Item 5A - 700 20th St
CITY OF BOULDER
PLANNING BOARD
MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
AGENDA TITLE: Review and Comment on the proposed site development plan for New
Vista High School proposing to replace the existing school building at 700 20th St. with a new
approximately 74,000 square-foot two-story high school, new sports field, an enlarged parking
lot, and updated access. Reviewed under case no. LUR2023-00017.
Representative: Gardner Clute, MOA Architecture
Owner: Boulder Valley School District
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT / PRESENTERS
Brad Mueller, Director Planning & Development Services
Charles Ferro, Development Review Manager
Shannon Moeller, Planning Manager
OBJECTIVE
1. Planning Board hears staff and applicant presentations
2. Hold Public Hearing
3. Planning Board to ask questions of applicant, the public, and staff
4. Planning Board Discussion and comment.
SUMMARY Project Name: New Vista High School
Location: 700 20th St
Size of Property 12.5 acres
Zoning: Residential – High 5 (RH-5)
Comprehensive Plan: Public (PUB), High Density Residential (HR)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is for Planning Board to review and comment on the New Vista High
School Site Development Plan proposing to replace the existing New Vista High School with a
new building, consistent with CRS § 22-32-124. This state law requires the board of education
of the school district to submit a site development plan for review and comment to the planning
commission or governing body of a municipality prior to construction. In addition, the planning
board or governing body may request a public hearing before the board of education of the
school district regarding the site development plan.
State law does not further describe the review process, nor does it specify criteria for review and
comment. Staff recommends a review process similar to a concept plan review including review
for consistency with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP) as it establishes the vision
for Boulder. If the site plan is not consistent with the BVCP, staff recommends the planning
board consider providing comments to the board of education. If the board wishes to make
comments, staff recommends a motion be made directing staff to draft a letter to the Boulder
Valley School District Board of Directors, incorporating the city’s comments and requesting any
proposed changes, which letter may be signed by the city manager.
Next Steps: Staff will send the site development plan and any planning board action to city
council for call-up consideration.
PUBLIC FEEDBACK
The review and comment outlined in this memo is being conducted pursuant C.R.S. § 22-32-124;
no mailings or sign postings are required. The process to construct a new school facility has been
ongoing for a few years.
In Nov. 2022, voters approved Issue 5A for a bond measure that included “replacing the 70-year-
old New Vista High School building, which has reached the end of its service life, with a modern,
energy-efficient building.” Information and full ballot language is available at:
https://www.bvsd.org/departments/operational-services/critical-needs
Additionally, meetings were held from 2021 to 2022 by the BVSD Design Advisory Team (DAT)
for the design of the school. The DAT included teachers, staff, parents and community members
who worked with the architects to develop the design for the project and provided opportunities for
public comment. A summary of the meetings and additional information is available at:
https://bond.bvsd.org/school-projects/new-vista-high-school
BOARD FEEDBACK
At its meeting on May 3, 2023, the Landmarks Board provided the following statement regarding
the proposal:
The city of Boulder’s landmarks board acknowledges the historic and architectural significance
of the New Vista high school and appreciates your stewardship of the property. We strongly
encourage documentation of the significant buildings and people associated with your property
as you explore development options and hope that you use our preservation staff’s comments as
a tool to evaluate the historic merit as you proceed.
Attachment D includes the historic preservation staff comments providing context in relation to
the Landmarks Board’s statement.
BACKGROUND
Existing Conditions: As shown in Figure 1, the subject property is an approximately 12.5-acre
site located northwest of the intersection of Broadway and Baseline Rd. The property contains
the existing New Vista High School facility including existing buildings, parking, and
recreational fields.
Figure 1- Existing site and its surroundings
As shown in Figure 2 on the following page, the property is adjacent to 20th St., Baseline Rd.,
and Broadway. One point of vehicular access to the site exists from Baseline Rd. into the
existing parking area located south of the building. The primary building entrance currently
fronts onto 20th St. Sports fields and courts including baseball, football/soccer, tennis, and
basketball exist on the property.
The high point of the site is located at the southwest corner with the site sloping towards
Broadway with elevation changes of over 30 feet. The site has been developed for approximately
70 years as a school use. There are some mature trees at the perimeter of the site, near the
existing school building and street trees in the public right-of-way. Views of the Flatirons are
visible across the site as depicted in Figure 2.
The surrounding area is characterized by a mix of uses, including:
• To the east across Broadway, University of Colorado Boulder main campus;
• To the southeast, two condo and apartment buildings and Boulder Fire Station #2;
• To the south across Baseline Rd., primarily single-family detached homes as well as
some duplexes and apartment buildings;
• To the west across 20th St., apartment buildings and duplexes;
• To the north, apartment and condo buildings.
Figure 2- Views of existing site
BVCP Land Use Designation: As shown in Figure 3, the underlying Boulder Valley
Comprehensive Plan (BVCP) land use designation is primarily Public (PUB), which reflects the
current high school use. Public land use designations encompass a wide range of uses that
provide a community service including public schools.
There is a small area at the north extents of the property with an underlying land use designation
of High Density Residential (HR). This area has been occupied by the existing baseball diamond
Left: Primary building entrance
facing 20th St
Right: Building and parking lot
from Baseline Rd
Left: Sports fields and property
from Broadway
for multiple decades, thus it is not clear why this remnant land use designation exists in this area
of the property.
Figure 3- BVCP Land Use Designations
Existing Zoning: The property is in the RH-5, Residential – High 5 zoning district, which is
described in 9-5-2(c)(1)(F), B.R.C. 1981 as “High density residential areas primarily used for a
variety of types of attached residential units, including without limitation, apartment buildings,
and where complementary uses may be allowed.” Public elementary, middle, or high schools are
allowed in the zoning district by-right.
Surrounding city zoning districts are shown in Figure 4 and primarily include RH-5 to the west
and southeast, RM-2 (Residential – Medium 2) zoning further west, RL-1 (Residential – Low 1)
zoning to the south, and P (Public) zoning to the east on the CU Boulder campus.
PUB
Figure 4- Surrounding Zoning Districts
Area Plans: The subject property is not located within the boundaries of any adopted area plans.
It is located in the Central Boulder - University Hill Subcommunity.
Transit: The site is served by transit routes primarily running along Broadway and Baseline near
the site, including routes 204 (Table Mesa Shopping center north along Broadway and 19th St. to
north Boulder), 225/225D/225T (Boulder to Lafayette), Dash (Boulder to Louisville and
Lafayette), Skip (south Boulder to north Boulder along Broadway), Bound (Basemar Shopping
Center to Diagonal Plaza along 30th St), AB1 (Boulder to DIA), FF1/FF2 (Boulder to Denver
Union Station), and FF5 (Boulder to Anschutz Medical Campus) routes; the Lyons Flyer, a
Boulder County weekday route to Lyons that replaced the former “Y” route operated by RTD;
the city’s summer Park-to-Park shuttle to Chautauqua offered on weekends/holidays from
Memorial Day to Labor Day; and the HOP2Chautauqua shuttle offered on Chautauqua concert
nights.
Connections: As shown in Figure 5 on the following page, an on-street bike lane exists along
the north side of Baseline Rd. Near the site, Baseline Rd. and Cascade Ave. are designated bike
routes. An existing multi-use path is present along Broadway. The existing sidewalk along
Baseline Rd. adjacent to the property is primarily a detached sidewalk while 20th Street is an
attached sidewalk. The City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) depicts a planned multi-use
path across the northern edge of the subject property, as shown in Figure 5 in dashed green lines.
The Low Street Walk and Bike Network Plan in the TMP depicts a Bike Lane along Baseline
with a preference for buffered lane.
Floodplain: As shown in Figure 6, portions of the southeastern area of the site are impacted by
the 500-year floodplain of Skunk Creek. The proposed school building has been designed to
remain outside of the floodplain area.
Figure 5- Existing and Planned Connections
Figure 6- 500 Year Floodplain
Existing Building: Baseline Junior High
School opened in 1954 to serve the needs
of the growing community that
experienced a large period of growth in
the Post-World War II era. The building
was designed by prominent Boulder
architect James M. Hunter with a later
addition by Hobart Wagener between
1955-1964.
The original building included the north-
south bar, a flared addition at the
southwest corner, and a prominent
vaulted gymnasium at the east elevation
(Figure 7). Between 1955 and 1964, the
north wing was constructed and was
designed by Hobart Wagener (Figure 8).
Between 1971 and 1983, three additions
were built: a new entrance addition was
constructed on the east elevation and
additions at the east sides of the
gymnasium and north wing. Between
1999 and 2004, an addition was built on
the south side of the flared portion of the
building at the southwest corner. It
appears the footprint of the building has
remained largely the same since 2004. Refer to Attachment D for additional historical
information.
According to the school’s website, New Vista High School currently serves approximately 330
students in grades 9 - 12 at the site.
PROCESS
CRS § 22-32-124(1)(a) states: “Prior to the acquisition of land or any contracting for the
purchase thereof, the board of education of the school district in which the land is located shall
consult with and advise in writing the planning commission, or governing body if no planning
commission exists, that has jurisdiction over the territory in which the site is proposed to be
located in order that the proposed site shall conform to the adopted plan of the community
insofar as is feasible. In addition, the board of education shall submit a site development
plan for review and comment to the planning commission or governing body prior to
construction of any structure or building. The planning commission or governing body may
request a public hearing before the board of education relating to the proposed site location or
site development plan. The board of education shall thereafter promptly schedule the hearing,
publish at least one notice in advance of the hearing, and provide written notice of the hearing to
the requesting planning commission or governing body.”
Figure 7- Baseline Junior High School, 1954. Carnegie Library
for Local History.
Figure 8- Proposed Addition to Baseline Junior High School, c.
1955-1964. Carnegie Library for Local History.
Following this Review and Comment, the proposal would require the following processes:
• Technical Document Review: Projects that include construction of public infrastructure
or private infrastructure affecting the public right-of-way require approval of final
construction documents prior to work in the Right-of-Way or Utility Permits being
issued.
• Building Permit Review: Building permits for public schools are reviewed by the State of
Colorado, rather than the city.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project at New Vista High School is a replacement of the existing building. BVSD
has determined that the existing building is no longer able to adequately serve the needs of a high
school population. The replacement building is to be located adjacent to the existing building;
following completion of the new building, the existing building would be demolished.
Site Plan: As shown in Figure 9, the proposal consists of a new approximately 74,000 square-
foot, two story high school building. The building is proposed to be located the east of the
existing structure, more central to the site, with a parking area at the southwest corner.
Figure 9- Proposed Site Plan
Vehicular Access: The proposal includes maintaining one vehicular access point from Baseline
Rd. which would be aligned with 21st St. to provide access into a parking lot, and adding a
second access point along 20th St. A third vehicular access point is proposed at the north end of
the site from 20th St. for a service access.
Transit and Connections: As part of redevelopment, the proposal would maintain the existing
conditions of the sidewalks along Baseline Rd. and 20th St. and would add additional internal
sidewalks for access to and around the building. Approximately 26 bike racks / 52 bike parking
spaces are proposed to be added in front of the building.
Building Design: As shown in the proposed site plan, Figure 9, the building is designed with two
“wings” connected in an oblique angle. The floor plan (refer to Attachment A) includes two
stories, with a centrally located auditorium, the northern wing housing primarily dining, lab,
fitness, and art studio spaces, and the southern wing housing primarily classroom and office
spaces. Outdoor patio learning spaces have been incorportated into the design. Proposed materials
include a mix of CMU veneer, metal panels, and aluminimum storefront systems. Refer to
Attachment A for complete building elevations.
Figure 10- Building Elevations
Open Space: The proposed design includes maintaining the field at the rear of the property
along Broadway and a relocated basketball court. In front of the building, areas of seating and
picnic tables have been incorporated to create outdoor gathering spaces.
Parking and Queuing: The proposal incorporates a new one-way pickup and drop-off loop
accessed from Baseline Rd. that proceeds through the site and exits onto 20th St. The current site
does not contain an on-site pickup and drop-off lane; pickup and drop-offs are currently done
curbside along 20th St. and Baseline Rd. The proposed parking area includes approximately 115
parking spaces, including four electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and five accessible spaces.
GUIDELINES FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT
CRS § 22-32-124(1)(a) states: “Prior to the acquisition of land or any contracting for the
purchase thereof, the board of education of the school district in which the land is located shall
consult with and advise in writing the planning commission, or governing body if no planning
commission exists, that has jurisdiction over the territory in which the site is proposed to be
located in order that the proposed site shall conform to the adopted plan of the community
insofar as is feasible. In addition, the board of education shall submit a site development
plan for review and comment to the planning commission or governing body prior to
construction of any structure or building. . . .”
In order to facilitate a review and comment as described in the state statute listed above, the
guidelines for review and comment typically used for a “Concept Plan Review and Comment”
in Section 9-2-13(g), B.R.C. 1981, will be used to guide the discussion. It is anticipated that
issues other than those listed in this section may be identified as part of the review and comment
process. The Planning Board may consider the following guidelines when providing comments:
(1) Characteristics of the site and surrounding areas, including, without limitation, its
location, surrounding neighborhoods, development and architecture, any known natural
depressions, steep slopes and prominent views to and from the site;
See description under “Background” above for characteristics of the site and surrounding area.
(2) Community policy considerations including, without limitation, the review process and
likely conformity of the proposed development with the Boulder Valley Comprehensive
Plan (BVCP) and other ordinances, goals, policies, and plans, including, without limitation,
sub-community and sub-area plans;
Review Processes: CRS § 22-32-124(1)(a) provides for the review and comment by the city’s
planning commission (Planning Board) prior to the construction of any new structure by a school
district. However, new construction, remodeling, and renovation is permitted through the state
and not through the city.
The proposal would require review of Technical Documents for any construction of public
infrastructure or any private infrastructure affecting the public right-of-way. As noted above,
building permits are reviewed by the state rather than the city.
BVCP Policies: In general, the BVCP supports the proposed project. The following BVCP
policies provide relevant guidance in site and building design:
BVCP Policy Staff Response
Policy 2.10 Preservation and Support for Residential
Neighborhoods
“. . . . The city will seek appropriate building scale and compatible
character in new development or redevelopment, appropriately sized
and sensitively designed streets and desired public facilities and mixed
commercial uses. The city will also encourage neighborhood schools
and safe routes to school.”
The existing school facility has been a
part of the neighborhood for
approximately 70 years and the site’s
continued use as a school is indicated
on the BVCP land use map “Public”
designation.
2.27 Preservation of Historic & Cultural Resources “The city and
county will identify, evaluate and protect buildings, structures, objects,
districts, sites and natural features of historic, architectural,
archaeological or cultural significance with input from the community.
The city and county will seek protection of significant historic and
cultural resources through local designation when a proposal by the
private sector is subject to discretionary development review.”
The building was designed by
prominent Boulder architect James M.
Hunter with a later addition by Hobart
Wagener between 1955-1964. Staff
strongly recommends the buildings be
documented prior to its deconstruction
and to incorporate historic
photographs and social history into an
interactive exhibit as part of the new
school.
Policy 2.36 Physical Design for People “The city and county will take
all reasonable steps to ensure that public and private development and
redevelopment be designed in a manner that is sensitive to social,
health and psychological needs. Broadly defined, this will include
factors such as accessibility to those with limited mobility; provision of
coordinated facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists and bus-riders;
provision of functional landscaping and open space; and the
appropriate scale and massing of buildings related to neighborhood
context.”
The redevelopment of the site presents
the opportunity for consideration of
physical design for people.
2.37 Environmentally Sensitive Urban Design “. . . strive to ensure
that buildings, streets, utilities and other infrastructure are located and
designed to protect natural systems, minimize energy use, reduce
urban heat island effects and air and water pollution and support
clean energy generation.”
Staff strongly recommends that the
building and site provide an
environmentally sensitive and energy
efficient design.
2.38 Importance of Urban Canopy, Street Trees & Streetscapes
“. . . encourage the planting and maintenance of attractive, healthy
street trees and streetscapes, which act as the primary connection
between the private and public realm and provide aesthetics, comfort,
cleaner air and other environmental benefits for the public realm.”
The proposal presents the opportunity
to incorporate street and site trees to
promote a high quality public realm
and site design.
2.39 Outdoor Lighting/Light Pollution “. . . encourage the efficient
use of outdoor lighting to reduce light pollution and conserve energy
while providing for public safety. The city will seek to provide a
nighttime environment that includes the ability to view the stars
against a dark sky so that people can see the Milky Way Galaxy from
residential and other appropriate viewing areas. Measures such as
using more energy-efficient lights, ensuring that the level of outdoor
lighting is appropriate to the application, minimizing glare and using
shielding techniques to direct light downward will be required.”
The proposal presents the opportunity
to provide dark-sky compliant lighting.
4.08 Energy-Efficient Building Design “. . . improve the energy- and
resource-efficiency of new and existing buildings. The city and county
will consider the energy consumption associated with the building
process (i.e., from the raw materials through construction), improve
regulations ensuring energy and resource efficiency in new
construction, remodels and renovation projects and will establish
energy efficiency requirements for existing buildings. . .”
Staff strongly recommends that the
building and site provide an
environmentally sensitive and energy
efficient design.
4.09 Building Construction Waste Minimization “. . . encourage
renovation of existing buildings over demolition. . . adopt policies and
programs that promote the reuse of materials salvaged after
deconstruction as a resource.”
The proposal presents the opportunity
to promote the reuse of deconstructed
materials.
6.17 Complete Missing Links “ . . . complete missing links in trails,
paths and sidewalks, including connections to all transit stops. The city
and county will work to complete missing links throughout the
transportation grid through the use of connection plans and at the time
of parcel redevelopment, as appropriate. . .”
The proposal presents the opportunity
to evaluate if the multi-use path linkage
shown on the Transportation Master
Plan at the north end of the site could
be incorporated into the design.
8.11 Planning for School Sites & Facilities “The city and county will
assist the Boulder Valley School District in its planning efforts to
assure that the number, size and location of school lands and facilities
is adequate to serve the population for the near future. The city and
county will consider current and projected school enrollment and
available school capacities when approving the type, scale and timing
of residential development. The city and county will work with the
school district to consider transportation impacts when planning for
school sites and facilities.”
The proposal presents the opportunity
for transportation impacts to be
considered.
8.12 Accessibility to Schools “The city and county will work with the
Boulder Valley School District to develop safe and convenient
pedestrian, bicycle and transit access for students to existing and new
schools. New school facilities will be located so that school-age
children have the opportunity to arrive safely on their own.”
The proposal presents the opportunity
for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit
accessibility to be enhanced.
(3) Applicable criteria, review procedures, and submission requirements for a site review;
BVCP Policy 2.41 “Enhanced Design for All Projects” encourages quality design for all
projects. Relevant elements of this policy include:
“b. The context. Projects should become a coherent part of the
neighborhood in which they are placed. . .”
The redevelopment of the site presents the
opportunity for the design to respond to
the neighborhood context.
“c. Relationship to the public realm. Projects should relate
positively to public streets, plazas, sidewalks, paths and natural
features. Buildings and landscaped areas—not parking lots—
should present a well-designed face to the public realm, should not
block access to sunlight and should be sensitive to important public
view corridors. . .”
The redevelopment of the site presents the
opportunity for enhancement of existing
public sidewalks or inclusion of planned
paths, consideration of views, and for the
placement and design of structures,
parking, and landscaping to create a
positive relationship to the public realm.
“j. Buildings. Buildings should be designed with a cohesive design
that enhances the streetscape and is comfortable to the pedestrian.
Buildings should demonstrate approachability and a relationship to
the street, with inviting entries that are visible from public rights of
way, multiple entrances and four-sided design. Foster appeal of
buildings through attractive, well-designed architecture made of
high-quality, long-lasting materials and innovative approaches to
design.”
The construction of a new building
presents the opportunity for selection of
building materials as part of a cohesive
design, compatible with its surroundings.
Generally the use of long-lasting,
authentic and human scale materials is
recommended.
(4) Permits that may need to be obtained and processes that may need to be completed prior
to, concurrent with, or subsequent to site review approval;
Technical Document Review. A Technical Document Review is required for any construction
of public infrastructure or any private infrastructure affecting the public right-of-way.
Building Permit. A building permit for the new structure would be reviewed by the State of
Colorado for a public school building.
(5) Opportunities and constraints in relation to the transportation system, including, without
limitation, access, linkage, signalization, signage, and circulation, existing transportation
system capacity problems serving the requirements of the transportation master plan, possible
trail links, and the possible need for a traffic or transportation study;
Vehicular Access: During the Technical Document Review, city staff will review the site
development plan to ensure that the proposal will not significantly impact existing traffic
conditions along Baseline Rd. where the proposal involves eastbound traffic on Baseline Rd.
turning left to enter the site.
During the Technical Document Review, city staff will review the proposed site access(es) for
conformance with Section 9-9-5 B.R.C. 1981 and DCS Section 2.04.
The proposed plan shows the only way to exit the school parking lot is by turning right
(northbound) onto 20th St. To reduce traffic within the residential areas to the west of the
property, city staff suggest allowing vehicles to turn left (southbound) onto 20th St. to provide a
shorter route to Baseline Rd. and Broadway.
The existing New Vista School westbound pullout bus stop on Baseline Rd. does not meet
current RTD standards adopted by the city. The city recommends that this bus stop updated to
the current RTD detail SD-C104 included in this project.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Access: The City’s Transportation Master Plan includes a 12’-wide
multi-use path to be that connects 20th St., at the Cascade Avenue intersection, to the Broadway
multi-use path at the east end of the property. The multi-use path follows the northern property
line of this parcel and will improve pedestrian circulation in the area. The city recommends that
this improvement be included in this project.
The city recommends that the existing sidewalks along 20th St. and Baseline Rd. be updated by
to meet current local residential and collector residential standards listed in Table 2-12 of the
City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards (DCS), respectively. Specifically, this would
create a 4’-wide detached sidewalk with an 8’-wide landscape strip along 20th Street and a
5’-wide detached sidewalk with an 8’-wide landscape strip along Baseline Rd., wherever
applicable.
(6) Environmental opportunities and constraints including, without limitation, the
identification of wetlands, important view corridors, floodplains and other natural hazards,
wildlife corridors, endangered and protected species and habitats, the need for further
biological inventories of the site and at what point in the process the information will be
necessary;
See description under “Background” above for environmental opportunities and constraints.
(7) Appropriate ranges of land uses;
The majority of the site is designated “PUB” Public on the BVCP Land Use Map in recognition
of its ongoing use as a public school; thus the continued use as a school is an expected and
appropriate use.
(8) The appropriateness of or necessity for housing.
No housing is proposed as part of the project to replace the existing school building with a new
building.
CONCLUSION
No action is required by Planning Board. State law gives the planning board or city council
authority to review the plans for the construction of a school district facility and provide
comments to the board of education of the school district. If the board wishes to make comments,
staff recommends a motion be made directing staff to draft a letter to the Boulder Valley School
District Board of Directors, incorporating the city’s comments and requesting any proposed
changes, which letter may be signed by the city manager. If the city is not satisfied with the
response to such comments and requests, the city could request a hearing before the Boulder
Valley School District Board of Education. By:
Brad Mueller, Secretary to the Planning Board
Attachments:
A. Plan Set
B. Written Statement
C. DRC Comments LUR2023-00017
D. Historic Preservation Staff Comments
1L-3011L-3003L-3001L-3002L-3005L-3012L-3006L-3014L-3004L-3005L-3015L-3014L-301BASELINE RD.20TH ST.BROADWAYSOD FIELDPARKING AREA,REFER: CIVILSOD, TYP.SOD, TYP.SOD, TYP.SERVICE DRIVEREFER CIVILPEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK,REFER: CIVILPOINT OF BEGINNINGFOR CHAIN LINK FENCINGENDING POINT FORCHAIN LINK FENCINGPUMP HOUSE, REFERIRRIGATION DRWGS.EXISTING MEMORIALAREA TO REMAINWET WELL, REFERIRRIGATION DRWGS.NATIVE SEEDSTORM DRAIN SYSTEM,REFER. CIVILEXISTING FENCETO REMAINEXISTING FENCETO REMAINSTAIRS WITHHANDRAIL8" CONCRETEEDGER(34) CONCRETESEAT BLOCK8" CONCRETEEDGERCRUSHER FINESPAVING4' HT. BLACK VINYL CLADCHAIN LINK FENCE(17) BIKE RACKS,BY OWNER(2) TRASH RECEPTACLE,BY OWNERTRASH RECEPTACLE,BY OWNER(13) PICNIC TABLE,BY OWNERTRASH RECEPTACLE,BY OWNER(9) BIKE RACK,BY OWNERCRUSHER FINESPAVINGSYNTHETIC TURF WITHTHICKENED EDGESTAIR, REFER:ARCHCONCRETESEATWALLTRASH RECEPTACLE,BY OWNERMAINTENANCE PATH,REFER: CIVILCONCRETESEATWALLTRASH RECEPTACLE, BY OWNERCONCRETE RAMP,REFER: CIVILEXISTING FENCETO REMAINDETENTION POND,REFER: CIVILENDING POINT FORCHAIN LINK FENCING6' HT. BLACK VINYL CLADCHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATEFENCING SET IN CONCRETERETAINING WALL, REFER: CIVILPOINT OF BEGINNING FORCHAIN LINK FENCING4' HT. BLACK VINYL CLADCHAIN LINK FENCESTAIR, REFER: ARCHTRASH RECEPTACLE,BY OWNERTRASH RECEPTACLE,BY OWNERBASKETBALLCOURT LAYOUTNATIVE SEED / RAINGARDEN AREA,REFER: CIVILSCREEN WALL,REFER: ARCHEXISTING TREETO REMAINEXISTING TREETO REMAIN1L-3008" CONCRETEEDGER9L-300TREEPROTECTION, TYP.3L-301CHAIN LINK FENCEFOOTING IN MOW BAND1L-3008" CONCRETE EDGER5L-300KEYED COBBLE MULCHDRAIN PIPELEGENDSODKEYED COBBLE MULCHCONCRETE, REFER: CIVILPICNIC TABLE, BY OWNERCONCRETE SEAT WALLTRASH RECEPTACLE,BY OWNERNATIVE SEEDSYNTHETIC TURFPROPOSED TREEEXISTING TREETO REMAINBIKE RACK, BY OWNERCRUSHER FINES4' HT. FENCE6' HT. FENCE8" CONCRETE EDGEREXISTING FENCE TO REMAINOVERALL SITE PLAN1Scale: 1" = 40"-0"0040' 80'SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"NORTHDateDrawn ByChecked By:Project NumberSheet NameCopyright:ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATIONAPPEARING HEREIN SHALL NOT BEDUPLICATED, DISCLOSED OR OTHERWISEUSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENTOF MOA ARCHITECTURE11/30/2021 1:35:50 PM
NEW VISTA HIGH SCHOOL
MA9/16/2022021147.00700 20TH STREET
BOULDER, COLORADOCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATIONCHREVISIONDATEL-100OVERALLSITE PLANAttachment A - Plan SetAttachment A - Plan Set
DN
DN REFCOPIERUP
DN
UP
REF
B9 B9
A10
A10
B12 B12
B13 B13
A5
A5
A13
A13
2
A-301
2
A-301
A16
B11 B11
A12
A12
A7
A7
B6
B6
B3
B3
B15 B15
B10 B10
A14
B1
B1
A4
A4
A3
A2
A1
B7B7
B14 B14
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
ART PATIO
SCIENCE PATIO
B8 B8
CORRIDOR
201
CLASSROOM (4)
202
CLASSROOM (5)
203
WAITING
205
ITINERANT WORK
SPACE
206
INTERVENTIONIST
OFFICE
207
SEMINAR (1)
209
CLASSROOM (6)
204
SEMINAR (2)
211
CLASSROOM (7)
208
PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO
213
FILM
214
STOR.
216
DARK RM
215
SEMINAR (3)
210
SEMINAR (4)
212
CLASSROOM (8)
217
TEACHER PLANNING
218
STAFF BREAK RM
219
T
220
T
221
ELEC.
222
MECH.
223
S.G.
226
IDF
225
SOUND
227
MOTHER'S RM
229
S.G.
228
T
231
T
232
T
233
T
234
T
235
T
236
T
237
T
238
CUST.
239
CLASSROOM (10)
241
CLASSROOM (11)
242
CLASSROOM (12)
243
SCIENCE
244
PREP.
245
SCIENCE
246
ART STUDIO
247
KILN
248
STOR.
249
IT
250 ELEC.
251
CLASSROOM (9)
240
4
A-301
4
A-301
A11
A11
A6
A6
B5
B5
B4
B4
1
A-302
1
A-302
3
A-301
3
A-301
2
A-302
2
A-302
OPEN TO BELOW
STAIR B
ELEV.
STAIR A
STAIR C
2
A-2003A-2004A-2001
A-200
A15
B16
B17
B17
B18
B2
3
A-201
4
A-201
2
A-201
1
A-201
1
A-203
4
A-203
1
A-202
2
A-202
6
A-203
5
A-203
Room
230
COLLABORATION ZONE
252
A8
2
A-203
3
A-203
A9
A9
B19
B19
STAIR D
OPERABLE PARTITION
B9 B9
A10
A10
B12 B12
B13 B13
A5
A5
A13
A13
2
A-301
2
A-301
A16
B11 B11
A12
A12
A7
A7
B6
B6
B3
B3
B15 B15
B10 B10
A14
B1
B1
A4
A4
A3
A2
A1
B7B7
B14 B14
OUTDOOR
LEARNING
PATIO
B8 B8
PLATFORM
145
VEST.
101
SEC. VEST.
102
RECEPTION
103
CORRIDOR
104
CORRIDOR
105
HEALTH
106
T
107
OFFICE
108
OFFICE
109
OFFICE
110
OFFICE
111
CSO
112
OFFICE
113
CONF.
114
RECORDS
115
WORK RM
116
OFFICE
117
OFFICE
118
T
119
T
120
CAREER/ WELCOME
121
COUNSELOR
122
COUNSELOR
123
PSYCHOLOGIST
124
REGISTRAR
125
CONF.
126
THE CENTER
127
CLASSROOM (1)
128
CLASSROOM (2)
129
CLASSROOM / SEMINAR
130
ELEC.
131
EDIT
132
RECORD
133
RECORDING
135
CORRIDOR
136
T
137
T
138
CHANGING
139
CHANGING
140
STOR.
141
MUSIC
142
OFFICE
143
MUSIC STOR.
144
AUDITORIUM
147
MULTI-USE STUDIO
149
IDF
151
S.G.
152
S.G.
153
COMMONS
160
VEST.
155
LIBRARY SUPPORT
156
LIBRARY OFFICE
157 ELEV MECH.
158
HELP DESK
159
T CORE
161
STOR.
146
VEST.
148
T
162
FAMILY T
163
T
164
T
165
T
166
T
167
T
168
T
169
CUST.
170
SCIENCE
171
PREP.
172
FLEX LAB
173
KITCHEN
175
D.S.
176
CUST.
177
T
178
STOR.
179
CLASSROOM (3)
181
FITNESS STUDIO
182
STOR.
183
CORRIDOR
180
T. CORE
184
FAMILY T
189
T
185
T
186
T
187
T
188
CORRIDOR
190
IT HUB
191
MDF
192
MECH.
193BLDG STOR.
194
ELEC.
195
FLOOR ABOVE
4
A-301
4
A-301
A11
A11
A6
A6
B5
B5
B4
B4
1
A-302
1
A-302
3
A-301
3
A-301
2
A-302
2
A-302
STAIR C
OH COUNTER
DOOR
OH DOOR
ELEV.
STAIR B
STAIR A
STAIR D
2
A-2003A-2004A-2001
A-200
AREA A
AREA B
AREA A
AREA B
A15
B16
B17
B17
B18
B2
3
A-201
4
A-201
2
A-201
1
A-201
1
A-203
4
A-203
1
A-202
2
A-202
6
A-203
5
A-203
VEST.
150
VEST.
154
DINING
COMMONS
174
A8
2
A-203
3
A-203
A9
A9
B19
B196"PLAN NORTH
Date
Drawn By
Checked By:
Project Number
Sheet Name
Copyright:
ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATION
APPEARING HEREIN SHALL NOT BE
DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED OR OTHERWISE
USED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT
OF MOA ARCHITECTURE
N O T FO R
C O N STR U C TIO N
4/4/2023 11:39:54 AMA-101
OVERALL FLOOR
PLAN -FIRST AND
SECOND FLOORNEW VISTA HIGH SCHOOLCS
03.16.23
021147.00700 20TH STREETBOULDER, COLORADOSCHEMATIC DESIGN - UPDATE
GC
1/16" = 1'-0"
OVERALL PLAN - SECOND FLOOR2 1/16" = 1'-0"
OVERALL PLAN - FIRST FLOOR1
THIS SHEET FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
REFER TO SHEETS A-101A THRU
A-102B FOR INFORMATION
REVISION DATE
Attachment A - Plan SetAttachment A - Plan Set
T ectonic Cop yright 2007T ectonic Cop yright 2007
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
A10 A13A12A111
A-316
A8
A9
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
B9 B12 B13B11 B15B10B7B14B8
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
A10A13A12A11
1
A-316
A8A9
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"33' - 8"PLAN NORTH
KEYPLAN
1
2
3
4
AREA A
AREA B
Date
Drawn By
Checked By:
Project Number
Sheet Name
Copyright:
ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATION
APPEARING HEREIN SHALL NOT BE
DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED OR OTHERWISE
USED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT
OF MOA ARCHITECTURE
N O T FO RC O N STR U C TIO N
4/4/2023 9:46:55 AMA-201A
EXTERIOR
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS -
OVERALLNEW VISTA HIGH SCHOOLCS
03.16.23
021147.00700 20TH STREETBOULDER, COLORADOSCHEMATIC DESIGN - UPDATE
GC
REVISION DATE
1/16" = 1'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH2
1/16" = 1'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - WEST3
1/16" = 1'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH4
1/16" = 1'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - EAST1
Attachment A - Plan SetAttachment A - Plan Set
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16, COLOR 1
RUNNING BOND
cv-A
07 4213 METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM, TYPES 1-1-2mp-A
CW 08 0000 CURTAIN WALL
SF 08 4313 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 4X16, COLOR 1
RUNNING BOND, ALTERNATING ROWS ARE RECESSED 1/2"
cv-B
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16, COLOR 2
RUNNING BOND
cv-C
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16 AND 4X16, COLOR 3
BANDED PATTERN OF DIFFERENT SIZE, COLOR AND TEXTURE
cv-D
07 4213 METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM, TYPES 3mp-B
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
B6B3B1
4
A-301
B5B4
3
A-301
14
A-314
8
A-313
B2
OBLIQUE ELEVATION RE:
/1 A-204
/1 A-202
cv-Dcv-Bcv-Bcv-D
cv-B
cv-A
cv-A
cv-BSF19
SF2SF2SF1
182C
SF1
SF21247B
TOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)
CJCJ CJCJ
CJCJCJCJCJ
16' - 0"16' - 0"18' - 0"
18' - 0"
15' - 4"16' - 0"10' - 8"
4' - 9"37' - 4"
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
5
A-312
T.O. PARAPET
137' - 6"
OBLIQUE ELEVATION RE: /1 A-204OBLIQUE ELEVATION RE: /3 A-202
cv-C
mp-A
mp-A
SF18
SF22
TOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
A5A7
5
A-315
A4 A3 A2A6
7
A-312
OBLIQUE ELEVATION RE:
/1 A-202
/1 A-202
TOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)
SF19
SF23
SF20
252SF1SF1SF2
SF14
190B
195A
SF24
SF24
mp-A
mp-A
cv-A
cv-D
cv-A
cv-A
cv-A
mp-A
cv-C cv-C
cv-Bcv-B
CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ
CJCJCJ
6' - 8"14' - 8"14' - 8"4' - 0"
cv-A ?CJ
CJ
cv-C
18' - 0"
182B
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
B6 B3 B1
4
A-301
B5 B4
1
A-302
3
A-301
14
A-314
8
A-313
B2
13
A-314
6
A-312
SF25
SF25
cv-A
cv-A
cv-A
mp-A
mp-Amp-A
mp-A
cv-Acv-Bcv-Bcv-B
cv-A
cv-A
mp-A
SF4 SF5 SF5
SF1SF2
cv-Ccv-C
T.O. MASONRY
112' - 0"
CONCRETE SLAB
03 3300 ARCHITECTURALLY EXPOSED
CONCRETE
SF2SF1246C244C
cv-B
SF26
SF26
OBLIQUE ELEVATION RE: /1 A-203
CJ
3' - 4"20' - 0"20' - 8"
CJCJCJCJCJCJ
2' - 8"
CJCJCJ
CJ
4' - 0"
CJCJ
SF3
SYNTHETIC TURF, RE: LANDSCAPE
PLAN NORTH
KEYPLAN
3
4
AREA A
AREA B
1
2
Date
Drawn By
Checked By:
Project Number
Sheet Name
Copyright:
ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATION
APPEARING HEREIN SHALL NOT BE
DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED OR OTHERWISE
USED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT
OF MOA ARCHITECTURE
N O T FO RC O N STR U C TIO N
4/4/2023 9:46:57 AMA-202
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS -
AREA ANEW VISTA HIGH SCHOOLAuthor
03.16.23
021147.00700 20TH STREETBOULDER, COLORADOSCHEMATIC DESIGN - UPDATE
Checker
REVISION DATE
NUMBERING IS GROUPED BY TYPE / PHASE OF WORKSHEET OF
NON-ARCHITECTURAL ITEMS OR INFORMATIONAL / INSTRUCTIONAL NOTATION.
SOME NUMBERS MAY BE SKIPPED ON ANY GIVEN DRAWING SHEET.
SHEET KEYNOTES
207 CARD READER, RE: TECH
SHEET SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS DIRECTLY REFERENCED TO CORRESPONDING
ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS IN THE PROJECT MANUAL.
THE DECIMAL AND SUFFIX NUMBERS / LETTERS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED IN SPECIFICATIONS.
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
1/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATION - AREA A - WEST2 1/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATION - AREA A - SOUTHWEST1
1/8" = 1'-0"
AREA A - NORTHWEST ELEVATION3
1/8" = 1'-0"
AREA A - NORTHEAST ELEVATION4
Attachment A - Plan SetAttachment A - Plan Set
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16, COLOR 1
RUNNING BOND
cv-A
07 4213 METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM, TYPES 1-1-2mp-A
CW 08 0000 CURTAIN WALL
SF 08 4313 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 4X16, COLOR 1
RUNNING BOND, ALTERNATING ROWS ARE RECESSED 1/2"
cv-B
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16, COLOR 2
RUNNING BOND
cv-C
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16 AND 4X16, COLOR 3
BANDED PATTERN OF DIFFERENT SIZE, COLOR AND TEXTURE
cv-D
07 4213 METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM, TYPES 3mp-B
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
B9B12
2
A-301
B11 B10 B7B8
9
A-313
10
A-313
12
A-314
SF26
SF26
mp-A
mp-A
cv-C
cv-A
mp-A
cv-A cv-B cv-B
173B171B
cv-D
cv-D
cv-Acv-A
CW18
SF5 SF4 SF5 SF5 SF4 SF5
SF1SF1SF2
T.O. PARAPET
133' - 8"
T.O. PARAPET
133' - 8"
T.O. PARAPET
115' - 8"
T.O. PARAPET
116' - 0"
OBLIQUE ELEVATION RE:
/1 A-202
/4 A-202
CJ
CJCJCJCJ
CJCJCJ
cv-B
cv-B
CJ
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
A10A13A12A11
11
A-314
T.O. PARAPET
115' - 8"
cv-A
cv-D
CJ CJ CJ CJ
CJ CJ CJ CJ
cv-B
4' - 8"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"
REPEATREPEAT
A= CENTRIA PROFILE 210
B= CENTRIA PROFILE 220
A A B
2
1
AREA A
AREA B
PLAN NORTH
KEYPLAN
Date
Drawn By
Checked By:
Project Number
Sheet Name
Copyright:
ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATION
APPEARING HEREIN SHALL NOT BE
DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED OR OTHERWISE
USED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT
OF MOA ARCHITECTURE
N O T FO RC O N STR U C TIO N
4/4/2023 9:46:58 AMA-203
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS -
AREA ANEW VISTA HIGH SCHOOLAuthor
03.16.23
021147.00700 20TH STREETBOULDER, COLORADOSCHEMATIC DESIGN - UPDATE
Checker
REVISION DATE
NUMBERING IS GROUPED BY TYPE / PHASE OF WORKSHEET OF
NON-ARCHITECTURAL ITEMS OR INFORMATIONAL / INSTRUCTIONAL NOTATION.
SOME NUMBERS MAY BE SKIPPED ON ANY GIVEN DRAWING SHEET.
SHEET KEYNOTES
207 CARD READER, RE: TECH
SHEET SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS DIRECTLY REFERENCED TO CORRESPONDING
ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS IN THE PROJECT MANUAL.
THE DECIMAL AND SUFFIX NUMBERS / LETTERS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED IN SPECIFICATIONS.
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
1/8" = 1'-0"
AREA A - EAST ELEVATION1
1/8" = 1'-0"
AREA A - AUDITORIUM NORTH ELEVATION2
1 1/2" = 1'-0"
METAL PANEL PATTERN3
Attachment A - Plan SetAttachment A - Plan Set
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16, COLOR 1
RUNNING BOND
cv-A
07 4213 METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM, TYPES 1-1-2mp-A
CW 08 0000 CURTAIN WALL
SF 08 4313 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 4X16, COLOR 1
RUNNING BOND, ALTERNATING ROWS ARE RECESSED 1/2"
cv-B
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16, COLOR 2
RUNNING BOND
cv-C
04 2000 CMU VENEER, 8X16 AND 4X16, COLOR 3
BANDED PATTERN OF DIFFERENT SIZE, COLOR AND TEXTURE
cv-D
07 4213 METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM, TYPES 3mp-B
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
A10 A13A12A11
T.O. PARAPET
116' - 0"
cv-D
cv-A
cv-B
cv-B
cv-B
136 142B
TOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)
CJCJCJ
cv-A
cv-A
CJ CJ
CJCJCJCJ
2' - 8"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"
3' - 4"
SF16
05 5133.01 ALUMINUM FIXED WALL
LADDER
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
B12B13 B11B15B14
2
A-302
9
A-374
mp-A
cv-B cv-A
cv-B cv-A
cv-B cv-B cv-B cv-B cv-B cv-B
SF4
121B 128B 129B
SF3 SF2 SF3
SF5 SF5 SF4 SF4
SF1 SF2 SF2 SF1 SF1
SF5 SF4 SF5 SF5 SF4
SF15
SF1 SF2
cv-BTOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJCJCJCJCJCJCJCJCJCJCJCJ
T.O. PARAPET
116' - 0"
T.O. MASONRY
112' - 0"
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
A16 A14
3
A-311
A15
T.O. MASONRY
112' - 0"
SF17 SF2
TOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)
cv-D
cv-C
mp-A
mp-B mp-B
mp-A
cv-A
SF4 SF5 SF20
SF16 SF16
SF16SF16 SF5 SF5 SF5
SF2
cv-B
STRUCTURAL COLUMN
03 3300 ARCHITECTURAL
EXPOSED CONCRETE
CJCJB.O. SOFFIT
112' - 0"
CJ CJ
cv-A
cv-A
cv-A
cv-A
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
1
A-311
2
A-311
4
A-312
B16 B17 B18
CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ
CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ
SF9 SF11 SF9 SF13 SF9
SF8SF12SF8SF8
SF10
SF4 SF5 SF5
SF1 SF1 SF1SF2SF2 SF2 SF2 SF2 SF2 SF7
SF5SF5SF4SF5SF5SF4SF4SF5SF4SF6SF4SF5
TOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)EQ2' - 0"EQDIMENSIONAL SIGN CHARACTERS10 1400.03
mp-A
cv-Dcv-Bcv-Bcv-Bcv-Dcv-Bcv-Bcv-Bcv-Bcv-Bcv-Bcv-Bcv-Bcv-D
cv-C
mp-Bmp-Bmp-Bmp-Bmp-B
GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET METAL -SCUPPER07 6200.1S
GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET METAL -SCUPPER07 6200.1S
B.O. SOFFIT
112' - 0"
B19
3' - 4"4' - 0"2' - 8"6' - 0"2' - 8"4' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 8"6' - 0"4' - 0"
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
TOL: 99'-4"
BRICK LEDGE (TOL = TOP OF LEDGE)
cv-A
CJ
SF2
FIRST FLOOR
100' -0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' -0"
T.O. PARAPET
133' -8"
B17B18
mp-A
B.O. SOFFIT
112' - 0"
STRUCTURAL COLUMN
03 3300 ARCHITECTURAL EXPOSED
CONCRETE
PLAN NORTH
KEYPLAN
6
2
1
3
AREA A
5
4
AREA B
Date
Drawn By
Checked By:
Project Number
Sheet Name
Copyright:
ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATION
APPEARING HEREIN SHALL NOT BE
DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED OR OTHERWISE
USED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT
OF MOA ARCHITECTURE
N O T FO RC O N STR U C TIO N
4/4/2023 9:47:00 AMA-204
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS -
AREA BNEW VISTA HIGH SCHOOLAuthor
03.16.23
021147.00700 20TH STREETBOULDER, COLORADOSCHEMATIC DESIGN - UPDATE
Checker
REVISION DATE
NUMBERING IS GROUPED BY TYPE / PHASE OF WORKSHEET OF
NON-ARCHITECTURAL ITEMS OR INFORMATIONAL / INSTRUCTIONAL NOTATION.
SOME NUMBERS MAY BE SKIPPED ON ANY GIVEN DRAWING SHEET.
SHEET KEYNOTES
207 CARD READER, RE: TECH
SHEET SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS DIRECTLY REFERENCED TO CORRESPONDING
ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS IN THE PROJECT MANUAL.
THE DECIMAL AND SUFFIX NUMBERS / LETTERS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED IN SPECIFICATIONS.
REFERENCE KEYNOTES
05 5133.01 ALUMINUM FIXED WALL LADDER
07 6200.1S GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET METAL - SCUPPER
10 1400.03 DIMENSIONAL SIGN CHARACTERS
1/8" = 1'-0"
AREA B - AUDITORIUM SOUTH ELEVATION5
1/8" = 1'-0"
AREA B - EAST ELEVATION6
1/8" = 1'-0"
AREA B - SOUTH ELEVATION 14
1/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATION - AREA B - WEST1
1/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATION - AREA B - WEST STAIR A21/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATION - AREA B - CLASSROOM 4 OVERHANG3
Attachment A - Plan SetAttachment A - Plan Set
General Description:
The New Vista HS project is a replacement building for the existing New Vista HS located near the
intersection of Baseline and Broadway in Boulder. The existing New Vista building was originally
constructed as an elementary school and is no longer able to adequately serve the needs of a High
School population. Due to condition issues with the existing building renovations to make it more
suitable for a High School population are not viable.
The replacement building will be located on the site adjacent to the existing building. Following
completion of the new building the existing building will be demolished. The final scope of work includes
a new approximately 74,000 sf two story high school, a new sports field, new enlarged parking lot, and
improved access.
Thank you,
Gardner Clute, AIA
Senior Project Manager | MOA ARCHITECTURE
Direct: 303.586.4017
Attachment B - Written Statement
DATE OF COMMENTS: April 28, 2023
CASE MANAGER: Shannon Moeller
PROJECT NAME: New Vista High School
LOCATION: 700 20TH ST
REVIEW TYPE: Concept Plan Review & Comment
REVIEW NUMBER: LUR2023-00017
REPRESENTATIVE: GARDNER CLUTE, MOA ARCHITECTURE
GENE TEMANSON, BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
DESCRIPTION: Review and Comment: The New Vista HS project is a replacement building for the
existing New Vista HS located near the intersection of Baseline and Broadway in
Boulder. The existing New Vista building was originally constructed as an elementary
school and is no longer able to adequately serve the needs of a High School
population. Due to condition issues with the existing building renovations to make it
more suitable for a High School population are not viable. The replacement building
will be located on the site adjacent to the existing building. Following completio n of the
new building the existing building will be demolished. The final scope of work includes
a new approximately 74,000 sf two story high school, a new sports field, new enlarged
parking lot, and improved access.
I.REVIEW FINDINGS
The city appreciates the opportunity to review the project plans. The review and comment process provided by CRS §
22-32-124 is an opportunity for review and comment on the general aspects of the proposal. The process does not result
in either an approval or denial, but allows for identification of items where city policies may provide guidance and where
city requirements are indicated in future review processes. Staff reviewer contact information is also provided for any
questions about the comments.
These comments and any community correspondence received will be forwarded to the Planning Board for review.
The Planning Board hearing for the Review and Comment has been tentatively scheduled for the May 16, 2023 Planning
Board meeting which begins at 6 PM online. Staff will forward a final staff memorandum upon completion.
III.INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS
1.Area Characteristics and Zoning History, Shannon Moeller, 303 -441-3216
The subject property is an approximately 12.5-acre site located northwest of the intersection of Broadway and
Baseline Rd. The property contains the existing New Vista High School facility including existing buildings, parking,
and recreational fields.
The property is adjacent to 20th Street, Baseline Rd., and Broadway. One poin t of vehicular access to the site
exists from Baseline Rd. into the existing parking area located south of the building. The primary building entrance
currently fronts onto 20th Street. Sports fields and courts including baseball, football/soccer, tenn is, and basketball
exist on the property.
The high point of the site is located at the southwest corner with the site sloping towards Broadway with elevation
changes of over 30 feet. The site has been developed for approximately 70 years as a school use. There are some
mature trees at the perimeter of the site, near the existing school building and street trees in the public right -of-way.
Views of the Flatirons are visible across the site.
The surrounding area is characterized by a mix of uses, including:
•To the east across Broadway, University of Colorado Boulder main campus;
•To the southeast, two condo and apartment buildings and Boulder Fire Station #2;
•To the south across Baseline Rd., primarily single-family detached homes as well as some duplexes and
Attachment C - DRC Comments
apartment buildings;
• To the west across 20th St., apartment buildings and duplexes;
• To the north, apartment and condo buildings.
The underlying Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP) land use designation is primarily Public (PUB), which
reflects the current high school use. Public land use designations encompass a wide range of uses that provide a
community service including public schools.
There is a small area at the north extents of the property with an underlying land use de signation of High Density
Residential (HR). This area has been occupied by the existing baseball diamond for multiple decades, thus it is not
clear why this remnant land use designation exists in this area of the property.
The property is in the RH-5, Residential – High 5 zoning district, which is described in 9-5-2(c)(1)(F), B.R.C. 1981
as “High density residential areas primarily used for a variety of types of attached residential units, including without
limitation, apartment buildings, and where complementary uses may be allowed.” Public elementary, middle, or
high schools are allowed in the zoning district by-right.
The subject property is not located within the boundaries of any adopted area plans. It is located in the Central
Boulder - University Hill Subcommunity.
2. Historic Preservation, Marcy Gerwing, 303-441-3207
Baseline Junior High School opened in 1954 to serve the needs of the growing community that experienced a large
period of growth in the Post-World War II era. The building was designed prominent Boulder architect James M.
Hunter with a later addition by Hobart Wagener between 1955-1964. The building continued to be added onto
between 1971 and 2004.
Staff strongly recommends the buildings be documented prior to its deconstruction and to incorporate historic
photographs and social history into an interactive exhibit as part of the new school. Recommended documen tation
includes measured drawings of the exterior of the building, archival photographs, and preparation of an Architectural
Inventory to document the building’s architectural description and social history. Consultants who have prepared
similar documentation in the past include Carol Taylor, Carl McWilliams (Cultural Research Historians) and Ron
Sladek (Tatanka Associates Inc).
3. Drainage, Scott Kuhna, 303-441-4071
A. Regarding the city’s new storm water regulations and the 2019 adoption of the updated City of Boulder Design
and Construction Standards (DCS), this development is considered an “applicable development”. All requirements
of Chapter 7 of the DCS apply including (but not limited to) LID Techniques, Quality D esign Standard Compliance,
Selection and Design of SCM’s, Preliminary Infiltration Feasibility Screening, Treatment Approach Selection
Criteria, Soil and Infiltration Test, etc.
B. A construction storm water discharge permit is required from the Stat e of Colorado for projects disturbing one
(1) acre of land or more. The applicant is advised to contact the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment.
4. Groundwater, Scott Kuhna, 303-441-4071
While the proposed development site is not known to have high groundwater levels, grou ndwater is a concern in
many areas of the city of Boulder. Please be advised that if it is encountered at this site, an underdrain/dewatering
system may be required to reduce groundwater infiltration, and information pertaining to the quality of the
groundwater encountered on the site will be required to determine if treatment is necessary prior to discharge from
the site. City and/or State permits are required for the discharge of any groundwater to the public storm sewer
system.
5. Irrigation Ditches, Scott Kuhna, 303-441-4071
The applicant is responsible for obtaining written approvals and/or agreements for any relocations or modifications
to irrigation ditches or laterals or easements from the impacted ditch company. This includes the crossing of any
irrigation ditch or lateral for vehicular or utility purposes, limiting access to the ditch or lateral or easement, changes
in scope of maintenance or landscaping within the ditch or lateral easement, and the release of stormwater runoff
into any ditch or lateral. The applicant is advised that revisions to any approved city plans necessary to address
ditch company requirements may require reapplication for city review and approval at the applicant's expense.
6. Landscaping; Chris Ricciardiello; ricciardielloc@bouldercolorado.gov; (303) 441 -3138; LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Provide a landscape plan and irrigation plan consistent with 9 -9-12(d), B.R.C. 1981 indicating all proposed
Attachment C - DRC Comments
landscape improvements. Provide drip irrigation to all landscape within right -of-way plantings in accordance with
the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards.
7. Landscaping; Chris Ricciardiello; ricciardielloc@bouldercolorado.gov; (303) 441-3138; Right of Way Tree
Protection: The subject development property has existing public right of way street trees along the Broadway,
Baseline Rd, and 20th St frontages. Add Drawing No 3.12 - Protected Root Zone and Drip Line - from the Boulder
Design and Construction Standards to the Site Plan and graphically show tree protection around all public street
trees. Follow Chapter 3.05 of the Boulder Design and Construction Standards - Tree Protection for
Construction Sites - for standard tree protection procedures. An applicant for construction approval shall
provide maintenance and care for existing trees required to be protected on site and in the public right-of-way
adjacent to any project or construction site during construction activities and the public improvement warranty
period to ensure that existing trees survive and are not damaged. Protection fen cing must be in place prior to the
commencement of construction activities or any site disturbance (stockpiling, vehicle tracking, demolition, utility
work, etc.).
8. Landscaping; Chris Ricciardiello; ricciardielloc@bouldercolorado.gov; (303) 441 -3138; Street Tree
Diversity: To establish and maintain a healthy and diverse street tree canopy, the applicant is required to adhere
to the Boulder Design and Construction Standards Table 3 -2: Limitations on Individual Tree Species. Specify
specific tree species selection using this table in association with the current City of Boulder Approved Tree List.
9. Landscaping; Chris Ricciardiello; ricciardielloc@bouldercolorado.gov; (303) 441 -3138; Street Trees: It is
standard design practice for new development to provide new street trees along all public rights -of-way: Broadway,
Baseline Rd, and 20th St. Each tree shall be a large maturing deciduous tree (over 45' mature height) sized at a
minimum 2" caliper, with 30’ – 40’ spacing from the adjacent street trees, within 4’-5’ of the existing attached
sidewalk, and a minimum of 10' from underground utilities. Examples of acceptable species for this use are State
Street Maple, (Fall Fiesta, Caddo, Legacy) Sugar Maple, Common Horsechestnut, Pecan, Shagbark Hickory,
Western Catalpa, Common Hackberry, Sugar Hackberry, Turkish Filbert, Kentucky Coffeetree, Sweetgum, White
Oak, Swamp White Oak, Shingle Oak, Bur Oak, Chinkapin Oak, Chestn ut Oak, Japanese Pagodatree, (Accolade
or David) Elm. Include a landscape plan specifying street trees accordingly.
10. Landscaping; Chris Ricciardiello; ricciardielloc@bouldercolorado.gov; (303) 441 -3138; Tree Inventory:
Provide a tree inventory that includes the location, size, species and general health of all trees with a diameter of
six inches and over measured fifty-four inches above the ground on the property or in the landscape setback of any
property adjacent to the development. The inventory shall indicate which trees will be adversely affected and what
if any steps will be taken to mitigate the impact on the trees. The tree inventory shall be prepared by a certified
arborist that has a valid contractor license pursuant to Chapter 4-28, "Tree Contractor License," B.R.C.
11. Review Process, Shannon Moeller, 303-441-3216
CRS § 22-32-124(1)(a) provides for the review and comment by the city’s planning commission (Planning Board)
prior to the construction of any new structure by a school district. However, BVSD is a sovereign entity under state
law. This means that new construction, remodeling, and renovation is permitted through the state and not through
the city.
CRS § 22-32-124(1)(a) states: “Prior to the acquisition of land or any contracting for the purchase thereof, the
board of education of the school district in which the land is located shall consult with and advise in writing the
planning commission, or governing body if no planning commission exists, that has jurisdiction over the territory in
which the site is proposed to be located in order that the proposed site shall conform to the adopted plan of the
community insofar as is feasible. In addition, the board of education shall submit a site development plan for review
and comment to the planning commission or governing body prior to construction of any structure or building. . . .”
In order to facilitate a review and comment as described in the state statute listed above, the guidelines for review
and comment in section 9-2-13(g), B.R.C. 1981, will be used to guide the discussion at the Planning Board hearing.
Staff will forward a final staff memorandum upon completion.
Generally, 9-2-13(g), B.R.C. 1981 calls for the identification of relevant review processes and evaluation of the likely
conformity of the proposal to BVCP policies. In general, the BVCP supports the proposed project. The following
BVCP policies provide relevant guidance in site and building design:
• 2.10 Preservation and Support for Residential Neighborhoods
• 2.27 Preservation of Historic & Cultural Resources
• 2.36 Physical Design for People
• 2.37 Environmentally Sensitive Urban Design
Attachment C - DRC Comments
• 2.38 Importance of Urban Canopy, Street Trees & Streetscapes
• 2.39 Outdoor Lighting/Light Pollution
• 4.08 Energy-Efficient Building Design
• 4.09 Building Construction Waste Minimization
• 6.17 Complete Missing Links
• 8.11 Planning for School Sites & Facilities
• 8.12 Accessibility to Schools
12. Flood Control, Christin Shepherd, 303-441-3425
The structure is classified as a critical facility under the city of Boulder's Critical Facility Ordinance. However, the
proposed structure is not located in the 500-year floodplain and is, therefore, not subject to floodplain
requirements. Staff suggests the applicant include this information in subsequent submittals as part of the written
statement, and clearly identify the 500-year floodplain on all site plans, to avoid confusion and to streamline
floodplain review and approval.
13. Transportation, Tom Pankau, 303-441-4369, pankaut@bouldercolorado.gov
City staff is concerned that during peak -hour or pick-up/drop-off times, eastbound Baseline Road traffic may
back-up due to vehicles attempting to turn left and cross westbound traffic to enter the site. Provide a traffic
analysis with your Tec Docs to determine that this will not significantly impact existing traffic conditions along
Baseline Road.
14. Transportation, Tom Pankau, 303-441-4369, pankaut@bouldercolorado.gov
City staff will review that site access(es) meet requirements listed out in Section 9-9-5 B.R.C. 1981 and DCS
Section 2.04. Justification for having two access points to the site will be required in the form of a written statement
that is backed with information listed in Section 9-9-5(c)(1), B.R.C. 1981. This written statement can be included
with the TecDoc construction documents that are required for work in the public right -of-way and work on city
infrastructure.
15. Transportation, Tom Pankau, 303-441-4369, pankaut@bouldercolorado.gov
Due to the proposed site sidewalk alignments, city staff have recognized that potential unwanted shortcuts can be
formed in the grass from students leaving the school to head west on Baseline Road.
16. Transportation, Tom Pankau, 303-441-4369, pankaut@bouldercolorado.gov
The City’s Transportation Master Plan includes a 12’-wide multi-use path to be that connects 20th Street, at the
Cascade Avenue intersection, to the Broadway multi-use path at the east end of the property. The multi-use path
follows the northern property line of this parcel and will improve pedestrian circulation in the area. The city would
prefer to see this improvement included in this project.
17. Transportation, Tom Pankau, 303-441-4369, pankaut@bouldercolorado.gov
The existing New Vista School WB pullout bus stop on Baseline Road does not meet current RTD standards
adopted by the city. The City would prefer to see this bus stop updated to the current RTD detail SD -C104 included
in this project.
18. Transportation, Tom Pankau, 303-441-4369, pankaut@bouldercolorado.gov
The existing sidewalks along 20th Street and Baseline Road should be updated by this project to meet current local
residential and collector residential standards listed in Table 2-12 of the City of Boulder Design and Construction
Standards (DCS), respectively. Specifically, this would create a 4’-wide detached sidewalk with an 8’-wide
landscape strip along 20th Street and a 5’-wide detached sidewalk with an 8’-wide landscape strip along Baseline
Road, wherever applicable.
19. Transportation, Tom Pankau, 303-441-4369, pankaut@bouldercolorado.gov
The proposed concept plan shows the only way to exit the school parking lot is by turning r ight (northbound) onto
20th Street. To reduce traffic within the residential areas to the west of the property, city staff suggest allowing
vehicles to turn left (southbound) onto 20th Street to provide a shorter route to Baseline Road and Broadway.
20. Utilities, Scott Kuhna, 303-441-4071
A. The applicant is notified that, though the city allows Xcel and Qwest to install their utilities in the public
right-of-way, they generally require them to be located in easements on private property.
B. The applicant is advised that any proposed street trees along the property frontage may conflict with existing or
proposed utilities, including without limitation: water, wastewater, storm drainage, flood control, gas , electric,
Attachment C - DRC Comments
telecommunications, drainageways, and irrigation ditches, within and adjacent to the development site. It is the
applicant’s responsibility to resolve such conflicts with appropriate methods conforming to the Boulder Revised
Code 1981, the City of Boulder Design and Construction Standards, and any private/franchise utility specifications.
C. The landscape irrigation system requires a separate water service and meter. A separate water Plant
Investment Fee must be paid at time of building permit. Service, meter and tap sizes will be required at time of
building permit submittal.
D. On-site and off-site water main and wastewater main construction per the City of Boulder Design and
Construction Standards (DCS) as necessary to serve the development, as well as perpetuate the overall system,
will be required. All proposed public utilities for this project shall be designed in accordance with the DCS.
E. A separate Technical Document Review (TEC Doc) application is required for easement dedications necessary
for proposed water main, services, meters, etc. The easement dedications must be approved and completed prior
to approval of the final utility construction plans.
F. The separate Technical Document Review (TEC Doc) easement application shall also include required
easement dedications necessary for any public storm sewer mains, inlets, etc. running through the site. The
easement dedications must be approved and completed prior to approval of the final utility construction plans.
G. Fire hydrants will need to be installed to meet the coverage requirements outlined in Section 5.10 of the City of
Boulder Design and Construction Standards. Per the standards, no portion of any building shall be over 175 feet of
fire access distance from the nearest hydrant. Fire access distance is measured along public or private (fire
accessible) roadways or fire lanes, as would be traveled by motorized fire equipment. All fire hydrants and public
water lines will need to be located within public utility easements.
H. The applicant should note that trees are not permitted within ten feet of underground utility lines. At Site
Review, the applicant will need to demonstrate that their plans can meet both landscaping and utility requirements.
21. Next Steps, Shannon Moeller, 303-441-3216
The review and comment provided by CRS § 22-32-124 results in neither an approval nor a denial, but rather is an
opportunity for the Planning Board and community members to comment on the general aspects of the proposal.
These comments and any community correspondence received will be forwarded to the Planning Board fo r review.
The Planning Board hearing for the Review and Comment has been tentatively scheduled for the May 16, 2023
Planning Board meeting which begins at 6 PM online.
Staff will forward a final staff memorandum upon completion.
Attachment C - DRC Comments
Historic Preservation Comments
Baseline Junior High School was designed by prominent Boulder architect James M. Hunter with a later
addition by Hobart Wagener. The school opened in 1954 to serve the growing community, spurred by
Post-World War II growth.
The original building included the north-south bar, a flared addition at the southwest corner, and a
prominent vaulted gymnasium at the east elevation (See Figure 1). Between 1955 and 1964, the north
wing was constructed and was design by Hobart Wagener (Figure 2). Between 1971 and 1983, three
additions were built: a new entrance addition was constructed on the east elevation and additions at the
east sides of the gymnasium and north wing. Between 1999 and 2004, an addition was built on the
south side of the flared portion of the building at the southwest corner. It appears the footprint of the
building has remained largely the same since 2004.
JAMES HUNTER1
James Hunter was born in Omaha, Nebraska on April 19, 1908 to
Edgar W. and Ida J. Hunter. He studied architectural engineering at
Iowa State University from 1927 to 1931 before transferring to the
University of Illinois, where he received his degree in 1936. Hunter
began his career as a draftsman with Ernest Stouffer, Supervising
Architect at the University of Illinois. He came to Boulder to work as a
head draftsman in the office of Glen Huntington, as well as head
draftsman for the University of Colorado. In 1940 he formed a
partnership with Harold Jones, but left to serve in World War II. After
the war, Hunter returned to Boulder and started his own firm, James
M. Hunter & Associates.
Although his work extended through the state, as well as in other
states, the bulk of his practice was in Boulder where he could be close
enough for full supervision. He felt “that an architect could function in a small community and could be
an influencing and bettering force in the esthetic environment of that community.” Some of his key
designs in Boulder include the Boulder Masonic Lodge, Boulder Municipal Building, the Nelson House,
the original Boulder Public Library, and the Boulder Medical Center.
During his illustrious career, Hunter served as planner and architect for Colorado State University and
Fort Lewis College in Durango. He also held similar posts with Regis College, Denver, and Tarkio College,
Missouri. In addition, he was president of the Colorado board of architect examiners, president of the
Colorado chapter of the AIA, national second vice president of the AIA, and was made a Fellow of the
AIA in 1957.2
1 Landmarks Board Memorandum, 2205 Broadway. City of Boulder. August 7, 2013.
2 James M. Hunter, Biographical Sketch. Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation, Colorado Historical
Society, 2006.
James M. Hunter
Attachment D - Historic Preservation Comments
Hunter retired from active practice in 1973 and died at the age of 75 in 1983 at his home in Boulder. His
work was recognized in architectural professional magazines during his time and today James M. Hunter
is considered to be one of Boulder’s most influential architects.
HOBART WAGENER3
Hobart Wagener was born in South Dakota in 1921 and graduated from the University of Michigan,
School of Architecture in 1944. After serving in World War II in the Okinawa campaign, Wagener began
his architectural practice in New York City with Eggers and Higgens. In 1950, Wagener and his family
moved to Boulder where he first worked with local architect James Hunter prior to launching his own
firm in 1953. In 1985 Wagener and his family retired to Coronado, California where he died in 2005.4
Wagener had a prolific career, designing over 200 public and private buildings in the Boulder area. Some
of his most notable commissions include The Greenshield Insurance Building and Labrot House (both
individual local landmarks), St. John’s Episcopal Chapel, the First Methodist Sanctuary, Fairview High
School, and the First National Bank. He also designed the University of Colorado Kittredge Dormitories
and Williams Village and collaborated in the design of the University’s Engineering Sciences Complex.
Ten of Wagener’s designs received either national or regional awards from the American Institute of
Architects and in 1985 the AIA recognized him as the architect of the year.
Documentation
The City strongly encourages the Boulder Valley School District to document the building prior to its
deconstruction and to incorporate historic photographs and social history into an interactive exhibit as
part of the new school. Recommended documentation includes measured drawings of the exterior of
the building, archival photographs, and preparation of an Architectural Inventory to document the
building’s architectural description and social history. Consultants who have prepared similar
documentation in the past include Carol Taylor, Carl McWilliams (Cultural Research Historians) and Ron
Sladek (Tatanka Associates Inc).
Additional Research
700 20th Street (Baseline Junior High School) – Built 1954. Carnegie Library for Local History, Call #533-
1-1. James M. Hunter collection. Photograph stamped James M. Hunter A.L.A., Architect Boulder. Ibid.
Call #328-61-(2-6). Newspaper articles, etc. about the construction of Baseline Junior High School.
Colorado Architects Biographical Sketch, Credited Buildings, James M. Hunter. “Baseline Junior High
School, Boulder, 1954”5
3 Landmarks Board Memorandum, 1300 Canyon Blvd. City of Boulder. Dec. 1, 2021.
4 Hobart D. Wagener Obituary. http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/denverpost/obituary.aspx?n=hobart-d-
wagener&pid=15374827. Published Oct. 16, 2005.
5 The Architects of Boulder, 1859-1959.
https://localhistory.boulderlibrary.org/islandora/object/islandora%3A97053?solr_nav%5Bid%5D=7f8a25cb3b2a2db
f4f59&solr_nav%5Bpage%5D=0&solr_nav%5Boffset%5D=0&solr_nav%5Bquery%5D=%22baseline%20jr%20hig
h%22
Attachment D - Historic Preservation Comments
Figure 1. Baseline Junior High School, 1954. Carnegie Library for Local History. Link
Figure 2. Proposed Addition to Baseline Junior High School, c. 1955-1964. Carnegie Library for Local
History. Link
Attachment D - Historic Preservation Comments
View of the entrance and auditorium, 1954. Carnegie Library for Local History. Link.
Attachment D - Historic Preservation Comments
View of the Library, 1954. Carnegie Library for Local History. Link.
View of a typical classroom, 1954. Carnegie Library for Local History. Link.
Attachment D - Historic Preservation Comments
View from the playground, 1954. Carnegie Library for Local History. Link.
Aerial photograph c. 1950-1959.
https://localhistory.boulderlibrary.org/islandora/object/islandora%3A13387
Attachment D - Historic Preservation Comments