HomeMy WebLinkAbout5B - Request to grant Landmark Alteration Certificate for an addition to the residence at 504 MaxwelMemo to the Landmarks Preservatlon Advisory Board
Re Request for Landmark Alteradon CerpBcate for 504 Maxwell
MEMORANDUM
February 4, 2004
TO: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
FROM: Ruth McHeyser, Director of T.ong Range Planning
Bohdy Hedgcock, Historic F'reservation Planner
SUBJECT: I2equest to grant a Landmark Aiteration Certificate for an addition to the residence at
504 Maxwell Avenue, within the Mapleton Hill Histonc District.
STATISTICS:
l. Site: 504 Maxwell Avenue
2. Zoning: LR-E (Low-Density Residentiat, Established)
3. Owner; Tami Simon
4. Applicant. Tami Simon / Kyle Callahan - Architect
BACKGROUND:
The planning department has received an apphcaUon for a landmazk alteration certificate to
construct an addrtion to the residence at 504 Maxwell, within the Mapleton Hill histor~c district.
When surveyed m both 1993 and 1996, the house at 504 Maxwell was determined to be
contributmg to the Mapleton Hill historic district (see Attachment A: Histonc Building Inventory
Records). While addirional work has been completed smce those surveys, mcludmg the upper
story addrtion and the "connector" between the original structure and the accessory structure at
the rear of the lot, the building mamtams significant historic integrity, particularly on the front
elevahon Staff balieves that the building is contnbuting to the histonc district.
The applicanYs architect met with staff and the landmarks design review committee to review
altemat~ve proposals. After the mihal review, the committee members indicated concerns
regarding the overall mass and scale of the house relative to the size of the lot and the possibil~ty
th'at the various additions would overwhelm the onginal structure and lot. A new proposal was
considered at a subsequent meeting which reduced the size of the addrtion, panc~ularly on the
ground floor. While the overall increase in square footage to the home is minimal, the members
of the committee referred the item to the full board for review based upon a concern that the
addrtion could have a negative impact upon the site and the histonc distnct. The home has been
added on to sigmficantly during previous remodels. There is concern that, while the incremental
impact of the current proposal may be minimal, the overall impact of the vanous remodels may
be bringmg the mass and lot coverage of the home out of character with the distnct.
The board may approve or deny all or part of an application for a landmark alteration certificate.
The board may attach condihons to any approval and may remand the apphcation to the
landmarks design review committee for final review and approval if necessary.
Memo to the Landmarks Preservalion Advisory Board
Re Request for Landmark Alteratwn Cerhficale for 504 Maxwell
DESCRIPTION:
Wlule the historic surveys state that the ongmal home was constnicted m 1906, staff analysis of
Sanborn maps suggests that the ongmal 1906 stnicture was replaced wRh a new buildmg
sometime between 1922 and 1931 (see Attachment B. Sanborn Maps). The lot origmally
measured approximately 37.5' by 180' but was subdivtded at an unknown date~, reducmg the lot
size at 504 Maxwell to approximately 37.5' by 95' The wood-frame dwelhng features a side-
gabled roof with a pro~ectmg front gable and denhl moldmgs at the cornice. The gabled ends are
shmgled, while the remamder of the home has hortzontal wood lap sidmg A covered front porch
is centered on the front elevation, supporied by tumed wood posts and brackets, and framed with
a simple wood ra~l balustrade The front door is paneled and glazed and is set slightiy off-center,
under the porch Wmdows are generally wood framed and double-hung. A shed-roofed addition
was added sometime after 1931 on the west elevation, behmd the side-gabled front portion of the
house That addrtion is v~sible m
a 1940 photo (left) Accordmg
to the surveys, the buildmg is
"an example of vernacular wood
frame architecture, commonly
found around Colorado afier
1860 Charactenstics mclude the
gabled roof, front porch
supported by tumed posts and
brackets The gable ends with
dentil trim and fishscale shmgles
are somewhat unusual "
A hipped-roof upper story addition was added over the rear port~on of the house m 1995 It has a
balcony on the south elevatron, accessed by French doors. That addrtwn was reviewed and
approved by the Landmarks Board at a publtc hearmg. An accessory butldmg at the rear of the
lot, also v~sible m the1940 photo but not evident on the 1931 Sanbom map, was converted mto a
bedroom and connected to the mam house by a flat-roofed "connector" m 1999 That alteration
was rev~cwed and approved by the Landmarks design review committee. Both the upper story
addition and the connector required vanances from the city's development standards which were
supported by the Landmarks Board (see Attachment C Exist~ng Conditzons Photos).
Development on the lot is consiramed by a vanety of development standards The small lot size,
comer location, and ad~acency issues require sigmficant setbacks that result m a buildmg
envelope of only 7 5' by 45', or 337 square feet The apphcant has provided diagrams detailing
this bu~lding envelope and comparmg rt with typical lots m the neighborhood (see Attachment
D Bu~ldang Envelope Comparasons). The entire by-r~ght bu~idable space is already covered ov
the ground floor and is parhally covered on the upper story In addthon to Landmarks Board
~ Subdrv~s~on records for the parcel are unclea~ The buildmg to the sou[l~, 2238-2240 5'~' Street, was constructed m
1924 and is md~cated on the 1931 Sanbom map That Sanborn does not mdtcate two separate lots, however
2
Memo fo lhe Landmarks Preserva4on Advisory Board
Re Request for Landmark Alterahon CerGficate for 504 Maxwell
approval of a Landmark Alteration Cerhficate, the apphcant also requires vananccs from
development standards regardmg the west setback and overall buildmg coverage The apphcant
has requested Landmarks' support for those variances, which could be tndicated by condihonal
approval of an alteration certificate
REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to constntct a 358 square foot addition to the home The addition would
mclude 45 square feet of new space on the ground Iloor, accommodatrng a new code-comphant
stairwell to replace the exishng spiral stair leadmg to the second floor bedroom On the upper
story, 313 square feet of new space would be added to allow for the expans~on of the existmg
master closet, a second bedroom, and a new bath. (see Attachment L Appl~cat~on and Plans).
The addrtion at the ground IIoor would replace the existmg glass doors that run the length of the
connector with a new wall and a pair of double-hung wmdows. The addrtion would enclose an
additiona145 square feet of space, allowmg room for the new stairwell On the upper story, the
existmg l~ipped roof would be overframed, creatmg shmgled gable ends above the existmg
hipped roof facmg to the north and west An existmg small wmdow m the upper story would be
replaced wilh a new double-hung wmdow matching the ad~acent wmdow m s~ze and details A
new upper-story balcony would extend over the exishng courtyard space on the west side of the
home Wmdows on the west elevation of the former accessory bwlding would be replaced w~th
double doors salvaged from the "connector" portion of the home. Materials would match the
existmg lap wood sidmg, wood trim, and shmgles throughout. East and north elevations have
notbeen provided
CRITERIA FOR THE BOARD'S DECISION:
The H~stonc Preservation Ordmance sets forth the standards the Landmarks Board must apply when
reviewmg a request for a Landmark Alteration Certificate (10-13-18(b), B R.C , 1981)
1 The proposed work preserves, enhances, or restores and does not damage or destroy the
extenor archrtectural features of the landmark or the sub~ect property wrthm an histonc
distrtct,
2 The proposed work does not adversely affect the special character or special histoncal,
architectural, or aesthetic mterest or value of the landmark and its site or the district,
3 The archrtectural style, arrangement, texture, color, arrangement of color, and mater~als used
on exishng and proposed structures are compatible with the character of the exishng
landmark and its site or the historic district
ANALYSIS:
The Board has adopted the General Design Guadelznes to help mterpret the histonc preservahon
ordmance Staff has analyzed the proposed new construct~on agamst relevant guidehnes The
foliowing is a discussion of those guidelines the proposal does not, m staffls opmion, meet It i~
important to note that the design guidelmes are mtended to be used as an a~d to appropriate
Memo to the Landmarks Preservahon Adwsory Board
Re Request for Landmark Altera4on Cer4ficate for 504 Maxwell
design and not as a checkl~st of items for compltance Lack of conformance wrth an md~vidual
guidehne is not necessanly reason for disapproval if the overall quahty of the proposal is in
keepmg with the ordmance cr~teria listed above.
-- - GUIDELINE I STAFF ANALYSIS CONFORMS?
~
Protection of Historic Structures and Site
41 The pnmary concern of the Landmarks Board m revlewmg add~hons to histonc structures ~s the protechon
of the ex~stmg structure and the charactei o( the srte and distnct
3 It is not appropriate to The overall effect of the several additions is to No
construct an addition that will overwhelm the original building and site
detract from the overall
historic character of the
principal building and/or
sde
Compatibilitywith Historic Structures
4 3 Introducmg new construchon that contrasts sharply wrth an ex~shng h~stonc structure or srte detracts from
the visual conhnuiry that marks our histonc distncts Addrtions should never overwhelm hwtonc
structures orthe s~te, in mass, scale ordetadmg
1 An addi4on should be While the new construc4on is sympathetic to the No
subordinate to the historic original structure, the combined effect of the several
bwlding, limited in size and additions is to overwhelm the original building and site
scale so that it does not
diminish or wsually
overpower the bwlding
2 Design an addition to be Materials and overall detailing of addition as proposed No
compatible with the historic is compatible with historic building, however, mass and
bwiding in mass, scale, scale may be overwhelming original building and site
materials and color
Compatibilitywrth Historic Srte and Settmg
4 4 Add~hons should be designed and located so that signibcant s~te features, mcludmc~ mature trees, are not
lost or obscured The size o/ the add~bon should not overpower the s~te or drama6cal/y alter its histonc
character
2 Locate new addihons on an The addition is pulled back from the front faGade No
inconspicuous elevation of However, because the home is located on a corner lot,
the h~storic budding, generally the west fa~ade is also very visible The addilion sits
the rear one back from the west building line but is still highly visible
4 Preserve a backyard area The small size of this lot makes outdoor space No
between the house and the particularly valuable The incremental increase in lot
garage, maintaining the coverage is minimal, at only 45 square feet However,
general proportion of bwlt given the already substantial building coverage, this
mass to open space found increase may not be appropriate
wdhm the area
Memo to ~he Landmarks Preservallon Advisory Board
Re Request for Landmark Alterahon Cerhficate for 504 Maxwell
4 5 2 Rooflines on additions should The decision to allow the upper story addition to rise No
be lower than and secondary above the original roofline was approved at public
to the roofline of the original hearing in 1995 The new addilion, however, would rise
building even higher in order to overframe the existing hipped
roof The overframing allows for the gabled roof forms
of the original house to be repeated throughout the
adddion However, d also increases their wsual impact,
particularly from the west and south
SUMMARY:
Many elements of the proposal are m conformance wrth the adopted design guidelmes, mcludmg
matenals, wmdow proportions and locahons, and general detathng The archrtect has done an
admirable ~ob addressmg the numerous constramts of the site, while keepmg the ma~onty of new
development withm the allowed buildmg envelope. Nonetheless, the threshold quesrion for the
board to consider ~s whether additional development on this lot is appropriate. While the proposed
addihon may better coordmate the currently disparate parts of the home, it also bnngs more visibility
to the upper level What was once a relahvely small one-and-a-half story home will now read as two
stories The impact in terms of square feet associated with fillmg m the void between the existing
upper story and the former accessory buildmg ~s mmimal, but the v~sua] impact appears sigruficant
The origmal buildmg will be largely lost withm the various add~tions
FINDINGS:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt ihe followmg findmgs;
The proposed work adversely affects the special character or special historical, architectural,
or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark and its srte or the distnct by overwhelmmg the
origmal histor~c structure and s~te
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The Plamm~g Department recommends that the Landmarks Board deny the request for a Landmark
Alteration Certificate for construction of a 358 square foot addition for the property at 504 Maxweil,
adoptmg the staff inemorandum as findmgs of the Board
Staff recommends that the Board offer the appl~cant direction as to whether some other approach to
modtfy the home m order to gazn addittonal space may be appropriate, and not restrict resubmiss~on
of a new apphcation that meets those standards.
ATTACHMENTS:
A: H~stonc Building Inventory Record
B Sanborn Maps
C: Existmg Condrt~ons Photos
D Buildmg Envelope Comparisons
E. Apphcation and Plans
Attachment A
Co~auoo M~ttaiut wc~trr
Offiq of Archwalopy ind Ni~tor~c Vra~ervatfon
1500 ~rod/y. Danwr, Cqlorado 80203
H14TORIC W11lDING IMVEMiORY RECORD
PROJECT W11~; yculAl~ 5larvey o1 Nittorie Plxes, ~Y;
1943 Boulder
CURREMT Yi11lDING MME:
ADDRESS: 504 MA%YELL AV
BOULDER CO A0306
NISTORIC NAME:
OISTRICi NAME: Mapteton N~ll
(ILM ROLL NO.: 93•5 NEGpTIVE MO,;
BY: Roxr 4hitecre 1
~ • :i ~ .. ~r \~[_/
NOi FOR FIELD ~ --
_ E1i0161e ~ ~irytM
_ Det. Mot Eltpibte ~ ~,~~f~~ p~
a:~
---__._
--._
CITY: STATE ID NO,; SBL396~
Boulder
OWER: DAVIS NICNAEL N i JULIA P
100 8 CIWlLES ST
BALTIlIORE IID 21207
TEIPORARY MO.: 1{61'25•i-OS•012
T0IMSHIP 1M kANGE 71Y SECTIqI ZS My 1/4 ~ 1/i
U.S.G.S. OUAD NAME: Baulder, Colo. ...-__
YEAR: 1966 (pRiV79) 1( 7.5~ 15'
elocr: ~ LOT(S>: 13•1ip
ADDITION: Nepletm YR. OF I~DplT10N: 1888
LOGTION OF MEGATIVES: DATE OF CqISTRUCTION:
.~ ~ - J k. ESTIMATE: 1900 ACTWL:
~ - 90lptCE:
Boulder Canty Asoeawr
~ . . ~
~ ~~ .n. ~ ~ ,~ ,- ~~ - USE:
/ ~ ^ ~ ' ~ < PRESENT:
~ ~ Residrnttal
~~ >
, / {"~ ~ NISTORIC:
-' Rea~dmttat
~
~-' _ ~" .~-,w
' -'i - '~ CONDITION:
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~_'~'- FAIRLLENT
~"~i. ~~ ^
x cooo
_ DETERIOpATING
~a' ~' EI(TENT OF ALTERATIONS:
_ - - ~ MINOR X IqDERATE
DESCRIBE: ~~~
' _ Nsjar inlerior renndel mp; roofinp;
': ~ 3 ~,- netal chianey: ekyliphts; west-~ide
.~,~(~~ ^~ wmdow. Gsrape rww cwlverted to
~ ^ ` y ~
v ~ r • ~YV ~r~t•
._.~~~_ - ~ -'~i'i; /% ,, ~_~ ~ ~
~ r CONTINUEO YES x yp
STYLE: Verneculer Wood freme STORIES: ORIGINAL SITE R lqypp
~ DATE(S) OF 1qVE;
MATE0.IALS: IAwd~ Stdx S0, FOOTAGE: MA710NAL REGISTER ELICIBILITY
832
ARCHITECiURAI ~ESCRIPt10N: tN~~~~~~~ YES % Ip
One•atory uood-frame Aie(lmg on stone fardat~on. Cleptwerd exterior, with Cq!'RIBUTINC TO DISTRICi:
ehinpled trin on pebte erds. Side•gabled roof, with pro~eetmp front gebte, with X YES ip
dentil pquldm9s at corn~ce, deeoratrve shmgles, and small ymdow, Covered ~pq~ ~µp~RK DES(GNA710N: Te~
frmt porch s~orted by turrxd uood sp~Mles and tr~enguler breces; wood
hetuatrede; latt~ced tnm uxkr porch floor. Off•cmter door, paneled and plazed; MANE: City of 8oul., HD~2-1
doublrhing ~indows wtth architrave surrands. Br~ek end netal ch~~neys. DATE: 10-7•1982
ASSOCIAiED BUILDIMGST X YES Np
TYPE:
Garspe
IF 1MVENTORIED, LIST ID NOS.:
CdITINl1ED7 YES % MO
ADPITIq7AL VAGES: YES k MO
b
PI WI 9WIVE;
_ ~
1A~RCWHIT_ECT:
~«~1
MM~wf:i
BUILDER/COMTRIICTOR:
Unkno`n
SOURCE:
6TATE ID Iq.: 59139l~
~1`~~G~M~ v~N~
VM~•
Jyy~~YG i
TXEME(S):
Urban Residmtial Neiphborhooda,
1858•present
CpISTRUCTION HISTORY (OESCNIPTIqI, NANES, DATES, ETC., RELATING TO NAJOR AITERATId15 TO OR16IN11L STRUCTURE):
COMTINUED YES X Ip
- H1STqUGL BACKGROUND (DISLUSS IMPORTAMT PERSONS AND EVENTS ASSOCGTED 4ITN~THIS STRUCTURE):
° Camwwealth Lend Title Ineurence Cmparry reeords shou thet A.N. Yatee purchaeed the property fran A.R. Henry in 1897, ~nd
Bold it to G.Y. Colrnrd m epproximetely 1900. The 1901 Boulder City Directory shows Y.L. and Ruth Haover ea ow~ers.
-_ Hoqver was e stewerd at the Boulder Sam tar~ua. In 1906, JoM S. Seybold eppears ae owner, and in 1914, Thamea Stane. R. L.
Ftnk owned the house tn 1917. Leter arners were Carne B. Srntt rd Garth Htll.
~
. CqITINUED YES ~ ",~ AO
"~ _
7 S(GN(FICANCE (CNECK APPROPRIATE CATEGORIES AND BR[EFLY JUSTIFY BELOY):
ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFIGNCE: NiSTORIGL SICNIFIGNCE:
~ REPRESENTS THE HORK OF A MASTER ASSOCIATED WITH SIGNIFIGNT VERSONS
~ POSSESSES HIGH ARTISTIC VALUES ~SSOCIATED Y1TH SIGNIFIGNT EVENTS OR PATiERNS
~ % REPRESENTS 11 TYPE~ PENIOD, OR METH00 OF CONSTflUCTIdI X~TRIBUTES TO AN HISTORIC DISTRICT
~ STIITEMENT OF SIGNIfItANCE:
TMc house is representetive of the smell, Vernecular Mood Freme etyle hanes ereeted m Boulder ara+d the turn of the
~ emtury. The houee ts rateble for ite elapboerd sid~rp, 9eble mda wtth deeoratrve wood eh~nples, wmdows with arehitrwe
surrands, end porch with turned spmdle supports.
COMTINUED 1'ES % MO
REFERENCES (BE SPEC(FIC):
Boulder Canty Aeseasor informetion; Boulder Carne9ie librsry, Boulder Lanty Aasessor eollectim; Laimnnweeltb l~nd Title
Ine. Co. recorde; Boulder City Directones; Boutder Dnly Canera bwgraph~cal f~les.
CONTIIRIED YES %
SURVEYEO BY: C. Shew McLaughlin I ~FFILIATION: Frant Range Research Assoeiates, Ine. I DATE: Jen. 1993 ~
7
COLORADO HISTORICAL SOLIETY
Office of Archaeology and Hisionc Preservation N0T FOR F1ELD ~SE
1300 Broaduay, Denver, Colorado 80203 Eligibte Nominated
Det Not Eltgibte _ Certified Rehab
HISTORIC BUILDING INVENTORY RECORD Date
PROJECT NAME Boulder Survey of Histonc COUNTY [I7Y STATE iQ NO 59L3984
Places•NOrthern Mapleton Hill, 1993 Boulder Boulder
Tier Evaluation, 1996 TEMPORARY NO 1461-25-4-OS-012
CURRENT 9~1LDING NAME OYNER DAVIS MICHAEL H& JUL IA P
100 S CHARLES ST
BALTIMORE MD 21201
ADDRESS 504 MA%WELL AV
BOULOER Ca 80304
TOWNSHIP 1N pANGE 71u SECTION 25 NY 1/4 SE 1/4
HIS70R1C NAME U 5 G S OUAD NAME Boulder, CoLo
YEAR 1966 (PR1979) X 7 5~ 15'
3-
4
BLOCK 4 LOT(S) 1
1
p
DISTRICT NAME Mapleton Htll ADOlTION Mapleton YR OF RDDITION 1868
fILM ROLL NO 93-5 NEGATIVE NO LOCATION OF NEGATIVES DATE OF CONSTRUCTI ON
BY Roger Whitacre 1 Boulder City Ping ESTINATE ALT~AL 1906
SOURCE.
USE
PRESENT
Residenttal
HISTORiC
Resldential
ATTALH PHOTOGRAPH HERE
CONTIN~ED YES % NO
CONDITION
E%[ELLENT % GOOD
FAIR DETERIOFATING
E%TENT OF ALTERATIONS
MINOR X MODERATE MAJOR
DESCRIBE
Large rear add~tion, nev door, neu
railing and stairs, skyLights, uest-
side uindow altered Garage nov
converted to apartment
STYLE. Ve~nacular Yood F~ame STORIES ORIGiNAL SITE X NOVED
_ _ 1 1/2 DATE(S) OF MOVE
MATER1AlS Wood, Stone
SQ FOOTAGE
832
NATIONFL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY
IND[VIDUAL YES x NO
CONTRlBUTlNG TO DISTRICT
X YES NO
IOCAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION Yes
NAME City of 6oul , HD82-1
DRTE 10-7-1982
ARCHITECTUAAL DESCRIPTION.
One•story Nood•trame dNeLLing on stone foundation Clapboard exterior, with
sM ngted tnm on gable ends Side-gabLed roof, uith pro7ecting front gable, with
dentil mouldings at cornice Covered front porch supported 6y turned wood posts
and brackets, uoad ratl with latticed trim under porch floor Off-center door,
paneled and glazed, douhle-hung windovs Brick and metal chimneys
CONTINUED~ YES % NO
ASSOCIATED BUILDINGS° X YES NO
TYPE
Garage
IF INVENTORIED, IIST ID NOS
ADDITIONRL PAGES YES X NO
8
PIAN SHAPE
ARCNITECT
Unknoun
SOURCE
BUILDER/CONTRACTOR
Unknoan
SOURCE
STATE iD NO $BL3984
ORIGiNAI OWNER
Unknown
SOURCE
THEME(S)
Urban Residentiat Neighborhoods,
1858-present
CONSTRU[TION HISTORY (DESCRfPTION, NAMES, OAiES, ETC , flELATING TO MAJOA ALTERATIONS TO ORIGINAL STRUCTURE)
CONTINUED YES % NO
NISTORitAL BACKGROUND (DISCU55 IMPORTANT PERSONS AND EVENTS ASSOCIATED NITH THIS STRUCT~RE)
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company records shoa that A N Yates purchased the property from A R Henry in 1897, and
sold it to G U Colcord in approximately 1900 The 1901 Boulder tity Directory shous W L and Ruth Hoover as oWners
Hoover uas a steward at the Boulder Sam [artum in 1906, John S Seybold appears as owner, and in 1914, Thomas STOne H L
Fink ouned the house in 1917 Later owners were Carrte 0 Scott and Garth Hill
CONTINUED YES X NO
SIGNIFICAN[E (CHELK APPROPRIATE CATEGORIES AND BRIEFLY JUSTIFY BELOY)
ARCHITELT~RAL SIGNIFICANCE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
REPRESENTS THE WORK OF A MASTER ASSOCIATED YITH SIGNIFICANT PERSONS
POSSESSES H1GH ARTISTIC VALUES ASSO[IATED 4ITH SIGNiFiCANT EVENTS OR PATTERNS
X REPRESENTS A TYPE, PERIOD, OR METH00 OF CONSiRUCTION X CONTRIBUTES TO AN HISTORIC DISTRICT
TIER EVFLUATION; [ontrtbuting Bulldmg-Restorable
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE.
An example of vernacular uood frame architecture, commonly found around Colorado after 1860 Characteristics incLude the
gabled roof, front porch supported by turned posts and brackets The gable ends Wtth dentil trim and fishscale shingles
are someWhat unusual
CONTIN~ED YES x NO
REFERENCES (BE SPECIFIC)
Boulder County Assessar information, Boulder Carnegie Library, Baulder County Assessor collection, Commonwealth Land Tttle
Ins Co records, Boulder c~ty Directories, Boulder Daily tamera bmgraphical files.
CONTINUED YES X NO
S~RVEYED 8Y C Mclaughlin/R L Simmons I AFFiIIATION Front Range Research AssociaTes, Inc _ LATE Jan 1993/Apr 1996
9
Attachment B
• L v e' . -- ~• •
-a e......Jrac--. '~ ..~- ~.
p' p ~JD1 t 1~ ° M
~ L' 'I -~ ..~3~ e iM~
~~ T `~
~ '~ ~_
~LL • I Y+'
MnC`-'"~
renI " '
Nn'~
i
fial ~
v a ~ N ~
z+sa ~~-
67 "~
m ~
e n~ ~~ I
I
_~
~ IaaRnW~orJ B''!' ~° i~
1n'
~ - ~
t-''~ p
~ ~
h '
s i
~
~ ~
I
17 y
„ ~ ~ ' ~
~
L'"~ - rf_"mJ"
,J .. y}I
~ ~
~
~ ---'~_ ~' JuHe190
' ° ~' n BoULO
~ ~ ~ '~ ca~o
~
R ~
~
1 ~ I
~~ v ~ ~ o ~ ~ I
1 _ I
~ I
e 7T!' ST ~ ~ ~
j~ - i s e
i F ~~~' - ~ n
`
N-~e
~ ~
i
~
mv i - 3' LJ
r
1
]
,
9
a
-M '
_» .
N~
lI
_
L
~
~
y T` 1~1J
N
u S~
N
d
~~
[~9
~~ D~
~
e
- y
Y
n
IGI~P
~~'
., w n '~,
m
~~ ~
n
ie
~
~~
i C ; ~p~ 9 ~i ~
~ I ' 'u ~.1 h ~ y 0~ ~
~ +~ I ~i _ ~
~ 4; i
~ ~~[I]~r~ O' M !f 1 ~
u ~ D 4~D._ ~ ~ ~2 ~~ I i~ i I i
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _- e • I
~ ,,.. ,.~ ..., ~ 1
~a
I
I
i
7'
a~
i
~
;
1
I
i 3
i
"a ~
„ ; 4
!/ ~ I
L ~
6 Je ~'
~i1 ~
I I ~
J~ Q~ y y~,~~ b~ ~ ,
I ~ a Z
3~ W I J '
$ i i n"~. ~ " '~ u i
f ; ~ I re Z '
~ ~ ~
~ } er ~
i
~
v%
,~ w ~ ~ 6?" + ~ ST ~s ~
al `~ _ ~
I ~
~~ H ~ ~ I
~., ~r:~ ~ I
n ~
I
rt~~~~ I
J! I' I "~' & i
I
I
umD~N ~
L~ ~ ~ ~
I
ta " ;~`~'I i
% I. ~ I
_ UO~,~ R ~ ~
' e
rs ~
I g
I
1
,
/e I
u ~
s.i. or r.a
a~ ~~
~
~
_
~
~
~
~ ~
oa
s]
J
~ e S/
re
@ > 4 :.
o n „ + ~~
n ~
~~
~ ~
n
n'
,
L
~
~ ri
~
e
~~n oa
a
~D
~, ie ~
~
~~
~ ~
OO
1
I ~
I ~
1
1 T
1
~ ~ ,
i
i '
& ~
I i
I
I A
i ~~~ -
~ ~ ~~
1
~
; ~
1 !
~ ~
i
6 ~
I
i
~
~ R
~ i
~
~
i
;
~
I
{
r '
1
nm
~ 6~x ! ST. § ' .
i, 4 I e a r _ffi,.z- ~ i
~~~nnn---1 y I ,r' " >- °~ r ~ u /1 ~ / ~
'I " I n ~ g i a a ~j ,: ~C ~j `,„~n^,,,~" ~ '~ .1
LSJ ia l ~ ~- a 7- 7 i
l ~ ~~Y~ I . ~
.it ,~p n ~ n~ J ~ :, 4 !° n j m 6 -uuP 9
`~ ~ rv [~1~~(~ ~e fool q ~~'''
~ ~~_ .~ .F. ~'_"'~ '~._._-.~~ _ .._.1::~_~._ _,.~.,Ra '~~ '-~_-~ ~~'~~~~ ~
~O
~~~ ;
~ ~T ~ ;I2 I
~ voi ~
~ • ~
7 ~
ai t
~ I
~ ~ EI
,
i '
i I
6~ M(=
_ .~~ _ .
, ... ,
_ . ~...,,a.~.__. - ~ - - ~-
e fp~ w ~ •
~' ~~i
s ~a ~' oua
n
n ' .,
, °,J a..Y ~
' a ,n
w u ~~ R
/ /J ~ y ~ ~
L J
~ ~~~ 57 ~
/ H P,~ ~
~ ~ ~
e u ~C,
.. l~,l °
- - -- i -
~ 2 ~ rVe~; ~ ~ ~ ...,.,~
~ eNg:
aon~.~n ar sr -°~~" ~x,
/ ~ ~
~ --
3
i~ ~
~~, _ >
~ 9~ ,
A
M~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~~
;~, 6
!~' d~
6 i' ST
co ~ s
N
~y ra
f6
!T 0 ~
~ W I
A ~ ~~
33 f P
ee `~
a~
ea
PY
49
9i
5 ~' ST
~.+. wn zas
a+ d ? e
'" , ° °h
F is
I ~ Q
14
e ~r___
rr ~
v
PI ~y
dl
~
Q
/~
u -9J LJ~
rs
ro <i ~
~ J
v ro W
m
/0~
9 ~/
~ /9 ~ Dy
~~
~ K
Q
.~ .e ~'~I f
7Tl~
~ / ~
~
'
c I rc ~
~x v
;~ J >o
~
u a 3 z9 ~
'
"LJ J
d ,5 se / ~;
ILL~_J
r
P \
~
~ ~~
16
~ _
" 0
5T
i
~ ~
a
i
Z
F
J
Q
~
~u+
0
~. ~ ae
„ ~~
x
~ ~° ~; ~
a .
J
7
O L
19
B
~
~Z I(: 1
uu a M1
s m
;,~~'' i
%
nQ ~
m
n
/J N
H r
a
f4 u ~~
g
~
sule of r:.t
~
~~
,
~
, Re ~~~ ~ ~
P/
-;. ~~,
4/
oa
JY
~a n ^
F.i ~
9
~ ~tl 4n
/ P/
<n n
_m~ ~~ ,~
M .y
° ~ ,o ~, ~ -
•.r, ~ r~ a ~~...r~T~ ..--~- ~..~.. _~~ .. . ~ I
a
ZO
J
~
I
~tY
~
//
~ ~~
- _ _ __ a
.s~ _
6 ~ ~ I
M1 ~ ~ ~_~~~ &' G ~'~~ ~d a` 2. prt...µn..,,.'1 ~ ~ `n`~m snv,w....~'...- n
~,
v
e ° i ~~.+: g evhw.va grH sr8 '_•••3~x'~' a' r, rel
^ ' ~ ~~'
- i~~ ~ ;~ ~ '~,~, , ~ '~ - "` _~ ' ~ ~ B
- a ~!Y~~ .: , .~ ~~~I 6~ fl ~ ~ ~ ,,,~~
i - L~J ~ ~ ° ~ ~ 4-~ < .~
° r~ ~, ~_"_
a ~.H sT ~ a i~ 6 A ,r r-a 6 ~'r
t
__`
_ IF
~~
/
~
,
~~ , ~"
. ° ° 3 ~ ~ a
u ~ _
w ~ ~Q~ - > ~'
e k '~ ] ~
;~- ~ ~ P //~
~ +i ~~ ~ ~o~ V __J ~ ~.i .H'A ~ i ~ i b IL
~
~
---„ ..~,~,. I d B ~~H 57 ,~
~ ~ .,,;~d
~ ..... .._ _'. _' '__
a 0~ '~ b
~~ b ~~
A
m ~
a p ~ 7
- ~ a
n ~y ° A1 ~
n
t' ~ d ~~
d ~~ ~ ~
~~
I-y ~~i 1
W~J
~o ~
~N
p ~~ ~ ~~
~_Y ~~
-o ~a ~ s
_~ ~
~' W
,~ ~
~ ~
,
I T
~
/
/ ~~TTZ
'F' ~
~N A .i
~ ~O ' il~~Rir~~~
Jt ~
~r
}f
~ r +~.~.
L
~
~
~
~
~
~e3 ~
y~'~~
~I
`LL~YI
'
' ` r
~, ~
" ~ ' k'h., l~
a
t
yBra
~
~
i
_ ~
~
~
6TN
~ ~ ~Vd
~
V~J Q
~
`~~
~-
~~ ,
~'Y e
~
f'~ °
l
~
~
~ ST
~ ~
~
~
SQ
z
~
Q
w ~
~ a ~
~ 5L~ ST
am wr Ma
~ ~ ~ {~ J~ - m
4~ aJ ~'~ ~ p~ ~ ~ d ~~I m~D F n~
e~ ~~
e,
i 10 n "~ ° 4
~ n i p ~ m
! p ~,o a 00' d N' ~
~
., , .~ . ___ _ ._ _„ __. _ __.___ Y _ _. __ _., -.~ __ - -
/
~! !
~~n ;~
!
~~~ 6
~1' ,
6
X~
° ~~
m
i ~ ~
n i
° f n
e. n. R ~
x
N
l
~
S `
- s~~'.~
a
~
0
za
J
~ [[[
~ '."_'- f
+
~
~ $
~
4 [ w p
~ a I~
Scale of feet ~
~
.,.n,.. Q n ~
i ° - I
k~ ~I
` m s ~~
/¢~' ~ m d6
, I`~ ~' ~~''~ ~
~~
.. • .._ f - ~ .
~ i y h ~ ..
i '
d. `'b 19 w ' IQ %»~ r ~ 1 ~iwa yyPlrt- ~'-
~ {o
~ ~ n ~ ~~ L ~m~ ~
bp ~
~ ~
~ e r ~ i . ~ ~ ~ i . o'~{ ~cn rr~
o ~~ , n n ' „"'~FJ!''€' BO~w/de • -8~
j .. ~~ / I _ . .
~ ~J R i
p /1 ~I
- -p ~ a:
¢ •
~~ 7T_~ 5T, o
i ip T
3l ~
3 R T
o ~~
~- ~.r ~
~°.' d ~
~
~ S
"4"-J~ >
~
~ ~ p ~ ~
~
(_n~
i ~s ~,'__' - a.
~8~'r h~, m~
~1 ur
Q ~^ r s ~~~
~ ~ ~ a O
e~ in
,
~ -'"~^ a - 'T~' sT
~ ~
, -~ , , r,
e
9 ' ~ ~
.. ~," ~ 9 a
~ , ~~~(((
~~ b
~ J
y W
l 9 M
p - ei ~n.
i ~ ~
a m ro ~
~> p b I~'i a ""B~
~
v
~- ~
n
'ro 4J~ a
ir ~
~~a
~ ~~ ~
'° ~ ~ E
~ `~~
_ 0
-m t
~' E
ar ~ p
I R ~
n
~~ 9
~
~
~ I x ~ JN0
~ ~~.
e o
9~ a
i. b
N B~`t
C f A F !
GP ~
~ ~.
Stl
/
l L D i~
a
. I~
4/
~m
~~~~
3
~ ~ 's
~ .~mm
,o ~
u s
m ~
~
_~ o
~
~~
~I
M
1
.~
.._ - su+ 4 sr
nn ~ ' 9 ~
f~,~
~
. t
~ ~ ~
P°
Po~
~ 9
~4F~
_~p /2 _
D U
~I. ~ I
ID ~
~ ~
Jt
rr ~
m A'e~
A ~
9
R
-~
V
4
~7
54
~
D ~ L ;
~ 9 ~ ~
~ g 1
~ '
I
2 N ___^ }I
v ~ s~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~' 9 ~ ~"r
n
~ ~ ~
L
5T Mw un+.~+~r~ ,~ I
e I i
v i ~~ , ~
- ~ µ ~ i i
4S D 9 1 YI
i I
0/ ~. ~I ~ ~~ 1
~ "~ m s ~---J ~ ~ 2 6~
~
~ /~ ~ IxD ~ / J
4
20
/3
~~ . r
_ ,--- - ~
6
» ~
_. . RxPP(.
Y'"'..~ ~.r.eve
~ '~
~~ ~
; ...~~~~.
5 ,
m
CoNCORD
~_
. r ~. ~a
MAXWELL
~~ ~-~-° ~J
~~;
~ o
I
b~lrv
c
N vr
, .
w
m ~
~ ~~ ~
~_
„w„ -
JAN 1931 i"
nv BOULDER _..wy-n~.L,?
COLO r .
'~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ `'o
, o ° ~ .
~~, ,~. ,fl ~ ~ ~~ ~
i
C~n M
K~ ~~~ ~~
~, .., ,., ,,, ,u ,., ,..
AV 9XPfA...~ ... _
~ LD ~
^ p
~ . .
R q
qr
~~ u~ sl
v •• , ,. ,> „ ~
., „'y.-:~ « n
~~ i
a ~ C~ _
. ~~
- ;, -~.o„
4
$ ~ -- MAPLETON AV
1 ~
~ P 5
~~^ ~ ~rt~ )r . ~
Q
~ ~ -~~~~~~
~ ~..~ so
~ ~° J
~ o ~!
~~
~ „~~
' , ~,
~
_- ~ ...
~
~
$ ~
"~ ~~~~t
td. ., r
~ ~~ ~
~
x~
n
~, a
_aCrevl'".~" "_''
s
0 ~
~ a ~~~ ~
4 .., ~ .. _
.
~...g.anrie~' y,~q,~d•,~~~~~.o+•~~ HIGHLAND AV
; u.nni~.~...,i
8
a
j.. ~
6.W91F _'~.. _.'_"'
JS
/~
Attachment C
I3
~~
LI
- AttachmentD ~7/n~
Z~~.us-rzn.-r~~,~ ~ /~~~~r
~i.a1Lt7A8~~ AiZEA
Nc- ~o ~
-,7 ~ALG
~-~~ ~ u: I L~ F C~.
~,~~'tr,~
50
~
1~ ~
I I
~ ~
i ~
K~ , ~
~ ~
~ '
, ~,
~
----~
j' S'
L~a «~.~.g_F
A r_~A
i9o'
L c r /a F~k -~ a:,c. ~.x=
L7ui~n,t~LE- Z,`~L5 at=
- I~ ~
'TJ L ~} (~1A.X w ~ c..~ ~.
~
~ ~.~
ZZi
I i
/~
4~' ~/I
/ ~
~~
.b 1.~ I l-DS ~L`C
P~t~t
7ri~ D~.~LJ7.1P-LE
y/~ Q~r_a
~' ~~ ~~~~
~~' i~i
~~~
* c.~~,Nt, -r~~ ~~K~
C c ~r.+c,_ y~---
J~_Ti3n_-F=~
Lv ~ I~-~El~ - ~, ?~? 5 ~-
~ C~
~7 J t L_I'71-~ L7 c--L - I ~ l,~ ~~ I-
- Z -C- °~
~~`f h'tax"~-»LC- ;~~
3`i,~'
~~ US,~=~,
L'v j
L~.rN
Lc--r i-~ r'~. E A-
~l.l ( L ~ra.~+-_~ '
C~~,~~~
J i_ r nrc.t=S
~ ~ ~ t~c C- C h=C ~
~~ 7-~ z ~ ~ I_
~j? 5F-
~~
i8
I~ 0 6 ~ r ~ Attachment E
~ ~~ a I I a h a n Arch~t~~ts,LLC
I
~
~
To Landinarks Pxeservauon Adv~sory Board )~~y ~s, 2ooa
Archrtecture
Plannmg ~e Remodelmg and add~uon to 504 Ma.~cwell
Intenors
orvelopmen~ i I am xepxeseanng the two new owners for 504 Iv[a:cwell - Tarru Sunon and JuLe Kratnex The new
consalung i ownecs purchased the home at 504 Ma.~cwell late last yeaz, closmg ui December of 2003 They
~ puxchased the home with the intent to add onto and cemodel ~n oxder to coricct some of the
I deficienc~es contauied within the home, and ro cestoce rhe extenor unage o£ the home to tfie standa=d
~ of quaLty consistent w~th the t7ne homes that are pmvalent throughout rhe neighborhood Due to the
locahon of the home on a comex lot, the smell size of the lot, an ad~acency issue with the lot direcdy
south, and the plannmg cegulaUons that requ~e substannal setbacks di~ecdy celated to these
condmons, development and expans~on of the home is severely consm.nned This ~s made only too
evident by the record of approved zomng vazrances - two smce 1995 We are seekuig the support of
the Landmarks Pceservanon Advisoxy Boazd m~~n~ng appcoval foe an expansion to this home that
w~ll corcect the mhecent pcoblems w~th irs curxent des~gn, and cceate a home of appropnate scale, size,
and amecuues fo~ its value and ne~~borhood locadon Zomng cntena for which we aze seekutg your
support m ozder to gain cehef are the west setback (side yazd facmg a srreet w~th an ad~acency) and
ovecall buddu~g coverege
The problems that we have idenhfied with the curcent home ue as follows
. The builduig lot ~s encumbered with an ad~acency, w}uch sevecely 1vTUts the buildable
envelope m a 337 squaze foot smp that is 7 5` wide and 45' long, ~usafied near the east
property lme Th~s buildable envelope is mdicated on the floor plans pcesented on Illustrauon
1, 2, 3 and 4 Solaz access considecauons and the pcagmahc requ~rements of funcuonal spaces
preclude development wholly anthui dus azea Further, an addihon ui the conFomvng pornon
of the s~te wouid l~kely not be code compl~ant (room height), and would fiuthec urqmct the
design and eatenox unage foL the home.
Past addiaons, both of wh~ch were conducted through the vanance process, did l~ttle to
remEocce the h~stonc nature oE the home In 1995, a"pop rop" was erected on the south end
of the home, conLVnuig a mastet bedroom, closet, and canhlevefed deck T}us pop top has a
7/12 p~tched pyramidal shaped lupped roof, which ~s mcons~stent vmth the coof form of the
cemammg pornon of the eausung home. ReFer to ewsung elevanon, illustianon 5
Funcrional problems that were pceap~hted by the 1995 addinon cannot be conected wittun
the ex~sung footpnnt The pop mp addmon is connected to the mam floor by a non-
compLant c~culac sta~r, considermg curcent build~ng codes. T'his sreic is open between the
master bedroom and the public space on the mam level, offenng no pnvacy to the bedcoom
The correcaon of this problem by mstalluig a code-comphant sta~c that provtdes pnvacy
would consume moce than half of the second story flooz space, rendenng the second story
essennally unusable for ~ts purpose as a mastec bedroom Further compounding t}us problem
is the lack oEbathcoom Eacilmes on the second floor, wluch is both a funehonal deficiency ~n
tecros oFpnvacy, and a safety issue w~th the need to nav~gate the arculaz stau in the dazk of
nigJ~t
19
C o ti u r n
~ /' a ~ ~ a ~ a n
~
/~ r c h i t e c t s, L L C
In 1999, a variance was approved to connect an ewsung outbuddmg onsite to the mam
residence, and thus prov~ding a second bedroom and much needed storage For the home
Th~s add~hon is a flat-roofed connectoc that spans the former gap behveen the two buildmgs
Although rt was erected as a cost effecave and e£ficient me;uis to connect the two suvctures, it
~s clearly inconsistent with the foem and design of the esist~ng home Further, honzontal flat
glass skyLghts that punctuate the flat ioof inembrene aze not only mcons~stent with the
vemaculu of the home, but aee also likely to be ovecheat~ng problems m the summer months,
requinng forced air wnd~bomng ro m.nntam comEortable ~ntenoc temperamres
Funcnonal pcoblems that wece precipitated Uy the 1999 addinon cannot be corrected w~thm
the esisnng footpnnt Consider the relat~onsh~p between rhe master bedroom and the second
bedroom addinon Given the s~ze of the second bedroom, it is appropnate for a small chdd
What puent would be comfortable sleep~ng on the second ~oor w~th theu smali chdd located
down a steep flight of non code comphant stairs and essenhally ui a connected buildmg'
We propose an addition that would agun requ~re a vaz~ance from curcent plannng cegulauons The
pcoposed add~aon would mcrease the buildu~g footpnnt by about 45 square feet on the rnam levei In
this space, we propose to bwld a new code-compl~ant stair connechng the maui level of the buildmg
wrth the second story. The addinon will also remove a small closet curcendy prov~dmg srorage to the
bedcoom on the ~naui level We also pcopose an addihon to the second floor The second floor
addidon will be 313 squaze feet of floor area, with 186 squace feet ocaArang w~d»n d~e allowable
buddable envelope, and 127 squaze feet outside of the buddable envelope The addiaon will be
erected with a lower second Dooc height (8'6" above the maui flooc), reqwnng a step down Fcom the
mastec bedTOOm We aze proposmg t}us configuranon m ocdee to achieve compLance with solaz access
requ~rements of the builcLng regulahons The second story add~eon will conta~n space for a master
bathroom, an expansion to the master closet, and a second bedxoom A small landuig wdl occux at rhe
top of the new staus, pcovidmg an oppomuuty for doocs and pnvary fox the occupants Please cefer
to illustranon 4 foc pmposed floor plans
Th~s proposed adduron is much moce appropnate m estenox image than the previous two addiuons
In fact, we aze oE the op~mon that the addiaon we propose corrects some of the negauve unpachs
assoc~ated vnth the previous two, and is moie cons~stent w~th the type of architectuee found withui the
Dismct As Tam~ and JuLe have observed, our proposed addmon wdl begm the healmg of past
wcongs unposed upon the ongmal home Our proposed addihon connects the '95 pop top more
effectrvely to the cest of the home, makmg ~t appeaz as a second story of a two story home, ac~d not a
pop top at all The proposed addmon also plugs the gap between the onginal home and the
outbuildmg that was connected to the home w~th the '99 vanance, elicmnaung the mappropnate "flat
top" connector, and what Tanv and Julie cons~der to be an uncomfortable, nariow hallway We firmly
beheve that our proposed design wdl conmbute more to the character of the d~smct than the current
design Please reEer m extenor elevanons of the proposed addmon on dlustration G~ 7,
~~
2~
C a 6 u r n
~ /~ a ~ ~ a h a n
<
A r c h i t e c t s, L L C
We need youc support under cntena 4 oE the vanance rcgulauons m order to gam appcoval for this
add~uon by the Board of Zonuig Ad~usvnents We mtend to File an appLcauon foe zomng review
upon gumng your appeoval The followmg are staUStical data that we have compiled associated with
the e~snng lot and home, and our proposed add~uon, which we bel~eve demonstcate substanbal
h•ardship associated with the lot and exisang home, and support our applicanon fo~ a vanance
Lot size
Mu~~mum lot area for zone distr~ct LRE - 7,000 SF
I.ot Area Foc 504 Maacwell Ave - 3,562 5 SF
Area Percent of Lot
Allowable er current zomn 337 5 SF 9°/a
Extsnn Covera 1,289 5 SF 36.2%
Pro osed Covere 1,334 5 SF 37 5%
R,~ddable Acea
Change ~n covexage -1 3%
Note that buddmg coverage on a standard 50' x 140' LRE comer lot would be 41%
Crrhacks
N fcont W street S ceaz E intenor
Allowable r curcent zonu~ 25' 25' 25' S'
Ewshn 15' 7' 17' 4'
Pm osed at addmons 30' 2 fl 1G.5' 1, 2 25' 2 fl 5' 1, 2
Note that the ad~acent home to the south is set back tiom 9°1 street (west s~ae)
F1oor Area
First Floor Second Flooc Toral
Ex~snn Home 1,289 5 SF 227 5 SF 1,517 SF
Pzo sed new 45 SF 313 SF 358 SF
Total 1,334 5 SF 540 5 SF 1,875 SF
Add~hons in the buddable zone
Fust floor - 0 SF
Enure buildable zone ~s occup~ed by the ewsnng structuze
Second Eloor -186 SF
60 % of the pcoposed second floor addiuon ~s u~ the buildable zone, 40% is outside
the buildable zone
Thanks very much
~~ ~, C ~~~----------_.~
Kyle Callahan, tlzc}utect
~
~
~Yaf rin•.tp N I~{4 , i, ~~'.,,y,q~~/i t~~'t'~• ,`,,+lt..Y ~a~ea,%~'»! r 4
P,. ~~ ~, ~ ~
CQN~
u ~ •°
- -- 'z ~. I~2 .a: GJR6
V
. . ~~ ,'•~ , ~ c;Or~ ~; I-~ T ~. W/~.LK o ' , '.
• ~,,~ - •- --
- - --•--
r-----------37; b,; --- -- , r-ouN i ~,
~ ~
I I If~ON ~ f~l ~.t
v• ~ ~
~ .~ ~ ~.~
n~
o~
~
~~
~~
DI
r
~ ~
~
~~
I
,
,
~~ ~ I
~_~ i' ~
~
~
~
,
~
I~
~
~
,
~
)
~ a u~
~ ~'
~
~ ~
l
~
~._.-.~.-.-. .-
~--------------- --
~ ~~~ / 'zr
~~~ (
. ~.,. c~ u~ ~
~ `~ I
. ~~ ~~. ~ < < I ~ ~4
()
~ ~
~ y
mm~ f
,--~~
T ~
m I
~
~ ~
-----~
•, ~
1)
\
I
~
)
~
~
1
I
i~~ ~
I
~, I
~I
I
I
1
~~/ ~.. I
i
~_ n I ~ V
\ r~~ O
.„
~- ~, -~-
d ^I -
= Z
.~ E
~f
N
r
~
_-~ .~ ._~ ~ ~,r~~~,,, ~„T~,",, . r ~9,.~ ~W",~1.~y +a~(, ~~y~~ s
,' t.~.~ t7 "'",~~../.~~ITm'4YHximaF ~1~i~~s
p'~WRI'• v
~~i 1~}~•~ ~i~~ , ' ~
/' ~ _
i I ~I
, ~,
~ J
~ ,_
.'r----
~
u ~
~
~I
I
~
i
I
i~
I
i
a ~
i
~ ~
~
,~ ~ ~
;~
lS ) ~ I
i.~ i il I ~
~`~ /
1II ~
~l ~
m
J I~-~--
n'
~, t
1
1)
~
,
J
Z
_~
,
..' COt~1C
~/ ~ GvR~
3 7 ? .~:
~~ . ' C;(~-~J L l-~ T ~. W/~.t..K o ' . ~ '. ,° ' ' ~
__--- • - - --r.-i.
-------------------~ ~ •
' ~~F~-' -__.
I IRON' ~~1h1
~ I
'Y ~
i~ I
,pZ--~N-xm I I
~ONO'0 ~
- -- I I
~ ~
~ ~ I
I ' I
~I ~ I (
_ ~ i
-_ _n-- I ~
~ ,y ~ ~ i --- p ~ --- ~ ~) I
~, ,
II '
'~ ~
II ~
m , ~
~ ~tl ~
L r ~
i a
~
__ . ~ ~ P ~i6„
~•
~ ~
_~. ~ _
~
~ =
--,_, -
~ ~ -~ ~ ~
S' Y ~ I I
~
1~ j
I
;-v~~_i
`
I ~
~ _--__ ~
I
.9 1
6~_6~~ ;I ~
'
'' ~ ~~ ~
~ ~I ~
~
'
~
'~ ~
~ --
~ !
~
~ ___= ~ '
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
~,
~ ~ ~~,~- ~
_
~
, ,
~ L $ x~ I I
IZ V
ry
~ I
I
I
~ C ~ ~^ i
z
I I
.„ 1
I-._._,_.-._._
~ ~----- ~„-----
~ ~` ~ ~ '~. I
~~J I
-~.. ow ~
l ~1 I
~ ~~« ~ ~. % ~ ~ ~i .
~--
( I ;
_ ~ ~;
-------~-~_
, ~
I'~ n i~ I ~
~
° -~ o F ~
_
~ - ~ -t~-i
~ ~ r
F
0 . I
~ x
t ~
N~' ~
~n Z
N
1 rirst
~,8. -,.-0•
'dui~nn~s`~ P~sP~
~ . ~ ~ ~
P1.~-xa~z-
$~ v'~+,.
~u i<x~~s ~~ >~c>
____"_' ~
F I
y
'_r== ___"_"-'==z r_-= ~ i
~ I
I
I
I' I ~I I~
~~
~---
G~zc sTn~a~
I ~~~ar~, I ,
RooF ~ ~ ~
~`G>N~r~ LEJE€~c,7~
DEG~
Giv_C._ SrA~7.z
Existing
2 Second i
I/8° - I'-0'
T, , KS ; r--e1T~o%~ ~
I
so9- MAXW~LL
EXISTI NG
~ ~LOOR PLANS
~/a° - i ~-0•
~ "~'
~6
E
Coburn
f~Ca~~ahan
p..trz.u. LLC
coP.,nSa.~.5~6
6e~~• C=b.de s=roa
T.~,~,~ ~o>~~,»,
»~a,,,
i..,~._ .os~m.~a~~.r.a.
' iI~I ~E
~ ~~ ~ - - -~ - - -
~
~
a'°
~
~
I *
i
I
~ I
I
li 1
~ I
I
IJ
~' i~
~ i
~ ~~
~
~ 1~EIJ J.~u~Do
~----- ~ ----------
~~
r-----------
~ ~
r' - - -
pI
i~
i.._../1 .1
"-_' ~ ~- ~_~_- ' ~_~_'~~
~ ~ 1
1
__'"~_ --___- __~ ~ _~ _' _ 1~ II I I
1
~__-_-_ ___ -___ __ ., ;,~.~~~~h' i; I ~
- - - - - - - --- - - ' ~
,~
r i~ ~ I ~ i
__' __- =_z_ -
t y
~ -'- - ~iS ~
-,4_ '~~( '{~ ~F P~'o~rmra
NSU ybo~
~EW.n~/G Srl.iR-
I I
I
~
'I I j
~~
i"
~oc~r~ I
Poo2> i
1
i
rr~ na,~ ~ i I
~1 rf,a
1 w.rc ~
-~-+~~!
-------r-.-- - -_- ~_-_,
j~as~ -~T,.~o.~ ~ 3,3 5~
-~-n ~------ , i
NEw ~BEnx.oo,. ~
I ~/
/ z;~ ,i~l I~,I~
~p ~~\ ~
~~ ~~ ~ ~I 1 ~ -
I
~ Y
~ E%PAPD ,
~~ I
i ~
~ i
- L~NE o~ F..>r
~ KEMwE GZG NEI+~ DECJ~- ~F Tb $E, ~EHDJED
' Sra,~-r~a~i~ I
i ~
I ~ ~ LiN~ D~ DECK
I
~ TTJ 'SE KEMO~6D ~pj~ E Plow p
~ur•ro t7" I
~--- -- ~ ------ -------- ------J. T_~~ ~ ~.l
i
I
~
~
I~
15
I~
~
1
~
Ti_c.~AST~aTi~IJ ~
so9- MAXWELL
PROPOSED
~LOOR PLANS
~~go_~~,-0v
~ ~
Coburn
Fy~a~~a~an
xP..A~ SK'g~e. LLC
6~~. C=~.owz
T..,~_ ,,,»,,,,,
M1. >mm~~n
Mx...e- .a4...,„~w.~
~ ~~us-r~zr>T~DiJ S
~~ MA,~ti~i~LL
~X15T1NG
~L~.VATION itiVES~
,~e,_,,-0o
s~~ -,~„r~ vFSTa~vnnoN~
r;n;~,,. ~ ,„.. ~
~oburn
fy~allahan
q..e ..«. ~yC
aoP...~Se.~.eS~6
Batk. Cab.,m.o~u
T.k,~ wf,.frof]
Fa- »~«e.n.~
I~...~ ~b....~.....e.
_~1.._LlS-2G,T1a1Jv b
_ Y=2? =6w.t~
1?ai.:~i 5Xa
_ ~~ - ~
~x • s- ,.~ ; ^-..r.c P
NSW WWDOW~/
MI~TGU Exi~r~i.7 4 Tiz~n
G~?~Z Z 3~92ccrti }>-/~~eJ
.^~E'_x= r~~NJDU
__~ ~.__=s ~ ..:eo_ -_,.,.
_nT -e~
s ~~.-+a ~[
76 i..~r~v rz~..~.
m>rcr. 2 k ~sr,J 4
~F~4T/w1(n~~ p99lT~ON`S/~FILL ~ £XI°T/~.][~
~~O t~OS~D J~l ~T ~L'Evt~.'r ~ ~ ~1
2E.~or~
~Ji~JDOWS ~
S~JSTGL-t_
.K.a-r.r1C~
~ o~wa~
~opL_s
~oburn
FyCallahan
A..t e=... L'C
mP,.AS~=e.$,a~
~wle.. Cabm ios.
Tskpl.vs
P.. a ti)u~ ~
I•x rc~ wa„~,~,~c,.,._.,-
~
o /~ p
' ; i
~ o t ~!
`~ ~ N
a ~,'" n
a
j e o ,r t
9
' 4~ ?i
J ~ 1 f~
1 i ~ Y~
~` ~
e ~ ~
~ h' J ~
u ~~ ~
S
K ~)
, ~
)
i I ~~
n
W I
~ ~,~;I~
i
M
i~
o i ?
a ~
:l '1 0
dn~
,n~
u
P
1
w
z
- ----- ,~~-,oz
-~-_ „9-.Sl
~
I
a
~9/ll~~-.~ n9'~~
O
~ \ ~ I~
V
O
~ ~
~
1~ ~
Z
~ ~~~ ~~
~
~
~ ~ F { 1 I~ ~
` f1 ~d~ ~
L+LL~ ~ I-
~ {~
( \J ~~
~
~
~a
`~ '
~~,~
7
,~
3x
~W
1i ~
1~
e
z£~
,o
M
~ II
~ II
w
~
~
~
~
~
V!
~
~
0
0
~
7I4
l.l
1' I
V
W
VI
Q
~
~
0
~
C ~ ~
~ ~ ;i
1 ~ md ; ^3~
~ m
~- a~^i={
~ ~ ~~~~5
o U >`-'~
~,~
U ~ 8~~.~=