Loading...
7A - Item for Discussion: Recycling Efforts in Urban ParksDO NOT REMOVE - PRAB F~le Mater~al CITYOFBOULDER ~ PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: February 25, 2002 (Agenda Item Preparation Date: February 13, 2002) AGENDA TITLE: Item for Discussion: Recycling Efforts in Urban Parks REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Jan Geden, CPRP, Director, Parks and Recreation Doug Hawthorne, CPRP, Parks Superintendent Kara Dinhoffer, Environmental Affairs Department Bob Peck, City Parks Manager FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown at this time PURPOSE: ~^ The purpose of ttus memorandum is to provide mformat~on to the Board concemmg the lustory of ~~~ recychng efforts m urban parks, mformaaon about how trash is currently collected in urban pazks, and opportunihes for implementmg test recychng si[es in 2002 Bob Peck of City Pazks and Kaza Dmhoffer of Environmental Affairs will be at the Boazd meehng to discuss this program. BACKGROUND: Recycling Efforts The City's office of Envuonmental Affairs is the Division chazged with the responsibility of coordinating recycluig efforts m the City. The City currendy has a program for the recychng of office papers, alummum cans and bottles and newspapers m publtc buildutgs and office space areas. In 1992, Environmental Affatrs attempted to pilot a recychng program m a few key pazk azeas, but the program's successes were mixed. An example of an unsuccessful effort occurred m 1998 at Mapleton and Stazio Ballfields. At that trme, three recyciing "toters" (flip up top, plastic wheeled, plastrc carts) were placed at Mapleton and Stazio Ball fields There was no designated, regulaz pick up estabhshed to empty the recyclables and we found that the contents of these contazners were contaminated and could not be scavenged for recychng Environmental Affau~s staff beheved that the contazner design and the lack of regular pick up resulted m the contanunaaon for recychng purposes. These recyclmg contazners were removed from these sites m 1999 Another fatlure, but subsequent success at Peazl Street Mall is worth noting In 1992, two recycling ~""^ ~ AGENDA ITEM # VII-A. PAGE 1 collec[ion bms were mstalled on the Mall and tn a location on East Pearl, (by 18`" Street) and a locat~on /~-, on West Pearl, (by 10`" Street). An mdependent ~azutonal contractor was iured to empty the contamers -^ weekly. Approximately 75% of the 6me, the recyclables had to be thrown m the trash, because they were contammated with trash and non-recyclables. Environmental Affa~rs researched new bin designs, and in 1998, the Peazl Street bins were replaced and an addidonal cluster of recychng/trash bins was placed on the Civic Plaza, next to the Tea House. The new bms were designed with more prevalent signage, and a shape that made it difficult to throw general trash into the bm Smce the bms were redesigned, [here have been no mstances where these containers have been too contanunated for recychng collect~on. From a distance the recychng bms do not look lilce trash contamers. They aze clustered with the regulaz trash contamers so that if a person has trash m one hand, they could sepazate the trash themselves without leavmg the area. The weekly collect~on costs for recycling from these clusters of recychng bins costs the city $3,000/yeaz. These costs aze paid for by Environmental Affairs Pazk and Recreahon mamtenance staff assigned to the Mall contmue to regulazly collect the non- recyclable trash from the free-standmg trash recegtacles, but do not normally service the recychng containers To date, rt appears that this method of collecaon is workmg and could be expanded to other areas. Current Trash Removal Processes in Urban Park Areas There are currently 62 urban pazk srtes mamtazned by the Pazks Division Wittun these 62 sites, there are approximately 300 mdividual, 33-gallon trashcans located at strategic locahons m each park In addit~on, lazge, achve commumty or neighborhood pazks that generate a lazger volume of trash have two-yazd dumpsters that aze used to collect trash from these mdividual pazks, as well as serve as a ~ recervmg site for other pazk trash. There aze two-yazd dumpsters located m 11 sepazate pazk or City "~ sites. The Crty Pazks Secuon funds trash removal as a separate lme rtem, with a budget of approximately $113,000 each yeaz Full tune and seasonal pazk employees aze responsible for collectmg trash, along wrth the~r other pazk mazntenance duhes and responsibihhes Several years ago, City Parks decided to consohdate and centralize tlus function m an effort to become more efficient and to deal wrth the growth m pazkland and mcreased use of the system City Parks has attempted to lure desigiated seasonal employee(s) to collect trash seven days per week dunng the peak use times. Although we prefer relymg on seasonal employees to perform tlus type of work, di~wlties m findmg labor for tlus function has caused us to use full time, as well as seasonal employees Trash collection currenfly remains a funcuon performed m con~unchon with ottter mazntenance duhes Collection and Disposal of Trash Collecuon and disposal of trash m pazk azeas is different than the collechon of trash m neighborhoods with curbside service There is no automation in any of the pazk trash collect~on processes. In small, neighborhood park sites, staff travels from pazk to pazk and collects a trash bag full of trash from each contamer and places the bag m the back of a pickup truck A new trash lmer is placed m the can and the process is repeated at the next pazk Dependmg on how full the cans aze, trash may exceed 100 pounds m weight. Once the pickup [ruck bed is full of the trash bags, the muntenance employee ~ AGENDA ITEM ~ VII-A, PAGE 2 ~ dnves to the closest large park site and manually removes the bags and tosses them mdividually mto the two-yazd dumpster. The Department contracts with Western Disposal to collect and dispose the [rash from the two-yard dumpster. Depending on the panc~ulaz pazk and tristory of use, the dumpster is collected 3~ tunes per week in the summer, and at least weekly m the wmter. The Department pays Western Disposal approximately $6,500 per month for the two-yazd dumpster service m the eleven srtes with the dumpsters In 2001, Western Disposal removed 24,000 cubic yards of trash from city park and recreation areas. Dunng the past few yeazs, trash collection systemwide has taken approximately 7 staff hours per day to make the rounds of all of the city pazk sites. Additionally, over the same nme penod, staff has noUced an mcreased amount of personal or home generated trash bemg deposited in the two-yazd dumpsters from neighbors or others, and m some mstances have seen mdividual full trash bags placed outside of some park trash cans. This could be a result of mcreases m neighborhood curb collechon fees or increased park usage. Since the two-yazd dumpsters aze not locked, it is not difficult for a person to unload a trunk load of trash mto these two-yazd dumpsters - ANALYSIS: Staff believes there are opportumties for contmued recychng m outdoor urban pazks Envuonmental Affaus staff expenence has shown that it is crit~cal to purchase specially designed contamers for pubhc area recychng. The specialty contamers must discourage "contanunat~on" (trash and non-recyclables m the recychng) and be easdy and mu[mely serviced by the collechon personnel. Past recycluig efforts r m pazks have not been realized due to [he lack of operat~onal budgetary dollazs for the purchase of ~. special recyclmg collecrion bms and due to past experiences with contanunafion of recychng contazners Due to other workload demands, both Pazks and Recreat~on, and Environmental Affairs staffs have also not had the opportumty to properly develop and analyze pilot srtes. With the re- allocation of the Trash Tax, there is $ 6,750 budgeted m the Environmental Affairs 2002 budget to purchase recychng bins for parks Environmental Affairs also has lured addihonal staff to monitor busmess and city recychng effoRS. As mdicated with recychng efforts on the Mall, Envuonmental Affau~s staff beheves that a successful recychng program needs to include regular collection services Pazks and Recreation could either urihze exisring pazks maintenance employees to periodically pick up the recyclables dunng theu normal trash collection method ident~fied previously, or could estabhsh a sepazate collechon contract with a recychng collection company, a trash collecuon company, or ~anitonal contractor, similar to that performed on Pearl Street Mall. The types of collectron contract often impact the contamer design guidelines The recychng efforts will need to be analyzed to deteimme if the mcreased costs of collectron will be offset by a decreased cost of non-recyclables and to determme workload issues with pazk staff performing recychng efforts PUBLIC COMNIENT AND PROCESS: Tlus item is bemg heard at ttus pubhc meering, as advemsed m the Dazly Camera. ~ AGENDA ITEM # VII-A. PAGE 3 STAFF RECOMNIENDATION: Staff proposes to work closely with Environmental Affairs staff to develop a pilot program dunng the next mne months We propose that three different types of pazk areas should be chosen as test sites for ttus pilot program We recommend [hat one large commumty pazk site such as Tom Watson Pazk, a designated sports complex site such as Stazio Ballfields and a small neighborhood pazk srte such as Martm Pazk (that also houses a reservable picmc shelter) be used as pilot sites ttus yeaz We propose to explore and analyze the costs and demands on workload of staff collectmg the recyclables versus usmg pnvate contractors to do ttus work. We also would also analyze the recychng program's effect on the amount of cubic yards of non-recyclables collected in these pazks. Staff will present their findmgs to the Board at a meetmg later tlus summer or fall. -.'~+a .~.,- ~ AGENDA ITEM # VII-A PAGE 4