5 - Update on the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan (BVCP)
C I T Y O F B O U L D E R
TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD
AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: December 13, 2004
AGENDA TITLE:
Update on the 2005 Major Update to the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan
PRESENTERS:
Tracy Winfree, Director of Public Works for Transportation
Ruth McHeyser, Long Range Planning Manager
Louise Grauer, Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide TAB an update on what has occurred to date on
the major update to the Comp Plan, and focus in on a few key areas of interest: the Transit
Village Environs Area Plan, the city structure maps, and the public process and opportunities for
input.
We are at the end of the first phase of the Comprehensive Plan Major 2005 Update involving the
key areas of focus for the update. This has included public outreach on the history of the
Comprehensive Plan and its role in shaping the community and input on emerging issues that
might need to be addressed in this comprehensive plan update (i.e., the Planning 201 sessions
and a public meeting on September 13). Based on this input and a joint study session with
Planning Board and City Council on July 27, five areas of policy focus and two areas of land use
focus were identified for this update. Planning Board and City Council endorsed these areas of
focus at their meetings on October 14 and November 9 respectively. The focus areas are:
Policy Areas:
1.Economic Prosperity
2.Social Equity and Diversity
3.Environmental Sustainability
4.Urban design
5.Regionalism
Land Use Areas:
1.Transit Village Environs Area Plan
2.CU South Land Use Suitability Analysis
AGENDA ITEM ___5___PAGE NO. ___1___
In addition to these focus areas, we have always envisioned that the transportation policy
direction from the recently completed Transportation Master Plan (TMP) be incorporated into
the Comp Plan in the policy section. Other parts of the TMP may also be incorporated into the
Comp Plan.
Staff has received 25 requests from the public for changes to the plan. On December 2, Planning
Board and City Council will hold a public hearing regarding which of the public requests should
go forward for further consideration.
Staff will also prepare a briefing paper on the topic of service provision and on Comp Plan
amendment procedures. Service provision will include an evaluation of the plan’s service
provision policies and the Urban Service Standards and Criteria section. The paper on
amendment procedures will review the current procedures and identify potential areas for change
including four-body review, the process for service area expansions, and the public request
process. These papers will initially be a staff effort, followed by public review and input during
the public workshops.
Before we move into the second phase of the update process, it is important to understand what
the future would look like under the current comprehensive plan. The purpose of this meeting is
to discuss the following three items with the board:
1.The future under the current Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan
Staff has prepared information on:
Existing and projected future employment and population
Overall city structure and urban form today and in the future under the
comprehensive plan, and how that translates into the areas of the community that
can be expected to change the most in the future in comparison with areas that can
be expected to remain relatively stable.
2.The Transit Village Environs Area Plan
One of the land use focus areas identified for this update is an Area Plan for the area
surrounding the Boulder Transit Village (BTV.) The work plan and goals and objectives
revised at the November 18 Planning Board meeting are included.
3.The Public Process for the Major Update
Included is a draft public process proposal. A working group of two city council members
and two planning board members have had an initial discussion, and an interdepartmental
staff group has provided additional feedback. .
THE FUTURE UNDER THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
A. Employment and Population Estimates and Projections
Planning staff has updated the city’s employment and population projections for the
major update. The projections are based on the current comprehensive plan and zoning
and are summarized on the chart below.
AGENDA ITEM ___5___PAGE NO. ___2___
Draft 2004 Population and Employment Estimates and Projections for Areas I & II
Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan 2005 Major Update
Existing*BVCPProjected Realistic
(Jan. 2004) Estimate to 2030 Buildout
+12,900 +12,900
Population
111,500
(124,400) (124,400)
+24,400 +70,900
Jobs
101,100
(125,500) (172,000)
Jobs to
Population.91 1.01 1.38
Ratio
+6050 +6050
Dwelling Units
48,850
(54,900) (54,900)
*based on DRCOG 2004 estimates
The projections have been updated to reflect a 2030 and “realistic buildout” for both
population and employment. The 2030 projection corresponds to the timeframe used by
the Denver Regional Council of Government’s (DRCOG) projections for the region.
“Realistic buildout” is based on the likely amount of development under current
regulations. It does not assume that all properties develop to 100 percent of their
maximum zoning capacity, but rather a likely maximum.
. City Structure and Urban Form
B
The Comp Plan defines and describes in text and a map, the four elements of the city’s
overall structure:
Natural setting and open space
1. defines Boulder’s shape and size
The Mobility grid
2. defines important intersections and corridors
Activity centers
3. define areas of high activity and intensity. This includes the
three regional centers: the historic downtown, the Boulder Valley Regional Center
and the University of Colorado with the University Hill commercial area.
Subcommunity and neighborhood centers form a second tier of centers that focus
retail and service activities at locations that are easily accessible to surrounding
neighborhoods.
Special character areas
4. define the quality of Boulder’s centers and residential
neighborhoods. Each of these areas-- residential, commercial centers, and
industrial areas-- have unique qualities that are to be preserved and enhanced.
(See pages 13 and 14 of the Comp Plan and Map 2). The diagram and description do not
include the nodes of higher residential densities that are located along the multi-modal
thth
corridors, including Broadway, Pearl, Arapahoe, and the 28 and 30 Street corridor.
AGENDA ITEM ___5___PAGE NO. ___3___
Staff has drafted revised city structure/ urban form maps with this additional layer of
Attachment A
information (see ). Included are three draft maps:
a) City structure/ urban form today;
b) City structure under the comprehensive plan at 2030; and
c) Locations of the areas anticipated for change in the future.
Areas of Change: Areas where significant change in character, density and/or use
is anticipated along with significant future population or employment growth.
Areas of change often result from city actions to actively shape future
redevelopment, either through regulatory changes or investment.
The following areas have been identified as areas of change. Additional detail on each of
Attachment B.
these areas is in
1.North Broadway
2.Downtown
thth
3.28 & 30 Street Corridor/ Transit Village Environs
4.28 Street Frontage Road/ Williams Village
5.McKenzie Junction at Foothills Pkwy and the Diagonal
6.Pearl Parkway/ Valmont City Park/ City Yards
rd
7.63 Street Recycle Row
8.Gunbarrel Community Center
9.University of Colorado: Research Park, CU South, and Grandview Terrace
WORK PLAN FOR THE TRANSIT VILLAGE ENVIRONS AREA PLAN
Introduction and Context
The city initiated a site selection process in 2002 to determine the best location for a transit
village to include a regional transit station, high density housing, and supporting retail services—
in close proximity to the existing rail lines-- to accommodate future rail service between Boulder
and Denver. The process analyzed four sites, one in each of the 4 quadrants of the intersection of
the rail lines and Pearl Street. The best location, based on a number of criteria, was determined to
be the northwest quadrant of the rail lines at Pearl Street, or the Pollard site, an 11 acre site on
th
the northeast corner of Pearl and 30 Street.
The transit station will include local and regional buses and potential future commuter rail to
th
Denver. The new transit service will provide high frequency transit service in the 30 Street
corridor. The Goose Creek bikeway is immediately adjacent to the site. Housing will be an
important component, and was specifically called out in Resolution 922. The city has always
envisioned transit oriented development surrounding the transit village—in an approximate half
mile or walking distance of the transit station.
AGENDA ITEM ___5___PAGE NO. ___4___
The city has purchased the property, the major update to the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan
(Comp Plan) is beginning, and the time is right to develop an area plan for the transit village
environs which in turn would give rise to potential land use designation and transportation
connection changes in the area and potential design guidelines and zoning changes.
Purpose
Area and subcommunity plans serve as a basis for future land use decisions, for reviewing and
approving development projects, for ensuring desirable transportation connections, urban design
character, public improvements, and public facility locations. An area plan for the transit village
environs will provide a common understanding between the city, property owners and citizens on
the future of this area.
Objectives
As the work of the area plan progresses, a set of goals and objectives should guide the work. The
study area around the transit village is unique since it is within a half-mile radius, or walking
th
distance of the future transit station. The area is bounded by Valmont to the north, 28 Street to
the west, Walnut Street to the south and Foothills Highway to the east. In addition, an analysis of
land use and transportation connections was conducted in conjunction with the review and
rd
analysis of the 33 and Arapahoe project, for the area south of the transit village study area,
th
from Walnut on the north, 30 Street to the west, Arapahoe to the south, and Foothills Parkway
rd
to the east. If the 33 & Arapahoe site review is approved, this area will be incorporated into the
overall transit village environs study area, and if not, it will not be included. (See map
Attachment C
).
We have identified the following draft goals for the area plan:
1.Location efficiency: the conscious placement of homes and places of employment in
proximity to future commuter rail and bus rapid transit service, and local and regional
transit
2.Rich mix of choices: a mix of land use and mobility options that expand opportunities for
households of different incomes, different demographics, and people of different abilities.
3.Value capture: for Boulder, increased revenues from increased sales and property values;
for residents, employers and employees, reduced transportation expenditures and increased
convenience; for RTD increased fare box revenues
4.Connections to the natural environment: future development should reflect environmental
sustainability
5.Place-making: creation of a well-used and well-loved place of enduring value that reflects
Boulder’ s personality and respects existing neighborhoods
An area plan should be developed which addresses all of the following objectives:
The Area Plan should support all existing planning efforts and adopted plans
The Area Plan should include:
AGENDA ITEM ___5___PAGE NO. ___5___
1.Active walkable streets
2.Adequate city services available to both the residents and employees
3.Multiple housing choices of different types and income ranges
4.Multiple choices for places of employment, for different types of business spaces and
different price ranges.
th
5.Good access within the area, and to and from adjacent areas including 29 Street, the
th
, adjacent neighborhoods
28 Street shopping street, the Downtown, Goose Creek
bikeway / Valmont Park, and the future neighborhood park
6.Multiple transportation options to provide alternatives to the auto and parking
requirements
7.Analysis of traffic congestion
8.Analysis of existing environmentally hazardous elements and proposed remediation
9.The identification and preservation of special character
10.The availability of neighborhood-serving retail uses
11.Analysis of flooding and storm water issues
12.Analysis of building intensity and concentration: intensity relates to development on
individual sties, while concentration relates to the cumulative activity in the “transit
zone”. Regulating for intensity and concentration that support transit productivity is a
specific objective that will require some additional research and discussion.
13.Usable functional public spaces that have plenty of sun
Outcomes/Tasks
1.Create a land use and urban design plan
a. Develop several land use sketch plans based on community-wide planning
principles; investigate alternative approaches for the urban design plan i.e.
visual preference survey, urban design criteria, use of a framework plan
(see above)
b. Identify locations for public facilities, with emphasis on a park
c. Ensure that the land use alternatives are consistent with population and
employment projections
.
dInclude development criteria for open space to ensure adequate
functional open space is included in all residential projects.
2.Create a circulation plan, for bikes, pedestrians, auto, and transit.
3.Create an implementation plan including funding and the process for changes to the land
use map, design guidelines, the Transportation Master Plan, zoning regulations, and
possible grants or outside funding sources.
PUBLIC PROCESS
Attachment D
A flow chart showing the overall public process for the update is included in .
Although each of the key components of the update (public requests, policy changes, Transit
Center Environs Plan, CU-South, and Process Changes) has its own work plan, the chart shows
AGENDA ITEM ___5___PAGE NO. ___6___
the phases of the update and key stages of public input, policy direction, and decision. Staff is
working with the Planning Board/City Council working group to refine the public involvement
plan.
In Phase 1, a major public outreach effort occurred through the Planning 201 sessions and
the September 13 community meeting. We are now at the beginning of Phase 2, where
efforts will focus on working with “partners” to prepare background information and
briefing papers in each of the key policy and land use areas. Although Transportation is
not one of the five focus areas, since policy direction was determined during the TMP,
TAB will be partner as the transportation policy direction gets incorporated into the
Comp Plan. Phase 3 will be the key stage of broad public outreach and input, focusing on
a public workshop in February. Questions at the public workshop include:
Ask the community:
What policy and other text changes are needed?
What is the vision for the Transit Village Environs Area?
What areas need to be addressed in a land use suitability study for CU-South?
Approved By:
___________________________
Tracy Winfree,
Director of Public Works for Transportation
ATTACHMENTS:
A.
City Structure Maps A1, A2, A3
B.
Description of the Areas of Change
C.
Transit Village Map and Planning Process
D.
Public Process
AGENDA ITEM ___5___PAGE NO. ___7___
ATTACHMENT A1
ATTACHMENT A2
ATTACHMENT A3
ATTACHMENT B
Description of Areas of Change
1.North Broadway: The areas along North Broadway, shown on the North Boulder
subcommunity Plan (NoBo Plan) as the North Boulder Village Center, industrial and
mixed use areas. This area is currently being redeveloped based on the NoBo plan, and is
undergoing changes in use and character. Population and employment growth is
anticipated.
2.Downtown: The downtown includes the commercial areas generally from Spruce Street
thth
on the north, Canyon on the south, from 9 to 16 street, although in spots is expands to
th
South to Arapahoe and east to 17 street. The historic district is not expected to change in
character, although additional residential can occur in the future.
ththth
3.28 & 30 Street Corridor/ Transit Village Environs: The 29 Street project is underway
and its redevelopment will result in significant changes in character, and in the
transportation network. The city has purchased the Boulder Transit Village site from the
Pollard family, and planning and development is expected to occur over the next several
years, reflecting significant changes in use and character as well as additional residential
density.
As a result of the city and RTD investment in the transit village, an area plan for the
environs within generally a half mile of the transit village is anticipated which will result
in a land use and transportation connections plan for the area. Ti is anticipated that
changes in both use and character, with increased population and employment density
occurring over time.
th
Other redevelopment may be expected to occur as a result of the 29 Street project and
additional land use changes to mixed use business land use that were approved in the
2000 Update to the Comp Plan within this corridor.2
th
4.28 Street Frontage Road/ Williams Village: As part of the 2000 major update to the
th
Comp plan, the areas along the 28 Street Frontage Road from Colorado to Aurora had a
land use change from transitional business to high density residential uses, in part
because of its adjacency to the University of Colorado main campus. The Williams
th
Village shopping center site at the southwest corner of Baseline and 30 Street received a
land use designation change to mixed use business from community business. This mixed
use area is adjacent to the University’s property where new residential units have been
built and where additional housing may be planned for the future.
5.Gateway Parcel: This is one of the few vacant parcels of this size in the city. While
various proposals have been reviewed by the city, there is no current development
application for the property.
6.Pearl Parkway// Valmont Park/ City Yards: The city is in the process of revising the
th
master plan for the city yards property, along Pearl east of 49 Street. The yards may be
reconfigured, and the park will be redeveloped in the future. As a result of these future
city actions, additional changes may occur in the area between New Pearl Parkway and
th
Old Pearl, east and west of 49 Street.
rdthrd
7.63 Street Recycle Row: The area along Arapahoe from about 55 to 63 Street contains
a number of small under-developed industrially-zoned parcels, most are in the city, but
several of which are in Area II, and are County enclaves. The area north of Arapahoe
rd
west of 63 Street contains a number of large parcels that are expected to add industrial/
waste recycling uses. Parcels include Western Disposal’s site (in Area I), the Brickyards
and Resource 2000 (in Area II). The Valmont Butte site (owned by the city, in Area III)
is immediately adjacent to the area, on the east.
8.Gunbarrel Community Center: A public process to develop an area plan for the
community center areas of Gunbarrel ahs been completed and approved by the city. New
mixed use development as well as redevelopment in some areas is expected, with both
changes in use and character of this area, along with population and employment growth.
9.CU: CU has indicated some changes in their master plan regarding their Research Park,
the South Campus, and the Grandview Terrace area. Final plans have not been
completed, but it is anticipated that changes in character and use will occur in these area
as well as additional employment growth.
ATTACHMENT C
Planning Process for the Transit Village Area Plan
Planning Process
Phase I. Opportunities & Constraints
What
Data gathering
Issue identification
Discussion / agreement on objectives
Who
Identify stakeholders: property owners, University of Colorado, students
from a planning class, RTD, Urban Land Institute (ULI), Downtown and
BVRC interests, citizens, city and county staff: current and long range
planning, transportation, parks, economic vitality.
When
October – December
Phase II. Land use and transportation alternatives; urban design concepts
What
Several charrettes with key stakeholders to identify land use,
transportation, and urban design alternatives
Who
Stakeholders identified above, ULI expert panel, other consultants if grant
request is successful
When
January – March
Phase III. Public review and land use, transportation, and urban design alternative
recommendations;
When
April - May
Phase IV. Adoption hearings
When
June - July
Phase V. Implementation Plan
When
August – September