5 - Meeting Agenda, 9/13/2001City of Boulder Development Review Committee
MEETING AGENDA
1739 Broadway, Room 401 8:30 a.m.
9/13/2001
PROJECT DISCUSSIONS
PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS SCHEDULED for 9/19101
Allan Parr 2750 Baseline
1;00 p.m.
LAND USE REVIEW
KEY ISSUES for TRACK 36
NEW CASES
Applicant Name Case Number
Deveiopment Name Review Type
Address
City of Boulder CEAP-01-02
Public Works, Transportation
BROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
VERN SElROE
VALMONT PARKIMOUNTAIN OCEAN LT
2445 STAZIO DR
REVIEW OF REVISIONS
Applicant Name
Development Name
Address
LUR200f -00054
Concept Plan Review & Comment
Case Number
Review Type
GREG GASTINEAU
WALNUT CANYON BLOCK
1470 WALNUT
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS REVIEW
KEY ISSUES for TRACK 36
NEW CASES
Applicant Name
Development Name
Address
ANN GETCHES
CENTRO OFFICE PROJECT
2525 28TH ST
JIM CHANIN
KALMIA GROVE
1565 KALMIA AV
DENNIS FROHLICH
MAPLETON GROVE LOTS 1 AND 2
2323 4TH ST
LU R2001-00047
Subdivision Preliminary Plat
Case Number
Review Type
TEC2001-00037
ROW/Easement
TEC2001-00038
Subdivision/Final Plat, Stormwater Report
TEC2001-00039
Lot Line Adjustment
Nan Johnson
Case Manager
Nan Johnson
Don Durso
Case Manager
Brent Bean
Case Manager
Ann Goodhart
Don Durso
Robert Myers
CONTINUED ON BACK
GREG GASTINEAU TEC2001-00040 Brent Bean
WALNUT CANYON BLOCK Subdivision/Final Plat
1495 CANYON BL
JERRYLEE
ONE BOULDER PLAZA
1301 CANYON BLVD
TEC2001-00041
Utility Plan, Stortnwater Plan, Stormwater Report,
Final Architecture, Final Landscaping, Final Site
Plan
Brent Bean
REVIEW OF REVISIONS
Applicant Name
Development Name
Address
PRIME PLUS DEVELOPMENT LLC
SANITAS TERRACE SUBDIVISION
1715 YARMOUTH
Case Number
Review Type
TEC2000-00006
Utility Plan, Transportation, Subdivision/Final
Plat, Stortnwater Plan, Final Landscaping
WAYNE KUHN TEC2001-00034
BOULDER COUNTY NORTH BROADWAY Utility Plan, Development Agreement, Stormwater
3482 BROADWAY Plan, Stormwater Report, Final Architecture, Final
Landscaping, Final Site Plan
DREXEL BARRELL & CO TEC2001-00035
MICRO MOTION Transportation, Stormwater Plan, Stormwater
6940 WINCHESTER Report
36-9-13.agn
Case Manager
Mike Randall
Mike Randall
Scott Kuhna
Page i of 2
Mary Lovrien - County Planning Gommission Meeting Sept 19
From: Ray Hedberg <hedberg@attglobal.net>
To: "Hedberg, Ray" <hedberg@AttGlobal.net>, "Ekrem, Connie" <csprecher@juno.com>, "Thurmer,
Joyce" <joycethurm@aol.com>, "Caldwell, Bob & Jo" <RCaldwell@ponderosa•Assoc.com>,
"Olmsted, Connie & Jackie" <OlmstedJ@USWest.net>, "Young, Porsche"
<Porsche@learningpow.com>, "Macinko, John & Connie" <~Macinko@boulder.net>, "Bruff, Hal
& Sherry" <Sherry.Bruff@Colorado.edu>, "Corson, Tom & Barbara" <BASC1@AOL.com>,
"Coggan, Pete & Caroline" <Argosy@Filmlover.com>, "Anderson, Charles & Cynthia"
<Cyn_Anderson@yahoo.com>
Date: 9/13/2001 4:14 PM
Subject: County Planning Commission Meeting Sept 19
CC: Andria Jacob <ajacob@esource.com>, "Pommer, Beth" <porr~merco@aol.com>, Alan 0'Nashi
<ado-ecos@indra.com>, AI Gunter <algunter@home.com>, "Nielsen, Tina"
<tinan@qwest.net>, "Lovrien, Maty' <LovrienM@ci.boulder.co.us>, "Ruzzin, Mark"
<mruzzin@igc.org>, "Bean, BrenY' <beanb@ci.boulder.co.us>, "Renfroe, Judy"
<Judrenfroe@aol.com>
Hi all ~
I went to the Boulder County Planning Commission meeting that was held
on Aug 15 and was disappointed. In the end they voted to table any
decision on the topic (Parcel 22A) until Sep 19. Since the original
notice was published in the paper the owner of the proparty (Wm
Reynolds) and the city have powowed and he now wants both 22A and 226 to
be redesignated. The land planner (architect) who works for Reynolds was
there and showed 2 alternative plans for 22A and 22B, Plan 1 has
42 2 Br units {Condos ?) 40 %p of which would be "permanently affordable"
~ it was not defined exactly what that meant. Clearly the city wants the
affordable housing committment and hence supports plan 1. The planner
also showed an "all light industrial" plan 2 which would have a number
of "office buildings" plus parking. Unfortunately this also requires a
change in the designation of 22B (hack behind the auto dealers). The net
is Wm Reynolds wants botb parcels redesignated and the city like his
plan 1, He claims to be neutral to either version.
However, since the meeting announcement stated that only parcel 22A
woultl be discussed, the planning commission couldn't act on the "whole
proposal". After listening to everybody there they decided to table the
topic until Sep 19 when both parcels can legally be considered and 2
absent members of the commission will be back in attendance. There were
only 6 of the 8 members present on Aug 15. Neighbors who made
presentations were Judy Renfroe, Porsche Young and mysetf. Rigo Thurmer
was there but didn't speak.
The Boulder County Planning Commission will meet again on Tuesday Sep 19
in the afternoon at the Boulder County Courthouse 3rd floor. I will not
be able to attend as I will be out of town. Based on some discussions
from the Aug 15 meeting, it seems to me very likely that the Planning
commission will go along with the city's recommendations and vote to
designate both parcels as required by the Wm Reynold Plan 1(i,.e. with
42 residential units. As you have all probably already noticed, they
are hauling dirt onto the lots already. The architect explained this was
a"short term deal" with the city to take dirt from the new hotel
excavation at 6th & Canyon until the hospital site at 47th and Arapahoe
had been approved by the city.
My net is we will either end up with onlyoffice buildings or with a
smaller set of office buildings and some high density residential units.
I perso~ally am against any residential units on that property and have
made presentations multiple times at each of the public hearings. We
already see impacts to being able to exit from Old Tale Road just due to
file://C:iWINDOWSiTEMP1GW}00OO1.HTM 9/7/2001
Page 2 of 2
khe trucks Mauling dirt onto that property. I am further concerned about
any building on the floodway/tloodplain and the possible imapcts due to
floodwaters backing up onto Old Tale as a result.
I have carbon copied this note to the members of the Boulder County
Planning Commission. Please attend the meeting or write to them and let
them know your position.
Ray Hedberg
1310 Old Tale Road
Snowmen fall from from the sky unassembled ....
file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW } 00OO1.HTM 9/7/2001
rage 1 ot t
Mary Lovrien - Wednesday meeting
From: Porsche <porsche@learningpow.com>
To: "Lovrien, Maty" <LovrienM@ci.boulder.co.us>
Date: 9/17/2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Wednesday meeting
September 17, 2001
Dear Memhers of the County Planning Board,
Unfortunately, I will 6e unable to attend the meeting this Wednesday.
However, before relenting to the pressure to change your previous vote,
visit the site in question on Arapahoe, across from Old 7ale. Pretend you
are living in a residential complex on that site. Notice the intensity and
constant noise of the traffic. Ask yourself how comfortable you would be if
your children played so close to that street. Listen to the public address
system from the next~door automobile dealership. Ask y~urself if you would
like to be constantly informetl of who has a telephone call and on which line
is that call. Notice the intensity of the lights from the dealership.
Imagine how bright they will be as soon as the leaves are no longer on the
trees. Visualize flood waters pouring over their banks. Ask yourself if
you can really sleep at night knowing that you voted for high density
housing to he placed directly in the path of a flood.
While you are there, notice how much work the developer has already been
done on that site. Ask yourself if he has only'stockpiled a few loads of
dirt from another construction site' as the developer's representative
claimed during your last meeting.
Is this a done deal?
A change to the Comprehensive Plan is supposed to require the vote of four
governmental bodies. You already voted against including this parcel in the
Comprehensive Plan. Why all this pressure to change your minds?
Porsche Young
1548 Old Tale Road
Boulder, 80303
(303) 443~3154
Porsche@lea rningpow, com
file://C:\WINDOW S\TEMP\GW } 00OO1.HTM 9/19/2001