04.13.16 OSBT PacketOPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
Council Chambers, 1777 Broadway
MEETING AGENDA
(Please note that times are approximate.)
6:00 I. Call to Order
a) Oath of Office – Curt Brown
b) Election of Officers
6:15 II. Approval of Minutes
6:20 III. *Public Participation for Items Not Identified for Public Hearing
6:30 IV. Matters from Staff
a) Brief staff updates on projects/plans
b) Wildfire response simulation event in May
c) Flood repair on Mesa Trail/Skunk Creek Crossing
d) Update on Draft 2017 Work Plan and Budget
e) Staff update on exploratory talks for a Conservancy to provide private
funding to support OSMP priority programs and projects
8:00 V. Matters from the Board
a) Board retreat discussion
b) May Board meeting schedule
8:15 VI. *Summary of 2015 Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteer Services Annual
Report and Declaration to Honor Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteers
during National Volunteer Week, April 10-16, 2016.
8:30 VII. Adjournment
* Public hearing
AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 1
OPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Minutes
Meeting Date March 9, 2016
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Shelley Dunbar Frances Hartogh Molly Davis Kevin Bracy Knight Tom Isaacson
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT
Tracy Winfree Jim Reeder John Potter Mark Davison Mark Gershman
Bethany Collins Deryn Wagner Phil Yates Cecil Fenio Alycia Alexander
Juliet Bonnell Steve Armstead Leah Case Gabe Wilson Don Damico
Brian Anacker Luke McKay Heather Swanson Lynn Riedel
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:02 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM 1 – Proclamation
Frances Hartogh read a proclamation for Shelley Dunbar, the exiting Board Chair, acknowledging her years
of service as an Open Space Board of Trustee.
AGENDA ITEM 2 – Approval of the Minutes
Tom Isaacson asked that Tim Hogan’s public comment be summarized and the attachment be removed
from the minutes. The Board agreed that for consistency, minutes will remain a summary and handouts
and/or presentations from the public can be archived on the website. Frances Hartogh said on page 3, it
should be noted that Kirk Cunningham spoke on behalf of the Sierra Club. On page 5, during Mike
Barrow’s public comment, it should read, “. . . for the amount of time . . .” On the same page it should
read, “Dan Brillon said recreation experience on the west side is far superior. . .” In the motion language
on page 8, add the word “that” after “moved.”
Frances Hartogh moved that the Open Space Board of Trustees approve the minutes from Feb. 11, 2016
and Feb. 12, 2016 as amended. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM 3 – Public Participation for Items not on the Agenda
None.
AGENDA ITEM 4 – Matters from Staff
Jim Reeder highlighted several staff projects. Tracy Winfree introduced Mark Davison, the new
Community Connections & Partnerships Division Manager for Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP).
Staff reminded the Board about a joint Board meeting on April 27.
AGENDA ITEM 5 – Matters from the Board
Molly Davis said the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) are tasked with a difficult job trying to
balance interests. She said some interests are competitive in nature and proceedings need to be
transparent; the Board needs to make sure Board actions take place during Board meetings. There needs
to be a set foundation and effort to gain back the public trust.
Tom Isaacson noted that the Parks and Open Space Advisory Committee (POSAC) voted five to two to
not take a position on the North Trail Study Area (TSA) Draft Plan.
AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 2
AGENDA ITEM 6 – Consideration of a motion to approve and recommend that City Council
approves the conveyance of an easement to Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) for
ingress/egress along a portion of the Mesa Trail to provide access to the company’s 9205 Eldorado-
NCAR electric transmission line. This is a disposal of Open Space land under City Charter Section
177.
Bethany Collins, Property Agent, presented this item.
Frances Hartogh asked if this easement would allow PSCo trucks to drive up this portion of the trail.
Bethany said yes; however, staff would be given notice prior to any maintenance access. Shelley asked if
this trail would be closed if they were doing maintenance work. Bethany said it may depend on the
activity; if a closure were needed there would be plenty of notice provided.
Public Comment
None.
Return to the Board
No further comment.
Motion
Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees approve and recommend that the City
Council approves the disposal of an interest in Open Space lands pursuant to Boulder City Charter
Section 177 through the conveyance of an easement to Public Service Company of Colorado for
ingress/egress along a portion of the Mesa Trail to provide access to the company’s 9205 Eldorado-
NCAR electric transmission line, as approved by OSMP and PSCo staff and the City Attorney’s
Office. Molly Davis seconded. This motion passed unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM 7 – *Consideration of a motion to approve and recommend that City Council
approves the conveyance of a 10-foot wide nonexclusive easement to Public Service Company of
Colorado for an underground electrical line across approximately 1,000 linear feet of the Dover-
Blacker Open Space property for the purpose of providing electricity to the Shanahan Ridge
neighborhood. This is a disposal of Open Space land under City Charter Section 177.
Bethany Collins, Property Agent, presented this item.
Public Comment
Karen Hollweg, Boulder, asked if there are stipulations in the contract that would require revegetation or
salvaging of the area. Bethany said if there is surface impact then revegetation would be required.
Return to the Board
No further comment.
Motion
Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees approve and recommend that the City
Council approves the disposal of an interest in Open Space lands pursuant to Boulder City Charter
section 177 through the conveyance of a 10-foot wide nonexclusive easement to Public Service
Company of Colorado for an underground electrical line across approximately 1,000 linear feet of
the Dover-Blacker Open Space property for the purpose of providing electricity to the Shanahan
Ridge neighborhood for the consideration of $12,500. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion
passed four to zero; Frances Hartogh abstained.
AGENDA ITEM 8 – Consideration of a motion recommending approval of the North Trail Study
Area Plan and recommending the North Trail Study Area Plan to City Council for its acceptance.
AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 3
Steve Armstead, Environmental Planner, presented this item.
Tom asked if the presence of bobolinks is among the reasons for properties in the north remaining closed.
Steve said yes. Tom asked if the current level of use has had an impact on the bobolink population.
Heather Swanson said bobolinks are ground nesters so they are fairly sensitive; she said nesting success
has not been monitored. Tom asked if nesting season is May 1 through July 31; Heather said yes.
Molly Davis asked where staff is looking for alternate horse arena locations other than Boulder Valley
Ranch (BVR). Steve said possibly the new Horseshoe or Lefthand Trailhead. Shelley asked how staff
came up with trail/trailhead names. Steve said a staff team came up with them.
Public Comment
Marty Walter, Boulder, said he is in favor of keeping the northern properties closed. There needs to
support for the lessees who have their agricultural operations on that land; do not open these properties to
general use. Open Space needs someone managing these fields otherwise they could become a fire
hazard.
Jiang Joy Wu, Boulder, said the northern properties should remain open for traditional agricultural use
only. These areas are not traditional horse boarding facilities. Open Space has plenty of options for
recreational use; but there are fewer and fewer agricultural lands.
Mike Barrow, Boulder Mountainbike Alliance (BMA), said BMA supports the Open Boulder position on
the draft plan. He thanked the Board and staff for staying on schedule. He asked that after completion of
this plan, staff takes the time to evaluate this process and make it better moving forward. BMA would like
to work with staff on the best management practices for the Joder Trail to accomplish access and manage
user conflict.
Roger Auerenamer, Boulder, said the northern properties need to remain closed except to cattle as it
always has been. There are already problems with Stratton even though it is closed; opening any of these
areas is not a good idea.
Alex Hycle-Wright, Boulder, said he supports making the west trail connection open for both hiking and
biking. He said having a complete connection from Boulder to Lyons is an exciting possibility.
Fred Stengel, Boulder, said the northern properties should remain as agricultural land. Opening these
areas will cause parking issues as well as disrupt the current process. He asked for them to remain closed.
Raymond Bridge, Boulder County Audubon Society, said the draft plan has major deficiencies. It is stated
that the number one criteria is compliance with sideboards, however the content does not reflect this. The
North Boulder Valley Management Plan mandates these trails be located along the edge to avoid
fragmentation. The proposed North Sky Trail cuts through habitat block and maximizes fragmentation.
The sideboards have been ignored in final evaluations. The resource impacts along the west connecter are
greater than the east. He said this plan is not ready to be submitted to council.
Edie Stevens, Boulder, said preservation of Boulder’s environment has always been the overriding
purpose of its Open Space. Open Space emphasizes preservation and protection of the natural
environment while fostering appreciation and use that sustain the natural values of the land. The mission
statement makes it clear that passive recreation will sustain the natural values.
Sue Cass, Boulder County Nature Association (BCNA), said they oppose placing a trail on the West
Beech Habitat Conservation Area (HCA). The Rocky Mountain Greenway process may present an
AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 4
opportunity for cost sharing, clarification for the wetland permitting process, allow negotiations currently
underway to remove Scenario B off of the HCA and onto the Conservation Easement (CE). Resolve these
issues now and not later.
Pat Billig, PLAN-Boulder, supports the draft plan minus the proposed trail on the West Beech HCA. The
foundation of the North TSA makes preservation of West Beech the strongest; a trail through this area
will have significant impact. This trail runs counter to the OSMP mission and violates management for
specified for an HCA. It makes no sense to damage sustainability when it can be built in a less impactful
area.
Marianne Martin, Boulder, said she is against opening the arena at Boulder Valley Ranch (BVR) to the
public. A lot of changes would need to be made in order to accommodate this. As it stands, this would be
a big risk; not to mention the parking lot is in the lessee’s front yard. She asked to maintain the current
balance.
Catherine Corona, Boulder, said she has been accessing the northern properties for years and it has been
wonderful to have that access. She asked for this area to remain as-is.
Patrick Brady, Boulder, said there are a number of parcels in the north that area closed to public. The
public pays taxes to support local community operations and local land; not having access to these
properties seems out of line. The land in question is leased to individuals for agricultural use; if decided
that they are the only ones who can use that land they should pay full market value.
Catherine Harris, Friends of Boulder Open Space (FOBOS), said it seems that we are still carrying out the
history of white settlers where humans will do what they will with no regard to the land. The trail on the
west was described as environmentally unsustainable; having an interesting visitor experience evidently
trumps the Open Space Charter. The proposed trail on the east side goes around the HCA as prescribed by
the North Valley Management Plan.
James Mapes, Boulder, said he values how open this process has been. He said the one area that deserves
more of a public process is specific to the northern properties; he suggested leaving this out of North TSA
plan. He added that the recommendation going to council should include language about Scenario A.
Paula Shuler, Boulder, said she agrees with only having Johnson and Schooley open to the public. The
rest of the northern properties are leased and actively used for agriculture. The lessees are working to
produce a product. It would be hypocritical for any of these properties to be open to the public and not
appropriate to allow people through these active fields.
Jackie Ramaley, Colorado Native Plant Society, said she supports Scenario A. The western foothills area
is generally un-fragmented and home to many native species as well as countless wetland and riparian
areas. We have the ability to protect this undisturbed habitat. The most recent draft speaks to mitigation
measures with the West Beech Trail, but only provides approximate cost; this needs to be more definitive.
Linda Parks, Boulder, said kudos to those supporting the non-existence of a new trail. She said she is
assuming that Open Space wants to preserve ranch operations; it would be a bad idea to allow general
horse access to BVR. Who will be responsible for preventing conflict of use. Longhorn Road should not
be used for additional vehicle access. Open space may be considering converting some of BVR into
organic farm land which is not a good idea; it will limit hay production. Keep this area open to cattle only
and for current horse boarding. It would be best to let the rancher determine the best access for this
facility.
AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 5
Adam Sher, BMA, said it is difficult trying to balance interests. BMA is generally supportive of the draft
plan. Do not support the closure of the northern tier properties. This needs further study and should not be
included in the plan. This new trail is a means of relieving ourselves of stress from work and life. It is a
way for children to experience open space and it more than just fun.
Helen Braider, Boulder, said she is saddened by the choice of a connecter on the west side and concerned
about the effects on wildlife. She is also concerned about the access to BVR. A horse trailer parking lot
would be a huge mistake; cannot accommodate that increased use. Please protect the integrity of the
ranch. Arena open to public use would not be good.
Steve Watts, BMA, said a compromised plan comes from the will of the public and it is encouraging that
staff received so much input; the draft plan is good. BMA will continue to be a partner in helping to
provide better recreation activities and experiences within OSMP.
Suzanne Webel, Boulder County Horse Association (BCHA), said we are so close to having plan for the
North TSA that we can all live with. Support staff working with lessees about access changes at BVR. Do
not support the last minute closure of northern properties; closures need to have specific reasons. She
asked the Board to adopt the original Scenario B.
Terry Stuart, Boulder, said he supports the farmers who want to keep their properties closed and was
concerned about a trail on north side of the highway. That area is precious and would quickly become
overused.
BethAnne Bane, Longmont, said there are already trails on the east side that go the same direction as the
proposed western trail. The area west of Hwy 36 has critical wildlife habitat; a trail would alter Open
Space resource. The plan says we need entire areas protected from recreation; closing a trail just during
nesting does not prevent irreversible damage.
Richard Harris, Boulder, said he is concerned about the proposed trail on the west side of Hwy 36. This
will encourage users from other connector trails and significantly increase use. The best place to put
traffic is on the side where it is easy to maintain. Damage on the west side will be incalculable.
Jessie Goldfarb, Boulder, noted that the City Open Space website states that the department protects the
environment and land that characterizes Boulder. It further states that OSMP fosters appreciation and use
that sustain the natural values of the land for current and future generations. She asked the Board to reject
this draft plan.
Jeffrey Dreyfuss, Boulder, asked to keep the northern properties closed to the public. There is no way to
get from Hester to Campbell without crossing the stream. Fields have been historically used for grazing
cattle; leave these as-is.
Lori Cameron, Boulder, said the Board should not vote in support of something that has ecological
danger. Listen to environmental experts; once you build a trail it is too late to fix any damage. She asked
for biking to be put somewhere else that does not compromise the mission.
Nickie Kelly, Boulder, said a trail on the east side would disperse traffic and parking over a wider area.
There needs to be focus on minimizing environmental impacts; we are not entitled as a species to plunder
this resource. She asked the Board to enforce bikers dismounting.
Karen Hollweg, Boulder, said the goal of the North TSA Plan is to provide a sustainable system for
visitor access. The plan references the North Sky Trail using the mud closure program to improve trail
AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 6
conditions and sustainability; there is no visible intention to construct a new trail that is sustainable. The
Visitor Master Plan (VMP) says highly erodible soils are not suitable for sustainable trail construction and
use. She would appreciate the promise to provide Scenario A to council in a minority report; to match
standards of previous TSA plans, the presentation must include ways that both Scenario A and B meet
goals and sideboards. Use education about invasive grasses; the language should be enhanced in plan.
Tim Dufficy, Marshville Ditch Company, said that lessees make Boulder look beautiful. The best way to
control weeds is to irrigate, cut and bail hay. Do not open arena up to public; this is a safety issue. The
best way to warm up your horse is to begin your ride.
Eileen Monyok, Friends Interested in Dog on Open Space (FIDOS), thanked the Board and staff for their
work. There has been lots of compromise from user groups, as well as FIDOS. She asked that outside of
the Papini Trail corridor, it should become on-leash to be consistent with the VMP.
Bobby Lover, Boulder, said he is the lessee at BVR. Opening up the arena to the public would be a
liability and hard to operate. He would like to keep the relationship with OSMP and the City of Boulder.
Return to the Board
Molly said she is concerned about the lessee at BVR being able to operate his business effectively if this
area were to be opened up to the general public. She noted that a compromise could be reached if parking
could be pursued at Lefthand Trail where there is parking already. Frances agreed that a public arena does
not seem like suitable use. Shelley said honoring equestrian use and its heritage needs to be included;
however, offering an alternate option is a good idea. She noted that the current lease agreement does say it
is open to the public currently. Tom said he would vote to preserve the status quo while looking for an
alternative.
Frances asked if it is an option for someone to ask the lessees of the northern properties to grant them
access permission. Steve said the leases allow for agricultural uses, but not for general access. Tom said
he is in favor of maintaining current status.
Frances said the West Beech property is one of the last unfragmented areas. She said staff should do
monitoring first and then have a plan to mediate any issues; do this first. Kevin said he disagrees that this
area is totally unique. He said he agrees that monitoring should happen and that this area could be a test
case of how monitoring should happen. It does not make sense to close trails unless there is a negative
impact. Tom said the Board could include a statement encouraging staff to make monitoring this area a
priority as staff sets out the program.
Motion
Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees recommend that staff continue to follow
the terms of the lease regarding public access to the Boulder Valley Ranch (BVR) equestrian arena
and will concurrently develop options for nearby horse trailer parking and/or seek to provide an
equivalent and suitable corral option that will be determined in cooperation with stakeholders that
will be vetted and approved in a future public process. The Board recommends that staff
proactively address any conflict issues resulting from public access in future lease negotiations.
Tom Isaacson seconded. This motion passed unanimously.
Frances Hartogh moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to ask staff to endeavor to develop and
bring back to the Board an ecological monitoring program for the North Sky Trail and the Joder
Property in light of the important ecological qualities of these properties. Tom Isaacson seconded.
This motion passed unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 7
Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees affirm the management area designations
as shown on page 16 of the North Trail Study Area Draft Plan. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This
motion passed three to two; Frances Hartogh and Molly Davis dissented.
Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to support the current access status of the
Northern Tier Properties as either open or closed be continued except that the Deluca, Hester, and
Campbell Properties be closed May 1 – July 31 for protection of ground-nesting Bobolink. Shelley
Dunbar seconded. This motion passed three to two; Frances Hartogh and Molly Davis dissented.
Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to amend the language on page 102 of the
North Trail Study Area (TSA) Draft Plan to add the word “important” in front of “note” and
eliminate “designated” in the first sentence. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed
unanimously.
Frances Hartogh moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to have the following statement be
added to the North Trail Study Area (TSA) Draft Plan on page 7: In fairness to the process, it
should be acknowledged that three OSBT members voted for the scenario while two voted against.
The main point of contention was whether a north-south connector trail should be constructed
through the North Foothills HCA. Molly Davis seconded. This motion passed unanimously.
Frances Hartogh moved the Open Space Board of Trustees modify the language on page 36 under
primary goal to read: Increase connectivity among North TSA properties while minimizing natural
resource impacts to every extent possible. Molly Davis seconded. This motion passed four to one;
Kevin Bracy Knight dissented.
Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees designate areas surrounding the
Wrangler Trail (the trail is designated as Voice and Sight on-corridor) be designated as dogs on-
leash as similar management to Wonderland Lake. Tom Isaacson seconded. This motion passed
unanimously.
Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to approve the North Trail Study Area
Plan as amended and recommend that the Boulder City Council approve the North Trail Study
Area Plan as amended. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed three to two; Frances
Hartogh and Molly Davis dissented.
Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to make the following statement: If City
Council does not support the North Sky Trail, the OSBT recommends that City Council direct staff
to revise a plan based on Scenario A as modified by OSBT votes at the February and March Board
meetings. Shelley Dunbar seconded. This motion passed three to two; Frances Hartogh and Kevin
Bracy Knight dissented.
ADJOURNMENT – The meeting adjourned at 11:31 p.m.
These draft minutes were prepared by Leah Case.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Open Space Board of Trustees
FROM: Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks
Annie McFarland, Visitor Access Coordinator
Heather Swanson, Wildlife Biologist
Gabe Wilson, Trail Specialist
DATE: April 13, 2016
SUBJECT: Flood Repair on Mesa Trail/Skunk Creek Crossing
________________________________________________________________________
As Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) has continued to implement the West Trail
Study Area (TSA) Plan in the era of flood recovery, it has been helpful to have the Open
Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) see and participate in various projects as they develop in the
field – especially when the nature and condition of trails and resources has changed
substantially since the 2013 and more recent deluge events. For example, a site visit helps the
OSBT see, first hand, some of the specific challenges of each project and develop a deeper
understanding of any revisions that may need to be made in light of the flood. However,
scheduling site visits for all five Board members can be time intensive for staff and
challenging for Board members to find time in their busy schedules. Also, unless the site visit
is open to the public, members of the public cannot benefit from the conversation had during
these visits.
In light of these challenges, OSMP is piloting an effort to provide OSBT members, and the
public, a way to conduct individual self-guided tours on their own time. For example, the
attached two-page handout is meant to provide a hands-on, independent tour of proposed
improvements to the Mesa Trail where it crosses Skunk Canyon, northwest of the National
Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Staff hopes that this format facilitates individual
time for familiarizing Board and community members with on-site conditions prior to Board
meetings, as well as the opportunity to formulate questions and feedback to be discussed at
the OSBT meeting. Following this pilot exercise, staff welcomes feedback from OSBT
members on how well the process worked and what improvements could be made in the
future.
Specific to the proposed improvements to the Mesa Trail at Skunk Canyon, the attached two-
page handout provides a brief history of, and introduction to, the project. It also shows
important points to stop along the trail with accompanying information to note. The self-
guided tour starts at the NCAR water tank which can be located by parking at NCAR and
walking west along the NCAR Trail. At the Board meeting on April 13, staff will present an
overview of the project and request feedback and input from the Board about the project
including effectively preserving natural resources, fitting the project into the landscape, cost
implications and other topics.
AGENDA ITEM 4C PAGE 1
This page is intentionally left blank.
AGENDA ITEM 4C PAGE 2
City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks
2011: The West Trail Study Area Plan 2013: The Flood 2017: Applying Lessons Learned
Proposed Improvements to Mesa Trail at Skunk Canyon: A Self-Guided Tour
The 2011 West Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan included a
recommendation to reroute the Mesa Trail where it crosses
Skunk Canyon. The proposal was developed and supported
by a group of community volunteers representing a cross-
section of community interests. The intention was to
move trails to the west, minimize grades in and out of the
drainage, install a short bridge if necessary and reroute
the trail out of muddy areas on the south side of Skunk
Creek.
Driving factors included:
•Decrease erosion into the drainage,
•Decrease trail widening, and
•Minimize the distance that the Mesa Trail spends in
the Skunk Canyon drainage.
In 2013, heavy flood waters scoured the banks of
Skunk Creek and destroyed the small footbridge that
once connected the trail across the creek. Slopes were
substantially de-stablized along the trail, including
sections north of the creek that have since been rerouted
to improve visitor safety.
This major flood event offered many lessons about trail
impacts to riparian areas and the sustainability of trail
infrastructure in drainages. For example, it brought to
light the need to design and build bridges considering such
events in the future. It also emphasized wisdom in the
West TSA Plan’s driving factors for improving the Mesa
Trail in this area.
Having learned from the 2013 flood, staff is now
proposing two revisions for this area that meet the intent
of the West TSA Plan but increase permanence of trail and
infrastructure improvements.
For example, to accommodate future flooding, the bridge
proposed for the canyon crossing would span 50 to 60
feet, longer than the short bridge originally envisioned. In
addition, the section of trail north of the creek would not
be rerouted or restored, since staff previously addressed
critical needs there immediately after the flood. As
proposed for 2017, improvements would focus on the
Mesa Trail and would not include major changes to the
Mallory Cave or NCAR trails. Only minor improvements
would be made where they each tie into the Mesa Trail.
More details on back
Conceptual rendering of proposed bridge looking north, photo: OSMP.
Flood damage along Skunk Creek, photo: OSMP.
Mesa Trail in muddy conditions south of Skunk Creek, photo: OSMP.
City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks
Proposed Improvements for 2017: Touring the Site
BearCanyon C r e e kSkunkCreek Table Mesa Dr.BearCanyonMalloryCaveMesaMesa(Trail Alignments are Conceptual)
Re-route
Repair
Restore/Close Undesignated Trail
Restore/Close Designated Trail
No Recommendation (Undesignated)
No Recommendation (Designated)
Trail Recommendations
N.C.A.R.
NRevised April 2016
2
3
4
5
Start at the water tank west of NCAR.
Head north along the Mesa Trail connector.
Current use levels and trail location here create muddy, unsustainable conditions.
Per the West TSA Plan, these trail sections south of the creek would be rerouted
upslope to the west and restored. If you look closely, you can see flags marking
the rerouted location uphill to the west. But be careful if you go exploring up
there. Off-trail conditions may be hazardous.
Was another option considered?
A multidisciplinary staff team explored the
possibility of crossing Skunk Creek farther
to the east, downstream from where the
trail crosses now. This option would require
a smaller, less expensive bridge. However,
this reroute would not satisfy the intention
of the West TSA Plan (see page 1). Muddy
sections south of the creek would not be
rerouted; the trail would remain in the
drainage longer than intended; and erosion
into the drainage would not improve
substantially. In addition, impacts to
healthy riparian vegetation and habitat
would be noticeable as the new trail would
have to be constructed in the drainage.
Be careful crossing Skunk Creek.
This drainage was heavily impacted by the flood, and the previous footbridge
was destroyed. Per the West TSA Plan, this trail section climbing northwest out
of the drainage would be closed and restored to minimize erosion and other trail
impacts to riparian vegetation and habitat.
Look for proposed bridge location.
Before the Mesa Trail switches back to climb northeast
out of the canyon, look for a large ponderosa pine with a
flat resting spot beneath (photo right, OSMP). About 50’
up canyon is a rock pile - the rough location for siting a
new bridge. Future design and engineering would specify
a more exact location, materials and bridge span.
Head northeast along the Mesa Trail for a view back into the canyon.
The last stop of the tour, this section of trail that climbs to the northeast would
not be rerouted or restored as the West TSA Plan recommended. Targeted trail
reroutes were already made soon after the flood to address critical issues.
1
2
3
5
4
Conceptual rendering of proposed bridge looking east down Skunk Canyon, photo: OSMP.
Natural resources in Skunk Canyon. This vegetated riparian area supports bears and shrub-nesting birds, and provides habitat
suitable for the federally threatened Preble’s meadow jumping mouse. Upstream from the proposed bridge location, seasonal closures
protect Golden Eagle nesting grounds. OSMP believes this project would support or enhance its ability to protect these species.
Proposed Improvements to Mesa Trail at Skunk Canyon: A Self-Guided Tour
MEMORANDUM
TO: Open Space Board of Trustees
FROM: Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks
Abbie Poniatowski, Central Services Division Manager
Lauren Kilcoyne, Finance Manager
DATE: April 12, 2016
SUBJECT: Update on Draft 2017 Work Plan and Budget
________________________________________________________________________
Executive Summary
The purpose of this informational item is to share the preliminary 2017 Open Space and Mountain
Parks (OSMP) Department Work Plan and provide the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) with an
overview of the department priorities, budget guiding principles, citywide economic forecast, budget
policy issues and operating and capital budget development processes. The OSBT will have an
opportunity to ask questions to ensure the OSBT is prepared to review, approve and recommend the
Open Space and Mountain Parks Department’s 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and
operating expenditures, including Lottery Fund.
This series of agenda items is three-fold. This month will include a staff briefing, information sharing
and Q&A. In May, staff will present a draft CIP budget for discussion. In June, there will be a public
hearing for the community to comment on the proposed 2017-2022 CIP. After considering public
comment, the OSBT will make a recommendation. The public will also have an opportunity to
comment during the Planning Board’s CIP review in July and City Council’s discussions and review of
the 2017 recommended budget during future public hearings later this fall. The staff also has a goal
of presenting the operating budget earlier in the budget process relative to previous years. Last year
the Board made its recommendation at the August meeting and staff anticipates presenting the
proposed operating budget for recommendation by the July meeting.
Background
Similar to 2016, the Draft 2017 Open Space and Mountain Parks Department Work Plan includes
community initiatives as well as core service activities supporting the important work required to
protect, maintain and support an open space system of over 45,000 acres. Projects and programs
that are a part of the department’s core mission include ongoing strategic property acquisitions;
conservation easement compliance; day-to-day and major maintenance of trailheads and trails;
agricultural lands management; visitor education, safety and enforcement; ecosystem monitoring,
maintenance and restoration; strategic and resource planning; community outreach, education and
events; providing media services, web-based information and social media; permitting and fees
management; providing support for the OSBT; etc. The core services of any municipal department
often can be invisible to its customers, yet are important to manage and maintain the valuable assets
supported by the local community.
While core service delivery continues throughout the year, OSMP also is pursuing community
initiatives in support of Board and City Council goals. OSMP staff teams collaboratively developed
proposed departmental work program priorities for 2017. Many of the priorities are familiar to the
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 1
Board and council since they continue to follow through on community commitments. Those
community initiatives translated into department priority projects are as follows:
Department Priority Projects for 2017
1.Complete Flood Recovery of Trails and Habitat that are FEMA reimbursable and continue work
on flood projects that are not reimbursable (includes county coordination);
2.Visitor Master Plan Update to be slightly Recast as Open Space Master Plan or OS(MP)² –
Continue plan, completing it in 2018 - establishes policy guidance, goals, objectives, priorities and
measures of success across services and programs, and addresses overarching issues such as
carrying capacity, night-time and temporal use and climate change mitigation and adaptation;
3.Implement Top Priorities of West TSA, North TSA, Agricultural Resource Management Plan,
and reduce facility deficiencies and maintenance backlogs. Implement plans through the
formation of cross-departmental implementation teams convened for each plan;
4.Continue to Implement Grassland Ecosystem Management Plan and Forest Ecosystem
Management Plan (FEMP), giving special attention/guidance to elements that need updating or
refreshing, particularly the FEMP. The OS(MP)² may be a good opportunity for such guidance.
5.Continue to Improve the Visitor Experience – Implement Community Ranger model; continue
the development of the Community Connections division; focus on community and department
relationships and interdepartmental coordination. Follow through on initiatives such as
recycling/dog waste composting at trailheads and monitoring and reporting results on Voice &
Sight program.
6.Develop Regional Trails through strategic property acquisition, coordination with other agencies,
and other avenues as needed (e.g., Eldorado to Walker Ranch, Joder and the Boulder Creek Path
extension).
7.Focus on Continuous Improvement within the OSMP Department - Such as to continue to
assess and develop best practices related to OSMP’s scientific approach, data stewardship,
recreation planning and design, work plan and budget management, staff training and
development, staff work space, equipment and facilities, communication and coordination
internally and externally.
These department priority projects, in addition to supporting core services, are informing the draft
2016 operating and capital budgets. As staff plans for 2017, OSMP recognizes the need to remain
flexible considering the community and City Council’s interests, as well as a department that is
experiencing organizational change with the implementation of a new structure and inclusion of new
talent on the OSMP team. An example of maintaining flexibility includes the strong message from
council at its January retreat to give the community a “breather” from significant public process on
Open Space planning initiatives. Following the acceptance of the North TSA and the Agricultural
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 2
Resources Management Plan, the staff will bring a recommended scope and schedule to the OSBT for
consideration, likely in the first half of 2017. The community process “breather” will be
advantageous to updating the Visitor Master Plan/OSMP Master Plan since it allows time for data
gathering, surveying and inventory work, which will inform the issues and scoping of the planning
process.
Budget Commitment and Guiding Principles
While developing the above-listed priorities, staff also developed a set of Budget Guiding Principles,
provided below, to support decisions regarding expenditures:
Open Space and Mountain Parks is committed to fiscal responsibility and sustainability.
Judiciously generating and investing funds.
Creating, optimizing and maintaining a budget which manages debt and plans for near- and
long-term futures.
Maintaining financial transparency.
These principles will guide the development and prioritization of the OSMP budget and work plan:
SAFETY FIRST
OSMP will first address essential safety issues for visitors and staff.
PLAY BY THE RULES
Comply with all (internal, local, state and federal) laws, regulations, policies, etc.
TAKE CARE OF WHAT WE HAVE
As top priority, restore and maintain valuable ecological systems, agricultural operations, trails
and trailheads.
As additions are made to the system, address ongoing operation and maintenance needs.
Continue to innovate and advance efficiency in the restoration, protection, operation,
investments in and maintenance of the OSMP system. Specifically, efficiencies will be sought
through:
Investments in regular maintenance (taking care of what we have to extend life cycle), and
Reductions in resource waste and use.
STICK TO THE PLAN
Actions committed to in plans or agreements should be included in either short-, mid- or long-
term budgets and work plans so staff can answer the question: “When do you plan to take this
action on this project?”
Strategically enhance visitor amenities, ecological systems, and agricultural operations,
prioritizing projects that will best achieve resource and master plan objectives.
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 3
LEVERAGE OTHER FUNDING
Leverage external funds, especially long-term funding, and capacity extending the ability of local
dollars to implement OSMP plans.
Continue to involve community members as volunteers to advance the departmental mission
and management objectives.
Work with partner agencies to accomplish shared goals.
Take no actions which would compromise the city’s bond rating or ability to leverage debt.
ADAPT AND LEARN
Advance research and monitoring to increase the likelihood of success and better integrate
principles of sustainability and resilience.
Citywide Economic Forecast
Important new information for the OSBT is that 2015 sales and use tax revenues for the City of
Boulder came in lower than projected. The city’s budget office will be developing revenue
projections that are likely to be lower than previously projected. Furthermore, the city’s Chief
Financial Officer, Bob Eichem, is recommending that the 2017 Budget be more conservative overall.
As part of the annual budget process, the City’s Budget Office generates projections for taxes and
conservation trust fund allocations at the end of April for next year’s budget development. Hopefully,
staff will have updated projections from the Budget Office prior to the May budget recommendation;
however, if the final projections are not available in time, OSMP staff will be preparing a draft budget
that is relatively conservative. The approved 2016-2021 CIP and the Operating Budget are included
for reference (Attachments A and B).
Budget Policy Issues
The OSMP budget theme for 2017 is “Refine and Realign.” The department continues to assess its
ability to be quality stewards of the OSMP system whether through evaluating adequate space and
facilities for operations and management, adequate investment in assets (trails, habitat, buildings,
water infrastructure) in the system, or appropriate support for visitor services to meet the provisions
of the Open Space charter. Recommendations from these analyses likely will influence multiple
budget years, not just the 2017 proposed budget.
Following a 2015 departmental reorganization, OSMP is committed to understanding the staff
resources needed to manage a land management operation that delivers services and programs to
the Boulder community. In reviewing OSMP’s organizational structure, staff has also been analyzing
current staffing to help ensure we are staffed to support the charter and department priorities.
Similar to other departments, staff is working with Human Resources to make sure that OSMP is
consistent with the intent and compliant with the Affordable Care Act. It appears likely that budget
adjustments will be recommended for health coverage for qualifying employees.
Operating and Capital Budget Development Processes
Key dates for the budget development processes are included below:
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 4
Milestone Date
Citywide CIP Information Sharing Meeting April 1
OSBT Information Item (1st Touch) April 12
Budget Guidelines and Targets to Departments April 18
1st Draft CIP to Planning April 29
Budget and Revenue Update to City Council May 10
OSBT Draft CIP Discussion Item (2nd Touch) May 10
Proposed Operating and CIP Budget Submittals Due to CMO May 31
OSBT CIP Public Hearing, Discussion and Recommendation (3rd
Touch)
June 14
Executive Budget Meeting with OSMP June 30
OSBT Operating Budget Public Hearing, Discussion and
Recommendation
July 12
Planning Board CIP Hearing July 28
City Council CIP Study Session August 9
City Council Budget Study Session September 13
City Council Budget Consideration (1st & 2nd Readings) October 4 & 18
ATTACHMENTS
A: 2016 – 2021 CIP
B: 2016 Operating Budget
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 5
This page is intentionally left blank.
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 6
Table 12-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountOPEN SPACE & MOUNTAIN PARKS $ 49,060,930 $ 11,900,930 $ 7,945,000 $ 7,455,000 $ 7,390,000 $ 7,290,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 11,324,600 $ 4,074,600 $ 1,975,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 572,600 $ 572,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ 75,000 $ 175,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 852,000 $ 252,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,700,000 $ 350,000 $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,036,330 $ 1,626,330 $ 270,000 $ 280,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 720,000 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 360,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 991,000 $ 991,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 205,330 $ 205,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 34,200,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 32,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ - Boulder Creek Bikepath Extension $ - Mineral Rights Acquisition $ 100,000 OSMP Real Estate Acquisition $ 5,400,000 Water Rights Acquisition $ 200,000 Hartnagle House Restoration $ - South Mesa Trailhead Bridge $ - Subtotal $ 5,700,000 Farm Site Improvements $ 60,000 Flood Trails $ - Foothills Nature Center $ - Agriculture Facilities Projects $ 120,000 Boulder & S Bldr Crk Flood Repair $ - Cultural Resource/Facility Restorat $ 100,000 Visitor Infrastructure System Wide $ 500,000 WTSA Implementation $ 150,000 Subtotal $ 280,000 S.Bldr Crk at E.Bldr Ditch Const $ - South Boulder Creek Instream $ - STSA - Plan and Implementation $ - OSMP Innovations $ 100,000 OSMP Master Plan Update $ 100,000 Flood Eng. Trails $ - Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage $ - NTSA - Plan and Implementation $ 100,000 Boulder Crk Above 95th $ - ETSA - Plan and Implementation $ 50,000 Facility Modifications-Space $ 100,000 Department Total $ 7,080,000 Subtotal $ 1,100,000 2019 ProjectedAGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 7
Open Space and Mountain Parks
Mapping
The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map-
able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro-
ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and
year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing
as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the
construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department
section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear-
marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of
the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information.
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 8
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 9
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 10
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 11
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 12
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 13
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 14
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 15
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 16
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 17
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 18
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 19
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 20
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 21
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 22
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 23
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 24
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 25
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 26
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 27
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 28
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 29
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 30
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 31
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 32
Open Space and Mountain Parks
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 33
This page is intentionally left blank.
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 34
City of Boulder
Open Space and Mountain Parks
2016 Annual Budget
$35,828,657
The mission of the Open Space and Mountain Parks Department (OSMP) is to preserve and protect
the natural environment and land resources that characterize Boulder. We foster appreciation and
uses that sustain the natural values of the land for current and future generations.
Department Overview
Executive Team
The OSMP Executive Team ensures strategic alignment of OSMP projects with the
department’s mission and priorities.
This workgroup includes the Executive Director, Science Officer, Community
Relations Officer, and the four Division Managers of the divisions outlined below.
Resources and Stewardship
The Resources and Stewardship workgroup enhances Boulder’s natural environment
by protecting its agricultural, cultural, and water assets.
This workgroup contains expertise in:
Preservation and restoration of agricultural, water, historical and cultural
resources;
Tracking and monitoring of the variety of systems across OSMP; and
Ecological systems.
Open Space and Mountain Parks
Resources &
Stewardship
Trails & Facilities Central Services
Community Connections &
Partnerships Executive Team
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 35
Open Space and Mountain Parks
Department Overview (cont’d)
Trails and Facilities
The Trails and Facilities workgroup supports the design, construction, and
maintenance of OSMP’s physical assets.
This workgroup manages and maintains OSMP’s:
Trails, trailheads and access points,
Acquired properties, and
Equipment and vehicle assets.
Community Connections and Partnerships
The Community Connections and Partnerships workgroup engages community
members around the mission and vision of OSMP.
This workgroup coordinates activities and messaging around:
Environmental planning and sustainability;
Education and Outreach programs, including volunteer projects and services
and the Junior Ranger Program; and
Ranger Services.
Central Services
The Central Services workgroup provides support for the daily internal operations
of the Department.
This workgroup offers real estate, information resources, administrative, and
financial services, including:
Acquisition of land interests and management of easement requests;
Data management, Geographic Information Systems, Web Site management, etc;
Support of the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT), front office, permitting and
program support (such as Voice and Sight programs), and
Preparation and analysis of the OSMP budget and monitoring of the parking fee,
cash management, and timesheet databases.
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 36
Open Space and Mountain Parks
Table 8-40: Open Space and Mountain Parks Summary Budget
2015 Accomplishments
In 2015, the Open Space and Mountain Parks Department set forward six departmental priorities
to guide its work. Accomplishments within these priority areas include:
Ongoing flood recovery
Continued work with FEMA to secure funding for OSMP flood recovery projects
including road, trail, and fence repair
Created plans to complete all flood recovery projects by 2017
Completed construction and habitat restoration on major projects including:
Gregory Canyon trailhead and access road
Sanitas Valley Trail
South Mesa/Shanahan Trail
Bear Canyon Road
Draft North Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan
Completed undesignated trail inventory for North Trail Study Area
Completed Resource Inventories for the North Trail Study Area
Completed a draft TSA plan to finalize with Council next year
Implement projects recommended in the West Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan
Completed a new trail in the West Sanitas/Wittemyer area
Began design on the Anemone Hill area with plans to complete this project by
2017
2014
Actual
2015
Approved
2016
Approved
Central Services 23.96 22.96 30.65
Community and Partnerships 26.63 29.63 34.50
Trails and Facilities 17.31 21.31 26.50
Resources and Stewardship 23.70 28.45 25.50
TOTAL STAFFING 91.60 102.35 117.15
Central Services 2,428,642 3,175,627 4,165,557
Community and Partnerships 2,716,691 3,646,782 3,826,613
Trails and Facilities 2,399,515 3,725,484 4,048,912
Resources and Stewardship 3,186,240 4,777,158 3,859,992
Capital Improvement Program, Cost Allocations and
Debt Service 21,728,261 14,811,900 19,927,582
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 32,459,350$ 30,136,952$ 35,828,657$
General 152,346$ 148,889$ 154,334$
Lottery 353,303 355,300 360,630
Open Space and Mountain Parks 31,953,701 29,632,763 35,313,693
TOTAL FUNDING 32,459,350$ 30,136,952$ 35,828,657$
STAFFING
EXPENDITURE
FUND
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 37
Open Space and Mountain Parks
2015 Accomplishments (cont’d)
Draft Agricultural Resource Management Plan
Continued agriculture infrastructure repair, including fence repair from flood
damage
Began research into seeding project to reduce fertilizers and improve rotation. A
pilot project will begin in 2016 based on findings
Continued work with real estate work group to integrate newly acquired properties
and interests into the plan
Plan drafted by end of year for review in 2016
Improve the visitor experience
Operated over 50 volunteer projects to engage more than 1,000 volunteers in over
5,000 hours of community service
In accordance with OSMP’s Real Estate Acquisition Plan, purchased over 20 acres of
land across the Schnell, Robert Oliver, and Coleman properties, valued over
$2,350,000
Continued major renovation of the Hartnagle House and farmstead outbuildings to
make them usable for farm tenants
Continued assessment of the Viele House
At the time of reporting, engaged in ongoing negotiations to acquire properties and
interests to meet the goals of the 2014 Open Space bond issue of $10,000,000.
Completed analysis of the pilot Voice & Sight Tag Program and utilized findings to
improve the program, launch new training, and update system.
Develop regional trails
Completed a new trail in the West Sanitas/Wittemyer area
Continue noxious weed eradication, suppression and containment in accordance
with city, county and state regulations
Continue ongoing ecological restoration projects
Continue grassland monitoring
Key Initiatives for 2016
The Open Space and Mountain Parks Department has set forward six departmental priorities to
guide its work in 2016. These priority areas include:
Ongoing flood recovery of trails and habitat
Submit the final North Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan
Begin Visitor Master Plan update to be recast as Open Space Master Plan
Implement top priorities of West TSA, North TSA, Agricultural Resource Management,
and Forest and Grassland Management Plans
Continue to improve the visitor experience
Continue to develop regional trails
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 38
Table 8-41: Open Space and Mountain Parks Significant Changes Between 2015 and
2016 Budget
Open Space and Mountain Parks
2015
Approved
Budget
2016
Approved
Budget
Total
Change
2015
FTE
2016
FTE
FTE
Change
Agricultural Resources Management Plan
Implementation $ - $ - $ 15,000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Climate Change Adaption - 5,000 5,000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Associate Planner 100,056 73,969 (26,087) 1.00 1.00 0.00
Cultural Resources Technician - Upgrade to 1.0 FTE and
Extend Fixed-Term for Three Years 36,466 54,845 18,379 0.50 1.00 0.50
Maintenance III Trails Specialist 41,914 63,000 21,086 0.00 1.00 1.00
Trail Contract and Project Manager - Extend Fixed-Term
for One Year 91,151 97,000 5,849 1.00 1.00 0.00
Water Resources Technician - Extend Fixed-Term for
Three Years 61,385 52,400 (8,985) 1.00 1.00 0.00
Administrative Specialist III - Two-Year Fixed-Term - 73,500 73,500 0.00 1.00 1.00
Ranger On-call/Standby 300,000 303,000 3,000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seasonal Resource Information Staff - 55,000 55,000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seasonal Sign Group Increase - 38,500 38,500 0.00 0.00 0.00
Addition of 25 Vehicles to Fleet - Shift from Lease to
Ownership - 900,000 900,000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction in Lease Vehicle Costs 165,000 - (165,000) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Junior Ranger Seasonal Funding - 177,500 177,500 0.00 0.00 0.00
Shift Trails Seasonal Funding from CIP to Operating
Budget (no net budget impact) 237,154 237,154 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Changes, Open Space and Mountain Parks 1,112,742$ 2.50
OPEN SPACE FUND
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 39
Table 8-42: Open Space and Mountain Parks
Department Detail
Open Space and Mountain Parks
Standard
FTE Amount
Standard
FTE Amount
Standard
FTE Amount
Standard
FTE Amount
Department Administration 13.45 1,238,810$ 12.50 1,894,186$ 15.00 2,262,554$ 2.50 368,368$
1.01 114,255 1.01 61,058 1.01 61,058 - 0
4.65 515,391 4.65 684,410 7.30 904,643 2.65 220,233
Conservation Easement Compliance 1.01 112,413 1.01 61,058 1.00 66,442 (0.01) 5,383
Real Estate Acquisition OSMP 1.26 140,238 1.26 157,278 1.00 96,758 (0.26) (60,520)
Real Estate Services to OSMP 1.26 140,238 1.26 157,278 4.07 619,769 2.81 462,491
Real Estate Services to General Fund 1.32 167,297 1.27 160,359 1.27 154,334 - (6,025)
Subtotal 23.96 2,428,642$ 22.96 3,175,627$ 30.65 4,165,557$ 7.69 989,930$
Community Outreach 8.41 1,032,565 7.41 930,141 7.00 848,316 (0.41) (81,825)
Public Relations - - 4.00 657,479 5.00 569,623 1.00 (87,856)
Ranger Naturalist Services 17.69 1,462,132 17.69 1,829,624 22.00 2,060,029 4.31 230,405
Junior Rangers 0.53 221,994 0.53 229,538 0.50 348,645 (0.03) 119,107
Subtotal 26.63 2,716,691$ 29.63 3,646,782$ 34.50 3,826,613$ 4.87 179,831$
Facility Management 5.24 783,865 6.24 1,000,476 7.00 1,657,733 0.76 657,257
Rapid Response 1.04 134,553 1.04 87,725 1.00 87,725 (0.04) -
Signs 2.10 314,145 2.10 267,173 2.00 235,375 (0.10) (31,797)
Trail Maintenance and Construction 4.73 574,775 7.73 1,541,137 12.50 1,683,980 4.77 142,843
4.20 592,177 4.20 828,973 4.00 384,099 (0.20) (444,874)
Subtotal 17.31 2,399,515$ 21.31 3,725,484$ 26.50 4,048,912$ 5.19 323,428$
Agricultural Land Management 2.03 275,773$ 2.03 273,017$ 2.00 273,017$ (0.03) (0)$
Water Rights Administration 2.10 285,283 3.10 448,057 3.00 436,803 (0.10) (11,253)
Cultural Resources Program 1.01 112,741 1.51 186,489 2.00 190,824 0.49 4,335$
1.53 248,792 1.53 311,255 1.50 311,255 (0.03) (0)$
2.22 360,993 2.22 475,119 2.00 475,119 (0.22) 0
0.91 147,975 0.91 209,362 1.00 209,362 0.09 0
Integrated Pest Management 2.01 326,845 2.26 498,868 2.50 498,868 0.24 (0)
Monitoring & Visitation Studies 3.13 257,610 3.13 333,808 2.00 441,003 (1.13) 107,195
Payments to Fire Districts - 78,030 - 78,030 - 78,030 - -
4.18 344,028 7.18 976,365 5.00 278,969 (2.18) (697,396)
1.22 198,383 1.22 271,718 1.50 271,718 0.28 (0)
3.36 549,787 3.36 715,069 3.00 395,023 (0.36) (320,046)
Subtotal 23.70 3,186,240$ 28.45 4,777,158$ 25.50 3,859,992$ (2.95) (917,166)$
Wetland and Aquatic Management
Program
Wildlife and Habitats
Ecological Restoration Program
Forest Ecosystem Management
Program
Grassland Ecosystem Management
Program
Regional, Master, and Related
Planning and Plan Implementation
Coordination
Variance -
2015 Approved to
2016 Approved2014 Actual
2016 Approved
Budget
2015 Approved
Budget
Central Services
Resources and Stewardship
Dog Tag, Permit and Facility Leasing
Programs
Resource Information Services
Trailhead Maintenance and
Construction
STAFFING AND EXPENDITURE BY PROGRAM
Community and Partnerships
Trails and Facilities
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 40
Table 8-42: Open Space and Mountain Parks
Department Detail (cont’d)
Open Space and Mountain Parks
Capital Improvement Program 11,966,192$ 7,964,000$ 12,295,300$ 4,331,300$
Cost Allocation 1,066,954 1,348,701 1,577,657 228,956
Debt Service 8,695,115 5,499,199 6,054,625 555,426
Subtotal 21,728,261$ 14,811,900$ 19,927,582$ 5,115,682$
Total 91.60 32,459,350$ 102.35 30,136,952$ 117.15 35,828,657$ 14.80 5,691,705$
Personnel 8,800,957$ 10,884,911$ 10,253,522$ (631,389)$
Operating 1,044,226 3,601,928 4,546,328 944,400
Interdepartmental Charges 885,905 838,213 1,101,225 263,012
Capital 11,966,193 7,964,000 12,295,300 4,331,300
Debt Service 8,695,115 5,499,199 6,054,625 555,426
Cost Allocation 1,066,954 1,348,701 1,577,657 228,956
Total 32,459,350$ 30,136,952$ 35,828,657$ 5,691,705$
General 1.32 152,346$ 1.27 148,889$ 1.27 154,334$ - 5,445$
Lottery - 353,303$ - 355,300 - 360,630 - 5,330
Open Space and Mountain Parks 90.28 31,953,701$ 101.08 29,632,763 115.88 35,313,693 14.80 5,680,930
Total 91.60 32,459,350$ 102.35 30,136,952$ 117.15 35,828,657$ 14.80 5,691,705$
Note:
STAFFING AND EXPENDITURE BY FUND
EXPENDITURE BY CATEGORY
Capital Improvement Program, Cost
Allocations and Debt Service
Changes to the layout of the OSMP Department Detail Page and the addition of 12 FTE are the result of departmental reorganization.
Standard
FTE Amount
Standard
FTE Amount
Standard
FTE Amount
Standard
FTE Amount
Variance -
2015 Approved to
2016 Approved2014 Actual
2016 Approved
Budget
2015 Approved
Budget
AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 41
Table 9-23: Open Space Fund, 2016 Fund Financial 20142015201620172018201920202021Actual Revised Approved Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedBeginning Fund Balance17,032,351$ 30,300,718$ 15,995,892$ 13,485,867$ 15,598,477$ 19,154,258$ 21,552,840$ 19,081,072$ Sources of FundsNet Sales Tax Revenue28,425,675$ 29,286,214$ 30,572,783$ 31,216,301$ 32,331,488$ 29,301,107$ 24,436,628$ 25,310,661$ FEMA Flood Reuimbursement89,839 - - - - - - - Investment Income95,131 101,247 104,000 107,120 110,334 113,644 117,053 120,565 Lease and Miscellaneous Revenue712,242 439,109 822,978 681,932 702,389 723,461 745,165 767,520 Voice & Sight Tag Program Revenue77,791 131,500 227,000 227,000 227,000 227,000 227,000 227,000 Bond Proceeds - 201410,135,898 - - - - - - - General Fund Transfer1,103,384 1,166,175 1,166,175 1,208,122 1,245,832 1,284,720 - - Grants105,313 - - - - - - - Total Sources of Funds40,745,272$ 31,124,245$ 32,892,936$ 33,440,475$ 34,617,043$ 31,649,932$ 25,525,846$ 26,425,745$ Uses of FundsGeneral Operating Expenditures10,731,098$ 15,262,996$ 15,157,879$ 16,277,781$ 16,635,893$ 17,001,882$ 17,375,924$ 17,758,194$ Supplemental Operating- 418,175 - - - - - - Carryover/ATB Operating- 82,707 - - - - - - Increase to 2016 base - operating increases- - 1,067,500 - - - - - Cost Allocation1,066,954 1,446,908 1,577,657 1,656,540 1,739,367 1,826,335 1,917,652 2,013,535 CIP- Capital EnhancementCapital-Boulder Creek above 95th St. Flood Restoration - - 500,000 - - - - - Capital-East TSA- - - - 200,000 50,000 200,000 200,000 Capital-OSMP Facility Mods (Space Needs)14,597 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital- Flood Eng. Trails570,940 -417,300 -----Capital-Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage- - - 300,000 - - - - Capital-North TSA50,000 50,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 Capital-Innovations- - - 75,000 175,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital-OSMP Master Plan Update- - 252,000 200,000 100,000 100000100000100,000 Capital-S. Boulder Crrek at E.Boulder Ditch Headgate Reconfiguration Flood Repair - - - 300,000 - - - - Capital-South Boulder Creek Instream Flow101,912 150,000 2,000,000 - - - - - Capital-South TSA- - - - - - 200,000 100,000 Capital-Visitor Infrastructure CIP350,000 - 100,000 200,000 200,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Capital-Visitor Infrastructure CIP Carryover575,584 600,000 - - - - - - Capital-West TSA500,000 - 350,000 500,000 400,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Capital-West TSA Carryover73,561 494,971 - - - - - - CIP- Capital MaintenanceCapital-Agriculture Facilities- 100,000 110,000 110,000 120,000 120,000 130,000 130,000 Capital-Boulder and S. BoulderCreek Area Flood Restoration- - 100,000 - - - - - OPEN SPACE AND MOUNTAIN PARKSAGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 42
Table 9-23: Open Space Fund, 2016 Fund Financial (cont’d) 20142015201620172018201920202021Actual Revised Approved Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedCapital-Cultural Resources/Facility Restor.- 60,000 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital-Farm Site Improvements- - 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Capital- Flood Trails- - 991,000 - - - - - Capital- Foothills Nature Center- - - - - - - - Capital-Hartnagle House Restoration- 65,000 100,000 - - - - - Capital-South Mesa Trailhead Bridge- - 60,000 - - - - - CIP- Capital Planning StudiesRadio System Analysis--5,000 -----LIDAR/Aerial Imaging34,406-------CIP- Land AcquisitionCapital-Real Estate Acquisition5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 Capital-Real Estate Acquisition Carryover273,867 3,444,322 - - - - - - Capital-Real Estate Acquisition 2014 Bond3,231,027 - - - - - - - Capital-Real Estate Acq 2014 Bond Carryover- 6,888,000 - - - - - - Capital-Water Rights Acquisition200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Capital-Water Rights Acquisition Carryover129,115 329,115 - - - - - - Capital-Mineral Rights Acquisition100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital-Mineral Rights Acquisition Carryover361,184 461,184 - - - - - - CIP- New Facility/InfrastructureCapital-Boulder Crk Bikepath Extension- - 500,000 - - - - - Debt Service - BMPA2,091,148 1,701,487 1,587,507 986,926 760,283 661,746 661,682 593,655 Debt Service - Bonds & Notes6,603,967 4,380,006 4,467,118 4,461,618 4,470,719 2,681,387 652,356 653,456 Total Uses of Funds32,459,360$ 45,429,071$ 35,402,961$ 31,327,865$ 31,061,261$ 29,251,350$ 27,997,614$ 28,308,839$ Ending Fund Balance Before Reserves30,300,718$ 15,995,892$ 13,485,867$ 15,598,477$ 19,154,258$ 21,552,840$ 19,081,072$ 17,197,978$ ReservesOSBT Contingency Reserve3,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 4,467,118$ 4,461,618$ 4,470,719$ 2,681,387$ 652,356$ 653,456$ Pay Period 27 Reserve50,000 146,000 242,000 338,000 434,000 530,000 626,000 722,000 Sick/Vacation/Bonus Reserve490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 Property and Casualty Reserve400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 FEMA De-obligation Reserve6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 South Boulder Creek Flow Reserve 1,750,000 2,000,000 - - - - - - IBM Connector Trail- 200,000 - - - - - - Vehicle Acquisition Reserve150,000 300,000 - - - - - - Facility Maintenance Reserve100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 Total Reserves6,446,289$ 6,242,289$ 5,905,407$ 6,095,907$ 6,301,008$ 4,707,676$ 2,874,645$ 3,071,745$ Ending Fund Balance After Reserves23,854,429$ 9,753,603$ 7,580,460$ 9,502,570$ 12,853,250$ 16,845,164$ 16,206,427$ 14,126,233$ AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 43
MEMORANDUM
TO: Open Space Board of Trustees
FROM: Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks
Mark Davison, Community Connections and Partnerships Division Manager
Abbie Poniatowski, Central Services Division Manager
John Potter, Resources and Stewardship Division Manager
DATE: April 2, 2016
SUBJECT: Staff update on exploratory talks for a Conservancy to provide private
funding to support OSMP priority programs and projects
________________________________________________________________________
Executive Summary
The purpose of this memo is to provide the City of Boulder’s Open Space Board of Trustees
with background information and seek input and guidance for exploring a concept for creating
a Conservancy to support Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) with private funding.
This memo includes:
Background information on why to explore a Conservancy to support OSMP;
Framework to explore the Conservancy concept, project details such as who is
involved, current status and next steps, and proposed timeline for input, review and
approvals;
Preliminary focus areas for a Conservancy; and
Precedent cases (Appendix A).
Why explore a Conservancy to support OSMP?
To address critical needs and emerging trends, park and open space systems across the
country are partnering with nonprofit, philanthropic organizations. These organizations are
able to pick up where typical public funding leaves off, to help ensure bright futures for our
communities’ most special places. The role of the Conservancy and the associated board is
not to act as an advocacy group, but to raise private funds that will support program areas not
typically provided for by public funds. The board members’ focus is to be able to raise funds
through private, grant, and corporate avenues to support OSMP priority programs and
projects.
The exploration of a Conservancy to support and supplement funding to better fulfill the
charter and mission of OSMP is now on the table. Such a Conservancy has the potential to
raise funds to make strategic investments that will yield significant impacts for protecting our
land and the enjoyment of the citizens who own it.
OSMP has been approached with this concept by several private citizens who have asked if it
is possible to partner and consider exploring the concept together. This forward-thinking
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 1
approach could reap benefits if coordinated well with OSMP direction, supporting projects
and programs that add value to the system beyond what the city provides.
Framework to consider developing a Conservancy
A framework for exploring the concept is described below within a series of steps that would
investigate feasibility, need, review precedents, complete outreach with interested parties, as
well as seek board and council approval.
Step 1: Discuss concept with Conservancy proponent group
Meet with proponents to:
Discuss overall concept,
Develop an approach for exploring the concept,
Identify Conservancy needs, opportunities, gaps, risks, stakeholders, and
Consider the process, review stages and approvals needed to create the Conservancy.
Due Date: Spring 2016
Step 2: Preliminary discussion to understand viability and legal implications
Meet with city finance staff to discuss financial implications.
Meet with city attorney to discuss legal implications.
Conservancy proponents canvass potential supporters.
Discuss process for informing board and council as well as seeking approval to move forward.
Meet with Board of Trustees to discuss:
Concept,
Approach and benefits,
Funding and risk, and
Ask for approval to proceed to Memorandum of Intent (MOI) stage with council
concurrence (Step 3).
Due Date: Summer 2016
Step 3: Develop MOI
Conservancy group in partnership with OSMP staff to conduct feasibility study to further test
financial viability and provide proof of concept.
Further explore precedents to understand opportunities and risks for this concept including
Boulder Library and Parks and Recreation Department.
Discuss with OSMP staff, stakeholders, board, city attorney, and council for input.
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 2
Conservancy proponents work with OSMP to develop:
Approach to charter purpose including governance and articles of agreement,
Partnership roles,
Organizational structure and approvals,
Potential OSMP prioritized programs and projects, and
Funding mechanisms and strategies for private fund raising that will add value to
existing public funding streams.
OSMP works with Conservancy proponents to consider input from public, staff and
stakeholders on concept.
Meet with Board and Council:
Ask for approval from board and council to proceed with developing Conservancy
concept.
Due Date: Fall 2016
Step 4: Conservancy is created
Support Conservancy proponents within scope of MOI to:
Develop charter and purpose with governance and articles of agreement (by-laws),
Apply for 501c3 status,
Provide prioritized list of programs and projects that will require Conservancy
funding,
Consider funding mechanisms and strategies for OSMP prioritized programs and
projects,
Launch Conservancy, and
Draft preliminary Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) from MOI.
Meet with Board and Council:
Board and council recognize conservancy through a charter agreement that defines
governance, articles of agreement and by-laws.
Due Date: Fall 2017
Step 5: Develop MOU from MOI
Discuss MOU with OSMP staff, stakeholders, board, and council for input.
Work with conservancy proponents to refine:
Clearly define partnership roles,
Formalize organizational structure and approvals,
Finalize OSMP prioritized list of programs and projects that will require Conservancy
funding, and
Launch fund raising campaign for OSMP prioritized programs and projects.
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 3
Meet with Board and Council:
Bring MOU to board and council for review and approval, and
Define metrics to track progress and success.
Due Date: Spring 2018
Potential Conservancy Focus Areas for Discussion
Five focus concept areas have initially emerged with the aim to add value by sharing our
decades-old legacy of innovative land management with others, affirming our connection with
nature, encouraging youth to identify with nature, increasing community food connections,
and ensuring there are inclusive opportunities for everyone in our community to conserve,
connect with and enjoy OSMP lands. Below is a summary of the five focus areas concepts:
Concept Focus Area 1:
Regional Conservation and Nature Access Institute
Boulder is renowned for its clean water, fresh air, healthy wildlife habitat, and beauty. People
live here for these reasons, and they can depend on OSMP to safeguard those qualities across
the region from the Flatirons on the west to the grasslands on the east. A unique set of high-
quality programs has been set up over time to address the use, protection, and management of
open space lands. We can create an institute of learning to share this unique Boulder
approach on a national stage with hundreds of students, professionals and other governments;
while continuing our own local dialogue on the best practices for managing OSMP lands. The
roles of planning and science have been employed for decades to consider long-term
sustainable conservation and access approaches. The institute would continue this tradition
and meet head on the challenges for our future by considering and sharing strategies for
current and future generations to protect nature, agriculture and recreation and providing
education as well as connections to these resources. It is also recognized that OSMP is not the
only leader in our community and so the institute could consider the various areas where
Boulder is a national leader. For instance, the nation looks to Boulder’s transportation system
and climate commitment as models, both of which could be incorporated into a broader
institute concept, if desired.
Concept Focus Area 2:
New Headquarters and Community Center
A new headquarters is needed to house OMSP staff under a single roof where knowledge can
be easily shared and the department can efficiently carry out operations to fulfill our mission.
In addition, this project affords an opportunity to include a Community Center that offers
quality, experiential environmental education programs and teaches outdoor recreation skills
to youth and underrepresented and under participating groups. The center can promote
environmental stewardship and outdoor recreation skills to thousands of people through
collaborations with school districts and community-based organizations.
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 4
Concept Focus Area 3:
Connect with Nature through Volunteer and Service Programs
People depend on nature and a natural setting for peace, quiet, inspiration, renewal,
exhilaration, and enjoyment. OSMP provides opportunities to immerse oneself in nature and
give back by learning, volunteering, and connecting to the outdoors. This is accomplished
through innovative programs such as Raptor Monitoring, Mountain Bike Patrols, Bat
Monitoring, and many others. We can expand these programs to encourage a greater
connection to nature for all of our citizens by teaching programs that foster a wider
understanding of conservation, learning outdoor skills, and providing opportunities for
activity groups, nonprofits, local businesses, and agency partners to work more closely with
us to further fulfill our mission. These programs could be particularly impactful to
underrepresented populations, and align with other city efforts to engage low-income and
minority community members. With enhanced programs and projects we will be able to
attract thousands of new Boulder volunteers every year, create a greater connection for
Boulder community members with nature and provide more opportunities for local businesses
to give back.
Concept Focus Area 4:
Youth Access to Nature
Nature supports healthy, active outdoor lifestyles. Whether you’re picnicking at the first
overlook off Flagstaff Road, strolling through a forest listening for birds along Shanahan
Ridge or jogging on the South Boulder Creek Trail, you will continue a tradition that stretches
back decades. Many of us take this for granted but know there is a need to create an
environment where youth can see how very special and valuable these local outdoor
opportunities are. To do this we can build confidence, teach skills and provide access
opportunities so our children gain an appreciation for the outdoors by developing programs
that focus on these areas. We can develop programs that teach children the outdoor skills they
need to feel confident when they enter nature; we can develop youth ambassadors able to
articulate the value of protecting lands. Youth emerging from an OSMP program will be able
to find a trail on the map, identify an eagle, know the leave no trace ethic, appreciate how to
hike safely, and learn camping and fishing skills. This passport to nature will attempt to
ensure that youth at Boulder schools have junior ranger experience beginning at age six to
twelve and advancing into their high school years by programs that provide outdoor areas to
play and learn in nature, opportunities to develop outdoor skills expertise and eventually to
become ambassadors to educate other youth about the importance of conserving nature. These
programs can also create pathways to careers in environmental stewardship (again where our
low-income and minority populations are underrepresented).
Concept Focus Area 5:
Community Connections to Food
Having farms nearby makes our community happier, healthier and resilient. By protecting
farmland we create an agricultural backyard for people living in the urban area. Farming
supports strong, resilient communities where people want to live and encourages investment
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 5
in the vitality of the local community. Future programs will enable families to know where
their food comes from, know who produces it for them; learn about and be reminded of their
local connections in local grocery stores; be able to learn how to tend a field and have access
to land and resources to try it themselves; run a community plot outside the urban area and
have the potential to stay overnight on it; and participate in events on local farms that bring
the community together and are a fun way for children to learn about farms. Activities can
be explored that will connect our community with food including farm events, education
programs for schools, community allotments, food forests, farm markets, farm stands,
demonstration farms, and farm camps. Connecting local families to farming and food is a
legacy that ensures continued community vitality. These efforts are also connected to the
city’s local food initiative.
Concept Focus Area 6:
Opportunities for All Grant Program
Diverse communities should feel ownership, safe and welcome on OSMP lands. Working
together, OSMP and partners can create opportunities for all of our residents to work at, play
in and care for these special places to ensure everyone gains from the benefits of conserving
nature, food production, and recreation activities. We need to further reach out and develop
programs with underserved community partners to foster a love of nature, food production
and recreation activities. Our goal is to work with culturally-specific, low-income
communities, elderly, and persons experiencing disabilities in places where OSMP does not
already have strong relationships. For example, Nature and Farm Connection Community
Grants can be considered that could focus on culturally-specific, low-income communities,
and persons experiencing disabilities. The grants can create opportunities to learn about,
practice, and engage in nature and farming activities. We can also consider School in Nature
and Farm Community Grants providing resources to enable connections with nature and
farming that schools are unable to make. We can also build upon and partner with existing
programs serving these communities, such as Parks and Recreation’s EXPAND program for
people with disabilities and Youth Services Initiative (YSI) program serving youth living in
low-income housing. We can also consider grants for improved nature experiences and
activities that meet expectations for universal access guidelines and develop more inclusive
programs for persons experiencing disabilities.
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 6
Appendix A
Example A: Boulder Library Foundation
Purpose: The Boulder Library Foundation strategically invests in innovative programming
and partnerships that enrich the Boulder Public Library and our community. The Foundation
is a 501c3 nonprofit organization led by a volunteer board of directors and supported by
individual donors and community partners.
Board: We’re delighted to provide leadership for the Boulder Library Foundation, including a
bi-annual grant review and selection process, fundraising initiatives, and community outreach.
We bring a variety of experience, expertise, and ideas to sustain the Foundation’s mission,
expand its reach, and support new initiatives.
Fund: Boulder Library Foundation-funded programs, events, and initiatives serve a diverse
mix of people (from birth through senior citizenship) at the Boulder Public Library as well as
outside its doors and throughout the community.
Example B: PLAY Boulder Foundation (Boulder Parks and Recreation Department)
Mission: The PLAY Boulder Foundation, in partnership with the Boulder Parks and
Recreation Department, supports excellence in parks and recreation by mobilizing community
support through education, philanthropy, and advocacy.
Purpose: By donating in support of your favorite program or facility, you can experience
firsthand the results of your giving while providing improvements for all to enjoy. The
opportunity and need for benefactors for our recreation programs and parks facilities has
never been more acute. We hope you will join us in supporting community parks and
recreation in Boulder.
History: The Boulder Parks and Recreation Foundation was established in 1976 as a non-
profit organization, enabling tax-deductible gifts to ensure excellence in Boulder’s parks and
recreation systems. In 2005, the Foundation adopted new bylaws and a new mission to keep
pace with the changing face of public/private partnerships. In 2009, the Foundation changed
its name to PLAY (Parks and Leisure for Adults and Youth) Boulder Foundation to better
reflect its new mission. It remains dedicated to working with the City of Boulder and the
private sector to create the best possible environment in which to live, work, and play.
Major program areas:
Critical Partnerships: To have a healthy city, PLAY Boulder recognizes the
importance of partnerships. Since its inception, PLAY Boulder (then Boulder Parks
and Recreation Foundation) has fostered a tight relationship with the city and Boulder
Parks and Recreation Department. Through this strategic partnership, we are able to
work together to ensure the best quality programs.
Support the PLAY Boulder Foundation: PLAY Boulder accepts online donations
through Network for Good. Thank you for your interest in supporting PLAY Boulder.
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 7
For more information on donating an item, please contact PLAY at
info@playboulder.org and we’ll get back to you with the requested information.
PLAY is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. Contributions are 100% tax deductible.
PLAY Supporters: PLAY is thrilled to be supported by a variety of individuals,
corporations, and foundations. It is through your support that we are able to offer a
variety of recreational programs for the community of Boulder.
Example C: Multnomah County Library Foundation
Purpose: this foundation enhances Multnomah County Library's leadership, innovation, and
reach, helping the library address emerging community needs through private support.
They don't support day-to-day operations but do underwrite staff positions in
programs that go beyond core services.
501c3 charity and gifts are tax-deductible.
Founded in 1995 "to build private support, enhance our library's impact and strengthen
the public's commitment to a strong library system"
o Work together to figure out "where private funds can be leveraged to have the
greatest impact and at the same time not supplant public responsibility for
supporting a strong library system."
The foundation is the independent non-profit that library management has designated
to receive bequests and planned gifts that benefit the library.
The library director sits on the board of trustees.
The foundation focuses support in three key areas: early literacy, school age success,
and learning for life.
While not advocating year-to-year for library budget or programs, the foundation did
play a major role in advocating for tax levies over the years and ultimately a move to
create an independently funded library district.
Commitment to donor privacy (and the opposite when appropriate)
o gifts of $100+ recognized on bookplates in new library books
o gifts of $1000+ can be recognized publicly, if wished
o gifts of $25,000+ can establish a named endowment.
Example D: Oregon State Parks Foundation
Purpose: Dedicated to supporting Oregon's state parks, working to enrich the state park
experience for generations to come.
501c3 charity and gifts are tax deductible
iconic restoration and enhancement/construction projects not going to be funded
publically
establishment of interpretive and educational programs
parks director ex officio on board and separate staff liaison
membership model
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 8
o 12-month day-use parking pass for every membership level
o subscription to 1859 magazine at higher levels
o $500+ includes behind the scenes field trip to one of the state parks
o $1000+ exclusive events
master agreement between state parks and foundation:
o http://www.oregon.gov/oprd/docs/foundation-master-agreement-2014.pdf
Example E: Yosemite National Park Conservancy
Purpose: Provide grants to Yosemite National Park based on the highest-priority needs of the
park. Has typically funded restoration of the trail to Lower Yosemite Fall, electronic bear-
monitoring equipment to keep bears safe, youth programs, etc.
Mission: Providing for Yosemite’s future is our passion. We inspire people to support projects
and programs that preserve and protect Yosemite National Park’s resources and enrich the
visitor experience. The major goals of the conservancy focus on:
Trails Restored
Wildlife Protected
Habitat Restored
Historic Preservation
Youth Stewardship
Visitor Enrichment
Partners: Yosemite Conservancy has 90 years of experience helping to preserve and protect
Yosemite National Park for current and future generations. We are proud to have strong
working relationships with extraordinary partner organizations that share a similar passion for
this magical place.
Funding: The most significant collaboration, and also the core of our fundraising, is direct
donations to National Park Service (NPS). Each year, NPS identifies projects of greatest need
that are aligned with the mission; these projects are then funded through donations. The
Conservancy has provided more than $100 million in grants to fund Yosemite’s highest-
priority projects in recent years. Yosemite Conservancy funds projects and programs that are
proposed and prioritized by NPS at Yosemite. Examples include:
fund trail and habitat restoration projects,
wildlife-protection programs,
scientific research, and
Youth in Yosemite Programs: these programs transform the lives of youth of all ages.
The Conservancy audience typically gives or benefits by:
Making a monetary gift to the Yosemite Conservancy with a benefit of discounts on
programs, accommodations and invitations to special events.
Pay for an art workshop or a live theater performance about Yosemite’s history.
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 9
Ways to volunteer with Yosemite Conservancy.
Purchase items in the Conservancy bookstore or online store.
Visitor Services: Conservancy partners with NPS to work on restoration projects and visitor
services, including issuing wilderness permits and bear-proof canisters.
Conservancy partners with NPS, Delaware North Companies (DNC), the Ansel
Adams Gallery and the LeConte Memorial Lodge to promote Art in Yosemite.
Working with NPS and DNC, which provide accommodations throughout the park,
the Conservancy created the guest donor program, allowing visitors to make donations
to programs at DNC facilities.
Working with NatureBridge, the Conservancy share resources such as housing and
training. They also exchange resources such as books for libraries.
History: Yosemite Conservancy has over 90 years of experience preserving and protecting
Yosemite National Park for current and future generations. The Conservancy established an
early model for many of today’s national park nonprofit partners.
The first fundraising organization, 1923
Cooperating association, 1923
Developed museum, 1926
Created a modern fundraising program, 1956
There are more than 65 national park cooperating associations, serving the 392 areas
of the national park system.
AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 10
CITY OF BOULDER
OPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: April 13, 2016
AGENDA TITLE: Summary of 2015 Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteer
Services Annual Report and Declaration to Honor Open Space and Mountain Parks
Volunteers during National Volunteer Week, April 10-16, 2016.
PRESENTER/S:
Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks
Mark Davison, Community Connections and Partnerships Division Manager
Lisa Dierauf, Community Education and Outreach Supervisor
Jennelle Freeston, Volunteer Services Supervisor
Kristin Weinberger, Coordinator of Group Volunteer Projects
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
National Volunteer Week is April 10-16, 2016. The City of Boulder Open Space and
Mountain Parks (OSMP) Department joins communities across the country and around
the world in recognizing volunteers for their efforts and contributions.
Every year, hundreds of volunteers aid the OSMP department in carrying out its mission,
goals and objectives. They help to inform the public, connect with the land through
hands-on projects, and protect the resources that make OSMP lands a special place. In
2015, more than 1,760 dedicated volunteers contributed a grand total of over 20,000
hours. (See Attachment A).
AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 1
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteer Services staff members request that the Open
Space Board of Trustees join them in honoring these dedicated people during National
Volunteer Week with a declaration:
The Open Space Board of Trustees joins the staff of the City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain
Parks Department in recognizing all of our volunteers during National Volunteer Week 2016. We
salute the more than 1,760 Open Space and Mountain Parks volunteers who contributed their
talents and efforts in helping the department carry out its mission. These individuals are an
inspiration as they help to protect the resources that make Boulder’s Open Space and Mountain
Parks so special.
COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENTS AND IMPACTS
Environmental: City of Boulder OSMP is a significant community-supported
program that is recognized as a leader in preservation of open space lands,
contributing to the environmental sustainability goal of Boulder’s City Council.
The department’s volunteers act as stewards to help preserve and protect the
values of these lands.
Economic: OSMP contributes to the economic vitality goal of the city as it
provides the context for the diverse and vibrant economic system that sustains
services for residents.
Social: Because the Open Space land system is accessible to the community, it
helps support council’s community sustainability goal - all residents who live in
Boulder have the opportunity to feel a part of, and thrive in, this aspect of their
community.
OTHER IMPACTS
Fiscal: The work provided by OSMP project and program volunteers adds over a
half a million dollars in value every year. In addition to this monetary value, this
volunteer effort supports departmental priorities while also building a stronger
sense of community. Engaged, educated, informed and participating citizens are
an important component to the well-being of a community.
Staff time: Working with volunteers requires staff time and planning. Two Full
Time Equivalent (FTE) Volunteer Coordinators and 1.5 seasonal staff members
are dedicated to directly manage both volunteer projects and programs, and over
40 other staff members work with volunteers as program leads and field
supervisors.
PUBLIC COMMENT AND PROCESS
This item is being heard at this public meeting, advertised in the Daily Camera on April
10, 2016.
AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 2
AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 3
This page is intentionally left blank.
AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 4
Volunteer Services
Community Connections & Partnerships
City of Boulder
Open Space & Mountain Parks
Photo: Dustin Allard
Annual Report 2015
2015 Overview
2
“Volunteering with OSMP has made me realize how important it is to use open
spaces wisely and participate in its future and its preservation.”
~ Teirnan Doyle, OSMP Volunteer
Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) Volunteer Services engages the community through the land
to inspire appreciation, connection and a legacy of stewardship. Volunteer Services serves departmental
programs, projects, and events, as well as requests for customized projects from community members
and organizations year-round. OSMP connects with the community through an outstanding volunteer
program that offers a variety of opportunities for people to give back to the land in a meaningful
way. Two major focus areas are ongoing volunteer programs and one-day projects. These help the
department meet its mission and charter.
Volunteer Services has offered formal programs and projects since the 1980s with a growing response
from the community. In 2015 Volunteer Services redirected their efforts towards recruitment for one-
day community volunteer projects due to the loss of AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps
assisting with out-of-state priorities and flood restoration projects coming to a close. Volunteer Services
changed the focus to community volunteer projects developed from OSMP work priorities. Working
closely with staff from forestry, agriculture, trails, integrated pest management, and water resources
Photo: Kristin Weinberger
Volunteers Collect
Native Seed for
Restoration
2015 Overview
3
multiple community projects were planned. To fill
these community volunteer projects, recruitment
occurred through the new Dream it, Build it,
Love it campaign which included the creation of
a program brand, a newly designed webpage, and
a formalized marketing plan. This comprehensive
marketing plan contains templates for flyer and
handout development, recruitment models,
outreach opportunities, online advertisements, and
much more. Volunteer Services’ ability to sustain
many volunteer projects in 2015 showcases the
community interest and success of new marketing
efforts.
In 2015 more than 1,765 volunteers contributed a
grand total of over 20,000 hours. The work provided
by OSMP project and program volunteers adds over
half a million dollars in value every year!
2015
20,031
Total Hours
1,765
Total Volunteers $514,396
Total Value
Volunteer Naturalists
Teach Students
Photo: OSMP Staff
2015 Overview
44
900
1200
1500
1800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
YearNumber of volunteersVolunteer Participation Trends
5
Project Volunteers
“This curious world we inhabit is more wonderful than convenient; more
beautiful than it is useful; it is more to be admired and enjoyed than used.”
~ Henry David Thoreau
Open Space and Mountain Parks offered 87 volunteer projects to individuals and organizations out of
over 100 that were planned. Project volunteers participated in a variety of one-day or multi-day, on-
the-ground projects. Each volunteer project involves an overview of the project objectives, information
about management methods from the specialists, safety briefings, and education from naturalists.
Volunteers are thanked throughout the day and lunch is provided by OSMP.
Volunteers continued to lend a hand assisting with eight flood restoration trail projects needed after the
historic 2013 floods. For the first time Volunteer Services collaborated with forestry staff to offer ten
one-day community volunteer projects. These projects involve chipping ponderosa pines to improve
forest ecosystem health and reduce threats of catastrophic wildfires.
Volunteers Help Repair
Royal Arch
Trail
Photo: Beau Clark
6
Volunteer Services also supported a departmental goal to highlight OSMP’s agricultural program and
give community members of all ages opportunities to have a hands-on experience with their local food
sources. Volunteer Services collaborated with staff to offer 15 youth and family friendly projects with
several agricultural tenants. These volunteer projects assisted with planting and harvesting vegetables,
fence repair, and structure demolition. Volunteers learned about the history of agriculture in the area,
organic vegetable production on OSMP, and what it takes to grow vegetables in this region. For the first
time restoration and agricultural staff offered a community volunteer project to create a bee pollinator
garden at Teller Farms to support local bee habitat.
Volunteer Services also supports staff from restoration, trails, trailheads, and water resources
workgroups with volunteer project planning and coordination. In 2015 an estimated 1,365 project
volunteers contributed 7,750 hours. See page 7 for the breakout of the 2015 volunteer projects per
workgroup.
Contracts: Volunteer Services manages two long-term work contracts; one with Bridge House Ready to
Work, and the other with Mile High Youth Corps. Volunteer Services pairs up community volunteers
with Bridge House Ready to Work crews on various projects to allow the opportunity for crew members
to work side by side with volunteers.
Volunteers Plant
Organic Vegetables
on Agricultural Lands Photo: Kristin Weinburger
2015 Volunteer Project Summary
7
Multiple Work Groups Served Project/Location Volunteer #HoursBridge House, Ready to Work Multiple Projects na naMile High Youth Corps Teller Lakes na na
Agriculture Project/Location Volunteer #HoursSportsLab - Loafing Shed Demolition Abbot 30 90Community Project with INVST Community Studies & One Act a Day Cure Organic Farm 24 82Engineers Without Borders - Cattle Fence Manchester 9 45Community Project - 63rd St. Farm 63rd Street Farm 31 128.5
Colorado College Outdoor Education - Corral Demolition North Teller/Manchester 40 320Community Project - Barn Demolition Berman Brothers 14 70Navigant Consulting/North Face - Cattle Fence Methvin 23 92Dish - Cattle Fence Andrus 7 39.5
Ecological Systems Project/Location Volunteer #HoursCommunity Project with CU & Medtronic - Forestry Flatirons Vista 85 392New Vista High School - Forestry Flatirons Vista 19 114Community Project - Bee Garden South Teller 15 40Community Project - Planted Plugs Dammyanovich 3 12Whitewave - Seed Collection South Boulder Creek 19 57Community Project - Seed Collection Doudy Draw 12 36WRV Seed Collections Multiple Properties 178 472
IPM Project/Location Volunteer #HoursSt. Olaf College - Cattle Fence for Tall Oat Grass Shanahan Ridge 29 203St. Olaf - Exotic Shrubs Skunk Canyon 16 112CU Geography/History - Cattle Fence for Tall Oat Grass Shanahan Ridge 12 72North Face - Cattle Fence for Tall Oat Grass Shanahan Ridge 3 21Boy Scouts - Moth Mullein Flatirons Vista 12 36Individual Volunteer - Mediterranean Sage BLIP 2 7.5WRV -Mediterranean Sage Beech 26 123
Trailheads Project/Location Volunteer #HoursYale Day of Service - Native Gardens Thorne/Sombrero Marsh 6 24County Court Projects Multiple Project Sites 55 416Individual Community Service Multiple Project Sites 57 1202Eagle Scouts Multiple Project Sites 130 923
Trailheads - Flood Restoration Project/Location Volunteer #HoursCounty Court Arnold Property 10 80
Volunteer Project Summary 2015
2015 Volunteer Project Summary
8
Trails Project/Location Volunteer #HoursNew Vista High School - Trail Construction Chautauqua 17 119Boulder Mountain Bike Alliance - Trail Repair Marshall Valley/FIV/High Plains 46 222Community Project - Trail Repair Chautauqua Meadow 17 119SolidFire - Trail Repair Chautauqua 9 27Adventure Forward - Trail Structures Built Chautauqua 35 140Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado - Trail Construction Long Canyon 21 168Flatirons Climbing Council - Trail Repair Flagstaff - Cloudshadow 19 152Community Project for National Trails Day - Trail Construction Joder 35 181Bike Patrol - Trail Repair Springbrook Loop Trail 10 30
Trails - Flood Restoration Project/Location Volunteer #HoursVolunteers for Outdoor Colorado - Trail Construction Long Canyon 17 136Individual Volunteer - Trail Repair Royal Arch/Royal Arch 4 39Front Range Climbing Stewards - Trail Repair Royal Arch 11 64Community Project - Trail Construction Towhee 18 126Boulder Mountain Bike Alliance - Trail Repair High Plains Trail 35 103Whitewave - Turnpike Homestead Trail 15 90
Water Resources Project/Location Volunteer #HoursSt. Olaf - Irrigation Maintenance North Toll Gate 36 227Community Project with CU Leadership Class - Irrigation Maintenance Silver Lake Ditch 33 225.5CU Triathlon Team - Irrigation Maintenance Silver Lake Ditch 11 66
Whole System Cleanup Project/Location Volunteer #HoursPUP Derby - Clean Up Dry Creek 3 9New Vista High School - Fence Demolition and Repair Cottonwood 19 114Flatirons Climbing Council - Graffiti Clean Up 2nd Flatiron 3 15Flatirons Climbing Council for the Trash Bash - Trash Clean up Flagstaff Summit 70 140Summit Middle School - Trash Clean Up Sawhill Ponds 14 28
Volunteer #Hours 1,365 7,750
2015 Total
The independent sector in Colorado estimates a hourly rate of $25.68 for volunteer work, totaling a value of $199,020 for this program.
9
Program Volunteers
Volunteers Monitor
Locally Nesting
Raptors
“Volunteering on behalf of OSMP for the past number of years has been
awesome. I have probably gained the knowledge equivalent of a master’s
degree in natural history. Each of the OSMP programs are meaningful and
have a significant impact.” ~ Joel Koenig, OSMP Volunteer
Volunteer Services offers over 17 longer-term program assignments to assist OSMP in carrying out its mission
and goals. In 2015, 354 individual program volunteers committed to assignments which included greeting
visitors on the trails and monitoring wildlife and plants. Program volunteers also assisted at outreach events,
answered questions at the Chautauqua Ranger Cottage and led interpretive hikes for youth and more. (see page
11)
Two milestones were marked this year with the 30th anniversary of the volunteer raptor monitoring program
and the 20th anniversary of the bat monitoring program. Over the last 30 years, OSMP volunteers have
monitored the fledging of 207 golden eagles, 31 bald eagles, 395 prairie falcons, 151 peregrine falcons, and 66
osprey. Raptor volunteers provide weekly information to OSMP staff about the status of nesting pairs and also
report any closure violations.
In 1995 agencies within Boulder County began an on-going bat survey to determine numbers and species
of bats in the area. Bat volunteers have gathered years of data for maternal roost sites and watering holes on
OSMP properties. These citizen science monitoring programs are national models which demonstrate the
Photo: Volunteer Staff
10
successful partnerships between local community members, conservation groups, recreational groups, and land
management agencies.
Based on a renewed staff need, herbarium volunteers reconvened once a week from March through June. These
volunteers have been collecting and pressing plants found on our properties for over 20 years building a library-
like collection that helps us better understand and manage our biologically diverse ecosystems.
“It is so life giving for me to be part of this volunteer program and feel like I can be helpful to the
preservation of the natural world.” ~ Betsy Heppner, OSMP Volunteer
Volunteer Services staff recruited and trained additional mountain bike patrollers and trail guide/park patrollers
who serve as extra eyes for the department and assist with communicating regulations, trail conditions, and
natural history information to visitors. The Boulder Mountain Bike Patrol is a multi-agency program with the
OSMP, Boulder County Parks and Open Space, U.S. Forest Service, City of Boulder Parks and Recreation, and
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance. Patrollers ride trails assisting and educating mountain bikers and other park
users. The goal is to promote a positive recreational experience on the trails. Over 75 mountain bike volunteers
patrolled over 600 times covering more than 8,000 miles on OSMP trails. A particular focus this year included
outreach in the Marshall Mesa area to educate about bike etiquette and to reduce user conflict. Similarly, trail
guide/park patrollers hiked on all OSMP trails with extra time spent in the North Trail Study Area (NTSA) to
provide information to visitors as well as assisting with Royal Arch closures and other departmental needs.
The Volunteer Naturalist program trained nine new volunteers who, along with 50 other volunteer naturalists,
provided 259 guided interpretive hikes and programs to 4,233 school-age children from the surrounding area
school districts. Youth served were mainly from the Boulder Valley School District as well as at least six other
school districts across the Front Range. In response to growing demand, classroom wildlife programs which are
scheduled and taught by volunteer naturalists, were expanded beyond bear and mountain lion curriculum to
include coyote education.
Volunteer Naturalists
Teach Students
Photo: OSMP Staff
2015 Volunteer Program Summary
11
Program Workgroups Served Volunteer #Site Visits/Events Hours
Bat Monitors Wildlife & Rangers 50 110 1330
Bear Care & Coyote Care Team Wildlife, Rangers & CPW 13 5 33
Bee Monitors Wildlife 3 20 16
Hayfield Monitors Agriculture,Wildlife & Rangers 6 26 40
Herbarium Ecological Systems 7 5 25
Hosts: Flagstaff Nature Center Community Outreach 18 116 479
Host: Event Help (Meadow Music & Voice & Sight Events)Community Outreach 12 15 193
Host: Ranger Cottage Community Outreach 5 20 150
Mountain Bike Patrollers Community Outreach & Rangers 75 609 1590
Native Garden Team Community Outreach 12 10 292
Naturalists (including bear, mountain lion & coyote classroom programs) Community Outreach 43 259 900
Open Space Board of Trustees All 5 12 1000
Raptor Monitors Wildlife & Rangers 50 525 2300
Resource Restoration Stewards Ecological Systems 6 5 15
Undesignated Trail Study Planning 1 4 50
Staff Assistants: Admin, Interns, Vegetation Studies All 5 5 461
Trail Guide/Park Patrollers Community Outreach & Rangers 89 1091 3407
Training Provided by Staff Volunteer #Site Visits/Events Hours
1,485 hrs 400 2,837 12,281
Volunteer Program Summary 2015
Grand Total 2015
The independent sector estimates a hourly rate in Colorado of $25.68 for volunteer work, totaling a value of $315,376 for this program. In 2015 there were 354 individual
program volunteers, 46 of these volunteers are involved with multiple programs.
Photo: Volunteer Staff
Plans for 2016
12
In addition to continuing to offer projects and programs, Volunteer Services will focus on new initiatives
in 2016. Staff will begin developing a five year strategic plan to look more closely at capacity, recruitment,
and targeting key audiences. In an effort to enhance our communication style with volunteers, Volunteer
Services will market projects and programs using Emma software. In addition, from the 2015 marketing
plan, Volunteer Services learned lessons about how many volunteer projects to offer, the best timing,
and when volunteers are most likely to participate. Volunteer Services will continue to offer one-day
community projects as well as placing a new emphasis on targeted marketing to local companies who
offer their employee’s time to volunteer. This involves making face-to-face contacts to develop long-lasting
relationships with identified businesses and organizations in our community. There will also be a focus on
offering additional agriculturally-based projects as well as a pollinator meadow restoration project geared
towards youth, families, and underserved communities.
Finally, Volunteer Services will continue to offer opportunities for long-term volunteer assignments.
Recruitment and trainings will be offered for the programs that are requested by community members
and/ or need additional volunteer support such as Mountain Bike Patrol, Trail Guide/Park Patrollers, and
Bat Monitors. In 2016 a plant phenology program will be piloted to monitor plant phases in order to track
trends over time. Phenology can be an early indicator of climate change especially for plants. Volunteers will
make field observations over the course of a growing season using protocols and standards designed by the
National Phenology Network.
Interested in Volunteering with Open Space & Mountain Parks?Visit our website at VolunteerOSMP.org or contact:
With the support of the Open Space Board of Trustees, the OSMP Executive Team, staff,
partner agencies, and our committed outdoor community, Volunteer Services continues to
grow relationships that connect people to the land. Volunteer Services is grateful for these
partnerships and dedication to the volunteer program. We tip our hats to the OSMP volunteers’
accomplishments and look forward to the year ahead. Visit VolunteerOSMP.org for upcoming
volunteer projects and programs.
Coordinator of Volunteer Groups
303.413.7632
weinbergerk@bouldercolorado.gov
Volunteer Services & Youth Engagement Sup.
303.413.7656
freestonj@bouldercolorado.gov
Kristin Weinberger Jennelle Freeston
Thank you!
Photo: Doug Goodin