Item 5B - 728 10th Sreet Memo 8.12.2020
MEMORANDUM TO THE
LANDMARKS BOARD
August 14, 2020
Staff
Charles Ferro, Interim Comprehensive Planning Manager
Lucas Markley, Assistant City Attorney
James Hewat, Senior Historic Preservation Planner
Marcy Cameron, Historic Preservation Planner II
Clare Brandt, Administrative Specialist II
Consideration of Demolition Permit
Public hearing and consideration of an application to demolish more than 50 percent of
the roof and construct in front of the street facing wall at 728 10th Street, a non-
landmarked building over 50 years old, pursuant to Section 9-11-23 of the Boulder
Revised Code 1981 (HIS2020-00159) and under the procedures prescribed by chapter
1-3, "Quasi-Judicial Hearings," B.R.C. 1981.
Address: 728 10th St.
Owner: Lucinda Low and Daniel Magraw
Applicant: David Biek, Arcadea Architecture
Case Type: Non-Designated Demolition
Code Section: 9-11-23, B.R.C., 1981
Property Information
Date of Construction: 1924
Zoning: RL-1 (Residential Low - 1)
Lot Size: 15,330 sq. ft. (approx.)
Legal Description: LOTS 15-19 BLK 31 UNIVERSITY PLACE
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Landmarks Board place a stay-of-demolition on the building to
consider alternatives to demolition. A 180-day stay period would expire on Jan. 11, 2021.
Recommended Motion
I move that the Landmarks Board issue a stay-of-demolition for the building located at
728 10th St. for a period not to exceed 180 days from the day the permit application was
accepted by the city manager in order to explore alternatives to demolishing the building,
and adopt the findings of the staff memorandum dated August 14, 2020.
Alternative Motion Language
If the Landmarks Board chooses to not initiate landmark designation, staff recommends
the following motion language:
I move the Landmarks Board approve the demolition application for removal of more
than 50% of the roof and a portion of a street-facing wall as shown on application
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 1 of 34
materials dated May 29, 2020, finding that the building to be demolished does not have
significance under the criteria set forth in section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981.
Should the board choose to issue the demolition permit, or if the permit is allowed to
expire, staff will require that prior to demolition the following be submitted to P&S staff for
review, approval and recording with Carnegie Library:
1. Measured drawings of all exterior elevations of the house and garage;
2. A site plan showing the location of all existing improvements on the subject
property;
3. Color medium format archival quality photographs of the interior and exterior of
the house and garage.
Summary
• On June 4, 2020, the Planning Department received an application to demolish a
portion of the building, including more than 50% of the roof and a portion of a
street-facing wall of a house constructed in 1924.
• The building is not in a designated historic district or locally landmarked but is
over 50 years old and the proposed work meets the criteria for demolition defined
in Section 9-16-1 of the Boulder Revised Code 1981.
• On June 17, 2020, the Landmarks design review committee (Ldrc) referred the
application to the Landmarks Board for a public hearing, finding there was
“probable cause to believe that the building may be eligible for designation as an
individual landmark” and that the proposed scope of work was “potentially
detrimental to the potential historic character of the building.”
• Staff finds that the property meets the significance criteria for individual landmark
designation and recommends the Landmarks Board issue a stay-of-demolition for
a period not to exceed 180 days from the day the permit application was accepted
by the city manager.
• A 180-day stay period would expire on Jan. 11, 2021.
Purpose of the Board’s Review
Pursuant to section 9-11-23(d)(2), B.R.C. 1981, demolition requests for all buildings built
prior to 1940 require review by the Landmarks design review committee (Ldrc). The Ldrc
comprises two members of the Landmarks Board and a staff member. If, during the
course of its review, the Ldrc determines that there is “probable cause” to consider that
the building may be eligible for designation as an individual landmark, the issuance of
the permit is stayed for up to 60 days from the date a completed application was
accepted and the permit is referred to the board for a public hearing.
If the Landmarks Board finds that the building proposed for demolition may have
significance under the criteria in subsection (f) of Section 9-11-23, B.R.C. 1981, the
application shall be suspended for a period not to exceed 180 days from the date it was
accepted by the city manager as complete, in order to provide the time necessary to
consider alternatives to the building’s demolition. If imposed, a 180-day stay period
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 2 of 34
would start when the completed application was accepted by the city manager (July 15,
2020, when the Landmarks Board fee was paid) and expire on Jan. 11, 2021. Section 9-
11-23 (g) and (h), B.R.C. 1981.
Property Description
The property is located on the east side of 10th Street between Baseline Road and
Cascade Avenue, in the University Place addition to the city, platted in 1890. An alley is
located on the east property line. At approximately 15,330 sq. ft., the lot is larger than the
surrounding properties. The building is centrally located on the lot. The property is
located in the identified potential University Hill Historic District and south of the
Chautauqua Park National Historic Landmark.
Figure 1. Location Map showing 728 10th St.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 3 of 34
Figure 2. 728 10th St., West Elevation (façade), 2020
Figure 3. 728 10th St., East Elevation (rear), 2020
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 4 of 34
Character-Defining Features
• One-story house with double front gable;
• Bungalow style, with overhanging eaves, exposed rafters and decorative beams;
• Walls composed of four materials: cobblestone with flagstone belt course, stucco,
and horizontal siding at enclosed front porch;
• Divided light windows.
Figure 4. 728 10th St., North Elevation (side), 2020.
Figure 5. 728 10th St., South Elevation (side), 2020.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 5 of 34
Figure 6. Survey Photo, 728 10th St., 1991.
Figure 7. Survey Photo, 728 10th St., 2001.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 6 of 34
Figure 8. Tax Assessor Card Photograph, 728 10th St., c. 1929.
Alterations
The 1924 house appears to be largely intact to its original construction, alterations
include:
• Dormer with wide overhanging eaves located on the south elevation (1960s);
• Partial enclosure of the porch (date unknown).
Scope of Demolition
–
Figure 9. Proposed scope of demolition, plan view.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 7 of 34
Figure 10. Proposed scope of demolition, elevation view (top: existing; middle: building permit submittal;
bottom: Landmarks Board proposal).
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 8 of 34
The threshold for historic preservation demolition review that is triggered by the proposal
includes (bottom image in figure 10):
• Removal of more than 50% of the roof;
• Removal of a portion of a street-facing wall (removal of a portion of the gable end
and replacement of the non-historic wood lap siding with stucco).
The applicants have submitted a building permit for a design that does not required
review by the Historic Preservation program (middle image in figure 10).
AREA HISTORY
This property was surveyed as part of the 1991 Boulder Survey of Historic Places –
University Hill (link). The following is an excerpt on the history of the University Hill
neighborhood.
The original University Place Addition to Boulder encompasses an area from Sixth
through Eighteenth streets and from College Avenue to Baseline Road (excluding a
triangular area which would later become University Park Addition). It was laid out and
subdivided, and platted in 1890 by the Denver and Boulder Land and Investment
Company.1
The company purchased 194 acres of land adjoining the city in June 1890 from William
Arnett. The land was divided into 1,820 lots. By 1891, the company had made some
improvements to the subdivision and University Place began to be advertised as a
potentially desirable residential area. However, the 1893 Silver Panic, a downturn in the
agricultural sector, and the resulting general depression prevented further development.2
The opening of the streetcar line and growth of the University of Colorado in 1899
ushered in the long hoped for real estate boom in the University Place addition. The
route from the Depot3 at 14th Street and Water Street (now Canyon) traveled on Walnut
to Broadway, up 13th Street to College Avenue, and then up 9th Street to Baseline Road
and onto the Chautauqua grounds while the return route went down 10th Street to
Aurora, to 14th Street and then to Broadway to Walnut Street and back to the Depot.
Ninth and 14th streets are wider than other thoroughfares in the area, indicating that they
were planned as the major north-south arterials in the neighborhood. By the 1910s,
steady growth was underway in the neighborhood with the construction of the first
houses in the area.
1 The area west of 9th Street between College Avenue and Baseline Road was platted in 1902 as the Chautauqua
Heights Addition.
2 Simmons, R. Laurie, and Thomas H. Boulder Survey of Historic Places, 1991 Survey Report. Front Range
Research Associates. December 1991.
3 This 1887 building, a local landmark, was threatened to be demolished in 1972, and was moved to the Pow Wow
fairgrounds at the northwest corner of 30th & Pearl Streets. In 2008, it was moved again to its current location east of
30th Street and north of Pearl Street near the railroad tracks.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 9 of 34
It was the proximity and steady growth of the University of Colorado that attracted
residents to the neighborhood, as people moved to the city to work or study at the
growing institution. A number of university professors chose the University Hill
neighborhood and the proposed district as a choice location to reside.
Early in the neighborhood’s history, a building covenant of sorts existed and was written
into the buyer’s deed agreement by the investment company. It stated that, “no building
can be constructed to cost less than $1500 and must be built of brick, stone, or a
combination of the two.”4
PROPERTY HISTORY
The house at 728 10th St. was constructed in 1924 and was owned by the Jump family
from 1924 until 1945.
George Jump was born in 1887 and moved to Boulder in 1905. He was a longtime
Boulder businessman and civic leader. Jump was long engaged in mining activities in
Boulder County, owning and developing a number of tungsten mining properties around
Nederland. He operated the April Fool and Good Friday mines and the Good Friday mill
on North Boulder Creek, which he later sold for uranium operations. During the 1940s,
Jump developed the Oregon Mine in Gordon Gulch. Jump was a member of Boulder
School District 3 board of education from 1933 until 1945. In addition, he was active in
many Masonic organizations. He owned the Ideal Metal Weatherstripping Company in
Boulder, which he operated with his sons. George married Clara Wessel of Boulder in
1907. Clara Wessel’s father was also a miner. The couple had five children – Robert,
Clyde, L.G., Raymond and Mary Lou. 5
In 1945, the Jumps sold the property to Arthur and Venola Bevins. Arthur Bevins was
born in 1891 in Trinidad, Colorado and worked as a mail carrier for the Post Office. He
registered for the World War II draft in 1942 and died in 1947 (cause of death unknown).
Venola was born in 1887 and died in 1983. Following her husband’s death, she operated
a boarding house at 945 11th St. and later moved to 1560 High St., where she lived with
Margaret Beins (relation unknown) who worked in the personnel department at the
National Bureau of Standards.
R. Ernest and Eleanor Leffel purchased the property in 1947 and lived there until 1952.
R. E. was an assistant professor at the University of Colorado.
Lorene Ruth, widow of Weldon Ruth, owned the property from 1952 until 1962. She
worked as a receptionist at Duhon & Wolfe.
4 Barker, Jane Valentine. Historic Homes of Boulder County. Boulder, 1979.
5 Simmons, R. Laurie, and Thomas H. Historic Building Inventory Record for 728 10th St. Front Range Research
Associates. June 1991.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 10 of 34
The property then passed to Daniel Bailey and then David and Bette Heimann, who each
owned the property for a decade. The Heimanns sold the property to the current owners
in 1983.
Criteria for the Board’s Decision:
Section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981, provides that the Landmarks Board “shall consider and
base its decision upon any of the following criteria:
(1) The eligibility of the building for designation as an individual landmark
consistent with the purposes and standards in Sections 9-11-1 and 9-11-2,
B.R.C. 1981;
(2) The relationship of the building to the character of the neighborhood as an
established and definable area;
(3) The reasonable condition of the building; and
(4) The reasonable projected cost of restoration or repair.
In considering the condition of the building and the projected cost of restoration or
repair as set forth in paragraphs (f)(3) and (f)(4) …, the board may not consider
deterioration caused by unreasonable neglect.
As detailed below, staff considers this property may be eligible for designation as an
individual landmark.
CRITERION 1: INDIVIDUAL LANDMARK ELIGIBILITY
The following is a result of staff’s research of the property relative to the significance
criteria for individual landmarks as adopted by the Landmarks Board on Sept. 17, 1975.
See Attachment D: Individual Landmark Significance Criteria
HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE:
Summary: The house located at 728 10th St. meets historic significance under criteria 1, 2,
3, and 4.
1. Date of Construction: 1924
Elaboration: The 1929 Tax Assessor Card records the date of construction as 1924.
2. Association with Persons or Events: George Jump
Elaboration: The 1991 Survey states:
In 1926, this was the home of George and Mary Jump and their son, Robert. George
W. Jump was a longtime Boulder businessman and civic leader. He was born in 1887
and moved to Boulder about 1905. Jump was long engaged in mining activities in
Boulder County, owning and developing a number of tungsten mining properties
around Nederland. He operated the April Fool and Good Friday mines and the Good
Friday mill on North Boulder Creek, which he later sold for uranium operations.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 11 of 34
During the 1940s, Jump developed the Oregon Mine in Gordon Gulch, Jump was a
member of Boulder School District 3 board of education from 1933 until 1945. In
addition, he was active in many Masonic organizations. He owned the Ideal Metal
Weatherstripping Company in Boulder, which he operated with his sons.
Jump married Clara Wessel of Boulder in 1907. Clara Wessel’s father was also a
miner. The couple had five children – Robert, Clyde, L.G., Raymond and Mary Lou.
3. Distinction in the Development of the Community: University Hill Addition
Elaboration: The property is located in the University Hill Addition to the city, which
was platted in 1890.
4. Recognition by Authorities: Front Range Research Associates, Inc.
Elaboration: The property was surveyed in 1991 and found to represent a type,
period or method of construction, noting “This well-preserved dwelling is
representative of the Bungalow style, popular during the 1920s in the University Hill
neighborhood in Boulder. The building is notable for its varied wall composition,
which includes cobblestone, wood, and stucco. The native stone construction is
found throughout this Boulder neighborhood.
ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Summary: The house located at 728 10th St. meets architectural significance under criteria 1
and 4.
1. Recognized Period or Style: Bungalow
Elaboration: The property is an example of the Bungalow style, with its double front
gable, stone and stucco walls, overhanging eaves with exposed rafters, decorative
beams and divided-light windows.
2. Architect or Builder of Prominence: Unknown
Elaboration: The builder of this house is unknown.
3. Artistic Merit: None observed
4. Example of the Uncommon: Use of materials
Elaboration: The use of cobblestone, flagstone, stucco and wood is unusual.
5. Indigenous Qualities: Native stone construction with the use of cobblestone and
flagstone.
ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Summary: The house located at 728 10th St. meets environmental significance under criteria
1 and 2.
1. Site Characteristics: The house is centrally located in the middle of a large lot with
mature vegetation and retains its historic residential character.
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 12 of 34
2. Compatibility with Site: None observed
3. Geographic Importance: None observed
4. Environmental Appropriateness: None observed
5. Area Integrity: The property is located in the identified potential University Hill
Historic District. The 700 block of 10th Street appears to retain its historic integrity.
CRITERION 2: RELATIONSHIP TO THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD:
The property is located in the identified potential University Hill Historic District. The 700
block of 10th Street appears to retain its historic integrity.
CRITERION 3: CONDITION OF THE BUILDING
Staff has not received information specific to the condition of the building.
CRITERION 4: PROJECTED COST OF RESTORATION OR REPAIR:
Staff has not received information specific to the condition of the building.
Analysis:
Staff considers that there is “probable cause” to consider the property at 728 10th St. may
be eligible for designation as an individual landmark based upon its significance as an
intact example of a Bungalow residence, its association with the Jump family and its
location in the identified Potential University Hill Historic District.
Consistent with the LDRC determination, staff considers that the removal of more than
50% of the roof as shown on application materials dated May 26, 2020 would be
potentially detrimental to the historic character of the building. The removal of a portion
of the front gable roof and its redesign into an asymmetrical configuration would also be
detrimental to the building’s potential historic character. However, the removal of the
wood lap siding on the street-facing wall, enclosed between 1929 and 1991, would not
be detrimental.
Neighborhood Comment:
Staff has not received public comment related to this case.
The Board’s Decision:
If the Landmarks Board finds that the buildings to be demolished do not have
significance under the criteria set forth in section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981, the city
manager shall issue a demolition permit.
If the Landmarks Board finds that the buildings to be demolished may have significance
under the criteria set forth above, the application shall be suspended for a period not to
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 13 of 34
exceed 180 days from the date the permit application was accepted by the city manager
as complete in order to provide the time necessary to consider alternatives to the
demolition of the building (Section 9-11-23(h), B.R.C. 1981). A 180-day stay period
would expire on Jan. 11, 2020.
Findings:
Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board adopt the following findings:
A stay of demolition for the property at 728 10th St. is appropriate based on the criteria
set forth in Section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981 in that:
1. The property may be eligible for individual landmark designation based upon its
historic and architectural significance;
2. The property contributes to the character of the neighborhood as an intact
representative of the area’s past;
3. It has not been demonstrated to be impractical or economically unfeasible to
rehabilitate the building.
Attachments:
A: Applicant Materials
B: Historic Building Inventory Form (link)
C: Boulder County Tax Assessor Card c. 1929
D: Significance Criteria for Individual Landmarks (link)
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 14 of 34
JULY 15, 2020
TO: MARCY CAMERON & JAMES HEWAT &
CITY OF BOULDER LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD
SUBJECT: 728 10TH STREET, BOULDER COLORADO
Dear Marcy, James and LPAB,
Thank you very much for your assistance and guidance with this project so far. Our clients, Lucinda Low and
Dan Magraw, who have owned this home for many years, but have not lived in it recently, would like to
update the whole house to current standards before moving back in.
We very much appreciate the members of the Board and Staff wanting to preserve as much of the original
1924 home as possible, and this is our goal, as well, within certain practical limits. We feel its historic value
has already been compromised quite a lot by the filling in of the porch and by the second level addition in
the 1960’s. After careful consideration of our options, we and our clients have decided we’d rather design
a whole home that looks like it could have been built in 1924 (or have a timeless character), rather than
have our addition look like a second level was plopped on top of the original home. We prefer to have
consistent detailing throughout, rather than making the addition stand out from the original. Our intent is
to replicate and replace the original detailing with new materials (as the existing boards are 96 years old
and falling apart), but with new energy efficient windows and sturdy detailing so that this home can stand
for another 100 years.
We did take into consideration the request of the LDRC to open the front porch back up to its original 1924
condition. While Lucinda and Dan did not feel this was practical, they did decide to remove some existing
shoddy construction and open up the south side of the porch to its original 1924 condition, rather than
enclosing it as originally proposed.
In the interest of staying close to the owners’ target schedule for construction, we have submitted a By
Right solution to the City for permit, but would like to make our case to the Board to change a few details
to be more in keeping with what Lucinda and Dan would prefer. This proposal is very similar to what was
presented to the LDRC at the end of May, with the upper level wall coming all the way out to the same
plane as the lower level. It also extends the second‐floor balcony across this façade so that it is more
functional and so that it aligns with the indentation of the open south side of the porch on the main level
below it.
We understand that this approach is somewhat at odds with the possibility of landmarking the home, but
the owners are sure they do not want to go that route. We feel this is the best solution for the character
of the neighborhood and the long‐term preservation of this historic asset.
WARM REGARDS,
David Biek
Principal Architect, 303‐819‐2424 mobile
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 15 of 34
W E S T E L E V A T I O N - E X I S T I N G
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
W E S T E L E V A T I O N - B Y - R I G H T *
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
*BY-RIGHT OPTION WAS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 01 JULY 2020.
W E S T E L E V A T I O N - P R O P O S E D
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
L O W / M A G R A W R E S I D E N C E - L A N D M A R K S R E V I E W
7 2 8 1 0 T H S T - 1 5 J U L Y 2 0 2 0
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 16 of 34
S O U T H E L E V A T I O N - E X I S T I N G
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
S O U T H E L E V A T I O N - B Y - R I G H T *
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
*BY-RIGHT OPTION WAS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 01 JULY 2020.
S O U T H E L E V A T I O N - P R O P O S E D
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
L O W / M A G R A W R E S I D E N C E - L A N D M A R K S R E V I E W
7 2 8 1 0 T H S T - 1 5 J U L Y 2 0 2 0
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 17 of 34
N O R T H E L E V A T I O N - E X I S T I N G
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
N O R T H E L E V A T I O N - B Y - R I G H T *
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
*BY-RIGHT OPTION WAS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 01 JULY 2020.
N O R T H E L E V A T I O N - P R O P O S E D
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
L O W / M A G R A W R E S I D E N C E - L A N D M A R K S R E V I E W
7 2 8 1 0 T H S T - 1 5 J U L Y 2 0 2 0
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 18 of 34
V I E W F R O M S O U T H - W E S T - E X I S T I N G
V I E W F R O M S O U T H - W E S T - B Y - R I G H T
V I E W F R O M S O U T H - W E S T - B Y - R I G H T *
*BY-RIGHT OPTION WAS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 01 JULY 2020.
V I E W F R O M S O U T H - W E S T - P R O P O S E D
L O W / M A G R A W R E S I D E N C E - L A N D M A R K S R E V I E W
7 2 8 1 0 T H S T - 1 5 J U L Y 2 0 2 0
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 19 of 34
V I E W F R O M N O R T H - W E S T - E X I S T I N G
V I E W F R O M N O R T H - W E S T - B Y - R I G H T *
*BY-RIGHT OPTION WAS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 01 JULY 2020.
V I E W F R O M N O R T H - W E S T - P R O P O S E D
L O W / M A G R A W R E S I D E N C E - L A N D M A R K S R E V I E W
7 2 8 1 0 T H S T - 1 5 J U L Y 2 0 2 0
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 20 of 34
6" / 12" (E)6" / 12" (E)6" / 12" (E)(E) ROOF
TO REMAIN
(E) ROOF TO
REMAIN
(E) ROOF
TO REMAIN
REMOVE (E) ROOF
& ROOF STRUCT.
REMOVE (E) ROOF
& ROOF STRUCT.
REMOVE (E) ROOF
& ROOF STRUCT.
8'-0 3/4"51'-0 1/4"14'-3 1/2"4'-2 1/2"12'-3 1/2"6'-2 1/2"2'-7 1/2"TOTAL AREA REMOVED: 1,080 SF
TOTAL AREA REMAINING: 1,109 SF11'-6 1/4"12'-8 7/8"12'-8 7/8"10'-10 1/4"16'-5 1/2"14'-8"8'-6 5/8"8'-6 5/8"
51% (E) ROOF TO REMAIN3'-0 3/4"15'-5 1/4"4'-2 1/2"6" / 12" (E)6" / 12" (E)6" / 12" (E)(E) ROOF
TO REMAIN
(E) ROOF TO
REMAIN
(E) ROOF
TO REMAIN
REMOVE (E) ROOF
& ROOF STRUCT.
REMOVE (E) ROOF
& ROOF STRUCT.
REMOVE (E) ROOF
& ROOF STRUCT.
8'-0 3/4"51'-0 1/4"14'-3 1/2"4'-2 1/2"12'-3 1/2"6'-2 1/2"2'-7 1/2"TOTAL AREA REMOVED: 1,135 SF
TOTAL AREA REMAINING: 1,026 SF11'-6 1/4"12'-8 7/8"12'-8 7/8"10'-10 1/4"16'-5 1/2"14'-8"8'-6 5/8"8'-6 5/8"
47% (E) ROOF TO REMAIN3'-0 3/4"15'-5 1/4"4'-2 1/2"R O O F D E M O L I T I O N P L A N - B Y - R I G H T
R O O F D E M O L I T I O N P L A N - P R O P O S E D
L O W / M A G R A W R E S I D E N C E - L A N D M A R K S R E V I E W
7 2 8 1 0 T H S T - 1 5 J U L Y 2 0 2 0
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 21 of 34
(N) AREA OF ADDITION
(N) DECK(N) RAMP
(E) CONC. WALK
(E) DRIVE
S 00°00'05" E 125.46'S 89°50'40" E 125.06'
N 89°56'00" W 125.06'N 00°00'00" W 125.66'(E) TRASH
ENCLOSURE TO
BE REMOVED
10TH STREET(N) DRIVE
(E) STONE
WALL TO BE
REMOVED
(N) AREA OF
ADDITION ON
UPPER LEVEL
LINE OF UPPER
LEVEL ABV.
AREA OF (E)
ROOF TO BE
REMOVED
AREA OF (E)
ROOF TO BE
REMOVED
AREA OF ADDITION
AREA OF ROOF TO BE REMOVED
OBJECTS ABOVE/BEHIND
EXISTING
NEW
KEY
(E)
(N)
L O W / M A G R A W
29 MAY 2020728 10TH STREET BOULDER, CO 80302 1.3
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
PROPOSED DEMO PLAN
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 22 of 34
L O W / M A G R A W
29 MAY 2020728 10TH STREET BOULDER, CO 80302 1.4
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION - EXISTING
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION - PROPOSED
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 23 of 34
L O W / M A G R A W
29 MAY 2020728 10TH STREET BOULDER, CO 80302 1.1
WEST ELEVATION (STREET FRONT)
EAST ELEVATION
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 24 of 34
L O W / M A G R A W
29 MAY 2020728 10TH STREET BOULDER, CO 80302 1.2
NORTH ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
Attachment A - Applicant Materials
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 25 of 34
Attachment B - Historic Building Inventory Form
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 26 of 34
Attachment B - Historic Building Inventory Form
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 27 of 34
Attachment B - Historic Building Inventory Form
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 28 of 34
Attachment B - Historic Building Inventory Form
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 29 of 34
Attachment B - Historic Building Inventory Form
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 30 of 34
Attachment B - Historic Building Inventory Form
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 31 of 34
Boulder County Tax Assessor Card c. 1929
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 32 of 34
Boulder County Tax Assessor Card c. 1929
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020 Page 33 of 34
Boulder County Tax Assessor Card c. 1929
Item 5B - 728 10th Street Memo 8.12.2020Page 34 of 34