5B - Consideration of demolition permit application for a non-landmarked building over 50 years in aMEMORANDUM
August 3~", 2005
TO: Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
FROM: Ruth McHeyser, Director of Long Range Planning
James Hewat, Historic Preservation Planner
Matteo Moore, Historic Preservation Intern
SUBJECT: Public hearing and consideration of a demolition permit application
for the demolition of a non-landmarked building over fifty years old
constructed c.1900 and located at 2224-2226 Pearl Street, pursuant to
Section 10-13-23 of the Boulder Revised Code (HIS2005-00141).
STATISTICS:
1. Site: 2224-2226 Pearl Street
2. Zoning: MU-X (Mixed-Use Redeveloping)
3. Owner/Applicant: Kay Yeagley
SUMMARY:
This building is neither in a historic district nor locally landmarked, but is
over fifty years old. Moreover, it meets the criteria for a proposed
demolition review as defined under Section 10-13-23g of the Boulder
Revised Code.
Despite being faced with a superficial wood facade in 1975, the building
(constructed sometime between 1887-1913) is a good representative
example of duplex-Terrace architecture with Italianate elements.
Based upon analysis of the building's architecture and level of historic
integrity, it is staff's opinion that it does have historic significance under
the historic, architectural, and environmental criteria set forth in Section
10-13-23(g) of the B.R.C. and the Individual Landmark Significance
Criteria (1975).
Staff recommends that a 180-day stay of the issuance of a demolition
permit be imposed for the property be imposed in order to consider
alternatives to the demolition of the building.
S:~PLANWataUongrangUi[ST~Demos\pearL2224-2226\08.03.05 memo.doc
~1cmo to thc Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
Re: Demolition Pcrmit, 2??4-226 Pcarl Street
ITEM & ISSUE:
The design review committee's decision that there was "probable cause" that the
building at 2224-2226 Pearl Street may be eligible Eor designation as an individual
landmark requires that this item be reviewed in a piiblic hearing as per Section 10-13-
23(g) of the Boulder Revised Code. In this regard, the Board's decision is limited to
evaluating the application under the relevant criteria (see page 4) and whether or not to
impose a Stay oE Demolition on the property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The brick terrace duplex is located on a 6,600 sq. ft. single lot originally platted as
part of the East Boulder addition.
The flat-roofed, one-story building is of brick construction and represents an
example of duplex, "Terrace" architecture with Italianate elements. The level oE
alteration to the original house can be described as moderate; a c.1940 tax assessor
photograph shows the building prior ta the addition of the wood Ea4ade and mansard
roof element. A site visit by staff indicates that the original north Eacing wall survives
beneath the applied fa~ade. At the rear (south) elevation is a small portal supported by
peeled logs that appears to have been constrticted within the last 30 years. The tax
assessor photograph shows this elevation to feature a decorative corbelled ~arapet,
segmental arch window lintels, and cut stone sills. These elements are still visible on the
east, west (side) and south (rear) elevations of the building.
S:\PI,.AN`data`lungrong`HI51"I)cmor'pearl.'?'~_2'26~1)8.03.05 memo.d~x
2-
Figure 1. 2224-2226 Pearl Street, July 2005.
i~lcmo to the Landmarks Prescrvation Ad~ i;urv Board
Re: Demolition Permit, ?224-22G Pcarl Strert
~
'~ , :~~ -r*- ,.
`, ~ . ~. s
.~ ~' .` • ~;~~ ~ R
"S = ..
,M,
T
~°~• iY ~
• ~. ~ + . ..
"( `~1+. ~ ~ a
. '~, ~~ ;
,,~;~''~ ~~~
.~~ ~~ ,~ r
.... y ~
a ~; I
~~ -.~i
1 - - ~ .,
~ 1.
_ f a.
• ~~~._ ~~--~~....~~ R.~~ j
+ ~- ~l ~~ . ~_ ..~ _ .
'~
Figure 2. 2224-222h Pearl Street, c.1940
It is unclear whether the historic windows survive beneath the north fa~ade or
boarded up openings on the sides of the building. Several oE the historic windows are
extant on the south elevation (figcrre 3). The walls feature hand moL~lded, low fired brick
laid up in stretcher bond with thin recessed mortar joints. In general the masonry walls
appear to be in good condition with limited areas oE missing mortar and inappropriate
Portland cement baseci re-pointing. A mort~red field stone foundation supports the brick
walls.
S:~PI,AN`data'~Iongrang~HlSl`•Demus'pearl.22?~1_2226\OR.03.05 memo.dix
3-
Figure 3. 222~-2226 Pearl Street, South elevation, july 2005
Mcmo to thc Landmarks Prescrvation Advisory Board
Rc: Dcmolition Permit, 2224-22fi Pcarl Strcct
CRITERIA FOR THE BOARD'S DECISION:
The Historic Preservation ordinance speciEies that the Landmarks Board shall consider
and base its decision whether or not to impose a stay of demolition upon any of the
following criteria [10-13-23(g)]:
(1) The eligibifit~ of the builcting for designation as an'irtdiz~idun( lanc~rnark cunsisterit zvith
rhe purposes nnd standards in Sections 10-13-1 arid 10-13-3, B.R.C. 1981;
(2) The relationsiiip of tfte bttilding to the charncter of the neighhorhood ns mT estahlished arid
defincrble area;
(3) The reasorrable co~idition of the buildifi~; and
(4) Tlie rensonable projected cost of restoratiori or repair.
In cortsiderircg t{ie cortditiori of tite bt~ilding and the projected cost of restoratiort or repair
as set fnrth iji para~~rnphs (3) and (4) nhoz~e, the hoarc~ rnat~ not consider deferioration
caused by tinreasoriabie rteglect.
As detailed below, staff considers that the subject property may be eligible Eor
designation as an individual landmark.
No evidence has been provided suggesting that the condition of the building or the cost
of restoration or repair (criteria 3 and 4) are factors in the rec~uest for demolition. As
such, staff concentrated on criteria 1 and 2, the building's eligibility for landmark
designation and its relationship to the character of the neighborhood, in the analysis
below.
NEIGHBORHOOD HISTORY
Located in the area today referred to as the East I'earl Street corridor, the property
was originally part of the East Boulder addition platted in 1872 between 18''' and 25~''
Streets between Canyon Boulevard (Water Street) and Mapleton Avenue. Early
buildings in the area included the 1877 John Lund Hotel at 1906 Pearl Street and
Hygenic Swimming I'ool (now the Spruce Pool) at 2102 Spruce Street. The White Rock
ditch (which runs along the north side oE Pearl Street between 22n~' and 25"' Streets) was
dtig in 1872. In 1873 the Union Pacific Railway Depot was constructed on 15 acres oE
land on the north side of Pearl between 21ti' and 25'h Streets. This depot was short lived
5 YLA~i dala`lungrang,lllti I' l)emos'prarl.?22~1-?'?6i1R i)3 Oi mcmu.dur
'~ -
~temo to thc Landmarks Prescrvation Advisory Board
Rc: Uemolition Pcrmit, 2224-226 Pcarl Strcct
being relocated to 10'h Street in 1853, but the land continued to Eunction on the site into
the mid-20~'' century.
Clearly the 2200 block oE Pearl Street was defined by the railroad. According to
local historic J.B. Schooland, there were competing oEfers to donate land at other
locations in Boulder for a railroad entry into the city. Amos Widner and Granville
Berkley succeeded in the selection of the site at the east end oE the new platted East
Boulder residential addition. As a result the area along Pearl Street immediately adjacent
to the subject property appears to have developed with a service-industrial character
with btisinesses such as livery stables, express oEfices, and warehouses mixed with small
residential and s~mi-agricultural sites. Housing in the immediate area appears to have
been lower income and transient in nature.
PROPERTY HISTORY
Stylistically, the duplex Terrace form bLiilding at 2224-2226 Pearl Street is
indicative of turn-of-the twentieth century architecture with its Italianate inspired
decorative brickwork. The 1887 Willits map shows lot 3, of block 77 oE the East Boulder
addition (on which the building is now located) as being undeveloped. By 1913, the city
directory indicates two dwellings on the property and lists 2224 Pearl Street as being
vacant with 2226 occupied by John Doyle whose occupation is given as janitor. A
number of tenants (mostly laborers and miners) are listed at having resided in the two
units between 1913 and 1949. In 1949, the Colorado Bicycle Shop is listed as operating
out of 2224 and Petrelli's Dixie Cream Donuts at 2226 Pearl Street. Use of the property
has remained commercial since that time. In the 1976, the current tenant, Mataam Fez
S:`YLAN~Jata~longrang~H1ST~Dcmos~pearl.2224-22?6'08.03.05 mcrno.d~x
5-
Figure ~k. Drumm Map, 1911 showing property location in relation to Denver & E3uulder Valley RR.
~temo to thc Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
Re: Demolition Pcrmit, 222d-22G Pcarl 5treet
Restaurant began operation in the building. A chain of title undertaken was incomplete,
but indicates that ownership of the property has been transferred ten times since 1937.
It was acc~uired by the current owner in 1993.
ANALYSIS OF LANDMARK ELIGIBILITY
CRITERION 1.
10-13-23(g)(1): Eligibility of the Building as an Individual Landmark.
Staff considers the house at 51715th Street to have historic sufficient signiEicance for
designation as an individual landmark under the criterion for Architectural (B),
Significance, adopted by administrative policy in 1975 (see attachrnent C). While moderately
altered in the non-historic period with the addition of the fa~ade in 1976 this element co~ild be
easily removed and the original masonry exposed. Staff is of the opinion that the building is a
good representative example of Terrace duplex architechire dating from the hirn-of-the-
twentieth cenhiry.
A. Historic Significance:
1. Date oE Construction: Constructed sometime between 1887 and 1913, the building
is over Eifty years and tizough moderately altered, retains historic integrity and
survives as a good representative example of Terrace duplex architech~re dating
from the turn-of-the-twentieth century.
2. Association with Historic Persons or Events: Little documentary material
regarding tenants and owners of the building was found in the course of archival
research. Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that any oE these persons are
of local, state, or national historic signiEicance.
3. Distinction in the development oE the community oE Boulder: The property is not
in an identified potential historic district.
4. Recognition by Authorities: A 1988 survey of the building by Front Range
Research Associates (atfnchment A) characterized the level oE change as major
rest~lting in a loss of historic integrity. However, a 1999 inventory of buildings
along the East Pearl Corridor compiled by the Board for a Structure oE Merit
Report(attachrrrerit B) identifies the extent of alterations including the superEicial
fa~ade treatment as moderate and that fa~ade restoration would be possible.
ti:'' PLAN`,data'Inngrang` f 11S I' Demos'~pcarl.'"~l_"'(, 0lt.03.05 mcrnu.d~x:
6-
~1emo ro thc l_andmarks Prescrvation Ad~ isorv [3oard
Rc: Dcmolition Pcrmit, 222d-22G Pcarl Strcct
B. Architectural Significance:
1. Recognized Period or Style: Terrace
The building at 2224-2226 ['earl Street is indicative of turn-of-the twentieth
century Terrace form architecture with its Italianate inspired decorative
brick~vork. This form of one or two-story brick ar~hite~ture is identified in A
Guide to Coforado's Historic Archifecfure arrd Engineering as being unusual outside of
the state. A c. 1940 tax assessor photograph indicates shows the building to
feature a decorative corbelled parapet, segmental arch window lintels, and cut
stone sills. These elements are still visible on the east, west (side) and south (rear)
elevations and beneath the applied Ea~ade on the north elevation of the building.
While moderately altered in the non-histori~ period with the addition of the fa~ade in
1976 this elernent cotild be easily removed exposing the original masonry and
fenestration.
Figure 3. 2224-2226 Pearl Street, East elevation, July 2005
2. Architect or B~iilder of Prominence: None known
3. Artistic Merit: Representative example af turn -of -the twentieth century duplex
Terrace construction with Italianate elements.
S:\PI_AN`data+longrang HIS I~Dcmos~pcarl.2224-2226`08.03.05 memo.d~x
7-
Memo to the Landmarks Preserva[ion Advisory Board
Re: Demolition Pertni[, 2224-226 Pearl Street
4. Example of the Uncommon: Relatively rare example of duplex Terrace
construction in Boulder.
5. Indigenous Qualities: Indigenous field stone foundation and locally produced
brick wall construction.
C. Environmental Significance:
1. Site Characteristics: N/A
2. Compatibility with Site: N/A
3. Geographic Importance: N/A
4. Environmental Appropriateness: None observed
5. Area Integrity: N/A.
CRITERION 2: RELATIONSHIP TO THE CHARACTER OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD:
As discussed, the area in which the subject property is located has not been
identified as a local or National Register of Historic Places district. Despite significant
change to the area, individual buildings have been identified along the east Pearl Street
corridor (1600-2700 blocks) as being potentially historically significant by the Landmarks
Board (Attachment B). Stylistically, the building is related to the tum-of-the century
development of east Boulder and, despite moderate alteration, survives today as a good
representative example of duplex Terrace architecture from that period.
DECISION OF THE BOARD:
If the Landmarks Board finds that the building to be demolished does not have
historic significance under the criteria set forth in section 10-13-23(g) B.R.C., and the
Individual Landmark Significance Criteria (1975) the city manager shall issue a
demolition permit.
If the Landmarks Board finds that the building to be demolished may have
historic significance under the criteria set forth above, the application shall be suspended
for a period not to exceed 180 days from the Julyl7~h, 2005 date the permit application
S:~PLAN\da~aUongrang\HISilDemos\pead1224-2226\08.03 OS memo.doc
g-
Memo to the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
Re: Demohtion Pertnit, 2224-226 Pead Street
was accepted by the city manager as complete [Section 10-13-23(h)], A 180-day stay
period would expire on February 13"', 2006.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Despite moderate changes including the addition of a superficial fa~ade on the
building's north elevation, the building at 2224-2225 Pearl Street survives as a good
representative example of duplex-Terrace architecture with Italianate elements dating
from the turn-of-the-twentieth century. When weighed against criteria set forth in
Section 10-13-23(g) B.R.C and the Individual Landmark Significance Criteria (1975) staff
considers the building to have historic architectural significance. As such, City Staff
recommends that a 180 day stay of demolition be imposed in order to consider
alternatives to the demolition of the building. Staff considers that rehabilitation of the
property in a way that respects that character is possible and encouraged. Furthermore,
staff recommends the applicant meet with the Landmarks design review committee and
review the rehabilitation plans. Following that review, the Board may elect to lift the
stay of demolition or to initiate the designation process. Designation would open up the
possibility of state and local tax credits for rehabilitation.
Should the Board choose to issue the demolition permit at this time, or if the
permit is allowed to expire, staff recommends that demolition be conditioned upon
submittal of the following to the Planning Department for recording with Carnegie
Library:
1. A site plan showing the location of all existing improvements on the subject
property;
2. Measured elevation drawings of the building depicting existing conditions, fully
annotated with architectural details and materials indicated on the plans;
3. Medium format black and white photographs of all exterior elevations.
FINDINGS:
Staff recommends that the Landmarks Board adopt the following findings:
A 180-day stay of the issuance of demolition permit be issued for the building at 2224-
2226 Pearl Street in that it:
1. May be eligible for individual landmark designation based upon its historic,
architectural significance (criterion 1).
S:~PLAN~dataVongrang\HIS7lDemos\pearl.2224-2226\08 03 OS memo.doc
9-
Memo to the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board
Re: Demolition Permit, 2224-226 Pearl Street
ATTACHMENTS:
A: Historic Building Inventory Record, 1988
B: Inventory of Historic Buildings along the East Pearl Street Corridor,1999.
C: Individual Landmark Significance Criteria
D: Tax Assessor Card
E: Newspaper Articles
F: Directory and Deed Research
G Current Photographs
S:~PLAN\data\longrang\HIS71Demos\pead 2224-2226\08.03 OS memo.doc
10-
Attachment A
COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY NOT FOR FIELD USE
Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation ELIGIBLE
1300 Broa~way, Denver, Colorado DET NOT ELIG
HISTORIC BL'ILDING INVENTORY RECORD NONINATED
CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO Boulder County CERTIFIED REHAB
DATE
PROJECT NAME: BOULDER HISTORIC PLACES State ID~: 5BL2196
Building Name: tSATAAM FEZ
*BUilding Address: 2224-26 PEARL STREET BOULDER, COLORADO 80302
Building Owner: GOAT HILL INVESTMENTS, LTD. .
~wner Address: 2224 PEARL STREET B~ULDER, COLORADO 8~3~2
USGS Quad: BOULDER Quad Year: 1966, REV. 1979
Legal: Tnsp 1N Range 70W Section 30 1/4 1/4
Historic Nane:
District Name: NOT APPLICABLE
Block: 77 Lot: 3 Addition: BOULDER EAST
Year of Addition: 1872
°ilm Roll By: ROGER WHITACRE Film Number: BL21
nber of Negatives: 20 Negative Location: BOULDER
onstruction Date: ESTIDfATE: PP,E-1900
Source: COCINTY ASSESSOR RECORDS
Present Use: COM~IERCIAL Elistoric Use: RESIDENTIAL
Condition: GOOD Extent of Alterations: PIAJOR
Description: NEW FACADE.
ORIGINAL If Ploved, Date(s):
Style: TERRACE (ORIGINALLY) Stories: 1
Materials: BRICK Square Footage: 2116
Field Assessment: NOT ELIGIBLE District Potential: NO
Local Landmark Designation?: NO Name: Date:
Associated Buildings?: NO Type:
If Inventoried, List Id Numbers:
Architect: UNKNOWN Source:
Builder/Contractor: UNKNOWN Source:
Original Owner: UNKNOWI~d Source:
2224-26 Pearl Street
Plan Shape: . . . . . . . . . .
Theme(s):
The Urban Frontier (1860-1920).
Page 2
Architectural Description:
Originally a terrace duplex. Each duplex door was flanked by
segmental-arched windows; corbelled brick cornice. The facade has been
entirely remodeled with diagonal wood siding; new windows and doors.
Original segmental-arched windows can still be seen on the side elevations.
Construction History:
Historical Background:
In 1913, one of the occupants of this duplex was John Doyle, janitor
of the Whittier School.
chitectural Significance:
_ Represents the work of a naster.
_ Possesses high artistic values.
_ Represents a type, period or method of construction.
Historical Significance:
_ Associated with significant persons.
_ Associated with significant events and/or patterns.
Contributes to an historic district.
Statement of Significance:
This building has been remodeled beyond its historic integrity.
References:
Boulder County Assessor's Records
Sanborn Insurance Maps
Boulder City Directory, 1913-14
Surveyed by Whitacre/Simmons Affiliation: Front Range Research
Date: June 1988
~Z
Attachment B 11
2150 Pearl pre-1913
Description: Ttus is a wide-gabled brick struchue, originally a church, with a comer
tower with pyramidal roof over the entrance. The tower sides have decorative fishscale
s6ingles and vents. A Paladin-style, Gothic-arched window is located in the gabled wall
dormer on the eastem elevation. Muhi-paned windows have flat arches and rusticated
stone sills. The entry door is flanked by columns, has a transom above. Stone foundation.
TI-is intact, early church is architecturally signiScant in that it represents a type and
period.
The 1413 Boulder City D'vectory lists this address as the Free Methodist Chwch; it is
currently a successful "adaptive reuse" as a business.
Extent ofAherations: Moderate. The porch steps are replaced.
Style: Gothic style church
Materials: Brick
Architect: Unknown District: None
2224-26 Pearl est. pre-1900
Description/EIistory: In this terzace duplex, each front door is flanked by segmental-
arched windows (covered with red drape now). There was a corbelled brick cornice. The
original decorative segmental-arched windows can still be seen on the brick side walls.
Apparently the original front is under the diagonal wood siding. Fa~ade restoration
would be possible by removal of the more recent materials, since the original brick
structure is intact, along with its windows and doors (no additions).
Extent of Ahetations: Moderate. Has a superficial fapade treatment.
Style: Originally a Terrace style duplex
Materials: Brick
Architect: Unlmown IJistrict: None
2232 Pearl est. pre-1900
Description/History: It is a one-story brick building representative of the Urban Frontier
style, with flat roof. The basic structure exists and t6e original segmental-arched
windows can be seen on the west side wall. There is a low addition on one side. Further
study is needed as to whether restoration of the faqade would be possible at some point.
By 1900, this was the grocery store and residence of John and Ester poyle and their two
young children. It was imown as the Doyle Grocery. Later became Roger's Kitchen.
Extent ofAherations: Major. The front fa~ade has been remodeled with aew wood and
metal siding, the sides are stucco.
Style: 19'~ C commercial
Materials: Brick and stucco
Architect: Unl~own District: None
2250 Pearl est. 1924
Description: Charactetistic of 20~` C wmmercial architecture, it reflects a`Snodem"
influence, and therefore has little omamentation. The stuccoed fa~ade has a balanced,
stepped slsape, with the gabled roof form hidden behind. Even though not in current use,
the front has retained the pa'ved garage doors. It is a good, and intact example of its
style, and retains its historic use.
I~
Attachment C
__ eservation Advisory Board
Adopted 9/17/75
_ '''~ ,~~ . ~~~
Secretary to the Board
SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
Individual Landmark
September 1975
On September 6, 1974, the City Council adopted Ordinance #4000 providing procedures
for the designation of Landmarks and Historic Districts in ihe City of Boulder. The purpose of
the ordinance is the preservation of the City's permitted cultural, historic, and archi[ectural
heritage. The Landmarks Board is permitted by the ordinance to adopt rules and regulations as it
deems necessary fo~ its own organization and procedures. The following Significance Criteria
have been adopted by the Board to help evaluate each potential designation in a consistent and
equitable manner.
Historical Significance
The place (building, site, area) should show character, interest or value as part of the
development, heritage, or c~ltural chazacteristics of the community, state or nation; be the site of
-• a historic, or prehistoric event that had an effect upon society; or exemplify te cultural, political,
economic, or social heritage of the community.
Date of Construction: This area of consideration places particular importance on
the age ofthe structure.
2. Association with Hisrorical Persons or Events: This association could be national,
state, or local.
3. Distinction in the Development of the Communitv of Boulder: This is most
applicable to an institution (religious, educational, civic, etc) or business structure,
though is some cases residences might qualify. It stresses the impoRance of
preserving those places which demonstrate the growth cluring different time spans
in the history of Boulder, in order to maintain an awareness of our cultural,
economic, social or political heritage.
4. RecoQnition bv Authorities: If it is recognized by Historic Boulder, Inc. the
Boulder Historical Society, local historians (Barker, Crossen, Frink, Gladden,
Paddock, Schooland, etc), State Historica! Society, The Imnrovement of Boulder,
Colorado by F.L. Olmsted, or others in published form as having historical
interest and value.
~ 04.OSsignif-indiv
Page 1 of 3
~ `~`
Architec[ural Sienificance
The place should embody those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type
specimen, a good example of the common; be the work of an architect or master builder, known
nationally, state-wide, or locally, and perhaps whose work has influenced later development
contain elements of architectural design, detail, materials or crafrsmanship which represent a
significant innovation; or be a fine example of the uncommon.
Recoenized Period/Stvle: It should exemplify specific elements of an architectural
period/style, ie: Victorian, Revival styles, such as described by Historic Amei•ican
Building Survev Criteria, Gingerbread Aee (Maass), 76 Boulder Homes (Barkaz),
The Historv of Architectural St ~Lle (Marcus/Wiffin), Architecture in San Francisco
(Gebhard et al), Historv of Architecture (Flectcher), Architecture/Colorado, and
any other published source of universal or focal analysis of "style."
Architect or Builder of Prominence: A good example of the work of an architect
or builder who is recognized for expertise in his field nationalty, state-wide, or
locally.
3. Artistic Merit: A skillful integration of design, material, and color which is of
excellent visual quality and/or demonstrates superior crafrsmanship.
4. Examole of the Uncommon: Elements of architectural design, details, or
craftsmanship that are representative of a significant innovation. ~:::_~, fi
Indieenous Oualities: A style or materiai that is particulady associated with the
Bouldec area.
6. Other, if applicable.
Environmental Significance
The place should enhance the variety, interest, and sense of identity of the community by
the protection of the unique natural and man-made environment.
Si[e Characteristics: [t should be of hi~h quality in terms of planned or natural
vegetation.
Compatibilitv with Site: Consideration will be given to scafe, massing placement,
or other qualities of design with respect to its site.
3. Geogra~hic Importance: Due ro its unique location or singulaz physical
characteristics, it represents an established and familiar visual feature of the
04.OSsignif-indiv
Page 2 of 3
~
community.
4. Environmental Appropriateness: The suaoundings are complementary andlor it is
situated in a manner particularly suited to its function.
5. Area Inteeritv: Places which provide historical, architectural, or environmental
importance and continuity of an existing condition, although taken singularly or
out of context might not qualify under other criteria.
6. Other, if applicable.
S:~PLAMdata\ComdevU-IIS'I~GEN\Designatio~Wbout Landmarks\signif cnt-indiv.wpd
_,.:.-_.~
04.OSsignif-indiv
Page 3 of 3
~ ~
~ Attac hment D
~~ , g
~
~ {
4
~~,~!
r4 t~,.~ .[~ . , ' J.••,
/~~ '
~
A
i
a ~
;
`+F.~
q.
,'
,y
J
~ •
' '~;i
~' ' ~ ` ~ ~~~'~'~~
t . . ~
\
r ,
~~~
"` ~ y N
'~I
~ f
'
{ .
~ ~ ^', ~ .
, +
~ #
~ C~4 ~.
.~.
~7
.
I
+
1~rJ • •.
' .
~
~
.11.
..
s ~ . _~ .~;
F_ , • ,, • ~ •' ~
. ~•
~ 't
Y
t ~ ~
i~4 ~
~ ~-~~ ~'~ ~.
..o-~
~~
~~t •
~ ~ ;~/
P
` ~ Ii-v
L `~
l
_ __~ ~- .
~
i ~
!
• R
:
~
`
:T ,. '. ' ..
_~
a
.
i ~ `/v APPraised l9 •
BOULDER CQU1*JT`! r'~~,QL FS ;,-^iT~ At'PRAISAL_
~t-L~ ._ C<
~~~ ~.::~~,'
~~ ;U[ ~r~:
. .. , .~. . . ,. r`~~t. Li:e in ~~~~,~r=
N;S'CIMATF: OF V,11.U.1TIUF -- - -- - - - -- -
, ULUG. PA6T d~ OIAC. PART ll GARACE
No.Cubicl~'ezt-----'---- ---'---------'-- --I---------
(:ost per cu. ft. ------~i------'--_'-"'----'-- -~-----------'
---
TotalCost----------I~------~- ---$----6---- ,
-~-I$--~-----
Porohes-------------~'---------------'------'---- ----'----------
K -'- ----'---------°-
Gara e--'-------"---I - ~-'--'----
--", ,
Extrae------"---~I'----'--'---' --'--- ---
-"- '--- ---" --
----- -------'---'-'-:'--' _ _ - _-.'''---- ----'-
--- ~'---' - -"_ -
-°-_ '-----"---
------ - - '-----------"
- -_ -- -= _ -:_ _ -----_= ~
I$----------
$ "-' _ - ""-- ~
-- ~ - - -
~r~-~=- -
~
s
---~ ObO es nce--'
--------'-
--- li r.
-~
'---------
-
----`kPh9sicalDe.--I.-~--'-----rr_.:_-----_
--
- p ;
l
_-_=~
'--
- -
Net After Deductinq i :
.
.
Depreciation-°-~a--'--------- b------- --- j$--------"- I
:
----,o Utility Dep.---~I~---------g-------- ----~
I
~
PRESENT VALUE--$-----------g----------
- --
- ---- - ~ - - - $ -c_r--
---
~~
- - - -
-
- ----- - ---
llESCSIPTION
~ ~~
--~-
--~---=-_=_= --
-------
-
i
Class of Bldg.-~_-- t'----'---__ Basement---_,- ----
-i
-"---'-"----- ,
Constructian .-~- --'--'---'----"IRooF-_-'-'---' - ---
~ ---.
~
'~Heatinq (~
'~.'~u~
L"- ~
iit;ILllItiC; PL~N
FxtermrConst.i,.-'~=' -'-'--"' -- - ----'_ .
°--°"-°-- -- -- - --- -- - -
'---'-- Ptumbin~t---_''-'--'---------- StiMJtARY
"~" - _ - _ - -_ _ __ _
Iqteriur Finish ___""""----- Light'_____-_ nFSCeiP7'~os'
__ Priv. Gara e_ """_______-___ kuildin~; k'ermit-~ _~_ -~ -
Fluora _._____' ._'_"_""""_ g
i Originel Cosr, lrnu~'~~~'«'n enL Uoiy _____
Stoties-------- ------------------ ~3rns or Sheds _..____________-- Additions and Bttterment+
' Stnte uf 2eps -_'__'_____"___'_~ __-_ __- _ _ _ . - . _
F~rc Resisting- .____: ,(lwnur's Iistimatc ut Prc~on[ ~'nluc
.-.__.__-____ _-__-
F~iundxtion_._ _ _____. Locni Imnc. _""_ ______ Pricate Anurnfe:+l
A'NOI 6T
- _ ~ _"
_ __- ~_ __ -_
___ _ ~____ _.__
-- - - ~ g -- - -
a
0
HeiRhtof Building_________ __.
-
-
- ~-- .
ANNU~L AtiSF:SSMA:NT
YF.AR ~
_ LAND ilIJ1PROYEMEN7S
_ _ 70TAI
_
193R j ~I3
_ _ - _ _ _ __ $
_ _
1939 ~
' ___ ___ _ _
19A0 i I
ivai
~ !
_ _-
-~ _
IU4L ~ ~i
-- - --- - - --- -
-- -- -
CLA9S OF BU[LDtNG ~ l1EIGHT
Chevk~ Cherk
~wqle Renidence ___ _.____' \u. of itories_____'___ _____
. 1Sansard'__ '___ _"_' _'_ • I ___' __ ___'__"'_' '_'_'_' _"__ "'""'____"'"'__"
__. `tre--t P::v,nK____."_________ ,
_ .-~__._ - - -_. : LNanto.___ ______ ~ "'_.
i . "_: FIS(mH
_'"____"_"___" "_'_ " '__""1 "" ' L~t ~>:viik'. -"__'__. . Gi.eJionber~
"__ _ , ' _" _"
---------------- -- ---- -- ---a
. ~ PI.tiDtfilFG ~ 5idewal6s___'____________"_"_' ~
aT~ ~ RI tiS
Duplex __
_ _ _ . . _
. .. ~.~ ~. ~
Fnli~~i. ,.~~
I ~,'~„~,d,n.n~.le .._.
. .
~° ----~--
----------- - _ - __- _.___.-_
'
ItrnE,a!ou~, Apt. Crc. -- -
~.kl
~•_~••d•~ ~ a nim<
=
Flatur'Ceira~e ~ I3rick "_'______'___
__-
' ~ Com~~o;ii•,~~n ~i..o,~l~. ,
_~_- ~ --- ---
__ _
~ ----'
-. ____ _ ;
_ _
, -.__-.- ' . ~
.__._.._
---- ,Conr
rete Tarar.dGin«~I- ~ - --- ~~------~ -- --- ~ -- --' !Li~:infiHumn----- ---- -~ -- ---- --------- -'--~
AF:arUnr-n[ [lu:i.e._ _
__ ,
_____.__.."_
-----
~ Stone -~
-
Prep~re~i Ynper-----~---
v
-t~_! ---- -~----~-
-------------~-~-~
liinin~+ Itoom------------... ------------ -- --- -'-
Hotel_
- __'___'____._
-- --- !
-- '
_ __ __. _ .._
3coreBuildmg ;
i WouJ __""__""'__"_'__
_ .- ~ ~hec:lron_'_ '____
__'_' PKIt'4Tr. (7.11±Af,li
~ Uinette ____" _"'_'___ __
~ ---~-'- ---- ------
------,.---
; Tile--------'--
-"
Copper-----'----'-'
'--
-~ -~- -.
--- ~ .
~ - - --
, -/
Iiitct:en--------"'
__. _-- ----" ._-------'-------
-----"--'----'-----'--
"- ---
-----
I ---'-
( l,uncrete Tile --'-'----
~ -- ~ ~'ize ------•
' "
-
-----'-----"'-'
-
Rreaktast Nuok "'-----"-
"""
'-'----
Oilice iimldinS__"'__""_ ~_____'_""""_'_'__'_-'_'"
; __" '_"'
~ Clay'lll~. _ ' .. _ -----
;'on:,trnc'~.ion.
_.__ :
. -
"'^___'Y"___'_"_ _'""'_'_____"""""'_"
~
[;ed P.ootn___"""_____'__":__"'______'
_
u.~,ita or Sxmterium------
~.---~--------°----- "-""
---i
1 ~iAtP_ ___
_ _'__
'
----'
~
_'__"'_'______ ___
- _________
___.
P.ath 'oo•
. ,tl'____ _
1 """'
""
Can!: iinildmK --
._~__
~ ~----_'--- - ~-'~- --- _"
_.
-- 1
_
2cuf _
______
'-'-'-----"-- - ~-----~
A.hestos j:imclr. - __
______ -'--"---"'-- ---- i Co~let i.oum---------'------
TneaU~r__"____."___'____.
i3.1SFM1P.CtiT'
Ln .__"
.
--- --- ' icsc------
~
_ ' '____'__'__'_
'__-
----
wer . ~m ' '
~:,ho ~ c~
R'urrhuusr__
_ - ,
___.
------
_ _ ,
----
~ .
'___'__"_'____
- - ---- '- -------- -
___"' '____ '
_'_" __
__ """'_"" "_'____"
'"" 'r
"""' _
~ ;~
u~~h
eepm~
k'actorl_"'___'
'
1 Qaartcr____"____""__"' "
""__'_
____ _'__'- " "'_'""_"'_ _ "_' _"
__'____.' ___.
'
__""'_
___-
PuhlicGarake__'___"_____
Half__'_____'___ . '._. ,
i 5TYLE
___ ___'__""__'
' __'_____'_""_'___'_ . .
.
~un ..o, m. ___'_______'_'________'_______________________
rivnte Garage
Three-Qu~rter .-'-'---__ --
'
;IEDS
'
RN3
.
D
; "'en---- ---
"-----'-'-- - ---""---'----
I
.
-- -'--
-"-'_"-_-
S
• -
i
I F
ll _
_
Lle
___".__
~
_______ -_ _
__
~ _
_ __ .
-
~
_~ __
t :
tnrss~e Luom."'______""_"""
~ "_---'-----------'-
ervu
c Station'-'---'----- u
_-----'------
--' _
~
li
____ '___'__ ___"
---
P--- ..
~iZe_
~ _ _
_____
- Con
s
---'--
I U;lice
Ilot House or Gr. Elouse ___.
~ Cement Flor,r__.__' . _._
'__ ~ F'lat
~~ize
Cnnet
1 '_'________""""__"
"'----~~----'-----"-'------
Ponltrv Uouse
!~I'imshett PJn.lla anu Ce~~hoq __
_____'____"'__._
~. tr=_
._ ___.____ _
. _'_"_
----- i Halls _'_
; _____"____.."_'_______"__._"______ _'____.
- ~---'----- . - f Gambrel
' ~
H:unsorShcds______ ______
~ .zundry ___. ___' _ ---
----~--
---
._ I --
`- L!J(1AL19Sf' R0~'k:518hT5 ---- ---__-----------"'------------`---'
--'--
(
CONS CRUI'I70 V
nc _____"_______"__'__'__"
;:,_ '--"----'~.
` ---- -----'----------
~rete, Piniu or Bloel:________
~rcte, Reinfu:ced ________.__
I Frame------~--------"--
rx~r~tctoh
-- ---
Common Brick--_`-_-_--'-_
Presaed Brick--_-~_--_------
Wire Cut lirick____ .______ ___
Glnzed Brick'---------------
Wood Siding--"--."-----'---
Wood Shinglce -'--"'----'-----
Cement Stuceo___________±_
Kellas[une --'----_ -"---"--'
Stone ----' °-------- -'-----
Cor t d I
~oor• -- - - ~
cne~~.'
LIGFPC ~ UFSCRIf'Tif/N
('UV~1 Pf'~ 7'~6V ', ~ . /! ~
~ n;c,•.nerty _.._ ____"____ _. 1 f:CQSfS
~ ~ nhntshea __"'___ ____ ______ ____'_ ____"'; __.'___
- ~ --- - Curbm ~
"--'
-------
Old 8cyle -~----- ------'- ~ ~ Fla.tered, Flain-°---- -- ~---- -"-----"_--'-----~
~ Wutur --'-----"--------"'---- >
lfodern---- -, I[Iacteree.Ornam---.. ---- _ ---- -' ---"'----.--.----
______"___'_______. Jtotm Sewer""__'_"""_'______
No. 6ath Tubs'----------'- Papered--------- --`-'--- -~ ---'-----'-'-----'
Sanitary5ewer___________________ YaintedorTinted__
No. Shower ttaths'--'-"_- --_'------ ----------'----
---I Eleetncity _--"----'-----"_.'_ ,
No.'Poilets"---------- Softwood Floor"-- - ------ - ---'----'-'---- -
------"°--------
-'--- Gae--'----'--
Vm Lavntories------- HardwoodFloor----. ._..'---- -- °---- ---- _-- _
___'_ Telephone"__'_______'__""""_ ~
Yu. Urinais_________"____ SofhvoodFinisn"'_ __"'!_ __ _ ________ ._ _ _ _
-----"-' ----- ---- - _ _'-"
No. LxnndryTuba__"'___'__ Aard~coodFinish __ _ _ __ __ __ _ ____ ______ _____.
"' _'"""""_ _ _ _ _""""'"' _' No.
No.Sinks________'__"_'__ ~ ITile___'_'__.___. - - _ __. '_._.
SynitaryCloaets __._______~ D713CELGAYEOUS ~'•O MerUleorOnyx
_ .--~- --'-- -
rn~a e ron__'_______'____ Cess Pool _____"'._____""___ I - - - __ _-_ ~4all Roard.___. _ ._ __._. __._. _. __..__
- - ------ - - -
.R:ICPGft ON ~'O\S'C. Terra Cotta _------------ ----- ---------'---- - ~ S~drboxr~„ - ------------------ Sheetrock---'-- ----- -~~ --'------- --_'--'~----'-
_- _ _______-_ ' I:t~ff~t ._______________
._------ 'Pi1e -------------- -"-- fIEA'fl!vG " -- - Celotez--'--'-----'----------'-°"'-----------_
'„ ------' - - - C:.!,.m t _- _-------°'-------I Nainscotin
------------ -- --- K------'------'------""'-"-'-°'---_'
~a ~~ __ . ., ._ "._"" ; c.,~;o . Y i Ce~cI:C:~.r. _""'_"_""'"'""__ ~ ~ietal C~et ~
___ "_ '__"__"' - _ '
__________________'__________.! ..~ _. _ ____..__ __ __ ' , mg"""'_'._""'_""_""""'____"_'_""'_
1 _ __ _ ____ __ ____"'~ ( Ruc Air :_ __'_'_.____. __.._, ~ ~ ..~m•'ri.mr, _______'_'______'_'.~ "_"""""'___""'_""__""'__"_""____"""_'_
________________
I'.oais;:r.~: ___' '_'_ '__'__'"' " "'_""'_"' ot R'nt~r'._ '_ __ nrmrrntur_' """"___" "' _ ~
~ II lI
~: . „ ~ OU'i'.:t i ., ~ . ~, -- - ~ - --REDiak- - -
~
.,r~ .~~•,~,,.Lr:; _.______"_ ' I li ~S.II: ~ S~c;,~n _ _ ._'___' _ _-_ ~;~:c L~-:hts _ ___ __.____ __.__'_ '____ _ _ K9
' - -.
__ --__ ___ _ ' ' ~ _ _ - '
~., :n
__._ __'____..______ __ I . ' \0 1~'~rePlai~e., '._, o~ri~ni ~r(oocr ~
~ II(11~ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ . . - ~~ ~ ~
.~n. "_ , ~~^', ~~m~~~~~ I ' _"_'__
-'_._'~""""___ 1 " ~
"'"__". I~unim}' l''v~~pian.. - '_""'__'_"___ i
Trrra Cotta_'_.__'_._ _________"""'____""'_."__'______"__"_"_'_____'__'
Sl'A1'4: UF H!':Yn.'itti
, f V
~ i.~r ~ u^^ I~nnrv,+ .,~.,u.er m~o ,~ _____'_
__"' •
[unr- "__ _'"_
~ ""__'"' ' _ ~ --. I
i .,. ~ 'ai~Les-_ ~ "_'____'_'_""____________"_.. ______'
w
c
~
.~
U
CC
w
~
~
Wm. C. Nialzahn
Dies After Long
Illness Saturdp,y~ ~; ;
William Christian ~Bill) Malzahn
of 785 University avenue, died Sat-
urday after a long illness. He was
widely k¢own in Boulder through
his ]ong association with the Boul-
der Grain and Elevator Co. under
the management of the late C. W.
Rowland and his successors.
Born at Stnckton, Calif., Nov. 28,
1876 to William and Pauline Rune-
hart Malzahn, he had been a resi-
de~t of Boulder for 50 years.
Survivors are his wife, Naomi,
and a daughter, 11irs. Pauline Wha-
len of Colorado Springs; three sis-
ters and three brothers. The sis-
ters are D4rs. Emme Hall and Mrs.
Myrtte Allen of Bemidji, Minn., and
Mrs. Lena Hoffman of Minneapolis
The brothers are Sam and John
Malzahn of $emidji and Lawrence
Malzahn of kaywood, Calif.
Private funeral services will be
held at the Allardice-Hibbard mor-
tuary Tuesday morning. Dr. Ralph
~'~ D. Evans, pastor of the First Pres-
I byterian church, will officiate. The
I famtly reqvests no flowers.
Giilette's Grbaery
O~pens Saturday Qn
1 University Hill
Harcp V, l7 e opane the Gti•
Ietta Grocery Market 8aturday
in the endre eou hatt of the~Mzl
Gelwicks csr Vn~ty Hfil garage
building at~ S
YiIr. Gittet c aned the Piatt
grocery at as moved 1k to
tbe new I atlo whar Se hae add-
ed a comg ew etoc ot grocer-
lea and meats.
Mx. Gilleite e ir not bntp
the space oacu ie Yiy the Oelwlck
~ mueau~m Lut t lepisq room oS
1 the garage, g3vtn him s Iarge
eto=Q.
Ha w111 not carry L'rUits ~and "vege-
tables because~of the flna stock al-
ready made,avaliable b9 Mra: Paro
in her.8na atore. . . . , . _
Clsire Stuck, widely knowa
6utcher, will ~be'in,charge of.the
maTkei.
~ _ __ _,.
Leslie Graham's
Funeral Held At
Sterling; Friday w
Funeral services ere held Fri-I
day, May 26th, '8terling, . Colo•
rado for Leallp (i ham of 2242
~Wal¢ut, who iyyy~~~,,, t. 7oseph's
7~daqltal ia~e~~ 23. .
Ae and fa , [e, lara E. Grg-
hama,_cam ° B ]der to make
their home, as~.~had retired
from the me ntf businesa in
Sterling. He h been i¢ buatneea
there for 23 peara.
' Besides Mra. Graham he is eur-
vived by a son, Me~le, of Denver,
aad two daughtera The latteY are~
R'ilda of Los Angelea, and Boa-
aie of Redoado Beach. There are
81so tovr graadchi~dren. The daugh-
tera ar0 here w3th their mother. '
~
N
DEED RESEARCH WORKSHEET
G~ ROPERTY I Z22~ ~E~ti S- I LEGAL DESCRIPTION I` 3 B
~
C
DATE GRANTOR/SELLER GRANTEE/NEW OWNER ~CEPTION #/
BOOK & PAGE NOTES
H' 37 Q4~~9 C~-~s~~w
Zs ~~ ~~ N
~ ~t5 co~. ~
~z ~ 8 s ~,~ ,w~h~ c N~~4 S.
~ ~ G G ~su~
E
6 2`~ 7 C
V~G~'r I . J ~ r R~ -~t2N ~1.
4 i ~ ~ ~. 1 ~w ~.-~~~ a~+
a
1~17T"I.F ~~O~tfr ~ RRtFhO M' I
OA°r Ic.c~ .(~TD.
t~_ ~ ~~ I N ~~-,~,.,TS 5V ~~-r,~ ,+ P
Z l~e
Arr-TN ~e
~ ~
~
~
~
~+
~
d
~
HIS1'ORIC BUILDING RESEARCH SHEET
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 22L4 - 2Z26 ~<no 5-r
PROPERTY NAIv1E: YE~~
STYLE: ARCHITECT:
DE V ELOPMENT/NEIGHBORHOOD:
RESOURCE CHECKLIST:
( ) HISTORIC INVENTORY RECORD:
( ) SANBORN It~'SURANCE MAP:
( ) MARDHN MAP:
( ) ADDITION/PLAT MAP:
( ) BUILDING PERMITS:
( ) ASSESSOR CARD:
( ) PROPERTY DEEDS:
( ) ZONING (from MapLmk): _
( ) DAILY CAMERA CLIPPINGS:
( ) GLADDEN REFERENCE BOOKS.
( ) PHOTOGRAPHS.
( ) HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT:
O FIELD GUIDE TO AMERICAN HOUSES
( ) GUIDH TO COLORADO ARCHITECTORE~
POLK'S CITY & COUNTY DIRECTORIES
BUSN 1869
CITY 1871
BUSN 1882
CITY 1883
CN CY 1892
CNTY 1896
CN CY 1898
CITY 1901
CITY 1903
CNTY 1904
CITY 1905
CITY 1906-07
CITY 1908
CITY 1911
CITY 1913
CNTY 1916
CNTY 1918
BUSN 1918
CNTY 1921
CNTY ] 923
CNTY 1926
CNTY 1928
CNTY 1930
CN"CY 1932
CNTY 1935
CNTY 1936
CITY 1938
CNTY 1940
BUSN 1940
CITY 1943
CITY 1946 (2q nl ~° .~~+ ~
CNTY 1947
CITY 1949 (~g O ~ No Za cr¢(u.i ' ,,
CITY 1951 ~t t+iTtvr~~ ~E ~ c~ (z6 /R~.,,+-.
2 `~
POLK'S DLRECTORY LISTINGS (CONTINUEDI
CITY 1953
CITY 1955
CITY 1956
CITY 1958
CITY 1959
CITY 1960
~ CITY 1961
C[TY t962
CITY 1963
CITY 1964
CITY 1965
CITY 1966
CITY 1967
CITY 1965
CITY 1969
CITY 1970
CITY 1971
CITY 1972
CITY 1973
CITY 1974
CITY 1975
CITY 1976
CITY ]977
CITY 1978
CITY 1979
CITY 1980
CITY 1981
C[TY 1983
CITY 1984
CITY 1955-86
CIIY 1987
CITY 1988-89
CITY 1989-90
CITY 1990-91
CITY t991
BLDR 1992
SLDR 1993
DNVR 1994
BLDR 1995
BLDR 1996
CITY 1997
CITY 1997-98
CITY 1998-99
CITY l999-00
CICY 2000-O1
CI'IY 200t
CITY 2002
CITY 2003
NOTES:
ZS
7 c%',
., j~ . . ~: -- - , . __.. _ -
~t v v1~ L~~I ~~~ l~~ ~- ~1 ~'~ ~l 6`
~ ~'"!~ t \ \ ~~ ~ . ~ r~ . ._....~ ~
'~~~"'a~5 ` _ ;;,jiMA ~ .1~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~, `',~ '.. ;
' ;„..~r, ~+~~,~ .~j''~T ~, C.t'~+"'t° r y .: ; .
~t °'•~ » 7/~ `,~ ~ ... . . ~~a
~'~~~~ ~ . ' ~. ~ ~;t~„~~ ~"T.M.~.rw "
~~l~jl ~~1~~~
~~! t~ ~ ~ I L, ~
~ ~