Loading...
Item 6A - Chautauqua Access Management Plan Memo 1 C I T Y O F B O U L D E R LANDMARKS BOARD MEETING DATE: March 1, 2017 AGENDA TITLE: Chautauqua Access Management Plan (CAMP) Summer 2017 Pilot Projects – Staff Recommendations PRESENTERS: Bill Cowern, Principal Traffic Engineer, Public Works-Transportation Division Susan Connelly, Deputy Director, Community Vitality Department EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This memorandum details the background on the Chautauqua Access Management Plan (CAMP) Summer 2017 Pilot Project origins, goals and process to date and presents staff’s recommendations for pilot implementation in summer 2017, including considerations related to selection of strategies to pilot and how success will be measured. The staff recommendations include multiple components across four “zones” within greater Chautauqua that address parking management and multi-modal improvements including: 1. Paid parking in all zones, 2. Two-hour time-restricted (and paid) public parking AND permit systems in the two Neighborhood Zones, 3. Free transit service from satellite parking lots and 4. An employee Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for employees within Chautauqua (Colorado Chautauqua Association, Colorado Music Festival, Chautauqua Dining Hall and OSMP/Ranger Cottage) The desired timing of the summer 2017 pilot is approximately June 1 through August 31 to respond to the highest usage time of the year. BACKGROUND: In 2015, the city and the Colorado Chautauqua Association (CCA) entered into a new lease, effective Jan. 1, 2016. The lease contains the commitment of the city and CCA to develop a Chautauqua Access Management Plan (“CAMP”) according to the following specific governing principles:  Chautauqua is a unique shared resource requiring unique solutions.  Chautauqua is a National Historic Landmark. 2  The needs of all stakeholders, including the Association, cottage owners, park users, open space users and neighbors should be considered.  A mix of uses must be accommodated.  Pedestrians must be given priority on narrow streets without sidewalks.  Traffic circulation should be minimized in the interests of pedestrian safety and user experience.  Parking demand is seasonal and solutions need not address time periods during which access is readily available.  During peak periods, the parking needs of users in the historic core should be prioritized, but not exclusive.  A seasonal transportation demand management (TDM) plan for employees should be implemented.  The right of public access should not be restricted except for good cause, with such restrictions minimized as appropriate.  The interests of the surrounding neighbors should be addressed.  Any plan should be flexible to address changing circumstances.  Access management should be consistent with the Guiding Principles for Place Management and Fiscal Sustainability.  Consistent with the city’s climate commitment and sustainability and resilience goals, any plan should support public transit, alternative modes of transportation, a reduction in vehicle miles traveled and a reduction in visits in single-occupant vehicles. In addition to the CAMP governing principles contained in the city-CCA lease, relevant guidance for this plan also includes the city’s Access Management and Parking Strategy (AMPS) guiding principles:  Provide for all transportation modes  Support a diversity of people  Customize tools by area  Seek solutions with co-benefits  Plan for the present and the future  Cultivate partnerships At a study session on Feb. 9, 2016, staff sought council feedback on the process for development of the CAMP. Council members supported staff’s recommendation to collect new (updated) data in summer 2016, followed by development of a CAMP pilot program for implementation in 2017. As discussed at that study session, options for the CAMP summer 2017 pilot would include consideration of:  Some degree of managed parking within the Chautauqua leasehold area and possibly in the surrounding neighborhood as well. This could include parking restrictions similar to those provided by the Neighborhood Parking Permit Program.  Some degree of paid parking, possibly in the Ranger Cottage lot, on the loop surrounding the park and/or on Baseline Road.  Enhancements to other modes of transportation including but not limited to restoration of transit service to the Chautauqua area. 3 Initial Mitigation Strategies in Summer 2016 Staff implemented several preliminary mitigation strategies in summer 2016 based on discussions with and feedback from residents within the neighborhood north of Baseline. Parking block striping (“Ls”) were installed in an attempt to address illegal parking blocking sight lines and driveways. Additional enforcement staff was also deployed on peak weekend visitation days. Summer 2016 Data Collection and Analysis – Key Findings Three types of data collection occurred in 2016 to aid development of a 2017 pilot program and subsequent evaluation of the implemented pilot. First, the Fox Tuttle Hernandez Transportation Group (FTH) collaborated with multiple city departments and the Colorado Chautauqua Association (CCA) to monitor and collect parking utilization and duration data as well as speed and volume data in and around the Colorado Chautauqua National Historic Landmark, including the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Data collection took place on multiple days in July and August. Second, RRC Associates developed a user intercept survey. This survey was conducted at multiple locations throughout the Chautauqua campus by a team of trained interviewers between June 30 and Sept. 4 throughout the day, from morning through early evening, on various days of the week. A total of 1,491 interviews were completed. Third, OSMP staff analyzed updated visitation counts in 2015 and administered visitor surveys at the Chautauqua trailheads in 2016 that were specifically designed to support the CAMP process. This data is available for review on the CAMP webpage www.ChautauquaAccessManagementPlan.com, including a high-level summary of more than 650,000 data points collected during summer 2016. The data collection efforts included new parking observation areas that had not been studied in previous field studies, new observations of bicycle demand, new travel pattern data beyond the Chautauqua area, and a shared street safety analysis within Chautauqua. The specific data collected included:  Travel pattern and arrival routes - Acyclica readers detect a portion of the Wifi or Bluetooth signal that emits from a mobile device or vehicle. The city’s Acyclica readers at four locations external to Chautauqua and two readers deployed within Chautauqua yielded data on two days that indicated arrival direction patterns of Chautauqua area visitors.  Vehicle traffic and speeds - Using traffic count and speed data equipment at various locations on roadways in and around Chautauqua  Parking supply, duration, and utilization - Through FTH field observation and photo documentation walking routes each hour for eight hours over 11 collection days with different usage patterns – concert and non-concert, weekday and weekend – as well as license plate recognition technology  Bicycle parking and usage - Through FTH field observation over two days 4  Rideshare usage and drop off locations - Using FTH field observations over 11 days while conducting the hourly parking supply, duration and utilization observations and photo documentation and on two concert nights  Shared Street interactions - Through video camera footage of Kinikinnick Road analyzed by FTH Key findings from the transportation data collection, OSMP surveys and RRC user intercept surveys included:  Approximately one-third of visitors to the Chautauqua area are city of Boulder residents, approximately another third are non-city Boulder County residents and the remainder come from other Colorado communities like Denver and Broomfield or from out of state (California and Texas, for example).  Approximately 70 percent of visitors who live between two and four miles from the Chautauqua area arrive by automobile and do so several days per week.  Data collected from August to November suggests that Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) visitation at Chautauqua more than doubled between 2004 and 2015. The largest component of this increase can be attributed to visitors living outside the City of Boulder.  Visitation to Chautauqua trailheads is twice as much on a weekend day compared to a weekday and typically peaks around 11 a.m.  Visitation to Chautauqua trailheads is typically around 2,500 people per day and can be as high as 5,000 people per day.  Almost half of the people surveyed when visiting Chautauqua trailheads stated that they found it “easy” or “very easy” to find parking. Less than one third found it “difficult” or “very difficult” to find parking.  The majority of people traveling to the Chautauqua area arrive from the south, using either US-36 or Broadway to access Baseline Road. Between a quarter and a third (varies by day) come from the north (downtown) and arrive by 9th Street. Most of the remainder come in from the east or northeast (east Boulder, Longmont, Lafayette, etc.). When entering the historic district, more than 80 percent enter from the Baseline Road/Grant Place/Kinikinnick entrance.  The duration that people parked in the Chautauqua area averaged close to three hours per visit. Parking duration in the Ranger Cottage lot, around the Chautauqua Green (city park) and in the neighborhood north of Baseline were typically between two and three hours. Parking duration on Baseline was shorter and parking duration within the leasehold was longer.  Five blocks in the neighborhood north of Baseline and most of the Chautauqua Leasehold streets meet the city’s 75% parking utilization four or more hours/day threshold to warrant a residential permit parking approach. It also was observed that:  Access for visitors with mobility impairments can be challenging, due to limited handicapped parking spaces, the historic character of the site and the elevation gain from north to south. 5  There are public parking spaces in the downtown, the CU campus and along South Boulder Road/Table Mesa and Broadway that many Chautauqua area visitors pass on their way to the site. The number passing these spaces and the availability of parking in these spaces is highest on the weekend when visitation to the Chautauqua area is highest. Issue Statements – Foundation for Development of the CAMP Summer 2017 Pilot Potential summer 2017 pilot projects will be targeted to mitigate the following main issues identified from the technical and survey data collected in summer 2016 and based on input from the Community Working Group (CWG):  The vast majority of visitors to the Chautauqua area arrive by automobile which, combined with the popularity of the area, creates traffic congestion, neighborhood livability/parking congestion and greenhouse gas emission levels that do not meet the city’s transportation mode choice or environmental goals.  Parking demand within the Chautauqua complex (including for access to the trailheads) exceeds supply, resulting in the surrounding neighborhood streets (within the CCA leasehold and north of Baseline) becoming overflow parking for the site and creating a variety of concerns for the residents of those streets, including lack of access to on-street parking for their own homes, illegal parking that limits sight distance to conflict areas, and issues with trash, noise and verbal conflicts.  On streets within the National Historic Landmark itself (i.e., the CCA leasehold area, the city park commonly referred to as “The Green” and the Ranger Cottage parking lot), pedestrians walking in the street (no sidewalks) are in conflict with motor vehicles, including those looking for parking spaces.  Chautauqua Auditorium event night shuttle buses become problematic for the neighborhood east of Chautauqua because of requests from some shuttle riders for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) drop-off at the Auditorium via Columbine vs. regular drop-off on Baseline, creating noise and odor for east-side neighborhood residents and concerns about conflicts with pedestrians and other vehicles along Columbine.  The CWG recommended adding as an issue for consideration speeding on residential streets within and outside of the historic district. Chautauqua-area Transit Study The city contracted with Jarrett Walker & Associates to complete a Chautauqua area transit study in support of the CAMP process and also the HOP Refresh initiative currently underway. The study explored the possible role public transit could play in addressing CAMP issues. https://www- static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/Jan._2016_JWA_CAMP_Transit_Analysis -1- 201702171306.pdf?_ga=1.151751353.1803319030.1459538082 Identification and Refinement of Possible Summer 2017 Pilot Projects In response to the key data findings and the articulation of the target issues, staff initially identified a wide range of potential strategies for summer 2017 pilots in the form of a 6 matrix that also connected strategies to key issues and identified associated considerations, implementation needs and potential impacts, concluding with an initial evaluation of the high-medium-low feasibility of summer 2017 implementation as part of a pilot. https://www- static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/Potential_Pilot_Strategies_FINAL_DRAFT_for_11.30.1 6_CWG_Mtg-1-201612120749.pdf?_ga=1.126052877.1803319030.1459538082 The CAMP Working Group (CWG) gave feedback, and additional input from the community was sought and considered. (Please see more information on the CAMP Community Engagement Process, below.) Staff subsequently performed more detailed analysis of potential pilot projects leading to recommendations made initially to the CWG and now to four city boards and commissions and the CCA board of directors. (Please see Next Steps below.) The CAMP Community Engagement Process To gain input on the many perspectives on Chautauqua from a variety of users and stakeholders, the project team has used various communication tools to foster outreach and engagement, including:  Community Open Houses - April 28, 2016 (approx. 50 community participants), January 26, 2017 (approx. 20 community members)  CAMP Working Group (CWG) - The stated charge of the CWG was to help city staff recommend to respective city boards and city council which short-term measures could be implemented and evaluated in 2017, with the acknowledgement that beyond the summer 2017 pilot, additional community process will help craft the final plan. Twenty-seven applications were received and 10 community members were appointed by the city manager. A meeting summary for each of the four CWG meetings to date is available on the CAMP webpage. The final CWG meeting is scheduled for Feb. 23, 2017. A meeting summary will be posted as soon as possible thereafter.  Stakeholder-specific meetings – with management of CCA, CMF, CDH; a meeting with neighbors on the proposed pilot residential permit program is scheduled for Mar. 9  Data “deeper dive” meetings with neighbors and CCA board members and staff  Project webpage - www.ChautauquaAccessManagementPlan.com provided project news, background, materials from the open houses and CWG meetings, and other resources, including a public comment e-mail address of CAMP@bouldercolorado.gov.  Community Questionnaire – Distributed mid-January and scheduled to close Feb. 26, this informal tool (not statistically valid) to gauge community support for possible pilot approaches provides staff and council an opportunity to hear from a wide range of stakeholders, including neighbors, CU students, non-city residents, CCA employees and others. (1,099 responses received as of noon on 2/16/17)  Earned media – Camera front-page coverage and 9News coverage 7  The city’s Community Newsletter (Feb/March issue) – “New ways to get to Chautauqua” article about the work on a pilot CAMP for summer 2017 in an attempt to manage and mitigate impacts of parking  Outreach to Boards and Commissions – Staff shared the CAMP pilot project work plan with Landmarks Board, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB), Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT), Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) and the Colorado Chautauqua Association (CCA) board of directors in Spring 2016 and is now in the process of presenting to each the staff recommendations for a summer 2017 pilot. ANALYSIS: The staff recommendations detailed in the next section address and reflect the different conditions and opportunities associated with four “zones” within greater Chautauqua: 1. The Adjacent Neighborhood Zone – north of Baseline and east of Chautauqua 2. The Baseline Road Zone 3. The Green/Ranger Cottage Lot Zone 4. The Chautauqua Neighborhood (leasehold) Zone Staff believes that it is essential to pursue a comprehensive strategy for all four zones of greater Chautauqua even for the summer pilot, as strategies employed in one area are highly likely to affect other areas – the “squeezing the balloon” syndrome. 8 The staff recommendations include multiple components across the four zones that address parking management and multi-modal improvements, including: 1. Paid parking in all zones, 2. Two-hour time-restricted (paid) public parking AND permit systems in the two Neighborhood Zones, 3. Transit service from satellite parking lots and 4. An employee Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for employees within Chautauqua (CCA, CMF, CDH and OSMP/Ranger Cottage) Transit and Parking Integration – A transit-only pilot, with no parking management, could result in increased use of the Chautauqua area, with increased trail crowding and impacts to the meadow habitat. It is anticipated that transit ridership would be low with available free and unrestricted parking in the Chautauqua area. Prior experience with the daytime HOP2Chautauqua (not to be confused with the successful evening HOP2Chautauqua Auditorium event shuttle) supports this expectation of low transit usage if parking remains free and unrestricted. A parking management strategy (paid and/or time-restricted) without transit could result in decreased use of the Chautauqua area but could divert some open space use to other trailheads, with potential impacts on those trailheads, and could diminish access to Chautauqua for some users. Staff recommends that the pilot include both parking management and transit to offer more choices and better access for more of the community. Parking Management – The staff recommendation for parking management is a combination of paid parking in all four zones, time-restricted parking in the two neighborhood zones with permit parking in the two neighborhood zones. The proposed parking payment rate of $2.50 per hour is deemed to be an acceptable payment rate for many users ($5 for two hours could include a modest hike or a meal at the Dining Hall), an incentive to take the free transit instead of driving to Chautauqua, an incentive for turnover of spaces to make way for other users and a way to help fund the hefty transit price tag. The staff recommendation is to provide as few parking kiosks as may be required for legal enforceability of the paid parking for the minimum required number of parking payment kiosks along Baseline (that will take credit cards and coins) and use of the ParkMobile phone app (credit card only) for all parking within the historic district and in the neighborhoods, in order to minimize visual impacts and to aid parking enforcement through use of license plate recognition technology. Some signage will be required, of course, and it will be minimized to what is required by the municipal court to make the parking restrictions legally enforceable. Time restrictions also encourage turnover of parking spaces to accommodate other users and will encourage some who desire longer stays at Chautauqua to use the free transit option. The initial proposal is to limit public parking in the Adjacent Neighborhood and 9 Chautauqua Leasehold zones to two hours (paid) once per day and no time restriction (but paid) in the Baseline and Green/Ranger Cottage zones. Neighborhood input will be important to finalizing those recommendations. The proposal is for parking restrictions and required payment to be in force 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. seven days/week in the Adjacent Neighborhood and Green/Ranger Cottage zones and 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. seven days/week in the Baseline Road and Chautauqua Leasehold Neighborhood zones. (Note that CCA also controls entry into the Chautauqua Leasehold Neighborhood on Auditorium event nights pursuant to a special event permit with the City in conjunction with offering a free event night shuttle from satellite parking. This arrangement has been in place for a decade or more.) A pilot permit program within either or both Neighborhood zones would reflect the city’s existing Neighborhood Parking Permit program (NPP) but perhaps could be customized to the specific conditions and the temporary nature of the pilot. This would include resident purchase of a permit (with license plate registration) and visitor permits and potentially commuter permits. Input will be sought from the affected neighborhoods at a meeting on March 9th before a recommendation to Council is finalized. Any mitigation approach that includes parking management through a permit system within the CCA leasehold or on Sundays and holidays anywhere in the pilot project study area may require an ordinance amendment (two readings and a public hearing by Council, then 30- days to effective date). A Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for employees within Chautauqua would include appointment of an Employee Transportation Coordinator by CCA and could include employee carpool/vanpool/ride share and/or paying for parking permits and or integration with the visitor transit strategy utilizing a satellite parking lot. Alternatives to the staff recommendations for parking management could include parking restrictions only Friday through Sunday instead of seven days/week, not charging for parking but relying solely on time-restricted parking (still coupled with permits in the two Neighborhood zones), charging higher parking rates, permit-only parking in the Chautauqua Leasehold zone and extending paid parking east along Baseline to 12th Street. Transit – An understanding of the existing transit network in the area, existing ridership, prior transit service, the original HOP2Chautauqua summer pilot experience, the current HOP2Chautauqua event night shuttle as well as the four drivers of transit feasibility (density, walkability, proximity and linearity) and cost factors (time/distance, and drivers) led to consideration of a variety of potential route and schedule possibilities for the summer 2017 pilot. Other factors considered include:  As stated above, staff believes that parking management is a prerequisite to achieving better transit ridership. Higher frequency (shorter waits) and shorter routes (faster speed, fewer stops) also aid ridership but cost more for vehicles and drivers. Free vs. paid transit and free vs. paid parking at satellite lots also will incentivize or dis- incentivize transit ridership.  Larger vehicles can accommodate more users but could operate empty in lower demand periods. 10  Multiple possible transit routes were considered to respond to the summer 2016 data indicating direction of travel of Chautauqua users, which also indicated that many Chautauqua users now drive by parking opportunities.  Various satellite parking opportunities were explored.  Micro-transit and rideshare offered by Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) also were explored as opportunities to test additional mobility options and to augment more traditional transit options. The desired transit strategy for the summer 2017 pilot likely will be tempered by budget constraints and is dependent upon responses to the city’s RFP for a transit operator and/or TNC participation. While a seven days/week transit strategy is highly desirable, a three- day (Friday through Sunday) approach would address the peak days of the summer weeks at a reduced project cost. Information/Education/Marketing of the Pilot – Effectively informing the myriad of Chautauqua area users about the details of the summer 2017 pilot will be a critical part of creating a successful pilot in summer 2017. This will require a multi-targeted, multi- channel approach, and a significant cost. Additional Considerations – There are three additional processes that may be necessary to complete prior to implementation of the summer 2017 pilot. The reality of these additional required processes could mean that either certain these strategies cannot practicably be tested this summer or that they can be tested over a shorter pilot period in summer 2017 than would otherwise be desirable.  Funding availability to implement the pilot – Estimated expenses of the summer 2017 pilot exceed estimated revenue generation from paid parking by a significant amount, potentially $200,000-300,000 or more depending on the details of the parking management and transit strategies that may be approved by council. Staff anticipates that input from the CWG, the city boards and the CCA board will help staff shape final recommendations to council that will include both fiscally-constrained and recommended packages. If council wishes to implement a summer 2017 pilot, it likely will have to approve an adjustment to the approved 2017 city budget, which decision would occur in early May.  Timing of any necessary landmark alteration certificate (LAC) approvals - Any mitigation approach that includes an external alteration within the historic landmark district would be dependent upon issuance of an LAC by the Landmarks Board or its Design Review Committee or staff, depending on the alteration. CCA’s Building and Grounds Committee or staff would offer its recommendation to the Landmarks Board, LDRC or staff.  Timing of any necessary temporary ordinance amendment approvals (for the duration of the pilot, only) by council 11 How will we measure pilot success? During the Summer 2017 pilot implementation, we will collect the following kinds of data to compare with the data collected in summer 2016:  Arrival mode (through an online users questionnaire)  Transit and TNC ridership (through the service providers)  Traffic patterns (through radar, Miovision counts and Acyclica data)  Parking location and utilization (through city Parking Management staff) The online users questionnaire also would gauge visitor demographics, whether users thought that the key issues were addressed and customer experience/customer satisfaction with the various pilot components. The Post-Pilot Plan Development – The data collected during the summer 2017 pilot and the subsequent user experience inputs will inform development of a permanent/ongoing Chautauqua Access Management Plan. It is anticipated that the future plan that builds on what we learn from the summer 2017 pilot also will address possible infrastructure and programmatic changes that were beyond the scope/capacity of the summer 2017 pilot planning effort. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: After evaluation of a wide-range of potential mitigation measures, taking into account a variety of considerations as well as input from the CWG and the public and debating pros and cons, staff recommends as summer 2017 pilots a “package” of actions that are consistent with the CAMP governing principles and the AMPS guiding principles and that address the key issues that arose from the summer 2016 data collection. The recommended timing of the summer 2017 pilot is approximately June 1 through August 31 to respond to the highest usage time of the year. Staff recommends incorporating multiple components across the four zones that address parking management and multi-modal improvements, including: 1. Paid parking in all zones, 2. Two-hour time-restricted (paid) public parking AND permit systems in the two Neighborhood Zones, 3. Free transit service from satellite parking lots and 4. An employee Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for employees within Chautauqua (CCA, CMF, CDH and OSMP/Ranger Cottage) The details of the proposed paid and time-restricted parking management by zone and transit service are shown below. The acronym LPR below refers to license plate recognition technology that supports parking enforcement. 12 13 As illustrated, the transit proposal includes two segments connecting (1) downtown and Chautauqua and (2) Broadway/Baseline and Chautauqua, using existing parking lots downtown and satellite lots at CU (Regent and Broadway) and/or New Vista High School (20th and Baseline). The desired level of service is 30 minute headways on weekdays and 15 minute headways on weekends, seven days a week. The proposal includes integration of or augmentation with ridesharing using transportation network companies (TNCs) like Uber and Lyft and/or zTrip, particularly to support the employee TDM program that must address both early-starting and late-staying Chautauqua Dining Hall employees. Together, these recommendations are intended to address the key issues identified through the summer 2016 data collection, resulting in:  Reduction of automobile mode share to meet CAMP governing principles and city transportation and environmental goals  Reduction of parking demand on adjacent neighborhood and Chautauqua (leasehold) neighborhood streets currently used as overflow parking for access to the site  Reduction of conflicts between automobiles and pedestrians in highly-trafficked residential areas. The recommendations do not at this time address the concerns raised by neighbors about quality of life impacts from Chautauqua Auditorium event night shuttles on Columbine at night. The recommendations also do not address concerns raised about speeding in the 14 neighborhoods because data did not support the concern. Both these concerns could be revisited in the post-pilot plan development phase. Information/Education/Marketing of the Pilot – Staff recommends that a robust information/education and marketing effort be undertaken to foster success of the summer 2017 pilot. It is anticipated that such an effort could include print and digital advertising throughout the summer, print collateral, website work, branded “wrapping” of transit vehicles, a city-wide mailer, etc. NEXT STEPS: Staff is scheduled to present a recommended summer 2017 pilot to City Council on April 4, 2017. Associated ordinance amendments necessary to implement aspects of the recommended approaches will have first reading (consent agenda) on April 4 and second reading/public hearing on April 18. These dates are critical to allow for necessary preparation for implementation in summer 2017. Thereafter, the staff work plan will include:  Submittal for council consideration of the associated adjustment to the approved 2017 budget (ATB) to fund the approved summer 2017 pilot program  Issuance of a request for proposals (RFP) for the pilot transit service and/or TNC/ride share component  Development of a communications plan and issuance of a RFP for marketing services  Preparation for implementation, including application for any required Landmark Alteration Certificates (LACs) (if any), production and installation of signage, etc.  During and following implementation in summer 2017, evaluation of pilot results to inform development of a permanent/ongoing plan  Return to boards and commissions and council to report on results of the summer 2017 pilot and recommended process to develop a final CAMP (Fall 2017)  Development of a CAMP, including community engagement (Fall 2017 to Winter 2018)  Return to boards and commissions and council for consideration of a recommended CAMP for implementation in summer 2018 and beyond (Spring 2018)