Loading...
04.13.16 OSBT PacketOPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Wednesday, April 13, 2016 Council Chambers, 1777 Broadway MEETING AGENDA (Please note that times are approximate.) 6:00 I. Call to Order a) Oath of Office – Curt Brown b) Election of Officers 6:15 II. Approval of Minutes 6:20 III. *Public Participation for Items Not Identified for Public Hearing 6:30 IV. Matters from Staff a) Brief staff updates on projects/plans b) Wildfire response simulation event in May c) Flood repair on Mesa Trail/Skunk Creek Crossing d) Update on Draft 2017 Work Plan and Budget e) Staff update on exploratory talks for a Conservancy to provide private funding to support OSMP priority programs and projects 8:00 V. Matters from the Board a) Board retreat discussion b) May Board meeting schedule 8:15 VI. *Summary of 2015 Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteer Services Annual Report and Declaration to Honor Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteers during National Volunteer Week, April 10-16, 2016. 8:30 VII. Adjournment * Public hearing AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 1 OPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Minutes Meeting Date March 9, 2016 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Shelley Dunbar Frances Hartogh Molly Davis Kevin Bracy Knight Tom Isaacson STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Tracy Winfree Jim Reeder John Potter Mark Davison Mark Gershman Bethany Collins Deryn Wagner Phil Yates Cecil Fenio Alycia Alexander Juliet Bonnell Steve Armstead Leah Case Gabe Wilson Don Damico Brian Anacker Luke McKay Heather Swanson Lynn Riedel CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:02 p.m. AGENDA ITEM 1 – Proclamation Frances Hartogh read a proclamation for Shelley Dunbar, the exiting Board Chair, acknowledging her years of service as an Open Space Board of Trustee. AGENDA ITEM 2 – Approval of the Minutes Tom Isaacson asked that Tim Hogan’s public comment be summarized and the attachment be removed from the minutes. The Board agreed that for consistency, minutes will remain a summary and handouts and/or presentations from the public can be archived on the website. Frances Hartogh said on page 3, it should be noted that Kirk Cunningham spoke on behalf of the Sierra Club. On page 5, during Mike Barrow’s public comment, it should read, “. . . for the amount of time . . .” On the same page it should read, “Dan Brillon said recreation experience on the west side is far superior. . .” In the motion language on page 8, add the word “that” after “moved.” Frances Hartogh moved that the Open Space Board of Trustees approve the minutes from Feb. 11, 2016 and Feb. 12, 2016 as amended. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed unanimously. AGENDA ITEM 3 – Public Participation for Items not on the Agenda None. AGENDA ITEM 4 – Matters from Staff Jim Reeder highlighted several staff projects. Tracy Winfree introduced Mark Davison, the new Community Connections & Partnerships Division Manager for Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP). Staff reminded the Board about a joint Board meeting on April 27. AGENDA ITEM 5 – Matters from the Board Molly Davis said the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) are tasked with a difficult job trying to balance interests. She said some interests are competitive in nature and proceedings need to be transparent; the Board needs to make sure Board actions take place during Board meetings. There needs to be a set foundation and effort to gain back the public trust. Tom Isaacson noted that the Parks and Open Space Advisory Committee (POSAC) voted five to two to not take a position on the North Trail Study Area (TSA) Draft Plan. AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 2 AGENDA ITEM 6 – Consideration of a motion to approve and recommend that City Council approves the conveyance of an easement to Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) for ingress/egress along a portion of the Mesa Trail to provide access to the company’s 9205 Eldorado- NCAR electric transmission line. This is a disposal of Open Space land under City Charter Section 177. Bethany Collins, Property Agent, presented this item. Frances Hartogh asked if this easement would allow PSCo trucks to drive up this portion of the trail. Bethany said yes; however, staff would be given notice prior to any maintenance access. Shelley asked if this trail would be closed if they were doing maintenance work. Bethany said it may depend on the activity; if a closure were needed there would be plenty of notice provided. Public Comment None. Return to the Board No further comment. Motion Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees approve and recommend that the City Council approves the disposal of an interest in Open Space lands pursuant to Boulder City Charter Section 177 through the conveyance of an easement to Public Service Company of Colorado for ingress/egress along a portion of the Mesa Trail to provide access to the company’s 9205 Eldorado- NCAR electric transmission line, as approved by OSMP and PSCo staff and the City Attorney’s Office. Molly Davis seconded. This motion passed unanimously. AGENDA ITEM 7 – *Consideration of a motion to approve and recommend that City Council approves the conveyance of a 10-foot wide nonexclusive easement to Public Service Company of Colorado for an underground electrical line across approximately 1,000 linear feet of the Dover- Blacker Open Space property for the purpose of providing electricity to the Shanahan Ridge neighborhood. This is a disposal of Open Space land under City Charter Section 177. Bethany Collins, Property Agent, presented this item. Public Comment Karen Hollweg, Boulder, asked if there are stipulations in the contract that would require revegetation or salvaging of the area. Bethany said if there is surface impact then revegetation would be required. Return to the Board No further comment. Motion Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees approve and recommend that the City Council approves the disposal of an interest in Open Space lands pursuant to Boulder City Charter section 177 through the conveyance of a 10-foot wide nonexclusive easement to Public Service Company of Colorado for an underground electrical line across approximately 1,000 linear feet of the Dover-Blacker Open Space property for the purpose of providing electricity to the Shanahan Ridge neighborhood for the consideration of $12,500. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed four to zero; Frances Hartogh abstained. AGENDA ITEM 8 – Consideration of a motion recommending approval of the North Trail Study Area Plan and recommending the North Trail Study Area Plan to City Council for its acceptance. AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 3 Steve Armstead, Environmental Planner, presented this item. Tom asked if the presence of bobolinks is among the reasons for properties in the north remaining closed. Steve said yes. Tom asked if the current level of use has had an impact on the bobolink population. Heather Swanson said bobolinks are ground nesters so they are fairly sensitive; she said nesting success has not been monitored. Tom asked if nesting season is May 1 through July 31; Heather said yes. Molly Davis asked where staff is looking for alternate horse arena locations other than Boulder Valley Ranch (BVR). Steve said possibly the new Horseshoe or Lefthand Trailhead. Shelley asked how staff came up with trail/trailhead names. Steve said a staff team came up with them. Public Comment Marty Walter, Boulder, said he is in favor of keeping the northern properties closed. There needs to support for the lessees who have their agricultural operations on that land; do not open these properties to general use. Open Space needs someone managing these fields otherwise they could become a fire hazard. Jiang Joy Wu, Boulder, said the northern properties should remain open for traditional agricultural use only. These areas are not traditional horse boarding facilities. Open Space has plenty of options for recreational use; but there are fewer and fewer agricultural lands. Mike Barrow, Boulder Mountainbike Alliance (BMA), said BMA supports the Open Boulder position on the draft plan. He thanked the Board and staff for staying on schedule. He asked that after completion of this plan, staff takes the time to evaluate this process and make it better moving forward. BMA would like to work with staff on the best management practices for the Joder Trail to accomplish access and manage user conflict. Roger Auerenamer, Boulder, said the northern properties need to remain closed except to cattle as it always has been. There are already problems with Stratton even though it is closed; opening any of these areas is not a good idea. Alex Hycle-Wright, Boulder, said he supports making the west trail connection open for both hiking and biking. He said having a complete connection from Boulder to Lyons is an exciting possibility. Fred Stengel, Boulder, said the northern properties should remain as agricultural land. Opening these areas will cause parking issues as well as disrupt the current process. He asked for them to remain closed. Raymond Bridge, Boulder County Audubon Society, said the draft plan has major deficiencies. It is stated that the number one criteria is compliance with sideboards, however the content does not reflect this. The North Boulder Valley Management Plan mandates these trails be located along the edge to avoid fragmentation. The proposed North Sky Trail cuts through habitat block and maximizes fragmentation. The sideboards have been ignored in final evaluations. The resource impacts along the west connecter are greater than the east. He said this plan is not ready to be submitted to council. Edie Stevens, Boulder, said preservation of Boulder’s environment has always been the overriding purpose of its Open Space. Open Space emphasizes preservation and protection of the natural environment while fostering appreciation and use that sustain the natural values of the land. The mission statement makes it clear that passive recreation will sustain the natural values. Sue Cass, Boulder County Nature Association (BCNA), said they oppose placing a trail on the West Beech Habitat Conservation Area (HCA). The Rocky Mountain Greenway process may present an AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 4 opportunity for cost sharing, clarification for the wetland permitting process, allow negotiations currently underway to remove Scenario B off of the HCA and onto the Conservation Easement (CE). Resolve these issues now and not later. Pat Billig, PLAN-Boulder, supports the draft plan minus the proposed trail on the West Beech HCA. The foundation of the North TSA makes preservation of West Beech the strongest; a trail through this area will have significant impact. This trail runs counter to the OSMP mission and violates management for specified for an HCA. It makes no sense to damage sustainability when it can be built in a less impactful area. Marianne Martin, Boulder, said she is against opening the arena at Boulder Valley Ranch (BVR) to the public. A lot of changes would need to be made in order to accommodate this. As it stands, this would be a big risk; not to mention the parking lot is in the lessee’s front yard. She asked to maintain the current balance. Catherine Corona, Boulder, said she has been accessing the northern properties for years and it has been wonderful to have that access. She asked for this area to remain as-is. Patrick Brady, Boulder, said there are a number of parcels in the north that area closed to public. The public pays taxes to support local community operations and local land; not having access to these properties seems out of line. The land in question is leased to individuals for agricultural use; if decided that they are the only ones who can use that land they should pay full market value. Catherine Harris, Friends of Boulder Open Space (FOBOS), said it seems that we are still carrying out the history of white settlers where humans will do what they will with no regard to the land. The trail on the west was described as environmentally unsustainable; having an interesting visitor experience evidently trumps the Open Space Charter. The proposed trail on the east side goes around the HCA as prescribed by the North Valley Management Plan. James Mapes, Boulder, said he values how open this process has been. He said the one area that deserves more of a public process is specific to the northern properties; he suggested leaving this out of North TSA plan. He added that the recommendation going to council should include language about Scenario A. Paula Shuler, Boulder, said she agrees with only having Johnson and Schooley open to the public. The rest of the northern properties are leased and actively used for agriculture. The lessees are working to produce a product. It would be hypocritical for any of these properties to be open to the public and not appropriate to allow people through these active fields. Jackie Ramaley, Colorado Native Plant Society, said she supports Scenario A. The western foothills area is generally un-fragmented and home to many native species as well as countless wetland and riparian areas. We have the ability to protect this undisturbed habitat. The most recent draft speaks to mitigation measures with the West Beech Trail, but only provides approximate cost; this needs to be more definitive. Linda Parks, Boulder, said kudos to those supporting the non-existence of a new trail. She said she is assuming that Open Space wants to preserve ranch operations; it would be a bad idea to allow general horse access to BVR. Who will be responsible for preventing conflict of use. Longhorn Road should not be used for additional vehicle access. Open space may be considering converting some of BVR into organic farm land which is not a good idea; it will limit hay production. Keep this area open to cattle only and for current horse boarding. It would be best to let the rancher determine the best access for this facility. AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 5 Adam Sher, BMA, said it is difficult trying to balance interests. BMA is generally supportive of the draft plan. Do not support the closure of the northern tier properties. This needs further study and should not be included in the plan. This new trail is a means of relieving ourselves of stress from work and life. It is a way for children to experience open space and it more than just fun. Helen Braider, Boulder, said she is saddened by the choice of a connecter on the west side and concerned about the effects on wildlife. She is also concerned about the access to BVR. A horse trailer parking lot would be a huge mistake; cannot accommodate that increased use. Please protect the integrity of the ranch. Arena open to public use would not be good. Steve Watts, BMA, said a compromised plan comes from the will of the public and it is encouraging that staff received so much input; the draft plan is good. BMA will continue to be a partner in helping to provide better recreation activities and experiences within OSMP. Suzanne Webel, Boulder County Horse Association (BCHA), said we are so close to having plan for the North TSA that we can all live with. Support staff working with lessees about access changes at BVR. Do not support the last minute closure of northern properties; closures need to have specific reasons. She asked the Board to adopt the original Scenario B. Terry Stuart, Boulder, said he supports the farmers who want to keep their properties closed and was concerned about a trail on north side of the highway. That area is precious and would quickly become overused. BethAnne Bane, Longmont, said there are already trails on the east side that go the same direction as the proposed western trail. The area west of Hwy 36 has critical wildlife habitat; a trail would alter Open Space resource. The plan says we need entire areas protected from recreation; closing a trail just during nesting does not prevent irreversible damage. Richard Harris, Boulder, said he is concerned about the proposed trail on the west side of Hwy 36. This will encourage users from other connector trails and significantly increase use. The best place to put traffic is on the side where it is easy to maintain. Damage on the west side will be incalculable. Jessie Goldfarb, Boulder, noted that the City Open Space website states that the department protects the environment and land that characterizes Boulder. It further states that OSMP fosters appreciation and use that sustain the natural values of the land for current and future generations. She asked the Board to reject this draft plan. Jeffrey Dreyfuss, Boulder, asked to keep the northern properties closed to the public. There is no way to get from Hester to Campbell without crossing the stream. Fields have been historically used for grazing cattle; leave these as-is. Lori Cameron, Boulder, said the Board should not vote in support of something that has ecological danger. Listen to environmental experts; once you build a trail it is too late to fix any damage. She asked for biking to be put somewhere else that does not compromise the mission. Nickie Kelly, Boulder, said a trail on the east side would disperse traffic and parking over a wider area. There needs to be focus on minimizing environmental impacts; we are not entitled as a species to plunder this resource. She asked the Board to enforce bikers dismounting. Karen Hollweg, Boulder, said the goal of the North TSA Plan is to provide a sustainable system for visitor access. The plan references the North Sky Trail using the mud closure program to improve trail AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 6 conditions and sustainability; there is no visible intention to construct a new trail that is sustainable. The Visitor Master Plan (VMP) says highly erodible soils are not suitable for sustainable trail construction and use. She would appreciate the promise to provide Scenario A to council in a minority report; to match standards of previous TSA plans, the presentation must include ways that both Scenario A and B meet goals and sideboards. Use education about invasive grasses; the language should be enhanced in plan. Tim Dufficy, Marshville Ditch Company, said that lessees make Boulder look beautiful. The best way to control weeds is to irrigate, cut and bail hay. Do not open arena up to public; this is a safety issue. The best way to warm up your horse is to begin your ride. Eileen Monyok, Friends Interested in Dog on Open Space (FIDOS), thanked the Board and staff for their work. There has been lots of compromise from user groups, as well as FIDOS. She asked that outside of the Papini Trail corridor, it should become on-leash to be consistent with the VMP. Bobby Lover, Boulder, said he is the lessee at BVR. Opening up the arena to the public would be a liability and hard to operate. He would like to keep the relationship with OSMP and the City of Boulder. Return to the Board Molly said she is concerned about the lessee at BVR being able to operate his business effectively if this area were to be opened up to the general public. She noted that a compromise could be reached if parking could be pursued at Lefthand Trail where there is parking already. Frances agreed that a public arena does not seem like suitable use. Shelley said honoring equestrian use and its heritage needs to be included; however, offering an alternate option is a good idea. She noted that the current lease agreement does say it is open to the public currently. Tom said he would vote to preserve the status quo while looking for an alternative. Frances asked if it is an option for someone to ask the lessees of the northern properties to grant them access permission. Steve said the leases allow for agricultural uses, but not for general access. Tom said he is in favor of maintaining current status. Frances said the West Beech property is one of the last unfragmented areas. She said staff should do monitoring first and then have a plan to mediate any issues; do this first. Kevin said he disagrees that this area is totally unique. He said he agrees that monitoring should happen and that this area could be a test case of how monitoring should happen. It does not make sense to close trails unless there is a negative impact. Tom said the Board could include a statement encouraging staff to make monitoring this area a priority as staff sets out the program. Motion Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees recommend that staff continue to follow the terms of the lease regarding public access to the Boulder Valley Ranch (BVR) equestrian arena and will concurrently develop options for nearby horse trailer parking and/or seek to provide an equivalent and suitable corral option that will be determined in cooperation with stakeholders that will be vetted and approved in a future public process. The Board recommends that staff proactively address any conflict issues resulting from public access in future lease negotiations. Tom Isaacson seconded. This motion passed unanimously. Frances Hartogh moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to ask staff to endeavor to develop and bring back to the Board an ecological monitoring program for the North Sky Trail and the Joder Property in light of the important ecological qualities of these properties. Tom Isaacson seconded. This motion passed unanimously. AGENDA ITEM 1 PAGE 7 Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees affirm the management area designations as shown on page 16 of the North Trail Study Area Draft Plan. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed three to two; Frances Hartogh and Molly Davis dissented. Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to support the current access status of the Northern Tier Properties as either open or closed be continued except that the Deluca, Hester, and Campbell Properties be closed May 1 – July 31 for protection of ground-nesting Bobolink. Shelley Dunbar seconded. This motion passed three to two; Frances Hartogh and Molly Davis dissented. Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to amend the language on page 102 of the North Trail Study Area (TSA) Draft Plan to add the word “important” in front of “note” and eliminate “designated” in the first sentence. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed unanimously. Frances Hartogh moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to have the following statement be added to the North Trail Study Area (TSA) Draft Plan on page 7: In fairness to the process, it should be acknowledged that three OSBT members voted for the scenario while two voted against. The main point of contention was whether a north-south connector trail should be constructed through the North Foothills HCA. Molly Davis seconded. This motion passed unanimously. Frances Hartogh moved the Open Space Board of Trustees modify the language on page 36 under primary goal to read: Increase connectivity among North TSA properties while minimizing natural resource impacts to every extent possible. Molly Davis seconded. This motion passed four to one; Kevin Bracy Knight dissented. Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees designate areas surrounding the Wrangler Trail (the trail is designated as Voice and Sight on-corridor) be designated as dogs on- leash as similar management to Wonderland Lake. Tom Isaacson seconded. This motion passed unanimously. Shelley Dunbar moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to approve the North Trail Study Area Plan as amended and recommend that the Boulder City Council approve the North Trail Study Area Plan as amended. Kevin Bracy Knight seconded. This motion passed three to two; Frances Hartogh and Molly Davis dissented. Tom Isaacson moved the Open Space Board of Trustees to make the following statement: If City Council does not support the North Sky Trail, the OSBT recommends that City Council direct staff to revise a plan based on Scenario A as modified by OSBT votes at the February and March Board meetings. Shelley Dunbar seconded. This motion passed three to two; Frances Hartogh and Kevin Bracy Knight dissented. ADJOURNMENT – The meeting adjourned at 11:31 p.m. These draft minutes were prepared by Leah Case. MEMORANDUM TO: Open Space Board of Trustees FROM: Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks Annie McFarland, Visitor Access Coordinator Heather Swanson, Wildlife Biologist Gabe Wilson, Trail Specialist DATE: April 13, 2016 SUBJECT: Flood Repair on Mesa Trail/Skunk Creek Crossing ________________________________________________________________________ As Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) has continued to implement the West Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan in the era of flood recovery, it has been helpful to have the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) see and participate in various projects as they develop in the field – especially when the nature and condition of trails and resources has changed substantially since the 2013 and more recent deluge events. For example, a site visit helps the OSBT see, first hand, some of the specific challenges of each project and develop a deeper understanding of any revisions that may need to be made in light of the flood. However, scheduling site visits for all five Board members can be time intensive for staff and challenging for Board members to find time in their busy schedules. Also, unless the site visit is open to the public, members of the public cannot benefit from the conversation had during these visits. In light of these challenges, OSMP is piloting an effort to provide OSBT members, and the public, a way to conduct individual self-guided tours on their own time. For example, the attached two-page handout is meant to provide a hands-on, independent tour of proposed improvements to the Mesa Trail where it crosses Skunk Canyon, northwest of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Staff hopes that this format facilitates individual time for familiarizing Board and community members with on-site conditions prior to Board meetings, as well as the opportunity to formulate questions and feedback to be discussed at the OSBT meeting. Following this pilot exercise, staff welcomes feedback from OSBT members on how well the process worked and what improvements could be made in the future. Specific to the proposed improvements to the Mesa Trail at Skunk Canyon, the attached two- page handout provides a brief history of, and introduction to, the project. It also shows important points to stop along the trail with accompanying information to note. The self- guided tour starts at the NCAR water tank which can be located by parking at NCAR and walking west along the NCAR Trail. At the Board meeting on April 13, staff will present an overview of the project and request feedback and input from the Board about the project including effectively preserving natural resources, fitting the project into the landscape, cost implications and other topics. AGENDA ITEM 4C PAGE 1 This page is intentionally left blank. AGENDA ITEM 4C PAGE 2 City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks 2011: The West Trail Study Area Plan 2013: The Flood 2017: Applying Lessons Learned Proposed Improvements to Mesa Trail at Skunk Canyon: A Self-Guided Tour The 2011 West Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan included a recommendation to reroute the Mesa Trail where it crosses Skunk Canyon. The proposal was developed and supported by a group of community volunteers representing a cross- section of community interests. The intention was to move trails to the west, minimize grades in and out of the drainage, install a short bridge if necessary and reroute the trail out of muddy areas on the south side of Skunk Creek. Driving factors included: •Decrease erosion into the drainage, •Decrease trail widening, and •Minimize the distance that the Mesa Trail spends in the Skunk Canyon drainage. In 2013, heavy flood waters scoured the banks of Skunk Creek and destroyed the small footbridge that once connected the trail across the creek. Slopes were substantially de-stablized along the trail, including sections north of the creek that have since been rerouted to improve visitor safety. This major flood event offered many lessons about trail impacts to riparian areas and the sustainability of trail infrastructure in drainages. For example, it brought to light the need to design and build bridges considering such events in the future. It also emphasized wisdom in the West TSA Plan’s driving factors for improving the Mesa Trail in this area. Having learned from the 2013 flood, staff is now proposing two revisions for this area that meet the intent of the West TSA Plan but increase permanence of trail and infrastructure improvements. For example, to accommodate future flooding, the bridge proposed for the canyon crossing would span 50 to 60 feet, longer than the short bridge originally envisioned. In addition, the section of trail north of the creek would not be rerouted or restored, since staff previously addressed critical needs there immediately after the flood. As proposed for 2017, improvements would focus on the Mesa Trail and would not include major changes to the Mallory Cave or NCAR trails. Only minor improvements would be made where they each tie into the Mesa Trail. More details on back Conceptual rendering of proposed bridge looking north, photo: OSMP. Flood damage along Skunk Creek, photo: OSMP. Mesa Trail in muddy conditions south of Skunk Creek, photo: OSMP. City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks Proposed Improvements for 2017: Touring the Site BearCanyon C r e e kSkunkCreek Table Mesa Dr.BearCanyonMalloryCaveMesaMesa(Trail Alignments are Conceptual) Re-route Repair Restore/Close Undesignated Trail Restore/Close Designated Trail No Recommendation (Undesignated) No Recommendation (Designated) Trail Recommendations N.C.A.R. NRevised April 2016 2 3 4 5 Start at the water tank west of NCAR. Head north along the Mesa Trail connector. Current use levels and trail location here create muddy, unsustainable conditions. Per the West TSA Plan, these trail sections south of the creek would be rerouted upslope to the west and restored. If you look closely, you can see flags marking the rerouted location uphill to the west. But be careful if you go exploring up there. Off-trail conditions may be hazardous. Was another option considered? A multidisciplinary staff team explored the possibility of crossing Skunk Creek farther to the east, downstream from where the trail crosses now. This option would require a smaller, less expensive bridge. However, this reroute would not satisfy the intention of the West TSA Plan (see page 1). Muddy sections south of the creek would not be rerouted; the trail would remain in the drainage longer than intended; and erosion into the drainage would not improve substantially. In addition, impacts to healthy riparian vegetation and habitat would be noticeable as the new trail would have to be constructed in the drainage. Be careful crossing Skunk Creek. This drainage was heavily impacted by the flood, and the previous footbridge was destroyed. Per the West TSA Plan, this trail section climbing northwest out of the drainage would be closed and restored to minimize erosion and other trail impacts to riparian vegetation and habitat. Look for proposed bridge location. Before the Mesa Trail switches back to climb northeast out of the canyon, look for a large ponderosa pine with a flat resting spot beneath (photo right, OSMP). About 50’ up canyon is a rock pile - the rough location for siting a new bridge. Future design and engineering would specify a more exact location, materials and bridge span. Head northeast along the Mesa Trail for a view back into the canyon. The last stop of the tour, this section of trail that climbs to the northeast would not be rerouted or restored as the West TSA Plan recommended. Targeted trail reroutes were already made soon after the flood to address critical issues. 1 2 3 5 4 Conceptual rendering of proposed bridge looking east down Skunk Canyon, photo: OSMP. Natural resources in Skunk Canyon. This vegetated riparian area supports bears and shrub-nesting birds, and provides habitat suitable for the federally threatened Preble’s meadow jumping mouse. Upstream from the proposed bridge location, seasonal closures protect Golden Eagle nesting grounds. OSMP believes this project would support or enhance its ability to protect these species. Proposed Improvements to Mesa Trail at Skunk Canyon: A Self-Guided Tour MEMORANDUM TO: Open Space Board of Trustees FROM: Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks Abbie Poniatowski, Central Services Division Manager Lauren Kilcoyne, Finance Manager DATE: April 12, 2016 SUBJECT: Update on Draft 2017 Work Plan and Budget ________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary The purpose of this informational item is to share the preliminary 2017 Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) Department Work Plan and provide the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT) with an overview of the department priorities, budget guiding principles, citywide economic forecast, budget policy issues and operating and capital budget development processes. The OSBT will have an opportunity to ask questions to ensure the OSBT is prepared to review, approve and recommend the Open Space and Mountain Parks Department’s 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and operating expenditures, including Lottery Fund. This series of agenda items is three-fold. This month will include a staff briefing, information sharing and Q&A. In May, staff will present a draft CIP budget for discussion. In June, there will be a public hearing for the community to comment on the proposed 2017-2022 CIP. After considering public comment, the OSBT will make a recommendation. The public will also have an opportunity to comment during the Planning Board’s CIP review in July and City Council’s discussions and review of the 2017 recommended budget during future public hearings later this fall. The staff also has a goal of presenting the operating budget earlier in the budget process relative to previous years. Last year the Board made its recommendation at the August meeting and staff anticipates presenting the proposed operating budget for recommendation by the July meeting. Background Similar to 2016, the Draft 2017 Open Space and Mountain Parks Department Work Plan includes community initiatives as well as core service activities supporting the important work required to protect, maintain and support an open space system of over 45,000 acres. Projects and programs that are a part of the department’s core mission include ongoing strategic property acquisitions; conservation easement compliance; day-to-day and major maintenance of trailheads and trails; agricultural lands management; visitor education, safety and enforcement; ecosystem monitoring, maintenance and restoration; strategic and resource planning; community outreach, education and events; providing media services, web-based information and social media; permitting and fees management; providing support for the OSBT; etc. The core services of any municipal department often can be invisible to its customers, yet are important to manage and maintain the valuable assets supported by the local community. While core service delivery continues throughout the year, OSMP also is pursuing community initiatives in support of Board and City Council goals. OSMP staff teams collaboratively developed proposed departmental work program priorities for 2017. Many of the priorities are familiar to the AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 1 Board and council since they continue to follow through on community commitments. Those community initiatives translated into department priority projects are as follows: Department Priority Projects for 2017 1.Complete Flood Recovery of Trails and Habitat that are FEMA reimbursable and continue work on flood projects that are not reimbursable (includes county coordination); 2.Visitor Master Plan Update to be slightly Recast as Open Space Master Plan or OS(MP)² – Continue plan, completing it in 2018 - establishes policy guidance, goals, objectives, priorities and measures of success across services and programs, and addresses overarching issues such as carrying capacity, night-time and temporal use and climate change mitigation and adaptation; 3.Implement Top Priorities of West TSA, North TSA, Agricultural Resource Management Plan, and reduce facility deficiencies and maintenance backlogs. Implement plans through the formation of cross-departmental implementation teams convened for each plan; 4.Continue to Implement Grassland Ecosystem Management Plan and Forest Ecosystem Management Plan (FEMP), giving special attention/guidance to elements that need updating or refreshing, particularly the FEMP. The OS(MP)² may be a good opportunity for such guidance. 5.Continue to Improve the Visitor Experience – Implement Community Ranger model; continue the development of the Community Connections division; focus on community and department relationships and interdepartmental coordination. Follow through on initiatives such as recycling/dog waste composting at trailheads and monitoring and reporting results on Voice & Sight program. 6.Develop Regional Trails through strategic property acquisition, coordination with other agencies, and other avenues as needed (e.g., Eldorado to Walker Ranch, Joder and the Boulder Creek Path extension). 7.Focus on Continuous Improvement within the OSMP Department - Such as to continue to assess and develop best practices related to OSMP’s scientific approach, data stewardship, recreation planning and design, work plan and budget management, staff training and development, staff work space, equipment and facilities, communication and coordination internally and externally. These department priority projects, in addition to supporting core services, are informing the draft 2016 operating and capital budgets. As staff plans for 2017, OSMP recognizes the need to remain flexible considering the community and City Council’s interests, as well as a department that is experiencing organizational change with the implementation of a new structure and inclusion of new talent on the OSMP team. An example of maintaining flexibility includes the strong message from council at its January retreat to give the community a “breather” from significant public process on Open Space planning initiatives. Following the acceptance of the North TSA and the Agricultural AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 2 Resources Management Plan, the staff will bring a recommended scope and schedule to the OSBT for consideration, likely in the first half of 2017. The community process “breather” will be advantageous to updating the Visitor Master Plan/OSMP Master Plan since it allows time for data gathering, surveying and inventory work, which will inform the issues and scoping of the planning process. Budget Commitment and Guiding Principles While developing the above-listed priorities, staff also developed a set of Budget Guiding Principles, provided below, to support decisions regarding expenditures: Open Space and Mountain Parks is committed to fiscal responsibility and sustainability. Judiciously generating and investing funds. Creating, optimizing and maintaining a budget which manages debt and plans for near- and long-term futures. Maintaining financial transparency. These principles will guide the development and prioritization of the OSMP budget and work plan: SAFETY FIRST OSMP will first address essential safety issues for visitors and staff. PLAY BY THE RULES Comply with all (internal, local, state and federal) laws, regulations, policies, etc. TAKE CARE OF WHAT WE HAVE As top priority, restore and maintain valuable ecological systems, agricultural operations, trails and trailheads. As additions are made to the system, address ongoing operation and maintenance needs. Continue to innovate and advance efficiency in the restoration, protection, operation, investments in and maintenance of the OSMP system. Specifically, efficiencies will be sought through: Investments in regular maintenance (taking care of what we have to extend life cycle), and Reductions in resource waste and use. STICK TO THE PLAN Actions committed to in plans or agreements should be included in either short-, mid- or long- term budgets and work plans so staff can answer the question: “When do you plan to take this action on this project?” Strategically enhance visitor amenities, ecological systems, and agricultural operations, prioritizing projects that will best achieve resource and master plan objectives. AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 3 LEVERAGE OTHER FUNDING Leverage external funds, especially long-term funding, and capacity extending the ability of local dollars to implement OSMP plans. Continue to involve community members as volunteers to advance the departmental mission and management objectives. Work with partner agencies to accomplish shared goals. Take no actions which would compromise the city’s bond rating or ability to leverage debt. ADAPT AND LEARN Advance research and monitoring to increase the likelihood of success and better integrate principles of sustainability and resilience. Citywide Economic Forecast Important new information for the OSBT is that 2015 sales and use tax revenues for the City of Boulder came in lower than projected. The city’s budget office will be developing revenue projections that are likely to be lower than previously projected. Furthermore, the city’s Chief Financial Officer, Bob Eichem, is recommending that the 2017 Budget be more conservative overall. As part of the annual budget process, the City’s Budget Office generates projections for taxes and conservation trust fund allocations at the end of April for next year’s budget development. Hopefully, staff will have updated projections from the Budget Office prior to the May budget recommendation; however, if the final projections are not available in time, OSMP staff will be preparing a draft budget that is relatively conservative. The approved 2016-2021 CIP and the Operating Budget are included for reference (Attachments A and B). Budget Policy Issues The OSMP budget theme for 2017 is “Refine and Realign.” The department continues to assess its ability to be quality stewards of the OSMP system whether through evaluating adequate space and facilities for operations and management, adequate investment in assets (trails, habitat, buildings, water infrastructure) in the system, or appropriate support for visitor services to meet the provisions of the Open Space charter. Recommendations from these analyses likely will influence multiple budget years, not just the 2017 proposed budget. Following a 2015 departmental reorganization, OSMP is committed to understanding the staff resources needed to manage a land management operation that delivers services and programs to the Boulder community. In reviewing OSMP’s organizational structure, staff has also been analyzing current staffing to help ensure we are staffed to support the charter and department priorities. Similar to other departments, staff is working with Human Resources to make sure that OSMP is consistent with the intent and compliant with the Affordable Care Act. It appears likely that budget adjustments will be recommended for health coverage for qualifying employees. Operating and Capital Budget Development Processes Key dates for the budget development processes are included below: AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 4 Milestone Date Citywide CIP Information Sharing Meeting April 1 OSBT Information Item (1st Touch) April 12 Budget Guidelines and Targets to Departments April 18 1st Draft CIP to Planning April 29 Budget and Revenue Update to City Council May 10 OSBT Draft CIP Discussion Item (2nd Touch) May 10 Proposed Operating and CIP Budget Submittals Due to CMO May 31 OSBT CIP Public Hearing, Discussion and Recommendation (3rd Touch) June 14 Executive Budget Meeting with OSMP June 30 OSBT Operating Budget Public Hearing, Discussion and Recommendation July 12 Planning Board CIP Hearing July 28 City Council CIP Study Session August 9 City Council Budget Study Session September 13 City Council Budget Consideration (1st & 2nd Readings) October 4 & 18 ATTACHMENTS A: 2016 – 2021 CIP B: 2016 Operating Budget AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 5 This page is intentionally left blank. AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 6 Table 12-1: 2016-2021 Funding Summary By Department Estimated Total Cost2016 Approved 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected Unfunded AmountOPEN SPACE & MOUNTAIN PARKS $ 49,060,930 $ 11,900,930 $ 7,945,000 $ 7,455,000 $ 7,390,000 $ 7,290,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT $ 11,324,600 $ 4,074,600 $ 1,975,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,300,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 572,600 $ 572,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ 75,000 $ 175,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 852,000 $ 252,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 1,700,000 $ 350,000 $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - CIP-CAPITAL MAINTENANCE $ 3,036,330 $ 1,626,330 $ 270,000 $ 280,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ - $ 720,000 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 360,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 991,000 $ 991,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 205,330 $ 205,330 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CIP-LAND ACQUISITION $ 34,200,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ 5,700,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ 32,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ 5,400,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - CIP-NEW FACILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ - Boulder Creek Bikepath Extension $ - Mineral Rights Acquisition $ 100,000 OSMP Real Estate Acquisition $ 5,400,000 Water Rights Acquisition $ 200,000 Hartnagle House Restoration $ - South Mesa Trailhead Bridge $ - Subtotal $ 5,700,000 Farm Site Improvements $ 60,000 Flood Trails $ - Foothills Nature Center $ - Agriculture Facilities Projects $ 120,000 Boulder & S Bldr Crk Flood Repair $ - Cultural Resource/Facility Restorat $ 100,000 Visitor Infrastructure System Wide $ 500,000 WTSA Implementation $ 150,000 Subtotal $ 280,000 S.Bldr Crk at E.Bldr Ditch Const $ - South Boulder Creek Instream $ - STSA - Plan and Implementation $ - OSMP Innovations $ 100,000 OSMP Master Plan Update $ 100,000 Flood Eng. Trails $ - Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage $ - NTSA - Plan and Implementation $ 100,000 Boulder Crk Above 95th $ - ETSA - Plan and Implementation $ 50,000 Facility Modifications-Space $ 100,000 Department Total $ 7,080,000 Subtotal $ 1,100,000 2019 ProjectedAGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 7 Open Space and Mountain Parks Mapping The mapping for CIP projects is now in a GIS-based electronic map accessed here. All the map- able projects proposed for funding in the 2016-2021 are shown. If the icons are clicked, the pro- ject name, project number (referenced on the project sheets), department, funding source, and year with initial funding will be shown. For many projects the initial funding is currently showing as 2015 as projects have funding for planning and design before actual construction however, the construction timing may be in the future. Please consult the project sheets in each department section for project descriptions, phasing and funding information. Projects with funding ear- marked for citywide or system improvements are not shown on the map. Ongoing refinement of the GIS-based map will result in greater clarity of project information. AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 8 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 9 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 10 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 11 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 12 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 13 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 14 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 15 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 16 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 17 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 18 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 19 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 20 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 21 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 22 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 23 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 24 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 25 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 26 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 27 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 28 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 29 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 30 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 31 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 32 Open Space and Mountain Parks AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 33 This page is intentionally left blank. AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 34 City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks 2016 Annual Budget $35,828,657 The mission of the Open Space and Mountain Parks Department (OSMP) is to preserve and protect the natural environment and land resources that characterize Boulder. We foster appreciation and uses that sustain the natural values of the land for current and future generations. Department Overview Executive Team  The OSMP Executive Team ensures strategic alignment of OSMP projects with the department’s mission and priorities.  This workgroup includes the Executive Director, Science Officer, Community Relations Officer, and the four Division Managers of the divisions outlined below. Resources and Stewardship The Resources and Stewardship workgroup enhances Boulder’s natural environment by protecting its agricultural, cultural, and water assets. This workgroup contains expertise in: Preservation and restoration of agricultural, water, historical and cultural resources; Tracking and monitoring of the variety of systems across OSMP; and Ecological systems. Open Space and Mountain Parks Resources & Stewardship Trails & Facilities Central Services Community Connections & Partnerships Executive Team AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 35 Open Space and Mountain Parks Department Overview (cont’d)   Trails and Facilities The Trails and Facilities workgroup supports the design, construction, and maintenance of OSMP’s physical assets. This workgroup manages and maintains OSMP’s: Trails, trailheads and access points, Acquired properties, and Equipment and vehicle assets. Community Connections and Partnerships The Community Connections and Partnerships workgroup engages community members around the mission and vision of OSMP. This workgroup coordinates activities and messaging around: Environmental planning and sustainability; Education and Outreach programs, including volunteer projects and services and the Junior Ranger Program; and Ranger Services. Central Services The Central Services workgroup provides support for the daily internal operations of the Department. This workgroup offers real estate, information resources, administrative, and financial services, including: Acquisition of land interests and management of easement requests; Data management, Geographic Information Systems, Web Site management, etc; Support of the Open Space Board of Trustees (OSBT), front office, permitting and program support (such as Voice and Sight programs), and Preparation and analysis of the OSMP budget and monitoring of the parking fee, cash management, and timesheet databases. AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 36 Open Space and Mountain Parks Table 8-40: Open Space and Mountain Parks Summary Budget 2015 Accomplishments In 2015, the Open Space and Mountain Parks Department set forward six departmental priorities to guide its work. Accomplishments within these priority areas include: Ongoing flood recovery Continued work with FEMA to secure funding for OSMP flood recovery projects including road, trail, and fence repair Created plans to complete all flood recovery projects by 2017 Completed construction and habitat restoration on major projects including: Gregory Canyon trailhead and access road Sanitas Valley Trail South Mesa/Shanahan Trail Bear Canyon Road Draft North Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan Completed undesignated trail inventory for North Trail Study Area Completed Resource Inventories for the North Trail Study Area Completed a draft TSA plan to finalize with Council next year Implement projects recommended in the West Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan Completed a new trail in the West Sanitas/Wittemyer area Began design on the Anemone Hill area with plans to complete this project by 2017 2014 Actual 2015 Approved 2016 Approved Central Services 23.96 22.96 30.65 Community and Partnerships 26.63 29.63 34.50 Trails and Facilities 17.31 21.31 26.50 Resources and Stewardship 23.70 28.45 25.50 TOTAL STAFFING 91.60 102.35 117.15 Central Services 2,428,642 3,175,627 4,165,557 Community and Partnerships 2,716,691 3,646,782 3,826,613 Trails and Facilities 2,399,515 3,725,484 4,048,912 Resources and Stewardship 3,186,240 4,777,158 3,859,992 Capital Improvement Program, Cost Allocations and Debt Service 21,728,261 14,811,900 19,927,582 TOTAL EXPENDITURE 32,459,350$ 30,136,952$ 35,828,657$ General 152,346$ 148,889$ 154,334$ Lottery 353,303 355,300 360,630 Open Space and Mountain Parks 31,953,701 29,632,763 35,313,693 TOTAL FUNDING 32,459,350$ 30,136,952$ 35,828,657$ STAFFING EXPENDITURE FUND AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 37 Open Space and Mountain Parks 2015 Accomplishments (cont’d) Draft Agricultural Resource Management Plan Continued agriculture infrastructure repair, including fence repair from flood damage Began research into seeding project to reduce fertilizers and improve rotation. A pilot project will begin in 2016 based on findings Continued work with real estate work group to integrate newly acquired properties and interests into the plan Plan drafted by end of year for review in 2016 Improve the visitor experience Operated over 50 volunteer projects to engage more than 1,000 volunteers in over 5,000 hours of community service In accordance with OSMP’s Real Estate Acquisition Plan, purchased over 20 acres of land across the Schnell, Robert Oliver, and Coleman properties, valued over $2,350,000 Continued major renovation of the Hartnagle House and farmstead outbuildings to make them usable for farm tenants Continued assessment of the Viele House At the time of reporting, engaged in ongoing negotiations to acquire properties and interests to meet the goals of the 2014 Open Space bond issue of $10,000,000. Completed analysis of the pilot Voice & Sight Tag Program and utilized findings to improve the program, launch new training, and update system. Develop regional trails Completed a new trail in the West Sanitas/Wittemyer area Continue noxious weed eradication, suppression and containment in accordance with city, county and state regulations Continue ongoing ecological restoration projects Continue grassland monitoring Key Initiatives for 2016 The Open Space and Mountain Parks Department has set forward six departmental priorities to guide its work in 2016. These priority areas include: Ongoing flood recovery of trails and habitat Submit the final North Trail Study Area (TSA) Plan Begin Visitor Master Plan update to be recast as Open Space Master Plan Implement top priorities of West TSA, North TSA, Agricultural Resource Management, and Forest and Grassland Management Plans Continue to improve the visitor experience Continue to develop regional trails AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 38 Table 8-41: Open Space and Mountain Parks Significant Changes Between 2015 and 2016 Budget Open Space and Mountain Parks 2015 Approved Budget 2016 Approved Budget Total Change 2015 FTE 2016 FTE FTE Change Agricultural Resources Management Plan Implementation $ - $ - $ 15,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Climate Change Adaption - 5,000 5,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Associate Planner 100,056 73,969 (26,087) 1.00 1.00 0.00 Cultural Resources Technician - Upgrade to 1.0 FTE and Extend Fixed-Term for Three Years 36,466 54,845 18,379 0.50 1.00 0.50 Maintenance III Trails Specialist 41,914 63,000 21,086 0.00 1.00 1.00 Trail Contract and Project Manager - Extend Fixed-Term for One Year 91,151 97,000 5,849 1.00 1.00 0.00 Water Resources Technician - Extend Fixed-Term for Three Years 61,385 52,400 (8,985) 1.00 1.00 0.00 Administrative Specialist III - Two-Year Fixed-Term - 73,500 73,500 0.00 1.00 1.00 Ranger On-call/Standby 300,000 303,000 3,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Seasonal Resource Information Staff - 55,000 55,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Seasonal Sign Group Increase - 38,500 38,500 0.00 0.00 0.00 Addition of 25 Vehicles to Fleet - Shift from Lease to Ownership - 900,000 900,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction in Lease Vehicle Costs 165,000 - (165,000) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Junior Ranger Seasonal Funding - 177,500 177,500 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shift Trails Seasonal Funding from CIP to Operating Budget (no net budget impact) 237,154 237,154 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Changes, Open Space and Mountain Parks 1,112,742$ 2.50 OPEN SPACE FUND AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 39 Table 8-42: Open Space and Mountain Parks Department Detail Open Space and Mountain Parks Standard FTE Amount Standard FTE Amount Standard FTE Amount Standard FTE Amount Department Administration 13.45 1,238,810$ 12.50 1,894,186$ 15.00 2,262,554$ 2.50 368,368$ 1.01 114,255 1.01 61,058 1.01 61,058 - 0 4.65 515,391 4.65 684,410 7.30 904,643 2.65 220,233 Conservation Easement Compliance 1.01 112,413 1.01 61,058 1.00 66,442 (0.01) 5,383 Real Estate Acquisition OSMP 1.26 140,238 1.26 157,278 1.00 96,758 (0.26) (60,520) Real Estate Services to OSMP 1.26 140,238 1.26 157,278 4.07 619,769 2.81 462,491 Real Estate Services to General Fund 1.32 167,297 1.27 160,359 1.27 154,334 - (6,025) Subtotal 23.96 2,428,642$ 22.96 3,175,627$ 30.65 4,165,557$ 7.69 989,930$ Community Outreach 8.41 1,032,565 7.41 930,141 7.00 848,316 (0.41) (81,825) Public Relations - - 4.00 657,479 5.00 569,623 1.00 (87,856) Ranger Naturalist Services 17.69 1,462,132 17.69 1,829,624 22.00 2,060,029 4.31 230,405 Junior Rangers 0.53 221,994 0.53 229,538 0.50 348,645 (0.03) 119,107 Subtotal 26.63 2,716,691$ 29.63 3,646,782$ 34.50 3,826,613$ 4.87 179,831$ Facility Management 5.24 783,865 6.24 1,000,476 7.00 1,657,733 0.76 657,257 Rapid Response 1.04 134,553 1.04 87,725 1.00 87,725 (0.04) - Signs 2.10 314,145 2.10 267,173 2.00 235,375 (0.10) (31,797) Trail Maintenance and Construction 4.73 574,775 7.73 1,541,137 12.50 1,683,980 4.77 142,843 4.20 592,177 4.20 828,973 4.00 384,099 (0.20) (444,874) Subtotal 17.31 2,399,515$ 21.31 3,725,484$ 26.50 4,048,912$ 5.19 323,428$ Agricultural Land Management 2.03 275,773$ 2.03 273,017$ 2.00 273,017$ (0.03) (0)$ Water Rights Administration 2.10 285,283 3.10 448,057 3.00 436,803 (0.10) (11,253) Cultural Resources Program 1.01 112,741 1.51 186,489 2.00 190,824 0.49 4,335$ 1.53 248,792 1.53 311,255 1.50 311,255 (0.03) (0)$ 2.22 360,993 2.22 475,119 2.00 475,119 (0.22) 0 0.91 147,975 0.91 209,362 1.00 209,362 0.09 0 Integrated Pest Management 2.01 326,845 2.26 498,868 2.50 498,868 0.24 (0) Monitoring & Visitation Studies 3.13 257,610 3.13 333,808 2.00 441,003 (1.13) 107,195 Payments to Fire Districts - 78,030 - 78,030 - 78,030 - - 4.18 344,028 7.18 976,365 5.00 278,969 (2.18) (697,396) 1.22 198,383 1.22 271,718 1.50 271,718 0.28 (0) 3.36 549,787 3.36 715,069 3.00 395,023 (0.36) (320,046) Subtotal 23.70 3,186,240$ 28.45 4,777,158$ 25.50 3,859,992$ (2.95) (917,166)$ Wetland and Aquatic Management Program Wildlife and Habitats Ecological Restoration Program Forest Ecosystem Management Program Grassland Ecosystem Management Program Regional, Master, and Related Planning and Plan Implementation Coordination Variance - 2015 Approved to 2016 Approved2014 Actual 2016 Approved Budget 2015 Approved Budget Central Services Resources and Stewardship Dog Tag, Permit and Facility Leasing Programs Resource Information Services Trailhead Maintenance and Construction STAFFING AND EXPENDITURE BY PROGRAM Community and Partnerships Trails and Facilities AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 40 Table 8-42: Open Space and Mountain Parks Department Detail (cont’d) Open Space and Mountain Parks Capital Improvement Program 11,966,192$ 7,964,000$ 12,295,300$ 4,331,300$ Cost Allocation 1,066,954 1,348,701 1,577,657 228,956 Debt Service 8,695,115 5,499,199 6,054,625 555,426 Subtotal 21,728,261$ 14,811,900$ 19,927,582$ 5,115,682$ Total 91.60 32,459,350$ 102.35 30,136,952$ 117.15 35,828,657$ 14.80 5,691,705$ Personnel 8,800,957$ 10,884,911$ 10,253,522$ (631,389)$ Operating 1,044,226 3,601,928 4,546,328 944,400 Interdepartmental Charges 885,905 838,213 1,101,225 263,012 Capital 11,966,193 7,964,000 12,295,300 4,331,300 Debt Service 8,695,115 5,499,199 6,054,625 555,426 Cost Allocation 1,066,954 1,348,701 1,577,657 228,956 Total 32,459,350$ 30,136,952$ 35,828,657$ 5,691,705$ General 1.32 152,346$ 1.27 148,889$ 1.27 154,334$ - 5,445$ Lottery - 353,303$ - 355,300 - 360,630 - 5,330 Open Space and Mountain Parks 90.28 31,953,701$ 101.08 29,632,763 115.88 35,313,693 14.80 5,680,930 Total 91.60 32,459,350$ 102.35 30,136,952$ 117.15 35,828,657$ 14.80 5,691,705$ Note: STAFFING AND EXPENDITURE BY FUND EXPENDITURE BY CATEGORY Capital Improvement Program, Cost Allocations and Debt Service Changes to the layout of the OSMP Department Detail Page and the addition of 12 FTE are the result of departmental reorganization. Standard FTE Amount Standard FTE Amount Standard FTE Amount Standard FTE Amount Variance - 2015 Approved to 2016 Approved2014 Actual 2016 Approved Budget 2015 Approved Budget AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 41 Table 9-23: Open Space Fund, 2016 Fund Financial 20142015201620172018201920202021Actual Revised Approved Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedBeginning Fund Balance17,032,351$ 30,300,718$ 15,995,892$ 13,485,867$ 15,598,477$ 19,154,258$ 21,552,840$ 19,081,072$ Sources of FundsNet Sales Tax Revenue28,425,675$ 29,286,214$ 30,572,783$ 31,216,301$ 32,331,488$ 29,301,107$ 24,436,628$ 25,310,661$ FEMA Flood Reuimbursement89,839 - - - - - - - Investment Income95,131 101,247 104,000 107,120 110,334 113,644 117,053 120,565 Lease and Miscellaneous Revenue712,242 439,109 822,978 681,932 702,389 723,461 745,165 767,520 Voice & Sight Tag Program Revenue77,791 131,500 227,000 227,000 227,000 227,000 227,000 227,000 Bond Proceeds - 201410,135,898 - - - - - - - General Fund Transfer1,103,384 1,166,175 1,166,175 1,208,122 1,245,832 1,284,720 - - Grants105,313 - - - - - - - Total Sources of Funds40,745,272$ 31,124,245$ 32,892,936$ 33,440,475$ 34,617,043$ 31,649,932$ 25,525,846$ 26,425,745$ Uses of FundsGeneral Operating Expenditures10,731,098$ 15,262,996$ 15,157,879$ 16,277,781$ 16,635,893$ 17,001,882$ 17,375,924$ 17,758,194$ Supplemental Operating- 418,175 - - - - - - Carryover/ATB Operating- 82,707 - - - - - - Increase to 2016 base - operating increases- - 1,067,500 - - - - - Cost Allocation1,066,954 1,446,908 1,577,657 1,656,540 1,739,367 1,826,335 1,917,652 2,013,535 CIP- Capital EnhancementCapital-Boulder Creek above 95th St. Flood Restoration - - 500,000 - - - - - Capital-East TSA- - - - 200,000 50,000 200,000 200,000 Capital-OSMP Facility Mods (Space Needs)14,597 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital- Flood Eng. Trails570,940 -417,300 -----Capital-Goodhue Ditch Fish Passage- - - 300,000 - - - - Capital-North TSA50,000 50,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 Capital-Innovations- - - 75,000 175,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital-OSMP Master Plan Update- - 252,000 200,000 100,000 100000100000100,000 Capital-S. Boulder Crrek at E.Boulder Ditch Headgate Reconfiguration Flood Repair - - - 300,000 - - - - Capital-South Boulder Creek Instream Flow101,912 150,000 2,000,000 - - - - - Capital-South TSA- - - - - - 200,000 100,000 Capital-Visitor Infrastructure CIP350,000 - 100,000 200,000 200,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Capital-Visitor Infrastructure CIP Carryover575,584 600,000 - - - - - - Capital-West TSA500,000 - 350,000 500,000 400,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Capital-West TSA Carryover73,561 494,971 - - - - - - CIP- Capital MaintenanceCapital-Agriculture Facilities- 100,000 110,000 110,000 120,000 120,000 130,000 130,000 Capital-Boulder and S. BoulderCreek Area Flood Restoration- - 100,000 - - - - - OPEN SPACE AND MOUNTAIN PARKSAGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 42 Table 9-23: Open Space Fund, 2016 Fund Financial (cont’d) 20142015201620172018201920202021Actual Revised Approved Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedCapital-Cultural Resources/Facility Restor.- 60,000 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital-Farm Site Improvements- - 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Capital- Flood Trails- - 991,000 - - - - - Capital- Foothills Nature Center- - - - - - - - Capital-Hartnagle House Restoration- 65,000 100,000 - - - - - Capital-South Mesa Trailhead Bridge- - 60,000 - - - - - CIP- Capital Planning StudiesRadio System Analysis--5,000 -----LIDAR/Aerial Imaging34,406-------CIP- Land AcquisitionCapital-Real Estate Acquisition5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 5,400,000 Capital-Real Estate Acquisition Carryover273,867 3,444,322 - - - - - - Capital-Real Estate Acquisition 2014 Bond3,231,027 - - - - - - - Capital-Real Estate Acq 2014 Bond Carryover- 6,888,000 - - - - - - Capital-Water Rights Acquisition200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Capital-Water Rights Acquisition Carryover129,115 329,115 - - - - - - Capital-Mineral Rights Acquisition100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital-Mineral Rights Acquisition Carryover361,184 461,184 - - - - - - CIP- New Facility/InfrastructureCapital-Boulder Crk Bikepath Extension- - 500,000 - - - - - Debt Service - BMPA2,091,148 1,701,487 1,587,507 986,926 760,283 661,746 661,682 593,655 Debt Service - Bonds & Notes6,603,967 4,380,006 4,467,118 4,461,618 4,470,719 2,681,387 652,356 653,456 Total Uses of Funds32,459,360$ 45,429,071$ 35,402,961$ 31,327,865$ 31,061,261$ 29,251,350$ 27,997,614$ 28,308,839$ Ending Fund Balance Before Reserves30,300,718$ 15,995,892$ 13,485,867$ 15,598,477$ 19,154,258$ 21,552,840$ 19,081,072$ 17,197,978$ ReservesOSBT Contingency Reserve3,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 4,467,118$ 4,461,618$ 4,470,719$ 2,681,387$ 652,356$ 653,456$ Pay Period 27 Reserve50,000 146,000 242,000 338,000 434,000 530,000 626,000 722,000 Sick/Vacation/Bonus Reserve490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 490,000 Property and Casualty Reserve400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 FEMA De-obligation Reserve6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 6,289 South Boulder Creek Flow Reserve 1,750,000 2,000,000 - - - - - - IBM Connector Trail- 200,000 - - - - - - Vehicle Acquisition Reserve150,000 300,000 - - - - - - Facility Maintenance Reserve100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 Total Reserves6,446,289$ 6,242,289$ 5,905,407$ 6,095,907$ 6,301,008$ 4,707,676$ 2,874,645$ 3,071,745$ Ending Fund Balance After Reserves23,854,429$ 9,753,603$ 7,580,460$ 9,502,570$ 12,853,250$ 16,845,164$ 16,206,427$ 14,126,233$ AGENDA ITEM 4D PAGE 43 MEMORANDUM TO: Open Space Board of Trustees FROM: Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks Mark Davison, Community Connections and Partnerships Division Manager Abbie Poniatowski, Central Services Division Manager John Potter, Resources and Stewardship Division Manager DATE: April 2, 2016 SUBJECT: Staff update on exploratory talks for a Conservancy to provide private funding to support OSMP priority programs and projects ________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary The purpose of this memo is to provide the City of Boulder’s Open Space Board of Trustees with background information and seek input and guidance for exploring a concept for creating a Conservancy to support Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) with private funding. This memo includes:  Background information on why to explore a Conservancy to support OSMP;  Framework to explore the Conservancy concept, project details such as who is involved, current status and next steps, and proposed timeline for input, review and approvals;  Preliminary focus areas for a Conservancy; and  Precedent cases (Appendix A). Why explore a Conservancy to support OSMP? To address critical needs and emerging trends, park and open space systems across the country are partnering with nonprofit, philanthropic organizations. These organizations are able to pick up where typical public funding leaves off, to help ensure bright futures for our communities’ most special places. The role of the Conservancy and the associated board is not to act as an advocacy group, but to raise private funds that will support program areas not typically provided for by public funds. The board members’ focus is to be able to raise funds through private, grant, and corporate avenues to support OSMP priority programs and projects. The exploration of a Conservancy to support and supplement funding to better fulfill the charter and mission of OSMP is now on the table. Such a Conservancy has the potential to raise funds to make strategic investments that will yield significant impacts for protecting our land and the enjoyment of the citizens who own it. OSMP has been approached with this concept by several private citizens who have asked if it is possible to partner and consider exploring the concept together. This forward-thinking AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 1 approach could reap benefits if coordinated well with OSMP direction, supporting projects and programs that add value to the system beyond what the city provides. Framework to consider developing a Conservancy A framework for exploring the concept is described below within a series of steps that would investigate feasibility, need, review precedents, complete outreach with interested parties, as well as seek board and council approval. Step 1: Discuss concept with Conservancy proponent group Meet with proponents to:  Discuss overall concept,  Develop an approach for exploring the concept,  Identify Conservancy needs, opportunities, gaps, risks, stakeholders, and  Consider the process, review stages and approvals needed to create the Conservancy. Due Date: Spring 2016 Step 2: Preliminary discussion to understand viability and legal implications Meet with city finance staff to discuss financial implications. Meet with city attorney to discuss legal implications. Conservancy proponents canvass potential supporters. Discuss process for informing board and council as well as seeking approval to move forward. Meet with Board of Trustees to discuss:  Concept,  Approach and benefits,  Funding and risk, and  Ask for approval to proceed to Memorandum of Intent (MOI) stage with council concurrence (Step 3). Due Date: Summer 2016 Step 3: Develop MOI Conservancy group in partnership with OSMP staff to conduct feasibility study to further test financial viability and provide proof of concept. Further explore precedents to understand opportunities and risks for this concept including Boulder Library and Parks and Recreation Department. Discuss with OSMP staff, stakeholders, board, city attorney, and council for input. AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 2 Conservancy proponents work with OSMP to develop:  Approach to charter purpose including governance and articles of agreement,  Partnership roles,  Organizational structure and approvals,  Potential OSMP prioritized programs and projects, and  Funding mechanisms and strategies for private fund raising that will add value to existing public funding streams. OSMP works with Conservancy proponents to consider input from public, staff and stakeholders on concept. Meet with Board and Council:  Ask for approval from board and council to proceed with developing Conservancy concept. Due Date: Fall 2016 Step 4: Conservancy is created Support Conservancy proponents within scope of MOI to:  Develop charter and purpose with governance and articles of agreement (by-laws),  Apply for 501c3 status,  Provide prioritized list of programs and projects that will require Conservancy funding,  Consider funding mechanisms and strategies for OSMP prioritized programs and projects,  Launch Conservancy, and  Draft preliminary Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) from MOI. Meet with Board and Council:  Board and council recognize conservancy through a charter agreement that defines governance, articles of agreement and by-laws. Due Date: Fall 2017 Step 5: Develop MOU from MOI Discuss MOU with OSMP staff, stakeholders, board, and council for input. Work with conservancy proponents to refine:  Clearly define partnership roles,  Formalize organizational structure and approvals,  Finalize OSMP prioritized list of programs and projects that will require Conservancy funding, and  Launch fund raising campaign for OSMP prioritized programs and projects. AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 3 Meet with Board and Council:  Bring MOU to board and council for review and approval, and  Define metrics to track progress and success. Due Date: Spring 2018 Potential Conservancy Focus Areas for Discussion Five focus concept areas have initially emerged with the aim to add value by sharing our decades-old legacy of innovative land management with others, affirming our connection with nature, encouraging youth to identify with nature, increasing community food connections, and ensuring there are inclusive opportunities for everyone in our community to conserve, connect with and enjoy OSMP lands. Below is a summary of the five focus areas concepts: Concept Focus Area 1: Regional Conservation and Nature Access Institute Boulder is renowned for its clean water, fresh air, healthy wildlife habitat, and beauty. People live here for these reasons, and they can depend on OSMP to safeguard those qualities across the region from the Flatirons on the west to the grasslands on the east. A unique set of high- quality programs has been set up over time to address the use, protection, and management of open space lands. We can create an institute of learning to share this unique Boulder approach on a national stage with hundreds of students, professionals and other governments; while continuing our own local dialogue on the best practices for managing OSMP lands. The roles of planning and science have been employed for decades to consider long-term sustainable conservation and access approaches. The institute would continue this tradition and meet head on the challenges for our future by considering and sharing strategies for current and future generations to protect nature, agriculture and recreation and providing education as well as connections to these resources. It is also recognized that OSMP is not the only leader in our community and so the institute could consider the various areas where Boulder is a national leader. For instance, the nation looks to Boulder’s transportation system and climate commitment as models, both of which could be incorporated into a broader institute concept, if desired. Concept Focus Area 2: New Headquarters and Community Center A new headquarters is needed to house OMSP staff under a single roof where knowledge can be easily shared and the department can efficiently carry out operations to fulfill our mission. In addition, this project affords an opportunity to include a Community Center that offers quality, experiential environmental education programs and teaches outdoor recreation skills to youth and underrepresented and under participating groups. The center can promote environmental stewardship and outdoor recreation skills to thousands of people through collaborations with school districts and community-based organizations. AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 4 Concept Focus Area 3: Connect with Nature through Volunteer and Service Programs People depend on nature and a natural setting for peace, quiet, inspiration, renewal, exhilaration, and enjoyment. OSMP provides opportunities to immerse oneself in nature and give back by learning, volunteering, and connecting to the outdoors. This is accomplished through innovative programs such as Raptor Monitoring, Mountain Bike Patrols, Bat Monitoring, and many others. We can expand these programs to encourage a greater connection to nature for all of our citizens by teaching programs that foster a wider understanding of conservation, learning outdoor skills, and providing opportunities for activity groups, nonprofits, local businesses, and agency partners to work more closely with us to further fulfill our mission. These programs could be particularly impactful to underrepresented populations, and align with other city efforts to engage low-income and minority community members. With enhanced programs and projects we will be able to attract thousands of new Boulder volunteers every year, create a greater connection for Boulder community members with nature and provide more opportunities for local businesses to give back. Concept Focus Area 4: Youth Access to Nature Nature supports healthy, active outdoor lifestyles. Whether you’re picnicking at the first overlook off Flagstaff Road, strolling through a forest listening for birds along Shanahan Ridge or jogging on the South Boulder Creek Trail, you will continue a tradition that stretches back decades. Many of us take this for granted but know there is a need to create an environment where youth can see how very special and valuable these local outdoor opportunities are. To do this we can build confidence, teach skills and provide access opportunities so our children gain an appreciation for the outdoors by developing programs that focus on these areas. We can develop programs that teach children the outdoor skills they need to feel confident when they enter nature; we can develop youth ambassadors able to articulate the value of protecting lands. Youth emerging from an OSMP program will be able to find a trail on the map, identify an eagle, know the leave no trace ethic, appreciate how to hike safely, and learn camping and fishing skills. This passport to nature will attempt to ensure that youth at Boulder schools have junior ranger experience beginning at age six to twelve and advancing into their high school years by programs that provide outdoor areas to play and learn in nature, opportunities to develop outdoor skills expertise and eventually to become ambassadors to educate other youth about the importance of conserving nature. These programs can also create pathways to careers in environmental stewardship (again where our low-income and minority populations are underrepresented). Concept Focus Area 5: Community Connections to Food Having farms nearby makes our community happier, healthier and resilient. By protecting farmland we create an agricultural backyard for people living in the urban area. Farming supports strong, resilient communities where people want to live and encourages investment AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 5 in the vitality of the local community. Future programs will enable families to know where their food comes from, know who produces it for them; learn about and be reminded of their local connections in local grocery stores; be able to learn how to tend a field and have access to land and resources to try it themselves; run a community plot outside the urban area and have the potential to stay overnight on it; and participate in events on local farms that bring the community together and are a fun way for children to learn about farms. Activities can be explored that will connect our community with food including farm events, education programs for schools, community allotments, food forests, farm markets, farm stands, demonstration farms, and farm camps. Connecting local families to farming and food is a legacy that ensures continued community vitality. These efforts are also connected to the city’s local food initiative. Concept Focus Area 6: Opportunities for All Grant Program Diverse communities should feel ownership, safe and welcome on OSMP lands. Working together, OSMP and partners can create opportunities for all of our residents to work at, play in and care for these special places to ensure everyone gains from the benefits of conserving nature, food production, and recreation activities. We need to further reach out and develop programs with underserved community partners to foster a love of nature, food production and recreation activities. Our goal is to work with culturally-specific, low-income communities, elderly, and persons experiencing disabilities in places where OSMP does not already have strong relationships. For example, Nature and Farm Connection Community Grants can be considered that could focus on culturally-specific, low-income communities, and persons experiencing disabilities. The grants can create opportunities to learn about, practice, and engage in nature and farming activities. We can also consider School in Nature and Farm Community Grants providing resources to enable connections with nature and farming that schools are unable to make. We can also build upon and partner with existing programs serving these communities, such as Parks and Recreation’s EXPAND program for people with disabilities and Youth Services Initiative (YSI) program serving youth living in low-income housing. We can also consider grants for improved nature experiences and activities that meet expectations for universal access guidelines and develop more inclusive programs for persons experiencing disabilities. AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 6 Appendix A Example A: Boulder Library Foundation Purpose: The Boulder Library Foundation strategically invests in innovative programming and partnerships that enrich the Boulder Public Library and our community. The Foundation is a 501c3 nonprofit organization led by a volunteer board of directors and supported by individual donors and community partners. Board: We’re delighted to provide leadership for the Boulder Library Foundation, including a bi-annual grant review and selection process, fundraising initiatives, and community outreach. We bring a variety of experience, expertise, and ideas to sustain the Foundation’s mission, expand its reach, and support new initiatives. Fund: Boulder Library Foundation-funded programs, events, and initiatives serve a diverse mix of people (from birth through senior citizenship) at the Boulder Public Library as well as outside its doors and throughout the community. Example B: PLAY Boulder Foundation (Boulder Parks and Recreation Department) Mission: The PLAY Boulder Foundation, in partnership with the Boulder Parks and Recreation Department, supports excellence in parks and recreation by mobilizing community support through education, philanthropy, and advocacy. Purpose: By donating in support of your favorite program or facility, you can experience firsthand the results of your giving while providing improvements for all to enjoy. The opportunity and need for benefactors for our recreation programs and parks facilities has never been more acute. We hope you will join us in supporting community parks and recreation in Boulder. History: The Boulder Parks and Recreation Foundation was established in 1976 as a non- profit organization, enabling tax-deductible gifts to ensure excellence in Boulder’s parks and recreation systems. In 2005, the Foundation adopted new bylaws and a new mission to keep pace with the changing face of public/private partnerships. In 2009, the Foundation changed its name to PLAY (Parks and Leisure for Adults and Youth) Boulder Foundation to better reflect its new mission. It remains dedicated to working with the City of Boulder and the private sector to create the best possible environment in which to live, work, and play. Major program areas:  Critical Partnerships: To have a healthy city, PLAY Boulder recognizes the importance of partnerships. Since its inception, PLAY Boulder (then Boulder Parks and Recreation Foundation) has fostered a tight relationship with the city and Boulder Parks and Recreation Department. Through this strategic partnership, we are able to work together to ensure the best quality programs.  Support the PLAY Boulder Foundation: PLAY Boulder accepts online donations through Network for Good. Thank you for your interest in supporting PLAY Boulder. AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 7 For more information on donating an item, please contact PLAY at info@playboulder.org and we’ll get back to you with the requested information. PLAY is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. Contributions are 100% tax deductible.  PLAY Supporters: PLAY is thrilled to be supported by a variety of individuals, corporations, and foundations. It is through your support that we are able to offer a variety of recreational programs for the community of Boulder. Example C: Multnomah County Library Foundation Purpose: this foundation enhances Multnomah County Library's leadership, innovation, and reach, helping the library address emerging community needs through private support.  They don't support day-to-day operations but do underwrite staff positions in programs that go beyond core services.  501c3 charity and gifts are tax-deductible.  Founded in 1995 "to build private support, enhance our library's impact and strengthen the public's commitment to a strong library system" o Work together to figure out "where private funds can be leveraged to have the greatest impact and at the same time not supplant public responsibility for supporting a strong library system."  The foundation is the independent non-profit that library management has designated to receive bequests and planned gifts that benefit the library.  The library director sits on the board of trustees.  The foundation focuses support in three key areas: early literacy, school age success, and learning for life.  While not advocating year-to-year for library budget or programs, the foundation did play a major role in advocating for tax levies over the years and ultimately a move to create an independently funded library district.  Commitment to donor privacy (and the opposite when appropriate) o gifts of $100+ recognized on bookplates in new library books o gifts of $1000+ can be recognized publicly, if wished o gifts of $25,000+ can establish a named endowment. Example D: Oregon State Parks Foundation Purpose: Dedicated to supporting Oregon's state parks, working to enrich the state park experience for generations to come.  501c3 charity and gifts are tax deductible  iconic restoration and enhancement/construction projects not going to be funded publically  establishment of interpretive and educational programs  parks director ex officio on board and separate staff liaison  membership model AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 8 o 12-month day-use parking pass for every membership level o subscription to 1859 magazine at higher levels o $500+ includes behind the scenes field trip to one of the state parks o $1000+ exclusive events  master agreement between state parks and foundation: o http://www.oregon.gov/oprd/docs/foundation-master-agreement-2014.pdf Example E: Yosemite National Park Conservancy Purpose: Provide grants to Yosemite National Park based on the highest-priority needs of the park. Has typically funded restoration of the trail to Lower Yosemite Fall, electronic bear- monitoring equipment to keep bears safe, youth programs, etc. Mission: Providing for Yosemite’s future is our passion. We inspire people to support projects and programs that preserve and protect Yosemite National Park’s resources and enrich the visitor experience. The major goals of the conservancy focus on:  Trails Restored  Wildlife Protected  Habitat Restored  Historic Preservation  Youth Stewardship  Visitor Enrichment Partners: Yosemite Conservancy has 90 years of experience helping to preserve and protect Yosemite National Park for current and future generations. We are proud to have strong working relationships with extraordinary partner organizations that share a similar passion for this magical place. Funding: The most significant collaboration, and also the core of our fundraising, is direct donations to National Park Service (NPS). Each year, NPS identifies projects of greatest need that are aligned with the mission; these projects are then funded through donations. The Conservancy has provided more than $100 million in grants to fund Yosemite’s highest- priority projects in recent years. Yosemite Conservancy funds projects and programs that are proposed and prioritized by NPS at Yosemite. Examples include:  fund trail and habitat restoration projects,  wildlife-protection programs,  scientific research, and  Youth in Yosemite Programs: these programs transform the lives of youth of all ages. The Conservancy audience typically gives or benefits by:  Making a monetary gift to the Yosemite Conservancy with a benefit of discounts on programs, accommodations and invitations to special events.  Pay for an art workshop or a live theater performance about Yosemite’s history. AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 9  Ways to volunteer with Yosemite Conservancy.  Purchase items in the Conservancy bookstore or online store. Visitor Services: Conservancy partners with NPS to work on restoration projects and visitor services, including issuing wilderness permits and bear-proof canisters.  Conservancy partners with NPS, Delaware North Companies (DNC), the Ansel Adams Gallery and the LeConte Memorial Lodge to promote Art in Yosemite.  Working with NPS and DNC, which provide accommodations throughout the park, the Conservancy created the guest donor program, allowing visitors to make donations to programs at DNC facilities.  Working with NatureBridge, the Conservancy share resources such as housing and training. They also exchange resources such as books for libraries. History: Yosemite Conservancy has over 90 years of experience preserving and protecting Yosemite National Park for current and future generations. The Conservancy established an early model for many of today’s national park nonprofit partners.  The first fundraising organization, 1923  Cooperating association, 1923  Developed museum, 1926  Created a modern fundraising program, 1956  There are more than 65 national park cooperating associations, serving the 392 areas of the national park system. AGENDA ITEM 4E PAGE 10 CITY OF BOULDER OPEN SPACE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: April 13, 2016 AGENDA TITLE: Summary of 2015 Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteer Services Annual Report and Declaration to Honor Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteers during National Volunteer Week, April 10-16, 2016. PRESENTER/S: Tracy Winfree, Director, Open Space and Mountain Parks Mark Davison, Community Connections and Partnerships Division Manager Lisa Dierauf, Community Education and Outreach Supervisor Jennelle Freeston, Volunteer Services Supervisor Kristin Weinberger, Coordinator of Group Volunteer Projects EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: National Volunteer Week is April 10-16, 2016. The City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) Department joins communities across the country and around the world in recognizing volunteers for their efforts and contributions. Every year, hundreds of volunteers aid the OSMP department in carrying out its mission, goals and objectives. They help to inform the public, connect with the land through hands-on projects, and protect the resources that make OSMP lands a special place. In 2015, more than 1,760 dedicated volunteers contributed a grand total of over 20,000 hours. (See Attachment A). AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Open Space and Mountain Parks Volunteer Services staff members request that the Open Space Board of Trustees join them in honoring these dedicated people during National Volunteer Week with a declaration: The Open Space Board of Trustees joins the staff of the City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks Department in recognizing all of our volunteers during National Volunteer Week 2016. We salute the more than 1,760 Open Space and Mountain Parks volunteers who contributed their talents and efforts in helping the department carry out its mission. These individuals are an inspiration as they help to protect the resources that make Boulder’s Open Space and Mountain Parks so special. COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENTS AND IMPACTS  Environmental: City of Boulder OSMP is a significant community-supported program that is recognized as a leader in preservation of open space lands, contributing to the environmental sustainability goal of Boulder’s City Council. The department’s volunteers act as stewards to help preserve and protect the values of these lands.  Economic: OSMP contributes to the economic vitality goal of the city as it provides the context for the diverse and vibrant economic system that sustains services for residents.  Social: Because the Open Space land system is accessible to the community, it helps support council’s community sustainability goal - all residents who live in Boulder have the opportunity to feel a part of, and thrive in, this aspect of their community. OTHER IMPACTS  Fiscal: The work provided by OSMP project and program volunteers adds over a half a million dollars in value every year. In addition to this monetary value, this volunteer effort supports departmental priorities while also building a stronger sense of community. Engaged, educated, informed and participating citizens are an important component to the well-being of a community.  Staff time: Working with volunteers requires staff time and planning. Two Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Volunteer Coordinators and 1.5 seasonal staff members are dedicated to directly manage both volunteer projects and programs, and over 40 other staff members work with volunteers as program leads and field supervisors. PUBLIC COMMENT AND PROCESS This item is being heard at this public meeting, advertised in the Daily Camera on April 10, 2016. AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 2 AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 3 This page is intentionally left blank. AGENDA ITEM 6 PAGE 4 Volunteer Services Community Connections & Partnerships City of Boulder Open Space & Mountain Parks Photo: Dustin Allard Annual Report 2015 2015 Overview 2 “Volunteering with OSMP has made me realize how important it is to use open spaces wisely and participate in its future and its preservation.” ~ Teirnan Doyle, OSMP Volunteer Open Space and Mountain Parks (OSMP) Volunteer Services engages the community through the land to inspire appreciation, connection and a legacy of stewardship. Volunteer Services serves departmental programs, projects, and events, as well as requests for customized projects from community members and organizations year-round. OSMP connects with the community through an outstanding volunteer program that offers a variety of opportunities for people to give back to the land in a meaningful way. Two major focus areas are ongoing volunteer programs and one-day projects. These help the department meet its mission and charter. Volunteer Services has offered formal programs and projects since the 1980s with a growing response from the community. In 2015 Volunteer Services redirected their efforts towards recruitment for one- day community volunteer projects due to the loss of AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps assisting with out-of-state priorities and flood restoration projects coming to a close. Volunteer Services changed the focus to community volunteer projects developed from OSMP work priorities. Working closely with staff from forestry, agriculture, trails, integrated pest management, and water resources Photo: Kristin Weinberger Volunteers Collect Native Seed for Restoration 2015 Overview 3 multiple community projects were planned. To fill these community volunteer projects, recruitment occurred through the new Dream it, Build it, Love it campaign which included the creation of a program brand, a newly designed webpage, and a formalized marketing plan. This comprehensive marketing plan contains templates for flyer and handout development, recruitment models, outreach opportunities, online advertisements, and much more. Volunteer Services’ ability to sustain many volunteer projects in 2015 showcases the community interest and success of new marketing efforts. In 2015 more than 1,765 volunteers contributed a grand total of over 20,000 hours. The work provided by OSMP project and program volunteers adds over half a million dollars in value every year! 2015 20,031 Total Hours 1,765 Total Volunteers $514,396 Total Value Volunteer Naturalists Teach Students Photo: OSMP Staff 2015 Overview 44 900 1200 1500 1800 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YearNumber of volunteersVolunteer Participation Trends 5 Project Volunteers “This curious world we inhabit is more wonderful than convenient; more beautiful than it is useful; it is more to be admired and enjoyed than used.” ~ Henry David Thoreau Open Space and Mountain Parks offered 87 volunteer projects to individuals and organizations out of over 100 that were planned. Project volunteers participated in a variety of one-day or multi-day, on- the-ground projects. Each volunteer project involves an overview of the project objectives, information about management methods from the specialists, safety briefings, and education from naturalists. Volunteers are thanked throughout the day and lunch is provided by OSMP. Volunteers continued to lend a hand assisting with eight flood restoration trail projects needed after the historic 2013 floods. For the first time Volunteer Services collaborated with forestry staff to offer ten one-day community volunteer projects. These projects involve chipping ponderosa pines to improve forest ecosystem health and reduce threats of catastrophic wildfires. Volunteers Help Repair Royal Arch Trail Photo: Beau Clark 6 Volunteer Services also supported a departmental goal to highlight OSMP’s agricultural program and give community members of all ages opportunities to have a hands-on experience with their local food sources. Volunteer Services collaborated with staff to offer 15 youth and family friendly projects with several agricultural tenants. These volunteer projects assisted with planting and harvesting vegetables, fence repair, and structure demolition. Volunteers learned about the history of agriculture in the area, organic vegetable production on OSMP, and what it takes to grow vegetables in this region. For the first time restoration and agricultural staff offered a community volunteer project to create a bee pollinator garden at Teller Farms to support local bee habitat. Volunteer Services also supports staff from restoration, trails, trailheads, and water resources workgroups with volunteer project planning and coordination. In 2015 an estimated 1,365 project volunteers contributed 7,750 hours. See page 7 for the breakout of the 2015 volunteer projects per workgroup. Contracts: Volunteer Services manages two long-term work contracts; one with Bridge House Ready to Work, and the other with Mile High Youth Corps. Volunteer Services pairs up community volunteers with Bridge House Ready to Work crews on various projects to allow the opportunity for crew members to work side by side with volunteers. Volunteers Plant Organic Vegetables on Agricultural Lands Photo: Kristin Weinburger 2015 Volunteer Project Summary 7 Multiple Work Groups Served Project/Location Volunteer #HoursBridge House, Ready to Work Multiple Projects na naMile High Youth Corps Teller Lakes na na Agriculture Project/Location Volunteer #HoursSportsLab - Loafing Shed Demolition Abbot 30 90Community Project with INVST Community Studies & One Act a Day Cure Organic Farm 24 82Engineers Without Borders - Cattle Fence Manchester 9 45Community Project - 63rd St. Farm 63rd Street Farm 31 128.5 Colorado College Outdoor Education - Corral Demolition North Teller/Manchester 40 320Community Project - Barn Demolition Berman Brothers 14 70Navigant Consulting/North Face - Cattle Fence Methvin 23 92Dish - Cattle Fence Andrus 7 39.5 Ecological Systems Project/Location Volunteer #HoursCommunity Project with CU & Medtronic - Forestry Flatirons Vista 85 392New Vista High School - Forestry Flatirons Vista 19 114Community Project - Bee Garden South Teller 15 40Community Project - Planted Plugs Dammyanovich 3 12Whitewave - Seed Collection South Boulder Creek 19 57Community Project - Seed Collection Doudy Draw 12 36WRV Seed Collections Multiple Properties 178 472 IPM Project/Location Volunteer #HoursSt. Olaf College - Cattle Fence for Tall Oat Grass Shanahan Ridge 29 203St. Olaf - Exotic Shrubs Skunk Canyon 16 112CU Geography/History - Cattle Fence for Tall Oat Grass Shanahan Ridge 12 72North Face - Cattle Fence for Tall Oat Grass Shanahan Ridge 3 21Boy Scouts - Moth Mullein Flatirons Vista 12 36Individual Volunteer - Mediterranean Sage BLIP 2 7.5WRV -Mediterranean Sage Beech 26 123 Trailheads Project/Location Volunteer #HoursYale Day of Service - Native Gardens Thorne/Sombrero Marsh 6 24County Court Projects Multiple Project Sites 55 416Individual Community Service Multiple Project Sites 57 1202Eagle Scouts Multiple Project Sites 130 923 Trailheads - Flood Restoration Project/Location Volunteer #HoursCounty Court Arnold Property 10 80 Volunteer Project Summary 2015 2015 Volunteer Project Summary 8 Trails Project/Location Volunteer #HoursNew Vista High School - Trail Construction Chautauqua 17 119Boulder Mountain Bike Alliance - Trail Repair Marshall Valley/FIV/High Plains 46 222Community Project - Trail Repair Chautauqua Meadow 17 119SolidFire - Trail Repair Chautauqua 9 27Adventure Forward - Trail Structures Built Chautauqua 35 140Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado - Trail Construction Long Canyon 21 168Flatirons Climbing Council - Trail Repair Flagstaff - Cloudshadow 19 152Community Project for National Trails Day - Trail Construction Joder 35 181Bike Patrol - Trail Repair Springbrook Loop Trail 10 30 Trails - Flood Restoration Project/Location Volunteer #HoursVolunteers for Outdoor Colorado - Trail Construction Long Canyon 17 136Individual Volunteer - Trail Repair Royal Arch/Royal Arch 4 39Front Range Climbing Stewards - Trail Repair Royal Arch 11 64Community Project - Trail Construction Towhee 18 126Boulder Mountain Bike Alliance - Trail Repair High Plains Trail 35 103Whitewave - Turnpike Homestead Trail 15 90 Water Resources Project/Location Volunteer #HoursSt. Olaf - Irrigation Maintenance North Toll Gate 36 227Community Project with CU Leadership Class - Irrigation Maintenance Silver Lake Ditch 33 225.5CU Triathlon Team - Irrigation Maintenance Silver Lake Ditch 11 66 Whole System Cleanup Project/Location Volunteer #HoursPUP Derby - Clean Up Dry Creek 3 9New Vista High School - Fence Demolition and Repair Cottonwood 19 114Flatirons Climbing Council - Graffiti Clean Up 2nd Flatiron 3 15Flatirons Climbing Council for the Trash Bash - Trash Clean up Flagstaff Summit 70 140Summit Middle School - Trash Clean Up Sawhill Ponds 14 28 Volunteer #Hours 1,365 7,750 2015 Total The independent sector in Colorado estimates a hourly rate of $25.68 for volunteer work, totaling a value of $199,020 for this program. 9 Program Volunteers Volunteers Monitor Locally Nesting Raptors “Volunteering on behalf of OSMP for the past number of years has been awesome. I have probably gained the knowledge equivalent of a master’s degree in natural history. Each of the OSMP programs are meaningful and have a significant impact.” ~ Joel Koenig, OSMP Volunteer Volunteer Services offers over 17 longer-term program assignments to assist OSMP in carrying out its mission and goals. In 2015, 354 individual program volunteers committed to assignments which included greeting visitors on the trails and monitoring wildlife and plants. Program volunteers also assisted at outreach events, answered questions at the Chautauqua Ranger Cottage and led interpretive hikes for youth and more. (see page 11) Two milestones were marked this year with the 30th anniversary of the volunteer raptor monitoring program and the 20th anniversary of the bat monitoring program. Over the last 30 years, OSMP volunteers have monitored the fledging of 207 golden eagles, 31 bald eagles, 395 prairie falcons, 151 peregrine falcons, and 66 osprey. Raptor volunteers provide weekly information to OSMP staff about the status of nesting pairs and also report any closure violations. In 1995 agencies within Boulder County began an on-going bat survey to determine numbers and species of bats in the area. Bat volunteers have gathered years of data for maternal roost sites and watering holes on OSMP properties. These citizen science monitoring programs are national models which demonstrate the Photo: Volunteer Staff 10 successful partnerships between local community members, conservation groups, recreational groups, and land management agencies. Based on a renewed staff need, herbarium volunteers reconvened once a week from March through June. These volunteers have been collecting and pressing plants found on our properties for over 20 years building a library- like collection that helps us better understand and manage our biologically diverse ecosystems. “It is so life giving for me to be part of this volunteer program and feel like I can be helpful to the preservation of the natural world.” ~ Betsy Heppner, OSMP Volunteer Volunteer Services staff recruited and trained additional mountain bike patrollers and trail guide/park patrollers who serve as extra eyes for the department and assist with communicating regulations, trail conditions, and natural history information to visitors. The Boulder Mountain Bike Patrol is a multi-agency program with the OSMP, Boulder County Parks and Open Space, U.S. Forest Service, City of Boulder Parks and Recreation, and Boulder Mountainbike Alliance. Patrollers ride trails assisting and educating mountain bikers and other park users. The goal is to promote a positive recreational experience on the trails. Over 75 mountain bike volunteers patrolled over 600 times covering more than 8,000 miles on OSMP trails. A particular focus this year included outreach in the Marshall Mesa area to educate about bike etiquette and to reduce user conflict. Similarly, trail guide/park patrollers hiked on all OSMP trails with extra time spent in the North Trail Study Area (NTSA) to provide information to visitors as well as assisting with Royal Arch closures and other departmental needs. The Volunteer Naturalist program trained nine new volunteers who, along with 50 other volunteer naturalists, provided 259 guided interpretive hikes and programs to 4,233 school-age children from the surrounding area school districts. Youth served were mainly from the Boulder Valley School District as well as at least six other school districts across the Front Range. In response to growing demand, classroom wildlife programs which are scheduled and taught by volunteer naturalists, were expanded beyond bear and mountain lion curriculum to include coyote education. Volunteer Naturalists Teach Students Photo: OSMP Staff 2015 Volunteer Program Summary 11 Program Workgroups Served Volunteer #Site Visits/Events Hours Bat Monitors Wildlife & Rangers 50 110 1330 Bear Care & Coyote Care Team Wildlife, Rangers & CPW 13 5 33 Bee Monitors Wildlife 3 20 16 Hayfield Monitors Agriculture,Wildlife & Rangers 6 26 40 Herbarium Ecological Systems 7 5 25 Hosts: Flagstaff Nature Center Community Outreach 18 116 479 Host: Event Help (Meadow Music & Voice & Sight Events)Community Outreach 12 15 193 Host: Ranger Cottage Community Outreach 5 20 150 Mountain Bike Patrollers Community Outreach & Rangers 75 609 1590 Native Garden Team Community Outreach 12 10 292 Naturalists (including bear, mountain lion & coyote classroom programs) Community Outreach 43 259 900 Open Space Board of Trustees All 5 12 1000 Raptor Monitors Wildlife & Rangers 50 525 2300 Resource Restoration Stewards Ecological Systems 6 5 15 Undesignated Trail Study Planning 1 4 50 Staff Assistants: Admin, Interns, Vegetation Studies All 5 5 461 Trail Guide/Park Patrollers Community Outreach & Rangers 89 1091 3407 Training Provided by Staff Volunteer #Site Visits/Events Hours 1,485 hrs 400 2,837 12,281 Volunteer Program Summary 2015 Grand Total 2015 The independent sector estimates a hourly rate in Colorado of $25.68 for volunteer work, totaling a value of $315,376 for this program. In 2015 there were 354 individual program volunteers, 46 of these volunteers are involved with multiple programs. Photo: Volunteer Staff Plans for 2016 12 In addition to continuing to offer projects and programs, Volunteer Services will focus on new initiatives in 2016. Staff will begin developing a five year strategic plan to look more closely at capacity, recruitment, and targeting key audiences. In an effort to enhance our communication style with volunteers, Volunteer Services will market projects and programs using Emma software. In addition, from the 2015 marketing plan, Volunteer Services learned lessons about how many volunteer projects to offer, the best timing, and when volunteers are most likely to participate. Volunteer Services will continue to offer one-day community projects as well as placing a new emphasis on targeted marketing to local companies who offer their employee’s time to volunteer. This involves making face-to-face contacts to develop long-lasting relationships with identified businesses and organizations in our community. There will also be a focus on offering additional agriculturally-based projects as well as a pollinator meadow restoration project geared towards youth, families, and underserved communities. Finally, Volunteer Services will continue to offer opportunities for long-term volunteer assignments. Recruitment and trainings will be offered for the programs that are requested by community members and/ or need additional volunteer support such as Mountain Bike Patrol, Trail Guide/Park Patrollers, and Bat Monitors. In 2016 a plant phenology program will be piloted to monitor plant phases in order to track trends over time. Phenology can be an early indicator of climate change especially for plants. Volunteers will make field observations over the course of a growing season using protocols and standards designed by the National Phenology Network. Interested in Volunteering with Open Space & Mountain Parks?Visit our website at VolunteerOSMP.org or contact: With the support of the Open Space Board of Trustees, the OSMP Executive Team, staff, partner agencies, and our committed outdoor community, Volunteer Services continues to grow relationships that connect people to the land. Volunteer Services is grateful for these partnerships and dedication to the volunteer program. We tip our hats to the OSMP volunteers’ accomplishments and look forward to the year ahead. Visit VolunteerOSMP.org for upcoming volunteer projects and programs. Coordinator of Volunteer Groups 303.413.7632 weinbergerk@bouldercolorado.gov Volunteer Services & Youth Engagement Sup. 303.413.7656 freestonj@bouldercolorado.gov Kristin Weinberger Jennelle Freeston Thank you! Photo: Doug Goodin