HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.28.22 PRAB PacketPARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
Virtual Meeting
6:00 p.m., August 22, 2022
100 Years of Excellence
Boulder Parks & Recreation
Advisory Board Members 2022
Charles Brock
Elliott Hood
Mary Scott
Anita Speirs
Jason Unger
Sarah van der Star
Pamela Yugar
Mission Statement
BPRD will promote the health and well-
being of the entire Boulder community
by collaboratively providing high- quality
parks, facilities and programs.
Vision Statement
We envision a community where every
member’s health and well- being is
founded on unparalleled parks, facilities
and programs.
Goals of the Master Plan
1. Community Health and Wellness
2. Taking Care of What We Have
3. Financial Sustainability
4. Building Community
5. Youth Engagement
6. Organizational Readiness
AGENDA
All agenda times are approximate
/͘ APPROVAL OF AGENDA (2 minutes)
II͘ FUTURE BOARD ITEMS AND TOURS (2 minutes)
II/͘ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (15 - 30 minutes)
This portion of the meeting is for members of the public to communicate ideas or concerns to the Board
regarding parks and recreation issues for which a public hearing is not scheduled later in the meeting (this
includes consent agenda). The public is encouraged to comment on the need for parks and recreation
programs and facilities as they perceive them. All speakers are limited to three minutes. Depending on the
nature of your matter, you may or may not receive a response from the Board after you deliver your
comments. The Board is always listening to and appreciative of community feedback.
VIII.MATTERS FROM THE BOARDA.New Procedure: Video conversions from Zoom Webinar meetings (5minutes)B.PRAB Recruitment: Prospective Board Member Application Questions(15 minutes)C.PRAB Matters (Verbal) (5 minutes)
IX.NEXT BOARD MEETING: 6:00 p.m. Monday, Dec 12, 2022 - Virtual
X.ADJOURN
IV.CONSENT AGENDA (5 minutes)
A.Approval of Minutes from Oct 24, 2022 and Nov 7, 2022B.Updates from the Director of Parks and RecreationC.Parks and Recreation Project UpdatesD.Parks and Recreation Operations Updates
V.ACTION ITEMS
A. None
VI.MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION/INFORMATION
A.2022 Boulder Reservoir Operation Plan Review (45 minutes)
VII.MATTERS FROM THE DEPARTMENT
A. Dec. 12 Meeting (5 minutes)B. Pleasant View Fields Access, Parking, and Improvements FeasibilityStudy (15 minutes)C. Final 2023 Operating Budget (15 minutes)
1
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
FUTURE BOARD ITEMS
UPDATED: November 18, 2022
NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY REGULAR MEETING November 28: Virtual
•Drive-in Happiness (c)
•Reservoir Annual After
Action Review (d/i) 45 min
•Pleasant View Access
update/process overview
(md)15 min
•Final 2023 Operating
Budget (md) 15 min
•PRAB Recruitment
Questions (mb) 15 min
•PRAB Retreat Follow-Up
Letter to Council (mb) 15
min
•PRAB In-Person Meeting
prep (mb) 15 min
December 12: Hybrid In
Person
•Reservoir ANS Update (d/i
or md)
•Flatirons Golf Course (md)
•Reservoir Annual After
Action Review – (md) 15
min
•Board and Commission
Inclusion (mb)
January 23: Hybrid
•Recreation Center
Strategy process/input
(d/i) 30 min
•Civic Area Project
Overview (md) 20 mins
•BPR 2023 Action
Initiatives and Workplan
Highlights (md)
February 27: TBD
Consent:
•Pleasant View Access
(d/i) 20 mins
•HiPP (d/i) 20 mins
•Community Programs
summary - EOY reporting
(md)
•Violet Park Project
Overview (md) 15 mins
Other Meetings or Topics Nov. 7: PRAB Retreat
Nov. 17: 2nd Adjustment to
Base and ARPA Funding (cc)
Dec. 1: International Day of
Persons with Disabilities
declaration, Mid-Term check-
in and updates (cc)
Dec. 15: Shared
Micromobility Update Department Events and Items of Interest •November 24:
Thanksgiving Day Closure
•December 25: Christmas
Day Closure
•December 31: New Year’s
Eve limited hours/closures
•New Year’s Day:
Recreation Centers
closed, EBCC New
Year’s Kick-off
AGENDA SETTING
The PRAB Chair, PRAB Vice Chair and BPR staff set the agenda for the next month on the Thursday directly following the regular PRAB meeting. PRAB
members can submit agenda requests to the Chair and Vice Chair by Wednesday following the PRAB regular meeting for consideration. If time-sensitive
matters arise, PRAB Chair and Vice Chair may amend the agenda as needed.
LEGEND
Action Item (a): A public hearing item to be voted on by the Board (public comment period provided).
Procedural Item: (p): An item requiring procedural attention.
Consent Item (c): An item provided in written form for consent, not discussion by the Board; any consent item may be called up by any Board member for
discussion following the consent agenda.
Discussion/Information Item(d/i): An item likely to be a future action item (or council item) and/or that benefits from an in-depth discussion.
Matters from the Department (md): Items that will be reviewed and discussed during the meeting but not requiring as much in-depth analysis.
Matters from the Board (mb): Items initiated by the Board that will be reviewed and discussed during the meeting but not requiring as much in-depth analysis
City Council Item (cc)
Other Boards and Commissions (obc)
Community Engagement and/or Events (e)
Holiday/Closure (h/c)
Italics indicate a tentative date or plan.
2
TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
FROM: Alison Rhodes, Director of Parks and Recreation
Bryan Beary, Senior Manager, Community Building and Partnerships
Mark Davison, Senior Manager, Planning
Regina Elsner, Senior Manager, Natural Resources
Jackson Hite, Senior Manager, Business Services
Megann Lohman, Senior Manager, Recreation
Stephanie Munro, Senior Manager, Regional Facilities
Scott Schuttenberg, Deputy Director
Dennis Warrington, Senior Manager, Urban Parks
SUBJECT: Consent Agenda
DATE: November 28, 2022
A. Approval of Minutes from October 24, 2022 and November 7, 2022 Retreat
3
CITY OF BOULDER
BOULDER, COLORADO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING MINUTES
To listen to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meetings in their entirety, please go to the
following link: www.boulderparks-rec.org
Name of Board/Commission: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Date of Meeting: October 24, 2022
Contact Information Preparing Summary: Rosa Kougl; 303-413-7223
Board Members Present: Anita Speirs, Charles (Chuck) Brock, Elliott Hood, Mary Scott, Jason
Unger, Pam Yugar, Sunny van der Star
Board Members Absent:
Staff Present: Ali Rhodes, Rosa Kougl, Sandra Llanes, Valerie Watson, David Kemp, Mark Davison,
Megann Lohman, Regina Elsner, Stephanie Munroe, Doug Godfrey, Christy Spielman, Bryan Beary,
Jackson Hite, Dennis Warrington, Stacie Hoffmann, Jonathan Thornton
Guests Present: N/A
Type of Meeting: Regular
Agenda Item 1: Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:01 p.m. A quorum was present for the conduct of business.
Motion to approve agenda. First motion by Hood, second by Unger. The motion passed 7-0.
Agenda Item 2: Future Board Items:
Rhodes, Director reviewed upcoming agenda items and tours.
•No questions or comments from the PRAB
Agenda Item 3: Public participation:
No public participation
Agenda Item 4: Consent Agenda
A.Approval of Minutes from September 26 Business Meeting
Motion to approve the minutes from the September 26 Regular PRAB meeting. First motion by
Brock, second by Hood. The motion passed 7-0.
B, C, D. Updates from the Director, Project Updates, Operations & Development
•No comment
4
Agenda Item 8: Items for Action
•No items
Agenda Item 9 and 10: Matters for Discussion and Matters from the Department
•Overview with City Attorney. Attorney Llanes presented the functions of the PRAB and the
distinctions of “shall” and “may” of those functions. The PRAB Handbook, which was created
by board members with CAO input. is a great resource and includes information about open
meetings laws, meeting procedures, etc.
•Micromobility Pilot Review. Staff member Kemp provided an update and evaluation on the
current e-scooter program, the overall utilization of the e-scooters as an alternative to driving.
PRAB members provided input on the analysis and their experiences.
•Overview of Capital Investment Strategy Update and Process. Staff member Davison
provided an update on the BPR Capital Investment Approach, an overview of the Asset
Management System and how it informs the Capital Improvement Strategy and the current
focus for capital planning in 2023 and 2024. Davison shared that his team is still working on
completing the workplan and will share to PRAB in the spring of 2023 to garner board input
and then staff will develop a comprehensive workplan for the next six years (2023-28).
PRAB had the following questions or comments. Board members commended Davison on a
thoughtful presentation.
•North Boulder Park Alternatives Review. Staff member Godfrey provided PRAB with
information regarding the development of a site plan for North Boulder Park and with the aim
to gather input regarding the Play Areas, Fitness Equipment, Shelter, Bathrooms and Adjacent
Gathering Areas. Godfrey presented two plan alternatives during the presentation.
o PRAB had the following questions or comments:
o Were the alternatives shared with Spanish speakers
o Were there plans to explore universal restrooms
o Was a zip line explored
o Do park amenities lend to a more aging population.
o Are there opportunities for more trees.
o Staff member Godfrey answered that universal restrooms will be included as part of
these amenities and alternatives translated into Spanish. Due to the size that a zip line
requires, at this time open turf areas were not used for this amenity but will continue to
explore. The opportunities to provide shade using trees has been explored and trees will
be planted where they will grow considering some of the landscaping.
Agenda Item 6: Matters from the Board Members
Unger reviewed the PRAB Retreat agenda.
Agenda Item 7: Next Board Meeting
5
Next Board meeting: Monday, November 7, 2022, Study Session in person
Agenda Item 8: Adjourn
Motion to adjourn. First motion by Scott, second by Hood. The meeting was adjourned at 8:51 p.m.
Approved by: Attested:
___________________ _____________________
Pamela Yugar Rosa Kougl
Board Members BPR Staff
Date: ______________ Date: _________________
6
CITY OF BOULDER
BOULDER, COLORADO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING MINUTES
To listen to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meetings in their entirety, please go to the
following link: www.boulderparks-rec.org
Name of Board/Commission: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board RETREAT
Date of Meeting: November 7, 2022
Contact Information Preparing Summary: Rosa Kougl; 303-413-7223
Board Members Present: Mary Scott, Jason Unger, Pam Yugar, Sunny van der Star, Anita
Spiers, Charles (Chuck) Brock, Elliot Hood
Board Members Absent:
Staff Present: Regina Elsner, Ali Rhodes, Stephanie Munro, Mark Davison, Dennis
Warrington, Rosa Kougl
Guests Present: N/A
Type of Meeting: Annual Retreat
Start Time 6:02
Introductions of members
Discussion Item 1: How are the issues of public safety and future development impacting the
department and what is/will PRAB’s role in these issues?
•BPR Briefing on: Future Parkland Development and Safe and Managed Public Spaces
Break for “Getting to know each other”
Discussion Item 2:
What are we doing now that we can be doing differently?
•Expand information included in the Future Board Items document.
What can we do?
•Make an appointment with a council member to discuss items and opportunities
What can we continue doing?
•Dedicate time at the meetings to talk about events
•Plan out year with key events involving PRAB, set goals to attend and engage in events
End Time 8:02pm
7
Approved by: Attested:
___________________ _____________________
Pamela Yugar Rosa Kougl
Board Members BPR Staff
Date: ______________ Date: ___________
8
B. Updates from the Director of Parks and Recreation
The following information is intended to provide the PRAB with general department updates
from the Office of the Director.
2023 Health Equity Fund Awards
The department was preliminarily awarded with $151,000 from the City of Boulder’s Health
Equity Fund (HEF) for 2023. The HEF provides grant funding to community organizations and
agencies promoting health equity for Boulder residents. Funding investments are awarded
through an annual competitive process based on alignment with the intent and language of the
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Product Distribution Tax, a ballot measure which was approved in
November 2016.
The total amount awarded is the same as 2022 funding awards, however the distribution between
programs has changed slightly for 2023:
•$91,000 awarded for the Recquity Program – which operates in conjunction with the
department financial aid program to provide fully subsidize access to recreation facilities
for under-resourced community members (up from $61k in 2022); and
•$60,000 awarded for the YSI Program– which inspires youth and families from
underrepresented communities to make healthy, caring and responsible choices through
recreation, health and well-being opportunities as well as life skill development (down
from $90k in 2022).
Staff will be meeting fund managers to gain some context and explanation for the
recommendation which will help us strategize the 2023 scope of work based on the changes for
these programs that directly support and underscore the “entire Boulder community” statement
in the department mission.
Like department awards, the PLAY Boulder Foundation was also preliminarily awarded
$112,000 (same as 2022) from the HEF for the PLAYpass program which removes barriers to
fee-based participation in recreation activities (including BPR’s) by awarding non-cash vouchers
to participants to be used towards the cost of registration for approved Service Providers’ sports
and recreation programs.
C. Parks and Recreation Development Update
The following information is intended to provide the PRAB with relevant updates on specific
projects as they reach major milestones. This section is not all inclusive of all current projects
and only illustrates major project updates. For a complete list of all current projects and details,
please visit www.BoulderParkNews.org.
Natural Resources
The following projects are focused on vegetation, wildlife, and visitor management in an urban
environment.
9
•Boulder Reservoir North Shore Stabilization: Starting November 9, 2022, Northern
Water, in partnership with Parks and Recreation and Utilities began work to stabilize a
section of the North Shore of the Boulder Reservoir. In late 2020, this area of shoreline
was re-graded and seeded with native grass seeds to eliminate an area of significantly
eroding shoreline. The wet conditions in the spring of 2021 caused this grading and
seeding effort to fail and the slope to again erode. Northern Water is currently installing
rip rap (i.e., large rocks) at the bottom of the slope to protect from further erosion. Then
the slope above that rip rap will be regraded. Trails accessing the Boulder Reservoir are
currently closed due to heavy equipment and operations. The primary construction should
be complete by early December. Vegetation restoration will occur in spring 2023.
D. Operations Update
The following information is intended to provide the PRAB an update on operational activities,
changes, or highlights.
Halloween Drive-in Movie
Initially created to support COVID-safe Halloween activities for the entire community in 2020,
BPR hosted a series of sold-out drive-in movies last month, building upon two years of success
and popular community demand. The 2022 program grew to a larger venue at Boulder Reservoir
and featured two nights of spooky double features. Registrants enjoyed pre-made candy treat
bags (the 2022 move to off-season at the Reservoir also allowed dog treat bags to be on offer for
the first time) and watched movies under the stars as part of two movie screenings per day:
an early screening at 6 p.m. (suggested for families with children ages 12 and under), and
a late screening at 8 p.m. (suggested for adults and children 13+). A community poll hosted via
social media with over 1,000 responses selected these films:
•Oct. 27 – Coco (6 p.m.) and Beetlejuice (8 p.m.)
•Oct. 28 – Hocus Pocus (6 p.m.) and Ghostbusters (1984) (8 p.m.).
Those who entered an email address when participating in the online movie choice poll had the
first opportunity to buy tickets. The remaining tickets were made available via BPREvents.org
and sold-out quickly, though a waitlist was able to accommodate additional patrons – especially
as light snow and brisk temperatures earlier in the day Thursday kept away some ‘fair weather’
viewers. Those who packed extra blankets and warm drinks (no engine idling permitted) were
treated to crisp, clear evenings of outdoor cinema.
10
Photo credit: BPR staff
11
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 1__
C I T Y O F B O U L D E R
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: November 28, 2022
AGENDA TITLE: 2022 Boulder Reservoir Operation Plan Review
PRESENTERS:
Alison Rhodes, Director, Parks, and Recreation Department
Stephanie Munro, Regional Recreation Facilities Manager
Stacy Cole, Boulder Reservoir Facility Supervisor
Chris Passarelli, Data Analyst
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Boulder Parks and Recreation (BPR) continues to align business practices with the guidance
outlined in the 2022 Boulder Parks and Recreation Plan. At the Boulder Reservoir, operations are
also informed by the Boulder Reservoir Master Plan. This item is part of a two-step approach to
develop the 2023 Operation Plan for the Boulder Reservoir. First, with this item, staff share an
overview of 2022 Reservoir performance and gather the board’s input on recommendations for
2023, briefly summarized here:
1. Continue strenuous ANS procedures to protect water resources
2. Continue bringing storage pricing closer to market average
3. Continue incentivizing sustainable visits by carpool and non-motorized vehicles
4.Offer a Reservoir-only pass in line with the fee season and cost recovery
5.Increase Weekday small craft permits and incentivize early purchase of access passes
Next, at the December business meeting, staff will confirm proposed operation and access shifts
for 2023 based upon the department’s approach where solutions are based upon the triangulation
of data, community input, and policy. The PRAB’s role in these items is to advise the
department, providing input to guide the final 2023 Boulder Reservoir Operation Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Boulder Reservoir
Constructed in the 1950s, the Boulder Reservoir collects and retains water for municipal,
domestic, agricultural and industrial uses for members of the Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District (Northern Water). The Reservoir is, first and foremost, a valuable drinking
water supply for the City of Boulder. The recreational activities at the Reservoir are supported by
the Parks and Recreation Department in a manner that is compatible with the protection and
12
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 2__
management of the water supply. The Boulder Reservoir (Reservoir) is one of the city’s premier
recreation destinations and one of only eight reservoirs and lakes offering significant water-based
recreation and boating opportunities along the Front Range corridor. Over the years, the Boulder
Reservoir has increased in popularity as a local and regional venue for small and large-scale
group and organized events. The management of and investments in the Reservoir are guided by
the 2022 Boulder Parks and Recreation Plan, the Boulder Reservoir Master Plan and the 2020
South Shore Capital Strategy and Concept Plan, approved by the PRAB in April 2020.
The BRMP guides long-term goals, and the plan also calls for annual reviews and refinements to
help achieve those goals in an ever-changing environment. As part of the adaptive management
principles outlined in the BRMP, the reservoir management team complete an After-Action
Review of the high season and boating program each year to evaluate and improve services.
Reservoir Services
The 1190 acres of land surrounding the reservoir are divided into four management areas (see
Figure 1). The South Shore Management Area (“South Shore”) consists of roughly 76 acres and
is the location of the most intensive active recreational uses at the reservoir. Facilities on the
South Shore include gate house buildings, Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) inspection building,
a new Visitor Services Center, lifeguard station, boat house maintenance building. Popular
amenities are the swim beach, boat parking, boat moorings, boat ramps, a variety of docks,
reservable picnic site locations and numerous vehicle parking areas.
Figure 1 Boulder Reservoir Management Areas
13
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 3__
Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) are exotic or nonnative aquatic wildlife or any plant species
that have been determined to pose a significant threat to the aquatic resources or water
infrastructure of the state. Key ANS of concern include zebra and quagga mussels, New Zealand
mud snails, and Eurasian watermilfoil. If these ANS were introduced, eradication would likely
not be possible. Since 2008, the reservoir has operated a leading ANS program which is
reviewed annually. As part of the ANS program, reservoir operations always require boat
inspection staff on duty while the facility is open.
In 2022 the presence of Eurasian water milfoil was confirmed by Colorado Parks and Wildlife
(CPW). BPR staff will provide a complete ANS update during the December business meeting.
The Boulder Reservoir is a highly seasonal facility, with the height of recreational use occurring
from Memorial Day to Labor Day when the reservoir is fully staffed, delivering ANS and water
safety services for boaters and swimmers at the swim beach. On either side of the peak season,
the spring and fall months see reduced staffing and the closure of the swim beach, but other
services are still available in this flank season. The winter months see the least visitation and,
therefore, the least amount of services (Lake Patrol does not operate from November – February,
though ANS inspections continue when boating can take place). See Table 1 for a summary of
reservoir seasons and services available.
Table 1: Boulder Reservoir Operating Seasons in 2022
Jan 1-
Mid
April
Mid April
Memorial
Day
Memorial
Day -
Labor Day
Labor
Day to -
Mid
October
Mid October -
December 31st
Season Low
Season
Flank
Season
High
Season
Flank
Season
Low Season
Gate
Staffed
All Open
Hours
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Gate Fee No Yes Yes Yes No
Swimming
area Water
Safety
No No Yes No No
Regular
scheduled
Lake
Patrol
April Yes Yes Yes End of October
Boating
Access-
(permit
and ANS
protocol
required)
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
14
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 4__
Reservoir Funding and Access
Recreation operations at the Boulder Reservoir, which include boating and the activity in the
managed South Shore recreation area, are funded from the BPR-managed Recreation Activity
Fund (RAF). The RAF is characterized as a quasi-enterprise fund where the department manages
all expenses, receives revenues from user and participation fees, and relies on a subsidy from the
General Fund to support community benefit programming.
In May 2019, the department presented an update to the PRAB on the Recreation Activity Fund
(RAF) and the related revenue management strategies developed to align with the Parks and
Recreation Plan and additional guiding documents. The department uses this guidance, along
with the Recreation Priority Index and the Service Delivery Model, to classify services based on
their exclusivity and degree of community benefit. Exclusive activities should achieve at least
full cost recovery while community benefit programming is subsidized through the General Fund
and other program revenue because of its importance to the department and the city. More details
can be found in the May 2019 PRAB memo (starting on page 15).
At the Reservoir, and at current cost recovery, access fees support age-based discounts for youth
and seniors and financial aid to support participation by community members with lower
resources. All other programming and operations are expected to achieve full cost-recovery.
Capital efforts at the Reservoir are funded by the department’s dedicated .25 Cent Sales Tax and
Permanent Parks and Recreation Fund.
Since 2020, the high season entrance fees have matched the entrance fee at other BPR facilities
based upon feedback from users indicating this was preferred to ensure annual and other multi-
visit passes included the reservoir and seasonal outdoor pools. While a single annual access pass
had been included with large boat permits through 2021, access was fully separated from boat
permits in 2022 (matching the “a la carte” access structure for small craft users and allowing
each permitholder to purchase the passes that matched their needs best).
Reservoir Visitation
The South Shore is visited by approximately 300,000 visitors in the typical year, a large majority
of which occurs during the high season from Memorial Day to Labor Day. The Reservoir
charges full entrance fees during the high season between Memorial Day and Labor Day and
visitation numbers are carefully recorded. In 2022 users also paid a reduced flank season fee for
access during those times. Outside of the high and flank seasons, visitors can use the South Shore
without paying a entrance fee. As demonstrated in Figure 2, the majority of visitation takes place
during the high season.
15
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 5__
Figure 2: Monthly visitation with Flank seasons marked in boxes. High season takes place between them.
Boating is one of the most popular activities, representing over 30% of all annual revenue. Since
2021, Reservoir staff has been scheduling the lake in two modes to manage the popularity of
different water activities safely:
1.Shared Lake: The lake is open to all watercraft and all activities. Small craft are limited
to the No-Wake Zone to limit potential for conflict with fast-moving power boats in the
center of the lake.
2.No-Wake Lake: The lake is open to all watercraft, but power boats are not allowed to
create a wake. This limits higher speed activities by power boats (no water skiing, wake
boarding or wake surfing) during these times, allowing small craft to visit all areas of the
lake safely. This no-wake time stems from a recommendation in the BRMP. In 2022, the
schedule included 16 hours of No-Wake Time each week during the high season.
To prevent ANS, all craft visiting the Boulder Reservoir must have a current annual watercraft
(SWC or LWC) permit.
For both large and small craft, BPR offers a season permit, valid every day of the year where
boating is allowed, or a less expensive weekday permit which is not valid on weekends or
holidays.
Stand Up Paddleboards (SUP) and kayaks have become more popular since the COVID-19
pandemic, when many customers purchased their own craft to seek out safe outdoor recreation.
Quantities of both season and weekday SWC permits have been significantly increased to try to
keep pace with demand since the COVID-19 pandemic, but in 2022 season permits sold out
within 24 hours. Weekday permits sold out in 2.5 months. For those who do not have permits,
visitors have the option to rent small watercraft from the city’s boating concessionaire, Rocky
Mountain Paddleboard (RMP).
16
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 6__
Figure 3: Reservoir Boat Permit sales 2018-2022
The operations discussed to this point are evaluated and adjusted annually using adaptive
management principles. Since the beginning of the ANS program in 2009, and with guidance
from the BRMP, each year staff evaluate the data, gather input from users, and review policy
guiding the operations to respond to changing conditions and address opportunities for
improvement.
Revisions of management actions are based on new information from research, qualitive data,
and community feedback. To achieve this continual improvement, staff conduct an annual
After-Action Review (AAR) of the high season, beginning in September with a stakeholder
questionnaire to gather feedback from users and visitors and the latest figures from Rocky
Mountain Paddleboard. . This data is analyzed in conjunction with feedback collected throughout
the year outside of the AAR, performance data for the year as well as policy in the form of
governing documents (BRMP, the South Shore Capital Strategy and Concept Plan (SSCS), and
the Parks & Recreation Plan). This approach synthesizes data and community input with policy
direction, and with PRAB’s input, it allows staff to respond appropriately to the past year and
prepare and make operational adjustments for the year(s) ahead.
Knowing that many visitors to the Boulder Reservoir also visit the passive recreation amenities
provided free of charge on the North Shore and Coot Lake, Natural Resources staff conducted a
complementary visitor use questionnaire for visitors of those areas. A summary of those results
can be found in Attachment A. This was the first time a questionnaire of this type was conducted
with visitors to the North Shore and Coot Lake. Over time, these data will improve
understanding of how visitors use the site and what their needs are to direct management
decisions, including shaping signage improvements, trail maintenance, rule changes, and
decisions about existing or future infrastructure for these passive, free recreation areas.
ANALYSIS:
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
263 284 244 236 232
810
1110
1792 1700
2893
Permits Sold by Year
Large Boat (incl. power and sail boats)Small Craft
17
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 7__
The PRAB’s role is to provide feedback on the proposed adjustments for 2023. Operational
changes are generally presented for the PRAB’s knowledge, while changes to the pass and/or fee
structure are where the PRAB’s feedback is most helpful.
As part of the annual AAR, In the following pages, staff share initial performance data for the
2022 season, an assessment of the adjustments made for 2022, and propose updates for the 2023
Operation Plan.
2022 Operations
Reservoir operations have continued to move into recovery from pandemic-related impacts,
however, the reservoir has experienced a slight decline in annual visitation through the gate
through mid-October (approximately 78,000, down from 82,000 in 2021). This, and the new
sustainability incentive (discussed in the “Incentivize Sustainability” section below), account for
a decline in gate revenue of about $65,000. As a result of an increase in small craft permits
offered as well as special events and picnics, the Reservoir is still on track to achieve the targeted
revenue of almost $1,284,000 (13% higher than 2021's budget - see Table 2). Special events
have returned to the historic schedule with participation numbers similar to those prior to 2019.
Camps were again offered by both BPR and partners like Avid for Adventure, and BPR executed
the PRAB approved 5-year Rocky Mountain Paddle boat rental agreement which includes a
revenue share.
Table 2: Reservoir Revenue 2021 and 2022
Reservoir Revenue Original Revenue
Projection
YTD ACTUAL
Through October
2021 $1,137,000 $1,129,783
2022 $1,284,870 $1,249,512
The Reservoir management team has continued to control expenses. An End of Year (EOY)
projection estimates expenses at the budgeted total of $1,200,000, achieving full direct cost
recovery and a net benefit of $100,000 to support other operations in the Recreation Activity
Fund, including community benefit services.
The Boulder Reservoir continued to work with special event managers to apply event
management practices and communication to mitigate traffic impacts related to large special
events. The team also operated the sound monitoring system and protocol with zero noise
violations. See Table 3 for event count compared to recent years.
Table 3: Medium and Large Special Events at the Reservoir*
Event Class 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Medium (200-800
participants)
22 20 0 12 13
Large (800+
participants)
2 2 0 2 3
18
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 8
*The department does not track or report out on small events, as they do not have impacts on
Reservoir operations, traffic, or sound and the value of doing so does not match the
administrative burden given the quantity of small events.
Boulder Reservoir Special Event Listing
The hospitality partnership with LandLoch Boulder, LLC continued through the high season of
2022. The Operations Overview developed in the spring of 2021, which was informed by input
from the community, PRAB and City Council, informed their operations through the 2022
season. LandLoch sublet operations to Ruthie’s Restaurant at the Reservoir (as well as Scott
Carpenter Pool) during the high season to offer daytime food and non-alcoholic beverages to
visitors seven days per week.
A traditional full-service restaurant, which was the initial intent and agreement, has not been
financially viable without a liquor license. Driftwind instead offered the leased space, including
the dining area, patio, and yard, for rentals and private special events throughout the year in
alignment with the hours allowed by the Operational Plan and Lease. BPR staff are developing
an outline of short term goals for next seasons operation that share the work needed to steward
the Reservoir as a facility, the Main Building and what best serves the entire community.
Assessing and Adjusting 2022 Operational Adjustments
In addition to the operational data collected above, staff built a questionnaire and sent it to
Reservoir stakeholders including user groups, general visitors, event participants, and neighbors.
A total of 552 valid responses was received (comparable to 572 last year) after 170 duplicative
submissions from a single user were removed. Following is a summary of themes from the
results.
First and foremost, results demonstrated that guests enjoyed their time at the Reservoir this year
with over three-quarters of visitors reporting a positive experience (75.8%):
19
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 9__
The Main Building was only used by 35.9% of visitors, so opportunities exist to increase
activation. Those that did use the facilities rated the amenities overwhelmingly as Somewhat or
Very Positive.
The balance of shared lake and no wake time also appears to be appropriate at this time (see
Figure 4).
Figure 4: Balance of Shared Lake and No Wake time
20
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 10__
Almost half of respondents are happy with the balance between No Wake and Shared Wake
time, and the remaining responses are proportional to small and large craft permit quantities:
there are more small craft permits issued and more respondents want additional no wake time,
and there are fewer large craft permits as well as fewer respondents requesting fewer no wake
hours. These preferences are confirmed when results are filtered based on which kind of boat
permit(s) the respondent held in 2022. In summary, while smallcraft permit holders would like
more “No Wake” hours and large craft permit holders would like less, the balance seems
appropriate – especially considering that “No Wake” hours eliminate some activities, and the
shared lake allows all uses.
Operating Hours
Based upon projected revenues and service levels and anticipating no public health restrictions,
BPR offered a modest increase in high season operating hours in 2022. In addition, operating
hours were consistent throughout the week to simplify planning for all user groups. During the
high season, operating hours are focused on serving the whole community, balancing the
broadest mix of users and are based upon visitation levels. Specialized user groups activating the
reservoir outside of the operating hours were able to do so through lake rental options that
21
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 11__
marginally offset costs connected with necessary staffing and operations expenses. This balance
of high season operating hours throughout the season is planned to continue through 2023.
2022 Operation Adjustments
BPR implemented five operational adjustments to Reservoir service levels in 2022 as a result of
the 2021 AAR process. These efforts, influenced by community feedback,operational data, and
input from the PRAB, were designed to maintain sustainable operations while providing flexible,
multi-use access to foster well-being in line with policy direction of the Boulder Reservoir
Master Plan and the Parks & Recreation Master Plan:
1.Reduce ANS Risk
2. Update Storage Fees
3.Incentivize Sustainable Visitation
4.Separate Boat Permits and Access Fees
5.Enhance Access to Small Craft Permit (SWC)
The following sections will review the changes made, assess their effectiveness, and propose any
modifications or changes for 2023.
Reduce ANS Risk
Background
By far, the greatest risk to introducing ANS (mussels) is through standing water, most notably in
ballast tanks or bags, in a boat moving between bodies of water. Boats with ballasts are
considered Class 5 craft based on the Boulder Reservoir classification system, introduced in
2019, which classifies watercraft based upon their associated risk for introducing ANS at the
Boulder Reservoir. (see Table 1 below). Class 5 boats’ ballast tanks and ballast bags can never
be decontaminated with 100% certainty and thus present the greatest risk to introduce invasive
species.
Table 4: Risk Category Summary
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5
Solid SUP
267 Permits in
2022
Canoes,
inflatable SUPs
1,958 Permits in
2022
Open hull boats,
kayaks
515 Permits in
2022
Boats with
inboard motors,
117 Permits in
2022
Pontoon boats
and powerboats
with ballast
74 Permits in
2022
22
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 12__
(See the November 2021 memo for full background, page 15)
In 2022, no new Class V permits were offered, only renewals were allowed and those craft were
not allowed to leave the Reservoir to visit other bodies of water. Previously, the boats could
leave but were subjected to a sequence of decontaminations, quarantine, and inspections.
Data and Analysis of Adjustments
There were 76 total permits issued to Class V boats in 2022, down from 84 in 2021, as some
Class V boaters decided not to renew their permits.
Much like last year, boat permit holders proved to be highly informed about the ANS program
with only 5.9% reporting they were not familiar with the program. Large craft holders were
particularly well informed at 96.6%.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) detected Eurasian Watermilfoil, an ANS, in the Reservoir
late in the season. Staff are committed to minimizing the transfer of water (and ANS) through
uncleanable components of watercraft. The discovery of Eurasian Watermilfoil will be discussed
in detail in the December ANS update, informed by a late October survey of the Reservoir in
partnership with CPW.
Recommendation for 2023
Boulder Reservoir institutes some of the strictest protocols to protect water quality, well beyond
the standards dictated by Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Given the continued rising ANS risks in
this body of water and the state and the environmental impacts of class 5 watercraft, staff intends
to continue the moratorium on permitting any new class 5 watercraft. This includes any new
Class 5 permits for new boaters or for current boaters to replace their current class 5 watercraft.
In addition, restrictions on visiting other water bodies will remain the same.
BPR is working closely with CPW along with the city’s Utilities Department to analyze
operations and develop 2023 ANS program recommendations – scheduled for PRAB discussion
in December. BPR will provide the PRAB, along with the Water Resources Advisory Board
(WRAB), a full report of CPW and state findings in December.
Storage Fees
Background
As shared with the PRAB during last year’s AAR, Boulder Reservoir watercraft storage fees are
well below market rate. BPR charged $523 per year for a gravel storage space while the average
in the area was $1,760 annually. As this is an “Individual Benefit” service that should achieve
full cost recovery and align with market rates, staff proposed - and PRAB endorsed - a policy of
steadily increasing storage pricing by 10% annually until BPR pricing caught up to two-thirds of
the area average. The two-thirds goal is in recognition that BPR facilities do not include the same
23
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 13__
expenses of market rate facilities (such as property tax). This increase brought the price of the
benchmark gravel parking space at the Reservoir up to $575.
The associated revenue would directly support operations providing services to boaters including
ANS control and Lake Patrol.
Data, input, and Analysis
Total storage revenue declined from $188,922 to $165,042 in 2022. The decline came from large
craft storage: some Class 5 boats did leave the facility for good, and some others downgraded
from a wet mooring (which includes both space on the water and one in the parking lot) to a dry
mooring. Those remaining Class 5 boats are required to store on site if they want to maintain
their boat permit due to ANS program requirements. The total fill rate for all storage remained
around 70%.
BPR observed some large craft owners continue to buy a boat permit and pay for boat storage
even if they did not don’t use their boat in a year, as the combined cost remains lower than
comparable storage in the area. This illustrates how far below market rate BPR’s storage fees
remain at this time.
During the 2022 season, all usable small craft rack spaces were at full capacity.
The questionnaire indicated that neither group of boaters showed significant price sensitivity
(35.2% of large crafters and 16.3% of small craft users said the pricing had some kind of impact
on their decision to store on site). In the case of the large craft, given the value discussed above,
the impact of pricing was likely a positive one rather than a deterrent. Between that and the
100% occupancy of small craft storage, staff recommend continuing bringing pricing closer to
market rate.
Peer city reviews indicate that demand for storage is exceeding supply at other water bodies,
therefore prices in the area may increase in coming years.
Recommendation for 2023
Based on the operational adjustments instituted during the 2021 AAR process and the continued
low position in the market, BPR recommends continuing with another 10% increase for 2023 so
that the benchmark gravel space would cost $632.50, or approximately 36% of the 2021 market
average.
Staff plan to complete a new market study for the 2023 AAR process to determine if progress is
being made, or if other storage providers have raised their prices and maintained the gap.
Regardless, BPR does not intend to shock storage customers with a sudden, sharp increase given
the ANS requirements associated with some craft and will continue the 10% steady increase.
Incentivize Sustainability
Background
24
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 14__
BPR encourages multi-modal visits throughout the system which is in alignment with department
and city goals to increase sustainability by reducing single-occupancy vehicle trips and
encouraging alternate modes of transportation. In 2022, the Reservoir instituted a 25% discount
on multi-occupant vehicles and arrivals by foot or bike during the high season. This discount did
not apply to the flat flank-season fees, twilight fees or unlimited usage passes as they are already
discounted.
The per car fee during the flank season also incentivizes carpooling outside the high season. BPR
noticed that specialized user groups were more inclined to carpooling during their flank season
rentals.
This initiative encourages multi-modal visits while staff plans longer term transportation
solutions, like improving the trail system to and around the Reservoir, to further encourage visits
by non-motorized vehicles or on-foot. These capital upgrades will be explored further through a
future planning process.
Data, Input, and Analysis
In total, there were 21,712 visits by foot, or non-motorized or multi-occupant vehicles recorded
in 2022, or 48% of the 45,224 daily visits through the gate. Again, this total only includes those
paying gate fees during the high season and does not include anyone that entered during the flank
seasons, twilight hours or with an unlimited access pass.
While it is impressive that nearly half of the visitors came on foot, bike, or multi-occupant
vehicle, only 11.8% of those visitors said that the 25% discount impacted their decision – nearly
90% would have taken this transportation method anyway. It should be noted, though, that this
questionnaire most reliably reached regular customers who are on the Reservoir email list.
Meanwhile, total gate revenue this year was $339k, down by ~$66k from 2021 as discussed in
the operational summary. With $138k of that gate revenue coming from multi-modal visits, the
net impact of the sustainability incentive (25% discount) was about $46k, accounting for two-
thirds of the gate revenue decline.
Incentivizing sustainable travel to prevent climate change and increase community health and
wellness are core priorities for both BPR and the City of Boulder. As overall revenue at the
Reservoir still proved viable, the revenue decrease of $46,000 can be borne as long as this
incentive is making a difference in achieving city goals.
Though the questionnaire respondents did not say the incentive had a significant impact on their
behavior, qualitative data from gatehouse staff indicate that this is making a difference where it
matters most. They reported multiple families coming, particularly during peak times, on 4th of
July weekend, patrons commented that they didn’t usually come to visit the Reservoir but that
25
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 15__
the 25% discount for everyone in the car meant they could come out and spend the day at the
facility. If this initiative is bringing new customers and lowering barriers to cost-conscious
visitors, while encouraging carpooling and sustainable transport, the program is achieving city
goals.
Recommendation for 2023
Since the revenue impact is reasonable and directly supports climate goals, BPR recommends
continue offering this discount for gate-fee payers in 2023.
BPR plans to work with the internal marketing team to further encourage carpooling and other
sustainable means of visiting the Reservoir. Especially since this program appears to make the
most difference for visitors that are not regular users of the Reservoir, pushing this program
through marketing channels and providing continued awareness will help extend these
opportunities to the broader community. The reservoir management team provide continued
support and overlay communication to user groups and frequent users throughout the high
season.
Once the South Shore trail enhancements are completed, an additional free pass-through option
will be available in the peak season.
Separating Boat Permits and Access
Explanation
In 2019, the department worked with the PRAB to align entry fees and passes across the whole
system (see Item VI.A.i, starting on page 15). This change was brought before the PRAB based
on feedback from the general population: 55% desired a consistent entrance fee by facility. Prior
to that, the Reservoir-only access was underpriced in light of cost recovery; the true cost of
delivering an entry to any of BPR’s facilities is remarkably consistent and Reservoir facility fees
were below those for other BPR facilities. For 2021, large craft permits included a single annual
access pass and SWC permits did not include access (reflected in the low price of $50 for
residents and $55 for non-residents for full-week passes). In 2022, staff completed the transition
to a la carte access purchases across all boat permits, and large craft permits no longer included
any entrance passes. This achieved the goal of completely synchronizing the pass structure
throughout the BPR system.
The 2019 memo linked above explains the fee policy across the system: a base fee for entry is
established for resident adults, that base fee is then adjusted to varying degrees based on
residency and age and serves as the foundation for pricing of unlimited and punch passes.
At the Reservoir, feedback continues to support a pass that fit the fee season, and in 2022, BPR
added a new unlimited Summer Fun Pass. This pass covers the outdoor pool season and
Reservoir high season; BPR also offered a 6-month pass that covers the entire fee season
(including flanks) at the Reservoir. Discounted flank and twilight fees were also introduced to
mitigate the impact of the entry fees.
26
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 16__
As reviewed with the PRAB as the 2023 budget was developed, systemwide entry fees are
increasing in 2023 to address cost escalation and for the first time since 2020. Thus, the fees for
all Reservoir access will increase next year. The increase is necessary as expenses for labor and
materials have sharply increased in the past three years.
Data, Input, and Analysis
There has been continued feedback requesting a Reservoir-only pass. 46% of questionnaire
respondents reported that they prefer to access the site using a Reservoir-only pass or punches.
29% still enjoy using a systemwide pass (see Figure 4).
Figure 5: "Would you prefer to access the Reservoir with:"
A similar desire for dedicated access has been reported in previous years as some users only visit
the Reservoir and likely expect such a pass would be cheaper than a systemwide pass. Offering
this pass would run counter to the May 2019 guidance to synchronize all passes throughout the
system but can be delivered consistent BPR’s fee policy.
Usually, based on cost recovery, the discount for single-facility access would be minimal based
upon the costs to provide services and how passes are priced. The unlimited usage passes are
priced based on the number of entrances, at any facility, to achieve a “break-even” value for the
customer. The Summer Fun pass, for instance, breaks even after 21 visits, whether at the
Reservoir, Scott Carpenter Pool, or a recreation center. A user still receives that value whether
they visit one facility repeatedly or spread their visits out throughout the system.
One significant difference remains: the Reservoir’s unique season with cheaper access during the
flank season (based upon a lower level of service) means that a discounted pass can be offered
(compared to systemwide passes) because it is covering cheaper daily access at certain times of
the year. The Reservoir is the only facility with a seasonal variation in pricing based upon
seasonal fluctuations in service levels. By applying the same methodology used to calculate the
27
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 17__
pricing of other passes, a dedicated Reservoir pass can be offered in a viable manner and in
alignment with BPR fee policy.
Table 5: Calculation of base pass price (Resident Adult)
April May June July August September October
Visits 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Adult Resident entrance
price 2023/flank $5 $5 $10 $10 $10 $5 $5
Non-annual premium 15%* 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15%
Monthly Value $34.50 $34.50 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $34.50 $34.50
Pass Price $345.00
*All unlimited passes are based on the cost of 6 monthly visits + 15%. When buyers select an
annual pass, the 15% is removed, providing the discount for purchasing a year of access versus
a monthly pass.
This pass value assumes a seven-month fee season, which is proposed in the “Additional
Operational Changes” section near the end of this memo.
Since BPR is motivated to have customers visit other facilities, this pass could also have its
prorated value applied to an upgrade to a systemwide annual pass. See recommendation below
for full pricing table.
Recommendation for 2023
Staff propose the following pricing for a Reservoir-only pass covering the full season and
available to boaters and the general public. Versions for different residency status and age will
maintain consistent relative discounts compared with systemwide passes.
Resident/Worker Non-Resident
Adult $345.00 $414.00
Senior $260.00 $310.00
Youth $207.00 $249.00
Household $552.00 $662.00
This promotional pass will be considered a pilot effort for 2023 and will be assessed based on
usage, policy impacts and public response for 2024.
Water Craft Permits
Explanation
In the last few years there has been a sharp increase in small watercraft. The pandemic, along
with rising interest in SUPs, meant that more users purchased their own craft to pursue safe
outdoor recreation. In turn, the Reservoir has seen increased demand for small craft permits since
2020.
28
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 18__
In 2021, both types of SWC permit sold out after about four months, with 7-day passes (1200
available) selling out around April 28th and weekday passes (500 available) selling out
approximately one week later. This was the first year of online sales, which were popular in 2021
and showed continued support in 2022 with over 86% having a positive opinion of the system:
Figure 6: Satisfaction with the online purchase experience
In 2022, though staff added 500 Weekday and 500 Season permits, customers proved to be eager
and skilled in the online system. The Season passes sold out within a day and the last Weekday
passes sold around the end of April. Since past years showed that approximately 20-30% of
permits were never picked up and staff wanted to give other customers a chance to boat, permits
that were unclaimed as of July 17 (150 season and 200 weekday) were offered for resale in
August.
For those that are not able to purchase a permit, partners Rocky Mountain Paddleboard offer boat
rentals to visitors without a yearlong commitment. By relying on a dedicated set of craft based
on site, staff can maximize ANS safety and water safety which allows users to enjoy boating
infrequently or join their friends and family that may have a small craft permit.
Daily visits for personal craft are not currently an option due to BRMP policy, created to ensure
all craft permitholders understood BPR’s ANS program.
Along with the increase in small craft boating, came sharp increases in operating expenses. Lake
Patrol hourly wages, which directly support safe enjoyment of boating, have increased
approximately 50% since 2020 to ensure positions are filled and operations can remain safe. Fuel
prices have also risen, along with other utilities that form the foundation of operations at the
Reservoir.
29
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 19__
In 2023, staff must balance the demand for permits, ANS security, water safety, a collaborative
relationship with partners, and operating costs
Data, Input, and Analysis
Weekday permits did provide some option for customers after the season permits sold out, but
many were still left frustrated. Staff report repeated conversations with visitors that desire to
purchase a season pass or day access, so this year’s questionnaire included several proposed
ways to meet demand while maintaining water safety and security against ANS.
As discussed above, daily permits for SWCs are not viable due to BRMP policy. The resale of
unclaimed permits also proved to be administratively infeasible, requiring an intense process
during the peak of the season.
Since unclaimed permits remained an issue, staff analyzed bundling a portion of the season SWC
permits with a Reservoir-only pass, discussed above, to ensure greater commitment by
purchasers and reduce those that might urgently buy a permit without fully intending to use it.
This would force visitors on Silver Sneakers, financial aid, or holding another systemwide access
pass to purchase a redundant pass and presents equity issues: if demand is tight and only the
bundles remained, the price barrier would prevent those with modest incomes from participating.
Staff also explored saving some permits to sell later on in the spring, but it doesn’t change the
fundamental imbalance of permits to demand: staff are still turning away the same number of
potential customers, and splitting up the sales just multiplies the administrative load for permit
sales.
The questionnaire to users indicated that selling more permits is the preferred solution to meet
small watercraft demand, followed by some form of daily/punch pass. To address some of the
demand while not compromising safety, the number of weekday permits can be increased. There
will not be an increase to number of season permits given the increased use from all watercraft
on weekends. Small craft are the biggest risk in weather events. Increasing use during times
when the water is already busy would increase the risk for small craft and the need for safety
services. While there are times when the water is quiet with a small number of craft on the
water, those times are mostly during the weekdays and times of day when weather is not
favorable to most types of recreational boating. In addition to the SWC permits sold to the
general public, the reservoir allots an additional ~350 SWC permits for user groups.
Based on use trends in 2022, maintaining the current level of smallcraft access on the weekends
and holidays will support a safe experience on the water for all during high use times
To support additional demand for small craft on weekends or other times, Rocky Mountain
Paddleboard (RMP) offers day-use rental options for visitors. Besides the exceptional year of
2020, Rocky Mountain Paddleboard has been able to provide a relatively consistent number of
rentals: Staff will continue to assess trends with small craft demand and RMP’s sales as the
impact from the pandemic wanes.
30
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 20__
Figure 7: Rocky Mountain Paddleboard rentals by year
Pricing for all permits
Recommendation for 2023
As explained in the Background section, operating costs have risen by over 55% in the last two
years. Boat permit costs should increase to maintain cost recovery while delivering consistent,
proportional pricing across all craft types. Proposed pricing is included in the table below.
For smallcraft, staff have determined that there can be an increase in weekday passes. BPR
would issue an additional 500 weekday permits for a total to 1,500, which along with the 1,700
season permits would bring the total to 3,200.
Figure 6: Permit sales including 2023 projection. Note that 2022 totals include the permits that were re-sold late in the summer.
Also, to encourage commitment by those purchasing a permit, staff propose issuing a small
number of Reservoir-only paper access vouchers to those that also purchase the new Reservoir-
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Annual Rentals by RMP
Total Customers
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
263 284 244 236 232 3208101110
1792 1700
2893 3200
Permits Sold by Year
Large Boat (incl. power and sail boats)Small Craft
31
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 21__
only pass early. If they purchase their boat permit and Reservoir-only pass by the end of
February, small craft boaters would be issued 3 "bring a guest” passes and large craft boaters
would receive 5. This offering will incentivize boaters to bring new customers to enjoy boating,
including renting from RMP, and add to the perceived value of the pass. The permits and
vouchers will have to be picked up by June 30 to reduce unclaimed permits and encourage
visitors to get out on the water. Any unused vouchers will expire at the end of 2022.
In light of rising costs, an increase to permit pricing across the board will allow boating to
achieve cost recovery. Staffing costs in particular have accelerated this year with Lake Patrol and
Boat Inspection staff expenses on track to finish the year 20% above last year (~$120,000, up
from $101,000 in 2021).
Besides the overall need to aim for full cost recovery, the permit price structure requires some
alignment: in 2021, large craft base permit prices were not modified but the historically-included
access passes and punches were removed. After the removal of access passes, the sailboat and
under-50 horsepower permits were left costing only $180 which placed them below the value
needed to cover lake patrol and boat inspection services. These permits will see a greater
increase in price to address compression issues compared to other permit price points and
achieve cost recovery.
In the end, the sailboat and under-50HP season passes will be increased by approximately 30%
(from $180 up to $250 for residents) while a more modest increase of 10% for the other permit
classes will provide the needed cost recovery. Staff propose the following boat permit prices for
2023:
Permit Type and Price for 2023
Approximate %
increase from 2022*
Resident
2023
Non-Resident
2023
Powerboat Permit: 50+HP Season 10% $580.00 $700.00
Powerboat Permit: 50+HP Weekday 10% $310.00 $370.00
Powerboat Permit: Under 50HP Season 30% $250.00 $300.00
Sailboat Permit: Season 30% $250.00 $300.00
Small Watercraft: Kayak/Canoe/SUP Season 10% $55.00 $65.00
Small Watercraft: Kayak/Canoe/SUP Weekday 10% $35.00 $40.00
*Permit prices have been rounded to the nearest $5 or $10 to make the prices easy to parse.
Additional Proposed Adjustments
Staff propose two other operational adjustments to better align lake use and the seasonal
calendar:
1. Extending flank season to April 1 and October 31 to align with weather and potential
usage – total fee season would now be 7 months. The proposed Reservoir-only pass
would cover this entire 7 month season.
2.During Flank season, no-wake times should be adjusted to align with the facility hours to
ensure the same balance of shared lake and no-wake times. In 2022, the No-Wake hours
were effectively reduced as facility hours were reduced in the flank seasons. There are 16
32
AGENDA ITEM VI-A_ PAGE 22__
no-wake hours per week out of 105 in high Season but only 5 out of 70 during flank
seasons in 2022. To improve this and in 2023, BPR will increase no wake hours in flank
season to 11 hours thus maintaining the 15% of total lake time. The proportion between
shared lake and no-wake time will remain consistent throughout the fee seasons.
QUESTIONS FOR PRAB:
1.Does the PRAB support the proposed operational updates to the five topics discussed?
a.Continue to bring Storage pricing closer to market rate
b.Sustainability: incentivize bike/ped, carpooling
c.Offering Reservoir Only pass option
d.Water Craft Permits: increase of supply and price, discount when also purchasing
access
2. Does the board have any other questions or additional feedback on proposed reservoir
operations for 2023?
Next Steps
The PRAB’s input will inform the 2023 Reservoir Operations Plan. A final update in December
will include confirmation of adjustments. These adjustments will be communicated to
stakeholders and the community via email lists, the website, and through interactions with staff
so that the community is prepared for permit sales in January 2023.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: North Shore Questionnaire Summary
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
33
Attachment A: Fall 2022 Visitor Use Questionnaire Summary Coot Lake and Boulder
Reservoir North Shore
Overview
Natural Resources staff conducted a visitor use questionnaire at Coot Lake and the North Shore
of the Boulder Reservoir from October 7th-23rd 2022, corresponding to the Boulder Reservoir
After Action survey. Visitors to the area were encouraged to participate in the questionnaire
though on-site signage and in-person contacts with staff and volunteers. This was a voluntary
questionnaire with self-selected respondents, not a statistically valid survey.
Summary of Responses
Over the questionnaire period, 172 responses were recorded. The majority of respondents live
within Boulder County and living within the city of Boulder being the second largest group of
respondents (Figure 1).
Almost 75% of respondents indicated that they frequently visit the North Shore or Coot Lake,
either 2+ times per week or 2-4 times per month, 48% and 26%, respectively. The more
respondents (45%) indicated that they visited the loop trail around Coot Lake during their visit.
Visiting the Boulder Reservoir or Coot Lake shorelines or the loop around the Boulder Reservoir
were less popular places to visit at 17%, 13%, and 13%, respectively.
The top three reasons visitors came to the North Shore and Coot Lake were to be with their
dog(s), enjoy nature, and exercise. While visiting, most respondents did not indicate
dissatisfaction or conflict with a number of potential issues, including but not limited to safety
concerns, trail maintenance, or conflicts with other visitors or dogs. For the few that did
experience conflicts (less than 10% of respondents), those issues were most commonly around
restroom issues and dog waste.
Next Steps
This was the first time a questionnaire of this type was conducted with visitors to the North
Shore and Coot Lake. Natural Resources staff intend to continue this questionnaire at different
Figure 1. Respondents' place of residence
Attachment A: North Shore Questionnaire Summary
34
times of year to capture different visitor groups, as well as create longitudinal data over time.
These data will improve understanding of how visitors use the site and what their needs are to
direct management decisions. Over time, these data could help shape signage improvements, trail
maintenance, rule changes, and decisions about existing or future infrastructure.
Attachment A: North Shore Questionnaire Summary
35
Report for 2022 Boulder Reservoir
Annual AAR
Completion Rate:68.4%
Complete 552
Partial 255
Totals: 807
Response Counts
Which stakeholder group(s) do you identify with? (select all that apply)PercentBoater/PaddlerMemberof usergroup(camps,open-waterswimming,rowing,sailing,etc.)Eventattendee(picnic,competition,Dash ‘nDine)Generaluser(jogger,swimmer,dog-walker,swimbeachattendee)Pass-throughuser(biking orjoggingthrough,not payingentrancefee)Neighborliving inValhalla orWaterstoneand/orotherReservoirNeighborCommunityMember(anyresident ofBoulder orsurroundingareas)0
25
50
75
1
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
36
Value Percent Responses
Boater/Paddler 74.1%441
Member of user group (camps, open-water swimming, rowing, sailing,
etc.)
24.5%146
Event attendee (picnic, competition, Dash ‘n Dine)13.6%81
General user (jogger, swimmer, dog-walker, swim beach attendee)35.3%210
Pass-through user (biking or jogging through, not paying entrance fee)15.3%91
Neighbor living in Valhalla or Waterstone and/or other Reservoir
Neighbor
5.4%32
Community Member (any resident of Boulder or surrounding areas)34.3%204
About how many times did you visit the Boulder Reservoir this year?Count0 1-3 4-6 7-10 11+
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
37
Value Percent Responses
0 4.5%27
1-3 17.7%105
4-6 19.9%118
7-10 20.2%120
11+37.7%224
Totals: 594
During which timeframe(s) did you visit the Reservoir most frequently? (Select
all that apply)PercentJan 1 -
Apr 14
Apr 15 -
May 27
(day
before
Memorial
Day
weekend)
May 28 -
Sep 5
(Memorial
Day
weekend
through
Labor
Day)
Sep 6 -
Oct 15
(day after
Labor Day
to end of
season)
Oct 16 –
Dec 31
0
100
25
50
75
Value Percent Responses
Jan 1 - Apr 14 10.3%59
Apr 15 - May 27 (day before Memorial Day weekend)29.4%168
May 28 - Sep 5 (Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day)91.2%521
Sep 6 - Oct 15 (day after Labor Day to end of season)39.8%227
Oct 16 – Dec 31 12.8%73
3
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
38
If you didn't visit the Reservoir, why?Check all that apply:PercentCost Availability
of free
time
Hours of
operation
Rules and
regulations
Other -
Write In
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Value Percent Responses
Cost 37.0%10
Availability of free time 22.2%6
Hours of operation 18.5%5
Rules and regulations 33.3%9
Other - Write In 66.7%18
How do you get your information about the Reservoir? (Select all that apply)
4
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
39
PercentEmail list Website Social
media
Calling the
Reservoir:
Informational
recordings
Call the
Reservoir:
Talking to
staff
Other -
Write In
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Value Percent Responses
Email list 62.3%358
Website 56.2%323
Social media 11.0%63
Calling the Reservoir: Informational recordings 3.8%22
Call the Reservoir: Talking to staff 16.5%95
Other - Write In 7.7%44
What activities did you do at the Reservoir?
5
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
40
PercentBikingCamps orclassesDogwalkingEvents orPicnicsFishingPersonalsmall craft(paddleboard,kayak,etc.)PowerboatingSailingSwimmingVisitingNorthShore/CootLakeOther -Write In0
20
40
60
80
Value Percent Responses
Biking 18.8%105
Camps or classes 5.2%29
Dog walking 17.2%96
Events or Picnics 17.7%99
Fishing 3.4%19
Personal small craft (paddleboard, kayak, etc.)64.9%362
Power boating 21.5%120
Sailing 4.3%24
Swimming 28.5%159
Visiting North Shore/Coot Lake 20.3%113
Other - Write In 18.3%102
How would you rate your overall experience at the Boulder Reservoir this
year?
6
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
41
Percent1 - Very
negative
2 -
Somewhat
negative
3 - Slightly
negative
4 - Slightly
positive
5 -
Somewhat
positive
6 - Very
positive
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Value Percent Responses
1 - Very negative 5.2%29
2 - Somewhat negative 7.6%43
3 - Slightly negative 11.4%64
4 - Slightly positive 13.5%76
5 - Somewhat positive 30.2%170
6 - Very positive 32.1%181
Totals: 563
Did you use the Main Building?
7
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
42
36% Yes
64% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 35.9%207
No 64.1%369
Totals: 576
What was your experience with the Main Building amenities?
8
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
43
1 - Very
negative
2 -
Somewhat
negative
3 -
Slightly
negative
4 -
Slightly
positive
5 -
Somewhat
positive
6 -
Very
positive
N/A -
Didn't
use Responses
Food
Vendor
Count
Row %
5
2.5%
5
2.5%
8
3.9%
18
8.9%
34
16.7%
49
24.1%
84
41.4%
203
Patio
Count
Row %
1
0.5%
1
0.5%
4
2.0%
16
8.0%
41
20.4%
76
37.8%
62
30.8%
201
General
Locker
Rooms
Count
Row %
2
1.0%
2
1.0%
4
2.0%
11
5.5%
39
19.6%
84
42.2%
57
28.6%
199
Family/ADA
Locker
Rooms
Count
Row %
2
1.0%
1
0.5%
0
0.0%
6
3.0%
16
8.1%
32
16.2%
141
71.2%
198
Lockers
Count
Row %
1
0.5%
1
0.5%
2
1.0%
9
4.5%
17
8.5%
26
13.1%
143
71.9%
199
Outdoor
Showers
Count
Row %
1
0.5%
2
1.0%
2
1.0%
4
2.0%
14
7.1%
46
23.2%
129
65.2%
198
Totals
Total
Responses
203
When using the swim beach and swim area, did you feel safe in the water?
9
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
44
94% Yes
6% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 94.3%149
No 5.7%9
Totals: 158
If not, why?
waterbacteria
dirty areagoose
levels poopqualityswim
boats
coli
concerns
crowded crowds
due
families
feel
finehard
high
kids
multiple overgrowth
people
poor
Was the signage helpful?
10
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
45
87% Yes
13% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 86.6%465
No 13.4%72
Totals: 537
If not, why?
signagesignsyears0areas
clear
covemarked
neededremember
res allowingapparently
area bigbigger
bouys
buoys
cattle
closedconfusing
confusion
consistant
desk
developed
11
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
46
Did you visit the Reservoir during the twilight hours (after 5 p.m.) because of
the discounted entry rate?
10% Yes
43% No, I did visit during that time
period but the discount was not a
factor.
47% I did not visit during the
twilight hours
Value Percent Responses
Yes 9.8%55
No, I did visit during that time period but the discount was not a
factor.
43.1%243
I did not visit during the twilight hours 47.2%266
Totals: 564
Did you carpool to the Reservoir or visit on foot, bike, or other sustainable
vehicle?
12
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
47
52% Yes48% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 51.8%292
No 48.2%272
Totals: 564
Did the 25% sustainability discount on daily entry fees impact your decision to
do so?
13
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
48
12% Yes
88% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 11.8%34
No 88.2%254
Totals: 288
How satisfied did you feel with the value of the entrance fee?
17% Very Dissatisfied
14% Somewhat Dissatisfied
16% Slightly Dissatisfied
20% Slightly Satisfied
19% Somewhat Satisfied
14% Very Satisfied
14
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
49
Value Percent Responses
Very Dissatisfied 17.0%39
Somewhat Dissatisfied 14.0%32
Slightly Dissatisfied 16.2%37
Slightly Satisfied 20.1%46
Somewhat Satisfied 19.2%44
Very Satisfied 13.5%31
Totals: 229
Where do you typically enter the Reservoir, and which entrance method/pass
do you use? (Select all that apply)PercentFront Gate –
Daily entry fees
Front Gate –
Punch pass
Front Gate –
Monthly,
Summer Fun, 6
month or
annual pass
Front Gate –
Silver
Sneakers,
Renew Active,
or Silver & Fit
Front Gate –
pass-through
(no fee paid)
Dam Gate (east
side of park)
North Shore
Trailheads
(Coot Lake,
55th Street,
Tom Watson
Park)
0
10
20
30
40
50
15
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
50
Value Percent Responses
Front Gate – Daily entry fees 41.3%234
Front Gate – Punch pass 15.2%86
Front Gate – Monthly, Summer Fun, 6 month or annual pass 31.2%177
Front Gate – Silver Sneakers, Renew Active, or Silver & Fit 13.6%77
Front Gate – pass-through (no fee paid)9.9%56
Dam Gate (east side of park)5.6%32
North Shore Trailheads (Coot Lake, 55th Street, Tom Watson Park)20.1%114
Did you visit the Reservoir during the Flank Season (April 15 to May 27 or Sept.
6 to Oct. 15) because of the discounted entry rate?
32% Yes
68% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 32.3%80
No 67.7%168
Totals: 248
16
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
51
Demand for small craft permits exceeded supply in 2022. Which of the
following would you support to address this demand? (Select all that apply)PercentSell a
portion of
the small
craft
permits
bundled
with a
Reservoir-
only entry
pass
Issue
some
additional
small craft
permits in
the Fall
(after
Labor
Day)
No
change,
continue
to open all
sales in
February,
buy any
access
separately
Other -
Write In
0
10
20
30
40
Value Percent Responses
Sell a portion of the small craft permits bundled with a Reservoir-only
entry pass
26.2%93
Issue some additional small craft permits in the Fall (after Labor Day)28.7%102
No change, continue to open all sales in February, buy any access
separately
36.9%131
Other - Write In 37.5%133
If you boated with a boat permit in 2022, did you purchase it after August 1?
17
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
52
4% After August 1
89% Earlier in the year
6% N/A - I rented a small craft
Value Percent Responses
After August 1 4.4%16
Earlier in the year 89.2%323
N/A - I rented a small craft 6.4%23
Totals: 362
Would you prefer to access the Reservoir using:
18
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
53
29% A systemwide pass/punches
(would include outdoor pools,
recreation centers, Reservoir, etc.)
12% An "outdoor facility"
pass/punches (would include
outdoor pools and Reservoir)
46% A Reservoir-only
pass/punches
13% Daily gate fees
Value Percent Responses
A systemwide pass/punches (would include outdoor pools, recreation
centers, Reservoir, etc.)
29.0%96
An "outdoor facility" pass/punches (would include outdoor pools and
Reservoir)
12.1%40
A Reservoir-only pass/punches 45.9%152
Daily gate fees 13.0%43
Totals: 331
With your pass, did you visit any other Boulder Parks & Recreation facilities?
(check all that apply)
19
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
54
PercentYes,
outdoor
pools
(Scott
Carpenter)
Yes,
Recreation/Community
Centers
(North,
East, or
South)
No, just
the
Reservoir
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Value Percent Responses
Yes, outdoor pools (Scott Carpenter)36.9%65
Yes, Recreation/Community Centers (North, East, or South)35.2%62
No, just the Reservoir 50.6%89
Did the pass feel like a good value?
67% Yes
33% No
20
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
55
Value Percent Responses
Yes 66.9%115
No 33.1%57
Totals: 172
Why or why not?
passexpensiveaccessfacilities
hours
reservoir
boat
family
paylot
rowing
summer
good
seasontimespool pricerec
carpenter
center
cost
feeotherscott
early
Did you do any boating at the Reservoir in 2022? If so, did you purchase a boat
permit? (select all that apply)If you would like to be notified about boat permit
sales, click here! (The link will open in a new window)
21
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
56
PercentYes, I bought a
Large Craft
permit (sail, 1-
49hp, 50+hp)
Yes, I bought a
Small Craft
permit (Stand
up paddle
board, kayak,
wind surfer,
canoe etc...)
Yes, I rented
from Rocky
Mountain
Paddleboard
I participated in
a camp or class
that involved
boating
I went boating
with a friend
who had a
permit
No, I did not do
any boating at
the Reservoir
this year
I didn't
purchase a
permit in 2022
but would like
to in 2023.
0
20
40
60
Value Percent Responses
Yes, I bought a Large Craft permit (sail, 1-49hp, 50+hp)15.9%91
Yes, I bought a Small Craft permit (Stand up paddle board, kayak, wind
surfer, canoe etc...)
53.5%306
Yes, I rented from Rocky Mountain Paddleboard 5.4%31
I participated in a camp or class that involved boating 8.0%46
I went boating with a friend who had a permit 7.2%41
No, I did not do any boating at the Reservoir this year 19.9%114
I didn't purchase a permit in 2022 but would like to in 2023.4.5%26
Did the cost to store at the Reservoir impact your decision to store it here or
elsewhere?
22
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
57
20% Yes
80% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 20.2%65
No 79.8%257
Totals: 322
Are you signed up for the Reservoir email list to receive updates and
notifications?If you aren’t but would like to be, click here! (The link will open in
a new window)
23
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
58
73% Yes
27% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 72.7%420
No 27.3%158
Totals: 578
Management reviews safety concerns annually given the increased demand of
small watercraft and power boats on the Reservoir. Which of the statements
below would you agree with regarding "No Wake" hours during the flank
seasons (April 15 to May 27, Sept. 6 to Oct. 15)?
24
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
59
41% There should be MORE "No
Wake" hours during the flank
seasons
44% I like the balance of hours
during the flank seasons now
16% There should be FEWER "No
Wake" hours during the flank
seasons
Value Percent Responses
There should be MORE "No Wake" hours during the flank seasons 40.6%144
I like the balance of hours during the flank seasons now 43.9%156
There should be FEWER "No Wake" hours during the flank seasons 15.5%55
Totals: 355
Since last year the Reservoir has been using an online system for purchasing
permits, entry memberships, and onsite storage as well as signing the permit
agreement. How did that system work for you?
25
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
60
Percent
1 - Very
negative
2 -
Somewhat
negative
3 - Slightly
negative
4 - Slightly
positive
5 -
Somewhat
positive
6 - Very
positive
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Value Percent Responses
1 - Very negative 3.8%13
2 - Somewhat negative 3.8%13
3 - Slightly negative 6.1%21
4 - Slightly positive 16.2%56
5 - Somewhat positive 31.0%107
6 - Very positive 39.1%135
Totals: 345
Are you familiar with the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) program at the
Boulder Reservoir?
26
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
61
92% Yes
9% No
Value Percent Responses
Yes 91.5%323
No 8.5%30
Totals: 353
What factors influenced your decision to purchase a permit(s) at the Reservoir
versus any other body of water? (select all that apply)
27
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
62
PercentSize ofReservoirAtmosphere/viewat theReservoirStaffingRestroomsConcessionsCost ofaccessper visitSafety onthe waterCost ofboatpermitAllowspowerboatsBoatstorageoptionsCost ofboatstorageLakesidefuelRampsMooringsDocksProximityto homeParkingavailabilityParkingproximityto theboatingarea0
100
25
50
75
28
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
63
Value Percent Responses
Size of Reservoir 25.7%90
Atmosphere/view at the Reservoir 35.7%125
Staffing 8.3%29
Restrooms 10.9%38
Concessions 2.9%10
Cost of access per visit 9.7%34
Safety on the water 10.6%37
Cost of boat permit 11.4%40
Allows power boats 14.9%52
Boat storage options 15.4%54
Cost of boat storage 5.7%20
Lakeside fuel 4.6%16
Ramps 9.7%34
Moorings 2.6%9
Docks 11.1%39
Proximity to home 94.6%331
Parking availability 18.9%66
Parking proximity to the boating area 23.1%81
29
Attachment B: Reservoir Questionnaire Report
64
3198 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80304 | www.boulderparks-rec.org | O: 303-413-7200
TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
FROM: Alison Rhodes, Director of Parks and Recreation
Bryan Beary, Senior Manager, Community Building + Partnerships
Mark Davison, Senior Manager, Planning
Regina Elsner, Senior Manager, Natural Lands
Jackson Hite, Senior Manager, Business Services
Megann Lohman, Senior Manager, Recreation
Stephanie Munro, Senior Manager, Regional Facilities
Scott Schuttenberg, Deputy Director
Dennis Warrington, Senior Manager, Urban Parks Manager
Doug Godfrey, Senior Landscape Architect
SUBJECT: Matters from the Department
DATE: November 28, 2022
A.December 12 Meeting. The citywide goal was to offer one hybrid format for 2022 board
meetings. The city has two conference rooms set aside for hybrid board and commission
meetings. Due to the date change of the December PRAB meeting and recent flooding at
a city facility, it is unknown as of this packet publication if one of these two spaces is
available. There is an alternate room available, however, it does not offer the functionality
of a boardroom/conference room. This room has relaxed lounge seating and cocktail tables
and chairs. Staff will provide an update at the November meeting.
B.Pleasant View Fields Access, Parking, and Improvements Feasibility Study
The purpose of this item is to provide an informational update to the PRAB on the
progress of the Pleasant View Fields Access and Parking Improvements Feasibility
Study. Through an in-depth analysis of the existing physical site conditions, current
programming and uses, and relevant plans and planning documents the feasibility study
will identify recommendations for physical improvements and access management
strategies to address access and parking at the Pleasant View facility.
The department has been working with the engineering consultant, Fox Tuttle
Transportation Group, in the development of the feasibility study. The phases of the
project include review of relevant planning documents and information that could
influence decisions, the analysis of the existing conditions at the facility, development of
the recommendations and strategies, preparing a detailed process and timeframe for
implementation, and developing a high-level estimate of cost. This information will be
65
3198 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80304 | www.boulderparks-rec.org | O: 303-413-7200
compiled into a final report. A draft of the report is anticipated to be available in
February of 2022 and final report in March of 2022.
At this point, the consultant team has completed a draft of the existing conditions for
review. Included in the existing conditions portion of the feasibility study includes the
following:
•An inventory of all existing access opportunities (i.e. multi-use paths, bike parking,
bus routes, on-site parking, adjacent public parking, etc.),
•Assessment of physical site conditions within and adjacent to the Pleasant View
facility; and
•Completing counts and other data gathering necessary to illustrate how users and
spectators arrive to, leave, and use the Pleasant View facility.
The existing conditions portion of the study will form the basis of understanding for how
current site functions may influence the development of recommendations and strategies.
Background
The Pleasant View field complex is categorized as a ‘premier’ rectangular field type
within the department’s athletic field classification system. Premier fields are normally
grouped in complexes and have higher quality surfaces than the city’s ‘general fields’,
which are usually stand-alone, serviceable fields. Pleasant View is one of the most
heavily used athletic field locations in the city and contains the biggest concentrations of
rectangular fields. The fields have been the location for National Irish Football, ultimate
frisbee and rugby tournaments and the annual Rocky Mountain Cup Showcase Youth
Soccer Tournament. The fields are abundant with youth and adult soccer leagues, camps
and tournaments during the spring, summer, and fall. Amenities include restrooms and
picnic tables.
The current plan for Pleasant View is based off a 1993 master plan. Most recently, in
2013, changes were made to the parking lot and sidewalks to address accessibility issues.
A shade shelter was also installed at this time.
As the facility has grown in popularity, participation has grown across user groups, and
as the configurations have adjusted to allow for more usage (e.g., smaller 8v8 youth
fields), vehicle parking has proved insufficient for the use. This has resulted in facility
users and event spectators frequently overwhelming parking in adjacent neighborhoods
throughout the spring, summer, and fall seasons. The city’s Planning and Development
Services and Transportation and Mobility departments have, in the recent past, been
approached by the community members and the HOA for the neighborhood.
66
3198 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80304 | www.boulderparks-rec.org | O: 303-413-7200
The 1993 Preliminary Master Plan for Pleasant View shows a total of 343 parking stalls
in the main parking area. Another 58 stalls were proposed along the north and south sides
of Kalmia. The plan also shows 78 in a potential future lot at the northwest edge of the
facility. This would total 479 stalls, at full build-out, the total parking. In this plan, 8
soccer fields, 4 warm-up areas, and rugby field were shown. The current Pleasant View
facility has a total of 416 parking stalls. Parking along Kalmia and the 78 stalls along the
northwest edge of the facility were never realized. Around 2017, a field reconfiguration
added 4, 7 v 7 fields (bringing the total to 12) to accommodate demand for more youth
soccer play. The 7 v 7 layout is in place for the spring season and the fields are
reconfigured for 7 v 7 and 8 v 8 play in the fall.
Existing Conditions Report
The existing conditions report has been prepared by reviewing existing site conditions, historic and current programmed events, facility usage data, previous plans and
documents, site and surrounding land uses and zoning, and on-site data gathering during events. A major component of the existing conditions report that will be used to guide the recommendations and strategies for the feasibility was the on-site collection of different types of multi-modal traffic data to better understand the access and parking
issues that exist at the PV Fields. Specifically, the on-site data gathering looked at parking lot utilization, off-site parking at adjacent neighborhoods and businesses,
1993 Preliminary Master Plan
67
3198 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80304 | www.boulderparks-rec.org | O: 303-413-7200
bicycle and pedestrian access to the site, and traffic conditions along Kalmia Avenue.
Fox Tuttle staff made collected data on Saturday, October 15, 2022 and Sunday, October
16, 2022. Saturday, October 15 was a very busy day with most fields in use. Sunday,
October 16 was a less busy day, with fewer fields in use. As part of preparing the existing conditions report, crash data from January 2017 through September 2022 was reviewed. Proposed plans for future multi-modal improvements along CO-119 and Boulder Transportation multi-use path improvements were also reviewed.
A full list of conclusions, based on the existing conditions can be found in Attachment
A – Draft Existing Conditions. Some conclusions include the following:
•There is adequate parking and reasonable access to the fields during weekdayactivities. Challenges with parking supply and reasonable access generallyoccur on the weekends and primarily on Saturdays.
•On busier weekend days, the current parking supply in the parking lot isinadequate for the number of motor vehicles arriving. This results incongestion within the parking lot and potential conflict and frustrationbetween drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians.
•This situation in the bullet point above is exacerbated at times when gamesstart or end and large numbers of pedestrians enter the parking lot and arealso in conflict with drivers maneuvering for a parking space.
•In general, there are good bicycle and pedestrian facilities allowing access tothe PV Fields. Limiting access to the PV Fields to the east entrance requiresconsiderable out of direction travel for people traveling from the west as wellas unnecessary conflict between path users and people using the pickup/dropoff area in the parking lot.
•The primary facility missing for complete bicycle and pedestrian access to thePV Fields are bicycle facilities on Kalmia Avenue, as the bike lanes end at Island Drive.
•While some event related parking was found in adjacent neighborhoods, theamount was small with most occurring in areas closest to the fields.
•Illegal parking along Kalmia and in adjacent business was occurring.
Proposed CO-119 Improvements Proposed M/U Path Improvements (Trans. Dept.)
68
3198 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80304 | www.boulderparks-rec.org | O: 303-413-7200
Next Steps
•November 2022: Finalize draft existing conditions
•December through January 2022: Prepare draft feasibility study
•February 2023: Discussion / Information item with PRAB to discuss draft
feasibility study
•March 2023: Final feasibility study completed
Questions for the PRAB
•Question for the PRAB:
i.What question(s) does the PRAB have about the data and conclusions in the
draft existing conditions report?
Attachment
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
69
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Fox Tuttle Transportation Group
1624 Market Street | Suite 202 | Denver, CO 80202
Phone: 303.652.3571 | www.FoxTuttle.com
Appendix A: DRAFT Pleasant View Fields Sports
Complex Existing Conditions Report
Introduction
The City of Boulder is an active and engaged community, enthusiastic about a myriad of sports
and recreational interests. Managed by Boulder Parks and Recreation department, Boulder
maintains two categories of public fields, “Recreational Fields,” and “Sports Complexes:”
•Recreational (satellite) fields are available for practices, games and/or special events; no
supervisor is required.
•Sports complexes are locked facilities that are for games, special events, and
tournaments.3
The Pleasant View Fields Sports Complex (the PV Fields), at 3805 47th Street, Boulder, CO
80301, fall under the second category. They have hosted National Irish Football, ultimate frisbee
and rugby tournaments, and the annual Rocky Mountain Cup Showcase Youth Soccer
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
70
2
Tournament. The fields are often occupied with youth and adult soccer leagues, camps and
tournaments during the spring, summer and fall.3
As the facility has grown in popularity, participation has grown across user groups, and as the
configurations have adjusted to allow for more usage (e.g. smaller 8v8 youth fields), vehicle
parking has proved insufficient for the use. This has resulted in facility users and event
spectators frequently overwhelming parking in adjacent neighborhoods throughout the spring,
summer, and fall seasons.3 Some of this off-site access has involved illegal parking.
The City of Boulder hired Fox Tuttle Transportation Group (Fox Tuttle) to provide an Access,
Parking, and Improvements Study. The goals of this study are to identify access and parking
issues associated with the PV Fields and to develop strategies to creatively address these
challenges through physical improvements and access management. Fox Tuttle will be working
with City of Boulder officials and The Sanitas Group to complete this study.3
Background
The PV Fields has been providing sports fields for recreational use in the City of Boulder for
many decades.
Previous studies of the PV fields include:
•October 2008 - East Boulder Community Park Traffic Study
•September 2015 - Boulder Parks and Recreation Department Athletic Field Study
•November 2010 - Boulder Recreation Facility Transportation Access Study
According to Boulder City Staff, the following improvements have been made:
•In early 2013, work was completed associated with the 2011 Capital Improvement Bond.
Work included addressing ADA issues with the accessible parking stalls, ADA issues
with existing walk that goes out to a new shelter that was installed south of the rugby
field.
•Policies and procedures have been updated since the 2015 Boulder Parks and
Recreation Department Athletic Field Study, with the primary focus on the creation of
guidelines for space allocation, a more seasonal focused booking and billing cycle, and
a shift to online requests.
•Boulder Parks and Rec (BPR) and Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) developed a
new joint use agreement. To date, the BVSD has not needed rectangular fields to date.
However, when the PV fields are fully booked, BPR has referred groups looking to rent
space to BVSD. In 2021, three groups were referred to BVSD.
•In 2015 / 2016, additional bicycle parking was added.
•Around 2017, there was a field reconfiguration. Four “7v7” fields were added (fields 5
and 6) to the standard field layout to help meet the demand for youth soccer play.
The current layout of the turf fields are changed between spring and fall and again over the
winter. The fall layout accommodates additional “8v8” youth fields.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
71
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Fox Tuttle Transportation Group
1624 Market Street | Suite 202 | Denver, CO 80202
Phone: 303.652.3571 | www.FoxTuttle.com
Spring Field Layout3 Fall Fields Layout3
The current amenities of the PV Fields include:3
•Multi-use Field
•Soccer Field
•Restroom
•Picnic Area
Primary use of the PV Fields is for soccer practice, league games, and tournaments. It is also
utilized for ultimate frisbee and rugby. The PV fields are occasionally utilized as part of special
community events such as the Boulderthon.
While the majority of the currently scheduled events are youth-focused, the fields are used by
adult, teen, and youth-leagues:
•Adult: 19 years old and up
•Teen: 14-18 years old
•Youth: 13 years old and younger
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
72
4
Schedule of Events
Based on user-reported field demand information, fields are utilized by leagues year-round. 1
A review of the scheduled events from August 2022 through October 2022 reveals very high
usage of the PV fields.
•Every day during this time frame had events scheduled.
•During the week, afternoon to evening events were consistently booked from 4:00 PM
–8:30 PM.
o Mondays through Thursdays, 13 of the 13 available fields (100%) in the Fall
Fields Layout were consistently booked, mainly for training.
o Fridays, 11 of the 13 available fields (84.6%) in the Fall Fields Layout were
consistently booked, mainly for games.
•On the weekends, all day events were consistently booked from 8:00 AM – 8:00 PM.
o Saturdays, 12 of the 12 available fields (100%, with field 1A and 1B combined)
in the Fall Fields Layout were consistently booked, mainly for games.
o Sundays, 11 of the 12 available fields (91.6%, with field 1A and 1B combined) in
the Fall Fields Layout were consistently booked, mainly for games.
•Soccer league activities account for 53.6% of the total events, utilizing the fields 7 days
a week.
o Nearly half (47%) the total events were booked by one soccer league, which
hosts youth and teen training and games 6 days per week.
o Adult soccer leagues account for 6.5% of the total events, utilizing the fields 2
days per week.
•Ultimate Frisbee activities account for 18.8% of the total events, utilizing the fields 1
day per week.
•Rugby activities account for 0.03% of the total events, utilizing the fields 1 day per
week.
The fields are periodically reserved for special events. For example, typically there is a Labor
Day Tournament. Another example is the Boulderthon Half-Marathon and Full-Marathon.6
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
73
5
Event Fees
Event fees are as follows: 3
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
74
6
Multi‐modal Transportation Access:
Access to the PV Fields
Note: The PV Fields are typically fenced off completely, with the only entrance to the fields
being by the concrete plaza on the east side of the site. An additional gate along the southern
frontage adjacent to Kalmia Avenue is sometimes open for pedestrian access.
Vehicular Access
There is one driveway for the PV Fields parking lot, off of 47th Street. This section of 47th Street
can be accessed from Independence Road and the Diagonal Highway to the south and Jay
Road to the north. Kalmia Avenue borders the south side of the site, but there is no vehicular
access into the parking lot. On‐street parking is prohibited on both sides of Kalmia Avenue,
adjacent to the fields. Palo Parkway, within the neighborhood of Palo Park, terminates at the
northwest corner of the PV Fields, and there is no vehicular connection to the east. However, a
multi-use path connects the east end of Palo Parkway to the PV Fields parking lot.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Access
There are several completed or partially completed pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the area
of the PV Fields which can be used to access the site. A concrete multi-use path rings most of
the site, including the entire west and north sides of the site, and much of east side (interrupted
only by the parking lot). A gravel pathway exists on the entire south side of the site.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
75
7
Pedestrian and bicycle paths from Palo Central Park, Elks Park, and surrounding
neighborhoods can be utilized to access the PV Fields. On-street bike lanes on 47th Street
connect the PV Fields to Jay Road and the Diagonal Highway. Palo Parkway is a neighborhood
bikeway west of the fields and transitions to conventional bike lanes at 30th Street. Kalmia
Avenue has bike lanes for a portion of the corridor but does not have bike facilities from Island
Drive east to the PV Fields. The City of Boulder’s Low Stress Walk and Bike Network identifies
on-street bike lanes (preferably buffered) as the appropriate bike facility on Kalmia Avenue, but
these improvements are not scheduled at this time. The Iris path connects the PV Fields parking
lot to Kalmia Avenue on the south. Off‐street bicyclists can access the facility from the Four Mile
Creek multi‐use path, which passes through the north end of the complex and provides a link
between the Diagonal Highway and neighborhoods and facilities to the west.
Transit
According to the City of Boulder Transportation department, current ridership trends are
generally about 65% of 2019 counts (pre-COVID-19). However, even before the reduced
service effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were no RTD bus routes on the local
roadways in the PV Fields area, and the regional buses on the Diagonal Highway do not have
any stops that are convenient to the Pleasant View site.2
Currently, there are 5 active RTD bus stops listed within 0.5 miles of the PV Fields.7
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
76
8
1)The closest RTD bus stop is 0.57 miles away from the entrance to the complex:
o Stop Number 17993: BOLT route northbound, stops at State Hwy 119 & 47th St
7 (northbound on the Hwy 119, just east of Foothills Pkwy and 47th St).
This is still a 0.37 mile walk to the road entrance for the complex, and an
additional 0.2 miles to the entrance of the complex.5
o The frequency of this stop is:8
Northbound:
•Mondays – Fridays:
o every 30 min from approximately 6:55 AM to 9:55 AM
o every 60 min from approximately 9:55 AM to 1:55 PM
o every 30 min from approximately 1:55 PM to 7:55 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:55 PM to 12:55 AM
•Saturdays:
o every 60 min from approximately 7:55 AM to 12:55 AM
•Sundays / Holidays:
o every 60 min from approximately 6:45 AM to 11:45 PM
o In 2019, ridership was: 13 average daily boardings, and 6 average daily alightings.
*Note: Stop Number 25113: BOLT route, southbound stop, formerly at Hwy 119 &
Foothills Parkway (southbound on the south exit ramp), is currently inactive. RTD has
closed this stop due to safety considerations.
o The City of Boulder is exploring options to address the safety fixes through a TIP 3
project, which would include an upgrade for CO 119 BRT service, at both the
northbound and southbound stops.
o In 2019, ridership was: 4 average daily boardings, and 18 average daily alightings.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
77
9
2) & 3) The second and third closest RTD bus stops (eastbound and westbound) are 0.7
miles away from the entrance to the complex:
•Stop Number 19828 (eastbound) and 21023 (westbound): BOLT route stops at Hwy
119 & 34th St.7
o This is still a 0.5 mile walk to the road entrance for the complex, and an
additional 0.2 miles to the entrance of the complex.5
•The frequency of these stops are:8
o Eastbound:
•Mondays – Fridays:
o every 30 min from approximately 6:50 AM to 9:50 AM
o every 60 min from approximately 9:50 AM to 1:50 PM
o every 30 min from approximately 1:50 PM to 7:50 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:50 PM to 12:50 AM
•Saturdays:
o every 60 min from approximately 7:50 AM to 12:50 AM
•Sundays / Holidays:
o every 60 min from approximately 6:40 AM to 11:40 PM
o Westbound:
•Mondays – Fridays:
o every 60 min from approximately 5:30 AM to 6:30 AM
o every 30 min from approximately 6:30 AM to 11:00 AM
o every 60 min from approximately 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM
o every 30 min from approximately 4:00 PM to 8:00 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 8:00 PM to 12:00 AM
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
78
10
•Saturdays:
o every 60 min from approximately 7:00 AM to 12:00 AM
•Sundays / Holidays:
o every 60 min from approximately 8:00 AM to 12:00 AM
•In 2019, ridership was:
o Eastbound: 3 average daily boardings, and 4 average daily alightings.
o Westbound: 4 average daily boardings, 4 average daily alightings.
4) & 5) The fourth and fifth closest RTD stops (east-bound and west-bound) are 0.7 miles
away from the entrance to the complex:
•Stop Number 25673 (eastbound) and 25663 (westbound): RTD route 205 stops at
Jay Rd & 47th St.7
o This is still a 0.5 mile walk to the road entrance for the complex, and an
additional 0.2 miles to the entrance of the complex.5
•The frequency of these stops are:8
o Eastbound:
•Mondays – Fridays:
o every 30 min from approximately 6:20 AM to 7:20 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:20 PM to 9:20 PM
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
79
11
•Saturdays:
o every 30 min from approximately 7:50 AM to 7:20 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:20 PM to 9:20 PM
•Sundays / Holidays:
o every 60 min from approximately 7:20 AM to 11:20 AM
o every 30 min from approximately 11:20 AM to 7:20 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:20 PM to 9:20 PM
o Westbound:
•Mondays – Fridays:
o every 30 min from approximately 6:00 AM to 7:30 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:30 PM to 9:30 PM
•Saturdays:
o every 30 min from approximately 7:30 AM to 7:30 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:30 PM to 9:30 PM
•Sundays / Holidays:
o every 60 min from approximately 7:30 AM to 11:30 AM
o every 30 min from approximately 11:30 AM to 7:30 PM
o every 60 min from approximately 7:30 PM to 9:30 PM
•In 2019, ridership was:
o Eastbound: 1 average daily boardings, and 3 average daily alightings.
o Westbound: 4 average daily boardings, and 1 average daily alightings.
Automobile Parking
Automobile Parking: The parking lot at The PV Fields has 416 parking spaces, including 12
handicapped parking places. When entering the parking lot, from 47th Street, drivers can turn
left into the north end of the parking lot, or they continue along a drive aisle which includes a
pick up and drop off area approximately 220 feet long. Drivers exiting the parking lot have the
same two choices. All drive aisles in the parking lot are two-directional.
Parking Fees
According to Boulder City Staff, parking fees are not currently utilized.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
80
12
Bicycle Parking
There are 3 areas of bicycle parking
near the entrance to the PV Fields.
North of the pickup/drop off area there
are 3 wave-style bicycle parking racks
with a parking capacity of 13 bikes for
each rack. South of the entrance to
the PV fields there is one wave-style
bike rack (same capacity) and internal
to the concrete plaza there are 11
inverted U racks with a capacity of 22 bikes. Collectively, these 3 areas provide a maximum
bike parking capacity of 74 bikes. This bicycle parking is important for local access to the PV
Fields and is consistent with the City’s goals for multi-modal access to its facilities and use
during local team practice sessions. However, it should be noted that the majority of
tournaments and league games that are held at the PV Fields are regional events, with
participants coming from various locations across the front range, such as Fort Collins or
Colorado Springs. It is impractical for most of these individuals to access the site by bicycle for
these events.
User Feedback Regarding Parking
Fox Tuttle sought to obtain user feedback about parking and access by reviewing comments
about the PV Fields on Google Maps.
Although the fields themselves are generally in excellent condition, and indeed have won
awards for sports turf professionals,3 users do express frustration regarding parking and access
to the site, especially in conjunction with tournaments and ADA accessibility. Multiple
suggestions are offered, and bicycle use is mentioned as well. There are positive comments
about the parking, which do not include mention of tournaments. The outpouring of comments
supports the need for improvement to parking and access for the PV Fields.
As of October 2022, Google Maps housed 304 total comments, dating back to 2015 for the PV
Fields. The most commented upon category was parking; 61 comments referenced parking, and
6 comments referenced parking tickets. Only three comments indicated a positive outlook on
parking. A sampling of the reviews containing comments about parking include the following
posted comments:5
Parking comments related to tournaments / multiple games:
•Updated review. It's been 5 years since first posting and there has been no improvement to
the parking situation. It's a joke for that reason alone.. Boulder needs to do something about
parking...
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
81
13
•Fields are nice but parking is a bear! There is not nearly enough spots for the tournament's
they host!
•Parking was horrible. Having a large tournament here, there were no spots left and everyone
had to be creative in surrounding areas.
•Rediculous that they have large tourneys here. There is no where near enough parking. There
is a neighborhood to the west, which is closer to some of the fields, but I've never seen that
gate open/unlocked. At the very least, they need to have an off-site parking option with a
shuttle. Even arriving early doesn't guaranteea spot, unless you're the first game or in the
finals.
•The parking situation ruins everything about this complex. If we have to have a game at this
complex again. My kid will just have to miss that game. Will not return.
•Fields are nice but parking is miserable and frustrating. There is no where nearby and this
facility isn't designed to accommodate the number of people they're planning for these
fields. Get ready to park along the highway or miss your kids game while you troll for a spot.
Get rid of a field and make another parking lot.
•The only thing this place could use is more parking. With so many fields, no restrictions as
far as number of people that can attend the parking lot was packed. Outside of the parking
issue everything else was phenomenal!
•Parking can be tough if there is a large event.
•Parking can be hard to find sometimes, so plan on coming early if it's a busy day.
•Loose a star as parking is terrible. Stalls are really tight. Not nearly enough parking,
especially during tournaments.
•Parking is sometimes limited if large events are happening, you can park on Kalmia or at the
church parking lot if it's not Sunday.
•One of the most beautiful fields in Colorado with the worst parking ever. Not nearly big
enough and I have never seen lot attendants even at their tournaments.
•Worse parking ever. You're froced to either park illegally or walk over a mile which is
extremely unpleasant for a tournament in 90 degree heat.
•Good luck parking, and finding your field on a busy day. I'm fairly certain the field map
cartographer was a three-year-old with a limited concept of reality.
•The parking however is almost non-existent when the fields are hosting several teams. The
parking spaces themselves are small, so drive a smaller car if possible, and the likelihood of
actually getting a spot is pretty stacked against you (When there's several matches going
on). Hopefully there's a solution for the parking lot in future development.
•Parking is lacking and only can accommodate about 50% of a full tournament vehicle load.
Don't park on the weeds by the cemetery entrance you'll get ticketed, park at the church on
Sunday and you'll get ticketed. Boulder PD loves making revenue off of events so be careful.
•Parking is terrible and nothing is done to alleviate it on tournament days.
•Has about half the parking they need for the tournaments they hold here.
•Parking is horrendous! There is not nearly enough parking considering how many fields they
have with concurrent and overlapping game times. The lanes to get in and out are narrow
which makes it difficult to get in and out when people are lined up and not close enough to
one side to give you room to get through.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
82
14
•Great fields but parking is horrible if you don’t get a space in the main lot. If there’s a line of
traffic to get in, bypass the lot and park at the nearby school or church.
•There is not parking for the number of people trying to be there for soccer games. People
were getting tickets for parking on the streets. Watch out if you are going to a game there!
Parking comments related to ADA accessibility:
•Nice fields. Parking sucks. Big tourney's leave people driving around. Handicapped parking
being used by none handicapped people or at least the ones I saw did not have placards.
•Parking is always a big issue here. There is not nearly enough parking and police wait to
ticket people if you park in the wrong area, feels like a trap. Worst soccer field location of
anywhere in the area. Very difficult for handicapped family members to see games.
Parking Comments related to bicycles:
•Parking can be challenging if there are lots of games. I brought my bicycle since field is
surrounded by bike trails.
•My three major complaints are that it is frequently covered in goose poop, it has
inconvenient entrances and parking, and the bathrooms and water fountains are way too far
away half of the time. The parking is so poorly planed that it can be very confusing to a first
time visitor. There are two entrances, one in front of the parking lot (which is often crowded
by ice cream cones trucks) and one on the left side, if you are looking form the parking lot.
The one on the left side is locked half of the time and has no bike racks or anything. This
was the one that i would most frequently go through and it got rather annoying just throwing
my bike against the fence.
Positive parking comments:
•The parking can get really crowded on weekends but in general it's easy to park.
•You can only access it from the highway. There is plenty of parking and the field or nicely
tended.
•Tons of parking and a restroom at the entrance. Immaculate fields with a perfect view of the
Flatirons. There is virtually no shade except a pavilion in the center; there are some picnic
tables near the entrance, but not by the fields. No park/play structure for littles, just endless
perfect feilds.
General parking comments:
•Atrocious trying to get out of there on a Saturday. Had to jump the curb and drive down the
sidewalk with 40 other cars
•This field complex has the worst parking situation I've ever experienced. One entrance,
severely under needed parking capacity, nightmare. It took 20 minutes to get a space. 3X I
saw people screaming at each other when fighting for a spot.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
83
15
•The parking lot spaces are very tight. Be prepared for people to park in the fire lanes and
for.the lots to be a challenge to navigate.
•Great soccer complex but it is an absolute zoo with not enough parking and only one
entrance/exit.
•The only reason I don't give this place 5 stars is because of the parking. Parking is kind of a
nightmare. Both arriving and leaving can be a nightmare. Plan plenty of time to find a decent
spot.
•As others have stated, parking is atrocious.
•Absolutely beautiful fields, plan on getting there 20 mins early to find parking.
•Parking not great
•Great fields, challenging parking situation.
•The parking absolutely sucks. The lot directly next to the fields is very small forcing people
to drive to the other side and park in the neighborhood or the church. The city often doesn't
unlock the gates on the far side of the field forcing people too walk really far to enter the
fields.
•Zero parking or options to park. Police drive up and down ticketing. Prepare to walk a lot.
•Tons of parking and a restroom at the entrance.
•Very nice field, carpool if you can, never enough parking available.
•Great fields, not much parking.
•Gorgeous fields, once you get there... Parking situation is pretty bad so arrive early or be
prepared to hoof it a ways.
•Parking can be busy and difficult at best.
•Lots of "No Parking" signs surround the playing field. Organizers should plan better or work
with the city for alternates to parking tickets.
•Parking is terrible but the fields are great
•Not nearly enough parking, and getting to the parking lot is a pain.
•Nice field, needs more parking
•Terrible parking.. would have thought that Boulder might have fixed this issue by now!!
•Great fields, terrible parking
•Fields run across each other pretty confusing, parking lot is horrible.
•Parking is awful. Arrive 1 hour early to park
•Parking stinks, get there early or be prepared to walk
•Great fields, not nearly enough parking
•Nice view, parking is like Tetris
•Parking closed even though spots were open
•Great fields, bad parking.
•Awful awful awful parking situation.
•Worst parking at ANY COMPLEX IN COLORADO.
•Horrible parking
•Horrible finding a parking spot!
•Fix the parking and soggy fields!!
•Parking is a problem sometimes
•Parking is horrible
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
84
16
Future use growth projection
According to the 2015 Boulder Parks and Recreation Athletic Field Study, “Current growth
projections indicate that new rectangular and diamond fields will be necessary by 2030 to
maintain current levels of service.”1
Access and Parking Data Collection
Fox Tuttle has collected and evaluated several different types of multi-modal traffic data to
better understand the access and parking issues that exist at the PV Fields. Fox Tuttle staff
made visual observations during both of these days as well. Most of the data was obtained on
the weekend of October 15th and 16th which included a very busy Saturday with most fields in
use for most of the day, and a less busy Sunday with fewer fields in use, and access issues
observed. The following is a summary of the data collected and evaluated and the observations:
Parking Lot Utilization: Traffic counts were collected at the parking lot driveway which counted
motor vehicles entering and exiting the parking lot. On Saturday, October 15th, 2022, these
counts were taken from 7:30 AM to 8:30 PM. On Sunday, October 16th, 2022, counts were
taken from 8:30 AM to 5:30 PM. These counts represent motor vehicles accessing the pickup /
drop off aisle and drivers seeking to park in the lot. The utilization percentages noted below are
calculated by dividing the number of motor vehicles on-site by the number of parking spaces. An
industry standard for motor vehicle parking is that a parking area is perceived as “full” at
approximately 85% utilization. Note that while the majority of the vehicles counted at eh
driveway were parking in the parking lot, vehicles accessing the pickup/drop off aisle were also
observe and included in the counts.
On Saturday, over 2,000 vehicles entered the parking lot. At the start of the day the parking lot
was almost empty (3 cars present at 7:30 AM) but by 9:00 AM the parking lot utilization was
over 85% and remained that way until 3:00 PM. The data was collected in 15-minute bins.
There were 17 distinct 15-minute time periods in which there were more vehicles in the parking
lot than parking spaces (over 100% utilization). The peak occurred from 10:00 AM to 10:15 AM,
when there were over 500 vehicles in the parking lot (there are only 416 spaces). Graph 1
shows the profile of parking utilization in the PV Fields parking lot on Saturday, October 15th,
2022.
Fox Tuttle staff made observations of the PV Fields parking lot during these busier times on
Saturday. The combination of few parking spaces available, very congested drive aisles, and
traffic trying to travel in both directions collectively resulted in poor operations in the lot. These
concerns were exacerbated whenever a game would end, and dozens of pedestrians (including
many children) would enter the parking lot and be walking in the congested drive aisles to reach
their vehicles, often without parental supervision. The south end of the pick-up/drop-off aisle
next to the bathroom structure was particularly congested with vehicles accessing the curb
frontage, bypassing each other to gain access to the curb, vehicles u-turning to go back to the
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
85
17
driveway and being in conflict with other vehicles entering and exiting the area in both
directions. All of this motor vehicle conflict occurs at the location where the most pedestrians
are walking between the parking lot and the entrance onto the fields.
Graph 1 – Parking Utilization on Saturday, 10/15/2022
Photo of pedestrians exiting PV Fields into parking lot
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
86
18
The PV Fields parking lot conditions on Sunday were quite different. Approximately 550 vehicles
entered the parking lot on this day, during the time period studied. At 8:30 AM, there were 69
vehicles in the lot. The number of vehicles peaked between 10:30 AM and 10:45 AM, at 236
vehicles (57% utilization). Most times of the day, the parking utilization was less than 50%. Fox
Tuttle observed operations in the parking lot, and the lot appeared to be functioning well with
fewer potential conflicts than on Saturday. Graph 2 shows the profile of parking utilization in the
PV Fields parking lot on Sunday, October 16th, 2022.
Graph 2 – Parking Utilization on Sunday, 10/16/2022
Fox Tuttle staff also made several observations of parking and access of the PV Fields parking
lot during weekday evenings and observed that there was more than adequate parking for
demand at these times.
Off-Site Parking: Fox Tuttle sought to make observations and collect data which would identify
where additional PV Field related parking might be occurring off-site. The Palo Parkway
neighborhood to the west of the PV Fields, and the Calvary Bible Church embedded in that
neighborhood, are the most logical places for overflow parking to occur. Fox Tuttle also
observed neighborhood streets north of the East Palo Park, given their proximity to the Four
Mile Creek Path and the PV Fields. In total, there were 70 distinct parking zones studied.
Fox Tuttle calculated the available legal parking in the Calvary Bible Church parking lot and on
the neighborhood streets in the remaining parking zones. Parking utilization data was collected
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
87
19
every hour between 7:00 AM and 9:00 PM on Saturday, October 15th and between 8:00 AM and
6:00 PM on Sunday, October 16th. Exhibit 1 graphically shows the 70 distinct parking zones.
Exhibit 1 – Neighborhood Parking Zones Studied
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
88
20
When it was developed, the Palo Parkway neighborhood received on-site parking reductions
which reduced on-site parking availability. As a result, there are several parking zones in the
neighborhood which have high (greater than 85%) parking utilization throughout the day and
during the 8:00 PM to 9:00 PM time period, long after potential parking impacts from the PV
Fields. However, other parking zones in the neighborhood exhibit high parking utilization during
the day but lower utilization during the evening, indicating potential parking demand influence
from the PV Fields. Fox Tuttle also noted that some parking zones which had high utilization
were in locations further away from the PV Fields, with lower utilized zones between them and
the PV Fields, indicating that parking demand is likely from uses other than the PV Fields.
Zones highlighted in GREEN have less than 85% utilization throughout the weekend. Parking
zones which are highlighted in ORANGE have high parking utilization, but Fox Tuttle does not
think this is the result of parking demand for the PV Fields because: a) they have high
utilization even at times when the PV Fields are not creating demand, b) they are located further
away from the PV Fields and other parking zones closer don’t have high parking utilization, or c)
the parking zone is restricted to permit parking only. Parking zones highlighted in RED are
zones which have high parking utilization at times during the weekend and this may be a result
of parking demand for the PV Fields. While many of the parking zones close to the PV Fields
may have Field-related parking, most have a lower than 85% parking utilization. It should be
noted that there was very little on-street parking utilization on the neighborhood streets north of
East Palo Park, indicating it is unlikely that anyone is parking here to access the PV Fields.
The Calvary Bible Church is a large property embedded in the Palo Parkway neighborhood. It
has a parking lot with 380 parking spaces and is directly to the west of the PV Fields. Fox
Tuttle’s evaluation showed that on Saturday, October 15th, parking utilization was low in the
parking lot (less than 20% occupied at any time). However, observations by Fox Tuttle suggest
that the majority of vehicles that were parked in the church’s parking lot were doing so to access
the PV Fields. These vehicles were parked on the east end of the parking lot (closest to the PV
Fields), and drivers were observed leaving their vehicles and walking towards the fields. This
parking peaked during 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM, when there were 65 vehicles parked in the church’s
parking lot. On Sunday, October 16th, the church parking lot was busier, as a result of church
services occurring. Parking utilization peaked between 11:00 AM and Noon, when there were
196 vehicles parked in the parking lot.
Given the low demand for parking in the PV Fields parking lot on Sunday, one might conclude
that few of the vehicles parked in the church parking lot were associated with the PV Fields.
However, Fox Tuttle did correspond with the Boulder Police Department and confirmed that
officers are hired by the Calvary Bible Church to perform a number of security functions,
including the management of parking in their parking lot. They further confirmed that it is
common for drivers to seek parking in the church’s lot on both Saturdays and on Sundays.
Fox Tuttle observed off-site parking for the PV Fields in other locations as well. Vehicles were
parked on the south side of Kalmia Avenue, directly south of the PV Fields. This area is signed
“No Parking” but over a dozen vehicles were parked here and drivers were observed moving
between the vehicles and the PV Fields. There were also two vehicles parked on 47th Street,
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
89
21
north of the PV Fields driveway, in an area signed “No Parking – Bike Lane.” Fox Tuttle also
observed 7 vehicles parked in the Friends School parking lot, directly south of the PV Fields and
Fox Tuttle confirmed that there were no school activities that day.
Photo of vehicles illegally parked on the south side of Kalmia Avenue
Photo of vehicles illegally parked in the Friends School Parking Lot
Bicycle and Pedestrian Access to the Site: Since the PV Fields have fencing surrounding the
site, pedestrians and cyclists seeking to access the fields typically must travel to the east end of
the site and go through the main entrance. Pedestrians can approach the main entrance using
multiuse paths which connect to the parking lot both north and south of the PV Fields. Bicyclists
can access the PV fields by utilizing these paths as well but may also use the driveway from
47th Street. Video counters were used to capture pedestrians and bicyclists entering and exiting
the east side of the PV Fields at each of these locations. Data at all locations was collected from
7:30 AM to 8:30 PM on Saturday, October 15th, and from 8:30 AM to 5:30 PM on Sunday,
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
90
22
October 16th. Table 1 summarizes the total number of pedestrians and bicyclists tallied entering
and exiting the PV Fields site on Saturday, October 15th and Sunday, October 16th.
TABLE 1 Four Mile Creek Iris Path Driveway
Pedestrians Bicyclists Pedestrians Bicyclists Bicyclists
In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out
Saturday, 10/15/2022 518 315 48 33 90 83 18 36 55 23
[ 13 hours total ]
Sunday, 10/16/2022 102 84 25 11 73 63 13 18 38 13
[ 9 hours total ]
Table 1 – Pedestrian and Bicyclist counts at the PV Fields
There is a significant difference in pedestrian activity at the PV Fields on Saturday versus
Sunday. A possible explanation is that the parking lot was more congested on Saturday and
more people had to park off-site and then walk back to the PV Fields. It is also possible that
more people were involved in recreational walking activities on Saturday. Based on Fox Tuttle’s
observations, many of the pedestrians and bicyclists passing through the PV Fields parking lot
area were not destined for the PV Fields but rather were moving between the Four Mile Creek
Trail and the Iris Path which connects to Kalmia Avenue and the Diagonal Highway. The design
of these facilities require pedestrians and bicyclists to travel directly through the parking lot to
connect between these two multiuse paths. In addition, some pedestrians counted entering the
site from the north were actually people dropped off from motor vehicles which had entered the
parking lot (being dropped off before the formal pickup/drop off area). These pedestrians have
been tallied from the video and removed from the totals in Table 1 above.
On a weekday afternoon trip to the PV fields, it was observed that a large congregation of youth
soccer players was located on the concrete plaza area just south of the restrooms near the pick-
up and drop-off lane. This large group of youths were being held off the fields for some reason
before the gate was open to allow access to the fields. The fencing across the plaza resulted in
many of the youths standing on the curb next to the pick-up/drop-off lane immediately adjacent
to moving vehicles. Fox Tuttle staff would note this as a potentially unsafe practice.
It was also observed that some youths were kicking a soccer ball back and forth in one of the
parking drive aisles, often adjacent to moving vehicles, while waiting for the gate to open onto
the fields. This activity should be restricted.
Lastly, on this weekday afternoon there was lightning in the area and all the soccer players were
brought in off the fields to wait for the storm to pass. Many youths found shelter underneath the
roof of the restroom building, but a large group could not fit and stood outside next to the
building. Fox Tuttle staff would note this as potentially unsafe practice given the potential for a
lightning strike.
Traffic Conditions on Kalmia Avenue: Kalmia Avenue is a collector roadway with a 30-mph
speed limit which runs from N 26th Street on the west, to the PV Fields on the east, where it
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
91
23
dead ends in the Friends School parking lot. There is no motor vehicle access to the PV Fields
parking lot from Kalmia Avenue but there is a gravel path on the north side of Kalmia which
connects to the Iris Path, which can be used by cyclists and pedestrians to access the PV Fields
from the south. With its connectivity out to N 26th Street, Kalmia Avenue could serve as a
bicycle and pedestrian connection between the PV Fields and neighborhoods west of 28th Street
in Boulder. There are on-street bike lanes on Kalmia Avenue to the west, but these do not
continue east of Island Drive. There is a 5’ wide sidewalk along the north side of Kalmia
Avenue, between Island Drive and the Iris Path, appropriate only for pedestrians. The City of
Boulder has identified the need for bike lanes (preferably buffered bike lanes) to be installed on
Kalmia Avenue, between Island Drive and the Iris Path, but these improvements are not
scheduled at this time.
Fox Tuttle collected and analyzed traffic speed and volume data on Kalmia Avenue, to
determine if improvements should be recommended for Kalmia Avenue to create better
pedestrian and bicycle access to the PV Fields. Average daily traffic volumes and speed data
was collected just west of Pinedale Avenue, from Thursday, September 8th to Wednesday,
September 14th. 2022. The following is a summation of this data:
•The daily weekday traffic had a range of 470 vehicles per day (vpd) to 730 vpd, with an
average of 630 vehicles per day. These traffic volumes are low for a collector roadway.
•The weekend traffic was less, with volumes of 490 vpd on Saturday and 480 vpd on
Sunday.
•The average speed of eastbound traffic throughout the week was 30 mph. The 85th
percentile speed was 35 mph and the 95th percentile speed was 38 mph.
•The average speed for westbound traffic throughout the week was 30 mph. The 85th
percentile speed was 36 mph and the 95th percentile speed was 40 mph.
In summary, while traffic volumes were lower than expected on a collector roadway, the speed
of traffic was higher than anticipated for a roadway with a 30-mph speed limit.
Crash History
Fox Tuttle reviewed crash data within the parking lot from January, 2017 through September,
2022. There were four reported crashes during this time period. Three crashes were parking
related and resulted in property damage only. The fourth crash involved a person riding their
bicycle into the parking lot from the Iris Path and conflicting with a motor vehicle in the parking
lot drive aisle. This crash had a severe injury result for the bicyclist. A description of this crash
summarized from the Accident Report is provided here:
The bicyclist was riding his electric bicycle on the bike path that enters the Pleasant View soccer
fields parking lot from the East side. The bicyclist was close to entering the parking lot and was
maintaining a speed of 10-15 mph. At the last second the bicyclist noticed there was a car going
NB in the parking lot near the bike path exit. The bicyclist hit his brakes and his front tire
immediately locked up throwing him over the front handle bars. The bicyclist landed on his
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
92
24
head/face and both wrists and was transported to BCH for his injuries. There was no contact or
damage to the motor vehicle that the cyclist stopped for, the driver remained on scene, cared for
the bicyclist, provided her information and cooperated with the Police.
Future Multimodal Improvements
Boulder County has completed the planning and design process for the CO 119 Bikeway, a new
regional facility between Longmont and Boulder. The southern terminus of the bikeway will be
directly adjacent to the PV Fields parking lot and will connect into the Iris Path, continuing south
to the Diagonal Highway. Exhibit 2 is taken from the CO 119 Concept Design Validation Memo
and shows the southern terminus and how it would connect into the PV Fields parking lot.
Exhibit 2 – Southern terminus of the CO 119 Bikeway
This new regional bikeway will provide an additional walking and biking transport facility
providing access to the PV Fields from the land use and neighborhoods to the north and east.
The City of Boulder is collaborating with Boulder County in the design of this bikeway and has
advanced their own Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Grant application to extend the
Iris Path north along the side of the PV Fields parking lot and connect west to the Four Mile
Creek Trail. This additional section of path would allow people walking and biking between Four
Mile Creek and the Iris Path to make the connection without having to pass through the PV
Fields parking lot. This is only a grant application at this time and funding has not been
secured. Exhibit 3 provides a conceptual design of the new facility.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
93
25
Exhibit 3 – City of Boulder TIP application for new path connection
Conclusions
Fox Tuttle has considered the user feedback obtained, the data analyzed and our own field
observations and have drawn the following conclusions from the information contained in this
Existing Conditions Report:
•Usage of the PV Fields is high with year-round activity and some usage of the fields
being scheduled on every day of the week.
•Usage of all fields at once generally occurs only on the weekend when league games,
tournaments and other special events occur.
•There is adequate parking and reasonable access to the fields during weekday activities.
Challenges with parking supply and reasonable access generally occur on the weekends
and primarily on Saturdays.
•On busier weekend days, the current parking supply in the parking lot is inadequate for
the number of motor vehicles arriving. This results in congestion within the parking lot
and potential conflict and frustration between drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians.
•This situation is exacerbated at times when games start or end and large numbers of
pedestrians enter the parking lot and are also in conflict with drivers maneuvering for a
parking space.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
94
26
•The Iris Path which connects the Diagonal Highway and Kalmia Avenue to the south
with the Four Mile Creek Trail to the north requires users to walk or bike through the PV
Fields parking lot to make this connection. This creates significant potential for conflict
between path users and vehicles in the parking lot. This has resulted in one severe
injury crash in the past five years and likely many near misses, given parking lot
operations during these times.
•The PV Fields parking lot has only one entrance/exit resulting in congestion when high
numbers of vehicles are seeking to enter or exit the lot at the same time.
•In general, there are good bicycle and pedestrian facilities allowing access to the PV
Fields. However, limiting access to the PV Fields to the east entrance requires
considerable out of direction travel for people traveling from the west as well as
unnecessary conflict between path users and people using the pickup/drop off area in
the parking lot. The weekend that Fox Tuttle made their observations, there was a gate
open on the south end of the fields which appeared to be used by people parking off-
site.
•The primary facility missing for complete bicycle and pedestrian access to the PV Fields
are bicycle facilities on Kalmia Avenue, as the bike lanes end at Island Drive. The lack
of facilities on this roadway limits its use by cyclists of all ages and abilities to use Kalmia
Avenue to access the PV Fields.
•Limited parking and congestion issues within the parking lot of the PV Fields do result in
some off-site parking activity. The primary off-site parking location appears to be the
Calvary Bible Church parking lot, which had vehicles associated with the PV Fields
parking there on both the Saturday and Sunday observed.
•There was some additional PV Fields related parking on streets within the Palo Parkway
Neighborhood. However, parking on these streets is limited and is heavily used by
residents and guests already so it is estimated that the number of PV Fields related
vehicles parking in the neighborhood is typically small and focused on those streets at
the east end of the neighborhood, closest to the PV Fields.
•There did not appear to be a significant amount of off-site parking for the PV Fields in
the neighborhood north of the East Palo Park.
•Additional off-site parking for the PV Fields was observed on the east side of 47th Street,
north of the driveway (signed as No Parking – Bike Lane); on the south side of Kalmia
Avenue adjacent to the PV Fields (signed as No Parking Anytime) and within the Friends
School Parking Lot by the cul-de-sac at the end of Kalmia Avenue. All of this parking is
illegal, either parking on private property without permission or parking on the roadway
despite a signed parking restriction.
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
95
27
References
1.Boulder Parks and Recreation Department Athletic Field Study, September 2015
2.Boulder Recreation Facility Transportation Access Study, November 2010
3.City of Boulder website Pleasant View Fields Sports Complex,
https://bouldercolorado.gov/locations/pleasant-view-fields-sports-complex, September
2022
4.East Boulder Community Park Traffic Study, October 2008
5.Google Maps, Pleasant View Fields Sports Complex,
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Pleasant+View+Fields+Sports+Complex, October,
2022.
6.The World’s Marathons, https://worldsmarathons.com/marathon/boulderthon
7.RTD Rider Map https://www.rtd-denver.com/rider-info/system-map
8.RTD Schedules https://www.rtd-denver.com/app/schedules
Attachment A: Draft Existing Conditions
96
3198 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80304 | www.boulderparks-rec.org | O: 303-413-7200
TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
FROM: Alison Rhodes, Director of Parks and Recreation
Bryan Beary, Senior Manager, Community Building + Partnerships
Mark Davison, Senior Manager, Planning
Regina Elsner, Senior Manager, Natural Lands
Jackson Hite, Senior Manager, Business Services
Megann Lohman, Senior Manager, Recreation
Stephanie Munro, Senior Manager, Regional Facilities
Scott Schuttenberg, Deputy Director
Dennis Warrington, Senior Manager, Urban Parks Manager
Doug Godfrey, Senior Landscape Architect
SUBJECT: Matters from the Department
DATE: November 28, 2022
C.Final 2023 Operating Budget
City Council approved the 2023 Budget at their Council meeting on October 20, 2022. The
2023 Recommended Budget for Parks & Recreation is $35.9 million, representing a 27%
increase over the 2022 Approved Budget. Citywide the Approved Budget is $513.5 million
across all funds, representing an 11% increase over the 2022 Approved Budget.
Following an extensive 2 year process, BPR has a newly adopted Master Plan to guide the
department’s operations for the next 5-7 years. The 2023 budget funds additional staff
resources which includes the continuation of recreation positions that were overfilled in the
pandemic with ARPA funding, in addition to new positions of a Programs and Partnerships
Manager (Community Building + Partnerships), Landscaping & Irrigation Technician II –
Civic Area (Park Operations), Year-Round Boat Inspector (Regional Facilities – Boulder
Reservoir) and a Water Safety Coordinator (Recreation – Aquatics). Additionally, the budget
includes one-time funding for the continuation of the Urban Ranger Pilot Program (including
3 year-round staff and 1 temporary staff) and a one-time supplemental General Fund subsidy
increase to the Recreation Activity Fund. There is a lack of confidence on ongoing fund
availability in the General Fund, and these one-time dollars are intended to support service
delivery while BPR staff work with Central Finance and the community to determine
appropriate recreation service levels and ongoing funding.
BPR staff is grateful of the PRAB’s role in providing input on the operating and capital
budgets at the February 28, March 28, April 25, May 11, May 23, and June 27, 2022 business
meetings. Proposed fee increases as approved on May 23, 2022, will take effect on January 1,
2023. All funds will be available to spend starting on January 1, 2023.
97
TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
SUBJECT: Matters from the Board
DATE: November 28, 2022
A. New Procedure: Video conversions from Zoom Webinar meetings will be loaded onto the
city’s YouTube playlist so the public can access the recordings within four business days.
B.PRAB Recruitment: Prospective Board Member Application Questions
The City Clerk’s office requests input on 2023 Board and Commission recruitment
applications. Upon approval of the Chair and Vice-Chair, city staff have proposed an initial
round of updates to the questions.
1. Why do you want to be on this board? In 5 years, what would you hope to see as a
legacy from your time on the board?
2. Parks and Recreation has limited resources and is asked to support many different user
groups interests and balance requests to achieve its mission of promoting health and well-
being for the entire community. What should the Board consider when allocating
resources for different user groups across different use types and demographics?
3.Incoming board members will participate in updating the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan. After reviewing the Master Plan, what stands out to you about the key themes
(Chapter 6)? Is there anything you would recommend the department consider adding to,
or adjusting, these key themes when updating the Master Plan? Please review the “Where
We are Going” chapter of the 2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan (starting on page
61), which includes the strategic plan that guide the department’s investments and
decisions for the next 5-7 years. Please share your thoughts on what initiative(s) will be
most critical to ensuring BPR’s success into the future.
4.What recreational activities do you and your family enjoy? What is your experience
using the City of Boulder’s parks and recreation services, facilities, and programs, and
how might that inform your efforts on the Board?
C. PRAB Matters (Verbal)
3198 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80304 | www.boulderparks-rec.org | O: 303-413-7200
98