The URL can be used to link to this page

03.20.13 UHCAMC Packet UNIVERSITY HILL COMMERCIAL AREA MANAGEMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - March 20, 2013 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1777 BROADWAY - 9 - 11 am AGENDA 1. Swearing In of Commissioner 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of the January 16, 2013 Minutes 4. Police Update 5. Public Participation 6. CUSG Update 7. UHNA Update 8. Parking Services Update 9. Access Management and Parking Strategy Project Input 10. Matters from the Commissioners • Innovation District Update - Mural Status and "Collective" • Hill Flea 11. Matters from Staff • Hill Revitalization Update: o Residential Service District Attachments • December 2012 Sales and Use Tax Revenue Reports • 2012 Revenues and Expenditures • Police Stats - February 2013 and December 2012 • Access Management and Parking Strategy Information and Questions DUHMD/PS 2013 Priorities UHCAMC 2013 Priorities University Hill Revitalization • Support the Residential Service District • Support for creation of a Residential Service District Support the Hill Ownership Group • Innovation District/Organizational Options Create a clear brand identity for the Hill • 14" Street Lot Redevelopment Commercial area that includes a focus on Parkin,,; sustainability, creativity, innovation • Technology Ealiaucernents Encourage sustainable pilots to meet our energy • Access/Parking Management Strategy future o In collaboration with the Transportation Master Plan • Think creatively but carefully about affordable Update housing on the hill Dowwown Capital and Planning Projects Provide funding through the CIP for capital • 15'' Street (Canyon to Arapaho) Streetscape Implementation projects on the hill • 14'h and Walnut Pedestrian Improvements Implementation Develop sustainable partnerships with the • West Pearl Strectscape Design University • Pearl Street Mall Interactive Kiosks Implementation Changes to the regulations in the bill • Civic Use Pact Recommendations commercial area to promote creativity • Civic Park Master Plan participation Boulder Junction • Access Districts (Parking and TDM) Implementation • Depot Square Construction Coordination Administration • Remodel reception area • TBBI Planning • CRM and new website implementation Additional Items: • Pearl Sheet Smoking Ban Implementation Mission Statement: We serve the downtown, University Hill and affected communities by providing quality • Revisit Mobile Food Vending Ordinance program, parking enforcement, maintenance and alternative • Complete CAGID Garage C[P Projects modes services through the highest level ofeustomer • Organizational Assessment service, eRicient management and eRective. problem 0 Transition with Curmingham retircmcnt solving. City of Boulder Sales & Use Tax Revenue Report December, 2012 Issued February 19, 2013 This report provides information and analysis related to total year 2012 sales and use tax collections. Table 1 excludes Construction Usc Tax revenue from the Boulder Junction area and reports adjusted revenue that better reflects the underlying tax "base" that funds the on-going operations of the City. Table 2 includes Construction Use Tax from the Boulder Junction area, which is considered one-time in nature and is committed to fund specific infrastructure projects in the area. Results are for actual sales activity through the month of December, the tax on which is received by the city in the subsequent month. For clarification of any information in this report, please contact Chief Financial Officer, Bob Eichem at 303.441.1819 or eichemb@bouldercolorado.gov. REVENUE COMPARISONS TO COMPARABLE PERIOD IN PRIOR YEAR Table I lists the categories of sales and use tax collected by the City of Boulder. It illustrates the percent change in the various areas for total year 2012 over the same time period in 2011. As reflected in Table 1, adjusted Sales and Use Tax has increased from the 2011 base by 3.00%. As reflected in Table 2, actual Sales and Use Tax has increased by 3.97%. TABLE 1 REVENUE ADJUSTED TO EXCLUDE BOULDER JUNCTION CONSTRUCTION USE TAX % CHANGE IN TAX CATEGORY REVENUE % OF Increase/ Decrease) TOTAL Sales "Tax 3.71% 81.65% Business/Consumer Use Tax 2.33% 9.84% Construction Use Tax (9.23%) 5.88% Motor Vehicle Use Tax 8.04% 2.62% Refunds (100.00%) 0.00% Total Sales & Use Tax 3.00% 100.00% TABLE 2 ACTUAL REVENUE INCLUDING BOULDER JUNCTION CONSTRUCTION USE TAX % CHANGE IN TAX CATEGORY REVENUE % OF Increase/(Decrease TOTAL Sales Tax 3.71% 80.89% Business/Consumer Use Tax 2.33% 9.75% Construction Use Tax 5.27% 6.76% Motor Vehicle Use Tax 8.04% 2.60% Refunds (100.00%) 0.00% Total Sales & Use Tax 3.97% 100.00% ANALYSIS OF YEAR-TO-DATE 2012 RESULTS COMPARED TO 2011 • Retail Sales Tax - YTD retail receipts are up by 3.71 • Business/Consumer Use Tax - YTD revenue is up by 2.33%. Results include significant audit revenue collected during the months of October and December. Excluding audit revenue, this category would be down for the total year. • Construction Use Tax - This category is up in total for the year by 5.27%. When the dedicated Boulder Junction use tax is removed, Construction Use Tax is down by 9.23%. • Motor Vehicle Use Tax is up by 8.04%. Vehicles purchased by owners in the City of Boulder, regardless of where the vehicle is purchased, generate use tax revenue for the City. DETAILED ANALYSIS OF MAJOR CATEGORIES The following monthly information is provided to enable identification of trends in the various categories. Retail Sales Tax - Total year 2012 retail sales tax revenue was up by 3.71% from that received in 2011. December did compensate somewhat for the weak 2012 November numbers. Looking back, the December 2011 numbers were weak, retail was down by 0.29% from 2010, so the comparative "bar" was low. At the same time it is good to see steady progress in this sector of the local economy. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Se Oct Nov Dec 10.57%) (0.07%) 0.93% (0.55%) 4.91% 4.10% (0.53%) 8.13% 2.96% 7.33% (2.36"/x) 14.47% Food Stores - Retail sales tax revenue for food stores is up by 7.60% YTD. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aue Se Oct Nov Dec 12.40% (10.87%) 25.52% 11.14% 10.92% 4.55% 5.92% 6.93% H A2% (170%) (1.44%) 18.63% Sales at Eating Places are both an important revenue source (Eating Places comprise approximately 14.00% of sales/use tax) and are usually a significant indicator of the health of the economy in the city. This discretionary category is often correlated with unemployment (disposable income) and consumer confidence. Total December YTD retail tax at Eating Places is up by 8.84%. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep I Oct Nov Dec 607% 7.21% 15.78% 6.42% 10-45% 7.44% (3.66%) 10.63% 7.91% 2.28'% 10.01% 14.58°/a Apparel Store retail sales are up by 8.66% YI'D. One significant reason for this strong performance is incremental sales from the new from the new Nordstrom Rack store located in the TwentyNinth Street area. The first full month of revenue from this store was May of 2011. Therefore, as we predicted, the degree of these positive results experienced early in the year (when 2012 sales were compared to zero sales the year before) dial not continue as the year progressed. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Se Oct Nov Dec 29.040/ 45.610/ 30.430X, 19.19% 3.330/ {10.75%) (0.62%) 11.24% 7.01% 0.37% 6.75% 5.731/, General Retail is up by 0.78% YTD. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AuQ Se Oct Nov Dec (5.35%) 1.28% (0.60%) (5.31%) 6.46% 1.43% (4.99%) 12.24% (7.17%) 5.68% (2.70%) 7.64'% Utilities (primarily retail sales tax on natural gas and electricity) are down by 4.72% YTD. Tax on Public Utilities comprises approximately 5.00% of total sales and use tax revenue. According to the July 25, 2012 Denver Post, the drop in natural gas prices is the most significant factor in the cost and related sales tax in this category. "Xcel Energy customers are expected to pay about 4.8 percent less for electricity in 2012 than they did in 2010. The two items that cut the cost to consumers were a reduction in the cost of power purchased by Xcel from independent power plants down nearly 40 percent since 2010 and the cost of fuel, or natural gas, which dropped 12 percent." Even when natural gas prices do eventually increase, this category may not increase substantially if conservation strategies are successful and businesses significantly cut their energy use. According to a 2006 study by the City of Boulder, commercial and industrial sector energy use makes up 83%, of Boulder's energy use. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec 2.13% (6.61%) (2.42%) (8 291So) (9.83%) (10.34%) 5.60% (0.63%) (21.31%) 7.15% (8.84%) (9.83%) MEDICAL MARIJUANA BUSINESS SALES TAX In response to the interest expressed in this emerging industry, this section has been added to the monthly revenue report. Monthly sales tax revenue, and the percentage change from the same time period in 2011, is presented below. Total YTD retail sales tax revenue collected in this category is $789,720, up by 3.89% from 2011. This industry represents less than one half one percent of total sales and use tax collections. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec $53'35 560,606 563;171 566,157 $70,792 $63,948 S59,662 562,037 $62,472 563,496 S31525 581.773 (4.82%) H i.33%) 1.33%) 10.04:'6 21,.52'% 3.11' o 9-81% (14.521/..) (15.66%) 13.84%) 59.84% 15.()W/,- Significant YTD increases ,decreases by tax category are summarized in Table 3. TABLE 3 2012 RETAIL SALES TAX Change in Comparable YTD Collections STRENGTHS: WEAKNESSES: ■ Food Stores up by 7.60% Home Furnishings down by 1.07% ■ Eating Places up by 8.84% ■ . Transportation/Utilities down by 1.87% ■ Apparel Stores up by 8.66% Consumer Electronics down by 15.13% • General Retail up by 0.78% Computer Related Business down by 0.63% (Use ■ Automotive Trade up by 6.02% Tax in this category up by 22.74%) ■ Building Material Retail up by 8.38% Univ. of Colorado down by 4.10% ■ Downtown up by 2.35% UHGID (the "hill") down by 1.77% ■ North 28' St Commercial up by 3.770X, Metro Denver down by 22.67% ■ Basemar up by 6.20% Out of State down by 1.48% ■ BVRC (excl 291h St) up by 5.17% Public Utilities down by 4.50% ■ TwentyNinth St up by 12.02%, ■ Table Mesa up by 0.70% ■ The Meadows up by 2.52% • All Other Boulder up by 10.97% • Gunbarrel Industrial up by 32.25% ■ Gunbarrel Commercial up by 5.76% ■ Pearl Street Mall up by 12.20% ■ Boulder Industrial up by 5.66% 2012 USE TAX Chan a in YTD Com arable Collections STRENGTHS: WEAKNESSES ■ Motor Vehicle Use Tax up by 8.04% Construction Use Tax up by 5.27% (when adjusted Business Use Tax up by 2.33% to exclude dedicated Boulder Junction tax, down 9.23%) ACCOMMODATION TAX Total year 2012 Accommodation Tax revenue is up by 5.23% from the same period in 2011. ADMISSIONS TAX Total year 2012 Admission Tax revenue is up by 6.16% from the same period in 2011. REVIEW OF VARIOUS ECONOMIC DATA & PREDICTIONS FOR THE FUTURE The economy has stabilized and continues to expand at a moderate pace. Even though City of Boulder sales and use tax revenues were relatively strong for 2011 (up 5.89%), we predicted a weakening in the rate of increase in 2012. Fortunately this did not occur and the months of November and December were solid months for the city. Excluding Boulder Junction construction use tax, which was not included in the staff forecast, the actual rate of increase was 3.00%. Including construction use tax revenue from the Boulder Junction area (which is dedicated for a specific purpose) total 2012 sales and use taxes were up by 3.97%. The following information begins looking forward to the state of the 2013 economy and discusses some of the positive events and the continuing negative pressures that will impact City of Boulder sales and use tax revenue. As we enter 2013, the economy continues to have a great amount of uncertainty. An Associated Press article in the January 30, 2013 Boulder Daily Camera sees consumers as less optimistic early in the year: WASHING f0N - An increase in Social Security taxes is leaving Americans with less take-home pay - and a more negative outlook for the U.S. economy. The Conference Board said Tuesday that its index of consumer confidence plunged 8.1 points in January from December to 58.6. That's the lowest reading in 14 months and the third straight decline. Congress and the White House reached a deal in January to keep income taxes from rising on most Americans. But the agreement did not extend a temporary cut in the Social Security taxes. The tax increase will leave a household earning $50,000 a year with about $1,000 less to spend in 2013. A household with two high-paid workers will have up to $4,500 less. The private research group said the tax hike was the key reason consumers felt less confident in January. The survey was conducted through Jan. 17, at which point most people began to realize their paychecks were lighter. 'It may take a while for confidence to rebound and consumers to recover from their initial paycheck shock,' said Lynn Franco, the Conference Board's economist. Consumers also said they felt less optimistic about their job prospects over the next six months. Taxes are rising at a time when hiring is limited and wages are barely growing. The combination is expected to hurt consumer spending and slow economic growth. 'Perhaps more important than the shock to confidence, the hit to income is also likely to show up in a slower pace of consumer spending in the first half of this year,' said Thomas Feltmate, an economist at TD Economics, in a note to clients. The index has declined for three straight months since hitting a nearly five-year high of 73.1 in October 2012. It's still above the post-recession low of 40.9 reached in October 2011. Consumers began to feel less optimistic at the end of the year when it appeared congressional Republicans and President Barack Obama were at an impasse over sharp spending cuts and tax increases. Obama reached a deal with Republicans on Jan. 1 that kept most Americans from seeing higher income taxes. But they postponed decisions on spending cuts and raising the nation's debt limit until later in the year. And they allowed the Social Security tax cut to expire. 'All the negative news about the dysfunction in Washington surrounding the fiscal cliff negotiations contributed to the December plunge, and ongoing shenanigans concerning the debt ceiling and fiscal sanity in general continued to weigh in January,' said Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR Inc., in a note to clients. Most economists say the tax increase will hold back growth in the first quarter of 2013. The decline in confidence comes as the economy is signaling improvement elsewhere. An article in the January 23, 2013 Boulder County Business Report finds good economic signs aplenty: The hope and hype about the area's strengthening economy appears to be justified, as business leaders are optimistic heading into 2013 following strong performances in 2012, according to a panel at the Boulder County Business Report's CEO Roundtable on Wednesday. Local companies are expanding and looking to invest, banks are lending again and several economic indicators show the area economy has made up the ground lost since the 2008 recession. "The short version is, the state's doing better than the nation is, Boulder's doing better than the state is, and at this point, in terms of the economic cycle of job recovery, Boulder is back to where it was in terms of peak employment prior to the recession," said economist Richard Wobbekind, executive director of the Business Research Division at the University of Colorado's Leeds School of Business. Banks have adjusted to new regulations, have money to lend and are able to work with a greater range of clients, said Patrick O'Brien, Guaranty Bank and Trust Co.'s market president. Retail sales in the area also have solidified, according to Kim Campbell, an executive with Macerich Co. (NYSN: MAC), the company that owns the Twenty Ninth Street and Flatlron Crossing retail centers. "On a sales-per-square-foot basis, our sales at both properties are at an all- time high," Campbell said. Trends in residential and commercial real estate also give hope. Home prices are rising, and the biggest current problem is a lack of inventory, said Lew Kingdom, Wright Kingdom Real Estate's managing broker. In downtown Boulder, rents are high enough that new redevelopment projects are economically viable, said Bill Reynolds, president of W.W. Reynolds Cos. in Boulder. A survey of employers conducted by the city of Boulder with the help of the Boulder Economic Council found that about two-thirds of companies in Boulder are planning to expand in the very near term, said Clif Harald, executive director of the BEC. The following information was included in a January 3, 2013 article from Reuters: Several major U.S. retailers beat expectations of modest sales increases in December as shoppers wrapped up holiday buying, but overall results were mixed and only stores that were nimble enough thrived in an uncertain economy. Across 17 retailers including discounters, department stores and apparel chains, December sales at stores open at least a year rose 4.5 percent, topping analysts' estimates for 3.3 percent growth. The result reported Thursday also topped 1.6 percent growth in November 2012 and a 4.2 percent increase in December 2011. The stronger-than-expected December is likely to help retailers overcome a softer start to the key holiday season. The 2012 season was never expected to be stellar, but even the single-digit growth anticipated by chains and analysts came under pressure as Supcrstonn Sandy, the ever- present headlines about the "fiscal cliff' and the Connecticut school shootings affected consumers' moods in November and December. CONSUMER CONFIDENCE - With the country moving past the fiscal cliff debate, retailers will be watching whether the expiration of the payroll tax cut takes a toll on consumer spending. The expiration of the payroll tax holiday, which this week raises Social Security taxes for workers to 6.2 percent from 4.2 percent, may be more important to the economy than the income tax hike for wealthy people, said Michael Wilson, head of research at Morgan Stanley's wealth management division. "A two percent hit off the top for the average person is meaningful," he said. "It will change their spending behavior." While it was hard to say American consumers were tapped out, they are "fragile," said Chris Donnelly, global head of Accenture's retail practice. "It doesn't take much to rattle the consumer." As retailers finish up their quarter this month, they are bringing out fresh merchandise while offering deep discounts to move winter goods. Michael Niemira, chief economist of the International Council of Shopping Centers, sees a ho-hum spring selling season. He expects sales growth in the 2013 spring season to be weaker than in 2012. Higher food prices this year mean "a little less discretionary spending power" for U.S. shoppers, he said. According to the January 18, 2013 Boulder County Business Report, the local jobless rates dropped in December: The unemployment rate in Boulder and Broomfield counties dropped in I ccember, and Boulder County continues to have the lowest unemployment rate of Colorado's large counties, according to the latest labor report from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment. The rate in Boulder County dropped two-tenths of one percentage point in December to 5.5 percent as the county added 1,340 new jobs, the report said. In Broomfield, the rate dropped two-tenths of one percentage point to 6.6 percent. Employers in Broomfield added 240 jobs. Both counties outperformed the state, which had a 7.6 percent unemployment rated, down from 7.7 percent in November. The number of non-farm payroll jobs in the state declined by 2,400. The decrease in the unemployment rate was caused by a larger increase in the number of people reporting their status as employed than in the number of people actively participating in the labor force, according to the department. The national unemployment rate remained at 7.8 percent. According to a January 2, 2013 article in the Boulder County Business Report, a survey indicates that business optimism is lukewarm: BOULDER - Colorado business leaders' optimism is modest going into the first quarter of 2013 with uncertainty surrounding the nation's political and economic environments, according to the most recent quarterly Leeds Business Confidence Index, released Wednesday by the University of Colorado Boulder's Leeds School of Business. For the first quarter of 2013, the index, conducted by the Leeds School's Business Research Division, posted an overall confidence reading of 5 1.3, down slightly from 51.6 in the fourth quarter of 2012, A reading greater than the neutral mark of 50 indicates positive expectations and one less than 50 indicates negative expectations. Business leaders are optimistic about all of the metrics of the quarterly index except for the national economy and industry hiring plans. The other categories measured include the state economy, industry sales, industry profits and capital expenditures. "For months, drags on the national economy have included the European debt crisis, the slow rate of employment growth and the resolution of the federal debt crisis," said economist Richard Wobbekind, executive director of the Business Research Division. "While Colorado business leaders have stronger confidence in the local economy than the national economy, they're proceeding very cautiously." Confidence in the state economy, which is at 55.5 points for the first quarter of 2013, outstrips that of the national economy, which posted a reading of 47. The outpacing of confidence in Colorado's econormy compared with the national economy is a 30-quarter trend, based on index results. Business leaders' sales expectations for the first quarter increased to 54.4, up from 53.2 last quarter, and are buoyed by 44.1 percent of index respondents who anticipate an increase in the first quarter versus 25.2 percent who predict a decline. Meanwhile, leaders' profit expectations fell to 51.6, down from 52.2 for the last quarter of 2012. Hiring expectations have slipped into negative territory at 49.3, down from 51 in the last quarter of 2012, while expectations about capital expenditures remain close to neutral at 50.1. On the State level, economic forecasts are improving. Forecasts call for stronger results in 2013 as reported in a December 3`d article in the Boulder County Business Report: DENVER - Colorado's economy is poised to have a strong year in 2013, and the state is expected to gain 42,100 jobs, according to a forecast prepared by the state's top economists and business leaders. The University of Colorado's Leeds School of Business released its Colorado Business Economic Outlook 2013 on Monday. The forecast predicts strong growth in almost all industries and sectors and employment growth that beats the national average. "For the state, we see a very positive environment for 2013," said Richard Wobbekind, executive director of CU's Business Research Division, which wrote the forecast. "We're seeing a wide array of jobs being added, and they're diversifying our state economy." Next year's growth will build on momentum gained this year, when Colorado added 47,900 jobs. Colorado is expected to be in the top 10 states for job growth in 2013 and perhaps in the top six or seven, according to Wobbekind. If the forecast is accurate, Colorado's unemployment rate will fall from 8 percent in 2012 to 7.4 percent in 2013, which is comparatively better than the national jobless rate. But growth might not be evenly distributed throughout the year, Wobbekind said. The forecast predicts that growth in the first and second quarters might be slowed by national and international issues, such as budget negotiations in Washington and Europe's ongoing debt crisis. "Resolution of the so-called fiscal cliff and the resolution of the European debt crisis will have impacts on the national economy, and that will filter down to the state level," Wobbekind said. "Once that uncertainty gets resolved, we then expect business investments to start flowing again and consumers to start making decisions based on a known environment. We think the recovery will be quite a bit smoother after that," he said. Federal budget decisions could have a major impact on the Boulder area, especially on the University of Colorado-Boulder, federal laboratories such as the National Center for Atmospheric Research and National Renewable Energy Laboratory and small tech firms that rely on research- and-development money from the federal government. According to the December 20, 2012 publication of T'ocus Colorado: Economic and Revenue Porecast by the Colorado Legislative Council Staff. Colorado's economy outperformed the national economy in 2012 and appears ready to expand at an even healthier pace in 2013. Employment, income, and consumer spending are expanding steadily and the housing market is improving. However, uncertainly about a weak international economy and federal fiscal policy is preventing a stronger recovery. Economic growth is expected to lose momentum in early 2013, before expanding at a more moderate rate later in the year. The latest State Legislative Council forecast for percentage change in various statewide economic indicators follows: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Unem lovment Rate 8.9% 8.3% 7.9% 7.8% 7.2% Personal Income 3.9% 6.1% 3.6% 2.7% 5.9% Wage and Salary Income 1.4% 4.3% 3.6% 2.8% 4.9% Retail Trade Sales 6.6%, 6.8% 5.2% 4.1% 5.3% Denver-Boulder Inflation Rate 1.9% 3.7% 1.7% 2.1% The December 20, 2012 publication, The Colorado Outlook, by the Governor's Office of State Planning and Budgeting includes the following commentary and forecast: The national economy continues to exhibit only modest growth and mixed conditions, while there is more evidence that Colorado is among the top states in economic performance. `1`liough unemployment remains a challenge, the state's economy appears to be further along in rebuilding from the massive economic disruptions that occurred during the housing boom and bust, financial crisis, and Great Recession. Colorado businesses and individuals have been more successful in discovering ways to compete in the emerging new economy. This success is likely a product of the state's favorable mix of industries and economic assets, such as its research universities and institutions, its entrepreneurial culture, and its younger, more skilled workforce compared with many other states. OSBP projects continued uneven and below trend growth in 2013; however, Colorado will again outperform the nation as a whole. The economy will continue to add jobs - though unemployment will remain stubbornly elevated - and overall income and spending will continue to grow, though at a somewhat slower pace. Businesses have begun to show more caution in hiring and investment which is likely to cause ripple effects throughout the economy into 2013. Heightened uncertainty and diminished confidence surrounding the current lack of a satisfactory federal fiscal agreement and will likely take some toll on economic activity at least for a portion of 2013. The latest Governor's Office of State Planning and Budgeting forecast for percentage change in various statewide economic indicators follows: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Unemployment Rate 8.9% 8.3% 8.0% 7.8% 7.0% Personal Income 3.9% 6.1% 43% 3.9% 5.2% Wage and Salary Income 1.4% 4.3% 4.4% 3.3% 4.9% Retail Trade Sales 6.0% 7.3% 5.6% 3.8% 5.0% Denver-Boulder Inflation Rate 1.9% 3.7% 2.1% 2.9% It is important to note that "Retail Trade Sales" on the State level are not strictly consistent with the taxable retail sales tax base of the City of Boulder. The State forecasts may include gasoline and some retail services that are not included in the City of Boulder tax base. DECEMBER Y'TD Actual Total NetSaleslUse Tax Receipts by'I'a.x Category. 2011 2012 t ltam„c % of Total Sales Tax 74,960,833 77,741,989 3.71% 80.89% Business Use Tax 9,159,513 9,372,954 2.33% 9.75% Construction Salcs/Use Tax 6,172,383 6,497,662 5.27% 6.76% Motor Vehicle Use Tax 2,308,692 2,494,361 8.04% 2.60% Refunds -162,690 0 -100.00% 0.00% Total Sales and Use Tax 92,438,731 96,106.967 3.97% 100.00% DE.CEMBF.R Y TI) Actual % Chan ;e % of Total Total Net Sales/Use Tax Receipts by Industry'fype 2011 2U12 Food Stores 12,241,084 13,060,743 6.70% 13.59% Eating Places 11,838,300 12,937,276 928% 13.46% Apparel Stores 3,426,738 3,717,039 8.47% 3.87% Home Furnishings 2,766,830 2,733,694 -1.20% 2.84% General Retail 19,948,416 20,402,962 2.28% 21.23% Transportation/Utilities 7,332,332 7,022,842 -4.22% 7.31% Automotive Trade 5,942,804 6,314,939 6.26% 6.57% Building Material-Retail 2,903,474 3,192,767 9.96% 3.32% Construction Finns Sales/Use Tax 5,771,079 6,161,404 6.76% 6.41% Consumer Electronics 2,492,290 2,1 17,292 -15.05% 2.20% Computer Related Business Sector 5,700,245 6,355,355 11.49'% 6.61% All Other 12,237,830 12,090,656 -1.20% 12.58% Refunds -162,690 0 -100.00% 0.00% Total Sales and Use Tax 92,438,731 96,106,967 3.97% 100.00% f)EC'F.Ai f3Ea2 Y'E'1) Actual Total Net Sales/Use Tax Receipts by Geographic Area 2011 2012 Y~ Change of Total North Broadway 1,378,410 1,371,364 -0.51% 1.43 Downtown 6,281,046 6,451,278 2.71% 6.71% Downtown Extension 489,163 709,812 45,11% 0.74% UIIGID (the "hill") 1,100,879 1,060,228 -3.69% 1.10% East Downtown 639,204 650,546 1.77% 0.68% N. 28th St. Commercial 4,427,738 4,695,772 6.05% 4.89% N. Broadway Annex 561,198 449,011 -19.99% 0.47% UniversityOf Colorado 1,031,911 1,251,998 21.33% 1.30% Basemar 1,896,447 2,011,501 6.07% 2.09% BVRC-Boulder Valley Regional Center 17,495,044 19,370,696 10.72% 20.16% 29th Street 6,809,744 7,721,419 13.39% 8.03% Table Mesa 2,409,862 2,427,029 0.71% 2.53% The Meadows 872,671 891,835 2.20% 0.93% All Other Boulder 4,375,583 5,119,334 17.00% 5.33% Boulder County 1,233,498 1,081,894 -12.29% 1.13% Metro Denver 4,315,154 3,045,355 -29.43% 3.17% Colorado All Other 226,668 226,118 -014% 0.24% Out of State 11,391,942 10,959,470 -3.80% 11.40% Airport 18,600 62,717 237.19% 0,070X, Gunbarrellndustrial 5,460,565 5,811,852 6.43% 6.05°% Gunbancl Commercial 1,112,854 1,171,055 5.23% 1.22% Pearl Street Mall 2,513,5 t0 2,821,103 1224% 2.94% Boulder Industrial 8,155,246 8,491,146 4.12% 8.84% Unlicensed Receipts 1,257,308 1,296,949 3.15% 1.35% County Clerk 2,308,692 2,494,361 8.04% 2.60% Public Utilities 4,838,482 4,463,122 -7.76% 4.64% Refunds -162,690 0 -100.00% 0.00% Total Sales and Use Tax 92,438,731 96,106,967 3.97% 100.00% IECEMBER YTD Actual ('hangs in Miscellaneous Tax Statistics 2011 2012 Taxable Sales Total Food Service Tax 548,488 (15S,553 20.07" Ie, Accommodations Tax 4,797,280 5,048,277 5.23% Admissions Tax 586,303 622,444 6.16% Trash Tax 1,721,951 1,712,626 -0.54% COMPARISON OF YEAR-TO-DATE ACTUAL REVENUE FO$M4E9'AZ2012 TO COMPARABLE PERIOD IN 2011 USE TAX BY CATEGORY SALES TAX BY CATEGORY #7I:C'E311 I'R 1"I`i) :lctiani DE CEN-1 BUR ZTD :koval Irtte' ?(11 i' Ztll' t I one Standard Industrial Code ?i"i} l ~O12 177,877 80,879 -54.53% Food Stores 12,063,207 12,979,864 7.60%0 96,593 158,081 63.66% Eating Places 11,741,706 12,779,194 8.84% 46,301 43,910 -5.16% Apparel Stores 3,380,437 3,673,129 8.66% 16,106 12,409 -22.95% Home Furnishings 2,750,724 2,721,285 -1.07% 1,755,867 2,067,611 17.75% General Retail 18,192,548 18,335,350 0.78`367,473 188,142 -48.80% TransportationlUtiIities 6,964,859 6,834,700 -1.87% 2,418,720 2,578,571 6.61%, Automotive Trade 3,524,084 3,736,368 6.02%, 9,979 56,737 468.56% Building Material-Retail 2,893,495 3,136,030 8380/. 5,221,591 5,757,436 10.26% Constriction Use Tax 0 0 na 0 0 na Construction Sales Tax 549,488 403,967 -26.48% 55,219 48,872 -11.49% Consumer Electronics 2,437,071 2,068,420 -15.13% 2,957,303 3,629,702 22.74% Computer Related Business 2,742,942 2,725,653 -0.63% 4,517,558 3,742,627 -17.15% All Other 7,720,272 8,348,029 8.130/ 17,640,588 18,364,977 4.11% Total Sales and Use Tax 74,960,833 77,741,989 3.71% USE TAX BY CA'T'EGORY SALES TAX BY CATEGORY l)I.t`P;:\1111 NT I) ACNIZtl 1)I'C'E111 1:fr 1'"l'Ex:t~trt rl 2ti l l ' I `a'C I. t ] C f' Geographic Code _011 T 84,589 46,359 -45.19% North Broadway 1,293,820 1,325,005 2.41% 288,373 317,882 10.23% Downtown 5,992,673 6,133,397 2.35% 14,813 29,515 99.26% Downtown Extension 474,351 680,297 43.42% 54,317 32,192 -40.73% UHGID (the "hill") 1,046,562 1,028,035 -1.77% 62,559 73,284 17.14% East Downtown 576,645 577,262 0.11% 106,379 102,980 -3.19% N. 28th St. Commercial 4,321,360 4,592,792 6.28% 75,144 9,705 -87.08% N. Broadway Annex 486,053 439,306 -9.62% 12,226 274,135 2142.23% University of Colorado 1,019,686 977,863 -4.10% 96,502 99,890 3.51% Basemar 1,799,945 1,911,610 6.20% 533,270 1,531,968 187.28% BVRC 16,961,774 17,838,728 5.17% 131,856 240,940 82.73% 29th Street 6,677,888 7,480,479 12.02% 42,293 42,788 1.17% Table Mesa 2,367,569 2,384,242 0.70% 19,005 16,644 -12.42% The Meadows 853,666 875,191 2.52% 1,728,444 2,181,926 26.24% All Other Boulder 2,647,139 2,937,408 10.97% 366,197 112,706 -69.22% Boulder County 867,301 969,188 11.75% 787,437 317,546 -59.67% Metro Denver 3,527,717 2,727,808 -22.67% 47,178 32,429 -31.26% Colorado All Other 179,491 193,689 7.91% 1,863,882 1,572,366 -15.64%i Out of State 9,528,061 9,387,104 -1,48% 1,743 41,740 2294.72% Airport 16,857 20,977 24.44% 4,542,034 4,597,088 1.21% Gunharrel Industrial 918,531 1,214,765 32.25%, 13,054 7,869 -39.72%, Gunharrel Commercial 1,099,801 1,163,186 5.76% 38,150 43,654 14.43% Pearl Street Mall 2,475,360 2,777,449 12.20% 3,209,065 3,265,102 1.75% Boulder Industrial 4,946,181 5,226,044 5.66% 966,866 802,074 -17.04% Unlicensed Receipts 290,442 494,876 70.39% 2,308,692 2,494,361 8.04% County Clerk 0 0 na 246,523 77,h35 -68.43% Public Utilities 4,591,959 4,385,287 -4.50% 17,640,588 18,364,977 4,11% Total Sales and Use Tax 74,960,833 77,741,989 3.71%, Tax by Mo & Category TOTAL CITY SALES AND USE TAX COLLECTIONS V. Change in REVENUE CATEGORY YEAR JAN FE13 MAR. APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Taxable Sales RETAIL SALES TAX 2005 4,255.D41 4.453.370 5.232.389 4.353 026 4.576,664 5,535,196 4,494,079 5,D13,379 5,550,915 4.541.190 4,769,700 6.932,929 89.708.680 2-54% 2001, 4,734,249 4645,436 5,537,253 4659,458 4,882,331 6,129,363 4,737,773 5,237,757 6,156,056 4,950.305 4,387,847 7,891,618 63,949,446 7,1C% Rate Chg 3.41%>3.56% 2007 5,118,353 5.014,515 6,916,421 4,965,981 5,500,701 6,712,841 5,565,371 6,393,028 6,954,377 5,747.963 5.695,703 8,411,484 72,998,838 9.34% Rate Chg3.561k>3.41 % 2008 5,197,400 5.105,109 6,005,946 5,331,447 5,488,450 6,572,335 5,508,796 6,258,640 6,620,535 5,362,779 5,255,155 7,443,455 70,170,045 0.35% Rate3.41% 2009 4,919,570 4.659,632 5,850,036 5,077,648 5,131,444 6,428,343 5,206,770 5,790,533 6,093,314 5,170,325 4,735,769 7,814,230 66,877,613 -469% 2010 4,576.034 5,386,190 6,196,697 5,320,225 5,470,595 6,895.283 5,522,076 5,943,315 6,855,385 5,652,938 5,240,211 8,414,157 71,473,106 6.87% 2011 5,394,367 5,132.437 6,692,597 5,630,200 5,708,608 7,016,825 5,580.953 6,531,707 7,286,644 5,765,805 5,830,545 8,390,145 74,960.833 4.88`/0 2012 5,363,541 5,129,096 6,754,740 5,599,150 5,988,770 7,304,270 5,551,489 7,062,958 7,502,227 6,186,194 5,693,025 9,604,529 77,741,989 3,71% Change from poor year (Month) -0.57% -0.07'6 093% 4.91% 410% -0.53% 8,13% 2.961/. 7.33% -236< 1447% Change from prior year (YTD) -0-57% -0 32 % 0.16% -0 01 % 0 97% 1.59% 1.30% 2.24 % 2 33% 281% 2 35% 371% CONSUMER USE TAX 2005 827,887 507,036 951,085 1,016,614 1,103,592 1,001,046 864,720 786,465 1,094,030 758,937 966,467 1,248,300 11,130,180 8.95°/ (includes Motor Vehicle) 2006 686,686 517,101 1,277,146 577,144 964,529 781,362 895,403 776,258 1,054.696 727,776 1,092,224 1,287,157 10,637,482 443% Rate Chg 341%,3561. 2007 763,650 574,006 975,178 888,726 733,196 658,072 975,456 652,501 923.667 732,463 716,317 1,575,908 10,369,140 -6.63% RateChg3.56%>341% 2008 818,034 991,472 1,109,160 669,214 736.901 1,067,769 732,334 596.3399 899,934 989,683 599,876 1,253,267 10,464,043 535% Rate3,41 % 2009 909,558 657,250 1,062,587 997,891 531,724 790,819 858,325 1,299,767 989,089 741,576 698.452 1.600457 11.137,497 6.44% 2010 687,502 778,796 913,223 701,931 562,382 945,800 620,328 633,593 909,315 752.143 618,493 1,366,131 9,589,636 -1390% 2011 1,247,135 650,595 1.034.670 727,395 850,561 1,166,185 958,724 771,357 1,044,032 703,092 903,665 1,410,793 11,468,205 19-59% 2012 763,425 768,580 859,971 976,451 1,212,071 1,033,699 729,829 940,127 957,894 1,417,818 737,310 1,469,940 11,867.314 3.48% Change from prior year (Month) -38.79% 18.13% -16.88% 3424% 4150% -11.34% -23.87 ~ 21,88% -825% 101,65% -1841% 4.195_ Change from prior year (YTD) -38.791/. -1927% -1843 % -796% % 1.56% -109% -4.39% -1.65% -2.47% 553% 3.38 % 3.4855 CONSTRUCTION USE TAX 2005 912,585 782,540 287,865 461,878 456,073 913,197 186,408 235,308 282,503 276,247 288,104 514,975 5,597,684 8359% 2006 197,263 331,341 420,?49 294,094 337,237 774,420 352,533 261,409 343.749 559,975 410,958 1,018,272 5,302,000 -5.28% Rate Chg 341%,3.56% 2007 293,078 347.860 112,016 293,061 621,413 430,207 1,119,425 259,226 421,376 286,524 376,978 253,590 4,814,755 -13.02% RateChg3-56%>3.410/- 2008 330,080 347,219 748,549 454,797 327,855 241,649 100,759 442,652 347,954 217,865 107,831 381,753 4,048,982 -1221% Rate3,41% 2009 944,905 111,907 425,028 776,511 279,761 995,132 721,209 676,301 235.485 223,169 591,970 1,467,798 7,449,176 83,98%, 2010 591.599 242,591 245,829 362,619 226,230 1,921,675 1,075,078 467,423 245,361 234,021 406,668 531,670 6,550,964 -12.06% 2011 622,872 281,210 274,661 240,970 2,150,036 252,336 352,846 455,211 476,988 314,958 177,137 471,157 6,172,383 -5,78% 2012 385,392 1,697,323 315,856 503,719 342448 375,499 595,334 214,896 422,866 473,523 799,552 371,254 6,497,662 5.27% Change from prior year (Month) -36.13 % 50356% 15.00% 109 0491- -84.07% 6.57% 68.72% -52,79 % -11,72% 50,34% 351,37% -21 20% Change from pner year(YTD) -3813% 130.37% 103.491/. 10443% 9.10% -7,70% -139% -6,34% -6.83% -3.57% 746% 527% TOTAL FOR MONTH & CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR (MONTH & YTD) Rate 341% 2005 5,995,513 5,742,946 6,471,340 5.831,518 6,136,529 7,449,441 5,545,207 6,037,152 6,927,449 5,576,974 6,026,271 8,696,204 76,436,545 691% 2006 5,618,198 5,493,878 7,235,148 5,530,696 6,184,096 7,685,145 5,985,709 6,275,424 7,554,500 6,238,056 5,891.030 10,197,046 79888.928 4.52% Rate Chg 3.41%,3.56% 2007 6,175,081 5,936,481 8005,615 6,147,768 6,855,311 8,001,120 7,660,252 7,304.754 8,299,420 6,766.951 6,786,999 10,240,982 88,182,732 5.730/. Ratechg3.56%,3.41 % 2006 6,345,513 6,443,800 7,863,654 6,455,459 6,553,206 7,881,753 6,341,889 7,297,691 7,868,423 6,590,347 5,962,862 9,078,475 84,683,070 0.26;4 Rzte3.41% 2009 6,774.033 5,428,789 7,337,653 6,852,049 5,942,929 8,214,294 6,786,304 7,766,601 7,317,887 6.135,072 6,026.191 10,882,485 85,464,286 0921/- 2010 5,855,134 6,407,577 2355,749 6,364,774 6,359,207 9,762158 7,217,482 7,044,332 8,010,061 6,639,102 6,265,572 10311,957 87,613,706 2.51 % 2011 7,264,374 6,064,242 8,001,928 6,598,565 8,709,205 8,535,347 6,892,523 7,758,275 8,809,664 6,783,855 6,911,348 10,272,096 92,601,421 5.69% 2012 6,512,359 7.594,999 7,930,567 7.079,320 7,543,289 8713,668 6,876.652 8,217,981 8,882,987 8,079,535 7,229,887 11,445,723 96,106,968 3.79% Less Refunds 2004 -1,343 -10,505 -636 -872 -5,963 -151 -1,299 -4.643 -244 -27,318 -5,758 -4,330 -63,061 2005 -246 -66,044 -909 -2,666 -1,647 -10,080 -3,062 -0,207 -846 -1,586 0 -4,757 -96,051 2006 -40,302 -5,272 -22,761 -363 -5,099 0 0 -7,568 -806 -5,947 406 -16,773 -105,296 2007 0 -38,291 -2,013 -729 -9,326 -14,547 -14,440 -677 0 -5,963 0 -5.015 -91,001 2008 -978 0 -46,974 -1,409 0 -2,375 445 -9,493 -1,429 0 -48,521 -500 -112,123 Less Refunds 2009 -3.335 0 0 -1,111 -602 -692 -967 -3,520 -2,747 -179,087 -65,331 -26,376 -283,770 2010 -3,469 '38,130 -35,924 -1,444 -43,920 -3.832 -1,648 -4,204 -7,969 0 -12.480 -214 -183,234 2011 -8,569 -2,479 -1,188 -2,918 0 0 -7,175 0 0 -162 0 -140,199 -162,690 Adjusted total 2005 5,995,266 5,676,902 6,470,431 5,628,852 6,134,882 7,439,361 5,542,145 6,032,946 6,925,603 5,575,388 6,D26,271 8,691,446 76,340,493 6.87% 2006 5,577,696 5,488,606 7,212,388 5,530,333 6,178,998 7,685,145 5,985,709 6,267,856 7,553,694 6,232,110 5,890,624 10,180,273 79,783,631 4.51% Rate Ch93.41%>3.56% 2007 6,175,081 5,898,190 8,003,602 6,147,039 6,845,984 7,986,572 7,645,812 7,304,077 8,299,420 6,760,988 6,788,999 10,235,967 88,091,731 5,76% 2008 6,344,535 6,443,800 7,816,680 6,454,050 6,553,206 7,879,378 6,341,444 7.288,198 7,566,995 6,590,347 5,914,341 9,077,975 84,570,947 023% Rate3,41% 2009 6,770,698 5,428,789 7,337,653 6,850,938 51942,327 8.213.602 6,785,337 7,763.080 7,315,140 5,955,985 5,960,860 10,856,109 85,180,517 0.72% 2010 5,851,665 6,339,447 7,319.826 6,383,330 6,315,288 9,758.926 7,215,834 7,040,127 6,002,092 6,639,102 6,253,092 10 .311,744 87,430,472 2.64% 2711 7,255.806 6,061,763 8,000,739 6,595,647 8,709,205 8,535,347 6,885,348 7,758,275 8,809,664 6,783,693 6,911,348 10,131,697 92,438,731 5.73;0 2012 6,512,359 7,594,999 7,930,567 7,079,320 7,543,289 8,713.668 6,876,652 8,217,981 8,882,987 8,079,535 7,229,687 11,445,723 96,106,966 3.97% • Change (month) -10.25% 25.29% -0.88% 7.33% -13.39% 2 09% -013% 5.93`/0 0.83% 19.10% 4.61% 1297% Change (YTD) -10.25% 5.93% 3,38% 4..31% 0.10% 048% 0,40% 1-11% 1.08% 2,70% 286% 397% Sales and Use Tax Revenues Generated in the UHGID Area by Standard Industrial Classification Food Eating Apparel Home Gen. GRAND Stores Places Stores Furnish. Merchandise Construction All Others TOTAL 2010 sales tax rate of 3.41% Janua 2,707 46,314 1,190 2,074 60,011 128 620 113,043 February 2,924 46,114 1,733 2,691 17,304 2,469 3,221 76.456 March 3,254 49.483 2,234 2,431 27,214 5,473 1.040) 89,050 April 3,855 55,106 1,883 2,733 20,021 56 503 84,156 May 3,216 44,855 2,791 2.468 20,997 172 588 75,086 June 2.181 40,216 2,990 2,370 26,027 2,224 763 76,771 Jul 2,708 40,921 2,409 2,125 23,089 561 629 72,442 August 3.602 66,162 2,589 3,192 62,730 4,350 746 143,372 September 4,075 57,000 8,601 2,615 48,166 547 1.719 122,724 October 4,808 59.249 5,735 2.754 16,191 589 1,036 90,361 November 3,519 50,585 2,572 2289 15,069 54.999 534 129,568 December 3,179 48,910 3,126 2,829 18,818 34 823 77,719 2010 TOTAL 40,028 604,913 37,852 30,571 355,637 71,603 10,143 1,150,748 2011 sales tax rate of 3.41% January 4,508 50,460 1,204 2,400 41,579 900 607 101,659 February 4,634 46,447 973 2,297 14,556 3,724 741 73,373 March 4,870 51,591 1,994 2,249 16,375 9,059 963 87,101 April 5,438 66,217 1,834 2,458 18,772 298 1,084 93,933 May 4,175 54.508 1,611 1,950 23,506 25,023 711 111,486 June 4,024 50,603 2,424 2,264 15,395 1,257 1,133 77,100 Jul 4,386 49,952 2,253 2.261 17,963 2,280 557 79,652 August 5,529 54,052 2,960 2,839 55,427 478 787 122,071 September 6,123 66,496 5,588 2,264 28,241 638 1,602 110,953 October 5,946 64,799 3,410 3,019 19.015 43 5,330 90,904 November 4,833 50,027 3,257 2,699 14.365 3,215 573 78,970 December 3,754 45,380 3,688 2,629 16,701 499 1,026 73,678 2011 TOTAL 58,221 650,532 31,199 29,330 281,896 47,416 2,286 1,100,879 2012 (sales tax rate of 3.41%) January-December 74,987 637,659 28,068 30,800 257,134 21,390 10,190 1,060,228 2012 TOTAL 74,987 637,659 28,068 30,800 257,134 21,390 10,190 1,060,228 Change from 2009-2010 -18.42% 4.49% -15.34% 26.26% 8.81% 884.87% -62.08% 8.79°/6 Change from 2010-2011 45.45% 7.54% -17.58% -4.06% -20.73% -33.78% -7747% -4.33% Change from 2011-2012 28.80% -1.98% -10.03% 5.01% -8.78% -54.89% 345.85% -3.69% • Change from previous year month -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% S:1CM01DUHMDPS1dmclFinancia1 Mg1BUDGET DJ1UHGiD dj1UHGIDSIC.XLS Sales Tax Revenues Generated in the UHGID Area by Standard Industrial Classification Food Eating Apparel Home Gen. GRAND Stores Places Stores Furnish. Merchandise All Others TOTAL 2010 (sales tax rate of 3.41%) January 2,707 46,302 1,190 2,074 60,007 546 112,825 February 2,924 46,105 1,733 2,691 17,301 3,160 73,913 March 3,254 49,476 2,234 2,431 27,203 (1.290 83,309 April 3,855 55,075 1,883 2,733 20,012 503 84,060 May 3,216 44,842 2,791 2,468 20.993 401 74,711 June 2,181 40,058 2,990 2,370 26,000 482 74,080 Jul 2,708 40,903 2,409 2,125 23,073 629 71,846 August 3,602 66,124 2,589 3,192 62,717 746 138,971 September 4,075 56,902 8,601 2,615 48,164 1,477 121,834 October 4,808 59,219 5,735 2,754 16.189 801 89,506 November 3,519 47,445 2,572 2,289 14,984 534 71,343 December 3,179 48,886 3,127 2,829 18,817 608 77,446 2010 TOTAL 40,028 601,335 37,853 30,571 355,459 8,597 1,073,844 2011 (sales tax rate of 3.41%) January 4,508 50;434 1,204 2,400 41,573 607 100,726 February 4,634 46,429 973 2,297 14,543 671 69,547 March 4,870 51,312 1,994 2,249 16,370 668 77,463 April 5,438 63,130 1,834 2,458 18,769 (1.169 90,460 May 4,175 54,496 1,611 1,950 23.499 529 86,261 June 4,024 50,581 2,424 2,264 15,386 619 75,299 Jul 4,386 49,870 2,253 2,261 17,955 532 77,257 August 5,529 54,031 2,960 2,839 55,422 777 121,559 September 6,123 66,479 5,588 2,264 28,218 997 109,669 October 5,946 63,727 3,410 3,019 19,015 (5,330) 89,788 November 4,833 50,013 3,257 2,699 14,365 548 75,716 December 3,754 45,248 3,688 2,629 16,701 797 72,817 2011 TOTAL 58,221 645,750 31,199 29,330 281,816 246 1,046,562 2012 (sales tax rate of 3.41%) January-December 74,972 630,882 28,068 30,800 254,698 8,615 1,028,035 2012 TOTAL 74,972 630,882 28,068 30,800 254,698 8,615 1,028,035 Change from 2009-2010 -18.42% 4.39% -15.34% 26.26% 8.81% -64.87% 2.74% Change from 2010-2011 45.45% 7.39% -17.58% -4.06% -20.72% -97.14% -2.54% Change from 2011-2012 28,77% -2.30% -10.03% 5.01% -9.62% 3405.74% -1.77% % Change from previous year month -100.00% -100.00% -100,00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% UHGID Yearly Summary City Wide Yearly Summary Sales and Use Tax Breakdown by Industry Category UHGID Sales and Use Tax as a Percent of Total City Wide Sales and Use Tax Food Eating Apparel Home General Eating Apparel Home General Stores Places Stores Furnishings Merch All Other Total Food Stores Places Stores Furnishings Merch All Other Total 2012 $74,987 $637.659 528,066 530,800 $257,134 $31,580 $1.060.228 2012 513,060,743 $12,937,276 53,717,039 54,850,986 $2D,402,962 $41,137,961 S 96,106,967 7% 60% 3% 3%a 24% 30/6 100% 1% 5% 1% 1 % 1% 0% 1 1% 2011 $58,221 $650,532 $31,199 $29,330 5281,896 $49,701 81,100,879 2011 $12,241,084 $11,838,300 S 3,426,738 $ 5,259,120 $19,948,416 S 39,725,073 S 92,438,731 5%a 59% 3% 3% 26% 5% 100% 0% 5% 1% 1% 1%a 0% 12% 2010 $40,028 $604,913 $37,852 530,571 S355,637 S81,746 51,150,748 2010 $11,130,533 $10.930,482 $ 2,690,372 $ 4,459,406 $19279,577 538,940,102 S 67,430472 3% 53% 3% 3% 31% 7% 100% 0% 6% 1% 1% 2% 0% 13% 2009 $49,066 5578.900 $44,712 $24,213 $326,839 534,018 $1,057,749 2009 $11,160,109 $10,572,840 $ 2,626,020 $ 4,304,383 $17,515,062 S 39,002.103 S 85,180,517 5% 55% 4% 2% 31% 3% 1'DO% 0% 5% 2% 1% 2% 0% 1.2% 2008 $60,686 5568,692 $63,307 $24,768 5333,780 512,073 S1.063,507 2008 $11,204,475 $10,910,035 S 2,819,260 S 4,827,635 $18,101,297 S 36,708.245 S 84,570,947 6% 53% 6% 2% 31% 1% 1006/6 1% 5% 2% 1% 2% 0% 13% 2007 S56,250 $588610 $72,142 $30,921 $353,173 519,270 $1,120,367 2007 $11,205,584 $10.888,135 S 2.804,311 5 5,522090 518,040,152 539.631,459 S 88,091,731 5%a 53% 6% 3% 32% 2% 100% 1% 5% 3% 1%a 2% 0%a 1 3% 2006 S56,511 5525.911 $86,527 $33,045 S321.897 $19,261 S1,043,152 2006 $10,392,069 $ 9.582,212 S 2,424,694 S 4,611,056 $15,402,540 $ 37,371,060 S 79,783,631 5% 50°/ 8% 3% 31% 2% 100% 1% 5°% 4% 1% 2% 0% 1.3% 2005 S58,421 S493,955 $98,605 $28,891 5288,004 $29.024 S996 90C 2005 $10,046,723 $ 8,995.846 S 2,362.366 S 4.465.786 514,587,419 S 35,882,350 S 76,340,492 6% 50% 10% 3% 29% 3% 100% 1% 5% 4% 1% 2% 0% 13% 2004 $47.446 $461,253 $87,695 $25,958 $301,938 $124,607 $1,048,897 2004 $10,148,861 $8,637,718 52,232,147 $3,118,312 $14,123.007 $32,171,342 $70.431.387 5% 44% 8% 2% 29% 121/6 100% 0% 5% 4% 1% 2% 0% 15% 2003 $43.618 $417,782 $94,036 535,450 $304,099 $46,965 $941,951 2003 $9,052,658 $7.847,285 52,046,951 $3,922,549 $13,185.423 $31,552,637 $67,607,503 51/6 44% 101/6 4% 32% 51/. 103% 0% 5% 5% 1% 21/0 0% ' 4:a 2002 $42,268 $407,606 $89,454 534,104 $313,795 $41,419 5928,646 2002 $9,294,397 $8.133,237 52,346,305 $4,164,992 $13,572,651 533,815,600 571,327,182 5% 44% 10% 4% 34% 4% 100% 0% 5% 4% 1 % 2% 0% 1 3`1G S ICMO\DUHMDPS,dmctFinanGal Mg18UDGET DJtiUHGID dj1UHGIDSIC XLS UHGID Sales Tax Revenues (NO use tax) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 January 83,022 96,846 100,032 99,422 98,853 118,058 120,247 113,123 110,986 112,825 100,726 February 65,046 56,994 63,769 64,521 72,140 79,436 78,684 81,957 76,043 73,913 69,547 March 64,537 68,740 69,760 72,985 72,060 75,944 75,112 72,996 78,172 83,309 77,463 April 60,826 68,547 62,055 66,129 74,662 82,378 79,016 91,281 80,517 84,060 90,460 May 61,329 56,306 62,078 65,583 61,131 68,638 90,603 74,823 71,299 74,711 86,261 > June 92,013 76,086 69,726 73,693 69,085 72,486 71,063 66,754 62;685 74,080 75,299 July 59,675 63,058 48,079 53,263 65,768 56,168 67,097 65,755 62,034 71,846 77,257 August 88,127 87,167 125,801 124,050 144,466 109,263 118,556 145,179 149,212 138,971 121,559 September 123,121 129,966 104,739 108,698 99,702 147,416 149,898 117,567 118,373 121,834 109,669 October 66,451 73,867 81,351 82,562 93,865 89,472 101,034 93,772 82,191 89,506 89,788 November 60,396 58,271 67,097 64,189 65,915 60,321 71,082 65,404 70,564 71,343 75,716 C December 86,683 71,034 74,835 72,674 62,359 72,197 79,696 64,029 83,085 77,446 72,817 2 Totals 920,684 911,224 9Q6,884 929,322 947,770 980,005 1,031,777 1,102,088 1,052,642 1,045,162 1,073,843 1,046,562 1,028,035 Tax Rate 3 26 3.26 3.26 3.26 3.. ,.1 3 41 3.41 3.56 3.41 341 3 41 3.41 341 $ change from prior year -9,460 -4,340 22.438 18,448 32,235 51,772 70,311 -49,446 -7,480 28.681 -27,281 -18,527 % change from prior year -1 0°ia -0.5% 2.5% 2.0% 3.4% 5.3% 6.8% 4.5% -0.7% 2 70/c -2.5% -1.8% 3 year avg change 0.3% 1.3% 2.6% 3.6% 5.2% 2.5% 0.5% -0.8% -0.2% -0.5% S:\CMO\DUHMDPS\dmc\Financial Mg\BUDGET DJ\UHGID dj\UHGIDSIC.XLS I UHGID Retail Sales Tax Comparison by Standard Industrial Classification UHGID Safes Tax ONLY Sales % Change Tax Food Eating Apparel Home Gen. GRAND from prior UHGID 3 Year Rate Stores Places Stores Furnish. Merchandise All Others TOTAL ear year avg 1995 2.86% $40,972 $348,027 $100,979 $122,507 $294,154 $15,424 $922,063 1996 3.11% $33,737 $341,096 $145,399 $74,188 $317,697 $15,069 $927,187 -7.53% 1997 3.11% $37,557 $320,993 $126,540 $39,846 $316,938 $6,167 $848,079 -8.53% 1998 3.26% $33,806 $348,974 $126,695 $40,557 $306,134 $6,258 $862,424 -2.99% -6.35% 3 year avg 96-98 1999 3.26% $34,065 $344,848 $92,878 $46,325 $345,214 $1,311 $864,642 0.26% -3.75% 3 year avg 97-99 2000 3.26% $34,841 $376,947 $99,206 $39,066 $366,065 $4,559 $920,684 6.48% 1.25% 3 year avg 98-00 2001 3.26% $41,985 $392,466 $103,513 $35,111 $318,518 $19,632 $911,225 -1.03% 1.90% 3 year avg 99-01 2002 3.26% $42,223 $402,894 $89,454 $34,104 $313,566 $24,644 $906,885 -0.48% 1.66% 3 year avg 00-02 2003 3.26% $43,601 $413,020 $94,036 $35,450 $303,775 $39,439 $929,322 2.47% 0.32% 3 year avg 01-03 2004 3-41% $47,442 $452,585 $87,695 $25,958 $300,441 $33,650 $947,770 -2.50% -0.17% 3 year avg 02-04 2005 3.41% $55,352 $490,892 $98,605 $28,891 $287,524 $18,741 $980,005 3.40% 1.12% 3 year avg 03-05 2006 3.41% $56,511 $521,081 $86,527 $33,045 $321,380 $13,233 $1,031,776 5.28% 2.06% 3 year avg 04-06 2007 3.56% $56,250 $579,412 $72,123 $30,921 $352,147 $11,234 $1,102,088 2.31% 3.67% 3 year avg 05-07 2008 3.41% $59,273 $564,502 $63,307 $24,768 $333,238 $7,556 $1,052,643 -4.49% 1.04% 3 year avg 06-08 2009 3.41% $49,066 $576,030 $44,712 $24,213 $326,667 $24,474 $1,045,162 -0.71% -0.96% 3 year avg 07-09 2010 3.41% $40,028 $601,335 $37,853 $30,571 $355,459 $8,597 $1,073,844 2.74% -0.82% 3 year avg 08-10 2011 3.41% $58,221 $645,750 $31,199 $29,330 $281,816 $246 $1,046,562 -2.54% -0.17% 3 year avg 09-11 2012 3-41% $74,972 $630,882 $28,068 $30,800 $254,698 $8,615 $1,028.035 -1.77% -0.52% 3 year avg 10-12 S:\CMO1DUHMDPSIdmctFinancial Mg1BUDGET DJIUHGID dj1UHGIDSIC.XLS MEMORANDUM TO: UHCAMC Advisory Committee Molly Winter - Executive Director FROM: Donna Jobert, Financial Manager SUBJECT: 2012 Revenues and Expenditures DATE: March 5, 2013 Shown below is a summary of 2012 revenues and expenditures The 2012 budget and 2011 actuals are shown for comparative purposes. Overall revenues are 98.3% of total budget collected and are up $15,218 when compared with last year Meter revenues for on-street meters are greater than budget. They are above last years revenue because. the University Ave/Penn St lot swap occurred in July of 2011. Meter revenue for the 14th St lot are under budget and below last years revenue. Meter revenue for the Pleasant St lot are just over budget but, below last years revenue. Permit revenue for the Pleasant Lot is higher than last year. This is due to a 4% rate increase Expenditures for 2012 equal 95.9% of budgeted expenses and up $34,229 compared with 2011 Due to the Durbin Amendment Congress passed in Oct 2011, the credit card fees at the paystions are much higher. The city vac/sick liability and cost of living increases account for the other variances. Some of the major purchases for Hill Maintenance to date include holiday lights, repair lighting, remove trees, remove blue lights, planters, install new grates and frames (grateslframes purchased in 2011) and pressure washing. Economic Vitality intitiatives include sponsorship of Hill Flea and Parking 101 ad in student directory. Cost allocation (amount UHGID pays the City GF for services) increased over 2011 UHGID Revenues and Expenditures - Jan-Dec 2012 2012 2012 2011 Revenue Approved % Revenue 2011-2012 2011-2012 Revenues Collected Budget Collected Collected $ Difference % Difference Taxes $ 27,395 $ 29,075 94.2% $ 27,187 $ 208 0.8% Street Meters 400,000 400,000 100.0% 314,000 86,000 27.4% 14th Street Lot 53,013 66,000 80.3% 58.240 (5,227) -90% Pennsylvania Lot 0 0 - 55,805 (55,805) -100.0% Pleasant Lot (permits) 40,667 37,996 107.0% 37,991 2,676 7.0% Pleasant Lot (meters) 15,625 14,500 107.8% 16,856 (1,231) -7.3% Tokens 500 500 100.0% 19 481 Meterhoods 12,850 8,365 153.6% 16,325 (3,475) -21.3% Miscellaneous revenues 1,715 0 - 5,900 (4,185) -709% Interest 7,410 12148 610% 11.634 (4,224) -36.3°/a TOTAL $ 559,175 $ 568,584 98.3% 5 543,957 $ 15,218 2.8% 2012 2012 % 2011 2011-2012 2011-2012 Expenditures Expense Budget Expended Exponso $ Difference % Difference Parking Svcs Personnel $ 148,395 $ 149,685 99.1% $ 144,528 $ 3,867 2 7% Parking Svcs Non-personnel 146,667 141,175 103.9% 129,929 16,738 129% Pay Station Replacement Reserve 15,011 13,086 1143% 13,086 1,925 14.7% Vac/Sick Liability Adjustment 8,378 2,323 3607% 607 7,771 1280.2% DUHMD Personnel 104,116 109,612 95.0% 100,879 3,237 32% DUHMD Non-personnel 32,566 54,506 59.7% 32,259 307 1.0% Economic Vitality - Mktg/Parking Studies 2,400 10,000 24.0% 4.400 (2,000) -45.5% Eco-Pass Prog. - 675 0.0% Cost Allocation/Benefit fund 47,523 47,523 100.0% 45,138 2,385 53% Capital Replacement Reserve 9,000 9,000 100.0% 9,000 0.0% Studies 30,000 30.000 100.0% 27.900 2.100 7 5% TOTAL $ 544,055 $ 567,566 95.9% $ 507,726 $ 34,229 6.7% COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL HILL POLICE CALL STATISTICS MONTH Assault Auto Theft Burglary Crim. Mis. Crim. Tres- Disturbance Domestic Drunk DUI Felony Menacing Fight 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 January 5 8 6 4 11 16 14 10 5 5 15 11 10 1 7 6 4 4 12 3 February 6 7 3 3 7 19 15 12 2 3 10 8 5 4 13 15 4 3 3 6 March 9 1 4 20 43 18 23 1 11 5 15 2 1 9 10 2 3 1 4 11 April 12 5 4 6 24 15 30 25 7 9 13 13 3 3 14 14 6 7 2 12 6 May 1 6 2 1 17 17 32 23 11 3 14 16 4 8 11 10 12 8 8 5 June 5 3 2 15 13 17 11 5 3 7 13 5 2 5 13 3 3 4 2 July 5 2 1 2 9 14 18 16 3 5 13 5 3 4 13 6 3 3 3 1 August 4 6 5 5 19 13 23 19 7 4 14 12 1 1 16 7 7 4 13 6 September 10 10 2 6 23 23 26 25 2 11 13 22 2 3 17 18 3 4 7 15 October 10 8 2 3 22 22 32 25 4 3 16 15 7 5 11 13 2 2 1 10 9 November 8 1 2 19 10 25 9 1 1 13 4 4 2 13 4 3 8 December 4 17 2 5 14 8 15 4 5 8 12 4 1 10 6 2 4 MONTH Fireworks Harassment Hill Noise Indec. Exp. Liq. Law Vio. Loitering Narcotics Noise Open Door PartProwler 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 January 3 2 4 10 48 39 1 22 1 2 1 10 9 2 2 1 2 February 2 1 5 3 65 31 1 13 3 3 2 2 8 16 1 2 4 3 4 March 5 4 7 3 28 72 3 3 28 1 5 10 13 14 3 2 1 1 3 April 10 6 3 4 60 70 1 1 3 3 2 5 17 29 1 3 5 1 4 4 May 15 6 9 10 66 85 1 1 1 2 1 31 20 1 2 3 1 1 June 12 12 3 8 69 81 2 3 4 1 4 28 21 2 4 July 83 17 4 4 41 53 1 1 1 1 1 3 18 13 1 1 1 4 4 August 15 7 3 3 86 47 1 5 12 2 2 2 2 38 23 2 1 1 5 2 September 9 2 7 12 117 119 1 28 7 4 6 4 3 33 31 1 2 2 1 4 October 2 1 5 8 67 52 4 6 6 1 2 4 5 32 18 1 1 7 6 5 November 1 1 5 3 32 6 11 1 1 9 7 2 1 3 1 December 2 5 5 24 22 2 1 4 1 2 1 6 17 1 2 4 MONTH Robbery Sex Assault Shots Stabbing Suicide Suspicious Theft Threats Trespass Weapon Welfare Ck 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 January 2 1 2 1 8 10 18 18 1 11 7 13 6 February 1 8 12 10 17 1 1 7 11 7 19 March 1 1 1 1 1 3 10 13 22 4 2 6 15 1 4 12 7 April 1 1 3 11 5 23 15 2 1 12 8 1 17 9 May 1 2 1 1 1 12 10 17 25 2 2 11 7 1 8 6 June 1 2 3 1 9 10 21 20 1 2 9 8 1 11 13 Jul 1 1 2 2 1 10 4 22 15 2 2 4 8 1 3 7 12 August 1 1 2 3 1 10 10 23 25 1 1 16 11 1 13 8 September 1 2 5 3 1 8 12 22 18 1 14 15 19 11 October 7 1 7 16 35 26 4 15 16 13 16 November 4 1 1 2 6 27 10 3 12 2 2 10 2 December 1 4 9 8 9 20 1 5 9 2 4 11 Access and Parking Management Strategy (AMPS) Project Project Description DRAFT March 1, 2012 The access and parking management strategy (AMPS) is a comprehensive, phased, citywide initiate to: • Assess, enhance and evolve our existing access and parking management policies and programs focused on the district approach (Central Area General Improvement District, University Hill General Improvement District (UHGID), Boulder Junction Access Districts Parking and Travel Demand Management and the Neighborhood Parking Permit (NPP) zones); • Explore and develop new access and parking management strategies in other areas of our community that do not have an integrated, all-access approach; and • Coordinate and integrate AMPS with current plans and initiatives (Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Master Plan (TMP) update, Civic Area Plan, Sustainability Framework, etc.) and future planning initiatives (Sustainable Streets and Centers 2014, Climate Commitment, etc.). AMPS is a strategy, not a plan, to reach our community goals through multi-modal, all-access policies, programs and initiatives. Vision: Access and parking management implementing the goals of the City's comprehensive plan and sustainability framework- community character/built environment, natural environment, energy and climate, economic vitality, community well-being and safety, mobility and connectivity, and good governance. Goal: Evolve and continuously improve Boulder's citywide access and parking management strategies and programs tailored to address the unique character and needs of the different parts of the city. Guiding Principles The What: • Holistic parking and access management policies supportive of and consistent with the City's major initiatives, plans. The How: • Use the city of Boulder values as the guide to how we will do our work: Customer Service, Respect, Integrity, Collaboration, and Innovation. Obiectives • Provide balanced multi-modal access addressing the needs of our community and visitors • Integration across city departments for implementation of access and parking programs and service delivery. • Coordination with city plans and initiatives: Comprehensive Plan, TMP, Sustainability Framework, Climate Commitment, Sustainable Streets and Centers, Civic Center Master Plan, TVAP, Hill revitalization, etc. • Assessment of existing parking districts and policies to ensure consistency with citywide goals and incorporate state of the art tools and approaches. 1 • Development of a new citywide vision of access and parking policies, strategies, programs, and tools in areas without existing management. Outcomes: • Where needed, updated and enhanced access and parking policies and technology systems, when appropriate, to ensure efficient use of resources, system dependability and quality customer service • Telling the story of the continuing evolution of existing access and parking management programs and strategies both internally and externally • Consistent access and parking policies across departments in alignment with city goals and values. • Ongoing coordination, collaboration and communication amongst departments regarding access and parking issues • Development of appropriate access and parking strategies for areas of our city without existing management • Integration with city plans and initiatives. • Achievement of progress towards the climate action plan targets (need input from the Climate Commitment) • Measurement systems to evaluate the effectiveness of the outcomes. • City of Boulder is a national leader in access and parking management programs. QUESTIONS TO SOLICIT FEEDBACK AND INDENTIFY ISSUES In order to be sure staff is capturing all the concerns, ideas and issues about parking and multi-modal access both existing and in the future, the following questions will be used as a guide to solicit feedback: • What does parking mean to you? • What inspires you about this project? • What fears do you have related to the AMPS project? • What is working about the existing access and parking management system? • How can we improve our existing system? • Where do you see the greatest opportunities for change? • What is the greatest challenge/hurdle? • What role does AMPS have in supporting the TMP update, the sustainability framework and city's sustainability goals? • What are international best practices we should investigate? • What is your vision of parking and access management in the future? STAKEHOLDERS City of Boulder AMPS Team: • Transportation • CP&S • DUHMD/PS • Communications 2 • City Manager's Office • Municipal Courts • Parks and Recreation • OSMP • FAM • Boulder Police Department • City Attorney's Office Boards and Commissions • City Council • Downtown Management Commission • Boulder Junction Access Districts - Parking and TDM • University Hill Commercial Area Management Commission • Transportation Advisory Board • Planning Board External Stakeholders • Downtown community: Downtown Boulder Inc. and Downtown Boulder Business Improvement District, property and business owners, Boulder County, downtown churches • University of Colorado • Boulder Valley School District • Naropa University • Neighborhood Parking Permit Zones residents • General public • Visitors and tourists/BCVB • RTD • Via • Community Cycles and other bike-related groups • BCycle • Business community, including the Boulder Chamber of Commerce and the Boulder Economic Council • Residents • Private developers and property owners • Disabled community POTENTIAL WORK PLAN DESIGN: First Phase Addressing Existing Programs (to be prioritized: 1. Policies Review, Analysis and Enhancement of the Existing Parking System o Overall city policy statement about access and role of all modes o NPP management and pricing o Public right of way, on-street parking ■ Pricing ■ Time and Loading Zones, Disabled parking, etc. ■ Relationship to off-street parking o Private property parking regulations and code requirements: - from CP&S 3 ■ Parking by zoning district only ■ Parking reduction process ■ Parking maximums a District parking ■ Pricing and management ■ Relationship between off-street and on-street parking o City of Boulder Facilities -public access and employee parking ■ Parks and Recreation ■ OSMP ■ City offices o Enforcement ■ Reaffirm enforcement philosophy ■ Ticket pricing and approach ■ Relationship to other enforcement departments, BPD and Public Works, ie. Title 9 Enforcement by DUHMD/PS 2. Relationship to and Integration with current plans and Initiatives: o Comprehensive Plan o Sustainability Framework o TI VIP o Civic Area Master Plan o NAP and MU4 Code Changes o Community EcoPass Study o Parks and Recreation Master Plan 3. All Modes Access: Travel Demand Management/Parking -To be integrated with the TMP Update o Transit - ■ EcoPass program • Downtown Employee Program • BJAD-TDM • GO Boulder • Potential community pass o Bike Access and Parking ■ Bcycle ■ Bike parking downtown, hill and Boulder Junction • In public right of way • On private property o Multi-Modal ■ Car Share ■ Carpooling o Pedestrian ■ Pedestrian enhancement projects • 15th Streetscape • West Pearl Streetscape • 14th Street enhancements at RTD • No smoking ban on the Pearl Street Mall 4 • CIP proposal for hill commercial area improvements 4. Access and Parking System Technology Assessment and Enhancements o Potential integration with RTD smart card o Garage access system upgrades o Integrated parking systems: enforcement, permits, on-street and garages o Potential of mobile app technology 5. Assessment, Review and Analysis of Best Practices in Parking and TDM Second Phase: Integration with Future Project: 6. Relationship to and Integration with upcoming plans and Initiatives o Climate Commitment o Sustainability Framework o Sustainable Streets and Centers 2014 o Community EcoPass Study o Regional Partners Plan with RTD and CDOT Schedule 20.13 PHASE ONE: OUTREACH, INFORMATION SHARING, ISSUE IDENTIFICATION AND PROJECT DEFINITION First Quarter: January/February: Project definition and Scoping with internal staff Establish multi-departmental project team March: Out reach to boards regarding proposed project scope and seeking input on their issues using a standard set of questions: DMC: March 4 BJAD Parking and TMD: March 6 TAB: February 11 and March 11 DBI: March 13 BID: March 14 UHCAMC: March 20 Planning Board: March 21 PRAB and OSMP - outreach or information item? Outreach to CU Ongoing: Coordination with the TMP Update Coordination with the Civic Area Plan Second Quarter: April Finalize project scope, goals, objectives and phasing for Council memo April 1 Check in with DMC April 30: Study Session with City Council for confirmation of direction and input 5 May: Finalize RFP for consultant June/July: Hire Consultant Develop plan for public outreach based on work plan Ongoing: Coordination with TMP Update Coordination with Civic Area Plan Board check-ins as necessary SECOND PHASE: PROJECT DESIGN, PRIORITIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION AND ONGOING INTEGRATION WITH OTHER PLANS Third Quarter: • Board check-ins as necessary • On-going: o Coordination with TMP update o Coordination with Civic Area Plan • Finalize and prioritize the phased work program: o Assessment of existing access and parking management programs and begin implementation of short term items o Coordination with the TMP o Scope work program for coordination with future upcoming planning efforts in 2014, i.e. Sustainable Streets and Centers, Climate Commitment Fourth Quarter: o Continuation of the phased work program o Assessment of existing access and parking management programs and phased implementation o Coordination with the TMP o Scope work program for coordination with future upcoming planning efforts o Check in with city council o Board check-ins as necessary 2014 THIRD PHASE: WORK PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND CONTINUED COORDINATION WITH OTHER PLANS Duration and tasks to be determined in coordination with finalized work program and scheduling of the other planning initiatives. 6