HomeMy WebLinkAbout01.04.17 LC PacketCity of Boulder
2017 Library Commission Agenda
Meeting date: Wednesday, January 4, 2017
Location: Main Library, 1001 Arapahoe Ave., Canyon Meeting Room
Meeting start time: 6:00 p.m. (Note: There is no access to the building after 8 p.m.)
1.Approval of agenda
2.Public comment
3.Consent agenda
a.Approval of November 17, 2016 joint meeting with Landmarks Board (p. 2-3)
b.Approval of December 7, 2016 minutes (p. 4-6)
4.Updates to Library Commission Handbook (p. 7-26)
5.Discuss plan to review library rules and policies (p. 27-30)
6.Library Commission Update (p. 31-32)
a.Items from commission
b.Boulder Library Foundation update
c.City project representative update
i.Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan
ii.Boulder’s Civic Area
iii.Canyon Complete Streets
iv.EcoDistricts
d.Responses to patron emails from the Library Commission
7.Library and Arts Director’s Report (p. 33)
a.Master Plan Project update
b.1000 Books Before Kindergarten
8.Adjournment
2017 Library Commissioners
Joni Teter, Chair Alicia Gibb Tim O’Shea Juana Gomez Joel Koenig
1
Library Commission & Landmarks Board
Joint Study Session Minutes
November 17, 2016
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF BOULDER
BOULDER, COLORADO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING
MINUTES
Name of Board/ Commission: Library Commission and Landmarks Board
Date of Meeting: November 17, 2016 at the Main Boulder Public Library, 1001 Arapahoe Ave.
Contact information preparing summary: Maureen Malone, 303-441-3106
Library Commission members present: Joni Teter, Juana Gomez, Joel Koenig
Library Commission members absent: Alicia Gibb, Tim O’Shea
Landmarks Board members present: Deborah Yin, Eric Budd, Briana Butler, Ronnie Pelusio, Fran Sheets
City staff present:
David Farnan, Director of Library & Arts
Jennifer Phares, Deputy Library Director
James Hewat, Senior Planner
Edward Stafford, Development Review Manager
Jim Robertson, Chief of Urban Design
Joanna Crean, Senior Project Manager
Maureen Malone, Library Administrative Specialist II
Members of the public present:
None
Type of Meeting: Joint Study Session
Agenda Item 1: Call to order and approval of agenda [6:04 p.m., 0:00:00 Audio min.]
The meeting was called to order at 6:04 p.m.
Teter proposed moving agenda item 3 (Update on Library Master Plan process) to the beginning of the meeting.
Agenda Item 2: Update on Library Master Plan process – Jennifer Phares, Deputy Library Director
[6:06 p.m., 0:02:02 Audio min.]
Phares explained that library staff is looking at commissioning a feasibility study on renovating the north building to see
what’s possible and the associated cost; later next summer, staff will begin more in depth analysis of facilities and come up
with detailed plans of building uses based on community feedback.
Farnan added that he has requested a current valuation of the north building; code dictates that renovation costs are limited to
50% of the value of the building. A copy of the test fit of the area that was done over a year ago has also been requested.
Agenda Item 3: Matters from the Library Commission [6:08 p.m., 0:00:25 Audio min.]
a.Memo: Joint Meeting talking points
Butler asked about the library’s capacity to handle the growth experienced over the past year and whether
any big expansions are being considered. Farnan replied that the growth should start to level off and
explained that staff has worked to activate as much space in the library as possible, aside from the north
building due to the uncertainty of its future and the fact that its current layout is dysfunctional and
disorienting; determining the future of the north building will be part of the Master Plan process.
b.Colorado Cultural Resource Survey Historic Architectural Inventory of the Main Library north building
Butler asked if the 1974 addition would receive the same flood exceptions if historically designated,
despite the building being less than 50 years old. Stafford clarified that if the building is designated, the
flood regulation as it relates to historic buildings would apply; historic designation does not exempt a
building from flood regulations, but allows leeway for improvements to the structure and the value of the
improvements. Hewat added that if federal funds are used for improvements or physical changes to the
building, a section 106 review will be triggered to assess the impact of such improvements on a designated
or identified historic resource.
2
Library Commission & Landmarks Board
Joint Study Session Minutes
November 17, 2016
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item 4: Discussion [6:41 p.m., 0:37:00 Audio min.]
Yin explained that decisions on whether or not to landmark a building are based solely on the merit of the building,
not on what the applicant plans to do with it. There is a sense that the north wing has become an iconic building for
Boulder, and there would be an issue if the library wanted to demolish it; however, since the interior has changed so
much, it could be reprogrammed entirely.
Hewat explained that a landmark application could be submitted by the city (the city manager or City Council), a
third party recognized historic preservation organization, or the Landmarks Board. Ultimately City Council decides
whether or not to designate a building.
Teter communicated her hope that the Library Commission and Landmarks Board might jointly come up with a
process that over the next 2-3 years helps us as a community to determine the best use of the site of the north
building, taking into account library and other community uses, as well as all of the different values that are in
conflict with one another to some extent – historic value, maximum height, flood issues, etc.
Yin expressed her hope that the library would follow through on the Boulder Comprehensive Plan’s statement that
the city and county should take a leadership role in landmarking their own buildings, and trust that there is still a lot
of flexibility to do what they want to do with the north building, whether it be library-related use or some kind of
adaptive reuse.
Pelusio stated that starting the landmarking application and design review process would allow the Landmarks
Board to give the Library Commission insight on the board’s position on the building more quickly.
Hewat stated that the landmarking process typically takes 4-6 months from start to finish.
There was a question of whether state funds could be used for the interior of the building if the exterior building was
the landmarked aspect, or if the funds could be used for flood mitigation or energy upgrades.
Pelusio asked whether an addition to the west side of the building would be allowed if it were structurally
independent and met FEMA requirements. Stafford replied that more analysis would need to be done, but it would
have to function 100% independent structurally, and may not be a cost effective solution.
Pelusio expressed that there is merit associated with keeping the existing building – the educational component to
having a historic structure marries well to the objectives of the library, and the bridge connects either side of the
creek that is disconnected everywhere else in Boulder.
Stafford stated that should the bridge get destroyed in a flood, the city would not be able to permit its reconstruction.
Stafford explained that if the building receives historic designation, the 50% value cap for internal rehab of the
building goes away; however, there are still issues regarding flood-proofing requirements.
Yin suggested that it might be worth exploring the potential for an exception to the height restriction for a civic
building.
Teter suggested that the Library Commission and Landmarks Board should have another joint meeting around September of
2017, after the library’s community engagement process is complete and a study on the potential uses for the north building
has been commissioned by the Facilities and Asset Management department.
Agenda Item 5: Adjournment [7:41 p.m., 1:37:51 Audio min.]
The meeting was adjourned at 7:41 p.m.
3
Library Commission Minutes
December 7, 2016
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF BOULDER
BOULDER, COLORADO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING
MINUTES
Name of Board/ Commission: Library Commission
Date of Meeting: December 7, 2016 at the Main Boulder Public Library, 1001 Arapahoe Ave.
Contact information preparing summary: Maureen Malone, 303-441-3106
Commission members present: Alicia Gibb, Juana Gomez, Joel Koenig, Tim O’Shea
Commission members absent: Joni Teter
Library staff present:
David Farnan, Director of Library & Arts
Jennifer Phares, Deputy Library Director
Maureen Malone, Administrative Specialist II
Others present:
Brian Coppom, Executive Director, Boulder County Farmers Market
Jan Burton, council member
Members of the public present:
Margot Brauchli
Kai McKenzie
Type of Meeting: Regular
Agenda Item 1: Call to order and approval of agenda [6:01 p.m., 0:00:00 Audio min.]
The meeting was called to order at 6:01 p.m.
Agenda Item 2: Public comment [6:11 p.m., 0:09:30 Audio min.]
Kai McKenzie advocated for gender neutral restrooms at the library as a basic safety issue, and stated that public spaces
don’t reflect the fact that Boulder has a large transgender community.
Agenda Item 3: Consent agenda [6:02 p.m., 0:00:49 Audio min.]
Item 3A, Approval of November 2, 2016 Meeting Minutes
Koenig moved to approve the minutes, and O’Shea seconded. Vote 4-0, unanimous.
Item 3B, Approval of November 14, 2016 Study Session Minutes
Gomez moved to approve the minutes, and Koenig seconded. Vote 3 -0, unanimous (O’Shea abstained as he was not at the
study session).
Item 3C, Approval of November 17, 2016 Joint Meeting with Landmarks Board
Commission was unable to vote because there was not a quorum present (Gibb and O’Shea did not attend the joint
meeting).
Agenda Item 4: Conversation with Council member Jan Burton [6:04 p.m., 0:02:53 Audio min.]
See p. 9 of packet for discussion topics.
Commission discussion, questions, and comments included:
Gibb commented that there has been an increased awareness this past year of a need to communicate with other
boards and commissions through the Master Plan process and joint projects with other city departments.
Commission proposed that gender neutral restrooms be a citywide initiative; library staff is already exploring
options for adding gender neutral restrooms to its facilities.
o Koenig asked McKenzie what her ideal design for gender neutral restrooms would look like. McKenzie
replied that it would be ideal to do away with labels and have restrooms that are available to everyone,
and also shared a few specific options. McKenzie and O’Shea provided Burton with examples of
buildings in town that have well-designed gender neutral restrooms.
4
Library Commission Minutes
December 7, 2016
Page 2 of 3
o McKenzie proposed that the city pass a resolution that all single-stall restrooms in the city have to be all-
gender.
o Gibb stated that it doesn’t surprise her that the library might be the spearhead of getting all -gender
bathrooms into city buildings because, as commission expressed in their letter to council, “as a trusted
public space, Boulder Public Library is frequently at the forefront for issues of social equity, perceptions
of public safety and unbiased service to all”.
o Farnan shared that staff has engaged a consultant and architect, and will be proposing funding for gender
neutral restrooms in the 2018 budget.
Burton asked how commission envisions their involvement in the homeless strategy.
o Koenig suggested that the library could provide programs for the non -transient homeless population.
o Gibb stated that the commission wishes to remain informed around the development of the strategy.
Gibb expressed that commission would like to see the city start planning for programming in the Civic Area so
that it doesn’t fall solely to the library.
Farnan explained that the north building of the main library has been in much discussion, both as a potential site
for a center for performing arts and a candidate for landmark status. Farnan added that the building is not highly
functional as is, and the library has rapidly expanded the capacity of the building with the addition of BLDG 61.
Gibb expressed her hope for continued support and recognition of the importance of the library to the city.
Burton asked whether there are any boards with whom the Library Commission would like to see a better
partnership. Gibb stated that there is an opportunity for a great partnership between the library and Parks and Rec
to activate the Civic Area.
O’Shea expressed a desire for commission to be involved in the dialogue around the extension of the Community,
Culture and Safety tax. O’Shea also voiced a concern about the strong momentum of certain parties of the
community to expand the arts and cultural presence in the west bookend, as this discussion will inform whether
the library needs to start thinking about capital campaigns.
Burton encouraged commissioners to attend council meetings to give input on relevant agenda items.
Agenda Item 5: Seeds Library Café update – Brian Coppom, executive director Boulder County Farmers Market
[6:52 p.m., 0:50:45 Audio min.]
Commission discussion, questions, and comments included:
O’Shea proposed cultivating awareness of Seeds through programming at the library. Coppom shared his belief
that the more the community sees local farmers contributing to their events, the more natural it becomes for them
to buy from local farmers, and that is the best source of marketing/customer engagement.
O’Shea suggested using the Farmers Market mailing list for messaging around Seeds. Coppom replied that he
plans to hire a strategic marketing person to start taking on these types of efforts.
O’Shea asked staff why Seeds is not advertised on the front page of the library website. Farnan replied that Seeds
has been advertised in the newsletter, which has a better reach than the website.
Agenda Item 6: Library Commission Update [7:18 p.m., 1:17:15 Audio min.]
a. Matters from the Commission
i. Annual letter to City Council of the Library Commission’s 2017 priorities (see handouts).
Koenig moved to accept the draft letter with the edits discussed tonight, and Gomez seconded. All in
favor. Gomez will send polished version to Malone to submit to the City Clerk’s office.
b. Update from Joint BPL Commission and Landmarks Board
Farnan explained that Landmarks Board has been pursuing a broader approach to landmarking historically
relevant buildings owned by the city; commission has built a relationship with the Landmarks Board, and
anticipates open communication regarding any decisions to submit an application to landmark the main library
north building.
c. Boulder Library Foundation update
Gibb shared that the Foundation’s 2017 budget, including a brand new $7,000 marketing line item, was approved
at the November meeting. O’Shea added that the goal of the marketing campaign is to sustain the gift that is being
given to the library by the Foundation.
d. City project representative update
5
Library Commission Minutes
December 7, 2016
Page 3 of 3
i. Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan
ii. Boulder’s Civic Area
iii. Canyon Complete Streets
iv. EcoDistricts
e. Responses to patron emails from the Library Commission
Agenda Item 7: Library and Arts Director’s Report [8:14 p.m., 2:13:03 Audio min.]
a. January study session date
Staff will bring updates about the Master Plan process to regular meetings, instead of scheduling a separate study
session for January.
b. 2nd ATB update (may be oral)
The items proposed to City Council for the 2016 Budget’s 2 nd Adjustment to Base (presented in the November
packet) were approved.
c. Q3 Website use statistics
d. BLF budget and 2017 program proposals update
Koenig asked why there is no allocation for BoulderReads in the proposal, and Farnan explained that there is
currently a separate fund for BoulderReads; the Foundation has requested that staff spend the separate fund down
to zero and then fold the request in with the general Foundation fund.
Agenda Item 8: Adjournment [8:24 p.m., 2:22:40 Audio min.]
There being no further business to come before the commission at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
Date, time, and location of next meeting:
The next Library Commission meeting will be at 6 p.m. on Wednesday, January 4, 2017, in the Canyon Meeting Room at
the Main Library, 1001 Arapahoe Ave., Boulder, CO 80302.
6
To: Boulder Public Library Commission
From: David Farnan, Library and Arts Director
Jennifer Phares, Deputy Library Director
Maureen Malone, Administrative Specialist II
Date: December 29, 2016
Subject: Annual review of Library Commission Handbook
Background:
The Library Commission master calendar indicates that the commissioners will review the
Library Commission Handbook in January. The handbook is posted on the Library Commission
webpage at https://boulderlibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/2017-Library-Commission-
Handbook.pdf and is Attachment A.
Recent updates to the handbook:
In anticipation of the Library Commission’s Jan. 4, 2017 review of the handbook, staff tested all
the links and made the following changes which are reflected in the document at the link above:
Table of contents links
Most recent Library Commission priorities memo to City Council – 2017 memo
added
Past meeting agendas and minutes – link updated
Facilities Sustainability Study – added link to December 2015 update
Library Budget Basics (Handbook PDF p. 9-14)
Devin Billingsley, senior budget analyst, updated the document to reflect the changes to
the library budget structure made in 2016 and to address the questions raised during the
Nov. 2, 2016 Library Commission meeting by Commissioner Teter.
Question for the Library Commission:
Does the Library Commission have any other changes for the handbook?
7
Library Commission Handbook
Table of Contents
Note: Items with hyperlinks are not included in the handbook.
PART ONE: LEGAL BACKGROUND
I.Boulder City Charter on Advisory Commissions (Article IX) and Library
Commission (Sections 130, 132-134)
II.Boulder Revised Code (BRC) 2-3-8 Library Commission
III.By-Laws of the Boulder Public Library Commission
IV.Colorado Revised Statutes on open meetings
V.Colorado Library Law
VI.Colorado State Library resources
PART TWO: LIBRARY INFORMATION
I.Commission
A.Library Commission webpage and contact list
B.City of Boulder Library Commission webpage
C.Commission meeting schedule
D.Boulder Public Library Commissioners
E.Most recent Library Commission priorities memo for City Council
F.Past meeting agendas and minutes (hard copy of most recent included)
G.City of Boulder Boards and Commissions rules and responsibilities
H.Library Commissioner job description and FAQ
II.Principal documents
A.Most recent Library Master Plan
B.Facilities Sustainability Study - March 2009 and December 2015
III.Library operations and budget
A.Overview of library operations
B.Rules and Policies
C.Budget and fund management
1.Library and Arts Budget (Click on Annual Budget Vol. I. Search for Library
and Arts department)
2.Library department budget basics
D.Overview of the Boulder Library Foundation (BLF)
IV.Communications and commission meetings
A.Commissioner communication guidelines
B.Guiding principles for interaction among Council, Boards, Commissions, and
City Staff
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
8
BY-LAWS OF THE
BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSION
Article I. General Provisions
Section 1. The name of this commission shall be the Boulder Public Library Commission.
Section 2. The principal office of the said Library Commission shall be located at the Main
Branch of the Boulder, Colorado, Public Library.
Section 3. The Library Commission is an advisory commission to the department of library and
arts. The said Library Commission shall have such powers, duties and responsibilities as are set
forth in the Charter (Article IX, sections 132-136) and Ordinances of the City of Boulder,
Colorado, or as may be hereafter provided by an amendment to said Charter.
Article II. Membership
The appointment of members of the Library Commission, the terms of said members,
removal of said members, and the filling of vacancies on said Commission shall be as provided
in the Charter of the City of Boulder, Colorado, Article IX, Section 130 and by any future
amendments to this section of the Charter.
Article III. Meetings
Section 1. The said Library Commission shall hold regular monthly meetings at such times and
places as may be agreed upon by the Commission.
Section 2. Special meetings may be called at any time at the request of at least three members of
the Commission. Written notice stating the time and place of any special meeting and the
purpose for which called, unless said notice is waived, shall be given to each member of the
Commission at least two days in advance of such meeting and no business other than that
stated in said notice shall be transacted at the special meeting.
Section 3. Each year at its April meeting the Commission shall elect officers and shall make such
other organizational arrangements as may be required for the year.
Article IV. Officers
Section 1. The Library Commission shall elect a chair and a vice-chair. There may also be co-
chairs instead of a chair and vice-chair.
Section 2.The chair of the Library Commission shall preside at the meetings of the Commission
and shall sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver for the Commission all writings of any kind
required or authorized to be signed or delivered by the Commission. The signature of the chair
shall be attested by the secretary.
Section 3. The director of the library and arts department (or staff designee) shall serve as
secretary for the commission. In this capacity, the director shall record the proceedings of each
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
9
BY-LAWS OF THE
BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSION
meeting and present the same for approval at the next meeting of the Commission. There shall
be kept a permanent file of the minutes of said meetings and of all reports made to the City
Council.
Article V. Committees
The chair shall have the right to appoint special committees. Said committees shall be advisory
to the Commission and shall not have the authority to act for and on behalf of the Commission.
Article V I. Quorum
Three members constitute a quorum and the affirmative votes of at least three members shall be
necessary to authorize any action by the Commission.
Article VI I. Amendments
These By-Laws may be amended at any regular or special meeting of the Library Commission,
provided that notice of the proposed amendment has been given to the members of the
Commission at the regular meeting preceding the time at which action is taken thereon or
providing that said notice of the proposed amendment has been provided to the members of the
Commission at least two weeks prior to the meeting at which action is to be taken upon said
amendments. The above and foregoing By-Laws for the Boulder Public Library Commission
were read and unanimously adopted by the said Library Commission at its meeting of March 2,
2016.
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
10
BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSIONERS
1906-2016
First Commission
Miss Mary Rippon
Mrs. Fred White
Mrs. Adriana Hungerford
Mrs. W.H. Allison
Mrs. H.B. Rosenkrans
Mr. James Cowie
Mrs. Harry M. Pollard
Mrs. C. Henry Smith
Mr. Dan McAllister
Elizabeth L. Olsen
Mary K. Gamble
Mrs. Paul Friggens
Mr. H. B. Millard
Vina Knowles
Mr. Henry W. Callahan
Mrs. J. A. Davis
Elbert Greeman
Mr. Gilbert Callahan
Mr. J. F. Willard
Mrs. R. E. Arnett
Mrs. S. C. Barrett
Mrs. H. O. Dodge
Mrs. C. Henry Smith
Miss Maude McKenzie
Mrs. D. R. Jenkins
Mrs. E. W. Brett
Mrs. Martha Nafe
Mrs. Robert Sterling
Mrs. Gregory W. Cohn
Mr. Maxwell Burger
Mr. W. C. Duvall
Mrs. John D. Gillaspie
Mrs. E. H. Ellis
Ruben L. Olson
Mr. Audley McLure
Mr. Alfred E. Whitaker
Mr. George Clark
Rudolph Johnson
(1951)1956 Eugene H. Wilson 1960
(1954)1957 Mrs. Clyde Reedy 1961 (1956)
1958 Eugene Gullette 1962
1959 Mr. Stanley Hendrickson 1963
(1956)1960 Mrs. James Yeager 1964
1961 Eugene Wilson 1961
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
11
BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSIONERS
1906-2016
(Jan.) 1962 Ralph Underwager (Aug.) 1962
1962 Paul Friggens 1965
1962 Mrs. F. K. Bangs 1966
1963 Carl Ubbelohde 1965
1965 Dolores Kiser 1967
1964 James Buchanan 1968
1965 F. E. Luethi (March) 1966
1966 Mrs. Thomas Bilhorn 1969
1966 Paul Friggens 1968
1968 Eldred Wolzien 1970
1967 Lawrence Coolidge 1971
1968 Dolores Kiser 1972
1969 Alex H. Warner 1973
1970 Janet Roberts (Oct.) 1971
1972 Lawrence C. Brown 1974
1971 Eldred Wolzien 1975
1972 Bryan Morgan 1976
1973 Joanne Arnold (May) 1976
(Jun.) 1976 Harriet Crowe 1977
1974 Doris Hass 1978
1975 Dennis DuBe (Jul.) 1978
(Sept.) 1978 Alice McDonald 1979
1976 Kenneth Charlton 1980
1977 Michael Rayback 1981
1978 Harriet Crowe 1982
1979 Diane Ball 1983
1980 Alice McDonald 1984
1981 Bob Greenlee (Jul.) 1983
(Aug.) 1983 Ridi Van Zandt 1985
1982 J. K. Emery 1986
1983 Hardy Long Frank 1987
1984 Abraham Flexer 1988
1985 Francis Shoemaker 1989
1986 Janis Van Zante 1990
1987 Joseph Geiger (May) 1988
(Jun.) 1988 Duane Deyoe 1991
1988 Allen Sparkman 1992
1989 Jane Butcher 1993
1990 Charles Nilon (Jun.) 1991
(Jul.) 1991 Michael Schonbrun (Dec.) 1992
1993 Ann Cooper 1994
1991 Linda Damon 1995
1992 Arthur Bronstein 1996
1993 Neal McBurnett (June) 1995
(Aug.) 1995 Alex Goulder 1997
1994 Jeff Skala 1999
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
12
BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSIONERS
1906-2016
1995 Ann Cooper 2000
1996 Mariagnes Medrud 2001
1997 Shirley Deeter 2002
1998 Alex Goulder 2003
2000 Linda Loewenstein 2003
1999 Bruce Staff 2004
2001 Ann Aber 2006
2002 Lydia Tate 2007
2003 Catherine Sparkman 2005
2003 Stephen Topping 2010
2004 Steve Clason 2009
2005 Michael Keenan 2008
2006 Nadia Haddad 2011
2007 Sam Fuqua 2012
2008 Annette Mitchell 2013
2009 James Zigarelli 2010
2010 Celeste Landry 2014
2010 Anne Sawyer 2015
2011 Donna O’Brien 2016
2012 Anna Lull 2014
2012 Dan King 2013
2013 Paul Sutter 2016
2014 Alicia Gibb 2018
2014 Joni Teter 2019
2015 Tim O’Shea 2020
2016 Joel Koenig 2017
2016 Juana Gomez 2021
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
13
Overview of Library and Arts Department Operations
There are five divisions in the Library and Arts Department.
Administration
Administration is comprised of the office of the director, general administrative functions, such
as project/contract management and long-range planning, budget and accounts payable, public
information, volunteer services, and administrative support for the Library Commission and Arts
Commission. Administration also serves as the liaison to the Boulder Library Foundation by
providing administrative support to the annual grants program.
Community Engagement and Enrichment
Community Engagement and Enrichment is focused on engaging the community through
materials, programs, literacy, story times, and outreach. This division includes youth services,
the acquisition of library materials and electronic resources (e.g. e-books and informational
databases), library collection maintenance, the homebound delivery program, and program
promotion and graphics. The Carnegie Library for Local History collection and services, the
Boulder Reads adult literacy program, and Canyon Gallery exhibits are also part of Community
Engagement and Enrichment.
eServices
eServices is comprised of administration and maintenance of library-specific IT systems and
equipment, the patron computer reservation and print release system, computer technology
support, the library website, and the cataloging of library materials and resources. The division
serves as liaison to the Flatirons Library Consortium that operates the integrated library system,
i.e. the library catalog and patron database. The BLDG 61 Makerspace is also managed and
programmed by eServices.
Public Services
Public Services serves library patrons by addressing all customer service inquiries including
general reference and supports patron access to the library’s digital collections. The division
provides system-wide materials circulation services and shelving, interlibrary loan, maintenance
of patron accounts, and administration of the holds and Prospector system. The division also
manages the meeting room reservation system and maintains the automated materials handling
systems. The Meadows, George Reynolds branch libraries and the NoBo Corner Library
operations, programs and services, including literacy, youth services, storytime and outreach are
also part of Public Services.
Office of Arts and Culture
The Office of Arts + Culture is the city-wide cultural affairs group for the City of Boulder.
Guided by the Community Cultural Plan, the Office supports the Boulder Arts Commission in
the distribution of cultural grants, and provides services under eight strategies: support for
cultural organizations, public art, the creative sector of the economy, initiatives for the mix of
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
14
Overview of Library and Arts Department Operations
venues, programs for neighborhoods and underserved communities, support for artists and
creative professionals, civic dialog about the arts, and youth initiatives. These strategies are
designed to support city agencies, cultural leaders, and residents in achieving the Community
Vision for Culture: Together, we will craft Boulder’s social, physical, and cultural environment
to include creativity as an essential ingredient for the well being, prosperity, and joy of everyone
in the community. Accomplishing this vision requires an alignment of all of Boulder’s collective
cultural endeavors. It is the mission of the Office of Arts + Culture to facilitate the success of this
alignment in the creative community.
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
15
Library Department Budget Basics
Library Department Funding
The Library Department receives funding from six funds within the city’s financial structure. Each
fund has unique revenue sources which support unique expenditures. Provided below are
descriptions of each fund including revenue sources and expenditure categories, as well as how
each fund is used during the city’s annual budget process. A summary schematic of the library’s
funding structure is also included.
General Fund – The General Fund is the library’s main funding source. All revenues and
expenditures within the General Fund, of which the library’s budget is a portion, must be
appropriated by City Council through the City of Boulder’s annual budget process. Modifications
to the library’s budget may be made through twice-yearly Adjustment-to-Base (ATB) processes.
Library Administration develops the annual budget as well as any mid-year adjustments. The
mechanics of these processes are explained in a later section.
General Fund revenues that support citywide operating expenditures, including those of the library,
are sourced from a combination of sales and use tax, property tax, and a variety of other taxes. A
full description of the General Fund’s revenue sources can be found on page 63 of the city’s 2017
annual budget, which is available on the web at: Budget. Operating revenues that the library
independently generates - fines and fees, rental income, proceeds from the sales of used books,
etc. - are deposited directly into the General Fund. Any unspent Library Department
appropriations at the end of a given fiscal year fall to General Fund Balance and may be re-
appropriated at the discretion of the City Council either through the following year’s budget
process or through the ATB process.
Library Fund – The Library Fund is a pooled repository of revenues generated from four main
sources: 1) the one-third property tax mill levy that is dedicated to the library; 2) gifts and
contributions given to library; 3) the proceeds from the sale of library property or assets; 4) accrued
interest on the fund balance. Both the revenues and expenditures within the Library Fund are
tracked separately as many of the revenue sources, especially gifts and donations, are designated
for specific purposes such as materials acquisitions or capital improvement at various library
locations. The property tax revenues are less restricted and are used to support ongoing library
operations and/or materials purchases. Library Administration manages the outlay of monies from
the Library Fund and must appropriate both the revenue and expenditures on an annual basis
through the budget process. As per article IX, section 134 of the Boulder City Charter, expenditures
of revenues from items 2 and 3 above shall be made only upon the favorable recommendation of
the library commission.
Computer Replacement Fund (CRF) – The city’s Information Technology (IT) Department
manages the CRF. The library makes an annual contribution to the CRF based upon IT’s cost
projections for future replacement of computers as well as software upgrades, workstation
technical support, hardware maintenance and network infrastructure maintenance. The
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
16
Library Department Budget Basics
contribution formulas are set by the city’s IT Department according to industry standards. The
CRF is used to fund the replacement and servicing of workstations at the library, both employee
workstations and patron workstations. Printers and other peripheral computing equipment are not
funded in the CRF. These items may be funded in the Equipment Replacement Fund (below)
depending upon acquisition price.
Contributions to the CRF are reflected in the library’s annual operating budget. Expenditures out
of the library ‘s CRF balance are included in IT’s operating budget and managed according to
replacement schedules determined by IT. Any unspent annual appropriations at the end of a given
fiscal year fall to CRF balance and must be re-appropriated either in the next year’s budget process
or through the ATB process.
Equipment Replacement Fund (ERF) – The city’s Department of Public Works – Facilities Asset
Management (FAM) Division manages the ERF. The library makes an annual contribution to the
ERF based upon FAM’s inflation-adjusted projections for future replacement of major equipment
which are based upon industry standards. These contributions are included in the library’s annual
operating budget. Expenditures out of the ERF are reflected in FAM’s operating budget. The funds
within the ERF are used at the discretion of library staff, subject to ERF policies and procedures.
Any unspent funds in a given year fall to ERF balance to be used to offset future year’s
contributions or alternative equipment purchases.
Equipment must meet the following criteria to be included on the ERF:
1. Tangible in nature and does not lose its identity if removed from original location
2. Have a useful life of more than one year
3. Have an original cost of at least $5,000
The ERF cannot cover vehicles, buildings, building materials/machinery, fixtures,
or land/land improvements.
Furnishings are not included in the ERF; they are funded out of the library’s
operating budget
Facility Renovation and Replacement Fund (FR&R Fund) - The city’s Department of Public
Works – Facilities Asset Management (FAM) Division manages the FR&R Fund. The library
makes an annual contribution to the FR&R Fund based upon a combination of FAM’s facility
capital renovation and replacement projections as well as savings for future renovation projects
envisioned by library staff. These contributions are reflected in the library’s annual operating
budget. The funds are used at the discretion of Library Administration subject to FR&R Fund
policies. Expenditures out of the FR&R Fund are reflected in FAM’s operating and capital budget.
Any unspent funds fall to FR&R Fund balance to be programmed for future use.
The FR&R Fund is used specifically for major maintenance, renovation, and replacement of
capital facilities and equipment and is defined according to the following criteria:
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
17
Library Department Budget Basics
1. Maintenance: maintenance of existing building systems or components where the cost
exceeds $3,000 per repair
2. Renovation: replacement of 50% or more of a building system or component
3. Replacement: replacement of 100% of a building system or component
HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) and fixtures are included in FR&R
Capital Development Fund – The city’s Department of Public Works – Facilities Asset
Management (FAM) Division manages the Capital Development Fund. The Capital Development
Fund is funded with past balances of Capital Development Excise Taxes as well as ongoing
collection of Impact Fees. In 2010, the city shifted away from collecting Development Excise
Taxes in favor of collecting Impact Fees. These fees are assessed on commercial and private
development projects and are to be used to fund capital expansion of municipal facilities necessary
to support growing demand for city services. The recipient departments of Capital Development
Excise Tax and Impact Fee funding are: Transportation, Parks and Recreation, Police, Fire, Human
Services, and Boulder Public Library. Capital Development Funds are programmed and spent at
the discretion of FAM in conjunction with staff within the recipient departments. The Capital
Development Excise Taxes and Impact Fees collected on behalf of the library can only be spent
on capital facility expansion and materials expansion.
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
18
Library Department Budget Basics
Library Department Funding Structure
General Fund
Sales and Use Tax
Property Tax
Misc. Fees and Other Taxes
Library Revenues
Library Fund
Propert Tax (0.33 Mills Dedicated)
Interest
Proceeds from Sale of Library Property
Grants, Donations, Bequests, Gifts
Computer Replacement Fund
Annual Library Dept. Contributions
Equipment Replacement Fund
Annual Library Dept. Contributions
Facilities Renovation &
Replacement Fund
Annual Dept. Contributions
Capital Development Fund
Impact Fees Capex That Expands Library Capacity
*Budgeted expenditures require favorable recommendation from the Library Commission
Annual Variable Contributions
Major Maintenance, Renovation and
Replacement of Library Facilites
Capital Maintenance Work
Fund and Revenue/Source Expenditure Type
Donor Designated Programs/Materials*
Annualized "Smoothed" Contributions
Equipment Replacement
Annualized "Smoothed" Contributions
Comp. Purchased on Behalf of Library
Library Operations
Materials Acquisition
Computer Replacement
Eq. Purchased on Behalf of Library
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
19
Library Department Budget Basics
Budget Development and Adjustment-to-Base Process
Sourcing money from any of the funds described above must occur according to a defined City of
Boulder budget schedule. This schedule has two main components. The first component is the
annual budget development process during which library staff works with city executive
management to determine annual appropriations for the library. This process begins in March and
concludes in October when the City Council approves the upcoming year’s city budget.
Appropriations approved in the annual city budget are available to be spent on January 1 of the
following year.
The second component of the budget process is the Adjustment-to-Base (ATB) process. The ATB
serves as an opportunity for the library to adjust its annual budget mid-year. Development of the
first ATB begins in the March to April timeframe, and ends with City Council approval in either
May or June. Library staff cannot spend against appropriations included in the first ATB until they
receive council approval. The second ATB follows a similar pattern, beginning in the October to
November timeframe, and ending with council approval usually in December. Budget adjustments
included in ATBs come from three primary sources:
Operating Carryover from Fund Balance - Unspent balances that fell to fund balance
at the end of the previous fiscal year. These monies support specific projects or
programs that span more than one fiscal year.
Budget Supplemental from Fund Balance – Monies requested from fund balance to
support new programs or projects that were not included in the annual budget. The
library can only request to appropriate money from fund balance if money is available
(in excess of reserve requirements).
Additional Revenue - Unanticipated revenue that was not included in the annual
budget. The ATB is an opportunity for the library to recognize this revenue and
appropriate it for specific uses. If the department does not appropriate additional
revenue, it falls to fund balance.
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
20
Library Department Budget Basics
Budget Calendar
The calendar below lists important date ranges in the budget process and indicates when Library
Commission involvement is needed (shaded).
Date Deliverable/Event
March - April Review library’s first round of adjustments to the current year’s base
budget and solicit Library Commission input
April - May First round of adjustments to the current year’s base budget due for city
manager’s review.
May - June First round of adjustments to the current year’s base budget read before
City Council (first reading)
May - June Review next year’s Recommended Library Budget and solicit
commission input
May - June First round of adjustments to the current year’s base budget read before
City Council (second reading)
June Library and Arts Department director to provide next year’s
Recommended Library Budget for city manager review
July Update Library Commission on outcome of first round of adjustments to
the current year’s base budget
August Update Library Commission on the City Manager’s (next year)
Recommended City Budget
August Recommended City Budget delivered to City Council
September First City Council Study Session on Recommended City Budget
September Second City Council Study Session on Recommended City Budget (if
needed)
September Review library second round of adjustments to the current year’s base
budget and solicit Library Commission input
October - November Second round of adjustments to the current year’s base budget due for
city manager’s review.
October First reading of ordinances to approve Recommended City Budget with
opportunity for public comment.
October Second reading of ordinances to approve Recommended City Budget
with opportunity for public comment.
November Update on Approved City Budget (including Library Department
Budget)
November -
December
Second round of adjustments to the current year’s base budget read before
City Council (first reading)
November -
December
Second round of adjustments to the current year’s base budget read before
City Council (second reading)
December Update Library Commission on outcome of second round of the current
year’s adjustments to base budget
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
21
Overview of the Boulder Library Foundation
The Boulder Library Foundation strategically invests in innovative programming and
partnerships that enrich the Boulder Public Library and our community. The Foundation is a
501(c)(3) nonprofit organization governed by a volunteer board of directors and supported by
individual donors and community partners. The Foundation's purpose is to assist and aid the
Library by raising funds from private sources for the benefit of the Library. This includes,
without limitation, solicitation and receipt of private gifts, annual giving contributions, deferred
gifts, devises and bequests, corporate gifts and foundation grants, and special events.
The Foundation is responsible for identifying and nurturing relationships with potential donors
and other friends of the Library; soliciting cash, securities, real and intellectual property, and
other private resources for the support of the Library; and acknowledging and stewarding such
gifts in accordance with donor intent and its fiduciary responsibilities.
The Foundation Board of Directors is responsible for the control and management of all assets of
the Foundation, including the prudent management of all gifts to it, consistent with donor intent
and applicable laws. The Foundation is responsible for the performance and oversight of all
aspects of its operations based on a comprehensive set of bylaws.
The Boulder Library Foundation website is http://boulderlibraryfoundation.org/about/ .
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
22
Boulder Library Commission Communication Guidelines
Revised March 2, 2016
The City of Boulder maintains a set of “Rules and Responsibilities” for Board and
Commissions. The following is the “Open Meetings Regulation”:
“The general provisions concerning boards and commissions are contained in
Chapter 2-3 of the Boulder Revised Code of 1981, as amended. Paragraph 2-3-
1(b)(5) requires that each board or commission: “Hold all meetings open to the
public, after notice of the date, time, place, and subject matter of the meeting, and
provide an opportunity for public comment at the meeting.” This requires, at a
minimum, that boards and commissions provide 24 hour specific notice of each
meeting by posting a copy of the meeting agenda in the lobby of the Municipal
Building. The Citizen Assistance Office provides space for those notices. In
addition, most boards and commissions give notice of meetings by publication of
the agenda in the Daily Camera. Although publication is not required, it is highly
recommended. In the past, boards and commissions held agenda meetings and
other informal gatherings without giving the required notice. However, 1991
changes to State public meetings law, as well as the consistent interpretation of
Chapter 2-3-1, require that if three or more members of a board or commission
meet at any time and discuss public business, notice must be given of such
meeting, and the meeting must be open to the public. If a chance meeting occurs,
the members of the board or commission must refrain from discussing public
business or convene in groups of less than three. One-on-one communication
about public business between members of a board or commission is permitted at
all times, and it is only when three or more members gather that a ‘meeting’ is
constituted.”
In order to meet that regulation, the Library Commission developed the following
communication guidelines:
All commissioner communications:
Any two commissioners are allowed to discuss library or commission related
topics.
Even if a commissioner has discussed a topic with other commissioners, there is
no limit on the conversation other than to avoid attempting to make a decision
outside of a public meeting.
A commissioner should avoid representing another commissioner’s opinion to
other commissioners, staff, or the public.
No votes or consensus should be gathered outside of a public meeting; the only
exceptions are administrative decisions (i.e. deciding meeting day, time, place,
etc.)
Any or all commissioners are permitted to gather outside of scheduled meetings
as long as commission business is not discussed.
If a commission decision must be made in a timeframe not permitting discussion
at a regular meeting, a special meeting must be scheduled allowing as much
public notice as possible (minimum 24 hours).
All commission business communications involving more than TWO
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
23
Boulder Library Commission Communication Guidelines
Revised March 2, 2016
commissioners or representing a commission opinion to the public are a part of
the public record and can be requested by the public at any time.
Commissioner email communications:
Any email sent to staff and/or one or more commissioners, regarding commission
business (administrative business included) is subject to disclosure and considered
public record.
Any two commissioners may exchange email on any topic; messages containing
(non-administrative) commission business shall not be forwarded to any other
commissioner.
A commissioner may send informational emails to the entire commission; such
messages should include a reminder not to “reply all.” If any commissioner wants
to respond or discuss the contents of the email, the topic should be added to our
next meeting agenda; “reply all” only to ask for this agenda request.
Examples of all-commission emails:
1) Informational topics to be discussed at our next meeting as "heads up"
2) Research or public communication to be shared with fellow commissioners, not as
a part of an ongoing discussion
3) Questions being asked of staff
Questions to Library Staff:
Before sending a substantive request for information to library staff, a commissioner
should discuss with and receive agreement from another commissioner to insure that this
is a substantive commission request. The commission as a whole, the director, and the
deputy director should then be copied on the request so that they all may be aware of the
request.
If/when staff responds via email or memo to questions from a commissioner, staff
will try to answer the question as thoroughly as they can and will copy all
commission members. Substantive informational emails should be added to the
upcoming meeting’s commission memo if not already included in the staff memo.
If commissioners have follow-up questions that would require more than 15
minutes of staff time to respond, these should be sent to the commission chair
and/or vice chair for inclusion in the “Information Request” prior to the next
commission meeting.
For additional guidelines for communicating with staff, see item 8 in “Guiding
principles for interaction among Council, Boards, Commission, and City Staff”
document included later in the handbook.
Speaking with the public as a commissioner:
Commissioners should represent their ideas as personal (not as the commission) when
expressing opinions, unless the commission has voted on that issue. For guidelines for
communication with City Council, see “Guiding principles for interaction among
Council, Boards, Commission, and City Staff” document included later in the
handbook.
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
24
GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR INTERACTION AMONG COUNCIL, BOARDS,
COMMISSIONS AND CITY STAFF
Council appreciates deeply the time, specialized knowledge and commitment of members of City
boards and commissions. Occasionally, awkward situations have arisen from the lack of clarity
about roles and the lack of communication as to how to work seamlessly together. Council
realized that articulating some basic principles to guide interactions among boards, commissions,
staff and Council might help prevent some of these difficulties. The following guiding principles
are offered from the Council in the spirit of partnership and a desire to create a good working
relationship.
COUNCIL
1. City policies are established by the City Council. With the exception of limited
circumstances (often charter-based), the role of boards and commissions is advisory to the
City Council.
2. It is Council’s desire to use boards and commissions as the first step for gathering
community feedback on difficult and controversial issues as a means to creating viable
policy options.
3. All policy expressions on national, international, statewide and county issues should
come from Council and not individual boards and commissions. Boards and commissions
may suggest that Council take policy positions by resolution but should not independently
issue such resolutions.
4. Council members should refrain from discussion with board members any quasi-
judicial issues coming before the board. For matters that are not quasi-judicial, Council
members may discuss a point of view with board members but should clarify that this
perspective may not represent the position of the Council as a whole.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
5. Board and commission members who wish to explain or advocate positions to Council
should identify themselves as board members and clarify whether they are speaking from a
personal position or on behalf of the majority or minority position that the board has taken.
6. When members of a board or commission disagree about a given issue or policy,
Council expects to be apprised of the disagreements and of the reasoning underlying the
various points of view.
7. The City Manager is responsible for the budget recommendation to City Council. When
a board or commission disagrees with the City Manager’s budget, the City Manager should
be notified as a matter of courtesy prior to the board or commission members addressing
Council.
CITY STAFF
8. Staff takes direction from the City Manager, except as authorized by the Charter.
Boards and commissions may request research or other work of staff but, if the work
requires more than what staff determines is reasonable, the board or commission, supported
by a majority of members at a meeting, must make a direct request of the City Council.
9. City staff ultimately is responsible for supporting City Council. Council expects staff to
provide the best professional judgment regarding issues and policies, whether or not boards
and commissions agree with those professional judgments. Staff should inform Council
when a board or commission disagrees with the staff’s position and, when possible, explain
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
25
GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR INTERACTION AMONG COUNCIL, BOARDS,
COMMISSIONS AND CITY STAFF
the basis of that disagreement.
10. When several boards and commissions review elements of a given proposal or issue,
staff reports to Council should reflect the perspectives of all reviewing boards and
commissions.
In addition, the City maintains a Boards and Commissions website as an added resource to its
boards and commissions. (www.bouldercolorado.gov, then select Government, scroll down to
Boards and Commissions.)
Attachment A. 2017 Library Commission Handbook
26
To: Boulder Public Library Commission
From: David Farnan, Library and Arts Director
Jennifer Phares, Deputy Library Director
Date: December 29, 2016
Subject: Library Commission and staff review of library policies and guidelines inventory
Background:
The Library Commission master calendar indicates that the commissioners and staff will plan the annual
review and update of the library rules and policies for the year in January. Please see Attachment B.
which is an inventory of library policies and guidelines.
Policies due for review in 2017:
The library rules and most critical library policies have been updated and approved by the Library
Commission during the past three years. The recent holidays and vacations prevented the leadership
team from reviewing the policy and guidelines inventory and identifying any necessary changes to these
recently reviewed policies in time for the Jan. 4, 2017 Library Commission meeting. This matter is an
agenda item for discussion at the team’s meeting on Jan. 9, 2017. Staff will provide any
recommendations for changes to the Library Commission in the Feb. 1, 2017 meeting packet.
The following policies were identified for review in 2017:
Internet Access Policy and Acceptable Use Policy for Electronic Information Resources
A formal review of this policy is needed since it has been nearly 8 years since it was approved. The
overall intent of the policy is not likely to change but there is a need to update the language and ensure
its tone is consistent with the policies that were updated in the past three years. Staff will present
recommended changes to the Library Commission for consideration in the March 1, 2017 meeting
packet.
Circulation policies
Staff will provide the Library Commission with a recommendation regarding the request to increase the
holds limit in the second quarter 2017.
Carnegie policies
The Donations and Collections policy for the Carnegie Branch, Research Policies, and Request a Photo
policies will be updated after the implementation of the Digital Asset Management System (DAMS). The
DAMS will facilitate online access, by patrons, to digitized versions of archival resources housed in the
Carnegie Branch Library. Implementation of the system is scheduled to begin in January 2017. These
policy updates will be presented to the Library Commission for consideration sometime during the
second or third quarter.
Questions for the Library Commission:
1. What input does the Library Commission have for staff regarding the proposed scheduling of the
policy updates?
2.Are there other policies or guidelines that the Library Commission would like to review in 2017?
3. Does the Library Commission have any questions for staff about the policies and guidelines?
27
Attachment B. Library Policy and Guidelines Inventory
Dec. 28, 2016
P a g e 1 | 3
Review date Policy and link Notes
Oct. 8, 2016 Library Rules
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/
Jan. 6, 2016 BLDG 61 Makerspace Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/bldg-61-makerspace-policy/
June 1, 2016 Canyon Theater and Gallery Terms of Use and Rental Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/canyon-theater-and-gallery-terms-of-use-and-
rental-policy/
No date Circulation policies
Your Library Account
https://boulderlibrary.org/card/
Types of Accounts
https://boulderlibrary.org/card/#types
Check out, Renew, Return
https://boulderlibrary.org/card/#checkout
Books in a Bag
http://research.boulderlibrary.org/ReadingRoom/BooksinaBag
Holds
https://boulderlibrary.org/card/holds/
Reading History, Privacy
https://boulderlibrary.org/card/more-on-your-account/
Collection Agency
https://boulderlibrary.org/card/collection-agency/
These policies are updated as needed. Policy
updates are done in coordination with the Flatirons
Library Consortium members.
Holds limit to be reviewed in 2017.
Aug. 3, 2016 Collection Development Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/collection-development-policy/
May 5, 2015 Community Bulletin Board Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/community-bulletin-board-policy/
No date Donations and Collections Policy for the Carnegie Branch
https://boulderlibrary.org/services/local-history/donations-and-collections-policy-for-
the-carnegie-branch/
Due for review and update. Name Carnegie policies
consistently.
28
Attachment B. Library Policy and Guidelines Inventory
Dec. 28, 2016
P a g e 2 | 3
Oct. 7, 2015 Distribution of Community Information Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/distribution-of-community-information-policy/
No date Guidelines for Authors and Publishers
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/collection-development-policy/guidelines-for-
authors-and-publishers/
These are guidelines not a strict policy.
No date Interlibrary Loan Guidelines
https://boulderlibrary.org/services/interlibrary-loan/#guidelines
These are guidelines not a strict policy.
March 5, 2008 Internet Access Policy and Acceptable Use Policy for Electronic Information Resources
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/internet-access-policy/
Due for review and update.
No date Materials Donation Guidelines
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/donation-guidelines/
These are guidelines not a strict policy.
Feb. 10, 2016 Meeting Room and Study Room Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/meeting-rooms/
Nov. 5 2015 Photography and Video Recording Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/photography-and-video-recording-policy/
June 4, 2015 Privacy Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/privacy-policy/
No date Research Policies
https://boulderlibrary.org/services/local-history/research-policies/
Due for review and update. Name Carnegie policies
consistently.
No date Request a Photo
https://boulderlibrary.org/services/local-history/carnegiephotographic-reproduction-
policies/
Due for review and update. Name Carnegie policies
consistently.
April 8, 2015 Security Camera Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/security-camera-policy/
29
Attachment B. Library Policy and Guidelines Inventory
Dec. 28, 2016
P a g e 3 | 3
June 1, 2016 Sponsorship of Programs and Events Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/sponsorship -of-programs-and-events-policy/
Feb. 6, 2013 Unattended Children Policy
https://boulderlibrary.org/about/rules/unattended-children-policy/
30
City of Boulder
2017 Library Commission Commission Memo
Meeting Date: January 4, 2017 – Canyon Meeting Room - Main
Upcoming Special meetings
January 31, 5:30-8:30pm - Joint Boards & Commissions non-voting
Meeting regarding Canyon Blvd. Complete Streets Study
(Oertler Room, 1st Presbyterian Church, 1820 15th St)
March 13, 2017, 6:00 - Master Plan Study session - Canyon Meeting
Room
March (Date & place TBD) - Meeting with Community Reps
Interesting Upcoming Dates ( ALA Website):
Teen Tech Week - March 5-11, 2017
Freedom of Information Day - on or around March 16
D.E.A.R - Drop Everything and Read - April 12
National Library Week - April 9-15, 2017
National Library Workers Day - April 11, 2017 (Tuesday of National Library
Week)
1. Items from Commission
A. Report-out on meetings with Council members
2. BLF Update
3. Updates from Commissioners Representing the Commission
in other Venues (verbal)
BVCP
Civic Area
31
Canyon Complete Streets
EcoDistricts
4. Update on Emails to Library Commission
Hi, Councilmembers -December
28, 2016
I thought you might appreciate some end-of-year cheer, courtesy of our
community library. Many of you probably saw Monday's Daily Camera article
focusing the first class of graduates from the BLDG 61 "Tree-Opp" initiative.
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/boulder/ci_30681755/boulders-repurposing-
emerald-ash-trees-also-gives-homeless
This month, BLDG 61 and the "TreeOpp" program were also featured in Make
Magazine, a well-regarded nationwide Zine (see below). Earlier this fall, our
library was honored to receive an invitation to present on BLDG 61 at the
Capitol Hill MakerFaire in Washington, DC. And - after only 8 months' operation
- 9 patents have emerged from on BLDG 61 programs. Wow! Next year
promises more great opportunities, including launch of "Girls Build, Learn,
Design, Grow," a 12-week apprenticeship program for underserved teenage
girls. Find out more about this great program - and see community-based
making in action - in this short video, featuring BLDG 61 specialist Janet
Hollingsworth.
https://vimeo.com/195511968/a259ebd4f4
This year's 30th anniversary celebration for the Boulder Reads was a personal
highlight for me. Literacy in all its forms has never been more important, and
Boulder Reads exemplifies the library's role in making literacy possible for
people from every walk of life. This short video created for the anniversary
celebration brings tears to my eyes every time I watch it.
https://boulderlibrary.org/boulderreads/
We are blessed with an amazing community library. Kudos to David and the
BPL leadership team for their vision and courage in pursuing new opportunities;
to BPL staff for their flexibility, creativity and dedication in delivering library
programs and services; and to the Boulder Library Foundation for its
investments in library programming. And thanks to all of you for your support
of our community library!
Wishing all of you the best for the new year. I look forward to seeing you at our
library - The Place to Be!
Joni Teter
32
DIRECTOR’S REPORT JANUARY 2017
Master Plan Project update
During December 2016, staff continued researching master and strategic plans, and other guiding
documents from the City of Boulder and other community agencies to summarize community needs,
priorities and goals that are related to, or may be impacted by, library programs and services. Several
additional resources are being reviewed beyond the initial list that was given to the consultant that was
engaged for phase 1 of the project earlier this year. Staff anticipates having the research completed by
the end of January 2017. Staff is also in the process of completing an inventory of current programs,
services, and partnerships, and is gathering demographic and library use data by geographic service
area.
The data will be used by a local marketing firm selected to develop key messages and a presentation
about the Boulder Public Library to encourage the community members’ participation in the master
planning process. Staff is also in the process of reviewing three proposals from consultants for phase 2
of the project, specifically for creating, administering and analyzing the data from a survey and several
focus groups. Work on finalizing the consultant services contracts for both the marketing, and the
survey and focus groups will be completed in January 2017.
1000 Books Before Kindergarten
This past August, we launched 1000 Books Before Kindergarten
https://boulderlibrary.org/featured/1000-books-before-kindergarten-2/ . 1000B4K is a national
program designed to promote reading to toddlers, infants and newborns and encourages caregivers to
bond with their children through reading. I am pleased to announce that on Dec. 14, 2016, our first
young reader, Zimm completed the program.
33