Item 5A - 2250 Bluebell LB Memo 1.6.2020
MEMORANDUM TO THE LANDMARKS BOARD
January 6, 2020
Staff
Jim Robertson, Comprehensive Planning Manager
Lucas Markley, Assistant City Attorney
James Hewat, Senior Historic Preservation Planner
Marcy Cameron, Historic Preservation Planner II
Clare Brandt, Administrative Specialist II
Michelle Mikoni, Historic Preservation Intern
Demolition Request
Public hearing and consideration of a demolition application (stay of demolition
placed on application Oct. 2, 2019) for the house and accessory building located
at 2250 Bluebell Ave., non-landmarked buildings over 50 years old, pursuant to
Section 9-11-23 of the Boulder Revised Code, 1981(HIS2019-00238).
Address: 2250 Bluebell Ave.
Owner: Dr. Helmet Altschuler
Owner’s Representative: Rob Altshuler and Gary Gruber
Case Number: HIS2019-00238
Case Type: Demolition
Code Section: 9-11-23, B.R.C., 1981
Site Information
Date of Construction: 1919
Zoning: RL-1 (Residential Low – 1)
Lot Size: 41,550 sq. ft. (GIS)
Building Size: 2,300 sq. ft. (approx.)
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Landmarks Board approve the demolition application.
Recommended Motion
I move that the Landmarks Board approve the demolition application for the
buildings located at 2250 Bluebell Ave. and adopt the staff memorandum with the
findings as listed below. The Landmarks Board recommends that staff require
archival documentation of the property, including photographs and a landscape
plan with building footprints, landscape features, and tree and plant identification.
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 1 of 10 Page 1 of 59
Findings
Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board adopt the following findings:
Approval of the demolition application for the buildings at 2250 Bluebell Ave. is
appropriate based upon the criteria set forth in Section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981 in
that:
1. While the property was found to be potentially eligible for individual
landmark designation, the house is in very poor structural condition and
has been demonstrated to be impractical to rehabilitate the building.
2. While the property has unique vegetation and hardscaping features
associated with Darwin Andrews’ Rockmont Nursery, as a whole it does
not retain sufficient integrity for designation as a historic landscape.
3. The property will be recorded through archival documentation including a
detailed site plan of vegetation and hardscaping.
Summary
• On July 30, 2019, the Planning Department received a demolition review
application for the house and accessory building.
• On August 14, the Ldrc reviewed the application and referred it to the
Landmarks Board for review in a public hearing, finding there was “probable
cause to believe that the property may be eligible for designation as an
individual landmark.”
• On August 19, the applicant paid the Landmarks Board hearing fee.
• On October 2, the Landmarks Board placed a stay-of-demolition on the
application in order to explore alternatives to demolition.
• During the stay, Landmarks Board members and staff met with the owner’s
representatives, made site visits, and requested input from the Parks &
Recreation and Open Space and Mountain Parks departments to determine
the feasibility of the City purchasing the property. Neither department is
interested in purchasing the property.
• Staff considers the approval of the demolition application for the house and
accessory building appropriate due to the very poor structural condition of the
house, the high cost of rehabilitation, and the loss of integrity of the
environmental integrity of the site from the period of its use as the Rockmont
Nursery.
PURPOSE OF THE BOARD’S REVIEW
Pursuant to section 9-11-23(d)(2), B.R.C. 1981, demolition applications for all
buildings built prior to 1940 require review by the Landmarks design review
committee (Ldrc). The Ldrc comprises two members of the Landmarks Board
and a staff member. If, during the course of its review, the Ldrc determines that
there is probable cause to consider that the building may be eligible for
designation as an individual landmark, the issuance of the permit is stayed for up
to 60 days from the date a completed application was accepted and the permit is
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 2 of 10 Page 2 of 59
referred to the board for a public hearing pursuant to the procedures prescribed
by chapter 1-3, "Quasi-Judicial Hearings," B.R.C. 1981.
If the Landmarks Board finds that the building may have significance under the
criteria in subsection (f) of Section 9-11-23, B.R.C. 1981, the application shall be
suspended for a period not to exceed 180 days from the date it was accepted by
the city manager as complete, in order to provide the time necessary to consider
alternatives to the building’s demolition. If imposed, a 180-day stay period starts
when the completed application was accepted by the city manager (August 19,
2019, when the Landmarks Board fee was paid) and would expire on Feb. 15,
2020. Section 9-11-23 (g) and (h), B.R.C. 1981.
If, during the course of the stay, the Landmarks Board wishes to take action on
the application, it must vote to schedule a public hearing. On Dec. 4, 2019, the
Landmarks Board voted to hold a hearing to consider issuing a demolition permit
for the buildings prior to the Feb. 15, 2019 expiration of the stay-of-demolition.
Property Description
Reference the Oct. 2, 2019 Landmarks Board memo for a description of the
property and information on its history.
Figure 1. Location map, 2250 Bluebell Ave.
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 3 of 10 Page 3 of 59
Figure 2. 2250 Bluebell Ave., c. 1949 (left) and 2019 (right).
Figure 3. Accessory building, date of construction unknown.
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 4 of 10 Page 4 of 59
Figure 4. Example of rock wall/landscape feature on the property.
Stay of Demolition Summary
On Oct. 2, 2019, the Landmarks Board placed a stay-of-demolition on the
application in order to explore alternatives to demolition. Since that time,
Landmarks Board members have visited the site and Historic Preservation staff
have requested information on the possibility of the Parks and Recreation or
Open Space and Mountain Parks department purchasing the site.
Both city departments wrote letters stating the purchase of the property would not
be aligned with their master plans and that they were not interested in purchasing
the site. See Attachment D & E: Responses from City Departments.
Criteria for the Board’s Decision
Section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981, provides that the Landmarks Board “shall
consider and base its decision upon any of the following criteria:
(1) The eligibility of the building for designation as an individual
landmark consistent with the purposes and standards in Sections 9-
11-1 and 9-11-2, B.R.C. 1981;
(2) The relationship of the building to the character of the
neighborhood as an established and definable area;
(3) The reasonable condition of the building; and
(4) The reasonable projected cost of restoration or repair.
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 5 of 10 Page 5 of 59
In considering the condition of the building and the projected cost of
restoration or repair as set forth in paragraphs (f)(3) and (f)(4) …, the
board may not consider deterioration caused by unreasonable neglect.
As detailed in the Oct. 2, 2019 Landmarks Board memo, staff considers the
house may meet the criteria for designation as an individual landmark.
Analysis
CRITERION 1: INDIVIDUAL LANDMARK ELIGIBILITY
The following is a result of staff's research of the property relative to the
significance criteria for individual landmarks as adopted by the Landmarks Board
on Sept. 17, 1975. See Attachment F: Significance Criteria for Individual
Landmarks.
HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE:
Summary: The house at 2250 Bluebell Ave. meets criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 for historic
significance.
1. Date of Construction: 1919
Elaboration: The tax assessor card lists the date of construction as 1919.
2. Association with Persons or Events: Darwin Andrews
Elaboration: Darwin Andrews was an internationally known horticulturist and
the founder and operator of the Rockmont Nursery from approximately 1899
until 1937. The Andrews family owned the property from 1915 until 1957.
Additional research may be merited to determine the historic significance of
other individuals that are associated with the property.
3. Distinction in the Development of the Community: Rockmont Nursery
Elaboration: The property operated as Darwin Andrew’s Rockmont Nursery
and office for his mail-order seed business from 1919 until 1946.
4. Recognition by Authorities: Front Range Research Associates, Inc.; Daily
Camera
Elaboration: The 1992 by Front Range Research Associates, Inc. historic
survey form determined the building was in good condition with major
alterations, including “attic expansion; swimming pool. Remodeling in 1950.”
The historic background is recorded as “Philip and Sara C. Andrews are listed
as the owners in 1929 . . . Mr. Andrews, the founder of Andrews Arboretum in
Boulder and the owner of Rockmont Nursery, planted many rare species of
trees on this property. D.M. and Marian P. Gates were subsequent owners.”
The survey did not find the property to possess architectural or historic
significance, stating, “Alterations to this house have diminished its historic
integrity.”
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 6 of 10 Page 6 of 59
*Note: The survey form contains inaccurate information: Darwin Andrews was
the owner of the property in 1929 and founded Rockmont Nursery; his son,
Philip, operated the business following his father’s death in 1938.
Carol Taylor wrote a May 24, 2018 Daily Camera article “Darwin Andrews put
Boulder on map for small science”
ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Summary: The house at 2250 Bluebell Ave. meets architectural significance criteria
1 and 5.
1. Recognized Period or Style: Hipped-Roof House with Craftsman Elements
Elaboration: The building contains elements of the Craftsman style, including
overhanging eaves with exposed rafter tails and decorative masonry. The
original windows were replaced, likely around 1950, with steel casement
windows.
2. Architect or Builder of Prominence: Unknown
3. Artistic Merit: None observed
4. Example of the Uncommon: Modernized craftsman house
Elaboration: The building was modernized through the removal of the entry
porch and replacement of the original double-hung windows with steel
casement windows around 1950. The resulting design is a hybrid of time
periods and styles.
5. Indigenous Qualities: Stone walls
Elaboration: A series of stone landscaping walls are located around the
property.
ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Summary: The house at 2250 Bluebell Ave. meets the criteria for environmental
significance 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
1. Site Characteristics: The double lot exhibits qualities of planned and natural
vegetation reflecting its use as a nursery from about 1919 to 1938. Additional
research may be merited to better understand the environmental significance
of the property, including reports that Andrews’ tree hybrids still exist on the
property.
2. Compatibility with Site: The house and built landscape features are
compatible with its site.
3. Geographic Importance: The building is not an established visual feature
due to the placement of the house within the lot and the amount of mature
vegetation.
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 7 of 10 Page 7 of 59
4. Environmental Appropriateness: The surroundings are complementary and
appropriate to its earlier use as a nursery.
5. Area Integrity: The property was one of the first lots developed in the
Interurban subdivision, retains history from its uses as an early twentieth
century residence and nursery.
CRITERION 2: RELATIONSHIP TO THE CHARACTER OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD:
The neighborhood was developed primarily in the period after the Andrews sold
the property and the area was developed as part of the Oak Park Subdivision in
1956. Though changes have occurred over the last 50 years, the area appears to
retain its established residential character.
CRITERION 3: CONDITION OF THE BUILDING
The owner included a structural report as part of the Landmarks Board application
materials. Gebau, Inc. found the double-wythe masonry construction to be failing
due to the lack of stretcher courses and structural issues caused by expansive
soils known to be found in the area. An excerpt is included below; See Attachment
A: Structural Report.
Stair-stepping diagonal fractures appear on almost every exterior wall, be
it in the shallow slab on grade, or main level wood frame over basement
portions of the building. The double wythe exterior brick masonry was not
laid up with intermittent stretcher courses in its coursing. One wall along
the west side of the living area has suffered a major (16’ long wall
segment” delamination between wythes with a gap approaching 3-4” at its
largest separation between individual wythes at mid wall height.
“The 16’ delaminated long wall segment on the west side of the living area
is at risk of outright collapse at the exterior wythe at any time.”
… “reuse of the existing building would likely only be facilitated by
installing a complete supplemental wood-framed wall system inside the
double wythe building exterior and securing the double wythe brick there
to rendering it a non-structural veneer. This would be very expensive,
tedious and space consuming.”
Since the Gebau report was undertaken, staff has observed continuing structural
deterioration and considers there to be a high risk of collapse of some of the
walls. Given the advanced state of deterioration and the fact that the house has
been significantly modified in the period following ownership by Darwin Andrews,
demolition of the house is appropriate.
CRITERION 4: PROJECTED COST OF RESTORATION OR REPAIR:
The Gebau report estimates the cost to stabilize the foundation and reconstruct
the masonry walls to a non-structural veneer would be at least $250,000 and
recommends the estimate be verified by a contractor. At $250,000, the stabilization
and repair costs would add approximately $108/sq. ft. to the project.
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 8 of 10 Page 8 of 59
Archival Documentation
In September 2019, the property owners hired Birch Ecology to “conduct an
inventory of the existing vegetation and evaluate whether the site could
potentially support any historically or horticulturally significant trees or shrubs.”
See Attachment B: Ecological Report. Key points include:
• The landscape has not been maintained and many of the trees are
overcrowded, which has limited the flowering of ornamental species.
• There are many dead branches/undergrowth.
• The most abundant species are elms and cottonwoods.
• It is possible that there are aspen-cottonwood hybrid trees on the property,
but additional testing would been needed to confirm this theory.
• Other tree species include maple, oak, green ash, hawthorn, horse
chestnut, honey locust, pine, juniper, box elder and spruce.
• Ornamental shrubs include cherry, honeysuckle, holly, Oregon grape,
viburnum, cotoneaster, mock orange, black locust bush and lilac.
• Investigation was limited by the time of year and due to the overgrown
nature of the site.
• The consultants collected and pressed leaves and fruit to document the
species.
• If rare or unusual plants were found, cuttings could be used to propagate
them or smaller ones could be transplanted to a different location.
In 2016, the City of Boulder hired Kathleen Corbett of Corbett AHS, Inc. to
conduct a Historic Inventory Form for the Andrews Arboretum at 1560 Broadway.
The arboretum was established in 1948, ten years after Darwin Andrews’ death
and named in his honor with a “wide variety of plants donated by the family of the
late nurseryman.” The form focuses on the landscape and provides limited
information on Andrews and in the summary of the eligibility assessment states
“However, it should not be considered eligible to either register under Criterion B
for its association with Darwin M. Andrews, as he was deceased by the time it
was first built and the site has no direct association with his works.” See
Attachment C: The Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey.
Staff considers that due to 2250 Bluebell Avenue’s unique history as a plant
nursey that had a catalogue that shipped worldwide, additional archival research
is necessary to fully document the site prior to its demolition. Staff considers a
detailed landscape plan with building footprints, stone walls, landscape features,
plant and tree identification should be required as mitigation for the demolition
prior to the house being demolished.
Neighborhood Comment:
At the Oct. 2, 2019, five people spoke in support of preservation of the property.
Options
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 9 of 10 Page 9 of 59
If the Landmarks Board finds that the building does not have significance under
the criteria set forth in section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981, the city manager shall
issue a demolition permit.
If the Landmarks Board finds that the building to be demolished may have
significance under the criteria set forth above, the application shall be suspended
for a period not to exceed 180 days from the date the permit application was
accepted by the city manager as complete in order to provide the time necessary
to consider alternatives to the demolition of the building (Section 9-11-23(h),
B.R.C. 1981). A 180-day stay period would expire on Feb. 15, 2020.
Attachments
A: Structural Report
B: Ecological Report
C: The Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey
D: Letter from Open Space & Mountain Parks
E: Letter from Parks & Recreation
F: Significance Criteria for Individual Landmarks
Item 5A - 1.6.2019 LB memo - 2250 Bluebell Avenue - Page 10 of 10 Page 10 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 1 of 9Page 11 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 2 of 9Page 12 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 3 of 9Page 13 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 4 of 9Page 14 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 5 of 9Page 15 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 6 of 9Page 16 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 7 of 9Page 17 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 8 of 9Page 18 of 59
Attachment A - 2250 Bluebell structural report - Page 9 of 9Page 19 of 59
BIRCH ECOLOGY LLC · P.O. BOX 170 · 429 MAIN ST. · LYONS, CO 80540 · 720-350-2530 · WWW.BIRCHECOLOGY.COM
Stephen Sparn
Sopher Sparn Architects
1731 15th Street, Suite 250
Boulder, CO 80302
Date: October 2, 2019
RE: 2250 Bluebell Avenue Tree and Shrub Inventory
Dear Stephen,
Per your request Birch Ecology visited the former residence of Darwin M. Andrews located at 2250
Bluebell Avenue in Boulder, Colorado on September 23, 2019 to conduct an inventory of the
existing vegetation and evaluate whether the site could potentially support any historically or
horticulturally significant trees or shrubs.
Existing Conditions and Tree Species
It has been more than 80 years since Darwin M. Andrews lived at 2250 Bluebell. The yard
surrounding his former home has not been maintained in years. It is densely forested, however
many of the trees are overcrowded, unhealthy, and in some cases, mis-shapen. The shrub
understory is thick and overgrown.
Due to the dense shade, many of the shrubs and smaller trees appear unhealthy, and are
misshapen in their effort to reach light. Some of these have died over the years and there are
many dead branches that have not been removed. The shading also has reduced or eliminated
flowering for many ornamental species, such as lilacs.
Tree Species - The most abundant trees on the property are elms (Ulmus), and there are several
large, mature American elm trees as well as Siberian elms. Large, mature cottonwoods (Populus
sp.)are also common. Based on their morphology, the story of a potential aspen-cottonwood
hybrid cannot be discounted, since the leaf shape has intermediate characteristics between
aspen (Populus tremuloides) and cottonwoods; and the mature bark and stature are suggestive
of a plains cottonwood (Populus deldoides). During our inventory, we identified eight large,
mature trees with the intermediate morphology that were between 20-36 inches DBH (diameter
at breast height), and three younger trees averaging about 15 inches DBH. It should be noted
that both aspen and cottonwoods are in the genus Populus, and members of this genus are
known to hybridize.
Other native and ornamental trees and shrubs are scattered throughout the property. In addition
to elms (Ulmus sp.), at least two species of ornamental maples (Acer), three or more types of oaks
(Quercus), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), two or more types of hawthorns (Crataegus), a
horse chestnut (Aesculus), several mature honey locusts (Gleditsia), a few pines that are stretching
for light (Pinus), several unhealthy and dead junipers (Juniperus), a few boxelders (Acer negundo),
Attachement B - 2250 Bluebell Ave ecological report - Page 1 of 2 Page 20 of 59
BIRCH ECOLOGY LLC · P.O. BOX 170 · 429 MAIN ST. · LYONS, CO 80540 · 720-350-2530 · WWW.BIRCHECOLOGY.COM
and spruces (Picea) that are in poor condition. Grape vines (Vitis sp.) climb up the trunks and
through the lower canopy of the trees near the house.
In addition to these trees, there is a dense and overgrown shrub layer in the shady understory. We
identified ornamental varieties of cherry (Prunus), honeysuckle (Lonicera), holly (Ilex), Oregon
grape (Mahonia), viburnum (Viburnum sp.), cotoneaster (Cotoneaster), mock orange
(Philadelphus), privet (Ligustrum), and black locust bush (Robinia).
Mr. Andrews’ obituary indicates he was known for his work with lilacs, and many lilac shrubs were
present during our inventory. However, all appeared unhealthy due to the lack of sun and
maintenance; only one had a few fruits - suggesting the others did not flower due to the lack of
sunlight in the overgrown yard.
Evaluation of Resources
Our on-site assessment determined that the largest, most abundant trees on the property are elms.
Since neighbors reported the story of the “aspen-cottonwood hybrid” trees, we carefully
examined the large, mature trees on the property to consider whether this story could have merit.
Based on our observations of the trees and leaf morphology, the story could be plausible,
especially given that they are in the same genus and trees in this genus are known to hybridize.
Our initial site assessment documented a variety of species, but our investigation was limited by
the time of year, when the plants are scenescing. In addition, identification is difficult in the current
condition of the garden - when the dense shade and generally poor health of many of the shrubs
and small trees seems to reduce or eliminate flowering - which would be a key feature used in
identifying these ornamental varieties. During our inventory, we collected and pressed leaf
samples and fruits, when present, to document the species encountered during our inventory.
Summary
Large, mature American elm trees and honeylocusts are common on the property and there are
large cottonwood trees with leaves that could plausibly belong to an “aspen-cottonwood”
hybrid, but additional testing would be required to determine if that were the case. Other
ornamental species could be difficult to identify if they are not flowering due to the dense shade,
and our inventory was completed in the fall. In general, there were many unhealthy, overgrown
plants and the yard has not been maintained. However, it should be noted that if any of the
plants could be considered rare or unusual, cuttings could be used to propagate them or smaller
ones could be transplanted to a location where they could grow and thrive.
Please call if you have questions.
Thanks,
Heather Houston
Senior Ecologist
Attachement B - 2250 Bluebell Ave ecological report - Page 2 of 2 Page 21 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 1 of 32
COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY
Historic Cultural Landscapes Official eligibility determination
(OAHP use only)
Date Initials _________
Determined Eligible- NR
Determined Not Eligible- NR
Determined Eligible- SR
Determined Not Eligible- SR
Need Data
Eligible NR District -- contributing
Eligible NR District -- noncontributing
IDENTIFICATION
Property name: The Andrews Arboretum historic current other
Resource Count: _0_ buildings _7_ structures _ 2 _ objects _0_ sites
Ownership: federal state city county private unknown
Owner(s) contact info:
City of Boulder
PO Box 791
Boulder, CO 80306
Previously recorded resources associated with property (provide list of OAHP site numbers):
No previously recorded resources associated with this property were discovered in the
course of research
LOCATION
Street Address: 1560 Broadway
Municipality: Boulder, Colorado vicinity
USGS quad (7.5’): Boulder year: 2013
Parcel number: 146331200052
Parcel information: Part of Colorado & Southern Abandoned RR;
Tract in Block 1, Grand View Terrace
Acreage: 1.74 actual estimated
PLSS information: Principal Meridian 6th Township 1N Range 70W
L1 and L2 of N ½ of the NW¼ of section 31
Boundary Description and Justification: historic legal other _____________
please note that boundary on accompanying location map should conform to boundary as described
The Andrews Arboretum parcel boundary is roughly “dumbbell” shaped, with opposing
nodes connected by a long and narrow area. The western node lies on the east side of
Broadway between Marine Street and Grandview Avenue and is bounded on the west by
the sidewalk on the east side of Broadway, the north by adjacent properties and the
Boulder High School property, and the south by a series of properties owned by the
University of Colorado. The parcel follows an ESE path along what was once a railroad
line, fitting snugly between the south side of the Boulder High School athletic field
stadium seats and the CU properties, and to the eastern node on the hillside just below
the corner of 15th St. and Grandview Ave, where it is bounded on all sides by adjacent
This form, modeled on the Historic American Landscapes Survey (HALS) Short Format History Template, is
intended to aid in documenting the identification and evaluation of many types of historical landscapes in Colorado,
including historic archaeological landscapes. For guidance on completing this form and the required accompanying
documentation (maps, photos), please refer to the instructions found at:
http://www.historycolorado.org/sites/default/files/files/OAHP/crforms_edumat/word/1404i.doc and to the Colorado
Cultural Resources Survey Manual at: www.historycolorado.org/archaeologists/survey-manual.
Prehistoric archaeological landscapes should still be recorded on the OAHP Management Data Form (#1400) and
the appropriate component forms. Historic linear landscape features (ditches, roads, railroads, etc. in whole or part)
documented independently of the surrounding landscape context during archaeological surveys should still be
recorded on the OAHP Management Data Form (#1400), accompanied by the OAHP Linear Component Form
(#1418). Post-World War II Subdivisions should be recorded on OAHP form #1403 b. Cultural Landscape
Classification
Site
Historic Designed Landscape
Type of Landscape
☐Garden (private)
☐Park (public)
☐Green/Common/Plaza
☐Boulevard/Parkway/Trail
☐Other Transportation
☐Agricultural
☐Exhibition/Fairgrounds
☐Mine/Quarry
☐Other Industrial
☐Campus
☐Sports/Recreation
☐Cemetery
☐Commemorative/Memorial
☐Residential Subdivision
(other than post-WWII)
☐Office Park
☐Traditional Cultural Property
(TCP)
☐Natural Landform or other
Geological Formation
x Other (please specify):
ARBORETA, BOTANICAL,
AND DISPLAY GARDENS
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 1 of 32 Page 22 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 2 of 32
parcels. The following is the legal description of the boundary, as it was given in the Dec. 21, 1948, deed transferring the land
from Public Service Co, to School District No. 3.:
“Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot One in Block One in Grandview Terrace Addition to the City of Boulder, according to
the recorded plat thereof; thence southerly a distance of 109 feet along the westerly line of said Lot One and said Lot one
extended to the true point of beginning; thence easterly and parallel to the north line of said Lot One to a point on the sou th line
of the alley running easterly and westerly through said Block One, which point is also on the northerly line of the right of w ay of
the Colorado & Sothern Railway Company (75.9 feet from point of beginning); and running thence easterly along the northerly
line of said right of way to its intersection with the center line of Fifteenth Street in the City of Boulder, and running sou therly
along the center line of said Fifteenth Street to the intersection of said center line of Fifteenth Street with the southerl y line of
said right of way to the west line of said Block One, Grand View Terrace Addition to the City of Boulder, Which point is also
located on the east line of Broadway (formerly Twelfth Street), and thence northerly along the east line of Broadway to the true
place of beginning” (Transfer Deed, December 21, 1948).
DESCRIPTION (address all applicable features; include alterations and dates, when known)
The Andrews Arboretum lies on the east side of Broadway, just north of the CU Boulder campus and adja cent to the southern
boundary of the Boulder High School Stadium (aka the Christian Recht Field). The parcel is long and thin, about 900 feet in
length and ranging from about 50 feet at its narrowest point to about 140 feet at its widest. The portion of the parcel designated
for the public as the Andrews Arboretum is comprised of a polygonal western node bordering Broadway on the west and
containing two sunken garden locales bisected by a concrete-and brick-paved bike path and, to the south of these, an elongated
garden area separated by a concrete walking path that follows the uphill (south) side of the Arboretum. The arboretum is signed
by two markers: One is an engraved local sandstone half -round sign reading “Andrews Arboretum,” set into a triangular
planting bed with adjoining sandstone retaining walls. The other is a large granite stone with an affixed plaque commemorating
Darwin Andrews, for whom the Arboretum is named. Where the bicycle path and the walking path meet, two loop-style bike
racks are set into concrete, and a wrought iron fence and gate mark the entrance to the Arboretum. A second wrought iron fence
and gateposts (the gate is absent) on the upper part of the walking path mark the east entrance to the Andrews Arboretum. The
remainder of the parcel extends to the east, with the concrete path continuing at an ESE trajectory up the side of the hill,
following the historic Colorado and Southern rail line easement and the south side of the stadium. This path culminates in a zig-
zagged arrangement of switchbacks and steps through the eastern part of the parcel, which is bounded by other adjacent
parcels and is very near, but not adjacent to, the Hillside Historic District.
The Andrews Arboretum’s designed gardens areas are partially delineated by chain link fencing and contain a wide variety of
plant species, many of which are listed below, (a complete inventory of plant species was not performed for this documentation ,
but the results of a previous inventory, circa 2002, are attached). Mature trees, shrubs, and groundcover are organized around
unpaved circulation routes. Stone steps lead from the paved pathways down into two of the garden areas (A and B), which are
separated by the bike path. A third garden area (Area C) lies along the south side of the concrete walking path that parallels the
south parcel boundary and extends beyond the Arboretum to the east end of the parcel.
Garden Area A (see detail map for area delineation) has three points of access: The first (west) is a red sandstone stone stair
leading down from the sidewalk along Broadway, the second (south) is a similar stone stair leading down from the bike path
near the Broadway entrance to the arboretum, and the third is an ungated opening (north) where the corner of the garden meets
the bike path. The area has a black metal bench and a set of waste/recycling recept acles in the east side. Garden Area B has
two points of access: The first is on the west side and is an ungated opening in the fence at the hairpin turn of the bike pa th.
This point has a set of stone steps leading down to the garden, where a cleared area is delineated by a low stone retaining wall.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 2 of 32 Page 23 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 3 of 32
The larger of the trees in this area has been vandalized and graffiti is in plain evidence. A water feature, which was dry at the
time of documentation, lies near the fence on the north side of this area. An unpaved pathway rises to the east, running along
the south side of the cleared area and meeting the stone steps (which are roughly constructed and appear to have been in place
prior to 1989) that rise out of Garden Area B and meet the concrete pathway at t he east entrance to the Andrews Arboretum.
Garden Area C is open to the walking path and contains three seating areas with black metal benches and fixed waste
receptacles (note: the western and center seating areas were photographed during documentation. T he east seating area was
occupied and no photograph was taken, in order to preserve the privacy of the user).
East of the designated Arboretum, the concrete walking path continues to the east, paralleling the bleachers of the Boulder H igh
Stadium, with the chain link boundary fence interrupted by the Stadium’s sandstone masonry press box. The pathway opens
onto a wider area that has little planted landscaping, but ascends sharply, and so the path is aided by steps and zig -zag diagonal
trajectories, emerging at the top into the University of Colorado’s properties and Grandview Avenue. Part of this property
borders two utility easements, and utility box featuring heavy graffiti lies beside the path near the north fence of the Arbo retum
parcel.
Natural Features
Topography: The general topography of the City of Boulder, which lies at the foot of the Front Range, is an area of rolling
hills and valleys typical of the foothills of the Colorado Piedmont. The arboretum is located south of Boulder Creek at the
base of a hill that rises toward the University of Colorado campus. The Andrews Arboretum topography generally consists
of a roughly oval basin bisected by the bicycle path, which sit at the base of the hillside that drops sharply behind
Grandview Avenue.
Vegetation (include seasonal changes): A complete plant inventory was not conducted for this documentation. Most, if not all,
vegetation contained in the Arboretum has been introduced, although some has “volunteered” or migrated in from outside
the Arboretum. Research did not reveal a list of initial plantings for the 1948 Andrews Arboretum. The Urban Forestry
Division of Boulder Parks and Recreation has altered the plantscape on an ongoing basis since they took over
management of the property in 1989. However, some observed trees and shrubs include:
Garden Area A: Ginko, Pine, Cherry, Scrub Oak (girdled and dead, possibly vandalized); possible Honey Locust
Garden Area B: Ash, Apple, Pine, Juniper, European Mountain Ash (labeled)
Garden Area C: Pine, Spruce, Lilac (several varieties), Iris
Other observed plant species include The results of a plant inventory conducted in 2002 are included as an attachment to
this form
Water: No natural water sources exist within the Arboretum boundary. The property is irrigated by rainwater and an
irrigation system, installed in 1990, that is not visible to users. One water feature, which was dry at the time of
documentation, is in place in Garden Area B, and features a fountain at its west end.
Geology: No specific geological formations are evident in the Arboretum, which is primarily a designed landscape, although
the natural topography of the hillside dictated the general form of the gardens . The city of Boulder is underlain by the same
Lyons Sandstone Formation that forms the Flatirons. This sandstone has been used to construct many of the built features
at the Arboretum.
Ecology: No wildlife was observed during the course of documentation, although wildlife has been observed at the
Arboretum, and in 2012 a bear was seen w andering near the site (The Boulder Daily Camera, September 7, 2012).
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 3 of 32 Page 24 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 4 of 32
Climate: Boulder has a semi-arid climate typical of the Colorado Piedmont, with approximately 20.5 in. of precipitation
annually, and temperatures ranging from below zero to over 100 de grees Fahrenheit, with average of around 67 degrees
(high) and 37 degrees (low).
Designed / Cultural Features
Land Use patterns: The Arboretum is primarily used for recreational purposes or as an area that is traversed by pedestrians
and bicyclists.
Planting patterns: Hardscape, such as the sandstone staircases, sandstone retaining walls, fences, and planted areas
outlined by sandstone, tend to guide the plantings.
Boundary demarcations: Much of the Andrews Arboretum is fenced with wrought-iron fencing or chain link fencing. On the
west end the boundary is defined by a stone retaining wall and fencing and lies at the sidewalk on Broadway. The south
boundary is fenced in chain link fencing, approximately 4 feet in height. Chain link fencing also foll ows the north boundary,
separating the Arboretum from the school property adjacent.
Spatial organization/layout: The west end of the Arboretum contains the two nodes of gardens, separated by a
pedestrian/bicycle path that follows an S-curve trajectory between them, and a third planted area along a concrete walkway
that extends to the east. This walkway was extended from the Arboretum to the east end of the property in 1989, when the
City of Boulder acquired the Andrews Arboretum property from the Boulder High School, and replaced an area of dense
foliage behind the stadium.
Circulation networks: The sunken garden areas (A and B) are accessed by stone staircases, which were constr ucted
sometime in the 1990s. These are local sandstone, and the south stair in Garden Area A has a curved iron handrail. Paths
within the garden areas are generally organized around the larger trees, bench seating areas, and fence lines. A concrete
walking path leads from the sidewalk on Broadway, east through the arboretum and further eastward to the east end of the
parcel, where it zig-zags through a series of switchbacks, with square -timber steps, and onto the University of Colorado’s
property and Grandview Avenue (see aerial map).
Views and vistas: The designed gardens of the Andrews Arboretum are sunken and secluded, with little to offer by way of
views but a good deal of quietude. As the concrete paved pathway ascends the hillside, pedestrians are offered a good
view of the stadium and the Boulder High School property, bisected by Boulder Creek, below.
Water features (functional and ornamental): A single dry water feature is located in the eastern node of the designed gardens,
along the border fence with the Boulder High School Stadium. A roughly oblong feature measuring about 10 ft in length by
about 5 feet in width, it has a fountain spigot at one end. An irrigation system was installed in the 1990s, but is not visible
to users.
Buildings, Structures, Objects: No buildings are located within the boundary of the Andrews Arboretum, although some
sandstone buildings are adjacent and are associated either currently or historically with the Boulder High School Stadium .
Structures contained on the overall parcel include four stone stairways, a timber stairway, a bike path, a walking path, two
stone retaining walls, a culvert, and a stone-lined water feature (dry). Objects include a commemorative marker and a
fountain contained in the water feature structure. Ephemeral (removable) structures and objects include benches, chain-
link fencing, waste/recycling receptacles, and a utility box. Most built features in the Andrews Arboretum appear to have
been added after the Urban Forestry Division of Boulder Parks and Recreation took over management of the site in 1989. In
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 4 of 32 Page 25 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 5 of 32
the arboretum, red Lyons formation sandstone has been used in constructing the planting beds, retaining walls, and
stairways, giving the site a feeling of connection to Boulder more generally. In addition, Forestry has installed four seating
areas (one in Garden Area A and three in Garden Area C), waste/recycling receptacles, a culvert under the bike path
providing drainage for the Garden Area A and Garden Area B. In the east end of the parcel, “railroad tie” timber steps
bisect the switchbacks on the walking path that leads to Grandview Avenue.
Small-scale elements (markers, statuary, site furnishings, etc.): At the sidewalk on Broadway, an engraved sandstone sign,
which is half-round in shape, announces the entrance to the Andrews Arboretum. Across the bike path, another marker
commemorates Darwin Andrews, and was erected by Historic Boulder at an unknown date but likely after 1988, when the
Boulder Parks and Recreation took over management of the property.
Other (including ephemeral qualities – sounds, activities, wildlife, smells, etc.): The Andrews Arboretum is a quiet, shady place.
At the time of documentation, it had few people in evidence. Two bicyclists had stopped to rest and talk, and pedestrians
and bikers were using the pathways.
*list and briefly describe; attach Architectural Inventory Form (#1403) for each major resource
DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY
Location: original moved date(s) moved: ______________
Development date(s): 1948 estimated actual source: Pettem, Silvia. “Andrews Arboretum is Rooted in the Past,”
Boulder Daily Camera, September 30, 2006. http://www.dailycamera.com/archivesearch/ci_13064624. Accessed May 15,
2016.
Designer(s) / builder(s): Maud Reed (1948-1951); Marjorie Brown (1951-date unk); Neighbors of the Andrews Arboretum (1980-
1989); Boulder Parks and Recreation Urban Forestry Division (1989-present) attributed documented
source: Pettem, Silvia. “Andrews Arboretum is Rooted in the Past,” Boulder Daily Camera, September 30, 2006.
http://www.dailycamera.com/archivesearch/ci_13064624. Accessed May 15, 2016.
Developmental history and evolution: identify changes to landscape over time (additions, alterations, boundary alterations,
demolitions): The site of the Andrews Arboretum was the right of way f or an electric rail line from 1908 to 1919
(see photos 35 and 36). In 1932, after a long period of disuse, the tracks were removed, leaving this parcel of
land entirely fallow. The Andrews Arboretum was constructed in 1948. Existing documentation indicates that its
general configuration has changed little, with the biggest impact likely being the construction of the bike path,
probably around the time of the construction of the Boulder Creek Bike Path (in the 1970s?). By 1985, the site
was in poor condition and neighbors of the site banded together to lease the site from the school district, so
that they could hire a landscaping firm to restore it , although research did not reveal specific changes related
to this effort. A 1987 map shows that the area immediately behind the Boulder High School Stadium was fenced
and not traversable. The Boulder Parks and Recreation Department acquired it in 1989, and the Arboretum
came under the management umbrella of that agency’s Urban Forestry Division (Forestry). S ince that time
changes made by Forestry include the construction of stone access stairs to the garden areas (although some
appear to predate 1989), paving of the concrete walking path that follows the hillside, irrigation system
installation, seating areas, and signage.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 5 of 32 Page 26 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 6 of 32
The Andrews Arboretum parcel (west end) superimposed over the 1931 Sanborn Map,
demonstrating the location of the original railroad tracks in relation to the current
parcel boundary.
HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONS
Original/historic use: Railroad grade for the Denver & Interurban (Colorado & Southern Railroad); Arboretum
Current use: Arboretum
Historical Background/Overview (identify s ources of information): The Andrews Arboretum is constructed on the former Right-Of-Way
(ROW) for the Denver and Interurban Railroad, a subsidiary of the Colorado and Southern. This was an electric rail line that
ran through Boulder from 1908 to 1919. After the train stopped running, the large stretch of ROW between Grandview Ave
and the property to the north, a Public Service facility (see Sanborn graphic, above), became a weedy and overgrown. The
tracks were removed in 1932, and the land continued to lie unused. In 1948, a year that saw a push to improve the athletic
field at Boulder High School, including expansion of the field house and construction of the McKenna Ticket Booth
(5BL.5990), Boulder High’s botany teacher, Maud Reed, conceived of the idea to convert the one-acre area of the ROW next
to Broadway into a living botany classroom. With a wide variety of plants donated by the family of the late Boulder
nurseryman, Darwin M. Andrews, she was able to realize her vision and named the arboretum after him. The owner of the
Rockmont Nursery on Bluebell Avenue in Boulder, Darwin M. Andrews was a pioneer of domestic plants in the area,
importing many species of trees and shrubs from the Midwest, and a well-known specialist in plants of the Rocky Mountain
region.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 6 of 32 Page 27 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 7 of 32
The Andrews Arboretum was largely funded by donations and maintained with volunteer effort. The parcel was owned by
the Public Service Company, and as her retirement neared in 1950, Maud Reed convinced the Boulder County School
District that the Andrews Arboretum was important enough to the high school tha t it should be school property. They
agreed, and even ran a water line to the site, which must have been a great boon to those who had previously had to carry
water in to keep the plants alive. After Reed’s retirement, the arboretum became more community o riented. Local gardener
Marjorie Brown maintained the arboretum well into the late 1960s with the help of school district funding and local garden
club participation. Under Brown, the number and variety of exotic trees expanded, plant signage improved and increased,
and the hillside was stabilized with hand-poured concrete block.
By the early 1980s, the Andrews Arboretum was less well maintained. The school district cut funding for it, and it soon it
became what one news reporter called a “Hobo Haven.” The area uphill to the east of the Arboretum was fenced off to
prevent people from using the old railroad ROW as a footpath. To address its run -down state, a group of neighbors
banded together in 1985 and leased the site from the school district, hiring a landscape firm to renovate the arboretum.
Although it is unclear what changes occurred as part of this renovation, within a few years , in 1988, the City of Boulder’s
Parks and Recreation Department purchased the site from the school district. Management has been subsequently
undertaken by that agency’s Urban Forestry Division, which maintains the Arboretum in its current configuration.
According to Ken Fisher, Forestry Assistant with the City of Boulder, changes at the Andrews Arboretum since 1989
include the addition or replacement of fencing, the addition of seating areas, the addition of local sandstone staircases and
the paving of the footpath leading up the hill eastward through the parcel, and the installation of an irrigation system.
Sources:
“School Gardens” Constance Carter. Library of Congress, transcript. Accessed June 30, 2016.
https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/journey/schoolgardens -transcript.html.
Pettem, Silvia. “Andrews Arboretum is Rooted in the Past,” Boulder Daily Camera, September 30, 2006.
http://www.dailycamera.com/archivesearch/ci_13064624 . Accessed May 15, 2016.
Pettem, Silvia. Tracking Down Boulder: Colorado’s Railroads and Roads of the Mountains and Plains within the Boulder
Historic Context Area. 1996. Prepared for the Boulder Historic Context Project and submitted to the Boulder Planning
Department.
Taylor, Carol. “Boulder History: Bike Path Network Long in the Making.” June 19, 2016. Boulder Daily Camera.
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_30028664/boulder-history-bike-path-network-long-making. Accessed July 22,
2016.
Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, Boulder, Colorado, 1931, Page 23.
Ken Fisher, Forestry Assistant, City of Boulder. Undated Interview.
HISTORIC CONTEXT EVALUATION*
Name of Historic Context: The following contexts were of use in determining significance for the Andrews Arboretum:
Pettem, Silvia and Ed Raines, “The Use of Native Stone in Boulder Construction” 1999.
Pettem, Silvia. Tracking Down Boulder: Colorado’s Railroads and Roads of the Mountains and Plains within the Boulder
Historic Context Area. 1996.
“Botanical Gardens” University of Washington web service.
http://depts.washington.edu/open2100/pdf/2_OpenSpaceTypes/Open_Space_Types/botanical_gardens.pdf
Area(s) of significance: Agriculture; Education
Significant Person(s): Darwin M. Andrews; Maud Reed; Marjorie Brown
Period(s) of significance: 1948 - 1966
Significant Date(s): 1948; 1950; 1985; 1989
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 7 of 32 Page 28 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 8 of 32
Level of significance: National State Local
Discuss presence or absence of character-defining features needed to convey significance within this context: The Andrews Arboretum
began and remains a designed garden with an educational thrust. Labeled plants are still in evidence, and the arboretum
features areas that are good for solitary observation of the landscape and vistas, as well as areas that are meant to
facilitate gathering together to discuss and observe these elements in groups. Circulation routes within the arboretum are
organized around the trees and other planted areas, and built features appear to inhabit these routes very naturally.
Important character defining features are signed trees and shrubs, paved and unpaved paths and walkways, local
sandstone stairs and retaining walls.
Landscape retains Integrity of: location setting design materials workmanship association feeling
Discuss presence or absence of integrity within this context: Although some materials have been replaced or added within the last 50
years—most identifiably the bike path and the concrete walking path—the overall design, form, and feeling of the Andrews
Arboretum still convey its history as a designed landscape intended for educational purposes.
ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT
Existing designation? No Yes Individual property District
Designated property or district name: N/A
Designating authority: N/A Designation date: _____N/A___________
If the property is within the boundaries of an existing designated district, is it: Contributing Noncontributing
Individual site: Eligible Not Eligible Needs Data
Applicable NR Criteria: A B C D
Applicable Criteria Considerations: A B C D E F G
Applicable SR Criteria: A B C D E
Summary: The Andrews Arboretum was first an educational facility, and to some extent this purpose has continued since
its beginning. It should be considered eligible for the National and State registers at the local level under Criterion A for its
association with early science education at the Boulder High School. It should also be considered eligible for the NRHP at
the local level under Criterion C, as an example of a designed landscape that possesses high artistic value. Additionally, it
should be considered eligible for the SRHP under Criterion D, for its geographic importance as the still -visible reminder of
the history of the Denver and Interurban Railway line, which is encoded in the walking path that traverses the Arboretum
parcel. However, it should not be considered eligible to either register under Criterion B for its association with Darwin M.
Andrews, as he was deceased by the time it was first built and the s ite has no direct association with his works.
Potential district: Eligible Not Eligible Needs Data
Applicable NR Criteria: A B C D
Applicable Criteria Considerations: A B C D E F G
Applicable SR Criteria: A B C D E
Summary: The Andrews Arboretum sits in the area of historically significant resources associated with the Boulder High
School Stadium and, although for its first few years it was owned by the Public Service Company, it was later owned by the
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 8 of 32 Page 29 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 9 of 32
school district. However, its association with the development of the Christian Recht Field and that site’s associated
historically significant features has not been clearly established, and it should not be considered to be part of the district
based on this collection. At this time, the Andrews Arboretum should be considered eligible as a discrete site and not as
part of the collection of features associated with the Boulder High School or the Stadium.
If there is NR district potential, itemize contributing and non-contributing resources: N/A
RECORDING INFORMATION
Survey date: May 11, 2016
Associated Report: N/A
Photo log: See attached.
Surveyed by (include contact info): Kathleen Corbett for Corbett AHS, Inc. (925) 351-7417; kcorb58@gmail.com (additional
photographs contributed by Marcy Cameron, City of Boulder Dept. of Planning, Housing and Sustainability)
Project sponsor (include contact info): City of Boulder, Dept. of Planning, Housing and Sustainability
*For additional guidance on documenting and evaluating historic cultural landscapes, refer to the following National Register bulletins: Guidelines for
Evaluating and Registering Cemeteries and Burial Places; How to Evaluate and Nominate Designed Historic Landscapes; Guidelines for Evaluating and
Documenting Rural Historic Landscapes; Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties; and Guidelines for Identifying,
Evaluating, and Registering Historic Mining Properties.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 9 of 32 Page 30 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 10 of 32
Topographic Map
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 10 of 32 Page 31 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 11 of 32
Sketch / Other Maps
Aerial view of the Andrews Arboretum parcel and surroundings. Source: Google Earth.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 11 of 32 Page 32 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 12 of 32
Sketch / Other Maps
Andrews Arboretum, full parcel.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 12 of 32 Page 33 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 13 of 32
Sketch / Other Maps (cont.)
Detail Map, Andrews Arboretum (measurements approximate)
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 13 of 32 Page 34 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 14 of 32
Photo Location Key
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 14 of 32 Page 35 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 15 of 32
Photographs
Photo #1
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: NW
P5110785
Sandstone entryway sign at
the Broadway entrance
Photo #2
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: NNW
P5110851
Sandstone retaining wall at
the sidewalk along Broadway
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 15 of 32 Page 36 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 16 of 32
Photo #3
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: E
P5110848
Main entrance to Andrews
Arboretum, off Broadway,
showing forked paths: Bicycle
path on the left, walking path
following the railroad right-of-
way to the right. Two loop-
style bike racks are at the “Y”.
Photo #4
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: SW
P5110782
Memorial plaque to Darwin M.
Andrews, reading “The
Andrews Arboretum; Darwin
M. Andrews, 1878-1938;
Horticulturist and World
Citizen; Plaque Provided by
Historic Boulder, Inc.” The text
is also given in Braille.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 16 of 32 Page 37 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 17 of 32
Photo #5
Date: 04-22-2016
Direction Facing: SE
P4220718
Wrought iron fence and gate
at the west end of the walking
path
Photo #6
Date: 4-22-2016
Direction Facing: SSE
Photo by Marcy Cameron
4.22 (2)
Garden Area A
North entry point, to the right
of the bike path as it exits the
Andrews Arboretum.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 17 of 32 Page 38 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 18 of 32
Photo #7
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: ENE
P5110787
Garden Area A
South entry point, top of stone
steps.
Photo #8
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: SSW
P5110788
Garden Area A
South entry point, bottom of
stone steps.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 18 of 32 Page 39 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 19 of 32
Photo #9
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: W
P5110790
Garden Area A
West entry point, from the
sidewalk on Broadway.
Photo #10
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: E
P5110852
Garden Area A
Top of stone steps at west
entry point, looking into the
arboretum from the sidew alk
on Broadway
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 19 of 32 Page 40 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 20 of 32
Photo #11
Date: 4-22-2016
Direction Facing: WSW
P4220714
Garden Area A
Overview showing south and
west steps
Photo #12
Date: 4-22-2016
Direction Facing: E
Photo by Marcy Cameron
4.22(3)
Garden Area A
Bench and waste/recycling
receptacles
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 20 of 32 Page 41 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 21 of 32
Photo #13
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: S
P5110793
Garden Area A
Girdled scrub oak.
Photo #14
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: SE
P5110802
Garden Area A
Culvert
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 21 of 32 Page 42 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 22 of 32
Photo #15
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: SE
P5110810
Garden Area B
West steps, leading into Area
B from the bike path.
Photo #16
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: E
P5110811
Garden Area B
Path along south side of Area
B.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 22 of 32 Page 43 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 23 of 32
Photo #17
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: SW
P5110818
Garden Area B
Stone retaining wall and
waste/recycling receptacles
Photo #18
Date: 04-22-2016
Direction Facing: NE
P4220720
Garden Area B
Looking toward water feature
and stadium.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 23 of 32 Page 44 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 24 of 32
Photo #19
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: S
P5110815
Garden Area B
Vandalized tree
Photo #20
Date: 4-22-2016
Direction Facing:
Photo by Marcy Cameron
4.22(14)
Garden Area B
West stair and retaining wall
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 24 of 32 Page 45 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 25 of 32
Photo #21
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: NNW
P5110812
Garden Area B
View of Bike Path from west
stairs Area B
Photo #22
Date: 5-11-2016
Direction Facing: E
P5110820
Garden Area B
Dry water feature
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 25 of 32 Page 46 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 26 of 32
Photo #23
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: ESE
P5110824
Garden Area B
East step up to the walking
path
Photo #24
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: NW
P5110825
Garden Area B
Down the path from the east
entrance to Area B.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 26 of 32 Page 47 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 27 of 32
Photo #25
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: NW
P5110826
Garden Area B
East entrance to Area B from
the walking path
Photo #26
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: ESE
P5110827
Walking path following
historic ROW of Denver and
Interurban (Colorado &
Southern) Rail line, leading to
the east end of the parcel.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 27 of 32 Page 48 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 28 of 32
Photo #27
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: ESE
P5110830
East area of parcel, showing
the switchbacks and timber
steps on the walking path.
Photo #28
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: SE
P5110831
East area of parcel, looking
past the parcel to the CU
property.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 28 of 32 Page 49 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 29 of 32
Photo #29
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: NW
P5110833
East area of parcel,
switchbacks and steps, from
near the top of the hill. Utility
box is shown near the fence at
the base of the switchbacks.
Photo #30
Date: 04-22-2016
Direction Facing: Northwest
Photo by Marcy Cameron
04.22(9)
View of the mountains and the
Boulder High School Stadium
from the concrete-paved
walking path.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 29 of 32 Page 50 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 30 of 32
Photo #31
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: WNW
P5110836
Wrought iron fence at the east
end of the Andrews
Arboretum, looking into
Garden Area C
Photo #32
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: N
P5110842
Garden Area C
Example, labeled tree.
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 30 of 32 Page 51 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 31 of 32
Photo #33
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: S
P5110838
Garden Area C
Middle bench area
Photo #34
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: WSW
P5110846
Garden Area C
West bench area
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 31 of 32 Page 52 of 59
OAHP Site # 5BL.13413 OAHP Form 1404
01/2012
Page 32 of 32
Photo #35
Date: 05-11-2016
Direction Facing: ESE
P5110780
The entrance to the
Andrews Arboretum
from across Broadway.
Photo #36
Date: circa 1920s
Direction Facing: ESE
Photographer
unknown
Historic photograph of
the Colorado and
Southern Railway line,
at the crossing of
Broadway.
(Photograph provided
by James Hewat,
Boulder Historic
Preservation)
Attachment C - Andrews Arboretum Cultural Resources Survey - Page 32 of 32 Page 53 of 59
From:Burke, Dan
To:Meschuk, Chris; Bowden, Yvette
Cc:Cameron, Marcy; Hewat, James
Subject:RE: 2250 Bluebell Ave. - Exploration of Purchase for a City Park
Date:Monday, November 18, 2019 8:31:05 AM
Attachments:image003.png
Good morning Chris and Marcy.
Several OSMP staff have had the opportunity to review this including members of our Real Estate Services and
Ecology workgroups, and we offer the following feedback:
Staff are aware of Darwin Andrews and his important contribution to the nursery trade in our area as well as his
support of protecting mountain areas adjacent to Boulder. However, staff is unaware of the specifics regarding his
experimentation in creating hybrid species, such as a cottonwood-aspen hybrid, and cannot speak to that. In terms of
a potential pocket park in his honor, OSMP staff are in agreement that the department is not the appropriate
department to manage and oversee such a city park considering its urban/neighborhood location and the fact that
the property does not adequately fulfill the city charter purposes for which OSMP acquires and manages land.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this inquiry.
Sincerely,
Dan
Dan Burke
Director
Open Space and Mountain Parks
303-817-3143
burked@bouldercolorado.gov
2520 55th Street| Boulder, CO 80301
Bouldercolorado.gov
From: Meschuk, Chris <MeschukC@bouldercolorado.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:14 PM
To: Burke, Dan <BurkeD@bouldercolorado.gov>; Bowden, Yvette <BowdenY@bouldercolorado.gov>
Cc: Cameron, Marcy <CameronM@bouldercolorado.gov>; Hewat, James <HewatJ@bouldercolorado.gov>
Subject: FW: 2250 Bluebell Ave. - Exploration of Purchase for a City Park
Dan, Yvette,
See Marcy’s message below and the request from the landmarks board… Can you take a look and connect back to
her?
Thanks, Chris
From: Cameron, Marcy <CameronM@bouldercolorado.gov>
Attachment D - 2250 Bluebell Ave letter from OSMP - Page 1 of 3 Page 54 of 59
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 9:53 AM
To: Meschuk, Chris <MeschukC@bouldercolorado.gov>
Cc: Hewat, James <HewatJ@bouldercolorado.gov>
Subject: 2250 Bluebell Ave. - Exploration of Purchase for a City Park
Hi Chris,
The Landmarks Board placed a stay on the demo application for 2250 Bluebell at their Oct. 2nd meeting. The property
is the former Rockmont Nursery, operated by world-renowned arborist Darwin Andrews. In addition to his global seed
catalogue, Andrews is also known for his experimentation in creating hybrid species, such as a cottonwood-aspen
hybrid. Pretty interesting. Andrews Arboretum is named in his honor.
At the October hearing, a group of neighbors spoke in support of preserving the unique species and of exploring the
potential of creating a pocket park. The Landmarks Board directed staff to speak with OSMP and Parks and Rec staff
to see if it there would be support. Could you advise on how to move forward?
We are planning to report back at our next meeting, Dec. 4th.
Thanks,
Marcy
Marcy Cameron
Historic Preservation Planner II
O: # (303) 441-3209
Attachment D - 2250 Bluebell Ave letter from OSMP - Page 2 of 3 Page 55 of 59
cameronm@bouldercolorado.gov
Planning Department
1739 Broadway | Boulder, CO 80306
Bouldercolorado.gov
Attachment D - 2250 Bluebell Ave letter from OSMP - Page 3 of 3 Page 56 of 59
TO: Chris Meschuk, Assistant City Manager and Interim Planning Director
Cc: Dan Burke, Director, Open Space & Mountain Parks
James Hewat, Historic Preservation Manager
Marcy Cameron, Historic Preservation Planner
Alison Rhodes, Deputy Director of Parks & Recreation
Jeff Haley, Planning, Design and Community Engagement Manager for Parks & Recreation
Margo Josephs, Manager, Parks & Recreation Partnerships and Community Outreach
FR: Yvette Bowden, Director of Parks & Recreation and Community Vitality YB
DATE: November 18, 2019
Re: Parks & Recreation response – Landmarks Board inquiry (2250 Bluebell Avenue, Boulder CO)
Boulder’s Parks & Recreation Department appreciates the opportunity to respond to the recent
Landmarks Board’s inquiry concerning 2259 Bluebell Avenue, Boulder CO – a property previously
operated as a nursery by Darwin Andrews.
The department acknowledges the contributions made by Mr. Andrews to the field of science and as an
arborist. We do not generally take a position regarding private property matters absent proposed
donation of property to the City for purposes of enhancing the urban parks & recreation system.
That notwithstanding, the department is not able to recommend acquisition or disposition of this
property as a Boulder Parks & Recreation urban park (pocket park) asset. Such an acquisition or
potential use of the property would conflict with the Council-approved direction in the Boulder Parks &
Recreation Master Plan (2014). The Master Plan, which reflects broad Boulder community sentiment
concerning parks and recreation facilities, practices and services:
•directs the department to focus efforts and resources on the care and enhancement of existing
amenities and facilities rather than the acquisition or creation of new facilities; and
•requires that the department ensure an ability to maintain and/or operate all assets in its care
under the current cost-constrained fiscal environment.
In this instance, acquisition and/or use of the property as an urban park amenity/facility would be an
addition to the urban parks system for which the department does not have funding or other resources
to acquire or assume operational/maintenance responsibility.
Thank you again for contacting the department and for providing an opportunity to comment.
Attachment E - 2250 Bluebell Ave letter from Parks & Recreation - Page 1 of 1 Page 57 of 59
SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
Individual Landmark
September 1975
On September 6, 1975, the City Council adopted Ordinance #4000 providing procedures
for the designation of Landmarks and Historic Districts in the City of Boulder. The purpose of
the ordinance is the preservation of the City’s permitted cultural, historic, and architectural
heritage. The Landmarks Board is permitted by the ordinance to adopt rules and regulations as it
deems necessary for its own organization and procedures. The following Significance Criteria
have been adopted by the board to help evaluate each potential designation in a consistent and
equitable manner.
Historic Significance
The place (building, site, area) should show character, interest or value as part of the
development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the community, state or nation; be the
site of a historic, or prehistoric event that had an effect upon society; or exemplify the
cultural, political, economic, or social heritage of the community.
Date of Construction: This area of consideration places particular importance on the age
of the structure.
Association with Historical Persons or Events: This association could be national, state,
or local.
Distinction in the Development of the Community of Boulder: This is most applicable to
an institution (religious, educational, civic, etc) or business structure, though in some
cases residences might qualify. It stresses the importance of preserving those places
which demonstrate the growth during different time spans in the history of Boulder, in
order to maintain an awareness of our cultural, economic, social or political heritage.
Recognition by Authorities: If it is recognized by Historic Boulder, Inc. the Boulder
Historical Society, local historians (Barker, Crossen, Frink, Gladden, Paddock,
Schooland, etc), State Historical Society, The Improvement of Boulder, Colorado by F.L.
Olmsted, or others in published form as having historic interest and value.
Other, if applicable.
Architectural Significance
The place should embody those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type
specimen, a good example of the common; be the work of an architect or master builder,
known nationally, state-wide, or locally, and perhaps whose work has influenced later
development; contain elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship
which represent a significant innovation; or be a fine example of the uncommon.
Attachment F - significance criteria for individual landmarks - Page 1 of 2 Page 58 of 59
Recognized Period/Style: It should exemplify specific elements of an architectural
period/style, i.e.: Victorian, Revival styles, such as described by Historic American
Building Survey Criteria, Gingerbread Age (Maass), 76 Boulder Homes (Barkar), The
History of Architectural Style (Marcus/Wiffin), Architecture in San Francisco (Gebhard
et al), History of Architecture (Fletcher), Architecture/Colorado, and any other published
source of universal or local analysis of a style.
Architect or Builder of Prominence: A good example of the work of an architect or
builder who is recognized for expertise in his field nationally, state-wide, or locally.
Artistic Merit: A skillful integration of design, material, and color which is of excellent
visual quality and/or demonstrates superior craftsmanship.
Example of the Uncommon: Elements of architectural design, details, or craftsmanship
that are representative of a significant innovation.
Indigenous Qualities: A style or material that is particularly associated with the Boulder
area.
Other, if applicable.
Environmental Significance
The place should enhance the variety, interest, and sense of identity of the community by
the protection of the unique natural and man-made environment.
Site Characteristics: It should be of high quality in terms of planned or natural vegetation.
Compatibility with Site: Consideration will be given to scale, massing placement, or
other qualities of design with respect to its site.
Geographic Importance: Due to its unique location or singular physical characteristics, it
represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community.
Environmental Appropriateness: The surroundings are complementary and/or it is
situated in a manner particularly suited to its function.
Area Integrity: Places which provide historical, architectural, or environmental
importance and continuity of an existing condition, although taken singularly or out of
context might not qualify under other criteria.
Attachment F - significance criteria for individual landmarks - Page 2 of 2 Page 59 of 59