10.02.13 EAB Packet
CITY OF BOULDER
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD MEETING AGENDA
DATE:
October 2, 2013
TIME:
6 p.m.
PLACE:
1777 Broadway, 1777 W. Conference Room
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.APPROVAL OF MINUTES
September 11, 2013
A.The Environmental Advisory Board minutes are scheduled for approval.
3.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
4.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A.Access Management and Parking Strategies (AMPS) guiding principles and areas of focus
(Molly Winter)
B.Briefing on flood related activities
5.PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
6.MATTERS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD, CITY MANAGER, AND
CITY ATTORNEY
7.DEBRIEF MEETING/CALENDAR CHECK
8.ADJOURNMENT
For more information call (303) 441-1880. Board packets are available after 4 p.m. Friday prior to the meeting, online at www.bouldercolorado.gov, at the Boulder
Public Main Library’s Reference Desk, or at the Planning and Development Services Center, located at 1739 Broadway, third floor.
CITY OF BOULDER ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD
MEETING GUIDELINES
CALL TO ORDER
The board must have a quorum (three members present) before the meeting can be called to order.
AGENDA
The board may rearrange the order of the agenda or delete items for good cause. The board may not add items requiring public notice.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The public is welcome to address the board (three minutes* maximum per speaker) during the Public Participation portion of the meeting regarding any
item not scheduled for a public hearing. The only items scheduled for a public hearing are those listed under the category PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS on
the agenda. Any exhibits introduced into the record at this time must be provided in quantities of eight to the Board Secretary for distribution to the board
and admission into the record.
DISCUSSION AND STUDY SESSION ITEMS
Discussion and study session items do not require motions of approval or recommendation.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
A Public Hearing item requires a motion and a vote. The general format for hearing of an action item is as follows:
1. Presentations
Staff presentation (15 minutes maximum*) Any exhibits introduced into the record at this time must be provided in quantities of eight to
the Board Secretary for distribution to the board and admission into the record.
Environmental Advisory Board questioning of staff for information only.
2. Public Hearing
Each speaker will be allowed an oral presentation (three minutes maximum*). All speakers wishing to pool their time must be present, and time
allotted will be determined by the Chair. Two minutes will be added to the pooled speaker for each such speaker’s allotted time up to a
maximum of 10 minutes total.
Time remaining is presented by a green blinking light that means one minute remains, a yellow light means 30 seconds remain, and a red
light and beep means time has expired.
Speakers should introduce themselves, giving name and address. If officially representing a group please state that for the record as well.
Speakers are requested not to repeat items addressed by previous speakers other than to express points of agreement or disagreement.
Refrain from reading long documents, and summarize comments wherever possible. Long documents may be submitted and will become a
part of the official record.
Any exhibits introduced into the record at the hearing must be provided in quantities of eight to the Board Secretary for distribution to the
board and admission into the record.
Interested persons can send a letter to the Community Planning and Sustainability staff at 1739 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80302, two weeks
before the Environmental Advisory Board meeting, to be included in the board packet. Correspondence received after this time will be
distributed at the board meeting.
3. Board Action
Board motion. Motions may take any number of forms. Motions are generally used to approve (with or without conditions), deny, or continue
agenda item to a later date (generally in order to obtain additional information).
Board discussion. This is undertaken entirely by members of the board. Members of the public or city staff participate only if called upon
by the Chair.
Board action (the vote). An affirmative vote of at least three members of the board is required to pass a motion approving any action.
MATTERS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORYBOARD, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY ATTORNEY
Any Environmental Advisory Board member, City Manager, or the City Attorney may introduce before the board matters which are not included in the
formal agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
The board's goal is that regular meetings adjourn by 8 p.m. Agenda items will not be commenced after 8 p.m. except by majority vote of board members
present.
*The Chair may lengthen or shorten the time allotted as appropriate. If the allotted time is exceeded, the Chair may request that the speaker conclude his or her comments.
CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING SUMMARY
NAME OF BOARD/COMMISSION:
Environmental Advisory Board
DATE OF MEETING:
September 11, 2013
NAME/TELEPHONE OF PERSON PREPARING SUMMARY:
Juliet Bonnell,
303-441-1931
NAMES OF MEMBERS, STAFF AND INVITED GUESTS PRESENT:
Environmental Advisory Board Members Present:
Mara Abbott, Tim Hillman, Larissa Read,
Stephen Morgan, and Morgan Lommele.
Staff Members Present:
Jonathan Koehn, Jamie Harkins, Juliet Bonnell
1. CALL TO ORDER
L. Read
The Environmental Advisory Board temporary Chair declared a quorum and the
meeting was called to order at 6:05 p.m.
New board member, Morgan Lommele was sworn in and provided some information about her
interests and background.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M. Abbott, T. Hillman
On a motion byseconded by, the Environmental Advisory Board
M. Lommele
approved (4-0, abstained) the July 10, 2013 meeting minutes.
3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Mary Louise Chavers P.O. Box 4342, Boulder CO
expressed concern about U-Haul trailers
and vehicles parking outside her building at 42620 Broadway #212because of the exhaust from
their tailpipes and the impact it has on residents and property vegetation as well as the risk of a
building collision. She would like to see safer barriers used between the building and the trucks
and asked for suggestions of who she could speak with in order to get barriers added. She
mentioned that she has attempted to speak with the property manager with no results.
J. Koehn
noted that he would discuss options with zoning enforcement to address this issue.
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Debrief of August 19, 2013 Joint Board Workshop
J. Koehn
indicatedthis was the first joint board workshop held to help boards collaborate
successfully on important issues that span the expertise of multiple boards.
M. Lommele
said that board members felt there wasn’t an appropriate forum for some ideas to
be brought forward to council and emphasized that coordination between boards is essential to
meet some city goals- especially the climate commitment goal.
S. Morgan
felt there were many topics that could benefit from board collaboration because they
would be thoroughly thought through from different perspectives. He thought this cross-
pollination would result in more powerful, unified objectives.
M. Abbott
noted that people are aware of what quasi-judicial boards are doing, but don’t
necessarily know what EAB is doing. This is because EAB sets up priorities and approaches, but
other boards have more opportunity to take direct action. She felt that EAB’s activities should be
cross-referenced with the actions that other boards are taking to ensure synergy.
T. Hillman
felt it was important for boards to work together and liked the idea of “board
buddies” to cross-reference ideas.
L. Read
mentioned that environmental ethics pervade all city programs and all boards’ work
which is why the EAB plays more of an advisory role. She enjoyed the board workshop and felt
it was well organized and facilitated and full of good energy. Approaches to enhance board
collaboration that were discussed included: board members attending other boards’ meetings and
public meetings, creation of a pilot project that representatives from multiple boards would work
on together, increasing awareness of other boards’ activities, and board buddies. She suggested
focusing on the basics and revisiting why EAB was originally created.
J. Koehn
suggested creating a more centralized board agenda section on the city’s website.
M. Abbott
would like to see a list of board agenda topics with bulleted points where board
members could understand what other boards are addressing without having to read full board
packets.
L. Read
suggested identifying boards with overlapping tasks/agendas as EAB and having a
member that agrees to attend other boards’ meetings.
S. Morgan
liked the idea of board buddies as an informal way of staying in the loop of other
boards. He felt that EAB was well informed about what other boards are working on- especially
relating to climate commitment. He felt EAB was pretty broad in their understanding and well
positioned to be better-connected.
J. Koehn
reported that there was not a lot of concern about board buddies meeting with each
other, but noted that the attorney’s office was looking into creating proper protocol for these
meetings and ensuring that there is not a conflict in having members of various boards discuss
items outside of official board meetings.
M. Abbott
expressed concern about the additional time these ideas for collaboration might take
to implement. She felt it was easy to attend another boards’ meeting and speak under public
participation representing EAB’s opinion. She also liked the idea of board buddies providing
updates in an informal forum.
M. Lommele
suggested that EAB and other boards should think about interdisciplinary ways to
implement the plans that have been created.
S. Morgan
liked the idea of board buddies, but preferred the idea of creating a pilot project
where representatives from various boards look at tangible things and accomplish goals. The
project should be chosen wisely because there are many resources and power behind some
projects already. He suggested perhaps rezoning the Hill to enhance the community.
L. Read
also preferred the idea of a small pilot project (such as Boulder Junction) over board
buddies due to ease of meeting and creating a tangible result. She suggested that a pilot project as
well as board buddies could be the first collaborative board approaches EAB implements.
Working on a pilot project could coincide with her idea of going back to basics and the original
goals of the board.
J. Koehn
indicated there are a number of opportunities on the horizon to test this
interdisciplinary approach such as “ecodistricts”. This concept is being discussed and Boulder
will likely be partnering with Portland to kick-off a consortium of ecodistrict design to bring the
right experts to the table (transportation, land use, water, etc.) to talk about guiding principles.
The topic of ecodistricts will come to the board for further discussion soon.
The board liked the ideas of pilot projects and board buddies and requested additional
J. Koehn
information from regarding what collaborative approaches other departments and
boards prefer and whether there are any conflicts or legal stumbling blocks to moving forward
with them.
A. Market Innovation Program Update (J. Harkins)
J. Harkins
provided background information about the market innovation grant program funded
through the CAP tax as a council priority that is being developed to reach out to the community’s
creativity to reduce carbon emissions.
The city is working on putting together a working group by reaching out to new people to bring
new experiences and interests to the process. Clean tech, energy efficiency, green building, small
J. Harkins
business development, and market development experts have been scouted and asked
EAB for feedback on the list of targeted people.
J. Harkins
informed EAB that the Chamber of Commerce is trying to start a clean tech, low-
carbon group and might be a location for Market Innovation Program meetings.
J. Koehn
mentioned that there is currently a clean energy cluster based out of Fort Collinsand
added thataclean energy program was previously run out of the Chamber of Commerce, but
didn’t continue after a loss of staff. The question is whether we want to develop something more
local or participate in a more regional approach.
J. Harkins
provided an outline of the time commitment she’s looking for from the 8-10 person
working group. There will be a substantial 3-4 hour first meeting where background information
will be provided and evaluation criteria will be developed. This will be followed by subsequent
shorter meetings to evaluate proposals and choose the winners.
M. Lommele
noted that $300,000 seemed like minimal funding to accomplish true energy
efficiency change. She suggested including someone with a scientific background in the working
group as well as someone who could get the word out about the program. She volunteered to
help identify someone in NREL for the working group.
J. Harkins
said that this is a pilot year and that we might be able to leverage more funding in
future years. The purpose of this program is to see what new ideas the community comes up with
versus expanding upon existing programs.
J. Koehn
provided background on the amount of funding and indicated that it is seed money to
kick-start creativity and get people involved.
S. Morgan
reiterated the idea of doing an RFI before doing an RFP to build a foundation. Look
for complementary skills to round out the working group.Look for people with great ideas and
for people who can implement them. He believes there is government money available and
suggested following up with Jared Polis to see if the federal government may be able to help
with funding.
M. Abbott
likes going beyond the usual suspects and having fresh eyes in both the working
group and pool of applicants.
T. Hillman
was concerned that the working group is highly tech focused and technology has the
potential to use lots of funds without a lot of return, so he cautioned against putting all our eggs
in this one basket. He felt there was a lot of value in funding smaller projects to get more
community-based companies involved. He thought it was a better use of funds to get greater buy-
in from community members.
S. Morgan
said to think big. Community involvement is important, but thinking big is also
important to achieve a cause.
L. Read
agreed that the working group should be more diverse including scientific backgrounds,
some understanding of how government works, and an eye toward helping the larger community.
She suggested that the timeline might need to shift into Jan. since Nov.-Dec. is usually busy and
a difficult time to find volunteers. She suggested tapping into universities to help get the word
out about this project.
J. Harkins
was open to suggestions about how best to advertise this program through press
releases, media, networking groups, etc.
M. Lommele
suggested an article in the Daily Camera. She suggested allowing people to apply
with additional funding sources or using a phased approach where the city pays for the first
phase and applicants pay for subsequent phases.
J. Harkins
is looking for an EAB member to be a full participant in the working group to
develop evaluation criteria and evaluate applications.
S. Morgan
volunteered to be part of the working group.
T. Hillman
is very excited about this process, but didn’t feel like he could give it adequate time
L. Read
at this point. He nominated to be part of the working group.
L. Read
indicated she is interested in participating in the working group, but mentioned that she
travels a lot for work and may or may not be available.
5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
A.None
6. MATTERS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD, CITY
MANAGER, AND CITY ATTORNEY
J. Koehn
provided a brief update on municipalization. A press release was put out this week to
develop a new working group regarding solar incentives and distributive generation. If a utility is
created we need to determine how to handle ongoing incentives. The aim of the working group is
to determining local priorities and develop the next generation of solar incentives. Many people
have expressed interest in participating in this working group which will be kicked off in
November.
S. Morgan
noted that bears, coyotes and other wildlife are a big issue in the Chautauqua area.
He has a bear resistant trash can and it has alleviated the problem. He would like bear resistant
trash cans to be required in certain areas of the city.
J. Koehn
responded thatcouncil did not support requiring bear resistant trash cans initially
because this would require waste haulers to retrofit their systems entirely which would be costly.
This issue is currently being re-evaluated.
T. Hillman
informed EAB that CGBG is hosting a forum with all the committees advocating for
certain issues on the ballot this fall on Tues, Oct. 8 from noon-1 at Elevations Credit Union.
7. DEBRIEF MEETING/CALENDAR CHECK
T. Hillman
will be the temporarychair at the Oct. 2 EAB meeting.
A date will be chosen for EAB to hold their annual retreat in November.
M. Abbott
will be the temporary chair at the Dec. 4 EAB meeting.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Environmental Advisory Board adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Approved:
_________________________________________________________
Chair Date
C I T Y O F B O U L D E R
Environmental Advisory Board
MEETING DATE: October 2, 2013
AGENDA TITLE: Feedback regarding the AMPS (Access Management and Parking Strategy) guiding
principles and areas of focus.
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT:
Molly Winter, Director, Downtown and University Hill Management Division/Parking
Services
Kathleen Bracke, GO Boulder Manager, Transportation Department
OBJECTIVE:
Receive feedback from EAB on the AMPS project.
SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to receive feedback from EAB on the Access Management and Parking Strategy
project’s guiding principles and areas of focus. (See Attachment A.)
BACKGROUND
Building on the foundation of the city’s successful multi-modal, district-based access and parking system,
AMPS will define priorities and develop over-arching policies and tailored programs and tools to address
citywide access (vehicular, pedestrian, transit and bike) management in a manner consistent with the
community’s social, economic and environmental sustainability principles. AMPS will:
Be consistent with and support the city’s sustainability framework: safety and community well-
being, community character, mobility, energy and climate, natural environment, economic vitality
and good governance.
Be an interdepartmental effort that aligns with and supports the implementation of the city’s master
plan, policies and codes.
Be flexible and adapt to support the present and future we want while providing predictability.
Reflect the city’s values: service excellence for an inspired future through customer service,
collaboration, innovation, integrity and respect.
PROPOSAL
The interdepartmental staff team is proposing the following guiding principles for the project (also see Attachment
A for more specific description):
Provide for all transportation modes
Support a diversity of people
Customize tools by area
Seek solutions with co-benefits
Plan for the present and future
Cultivate partnerships.
Theareas of focus for AMPS develop are proposed to be (see Attachment A for specific descriptions):
District Management
Travel Demand Management Programs
Enforcement
Technology
Parking Management: on and off street
Parking Code Requirements for Private Property
Parking Management through pricing.
PUBLIC COMMENT AND PROCESS
After several multi-departmental staff workshops, the AMPS project concept was presented to city advisory boards
(TAB, Planning Board, and the district boards: Boulder Junction Access Districts, Downtown Management
Commission and the University Hill Commercial Area Management Commission) in the spring for feedback. A
study session was held with City Council on April 27 to affirm the project direction and approach. A joint board
th
meeting of the district boards, Planning Board, TAB and the Environmental Advisory Board was held in August to
present three inter-related efforts: AMPS, Transportation Master Plan Update (TMP) and the Climate Committee,
and provide a first time opportunity for discussion amongst the boards. During the fall, staff will be seeking specific
feedback from these advisory boards on the AMPS guiding principles and areas of focus. A study session with City
Council is planned for October 29 in order to receive their feedback, guidance and endorsement of the AMPS
principles and areas of focus in order to formulate the AMPS work plan for 2014.
ATTACHMENTS:
A.AMPS Areas of Focus and Guiding Principles
Attachment A
%147
%GGIWW1EREKIQIRX
4EVOMRK7XVEXIKMIW
;LEXMW4YVTSWI#
&YMPHMRKSRXLIJSYRHEXMSRSJXLIWYGGIWWJYPQYPXMQSHEP
HMWXVMGXFEWIHEGGIWWERHTEVOMRKW]WXIQXLI%GGIWW
ERHHIZIPSTSZIVEVGLMRKTSPMGMIWERHXEMPSVIHTVSKVEQWERH
XSSPWXSEHHVIWWGMX][MHIEGGIWWQEREKIQIRXMREQERRIV
GSRWMWXIRX[MXLXLIGSQQYRMX]vWWSGMEPIGSRSQMGERH
IRZMVSRQIRXEPWYWXEMREFMPMX]TVMRGMTPIW
8LI%GGIWW1EREKIQIRXERH4EVOMRK
7XVEXIK]
%147
[MPP
&IGSRWMWXIRX[MXLERHWYTTSVXXLIGMX]vWWYWXEMREFMPMX]
JVEQI[SVO WEJIX]ERHGSQQYRMX][IPPFIMRK
GSQQYRMX]GLEVEGXIVQSFMPMX]IRIVK]ERHGPMQEXI
REXYVEPIRZMVSRQIRXIGSRSQMGZMXEPMX]ERHKSSH
KSZIVRERGI
WYTTSVXWXLIMQTPIQIRXEXMSRSJXLIGMX]vWQEWXIV
TPERWTSPMGMIWERHGSHIW
JYXYVI[I[ERX[LMPITVSZMHMRKTVIHMGXEFMPMX]
MRWTMVIHJYXYVIXLVSYKLGYWXSQIVWIVZMGI
GSPPEFSVEXMSRMRRSZEXMSRMRXIKVMX]ERHVIWTIGX
%147
%VIEWSJ*SGYW
(MWXVMGX1EREKIQIRX4EVOMRK1EREKIQIRX
-RXIKVEXMSRSJTYFPMGWTEGIQEREKIQIRX
TEVOMRKQEREKIQIRXFYWMRIWWEWWMWXERGI
QEMRXIRERGIERHEPXIVREXMZIQSHIWWIVZMGIW
XSXLI(S[RXS[RERH9RMZIVWMX],MPP
1EREKITEVOMRKKEVEKIW
GSQQIVGMEPEVIEWXLVSYKLXLILMKLIWXPIZIPSJ
SRWXVIIXW]WXIQWERH
IRJSVGIQIRXJSVXLVIISJ
&SYPHIVvWGSQQIVGMEPHMWXVMGXW
IGSRSQMGEPP]ERHWSGMEPP]ZMXEPGSQQIVGMEP
(S[RXS[R&SYPHIV9RMZIVWMX]
,MPPERH[LIRGSQTPIXIH
&SYPHIV.YRGXMSREW[IPPEWXLI
2IMKLFSVLSSH4EVOMRK
4IVQMXHMWXVMGXWXLVSYKLSYX
&SYPHIV
8VEZIP(IQERH
1EREKIQIRX4VSKVEQW
4EVOMRK'SHI6IUYMVIQIRXW
JSV4VMZEXI4VSTIVX]
1EREKIEGGIWWMRSYVGSQQIVGMEPHMWXVMGXW
XLVSYKLEPXIVREXMZIQSHIWSJXVERWTSVXEXMSR
MRGPYHMRKXLIHS[RXS[RIQTPS]II)GS4EWW
I+S'EV7LEVIQIQFIVWLMTW&SYPHIV&G]GPI
WXEXMSRWERHTIHIWXVMERFEWIHMRJVEWXVYGXYVI
'SRWMHIVGSHIGLERKIWJSV
EYXSQSFMPIXVMTWPIEHWXSMRGVIEWIHTEVOMRK
VIKYPEXMSRWMRSVHIVXSEPMKR
WYTTP]JSVGYWXSQIVWERHZMWMXSVWERHWYTTSVXW
TSPMGMIW[MXLGMX][MHIKSEPWJSV
XLIGMX]vW'PMQEXI%GXMSR4PER
VIHYGMRKWMRKPISGGYTERX
ZILMGPIXVMTWWYTTSVXMRK
EPXIVREXMZIQSHIWSJ
XVERWTSVXEXMSR[MXLXLIKSEPSJ
GVIEXMRKZMXEPGIRXIVWERH
RIMKLFSVLSSHW
)RJSVGIQIRX
)QTPS]IRJSVGIQIRXXSIRWYVIVIEWSREFPI
EGGIWWERHXYVRSZIVJSVFYWMRIWWIWVIWMHIRXW
ERHZMWMXSVWXSWYTTSVXXLILIEPXLWEJIX]
4EVOMRK1EREKIQIRX
RIMKLFSVLSSHPMZEFMPMX]ERHIGSRSQMGZMXEPMX]
SJXLI'MX];IPPHIWMKRIHIRJSVGIQIRXIREFPIW
XLI'MX]XSQE\MQM^IMXWYWISJXLII\MWXMRK
XLVSYKL4VMGMRK
TEVOMRKWYTTP]
QEREKITEVOMRKVIWSYVGIWERH
FEPERGIXLIVSPISJTVMGMRKMR
WYTTSVXMRKXLIYWISJ
EPXIVREXMZIQSHIWSJ
XVERWTSVXEXMSR[MXLIGSRSQMG
8IGLRSPSK]
ZMEFMPMX]
XIGLRSPSKMIWXSQEREKII\MWXMRKERHJYXYVI
TEVOMRKERHIRJSVGIQIRXSTIVEXMSRWERHXS
MQTVSZIXLISZIVEPPGYWXSQIVTEVOMRK
I\TIVMIRGIMR&SYPHIV
%147
%GGIWW1EREKIQIRX
4EVOMRK7XVEXIKMIW
4VSZMHIJSV%PP8VERWTSVXEXMSR1SHIW 7YTTSVXE
FEPERGISJEPPQSHIWSJEGGIWWMRSYVXVERWTSVXEXMSR
W]WXIQ TIHIWXVMERFMG]GPIXVERWMXERHQYPXMTPIJSVQWSJ
QSXSVM^IHZILMGPIW{[MXLXLITIHIWXVMEREXXLIGIRXIV
7YTTSVXE(MZIVWMX]SJ4ISTPI
WXYHIRXWERHZMWMXSVW
'YWXSQM^I8SSPWF]%VIE 9WISJEXSSPFS\[MXLEZEVMIX]SJTVSKVEQWTSPMGMIWERHMRMXMEXMZIWGYWXSQM^IH
JSVXLIYRMUYIRIIHWERHGLEVEGXIVSJXLIGMX]vWHMZIVWIRIMKLFSVLSSHWFSXLVIWMHIRXMEPERHGSQQIVGMEP
GLEVEGXIVIGSRSQMGZMXEPMX]ERHGSQQYRMX][IPPFIMRK[MXLIPIKERXWSPYXMSRW{XLSWIXLEXEGLMIZI
4PERJSVXLI4VIWIRXERH*YXYVI ;LMPIJSGYWMRKSRXSHE]vWRIIHWHIZIPSTWSPYXMSRWXLEXEHHVIWWJYXYVI
HIQSKVETLMGIGSRSQMGXVEZIPERHGSQQYRMX]HIWMKRRIIHW
'YPXMZEXI4EVXRIVWLMTW &ISTIRXSGSPPEFSVEXMSRERHTYFPMGERHTVMZEXITEVXRIVWLMTWXSEGLMIZIHIWMVIH
SYXGSQIW
-WWYIW
3TTSVXYRMXMIW
1IIXMRKXLIEGGIWWRIIHWSJSYVHMZIVWIGYWXSQIVFEWIXSSYVGMX]GIRXIVWzIQTPS]IIW
ZMWMXSVWGYWXSQIVWGPMIRXWVIWMHIRXW ]SYRKSPHHMWEFPIHERHIZIV]XLMRKMRFIX[IIR
&EPERGMRKXLIIGSRSQMGZMXEPMX]SJSYVGSQQIVGMEPHMWXVMGXW[MXLSXLIVGMX]WYWXEMREFMPMX]
KSEPW WSGMEPERHIRZMVSRQIRXEP
1EMRXEMRMRKRIMKLFSVLSSHPMZEFMPMX][MXLMRXLIGSRXI\XSJSYVGSQTEGXQM\IHYWILMKLIV
HIRWMX]HIZIPSTQIRXQSHIP
STXMSRWERHZEPYEFPIMRGIRXMZIWMREQEVOIXRS[I\TIVMIRGMRKPSRKIVGSQQYXIVQMPIW
&EPERGMRKXLIHIQERHWJSVYWISJXLITYFPMGVMKLXSJ[E] TVSZMHMRKWTEGIJSVEPXIVREXMZI
QSHIWTIHIWXVMER[EPOEFMPMX]WSGMEPM^MRKERHLEZMRKIZIRXW
2I\X7XITW
'PMQEXI'SQQMXQIRX
7XVEXIK]HIZIPSTQIRXERHXIWXMRK
'SQQYRMX]SYXVIEGLERHIRKEKIQIRX
4EVXRIVWLMTHIZIPSTQIRX
8VERWTSVXEXMSR1EWXIV4PER
'SRXMRYIXSHITPS]ERHIZEPYEXIFMOITIHMRRSZEXMSRW
(IZIPSTERHIZEPYEXIXVERWMXWGIREVMSW
*EPP;MRXIV
-RXIKVEXIJYRHMRKTVSNIGXW8(1WXVEXIKMIWMRXSMRZIWXQIRXW
TVSKVEQW
7XYH]WIWWMSRWTVSTSWIHJSV*IFVYEV]ERH%TVMP
%GGIWW1EREKIQIRX
4EVOMRK7XVEXIKMIW
*IIHFEGOJVSQ.SMRX&SEVH1IIXMRK
-RXIVHITEVXQIRXEPXIEQWF]EVIEWSJJSGYW
,MVIEGSRWYPXERX
(IZIPSTHVEJX[SVOEVIEWERHTVMSVMXM^EXMSRQEXVM\
4YFPMG3TIR,SYWI
'LIGOMR[MXL'MX]'SYRGMP
4LEWIMQTPIQIRXEXMSR