The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7B - Codified Fee Request for Differential Weekend/Weekday Greens Fees at Flatirons Golf Course forDO NOT REMOVE - PRAB File Matenal „F„, CITY OF BOULDER PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: Seutember 30, 2002 (Agenda Item Preparation Date: September 12, 2002) AGENDA TITLE: Codified Fee Request for Differential Weekend/Weekday Greens Fees at Flatirons Golf Course for 2003 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Jan Geden, CPRP, Director, Parks and Recreation Doug Hawthorne, CPRP, Parks Superintendent Julya Bridgewater, Administrative Director Chase Weir, Golf Professional, Flatirons Golf Course Chuck McElwain, Administrative Analyst ~,"` ~... FISCAL IMPACT: Analysis mdicates that a weekday/weekend green fee differential between March ls` and October 31S` could generate addit~onal revenues of $SQ000 m 2003 PURPOSE: The purpose of ttus memorandum is to provide the Boazd with mformation regardmg a proposal to enact a weekend/weekday differennal greens fee at Flatuons Golf Course m 2003. The City's Budget office has requested that the PRAB consider this item for recommendauon to City Council as a part of the Department's 2003 budget subccuttal BACKGROUND: The Pazks and Recreanon Department is proposmg to Council m the 2003 Departmental Budget submission a recommendahon to enact a dtfferenUal weekend/weekday greens fee for F1atu~ons Golf Course. The current 2002 fee schedule and the proposed differenual fee is oudmed m Attachment #A As outlmed, the weekday fee would be applicable Monday through Thursday The weekend fee would be apphcable Fnday, Saturday and Sunday, and would mclude Monday holidays. ANALYSIS: In accordance wrth city's finance pohcies, revenues-generated from user fees at the Flahrons Golf /""°'' Course should cover direct and a portion of indirect costs The 2003 operat~ng budget for Flatirons ~r... AGENDA ITEM # VII-B Pa¢e 1 Golf Course has a revenue tazget of about $1 5 milhon mcludmg $13Q000 capital expansion funding ~ ~ As golf course operatmg expenses contmue to mcrease each year, it becomes difficult to generate sufficient revenues to balance the budget. In 2001, the golf course did not make sufficient revenues to contrtbute to its capital expansion fundmg It appeazs that mcreased revenues will be needed to fund operaaons and capital expansion m the fumre In 2001, the Parks and Recreauon Advisory Boazd approved a Master Plan concept plan wtuch will eventually remove the pro shop and FlaUrons Buildmg, expand the dnvmg range, reconfigure the pazkmg lot and develop a smaller facihty for golf course and banquet use only. The esumated costs are m the range of $4 to $5 million. Addmonally, due to the drought, the golf course will spend $50,000 tlus wmter to dredge out vanous ponds on the golf course to hold more water for unga[ion purposes. There aze other mfrastructure needs mcludmg rebuildmg golf greens, tees and fainvays, and updatrng the golf course ungation sys[em The golf course needs to maximize revenues m order to fund caprtal needs Plavers Fees in Municiual Golf Market The use of weekday/weekend differenhal green fees for golf is not umque m the mumcipal golf mazket Weekdays aze considered Monday through Thursday, and weekends are considered Fnday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday hohdays Attachment B is a survey of 2002 gteen fees for 18 separate golf courses m our mazket area. Of the ^'~ 18 courses idenufied m Attachment B, 11 of them have a differenual weekday/weekend fee for golf `~ Most mumcipahties have not set greens fees for 2003, but it appeazs that the proposed 2003 weekday/weekend differential fee structure w~ll place F1atu~ons Golf Course m the average for what is chazged for golf m the mumcipal market area Attachment C is an analysis of potential revenue impacts of the proposed differential fees Staff looked at actual revenues generated over a 10 week penod from roughly June 13- Augus[ 25, 2002. Of the 20,149 rounds of golf played dunng ttus tune penod, appro~mately 42% occurred dunng the weekend t~me penod. Total revenue for greens fees generated dunng the weekend ume penod was $183,885 Staff also looked at revenue pro~ect~ons based on a typical fee mcrease for 2003, wluch has normally been an mcrease of $0.50 for 9 holes, and $1 00 for 18 holes Assunung the same number of weekend rounds m 2003, an additional $6,700 would be generated with the normal fee mcrease. Staff also pro~ected revenues with the weekend differentral fee increase m place Based on our analysis, we beheve an addrtional $33,500 could be generated with the differential fees over the 2002 actual weekend revenue collected. Staff beheves that if the weekend rate mcrease is msatuted year round, revenues would mcrease by $75,000 ff the weekend rate mcrease is msrituted between March 1 and October 31, revenues would mcrease by $50,000. Attachment D provides a look at the impact on revenues based on a reduction m rounds played dunng the same hme penod. We looked at scenanos of 5%, 10% and 12.5% reductions in rounds ~ played and the potential impacts on revenues Based on our analysis, it would take approximately ~x,, AGENDA TTEM # VII-B Pase 2 a 12.5°lo reducnon of rounds to affect revenues negatively compazed to revenues generated for the normal fee mcrease. ~ ~ Advantages for implementing a differential fee system: 1 It appeazs that a differenhal fee system will razse revenues We believe that ttus system could ruse more than $75,000 in revenues yeazly 2. The differential fee system would not create issues wrth pass holders during the mazn golfing season, smce annual passes are not valid on weekends currently. 3. A differential fee system follows an acceptable pracace by many municipal golf courses in our mazket area Thus, many golfers expect to pay more to play on weekends than weekdays. 4. A differenual system dces not create a scenano of dimuustung returns because demand for golf on most weekends exceeds the available supply 5 Implemenhng a weekday/weekend differendal is easdy accomphshed wuh the new point of sale system implemented dunng the summer of 2002. 6. A weekday/weekend fee differential is not unique to the departxnent. A weekday/weekend fee differenual is already m place at Boulder Reservoir. Potential disadvantages with implementing a differential fee system: 1. A differential weekend rate implemented year round would potentially impact annual pass holders who cunently can use their passes to play on weekends between November 1 and February 28 or 29~' each year ~ 2 The pro~ected weekend fee mcrease is greater than the typical fee mcreases that have been ~... implemented dunng the past few yeazs Instead of a$1 00 per 18 holes round mcrease for resident players, the weekend mcrease would be $5 00 per 18 holes There could be some complaznts about the amount of the fee mcrease. However, based on the current fees chazged for golf m courses surveyed, the mcrease still places Boulder m the average of the range of fees chazged throughout the mazket. Oations to Consider r""" ~...- 1 Do nottung except implement the standard yearly mcrease m fees that have been implemented dunng the past six yeazs. However, there could sull be issues associated with not havmg sufficient dollazs to provide for future capital improvements at the course. 2. Implement a differenhal weekday/weekend fee system for the entire year Thus, every Fnday-Sunday, and all Monday or ma~or holidays would have lugher fees. 3. Implement a differenUal weekend fee system dunng the pnme golfing season. The pnme golfing season could be sirrulaz to the system for accephng annual passes Thus, the differential weekend system would be Mazch 1 through October 31. The weekend differential would also mclude Memonal Day, July 4`~ and Labor Day PUBLIC COMMENT AND PROCESS: Tlus item is bemg heazd at Uus pubhc meehng, as advertised m the Dazly Camera. AGENDA TTEM # VII-B Pa2e 3 STAFF RECONINIENDATION: "~s Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreat~on Advisory Boazd approve a plan to enact a ~` weekend/weekday differenual fee for greens fees at Flatuons Golf Course m 2003. Our recommendahon is to implement ttus differennal fee on weekends between March 1- October 31 only, mcludmg the ma~or holidays of Memonal Day, July 4~' and Labor Day each year. Between November 1- February 28`~ or 29th each year, there would not be a weekend fee differenhal and the greens fees would be the standazd weekday fee dunng ttus tune penod Staff beheves that there is a potential of mcreasing revenues by $50,000 with ttus system. ATTACHMENT. A. Flahrons Mumcipal Golf Course Proposed CotLfied Fee Schedule B. 2002 Golf Course Fee Informahon C Revenue Analysis with Differentaal Fee D. Esrimated Effect On Revenues Based On Dechne In Rounds Played ~ ~ ~ .~ AGENDA ITEM # VII-B Pa¢e 4 Attachment A .~'~ €,,r,,. Flatirons Municipal Golf Course Codified Fee Schedule Current2002 ~ Proposed 2003 1. Per Round - Mondav-Thursdavs Resid Adult 9 Holes 14.50 18 Holes 22.00 ChildlTeen 9 Holes 9 50 18 Holes 13 00 Senior 9 Holes 12.50 18 Holes 18.00 Per Round - Friday-Sun & Holidays Adu1t 9 Holes 18 Holes Child/Teers 9 Holes ~ 18 Holes Senior 9 Holes 18 Holes ~ 18.50 29.00 18 50 29.00 18 50 29.00 15 00 23.00 10 00 14 00 13 00 19.00 Resident 17 00 27 00 12.00 18 00 15 00 23 00 19 00 30.00 19 00 30 00 19 00 30 00 Non-Resident 21.00 34.00 21 00 34.00 21 00 34.00 AGENDA ITEM # VII-B, PAGE 5 Attachment B 2002 GOLF COURSE FEE INFORMATION zooz ~ WEEKDAY WEEKEND JR SR GOLF COURSE RES NON RES NON RES RES ~ FLATIRONS 9 $14 50 $18 50 $14 50 $18 50 $9 50 $12 50 ""' 18 $22 00 $29 00 $22 00 $29 00 $13 00 $18 00 INDIAN PEAKS 9 $19 00 $21 00 $20 00 $22 00 N/A N/A 18 $29 00 $35.00 $34 00 $40 00 N/A WA COAL CREEK 9 $17 00 $21 00 $19 00 $23 00 $13 00 $13 00 JdSr Weekday only 18 $27 00 $35 00 $32 00 $41 00 $18.00 $18.00 BROADLANDS 9 $15 00 $18 00 $17 00 $22 00 $1~.00 $10 00 18 $28 00 $30.00 $30.00 $35 00 $20 00 $20 00 EAGLE CC 9 $13.00 $10.00 $15.00 $15.00 N/A WA 18 $19 00 $20 00 $28 00 $30 00 $7 00 $17 00 TWIN PEAKS 9 $14.00 $16.00 $15.00 $1700 $11.00 $11.00 18 $21 00 $23 00 $23 00 $25 00 $14.00 $15 00 APPLEWOOD 9 $21.00 N/A $29 95 N!A WA N/A 18 $21 95 N/A $41 95 N/A N/A N/A UTE CREEK 9 $16.00 $17 OU $17.00 $18 ~0 $13 00 $73.00 JdSr Weekday only 18 $27 00 $32 00 $31.00 $35.00 $20 00 $20.00 INDIAN TREE 9 $13 00 $15 00 $13 00 $15 00 $8 00 $13 00 18 $20 00 $25 00 $20 00 $25 00 $15 00 $20 00 LEGACY RIDGE 9$14 00 $19 00 $21.00 $21 00 12M-TH 12M-TH HERITAGE 18 $27 00 $36 00 $34.00 $42 00 17M-TH 12M-TH LOVELAND 9 $15 00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18 $25 00 FOX HOLLOW 9 $16 00 $20 00 $16 00 $30 00 $9 00 $12 00 18 $30 00 $38 00 $30 00 $38 00 $17 00 $21 00 I THORN CREEK 9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18 $20 00 $30 00 $25.00 $35 00 $15 00 $ 18 00 ~9 HYLAND HILLS 9 $13 00 $17 00 $13 00 $17 00 N/A N/A 18 $24 00 $32 00 $24 00 $32 00 N/A N/A WEST WOODS 9 $16 00 $18 00 N/A N/A $7 00 N/A Differential Fee for Mornin s vs. 18 $27 00 $32 00 N/A N/A $14 00 N/A Aftemoons RIVERDALE 9 $12 00 $13 00 $12 00 $13 00 N/A N/A KNOWLES 18 $18 00 $23 00 $21 00 $23 00 N/A N/A DUNES 9 $15 50 $17 00 $17 00 $17 00 N/A N/A 18 $ 25.00 $ 31.00 $ 31.00 $ 33 00 DENVER 9 $11 00 N/A $13.00 N/A $6.00 $7 00 MUNICIPALS 18 $18 00 N/A $20 00 N/A $12 00 $12 00 AVERAGES 9 $15 00 $17 18 $16 83 $19 12 $ 9 61 I $ 11 44 i 1 S $ 24 06 ,$ 30 0~ $ 28 13 $ 32 92 I $15 89 $ 17 90 I ; Designates Golf Courses with Different Weekday/Weekend Fees '"~R ~ AGENDA ITEM #VII-B, PAGE 6 Attachment C City of Boulder Parks and Recreation Department Revenue Analvsis With Fee Differentiai Dates Covered in the Anaiysis: June 13, 2002 to August 25, 2002 2003 2002 2002 2003 2003 Projected Actual Revenue Estimated Projected Revenue Rounds Generated Rounds Revenue (Weekend Feesl Friday Through Sunday Detailed Rounds Standard 18 2,774 $80,446 2,774 $83,220 $94,316 Standard 9 2,033 $37,611 2,033 $38,627 $42,693 Adult 18 1,736 $38,192 1,736 $39,928 $46,872 Adult9 1,228 $17,806 1,228 $18,420 $20,876 Junior 18 167 $2,171 167 $2,338 $3,006 Junior 9 353 $3,354 353 $3,530 $4,236 Senior 18 176 $3,168 176 $3,344 $4,048 Senior9 91 $1,138 91 $1,183 $1,365 Totals 8,558 $183,885 8,558 $190,590 $217,412 Based up the revenue effect for the time penod June 13, 2002 to August 25, 2002, staff believes that revenues would be mcreased by $75,000 if instituted over the entve fiscal year or by $50,000 if instituted between March 1 through October 31 ~~~ ~ , ~ ,;' . . ~ Standarc! Pi9yers Fee'- i8',' -" ' St~ndard Pleyers ~ee - 9 Adulf 18 (Fiesid~ht} Aduii 9 (Resident) ~ Junior 18 (R~sident) Junior 9, (Resident) SenioP 18 (Resident}' ~ ~5snit~r9 (~iesid~~ity~~'~-~,,F,~ _~~~',,;, ',,.r. ' ~'idVi ~!~" ~ £rtIV ~- _ F ~~~;,~~,~ ,~~= fl~ , actu i ~ F ~j /{ ( '~ ~ O VV Y '~'~ e-r`ie~`'$h'P ~~~r . ~~~ ~J J~ ~ I~.~JV `~`i `i i`.r.. S '~ . {~~('s. ' " ~ 22,t~ 3' a 14,bG'3"~':ar;,; ;;, ;~a. ~;~;~; -13.~Qa , ~~~~T~~ ~ 9.6iI,., _ r~t, ~ ~"1~.00:~~~'!~~,;,~~~~'`_;.._„~;+ r l %_ i~' _v-zi~sry+'~'r "ix; ~. 'a~' i~-~a.~~ r!;~d.. tit t~~ ~ hi~~.:~~ - ~;~~~;~~ ~ ~~ y~ 1'~aA' `~ ?~ -4'x_~k'I",'~r~'~ i~~ ,. 4~t-`~~°~'~;'~ ~:a`~~¢N~~°~;~ ~4 ~_. > _~ _.- a~ ~ ~L54~~i~Y,kv~`~ 8~f~~ av~JOq.Vy.byI{-H~4'. ~V ~. _ ei~. ~!e IGiLVa. ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM #VII-B, PA. ~E 7 l..J Attachment D City of Boulder Parks an d Recreation Department Estimated Effect On Revenues Based On Decline In Rounds Plaved 2003 2003 2003 2002 2003 Projected 2003 Pro~ected 2003 Pro~ected Friday Through Sunday Actual Estimated Revenue Estimated Revenue Estimated Revenue Detailed Rounds Rounds' Rounds" (Weekend Fees) Rounds"' (Weekend Fees) Rounds"" (Weekend Fees) Standard 18 2,774 2,635 $89,600 2,497 $84,884 2,427 $82,527 Standard 9 2,033 1,931 $40,558 1,830 $38,424 1,779 $37,356 Adult 18 1,736 1,649 $44,528 1,562 $42,185 1,519 $41,013 Adult 9 1,228 1,167 $19,832 1,105 $18,788 1,075 $18,267 Junior 18 167 159 $2,856 150 $2,705 146 $2,630 Junior 9 353 335 $4,024 318 $3,812 309 $3,707 Senior 18 176 167 $3,846 158 $3,643 154 $3,542 Senior9 91 86 $1,297 82 $1,229 80 $1,194 Totals 8,558 8,130 $206,541 7,702 $195,671 7,488 $190,236 ' Actual Rounds Played From June 13, 2002 to August 25, 2002 "' Based upon a 5% reduction in the number of rounds played from 2002 '"' Based upon a 10% reduction in the number of rounds played from 2003 "" Based upon a 12 5% reduct~on in the number of rounds played from 2004 { ~k i , ~ ~ Standard P~ayers Fes -18 Standard Piayers Fee - 9 Adult 18 (Resident) Adult 9 {Resident) Junior 18 (Resident) Ju~ior 9 (ResideM) Semor 18 (Resident) Senfor 9 (Resident) i~'' F~u~q``Si~iL~6< ~ <m~'n~,k.~%}Fv.Y~~l!~+°Fi~~~~~~-m~~~rv~~~~'~~„~'~ r~ 2Q42 ` ~ Mo~~layTh~9~@h~ ~~9Q~ ~ , ~ ~~ Actual F~es Thur~day f~e4s W~kand Fe~s ~ 29,04 30.QQ ~ ~ ~ „ ~~ ~•OQs , 16.50 19.OQ ~ 21.00 22,OQ 23.00 27,OD 1~},~0 15.Q0 ~ 17,4~ _ 13.00 14.00 " ~ `t~,~?~ 9.60 1Q.00 ~ , 'r ~2~QQ~ ~ ~~'~8.00 -'~18.4H1 ~ ~ 2~:it0`~ . 12.50 13.00 15.D0 AGENDA ITEM #VII-B, PAGE 8 , ~) ~ ) ~,,~ t. :i i <.~ -- -- - DAILY TIMES-CALL- DAILY TIMES-CALL ] ~~~F_, ~~ Ihe Frv-1t Range C~1he Wat e ~ers 0 . . a~ ing many for progi~rn astated by high ed supply, Weld turned to a ~150 assistance pro- since the program a branch of the U.S. ;riculture's Farm which implements day last week t the county of- has been pretty White, a program technician at the Weld of- fice in Gree- ley. "We've had yuite a few people in 7 h~re." While ap- j plications haven't been ~ counted yet, the assis- tance has been attrac- lt tive because it's relatively easy to quali- fy for, unlike severalother USDA pra grams such as low-inter- estloans,said Ed Buck, an n specialist at the numbers, but we've p," Buck said. "It's ~e of the producers for (other assis- GS." ~plications also has y ~ankhauser, the sident of the Col- talked with a who said the ar in its first qualify would re- iit for each eligible can be used to buy ost from mills that with the USDA's Corp., which has ~n pounds of 2-year- in storage. The cor- ;imilar nonfat dry ial feed in the past, r animal consump- e USDA. s in Nebraska, Col- ~ South Dakota are tance. USDA chose ecause at least 75 re and forage crops the department as .~` Joy Master, a seasonal environmental resource specialist, talks about the new education signs near Coot Lake on Thursday morning. Below is one of the nine signs U~at shows information about prairie dogs on the half-mile •~rie dog interpretive trail, which was unveiled Thursday. ~ ~ • , ~ ~ ~ Boulder unveil~ half-mile rairie do inte retive trail p g ~ By Pam Meliskog T/~e Durly Trn:es-Call QULDER - With all the ink that's been spilled in Boulder County on prairie dogs, reading all about it happened long ago. Or did it? On Thursday, city of Boulder Parks and Recreation staff unveiled the county's one and only prairie dog interpretive trail. The half-mile path winds south- west from Coot Iake to near ~1e ~ Boulder Reser- been voir, past nine in- licde ~ formation many plaques and three and a colonies of ap- ~~e proximately 150 critters living on 50 acres beyond thetrail'ssplit- d'""""'~'~"" ilf tures sweat the details. Most burrows include several holes to ensure both good air circulation and easy escape. Intruders ranging from rabbits and turtles to snakes and spiders find prairie dog burrows hos- pitable. But when they invade, the dogs quickly unite to build an earthen barrier so they can live in peace. Deeper down, the prairie dogs make bed- rooms and line ra ence. A combination of photos, illustrations and text explains how prairie dogs interact with their habitat. For in- stance, one plaque - titled "A House in a Town" - depicts a single burrow. According to the sign, in a single burrow, prairie dogs can dig 7 feet below the surface and create as much as 80 feet of tunnels. Like the Army Corps of Engineers, these crea- them wllh soft ~ grasses. They even dig out a nursery. ~ort-grass prairie has always "A lot of people a land o( temperature exlremes, ' think ihey breed like ainfall, dryingwinds, and I•abbits," Master grazing animals. Natide plants said. "I3ul they actu- ~imals are adap~ed to thrive in ally have only one diHicult conditions. litter per year, typi- cally with only three to five pups. Only approximately 40 percent of them make it to the next year.° Within these burrows, clear family units exist. The plaque explains lhat members often greet each other with "prairie dog kisses" - touching teeth ur noses. But for all the burrow's protection, prairie dogs still must deal with natural predators. "A lot of people see what goes on out here, but they don't have a full understanding of the circle of life," said city ranger and naturalist Matt Claussen. "(The raptors) don't just eat fish." A plaque identifies those predators as golden eagles and hawks - red-tailed, Swainson's and ferruginous. Claussen installed the signs, and said he plans to plant two old 25-foot telephone poles to give the birds a place to hang out and balance the habitat. Believe it or not, the prairie dog interpretive trail idea didn't flower in Boulder. City environmental resource specialist and in- terpretive trail pmject manager Joy Master said she got inspired last Seplember after tour- ing the model Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area in Fort Collins. After securing permission from the city of Fort Collins' Natural Resource Deparlment, she said, she lift.ed about 70 percent of the text to bet- ter fit the displays to the Boulder Reservoir habi- tat. A$20,000 Dr. Scholl Foundation grant covered the cost of commissioning Boulder-based ECOS Communications to complete sign production and design. "It's a lot of education to mnkc sure people un- derstand the biology of the prau•ie dogs," Master explained. "It's to encourage (visitors) in work- ing with them instead of working against them." Less than 1 percent of the West's historic prairie dog population exists today, according to Master. Pam Mellskog can be reached at 30377fr2244, Ext. 224, or by e-meil at pmellskogCstlmescell.com. ~elder melds t~~vo hobbies into hoto busin p ess The As.rncrafed Press EVANS -Throughout histary, flight steps down has represented freedom: a place lo soar aiwve the noise and crowds. +puty town clerk It's treedom of another sort for John focus full-time on "Jack" Daniels of Loveland: freedom ~ / SEPTEMBER 7, 2002 agencies recently At the Colorado State Patrol headquarters in Evans. Daniels' neighbor, Sgt. Paul Matzke, a CSP accident investigator since 1994, [irst suggested the helicopter could be usef~il in photographing accident PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD FUTURE BOARD ITEMS ~"'' (prepared September 25, 2002) `v..~ • t * m * Denartment of Parks and Recreation 2002 Ma.ior Goals ^ Determine Department's Environmental Focus ^ Contrnue Valmont City Park Process ^ Complete Department Transitaon Analysis ^ Complete NBRC renovadon and fust phase of Ins Center remodel ^ Update Department Master Plan October 28. 2002 Board members absent:) Valmont City Park update Needs assessment update Elmer's Two-Mile nanung Board liaison appointments Boulder Creek Events/Boulder Creek Fesuval audit update Drought assessment Tree health status report of park sites November 25. 2002 Board members absent:) Valmont City Pazk update ~ TOURS and SPECIAL MEETINGS: Dedication of Chautauqua Playhouse in memory of Will Meyer - October 5> 2002 from 10 to 12 pm. at the Chautauqua Playhouse Timberland Volunteer Day at Valmont City Park - October 12, 2002 • Valmont City Pazk work session to develop a pazk mission statement - Wednesday, October 30`~ from 6 to o pm.at at Meadows Branch Iabrary at 4800 Baselme. 2002 PRAB Meetina Dates October 28, 2002 November 25, 2002 December 23, 2002 (to be rescheduled) MASTER PLAN ISSUES To be a ru~ning list of issues that anse dunng the yeaz which the Boazd would hke to consider during the Master Plan Update: * Park Naming Policy (including re-naming) * Gift Acceptance Policy (Check List) * Long-Range Strategic Plan for Park Acquisitions: 1. Pazk Definition Review 2. Park Level Service Standards Review ~ 3. New Development and Development Excise Fees 4. Neighborhood and Pocket Park Acquisition Goal * Future Golf Course AGENDA TTEM #~ PAGE 1 Refine Mission Statement Scheduled Use of Neighborhood Pazks AGENDA ITEM # VIIIs PAGE 2 ~