Landmarks Board, Planning Department, and City Attorney
7. Debrief Meeting / Calendar Check
8. Adjournment
VIDEO CONFERENCE INFORMATION
The City of Boulder is committed to its core value of community safety and is proactively taking steps to limit potential social
spreading of COVID-19. Because of this, this meeting will be held virtually via video conference. Any and all interested persons may:
• Speak under public comment or observe the public hearing via:
o Video conference. The conference link will be available 24 hours before the meeting on our website:
www.boulderhistoricpreservation.net or via email historic@bouldercolorado.gov.
o Call in to the public hearing video conference via telephone:
Call 346-248-7799
Meeting ID: 885 5234 6463
Passcode: None
• Submit written comments at least 48 hours in advance of the hearing to historic@bouldercolorado.gov. Please note that we
currently can NOT accept mail. Only email will be received at this time.
• Please note that City of Boulder staff is unable to provide individual technical assistance or one-on-one communication
once a meeting has started as this distracts from their ability to facilitate the live session.
For more information, contact Aubrey Noble at
noblea@bouldercolorado.gov, historic@bouldercolorado.gov, or (303) 441-3209.
PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURES
LANDMARKS BOARD MEETING
DATE: Wednesday, December 6, 2023
TIME: 6:00 p.m.
PLACE: Virtual and in-person, 1777 Broadway (Council Chambers)
Board members who will be present are:
Abby Daniels, Chair
John Decker, Vice Chair
Chelsea Castellano
Ronnie Pelusio
Renee Golobic
Mark McIntyre (ex officio Planning Board liaison without a vote)
The Landmarks Board is constituted under the Landmarks Preservation Ordinance (Ordinance No. 4721; Title 9, Chapter 11, Boulder
Revised Code, 1981) to designate landmarks and historic districts; review and approve applications for Landmark Alteration
Certificates on such buildings or in such districts; review demolition applications for non-designated buildings over 50 years old; and
recognize buildings as Structures of Merit.
Public hearing items will be conducted in the following manner:
1. Board members will explain all ex-parte* contacts they may have had regarding the item, if the hearing is quasi-judicial.
2. Those who wish to address the issue (including the applicant, staff members and public) are sworn in, if the hearing is
quasi-judicial.
3. A historic preservation staff person will present a recommendation to the board.
4. Board members will ask any questions to historic preservation staff.
5. The applicant will have a maximum of 10 minutes to make a presentation or comments to the board. Electronic
presentations should be emailed to the Board Secretary at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
6. The public hearing provides any member of the public three minutes within which to make comments.
(1) At the chair’s discretion, members of the public may pool their time provided all members of the pool are present.
Only one member of the pool may speak on behalf of the pool. Maximum pooled time allowed is as follows: 2
people = 5 minutes; 3 people = 7 minutes; 4 people = 9 minutes; 5 or more people = 10 minutes.
(2) Members of the public may, at the chair’s discretion, use PowerPoint, images, or handouts as part of their
presentation. Electronic presentations should be emailed to the Board Secretary at least 24 hours in advance of
the meeting. Time limits (above) apply.
7. After the public hearing is closed, there is discussion by board members, during which the chair of the meeting may
permit board questions to and answers from the staff, the applicant, or the public.
8. Board members will vote on the matter; an affirmative vote of at least three members of the board is required for
approval.
* Ex-parte contacts are communications regarding the item under consideration that a board member may have had with someone
prior to the meeting.
All City of Boulder board meetings are digitally recorded and are available from the Central Records office at (303) 441-3043. A full
audio transcript of the Landmarks Board meeting becomes available on the city of Boulder website approximately ten days after a
meeting. Action minutes are also prepared by a staff person and are available approximately one month after a meeting.
Note that the Landmarks Board adopted the following QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION RULE on April 23,
2020.
The Landmarks Board (“Board”) may hold quasi-judicial hearings at a meeting through electronic participation, subject to the
procedures set forth in this Rule. To the extent practical, the Board will use its standard meeting procedures, as modified by this
Rule. To the extent that this Rule conflicts with the procedural rules of the Board, this Rule is intended to prevail.
QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION RULE GENERAL PROCEDURES
A. Applicant’s Written Request. An applicant may request to have its application for a hearing conducted via electronic
participation by completing a written request form provided by the city. The applicant will acknowledge that holding a quasi-
judicial hearing by electronic participation presents certain legal risks and involves an area of legal uncertainty, and the
applicant will acknowledge that moving forward with a quasi-judicial hearing by electronic participation will be at its own risk.
B. City Manager to Determine Suitability of Conducting Quasi-Judicial Hearing by Electronic Participation. These procedures
create no right in any party to a quasi-judicial matter to a hearing conducted by electronic participation. Upon receipt of a
written request, the city manager will determine whether the city has the capability to hold the particular type of hearing by
electronic participation, what available form of electronic participation is most appropriate for the type of hearing and set a
date(s) for the hearing(s).
C. Hearings Open to the Public and Subject to Adequate Technology. Hearings will be open to the public and provide the ability
for interested members of the public to join the hearing electronically. The method chosen by the city manager will ensure the
public can view or listen to the hearing in real time and interested parties may speak at designated times during the hearing. If
at any point the city manager or board chair determines it is not possible or prudent to hold the hearing by electronic
participation, whether due to technical issues or an inability to do so while meeting constitutional due process requirements,
the hearing will be continued or vacated, and the matter will be held in abeyance until any technical problems can be resolved
or in-person meetings have resumed.
D. Notice Requirements. In addition to the requirements of the Boulder Revised Code, the city will include additional notice
about how the hearing will be conducted and how the public can access, observe, and participate in the hearing. The
additional notice is intended to reasonably inform interested persons that such hearing will instead be held by electronic
participation; provided, however, this additional notice will not be deemed jurisdictional.
E. Technological Accommodations. The city will make reasonable efforts to accommodate interested parties who lack necessary
computer equipment or the ability to access such equipment by providing call-in or telephonic access to the meeting.
Interested parties will be encouraged to submit written comments in advance of the hearing, which comments will be made a
part of the hearing record.
F. Hearing Procedures. Hearings are for conducting the business of the City of Boulder. Activities that disrupt, delay or otherwise
interfere with the meeting are prohibited. At the onset of the hearing, the board chair will describe the hearing procedures,
including how testimony and public comment will be received. The department that supports the Board will moderate the
electronic meeting. To the extent practical, any person that wants to attend the meeting will be added to the meeting and will
be muted. Any person that wants to testify should inform the moderator. The moderator will unmute such person during the
public hearing to testify for three minutes.
1. Any documentary evidence will be provided to the designated secretary of the Board via email at least 48 hours prior
to the beginning of the meeting. Documentary evidence includes, without limitation, materials related to specific
applications and other documents to be shown electronically during the hearing.
2. Any person testifying, including the applicant, shall be sworn in individually.
3. The applicant will be allowed to speak to its application for 10 minutes. City staff will be allowed to speak to its
recommendations for 10 minutes. The applicant or staff may request additional time from the board chair for more
complicated applications. Persons wishing to testify will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. For electronic
hearings, every person will need to testify for themselves. No pooling of time will be allowed.
4. The time for speaking or asking questions is limited to facilitate the purpose of the hearing. No person shall speak
except when recognized by the person presiding and no person shall speak for longer than the time allotted. Each
person shall register to speak at the meeting using that person’s real name. Any person believed to be using a
pseudonym will not be permitted to speak.
5. No video participation will be permitted except for city officials, employees and invited speakers. All others will
participate by voice only.
6. The person presiding at the meeting shall enforce these rules by muting anyone who violates any rule.
7. Board members, staff, and applicants shall not use chat features of electronic meeting software except for the
purpose of asking the board chair procedural questions or to request to be recognized by the board chair to speak.
8. Applicants will be provided the opportunity to speak for up to three minutes prior to the close of the public hearing.
9. In order to accurately record board member votes, the board chair will call for a roll call vote on any motions made
during the hearing or taking final action.
G. Record. The secretary of the Board will ensure that all equipment used for the hearing is adequate and functional for allowing
clear communication among the participants and for creating a record of the hearing as required by law; provided, however,
the secretary will not be responsible for resolving any technical difficulties incurred by any person participating in the hearing.
1
CITY OF BOULDER
LANDMARKS BOARD MEETING
ACTION MINUTES
Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 6:00 p.m.
Virtual meeting
The following are the action minutes of the November 1, 2023 City of Boulder Landmarks Board
meeting. A digital recording and a permanent set of these minutes (maintained for a period of seven years)
are retained in Central Records at 303-441-3043. You may also listen to the recording online.
BOARD MEMBERS:
Abby Daniels, Chair - present
John Decker, Vice Chair - present
Chelsea Castellano - present
Renee Golobic - present
Ronnie Pelusio - present
Mark McIntyre, Planning Board Liaison/Landmarks Board Rep. without a vote – present virtually
STAFF MEMBERS:
Lucas Markley, Attorney, City Attorney’s Office – present
Kristofer Johnson, Comprehensive Planning Senior Manager – present virtually
Marcy Gerwing, Principal Historic Preservation Planner – present
Clare Brandt, Historic Preservation Planner – present virtually
Aubrey Noble, Historic Preservation Program Coordinator – present
Olivia Simard, Historic Preservation Intern – present virtually
Lauren Kennedy, Permits Coordinator – present virtually
Amanda Cusworth, Internal Operations and Board Support Manager – present virtually
Brad Mueller, Planning and Development Services Director – present
1.CALL TO ORDER
The roll having been called, Chair A. Daniels declared a quorum at 6:02 p.m. and the following
business was conducted.
2.APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On a motion by A. Daniels, seconded by R. Pelusio, the Landmarks Board approved (4-0, C.
Castellano absent from the September meeting) the minutes from the September 6, 2023
Landmarks Board meeting.
3.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FOR NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS [05:05.00 audio minutes]
The following members of the public spoke:
1. Kathryn Barth
2. Lynn Segal
4.DISCUSSION OF LANDMARK ALTERATION AND DEMOLITION APPLICATIONS
ISSUED AND PENDING [12:00.00 audio minutes]
•1741 Walnut St. Update
2
• Proposed Civic Area Historic District Update
5. PUBLIC HEARING [17:37.00 audio minutes] under the procedures prescribed by chapter 1-3,
“Quasi-Judicial Hearings,” B.R.C. 1981:
1. [18:00.00 audio minutes] Public hearing and consideration of a motion to adopt a resolution to
initiate the process for landmark designation pursuant to Section 9-11-3 of the Boulder Revised
Code, 1981 or alternatively issue a demolition approval pursuant to Section 9-11-23 B.R.C., 1981
for 1741 Walnut St. (HIS2022-00307).
Ex Parte Contacts C. Castellano: None
A. Daniels: None
J. Decker: None
R. Golobic: None
R. Pelusio: None
Staff Presentation
M. Gerwing presented the application to the board, recommending the Landmarks Board approve
the application for partial demolition.
Applicant’s Presentation
Jordanna Schutz presented to the board.
Public Comment
The following members of the public spoke:
1. Lynn Segal
2. Kathryn Barth
Motion
On a motion by R. Pelusio, seconded by J. Decker the Landmarks Board voted (5-0) to approve
the application for partial demolition as shown on partial demolition proposal dated November
2023 (see Attachment C), finding that while the building at 1741 Walnut St. is potentially eligible
for landmark designation, the proposed scope of work would not be detrimental to the historic
character of the building, as the character-defining features of the alley façade and portions of the
east and west elevations and roof will be preserved.
As a condition of approval, prior to approval of the partial demolition application, the applicant
shall submit to staff for review and approval:
A. Documentation of the portion of the building proposed to be retained:
1. A site plan showing portion of the building proposed to be retained including preservation
of six feet of depth of roof
2. Measured elevations drawings of the North, East and West Elevations showing portions of
building to be retained.
3
B. Archival Documentation of the Building as it exists today, to be housed at the Carnegie Library
for Local History:
1. A site plan showing the location of all existing improvements on the subject property;
2. Measured elevation drawings of all exterior elevations of the building depicting existing
conditions, fully annotated with architectural details and materials indicated on the plans;
and
3. High resolution and professional quality digital color images of all exterior elevations.
4. A signed release form to gift the archival documentation of the building to the Carnegie
Library for Local History.
C. And the opportunity to install an educational sign on site, if desired
D. [1:03:58.00 audio minutes] Public hearing and consideration of an application to demolish a
house constructed in 1925 at 1015 Juniper Ave. (HIS2023-00180), a non-landmarked building
over 50 years old, pursuant to Section 9-11-23 of the Boulder Revised Code, 1981 and under the
procedures prescribed by chapter 1-3, “Quasi-Judicial Hearings,” B.R.C. 1981.
Ex Parte Contacts C. Castellano: None
A. Daniels: None
J. Decker: None
R. Golobic: None
R. Pelusio: None
Staff Presentation
C. Brandt presented the application to the board, recommending the Landmarks Board issue a
stay-of-demolition.
Applicant’s Presentation
Zachary Nassar presented to the board. Zachary also responded to public comments.
Public Comment
The following members of the public spoke in favor of approving the demolition request:
1. Lanning Schiller
The following members of the public spoke in favor of a stay-of demolition:
2. Ani Meier
3. Lynn Segal
4. John Walton
Prior to the Nov. 1, 2023, public hearing, the following members of the community wrote in favor
of approving the demolition request:
1. David Kornblum
2. D. Scott Rendleman
3. Gordon Gould
4. Lauren and Steve Sundstrom
4
Prior to the Nov. 1, 2023, public hearing, the following members of the community wrote in favor
of a stay of demolition:
1. Jay Couture
2. Bev Potter
-- M. McIntyre left the meeting at 7:52pm.--
Motion
On a motion by R. Pelusio, seconded by R. Golobic the Landmarks Board voted (4-1, Castellano
dissenting) to adopt the findings of the staff memorandum dated Nov. 1, 2023, and issue a stay-of-
demolition for the building located at 1015 Juniper Ave. for a period not to exceed 180 days from
the day the permit application was accepted by the city manager in order to explore alternatives to
demolishing the building.
E. [2:08:47.00 audio minutes] Public hearing and consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate
application to construct a new approx. 800 sq. ft. accessory building and modify an existing
garage at 703 11th St. (HIS2023-00209), an individual landmark, pursuant to Section 9-11-18 of
the Boulder Revised Code, 1981 and under the procedures prescribed by chapter 1-3, “Quasi-
Judicial Hearings,” B.R.C. 1981.
Ex Parte Contacts
R. Golobic Board member R. Golobic as the architect of the project
recused herself and left the meeting at 8:12pm.
C. Castellano: None
A. Daniels: None
J. Decker: None
R. Pelusio: None
--- BREAK ---
Return: [2:11:00.00 audio minutes]
Staff Presentation
C. Brandt presented the application to the board, recommending the Landmarks Board approve
the application with conditions.
Applicant’s Presentation
Damon Vangelis and Jim Cursley presented to the board.
Public Comment
The following members of the public spoke:
1. Lynn Segal
5
Prior to the Nov. 1, 2023, public hearing, the following members of the community wrote in:
1. Jim and Annie Fox
Motion
On a motion by C. Castellano, seconded by A. Daniels the Landmarks Board voted (4-0, Golobic
recused) to adopt the staff memorandum dated November 1, 2023, as the findings of the board and
conditionally approve a Landmark Alteration Certificate to construct a new accessory building at
703 11th St., an individual landmark, as shown on plans dated Oct. 4, 2023, finding that the
proposal meets the Standards for Issuance of a Landmark Alteration Certificate in Chapter 9-11-18,
B.R.C. 1981 and is generally consistent with the General Design Guidelines, provided the stated
conditions are met.
Conditions of Approval
1. The applicant shall be responsible for completing the work in compliance with the approved
plans, except as modified by these conditions of approval.
2. Prior to submitting a building permit application and final issuance of the Landmark Alteration
Certificate, the applicant shall submit the following, which shall be subject to final review and
approval by the Landmarks Design Review Committee (LDRC) to ensure that the final design
of the addition is consistent with the General Design Guidelines and the intent of this approval:
1) Revised architectural plans showing:
a) Details of the proposed regrading plan and retaining walls showing materials, height,
accompanying fencing, etc.;
b) Materiality of proposed walkway and patio;
c) Window and door (including garage door) details to confirm they are simpler in
detailing than similar elements on primary structure, trimmed with materials similar in
scale, proportion, finish, and character to those used traditionally;
d) Details of stucco type proposed to show compatibility with primary structure (traditional
stucco rather than synthetic, color matched, etc.);
e) Details of any exterior mechanical systems, lighting, guttering, etc. not currently shown
on plans.
6. MATTERS [2:57:44 audio minutes]
• Update about retreat follow up to be included in December packet
• Debrief of the first in person meeting since February 2020 included questions about criteria
and generally positive reaction to in the person/virtual meeting platform
7. DEBRIEF MEETING/CALENDAR CHECK
• Next regular Landmarks Board meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 6, 2023
6
8. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:22 p.m.
Approved on _______________, 2023.
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________________________, Chairperson
Attendees
• Abby Daniels
• John Decker
• Chelsea Castellano
• Renee Golobic
• Ronnie Pelusio
• Mark McIntyre
• Brad Mueller
• Kristofer Johnson
• Marcy Gerwing
• Clare Brandt
• Aubrey Noble
• Olivia Simard
Intention
• Get to know each other
• Share the vision of the program
• Brainstorm ideas for adjustments to the LDRC
• Get familiar with Council Chambers in advance of first hybrid meeting (11/1/2023)
Introductions
• Board members and staff introductions
Program Vision
• Acknowledging transition from James Hewat’s leadership of the program for 17 years
• Marcy shared the program vision, including remarks on the legacy of planning in Boulder, the
importance of historic preservation to Boulder’s unique sense of place, and that the team aims
for the program to be credible, welcoming and practical.
• Future “wish list” in 5 years:
o Sustainable workload
o Steady number of new designations
o Historic preservation valued by the community
o Grant funded documentation of underrepresented histories, from the perspective of each
community
o Updated significance criteria
o Code revisions to streamline process, increase efficacy
LDRC Brainstorm
• This discussion is intended to be a starting point to discuss potential changes to the LDRC to
improve the process for board members, staff, applicants and the public, and make the
Landmarks Board 5-year volunteer commitment sustainable.
• It is a time to discuss what ideas we would like to explore further.
• We do not have the capacity to make any changes to LDRC or LB while the Civic Area Historic
District process is going on (through April). We might be able to make minor changes, but we do
not have the capacity to make any administrative rules or code changes.
• Brad shared that a consultant has been hired to assess boards and commissions across the city
and recently completed a report.
LANDMARKS BOARD RETREAT
DATE: Friday, October 20, 2023
TIME: 12 – 2:30 pm
PLACE: Penfield Tate II Municipal Building – Room N101
Board members and staff discussed the following ideas:
1. Idea #1: LDRC meetings every other week
a. All the board members supported the idea, with the hope of reducing the number of
meetings each month.
i. Chelsea’s support is contingent on implementing idea #4 along with this idea
b. Abby raised the concern that if LDRC was held every other week, each meeting would be
longer.
i. Exploring other ideas that could be done in conjunction could solve this problem.
c. John proposed a hybrid version of the idea: LDRC every other week, with a flex week at
the end of every month to avoid getting behind on applications.
2. Idea #2: LDRC meetings on Fridays
a. John and Chelsea support the idea.
b. Marcy shared that there are a number of deadlines and pre and post LDRC work that
would be challenging if moved to Friday.
3. Idea #3: Demolition approvals expire after 1 (or 2) year(s)
a. All board members supported the idea.
4. Idea #4 Staff level review of more items
a. All board members supported the idea.
b. Renee asked, “if staff reviewed more items, would each case take less time for the staff to
review it compared to LDRC review?” Yes, because we would not be creating a
powerpoint slide or facilitating a meeting.
c. John questioned whether review of tax credit applications are a good use of LDRC’s time.
5. Idea #5: LDRC for staff referrals only
a. Neither staff nor board members supported the idea, as the perception could be that
LDRC is a penalty.
6. Idea #6: More than 14 days to review applications
a. All the board members supported the idea.
b. No further comments were made due to time constraints.
7. Idea #7: Staff refer straight to LB if they intend to call it up during the LDRC, skip LDRC
a. All board members supported the idea.
b. No further comments were made due to time constraints.
8. Idea #8: LDRC rotation reflects LB members availability
a. Concerns were raised about how implementing this idea would hinder inclusivity.
9. Idea #9: No LDRC during the workday
a. Chelsea proposed the idea during the retreat. All the board members supported it.
b. Chelsea gave the following comments:
i. The level of service we provide is very high, but it comes at a significant cost, it is
hard for our community to serve on the board.
ii. We must weigh the balance between what we offer to the applicants and what
we do as a board to make sure the future of the board is inclusive and
represents the community.
iii. Think about a world where there is no LDRC during the workday. No other
boards have meetings during the day. Why are we the only ones?
iv. Ronnie clarified that Chelsea is not asking for the elimination of the LDRC, but
for the timing to change.
v. She would like to explore times outside of Wednesday mornings or explore any
other day 9 am - 5 pm.
c. John mentioned that city employees do not want to work in the evenings, and many cities
do reviews during the workday.
• The board members took a straw pool and supported further exploring ideas 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9.
Follow Up Items
• There are other alternatives that we may not be aware of yet. Continue to brainstorm ideas for
adjustments to LDRC.
• Staff will further study ideas 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 and provide an update to the Landmarks Board in
the next few months.
Historic Preservation cases approved, denied or withdrawn
Data will be added after the 1st of the month to fully reflect the month’s statistics.
Amended: November 17, 2023
Last Planning Board Meeting: November 7, 2023
December 2023
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri
4 5 6 7 8
PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH: 5691 S. Boulder Rd
Annexation & Site Review (C.
Van Schaack)
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
LB, 6pm Hybrid – See webpage
for details
CC Meeting, 6pm will be held
virtually – See webpage for details
*2nd Rdg Ordinance 8611 604
Mapleton Designation (C. Brandt)
*Call Up 3990 15h St Use Review (C.
Van Schaack)
*IP – Chronic Nuisance (B. Mueller)
11 12 13 14 15
BOZA Meeting, 4pm will be
held virtually – See webpage
for details
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
DAB, 4pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
OSBT, 6pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
CC Study Session, 6pm will be held
virtually – See webpage for details
18 19 20 21 22
PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH: 1855 S Flatiron Ct. Concept
Plan Review (A.Blaine)
*PH: Repealing of Residential
Growth Management (K. Guiler)
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
CC Meeting, 6pm will be held
virtually – See webpage for details
*PH: Boulder Junction Implementation:
BVCP Land Use Map Updates
(C. Ranglos)
*1st Rdg Ord Repealing of Residential
Growth Management (K. Guiler)
25 26 27 28 29
CITY HOLIDAY No meetings No meetings No meetings
Amended: November 17, 2023
Last Planning Board Meeting: November 7, 2023
January 2024
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri
1 2 3 4 5
CITY HOLIDAY PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH: Energy Code
Recommendation (J. Hanson)
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
LB, 6pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
8 9 10 11 12
BOZA Meeting, 4pm will be
held virtually – See webpage
for details
CANCELLED
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
DAB, 4pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
OSBT, 6pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
CC Special Meeting – See webpage
for details
15 16 17 18 19
CITY HOLIDAY PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH: 2952 Baseline Concept
Review (C. Van Schaack)
*Matters: Process Streamlining
Code Changes
LDRC Meeting, 9:00am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
CC Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH – 2nd Rdg Removal of Residential
Growth Mgmt Ord (K. Guiler)
*1st Rdg 5691 S. Boulder Rd
Annexation (C. Van Schaack)
*1st Rdg Energy Code Adoption
(J. Hanson)
22 23 24 25 26
PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
(TENTATIVE)
LDRC Meeting, 9:00am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
CC Study Session, 6pm will be held
virtually – See webpage for details
*2024 Council Study Session of all
things downtown (K. King)
29 30 31
5th Tuesday – No meetings LDRC Meeting, 9:00am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
Amended: November 17, 2023
Last Planning Board Meeting: November 7, 2023
February 2024
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri
1 2
CC Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH 2nd Rdg, Energy Code adoption
*1st Rdg Chronic Nuisance Ordinance
*Call Up 2952 Baseline Concept Revew
(C. Van Schaack)
5 6 7 8 9
PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH: 999 Violet Ave Site Review
(C. Van Schaack)
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
LB, 6pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
CC Study Session, 6pm will be held
virtually – See webpage for details
12 13 14 15 16
BOZA Meeting, 4pm will be
held virtually – See webpage
for details
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
DAB, 4pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
OSBT, 6pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
CC Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*2nd Rdg, Chronic Nuisance Ordnance
19 20 21 22 23
CITY HOLIDAY PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*PH: Civic Area Historic District –
M. Gerwing
*PH: Process Streamlining Code
Changes (L. Houde)
*Matters: Review Zoning
Strategy and Draft Code
Updates for East Boulder
Subcommunity Plan
Implementation (K. King)
LDRC Meeting, 9:00am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
CC Study Session, 6pm will be held
virtually – See webpage for details
*Review Zoning Strategy and Draft
Code Updates for East Boulder
Subcommunity Plan Implementation (K.
King)
26 27 28 29
PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
(TENTATIVE)
LDRC Meeting, 9:00am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
Amended: November 17, 2023
Last Planning Board Meeting: November 7, 2023
March 2024
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri
1
4 5 6 7 8
PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
LB, 6pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
CC Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*Call Up 999 Violet Site Review (C. Van
Schaack)
*PH 2nd Rdg, 5691 S. Boulder Rd
Annexation
*1st Rdg: Process Streamlining Code
Changes
11 12 13 14 15
BOZA Meeting, 4pm will be
held virtually – See webpage
for details
LDRC Meeting, 8:30am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
DAB, 4pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
OSBT, 6pm will be held virtually –
See webpage for details
CC Study Session, 6pm will be held
virtually – See webpage for details
18 19 20 21 22
PB Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
LDRC Meeting, 9:00am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details
CC Meeting, 6pm Hybrid – See
webpage for details
*1st Rdg Proposed Civic Area Historic
District – M. Gerwing
*PH: 2nd Rdg Process Streamlining
Code Changes
25 26 27 28 29
NO Meetings (BVSD/Spring
Break)
LDRC Meeting, 9:00am will be
held virtually – See webpage for
details