Loading...
Item 5C - 406 Pearl St memo 06.02.2021 MEMORANDUM TO THE LANDMARKS BOARD June 2, 2021 STAFF Jacob Lindsey, Planning & Development Services Director Charles Ferro, Interim Comprehensive Planning Manager Lucas Markley, Assistant City Attorney James Hewat, Senior Historic Preservation Planner Marcy Cameron Gerwing, Historic Preservation Planner II Clare Brandt, Administrative Specialist II LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE REQUEST Public hearing and consideration under the procedures prescribed by chapter 1-3, “Quasi- Judicial Hearing,” B.R.C. 1981, for the on-site relocation of a contributing accessory building at 406 Pearl St. in the West Pearl Historic District, pursuant to Section 9-11-18 of the Boulder Revised Code 1981. Address: 406 Pearl St. Owner: Andrew & Diane Fordyce Applicant: Sam Austin, Samuel Austin & Company Architects Case Number: HIS2021-00117 Case Type: Landmark Alteration Certificate Code Section: 9-11-18, B.R.C., 1981 SITE INFORMATION Individual Landmark: N/A Historic District: West Pearl Historic District Zoning: RMX-1 (Residential Mixed-Low 1) Existing House sq. ft.: 1,862 sq. ft. House constructed: c.1890, modifications 1982 (non-contributing) Barn size: 263 sq. ft. Barn constructed: pre-1900 (contributing) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Landmarks Board approve the application with conditions. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 1 of 36 RECOMMENDED MOTION I move that the Landmarks Board adopts the staff memorandum dated June 2, 2021, as the findings of the board and, with conditions, approve the relocation and rehabilitation of the pre- 1900 historic barn as shown on plans dated May 7, 2021, finding that the proposal generally meets the Standards for Issuance of a Landmark Alteration Certificate in Chapter 9-11-18, B.R.C. 1981. Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall be responsible for completing the work in compliance with the approved plans, except as modified by these conditions of approval. 2. Prior to submitting a building permit application and final issuance of the Landmark Alteration Certificate, the applicant shall submit final architectural plans and specifications to the Landmarks design review committee (Ldrc), for its final review and approval to ensure that the final design of the building is consistent with the General Design Guidelines, the West Pearl Historic District Design Guidelines and the intent of this approval: a. Revise the proposal to not rotate, and preserve the historic orientation of, the pre-1900 barn unless it is determined that the tree located immediately to the east of the barn is a Notable Tree and worthy of preservation by the City of Boulder’s Forestry Program; b. Raise the historic barn only to the minimum required floodplain height, regrade up to the new foundation, and explore any other steps that will minimize the real and perceived increase in height of the building; c. Provide details of windows, doors, trim, siding, roofing, material colors/finishes and hardscaping to relocated and rehabilitated barn. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY • Because the proposal calls review for the relocation of a building in a historic district, review by the Landmarks Board in a public hearing is required (9-11-14(b) of the Boulder Revised Code). • Staff considers the accessory “barn” building, located at the southwest corner of the property, to be contributing as it appears on the 1900 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map (see figure 10), the 1929 Tax Assessment (see Attachment D) and retains a high degree of historic integrity. • The request to relocate and rehabilitate the building so it is within the property boundaries will require setback variances from the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BOZA) – the applicant requests support for these variances as part of this proposal. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 2 of 36 • On August 12, 2020, the Landmarks Board conditionally approved the demolition of the existing non-contributing house and 1950s cottage on the property to make way for the construction of a new house and free-standing garage. • Conditions of the August 12 approval were met in final designs reviewed by the Landmark design review committee (Ldrc) on October 7, 2020 (see figures 13-19) • Staff finds that the proposal to relocate and raise the c.1900 contributing barn out of the 100-year floodplain to generally meet the Standards for Issuance of a Landmark Alteration Certificate pursuant to 9-11-18(a) & (b)(1)-(4) B.R.C. 1981 and to be largely consistent with the General Design Guidelines and the West Pearl Historic Design Guidelines. • With the stated conditions, staff recommends approval of the proposal and support of required setback variances under 9-2-3(h)(4) Designated Historic Property of the Boulder Revised Code by the Landmarks Board. EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION • 7000 sq. ft. corner lot in the West Pearl Historic District slopes gently to the southwest and is located in the 100-year floodplain. • Four buildings currently on lot including main house, c.1950 cottage, c.1900 barn (proposed for relocation) and small shed of undetermined age; • Property takes access from 4th Street via mid-lot curb-cut; • Several mature trees on the lot. Figure 1. Location map, 406 Pearl Street, West Pearl Historic District, Boulder, CO. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 3 of 36 Figure 2. Axonometric View from northwest, 406 Pearl Street, Boulder, CO. Figure 3. Tax Assessor Card photograph, c.1949 Photograph Courtesy the Carnegie Branch Library for Local History Figure 4. Historic Building Inventory Photograph Photograph Courtesy the Carnegie Branch Library for Local History Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 4 of 36 Figure 5. 406 Pearl Street, 2018 Figure 6. 406 Pearl Street, looking east from 4th Street, 2018 Figure 7. view of back yard at 406 Pearl Street looking north with c.1950 cottage (mid-ground) proposed for demolition, 2020 Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 5 of 36 Figure 8. South wall of pre-1900 barn with lean-to addition (left) proposed for relocation and non-historic (right) shed that will be removed, 2020 Figure 9. c.1893 Photograph of Boulder from Red Rocks showing property at 406 Pearl Street Photograph Courtesy the Carnegie Branch Library for Local History PROPERTY HISTORY • Archival research indicates the one and one half-story vernacular house at 406 Pearl Street was constructed prior to 1893 and by 1900 the property was occupied by George L., his wife Alice (nee Stansbury) Harding, and their daughters Eva and Mildred. • Born in Cork, Ireland, in 1847, George emigrated to the United States with his family in 1861 and settled in Sturgis, Michigan. George graduated from the University of Michigan in 1874 with an MA and worked for a number of years as a schoolteacher in Minnesota and Ohio. • George and Alice Stansbury were married in Ligonier, Ohio, in 1887 and in 1890 the couple relocated to Longmont, Colorado, where George took a position leading the growing city’s school system. • In 1893, George was elected superintendent of Boulder County Schools, representing the Populist party and was re-elected to this position in 1897. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 6 of 36 • George and Alice are credited with having been instrumental in securing the Texas Chautauqua’s location in Boulder in 1898.0F 1 • The house appears to have been either operated as a rooming house or divided into flats beginning around 1901 as evidenced by the number and turnover of occupants listed in the Boulder City Directories beginning in the early 1900s. • Building permit records indicate that in June of 1953, a permit was issued for construction of a frame storage shed for $200 (presumably the cottage), and a November 1954 note on the Tax Assessor card (see Attachment D), makes reference to construction of a “12x20 . . . storage house” with a value of $200. • By 1972, the storage house was cited as having been illegally converted for use as housing. • In 1974, a bay and bedroom addition to the main house was constructed, and in 1982 a permit was issued to “take off and rebuild the second-story.” • The 1988 Historic Building Inventory form (Attachment C) for the property identifies the house as being “masonry vernacular” and by that time it had “been remodeled beyond its historic integrity”. Figure 10. 1900 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing footprints of house and barn at 406 Pearl Street 1 Portrait and Biographical Record of the State of Colorado, Chapman Publishing, Chicago, 1899 Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 7 of 36 Figure 11. 1930 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing footprints of house and barn at 406 Pearl Street Figure 12. 1958 Aerial Photograph showing house, cottage (center), and barn at 406 Pearl Street Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 8 of 36 DESCRIPTION OF APPROVED WORK (HIS2020-00163) Figure 13. 10.05.2020 Approved Site Plan (HIS2020-00163). Not to scale. Figure 14. Approved house (HIS2020-00163). Not to scale. Site Plan • Construction of 3,295 sq. ft. one and one-half story house approved by Landmarks Board in 2020; • Demolition of 263 sq. ft. cottage; • Demolition of small shed and construction of 400 sq. ft., two-car garage at southeast corner of property; Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 9 of 36 Figure 15. Approved West house (4th Street) Elevation (HIS2020-00163). Not to scale Figure 16. Approved East house. Figure 17. Approved house South (rear) Elevation. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 10 of 36 Figure 18. Approved New Garage South (alley) and East (side) Elevations. Figure 19. Proposed Garage West (side) and East (yard) Elevations. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (HIS2020-00163) The applicant’s request states: “… the historic Barn at 406 Pearl is currently in the City’s right of way. We are proposing to lift the barn up and rotate it. Then set it down with a floor level 2’ above the flood plane (as required by Federal Emergency Management Administration). We are proposing a combination of additional reclaimed barn wood siding and grade manipulation to mitigate the effect of having to raise the barn floor elevation. We propose to turn the barn into habitable space. In addition we would move the cow painting so that it continues to face 4th street”. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 11 of 36 Figure 20. Existing with approved new garage (above) and proposed (light yellow) showing proposed relocation of the barn. Site Plan • Indicates that the pre-1900 contributing barn is located in the 100-year flood zone and encroaching over the west property line into the city’s right-of-way; • Plans show relocation of the barn several feet east and south, so it no longer encroaches, and a requirement if the building being “improved” (plans are for it to be repurposed as habitable space) is that the entire building be located on the property; • 90° rotation of building is proposed in order to maintain the mature tree located immediately east of the barn (details of type and condition of tree not provided). Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 12 of 36 Figure 21. Existing and proposed (light yellow) west (4th street) elevations. (west becomes north face as building is turned 90°) West (4th Street) Elevation • Proposed rotation of building will result in the gable end of building, now facing the alley, to front onto 4th Street; • Non-historic plywood mural (on plywood attached to siding) is proposed to be re- installed on new west face of building; • Height of building relative to grade will rise but nor specific dimension has been provided. Figure 22. Existing and proposed (light yellow) south (alley) elevations. South Elevation • Gable end alley face of building featuring rafter tails, hay loft, novelty siding and shed roof addition to be replaced by side gable face with existing lean-to addition (currently east elevation); • Plans indicate the currently open face of the lean-to addition to be enclosed with vertical boards and fenestrated with two casement windows; • Because the building is to be raised and the grade is lowest at the southwest corner of the property, the relocated building is shown to placed upon an 18’ stone foundation that will be exposed on the alley side. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 13 of 36 Figure 23. Existing and proposed (light yellow) north elevations. North Elevation • With proposed rotation, north gable-end proposed to change to side gable roof (former west) face of building with removed cow mural (reinstalled on new west face) and existing casement windows retained; • New higher foundation appears covered in novelty siding to match existing. Figure 24. Existing and proposed (light yellow) east elevations. East Elevation • As proposed former gable-end yard face and entrance to barn to face east; • Existing door and window to be replaced (details not provided), and entrance to raised building shown to be accessed via a three-step stoop. CRITERIA FOR THE BOARD’S DECISION STANDARDS FOR LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATES, 9-11-18, B.R.C., 1981 (a) The Landmarks Board and the City Council shall not approve an application for a Landmark Alteration Certificate unless each such agency finds that the proposed work is consistent with the purposes of this chapter. (b) Neither the Landmarks Board nor the City Council shall approve a Landmark Alteration Certificate unless it meets the following conditions: Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 14 of 36 1. Does the proposed application preserve, enhance, or restore, and not damage or destroy the exterior architectural features of the landmark or the subject property within a historic district? Staff finds that provided the stated conditions of approval are met, the proposal will be consistent with the purposes of this chapter, in that the relocation and alteration of the pre- 1900 historic barn will not damage the exterior architectural features of property in the West Pearl Historic District. 2. Does the proposed application adversely affect the special character or special historic, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the district? Staff finds that, provided the stated conditions of approval are met, the proposal will not damage or destroy the historic character, interest, or value of the property or district as it will be generally compatible with the General Design Guidelines and the West Pearl Historic District Design Guidelines. 3. Is the architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and materials used on existing and proposed structures compatible with the character of the historic district? Staff finds that, provided the stated conditions of approval are met, the architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and materials in relocating the historic barn will be compatible with the character of the historic district. 4. With respect to a proposal to demolish a building in a historic district, the proposed new construction to replace the building meets the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section. Does not apply to the proposed application. (c) In determining whether to approve a Landmark Alteration Certificate, the Landmarks Board shall consider the economic feasibility of alternatives, incorporation of energy- efficient design and enhanced access for the disabled. Information specific to economic feasibly of alternatives, incorporation or energy-efficiency design and enhance access for the disabled was not submitted with the application. DESIGN GUIDELINE ANALYSIS The Historic Preservation Ordinance sets forth the standards the Landmarks Board must apply when reviewing a request for a Landmark Alteration Certificate (LAC). The Board has adopted the West Pearl District Design Guidelines and the General Design Guidelines to help interpret the Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 15 of 36 ordinance. Design guidelines are intended to be used as an aid to appropriate design and not as a checklist of items for compliance. SUMMARY Staff finds that if the following changes are made, the proposed will be generally compatible and consistent with the standards set forth in Section 9-11-18 of the Boulder Revised Code, the General Design Guidelines for Boulder's Historic Districts & Individual Landmarks and the West Pearl Historic District Design Guidelines. See Attachment A for a complete analysis of the proposal’s compliance with the design guidelines. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES (SUMMARY) 2.0 Site Design • Proposed re-location of the barn so it no longer encroaches into the right-of-way appropriate, but setbacks should be varied to closely preserve the historic location & context of the 120 + year old barn. • Little information about the tree proposed for preservation is included in the application. Consideration of rotating the barn 90 degrees to preserve the tree would only be appropriate if it were identified as a Notable Tree through the City of Boulder’s Forestry Program. • The need to raise the barn approximately 3’ in height will affect the historic scale, form, and massing of this historic building. • Steps to raise the building only to the minimum required floodplain height is recommended and regrading up to the new foundation to minimize the perceived increase in height should be further explored. 2.1 Building Location, Orientation & Spacing • Proposed encroachment of the barn into the side, rear and building separation setbacks appropriate to preserve the historic context of this highly visible contributing building. In this case support of requested setbacks by the Landmarks Board under 9-2-3(h)(4) Designated Historic Property of the Boulder Revised Code, is appropriate in that relocating the barn in a by-right location would likely have an adverse effect on it and historic character of the West Pearl Historic District. 2.3 and 7.1 Alleys and Existing Accessory Buildings • While never a first option, the relocation of contributing buildings is sometimes appropriate, especially if the orientation does not change and the spatial relationship of the buildings on the property is not significantly changed. • Proposed relocation will not impact existing character of the alley. However, re- orienting the building will likely impact the historic character of the barn and alley. Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 16 of 36 • Additional space between the previously approved new garage and relocated barn in its current (non-rotated) orientation appropriate and would not result in this block-end of the alley becoming tunnel-like. • The materials, features, and details of the historic accessory building will be maintained. PUBLIC COMMENT Staff has received no public comment on this case. FINDINGS Staff finds that if the stated conditions are met, the proposed relocation of the existing barn is generally appropriate in terms of site planning and preservation of character-defining features and that the proposal will meet the standards set out in Section 9-11-18, B.R.C. 1981, and will be consistent with the General Design Guidelines and the West Pearl Historic District Design Guidelines. The building cannot be rehabilitated in its current location in the public right-of-way and its proposed new location will require setback variances from the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BOZA). Staff recommends the Board’s support under 9-2-3(h)(4) Designated Historic Property of the Boulder Revised Code, finding that in that relocating the barn in a by-right location would have an adverse effect on the historic character of the barn and West Pearl Historic District. Staff recommends the Landmarks Board adopt the following findings: The Landmarks Board finds that the project meets the standards for issuance of a Landmark Alteration Certificate set forth in Section 9-11-18, “Standards for Landmark Alteration Certificate Applications,” B.R.C. 1981. In reaching this conclusion, the Board considers the information in the staff memorandum dated June 2, 2021, and the evidence provided to the Board at its June 2, 2021. Specifically, the Board finds, if the stated conditions are met, relocation of the existing contributing accessory building is compatible with the Historic Preservation Ordinance, in that: 1. If constructed in compliance with approved plans dated 06/02/2021 on file in the City of Boulder Planning and Development Services Department, the proposed work will not damage the immediate streetscape in the historic district is generally consistent with the General Design Guidelines and the West Pearl Historic District Guidelines. 2. The proposed work will not adversely affect the historic, architectural, or aesthetic value of the contributing barn and associated hardscaping features on the property or affect the special historic character of the West Pearl Historic District. § 9-11-18(b)(1). ATTACHMENTS A: Design Guideline Analysis B: Application Materials C: Historic Building Inventory Form (link) D: Tax Assessor card Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 17 of 36 Attachment A: DESIGN GUIDELINE ANALYSIS The Historic Preservation Ordinance sets forth the standards the Landmarks Board must apply when reviewing a request for a Landmark Alteration Certificate. The Board has adopted the General Design Guidelines and the West Pearl Historic District Design Guidelines to help interpret the historic preservation ordinance. The following is an analysis of the proposed new construction with respect to relevant guidelines. Design guidelines are intended to be used as an aid to appropriate design and not as a checklist of items for compliance. The following is an analysis of the proposal’s compliance with the appropriate sections of the General Design Guidelines and the West Pearl Historic District Design Guidelines. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES General Design Guidelines 2.0 Site Design Site design includes a variety of character-defining elements of our historic districts and building. Individual structures are located within a framework of streets and public spaces that set the context for the neighborhood. How structures occupy their site, in terms of alignment, orientation, and spacing, creates much of the context of the neighborhood. Guideline Analysis Conforms? .1 Locate buildings within the range of alignments as seen traditionally in the area, maintaining traditional setbacks at the front, side and rear of the property Staff considers that proposed re-location of the barn so it no longer encroaches into the right-of-way consistent with this guideline, but that setbacks should be varied to closely preserve the historic location & context of the 120 + year old barn. To this end, staff considers that rotating the building to preserve the tree immediately east of the barn is likely inappropriate. Resolve at the Ldrc. Maybe .2 Building proportions should respect traditional patterns in the district The need to raise the barn approximately 3’ in height will affect the historic scale, form, and massing of this historic building. Steps to raise the building only to the minimum required floodplain height is recommended and regrading up to the new foundation to minimize the perceived increase in height should be further explored. Resolve at the Ldrc. Maybe .3 Orient the primary building entrance to the street Because of its high visibility in the West Pearl Historic District, staff considers that rotating the building (and reorienting the building’s relationship to 4th Street and the alley) to preserve the tree immediately east of the barn is likely inappropriate. Resolve at Ldrc. Maybe Attachment A - Design Guideline Analysis Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 18 of 36 .5 A new porch may encroach into the existing alignment only if it is designed according to the guidelines and if it is appropriate to the architectural style of the house. Staff considers the proposed encroachment of the barn into the side, rear and building separation setbacks appropriate to preserve the historic context of this highly visible contributing building. In this case support of requested setbacks by the Landmarks Board under 9.2.3(h)(4) Designated Historic Property of the Boulder Revised Code, is appropriate in that relocating the barn in a by-right location would likely have an adverse effect on the historic character of the barn and West Pearl Historic District. Yes .7 Preserve a backyard area between the house and the garage, maintaining the general proportion of built mass to open space found within the area Staff considers the proposed encroachment of the barn into the side and rear setbacks will preserve a backyard between the house and barn and a 120 + historic characteristic distinctive to the West Pearl Historic District. Yes 2.2.2 Preserve significant street trees whenever possible Little information about the tree proposed for preservation is included in the application. Staff considers that consideration of rotating the barn to preserve the tree would only be appropriate it is identified as a Notable Tree through Boulder’s Forestry Program. (Resolve at the Ldrc). Maybe 2.1 Building Alignment, Orientation, and Spacing 1. Locate Buildings within the range of alignments seen traditionally in the area maintaining traditional setbacks at the front, side and rear of the property. Staff considers the proposed encroachment of the barn into the side, rear and building separation setbacks appropriate to preserve the historic context of this highly visible contributing building. In this case support of requested setbacks by the Landmarks Board under 9.2.3(h)(4) Designated Historic Property of the Boulder Revised Code, is appropriate in that relocating the barn in a by-right location would likely have an adverse effect on the historic character of the barn and West Pearl Historic District. Yes .6 … garages should be located at the rear of of the lot and accessed from the alley. Proposed garage is shown to be located at the back of the property and its orientation should not change (see .2.0(3) above). Resolve at the Ldrc. Maybe 2.3 Alleys & Existing Accessory Buildings Along the alleys are historic accessory building of various shapes and sizes including barns, chicken coops, sheds and small garages. This variety contributes to the general feeling of human scale in the alleys. GUIDELINES: ANALYSIS: CONFORMS .1 Maintain alley access for parking and retain the character of alleys as clearly secondary access to properties. Proposed relocation will not impact existing alley access or character. Yes .2 Retain and preserve the variety and character found in the existing historic accessory buildings along the alleys. Proposed relocation will not impact existing character of the alley, however, re-orienting the building will impact the historic character of the barn and alley. (see .2.0(3) above). Resolve at the Ldrc. Maybe Attachment A - Design Guideline Analysis Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 19 of 36 .5 Maintain adequate spacing between accessory buildings so that the view of the main house is not obscured, and the alley does not evolve into a tunnel-like passage. Staff considers that the additional space between the previously approved new garage and relocated garage in its current (non-rotated) orientation appropriate and would not result in this block-end of the alley becoming tunnel-like. Yes 7.1 Existing Historic Accessory Buildings A primary concern of the Landmarks Board in reviewing proposed changes in historic districts is the protection of existing historic accessory structures and the character of the site and district. GUIDELINES: ANALYSIS: CONFORMS .1 Retain and preserve garages and accessory buildings that contribute to the overall character of the site or district. The relocation of the contributing building will allow for its rehabilitation and will further preserve, protect and enhance this significant architectural feature. While never a first option, the relocation of contributing buildings is sometimes appropriate especially if the orientation does not change and the spatial relationship of the buildings on the property is not significantly changed. Little information about the tree proposed for preservation is included in the application. Staff considers that consideration of rotating the barn to preserve the tree would only be appropriate it is identified as a Notable Tree through Boulder’s Forestry Program. (Resolve at the Ldrc). Maybe .2 Retain and preserve the character- defining materials, features, and details of historic garages and accessory buildings, including roofs, materials, windows, and doors. The materials, features, and details of the accessory building will be maintained. (Resolve at the Ldrc). Maybe West Pearl Historic District Design Guidelines A. Site Planning Guideline Analysis Conforms? a. Proposed setback and location of house is generally consistent with historic properties in the district. Yes Attachment A - Design Guideline Analysis Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 20 of 36 b. Proposed spacing between proposed house and large non- contributing property to the east is consistent with historic condition on property and in the district. Yes c. Little information provided about proposed landscaping and hardscaping. Review at Ldrc. Maybe d. While proposed site design appears to preserve general proportion of built mass to open space, staff considers that large rear porch/deck area should be significantly reduced in depth to provide more back yard area – resolve at Ldrc. Maybe Attachment A - Design Guideline Analysis Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 21 of 36 Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 22 of 36 Property Information – Please complete for: ❑New free-standing construction ❑ Addition ❑ Dormers ❑ Porches ❑ Fences Staff Use Verified Need Info Zoning District ❑RL-1 ❑ RL-2 ❑ RMX-1 ❑ RH-2 ❑ DT-1 ❑ Other: ______ Floodplain ❑None ❑ 500 Year ❑ 100 Year ❑ Conveyance ❑ High Hazard Lot Size _______________sq. ft. ❑ Interior ❑ Through ❑ Flag ❑ Corner Source: ❑ City of Boulder ❑ Boulder County ❑ Survey ❑ Other:___ Existing Principal Building Setbacks Section 9-7-2 ❑No Change Front: Side: Side: Rear: Proposed Principal Building Setbacks ❑No Change Front: Side: Side: Rear: Existing Accessory Building Setbacks ❑No Change Front: Side: Side: Rear: Proposed Accessory Building Setbacks ❑No Change Front: Side: Side: Rear: Primary or accessory building located within 3 ft. of a property line: Y / N Primary or accessory buildings located within 6 ft. of each other: Y / N Existing Proposed Allowed Maximum Building Coverage Floor Area (sq. ft.) Height Past Discretionary Review: ❑ Site Review ❑ PUD/PRD/PD ❑None Will your project require a variance or exemption? Verified Need Info …Setback variance Section 9-7-2, B.R.C., 1981 …Bulk plane requirements Section 9-7-9, B.R.C., 1981 …Side yard wall articulation standards Section 9-7-10, B.R.C., 1981 …Exemption from the maximum building coverage for accessory buildings in the rear setback Section 9-7-11(d), B.R.C., 1981 …Solar exception Section 9-9-17, B.R.C., 1981 Form Completed by:__________________________________(Applicant) Date:______________________ Initial Verification by: ____________________________________(Staff) Date: ______________________ INITIAL CODE REVIEW This review is intended to identify potential zoning and building code issues. Please fill out to the best of your ability. The verification of this form is a customer service review and does not constitute a formal review of all applicable codes and regulations. All sections of the Boulder Revised Code must still be adhered to prior to performing any work. Property information can be found on https://bouldercolorado.gov/planning/property-report 7,247 25’-0”12.5’15’-0” 25’-0” 25’-0”12.5’15’-0” 25’-0” 116’-0”28’-0”-2’-0”0’-0” 116’-0”28’-0”0’-0”0’-0” 17’-0”20’-0” 477.07 477.07 477.07 477.07 20’-0” Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 23 of 36 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW LANDMARKS DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (LDRC) LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE REVIEW CHECKLISTS Initial review is completed by Staff (Administrative) or the Landmarks Design Review Committee (LDRC) within 14 days after a complete application is received. Staff and the LDRC can either approve the application, request revisions, or refer the proposal to the Landmarks Board for review in a public hearing. Please call 303-441-1994 if you have questions. City staff review of minor alterations typically has a quick review turn-around provided that application is complete and the proposed alterations are consistent with the applicable design guidelines. A complete application submittal includes: This application: Completely filled out Photographs: Color photos of existing conditions and details. Samples: Col or chips of paint and printed samples of roofing types are helpful. Fences and Hardscaping: Elevations and site plans should be clearly detailed and scaled ̀ preferably at an / or /4 Ԁ̀ scale on [ paper. Show eisting ̀ conditions and proposed changes sidebyside. )or fences show dimensions and spacing between picNets and a site plan showing e[isting and proposed locations. Landscaping Paint Roofing Mechanical Unit Fences and Hardscaping (rear / side yard fence only if maximum 5ft. tall with minimum Ԁ̀ spacing between pickets) Restoration of Existing Features DOWNTOWN ONLY: Commercial awnings, patios and signs Typical Projects: A staff member and two members of the Landmarks Board meet weekly to review applications for exterior alterations to designated properties. Large projects often require more than one meeting and may be referred by the committee to the full Landmarks Board for review. A complete application submittal includes: This application: Completely filled out, including zoning review sheet. Photographs: Photographs of existing building and surrounding context One set of scaled elevations and site plans: All drawings should be clearly detailed and scaled preferably at an / or /4 scale on [ paper. Show existing conditions and proposed changes sidebyside. Fences: A scaled drawing showing dimensions and spacing between pickets and a site plan showing existing and proposed locations. Survey: A land survey may be required if the proposed project is within 20% of the maximum permitted lot coverage, floor area or floor area ratio. The following documentation is required for final review and approval: Final Details: Specific materials should be noted on plans; include color chips and printed samples of roofing types ̀manufacturers/catalogue “cut” sheets for windows/skylights. Typical Projects: Deck / porch Doors / windows Dormers / skylights Additions .HZ DccHVVoU\ EXilGinJ (smaller than 340 sq. ft.) Fence (front yard or rear / side yard if taller than 5ft. or less than 1. Vpacing between pickets) Solar Panels Completed applications for LDRC review must be turned in by noon on the Friday prior to the requested meeting date and must be submitted through a Project Specialist. Please note that LDRC meeting requests are processed in the order in which they are received and that a first request may not be available due to scheduling. The LDRC meets each Wednesday morning (except holidays) at the P&DS Service Center offices on the third floor of the Park Central Building, 1739 Broadway. Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 24 of 36 LANDMARKS BOARD REVIEW (LB) 2019 Landmark Board Meeting Dates and Application Submittal Deadlines Landmarks Board meetings are generally held the first Wednesday of each month at 6 p.m. in the Municipal Building, Council Chambers, located at 1777 Broadway. Applications scheduled for a public hearing before the full Landmarks Board PXVW EH VXEPLWWHG at least 28 days prior to the meeting date. All applications must be submitted through a Project Specialist. 0ore information including deadlines and agendas can be found online ZZZEoXlGHUKiVtoUicpUHVHUYationnHt The Landmarks Board reviews new free-standing construction 340 square feet and larger, the demolition or moving of buildings, and applications referred from the LDRC. Public hearings take place within 60 days of the receipt of a complete LAC application and are conducted as quasi-judicial proceedings. Following the public hearing for the LAC, a 1otice of Disposition is sent to the City Council outlining the %oard s recommendation. City Council has 14 days to callup a decision of approval made by the Landmarks Board. If the Board votes to deny a Landmark Alteration Certificate application, the City Council has 30 days to call-up the decision. Tip: Projects that require full /andmarNs Board review should be presented to staff early in the planning process, before detailed drawings are initiated. Please contact staff prior to submitting an application for full Board review; these reviews are often complex. A complete application submittal includes: LDRC requirements (listed on the previous page) Written project description 7 copies of project drawings, including side-by-side existing and proposed conditions (preferably 11”x17” or 12”x18”) plans, including: ▪Scaled site plan (existing and proposed) ▪Scaled elevations for all sides of the building at 1/8” or 1/4” scale ▪Sketches, as needed 1 copy of any color renderings or photographs, color samples, etc. (preferably no larger than 11”x17”) 1 digital copy of all materials submitted in a PDF file format At the request of staff or the Board, the following may also be required: Building sections Methods of restoration 3-D modeling New free-standing construction 340 sq. ft. and larger Demolition Includes primary and/or accessory buildings designated as individual landmarks or within an +istoric District. Application referred from LDRC Typical Projects: ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔✔ Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 25 of 36 Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 26 of 36 406 Pearl: Historic Barn Project Description The historic Barn at 406 Pearl is currently in the City’s right of way. We are proposing to lift the barn up and rotate it. Then set it down with a floor level 2’ above the flood plane (as required by FEMA). We are proposing a combination of additional reclaimed barn wood siding and grade manipulation to mitigate the effect of having to raise the barn floor elevation. We propose to turn the barn into habitable space. In addition we would move the cow painting so that it continues to face 4th street. Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 27 of 36 JOB# 2011406 Pearl StreetCADDesigns 3/10/2021 SITE PLAN issued: drawn by: revised: SP-2 sheet 406 Pearl StreetBoulder, CO 803021701 15th Street, Unit ABoulder, CO 80302(303) 304-0868Samuel Austin & CompanyArchitects, Inc.3 of 17 NOTICE: DUTY OF COOPERATION Release of these plans contemplates further cooperation among the owner, his contractor, and the architect. Design and construction are complex. Although the architect and his consultants have performed their services with due care and diligence, they cannot guarantee perfection. Communication is imperfect, and every contingency cannot be anticipated. Any ambiguity or discrepancy discovered by the use of these plans shall be reported immediately to the architect. Failure to notify the architect compounds misunderstanding and increases construction costs. A failure to cooperate by a simple notice to the architect shall relieve the architect from responsibility for all consequences. Changes made from the plans without the consent of the architect are unauthorized, and shall relieve the architect of responsibility for all consequences arising out of such changes. 12.0' SETBACK 5.0'SETBACK25.0' SETBACK 3.0'6.1'±60.0'11.4'12.5'SETBACK5.4'12.3' 6.1'12.7'12.5' 60.0' 37.4'5393.485394.585391.365390. 7 6 5391. 2 4 5391. 7 4 1 SP-4 1 SP-4 2 SP-4 2 SP-4 3 SP-4 3 SP-4 4 SP-4 4 SP-4 5 SP-4 5 SP-4 6 SP-4 6 SP-4 7 SP-4 7 SP-4 8 SP-4 8 SP-4 MAIN FLOOR 100'-0" = 5397.2 WATER METER 5390 5391 5391 5392 5392 5393 53935394 N15°36'54"W 139.51' (C) S15°36'54"E 139.51' (C)N74°51'00"E 50.30' (C)406 PEARL ST. EXISTING BARN COVERED PARKING PEARL STREET (80' R.O.W.) 4TH STREET (80' R.O.W.) LOT 6 BLK 59 PEARL STREET I CONDOS LOT 7 & LOT 8 BLK 59 20' ALLEY50' (P)140'(P) 140'(P) OVERHEAD UTILITIES OVERHEAD UTILITIES 5391.51 LOW POINT 25' FROM HOUSE 5391 SECTIONS ARE SPACED 10'-0" O.C. PATIO PORCH STEPS STEPS PORCH SEE LANDSCAPING DESIGNER PLANS FOR FINAL HARDSCAPING, RETAINING WALLS, BOULDERS, FENCES, GRADE ELEVATIONS, STEPS, ETC. AND THEIR COVERAGES ELECTRIC METER SEE DEMOLITION PLAN FOR STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS TO BE REMOVED EXISTING SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN 5394 NEW IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SITE AREA = 7,017.44 S.F. HOUSE, STEPS AND PATIOS = 2,994 S.F. GARAGE, DRIVEWAY = 430 S.F. BARN = 402 S.F. TOTAL = 3,826 S.F. - 54.5% EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE SITE AREA = 7,017.44 S.F. BUILDINGS, SHEDS ONLY = 1,858 S.F. - 26.4% MAIN FLOOR 100'-0" = 5392.25 DRAINAGE GAS METER VERIFY EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) UPGRADE EXISTING WATER METER TO 1" WATER METER GARAGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT REMOVE EXISTING FENCE - BUILD NEW FENCE AT PROPERTY LINE ROOF ABOVE NEW 5'-0" TALL FENCE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY NEW 8" DIA. PIPE/CULVERT FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE RAISED GRADE WITH RETAINING WALLS NEW BURIED ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING UTILITY POLES74°51'00"W 50.30' (C)50'(P)PORCH STEPS STEPS FIREPIT STEPS CLEANOUTS PLANTERPLANTER 3'-0" X6'-0"5393.35392.85392.25392.55393.485394.585391.365390. 7 6 5391.55393.05393.25392.05391.85394.05393.05393.5 5394.4 5394.2 5393.9 5393.6 5393.95394.0 5393.6 5393.9 5394.45393.6 5393.8 5391. 2 4 5391. 7 4 5390 5391 5391 5392 5392 5393 53935394 N15°36'54"W 139.51' (C) S15°36'54"E 139.51' (C)N74°51'00"E 50.30' (C)A 5409.2 MAIN FLOOR 5397.2 B 5417.9 D 5425.9 5391 C 5417.9 E 5409.2 F 5409.2 G 5409.2 H 5409.2 I 5409.2 5394 S74°51'00"W 50.30' (C)SOLAR ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Property Zone District:Solar Fence Height 24 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Roof Element Elevation of Roof Element (y) Elevation of Grade at Property Line (x)* Relative Height of Roof Element (h)**Length of Shadow (L)*** 10:00 AM 2:00 PM 10:00 AM 2:00 PM 10:00 AM 2:00 PM A 5,409.0 5,393.6 5,393.3 15.4 15.7 B 5,417.7 5,393.8 5,392.8 23.9 24.9 2.4 C 5,417.7 5,392.2 5,392.2 25.5 25.5 4.0 4.0 D 5,425.5 5,393.8 5,393.6 31.7 31.9 20.4 20.9 E 5,409.0 5,394.4 5,393.9 14.6 15.1 F 5,409.0 5,393.9 5,393.9 15.1 15.1 G 5,423.7 5,394.4 5,394.4 29.3 29.3 14.0 14.0 H 5,409.0 5,393.6 5,393.5 15.4 15.5 I 5,409.0 5,394.2 5,393.9 14.8 15.1 * Elevation in USGS or relative to survey datum where the building element's shadow would cross the property line. ** The relative height of the building element is the elevation of the building element (step 1), minus the elevation of grade at the property line (step 2). *** The length of the shadow is determined by using the "Adjusted Solar Shadow Lengths" of Table 1, for Solar Access Area 1, of the Solar Access Guide. 1 NNSCALE: 1" = 10'1 Site Plan 0 5'10'20' SCALE: 1" = 10'2 Solar Shadow Plan 0 5'10'20' Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 28 of 36 Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 29 of 36 Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 30 of 36 Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 31 of 36 Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 32 of 36 Attachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 33 of 36 JOB# 2011406 Pearl StreetCADDesigns 5/4/21 SURVEY issued: drawn by: revised: SP-1 sheet 406 Pearl StreetBoulder, CO 803021701 15th Street, Unit ABoulder, CO 80302(303) 304-0868Samuel Austin & CompanyArchitects, Inc.2 of 17 NOTICE: DUTY OF COOPERATION Release of these plans contemplates further cooperation among the owner, his contractor, and the architect. Design and construction are complex. Although the architect and his consultants have performed their services with due care and diligence, they cannot guarantee perfection. Communication is imperfect, and every contingency cannot be anticipated. Any ambiguity or discrepancy discovered by the use of these plans shall be reported immediately to the architect. Failure to notify the architect compounds misunderstanding and increases construction costs. A failure to cooperate by a simple notice to the architect shall relieve the architect from responsibility for all consequences. Changes made from the plans without the consent of the architect are unauthorized, and shall relieve the architect of responsibility for all consequences arising out of such changes.Flatirons, Inc.Surveying, Engineering & Geomaticswww.FlatironsInc.com© 16406 PROF ESSIONAL L A N D SURVEYORCOLORAD O L ICE N S E DJOHN BRU C E G UY T ONAttachment B - Application Materials Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 34 of 36 ;p,;_1\1.rt X ? � ,-. , , 'I }· 6--J•� � -q,c;, ��l� 'y t:..t ClvYY1,,, �( '7 flh� ,,�, . _, (' Appraised 19._---''f'--- BOULDER COUNTY REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL OWNER Y. <c <, d I , hi, {,_ HOUSE No. I-/ 0 fc STREET ) LOTS B LOCKS-9 ADDITION Year Constructed Est. Life in Years ESTIMATE OF VALUATION BLDG. PART A BLDG. PART B GARAGE No. Cubic Feet_ _______ I_:)_ lo_ 0 0 __________________________ _ Cost per cu. ft . ________________ } Z _________ '2. _______________ _ r {,, (/ Total Cost_ ___________ $ ___ .I.._-------$ ______________ $ __________ _Porches ___________________________________________ -------------Garage ________________________________________________________ _ :: Ext,M ::: ::::::::::: :::::::::::::::! ::::::::::::::: :: :::: ::: __ , -t TOTAL ______ $--------------$ ______________ $ __________ _ ----% Obsolesence ____________________________________________ _ •L.'% Physical Dep. _____ ! __ �_LJ ___________ _l_ __ ·----------- CITY Net After J?e�u cting 9 I J _..,� � Depreciation _____ $--------------,$--------------$-----------r y ____ % Utility Dep. ___ $---·-----------$--------------$___________ ''\__ G. </ r IPRESENT VALUE __ $--------------$ ______________ $,_ ________ _---- DESCRIPTION )7 BUILDING PLAN Class of Bldg,_-�----------------Basement _ _____ l________________J Construction _______ -------�----Roof _ __________ .._, __ !: ___ _( _______ _ Char. of Const. ------__ :_ ___ ------Heating -------------__ :_ ___ ::__ --============'=lf=============;=:=======H=ei=g =ht=of=B=u=i =ld=in=g=_=_/_=_t-/_=' -=-=./=_ ··=-=--=--=-=-- Exterior_ _ ___ &�::-______ Plumbing _____________ -� _ _ _ _ ____ -'--�-'--------=-----S_U_M_M_A_R_Y_Cj'"-'t,e:::.t'l-"---=-'---'_P-;"--<..O;;i..::...r,__:_:_:_____ ---,-,-------'-A-'N-'N_U.::...:..::A.:....L.:....A...:.S.:....'S.:....E.:....,S:...cScc.M_E.:....Ncc.T.::__ ___ _ /J,, Interior Finish£ _____ (: ________ Light __________ r._ __ -::'..-!_• ___ ------_________ D_Es_c_·R_IP_T_IO_N _______ _ Floors _________ :-_:_�------------Priv. Garage _________ !_ _______ ':., _B_u_i _ld_in_,,g,_P_e_r_m_it _______________ 1 / 1/ tj -� Original Cost, hnprovements _On ly Stories ________ ------------------Barns or Sheds··-------------------"---------1/ Additions and Betterments Fire Resisting __ L'.'. __ ------------State of Reps., ______ ------------Owner's Estimate of Present ValueFoundation ____ •------· · ------Local Imps. - -------· -·--------· Private Appraisal �---=-'-----------------ADDITIONS AND BETTERMENTS Insurance YEAR AMOUNT YEAR AMOUNT Mortgage Monthly Rental AMOUNT $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ---------------$--------------------------------$ ___________ -----· Advertised for Sale -------'---'---------------11.:....-------------------s; ________________ ·--------____ $ _________________ Transferred in 19 1 //_,$ YEAR 1938 --1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 I I 1946 I 1947 I Utl $ LAND .;L I CJ ) I IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL $ $ 1----- I Attachment D - Tax Assessor Card Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 35 of 36 CLASS OF BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF LIGHT _______________ C...;h_e_c_k1 ______________ _;:C=b.::.•c:;::kl--------------�C:.:h�•::::ck Check DESCRIPTION Give Numbers1-Single Reside nce _______ !L_ No. of Stories __________ --�Jf_Y.'.CONSTRUCTION Electricity ___________________ i.__ROOMS STORIES2-Duplex ______ -----------FOUNDATION Wood Shingle-··········-· Ii,( Composition Shingle __ ··-·.Gas···········-···········Oil __ ··-···----····-·········· Bascm't 3-Bungalow, Apt., Crt. __4-Flat or Terrace ________ 5-Apartment Houses _____ 6-Hotel _________________ _7-Store Building _________ s-_______________________ _ 9-Office Building _________ 10-Hospital or Sanitarium_11-Bank Building ____ ·---_12-Thea,tre. _______ . ---· ._:13-Warehouse·-·---·-·---_14-Factory ___ ............ .15-Public Garage ..•...•..•16-Private Garage .•......17-Service Station ....•...18-Hot House or Gr. House •...19-Poultry House ·······-·20-Barns or Sheds_·····-·· ··-·····-·······-··-···-···- CONSTRUCTION Frame .................•....... Brick ...................... !L. Tile ................. ···-.. .Stone ··················-···Concrete, Plain or Block ...Concrete, Reinforced _····-·Steel Frame_ .. _ ........... .CHARACTER OF CONST. Cheap ............. ·-·······Medium_·-······-·---··-·--z Good .... _ ...... __ ....... __ _ Fire Resisting .... ·--·-····-Non-Fire Resisting ........ -STATE OF REPAIRS Bad ____ ..... _____ ... _. __ ...Fair -···-·-····---···---···Good .... -···---·-·-·---···· New·-····-·············--·Brick ········-····-·-····­Concrete ..... --··········­Stone ···---·--·--· .-· ·-·--Wood ·········-········-·-Tile .................•....._BASEMENT Quarter ............ ---···· Half ··········-····-··-...Three-Quarter ··········-·Full ................ _·-_ .. .Cement Floor ··········-·· Finished Walls and CeilingLaundry····-···-··-···-·· .7 .. L. --·-··-· ................ �. Tar and Gravel_ __ ·-·-··-·· Prepared Paper ····--··-·· Sheet Iron ·-····---------·Copper ................... .Concrete Tile ...... -··-.. .Clay Tile._ ............... .Slate·-·-·-····---·······-·Asbestos Shingle·-··-· ...Tin ---··-·-····--·········STYLE Gable .................... .Hip ............•... -··· ••.Flat ..•...................Gambrel ...........•......Mansard ················-·Leanto .••...... ·-·-·-····-PLUMBING EXTERIOR Old Style·······--·--·····Common Brick _···-·······.... Modern ----···············Pressed Brick ............. r.i!... No. Bath Tubs ........... .Wire Cut Brick .......... _.Glazed Brick_ ............ .Wood Siding ............. .Wood Shingles ·········-·· Cement Stucco ........... .Kellastone ............•.•.Stone .....•...............Corrugated Iron_ ......... .Terra Cotta ............•. Tile ..•....................OUTSIDE TRIM Wood ············-····----....No. Shower Baths _____ ···· No. Toilets ____ ·----····-·-No. Lavatories---·-----···No. Urinals ________ ····--·No. Laundry Tubs ..... _ ...No. Sinks ····----�--·----­Sanitary ClosetsGess Pool ---···-·-·------·--------------------I HEATING Stove -·-····-··-···-· .....Hot Air ··········-·······Hot Water ... ··-·······--·Steam ···---·········-···· No. Fireplaces -·-····--···No. Dummy Fireplaces ....Air Conditioned --······ FUEL PRIVATE GARAGE Size ·······-· ....... -········ Construction_ ............... .Floor ....................... .Roof .......... vV r •.•..•• ·-·Heat ..•..•.. Iii···-Lt-...... . -···· (_u_.; I • ----------------------------- / SHEDS AND BARNS �.. I I lk • ... Size .. ·······-· Const. .. _!_Lei ..••. ... Size ........... Const ........ �:Is.-. LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS Street Paving ............. --·Alley Paving .... ···········-·Sidewalks •••••..... --·-···· Curbing ..... -·····[_···· .....Water ........••.............Storm Sewer .....•......•••••Sanitary Sewer ·····-··----·· Electricity ..........•...•.••.Gas . ····--...... ·-·--· .••••••Telephone ....... _._ ......... .Living Room ... .Dining Room_ .. .Dinette ........ .Kitchen ........ ..L_. Breakfast Nook .Bed Room ...... .Bath Room .....• Toilet Room_ ... .Shower Room .. .Sleeping Porch ..Sun Room ...... .Den····-···-···· Storage Room_ .. Office .......... .Halls_ ... ··-· ... .FINISH Unfinished .....Plastered, Plain.Plastered,Ornam ··-·-···Papered ... ·-······· -·-·-Painted or Tinted ....... .Softwood Floor-···-.---·· Hardwood Floor .Softwood Finish.Hardwood Finish ·✓·-······ . L 1_-_· ·_·_··_-_--_·_··_·_··_·_··_·_··_·_-·_·_-·_·_··_·4--_ 1 Tile ........... _. Marble or Onyx .. Give No. MISCELLANEOUS Sideboards .................. .Buffet --·-·-·--···--·-··-···· Cabinet _·-·····-·······-·-··.Book Cases._ ........ --·······Beam Ceiling ....... ·-···--···Incinerator .. -·····--······--·Sky Lights.·-····---····-·--·Refrigerator or Cooler ·--·--·Bay Windows···········-···· Dormer Windows ·----·······Porches .. ·---········-····-·· ....Wall Board .... ·-------···Sheetrock ·-····-... ··-·--Celotex ................ .Wainscoting ............ .Metal Ceiling ..... ···-··-' REMARKS Terra Cotta .. ·-·-·-----·-­Stone ··--··--··---·------_Galv. Iron.·--·------------Concrete_ .• _ .. __ . _____ . ___ ,<_ ---✓ -----------1--�·�-·{ ··-··1-·······--···---·--· ....Coal ·····-·······-······--Oil -······--·······--·····Gas ........ -·--··-·· .... .Electricity·······-··--···-Attic . .... I···········- Give Numbers Attachment D - Tax Assessor Card Item 5C - 406 Pearl St. memo 06.02.2021 Page 36 of 36