6 - Agenda - November 26, 2007 Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) Casey Middle School Design Advisory Team~
Architects, inc.
~.v~raw.rbbarCt~lteC~s.COm
315 East Mountain Avenue, Suite 100
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524-2913
Ph 970.484.01 17 Fax 970.484.0264
Agenda
November 26, 2Q07 • 7:0o Ann
Boulder Valley Schooi District
Casey Middie Schoo!
Design Advisory Team
Vl/elcome
- Approval of November 5th Meeting Minutes
Overview of the DAT Process ~ the Last 3 Months
Vision of the New Casey Midd{e School
"7 Guiding Principals"
i
New and flid
- Examples of Historic Preservation
- Exampfes of integrating contemporary architecture with components of historic
structures.
DAT Process
f~
V
T
I ` ~ STAGE ` St1Pf'QCtT I
1 soon I I
(t,500SFj f
; 1
Auditorfum !
zs+? >t I
~iT ~ .y ~
551 sl s<9 551 sf ~ AUVII Oflgl~Uyl'/t
les ar { ` 166 ar ~3f~.w 1 I
380 d 586 of
557 d ~ Q hi i. 557 >I
I ~
~1o
v ~ ,
j _
806 al 27B at r 260 of 702 al 659 sf tiCB a!
165 a/ _ 185 sf
I
I CLASSROOM CIASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM j
I Third Floor Plan (850 SF) (850 SO (850 Shy (850 5i7
I ~
- - -
~ I
j CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSfl00M
(860 SF} (850 SF~ (850 S~ (850 SF7 ~
i
Upper Gym. COMMONS
SCIENCE (700 SF}
(1,150 SF} p ~
18ta1 7618! ~ Vlh GII/'1DE i
521 of y.;. 521 sf
186 at 16fi st
C` ~
t -
j c 7
~j~'~174a1 167 s1 - 326 >t 17491 i
557 s1 ' o ~ o o'~ 557 at
j I
ADMINISTRATION
~ ~-110 f ~ 440 of t85 sf
l _ 231 - - (3,490 Shy
- >I
I 609 of - 166 st 14J al ~116at' 727st 122af ~95s1 168 sl ~ - 604 sr
I
Second Floor PL9n j
j c I MAIN
Gymnasium GYty}
I ~ 977 s[ ay3l st 962 at (nfpcn SF}
[ _ V V.I.V. ~'1
j y
~ ~ ~t
l t J9 sf 134 sl r . ~ OM~ X 50' L3ASIC;r T~B,AIl.. I
1 _ _
I . ~
j 803 st 188 a/ 186 a1 803 a}
1
1 ~ ~ ~ ~I
' o
F N I DO
o 0
~ 213 al tt35 a/ ' 213 al
I ~ ~ 251 st
603 >I _ 471 a/ 200 st 677 of 362 a1 - fi09 sf
_
1 I
f~ CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL - D(ISTING VS PROGRAM
1 FI(St ~OOr Plan ~ BOULDER VN1EY SCHOOL DISTAfCT NCMEMSER 28, 2007
t
i
j
~
_
~
Option 1 r= ~ ; . ~
• Demo all additions to 1924 building. t
• Replace heaving floors w/ structural + _
floors.
• Add elevator.
Major renovations would require " ~
structural improvements that would be ' _ ~
cost prohibitive. ~
• Build new 80,000 sf building that barely ,,lr~ ~ r..
touches old building (30,000 sf assignable). ~ ~•x
i
L ` i _ _ W
r
y
' ~ ~ ~~3
J~~ - ~ - 4
~ . t _
~ tt~;..~ _ ~ ~r t ~
~ ~ ~
_ .w,_
~_y
f 3
1 :
s l _
m.~ , , ,
,3
~ , ,,Y ~ ~ ~ i
1 ~ b t
~ ` ~
~ : ~ ; r,
~ ' i ~ ~ 'y/' ,
~',.r ~ ~ +i ~ ~ ~A.
1; ~ - ~ It %/~1 f~~~ _
; ~ ~ , } ~ A,]
i
V ~
L
-s ~ - ~ ~ ~ i~ ~
~ rf ,.-5,
T,1t y _____,.i"'"`~ i.~.w y -'y'~ L ? r ~ ~ "s j ~.k ~1
~ L. - ~ya,
1.~ _ ~Y
~ ~ ~
.r
\ ~ ~3._.~.~:..-_ ..rte ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ i A
~ r ~ ~
1
. ,
~~,t- . ~ ,
A
.
-
A
~ v . ~ _ _
f j
Option 2 - ~ ,
4 l
• Demo all existing buildings except south
and west facades of 1924 buildin !';~f .
• Brace existing walls to remain.
• Build new 110,000 sf building. /f
• Arrangement of spaces constrained to
preservation. ~ ` _ _ _f
~ $325,000 ADD -
$195/SF x 108,300 5F = $21,500,000 'f ~ - ~ ~ ~l
$192/SF x 110,000 SF = $21,500,000
~ ~
, - .
~ ~ _
i~
_ ~
~
~ ~ ,
v - ,~~t ~
_
~ - ~ - _ ' AEI'
rr
~St ~~1 tl. s F oar ~=I+'- it i ~ i
n y !s c Y i l.i
1," i ~ ~ ~ ~ t ' ? h
~~~.r. 'ti
q /
i ~ w '
;4~:'~r. ~ Hut
•:4 y i~} ~ l.~
;i
, C
i
,r
~ . f
~ ~ ~ ~1.~-;~
~ ~ ,
'1
r,
~
4 R" 1 _
1' ~ ~ ~
k ~ -
~ y~ ~ ~ ~ • T I
~f
~ }
-
- .
~ - -
~ .
q
~
1: ~ ~i ~ ~ '
s ~i .
- ~
f
~
. - -
~ -
' ,-y - ~ - f
Option 3 l ; }
• Derno all existing buildings. Preserve terra cotta , . , j
~ for re-use. ~ ~ ~
i Build new 110,000 sf building. ~ ?
'x
• Arrangement of spaces based on site. ~
,
• $195/SF x 710,000 SF = $21,500,000
. r
f
1 / \ .Or~ y ~
~ f"
~j. ~ r ! ~T ~ j
11 ~
a~ '
:r .
\ _
~ ~ -
~
, , , .
a i
~ ~ r!
~ _
, ~ ,r
~ r~r_ 5 _
el
, `t: , .
}
~
t ~ ~
~1~, ~ .r~
t~ , , s ":y t
x
~ ti.
is ~ ?
C.
~'~`r Clean Slate '
A
~ f
4{
l 1 y' ~
n V~ M i /
"i.,``i '
4
,~1
i~ 1` _
S~r
t
t
n.~_.
i '
r
_
_ _ .
- ~ r
. - " .~_.r
. ,
~ _ ~ l~ _
~
~ ~ ,
_ '.V t. ~L~~~
7}~`y~ C..,rcco~Q IL~g f
oPT~oN 1 ~28Y s~•~• Reuse 1924 Building
~
•i~ ,
o ~ ~ 4 • Demo all ans to 1924 ing. e
N' • Selective demo roof; end and 3
~ ~1! ~ ` S 4 building. l
0 ~ • Rebuild floors roof in 1
11'~,M~ ~ building as required.
• building at 80,00 s .
~
. ~
~
1~~ -j,
ra1~t(,on ~ 1~~~~~~~6
t
;',p,1i
''i
G , ,
a r ~ ,,y~~ err...,,,
Z ~J O ~ i a , J
~ 1
'i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ \
I ~ 1'
Cost Implications: $ 2,7!13,358 Over Budget
Pros Cons
• Historic rehabilitation of 7596 of the 1924 building • Requires significant demolition of interior walls
exterior including roof and interior walls of old and floors to conform to programmatic space
auditorium and gym. sizes.
• Maintains a visible history of original 1924 • Requires significarrt structural work to isolate
building, interior and exterior bearing walls from footings
• Creates a dean visual separation of 1924 to drilled piers.
building. • Less flepbiliiy in design solutions.
• ~ ~ • Roof of old building (combustible) requires a
t y~• more reatridi+re building classification.
• ~ ` • Will always be 2 buildings, old and new.
. V
• ~ •
~~~c«~
(~rocros
Upper Audl<orhan
_ ~ Corstrol - -
Booth
un, ~ yy rr c ~ wtw ~ ~4 r
x t `f ~~y~~1~~j~ ~ fl~l' i
1 ~
III~Y ~ r1Y1~ (1~ ~7Cl LJI RJ ~
- I
~I',:
If'1
1 = ~i~~
~ ; ~:~i,i
i {~i ~
,I~
ry~ ~ ~ ~ i'I
~'7"' ~ ' i i 'LI ~ ' ~ ~
_ nip
~ u f
1 I~ ~I ~1 ~I,~ ~ 4
~!t III I
T7 y ~
T~-i-= - - - i
~ ~
i ~ I
5
~ ~Y Second Floor - Deng
I I
~r
I
i Adn~
~
17ckel
CorrVriorb /
C,ateoerfa
~
f ~
l
Flrat Floor Plan ~ CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL -OPTION 1 FLOOR
eou~ei v~r aaaa aQrwcr oECOrteEn a a~
1
I
~....n...~...a..s~=i-
a !N
•;~t.~:1•.. ~ +•±~Ct'f:. ~ s:~ssa... .•.rs•... 'r~i:.'e
~~~~~1~i ~ -
IO
Jt N.•w.y I w a ~ ~ N.re.
• r - 1 - -
•
•
_ _ .
•
-
-
• -LIB/u....h.M- - A- A xy..rr :.Y N ~ - .
0.~A{+f.:r~,'" :1r
x.79+ N" : j,R ~ ~ L~~e y ~
I
\ I
i
e
' ~ ~ -
oP-rioN z Save South and West Walls of 1924 Building
• Demo all e ' buildings e t pt
south and west fa of 1924 tt"`'
~ j l
• Brace existing to remat .
• Build new 110,000 ilding. j
-
~
l
~ L~.
y-~
~~/i ~
I ~ ,
i~
~
~ ~
Cost Implications: $ 325,000 Over Budget
Pros Cons
• Maintains a visible history of original 1924 • South and west elevations of 1924 building
building. being unshaded compromise heat gain and
• Allows programmatic spaces and adjacencies to glare. Functions which can exist by diffusing
comply to educational specs. natural light are cafeteria and media center.
• Creates a defined exterior space and people • Vertical spaang of windows not optimum.
plaza which aesthetically ties together building • Additional estimated building cost of $ 325,000.
and streets. • Solution does not constitute historic
• preservation.
i
~I
I
I
I
I
~ ~
I
i
i
tAtnic / ~dllotMm
/ CiF
f
I(
E
~ i
' i
Con I.aarr~irrp
Areas Cafeteria 1
AR / Tech Atioue ChA
~d~
i
I
Brat Floor Plan ~
~ ~
j¦ `r`s~r r~ioo~ scfioo~ - o~rioN z A ooR ~,,NS
OPTION 3 Clean Slate
~mo
• Demo all buildings. e
terra cotta for reuses. ~
~ i
• 110,000 sf ing. t
t~_, ^ =
-~J~~
r - ~s
- I I~ ~,5'
I`
1 ~i~`ii'i
' q
J
~ ,
~ J'
`~J ~r f ~ ii
I' ~
Cost Implications: $195/sf x 110,000 sf = $ 21,500,000
Pros Cons
• Allows multiple solutions to fully embrace • Solution loses any opportunity for historic
educational specifications, high performance preservation or any visible history of the 1924
sustainable strategies and site analysis. original building.
• Most cost efficient solution to address structural Creates export of demolished materials to landfill
and soil conditions. or diversion to fill for other projects.
• Will be able to lower construction contingencies. •
•
I
i ~
i
I
I (gym and WeYtbaa
I
161chen Catatrta / ~
i
j I~
Entry
i I
i
i
i
i
i
i
I
i
MUaiC /yJdApfM111
I
i
i
~~Y
t:0(e ~~0
Areas
Tech Ed
~ ADove
i
i
i
Ftret Floor Pwn
~i
CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL- OPTION 3 FLOOR PLAN
eouiner vv~r x?+oa asrncr oeccareer s, am