Loading...
7A - Presentation: Traffic in Boulder - City of Boulder Transportation Metrics. ~ C~t of Bou Id r Y e _ . .. ~_ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~., ~ ~ ~ ~ , L.. ".~ v 1 I ~ Trans ortation Metrics -- p Presentation Elements ^ TM P Context ^ Quantitative Metrics ^ Vehicle Counts ^ Bicycle Counts ^ Transit Ridership ^ Performance Metrics ~ ~ ~ . ,. ^'~ Tr~~ir~l ~~fim~r~~ ~et~ ~~r~l~/ „'~' 2 Trans ortation Master p Plan - s stem monitorin Y J 3 89-96 Modal Assum tions p figure 3-3. analysis: rnode share objectives % of Daily Person Trips 1989 TMP Survty Date' . ium '; ~ssa zmo issa i~4 oq<a~ . .:. _. _". _:.:.. ,. ..~,ma~a obj~aive actud actuai .. ~ .. . _ s~V 73 -1 5- 58 97 4A -]9 = 25 Mul~i-occupam 23 27 24 22 29 __auto___ --- ---- ._~_ ~~- --- Pedeatri~n 1 17 19 24 ------- >1 ~3 --- ---- --- Bic cla ---Y-- ~ --- ____ ia --- ii ---- ~s _ - Trenalt 3 12 2 4 7 -- ------- ToTAL --- 100 ---- ]00 --- 100 --- lOQ -- 100 Qriginal TMP SOV Reduction "shift 15%away from SOV" ]5 + 73 = 21% reducrion Actnai fteduction '90 -'94 3 + 47 = 6~o reduction Proposed Reduction by 2020 14 +44 = 43°o reduc4on ' based on resi~ent diaries. employee surveys. trn`:fc counts,regiond cngin & destinaticn study and reiated wurces • orig;nal T'4fP objective: shift 15°Io of daily SOV trips to other modes by 2010 • T1~iP update direction: no grosvth in long-termvehicle traffic (requires reducing single-occupant ~~ehicle trips to 25°ia by 202d) ~ , 4 Metrics - Vehicle Counts . 5 I M et ri cs - Boulder Valle Pro ram Y J Boulder Valley Count Program e.,..., ,., F, :, :~ 2005 ADT Summary by Count Station ~ ----- -- _____.______~f. ----- ---T- ----r-- ---_ . ~_.___ U.S. 36 s.o. Foothills Pkwy 82.191~ ~~~ , ~ ~. ~iagonal Hwy n.o. Monarch Rd 45,1$6 i S Boulder Rd e.o. Paragon Dr I 27;116 I ~ ' i Broadway s,o. City Limits 1~",987 Arepahoe e.o. 75th 17,360 ~ U.S. 36 n.o. Broadway 11.688 ' ~i [ ~ S.H. 52 e.o. 71st 10,028 ~ ~ BoulderCanyonw.o.Arapahce ,042 Loakout Rd e.o. 751h St 936 ' Baseline Rd e,o. 76th St 7, 65 Valmont e.o,75th 5,9~E1 I i 63rd St n.o. Monarch Rd 5.22 ~ - ' Lee t#ifl ~id w o. 4th Sf' 4,62 ~ i Cherryvale Rd s.o. SoNh Boulder Rd 3,359 Linden A~e w.o. Spring Hill Rd 2.693 ~ Mapleton A~e e.o. Green Rock Dr ~ 2,636 I ~ Baseline Rd w.o, Gregory Canyon 1,638 ~ ~ ~ 51st Street n.o, Boulder Peserwir 1,373 ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,600 70.000 80,000 90,000 Average Daily Traffic (vpd) ~~. ~' ' 6 Metrics - Boulder Valle y Travel Patterns .^~, ~...._ ,_ Boulder Valley Count Program 2005 _ ,,.. .,,. ,,~ ~,n . ~,.~_~~_,~ _: .~:~,c.-. ~ Quadrant Travel Pattems ~ I North (Lyons} 71.688 I ~ ~ , Weat (Foothilla) South (Golden, JeHeroon County) East (Lafayette, north Louiaville, Erie) 20,638 70, 753 SouthesaR (aouth Louisville, Broomfield, auperior, penver- Metro 0 Average Daily Trafflc (vpd) 7 trics - Boulder Valle Me y Travel Trends . . 265,~00 vehicles daily enter/exit the eouldaiYelleyCountProgram TotalTravel 350.0?0 _..._.. ._._ _ _ . city in 2005 _F,.b ____ _ ~~~ ~Rpreneion ~ ~ ~ $ ~ Every street morning z~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ inbound - evening ~2~~° ' outbound bias ~1500~ ~ . .., , .., . .. . . . ..,. .~ . . ~ncrease ^ 20% more travel than 1994 levels ~..~ 8 Metrics - Boulder Valle y Travel - Accumulation Curve 35, 000 9 i -1r 05 Outbound -F-OS Inbound ~ 25,000 _ __ -- --- - - . t g E 20.000 ~ 0 m 15,~ - - --- - -- - u ~ T 10,000 _ -- -- z ~ ~ 5,000 _ . _ . . ~ a ~O. ~r. ~~ ~i~. ~ir ~S ~ ~~ g4. ~9 ro jr ~c~. ~i~. ~Y. jS. ~6'. >> ~d. ~9. `'b ~'r `'2 `a~. ~„ .. po .~ .~ p~ .~ .~O2 ~ .b~ ,p~y~~ ~O, ~~ ~bo, ~~7, ~~o, '~ ~R~ ~47 47 ~ ~W ~~0, ~~7 ~~7 ~ ..~7~.J_ ~c~.!~ ~u~~.J- '4~.y ~S2 '6'./L ~1~L ~8, `Siry ~D ~l. jc~2. ~iA/.L ~Y.2 ~S~.y ~6:2 j~/~- jB~.i- ~i9.2 ~O. 27/.i ~c~~.L ~u~./z ~4/.~_ f~-. ~ . . ''U Zl . V 'U 'U 'V "V ~O 'V ~ ~ U 'V ~C/ 'V "V 'V U 'V ~ 'U 'V 'U 'TJ ~ Time period r ~. ~ 9 Metrics - Arterial Travel Trends _~ ~.~~~ti~~ ~~~ ~~_~» ~ a=~~~~~~ _t.r~~ m~~~3~.. ,. ~~_. . ~. ~~ ~ oe~ ~ ~.~~.~~ .~~ ~.~ .~~~~~~.~,~~ .~~:..~ ~~~~ ~.~~ ~.. z=. 10 ~ Metrics - Arterial Travel Trends Arterial and Boulder Valley Count Program Comparison __... _....__._... _..........._......._ 4.00% __.....~... . _~_:~~.~ . ... . ... .......... .......... ... .~,.. ,,...__.... '-+-Arterial Program ~o~ ~,-i- Boulder Valley Program~ 3.44% 3.19% 0 .00 /0 2.65% 2.98% 2.73 % Boulder Valley Growth R e-- 2.27 % APR ----------------------------- ------------------ ------------- ----- ------------ ~' d 2.~% 2.14% 0 1.78% 1.82% / ~ ~ 54% qrterial B-05 Growth Rate -- 1.33 % R ~ - •----------- '1-28°fo--- - -------------- -- ---- -- c I 1.33°ra 1.82% ' - -------' 1.69% ~ 0.48% ` ~- ~ ~ , r- n nF~--~-- !-r-~ ~ 85-89 56-90 87-91 88-92 89-93 90-94 91-95 92-96 93-97 94-98 95-99 96-00 97-01 98-02 99-03 I 11 Metrics - Bic cle Counts y ^ Analysis and understanding in infancy ^ 12 multiuse path count stations ^ Data since 1998 . ~~ Plgure 6-2. Boulder Lreek Path-Ylest Side, Looking Weat 12 Metrics - Bike Counts __ ,~: _______ __ , ^ Tuesday peak day for ~ ~~~ ~ bike travel ,~~{ ~~y`~'`~: -~=~:~~- i ^ Jul./Au eak months g • p ~ 'i ~ • `~1~y}~ • . -trta~4e/ye~ r;~`'~ ~~ ~ ~:~ Dec./Feb. low months ~ ~,, f, _ : ~ . ~ 4 .~i ! ..~ . f • ~.~.~"~• ~• _ _____ __~~.___ _ i ~ ~- ~ : ~+ ,., w eo .co ,s ~~ ^ Bike use <--> daytime ~ uyn r.s«.n.~. t .. . .. _ ____..___ .. ~a) 8oulder Creek Paih-East Sde temperature correlated ', ~~ P~~ -'~~ ^ Boulder Creek Station ~ m~ ~~ ~~a~~' ~'~~-; . ' ~~ bike use down sli htl g Y ~~' `~~.~" ~ ~ ~~ - over last 5 vears ~ ~ . ~~ ~, ~m~, _ M~~~ . ,,.~ ~ .,..~ ~ - ~ _ _ ~~---,~ z,;,-. ~. - z~- (a) Flcwlder 13 Metrics - Transit Ridershi p ^ Ridership Counts ^ Monthly cumulative totals by service type 1981- Present ^ Average daily riders by route 1997-Present ^ Ride Checks ^ Detailed rider surveys performed periodically on 2005 Average Daily Ridership ~zo; •- 203 7.000 ~ _.:.._.. - ~ 204 0 6,000 a . -_ . :~ ~ ~ ~'t ~ 2os 5.000 . ~ -a. -- - ,-.-zas ~' 4,000 - ~'' {^ ~~ v ' ~ ~ ~~.~ -zae ~ ~ 3,000 ..'...,__`, ~ „_.. -209 D 2.DOD ~` ~~ ,`~. •- ---+ -2io , o~ 1,000 ~ I e`-.~m,~,#~'• --` - ~e " z2s _ _ -- ~ •- SKII 1 ~~~lL ~VCO~Q~i Ig tV ~ ... :~.. cJa~ ~~~ 2`u,p PQC ~a.~ ,JCm ~~,~ ~y~ ~0~ o~e~ ~~~ ~~, i-~-JUMP(207) ~e and location 'a ~m~ ~ PSe~~ ~~am~~e ,-4-BO ND209) Month -•- ~ASH(227) . ~ ~ .._ Flpo 14 Averege Riders Per ~ay 1497•Present Metrics - Transit Ridershi p Boulder: Yearly Boardings - Local and Regional 9,00O,OOQ 8,000,000 7,000,000 ` ~ ~ '` ` '~ ~ a~ :~ ~ ~~. ~ 6,000,000 ~ ~ 5,000,000 ~ ~ ~ 4,000,000 ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3,000,000 ~ ~; o ' , re.~~~:~~~ : ~. ~: ~- :h-, a~ - , 8 ~ ~ ,~+ 2~a~~,~~~ c ~7ya~1'^'~~ 1 ,1 y s ~: ~ ~ .~i :~ ~ "~.~ t~ 1,000,000 ~ ~ p ~ tt~ iL. ;,~ ~ ~ a~ U ! ~ C ~ - ~ 0 ~ , ~ ~ ~~ti ~~3 a~c~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~o ~~~. ~~~, ~°'~ ~~a ~~h ~~6 ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ o°° O°~ 0°2 0°3 o°c~ o°~ ~. ~. ~. ~ ~. ~ ~. ~. ~ ~. ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ 2 ~t. ~l. ~L ~l. 2 Year ~ LOCAL: Boulder ^ REGiONAL: Northern ~: ~ 15 Metrics - Transit Ridership RTD Local Services: Yearly Boardings Denver Metro, Boulder, Longmont 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year ~ LOCAL: Denver ^ LOCAL: Boulder O LOCAL: Longmont 16 Metrics - Transit Ridership RTD Regional Services: Yearly Boardings Denver Metro, Boulder County I ~VV~VVV ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~nJ ~~ ~~ ~~O ~~ ~~ ~~J OJ~ p~~ ~~ ~~ p~~ ~~ p~~0 p~~ p~~ p~~ ~~ O~ O~ OnJ 0~ ~~ '~°' ~°' ~°' ~.°' ~°' ~.°' ~°' ~°~ ~°' ~°~ ~~' ~°~ ~.°~ ~.°~ ~°' ~°' ~°' ~°' ~,~ ~,~ ~,0 '1,~ `L~ ~L~ Year ~~ REGIONAL: Metro ~ REGIONAL: Northern 17 ~ Metrics - Transit Ridershi p Boulder: Average Daily Boardings Local and Regional 30, ~00 ~ ~ 25,000 ~ ~ c~ m 20,000 ~ c~ Y 15,000 a~ a~ ~ ~ 10,000 rn m L Q 5,000 n 18 Metrics - Transit Ridershi p Boulder: Local and Regional Services Average Daily Boardings per Month: 1997 - Present .:~ ., . ., .t. , 3_ r ~.... . ~.~ M~ .. F. t~~, :~~ .. ~.~ .~.. . ,. .. .~ . ~ ~s.~~x:~~.~.~,~.t~:~~.. 40 000 , ~ ; 35, 000 - - ~ 1997 ~ ~ so,ooo ~ - ~ - ; ~ ~ ^ 1998 ~ ^ 1999 g ~ 25,000 _ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ j ^ 2000 ~~~~ ~ a zo,ooo , ' ^ 2001 ~ o I ~ 2002 ~ 15, 000 ' I ^ 2003 ,o.ooo ` ^ 2004 ; _ ~ i ^ 2005 5,000 , - j ~ r: 1 ~Q,l ~~1 ~~c~'~ ~¢,t ~,00~ ~`p'C~ PQ~ ~`p~ ,JCO ,J\~ J,~t~ ~,~C~ ~~~ ~~ ~O , PJ ~~` ~ ,a~ ~t, 0 ~ Q v ~ ~e QP~ r1 Month 19 Metrics - Travel time stud y How lon is forever? g ^ Travel time study ^ Four corridors ^ Two north-south ~ ^ Two east-west ~ Arapahoe ~... .. initiated 1986 ~ 28th, Broadway Valmont/Edgewood, _ .. . . ~ 20 Metrics - Travel ti me Arapahoe Ave. (9t" to 55t") Arapahoe Avenue Travel Time Survey ,, , ,. ,..~. .,,... ., . ~ ..... ::.::.. . . :.~,~ ,..~:.,,. ,...h~~-(9th.StraettR~SbthSts~~ . ~~~:~ . ~ t~, o~. ~~~~,:~ . , 2o.ao --- so,ooo ~ Mean Total Tnp Time ~ ~ 8~ ~ ~ t Composite Corridor Raffic Volume -~~-~ Linear(Composi[eCorndorTraffic 17.78 1723 ~ I 4~ : j ~ . ~ Volume) I ~~~ 16.00 i .. sp.00C ~ I 14.00 1 35.OC0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 3Q000 °' 12.00 5 ~E 11.05 10.75 d ~ ~. ' E •- 10.00 ~ 10.38 10.18 10.D7 9.72 .._.. - ~~- ~ _.._ - ._.. _..&.5B ~ --. ~ 25,000 > ~ 9. ~ ~ ~ W 6.00 - - 20,000 ~' ~ u ~ ~~ 6.40 15,000 ~ ptimal ime = inute ~ ~ . 4.40 i 10, 000 I ~' ~ ~li ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 2.i30' ~ r 5,~0. ~~, . ~ ~ . ~ . ~. . ' ~ ', ~;, ~'~~ ~~.- . . 0.00~~.-. . . ~ ~ 1987 ~ 1989' ~ ~ i991 ~ ~1993 . ..1995 ~ . 1997. 1999 . . ~ ~ .. . : . . ' 0 200t ~ . . 2003 ~ .. 2005 ~ . . . . ' ~ - . ' ~'~. a~ ~; . . . . . .. . . . . . . Year ~~ ~ ~ . . .. :.. . . . . . i:~. . ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . . ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ 21 Metrics - Travel Time EdgewoodNal mont (9t" to 55t") EdgewoodNaimont Travel Time Survey ' - ;.,. ]~T,~~a~tsw Ta334s~'RF'~.n~:~°t~,<:. .,. . ... ... .. . . _ . .... . ,.. ,~;,..,..., .~ .. .. .- ~au~ w~:MM}lij,t°w~".~"f~ . . . . _ . . t~s..,i.,. ~: r!~ e ~ 14.00 t~ - __ _.. . .... .._._.. ~ ..__.....~:__~___ ..~____:_.._~._____ ....._.._:..~ 30,000 ~I - l T ~ i ~ Mean Tota np Tme l ~ `~~, ~ -~-Composite Comdor Treffw Valume , ' ~~ 7p,pp + , - - - Linear (Composite Corridor Traffic Volume) i , ~ i '~-- 25.000 ~~ ~ _~ : 10.38 10.23, - ' ~ 1027 1022 ~ ±i `~~`'~ 10.00 ~ 10.00 9,87 9.60 , ~ ~ 9.83 ~e ~ 8.95 ~ 20.000 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , " 8.20 2. E '~ £ 8.04 a > ~ E ~ ~ ~ t 5.000 ~ _ ~ j • al Tra = 6.2 tes •• •~~~• •~~~• •~~~• ~~~~~~ r~~~• •~~~~• •~~~. ....• • ..... , • ~ '~~` ,= s.oa ~ T d ~- ,~ <,:~;,>,r« ~ 22 ~ 23 Metrics - Travel ti me Broadway (Violet to Greenbriar) Broadway Travel Time Survey , i l G b _ ~ _ . _. ~ a _ ,~. ~.. et2o, r ar)~ ~ .4. ~ ~~: ,,. ~~,:a~ . ~ ,_ __ ~eeo 4.;.f .ff < ~,~E . . ~ ~~o ~ 20.00 ._.........._ _ . _._ _ ~_______.:.~____._.__.~_..---.._...____ _ __,._ .. .... ............................ . ...._...__......_ ...._.__...._._..~__....._ . 40.600 ~ ~ Mean Total Tnp Time 18.33 18.00 I tCompositeCorridorTrafficVOlume I 17.82 I I 35.600 --- Linear (Composite Coindor Tra(fic Volume) i _ 16.02 ~ 16.00 .! ~ . 15.37 15.10 15,15 _ _ _ ~ 14.55 14.50 14~76 - - - ; i 30,000 14.a0 13.93 - - ~ ' v a ~ 12.00 - - - . a L 25.000 d E ~ .. ~E . .. .. .. . .. .. ... .. . . .. .. al ~ra i . . r rrr ~ - i ~~ ~. ~ ', , .. ~ . . y.~... o'r~.... .. .. .. .. .. . . ° 0 ~ m ~ 7 0.00 . I ~ u 20, 000 ~ ~ ~ F c 8.00 d y ~ ~ ,. ~ ~ 15,000 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ °~" d 6.00 ~. a ~ ~0,000 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 f ~ . 7 :1- ~ ~ S,ooa 2.00 6. : : : ' ~. ~ ~ ~ 0.00 -I' ty~6 ~ 198~ 1990 1992 ~ 1994 ~. .1996 1996 ....^ .2400 2002 2004 ' O ~ ~ ;; ~ ~.. ~. . . ~ Year ~ ~ ~ . 24 Metrics - Travel Time Corridor Comparison .. . ~ . ,~ ..._ . ~. e r. ,,, .. &' ~. -.. ~;3+~., ~ £oSi~bA':R&iShi~°`~tdE.~r~°.b~~'.AX:~tP~ YaE 'iYn~. s.~:. ~ ~ ~ ..a,a ao ~_..__ 0°ia ___ Ho ._~ _. _ __. w Long is Forever? _ --- - . _.. ._.._. _. _ ._._._ ._ . _ _ .._ _.._...------- -..._ _ _ __ _i -Optimal Traeel Time ~ ~ -.E--Broadway I ~ --,~--- EdgewoodNalmoM ' ! 35 0°/ -~28th Street i 0 A h _ -~- rapa oe A~enue i i ur 30 Q% --- - - - - -- --- - --... -__ _------___ ._- , i F > ~ E ~ ~ 251 ' ~% - _ _- -- _ I 1 E 3 ~ € ° i o: , 20 Q46 - - - - _ _ _ - - ---- - _ _ __ € f f ~-'~° ' - _ 15 6% --`"`-~ - _ - _ .'" ~~?' ~` ~~ ,~ ~ OPTIMAL TRAVEL E 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 l Year 25 J Metrics - Cit -wide Level y of Service Anal sis y Peak hour traffic monitored at all traffic signals 131 signalized intersections 26 27 ~ Metrics - Level of Service AM Peak Noon Peak .. ,~~ N , ~ __ ~ ~~ ~ N ~_~ I .. ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( I I _ I l; ; ~ a.~Nacaa~ ~ 1 E cun~ma IMSEi ~ ~ IIJSET ~ ~ ~ . _~~~ _L_a l ~i - I L I~~.~ / ~ I/;~~ f~~~ _Ist._ ~~~ ~~ 1 .f E,~,~ ~-/ 1. _ ~~ _ , _ -~ ,--~~ ~ ~l~.. - ~ ~I " ~ / 7 ~I ~ ~ ~ V-~ ;/ 1 ' Y :~I~I~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I n -, ,I ~' - ~` ^ ~~; l,~ y _C~~ ~ ~~ ~ _ _ ~ , _ ~~ ".~ =~ , = ~ ~ ~,--1 ~ ~ , ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~--~ ~ ~' \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ i ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~^ ~~ ' ~~ , _. ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ' ~.: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ..~. ~ . ~~„ - } ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '; ' ~ ~ - FOX - ;... . 37' ,, •••••,•,c••••••• axouuna~rrt~rm~rcntwnas~va~r~r w~. I ., ~ AMPFAKIIOURLEYEIlOFBEfNCE-mD11F0.~TE << _ ~FOX ••••••••,,•••••••• crtvof~auc~n~rrumu~:rv/iwc~s~wnu~wR+ MOON PF 1K IpUlt IEVEl! OF 9EtMCE -lOOt UPDIIIE ~ ~ ~ ~w ww#+~ U~w isrm '.4~ ~' ur~M w~ ~ INI,4~+1 bY nrm ~iar nm~ n~nW m ~w~ ~ ~ ~ ` 28 _i Metrics - Level of Service PM Peak Critical Peak 29 Metrics - Level of Service Intersection Data Individual Movement Data NatL S # at LOS # at LOS E or F in # at LOS E or F in E or F in Noan ~ or ~' in Any Peak AM Peak Peak PM Peak ~ Data Year Tolai Hour °~o of Totai Hour % of 7otal Hour °10 of 7ota! Mour ~% pf Tofal Total LOS Sonware Used ~ 1998' 908 194 21% 67 7/ 86 9°%~ 166 18°-o TEAPAGSignal97 '~ '-` 1999" 908 208 23°,% 67 7°0 87 10% 180 20% TEAPAC~Signal97 (~ ; 2000` 913 222 24% 82 9% 95 10% 185 20% TEAPAC/Signa1200o j3; s~i 2001' 923 222 24% 77 8% 84 9% 177 19% TEAPAClSigna12000 ~? 2002' 919 249 27% 87 9% 98 11% 203 22% Synchro 5 _' {' 003/2004 967 233 24% 73 8% 87 9% 193 20°b Synchro 6 ~i r ~'~i ~ ~ ' Excludes exclusi~ right-tum mo~ments that were caiculated at E or F(no RTOR deduciion taken) Note: For each year/update, roughly 33% of all ;ntersections ha~e updated cou nt wlumes . Frequency of timing ~ ancVor geometric changes vary per year. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ata Year otai # at L05 E or F in Any Peak iiour ot Totai # at LOS E ar ~ in AM Peak Haur ~, of 7otal ~ at LQS E ar F in Noon Peak Hour a of Tata( # ai LOS E or F in PM Peak F+our io ot 7otal ota1 LOS Software Used 1998 126 29 23°~b 9 790 11 9°a 27 21~~ TEAPAC/Slgnal97 1999 126 32 25% 11 9% 12 10°/, 30 244-o TEAPAClSignal97 2000 127 36 28% 13 10°/o i6 13% 33 26% TEAPAC/Signa12000 2001 129 35 27% 13 10°/o 11 9% 31 24% TEAPAC/Signa12000 2002 130 31 24% 9 7% 12 9% 28 22% Synchro 5 2Q03/2004 131 25 19% 7 5% 9 7°/a 23 18% Synchro 6 30 Trans ortation Metrics - p S nthesis ,3~:~ }5: y ~~. e~:~ Veh ,. but at slov~ 31 ~ Trans ortation Metrics - p S nthesis y Vehicle system performance maintained over last 20 years ~ ^ Performance maintained ;: ~ through more ~; sophisticated timing ~~ strategies and strategic i: _; investments = ^ We need to develop performance monitoring for all modes ~ ~ I S;. i ~ ;4 ~~ ~ r .,t x.r ~ls ~}:. {r k._rY~~ ~~"'~. ..~.. ~, ~ ~."~~~- ~ ~r'~ii~~l - ~ ~ 32