5C - Public hearing and consideration of landmark alteration certificate to demolish a contributingSeptember 6`h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
MEMORANDUM
September 6~'', 2006
TO: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
FROM: Susan Richstone, Acting Long Range Planning Manager
Chris Meschuk, Historic Preservation Planner
Alice Gilbertson, Historic Preservation Intern
James Hewat, Historic Preservation Planner
SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of a landmark alteration
certificate to demolish a contributing garage and in its place
construct a new 620 sq. ft. two-car garage and studio
building at 2529 6t" Street in the Mapleton Hill Historic
District (HIS2006-00169).
STATISTICS:
1. Site:
2. Historic District:
3. Zoning:
4. Owner/Applicant:
5. Date oE Construction:
6. Proposed New Const.
2529 6t'' Street
Mapleton HiII
LR-E (Low Density Residential Established)
Penny Normann/Scott Coburn
House, c.1900, shed constructed bet. 1922-31)
Two car garage and attached studio, 651 sq. ft.
SUMMARY:
This application calls for the demolition of a building and in its place the
construction of a free-standing garage & studio more than 340 sq. ft. in
size. As such, a public hearing is required (10.13.14(3)(b) of the Boulder
Revised Code).
On July 26t'', 2006, the design review committee reviewed preliminary
plans for additions to the contributing main house on the property. At
that meeting the applicant was informed that the proposed demolition
and new free-standing construction would require the full Board's review.
S:IPLAMdataUongranglHIST\ALTCERTS~-Iistoric DisvictsuVlapleton Hi1116th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doo- 1-
5eptember 6`h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
The shed/garage proposed for demolition was constructed sometime
between 1922 and 1931 and was identified as being contributing during
the 2005 survey of accessory buildings in the Mapleton Hill historic
district.
• Staff considers the proposed new construction inconsistent with the
criteria for a landmark alteration certificate as per Section 10.13.18
(b) of the Boulder Revised Code and Section 7.2 of the GeneraI
Design Gc~idelines.
• Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board deny the request for a
Landmark Alteration Certificate to remove the non-historic shed and the
construction of the proposed two-car garage and attached studio. This
recommendation is based upon staff's opinion that the proposal does not
meet the requirements set forth in the Boulder Revised Code for a
landmark alteration certificate
BACKGROUND:
On July 26th, 2006, the Design Review Committee reviewed preliminary
plans for the rehabilitation of and addition to the house at 2529 6th Street in the
Mapleton Hill historic district. At that time, the applicant was advised that
demolition of the contributing shed at the rear of the property and construction
of a new building with square footage of more than 340 sq. ft. would be subject to
a public hearing by the Board pursuant to Section 10-13-18 B.R.C. This
S:IPLAMdatallongranglHIST\ALTCERTS1Historic Districts~Mapleton Hilll6th 252919.06.06 memo.doo- 2-
Figure 1. 2529 6th Street Location Map
September 6~h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
application represents the property owner's rec1uest to demolish the shed and in
its place construct a two-car garage and attached studio.
PROPERTY HISTORY:
The frame house at 2529 6~'' Street appears on the 1906 Sanborn Fire
Insurance Map and the 1993 historic building inventory form estimates the date
of construction to be 1900. In 1913, the city directory listed Joseph and Elizabeth
Lloyd as living at the property. Sanborn maps indicate that the frame shed
located at the west side of the property was constructed between 1922 and 1931
with a carport addition at the east of the building having been constructed
sometime after 1960. The lot is 6,750 sq. ft in size.
BUILDING DESCRIPTION:
The shed at 2529 b"' Street is a one-story, shed-roof building of simple,
two-by-four frame construction sheathed with unfinished vertical plank siding.
A shed roof, lean-to addition carport addition extends from the east elevation of
the building. The garage is in deteriorating condition with visible bowing and
deflection observed in the walls.
S:IPLAMdata\Iongrang~HISTIALTCERTS\Historic DistrictsVVlapleton Hill\6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 3-
Figure 2. Main house 2529 6~h Street, August, 2006.
September 6~h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
Figure 3. Shed/garage 2529 6~h Street (south-west corner), August, 2006
ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE:
The modest shed/garage at 2529 6t'' Street was constructed sometime
between 1922 and 1931, presumably to house an automobile and provide storage
space. With the exception of the addition of the post 1961 east facing carport
additions and a recent enameled steel roof, few alterations appear to have been
made to the building.
The 1993 historic building survey identifies the house as being a good
example of vernacular wood frame architecture with its hip roof, shed dormer,
gable end decorative shingles, and its contribution to the Mapleton Hill historic
district as a whole (see Attachrnent A). The building proposed for demolition is
identified as a garage on the survey form. In 2005, the building was inventoried
as part of the survey of accessory buildings in the Mapleton Hill historic district
and identified as an "early shed roofed wood storage building and garage" and
contributing to the Mapleton Hill historic district (see Attachment B).
S:IPLANIdataUongranglHIST\ALTCERTS1Historic DistrictslMapleton Hill\6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 4-
September 6`h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
Figure 4. Shed/garage, 2529 6~h Street (east elevation), August, 2006
Architecturally, the shed/garage is a modest (and currently deteriorating)
example of vernacular accessory architecture. The building is a visible aspect of
the alley between Concord and Maxwell Avenues and visible from 6t'' Street.
Figure 5. Shed/garage, 2529 6~h Street (west elevation), August, 2006
Staff is of the opinion that the shed/garage is contributing as defined in the
General Design Guidelines and Mapleton Historic District Design Gatidelines. While
simple and utilitarian in nature, staff considers the building a good example of
early twentieth century accessory building construction and that it contributes to
the historic character of the Mapleton Hill historic district. It is staff's estimation
S:IPLANIdataUongranglI-IISTIALTCERTS\Historic Districts~Ivlapleton Hi1116th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doo- 5-
September 6th, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6th Street
that its removal would constitute an "adverse effect" to the special historic,
architectural, aesthetic character of the district (Section 10-13-18 (b)(2)).
REQUEST FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION:
`~'~',v ='.~'~ ---- :{~
Figure 6. Plan of proposed new garage at 2529 6~h Street.
In the place of the existing building, the applicant proposes the
construction of a new one-story, two-car garage and connected studio space with
a footprint of 651 sq. ft. Drawings show the proposed frame building to be
erected on the location of the existing garage with two vehicular doors facing
south onto the alley.
.__ _ _ _ ._.-
I
, ~
~j ,~~:«~~~. ~
:H~~c~esrowin+ /
/
rrm*n
I
_~.__-__..- . _._
_ t / ~ . n v.v:u eo~n;
' /
+.. ilEi0.kCW~Y] ~_ ~
. ;,ti ~>~ . -~
_. ~ .:~ ~ ___. ~_.~~~.~
~
- a~~«.eA~ '
~"
~
~
~~
C.~
.
"
~ f
~~!~ -
~~
~ ~ w 4PrG
~ C
/ J , =
q [`~ ~
{ ~ J i : ;
~
~~
~
~
:r
~^
,
~YFa1d
i a"4+
~'.
~ ~ I~'7
il~~ ~p
t~ l
-.d,s,+ I -
i . i
` f =
@ 1 I
~ I ~
~
~ ~
~ __" f
~ F
-
. [^'.r,=
[;
5:.
~ j~ ~1 J ~ y ~ ~~- ~~ __ ~
~
~III ~
~ ~~te~r~l ~I~~U~4 ~
'7
.
~
,F .
~~ ~ ~~I i .:_
fii~ _ ~-~"~
_ ,~
- f _ -~ ~_- _ _ _" _JI
SOUTH ELEVATION NQRiH ELEVATION
e.At ~s - ~ c !KAtI~ ~~b. 1'.ir
Figure 7. South and north elevations oE proposed new garage at 2529 6~h Street.
Elevations show the proposed building to feature intersecting hip and
gable roof forms that reference the main house on the property. The south face of
the garage is shown to feature two, two leaf garage doors with each with two
S:~PLAN~data\IongranglHIST1ALTCERTS\Historic DistrictslMapleton Hilll6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 6-
; ~-. --
-, , =~
September 6th, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
panels of four light windows. On the south elevation, drawings show the east
end of the wall punctuated with a single, two-panel four light door. The walls of
the building are shown to be sheathed in wood clapboard siding to match that of
the main house. No details were submitted regarding the roofing material or
paint color for the proposed building.
THE BOARD'S DECISION
The Historic Preservation Ordinance specifies that a Landmark
Alteration Permit may not be approved by the Board or City Council unless it
meets the conditions specified in Section 10-13-18 B.R.C. Specifically:
(a) The landmarks board and the city council shall not approve an
application for a landmark alteration certificate unless each such agency
fir~ds that the proposed work is consistent with the purposes of this
chapter.
(b) Neither the landmarks board nor the city council shall approve a
landmark alteration certificate unless it meets the following conditions:
(1) The proposed work preserves, enhances, or restores and does not
damage or destroy the exterior architectural features of the landmark or
the subject property within an historic district;
(2) The proposed work does not adversely affect the special character or
special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the
landmark and its site or the district;
(3) The architectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of
color, and materials used on existing and proposed structures are
compatible with the character of the existing landmark and its site or the
historic district; and
(4) With respect to a proposal to demolish a building in an historic district, the
proposed new construction to replace the building meets the requirements of
~aragraphs (b)(2) and ~ of this section
The following is an analysis of the proposal's compliance with the applicable
design guidelines:
S:IPLAMdata\lon~rang~-IISTWLTCERTS1Historic Districts~Ivlapleton Hilil6th 252919.06.06 memo.doc- 7-
September 6Lh, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6~h Street
General Design Guidelines
7.2 New Accessory Buildings
~
New accessory buildings should follozv the character and pattern of historic accessory I
structi~res. Wlzile they shouId be take design clues fro~ri the prirnary structure, fliey mtfst be
subordinate to the primary structure in size, massing and detailing. Alley buildings should ~
rnaintain a scale tjmt is pleasarit to tunik alo~zq and contfortahle for pedestriar2s.
- _ -__
- - - --
GUIDELINES: ANALYSIS: CONFORMS
.1 It is inappropriate to introduce n new Construction of the new garage will No
garnge or accessory building if doing necessitate the demolition of a
so will detract fror~~ tlze overall historic contributing building which will
character of the principal bi~ilding and detract from the historic character of
the site, or if it will rec~uire the re»~oz~aI the property.
of a significarzt historic building
element or site feature, such as a
nTature tree.
.2 New garages and accessory bicildirtgs The building location is consistent YES
should generally be located at the rear with historic patterns of garages
of the lot, respecting the traditional facing onto the alley on this block.
relationship of such buildings to the
primary structure artd the site.
.3 Maintain adequate spacing between Distance between south wall of YES
accessory buildings so alleys do not proposed building and buildings
evolve into tunnel-like passagezvays. across alley 30' plus.
.4 Preserve a 6ackyard area 6etzueen the The new garage does encroach YES
house and the accessory buiIdings, upon garden space, but proportion
maintaining the general proportion of of built mass to open space is
built mass to open space found within generally consistent with immediate
the area. area.
.5 New accessory structures should take T'he new building is generally YES
design cues from the prirnary compatible with the primary
structure on the site, but be building in terms of architectural ~
subordinate to it in terrns of size and details and materials and is
ntassing. secondary to it in mass, scale and
height.
.6 New garages for single famil~ Proposed one story building to YES
S:IPLANIdata\IongranglHIST~AI,TCERTS~I-Iistoric DistrictslMapleton Hilll6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 8-
September 6`h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
residences should generally be one shelter two-cars.
story tall and shelter no more thnn two
cars. In sonte cases, a two-ear garage
may be inappropriate.
.7 2oof forrn atid pitch should be The form and pitch of roof YES '
complimentar~ to the primary complimentary with the main
stri~cti~re. house.
.8 Accessor~ stri~ctures should be sintpler The proposed garage is simpler YES
itt design nnd detc~il than tl2e pri~riar~ than house in scale and detail.
buildi~ig.
.9 Materials for new ~arages and Materials as proposed, including YES
accesson~ strirctures shoicld be wood clapboard siding, doors, and
corl~patible zvitl~ those found o~z the are appropriate.
prinlari~ structure arid in the disfrict.
Vin~l siding and prefabricated
structi~res are inapproprinte.
~
.10 Windozvs, like all elements of accessory The proportions, design and YES
strt~ctures, should be simpler in materials of proposed are generally
detaiiing and s»inller in scnle tha~z consistent regarding window and
similar elemerits on prirnary garage door changes.
structures.
.11 If consistent with fhe architectural Not applicable N/A
st~le and appropriately sized and
locafed, dorrners may be an
nppropriate way to increase storage
space in garages.
.12 Garage doors should be consistent Proposed wood doors will be
with the historic scale a1Td materials of consistent with Guidelines. YES
traditional accessory structures.
Wood is the most appropriate material
and two smaller doors may be more
- ~ a~~proprirzte thrt~r onc l~r~e door. ~
- - - - -
S:IPLANIdata\IongranglHIST1ALTCERTS\Historic DistrictsVvlapleton Hilll6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 9-
September 6`h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
Mapleton Hill Historic District Design Guidelines.
D. ALLEYS, EASEMENTS and ACCESSWAYS
Alleys are a strong visual element of the district, and have much variety of scale and detail.
They play an important role in the development patterns that give the more visible areas
their character. Alleys provide access to rear parking and garages. They have a varied
edge quality, with buildings both on the property lines and set back. The size and quality
of these accessory buildings varies considerably. Careful consideration should be given to
changes in traditional uses.
Guidelines: Anal sis: Conforms?
1. The use of alleys to provide The proposed garage will provide vehicular
Yes
access to the rear of access from the alley.
properties should b~
reserved.
2. Efforts shoi.cld be made to Nearly every property along the alley
Maybe
protect the variety of shape, contains an accessory building, with sizes
size and alignrnent of ranging from small one-story storage sheds
bc~ildings along the alleys. to larger two-car, one-and-a-half-story
Alle~s should rnaintain a garages. The proposed garage is larger in
hacman scale and be sensitive scale and massing, placement than others
to pedestrians. found in the alleyscape. Retains an adequate
amount of o en fronta e alon the alle .
3. Efforts should be made to The proposed demolition of the garage/shed
maintain the character of the to make way of the proposed garage/studio ~O
alle~s in the District. will alter the character of this portion of the
alle .
P. GARAGES, ANALYSIS: CONFORMS?
GUIDELINES:
2. Wheri garage doors are The applicant proposes to incorporate two.
Yes
added to a building they Two-leaf garage doors on the alley
should be wood. Different elevation. Proposed doors are each shown
types wilI 6e approyriate for to feature two, four light fixed-light
different buildings. Two windows.
smaller doors may be more
appropriate than one Iarge
door.
3. If a new structure is to be Most accessory buildings along the alley
constructed, design ideas feature gabled roof forms. Staff considers No
miglTt be found in existing that the proposed garage is larger and more
historic accessor buildin s elaborate than historic accessor buildin s
S:~PLAN\datallongranglHIST1ALTCERTS~Historic Districts~Ivlapleton Hill\6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 10 -
September 6`h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 2529 6`h Street
located nearb . on the alle .
4. The nezv bitilding should be Staff considers that the proposed garage is
secondnry in ~iature to the secondary in nature to the main house. Yes
mai~1 house and smalier in
scale.
5. Accessory buildi~igs should Staff considers that the proposed garage is
be sir~alI in scale ar2d ~riass, not in keeping with the existing garage/shed ~O
and cunstri~cted in a rrianner or the alleyscape as a whole.
wl~iclt is compli»ientan~ to
the character of the house
nrtcl rrlle~. They are clearly
seco~~dary in importance to
tlie prirrirrry sfructure.
Typically, prefabricated
s{~ed5 are discoura~ed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is of the opinion that although deteriorated, the existing garage/shed
is a contributing resource to the district and that its removal will have an adverse
effect on the alleyway and the historic district. While the proposed garage is
generally consistent with the General Design Guidelines for new construction, it is
inconsistent with Section 7.2.1 which states that a historic building should not be
removed from a property if it will detract from the historic character of the
property. Furthermore, the removal of the existing shed/garage and proposed
new building is inconsistent with the Mapleton Hill Historic District Gaiideiines for
New Construction. Finally, staff considers the proposed removal of the
contributing building will be inconsistent with the conditions as specified in
Section 10-13-18(a)&(b)(1-4) of the historic preservation ordinance.
Staff encourages the applicant to explore rehabilitating the building using
historic preservation tax credits. An addition to the garage/shed building may be
appropriate to provide space for a studio.
FINDINGS:
The Landmarks Board finds that the application for the demolition and
new construction at 2529 6~'' Street does not meet the requirements set forth in the
Boulder Revised Code for a landmark alteration certificate, based upon the
evidence presented to it at its September 6°i, 2006 meeting. Specifically, the
Board finds:
S:~PLAN~data\IongrangUIISTIALTCERTS~IIistoric Districts~Nlapleton Hilll6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 11 -
September 6`h, 2006 memo to Landmarks Board re: 25Z9 6`h Street
The application is inconsistent with the purposes and standards of the Historic
Preservation Ordinance and the Standards for Landmark Alteration Certificate as
set forth in 10-13-1, B.R.C. 1981
The proposed project is inconsistent with the purposes of Historic Preservation
Chapter of the Boulder Revised Code as set forth in 10-13-1, B.R.C., including but
not limited to the following:
1. The proposed work will damage exterior architectural features of
the subject property within an historic district;
2. The proposed work will adversely affect the special character or
special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the
district;
3. The request is inconsistent with Section 7.2.1 of the GeneraI Design
Guidelines and Sections D(3) and P(3 & 5) of the Mapleton Hill
Historic District GatideIiries.
ATTACHMENTS:
A: Historic Building Inventory Form
B: Sanborn Map Analysis
C: Photographs, Site Plan, Elevations
S:~PLAN~data\longranglHIST1ALTCERTS1Historic Districts~Nlapleton Hilll6th 2529\9.06.06 memo.doc- 12 -
Attachment A ~ddress: 2529 6TH ST
Boulder, Colorado
COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY
Cultural Resource Re-evaluation Form: Accessory Building Survey
1. Resource Number: 5BL4073
2. Temp. Resource Number:
3. Attachments: 4. Offical determination:
(Check as many as apply) OAHP USE ONLY
[ ] Determined Eligible
~~ Photographs ~; Determined Not Eligible
~~ Site sketch map ~ Need Data
~.~ U.S.G.S. map photocopy ~_] Nominated
~~/~ Other 1931 Sanbom ~~j Listed
! i Other ~__; Contributing to N.R. District
~~ Not Contributing to N.R. District
5. Resource Name of Primary Building
6. Purpose of this current site visit: Resurvey
7. Previous Recordings: Front Range Research Assoc. Apr. 1996
8a. Description of Accessory Building:
Early shed roofed wood storage building and garage with cor~ugated Outbuilding Type:
metal roofing: unfinished vertical wide board sheathing. Twelve-light Shed
fixed window, and a square opening with screening on west side; two Outbuilding Material:
side-hinged vertical board double doors on south side; slightty pitched
shed roof {looks like a carport) that shelters area adjoining building on Wood Frame
east side. Outbuilding Covering
Wood Siding
Outbuilding Roof Materia
Metal
8b. Date of Construction: pre 1931
8c. Date of Construction Source:
1931 Sanborn Map: building appears on map. This building and the accessory building for 2541 6th St were located together
on one large lot of combined lots 4, 5 which ran noRh - south through the block. The lots have been reconfigured since Men.
9. Condition: Deteriorating
10a. Changes to Location or Size Information:
10b. UTM Coordinates:
~~
Cultu~al Resource Re-evaluation Form:
Accessory Building Survey
page 2 of 2 Address: 2529 6TH ST
Boulde~, Coiorado
Temp. Resource Number
11. Current Ownership SCHELLING ANDREW UND 55 PCT INT 8
2529 6TH ST
BOULDER
CO
80304
12. Other Changes, Additions or Observations:
13. Eligibility Assesment:
Individual
National Register: N!A
Local Landmark: NlA
Locally Designated Property: NO
District
National Register: Contributing
Local: Contributing
14. Management Recommendations: N/A
15. Photograph Types and Numbers:
Type: B8W Roll No: 3 Frame No: 23, 24
16. Artifact and Field Documentation Storage Location N/A
17. Report Title: Accessory Building Suroey
18: Recorder(s): Kathryn Howes Barth, AIA; Lara Ramsey 19: Date(s): Feb. 2005
20: Recorder Affiliation: Kathryn Howes Barth, AIA; Ramsey Planning and Preservation
Colorado Historical Society, Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
1300 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203
/ ~
... .
A~
ATTACHMENT B: Sanborn Map Analysis
1922 Sanborn Map
~ ~~
• ~~'
, ~v ~
~
~ a .~ ~;,
,, ~~
~
V ' ~ f ~ 6
- h 1
~
` ,
I ~ ~+
ti ~
~ ,x ~
i_ __5 I
~ 4'~ryViVe_ ~ ~ _ _ ' .o
f ' ' ~ ~~
~ ~ ' R ~ r q ~o 'e ~ \ Os t1 ~ 4r r° ! .y (1 ~
~ ~ . ~ ,~ ~~1
C~1 I "' ~
~~ k r1
~~ ~
I
I
1 ?L
~~ ~ ~ ~6 0
~
~ ^ ~
r \~ ~
'R
y x
. ~
,
I
-:
, ~
~
+~ ~ \
~".'. ~
f
, ~
°`
~~
•
~
~
o
~~
..
-- ° ~---
--- -- . 1 ~°--~'
.,.. f
~
,v,.
. .T
1931 Sanborn Map
~$h 4Ix> ~i:!! -/~
~~
0
~ ~
w
M~
- -
- - ^
~ r
~
-,
i_ : ~
, n `• , U •
. ~__ --
~.~
b
~~
`-=' ~ r.--, ~ 'i
~ ;~ p i
D ' r ° t
p i
•
~ ~
ja .:~ /9
~
p `_•
F' M 1 d /
~ ~
G r ~
/~
w ,~~~{I1~
9 j I~ I ~'K ~
K{^
Y
•
r~ ~ ~ A r
~ ~ O
~ ,,
i
!) /C i~
%--~
~'
g-', ~ ~_~
V Y/ Il
~ ~
~..
~ ~`--~ ;, •
] h/
x
«~Y~
'~
~ q
f~ f~'
l~
~.
~
n
r •~
L
l7 !C
~
~~ '
tl i
~
P I
T
~ , ,
w ~
_~ '
.°f JO
•,
L
I ,
_`__
" i ,
_~~~~ '
iJ
-_ -..
/ • •_~
J
a[e~ w~e .ieY ?Y~ rF?~ ~'S~
~-~---~_-~-"-`~P`__ MAX WE L L
~~
~~' ~
a ~ ~ a y fl V
~
; "
0
L j ~ •~
~~s
~ ~C ~ ~ •~ ~J
i
~ I
•~ ~
y ~ R
•- xS ~
r.dJ3 tv17 G~3 e
~ n~AxwE~~
ti ~~ u
~ / /1 'I/ ,i
`r_ _ • :.~ ,
~ ~A
F~ ~ 13 !j p .10 J,
~ ~ 1
~h ~ ~
`L~ 9
} 17 ~ P
~
~ ~~------i--
~f' A6' !7 JQ !"" - tG
. ~' 'J ~
r i n 1!
i
t~ ~ "_~
L~...~
AV.
ATTACHMENT C: Photographs, Site Plans, Elevations
/~
Shed/garage, 2529 6t'' Street (east elevation), August, 2006
Shed/garage 2529 6~h Street (south-west corner), August, 2006
~
Shed/garage 2529 6t'' Street (west elevation), August, 2C06
Shed/garage 2529 6th Street (south elevation), August, 2006
/~
. ,
. x>::..
~ ~.,., , , . :
. . ~~ w. .. _ ~ ~ ~~a
~~. ~~, ~~ _ . _ . t u . _ .,
~, ~ .. ~~ ; ~~ .° ~
~ cn~v ~~ ~~•w~-
Sx'i"w h .,. a,. ,
SITE PLAN rf,
SCALE 1' - 20'-0" t~
Proposed site plan, 2529 6t'' Street Garage/Studio
EAST LL~I .
SCa~ 1,E' = t' 7
tiNEST ELEVATION
sc~~ ~:a- ., ; ~
Proposed east and west elevations, 2529 6~h Street Garage/Studio
i
---~
i
i
_J
~~
Proposed south and north elevations, 2529 6t'' Street Garage/Studio
~------------------
r
Attachment ~
~
SCOTT COBUR~i
.4 ~SSOc_;I.1TE~
~RLHIT.L~_T~
~i/18/OG
iames He~vatt & Chris ~Ieschuk
Planning Department
f:in~ of Boulder
RE: Lanclmark ~~lteration Cc:rtificate (re~-ised application)
Pcnnv Normann HoYne
25?9 G'" St.
Dear James, <:hris and Landinatks Board,
The owner has decided to onlv request a hearing on the shed demolition and new
garagc,/studio const~crion E~r t~7e abo~-c referer.ced pr~perr,- at t~is tir~.e.
Please disregard the prior applicarion materials for the home addition and temodel.
Thank y ou for y our time and consideration. `~1e'll see you September G`~'.
Sincerely,
~~~~
Scott Coburn .
303-443-7557
~~
? l OQ Pr ~~i. S rki :~ r S~ irE_ [3 B„~ i.ui k. C'O 803U? 3O3.-i-43.7_ ;•
;.._-.~~L. ~_~._t~_._1 1~:_a!i, _--• -._. _ - --l_. ..'.
:;•::.. `uJ'rii~:~•~: 67 ~ O Otv i -•>':C:"^ _.:~:: __._. G~2~ ~'•` ~'~'.
7-
~ .:~-:c:. ~QPl~~r1 ~~ L.: :d.;.a.-~.. ..,.... _. ho~e
,-
: ;~:~::~: ~~.: ::: ~'j[~o~" eobur-1 CAr~~+ifect~ .~ ~ . ._. ~I~•~143-75~7 ---
:.: ,_ . ....~.. ~~,~89-0l~~~T .-...:. _ 3o3.y43• 0143
_..._:~;:.~~:? ,~~ pr~~: _. _ _ _._...~__ . _ -.. ._ . . ITRG~-f-ITFG7"-- -
:c~r.t'> !~I.::iia; ~ ''_. _,...
r~
r
~~~i~;L'r ~~~~~i:~ ~ n~.~a.n~. j ~~'iK ~~rY+san-~ -- - - . :.... . .. :.. _. 303 • 443- I1~37
1 '. ~ -~, C a V _ - _
~-~;ce:~~ oti4~ner's full ad~r~~ss: ~.SL~ ~ tJ"~'. ~ou~c~er
This abuve intorm~tien i~ r;.yu:r.:i in cr~~: t~ t;:i;;: cr~~.:~::s .::~~ ~Y~i:;.aticr.
T•~ a~;ist us i7 r~vietivin~~ ;~our groject, pleas.° provie?e a project ~esc:ipticn i~ th~ s~:ac~ Fro~~L~~' re'.,~~.~.
Include all of the e:cterior alterations proposed for the propzm~. Pieas~: submit the comple;~~
a~plicarion, alony ~vith any supportin~~ informatiun, pricr to your tirst desi~n revie~v meetin~T. If you
have questions, or to schedule an appointment for review, please contact Bohdy Hed`cock at (303) 4-~1-
4293. .
We look forward to wotkil~e w11J~ you on your proposal! .
PROJECT DESCRIP7"ION Please list all exterior alterations proposed for the property. _, ;;...;;.;~~'~~ :'~
l. ~ev-~of ~s h e xisf;n`~ s~c~ ~ roo~F' ovc-- yarc~ z- 7D~ s.{. covcr ;J
2, Dev-ao 2 bo~.ct" 2~' Jof e x~'S-f~-TKq ~` k+. ~edar -~~NCe ~ S. W. Cer++c r t;
3. I~e~ ZD' x Zo~ ara e w~`f~ atfa~ls~~ S~ccdio~s ~ar~. e I SS s. ~', '
~ 9 ~ ~ °~
z ~B~O 5. ~. Cover
,~ ;-:~~
,TERATIOY Please check all that apply.
dition Raof Repair Required:
_,
~'`
rage**
~C,_~e~t~ ~a~a U~~ar t
x Lot size (in square fect) ~7~
ion**(SI~(, Dormer(s) 70 ~'otal ezisting square fect 51
~(s) Slcylight(s) Proposed additional sqaa re.i
~~ _
Paint ,
12 . Ea.isting height
removt Part
Porch t
18_Froposed heirht
D; •
- _~. - , -
*'Requires a public htarine
~~
%.': :r ~,~ ~.;r:n, t,I lJlll ,? ~~ ~~~~~
i'~~_,~:~ ;i1GfT11i Ih15 C^l7lF~C:::C: ~~~~:~1I:Cf1 [~:,~'"i'. 1G:~ .i:C ~~:'CCT":i._ ,..:'_:_. ~:i. -r~.r :,; .._ __.~;-~ -.. _ ,
..._.... T~ r;-,a:e th~ m~5t ct~, ~.Lr ~:~~i_-: -.,._ . i~ ...~.:::t ~i:_~~-~._ _ . .~i ..~ . .. .;.,..- - . -:.:~: _
~r~~ ~....',1i1t.'.~~~ F!Y.'L:l CCC!'. ... !'...,'!'.l:F :'~' '~'..:: ,......'!1 :::~ ~ 'l:i _'.l .:t,~:....._. .~....l;~.' ...,-i__. '_.. -
i ~~..., r~il~li'~'1f1'T i~l!l'::ri: :I~ '1 'S ~" ~ -- • . ~ ,. t~
~~ ~,:. M
% ..... _ ~r~ ~::..-.: .. ...:..., _ "'_-•.... _ =. . .'_.. ;i.i._.: _ . ..- -~
i~ ,(»',Llil'1515:~.;C.:~i~:5 ~f ;~::._'.:l:i'.1'.ti-_ .: _.. '~~t:`,2:J
i~' '~'~'l~:'•V111'~d~~l'1i77k'..^I:ii:~:~l :~ ':1: •r ~r tl ~~~'i ~- - •
~ .:.'l:l;~ SI[Z ~'i~;1TIS
~c :;~~:wt;cns (usu:~ll; l. : = i' ~~•~:..
_~I.:terials (eric~;'stcr~ ~a::~,.l=s~
_Co!crs (pain~'st~in celcr c~in) "
_P~etoaraphs (photos of e:cistin~,~ bu:i4ir,~7 ail ~;c:~s •~^~i _~:~- -r.~.:. ~ .,..~'::,
~Ianufacturer'sleataloeue "t~ar" sh~.t
_For fznces, please brin~ drawin~~s to scale showir.~1 dim.z^~sior:~, i~c~~~ir:~~ ~~:~c;:~•7 ~~r.~e=a rx:is.
It is also helpful if vou provide:
_Buildina sections X- Floor pl~ns Studv medel (additions)
CO~L~IITTEE CO~f~iEtiTS ABOLT Tf~ PROPOSAL: -
j' :. ~ ~~,
:.~M~~
~ ~ ~~
. . ;'ti r
"`~' ;:, .'r:=~<~;d
' ' i: Y~, ~:a..i+~~
. ~'=::~~~
:, .
i
I~~E!{T STEPS: P(,BLlC HEARI\G? YES Ir~~ _~~.,;~~;~'..:3` ~'~
~?~!; r`~~~."*;
The Design Review• Committee cannot deny an alt~ration application, hoa~ever, any one Committee member can .q, rtv,,t' ;
require a full-board hearing. ' ~ ;~
,~,~,~ -~~
~>
. .. .~~::.,.. .. .
;
10.02-LAC8pp1 ~ .1~~ `.~':,~
~~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(provided by Client)
The Southerly 54 feet of
Lots t-5,
MAXWELLS ADDITION,
County of Qoulder,
Stote of Colorado.
Flatirons, Inc.
3825 1R1S AVENUf
80ULDER, CO 8030 t "
PHONE: (3p3) 443-7001
FAX: (30.3) 443-9830
www.Rotsurv.com
.,'';_ ~ nr~J.,,
U~ZI l_ ~ ~ ." ._ ~ 7' .
~ ~,, .~ ~, : r.
I- ~
I ~
I ~ ~ T
I I
I i ~
I -I
~
~
I ~
I
I I
( I I
I
~
FOUND
I I ~4 REBAR ~
~',~I;v, J`
I
I I
~ .--.
~~
~
~ t I I
( OF
P P
OF~
tD~ ~
~d I PART OF LOT
( LOT
i I
PART OF I PF;RT OF
LOT
3 x v
~
M
LOT 5 I
(
~)
LJT 4 ~ 2S' PL T
il~ ~ I
N
`~
t
I
40'
fOUND
4 REBAR
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~. ._ ovf+ iz.o' ~i ~,.a ,~ ~ w
• I .~? TWO-STORY I w
3~ t3.z' i'v ( N FRAME W/ n Y ~
`1' ~^ `BASEMENT n BRICK ; ~
sE~~ r~n~.~-. ~ . FR~ME . ( ( 2~.5• W -~- ~
o ~
~'3 ~f~.C. 'i S ED ~ i2.o~ E ~ cD
~ N ~ COV I I ` I ~ . ~ _. N
,o~ ; I ~" i / N
FOUND 3's" ;~ o c • ~ I
IRON ROO ' -25 ^ ~15' 25' ' ~ 25' 25'
r
~ 6 125' (PLAT) DIRT ~r
, 3 ~ .,, ~ + ~' r ~
I o,._j ~r., ti ~ ` t,
_ : , , ,1 .,
~ , _ ~,:
:, ,J, { ~ • i ;:a ,
~. ~ 'a...
~ . _ . _. - -- .- ; , -
Notes:
1-THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT CONSTI7UTE A TITLE SEARCH 8Y FLATIRONS, INC. TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP,
RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN BY THE PLAT THAT MAY AFFECT THIS TRACT OF
LAND. THERE MAY 8E EASEMENTS 0:: RIGHTS OF WAY OF THE PUBLIC RECORO THAT AAAY AFFECT THIS TRACT
OF LAND THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS' CERTIFICATE.
2-THE 5 LOTS MEASURE APPROXIMATELY 2~~ SHORT IN AN EAST-WEST DIRECTION BETWEEN FOUNO MONUMENTS
SHOWN AND 1~' SHORT IN A NORTH SOUTH ~IRECTION BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS. AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEl
PLAT IS RECOMMENDED TO ADORESS TH~SE SHORTAGES AND TO DEPICT MORE PRECISELY THE LOCATION OF
THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREGN.
3-OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES CROSS THl: AIt~SPACE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOV~~~~~~REON,
.~~\~~.~.USi1~ B~n:~~~i~ . •
J ~ ~ / ~/ ~ ~ ~I
~~.-~ ~t ,~ t
.~ a. ~,„~.~
IMPRJV~MENT LOCATION CER
I hereby certify thot lhis improvament locotian certi~~cote waa preporad tor ANDREW SCHEWI
Plol, ond thot it is not lo be relied upon for the eskoblishment o( fence, buildinq or olher i
improvemenls on lhe obove deseribed porcel on thie dote, 4oy 2J, 2D06, wctept utility conn
except os shown, thot there ora no encroochmenb upm tha deacribW premisea by improra~
thot lhere ia na opporent avieence a tiqn of ony eusemant crossinq or Ourd~nin9 eny porl
NOTICE: This Improveme~t Locolion Certilicate is prnaored fa lhe sde purposa of usa by th
dslinad by C.R.S 38-51-102(12) or an Impro~rement Survuy Plot as d~fuiad by C.R.S 38-51-
preciss ralotionship of the improvemenls to the boundwy lines con be datermined by a Lonc
ganerolty siluatetl as shown ond only opporent (viai6~e ot ths LIm~ ol field~ork) fmprov~m~nt
Guyton rill not ba liobie tor more thon tha cost of thia lmprovament Locotion Certfficata, ar
Acceplance and/or uee of this Improvemant Locotia~ Certi(icote fot ony purpose tOnslitul~s
Flatirons No. 06-50,775 Tille Co. No.
tnot tne •
~ ot the porcal,
os indicol~d. ond
~n. Il is not a Land Survey Plot os
~toGlish proparty cornvs. A mar~
nt Surv~y. Th~ improv~m~nts ar~
ore not~d. flatiron~, Inc, ond John 8.
ortfa ~p~cificolly slrown h~~on.
oqrean~nt to oll term~ stol~d hsram.
8otrorv:
FLA1 ~RONS, If ~~. B:;ulder, Cc'
SCALE 1"=30'
~5~ ~v~ y
~.~,c.
- ~~ ~
- ~ ;
,
~ , ~
~ ~ ~
. , ;
i ~ ~.; ~.-`. LE ~
; ! j IM~ ~~
~
~
)N(` ~3
p° .
I
I
~ PART OF
~ LOT 5
~ PART OF
PART OF LOT 3
LOT 4 125' (PL
FENCE
_ . c
, C ~
~
OVH
.I ~~
I 1zo I
~
i
1~ ~D~.,~,~.~;.`a ~~ .'? ;..; ~a~~~-~ ~
xs2~ ~-~ st .
i F~'=''ac '
; ~ ~~ -~~~ ~
~
~ L~
~ W
4: 1
~
l PART OF PART O~v _ 40'..
1 T2 LOT1 `~' __
LO M - y~
~I ~ ~-~
T, "j I " ..I _. Foutvo:::~
•-r "~ Zi.5" ~ > 11h
I 2.0' ~' • • '~'~~
' '- o.
T 0-STORY ~E ~~ ~ „~:L~
~ . FRAME W/ ~ ~ -;~~~~
~~ ~ F3ASFMFNT ~i ~R1CK 3 ~ 'r :~,~~~
~~ S ED ~ I l ~! / ~ t2.o' ..., ~ .,~- ;
~.
~; ~ cov - ~ . ~. ~ :~'3~~ ~'
~. ^fV , I ~~~ ~ t 1~~
~ O' • ~ ~ , _~- / _ ~__ ~ . " . ' .. ~,~°ji:•• tl
l __ ___ =~ ::~
~--- _ _ ____~ . _ _ , ~. ~ - ,
~ ° - - ° ' • 25' ' ~ 25' S~ ~ ~ '~~~;:a~
~- ~15 2 ' ' `~,
~5 ._ . .
~-y., ~ .}\.N'
.. , ' . . • .`f~~~~~~? ~r ^~.,~1~i.1/~'
~~
, . 125' (PLAT) OIkT ALLEY~ ~1~~.~M-~ ;
f ~ ~ "`~- _.' ~ y, ~ i
i . . , . ' ~~r':.'t Ot? .s,'a y
` ~ , ~ • _ ~ r ' ~''_Y.
.~ w~ ` ~~ ~.~.~ . ~~ ~..~~ . ~~ ~~~ w ~~ ~' ~'r~` ~. ' ' . ' a ,
5
, . . . ' . . . ~ ~~~ ~ ~
, ~ :~ - ~; ` , ~ ~~~3 ~ ~~~ i, :~~ ~:.
: 3 ~ 2 ~ , , . `~
~ , . ~ ; ' ., ~ ~ . . . , , .~.
~??~~~~v. ,,tJC_~ ^^u~. :~: i.v.-i'7;~V~a . . I~~1 ..-.. . ~?'-.'LK~, :''.~.' ` {t~ ~ ~~Yj .
,-~, . , ,~ . '' ~.~T~•;c~::: r .~.~. ;-~ rl t f, ~+.~~~~~' ~~:
~ ~ ~~ ~ n ' . ' ~. ''
rJ ~ , i ' J ! ~.~ ~V~l .
;~ _ _' ~ . + • . ) "~; r~
' ~ i ? ~ , ~ ' . - . '• . w~~,~~'~
~ ~' ."
- , .,
r
iv ~
v`
t25'-~'
~~v~~ au.Er
soct~io n
SITE P1~4N
SCALE 1 • = 2a-0~~
NONTH
~
~
~
~
~
_`
~~
r~
:;< <~ i ; ~~,,tu i: ~;
.:~s..c,~ i=i~ ~
~u~ iriu:. i,
„
;;~
r:, ~.. ,.. :,~:~
v
u
u
'~
` :~~ I
~ ~~
p I
E ~N
Z N
~~
. . .... ,l ! I
~
, '~
,~SRE PLPN
• ~~ ~
~ A1 l
~/
~
`_;,,1)fi l.',J!:(,i7\
~ :1:=y:'C1:1'i F_~
1KC:H! I I'C-I'S
Ni
SOUTH ELEVATION
scn~ ~re~ = r a
~~
1SP}~
>M~N
:JQSI
xe
%6
x~
rw
~.
I
I
~I
F
I
~~
ROOF PLAN ~
SCALE 1~' = 1'-0'
NORTH ELEVATION
scue ~ re~ = r o~
EAST BLffil ,
SCALE L'B' = 1'-0'
WEST ELEVATION
sca,t~ ~r~ = r m
:~ : ~ ..~~ ry
i:- ~ ~~ . c + ..
. ~, 1 17 ) ...
. r;:
: 7 c;
~ . '~ ~1'~.
. - ... F..~. J.{i
.~ ...:i
V
V
C
n '~
u ~
OCQ,~-i
i E~~
, Z N ,
~a~
GARAGE PLAN ~
SCALE 1~B' =1'-0'
i ~
i
v~.v~*: a '
or~.cty I