08.21.13 UHCAMC Packet
UNIVERSITY HILL COMMERCIAL AREA MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
OFF-SITE MEETING – August 21, 2013
th
Grace Lutheran Church, 1001 13 Street
AGENDA
1. Roll Call
2. Committee Assignments
3. Approval of the July 17, 2013 Minutes
4. Police Update
5. Public Participation
6. CUSG Update
7. UHNA Update
8. Parking Services Update
9. Matters from the Commissioners
Innovation District Update – Spark
Hill Flea
10. Matters from Staff
Budget Committee Representative
Update on 14th Street Parking Lot Public/Private Partnership Project
Hill Revitalization Update:
Residential Service District
Draft City of Boulder Economic Sustainability Strategy
EBikes Proposal
Mural Project for the Fall
Attachments
Quarterly Financial Report
Police Stats
City of Boulder Economic Sustainability Strategy Draft
EBikes Proposal
DUHMD/PS 2013 Priorities UHCAMC 2013 Priorities
University Hill Revitalization
Support the Residential Service District
Support for creation of a Residential Service District
Support the Hill Ownership Group
Innovation District/Organizational Options
Create a clear brand identity for the Hill
th
Street Lot Redevelopment
14Commercial area that includes a focus on
Parking
sustainability, creativity, innovation
Technology Enhancements Encourage sustainable pilots to meet our energy
future
Access/Parking Management Strategy
In collaboration with the Transportation Master Plan Think creatively but carefully about affordable
o
Updatehousing on the hill
Downtown Capital and Planning Projects
Provide funding through the CIP for capital
th
15 Street (Canyon to Arapaho) Streetscape Implementation projects on the hill
th
14 and Walnut Pedestrian Improvements Implementation Develop sustainable partnerships with the
University
West Pearl Streetscape Design
Changes to the regulations in the hill
Pearl Street Mall Interactive Kiosks Implementation
commercial area to promote creativity
Civic Use Pad Recommendations
Civic Park Master Plan participation
Mission Statement:
We serve the downtown, University
Boulder Junction
Hill and affected communities by providing quality
Access Districts (Parking and TDM) Implementation
program, parking enforcement, maintenance and alternative
Depot Square Construction Coordination
modes services through the highest level of customer
Administration
service, efficient management and effective problem
Remodel reception area
solving.
TBBI Planning
CRM and new website implementation
Additional Items
:
Pearl Street Smoking Ban Implementation
Revisit Mobile Food Vending Ordinance
Complete CAGID Garage CIP Projects
Organizational Assessment
° Transition with Cunningham retirement
1
CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETING MINUTES FORM
NAME OF BOARD/COMMISSION: UNIVERSITY HILL COMMERCIAL
AREA MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
NAME/TELEPHONE OF PERSON PREPARING SUMMARY: Ruth Weiss – 303-413-7318
NAMES OF MEMBERS, STAFF, AND INVITED GUESTS PRESENT:
COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, RAJ (late arrival), WINER, MITCHELL (late arrival), GRIFFITH
STAFF: WINTER, LANDRITH, WEISS, GOSAGE, LANDRITH, JOBERT, MATTHEWS,
GUESTS: GLENN MAGEE, SAM VEUCASOVIC, MARK HEINRITZ, CHRIS SCHAEFBAUER,
MICHAEL P. ABSALOM, BILL SHRUM
TYPE OF MEETING: Regular MINUTES MEETING: July 17, 2013
AGENDA ITEM 1 – Roll Call:
Meeting called to order at 9:06 a.m.
AGENDA ITEM 2 – Committee Assignments:
Griffith offered to be on Budget Committee.
AGENDA ITEM 3 - Approval of May 9, 2013 Minutes: (See Action Item Below):
AGENDA ITEM 4 - Police Update:
Gosage mentioned that it has been a quiet summer, up 3% in overall major crime
with sex assaults up 400% from last year; burglaries are down from last year especially since the students are gone and
th
doors are not open; 4 of July was very busy on the hill; and, a large party was discussed. Dahl commented that her
employees were commenting that since it was quieter there appeared to be more police harassment. Winer questioned
safety concerns and the incoming class. Gosage replied that there will be marketing and door to door meetings to pass on
message.
AGENDA ITEM 5 –Public Participation
: None
AGENDA ITEM 6: Council Chamber Remodel:
Magee approached the podium to discuss the remodel of the space and
offered that a consultant, K2, was hired; there is a package of upgrades to include audio, visual, digital, and greater
microphone control. Magee continued with the new dais set up, a meeting room creation along with another CAO office,
other security measures in place, design plans also include getting the public more engaged with council and vice versa.
Griffith offered that IPad docking stations would be appreciated. Magee agreed with Griffith and offered that there are lots
of options available and is concerned that there is not enough desk space to accommodate appropriately. Winer asked
about how it will work with construction from November to January. Magee replied that other rooms will be used and it is
planned to start in November. Griffith suggested using hill locations/businesses for meetings. Magee offered that six more
board presentations are planned and going to council in August with plans.
AGENDA ITEM 7 –Proposed 500’ Alcohol Rule and Alcohol Land Use Definition Options
: Winter mentioned that
this will be going to many boards for their comments and there will be a first reading on 9/17 with city council. Winter
continued that there are two separate types of changes. Land use changes apply citywide; page 5 shows the options;
interpretation of uses; hill is BMS zoning; land use changes include restaurants that are required to close at 11 pm as a
conditional use; those open past 11 pm and there will not be any additional restaurants permitted after Midnight on the hill;
taverns would not be permitted on the hill and brew pubs would have a conditional use; and, retail liquor license stores
were discussed. Winter continued that it gives more flexibility to the licenses allowed. Winter mentioned the 500 Foot
Rule changes which impacts the hill and some peripheral locations; may grandfather in existing licenses but one option no
new licenses would be granted; and there is a lot of detail per Winter.
th
Mark Heinritz, The Sink, 1165 13 Street, Boulder, approached the podium and offered it was interesting to hear the
consultant talk about chamber AV upgrades because they had a plan with a defined purpose and an expected outcome, and
they filled in the blanks on how they were going to get there, and what could be expected when they were done. Heinritz
commented that was not done in this entire process. He continued that there have been a string of public meetings for 18
years with no real focus on the issue except for overconsumption of alcohol in our community. Heinritz continued that
there has been no analysis of the issue to date on what effect these changes will make and we don’t know what we are
stepping into and yet, language has been drafted to vote on in November. Heinritz continued that a third option should be a
2
hotel liquor license on the hill. Heinritz offered that it seems preordained that this is going to happen, decision has been
made, stay out of the way, we know what’s best, and it is insulting. The question should be to find out if hill liquor licenses
are a contributing aspect and advise city council that this is inappropriate. Griffith questioned Heinritz that if he were to
design a study to understand the impact of the bars and restaurant, what would he recommend? Heinritz replied that he has
done his own analysis, mentioned the differences of the licenses and the size of the establishments to hold people. Heinritz
remarked on the crowd numbers from years ago and that today there are only 4 occasions that would draw a maximum of
900 people opposed to the 2 thousand people years ago. Dahl asked if the hill is being singled out. Heinritz remarked that
the issue is broad and started out as to change alcohol on the hill. Winer questioned Heinritz as to how will the 500’ Rule
long term impact the hill. Heinritz, as an operator, he constantly is on the defensive and it should be a matter of putting
more energy into the hill. Raj questioned Heinritz’s solution on the hill would be and he replied that the problems needs to
be separated to location, he empathizes with neighbors regarding noise, and mentioned that one - is for city council to
personally lend their voices to support the hill and getting to know it; and two -, shifting the conversation to how to curb the
egregious behavior. Heinritz would not be concerned with licensing on the hill as they are difficult to get. Heinritz said that
understanding social norms is important and the 500’ Rule would do irreversible economic damage to the hill, the brand of
the hill is so tarnished. Higher density on the hill would require more parking on the hill, a parking structure would be
beneficial and can’t build it without demand and can’t get demand without a parking structure. Winter questioned Heinritz
and a new type of license that would be beer and wine only and open to Midnight and its viability. Heinritz commented
that for a smaller footprint place, it would be a perfect application but if you want another Aion, it would need the full
alcohol availability and the rule would turn away larger operators. Beer and wine licenses were discussed.
Chris Schaefbauer, President of Student Affairs, CU Student Government, 6175 Habitat Drive, Boulder, and served in the
role as the director of Health and Safety and worked with a group to address this issue and looked at this problem with CU
staff, students, residents, and there was a lot of consensus. Schaefbauer continued with the 500’ rule and its unintended
consequences in the long term; if we continue to over regulate the hill and make it more difficult to come to the hill for
businesses, good businesses will be driven away. Schaefbauer continued that as a student, it is important to have positive
places on the hill to get together and alcohol is part of it; most heavy drinking happens on Pearl Street and in private
residences and house parties; targeting the hill with this potential solution that does not solve the problem. Research has
shown that highest risk drinking is done in houses and they drink more. The 500’ rule is concerning. Schaefbauer urged the
commission to make statements about it and council needs a strong message, economics of the hill at risk and student safety
is a concern. He continued with discussing definitions and offered that before you have definitions, consequences needs to
be understood, and so if you have definitions without consequences, it seems unfair for businesses if you don’t know what
will come. So, to have no more restaurants on the hill, in order to get rid of liquor, it is proposed to have no more
restaurants and removing food from the equation will bring more harm. There should be more restaurants open after 11 pm
and regulating restaurants to get rid of alcohol is backwards and alcohol should be focused. Creating polices for
establishments to do well should be the focus and not creating polices to prevent people from doing things. Winter
questioned the use of the word consequences of definition and Schaefbauer replied that the definitions need to be clear as to
how they will be used. Griffith commented if there are commercial areas within other universities that have the same
issues, is there a way to look at them. Winter does have more information on this issue. Griffith questioned the path from
Pearl Street to the hill at night. Gosage replied with the streets typically taken and offered concern of the number of single
intoxicated females out at night and walking. Mitchell offered that he has noticed an increase in the number of females
walking alone at night in the last ten years. Winer questioned if increased lighting across the creek would help and Gosage
replied that it could help. Winter questioned if there is an official position from student government, Schaefbauer offered
that this is consistent with the student government position from last year. Schaefbauer is looking to do some research with
students in this regard. Mitchell offered that this limit will drive more risk behavior house parties and believes the drinking
laws are wrong and should be moved to 18, parents continue to buy homes for their students on the hill, existing businesses
will form a monopoly and the good operators are induced to sell out, concurs with Heinritz, it creates crime and a mess on
the hill, and cleaning up the aftereffects of weekend drinking is a start.
Michael P. Absalom, 2638 Grapewood Lane, Boulder; president of the Responsible Hospitality Group and general manager
with the Mountain Sun Restaurant Group, is very encouraged by the tone of this board. Absalom continued that in terms of
definitions that every licensee in the State are defined as a license type and the City of Boulder is outside of their purview.
The definitions they are trying to put forth are in place already set by the Colorado State Liquor Code. When the City of
Boulder is trying to regulate alcohol, they are doing what the state has already done in the State Liquor Code. At the
February 19 City Council meeting, council was concerned that there may be a tax on landlords and problem landlords pr
problem residents. Things to address are the over consumption, council was concerned that students would be scared to all
police, spend a lot of money and time to train staff how to serve people and watch safety, and the issue of the house parties
3
are not being addressed. Raj offered that neighbors are concerned with noise and trash, and she is concerned that they are
going about it the wrong way, but thinks the approach to shut down commercial establishments is not the way to go.
Griffith offered that a door hanger could be distributed to residences with a phone number to give their voice to
communicate, a hot line / website of sorts. Absalom mentioned that council requested more analysis and feedback from the
community and suggested that everything discussed today is valuable and should be brought to council. .
Bill Shrum offered that he was part of the stakeholder group and is extremely disappointed at the things that they were
convened to discuss by council. As we all found some agreement on certain things, none of those things the groups found
agreement on were in the packet. Finds it disappointing that no one from council was present at this meeting. This is the
most impactful piece of legislation that council has potentially put forth on the hill. Shrum offered that he has seen more
council members at UHNA meetings listening to the complaints of neighbors as opposed to an open public meeting to a
commission that they assembled to gather feedback from the public. Shrum continued that he hopes council will read the
minutes of this session. Shrum continued that the 500’ Rule and having a geographic solution for a health and safety issue
is completely inappropriate. He continued that students are the most health impacted group involved in this issue and if we
taking care of them, it needs to be citywide as they can acquire alcohol citywide. Raj commented that she agrees with
Shrum and sees it as a behavior problem and how are we speaking to young people. Shrum replied that speaking to young
people by the media focuses on ruckus induced fun with alcohol. Shrum suggested addressing alcohol health concerns
together.
Mitchell motioned to council: The University Hill Commercial Area Management Commission does not support the
proposed changes to the 500 foot Rule; additionally, we recommend the solutions proposed include more consideration
from the working groups and the individuals who presented testimony to us today, addressing education, prevention and
enforcement. The proposed changes in the liquor code do not appear to us to adequately address the problem given the
public testimony we received at our meeting today. Consideration of public input from the working groups and effected
parties should be included. Further targeted analysis is needed in the following areas: economic impact to the hill,
feedback from the students, impacts on public health, similar university’s solutions and proven results, before there are any
new definitions are created. UHCAMC requests that City Council more carefully define the problem so that tailored
solutions can be implemented. The motion was four in favor and Raj abstaining.
Dahl offered that a relationship should be established between CU and Hill businesses.
AGENDA ITEM 8 –CUSG Update
: Shrum would appreciate UHCAMC support of his nomination in CU Student
Government.
AGENDA ITEM 9 – UHNA Update
: None
AGENDA ITEM 10 - Parking Services Update
: Matthews commented that he hasn’t reviewed the construction on
th
College; has had a couple of service project requests to include sticker removal, paint railing along 13 Street and clean up
of tree wells. Matthews continued that an RFP will go out today regarding pay by phone for parking. Winter mentioned
that curb repair will take place. Raj questioned the tree grates and Matthews replied that tree grates allows for walk able
space, allows water in and is a city standard.
th
AGENDA ITEM 11 – Matters from the Commissioners
: Hill Flea is on August 17 on the hill.
AGENDA ITEM 12 – Matters from the Staff:
Landrith commented that the hill wall mural is back on track and Tyler
Alpern, from the Libby Dorm at CU, and his director are in support and want to make it part of their syllabus for the start of
the school semester and looking at an October date. We are applying for a Boulder Arts Commission grant that requires a
commitment from a property owner that it will all be used. Fox Theatre will be a host for the AAA Music Radio
th
Convention. Live music stage will be set up on College between the alley 12th and 13, beginning Wednesday August 7
through the 9th with two hours of live musical entertainment each night. No alcohol service, just live music. Griffith
offered that she has another woman interested in mural and discussed sister city and the mural.
Winter – RSD is moving forward with discussion on the most effective legal process; Spark is moving forward with Shrum
and Winer on the group and a legal firm is providing financial support and may be open by November; AMPS and a joint
th
board meeting on August 19 from 5:30 to 8 p.m. at Shine, Climate Commitment, Transportation Master Plan Update and
Access Management and Eric Ameigh, senior project manager with the city, will be doing coordination and project
4
management of the RSD.
Meeting adjourned at 10:59 a.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
MOTION: Winer motioned to approve the May 9, 2013 UHCAMC meeting minutes. Dahl seconded the motion. All
commissioners approved.
MOTION: The University Hill Commercial Area Management Commission does not support the proposed changes
to the 500 foot Rule; additionally, we recommend the solutions proposed include more consideration
from the working groups and the individuals who presented testimony to us today, addressing
education, prevention and enforcement. The proposed changes in the liquor code do not appear to us to
adequately address the problem given the public testimony we received at our meeting today.
Consideration of public input from the working groups and effected parties should be included.
Further targeted analysis is needed in the following areas: economic impact to the hill, feedback from
the students, impacts on public health, similar university’s solutions and proven results, before there
are any new definitions are created. UHCAMC requests that City Council more carefully define the
problem so that tailored solutions can be implemented. The motion was four in favor and Raj
abstaining.
FUTURE MEETINGS
August 21, 2013 Grace Lutheran Church Off Site
APPROVED BY: UNIVERSITY HILL COMMERCIAL AREA
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Attest:
Ruth Weiss Hillary Griffith, Chair
5
6
CityofBoulder
EconomicSustainabilityStrategy
DraftforPublicReview
8513
8
Introduction
Inresponsetoinputfromthelocalbusinesscommunityand
Economicvitalityinthecityof
directionfromCityCouncil,thecityofBoulderhasdeveloped
Boulderisapublicprivate
anEconomicSustainabilityStrategy(ESS)designedtosupport
collaborationtopromoteahealthy
theĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomicvitalitybybuildingonitsstrengthsand
economywhichsupportsthe
addressingchallenges.
outstandingqualityoflifeenjoyedby
itsresidents.Boulderisfollowinga
TheESSwillbeusedtoguidetheactions,workprogram,and
sustainablepathtoeconomic
effortsofthecityanditsstrategicpartnersrelatedtoeconomic
development,adoptingstrategies
sustainability,andtointegrateandinformothercityplansand
thatfosterinnovation,
Bouldermanageandreactto
processes.Thestrategywillhelp
competitiveness,and
changewhilemaximizingtheuseofavailableresources,andto
entrepreneurship,andmaintaininga
encourageandsupportthecreativity,innovationand
positivebusinessclimate,while
entrepreneurshipthatdrivestheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomy.
enhan
cingcommunitycharacterand
TheESSisthekeytooltoimplementtheEconomicVitality
preservingenvironmentalquality.
strategyareaoftheĐŝƚLJ͛sSustainabilityFramework.The
SustainabilityFrameworkisbasedonthegoalsandpoliciesoftheBoulderValley
ComprehensivePlanandtheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛprioritybasedbudgetingprocessandisusedtoassessand
evaluateplansandprogramsagainstgoalsoftheCityCouncilandcommunity.
ImplementingtheESSwillrelyonboththecityandexternalstakeholdersincludingbusinesses,
commercialpropertyownersandnonprofitorganizationsthatworkwithbusinesses.
Leveragingcommunityassetsiscriticaltomaintainingastronganddiverseeconomy.
EconomicSustainability
TheESSwillberegularlyevaluatedthroughinformalandformal
(surveys,focusgroups,etc.)feedbacktoensurethatactionsare
Therearecriticalinterrelationships
achievingdesiredresults.
amongeconomic,socialand
environmentalhealth.Maintaininga
EconomicSustainabilityStrategy
healthy,adaptableeconomythatis
vitaltotheĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͛Ɛqualityoflife
Boulderwillcontinuetoberecognizedthroughoutthe
andhighlevelofservicesand
worldasacitywhereemployersandemployees
amenities,whichsupportadiverse
innovate,create,andthriveinamannerconsistentwith
economywithaqualifiedand
theirĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͛Ɛenvironmentalandsocialvalues.
diversifiedworkforcethatmeets
ĞŵƉůŽLJĞƌƐ͛needsandsupportsa
rangeofjobswhileprovidingforand
Thecitysupportsahealthy,adaptableeconomythat
investinginaqualityoflife,unique
reflectsourĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomic,socialand
amenities,andinfrastructurethat
environmentalsustainabilitygoalsthrough:
attracts,sustains,andretains
Sustainableincomeandemployment
Strategicredevelopment businessesandentrepreneurs.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520132
9
Diverseeconomicbase
Superbqualityoflife
Sustainablebusinesspractices
Awelleducated,highlyskilledworkforce
ThislivingstrategydocumentoutlinestheESSandisdesignedtobeaflexibledocumentwith
actionsthatareupdatedannuallyascommunityneedsandprioritieschange.Itincludes
strategiesandactionsorganizedintothreecategories:
PeopleʹǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĐĞ͕qualityoflifeandsocialissues
Placeʹphysicalenvironment(infrastructure,amenities,buildings)
Processʹeaseofdoingbusinesses(cityprocesses,programs,codesandprocedures)
Strategiesdescribehowthecitycanbestrespondto
A͞ƉůĂĐĞďĂƐĞĚ͟approachto
issuesraisedinthe2012PrimaryEmployerStudyand
economicsustainabilityseeksto
otherresearchconductedbythecitywhilefurtheringthe
createvibrant,amenityrichbusiness
ESSvisionandthegoalsarticulatedintheBoulderValley
districtsthatvaryintheirfocusand
ComprehensivePlan(BVCP).Thestrategiesarebasedon
intensitybutallofwhichoffer
a͞ƉůĂĐĞďĂƐĞĚ͟approachtoeconomicvitality,improving
environmentsthatsupportkey
citycodesandprocessandaddressingbroaderpolicy
industryclusters,retaintalented
issues.
workersandenhanceauniqueand
sustainable͞ŽƵůĚĞƌ͟qualityoflife.
Actionitemsidentifyhowstrategieswillbeimplemented
Eachareaofthecityisdiff
erentanda
overthenext5to10years.Someactionscanbe
placebasedapproachlooksat
accomplishedbythecitythroughimprovementsin
ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛvariousemploymentareas
internalprocessesandprocedures.Othersinvolve
toidentifydesiredchangeand
coordinationwithexternalstakeholdersorrequire
tailoredstrategiesforachievingthat
furtheranalysis,particularlywhenanissuetobe
addressedmayleadtopolicychangesormajorprogram
change.
additionsorenhancements.Actionitemsarecategorized
aspriorityactionstobecompletedin2014orlongtermactionsthatmaybeginduringthis
timeframebutwouldbecompletedatalaterdate.
ǯEconomy
Boulderisahighlydesirableplacetowork,live,andplay.Thecityisanimportantemployment
centerfortheareaandhasadiverseandhealthyeconomy.Boulderbusinessesrepresenta
widevarietyofindustriesandthecityhasahighconcentrationofaerospace,bioscience,clean
tech,datastorage,digitalmedia,naturalandorganicproducts,outdoorrecreationand
softwarecompanies.WhilethemajorityoftheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛemployersaresmallbusinesses,several
Fortune300corporationshaveapresenceinBoulder.Thisdiversityhascontributedtothe
ĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomicvitalityandhelpedmitigateeffectsofrecenteconomicdownturns.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520133
10
BusinessesinBoulderbuildonthefoundationoftheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛhighlyeducatedworkforce,superb
qualityoflife,favorablebusinessclimate,highconcentrationofcompaniesingrowing
industriesandsynergieswiththeUniversityofColoradoand14federallabs.Thecityattracts
talentedentrepreneurswhohavecreatedauniquebusinesscommunityfocusedoncutting
edgeinnovationandvision.ThecityhasbeenrecognizedasoneoftheŶĂƚŝŽŶ͛Ɛbestcitiesfor
startupsin2013andRichardFlorida,authorofTheRiseoftheCreativeClass,namedBoulder
themostcreativecityintheU.S.in2012basedonadetailedanalysisofhowmorethan350
metroareasrankedintechnology(newideas,inventions,hightechcompanies),talent(skilled,
ambitiousindividuals),andtolerance(nonjudgmental,openminded).
ManypeoplechoosetoworkorliveinBoulderbecauseofitshighqualityoflife,senseofplace
andextensiveamenities.Boulderboastshundredsofmilesofbikeandwalkingtrails,excellent
busservice,easyaccesstoopenspaceandthemountainbackdrop,numerousandvariedart,
cultural,dining,entertainmentandshoppingoptions,excellentschools,andhighquality
healthcare.Thesecommunitycharacteristicshavecreatedastrategiceconomicadvantagethat
isdifficulttoreplicate,butrequirescarefulconsiderationandplanningtoensureitsviability
intothefuture.
Boulderisalandconstrained,compactcommunitybydesign,reflectingtheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛcommitment
toasustainableurbanformwhileprotectingtheĂƌĞĂ͛Ɛscenicbeauty,openspaceand
recreationalopportunities.Withrelativelylittleundevelopedlandavailableforcommercial
development,thecityisstrategicabouteconomicvitality.ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛeconomicsustainability
effortsrecognizetheimportanceofjobsalreadyinthecity;andbusinessretentionandsupport
forhomegrowncompaniesisapriority.WhiletheESSisintendedtohelpimplementthe
resultsofthe2012PrimaryEmployerStudy,ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛeconomicsustainabilityismuchbroader.
Economicsustainabilityalsoresultsfromtheuniquemixofasuccessfulandhealthytourist
withuniversitiesandfederallaboratories,andmanyarts,cultural,
industry,partnerships
entertainmentandretailoptions.Thecityalsorecognizestheimportanceoftheprimary
employersthatmakeupthecoreofthelocaleconomy.Primaryemployersaredefinedbycity
ordinanceas:
Abusinessororganizationofanynumberofemployeesthatgeneratesmorethan50
percentofitsrevenuesfromactivitiesoutsideofBoulderCounty,andshallinclude,butis
notlimitedtothosefacilitiesofsuchbusinessandorganizationdevotedto
manufacturing,researchanddevelopment,dataprocessing,telecommunicationsand
publishing,butshallnotincludehotels,motels,retailers,orfoodservicefacilities.
Primaryemployersbringnewmoneyintothelocaleconomy,supportsecondaryemployers
(restaurants,printers,banks,etc.)andpaysubstantialpropertytaxes,salesandusetaxesand
permitanddevelopmentfeestothecity.ManyoftheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomicvitalityefforts,including
businessoutreachandassistance,aflexiblerebateprogramandamicroloanprogram,have
focusedonprimaryemployers.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520134
11
In2012,citystaff,alongwiththeUniversityofColoradoLeedsBusinessResearchDivisionand
theBoulderEconomicCouncil,conductedaprimaryemployerstudyidentifyingtheissues,
trendsandneedsofŽƵůĚĞƌ͛ƐprimaryemployersrelativetotheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛexistingindustrialand
commercialspace.
Keyfindingsfromthe2012PrimaryEmployerinclude:
Boulderhasapproximately554primaryemployers
ulderemployers
8.2%ofallBo
o
ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛprimaryemployersemployanestimated26,059individuals
29%ofallindividualsemployedinBoulder(excludingselfemployed)
o
ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛprimaryemployersoccupyapproximately:
538commercialbuildings(29%ofallcommercialbuildingsincity)
o
7.5millionsquarefeetofcommercialspace(35%oftotal)
o
Primaryemployersareconcentratedinthreemainareas:EastBoulder(44%),Gunbarrel
(15%)andDowntown(15%).
Asignificantnumberofprimaryemployersexpecttoexpandinthenextfewyearsand
manyanticipateneedingmorespaceandmovingtoanewlocation.
Thefourkeyissuesidentifiedinthestudywere:
1.Availabilityofsuitablespaceforexpansion
2.Lackofflexibilityinalloweduses
3.Highcostofland/costofdoingbusiness
4.Lackofamenitiesinsomeareasofthecity
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520135
12
People
Introduction
Boulderhasawelleducated,highlyskilledandcreativeworkforce.ThecityhastheŶĂƚŝŽŶ͛Ɛ
highestpercentageofcollegegraduatesandaveryhighconcentrationofindividualsemployed
inscientificandtechnicaloccupationsincludingaerospaceengineers,architects,biochemists,
environmentalscientistsandsoftwaredevelopers.Thishighconcentrationoftalentreflectsthe
presenceoftheUniversityofColoradoatBoulder,federallabs,andtechnologyintensive
industrieswhichdrawcompaniesandentrepreneursfromaroundtheworld.
ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛworkforcedrawsfromseveralkeysources.ThedesirabilityofŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛqualityoflife
andacollaborativeandsupportivebusinessclimatehasattractedpeoplewithworldclass
talentandskillsformanydecades,andtheworkforceincludesmanywhochoseBoulderasa
foundajobhere.Theworkforcealsoincludestechnicallytrainedand
placetoliveand
͞ĐƌĞĂƚŝǀĞĐůĂƐƐ͟workersdrawntogrowingBouldercompanies,residentswhogrewupand
remainedinBoulderandUniversityofColoradoandotherareacollegegraduateswhofind
workandcareersinthecity.Citywide,medianincomehasdecreasedforBoulderhouseholds
increasingamongcertain
since2000.Povertyratesandothernegativeeconomicindicatorsare
populations(e.g.Latinoresidents,seniors,children).
IssuesandChallenges
Aneducated,creativeandproductiveworkforcehasalwaysbeenvitaltoŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛ
economicprosperity,andwillbeevenmoresointhefutureasothercommunities,
otherstates,evenothernationscultivatetheeducation,creativityandproductivityof
theirworkforces.Workforcetrainingandhighqualityeducationneedstobeafocus,
especiallyintheScience,Technology,EducationandMath(STEM)fields.
ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛworkforceisdrawntoemploymentareaswithawidevarietyofamenities,
uses,andservices(e.g.restaurants,retail),recreationalamenities,thearts,and
increasedwalkabilitytopublictransportation,bicycle,andpedestrianfacilities.East
BoulderandGunbarrelareprimaryemploymentcentersthatlackthesamediversityof
amenitiesthatareavailabletodowntownworkers.
Changingworkpatternsandtechnologyhaveresultedinmoreindividualsoperating
smallbusinessesandstartupsfromtheirhomes,withoccasionalvisitorsorparttime
employees.Currentcityregulationsforhomeoccupationsdonotalwaysreflectthese
typesofhomebasedbusinessesthatmanytimesarecompatiblewithresidentialuses.
(Note:seeProcess2014Actionchart)
WhilemostoftheindividualswhoworkinBoulderareresidentswithinBoulderCounty,
betweenhalfandtwothirdsofBoulderemployeesliveoutsidethecitylimits.Whilethe
cityhasahighconcentrationofselfemployedandresidentswhoworkfromhome,over
59,000employeescommuteintothecityforwork(2013CityofBoulderestimate),using
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520136
13
theU.S.36Corridor(26%)andtheDiagonalHighway119(18%)(BoulderEconomic
CouncilCommutingPatternsStudy2012).
Astechnologychanges,therewillbeincreaseddemandforworkforcewithspecialized
skills.CurrentK12andpostK12highereducationoptions,includingnonuniversity
training,professionalandtechnicalschools,andcommunitycolleges,mayneedtobe
expandedandcustomizedtomeettheneedsofemployers,workersandresidents.In
addition,demographictrendsindicatebetween2020and2025Coloradowillrequirea
significantinmigrationofemployeestofillvacanciesfromretirees.
Strategies
Expandopportunitiesforworkerstolivewithinthecity.
Expandregionaltransitalternativeswithlocalpartnerssothatcommutershavemore
transportationoptionsotherthansingleoccupantvehicles.
Workwithemployerstodevelopandsupportprogramsdesignedtohelpattract
workerswithhighlyspecializedskillsandexperience,andprovideworkforcetraining
opportunities.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520137
14
2014ActionChart
Responsible
PriorityActionsTiming
Parties
Action1.1:Enhanceengagementwitheducationand
trainingorganizations,seekingopportunitiestocollaborate
ondevelopmentoftheworkforceavailabletoBoulder
employers.
Action1.2:(2014)EnsurethattheĐŝƚLJ͛ƐTransportation
MasterPlanupdate,cityinvolvementintheRTD
NorthwestAreaMobilityStudy,andtheĐŝƚLJ͛ƐAccess
ManagementandParkingStrategyfocusondeveloping
strategiesandfundingmechanismsforaddressingthelocal
andregionalcommutingchallengesandopportunitiesfor
Boulderworkers.
Action1.3:(2014)ThroughtheĐŝƚLJ͛ƐComprehensive
HousingStrategycurrentlyunderdevelopment,understand
anddevelopapproachesfortheneeds,desiresand
preferencesofBoulderworkerswhodonotliveinsidethe
citylimits.Expandhousingopportunitiesforthoseworking
inBoulder.
Action1.4:Supportlocalbusinessandindustryorganizations
tofoster͞ƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝǀĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͟oflocalworkerswhich
provideopportunitiesforexchangesofideasand
collaboration.
LongertermActions
Workwithstrategicpartnersʹindustryassociations,businessorganizations,and
educationinstitutionsʹandemployerstodevelopaplantohelpattractworkersin
selectfields.
WorkwiththeBoulderChamberandothercommunitypartnerstoimplementthe
InnovationBlueprint3.0,inparticularto͞ĞdžƉĂŶĚmentoringandtrainingprogramsfor
entrepreneurs,femaleandminoritybusinessleaders,facilitatecrossindustry
collaboration,anddeveloptalentamongouruniversitystudentƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ͘͟
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520138
15
Place
Introduction
TheworkplaceneedsofƚŽĚĂLJ͛Ɛemployersarevastlydifferentfromthoseofjustafewyears
ago.TheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛemploymentareasneedtomakeasimilartransformation.Eachareaofthecity
isdifferentandamoreplacebasedapproachwouldidentifydesiredchangeandtailored
strategiesforachievingthatchange.ThereisenormousopportunitytoimproveŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛ
employmentareastoprovideagreaterdiversityofusesandservices,increasedwalkability,
improvedqualityofthebuiltenvironment,andincreasedaccesstopublictransportation,
bicycleandpedestrianfacilities.Publicinvestmentininfrastructurecanalsobeakey
component.
asDowntown,EastBoulder,
Thecityhasthreemajoremploymentcenters,generallydescribed
andGunbarrel.PrimaryemployershavealsoclusteredinotherareasliketheTwentyNinth
Streetarea(Crossroadssubcommunity),BoulderJunction,theNorthBouldersubcommunity,as
wellassmallercommercialcenters.However,withthedevelopmentofthecity,those
employmentareasonthewestsideofBoulderbenefitfromthesmaller,tighterstreetgridand
prewardevelopmentpattern,whereastheEastBoulderandGunbarrelemploymentareasare
veryautoorientedinlargesuperblocks,andalackofaconnectedstreetgrid.
The2012PrimaryEmployerStudyhighlightstheuniquecharacteristicsandneedsofspecific
Boulderareaswheremostprimaryemployersarelocated.Desiredpublicandprivateamenities
likerestaurants,shopping,parking,bikepaths,andtransportationʹandtheneedsofprimary
employersʹdiffergreatlybetweenDowntown,EastBoulder,andGunbarrel.
Downtownrestaurants,retail,districtparking,andthePearlStreetMallserve
downtownemployees,residents,andvisitors.Downtownzoningincludesnonindustrial
primaryemployerofficesinadditiontofinancialservicesandotherprofessionaloffices.
Employerslovedowntownforthemanyopportunitiesfor͞ĐĂƐƵĂůĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͟onthemall
orinacoffeeshop.Somecompaniesfindtheparkingdistrictconvenient,whileothers
donotchooseadowntownlocationbecausetheyĚŽŶ͛ƚwanttheiremployeesorvisitors
topayforparking.Highdemandhasresultedinverylimitedofficespaceavailability.
EastBoulderhousesamixofmanufacturers,researchanddevelopment,andawide
rangeofindustrialuses,andistheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛlargestemploymentcenterforprimary
employers.Freeandabundantparkingisseenasaplusformostemployers.Bikepaths
andsidewalksprovidepedestrianaccess.Therearesomelunchtimeoptionswithin
th
FlatironParkandintheareaofthe55andArapahoeintersection,butmanyemployees
drivetoTwentyNinthStreet,downtown,orothercommercialareasformoreeating
options.Additionalamenitiessuchaspedestrianconnections,restaurantsandother
servicesaredesired.Shuttlebusesorothertransportationoptionshavebeen
requested.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft8520139
16
Gunbarrelisevolving,withnewhousing,retail,brewery/restaurant,andhotel
developmentallunderconstruction.Gunbarrelishometomanylargercompanies,and
employersdesiremoreeatingoptionsandservicesinthisportionofBoulder.AsinEast
Boulder,parkingisfreeforemployeesandvisitors.MoreGunbarrelhousingoptionsʹ
intypeandpriceʹǁŽƵůĚallowmoreGunbarrelworkerstoconsiderlivingcloserto
work.
Boulderrecognizestheneedtorevitalizeitsoldercommercialandindustrialareas,renovate
͞ƚŝƌĞĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͟andsupportbusinessgrowthintheseareas.Asamature,compactcitywith
littleremainingvacantland,thecityhasanopportunitytorevitalizeareasofthecitythatare
notreachingtheirfullpotential.Strategicplanningtoaddresstheuniqueneedsandpriorities
ofeachemploymentareaandensurethateconomicsustainabilityandplacemakingisa
primaryoutcomeistheessenceoftheplacebasedapproach.Whilesupportingandsustaining
thesevibrantplaces,thecitycanhelptoretainandattractprimaryemployersaswellas
enhancetheuniquecharacterofBoulder'ssubcommunitiesandadvanceothercommunity
sustainabilitygoals.
IssuesandChallenges
MainemploymentcentersofEastBoulderandGunbarrellackadiversityofamenities,
uses,andservices(e.g.restaurants,retail),increasedwalkability,recreationalamenities,
thearts,andincreasedaccesstopublictransportation,bicycle,andpedestrianfacilities
tomeettheneedsofŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛworkforce.
Asanoldercommunity,Boulderhasanoldercommercialbuildingstockascomparedto
newer,remodeledspaceinneighboringorsimilarcities.Asaresult,͞ƚŝƌĞĚ͟buildings
maynotprovidetheamenitiesorupgradesdesiredbyemployers.
Thereislimitedavailabilityofhighquality,largefloorplatecommercialspacetomeet
thedemandofgrowingBoulderlargerprimaryemployers.Manylargeremployerslook
fortheefficienciesprovidedbylargerfloorplates.
Theverylowsupply(lowvacancyrate)ofdowntownofficespacepresentsachallenge
duetothehighdesirabilityanddemandfordowntownspace(anditsnumerous
amenitiesandconcentrationofcompanies)byBoulderprimaryemployers.
Strategies
SupportthevitalityofŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛvariedemploymentareasthroughoutthecommunity
(e.g.TwentyNinthStreet,SouthBoulder,andNorthBoulder)throughaplacebased
approachthatbuildsupontheuniqueamenitiestothoseareas,inadditiontotheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛ
mainemploymentcenters.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft85201310
17
EnhancetheEastBoulderemploymentareatocreateamoredesirableplacefor
companiesandworkerswithdesiredamenities:eatinganddrinkingplaces,retail
services,thearts,andincreasedmultimodalaccesstopublictransportationandbicycle
andpedestrianfacilities.
ContinuetheeffortsintheGunbarrelcommunitycenter,tocreateamoreinvitingand
diverseplaceforcompaniesandworkers,withdesiredamenitiesandincreasedaccess
topublictransportationandbicycleandpedestrianfacilities.
EnsureDowntownŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛcontinuedsuccessasavibrant,desirablelocationforarich
mixofusesbyfindingopportunitiestoupgradeandcreateadditionalspaceforkey
industriesaswellashighqualityoutdoorspaces,includingimplementationofthecivic
areaplan.
EncourageandincentivizetheupgradingofBouldercommercialbuildingsin
appearance,tenantamenities,energyefficiency,andothersustainabilitymeasures.
Supportamultipronged,communitydevelopmentbasedstrategytomaximizethe
uniqueassetsandopportunitiesofUniversityHill.
2014ActionChart
Responsible
ActionsTiming
Parties
Action2.1:ImplementtheCivicAreaPlanPhase1including
investmentstrategies,financingtools,capital
improvements,floodprotection,safetyimprovements,and
feasibilityplanningforfuturephases.
Action2.2:Worktosupportpublicandprivateinvestmentin
amenitiesintheEastBoulderemploymentareathroughthe
EastArapahoeareaplanningeffort(tobeginin2013).
Action2.3:Examinethemixandtypeofbusinesseslocated
inandaroundNorthBoulderaspartoftheSubcommunity
Planupdate,includinganalysisofthefeasibilityoffully
developingtheVillageCenter.
Action2.4:InpartnershipwiththeHillstakeholders,provide
resourcesandcoordinationfortheimplementationofthe
ResidentialServiceDistrictandtheinnovationdistrict
concept.DevelopacrossdepartmentalHillteamtoensure
coordinationofandcommunicationaboutHillprogramsand
activities.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft85201311
18
LongertermActions
SupportareaslikeDiagonalPlazatomaximizeredevelopmentopportunitiesand
strengtheneconomichealth(fromBVCPpolicy5.01).
Exploreincentivesandfinancialtoolsforcommercialpropertyownerstoupgradetheir
buildingstock,catalyzecommercialenergyupgrades,andprovideemployeeamenities.
ThroughtheSustainableStreetsandCentersprojectandEastArapahoeareaplanning,
studyEastBoulderandGunbarrelzoning(e.g.openspace,parking,andfloorarea
requirements)andconsiderupdatestoreflectcurrentemploymenttrendsandneedsof
primaryemployers.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft85201312
19
Process
Introduction
ManyissuesrelatedtoprimaryĞŵƉůŽLJĞƌƐ͛space,location,andexpansionarepurelydefinedby
themarket.TosupporttheretentionandattractionofƚŽĚĂLJ͛Ɛtalentedworkforceand
progressiveemployers,however,thecitycanhaveadirectinfluenceonanumberofimportant
issues:
TheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛcomprehensiveplansetsbroadeconomicpolicyandlandusedirection.
TheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛzoningdistrictsdefinetheusesallowedindifferentareasoccupiedbyprimary
employers.
Developingnewspaceorupgradingexistingbuildingsrequirereviewandpermitsbythe
city.
Businessretention,expansion,outreach,andincentivesthroughtheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomic
vitalityprogram.
Thecomprehensiveplanrecognizesthatlanduseregulationsimpacttheabilityofbusinessesto
evolve.TheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛregulationsandreviewprocessesneedtoprovideflexibilitytoallow
businessestoberesponsivetoemergingtechnologiesandevolvingindustrysectors.There
aredailyinteractionsbetweenemployersandŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛcitygovernment.Theseoccurwhen
companiesgetservicesfromthecityandaresubjecttocityregulationsandprograms.These
includelicensingandtaxing,permittinganddevelopmentreview,theadoptionoflegislation,
andbusinessassistanceandbusinessretentionservicesprovidedbytheEconomicVitality
program.Overthepastfewyears,thecityhasplacedadditionalfocusontheimprovementof
thesebusinessservices,aspartoftheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛvisiontostriveforserviceexcellence.Efforts
economicvitalityservices,awebbusiness
implementedandunderwayincludeexpanded
portal,andnewwaystocommunicateaboutcitynewsandprojectsthatmattertobusinesses.
ManyBoulderprimaryemployersleasetheirspace.Theyoftengrowquicklyandmove
frequently,triggeringremodelingtomeetƚĞŶĂŶƚƐ͛needs.Remodelingconstructionrequires
somecombinationofcitydevelopmentreviewandpermits.Timingwindowsareroutinely
affectedbyleasetimingandcompanyoperations.Ascompaniesplantheirmovesfromspace
tospace(ofteneveryfewyears),thecost,predictability,andtimingofbuildingimprovement
projectsandpermits(includingcodetriggeredupgrades)becomekeyfactorsintheirdecisions
tostayandgrowinBoulder.
TheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomicvitalityprogramprovidessupportforbusinessrelocation,retention,and
expansion.Onetoolistheflexiblerebatebusinessincentiveprograminwhichthecitymanager
canapprovecustomizedrebatesofsalesandusetaxesandpermitanddevelopmentreview
feestokeyprimaryemployers.Amicroloanprogramprovidesanadditionalfundingsourcefor
Bouldersmallbusinesses.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft85201313
20
IssuesandChallenges
TheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛdiscretionaryreviewprocesscanresultinawiderangeofoutcomeswhichcan
increasethelevelofriskandassociatedcosts(whichaffectstheabilitytobuildthe
developmentpotentialaccordingtothezoningcode).
Becausemostprimaryemployersarelessees(81percent)andmovefrequently,
employersandpropertyownersmaynotinvestcapitalinbuildingupgrades.
Certaincityzoningregulationsontheusesofcommercialspace(andsizeofuses)may
unnecessarilylimituseflexibility.
Upgradingolderbuildingscanresultinsignificantbuildingimprovementrequirements
(e.g.energycode,accessibility,wiring,utilities)thatmaybeunexpectedtoaproperty
ownerorabusinesstenant.
Landcostisasignificantfactor;ŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛcommerciallandcostisgenerallyhigherthan
surroundingcommunitiesandthisaffectsdecisionstoupgradeanddevelopcommercial
property.
Strategies
st
EnsurethatŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛlanduseandothercodesrespondtochangesthatsupport21
centuryemployerneedsforflexibilityincommercialusesandemployeeworkplaces.
EncourageownersofŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛindustrialandcommercialbuildingstocktoupdatetheir
st
buildingssothattheybecomemodelsof21centuryenergyefficiency.
Makedoingbusinesswiththecityeasier,throughimprovedapplicationandpermitting
processes.
ContinueandexpandtheĐŝƚLJ͛Ɛeconomicvitalityeffortsinbusinessretentionand
expansion,outreach,incentives,andassistance.
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft85201314
21
2014ActionChart
Responsible
ActionsTiming
Parties
Action3.1:Updatecommercialandindustrialzoninguse
chartsanddefinitionstoprovidemoreflexibilityforspace
options,respondtothedynamicnatureofŽƵůĚĞƌ͛Ɛ
primaryemployers,andtoallowandencouragedesired
amenities.
Action3.2:Continuetoimprovethecommercialtenant
finishpermitprocesstomakeitmoretimelyand
predictable(withpredictablerequirements)forapplicants
andpropertyowners.
Action3.3:Updatehomebasedoccupationregulations
reflectcurrentindustriesandbusinesses,theuseofthe
Internet,andtobalancepotentialimpactstoresidential
neighborhoodswhileallowingflexibilityforhomebased
businesses.
LongertermActions
Evaluateupdatestozoningbulkandintensitymethods(height,stories,FAR,building
size,openspace,setbacks,parking).
Examinepoliciesandregulationsaroundcomplimentaryusesandamenitiesin
employmentcenters,suchaseatingestablishments,retailandservices.
Considerincreasedfundingforflexiblerebateincentives.
Modify/enhancedevelopmentreviewprocesses(reviewthresholds,reviewtimes,fees,
predictability).
CityofBoulderEconomicSustainabilityStrategyDraft85201315
22
Standard Response to Electric Bicycle Questions
Thank you for your message to the Boulder City Council.
The Boulder Revised Code (BRC) regulates the operation of electric-assistedbicycles in Boulder.
Electric-assisted bicycles are currently permitted to operate on streets and in designated bicycle lanes,
but are prohibited from operating on paths and sidewalks. The specific regulations are listed in BRC
Chapter 7-5: Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Animal Traffic.
Proposed electric bike pilot project for 2013-14
As part of the ‘Complete Streets’ focus area of the current update to Transportation Master Plan(TMP),
staff is developing a proposal for City Council consideration of a one-yearpilot project to test the use of
electric bicycles on off-street multi-use paths (this pilot will not include open space trails).
Changing an ordinance, even for a pilot program, requires council action. The Transportation Advisory
Board will hold a public hearing on Sept. 9 and make a formal recommendation to City Council.
Council will consider the pilot ordinance change at its on Oct. 1 meeting.
If approved by council, the pilot project would modify the existing city ordinance to allow people to ride
electric bicycles on multi-use paths. In addition to the ordinance change, the city would implement a
public information campaign to raise bicyclist and pedestrian awareness, emphasizing safety and
courtesy among all multi-use path users.
Concurrently, the cityis also working on local amendments to be consistent with new policies adopted
by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) that will allow people with mobility impairments to use
personal motorized devices, including electric-assistedbicycles, on multi-use paths. However, this will
not address the use of electric bicyclesby able-bodied persons.
Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Update Process
As part of the 2013-14 TMP update, the city is looking for public feedback to better understand
transportation choices and identify strategies that encouragemore people in our community to walk and
bike. The city isalso seeking community input on proposed innovations to be included in a “Bicycling
and Walking Action Plan” that will be incorporated into the TMP update.
The TMP update is a good forum to discuss and consider changes to current regulations on electric-
assisted bicycles. You can learn more about the current TMP update process at www.bouldertmp.net
and to participate in the conversation, visit www.inspireboulder.com.
Please consider sharing your ideas with the city through Inspire Boulder and staying informed about the
TMP update on Twitter and our blog at goboulder.tumblr.com.
You also may contact me directly at 303-441-4138 or ratzelm@bouldercolorado.gov. Thank you for
taking time to share your ideas.
To learn more about the operation of electric-assisted bicycles, motor scooters, Segways and other
personal motorized devices in Boulder, see the Personal Motorized Vehicles Fact Sheet.
Marni Ratzel
City of Boulder Bike and Pedestrian Coordinator
23