HomeMy WebLinkAbout6 - Memorandum, Update MemoSeptember 3, 2003
TO: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
FROM: Bohdy Hedgcock
SUBJECT: Update Memo
GENERAL UPDATES:
Historic District Designation Process Work Group
As requested, staff has contacted the various stakeholder groups identified by thz Board
and requested representatives to serve on a work group. The group will assist staff by
suggestmg and analyzmg potenhal changes to the Historic Preservation Ordmance
relative to the historic district designation process. A memo, mcludmg a list of work
group members and an outlme of the proposed process is attached.
2003-04 Work Program / Retreat Follow-Up
Attached is a memo detaiimg direction on pro~ects and goals based on our discussion at
the August 9~h Board retreat. Several potential grant pro~ects were suggested at the retreat
and are listed m the memo We need to prioritize Chose potential pro~ects so that
applications can be completed prior to the October deadlme for Colorado Historical
Society grants
General Design Guidelines
Letters were recently sent to owners of all properties designated as individual landmarks
or wrthm historic districts notifying them of the adoption of the new General Design
Guidelines and direchng them to the c~ty's website or the Plannmg offices for a copy
Copies of the letter are mcluded m this packet. Those letters are attached. Notice will
also be sent to City Council, Plannmg Board and DDAB notifymg them of the new
guidelmes. Also mcluded is a bound copy of the Guidelines for your own use.
429 Spruce
Staff has made several attempts to contact the owner, Jon Telleen, through his attorney,
Rich Lopez, in order to schedule the mdependent assessment of this property as requested
by City Council Mr Lopez replied via email on August 13~h that Mr. Telleen has been
suffering from a vanety of health problems and the resolution of the demolition request is
not a concern to him at this hme. To quote Mr. Lopez: "There is no hurry on our side."
Staff has requested to be contacted when Mr. Telleen ~s ready to proceed with th~s
pro~ect City Council has been made aware of this sRuation as well.
ARTICLES AND INFORMATION:
Photography as Visual Record• Documenting Change in the Built Environment
Saturday, September 20`h, 9am - Spm Cost: $125
Nataonal PreservaUon Institute • 2003-04 Sem~nars in Historic Preservation
Letter regaiding Amendment 34 and its potential negahve impacts on preservation
fundmg.
Memo to the Landmarks Preservatlon Advisory Board
Fie Historic District Designetion Work Group
MEMORANDUM
September 3, 2003
TO: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
FROM: Ruth McHeyser, Director of Long Range Planning
Bohdy Hedgcock, Plamm~g Associate
SUBJECT: Historic District Designation Process Review
The Landmarks Board has directed staff to move forward wrih a public process to consider issues
raised durmg the Umversity Hill designation effort regarding the historic district designation
process. The Board identified several organizations and groups with a stake in that process,
including existmg historic districts, potential historic districts, recognized third party organizations
with an interest in preservation and city staff Staff has contacted those various groups to request
representahves to take part in a work group that will assist m suggestmg and analyzing potential
code changes.
The representatives, and the group(s) they are representmg, are listed below. The first meetmg of
the group is scheduled for September lOth from 6- 9 pm. A draft agenda is included below.
WORK GROUP REPRESENTATIVES
~xisting Districts
^ Catherme Schweiger (Mapleton Hill)
^ Krysia B~lham (Hillside)
Potential Districts
^ Jan Otto (University H~ll)
^ Stephen Sparn (University Hill / Architects & Planners of Boulder)
^ Vicki Naber (Whittier)
Preservation Organizations
^ Margaret Hansen (Historic Boulder)
^ Betty Chromc (Narional Trust for Historic Preservation)
(Note: The two other organizations that have been mvolved in designation efforts m the past, the
Modern Architecture Preservation L.eague and the Colorado Arts & Crafts Society were also
contacted, but chose not to panc~ipate in this effort )
PUBLIC PROCESS OUTLINE
Staff has refined the general process originally described in the May 2003 staff inemo on the
subject
Idenitfy issues and concerns regardmg the designation process
S\PLAN\data\Comdev\HISl1GEN\Code changes\Designation Process\LPAB MEMO 09 03 03 doc
Memo to the Lantlmarks Preservation Atlvisory Board
Re Historic Dlslrict Designetlon Work Group
2. Form a group of stakeholders with an mterest in the designation process and hold a limited
number of ineetings to identify issues and make recommendahons to the Landmarks Board
for code and process changes.
3. Hold an open house for presentatron of options to the general public and to gather addrtional
feedback.
4 Hold a Landmarks Board public hearmg to consider recommendations from the work group
and make recommendations to City Council for specific changes to the Historic Preservation
Ordinance.
DETAILED PROCESS OUTLINE
April - May 2003
Staff presented memos to the Landmarks Boud at their April and May meerings that outlined a
variety of concerns related to the historic district designation process that were raised during the
effort to designate the University Hill Residential District The Board asked staff to move forward
wrth a public process, as outhned m the May memo, includmg forming a work group of
stakeholders m order to identify additional issues and potential code changes
August 2003
Identify stakeholder groups and representatives
• Existmg Historic Distncts (Mapleton Hill, Hillside)
• Potential Historic Districts (Umversity Hill, Whittier)
• 3`d Party Preservahon Organizations (Historic Boulder)
• National Trust for Histaric Preservation
• City Staff (Historic Preservahon, City Attorney)
• September 10, 2003 (6 - 9pm)
Meeting 1: Introduction / Issue Identi~cation
6:00 - 6:15 Welcome and introductions
6:15 - 6.30 Overview of historic preservation program and ordinance
630 - 6:45 Review of issues raised by University Hill des~gnation apphcation
6:45 - 7 15 Scope and ouflme of current effort (review designahon process)
Role of the work group
Other preservation code changes bemg considered outside of this process
7.15 - 7:45 Review of current designation process
How Boulder's designation process compares with other communities
7•45 - 8:00 break
8:00 - 8:50 How could the designation process be improved?
What specific changes to the code are necessary to implement those improvements?
8:50 - 9:00 Review and Next Steps
Remainder of September 2003: Staff prepare draft code change options for review by group
(distribution prior to meeting 2)
• Meeting 2: Review/Analysis of Options (Week of October 6`n ~)
1. Review of issues and options identified at Meetmg 1
S.\PLAN\data\ComdevlHIS11GEN\Code changeslDesignation Process\LPAB MEMO 09 03 03 doc 2
Memo to ihe Landmarks Preservatlon Advisory Board
Re Historlc Dlstrict Designation Work Group
2. Presentation of potential code changes
3. Review and analysis of options
4. Suggested revisions
^ Meeting 3(if necessary): Additional Review/Analysis of Options (Week of October 20~' ?)
^ Meeting 4: Public Open House (Week of November 10`n ~)
Presentation of potential changes to the Preservation Ordmance at a public forum.
^ Meeting 5: December 3rd LPAB Meeting
Presentarion of staff recommendation and other options for LPAB consideration
Recommendation by LPAB to CC regarding potential code changes
^ 2004: Presentation of code changes in the form of ordinance amendments to City Council
Staff would appreciate any comments or suggestions on the proposed process and agendas durmg
discussion of this ~tem at the Board meeCmg.
S\PLAN\data\Comdev\HISl1GEN\Code changes\Designation Process\LPAB MEMO 09 03 03 doc
Memo to the Lantlmarks Preservation Advisory Board
Re 2003-04 Work Program
MEMORANDUM
September 3, 2003
TO: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
FROM: Ruth McHeyser, Director of Long Range Plannmg
Bohdy Hedgcock, Plannmg Associate
SUBJECT: 2003-04 Work Program and Retreat Follow-Up
PURPOSE
The purpose of this memo is to provide a summary of the work program ~tems identified by the
Board at their retreat held on August 9, 2003. Overall, the Board mdicated two key focus areas
for work over the next year: improving our educational actrvrties and outreach to the community
and continuing an update of the Historic Preservation Ordmance, inciuding reviewmg the historic
dtstrict designation process. Of course, the essenlial functtons of the program, includmg review
of alterahons and demolitrons, the m~t~ation and review of ]andmark designations, coordmation
wiYh other ciYy departments, the responsibilities associated with our CLG standing, and Yhe
pursuit and admmistration of grant pro~ects will all be continued. Both the Board and staff
indicated a need to review these functions m order to ident~fy areas that could be handled more
efficiently given current budget and staffing challenges.
2002-03 WORK PROGRAM & ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The Landmarks Board completed many important pro~ects between July 2002 and June 2003. A
complete list of those accomplishments is attached (see Attachment A• 2002-03
Accomplishments). Some highlights of items from the 2002 work program that were completed
include the adoption of changes to the Downtown Design Guidelines, completion of the General
Design Guidehnes, completion of the 2001 and 2002 CLG grant pro~ects, and the imtiation of a
fee to recover some costs associated with the review of non-designated buildings for demolihon
EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
All Board members and staff seem to agree that this uea deserves significant attention over the
next year. Several pro~ects already underway will better our ability to provide consistent,
valuable informahon about the preservahon program to the pubha These include our cunent
grant pro~ects to produce new handout materials about the program and the production of an
educational video about preservation m Boulder, as well as the updatmg and upgrading of the
program website.
In addirion, Board members made several suggeshons for more informal outreach achvities to
stakeholder groups and decision makers Specifically, Board members were encouraged to meet
with city council candidates to brmg them up to date on the program, policies and future goals.
Staff will piepare a list of "talkmg pomts" that highhght some of our current pro~ects that can be
referred to in these conversations. In addriion, better communicaUon between the Board and a
number of other organizations was seen as an ~mportant goal foi the next years. Retreats or study
sessions with members of the Plannmg Board and the Downtown Design Advisoiy Boaid were
suggested. Better coordmation wrth Historic Boulder is also required. Regulai meetmgs
Memo to the Landmarks Preservatlon Advisory Board
Re 2003-04 Work Program
between the Landmarks Board and with the Historic Boulder Board were requested More
coordmation with neighborhood groups in both potential and designated districts is also needed.
Providmg more mformation about the program and Boulder's histor~c resources was also
suggested. Possible pro~ects include more "how-to" warkshops for the public, similar to the one
held on wmdow restoration and repair last year and revivmg the walking tour program and
mcluding the walking tour mformatton on the city website.
CHANGES TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
The first steps in our public process to review the district designation process have already
begun. A separate memo details that process. In addition, a number of other potential changes to
the ordinance were suggested and should be considered over the next year. In particular,
potential changes to the demolition review section of the code may be needed as more and more
of Boulder's housing stock reaches the 50-year threshold The Board clearly stated that large
areas of the city developed in the 1950s should not be subject to Landmarks review for
demolition. Martin Acres is the most obvious example.
REFINEMENTS OF CURRENT BUSINESS PROCESSES
Several suggesrions were made regardmg how current practices could be improved. Some of
these suggestions that will contmue to be explored by staff mclude:
^ grvmg direct and clear feedback at DRC meetings, and followmg-up with formal comments
m wntmg for comphcated pro~ects
^ mstituting a standard process for engineermg or other speciaLst review when necessary,
possibly mcludmg adding the cost of that review into the demolition fee
^ reviving the Structures of Merit program, possibly designating a specific month to handle the
designation of SOMs, makmg it an annual event wrth a theme
^ improve the coordmation between Landmazks review and plannmg review
^ improve the coordmation between Landmarks Board and BOZABA
^ better define the process for reportmg and following-up on enforcement issues
POTENTIAL GRANT PROJECTS
The apphcation deadline far the next round of CLG grants is November 17~' The Board suggested a
variety of potent~al grant projects aC the retreaC We need to pnontize these potenrial pro~ects, listed
below, so that staff can begm researching them and prepanng the grant application
^ Impacts oF historic designation on pioperty values in Boulder
• Economic impacts of histonc preservation on Boulder's overall economy
^ Survey of designated structures to identify those m need of considerable mamtenancehepair
^ Survey of accessory structures in designated districts
^ Resurvey of vernacular buildmgs to piovide more detailed information on style, form, etc.
NEXT STEPS
Please review the above list of items If there are any other work program items that were
om~tted or you would like to suggest, please be prepared to discuss them at the September
meetmg Also be prepared to address the relative priorities of the potential grant projects
A: 2002-03 Preservation Program Accomplishments
B. 8/03 LPAB Retieat Notes
Memo to ihe Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
Re 2003-04 Work Program
ATTACAMENT A
2002-03 City of Boulder Preservation Program Accomplishments
(July 2002 - June 2003)
1 Issued 303 Landmark Alteration Certificates; 15 approved at public hearing.
2. Issued 72 demolrtion permits for non-landmarked buildmgs over 50 years in age. Called-up
10 applications to public hearing, one of which was withdrawn by the owner (787 16`n
Street).
3. Designated eight individual landmarks•
Hohday Dnve-In Sign
Anderson-Martm House
Fox Theater
Boulder Oil Field's McKenzie Well
Pietenpol House
Dasy Grocery
Chauncey Stokes House
W H. Pool and 5on Blacksmith Shop
4 Expanded three existmg historic districts:
Mapleton Hill Historic Distnct (enlarged by 88 properties)
Hillside Historic District (enlarged by 1 property)
Downtown Histonc Distnct (enlarged by 1 property)
5. Reviewed and approved 5 sCaYe tax credit final apphcations; total rehabilrtation costs
$524,02114; total state income tax credits. $103.937.69.
6 Reviewed and approved 4 state tax credit preliminary applications.
Completed the 2001 Certified Local Government Grant from the Colorado Histortcal Society
for the re-survey and evaluation of the Uruversity Hill residential district. Held an open
house foi residents and the public on the grant project and historic district designation.
8 Initiated and completed the 2002 Certified Local Government Grant from the Colorado
Historical Society for the photographic documentation of designated landmarks, mcluding
accessory buildmgs, for the city webpage.
9. Applted for the 2003 Certified Local Government Grant from the Colorado Historical Society
for the produchon of an educarional video and for the redesign of prmted materials.
10. Coordinated and prmted the 2002 Historic Preservation Week brochures.
11. Passed code change which revised the defmition of "demolition" pursuant to Sechon 10-13-2
of the B.R.C. 1981.
12. Passed code changes which revised Section 10-13-3 (discontiguous historic district) and 10-
Memo to the Landmerks Preservatlon Advisory 8oard
Re 2003~04 Work Program
13-14(3)(b) (Staff review of application for Landmark alYeraCion Cerhficate) of the B R C.
1981.
13. Approved changes to the Downtown Design Guidelmes as ad~umstrative regulations; now
available on the Historic Preservation Program webpage; application forms available on-line.
14. Prepared final draft of General Design Gutdelines for Local H~storic Districts and Indrvidual
Landmarks. (adopted July 2003)
15. Held LPAB 2002-2003 work program study session.
16 Participated m training workshops/conferences
Hosted a workshop on historic wmdow preservation and restoration for the public
Second annual Boulder County preservahon commissioner workshop (staff &
three board members)
CAMP commissioner training workshop at CPI conference (one staff & three
board members).
17 Held two neighborhood meetings with residents of the 2300 block of 4~~' Street to constder
historic district designation.
18 Instituted a fee to help recover some costs associated with ieview of non-designated buildings
older than 50 years.
Memo to the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
Re 2003-04 Work Program
ATTACHMENT B: 8/03 LPAB RETREAT NOT~S
• Board members should meet mformally with City Council candidates to educate them on
Landmarks goais and pohcies
• Consider perception of 180-day stay as well as results
• 56% of time spent on "changing" landmark properties (LACs and demos) - this doesn't
match public perception that we are only trymg to prevent change
• Need better coordmation with Historic Boulder (retreat with HB Boazd?)
• Communication materials (websrte, handouts, video, etc)
• Get Martin Acres off the table
• Video suggestions.
^ Show mterior renovations as well as exterior (modem kitchen, bath, master br)
^ Energy conservation
^ Tax credits
^ Examples of comprom~ses that work
^ Economic impac[ of preservation (to mdividuals and community)
^ Importance of using professionals (architects, engmeers, contractors)
^ Dave Naber
^ Ray & Mia DeLong
^ Leland as Board rep m discussions with consultants
^ Mixed use pro~ects l~ke 12 Maples and Via Broadway
• Design Review Committee:
Clear direchon is most impartant - especially at begmning of process
Provide DRC comments after meetmg (at least for complicated projects) - allows them to
be reviewed by DRC members and to reference speci~c design guidelines
• Professional consultants (e g., engineers).
Worth the money, when we have it
Can we identify qualified consultants and refer property owners to them - preferably early
in the process?
On demolrt~on projecCs that will include arguments about restorahon costs and building
condition, can we include a fee for the engineermg report in the demolition fee~
~ Communicatron:
o Need better overall commumcation with Historic Boulder, City Council,
neighborhood groups
o Prepare a list of talkmg points about the preservation program and its benefits for
Board members to mention m conversations with Counc~l candidates
i.e., tax benefits, code changes
o Annual retreat or study session with Plannmg Board (possibly in place of ex-officio
member)
Memo to ihe Landmarks Preservatlon Advisory Boartl
Re 2003-04 Work Program
District designations are on hold until complehon of code changes
o Focus at this time should be on laying the ground work for future designations,
includmg better public educarion and addressmg the suggestions raised through Uni
Hill such as pursuing individual landmarks and National Register recognitron
o Evaluate Whittier to see if there are smaller sechons that could be designated, rather
than the entire potential district
o Educatton materials that describe types of work that is allowed (examples)
• Structures of Merit Program:
Select a theme and present report annually (i.e. SOM Month)
• Specific Project Comments•
o Drive In Marquee
o Follow-up wrth 4`~' Street neighbors
o BVSD issues
• Interaction/Conflicts with other plannmg issues and codes
• Potential grant projects•
economic impacts of preservation in Boulder
structures m need of care (demo by neglect)
accessory structures
resurvey of vernacular buildings with more mformat~on and distinctions
• Better define the process for enforcement issues
• Include walking tours on website
CITY OF BOULDER
~~~ ~ Planning and Development Services
~ / 1739 Broadway, Third Floor P O Box 791, Boulder, Colorado 80306
~ phone 303-441-1880 fax 303-441-3241
August 19, 2003
On July 2"~ the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board adopted the General Desagn
Guidelanes for Local Hestorec Dtstr~cts and Indivzdual Landmarks as admmistrahve
regulations.
The purpose of the design guidelmes is to provide the owners of h~stonc properties
direction m making decisions about improvements to and maintenance of their homes
while also providing the Landmarks Boazd with a framework for evaluating those
proposed improvements.
The General Design Guadelines will serve as the guidmg document for present and future
residential historic districts and for mdividual landmarks. Many of oui current hisYonc
districts, mcluding Mapleton Hill, aiready have district-specific guidelines. Those
guidelmes will now supplement the Ceneral Design Gu~delanes We plan to work with
the Mapleton Hill neighbors m the future to identify and mtegrate district-spec~fic
guidehnes into the General document as an appendix
The General Des~gn Guidel~nes are available onlme at
http ~//www.ci.boulder.co.us/buildmeservices/historicpres/drafteeneuideltnes.ndf
Prmted versions are also available from the Planrung Department's offices on the third
floor of 1739 Broadway (the cornei of Broadway and Arapahoe).
Questions and comments about this new document are welcomed.
Bohdy Hedgcock
Historic Preservation Planner
City of Boulder
HedgcockB@ci bouldei.co.us
(303) 441-4293
~, CITY OF BOULDER
~~/~„ Planning and Development Services
`' 1739 Broadway, Third Floor P O Box 791, Boulder, Colorado 80306
~/h'~/
L phone 303-441-1880 fax 303-441-3241
August 19, 2003
On 7uly 2"d the Landmarks Preservahon Advisory Board adopted the General Deszgn
Guidelanes for Local Historic Districts and Individual Landmarks as admmistrative
regulattons
The purpose of the design guidelmes is to provide the owners of historic properties
direction m makmg decisions about improvements to and maintenance of their homes
while also providmg the Landmarks Board with a framewark for evaluating those
proposed improvements
The General Design Guidelines will serve as the guiding document for present and future
residential historic districts and for mdividual landmarks Many of our current historic
districts already have district-specific guidelmes, which will now supplement the General
Deszgn Guidelines
The General Design Guadelines are available onlme at~
http.//www ci.boulder.co.us/buildingservices/h~storicpres/draft~engwdehnes.pdf
Prmted versions are also available from the Planning Department's offices on the third
floor of 1739 Broadway (the corner of Broadway and Arapahoe).
Questions and comments about this new document are welcomed.
Bohdy Hedgcock
Historic Preservation Planner
City of Boulder
HedgcockB @ ci.boulder.co.us
(303)441-4293
~ University of Colorado at Denver
Professionnl Developmen[ Program+
College of Archrice[ure and Plamm~g
~ PHOTOGRAPHY AS
~ VISUAL RECORD:
Documenting Change
in the Built Environment ;
I With T John Hughes ~
' ~~ '~l~l~~ N
~__ v,~.w~~~ .~,~ ~ ~~°`i,~~
-.~,z;.~ , ,~~~r ~~ x .~- ~M' ~-`~
P '
Oenver's Pla[[e Valley from ehe
Wes[, 199] ~ T dohn Hughes
Befure iYs too late . . .
If you wait for someone else to photograph your community's everchanging archRectural herltage, chances
aze, It wlll never happen And, like images missing from a family album, photos of your communlty's past
cannot be recreated
Although photogrephy has played a central role m helping us record our bullt enwronments, rt is stlll a
s~vprisingly underutlllzed preservatlon tool
Most communrties have some histoncal pho[os But how many communities are currently engaged in making an
ongoing photograph¢ remrd of the changes m their surround~ngs~
Today, many Indivlduals seek to preserve their family storles m more organized ways through wntten words,
oral histones, photos and wdeos Shouldn't our communities do the same7 History is being made now, 6ut the
questlon must be asked, "Who's recording rt~"
Something is wrong with this picture or should we say lack of pictures And it Is actually not so difficult to
do something abouc It Almost any communlty -- even those wrth the extremely limRed resources - can begm a
photographic documentapon pro7ect
Consder this course the "starter krt" for undertaking a photographic pro]ect In your area
Among topics that will be uddressed;
- 8asm prmuplu and gwdelmes for
be9inning photo documentation
- Makmg "rephotogrophy" a part of your
pra~ect
- Deuding whaT to phatogroph
- Taking inveniory of ewsting histormal
photography of your community
- Important resources ovailable to you
- Developmg addrtional resources m your
community
- What makes a successful photograph~
- Camera aphons
- Lighting and composition
- Film or digrtal~ -- dealing wrth rapid
technologmal change
- Exteriors and mteriors
- Working with professional
photagraphers
- Archrving
- Displav optians
Pormat and Approach
Class wlll be comprlsed of
lectures, dlscusslons,
examples and case studies
Participants wlll visit some
sltes included in the Cityscape
Panorama ProJect and
eKamine images
photographed bythe
mstructor
' , ~r~-, ~ ' ,
`' i# ` . '1y~~ _ aw~~-- '_~'~ffLz~l~p~ r "
~~~ ~~ i3r`~~FK«+.Y6qFf~ ~~1 ~P ~~~~fw4~
Denver's Platee Valley from che Wese, 199"! '~ T ~ohn Hughee
Who should attend7
The course is relevant for architects, landscape archrtec[s,
planners, developers, preservationists, historians, educators, and
other indrviduals worWng with mumapal governments, plannmg
departments, parks departments, preservatlon societies, libraries,
historical organizations, educatlonal Institutions and
nzightcrhood organizations
Date and Location:
Saturday, September 20, 2003, 9 AM - 5 PM
College of Architecture and Planning, Univers¢y of Colorado
at Denver, 14`" and lanmer Street, Downtown Denver
Course Fee and Registration. $125
A registration form can 6e obtained by contacting
Professwnal Development Programs at the College of
Archrtecture and Plamm~g, UCD, Send an e-mall request
to ~anis nowlan@cudenver edu, or call 303-556-3954
s eu~ :~s~m::o-~r `
- ~:,3:: ..G^ ~` a
:::~~IiI':~.^~:C: _
re '
Denver s Pla[[e Valley from the West, 200J ~ T Sohn Hughee
University of Colorado at Denver
College of Archi[ecture and Plamm~g
Campus Box 1?6
P O Boz 173164
Denver, Colorado 80217-3364
"'•'••'••]-DIdIT B03
OEON WOLFENBARaER•
BOULDER LANOMAHKSPREeERVATION BOARD
1739 BPOADWAY, FOURTH FLOOR
BOULOER CO 80302
gfi?f~_ r__~. ~~
PHOTOGRAPHY AS V ISUAL RECORD:
Documenting Change in the Built Environment
September zo, 2003
,_
L~: ~~_ I_ ---
~--- _
1 P 1
Non-Pro6t Org
U S Postage
Paid
Baulder, CO
Permit Number 257
~~v~i~~imi~~i~~niu~i~i~~uiiL~t~ii~m~~~i~ii~r~w~~ii~
~ Continuing Educatlan:
i Particlpan[s who successtully
~ mmplete Ihis caurse wlll be
' awarded a certificate of
~ complebon an0 earn 7
- ~ Conhnuing Edutation Unl[s
~ (CEU's) Also available, as
,~ ~ apphcable, are 7 LearNn9 Units
~ ~ (LU's) [hrough the Ame~l[an
Instltute otArchitec[s
19
OFtaed [luougli UCD ti
College ot A~clutectwe .uld Pl:wung
Protc..~s5~on.d Dc~~elopmatt P~c~s~:um
~
~ , ~ {'' „r _' ', + "~ ~~
19"' antl Wynkoop ~enve[, 1999
For informatlon on this and other courses, vlsit:
www cudenver edu//Aandp/s0ecial_programs/pro_dev h[ml
(Check out "Professional Pro Ieci Management" - scheduled for November 2003)
About The I~structor
T. John Hughes has been a pract~c~ng arch~tectural photographer for the past twenty years H~s
cl~ents mclude architects, mter~or des~gners, construction mmpan~es, developers and adverhs~ng
agenc~es Since 1985, he has been a faculty member of the Art Inshtute of Colorado where he
teaches "Architectural Photography,"'Photo History" and "Photo Des~gn" Addihonally, he has
taught basic and advanced photography for the Umvers~ty of Colorado undergraduate and
graduate arch~tecture programs Mr Hughes ~s the creator of "Cityscape Panoramas;' scheduled
Eor a public showmg September 5 through October 12, 2003, at the Art Inshtute of Colorado, 1200
Lmcoln, Denver The exh~bit ~s a collection of extra wide photographs of downtown Denver
taken m 1992, 1997 and 2002 from the same vantage points Th~s critically acclaimed pro~ect
mvolves fascinattng ~mages of c~tyscapes and streetscapes that dramatically demonstrate
Denver's changing fabric
Visit his website at --www asmpcolorado arg/members/hughes/hughes himl
r - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _~
~ Registration Form ~
~ Registrahon Infarmatron ~
~ Ni~i.vaunn n rcio~nmended et I~ n~ fi wxki pnor Io thi ~
~...inmeno.ttum e pia~e md ~o awid ianwile~inn dua m ~
~ Iowuirollnun~P.ymentlb~che.Aorae~~«.Wlorremip~ ~
' ot a vainmt wmhvlpuahe~e nrder ~. duc pnor ~o ~he I
'.emma~ R~(und..uc madz on1Y fiv oa~cJlauon. nurve~ I
1 w~cA~ pnoi 0.uhc wnm.v Re~n~r nb rau~e e luil rctnnd
~ tl ~he.cm~nar ~. uni~iled Fy ~PI ~
~ Semmar LocaGOn, Hours, antl Notels ~
~ Cnnfirnunnnolnentreuann.~mawb.enWorldxnne ~
~ mnmh pnnr ~o ~he xmm rt da~c nnd mdud~~ ~M1~ Icw+lion ~
I Mmr~ and a lie of wmcmen~ly lir~~id hnich Sannn ~n ~
I ~..nuallVrt~hildlmmYanlmSpm I
I Vem I
I Tille I
I AtFili ihon I
I Addre.~ I
Cny_ 9e~c_Gp
~ 1J Fu ~
~ ~ mul ~
~ Seminar Locat~on Date(s) Twtion ~
~ I
~ ~
~ To[al 5 ~
~ Turtwn ~
~ Rai~. cf(~iuve for regi.~ntiun. recervut throu_h i
~ Dicimtv:r :I 20(}t R nu apph tnr.eminan mAen wrthm I
I.1 ~-1~1\ IIIII~ ~1Lf1111~ ~IICVIIIII~ 1111y ~l~ .1Y~11IJnI~ Kh~ll
n~~nn~ (our ur more partiup~nh kom ~h~ .anie
~ orsanv~tinn lar onc wminsr Rate. m hrdik~t. apply io
~ fullonn.wtlLnnwilhvAitl~denuGmnun
~ 7 1 dav b'_'_i l81'_5~ ^ 1 d.ry. $6]5 ($.,'*IS)
~ O 2Uey.Si]SISI]~) ^ iday.SV?Sla3'il
I O 3w~.$i^_Sl5°15) ^ 6ary.S9~i(Sv']Sl
~ Paymenl
' ~ Che~Ap~~ebl~~othiNaM1UnalPresenahnnlmh[ute
~ ^ T~~~~~~, ~o~~n~dr~.~n... ~,me~
^ V~~ ^ MenIDrC vJ ^ Am~nc m Expre.+
~ Card# HxpJ_
~ -
~ (~nIM1~IJcr.Nain~ tii nawi~
~ CertL[ale
~ ^ Piw.~~p+d u.sofiietund~euun_~an~plrawnulirvinm~
~ Cimlurtuv~maJedout~tthccndolcahwmaicr
~ AIA/CES
~^ A. an 41A mrnitx.r 1 wuuld Lk~ w rciuve liamm~
I unibPor[hceli~,iblepro:rsm(.7L~t~diMn~
I AIA memlui #
~ Please retum Ne comple[etl form to
~ Nahonal Preservation Inshtute
~ PO Boz1702 Alexantlna VA22313-1702
~ Ouesttons~
I 7037650t00 mfoQnpi.org www.npiorg
L___________________
Cooperahng Orgamzations
NPI e.~nely .mk. pann~n io hold ~cm~wn in ionluncbun
wrth iwdircme~ ar pmgrem. and ~u p~nvWe p~oLL.~wn J
vunm~ arm. ~h~ imn[ry n~finn< <mpuatin_
mvaunn. .mlt end ~mtl.nt~ veluebl~ ti unin,
nppormnmc~ Ccropea~m~ orgnnivauum wurf, w nh NPI M1~
pm.i~m~~cmmar.~eie aoaio~nudic4wpman co~~ inA
e.harmg anJ/o~ prmm~uon th~ou,M1 .h ~ud m Wng
l~~MII
end c maJ L+b nnd web Inon~. Fnr mm~ inlunnevun
~ma~i NPI it ]114 ]6501Ip or mYn@npi ac~
AIA Atai niLU ~~ Alix~nJn ~ 4nM1~cola~v ltm Ce~ ul
Alic~vdmsµe~ •AluNneP..~TM1m .nln.iu~lm
(n.neiiollln~~ mtlArm~R~rti..lVQ~~T~iAmunm
~muwl~a~ d¢h~n (\I41 ~.\rtL~nib~ w In. ~ uu nt dm uu•
A.exw .n nh~Pre~cr•a~ i N Wa i~(nn_ ..u~nal(.mi v
• Hmmn S~x oiY ~~t Anhm ~JA1 A~(ddw ~ 0.p~iu ~ ul
Immpm •(emPM1vllCin~tlnrHn.iiPi~v~ilionSUWa
Ch~om Farmlauun Inc .( olandn Prt u~ mnn Im ~ Culw~ d
Lund.upeFoundahu dhp.rninui nlH~v ~ndRUliilliWu.
~3nFop Mmeum ~ I dcnl (umnnin'iuunn.6 r\~r..~eua~ ~ Hieni
Ca~~li Cdilunue Su~i N~d~ ~ Ili4nnc Pm.in wou Ra isin
Iry~ i olHevu~Jid.ovilleHnanePm.ir. ~o(~.~ ..inn
•1 ¢k~nmJ4 Yl w~m^mil IkuJupnnm Dcl~~~tmuu~ W n..~Jn._m
Po. ~n~il Cun nn.ion ~ M1luui ~ bu u Arth nnlo_> . u.A.i
Hni .uc J Mmu wuv ~ Y inon ~I ( onlouii. ul 1~ u~H~aoi m
Vr~..rveuunOlluuvNuuo~idPuAlmui 41MeSUpMmOL¢c
Hmm~c LnWwery Imw nc Nenhwa Reuw n I P.¢Jn Pw
Rcz •4~enMTrm~larHnuuiPnwn~n~~1'mur.e.iAU.n
. ~i~.en.u nn Snn ¢Fix.{.. TM1.. Pa.W~n Trni. DuM1hv. Hnw ~
Pra inD~yunnenkolHnluryAnu~mSUiUiu~.q~OmuWi
iMn,~n,~ ~.a~.~,~ ~ay, ~m~„ ~„aF~m~.<~..,~~r~~.
\ui6u~ • fti. v S Ru ..n GM1~Fm mJ Gmlu, .•
\w ~ Spnn ~ Prc n YuunW~ .. Mxi. ~ lur ( JJwnu
4a~~ieula~ ~1yu nFlentlTil~c (npwnilR..~n .NU i~. ~
OIL~ ~S~ei1ln~.n~+ISm~ nfNn m •`Srt~HnniW
Prc n~ inn Ol~u~ Anen~ie l[a¢ YvA. ~ T.~ i~ f)~p rt mu~ nl
9ri.ry~n •T.~e.Hn ulC~mm~nvan~USlu~vnnmunil
Pos.~u.n A~ n~Y R.~ ~ e Den.u
DonaUOns and Annual Grving
Campa~gns-#2391
NPI n e nonpruLt SOIpitM1) ~~ _ iatwn .uAmg
n.per mvc rciauw~hipti wnh mdn i~iuei. md or~ mv muu.
inmrnt~A in pmvWm~, funJine end a~h.r.uppou m
unJermnm .ihularsh~p npMmumn~. lor uur ~du~euuu d
pro_r im. m ~M1~ Geld. nt hi.wn~ pn.enabon mJ cWwi il
une m~n ~~umm
r ~PI n a p.mwpem m the Cnnservehon anJ Prenne~ion
Chanhes uC 4m~nea iampa~gn-1t3341 ( PCA i.
in~ludat m ih. ConibmW Fed~ml Ceinp n_n ~nd in ~nii~d
W iy .ulc unploycc mumupal ~ounrv ~ .ip anA
m~epcndint ~nr~ratc umpng ~ Mori iN~mm~ion i.
awJabiiacxwwnP~oro ]Oi"]6501W ormfu( npiui_
Scholarships
NPI o0en limttcd.i.halanhip oppnrtuniou Inr mmnn anh
m pamupant. to auen~ nc ~eminan Appi~~aunm s~
adaMe on-Ime a~ wwwnpi nrg or by iomaum__ NPI ai
']Ili ]6i 01(q ~nd mmt he recuval,u leaa 6 wttk. pnnr w
~Ac ~cm„ur
±i~
~
_ ' `- _ X" "`S"-«~~~`#.f..
-- . =IZ``:,
- 3~`i
~ r~ -
A6out NPI
Fnum4d in I4MOn+nanpruln or~aniuuan NPI n pmud ~n.erv~
~ n~o ~a.p.~~N~~„~r r.~,r ..~.,~~i. r~,m n~m m< <,~~rm~n~m.w
pn.~t..~cmnbY~mrvW~ngPrturvmm~~nLxinauon know4il<<
anJ .AJI. u. tum anG gmdi tM1c a~xaN~ n! hnmrn ~~xi wl WN
pla~ . i~rom M1~ i er. m hntom Pr~.erv~bnn a~W wlwr J
ttv~m~~m ~ ffn'Inlmfv/h~rm(nm~2ur t^muxnnp~nq
Scheduled Semmars
On-SAe and Customized Treining
~PI afhn al prnfe. nai ioimng . ~(or Nc
ne~~men~ J.~elnpm~m md pma. vaunn oFhntan~ ..ulrtin~
an~ <nvirnnm..nml rcvwrtm nWtN ~o M1n~oui Prcmrvauon mJ
wlinraimiwninuwFim~nL~ ird~un0~~^~~•+~~+ECnJn<
.~n M1e Inund n uww npi orp ~x by umia~un_ NPI ~Y PFnrc m
utl VPinll.nwuomm~ ~nJun-~im~vmm~mmiu~peuhc
nunwl m W. 'llu vinman LaW m iM1n FnYM1Un mav M.
iaJmeJm~rut..mel~ i rvIUOI~JaYwnrA.hn~n~~elix~uan
m~ u m ~o ~hvnq~ wr NPI ahn n devebp n w
pr~ n~u~n1rclahdvainm~a n Forfunhennio~mae~+nLUr
ro i c~rve i pmry~W ~omxi NPI at ]IN ~65 ~Iql uvmto@np~ a,
FacWty
NPI. u~M by n~nomllv magnrzi~i ~ducamr.
.ult~nnanJ~ eenunmb~ynmprearvauun mM1ambgY
.2hrt«wrc ~nd I~nEv.ap..nM1nn~ore ~ rvm~nn h~ww~wl
r~.anM1 rc raean aM wlwul ~. am VPI
~un
... iA. n~M1i in.ub.uwti s inarw~nr if n~x~ ary and w~ll
m~elv ngnnnJ p.~rou~wnt. xhuuver qi..~Mi
Nahrtdqmr.cn~Chede~A Bimh+um FASLA~JunC~rta+n
AIA ~ hmm~ A CnnmJ PF ~ JnAn 1 Cullmani AIA ~ Rik
tnl4r. Daµ GanFI~.IkM1i hlaiAer.Shvny Hutl J U PA D.
TTom n F KinC PM1 D~ WJbam L~M1mmM1. Barlvu H M1ie; id
•Inm+C Mwey.SA~du Naxwell.fi~rt ..MWae~,m~
Allon.o A N~rvne ~CI~uJu Nnd« ~ A4~ nJra 0 0.nmJl
• Lem Vr..~nn . U~vW 5 Rni.m~un PM1 D~ MuhdJ
TnnA4~ I'M1D ~)ceTmAa AICPCEP.OndvNJlunn.
N..M1.tw Yamm fT D. Liv Ynun~
Boartl of Directors and Staff
Oudi. W Slnan (T~rtm~n ~ E1win N FinJer AICP. RuA~rJ
Hryu PM1D AIA.RMx.nl Kapv.h.K~rcnR LmJyma~Nell¢
L Lon_ uonh ~ lamv. C Ma~~ev ~ 1 Bcm~rd MurpM1V PM1 D
AICP ~ H Matlxu Nox~knx.ki MSHP. Maa C W~nir •
L~M1n G Wan~ AIA~ThOme~ F Kmg Ph U S.nmrAJnvrranJ
tr~~ ~~~ c~~~,•mmm. arc ann« e>,.m~.e n~reuw
www.npi org
4nA nn YPI ~ u~F ~i~c-wwu np~ arg-lar
. sem~~,~~~ ,~M~~~~..~e,Er~~a~.
.Giwdareqingot'~Piw menhYmnmF
• Ri~~.vranon int~mmn~on m
. 1 mA. io CRSt ni~md w.F+n..
• (elinJarinen~,ol me~ormn4rcna~
• AIAUnumm~yE~luuuunSVU~m(AWCESI
• In~orn~uon~M1UU~NPIdnJCwpcrnm,~~~amiauom
. WeMM1nduwi.larwlwrvirc.minem~~u~u.
~ Tmil~ Inr Pr<rynn~ rv¢imwo amier Suunn I(N.
. NEPAIarHnmrn~Prv.enmoma~ inJGilwul
It~.v~ .~M~n
~ l.Fnlv.M1ipoppmum~n ~nJJunaunn.
Seplember 2003
Y- 10 S~a~mn ~IM A Ito~ex (ar
t.~~~ad rn.in~~~~.~
0.mu CO
in i~ ti..i~ i~n rn minau.mM
x,ni. wn
I I C Idcnhfiu4m~ antl M1lam4 mrnl nf
r.~,an~~~m~~ ~mm~,i iw«
Iknuir CO
Is IG In1e~nOnRCUllurelWwwrte~n
ntvna~mw~a~«
s..W. wA
m ix ~M.v.~~~..kmar~~~cmm~.i~~e
vx~v'el~.-.iun.~ ~n a I eF.l
tm nt
N'rhinym~ IlC
IV IY (nnwlldron~rLLhlMunTnLm'on
( niwul Rrmme Mue.
\~irinhn4~ CA
__ YxltlComervemnLn
AM.wn4ry;elsl (nmenahnn
N~mm~4 ~n~ '4m~ ~W
~IuvmKmnn Vl
- _ teuunu~anur~<M,.m~.e~~o
r« ~~rvn~~a ~n..
o~~,.,., ca
__ '_J ~¢a4nn IIM An Inlmdu~4an
Hnn.dnlu HI
_. 'J Frc14Cno~cnubnnfnr
1rtM1ea~l~,~w11 1n~L.t
Cnmen-~unn ~M MaM1AUImn
Nuum Vvrn.m W
~s .n iamoroa~~~a.ntie~~~~~or
IrMn~nml ( ulluml A~u+
HnnnWlu HI
Oclober
x a uv~~u~nrx.a~~..~tmeinw~~r.
ti.~a.m. r~~, me urn.nmi~n~~~ ~~r
Hntnnc Yrvpenm'9"
JnA.unnl4 II
~ ( emelery Pmarvahnn
Wn.h~nz~~~n I%
ie is mi„,,,+~n<~eu,~.<r~~~
o-e~.pM~n~ r~~rv.y.
}.~ r, ~~~.~,,.~ ca
Semmars at Conferences
~ NPISmnnanalCmle~m(psaM~rtqams
~ ~ NamevlConlerencea~Pteg~am ~o
inlumaMm m~lacl NPI o~ ga lo nxw np aq
P¢staa4an 8 Hmaval~on EzMENOn anE
Lm~¢r¢r¢e Boslon MA Apnl21 2i 2(106
8110 9 62 6 2 6] m~oWre9oremetluwm
~ ~vorauo~a~are~waiw~ wm
AIA/CE5
qlq pm¢rTanIn541u1¢oIF~cTi¢[fyCES
NPI is re~sie~e~ wil~ I~e imenFa~ InsL W~e
olArcl~Nect Can4nungEdu[aLOnSystem
aM ~s wmmilt¢0 b Oev¢lopmg Q~ali~y
ieamng aannres in accomarux w~m
AINCES ceM1ena Alq memOees will
rve6leamngun~~seaG~[Ny ~
1 ¢peygna~e0 ssmmars AIA ~
mbers can wm0~ete a sell
r¢p~Illortnlorol~etNGlym~~urs ~
is m rnm~a~.um.~um~n~~tt~im..t
x~
tmi~ ~cw
in nrr~,~a~~xrnc.r~v~~=~are.
Tim.mmunu-~[ nn. ~nd 6nvE~al
Yx~44es
Ihmu U)
I~ Am~uF1[wndllnin~ulmagnn•^"`•
S~n Fnr.n.n ( r\
~I _~ 4CLm~I1MH~~wtnVryMUleand
\Ynl~ ALnSmmts
rrmrc v
_T/ :M 4[W~OIMinIMn~tlui~un
AixM1~~nEa ~K
?] +v kre~~nl~ Anlnlnbrnenn
} in k~nuan U
ZY tll ItlenL~ lx~nmJMana} lof
o-,enN~~~m c mm~u~~.r
4mM1nu~c AK
Novem~e~
~ M1 VA1 PR\+npiRP\ APPL~ohum
~nJ R ymrcmem.
F1Wnnn NI
s e o.~~winrs...n.n~~rm.mm~~~..
YWMardi fw IM1e NeM1aUd~W~mn nf
NNnm Ymprtm"`"'
•~~ t..~.~..o Ca
I I HMnna 11ru~tum Ntµ~tlc•",'•
0.~•cr CO
11 I l y 1mn IIM An In~ndui~mn
MWiwn WI
iz np~~~.~,mx.,m..mn.~eu.~ay
AlumJne b\
R Ii HnlnruLmdx-ap~ ILnnmF
PI~~u4 mml vntl ( ul~unl
irnM1rapeNeport^'^"
Sen f r~nuaa C ~
c n r.~.~~e~~~~~~~~~~~,~«
6nJ~nlmEnry,~nd Prtvnm4
x.,m~~ x„aa~~e~°°,
Il~n.u CO
11 Ii ~[mn11MAMUUV4ir
c~~.r.~.ee r~~~e~~~.~
Kan~~Ory Kl
i~ ~5.~e~p~~a~Ram~jueuww
(nfAM11~YeW~T/[al eM IIM~~n~
Pmenauan IT~mi.
Ni.indna v,~
I~ Ix Inte•y-mnqlulturallL wrto~n
vf ra c~~mvw~..
W nliinlM1w D(
March 2004
z ~ }.te~~n iw~ ~~ mmm~.eo~
InA.nnvlle FL
ie ie hn~ vx~.~aaxra srv~•~e~~~n.
aMHrymremmt
MiM1nnyv dK
'_0 6rtvn]ln4;u.+furHUtanc
¢~~na~~w°°~
e~.m~~ uu
._ ?3 Ha5Nna11ruc~umN~P~~N~~~~J
rn,~..m.~~ rvi~~~u~~«
UnJaL~~WmF+nJ Prt+~mnp
IL.mn~ Nmldm4 •'°'• ~.~~~^nmW I
LnSnmm~ C4
Logrsncs
• OescnpOOns an0 agenEas Semma~
aex~m~w~s a~a aqe~aas fa~ ae ~w~a a~
wwvnpory orrm~IMNPIaI]031650tCp
• Sem~ ar formal T~e 5 r lorma~
uages Eizassan anEealiows ume ~o
ix.~ sv,es w wnKma~ ~~ es~ m me
s~w,o aamcmenrs rew.~ io ~ne .m~uwaa
wM rew y~Jk aM xmwlexje ~mmetlalHy
appucaoie ~o me w~rem co~~ems oi nre~~
o.qa~aam~swaKmz
• CeN~M1Calea NPI seminar Oar~ic~panls
ceNLCales a~ Ira~n~~ com0~elion
ai m:eme m me :emesier n req~es~ee
(SeeFe~rN2MnFwm~
'_~ ~J N1enlifoUOn~ntlR~Imh~mM
N~d-Jtl~-(enlurv Ruddmg~
IYNFI'YIU•"•"
SmUupU
') Il Sa~[I~on~IM \Re~~ewfw
t.x..~.fa rracoameR
H olm ~ i IK
Apnl
Il I5 4xhnn1lM Anlnimda~4nn
Cm ~n~un.o G
li IG 1e.unnJlpl~unPivnafn~
r~~ ~w~.G~w~~ rmm'i.
Naalnun WI
Ih 1> Own~,~M1eM.remryof~@Inlmnrc
NeMard~ for ~M1e Relu~d~ W~nm of
xotarn rmpen..°•,,•
Chiu~o II
xo m.nor~,e~~~.naF.n~~e~~~~~r
+ue-znm cMm~y n~ua~~ti
~wui~vm•,~^~•
ua.~on ualRSHI
'_II ~_ 4a~mm ~IM Hun ~n VepM~a[e mtl
\1Mi 14mmenle
Aa.lin l %
_ ~ }u cu~.m~~e~~~.nm m~~~ mn., ~m
Cm~u~.i xww.c~ t+.~
Se~lll~ W4
May
i 5 lnhonllM Nnw4~M~o1~a4anE
Wn1eAKrtemenL
$i nlli WA
1 A~fRVb~L~vIMH~vlnrtlnl~p,nlr••~~•
VnM1~u;h V1
~ fi PMI~WFVm~ntelxm~rlCUllurul
u.G •
r,~~n~~~~ rn
10 IJ Hotnna Pmpertv M1laneFemmt
~ mm a~m..,n. i~~ ~.u.m..~~~„
Fmrtn(unmv VT
II 1 1eaUUn11M I~nwtoNa}aWiLLantl
Wnte.l~JttmeMi
NaJiv.n \N
In la ~ntq,ne~¢CulmrelNwwr~om
~kPACwnplumr
s.,,~ o~~:,~ ca
'S ~(. InLLq,nhnFCUlturalHnaunnin
rvYPaCompiwm~e
0.mu CO
Semmars by Subject
Cuttural Resource Management Bas~es
AItaN ~bl~ Hommg and Hi.~an~ Pre.enanon' a~n..
Approwhe. to Hu~oriial Arih uologY
Conauluhon urth indun Tnb~s on CWmrd Resounc h+ui.
Hntonclrnd.~apn Plamm~g Mana~~m~m anJCW~ural
f.~nd~wp Rep~rti ~wu.
Idv.miGuuan anA Evaiwnon ol M~d-2(P Cinmry Bwldingti
1?tll-19]0 .~..v.
IdenbLi umn md Mana_ementofLaJioonal Culwral Plam.
Phoux4numnm mnn ot Culmral Ruource..i.m.
Wntm, and Cnaov~ Mnigauon fnr Archaml e~~ai and
H~.mn~ Pa.~.rvanon Pmlei~.
Laws antl PegulaLOns
CERCLA and NHPA CroNmaoon for SuperfunJ Srz~.
CRM Comphnni~ for Non-Spcculi+t+'
p~i mnaAme fnrQJmr I and Nawr J ftewunm m ~h~
LegJ Envrtonmem
Imieranng CWmrai Riwune~ in NEPn Co~npli m~e
~AGPR 1 anJ ARVA AppLi inom and Reyuv~m~nh
hEPA anA hHPACainp6anu for Tcie~mnmumuonm anJ
Broadu.t Fauhti ti
Se~uun 1(i) Cumphan~e lorl run.ry~rtatinn Pm~a~~
S~cnnn 10! An Imnwlucnon
Sewon I(Ki A Ruiew for Fxpincn~ed Prai~mon.n
Sunon I(16 How ~u;\isoaaii anJ Wme 4grcunem.
u,~~~ r~a~~~i ~~w u, r.~~««,~~«.«~i s~~r,~
Hislone Properry Management anE Oesign issues
Aui~vhdar and H~.roni Inmgnty .iix~.
Grcen Stni~_~~. for Hnmrn Bwl~inc~ ~~+~.+
HrteornPrupinvMena,cmem From47a~enahm5~.¢m~~i~.~.
H~.ronoSvuiWti.Rcp~rt AManaecmcntTawllnrHn~oni
ProFnr~n
Nu..ervauonAl~mtenmu Und.nianJmgenAPre~crvm~
Flnrom Awldin +,i+n i.
U~inc ~he Siircury nf th~ In~umr . S~anJard. lur thc
RchaAiWauonot HMnn~ Pmpemi. ~iv~r.
Curatioq Conservation, antl Stewardsh~p
A¢hecoWEiulCurnoun Can.evvmon andColla~ion.
Mana~cmmt'
ain~ary rre.ir. n~nn
RJA Cnn.crvauan torArihemiopnh 1
Con.irv mon Plamm~g m~d Fin~ 4id
F~cld Cnmwat~on lor Atthanilayia. ll
Anilai~Conurvanon mAS~abdv~non
Holiq~i SnwarJ.hip ul ihc Hiuou. Sne`
-lluv vmin in ~rc ~ml wm~nlly ¢~ednlN M1nl ~n ~~ uLMi n
vN wm~mn nr inaa M. oflenA in m u~waimn,
VPlvnun r~.h~~uli
~ook ror semmar descnpt~ons ana
agendas a~ www npi org
or contan NPI at 703 ]65 0100 / mfo@ npi org
Don't Turn Racetracks
Into Casinos
P 0 Box 18459
Denver, CO 80218
(720) 889-0804
August 21, 2003
DEON WOLFENBARGER
BOULDER LANDMARKS PRESERVATION BOARD
t739 BROADWAY ST FL 4
BOULDER, CO 80302-6220
John Dill, Chair
Dear DEON WOLFENBARGER,
Dana Abrahamson
Nan Anderson
On November 4~^, Colorado voters will be asked to vote on a controversial initiative that, if
William Arbogast passed, will have a severe nepative imaact on historic preservation and heritaae tourism withm
Richard Beardmore our state We urge you to vote NO on the measure and ask for your support to ensure its defeat
Tawney Becker
Patrice Berglund
A British gambling corporation, Wembley PLC, is pushing this initiative to allow placement of
Terry Blewns Video Lottery Terminals (VLTs) at five designated racetracks across the Front Range, four of
'
DeeAnn Blevins s Rhode Island operation at
which they own VLTs are Slot Machines (wsit Wembley
Stephen Blitz '~"~ lincolnparkri com), however, the machines will not come under the rules and regulations
Richard Carillo governing Colorado's gaming industry Instead, the racetrack casinos will be organized under a
Betty Chronic new agency at the Lottery Commission, and the proceeds will be split between the racetracks
Dawd Cohen and tourism promotion The initiative prowdes no funding for Historic Preservation or Heritage
Dan Corson Tourism.
Dana Crawford
Richard Cronenberger
Most alarm~ng is that this proposal will divert (many expect it to practically eliminate) money from
Monta Lee Dakin the State Historical Fund, an effect acknowledged by the supporters of this initiatwe
Dan Davidson Racetrack casinos will eventually be allowed to match the number of machines currently in use
Susan Davies at the limited stakes mountain casinos, meaning paminp enthusiasts will no lonqer need to leave
Lyn Deal their backyards and travel to Black Hawk Central Citv or Criople Creek As casino revenues dry
Jo Downey up in these gaming towns, so will state revenue from limited stakes gaming, funding currently
'
John Fielder s historic resources
used for the preserva4on and promotion of Colorado
Allyn Feinberg
Ellen Fisher Since 1993, the State Histoncal Fund has awarded over $125 million to more than 2,400
William Gary pro~ects, providing grants in all 64 Colorado counties In addition to helping preserve our
Friday Green irreplaceable historic resources, the State Historical Fund has served as a maior economic
Amy Guthrie catalvst within a larqe number of communities throuqhout Colorado The Fund has leveraged an
Elizabeth Hallas additional $6 million m private investments for every $1 million awarded for rehabilitation
Tom Hogue pro~ects. Colorado cannot afford to gamble away this important economic resource by allowing
Michael Holleran VLTs to replace the limited stakes casinos
Sally Hopper
Barbara Sudler Hornby
Wembley touts the VLT initiative as a"Tourism Promotion" measure Granted, while the larger,
Doug Johnson corporate tourism industry may beneft with national-scale marketing, others in the tourism
Bernedette Kelley industry are certain to be hurt Of the 2,400 pro~ects undertaken since the inception of the State
Vicky Kipp Historical Fund, the vast majority have had a direct tounsm connection. No other funding
William Koerner source reaches such a wide variety of projects - small businesses, Main Street buildings, arts
venues, museums, churches, schools, courthouses, etc. These pro~ects fuel Heritage Tourism
which brought 4 6 million people to Coloratlo in 1999 alone, generating over $31 billion in
expenditures These are real dollars that reach all areas of the state
Chris Koziol This VLT idea was not designed to help Colorado, it was designed to help Wembley. The
Constance LaLena measure was drafted by, and intended for, one company that owns four of the five race tracks
Rheba Massey Along the way, they threw a bone to the Colorado Tourism Boartl to find some political cover for
Nicholas Mathers their business plan On three different occasions Wemblev had the oqportunitv to "hold
Ann Mullins harmless" the State Historical Fund - that is to arotect it from beinp siphoned off bv the shift in
Ronald Neely business from mountain casinos down to the racetrack casinos - antl all three times thev said
Nancy Niero "no". Given that the casino market in Colorado isn't large enough to provide for both tounsm and
Dr Tom Noei historic preservation, Wembley chose the one they felt would provitle them with the greatest
Roberta Peterson political cover.
Gary Petri
Ann Pritzlaff This initiative is the largest expansion of gambling in Colorado's History, allowing 18-yearvolds to
Beverly Rich gamble. The state, not the racetrack owner, is required to purchase the VLT machmes (a
Mark Rodman taxpayer subsidy of $38 million) with replacement required every three years And, none of the
Melanie Roth five communities (Loveland, Commerce City, East Aurora, Colorado Springs or Pueblo) were
Jill Seyfarth ever consulted nor will they be compensated for the impact of the financial and social costs.
Barbara Sheldon
Frances Taylor This is it, friends Nobody can take away historic preservation monies without first going to a
Linde Thompson vote of the people Wembley is going to try We need to gear up to defeat this initiative, for with
Wallace Yvonne Toliette the current economic climate, we'll never recover this money if this measure were to pass.
Gary Trujillo
Kathy Verlo Please help us defeat this devastating initiative As preservationists, community leaders, and
Elisabeth Vinton heritage tounsm supporters, we need to get the message to Colorado voters that this proposal is
Leslie Walker NOT a new revenue source, but an effort to redirect funds from a program that has had an
Mark Werrnmont enormous economic impact in our communities across the state Please consider how you can
Dottie & Bob Wham contribute to spreading this message and return the enclosed card lending your support.
Linda Wheatcroft
Maxine Wheatcroft More information can be obtained by visiting www itsabiQlie com or calling Colorado
Preservation,lnc at303-893-4260
Thankyou
paid forby Don't Turn Racetracks Into Casmos, John Dill, Chair, www ItsAbiqLie com