Loading...
Item 5A - 744 University Ave Agenda Item #5A Page 1 M E M O R A N D U M January 3, 2017 TO: Landmarks Board FROM: Lesli Ellis, Comprehensive Planning Manager Debra Kalish, Senior Council, City Attorney’s Office James Hewat, Senior Historic Preservation Planner Marcy Cameron, Historic Preservation Planner Tony Wiese, Historic Preservation Intern SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of issuance of a permit to relocate the house at 744 University Ave., a non-landmarked building over 50 years old, to 106 W. Geneseo St., Lafayette, Colorado pursuant to Section 9-11-23 of the Boulder Revised Code (HIS2017-00275). STATISTICS: 1. Site: 744 University Ave. 2. Date of Construction: 1923 3. Zoning: RL-1 (Residential Low) 4. Lot Size: 7,073 sq. ft. (approx.) 5. Applicant/ Owner: Public Works, City of Boulder STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board adopt the following motion: I move that the Landmarks Board issue a permit to relocate the building at 744 University Ave., in Boulder, Colorado to 106 W. Geneseo St. in Lafayette, Colorado adopting the staff memorandum with the findings listed below, as an alternative to demolition. While moving is never the preferred approach to preserving historic buildings, in this case staff considers issuing a permit for the relocation of the house to 106 W. Geneseo St. in Lafayette represents a reasonable balance of the city’s goals of providing flood safety in high hazard zones while protecting city owned properties that have been identified as historically significant per Section 2.28 Leadership in Preservation: City and County Owned Resources of the “Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (2015)” If the board directs staff to issue the permit to relocate the building, prior to the move staff will ensure the following documentation be submitted to Planning, Housing & Sustainability (PH&S) staff for review, approval and recording with Carnegie Library: Agenda Item #5A Page 2 1. A site plan showing the location of all existing improvements on the subject property 2. Measured elevation drawings of all faces of the building, depicting existing conditions, fully annotated with architectural details and materials indicated on the plans; and 3. Color medium format archival quality photographs of all areas of the lot with exterior elevations of the house. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On Aug. 28, 2017, Planning, Housing and Sustainability Department (PH&S) received an application to demolish the house at 744 University Ave. (HIS2017-00275). On Sept. 6, 2017, the Landmarks design review committee (Ldrc) referred the application to the Landmarks Board for a public hearing, finding there was “probable cause to consider that the property may be eligible for designation as an individual landmark.” The demolition permit applicant was submitted by the City of Boulder’s Public Works Department, as part of the High Hazard flood zone property acquisition program and to implement the Gregory Canyon Creek Flood Mitigation Plan. The plan, adopted by the City Council in 2015, was initiated following the September 2013 flood, which caused extensive damage along Gregory Canyon Creek. The plan identifies a prioritized list of properties to acquire in the High Hazard Zone to achieve flood mitigation so that the creek can convey a 10-year storm event. The Flood Mitigation Plan is available on the City’s website: https://bouldercolorado.gov/flood/gregory-canyon-creek-flood- mitigation-study. On October 4, 2017, the Landmarks Board voted to impose a stay-of-demolition on the house to explore a possible new location for the 1923 Nelson House. Following an on-site meeting with the demolition sub-committee (F. Sheets and W. Jellick), it was agreed that the Public Works Department and the Historic Preservation program would work together in issuing a Request for Proposals (see Attachment A) to individuals and groups that may be interested in relocating and preserving the house. Two proposals were received on December 5, 2017; one for relocation to the lot at 757 12th St., adjacent to the Cowgill property which was landmarked in 2015; and a second to move the house to 106 W. Geneseo Street in the Old Town district of Lafayette, Colorado (see Attachment B). Both proposals were evaluated and ranked by Public Works and Historic Preservation staff using criteria outlined in the Request for Proposals including historic appropriateness of proposed location and use, restoration of site, completeness of moving and preservation plan, financial capability, and schedule. The Old Town Lafayette proposal was evaluated by staff to be a stronger proposal and contract negotiations have begun with the anticipated relocation of the house to the new site to Agenda Item #5A Page 3 occur sometime in April of 2018. Following the relocation, an application will be submitted to designate the house a local landmark in its new Lafayette location. PURPOSE OF THE BOARD’S REVIEW Pursuant to Section 9-11-23(d)(2), B.R.C. 1981, demolition or relocation requests for all primary buildings built prior to 1940 requires review by the Landmarks design review committee (Ldrc). On October 4, 2017, the Landmarks Board voted to impose a stay-of- demolition on the Nelson House finding that it has historic and architectural significance and to explore a possible new location for the Nelson House. A new location in Old Town Lafayette has been proposed by Kate Williams as a new location for the house. The Public Works Department is requesting the Landmarks Board issue a permit for the relocation of the house to 106 W. Geneseo St. in Lafayette. This is based upon the City’s opinion that moving and preserving the house in that location will represent a reasonable balance of the city’s goals of providing flood safety in hazard zones while protecting city owned properties that have been identified as historically significant per Section 2.28 Leadership in Preservation: City and County Owned Resources of the “Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (2015).” If the board chooses not to direct staff to issue a permit to relocate the building and it takes no other action, the stay-of-demolition will expire on March 7, 2018 and the demolition permit will issue automatically per Section 9-11-23 (g) and (h), B.R.C. 1981. Reference the Oct. 4, 2017 Landmarks Board memo for the history and significance of the house. RELOCATION Figure 1. 744 University Ave., North elevation, c.1949 and 2017. Agenda Item #5A Page 4 Figure 2. 744 University Ave., Current Location Map. Figure 3. Proposed Route from 744 University Ave. to 106 W. Geneseo St. Figure 4. Proposed Location, 106 W. Geneseo St. Agenda Item #5A Page 5 Key Points of the Proposal to Relocate the House to Lafayette: • The proposed location is in Old Town Lafayette, on the same lot as a 1918 miner’s cottage. The house will front onto Hopkins St. • The lot is .25 acres and located near the intersection of Geneseo and Hopkins St. • The area was surveyed in 2001 and is primarily comprised of late 19th and early 20th century single family houses in styles popular at the time, including hipped- roof and gable cottages, bungalows and Edwardian Vernacular residences. • Interestingly, the survey report (pgs. 51-94 of the proposal in Attachment B) documents the history of house moving in West Lafayette: o “The practice of relocating houses persisted as a local tradition, beginning in 1889 when some of the town’s first houses were brought to Lafayette from Louisville. Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, small houses were moved to Lafayette from the various mine camps, and were also moved from one Lafayette neighborhood to another.”1 o Two known relocated houses are located at 201 W. Geneseo St. and 201 W. Cannon St. • The applicant is a project manager for Boulder County’s Flood Recovery Buyout Program, responsible for managing demolition and restoration of sites purchased by Boulder County as part of their flood recovery efforts. • The relocation team includes Ms. Williams, Powell Structure Moving, Hudspeth & Associates (general contractor) and Scott Cox & Associates (structural engineer). • The proposed use is to remain residential, and be used as an Accessory Dwelling Unit. A letter from the City of Lafayette supporting this proposal is included in Appendix H of the proposal. • The site at 744 University Ave. will be restored to remove all building materials in the time frame indicated in the Request for Proposals. • The proposal is complete and clear, with methodology including permitting, mitigation of hazardous materials, demolition, restoration of the site and a reasonable schedule. • The roof of the house is proposed to be removed and reconstructed. While not ideal, this allows the building to be relocated without moving traffic signals and electrical lines. The house will be documented prior to the move to ensure the roof can be accurately reconstructed. • See Attachment B: RPF: 744 University, Kate Williams. 1 Norman, Cathleen. 2001 Architectural Survey of West Lafayette. City of Lafayette. 2001. Page 9. Agenda Item #5A Page 6 THE BOARD’S DECISION: If the Landmarks Board finds that relocation of the Nelson House to 106 W. Geneseo St. in Lafayette, Colorado where it will be preserved and an application for local landmark designation a reasonable alternative it may direct staff to issue a permit for moving (Section 9-11-23(h), B.R.C. 1981). If the board chooses to take no action, the current 180-day stay-of-demolition period would expire on March 7, 2018 and a permit to demolish the building would automatically issue. FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board adopt the following findings: Issuing a relocation permit for the Nelson House from 744 University Ave. to 106 W. Geneseo St. in Lafayette, Colorado is appropriate based on the criteria set forth in Section 9-11-23(f), B.R.C. 1981 in that: 1.The property may be eligible for individual landmark designation based upon its historic and architectural significance; 2.Relocating the house to the proposed new location in Lafayette will ensure that it is preserved while allowing for Flood Mitigation Safety in the Gregory Canyon Creek area providing a reasonable balance of the public interest of the city’s flood regulations and the city’s historic preservation program ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Request For Proposals for the Relocation of the Nelson House Attachment B: December 5, 2017 Proposal from Kate Williams to Relocate the Nelson House to Lafayette, Colorardo Attachment C: Oct. 4, 2017 Landmarks Board Memo – 744 University Ave. (link) Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation The City of Boulder’s Public Works Department seeks proposals from qualified parties for the acquisition and relocation of the house at 744 University Avenue. Located in the High Hazard Flood zone, the removal of this house provides flood mitigation opportunities for Gregory Canyon Creek while allowing for the re-use and preservation of this house in a new location. Constructed around 1923, the Nelson House is well-preserved 1,700 sq. ft. wood frame Bungalow, including the rear 1973 addition. Following successful relocation of the original portion of the house and submittal of an application for Landmark designation, the City of Boulder will provide a $40,000 stipend to assist with any hazardous material mitigation and the costs associated with the moving of the building. The City requests that the house be moved to a new location, and the site restored by July 1st, 2018. If more than one qualified proposal is received, qualified proposals will be assessed on the strength of the proposals according to the following criteria: -Historic appropriateness of proposed new location and use -Ability to undertake project including restoration of site -Level of detail in moving plan -Schedule Proposals will be received by the City of Boulder, Colorado, at the office of Purchasing, 1777 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80302 until 3:00PM, Tuesday, December 5, 2017. Please submit two printed and one electronic version of each proposal. A pre-proposal meeting/building walk through will take place at 11 am Monday, November 20th, 2017, followed by a mandatory pre-proposal conference at 11 am on Thursday, November 30th, 2017 (both on-site at 744 University Avenue). SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The following information is required for a proposal to be considered complete and to be eligible for the award process. Please respond to all of the following outlined points specifically and clearly. A.GENERAL INTRODUCTION Provide a concise description and experience of yourself, or your firm, and the experience of the Contractor. The description for both the Submitter and the Contractor shall identify Attachment A: Request For Proposals for the Relocation of the Nelson House name, address, contact person name, phone number. Number of years in business. B.PRIOR EXPERIENCE Provide evidence that proposed house structural mover and/or contractor has successfully completed at least two (2) house relocation projects of similar size and materials within the last 5 years. C.LOCATION Provide information about proposed new location for house demonstrating ownership and feasibility of locating the building at proposed site consistent with applicable zoning and building codes. D.MOVING PLAN i.Provide concise methodology for moving the house including permitting, mitigation of hazardous materials, demolition, staging for move, restoration of site at 744 University Avenue, and new foundation including anticipated dates. Restoration of site and permanent location of building on new foundation of application to designation shall occur prior to issuance of financial stipend by the City of Boulder). ii.Provide information that the City of Boulder, and any other governmental agencies which may be involved, have approved the zoning, transportation of the improvements along the public streets, roads or highways on the route leading to the site to which the house will be relocated. E.HISTORIC DESIGNATION Provide information about submitting application to historically designate as a local historic landmark (submission of application to designate shall occur prior to issuance of financial stipend by the City of Boulder). F.LICENSES Provide a statement attesting that the proposed Contractor has the necessary licenses, including a City of Boulder Class “B” contractor license. Submitter must provide proof of the necessary licenses within ten (10) days of award. G.INSURANCE Submit evidence of, or attested by, the Submitter that you are able to obtain adequate insurance coverage. H.ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE State that you understand and will comply with the environmental requirements stated in Section III of this RFP and that you have reviewed the environmental report(s) for the house that will be made available by the City of Boulder’s Public Works Department I.ESCROW State that you understand that a $5,000 good faith deposit will be required upon being awarded the house. These funds will be held by the City in an escrow and refunded to the recipient once the house has been successfully moved, the site restored, and landmark designation application made. Call or email James Hewat at 303.441.3207 hewatj@bouldercolorado.gov with any questions. SIGNATURE The Submitter’s proposal must be accompanied by the signature below of an individual who is authorized to legally bind the individual or company. The Submitter attests by signing below that they are aware that at the time the house is to be moved, the building may contain asbestos material and lead-based paint and that they have reviewed the environmental reports for the respective properties being submitted. In addition, by signing below, the Submitter affirms acceptance of all Terms and Conditions listed in this Request for Proposal. By: ____________________________________________ Name: Title: ________________________________________ (Please print or type name and title) Daytime Telephone Number: (___) __________________ Date of Response: _______________________________ RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation December 5th, 2017 Submitted By: Kate Williams 106 W. Geneseo St. Lafayette, CO 80026 Attachment B: December 5, 2017 Proposal from Kate Williams to Relocate the Nelson House to Lafayette, Colorardo RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 1 KATE WILLIAMS WilliamsKpdx@gmail.com (305) 484 2432 December 5, 2017 City of Boulder Public Works Department 1777 Broadway Boulder, CO 80302 Dear Reviewing Committee, It is my pleasure to submit this proposal in response to your Request for Proposals, Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, Co Available for Acquisition and Relocation. Upon hearing about this opportunity, I was elated to realize the serendipity of the situation; my Old Town Lafayette double lot (.25 acre) would make a perfect home for the 1923 Bungalow, and my professional experience working with Boulder County’s Buyout Program has given me the exact skillset necessary to oversee the house relocation project through completion and to your satisfaction. As part of this submission, I have included historic information on the proposed site and neighborhood for relocation. In January of this year, I purchased the 1918 historic miner’s cottage at 106. W. Geneseo Street in Lafyatte. I am currently rehabilitating this property; it was through my historic renovation contractor that I learned of Historic Preservation Boulder’s RFP opportunity. I believe that relocating the 1923 Bungalow to 106 W. Geneseo St. would suit the character of the home and enhance the historic nature of Old Town Lafayette, and I would be honored to advocate for its historic designation. As a project manager for Boulder County’s Flood Recovery Buyout Program, I manage the demolition and restoration of all residential ‘buyout’ properties. I am responsible for all contractor procurement, scope development, contracting, and regulatory compliance. We are nearly finished with that program, having completed 46 of the 47 properties. If selected, I will directly apply this expertise to the home relocation project, and will call upon my experience and professional contacts to ensure that the home is relocated and the site is restored according to schedule. Having completed 46 properties with a similar scope, you will benefit from my having already learned from mistakes that cause schedule delays and errors/omissions in project scope. As the project manager for this project, I would employ the same professional integrity and dedication that I have employed with past projects. I encourage the reviewing committee to contact my references for more information on my personal character and professional capabilities. Sincerely, Kate Williams RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 2 A. GENERAL INTRODUCTION Kate Williams will serve as project manager for the suite of work and related contracts required for this project. The team is composed of five key players who will each tackle a specific portion of the scope of work. 1. Kate Williams- Homeowner, Project Manager 2. Powell Structure Moving- Structure Relocation Contractor 3. Hudspeth- Site Demolition & Restoration Contractor 3. Scott Cox & Associates- Structural Engineer Consultant 5. General Contractor- TBA, pending award and scope development. This contractor will specialize in residential construction, and will be responsible for completing any structural work required before/after the move is completed. ** Note on Contractor Selection: Due to the timing and nature of this project, scopes of work and resulting bids are considered preliminary. The current leading bid for each task has been included in this proposal, but until scopes of work are finalized, and each individual contract is approved by the homeowner and executed by both parties, they are subject to change. Contractor bidding documents and preliminary scopes of work are included as Appendix A. The selected contractor(s) will meet City of Boulder or City of Lafayette licensing and insurance requirement, when applicable. Kate Williams- Homeowner, Project Manager 106 W. Geneseo St. Lafayette, Colorado 80026 Williamskpdx@gmail.com 305.484.2432 Ms. Williams purchased the property at106 W. Geneseo St. in January of 2017 and is currently rehabilitating the historic downtown property. She is a planning professional with 7 years combined experience in program and project management, community development, and disaster recovery. Ms. Williams currently manages the Boulder County Home Access program, responsible for restoring private bridges, driveways, and roads to residences damaged by the flood. She also manages all property clearance and restoration activities of the Boulder County ‘Buyout Program’. That program is nearly complete, and 46 of the 47 properties have been completely cleared of residential improvements, and have been brought back to the pre- development state. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 3 Mark Powell | Powell Structure Moving- Contractor for Structure Relocation 1716 Main St Longmont, CO 80501 Longmontmark@aol.com 303.678.7030 Mark Powell has been contracting for 40+ years. He provides structural moving services all over Colorado, focusing in Boulder County, Larimer County, Denver City and County, and Weld County. Mark has experience moving timber, brick, and stucco structures of one or multiple stories. He has served as the contractor on small (<$100,000) residential contracts, as well as a subcontractor to large multi-million dollar government contracts for local and regional jurisdictions like the City of Lyons, City of Fort Collins, etc. He is based in Longmont, Colorado. Hudspeth- Demolition & Restoration Contractor Justin Mast 4775 S. Santa Fe Circle Englewood, CO 80110 jmast@hudspethinc.com 303‐791‐5562 office Hudspeth & Associates, Inc. is an experienced environmental remediation and general contractor with nearly 20 years of specialized project success. They are known for providing out of‐ box thinking and flexible solutions for even the most complex environmental and construction projects. Hudspeth provides the technology, people, equipment and expertise to self‐perform work on projects from start to finish. The majority of their 120 employees are cross‐trained in all service areas. This allows us to provide our clients with consistent quality; safe, responsive service; more efficient schedules and lower costs. Hudspeth’s focused performance in asbestos and lead‐based paint abatement and contaminated soil remediation results in a predictable, safe, quality project outcome that mitigates an owner’s risk. They have the experience and skill to implement a wide range of cleanup technologies and to properly handle both hazardous and non‐hazardous soils, sludge and debris. No other team can offer each client the turnkey experience that Hudspeth has. Below is an overview of the services provided:  Abatement of asbestos and lead in all building medias, including installation of controls and removal and disposal  Remediation, transportation and disposal or on‐site treatment of soils contaminated with a wide spectrum of contaminants, such as asbestos, petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides, PAHs, PCBs, VOCs and chlorinated solvents  The development of project designs, installation of proper engineering controls, coordination with regulators and submission of all applicable closeout documentation RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 4 Hudspeth’s demolition and dismantlement services include:  Pre‐demolition hazard assessment, waste inventory and abatement  Waste stream segregation, management and disposal  Salvageable materials recovery/demolition/dismantlement Hudspeth’s general construction services include:  New construction, expansions and renovations  Horizontal construction, including utilities, roads and earthwork Hudspeth’s civil site services: • Site Clearing • Structural Excavation • Back‐Fill, Rough Fine Finishing Scott Cox & Associates- Structural Engineer Consultant Donald P. Ash 1530 55th Street Boulder, CO 80303 Ash@scottcox.com 303.444.3051 Scott Cox and Associates (SCA) has been meeting the engineering needs of Colorado for over 50 years. We are a full service engineering firm with core strengths in civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, materials testing, special inspections and land surveying. The interaction between these engineering disciplines gives us strength and insight that allows us to meet the multidisciplinary needs of the client. We offer our clients the expertise and service that comes only with years of dealing with local conditions and successfully interacting with the various local municipalities and regulatory agencies. SCA is an established local company with extensive project experience providing Land Surveying, Civil Engineering and Geotechnical Engineering design assistance to several local municipalities and government agencies. This experience will enable us to successfully and efficiently respond to your project needs with an absolute minimum amount of coordination difficulties. B. PRIOR EXPERIENCE Kate Williams For the last four years, Ms. Williams has worked as a project manager and coordinator for Flood Recovery. In her tenure, she managed Boulder County’s High Hazard Home program, overseeing the demolition of highly damaged structures throughout unincorporated Boulder County immediately following the 2013 Flood Event. Since that time, she has continued to work on large RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 5 infrastructure projects, and currently manages Boulder County’s $8.4 million dollar Home Access Program, and is responsible for overseeing all site-work for Boulder County’s $27 million dollar Buyout Program. In the past 4 years, she has managed more than 30 bridge reconstruction contracts, and oversaw the clearance and restoration of more than 50 properties throughout Boulder County, ensuring that each property is sustainably cleared and restored to a pre- development state. See Appendix B for her full resume. Figure 1. “Before” and “After” Figure 2. “Before” and “After” Powell Structure Movers Mark Powell has moved countless structures in the last 40 years. He is recommended by countless residents, government offices, engineering firms, and contractors. A few of his letters of reference are included in Appendix C. A selection of his recent projects includes:  ‘The Bishop House’ for RTC,1375 W 8th St. Loveland, CO  Horseshoe shaped House Lift for David Thompson, 5420 W Highway 34 Loveland, CO  Small Farmhouse for Rick Lutz, 31938 Weld CR 47 Greeley, CO  Louisville Historic House reposition and lift, 721 Grant St. Louisville, CO RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 6 References: Paul Gallagher| Gebau Engineering paul@gebau.com 303.444.8545 Lonnie Sheldon | Van Horn Engineering & Surveying 970.586.9388 Jeff Medanich | Chautauqua Association jeff.medanich@chautauqua.com 303.952.1676 “The Bishop House” Dec-Jan 2013- Mark completed a relocation of ‘The Bishop House’ in Loveland, moving the two- story Victorian from 871 E. First Street to Eighth Street and Taft Avenue. Loveland News article: http://www.reporterherald.com/news/loveland-local-news/ci_24617259/bishop-house-east-first- street-will-be-relocated RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 7 RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 8 Figure 3. Powell Structure Movers Projects RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 9 C. LOCATION C.1. OWNERSHIP Proof of ownership is included as Appendix D: Williams’ Deed to Property. C.2. LOCATION The proposed location is 106. W. Geneseo Street in Old Town Lafayette, Colorado. The property is a 0.25 acre, corner lot, located at the intersection of Geneseo St. and Hopkins St. Please see Preliminary Site Plan (Appendix E). The Lafayette Historic Preservation Board’s 2001 Architectural Survey of West Lafayette (Appendix F) describes the historical context of the neighborhood and typical architecture found in Old Town Lafayette. This neighborhood experienced a surge of single family homes in the late 19th early 20th century. Homes here demonstrate a variety of architectural styles, including hippped roof box and gable-sided homes, Craftsman Bungalows, and Edwardian Vernacular two-stories. Figure 4. Lafayette Map with 106 W. Geneseo RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 10 Figure 5. Lafayette Street Map, with 106. W. Geneseo Street marked in red box. C.3. ZONING- Old Town Lafayette 106 W. Geneseo St. is located in the Old Town Residential district (OTR) of the City of Lafayette’s Zoning Map. Per Lafayette Municipal Code (Sec. 26-2-2), properties zoned OTR are allowed an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). If relocated here, the 1923 Bungalow would legally be considered an ADU per the zoning allowance. Despite this, the1923 Bungalow would be located facing East towards Hopkins street, with its own separate driveway entrance off of Hopkins. No visual markers would identify the structure as an ADU. Sec. 26-2-2. - Lafayette Old Town Neighborhood Overlay District. In addition to the basic zoning districts established by section 26-2-1, there is established an overlay zone district designated as the old town neighborhood overlay district. This district encompasses the entirety of the old town residential (OTR) zone district and portions of adjacent R-1, R-2 and T-1 zoned areas, and is established to maintain the existing character of the property within the overlay district. Regulations are established for this overlay district that shall apply in addition to, or as a modification of, the regulations established for any underlying basic zoning district encompassed within the old town neighborhood overlay district. OTR zoning allows for Duplex properties or Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) accompanied by a single family residence. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 11 Figure 6. 106 W. Geneseo on Zoning Map of Lafayette C.4. Accessory Dwelling Units ADUs in Lafayette are held to the code requirements outlined in Section 26-14-19 of the Lafayette Municipal Code. The full section language is included as Appendix G: Sec. 26-14-19. Accessory Buildings, Structures and Dwelling Units. The lot and the property meet all requirements except for maximum coverage, for which it would exceed the maximum of 750 sf floor area. In order to get permit approval, the project would require a variance on maximum square footage. Regarding this issue, Ms. Williams met with Lafayette Senior Planner Greg Thompson on November 17th, 2017 to discuss the feasibility of this project with consideration to Lafayette zoning and code. When questioned on the likelihood of the variance being approved, he reiterated that the project supports the goals and objectives of the City of Lafayette and the Old Town District in several ways: 1) through an appropriately historic structure relocated in an historic district, 2) through the sustainable reuse of materials (compared to new construction), 3) through infill development, 4) and through compatible design, bulk, and massing. While a preliminary or guarantee of approval could not be granted, a letter of ‘general support’ was provided (Appendix H: Letter from Lafayette Senior Planner Greg Thompson) in which is stated, “The relocation of an historic structure into this area, which has a size and style that is similar to other existing structures is desirable.” RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 12 C.4. Code- Lafayette Historic houses can be difficult to bring up to code, depending on what standards the municipality follows or what they will grant for waiver. Generally speaking, a structure must be brought up to full code compliance if relocated. On November 17th, Ms. Williams met with Lafayette Chief Building Official Ron Kauffman to discuss the feasibility of relocating the 1923 Bungalow to Lafayette, with consideration of current code standards. While Mr. Kauffman wasn’t willing to put any commitment in writing, he reiterated that his main concerns in regards to code are ‘health and safety’ issues that typically relate to stairways, electrical, and plumbing. The front porch steps and the basement steps may need to be altered to meet code- this would occur after relocation. Regarding the ‘health and safety’ items that Mr. Kauffman noted as a specific concern, Ms. Williams had the house informally inspected by a code specialist, who noted that plumbing, ventilation, and electrical appear to all have been updated and are up to code, with the exception of the electrical box, which will need to be replaced. D. MOVING PLAN D.1. Methodology Upon award, additional inspections of the house will need to be completed in order to determine full scope of work and comprehensive workplan. Workplan Considerations: The original part of the house and the southern bathroom will be preserved, while the carport and the 1970s bedroom addition will be separated from the main house and demolished on-site. The chimney may not be movable, and may be demolished on site and reconstructed in the new location. The existing roof is failing and so will be demolished on-site and then rebuilt at new location. Removing the roof while the home is still located at 744 University reduces moving costs by approximately $20,000. By removing and then reconstructing the roof in this sequence, those savings can be used to reconstruct a new roof that meets current code, rather than being spent on utility fees. HAZMAT: The provided HAZMAT report completed by Freedom Environmental Consultants, Inc was reviewed by Tom Norman, PE, CHMM, Senior Program Manager at Landmark Environmental, Inc. His determination is that the asbestos- containing vents should be relocated with the house, and therefore would not require abatement. If, after additional review, the vents cannot be relocated with the house, then a certified General Abatement Contractor (GAC) will complete abatement. Per section 5.4 of the HAZMAT report, demolition of the roof, including shingles, may require appropriate abatement per Category 1 non-friable RACM. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 13 Preliminary workplan as follows; 1. Application for Utility Decommission a. Utilities must be fully decommissioned before structure relocation/demolition can occur, and applications to Utility companies should be submitted as soon as possible. To expedite the relocation, it may be preferable to have the current owner (City of Boulder) submit the application as soon as practicable, and reduce the financial reimbursement to Homeowner accordingly. 2. Historic Designation Studies & Application a. Additional research must be completed regarding whether the structure can be designated historic prior to relocation. To be initiated upon award. 3. Permit Applications a. State and Local Permits for Demolition, and Building Permits with the City of Lafayette, submitted by Homeowner and/or Consulting Engineer. i. Building Permits for Lafayette will require the 6-8 week PUD process. b. Oversize/Overweight transportation permits will be needed for the City of Boulder, Boulder County, and City of Lafayette, submitted by Structure Mover. 4. Structure Relocation (after utility decommission confirmed). a. Hand demo the attached carport and small block storage shed south of carport. b. Position roll off along east side of house. i. Exact position to be determined by City of Boulder demolition permit. c. Stabilize porch roof as needed to transport with porch floor section, detach porch roof from house's gable, detach porch floor section from house, load porch roof and floor onto trailer for transport. d. Begin hand demo of chimney, salvaging fascia stone; simultaneously hand demo roof section of original house. As hand demo progresses from the North end of home, reinforce ceiling joists if needed as they serve as a diaphragm tie for top of house walls, place OSB on top of ceiling joists and affix OSB as needed, covering OSB with good quality tarp. This process will be done to the original part of the house and the newer bath on the south end of original house. i. Fascia stone to be reused in reconstructed foundation. e. Excavate area North of house about 1-2' to allow placement of two WF 12"x65# or heavier steel mainbeams running the length of house and bath. Demo mainbeams holes in foundation as needed. f. Move cribbing into basement from demoed holes in sides of foundation. Construct crib stacks inside basement to serve as roller stacks to place mainbeams under house. Construct crib stacks below mainbeams to lift house. Install mainbeams under house. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 14 Note: Mainbeams will probably be brought to site and installed on a Sunday morning to mitigate impact on traffic. Install jacking system on crib stacks. Shim between mainbeams and floor joists to compensate for beam deflection. Note: There may be very minor plaster or sheetrock cracks when house is lifted or set down on a flat surface. Sometimes interior finishes have been done when a house is not perfectly level. Powell is not responsible for repairing minor cosmetic damage. g. Reinforce bath attachment to house as needed. h. Sever any sill plate attachments to foundation. i. Lift house off foundation. Demo top of foundation to allow house to be lowered as much as possible to alleviate the fact that the house is on a bit of a hill in relation to the street elevation. Roll house on steel rollers North 20' approximately to a point where rubber tired dollies can be placed under mainbeams. Secure dollies to mainbeams. Place safety equipment on house, ie. signage and lights. j. Finalize transportation permits with Cities of Boulder and Lafayette and Boulder County. Coordinate with any necessary utility entities regarding transport. Note: By removing the undersized, failing roof section of the house, its loaded height will be <14', thereby requiring no assistance with overhead utilities. There may be a few sign post conflicts depending on the chosen route. k. Suggested route will be east on University to Broadway, south on Broadway to Baseline, East on Baseline to Corneleous in Lafayette, South on Corneleo us to Geneseo, East on Geneseo to 106 Geneseo and into lot. This route is subject to further review and the review of the City of Boulder Transportation dept. l. Transport house to 106 Geneseo, back into lot, rotate house 90 degrees, roll sideways on roller beams. Lower onto foundation when cured. Sill plate and attachment of house by others. m. Demobilize. 5. (To begin at completion of 3.K, above) Mobilize demolition team for 1970s addition, carport, and basement removal. Complete removal of all residential improvements. Clean fill to be used in basement void. No compaction required. 6. Native seeding and straw mulching of all disturbed grounds. 7. Mobilize General contractor to rebuild Roof, chimney, and rear of house. 8. Connect structure to new utilities. New Foundation Considerations: The new foundation will be designed by the Consulting Structural Engineer. Due to the historic nature of the house, it is recommended that excavation, only, be completed prior to house placement on property. House will be rolled over excavated hole. Then, the foundation will be poured by the General Contractor (TBD) to match house dimensions or field-verified measurements, without using standard aluminum frames. This is the preferred sequencing used to mitigate any issues arising from the home not being ‘square’, as is typical of older homes. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 15 Timelines Preliminary Timeline Dec-'17 Jan- '18 Feb- '18 Mar-'18 Apr- '18 May-'18 Jun-'18 Jul-'18 Aug-'18 Utility Disconnections Historic Designation Application Additional Inspections & Scope Refinement Foundation Engineering/Design New Location Site Plan City of Lafayette Permitting Demolition, Transportation Permits Pre-Transport Site-Work (744 University) Structure Transport and Placement Site Work (Lafayette) & Foundation Excavation Post-Placement Foundation Pouring Carport (etc) Demolition and Site Restoration Placement on New Foundation Rebuild Roof, Chimney, Rear of House New Utility Connections Post-Relocation Site work and Landscaping Sequencing & Process to be determined RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 16 D. 2. PERMITTING For structure transport, permitting coordination will need to occur in all jurisdictions of passage, including the City of Boulder, Boulder County, City of Lafayette. Those permits are not eligible for pre-approval, and permit applications cannot be made in advance of award. There are no improvements along public streets anticipated. Standard wide/oversized load permits will be required. The Project Manager has had initial consultation with these three permitting entities and there is no expectation for permit denial. Structure mover will be responsible for securing Oversized/Overweight permits under their contract with homeowner. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 17 Figure 7. Proposed Route from 744 University to 106 W. Geneseo RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 18 E. HISTORIC DESIGNATION It is acknowledged that the submission of an application to the City of Lafayette’s Historic Preservation Board is a requirement of the award, and that no financial stipend will be provided until that application is submitted. Application to Lafayette’s Historic Preservation Board will occur after award. F. LICENSES All contractors hired for this project will be appropriately licensed in the authorizing jurisdiction. 1. Mark Powell- Contractor for Structure Relocation  Mark Powell has held a Class D- ‘Demolition & Moving’ license with the City of Boulder. If awarded, Mark will renew his license. A Class B license, as requested in the RFP, is not required for the scope of worked asked of Mr. Powell. 2. Hudspeth- Contractor for Site Demolition & Restoration  Hudspeth currently maintains a Class A Contractor license in Boulder. 3. Scott Cox & Associates- Consulting Structural Engineer  Scott Cox maintains all standard professional licenses. 4. General Contractor- TBD, pending award and scope development.  Additional scope work is necessary before determining what contractor is appropriate for this position, where the work will occur (i.e. if work is completed in City of Boulder vs. City of Lafayette). Appropriate licensing will be determined after award and completion of a full scope of work. G. INSURANCE I, Kate Williams, attest that I will acquire all necessary insurance coverage for the duration of this project. Additionally, I attest that I will acquire homeowner’s insurance for the 1923 Bungalow if awarded. H. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE I, Kate Williams, understand and will comply with the environmental requirements stated in this RFP and I reviewed the environmental report(s) for the house that have be made available by the City of Boulder’s Public Works Department. I. ESCROW I, Kate Williams, understand that a $5,000 good faith deposit will be required upon being RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 19 awarded the house. These funds will be held by the City in an escrow and refunded to the recipient once the house has been successfully moved, the site restored, and landmark designation application made. J. SIGNATURE The Submitter’s proposal must be accompanied by the signature below of an individual who is authorized to legally bind the individual or company. The Submitter attests by signing below that they are aware that at the time the house is to be moved, the building may contain asbestos material and lead-based paint and that they have reviewed the environmental reports for the respective properties being submitted. In addition, by signing below, the Submitter affirms acceptance of all Terms and Conditions listed in this Request for Proposal. By: __ __________________________________________ Name: Katherine (Kate) Williams Title: Resident Homeowner (Please print or type name and title) Daytime Telephone Number: (305) 484.2432 Date of Response: December 5th, 2017 RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 20 Appendix A: Contractor/Consultant Bidding Documents & Preliminary Scopes of Work 4775 S SANTA FE CIR, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 ▪ 303.791.5562 ▪ HUDSPETHINC.COM November 30, 2017 Kate Williams RE: 744 University SECTION I – INTRODUCTION Founded in 1999, Hudspeth and Associates, Inc. (Hudspeth) is a certified small business specializing in general construction, civil site services, demolition, dismantlement and environmental services. Due to our “turnkey” specialty, Hudspeth has enjoyed steady annual revenue increases over the last 18 years ultimately transforming us into a leader in our industry. SECTION II – PRICING Demolition Scope Total cost for the proposed base scope of work: Twenty-Two Thousand One Hundred Ten Dollars and No/100…… ($22,11 0.00) SECTION III – SCOPE OF WORK 3.1 SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIPTION Separation of 1970s addition from main house Removal of main house foundations and demolition of 1970s addition after main house is removed Backfilling of the site. No compaction requirements and backfill will be a clean standard fill material Seeding and mulching of site 3.2 SCOPE OF WORK – GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS The table below displays the scope of work general assumptions based specifically on the RFP provided: DESCRIPTION All labor, equipment, materials, and disposal required to perform work Owner to coordinate with surrounding properties for demolition and construction activities Owner is responsible for site access at the completion of demolition and construction activities Traffic control will not be required Demolition will be considered complete upon visual inspection of the disturbed area All salvageable material becomes the property of Hudspeth and is included in the price Work Hours will be 7:00am to 3:3 0pm 744 University Ave Boulder, CO Justin Mast Pre-Construction Manager 2 All walls are assumed 8” thick, any thicker, Hudspeth reserves the right to a change in condition All square footage, salvage and materials to be verified upon award, difference in quantities reserves the right for additional pricing if needed Proposal is contingent on execution of a mutually agreeable contract Hudspeth will have exclusive use of the building for the duration of the project Fire Hydrant will be available for water use Concrete foundations are 8” thick and 4’deep. It is assumed that no buildings have no crawlspaces Power and gas will be disconnected by owner. Building is deemed clean of all hazardous material to include asbestos, RBM(s), and lead. Pricing is guaranteed for 45 days 3.3 SCOPE OF WORK – GENERAL EXCLUSIONS The table below displays the scope of work general exclusions based specifically on the RFP provided: DESCRIPTION Bonding (Add 1.5% if required) All testing; permits (other than CDPHE demolition and CCOD Permit); fees, waivers of subrogation; indemnification Site and street protection; access and street repair Damage to existing improvements by construction traffic access, other than carelessness Temporary or fire access roads and paved access areas All parking lot, sidewalks, curb and damage on any concrete or asphalt unless noted in the scope of work Additional demolition not shown in the specifications, drawings, or listed in the scope of work Utility disconnects and/or capping in existing city Right-of-Way (ROW) that will require flash fill and restoration costs. Engineering reports or testing Street closures Removal of hazardous materials / Hazmat recovery Protection of existing conditions Dewatering, temporary pumping, temporary wells and drainage ditches Tree removal, protection and relocation Removal of deleterious materials, concrete, tanks, or trash discovered during excavation 744 University Ave Boulder, CO Justin Mast Pre-Construction Manager 3 Any ROW work, closures, or permitting Traffic Control Snow/Frost/Mud or any inclement weather related removals Erosion control installation/maintenance/permits/seeding/mulching All utility disconnect including water, sewer, power and gas 744 University Ave Boulder, CO Justin Mast Pre-Construction Manager 4 SECTION V – SAFETY COMMITMENT 5.1 OVERVIEW OF SAFETY PROGRAM Hudspeth safety culture begins with an expectation of continuous improvement in safety performance. This commitment underlines an error-free project execution through intelligent planning, proactive evaluation of hazards and prevention of injuries, illnesses, property damage, spills, community/environmental impacts, or near miss incidents that could have resulted in these occurrences under different conditions. Management commitment at all levels establishes the priority for safety during the planning and execution process and by individual effort. Hudspeth believes that all incidents are preventable. 5.2 HUDSPETH’S PROACTIVE APPROACH METHOD Our proactive approach to safety can be seen in the diagram below: Hudspeth employees are proficient in a behavior-based safety program that proactively manages risk in the field. Every employee and partner has the ability and authority to stop work without repercussions in the event an unsafe condition exists. We mandate formal and frequent daily communication between crews and the site safety officer to ensure all workers are empowered to address and respond to safety concerns. This promotes a safety culture where each employee is recognized, rewarded and groomed to be a leader. These behavior based principles provide the framework for integrating our safety culture and values in the execution of our work. 744 University Ave Boulder, CO Justin Mast Pre-Construction Manager 5 SECTION VI – CLOSING Hudspeth would like to thank you for the opportunity to bid on this project. If you have any questions or require further information regarding this project, please call us at (303) 791-5562. Sincerely, Hudspeth Justin Mast Pre-Construction Manager CITY OF BOULDER Planning and Development Services 1739 Broadway, Third Floor • P.O. Box 791, Boulder, CO 80306-0791 phone 303-441-1880 • fax 303-441-4241 • web boulderplandevelop.net HUDSPETH & ASSOCIATES, INC 4775 S SANTA FE CIR ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 This document certifies that HUDSPETH & ASSOCIATES, INC currently holds the following contractor license(s) : CONTRACTOR LICENSES August 28, 2017 LIC-0010641-07 06/13/2018General Contractor Class A Expiration DateLicense TypeLicense # Associated Certifications : 1/26/2020RM219492Rodney McLean ICC Standard General Building Contractor (A) Name/Company License Type License No. Expiration Date Tested Individuals : Name License Type Title of Tester None None None None Code Tested or Reciprocity ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEOFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: FAXPHONE (A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person)$ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER:$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)$ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident)$AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ PER OTH-STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) $ $ $ $ $ The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD DDAVIS Diane Davis 10/25/2017 HUDS&AS-01 A 7930041150001 B EBA0222576 C 4064674 A 7930041140001 B ENP0222576 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 XCU Included 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Poll & Prof Included 25,000 300,000 1,000,000 Poll/Prof Incl 1,000,000 1,000,000 XX X X X X X X X X X X X X B ENP0222576 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 Forsberg Engerman Co 3575 S Sherman St Englewood, CO 80113 (303) 762-1733(303) 762-1717 S A M P L E Hudspeth & Associates Inc 4775 S Santa Fe Circle Englewood, CO 80110-6477 Homeland Insurance Company of New York Cincinnati Insurance Companies Pinnacol Assurance 10677 41190 Y Leased/Rented Equip Scheduled Equipment 350,000 4,543,439 Equipment Floater Equipment Floater SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES Consulting Engineers • Surveyors 1530 55th Street • Boulder, Colorado 80303 Phone (303) 444-3051 • Fax (303) 444-3387 Parties This Agreement is made this the 4th day of December 2017, between Ms. Kate Williams, subsequently referred to as "Client" and Scott, Cox & Associates, Inc., subsequently referred to as “Consultant.” Project Client retains Consultant to provide surveying and engineering consulting services in connection with the project located at 106 W. Geneseo Street, in Lafayette, Colorado, subsequently referred to as “Project”. Scope of Services The attached Scope of Services, dated 12/04/17, Pages 1 through 2, are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement for Services. General Conditions The attached General Conditions, dated 01/01/17, Pages 1 through 3, are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement for Services. Fee Consultant agrees to provide services hereunder on the following basis: The lump sum fee for the TASK A – TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY listed scope of services is $1,500.00. The lump sum fee for the TASK B – FOUNDATION PLANS listed scope of services is $2,500.00 The fee for the TASK CS – CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING listed scope of services will be on a time and materials basis, at the rates on the attached Standard Billing Rates. We estimate that our fee will be between $1,500.00 and $2,000.00. The fee for the TASK T – CONSTRUCTION TESTING listed scope of services will be on a time and materials basis, at the rates on the attached Standard Billing Rates. We estimate that our fee will be between $1,500.00 and $2,000.00. Additional Services will be charged per the attached standard fee schedule and are not included in the above referenced fees. A detailed description of services performed will be provided with each time and material billing. The above referenced fees are based on the Consultant performing all tasks together under this Agreement. Authorization Scott, Cox & Associates, Inc. Donald P. Ash, P.E. Client Acceptance Printed Name 12/04/17 Client – Printed Date Name – Printed (Authorized to Sign Agreement) Project Number Signature Date Mailing Address – Printed City/State/Zip – Printed ( ) – ( ) – ( ) Phone ( ) – ( ) – ( ) Fax 12/04/17 Page 1 of 2 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant will provide the following surveying and engineering consulting services for the project located at 106 W. Geneseo Street, in Lafayette, Colorado. TASK A – TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY We will provide a topographic survey of the project site. Our survey will identify existing surface topography, drainage features, and adjacent municipal utilities. The topographic survey will include 1-foot contours and spot elevations. Our survey will collect additional data in areas adjacent to the site, including areas in W. Geneseo Street. Said survey will be provided digitally as an AutoCAD drawing file and graphically in the form of a translucent bond reproducible print. Utility information will be based on visible evidence. Consultant’s plans will show underground utility information provided by others. Consultant will not be responsible for the accuracy for information provided by others. We will not be responsible for locating non-City utilities such as gas, telephone and cable. Consultant will not be responsible for coordinating with these non-City utility companies for service availability or connection requirements. If any of the above referenced services are required, Consultant will provide them as Additional Services. As an Additional Service Consultant can subcontract with a utility locate company to attempt to further identify underground utilities on-site and in the vicinity of the proposed utility connections within the R.O.W. TASK B – FOUNDATION PLANS Design and preparation of concrete and masonry contract documents, as applicable, for the building substructure. This includes value engineering analysis of appropriate geotechnical recommendations applicable to the building substructure, design of foundation structural elements, and preparation of applicable specifications and drawings. Geotechnical investigation, shop drawing review, on-site observations, and other construction review is not included. TASK CS – CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING Consultant will provide the following construction staking services as requested: • Utility Staking • Building Staking • Curb & Gutter Staking • Paving Staking • “As-built” Plans • Lot Corner Pins and Site Monuments • Improvement Survey Plat TASK T – CONSTRUCTION TESTING Consultant will provide the following construction testing services as requested: • Open Excavation Inspection • Footing Inspection • Reinforcing Inspection • Soils Testing • Concrete Testing • Nuclear Moisture/Density Testing 12/04/17 Page 2 of 2 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES (CONTINUED) ASSUMPTIONS The tasks and fees contained herein are based on the scope of work provided by the Client on November 21, 2017. Consultant may revise and/or resubmit this Agreement in the event the site plan or scope of work is substantially revised. ITEMS SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE ABOVE SCOPE OF SERVICES Scott, Cox & Associates would gladly provide these services and typically does for site development projects. They are excluded, because they were not specifically requested and the exact limits of the scope of work that would be necessary to accomplish these tasks is unknown at this time. In the event these services are required, Consultant will gladly perform these tasks as Additional Services. • Detention/Storm Water Quality Pond • Utility construction plans (water, sewer, storm sewer) • Grading and drainage plans • Drainage reports • Paving and staking construction plans • Cost Estimates • Geotechnical Investigations • Easement document preparation • Off-site design, utility and drainage/storm system analysis • Water quality issues/plans • Erosion control issues/plans • Special engineering plans, reports or permits (except as noted) • Earthwork calculations • Application preparation and fees • Structural/retaining wall design • Construction Administration/Management • Construction Specifications • Attendance at public hearing meetings AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES GENERAL CONDITIONS Scope of Services The Consultant’s Scope of Services (“Services”) are described in the Agreement for Services, Task Agreement or Proposal unless Services are otherwise described in a verbal agreement. Portions of the Services may be subcontracted. Acceptance and Execution Client agrees that execution of this Agreement is a material element of the consideration Consultant requires to execute the Services, and if Services are initiated by Consultant prior to execution of this Agreement as an accommodation for Client at Client’s request, both parties shall consider that commencement of Services constitutes formal acceptance of all terms and conditions of this Agreement. Additional terms and conditions may be added or changed only by written amendment to this Agreement signed by both parties. In the event Client uses a purchase order or other form to administer this Agreement, the use of such form shall be for convenience purposes only and any additional or conflicting terms it contains are stricken. This Agreement shall not be assigned by either party without prior written consent of the other party. Clients Shall Provide Clients shall provide all criteria and full information as to Client’s requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints and all available information pertinent to the Project, including digital drawing files, shall be provided to the Consultant. Client shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Consultant, their agents, and employees, from and against legal liability for all claims, losses, damages, and expenses to the extent such claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by information supplied by the Client. Right-of-Entry and Safety Client will provide for right-of-entry of Consultant and all necessary equipment in order to complete the work. Client agrees that in accordance with generally accepted construction practices, the construction contractor will be required by Client to assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of the Project, including safety of persons, property, and construction means, methods, techniques and sequences. Cost Estimates Since Consultant has no control over Contractor(s) methods of determining costs, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project Cost and Construction Cost are made on the basis of his experience and qualifications but Consultant does not guarantee that costs will not vary from opinions of cost prepared by him. Utilities Client shall provide the location and/or arrange for the marking of private utilities and subterranean structures. Consultant can assist the Client with locating subterranean structures and utilities via a Change Order. Consultant shall not be responsible for damage to subterranean structures or utilities that are not called to Consultant’s attention, are not correctly marked, including by a utility locate service, or are incorrectly shown, or omitted, on the plans furnished to Consultant. Subsurface Explorations Subsurface conditions throughout the site may vary from those depicted on logs of discrete borings, test pits, or other exploratory services. Client understands Consultant’s layout of boring and test locations is approximate and that Consultant may deviate a reasonable distance from those locations. Consultant will take reasonable precautions to reduce damage to the site when performing Services; however, Client accepts that invasive services such as drilling or sampling may damage or alter the site. Site restoration is not provided unless specifically included in the Services. Testing and Observations Client understands that testing and observation are discrete sampling procedures, and that such procedures indicate conditions only at the depths, locations, and times the procedures were performed. Consultant will provide test results and opinions based on tests and field observations only for the work tested. Client understands that testing and observation are not continuous or exhaustive, and are conducted to reduce, not eliminate, project risk. Client agrees to the level or amount of testing performed and the associated risk. Client is responsible (even if delegated to contractor) for notifying and scheduling Consultant so Consultant can perform these Services. Consultant shall not be responsible for the quality and completeness of contractor’s work or their adherence to the project documents, and Consultant’s performance of testing and observation services shall not relieve contractors in any way from their responsibility for defects discovered in its work, or create a warranty or guarantee. Consultant will not supervise or direct the work performed by contractors or their subcontractors and is not responsible for their means and methods. Sample Disposition Affected Materials and Indemnity Samples are consumed in testing or disposed of upon completion of tests (unless stated otherwise in the Services). Client shall furnish or cause to be furnished to Consultant all documents and information known or available to Client that relate to the identity, location, quantity, nature, or characteristic of any hazardous waste, toxic, radioactive, or contaminated materials (“Affected Materials”) at or near the site, and shall immediately transmit new, updated, or revised information as it becomes available. Client agrees that Consultant is not responsible for the disposition of Affected Materials unless specifically provided in the Services, and that Client is responsible for directing such disposition. In the event that test samples obtained during the performance of Services (1) contain substances hazardous to health, safety, or the environment, or (2) equipment used during the Services cannot reasonably be decontaminated, Client shall sign documentation (if necessary) required to ensure the equipment and/or samples are transported and disposed of properly, and agrees to pay Consultant the fair market value of this equipment and reasonable disposal costs. In no event shall Consultant be required to sign a hazardous waste manifest or take title to any Affected Materials. Client shall have the obligation to make all spill or release notifications to appropriate governmental agencies. The Client agrees that Consultant neither created nor contributed to the creation or existence of any Affected Materials conditions at the site. Accordingly, Client waives any claim against Consultant and agrees to indemnify and save Consultant, its agents, employees, and related companies harmless from any claim, liability or defense cost, including attorney and expert fees, for injury or loss sustained by any party from such exposures allegedly arising out of Consultant’s non-negligent performance of services hereunder, or for any claims against Consultant as a generator, disposer, or arranger of Affected Materials under federal, state, or local law or ordinance. 01/01/17 Page 1 of 3 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES GENERAL CONDITIONS (CONTINUED) Change Orders Client may request changes to the scope of Services by altering or adding to the Services to be performed. If Client so requests, Consultant will return to Client a statement of the change setting forth an adjustment to the Services and fees for the requested changes. Following Client’s review, Client shall provide written acceptance. If Client does not follow these procedures, but instead directs, authorizes, or permits Consultant to perform changed or additional work, the Services are changed accordingly and Consultant will be paid for this work according to the fees stated or its current fee schedule. If project conditions change materially from those observed at the site or described to Consultant at the time the project is started, Consultant is entitled to a change order equitably adjusting its Services and fee. Changes in Instruments of Service due to a change in design direction by the Client after Client’s original direction has been received and additional copies of Instruments of Service provided at Client’s request will be charged on a time and materials basis and said fees will be in addition to the fee stated in the Agreement. Preparation of revisions to Instruments of Service in response to Governmental Agency requests when said requests are not part of a formal Governmental Agency standard, or could not have been reasonably anticipated, or not due to an error by the Consultant will be charged on a time and materials basis and said fees will be in addition to the fees stated in the Agreement. Ownership of Documents All reports, plans, specifications, field data and notes and other documents, including all documents on electronic media prepared by the Consultant are Instruments of Service and shall remain the property of the Consultant and may not be used by the Client for any other endeavor. Client shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Consultant, their agents, and employees, from and against legal liability for all claims, losses, damages, and expenses to the extent such claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by reuse of the Instruments of Service. Electronic Files Consultant is not responsible for any liability arising from any reuse or modification of electronic files provided and makes no warranties, either expressed or implied, of merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose. In no event shall Consultant be liable for any loss of profit or any damages associated with use of this information. Limitation of Liability The liability of the Consultant and Consultant’s officers, directors, employees, agents and Consultant’s Sub-Consultants, and any of them, to Client and anyone claiming by, through or under Client, for any and all claims, losses, costs or damages whatsoever arising out of, resulting from or in any way related to this project or this Agreement from any cause or causes, including but not limited to the negligence, professional errors or omissions, strict liability or breach of contract or warranty expressed or implied of Consultant and Consultant’s officers, directors, employees, agents and Consultant’s Consultants, and any of them shall not exceed the total amount of $ 100,000.00. Indemnity In addition, and notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Consultant, its officers, directors, employees and subconsultants (collectively, Consultant) against all damages, liabilities or costs including reasonable attorney’s fees and defense costs, arising out of or in any way connected with this Project or the performance by any of the parties above named of the Services under this Agreement, excepting only those damages, liabilities or costs attributable to the negligent acts or negligent failure to act by the Consultant. In the event of any claim, Client agrees to make claim against the Consultant and not against any individual employed by the Consultant. Standard of Care Consultant will perform the Services in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. Consultant makes no warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, relating to Consultant’s Services and Consultant disclaims any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Work not Included Consultant’s Services do not include the investigation or detection of, nor do recommendations in Consultant’s reports address the presence or prevention of biological pollutants (e.g. mold, fungi, bacteria, viruses, or their byproducts) or occupant safety issues such as vulnerability to natural disasters, terrorism, or violence. Consultant’s findings, opinions, and recommendations are based solely upon data and information obtained by and furnished to Consultant at the time of the Services. Certificate of Merit The Client shall make no claim for professional negligence, either directly or in a third party claim, against the Consultant unless the Client has first provided the Consultant with a written certification executed by an independent design professional currently practicing in the same discipline as the Consultant and licensed in the State of Colorado. This certification shall: a) contain the name and license number of the certifier; b) specify each and every act or omission that the certifier contends is a violation of the standard of care expected of a Consultant performing professional services under similar circumstances; and c) state in complete detail the basis for the certifier’s opinion that each such act or omission constitutes such a violation. This certificate shall be provided to the Consultant not less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the presentation of any claim or the institution of any arbitration or judicial proceeding. 01/01/17 Page 2 of 3 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES GENERAL CONDITIONS (CONTINUED) Mediation In an effort to resolve any conflicts that arise during the development, design or construction of the project or following the completion of the project with the exception of fee disputes, the Client and the Consultant agree that all disputes between them arising out of relating to this Agreement shall be submitted to non-binding mediation unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. The Client and the Consultant further agree to include a similar mediation provision in all agreements with independent contractors and consultants retained for the project and to require all independent contractors and consultants also to include a similar mediation provision in all agreements with subcontractors, sub-consultants, suppliers or fabricators so retained, thereby providing for mediation as the primary method for dispute resolution between the parties to those agreements. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its employees are protected by worker’s compensation insurance and that Consultant has such general liability, property damage and professional liability insurance policies as Consultant deems to be adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shall be provided to Client upon written request. Consultant shall in no event be responsible for any loss or damage beyond the amounts, limits and conditions of such insurance. Termination Either the Client or the Consultant may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause upon giving the other party seven (7) calendar days prior written notice. The Client shall within thirty (30) calendar days of termination, pay the Consultant for all services rendered and all costs incurred up to the date of termination, in accordance with the compensation provisions of this Agreement. Third Party Reliance This Agreement and the Services provided are for Consultant’s and Client’s sole benefit and exclusive use with no third party beneficiaries intended. Reliance upon the Services and any work product is limited to Client, and is not intended for third parties. Applicable Law The law of the State of Colorado shall govern the validity of the Agreement, including these General Conditions and its interpretation and performance. Enforcement In the event either of the parties fails to keep any of the conditions or agreements contained herein, each shall have the right to bring an action for damages for breach of this Agreement or to pursue any other remedy allowable by law or in equity. Invoices Payments are due at time of delivery of products of service. If the Client is invoiced at a later date, payments of invoice by Client is due upon receipt. Interest at 1 -1/2% per month from the date of the invoice will be charged on invoices not paid within 30 calendar days. If the invoice is not paid within 30 calendar days, the Consultant may, without waiving any claim or right against the Client, and without liability whatsoever to the Client, terminate the performance of the service. Client agrees to pay all attorney fees and collection costs used to obtain payment of attorneys’ fees. Consultant may suspend Services for lack of timely payment. The Client warrants that funds are available to compensate the Consultant and that these funds are neither encumbered nor contingent upon the subsequent granting of approvals, permits or financial commitments by lending institutions or other entities. Entire Agreement These General Conditions shall be used in combination with a Task Agreement, a proposal, or a contract. These combined documents shall be the entire Agreement and shall supersede any other agreement between Client and Consultant relating to the subject matter thereof. In case of a conflict or inconsistency between these General Conditions and any other contract documents, these General Conditions shall control. 01/01/17 Page 3 of 3 SCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2017 Standard Billing Rates LABOR $/Hour Principal Engineer, PE ...................................................................................................... $215.00 Senior Engineer, PE ........................................................................................................... $174.00 Geotechnical Engineer, PE ................................................................................................ $169.00 Project Manager/Civil Engineer III, PE .......................................................................... $162.00 Project Coordinator /Civil Engineer II ........................................................................... $144.00 Junior Geotechnical Engineer/Civil Engineer I ............................................................. $135.00 Engineer Technician III/Assistant Survey Manager .................................................... $126.00 Geotechnical Technician/Engineering Technician II/CAD Operator ....................... $116.00 Engineering Technician I / Survey Instrumentman ..................................................... $83.00 Clerical ................................................................................................................................ $83.00 Survey Manager, PLS ........................................................................................................ $132.00 Survey Party Chief ............................................................................................................. $107.00 Two-Man Survey Crew (PC and Instrumentman) .................................................................................... $190.00 (PLS and Instrumentman) .................................................................................. $215.00 (PC and Robotic Survey Instrument) ................................................................ $180.00 EXPENSES Nuclear Moisture/Density Gauge .................................................................................. $27.00/day Concrete cylinder molds and caps ................................................................................. $6.00/cylinder Concrete cylinder cure and compression test ................................................................ $22.00/cylinder Hold reserve concrete cylinder ........................................................................................ $12.00/cylinder Vehicle Mileage ................................................................................................................. $0.65/mile Printing/Reproduction Black and White Copies (8½ x 11) ..................................................................... $0.15 each Color Copies (8½ x 11) ............................................................... ………………. $0.60 each Large Format Bond Copies ................................................................................ $0.65/square foot Inkjet Plotting ..................................................................................................................... D Size/E Size Black and White Paper Plots ............................................................................. $ 9.00/$12.00 each Color Paper Plots (for presentation/reproduction) ....................................... $34.00/$44.00 each Mylar Plots .......................................................................................................... $34.00/$44.00 each Survey Monuments Survey Monuments ............................................................................................. $35.00 each Survey Monument Box and Cover ................................................................... $70.00 each Outside expenses @ cost + 10% RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 21 Appendix B: Williams Resume KATE WILLIAMS Urban Planner, Project Manager — AICP WilliamsKpdx@gmail.com 106 W. Geneseo St. Lafayette, CO (305) 484-2432 PROFILE Planning professional with 7 years combined experience in program and project management, community development, and disaster recovery.  Excellent leadership in relationship building with diverse communities  Consistently exercises good judgment and takes initiative to enhance programming  Practical and solutions-oriented team member with a keen ability to ‘get it done’  Resourceful, strategic, and adaptive to quick changes in priority and approach EDUCATION 2011 – 2013 PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, PORTLAND, OR Masters in Urban and Regional Planning (MURP) Concentration in environmentally focused planning 2007 – 2010 PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, PORTLAND, OR B.A. Community Development, Magna Cum Laude Concentration in housing and economic development CERTIFICATIONS Certified with the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) | 5/16 – PRES MEMBERSHIP Commissioner- Lafayette Urban Renewal Authority | 2/17 – PRES AWARDS (SELECTED)  MERIT AWARD | CO Chapter, American Planning Association | July 2017  EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH | Boulder County | February, 2016  ACHIEVEMENT AWARD, County Resiliency | National Association of Counties | August, 2016  PINNACLE AWARD | Boulder County | April, 2016 EXPERIENCE 9/14 – PRES BOULDER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, BOULDER, CO Project Manager, 4/16 - PRES Planner II, 9/14 - 3/16 Flood Recovery Home Access Program  Recruited by the Transportation Department to develop and implement $8.4mm flood recovery program to rebuild private roads and bridges, funded by HUD’s Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR).  Develops all program policies, procedures, and application processes.  Ensures compliance with myriad complex funding sources: HUD, CDBG, FEMA, and State funding.  Creates comprehensive program budgets and expenditure forecasts.  Serves as project and grant manager for 15+ simultaneous bridge and road projects.  Successfully advocates at the state and federal level to remove program barriers.  Oversees contractor procurement and payment; writes and reviews Requests for Proposals (RFPs).  Manages program data for state and federal reporting.  Develops excellent resident/client and media relationships. Flood Recovery ‘Buyout Program’  Supervises staff to complete all property clearance and restoration site work for flood- damaged properties purchased with federal funds.  Oversees procurement, management, and invoicing of HAZMAT consultants, demolition contractors, and field oversight personnel.  Ensures all vendor contracts and program activities are in compliance with the requirements of FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and CDBG-DR. 1/14 – 9/14 RESOURCE SPECIALIST II BOULDER COUNTY RESOURCE CONSERVATION DIVISION, BOULDER, CO High Hazard Home Program  Program Coordinator, oversaw program to remove flood-destroyed residences (FEMA funded).  Superior program oversight resulted in 100% federal reimbursement rate.  Oversaw consultant and contractor bidding, selection, contracts, and invoicing.  Managed all data, documentation, and federal reporting. 3/12 – 8/13 GRADUATE RESEARCH ASSISTANT THE INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS (ISS), PORTLAND, OR Sustainable Neighborhoods Initiative  Program Associate, recruited by ISS Assistant Director to serve as single dedicated program staff.  Charged with shaping the goals and assessment metrics of the Sustainable Neighborhoods Initiative.  Researched and compiled literature, analyzed trends, identified institutional gaps, produced summary reports.  Developed new collaborative relationships with department leads and civic organizations.  Designed, implemented surveys; analyzed data, developed program recommendations.  Facilitated connections to community partners, negotiated agreements, designed collaborative projects.  Provided direct technical assistance to faculty; best practices, case studies, financial assistance information.  Researched and applied for grant funding. 3/12 – 3/13 CONSULTANT FRIENDS OF TREES, PORTLAND, OR Treecycle Northwest  Market Researcher & Program Designer, recruited by Executive Director to conduct exploratory market research, impact assessments, and scenario developments for an innovative urban tree reclamation and adults skill-building program.  Developed comprehensive business plan, scenario forecasts, negotiated purchase agreements.  Coordinated public outreach events, open house events, and served as liaison to the press.  Researched and compiled statistical data relating to urban forests’ economic and health impacts.  Convened and facilitated stakeholder meetings; presented to board and external business leaders.  Researched and applied for grant funding. REFERENCES BRIAN GRAHAM, AICP Flood Recovery Coordinator, Transportation Department Boulder County Government BGRAHAM@BOULDERCOUNTY.ORG 720.564.2667 MICHELLE KREZEK Boulder County Commissioners’ Deputy, Commissioners’ Office Boulder County Government MKREZEK@BOULDERCOUNTY.ORG SCOTT FOGARTY Executive Director Friends of Trees SCOTTF@FRIENDSOFTREES.ORG 503-467-2514 Additional references available upon request. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 22 Appendix C: Mark Powell Letters of Reference March 101h 20 l O To Whom It May Concern: Re: Powell Structure Moving Letter of Recommendation GEBAU1nc. Consulting Structural Engineers We are pleased to take this oppo1tunity to professionally recommend Mark Powell of Powell Structure Moving, for shoring and moving of complicated multi story historic masonry structures. We successfully interacted with Mark on many projects over the years, and especially the Peck Fannhouse project in 2002. The two story wythe historic masonry structure was raised and moved one mile down the road and founded on a new foundation system. Powel successfolly underpinned the masonry walls and braced the structure for moving and coordinated very well with our office regarding the process and procedures, so that we were able to design a proper foundation system for the moved structure. This company was very professional and stood behind their word. We highly recommend his company for shoring and moving of complicated historic structures. Sincerely GEBAU,INC PJG/lf e.mail: longmontmark@aol.com I 121 Broadway, Suite #20 I Boulder, Colorado 80302 (303/ 444-8545 Fax (303) 444-3140 MCSTAIN ENTERPRISES,INC.75 MANHATTAN DRIVE SUITE I BOULDER COLORADO 80303 303.494.5900 303.494.4933 FAX WWW.MCSTAIN.COM 5113/02 Jeff Medanich Superintendent of Special Projects McStain Enterprises 75 Manhattan Dr. Boulder,Co.80303 Me:5 T AI N To Whom It May Concern: NEIGHBORHOODS I am writing this letter as a means of recommendation for Mr.Mark Powell of Powell Structure Moving.We recently were involved in the relocation of The Peck House in Longmont.This building is one of the few surviving structures from the settlement of Burlington,which later became Longmont.This is a two-story brick home that was built in two halves at two separate times.We moved the structure approximately a quarter of a mile.After interviewing three house movers for the project,we decided to use Mark Powell to accomplish the move.I was impressed with Mr.Powell's knowledge of buildings,his commitment to preservation,and his enthusiasm for the work.This project was complicated by the fact that this was a brick structure and that the house had virtually no foundation.Mr.Powell took great care in calculating and engineering the proper support of the house prior to the actual move.He lifted and moved this three hundred thousand pound structure without so much as a crack in the one hundred plus year old bricks or stucco.I am impressed with his extensive knowledge of construction as well as his positive attitude.I have no reservations at all in recommending him and his work. \ Kee Construction Companies,Inc.4129 Arleigh ct.-Berthoud,CO 80513Phone(303)772-4855 -Fax (303)485-9397 -Email Ikee1@prodigy.netMay13,2002Re.Mark PowellPowellStructure Moving To Whom it may concern: Mark Powell has moved a couple of buildings for me,one in 1995 and another in 2002.Both times we contracted with Powell Structure Moving we have been very satisfied with his performance.His professionalism and expertise in moving these buildings was a great benefit to us.I would recommend Mark to anyone desiring to relocate an existing structure from their property. Si~e~~£ LaDon Kee President ,----------------------------------------~,--------------------------~")i:t_ao _~f~~~~;:l;~~..Little Thompson Valley Pioneer Museum'r'~"'"'rY-1!',~.,1.:;;'7''.,~.r "","'jI\';';::"c,r ">;F'1{,:,~,~,.Berthoud HistoricalSociety:,po.Box 2"25 •Berthoud,Colorado 8051:1 'IinTI Vaughall,Museum Director~-=----'.~=-:-,-,-_",-,-__,'-,J ,....".d••..•-»"-:-'.Phone 970.5:,t~.21_t7 Museum •22_t Mountain Ave.Annex ·222 Mouruuiu Ave.Museum Ilmll's'.1 :00 In .'>:00 •W,~III('sday -Sunday,,' November 17,2001 Dear Mark On behalfof the board of Directors,the membership and the people ,of Berthoud I want to thank you for your efforts in moving the Bimson Barn.There is no way ,we could have brought thebarn to the back yard without your dedication and professionalism.,',",,,I~ Enclosed are a few photoposrcards as a token of our appreciation -:-prints of the .actualmove will be,sent you soon.'' ,Againthanks for your 'donation. ,~~;:::el~.:- Tom Vaughan' Museum Director ..:-.. HELEN W.STEWARTBARBARASTEWARTCARLE SHIRLEY STEWART SCROGIN BUFFALO BILL MUSEUM p,-.u;-.St;:Jeepee LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN STEWART,INC. ROUTE 3,BOX 723 CRESTVIEW 9-3725 GOLDEN,COLORADO >!\(\fY\0.y K.....pO w ~\\,-2..")-0 D ?o IlJ e,\\1\(\Ov Irs1 \0 L{4 '2....IV.I~f!l ~\ kiD rJ q m ON +1 GO ~Of7J"3 N\llyK.,rO\Ntll CU.Jd hts COl1tptpJ1 m~Jt"f-)vtYl Ji{f-if.v/t- h 0 vs.£m ov~.f1r Owe Co·m f'lnJi -}h J'fA J I.!;Vtr1IJiVE. \,tJ /Dr~A-mA 2-€d A ++h/~SJ(i 1/61 /Ii d Ci+N -do f.J.H iJ-vcl E. fv'\r,fowl II (4;rlcf COmf/Pt--A/1 brov,hf -Iv fh,joh I 14 bo H-vn )fl'llZ-fNlt~I fhf hOIlJe;wAJ rnfJ.,8J J ()N f-lrt1L (!IN bv J j e..J-etA!J we dil.Lv'J 11IWf;10 liox /J -/h1'H11 ~~r k A 'b lL --e)f~L I A \l Y S j N U fh .-':>A DV ~IE-OJ po.f 11 ~~ecl 0 J.ft,t'i III J m A-it,ik Jb b €JJe.t-//Yl Ijft.C(9mf~I (?-j-4y Co tr-:r AN «s 1v-rIVeJ do""rJ fhv uJOrK:.bfJ-~d fJtl fh<+t ~L-.~A '~tJe · t\\0\.,(\<.~bli'tc.-\\(rJo w\h\s wod,,We-W{JV \~re L1)Yf\~tJ A \\\\Y\.-vJ '\~ov \-ft do'v b-t · S II'(evre-l'1 ) \3\\\{en le,H,w.~~a..r+..Jif('. tt ~ovt~JY)yv('/~~~A-~M II .:..I !]Hamilton Eng,::;in=e.:...;e=.r;....:in=o.g...;"...:;.~_-.-----------------.~Consultmg Engmeers 2543 South Oneida StreetDenver,CO 80224-2637 Phone (303)757-7678 Fax (303)757-7030 November 10,1999 Subject: Powell Structure Moving 10442 North 75th Street Longmont,CO 80503 To Whom it May Concern: I grew up on a farm near Lafayette,Colorado.The farm has been in the family for four generations_Rapid growth along the front range in recent years has escalated land values and made farming uneconomical.As developers move in,it becomes necessary for existing land owners to initiate development themselves or become gobbled up by adjacent development As part of the property development,two farm houses which had been on the property for decades stood in the way.The first of the two houses was acquired by another house moving company for speculation.The house was moved from it's foundation to another location on the property to allow site work to beqin.Although there was abundant lead time,the initial work was the house remained in the "temporary"location months beyond the contractual date. A second house was still on the property as the site work began.Demolition appeared to be it's only fate.As the bulldozers rumbled near the front door,Powell Moving Structures came forward with a buyer.While I was excited to hear of a buyer,I was concerned Mark could get the job done in time to save the house.Mark assured me he could handle the move within the time available.I was especially skeptical after seeing the performance of the other moving company.Nevertheless,we shook hands on the deal as the bulldozer continued to move closer to the house. Mark went to work without delay and did essentially all the work himself.The deadline he had to meet would have been a challenge for a crew of movers.Nevertheless on the promised day,the house was lifted from it's foundation and pulled to a site a hundred yards away to allow earthwork to be completed on schedule.I was pleased,but still concerned the house would stay in it's "temporary"position indefinitely.As promised,within a couple of days,Mark moved the house from my property as promised. Needless to say I was very pleased with Powell Moving Structures.Obviously Mark knew what he was doing and did it He makes promises and keeps them.I would not hesitate to recommend him to anyone. Sincerely, ~~~ Robert L.Hamilton RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 23 Appendix D: Williams’ Deed to Property RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 24 Appendix E: Preliminary Site Plan RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 25 Appendix F: 2001 Architectural Survey of West Lafayette RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 26 Appendix G: Sec. 26-14-19. - Accessory Buildings, Structures and Dwelling Units Sec. 26-14-19. - Accessory buildings, structures and dwelling units. (a) Accessory buildings and structures are permitted in any zone district, subject to all limitations contained in this chapter including, without limitation, the following: (1) Construction of an accessory building or structure must occur concurrently with or subsequent to construction of a principal building. (2) The maximum floor area of an accessory building located in a residential zone shall not exceed the lesser of ten (10) percent of the lot area or seven hundred fifty (750) square feet. In a residential zone, accessory buildings larger than those permitted by this subsection (2) may be allowed through a special use review as defined in Section 26-15. In a nonresidential zone, the maximum floor area shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the lot area. (3) An accessory structure is any device with a surface area of four (4) square feet or larger, including a microwave dish, antenna or other similar device, and is subject to all regulations applicable to accessory buildings and structures including height requirements. Amateur radio antennas and towers shall be subject to the requirements of section 26-14-21 of this chapter. (4) All accessory buildings and structures shall maintain side yard or side street yard setbacks equal to the side yard or side street yard setbacks required for the principal building located on the lot and a front yard setback equal to the front yard setback for the principal building plus an additional ten (10) feet. Any accessory building or structure located in a side yard must be screened so as not to be visible from any public street. Notwithstanding the foregoing, flagpoles may be located one (1) foot behind the rear edge of any sidewalk or property line, whichever location is further from the property line. (b) Accessory dwelling units are permitted in the Old Town Residential zone district, subject to all limitations contained in this chapter including, without limitation, the following: (1) The floor area of an accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed seven hundred fifty (750) square feet. (2) Not more than one (1) accessory dwelling unit may be constructed on any single lot or parcel of land. (3) An accessory dwelling unit may be contained within the same accessory structure or building that is provided for a separate accessory use, provided, however, that the building footprint of such combined accessory structure shall not exceed the lesser of ten (10) percent of the lot area or seven hundred fifty (750) square feet. When an accessory dwelling unit is contained within the same accessory structure or building that is provided for a separate accessory use, the building height limitation applicable to accessory dwelling units shall apply to the structure. (4) In the Old Town Residential zone district, an accessory dwelling unit shall maintain a setback from the front lot line in an amount that is equal to the required front yard setback for a principal structure plus an additional ten (10) feet. (5) An accessory dwelling unit shall be constructed not less than six (6) feet from the principal dwelling unit. RFP: Historic House at 744 University Ave., Boulder, CO Available for Acquisition and Relocation 27 Appendix H: Letter from Lafayette Senior Planner Greg Thompson