Loading...
2018-25_1030 6th St_Disposition Packet N O T I C E FINDINGS AND DECISION OF THE CITY OF BOULDER BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT DISPOSITION OF ZONING CASE DOCKET NUMBER BOZ2018-25 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE OF THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 9- 7-1, B.R.C. 1981 AT 1030 6TH STREET OF KARI AND CHARLES ARMSTRONG, WHOSE MAILING ADDRESS IS 1030 6TH STREET, BOULDER, COLORADO 80302. On December 13, 2018, the City of Boulder Board of Zoning Adjustment, a quorum being present, held a public hearing, after giving notice as required by law, on the application for the following variance: As part of a proposal to construct a roof over and existing elevated front patio to a nonstandard house, the applicant is requesting a variance to the front (west) yard setback in order to meet the front yard setback regulations of the RL- 1 zoning district. The resulting west setback will be approximately 7.7 feet (taken from the existing patio and new support columns) where 25 feet is required and 7.7 feet exists today. Section of the Land Use Code to be modified: Section 9-7-1, BRC 1981. Based on our field investigation and the relevant testimony, exhibits, and other evidence introduced at the hearing, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Boulder Revised Code, 1981, we find by a preponderance of the evidence that the criteria for granting a variance have been met, and grant the variance as requested: This variance is limited to the use and structure for which it was requested, including the location on the lot and maximum height, as approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment. This variance was approved by the vote of 4-0 (J. Lester absent). EXECUTED this 13th day of December 2018, effective as of, December 13, 2018. Michael Hirsch, Presiding Officer of the Board at the Meeting By: ______________ __________________________ Robbie Wyler, Secretary to the Board of Zoning Adjustment This decision constitutes a final decision as of the date of the hearing at which it was reached. If a variance was granted, the variance expires within 180 (one hundred eighty) days from the date on which it were granted unless a building permit for such variance is applied for within such period. CITY OF BOULDER Planning and Development Services 1739 Broadway, Third Floor • P.O. Box 791, Boulder, Colorado 80306-0791 phone 303-441-1880 • fax 303-441-3241 • email plandevelop@bouldercolorado.gov www.boulderplandevelop.net BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 1 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 2 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 3 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 4 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 5 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 6 of 36  Property History The property currently addressed as 1030 6th Street was at one point in a time a larger half‐acre lot known as 600 College Avenue.  The Bakers Half‐Acre property was split into 3 properties in 1995:  610 College to the north, 1030 6th Street (middle lot) and 1026 6th Street to the south.  The home was likely constructed around 1915 as it was documented in the City Directory for 1916, 1921 & 1926.  The west wall which faces 6th Street and elevated patio were part of the historic home.  The elevated patio is constructed on top of a historic root cellar which is accessed on the south side of the property.  The historic west wall of the home doesn’t comply with the current City 25’ front yard setback; the home was constructed well before the City of Boulder had adopted zoning and building codes.   The current owners purchased the property in 2011.  Front of home, approximately 1962   BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 7 of 36 Front of Assessors Card, approximately 1956  BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 8 of 36 Back of Assessors Card, approximately 1947 Lists depreciation for 1915, 1925 and 1965  BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 9 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 10 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 11 of 36 Written Statement for 1030 6th Street Proposed Front Porch    We are proposing to add a front porch over our existing concrete patio.  We’d like to have a  covered porch on the front of our home where we can sit outside. Our home faces west and the  covered porch would add much needed shade and protection of the west facing windows of the home.   Additionally we currently have snow and ice buildup on the existing concrete patio despite shoveling ‐  this safety concern will be much improved by having a covered porch.     Our current elevated concrete patio is constructed over a root cellar which was part of the  original home construction.  We are proposing to build the new front porch on top of the existing  concrete patio and root cellar.  We think that the new front porch design makes the front of our home  more inviting for visitors.  Many of our neighbors on 6th Street have front porches and we think  porches provide a place to enjoy the exterior of your home while adding to the streetscape.        BOZA Variance Criteria    (1) Physical Conditions or Disability  (A) i:  The existing home was built around 1915 and was constructed closer than current  setbacks allow in the for this RL‐1 Zone.  The west wall of the existing home is 15’ off of the  front property line where 25’ is now required.  On conforming properties front porches are  allowed to encroach up to 8’ within the front yard setback which would allow for a 17’ front  yard setback.  The proposed porch which is constructed over an existing patio has a 7’‐8.5”  front yard setback.  (B):  Most of the surrounding homes were built with conforming setbacks.  This home was  constructed before current zoning and building codes were adopted.  (C):  The proposed front porch will be constructed so that the new columns sit on top of an  existing foundation wall of the existing historic patio and root cellar below.  Our structural  engineer says the existing porch/ root cellar structure could not support the porch columns  unless they stack on top of the existing foundation wall.  (D):  The current owners purchased this property in 2011 and did not add to the nonconforming  location of the home on the property.    (2) Energy Conservation  (A):  The existing west wall and patio were constructed in approximately 1915, this is well  before the 1983 cutoff.  (B):  The proposed front porch will be designed to create a covered roof area for accessing the  front door to the home.  The proposed design has columns that will stack on top of the existing  foundation of the current patio and root cellar.  The new roof will nestle into the front façade in  an area that is currently a blank vertical wall.  The new covered roof will span from the  southern edge of the stone chimney to the right side of the existing patio which will provide  more visual balance to the front elevation and will add to the curb appeal.  (C):  The proposed covered porch will shade the existing west facing window which will lower  the solar gain on the west side.  BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 12 of 36   (3) Solar Access  (B):  The proposed front porch will not interfere with the solar access protection per 9‐9‐17 as  demonstrated by the submitted Solar Analysis diagram and Calculation Spreadsheet.    (4) Designated Historic Property  While this home is not a designated historic property it was constructed around 1915, please  see submitted History of Property Information.  The west wall which faces 6th Street and  elevated patio were part of the historic home.  The elevated patio is constructed on top of a  historic root cellar which is accessed on the south side of the property.  The historic west wall of  the home doesn’t comply with the current City 25’ front yard setback; the home was  constructed well before the City of Boulder had adopted zoning and building codes.       (5) Requirements for All Variance Approvals  (A):  The proposed porch will not alter the character of the neighborhood:  over half of the  homes on 6th Street between College and Euclid have covered front porches.  Porches add  variation to the streetscape and provide a place for neighbors to recreate outside of their  homes.  (B):  The adjacent properties will not be impeded from reasonable use and enjoyment of their  property or future development by the proposed porch as it will be constructed on top of the  existing patio.  Please see the submitted signed plans from the four adjacent properties.  (C):  The proposed porch is the minimum variance that would afford relief to this property.  The  new porch is being constructed on top of an existing historic patio and root cellar which  encroach into current front yard setbacks.  While we can not meet the required current front  porch setback the proposed porch has been designed to satisfy current front porch design  criteria.  The proposed porch is 146 SF where 150 SF is allowed.  The porch height is 11’‐10”  above the porch floor where 12’ is allowed.  The front yard setbacks for the existing home and  proposed porch are not conforming, but the side yard setbacks are conforming.  (D):  The proposed design does not conflict with Solar Access protections of 9‐9‐17 as  demonstrated in the submitted Solar Analysis and supporting calculated spreadsheet.      BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 13 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 14 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 15 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 16 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 17 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 18 of 36 1030 6th Street – Existing Photos    Front Elevation          Left Side (North) of Existing Patio            Right Side (south) of Existing Patio & Root Cellar  BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 19 of 36 1 Stephanie Ridgway From:Charles Armstrong <charlesarmstrong74@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 19, 2018 9:35 AM To:Stephanie@303Architecture.com; Kari Armstrong Subject:Fwd: Front porch plans Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Mary Reynolds <mbreynolds52@gmail.com> Date: November 19, 2018 at 8:49:04 AM MST To: charlesarmstrong74@gmail.com Subject: Re: Front porch plans Hi Chuck & Kari, Al and I think your porch project is lovely. Attached are the plans with our signatures. Mary On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:29 PM Charles Armstrong <charlesarmstrong74@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Mary, Thank you again for agreeing to review the plans that are attached to this email. We have decided that we would like to add a front porch over our existing concrete patio. In order to do this, we need to apply for a variance for the porch addition as our historic home is closer to the front property line than is now permitted by current zoning laws. The city has asked us to reach out to our neighbors to get approval for the proposed design. Please feel free to contact our architect (Stephanie Ridgway 303-641-6708) if you have any questions about the designs. Please sign each sheet of the drawings included. Our deadline is November 20 in order to make it on the docket for the December 13 meeting. Thanks again for reviewing the plans and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Chuck and Kari Armstrong BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 20 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 21 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 22 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 23 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 24 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 25 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 26 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 27 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 28 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 29 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 30 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 31 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 32 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 33 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 34 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 35 of 36 BOZA Disposition of Approval Page 36 of 36