01.07.2015 BJAD PacketBoulder Junction Access District (BJAD)
Joint Commission Meeting
January 7, 2014
9 to 11 a.m.
Council Chambers, 1777 Broadway
AGENDA
1. Roll Call
2. Approval of the December 3, 2014 Meeting Minutes
3. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
4. Public Participation
5. Parking Pricing for the Depot Square Garage
6. Election of Representative to the Depot Square Condo Association Board
7. Matters from Commissioners
• Status of Projects
• Council /Commissioner Liaison List
8. Matters from Staff
• New Policy Regarding Televising Board and Commission Meetings
• AMPS Update — Joint Board Meeting January 21S
• Update on EcoPasses and Car Share- Hagelin
• Joint District Board Meeting date
Attachments:
Memo Regarding Parking Pricing
• Meeting Minutes
• Response to City Council Retreat Questions for 2015
• Council /Commissioner Liaison List
• 2015 Meeting Dates and Locations
• Depot Square Condo Dec Section 6.3 Regarding Condo Board
• Televising Board and Commission Meetings
Upcoming Meetings /Topics
AMPS Joint Board Workshop: January 21S
City Council Retreat: January 23 — 24
AMPS Study Session: May 26
Joint District Board Meeting?
I 1 FA
J
DOWNTOWN AND UNIVERSITY HILL MANAGEMENT DIVISION
AND PARKING SERVICES (DUHMD/PS)
MEMORANDUM
To: Boulder Junction Access District (BJAD) Parking Commissioners
From: Molly Winter, Director, DUHMD/PS
Kurt Matthews, Parking Manager, DUHMD/PS
Donna Jobert, Finance Manager, DUHIVID/PS
Ref: Depot Square BJAD Parking Pricing
Date: January, 7, 2015
Background
As part of the Depot Square project, a shared parking garage is being built to provide parking for
the district. Garage ownership is shared between the district, RTD, the hotel, and the housing
unit as a Condominium Association. A parking management agreement (PMA) is also in place
governing aspects of the garage, in that all parking is to be shared, unbundled, managed, and paid
(SUMP). (See Attachment A). Each owner will have their own management system. PMA
allows for owners to place unused spaces into pool that would be managed by the BJAD Parking
District.
Negotiations and design considerations are currently underway for the parking access and
revenue control system (PARCS) that will control access to the garage and monitor utilization by
all condominium members. It is envisioned that the garage will be managed via this PARC
system, and there will not be a lot attendant present during hours of operation.
The Depot Square garage parking allocation is as follows:
100 - BJAD Parking
71 - Residential Units
136 - Hyatt Hotel
75 - RTD
9 - Depot Square Restaurant
Current development projections show that demand on the District spaces will be generated by
the overflow RTD bus station patrons, commercial properties, employees and restaurant users.
New development is underway north of the new bridge with commercial and residential uses that
will also be a factor. Boulder Junction is a nascent district and demand is unknown and very
dependent upon development and the types of uses.
Parking Pricing Approach
The BJAD parking pricing approach is based on the SUMP principles, current parking
management strategies as well as incorporating the Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
approach of Boulder Junction with the overlay of the WAD Transit Demand Management
(TDM) distri ct. The access management and parking strategy (AMPS) project which is
developing a citywide strategy for access and parking management will also be applicable to the
on -going development of parking management and pricing throughout the city. A key element
of the strategy will be to monitor utilization and demand and remain flexible to the evolutionary
nature of Boulder Junction.
As background information, below are the essential components of the current parking pricing in
the existing access /parking districts:
• Current rates in the Downtown and Hill managed parking are $1.25 /hour for on- street
parking (average time limit of three hours) and $1.25 /hour in the garages for the first 4
hours, then $2.50 /hour after that.
• There is no limit on hours charged in the garages; however, we set a $20 maximum per
day, which is in line with a lost ticket fee of $20.
• Permit rates are currently $330 /quarter in the downtown garages; surface lots are
$200 /quarter downtown and $175 /quarter on the hill. (There is currently a 1200 person
waiting list for downtown permits.)
In considering the parking pricing strategy, there are a number of factors that will influence the
decisions. These include:
• integration with the TDM access district programs;
• additional demand for residential permits from Solana;
• the rates charged to the affordable housing units for their parking spaces and potential
additional demand;
• potential demand for employee permits particularly from the hotel;
• the short term demand from the hotel and the Depot restaurant;
• the number of spaces that will be allocated to District management from the other
condominium members;
• the spillover parking demand from the RTD station (scheduled to open in August 2015);
• the timing and type of development within the area; and,
• the financial viability of the District.
Staff Recommendations
Short Term Rates
Staff recommends that the short term District parking rates for the Depot Square garage be
consistent with the current on- street parking rate of $1.25 /hour in the other access districts. The
AMPS project will be considering changes to parking pricing both in terms of rates and how
parking is charged by location and by duration.
Regarding the duration of charging for parking, staff is recommending that the short term rates
be charged 24/7. There are several reasons for this. First, we are not envisioning a parking lot
attendant at this location since there are multiple users with varying needs. Parking attendants
allow for more flexibility in when parking is charged. Secondly, the district is just one of five
garage users and automated entry is the best system to accommodate all users (RTD, housing,
Depot, hotel and the district). All parking rates will be integrated into the PARCS system based
on the individual user needs. And finally, given the proximity to the RTD Bus Rapid Transit
(BRT) station, it is important that the district spaces are not used for long term storage by
individuals that would arrive when parking is not charged; leave their car during vacation and
take RTD to Denver International Airport (DIA); and then return when parking is not charged
and depart the garage without paying. It would essentially be providing free long term parking
to non - district users.
Long Term Permit Rates
Paying for permit parking is a new concept in the Boulder Junction area — both for residents and
employees; and thus there is not a robust market from which to make comparisons. The most
immediate comparable is the permit rate at the residential Solana development which is
$50 /month. To our knowledge, there is not a comparable for employee parking permits in the
area.
Given the uncertainty of demand and lack of comparable pricing for long term permit parking,
staff recommends following the current market rate of $50 /permit or $150 /quarter. It will be very
important to closely monitor the demand and utilization during the next several years as the
Boulder Junction area and surrounding developments are built out and make the appropriate
adjustments.
Allocation of Parking between Permits and Short Term
As with the permit parking rates, it is currently difficult to have a definitive formula for the
allocation spaces between short and long term users. The demand for parking will drive the
allocation of the spaces. As a starting point, the initial approach will be to ensure that all user
types — permits for residential and employees, and short term users — will have accessibility to
parking. A lesson learned from the other districts includes the potential for overselling employee
permits. The introduction of residential permits into the parking mix is a new one; the other
district management districts do not include residential permits. Again, closely monitoring the
situation and remaining flexible and responsive to the evolving demand will be essential to both
meet the needs of the Boulder Junction residents, employees and users, and remain consistent
with the TOD and SUMP principles.
Questions for the Board:
• Does WAD Parking Commission support the staff approach to the WAD parking pricing
strategy?
• Does WAD Parking Commission support the staff recommendations regarding: short
term pricing, long term permit rates and parking allocation?
• Does WAD Parking Commission have any other suggestions or comments?
Attachments
Attachment A: Parking Management Agreement Depot Square
Attachment A. Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
PARKING MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
DEPOTSQUARE
This Parking Management Agreement is entered into to be effective the ;?&; µ day of July,
2013, by and between the City of Boulder, a Colorado home rule city (the "City "), 3001 Pearl,
LLC, a Colorado limited liability company as owner of the Residential Unit ( "Residential Unit
Owner "), HP Boulder, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, as owner of the Hotel Unit,
( "Hotel Unit Owner "), the Regional Transportation District, a political subdivision of the State of
Colorado ( "RTD ") as Owner of the RTD Parking Unit, Depot Square Owners Association, Inc.,
the Colorado non - profit corporation formed pursuant to the Declaration defined below (the
"Association "), and the Boulder Junction Access General Improvement District- Parking, a
general improvement district (the "District "), (individually a "Party" and collectively the
"Parties ") and 3001 Pearl, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the "Declarant ") to
implement the Parking Program for the use, management and maintenance of the Parking
Facilities located at Depot Square, a planned community located in Boulder Colorado.
RECITALS
A. "Depot Square" refers to the planned community created by the Community
Declaration thereof recorded on July2J, 2013, at Reception No. 333al B 3 , and the
Community Map thereof recorded on July A, 2013, at Reception No. 3330� in the records of
the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Boulder, State of Colorado (the "Declaration ").
B. The District is a general improvement district organized and existing as a general
improvement district under the laws of the State of Colorado and the Charter and municipal code
of the City formed by the City of Boulder by Ordinance No. 7731 adopted on July 20, 2010 and
recorded at Reception No. 03125016 on January 6, 2011 in the records of the Clerk and Recorder
of the County of Boulder, and created, inter alia, to implement the zoning requirements
regarding parking applicable to Depot Square and other properties within the District. The
zoning requirements and the formation of the District were adopted and created to further the
goals of the City of Boulder set forth in the Transit Village Area Plan dated September, 2007
( "TVAP "). The TVAP requires that Depot Square be constructed in accordance with the
requirements of the City, the approved site plan, and the construction documents approved by the
City, to create a Transit - Oriented Development ( "TOD "). The zoning for Depot Square allows
higher densities because of its inclusion into the District and management of its parking in
accordance with this Agreement. An integral component of the success of the City's goal for a
TOD is the bus transit facility and high density residences and commercial uses which are not
dependent on single -use parking within the Boulder Transit Village. This Agreement is to
implement the TVAP requirements and for the success of the Parties.
C. The land for Depot Square was jointly purchased by the City and RTD in 2004,
for construction of a bus transit facility and development of a TOD. The City and RTD have
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
agreed to implement the goals agreed upon by them in the Boulder Transit Village Master and
Site Planning and Preliminary Construction Agreement between the City and RTD dated
September, 2007 as such goals have been further refined by approved development plans and
subsequent agreements between the City and RTD and to work collaboratively to utilize new and
existing technology to implement a successful shared - management parking facility that does not
violate the existing statutory limitations on RTD's ability to charge fees or receive income from
patrons utilizing the parking facility.
D. The parking within Depot Square is to be managed as a single unit by the
Association in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement implements the
Parking Program described in Section 16.3 of the Declaration and is the Parking Management
Agreement identified in Section 16.4 of the Declaration.
E. Except for the Association, the Parties to this Agreement and Declarant own
Parking Units within Depot Square as described in the Declaration and have agreed that all
parking and the Parking Units within the Parking Facility are to be governed by this Agreement.
F. The purpose of this Agreement is to:
a. Meet the access needs of all Depot Square owners in order to support a
successful mixed use TOD, and for those owners participating in shared parking, in
compliance with the TVAP principles, to implement shared, unbundled, managed and
paid (SUMP) parking, as such terms are defined in this Agreement as the SUMP
Principles;
b. Implement a comprehensive and holistic parking maintenance and
management strategy that benefits all users and is more efficient than each Party
providing its own services; and
C. Maximize utilization of parking spaces within the Parking Facilities to the
benefit of all the Parties. Ownership of a Parking Unit as defined in the Declaration
provides that each Party owns a specific airspace in the Parking Facility, without a right
to use the spaces within such airspace, but has a right to use a specific number of spaces
within the Parking Facility.
G. Except for the RTD Parking Unit which is for RTD Users only, parking within
Depot Square is to be shared, unbundled, managed, and paid in accordance with the following
definitions collectively referred to as the "SUMP Principles ":
a. Shared: Shared parking reduces the number of parking spaces needed
within an area by allowing different uses to access the same parking spaces. At mixed -
use development, the various uses tend to have different parking demand peaks. An
office, restaurant and retail store can share parking because the office's peak parking
demand will occur in the day, and a restaurant in the evening, and the retail on the
weekend. Shared parking allows shared use among different users whose peak parking
2
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
demands occur at different times and thus fewer spaces are needed to meet all the
different parking demands, reducing development costs and improving urban design. It
also allows for more efficient and cost effective use of each space. For example, if there
were reserved spaces, the space designated for a single employee would sit empty when
the permit holder is on vacation, sick or away from the office. Shared parking allows a
smaller parking supply to serve more trips.
b. Unbundled: Unbundling refers to separating the cost of parking from the
cost of a commercial space or housing units so that real estate is sold or leases are entered
into separately from the parking it serves. Unbundled parking allows residents and
employers the choice to purchase the amount of parking they need at a given time,
separate from their property purchase or lease. For example, rather than renting an
apartment with two parking spaces for say $1,000 per month, an individual can rent just
the apartment for a lesser amount with no parking spaces and choose to pay a monthly
rate for parking spaces as needed. This can significantly reduce the cost of housing for
those able to reduce their parking needs. Unbundling parking also leads to an increase in
shared parking.
C. Managed: Parking management refers to various policies, strategies,
tools and programs that result in more efficient use of parking resources. These include
parking supply, utilization, technology, coordination with transit demand management
principles and pricing. Managed parking is critical to the efficient utilization of parking
and to the overall access to an area by incentivizing use of all access modes including
transit, walking and biking. Managed parking also maximizes the efficiency of the
overall transportation system, the quality of the urban design, and cost effectiveness.
Parking management tools can most effectively be used when there are a variety of
available alternative modes of transportation.
d. Paid: Paying for parking has several objectives: first to off -set the costs
of parking by the user (there is no such thing as free parking); second as a tool to manage
utilization and location of parking; and finally it is used to encourage and promote the use
of other modes of transportation. Maintaining the infrastructure for parking, either on-
street, a surface lot or a structure has a real cost that should be covered in some
proportion by the actual user rather than the entire community which may or may not
utilize the resource. Using varying parking rates can assist users in determining whether
they wish to prioritize convenience over cost or encourage users to use different modes of
transportation. Event parking charges, either for performances or sporting events, are a
practical example of how parking pricing can influence demand and the location of
parking — close -in parking is the most expensive; the cost decreases at locations further
away from the event venue.
H. The District and the Declarant have entered into a Parking Purchase Agreement
dated as of the date hereof (the "Parking Purchase Agreement ") pursuant to which the District
will purchase 100 spaces for use by the general public that are visitors to the users at Depot
3
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
Square. The Parties may pool any or all of their spaces for defined periods of time for use by the
general public to maximize the parking available. When a Party pools any spaces, it shall
receive the revenue derived from the use of the Pooled Parking as provided herein. The Pooled
Parking spaces shall be used for parking after the District Parking Unit is full, and the revenues
from the Pooled Parking shall be allocated proportionately among the owners that have
contributed spaces for the time the revenue was generated.
I. RTD is currently prevented by C.R.S. 32 -9 -119.9 from charging for parking
except in limited circumstances. Separate provisions are set forth herein for parking by RTD
Users while RTD is subject to C.R.S. 32 -9- 119.9. If the statute is amended or repealed, RTD
shall determine whether it shall continue being treated as provided herein, or whether it elects for
the RTD Parking Unit to be fully incorporated into the provisions of this Agreement.
COVENANTS
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and obligations set forth below,
the Parties and Declarant agree as follows:
1. The Recitals above are incorporated as part of this Agreement. This Agreement is
entered into to meet the terms and conditions of TVAP and satisfy the requirements of B.R.C. 9-
9-22 for the parking within Depot Square.
2. If a conflict should arise between this Agreement and the Declaration, this
Agreement shall control so long as this Agreement is consistent with the description of the
Parking Management Agreement in Section 16.4 of the Declaration.
3. Declarant shall not be considered a Party to this Agreement unless (a) the
Declarant is the Residential Unit Owner, in which case the Declarant is a party as an Owner and
not as Declarant, or (b) the District fails to appropriate funds for a payment due by the terms of
the Parking Purchase Agreement, and the Subdivided Parking Unit, as defined in the Parking
Purchase Agreement is created. In the event (b) occurs, the Subdivided Parking Unit shall be
considered Pooled Parking and the Declarant shall be considered an Owner entitled to revenues
from such Pooled Parking. Declarant may not use the spaces within the Subdivided Parking Unit
except as Pooled Parking.
4. Definitions. The following terms shall have the following definitions. Any
capitalized term herein that is not defined below shall have the same definition as in the
Declaration. For ease of reference, some of the terms used herein that are defined in the
Declaration are attached as Exhibit A. When not inconsistent with context, words used in the
present tense include the future tense, words in the plural include the singular, and words in the
singular include the plural. Words not defined in this Section or the Declaration shall be given
their common and ordinary meaning.
"Applicable Laws" shall mean all laws applicable to Depot Square by any entity with
jurisdiction, and specifically includes the parking maximums allowed under the zoning
4
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
for Depot Square per the approved site plan, and all other zoning requirements of the
City.
"Board" shall mean the governing body of the Association.
"Declaration" shall have the meaning provided in Recital A.
"Facility Operator" shall have the meaning provided in Section 11 below.
"General Public User" shall mean any vehicle parking in the Parking Facility who is not
an RTD User, and is not an Owner Parker.
"Owner" shall mean a Party to this Agreement. The Declarant shall be considered an
Owner only if it owns the Residential Unit or if the Subdivided Parking Unit is created as
provided in the Parking Purchase Agreement.
"Owner Parker" shall mean a vehicle driven by a person that is a Permittee of the
Owner (which shall include hotel guests and customers that the Hotel Unit Owner has
authorized to use spaces allotted to the Hotel Unit) so long as the number of Parking
Spaces allocated to the Owner is available for such vehicle. Unless RTD has elected to
contribute its spaces to the Pooled Parking, Owner Parker shall not include an RTD User.
"Parking Facility" shall mean the Parking Common Elements and the Parking Units
collectively including all parking areas within the Parking Structure and the surface
parking spaces adjacent to the access drive to the Parking Structure as depicted on the
Community Map.
"Parking Management Professional" shall have the meaning provided in Section 9
below.
"Pooled Expenses" shall mean the actual expenses of (a) accounting for revenues from
General Public Users using Pooled Parking in the Parking Facility; (b) allocating such
revenues among the owners of the Pooled Parking; (c) collecting and distributing such
revenues; and (d) enforcing the terms of this Agreement to the extent this Agreement
provides that recovery from such enforcement shall be paid to Parties contributing spaces
to Pooled Parking.
"Pooled Parking" shall mean Parking Spaces for which any Party, other than the
District, has submitted a writing to the District as provided herein for such spaces to be
used by General Public Users.
"SUMP Principles" shall mean parking that is shared, unbundled, managed and paid as
such terms are more specifically defined in Recital G.
5
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
"System" shall mean the entry /exit system and all components thereof that are necessary
to track each vehicle entering and exiting the Parking Facility to determine whether the
vehicle is a RTD User, an Owner Parker or a General Public User and, upon exit, charge
vehicles for parking as determined by this Agreement at the rate determined by the
District.
5. Parking Program Each Party, except RTD, submits its Parking Unit as defined in
the Declaration to be governed by the SUMP Principles as set forth herein. This Agreement
implements the Parking Program as described in the Declaration. Each Party shall have the use
of the number of Parking Spaces as defined in the Declaration. The designation in the initial
Declaration are as follows, but the number of spaces defined in the Declaration, if amended, shall
control:
Depot:
10
District:
100
Hotel:
136
Residential:
71
RTD:
75
WIX
6. RTD Parking Unit and Coordination. Until and unless RTD elects to be treated as
other Owners, in order to implement C.R.S. 32 -9 -119.9 and the SUMP Principles for the other
Parking Units, the RTD Parking Unit shall be located at the highest part of the Parking Facilities.
No vehicle other than a RTD User may use the RTD Parking Unit until such election is made or
RTD has contributed spaces to the Pooled Parking. In addition RTD shall:
a. Work collaboratively with the other Parties for the success of the SUMP
Principles at the Parking Facility;
b. Coordinate its use with the System to verify which vehicles that enter and
exit the Parking Facilities using the RTD Parking Unit are qualified RTD Users; and
C. Not take any action to interfere with the charging for parking by General
Public Users.
7. Rules for Owners In addition to all other terms of this Agreement, the Owners of
the Parking Units agree for their respective Parking Units as follows:
a. Parking Spaces may not be used for any other purpose than parking of
vehicles in compliance with this Agreement.
b. Except for RTD Users in the RTD Parking Unit, Owners cannot allow
General Public Users to use its spaces except through contribution to the Pooled Parking
described herein.
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
C. Owners cannot reserve any Parking Space for their own use or use of one
of its Permittees, except RTD for RTD Users in the RTD Parking Unit.
8. Role of Owners In their capacity as Owners of the Parking Units, the Parties are
each responsible for the following:
a. Management of its allotted Parking Spaces among its users. Such
management includes the distribution of passes for the users of their allotted Parking
Spaces and, except for RTD, the manner in which it will charge or distribute allotted
passes to its users for use of the Parking Spaces in compliance with the SUMP Principles
and this Agreement and setting rules therefor.
b. Parking Spaces are used by Owner Parkers only, unless those spaces have
been added to Pooled Parking at the time of use by the General Public User.
C. Owners may not set rules for its users that are inconsistent with this
Agreement or the Declaration, provided however, RTD may set rules for RTD Users in
the RTD Parking Unit that are consistent with Sections 5 and 6 above.
d. Enforce the rules of use of its Parking Spaces that are consistent with this
Agreement as approved by the Board.
e. In the event a Party transfers its Parking Unit in violation of the terms of
the Declaration, such transfer shall be null and void and the spaces allocated to such
Parking Unit shall be deemed contributed to the Pooled Parking.
f. It shall be a breach of this Agreement for any Party to allow the use of any
Parking Space to someone other than its Owner Parker other than if the Owner has made
such Parking Spaces available for Pooled Parking.
9. Role of Parking Management Professional The Board shall hire a professional
company or individual (the "Parking Management Professional ") to provide parking
management services as directed by the Board from time to time and including the following:
a. Maintain and manage the System in accordance with this Agreement and
Article 16 of the Declaration.
b. Monitor occupancy and report to the Parties.
C. Prepare monthly and quarterly reports reflecting compliance with SUMP
Principles for the District and the Association.
d. Make recommendations to the Board for budgets for long term (10, 15 and
20 years) maintenance, preventative maintenance, capital improvements and technology
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
upgrades, and plan for and implement long -term preventative maintenance and capital
improvements as approved by Board.
C. Manage the Pooled Parking pursuant to this Agreement and the rates to be
charged set by the District.
f. Provide an account of expenses monthly allocated as Parking Expenses or
Pooled Expenses.
g. Provide a monthly account of revenues from General Public Users
allocated among the Parties then participating in the Pooled Parking.
h. Provide a monthly report as to violations of this Agreement, enforcement
activity and other matters as may be reasonably required by the Board.
i. Promptly notify the Board of any matter that requires the Board's
attention.
j. Perform the duties delegated by the Board.
The Board shall negotiate, approve and enter into a separate agreement with the Parking
Management Professional outlining responsibilities, fees and compensation and terms of
engagement for such Parking Management Professional.
10. Role of District The Parties recognize and the District agrees that, except for the
RTD Parking Unit, the District shall provide the following support and duties in its capacity as
the District regardless of whether it owns a Parking Unit:
a. Monitor the use of the Parking Facility to ensure that the SUMP Principles
and the rules of the District are complied with.
b. Propose procedure and implement Pooled Parking procedure for Owner
approval in accordance with this Agreement and the Declaration.
C. Determine the amount of fees for General Public Users.
d. Seek strategic opportunities to maximize the use of parking in the Parking
Facilities and throughout the District.
C. Coordinate with the Boulder Junction Access General Improvement
District- Travel Demand Management to implement the goals of both Districts.
f. Provide input to the Budget for the Parking Facility.
11. Role of FacilityOperator. The Board shall hire an operator for the Parking
Facility (the "Facility Operator "), who shall have the following responsibilities as directed by the
8
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
Board (in addition to any other responsibilities as may be determined by the Board from time to
time):
a. Daily and periodic maintenance of the Parking Facilities, including
without limitation, trash and litter pickup, cleaning, graffiti removal, and routine
maintenance.
b. Maintain the Parking Facility in a clean and orderly manner according to
the Standards of Maintenance defined by the Association.
C. Perform the duties delegated by the Board.
The Board shall negotiate, approve and enter into a separate agreement with the Facility
Operator outlining responsibilities, fees and compensation and terms of engagement for such
Facility Operator.
12. Parking Access System The Parties intend that the System, or any individual
system that is added to the System as permitted by this Agreement, is operated as a unified
parking system. No System shall be purchased or installed without the prior written consent of
each Party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The cost of initially purchasing the
System shall be paid by Declarant. The System shall be designed to:
a. track each vehicle entering and exiting the Parking Facility for purposes of
determining whether the vehicle is an RTD User, or an Owner Parker, or a General
Public User;
b. determine the length of time the vehicle was in the Parking Facility;
C. determine when all of the District spaces are used so that the revenues
generated from General Public Users in addition to those using District spaces can be
allocated to the pool;
d. charge the vehicle upon exit for any fees due by General Public Users; and
e. produce monthly and quarterly reports of the use by each Owner, the
revenues collected from General Public Users allocated among the District and other
Parties.
In addition, to the extent reasonably possible, the System shall integrate with the property
management system and keycard locking system utilized by the Hotel Unit Owner and shall
permit "in and out" privileges for Owner Parkers; provided, however, that if the Hotel Unit
Owner determines in its reasonable discretion that the System does not integrate with its
management system in a manner sufficient to meet its needs, the Hotel Unit Owner, at its cost
and expense, may elect to install and operate its own separate parking entry /exit system and all
components thereof that are necessary to track each vehicle of its Owner Parkers entering and
6
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
exiting the Parking Facility, which separate system shall be integrated with the System. The
Hotel Unit Owner shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated with integrating its
own separate parking entry /exit system and all components thereof into the System.
Further, if the RTD Unit Owner determines in its reasonable discretion that the System does not
integrate with its management system in a manner sufficient to meet its needs, the RTD Unit
Owner, at its cost and expense, may elect to install and operate its own separate parking
entry /exit system and all components thereof that are necessary to track each vehicle of its RTD
Users entering and exiting the Parking Facility, which separate system shall be integrated with
the System. The RTD Unit Owner shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated with
integrating its own separate parking entry /exit system and all components thereof into the
System.
For the purposes of this section, "integrate" or "integration" of an individual system into the
System means that together, the systems will meet the requirements of the subparagraphs a.
through e. above.
13. Pooling of Spaces To optimize the implementation of the SUMP Principles the
spaces within the Parking Facilities may be pooled for use by General Public Users when an
Owner elects to contribute spaces to the pool. Each Party may pool any or all of its spaces for
particular hours, days, weeks or months as provided in this section. When a Party contributes any
spaces to the pool, it shall receive the revenue derived therefrom, calculated as provided in this
section.
a. Calculation of Revenues for Pooled Parkin For any General Public
Users entering the Parking Facilities after the District spaces are full, the System shall
count the vehicles and the fees received for such Pooled Parking. The fee revenue from
such Pooled Parking shall be distributed to the Owners pooling spaces on a monthly
basis, after deduction of the Pooled Expenses. The formula for distribution of such
revenue shall be:
Amount Payable to Owners for Spaces Contributed to Pooled Parking =
(Revenue from Pooled Parking — Pooled Expenses
Number of spaces in Pooled Parking
X Number of spaces Owner designated for Pooled Parking during period of
calculation
b. Procedure for Pooling _Spaces. The Party desiring to contribute spaces to
the pool shall complete the written form developed by the District, specifying the number
of spaces, the time(s), and day(s) for which it desires to contribute spaces to the Pooled
Parking. The District may rely on such completed form for programming the System and
planning use of the Parking Facilities. The Party may revoke or revise the spaces
10
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
contributed to the pool by completing a revised written form and providing such writing
to the District.
14. Delineation of Parking Spaces The initial delineation of each Parking Space
marked in the Parking Facility for one vehicle, and whether it is for a handicapped, compact or
regular vehicle or a bicycle, is included within the tech does for Depot Square. In the event that
the Parties determine that a reallocation of spaces within the Parking Facilities other than the
RTD Parking Unit is necessary to accommodate a different mix of parkers, the District shall
propose a revised plan for demarcation to be approved by the Parties. In the event that the
revised plan results in more or less parking spaces, the increase or reduction of spaces shall be
allocated proportionately among the Owners unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.
15. Enforcement of Agreement In the event any Party breaches this Agreement, and
such breach continues beyond written notice and 10 days to correct the breach, in addition to any
other remedy allowed at law or equity, the breaching Party shall pay to the District the amount
for its spaces corresponding to the full -time use of the portion of the Parking Spaces related to
the breach allotted to its Parking Unit by a General Public User. The District shall distribute any
revenues received from a defaulting Party as provided for distribution of other revenue from
General Public Users as if the spaces of the Party in breach were part of the Pooled Spaces (but
excluding the defaulting Party as a recipient of such revenue).
16. Disputes — mediation. If disputes remain unresolved after negotiations between
the Parties, the Parties shall submit the disputes to nonbinding mediation. The Parties shall
attempt to jointly select the mediator from a list of proposed mediators generated by the Parties.
The Parties may seek the assistance of the American Arbitration Association in generating a list
of potential mediators. Each party shall bear its own costs associated with presenting any
disputes to the mediator, which costs shall not be recoverable as part of a change order or in any
subsequent litigation or arbitration. No decisions or statements of the mediator may be admitted
as evidence in any subsequent litigation between the Parties nor may the. mediator be called to
testify in any litigation.
In the event any dispute, mediation, arbitration, or litigation arises under this Agreement
and during the time such dispute, mediation, arbitration, or litigation is pending, the Parties shall
continue performance under this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof.
The submittal of disputes to non - binding mediation shall be a condition precedent to
commencing litigation or arbitration by either party. Except as may otherwise be provided by
law, no claims, disputes, or other disagreements arising out of this Agreement shall be decided
by arbitration.
17. Responsibility. Each party assumes responsibility for itself and its Permittees the
actions and omissions to act in the performance or failure to perform work under this Agreement.
Neither RTD, the District, nor the City waives or intends to waive the limitations on liability
which are provided to RTD, the District and the City, their officers, and employees under the
Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. 24 -10 -101 et, seq.
11
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
18. Notice Any notice required by this Agreement shall be in writing, made by hand -
delivery or certified mail, return receipt requested, or electronic mail and addressed to the
following:
To RTD: Assistant General Manager for Safety, Security and Facilities
1600 Blake Street
Denver CO 80202
With a copy to:
General Counsel
1600 Blake Street
Denver CO 80202
To District: City Manager
With a copy to BJAD -P District Manager
Municipal Building
P.O. Box 791
Boulder, CO 80306
To City: City Manager
Boulder Municipal Building
P.O. Box 791
Boulder, Colorado 80306
To Residential
Unit Owner: 3001 Pearl, LLC
Scott Pedersen, Manager
P.O. Box 328
Boulder, CO 80306
To Hotel
Unit Owner: HP Boulder, L.L.C.
c/o Hyatt Corporation
71 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Attention: General Counsel
Telephone: 312/750 -1234
With a copy to:
Hyatt Corporation
71 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Attention: Charles Barcus
12
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
To Declarant: 3001 Pearl, LLC
Scott Pedersen, Manager
P.O. Box 328
Boulder, CO 80306
Notice given by hand- delivery or ' electronic mail shall be effective immediately and
notice by mail shall be effective three days after it is deposited in the United States mail
depository correctly addressed with sufficient postage for delivery.
19. General Provisions
a. Term Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, this Agreement
shall be effective unless and until the Project is terminated as described in the
Declaration.
b. Complete Agreement This document represents the complete agreement
between the Parties with respect to the Parking Management Agreement defined in the
Declaration. Parties to this Agreement must be Owners of Parking Units in the Parking
Facilities or the District, and no Party shall assign, sublet or transfer its interest in the
Agreement separate from ownership of its Parking Units. No amendments or
modifications shall be made to this Agreement unless it is in writing and signed by all
Parties.
C. Attorney's Fees If there is a default in the payment or performance of
this Agreement, the defaulting party shall pay the other Parties' reasonable attorneys fees
and costs incurred to pursue correction of the default, even though no suit or action is
filed, as well as any other fees or expenses incurred by the non - defaulting party.
d. Governing Law This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of
Colorado and the Applicable Laws. Any suit between the Parties arising under this
Agreement shall be brought only in a court of competent jurisdiction for the Twentieth
Judicial District of the State of Colorado.
e. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement and all terms in this
Agreement are for the benefit of the Parties hereto, and no other party.
f. Binding Effect This Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and
their successors and assigns. Except for the District, this Agreement is among the Parties
in their capacities as Acceptable Owners. Except for the District, no Party may remain a
beneficiary of this Agreement if it sells or otherwise conveys its Unit in Depot Square.
This Agreement is assignable and shall be assigned by a party if it sells or otherwise
conveys its Unit in Depot Square.
13
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
g. Waiver No waiver of any right under this Agreement shall operate as, or
be construed to be, a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision
of this Agreement.
h. Cooperation Each party agrees to perform all other acts and execute and
deliver all other documents as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the intent and
purposes of this Agreement.
i. Severability Each provision of this Agreement shall be severable. If any
provision is held invalid, contrary to, or in conflict with any law or regulation by a
tribunal with competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in
effect.
Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterparts.
CITY:
CITY OF BOULDER
r
City Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk f
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney's Office
14
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
DECLARANT: 3001 PEARL, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
company
Scott Pedersen, Manager
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF BOULDER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 day of July, 2013, by
Scott Pedersen, as Manager of 3001 Pearl, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: 57
Public .--'
z SNODY PUBLIC OLORADO
My Commission Expires 05/25/2016
15
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
DISTRICT:
ATTEST:
BOULDER JUNCTION AREA GENERAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - PARKING
By
City Manager as General Mgiager of BJAD -P
B y e
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney' Office
16
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
RTD:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
FOR RTD:
General Counsel
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
17
Phillip A. Wk'shington, General
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
RESIDENTIAL UNIT OWNER:
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF BOULDER )
3001 PEARL, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
company
Scott Pedersen, Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this V. day of July, 2013, by
Scott Pedersen, as Manager of 3001 Pearl, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: r ( / 61
Notary Public
=COLO
My Commission Expires 05/25/2016
18
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
HOTEL UNIT OWNER HP BOULDER, L .L.C., a Delaware limited liability
company
n, B
Name: S�fep�(eaJ ill• Sof�/k
Title: (Ce P2riDE�fi
�Ir"v t-3 i -S
STATE OF G% 1 )
Cn b k— ) ss.
COUNTY OF B9UybBE R } Ak f
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1A day of.,l r , 2013, by
S M. s�k �� , as `I i e-f— POL0MIQV HF Boulder, L.L.C., a Delaware
limi ed liability company.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: Lo
Notary Public /&
OFFICIAL SEAL
Teresa C. Brazzale
Notary Public, State of Illinois
My Commission Expires 816/2015
(00101046.DOC :3) 19
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
ASSOCIATION DEPOT SQUARE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Name: S, c&fl " ilb- 0 k-= r�J
Title: President
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF BOULDER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 day of July, 2013, by
as President of the Depot Square Owners Association, Inc.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires: 1 2-C - 12-0 /4
Notary Public
ESTAT IN G. SNOODY
TARY PUBLIC
OF COLORADO
My Commission Expires 05/25/2016
20
Attachment A: Parking Managment Agreement Depot Square
EXHIBIT A
DEFINITIONS FROM DECLARATION
In the event any of the following definitions are revised in the Declaration, the definition of the
term in the Declaration shall control
"Acceptable Owner" is defined in Section 16.2 of the Declaration.
"Parking Expenses" are defined in Section 9.2.3 of the Declaration.
"Parking Spaces" shall mean the area delineated by markings within the Parking Facilities for
use by one vehicle. References to a Parking Space(s) do not entitle the owner or user thereof to
exclusive use of a particular space or area, but only the number of vehicles a Party has a right to
park in the Parking Facility.
"RTD User" shall mean a vehicle using the Parking Facility while the driver is utilizing the mass
transportation system operated by RTD and complying with RTD parking requirements while
parked in the Parking Facility, which vehicle is using a Parking Space included in the Parking
Unit owned by RTD.
{00101046.DOC:3} 21
CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING MINUTES FORM
NAME OF BOARD /COMMISSION: BOULDER JUNCTION ACCESS DISTRICT
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular December 3, 2014
AGENDA ITEM 1— Roll Call: Meeting called to order at 9:06 a.m.
AGENDA ITEM 2 — Approval of the November 5, 2014 Joint Meeting Minutes (Action Item Below)
AGENDA ITEM 3 — Disclosure of Conflict of Interest: Completed.
AGENDA ITEM 4 — Public Participation: None
AGENDA ITEM 5 —City Council Questions for 2015: Winter discussed the council questions with the board. Osborne
would like council to know that the fruits of planning work for Boulder Junction are now being seen and in the course of the
coming years, council needs to think about the city's housing needs for this property and how to accommodate alt modes.
Koval said the message needs to be sent to council that planning needs to commence on the Pollard site. Winter said that the
Pollard site is on the radar screen for council and there is the need to see how Boulder Junction develops out and it is a
matter of prioritization. Winter acknowledged that there is a sense of urgency by the board in terms of getting started in the
planning process on the Pollard site rather than waiting to 2016. Koval said that council needs to vision the community
benefits and resources are needed for access, transportation and parking and the commission would like to be part of the
prioritization. Osborne said that putting the Quiet Zone for Boulder Junction on council's radar is necessary.
Shanahan questioned the negotiation of the car share program enhancement. Priorities include transportation around Boulder
Junction and district parameters. Enhancing Boulder Junction as a hub for transportation and internal circulation between
areas similar to the HOP, enhancing car share program as an important part of the TDM program are suggested priorities.
Koval said council needs to tap the commission for policy discussions, council seems to have no understanding of what the
commission is doing, and should tap them as an advisory board. Pawlowski suggested asking council what they would like
from the commission. Koval believes that the board has a different perspective to offer. Winter said some boards have a
designated council person to communicate with and have a check in on an individual basis. This will be on the commission's
January agenda.
AGENDA ITEM 6 — City Attorney Update on Petition Process: Haddock said that notice was received from Packard
Dierking that Depot Square is 4 months out for completion. Haddock spoke about the petition process and the inclusion of
the properties as outlined in the agreements. Haddock said that BJAD is the final decision maker on properties to include
unless arbitrary by council. The Pilot Agreement would need to be signed by new properties along with a promise to pay
taxes, acknowledge all the rules and comply with the rules of the district. Haddock outlined the details of including a
property in the district. Winter clarified that when it says BJ -P, it also includes the TDM. Pawlowski asked what it legally
takes to expand the borders of the district. Koval asked if there have been any requests and Winter replied none formally.
Haddock said that the criteria to evaluate needs to be determined. Hagelin said on the business EcoPass side, the more
properties there are, the expense lessens. Winter offered that the concept to expand the boundaries of BJAD TDM to the east
is something to consider. Koval what is the cost benefit analysis by an estimate of employees. Osborne questioned if
additions to the district could be in the TDM district and not in the parking district. Winter gave an analysis of the parking
situation. Winter mentioned that they may reach out to the Reve project and Google and see if this is something they may
want to consider.
Haddock has received notice, under the Parking Purchase Agreement, that the parking structure is within 4 months of
substantial completion and the board needs to decide when to take title of the parking spaces in the garage. Pedersen offered
that the hotel is projected for CO in the middle of February, residential should CO sometime in the middle of April. Koval
questioned a fair way to allocate parking to 3100 Pearl, should a system be created? Winter replied that it will need to be
looked at differently. Winter offered that the Depot restaurant scheduled to open in June. Winter said some spaces will be
retained as short term parking and will also look at the demand at 3100 Pearl. Pedersen said should have the garage access
system in place by the end of June. Winter remarked that the rate structure will need to be reviewed and the residential is a
component and will need to review the market for permits. Haddock offered that the way the agreements are set up is with
the Condo Association and representatives are needed to be on the Condo Association Board. Winter mentioned the condo
declaration language and the parking management agreement. The process for the parking district board electing a
representative to the condo board will take place at the January 7 BJAD commission meeting.
AGENDA ITEM 7 — Update on Pollard Property by Housing Department — Beth Roberts: Roberts, Housing Division,
said that in 2015 staff will be tasked with an analysis of the Pollard site on processes and procedures but now there is no
activity. There will be a Study Session in late 2015 with council. The Pollard lease expires in the fourth quarter of 2016 and
it could be moved earlier but not extended. Koval said the site is currently being graded. Pedersen asked if Housing is
entertaining purchasing the site. Roberts replied that anything is on the table right now.
AGENDA ITEM 8 — Matters from the Commissioners:
AGENDA ITEM 9 — Matters from the Staff: Kathleen Bracke, Go Boulder Manager, introduced Natalie Stiffler. Bracke
said that all capital improvements are underway in Boulder Junction and the Transit Center is scheduled to have a soft
opening m2015 that serve existing routes. The grand opening will be incoordination with the launch of the I -36 bus rapid
transit service scheduled in January 2016. The HOP will continue to stop at 30 and Pearl. Bracke continued that the
Boulder Junction Transit Center will be branded as Boulder Junction Transit Center and not as an address, 30 and Pearl, as
RTD typically brands stops. Service changes that are coming in January of 2015 by RTD is to the Bound and BX to enhance
the routes and address overcrowding. There is a public meeting this evening at the Boulder County Courthouse from 5 — 7
pm. Bracke said the proposed changes by RTD is the branding the US36 route the Flatirons Flyer with a color scheme and
graphics to create a unique identity. Staff's concerns include the Boulder Rapid Transit (BRT) service for all day and wide
spread service will impact Peak Hour express service. Another concern is that RTD Service Plamung is looking at existing
ridership and staff believes they should look at future demand with changing community needs, a concern by Boulder and
community staffs. Another concern is that the service proposal is showing Peak times and should look at frequency of
service and reliability and need to enhance all services to Boulder and Boulder Junction. Pawlowski asked if RTD is de-
committing and Bracke replied that RTD is looking to even out the service and not growing the service, a reallocation
philosophy and not an enhancing philosophy. Osborne asked the theory behind the design of bus route. Osborne said that the
RTD approach now is taking the current routes and moving them around and not adding new trips. Bracke responded it's
about service hours and RTD is struggling with the allocation in the corridor. Staff hopes RTD will do an optimization of the
routes. Bracke offered that the over the road buses will be used with the Flatiron Flyer, branded for the I36 route. RTD will
work with local communities to design the bus and the 136 BRT is the first for RTD and there is an 136 Coalition working to
influence RTD on the routes and service. There will be another meeting in January about these service changes. Bracke
continued that in 2016 they are looking to reduce the service of the 209 and 206. Bracke remarked that staff is looking out
for Boulder Junction and want to enhance the services.
Shanahan asked on an update on the Quiet Zone. Bracke replied they are looking for funding for the recommended
improvements of $5 million dollars. Pedersen questioned if the funding is completely through the grant process. Bracke
replied that any type of combination would be a step in the right direction. Pedersen questioned the city's potential
participation and Bracke replied that it is being investigated. Discussion continued on the technical issues of the
improvements and range of costs. Pedersen questioned if a private entity could do it and Bracke said that it is the cost of the
railroad and it could be done by a private entity but would have to be approved by the railroad. Bracke mentioned some
grants to pursue for the funding. Shanahan questioned how many grants have been applied for and Bracke replied that there
are no grants that fit the letter of certain types of funding programs. Koval questioned the HOP service and who runs it.
Winter mentioned that downtown is looking at a trolley to access Boulder Junction. Osborne mentioned the transportation
system in Portland, OR, and its efficiency. Bracke remarked that the Portland system is inspiring. Pedersen mentioned that
RTD is branding the 136 BRT and asked about Boulder Junction. Bracke remarked that Boulder Junction at Depot Square
does identify the place. Pedersen asked if staff is presenting any studies to RTD about services to Boulder Junction. Bracke
replied that staff has done an in -depth analysis that they will share with RTD.
Chris Hagelin Senior Transportation Planner, mentioned the neighborhood EcoPass is being renewed for Boulder Junction.
Of the 298 residential units with 246 occupied, over 200 EcoPasses have been issued so far for 3100 Pearl. The 2015
contract estimated cost is $47,232 for the contract start and as new residential projects open, it will be adjusted. The business
master contract is written and the estimated number of employees at the Hyatt has not been provided. The community wide
EcoPass study is continuing with a kick off meeting tomorrow to talk about the possible paths to go down, funding sources,
looking at implementation and service aspects, are moving forward. Hagelin continued that the city and county have jointly
began looking at bike storage facility similar to the secure bike storage at the Table Mesa ParkNRide.
Winter mentioned the Joint District Board Meeting on January 21 and the District Board meeting may occur in March.
Meeting adjourned at 10:12 a.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
MOTION: Pawlowski motioned to approve the November 5, 2014 meeting minutes. Shanahan seconded the
motion. With additions as suggested by Koval. The motion passed unanimously 5 -0.
FUTURE MEETINGS:
January 7, 2014 Council Chambers Regular Meeting
APPROVED BY: BOULDER JUNCTION ACCESS DISTRICT JOINT
COMMISSION
Attest:
Ruth Weiss, Secretary Scott Pedersen, Chair - Parking
John Pawlowski, Chair - TDM
2015 Retreat Questions for Boards and Commissions
Boulder Junction Access District /Parking Commissions
What are your priorities within the framework of the current council work plan
that was adopted at lastyear's council retreat?
The community is beginning to see the fruits of many years of planning and public
investment focused on the building of the city's first transit - oriented development
(TOD) - the RTD bus rapid transit station, the new hotel, multi - family housing
including permanently affordable units, the restoration and repurposing of the
depot, the shared street design of Junction Place, a public plaza and the
implementation of a TDM taxing district and the mobility amenities that it provides.
As this new city neighborhood emerges, there are certain to be challenging new
issues and opportunities that Council and the commissions will be called upon to
address.
What would you like to see done to further advance the council goals?
1. Planning for the Pollard Site
The Boulder Junction Commissions feel strongly that planning work on the Pollard
site must start sooner than the end of 2015. The site is key to the future of the area,
and preliminary work exploring the options and development priorities for the site
will take time. Further, from the perspective of the Boulder Junction commissions,
the site may have a role to play in the parking supply for the area.
2. Implementing "quiet zone" improvements
Livability in the new neighborhood is compromised by excessive train noise, and this
will become a greater factor as Boulder Junction builds out. The city must begin to
explore funding options to make quiet zone improvements at Valmont and Pearl.
3. Planning for "last mile" strategies
Boulder Junction's role as a future transportation hub will be strengthened by the
development of strong inter -city circulation options. Ideas to consider in a TMP
update include a HOP -like shuttle to East Arapahoe and the employment area to the
east, a car share station and a trolley to the downtown.
New goal from Susan:
4. Lobbying the state legislature for changes to promote ownership options
in higher density residential projects (underline) The success of Boulder
Junction, and other similar areas, will depend on providing both rental and
ownership options to future residents. Current state law creates a
disincentive to build for sale units. The 2015 legislative agenda should
include lobbying for a solution to this problem.
New goal from John P:
S. Expand the Boulder Junction TDM access district to include adjacent properties
such as the REVE project and the Google, Pearl Place. This would
expand the concept of the TOD district and provide those properties
that would petition into the taxing district the opportunity for
EcoPasses, and bike and car share memberships.
How can your board help reach the current council goals?
The members of the Boulder Junction Access and Parking Commissions are available
to the Council to share knowledge and expertise. The commissioners often feel that
they are operating in a vacuum, and that the Council doesn't understand what the
commissions do.
Are there city policies that need to be addressed to enable your board to function at a
higher level?
The commissioners request a reassessment of the current two commission structure
-- one for travel demand management and one for parking. Most, but not all,
members serve on both commissions. This has resulted in occasional confusion.
Cannot the same members act on behalf of the TDM district, adjourn and reconvene
as the parking district commission?
Are there other priorities outside of the council goals thatyour board /commission
would like to address in the coming year?
It is the intention of commission members to reach out to individual council
members to share information and to learn council expectations.
2015 Citv Council Members
Matt Appelbaum
Macon Cowles
Suzanne Jones
George Karakehian
Lisa Morzel
Tim Plass
Andrew Shoemaker
Sam Weaver
Mary Young
BJAD JOINT COMMISSION
2015 MEETING SCHEDULE
9 -11am
JANUARY 7
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FEBRUARY 4
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MARCH 4
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
APRIL 1
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MAY 6
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JUNE 9
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JULY 1
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AUGUST 5
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SEPTEMBER 2
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
OCTOBER 7
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
NOVEMBER 4
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DECEMBER 2
COUNCIL CHAMBERS