The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHandout - Capital Improvements Program (CIP)Capital Improvement Program 6.1 Cost Estimating Itemized cost estimates were developed for each CIP project with an anticipated level of accuracy of +50% to -30% (order-of-magnitude cost estimates). The cost estimate worksheets are included in the appendix for reference. The estimates include capital construction costs and estimates land acquisition. Unit costs were obtained from recent bid tabs and Site Work and Landscape Cost Data, RSMeansO, and equipment suppliers. Unit costs for pipeline construction, manholes and inlets include material, excavation, and backfill. Surface restoration was developed as a separate cost item. Utility relocation cost were developed as a separate item for sewer line relocations and for watermain lowerings 16" in diameter and greater. Minor utility relocations including, water and sewer service laterals, were accounted for as an allowance of the total construction cost. Quantities were for pipes, inlets, manholes, and water quality facilities were obtained from the project GIS. The cost estimates also include a 30% construction contingency and an 18% allowance for engineering and administration. All estimates are in 2006 dollars and equate to an Engineering News Record, Construction Cost Index of 7880 6.2 Implementation Plan The goal for this strategic plan is to manage stormwater, by minimizing impacts on localized and downstream flooding and improving water quality. To these ends, the recommended system improvements were categorized as 1) Hydraulic and Combined Hydraulic/Water Quality projects or 2) Water Quality Improvement projects. These two project categories form the collector system CIP. The implementation plan for the Hydraulic and Combined Hydraulic/Water Quality CIP projects follows the Tier 1, 2 and 3 problem areas. Tier 1 CIP projects are considered high priority improvements as they resolve severe conveyance system problems and in some instances address stormwater quality problems. Tier 1 projects areas are anticipated to a) have a high social benefit by resolving street and property flooding issues, b) have a high economic benefit by reducing flooding risk and property damage, and c) provide an environmental benefit by addressing stormwater quality issues at identified problem locations. Note that not all Tier 1 locations included a water quality problem site and that the overriding criterion for prioritization was resolving flooding issues. Table 6.2-1 identifies the Tier 1, Tier 2 and 3 CIP projects. Table 6.2-1 Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 CIP Projects Implementation Plan New I- GC_01 Upper Goose Creek Problem Tier 1 1 GC 02 Broadway, Iris to Balsam I Tier 1 ~ 2 ~ MBC 10 ~ 18'h and Spruce Street I. Pipe Replacement I$~,577,000 I Table 6.2-1 Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 CIP Projects Implementation Plan Problem Ranking Improvement Location Improvement Type Capitaf `Priority ID Cost • Storm Drain Re- Routin /Extension Tier 1 3 MBC_14 Arapahoe and 28`h • Pipe Replacement $1,659,000 Street . Storm Drain Re- Routing/Extension • Pro rieta BMP Tier 1/2 4/13 DC_01 Gunbarrel - Spine • Pipe Replacement $5,964,000 Ro d, Lookout and a 63 Systems . Storm Drain Re- Routing/Extension ' • Constructed Wetland Tier 2 5 SC_01 Moorhead and • Pipe Replacement $968,000 Moorhead frontage . Diversion to Major Draina ewa Tier 2 6 MBC 04 Lincoln • Pi e Re lacement $543,000 Tier 2 7 WC_03 Vail and. • Pipe Replacement $644,000 Inde endence Tier 2 8 MBC_22 Arapahoe, Commerce, . Pipe Replacement $1,740,000 and Ran e Tier 2 9 MBC_20 Parking structure • Pipe Replacement $63,000 between Foothills and 38cn Tier2 9 DC2_02 Thunderbird, Osage, • Pipe Replacement ~4,381,000 and Foothills Tier 2 11 GC_08 Foothills and Valmont . Pipe Replacement ~397,000 • Pro rieta BMP Tier 2 12 GC_09 Industrial area near . Pipe Replacement $$~4,000 Pearl Parkway and Constructed Wetland ~ Wonderland Creek Tier 2 14 ETC_01 Broadway and Iris • Pipe Replacement $526,000 • Diversion to Major Draina ewa Tier 2 14 MBC_23 Access road and 55`" • Pipe Replacement $380,000 SUPearl and Boulder Proprietary BMP ~ Creek Tier 2 16 DC2_06 Arapahoe/56th Street • Pipe Replacement $547,000 and Dry Creek Pro rieta BMP Tier 2 18 SC 02 Euclid and 30`" • Pi e Re lacement ~931,000 Tier2 19 MBC 09 16~h St. • Pi e Re lacement ~1,004,000 Tier2 20 GC_04 Folsom, Glenwood, & • Pipe Replacement ~1,360,000 Floral Diversion to Ma~or Table 6.2-1 Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 CIP Projects Implementation Plan Tier2/3 21/23 BCC_03 Gillaspie and Darley . Pipe Replacement ~1,183,000 • Storm Drain Re- Routin /Extension Tier 3 22 VC_01 Gillaspie and • Pipe Replacement ~941,000 Heidelber Tier 3 23 VC_02 Broadway and Viele • Pipe Replacement $1,284,000 Channel Tier 3 25 MBC_18 Arapahoe and 30`h • Pipe Replacement ~1,422,000 Street Pro rieta BMP Tier 3 26 DC2 01 Baseline and Inca • Pi e Re lacement $982,000 Tier 3 27 BCC_04 Broadway and Bear • Pipe Replacement ~397,000 Creek Tier 3 27 DC2_05 55`h and Dry Creek • Pipe Replacement $588,000 Number 2 Tier 3 29 GC 06 Pearl and 30"' . Pi e Re lacement ~~40,000 Tier 3 30 DC2_04 Pennsylvania and . Pipe Replacement $~04,000 Crescent Tier 3 30 MBC 13 Folsom and Walnut • Pi e Re lacement $624,000 Tier 3 30 GC 03 23`d and Mapleton . Pi e Re lacement ~637,000 Tier 3 33 WC 02 Island and Kalmia . Pi e Re lacement $333,D00 Tier 3 33 BCC_01 Lehigh and Bear • Pipe Replacement $863,000 Creek Tier 3 35 FCC 01 HoKa, Corriente and . Pipe Replacement $718,000 30~ Tier 3 36 DC_02 Clubhouse and • Pipe Replacement $334,000 Au usta Tier 3 36 GC 07 30'h and Corona • Pi e Re lacement $154,000 Tier 3 36 WC_01 Wonderland Hili and • Pipe Replacement $239,000 Po lar Tier 3 36 ETC D2 Cioverleaf and Kalmia • Pi e Re lacement $~43,000 Tier 3 36 MBC_19 Marine Avenue and • Pipe Replacement $408,000 Boulder Creek pro rieta BMP Tier 3 36 MBC 02 4"' and Canyon • Pi e Re lacement ~z04,000 Tier 3 36 BCC_07 36'h and Baseline • Pi e Re lacement ~337,000 Tier 3 36 BCC_02 Hartford and Darley • Pi e Re lacement $153,000 Tier 3 36 BCC_06 42"d and Moorhead . Pi e Re lacement ~656,000 ; Tier 3 36 BCC_05 Martin and Ash • Pi e Re lacement $156,000 Tier 3 48 ETC_03 26`h and Kalmia • Pi e Re lacement ~$$1,000 61 Table 6.2-1 Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 CIP Projects Implementation Plan Problem Rankin ' Improvement Location Improvement Type Capital Priority ID Cost Tier 3 49 GC_05 27'" and Spruce • Pi e Re lacement ~548,000 Tier 3 50 MBC_15 2g'~ and Colorado • Pi e Re lacement ~125,000 Tier 3 5p MBC_08 ~3`" and Broadway • Pi e Re lacement $1,018,000 Tier 3 50 DC2_03 Manhattan and • Pipe Replacement $482,000 Baseline Tier 3 53 MBC_01 5`n and Mountain View • Pi e Re lacement $~49,000 Tier 3 54 MB~-2~ 48"' and Arapahoe • Pi e Re lacement $184,000 Tier 3 55 MBC_17 2g"', 500' north of • Pipe Replacement $411,000 Can on The implementation plan for the WQIMP projects were prioritized based on problem severity as identified by pollutant load. The WQIMP category was developed since many of the water quality project sites were not adjacent to hydraulic problem and improvement locations. In addition, many of these WQIMP projects could be defined as a small capital projects since the estimated construction costs are less than $100,000. Table 6.2-2 Water Quality Improvements Implementation Plan Improvement Annual ID TSS Load (pounds) Location Capital Cost WQIMP 2 61,900 goulder Creek 1,400' East of 75`h Street $104,000 WQIMP 3 56,500 goulder Creek & 28'" Street ~81,000 WQIMP 5 46,200 Boulder Creek 8~ 75'" Street $76,000 WQIMP 6 WQIMP 9 45,700 & 38,400 Boulder Creek & East Broadway Street & Arapahoe Avenue $157,000 WQIMP 8 4~,500 Boulder Creek 200' West of Folsom Street ~84,000 WQIMP 12 29,000 Boulder Creek & Folsom Street $78,000 WQIMP 14 24,200 Boulder Creek & 9~h Street $73,000 WQIMP 15 22,800 groadwa & Skunk Creek $73,000 WQIMP 16 20,300 Boulder Creek & 13"' Street $81,000 WQIMP 18 15,00a Boulder Creek & 11"' Street $51,000 62 ~---------------i ~: ar~ . -------~ ~.c.~1 ~ I ~-~~~~~~~ J_I ~ . r, '~I` . . . . brie~IRA , . I __ !'/ I ~ I ~_I L ~ ~~ i r i Q`~ ~~ 5 ,,_r-- ,_ ~ _~ r_ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ _~- _ , • • '~ M~M ~ 4 ~~ f. r ~ mw'°°"°_` '~ ~ , - ~ BC11 ~ ~ - ~ , ' 7 ~IrNRE ~ ~ I r ` 4K y~' ~ ~~J ) ~4 9 J i r_r E ~ ~ --- ~ g ~i 17 .1~ RO i ~ ~ AMt~i PO ~ ; ,"~ --------N_i ~ _y ~,,,,_r- , p, ~ ~ ~ a l ~0 • 6: j . ,hp~a,~.,p6.._ 1 ~~~Pa ~__ ~ ~ Y: 1Y1nohFE ~ " ' ~ WQ9 ~ ~ - ~ ~- ~ ~ - BC16 .°~- ~ •,~ `~` `L_ .,.._..... , , - WQ10 ti ~ ~`~_~ ~. ~___..--~' ~ _ ~ '~1~~ 1 I ~ JI L _....~.~_~ ` ( ~ ' 4 I I ~ I '. --- ~--- _ ~ &~ ~~ ~ i I ~ ~ I 7 ~ ~ ' ~ `I _-_' - ~ u...._ ~ ~ ~ v,j* `'~ ~ , Leqend 0 4,D00 s Key Pollutant Load Outfalls /\/ Major Roads Load (Lbs TSS/Ac/Yr) 501 - 750 1 inch equals 4,000 feet O Outfall Catchments ~•1~ ~ Gity Limits _ 0- 250 _' 751 - 1000 N Modeled network Lakes 251 - 504 1001 + CanaV Ditch ~ Boulder Creek Outfalls I ~~ Major drainageway ' Water Quality Improvement Summary Map ~~ Figure 5-1 ~ Stormwater Strategic Plan ~ City of Boulder ONE COMPANY ~ Muny Solrstions ~ ~